Next Article in Journal
A Novel Proline-Rich Cathelicidin from the Alpaca Vicugna pacos with Potency to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: Mechanism of Action and the Functional Role of the C-Terminal Region
Previous Article in Journal
In Utero Electroporation for Manipulation of Specific Neuronal Populations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Three-Phase Three-Dimensional Electrochemical Process for Efficient Treatment of Greywater

1
State Key Laboratory of Separation Membrane and Membrane Process, School of Material Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China
2
Jiangsu Longmem Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Changzhou 213000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2022, 12(5), 514; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050514
Submission received: 4 April 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 8 May 2022 / Published: 12 May 2022

Abstract

:
Water shortages around the world have intensified the search for substitute sources. Greywater can serve as a solution for water requirements. Compared to two-dimensional electrochemical processes for water treatment, the addition of particle activated carbon enhances the conductivity and mass transfer or the adsorption of pollutants in a three-dimensional (3D) electrochemical process. The large specific surface areas of these particles can provide more reactive sites, resulting in a higher removal efficiency. In this study, the treatment of greywater by the electro-Fenton (E-Fenton) method was carried out in a 3D electrolytic reactor. The effects of the operating conditions, such as electrode spacing, applied voltage, treatment time, and activated carbon loading, on the efficacy of the E-Fenton process were investigated, and the corresponding optimum conditions were found to be 7 cm, 9 V, 2 h, and 10 g. The results showed that CODCr removal of greywater treated using the 3D electrochemical process was 85%. With the help of the Box–Behnken experiment design and the response surface methodology, the parameters were optimized to determine the optimal conditions. The results of the response surface analysis were consistent with the experimental results. The above findings illustrate that the proposed three-phase 3D electrochemical process is feasible for the efficient treatment of greywater.

1. Introduction

With the ongoing global progress in social and economic development, the problem of water shortages is becoming increasingly alarming, especially due to the unwise and inefficient use of water resources [1,2,3]. The World Water Council projects that global water consumption will increase by approximately 50% by 2034 [4]. In China, greywater accounts for approximately 30% of urban domestic wastewater [5]. Since it is moderately polluted, it can be recycled and reused. From an environmental perspective, it is wiser to recycle greywater than further pollute urban wastewaters [6]. Draining greywater directly (i.e., without treatment) into a drainage system will cause pollution of natural water system [7,8,9]. Moreover, it will produce destructive and cumulative biological diseases and have a greater impact on human health [10,11]. For example, most cases of enteric virus infections originate from contaminated drinking water resources, recreational waters, and foods contaminated by sewage and sewage effluent waters [12,13].
Within this context, conventional biological treatment does not always achieve satisfactory results, and traditional physicochemical methods are relatively expensive, ineffective, or may lead to secondary contamination. For example, the dissolved air flotation method [14,15,16] involves injection of a large number of dense bubbles into treated wastewater, whereupon impurities adhere to the bubbles, effectively forming a liquid with a density less than that of water. The primary disadvantage of this treatment method is that it is difficult to directly contact the suspended sludge, which results in secondary sludge formation. In coagulation–flocculation treatment methods [17,18], colloidal particles in contaminated water collide and agglomerate, thus forming larger particles or flocs. However, these methods are expensive and ineffective at removing anionic detergents and pathogenic pollutants from greywater [19].
Advancements in water treatment technologies enable efficient treatment of wastewater [20,21,22]. Electrochemical technologies are a huge improvement in the field of wastewater treatment because of their high efficiency, environmental protection, and versatility. Despite these advantages, conventional two-dimensional (2D) electrochemical electrodes have a mass transfer limitation, small space–time yield, and low area–volume ratio. The development of three-dimensional (3D) electrochemical electrodes provides an outstanding solution to the above shortcomings that limit the application of 2D electrodes. Compared with conventional electrochemical technologies, 3D electrochemical processes can overcome the shortcomings of plane electrode design due to the increased electrode surface area per reactor unit volume and higher throughput. This enables high current efficiency, improved productivity, compact design, decolorization, and efficient removal of heavy metals. Moreover, the biochemical characteristics of processed wastewater can also be improved. High treatment capacity, lack of secondary pollution, and mild reaction conditions are among the other advantages of this technology [23,24].
Table 1 presents a comparison of the performances of a 3D electrochemical process and other physiochemical treatment processes for different target pollutants. It clearly illustrates the high efficiency of the 3D electrochemical process in CODCr removal. However, the particle electrode may lose its adsorption capacity and catalytic activity due to the accumulation of pollutants on particle surfaces over continuous runs [25]. In general, 3D electrochemical technology stimulates the further development of electrocatalysis technology with the aim of applying it to treatment of highly concentrated wastewaters [26,27,28]. This can also help solve the problem of the treatment and reuse of greywater [29,30,31].
Herein, the experiments were carried out in a homemade 3D electrode reactor. The effects of the interelectrode spacing, voltage, treatment time, and activated carbon loading on the performance of greywater treatment were investigated. The feasibility and efficiency of the 3D electrochemical process for the treatment of greywater were also verified. Additional analysis aimed at the optimization of the process parameters was performed using the response surface method and the Box–Behnken design [37,38,39]. These findings are expected to encourage the application of 3D electrochemical technology in greywater treatment. A three-dimensional process can serve as a pretreatment process to increase the biodegradability of effluent. This will be a trend in future development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Cholesterol (C27H46O, BR), fatty acid (CnH2nO2, AR), calcium chloride (CaCl2, AR), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4, AR), lactic acid (C3H6O3, AR), and glucose (C6H12O6, AR) were purchased from Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Research Institute (China). Sodium chloride (NaCl, AR) was purchased from Tianjin Wind Ship Chemical Reagent Technology Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Magnesium sulfate (Mg2SO4, AR) was purchased from Tianjin Standard Technology Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Potassium chloride (KCl, AR) was purchased from Tianjin Yingda Rare and Precious Chemical Reagent Factory (Tianjin, China). Urea (CH4N2O, AR) was purchased from Tianjin Shentai Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). The shower gel and activated carbon were purchased from a local market. Ultrapure water was produced in laboratory.

2.2. Preparation of Simulated Greywater

According to a certain proportion (see Table 2), the reagents were weighed and dissolved in pure water and then mixed well under ultrasound. The simulated greywater was characterized by a high concentration and complex composition. The characteristics of the simulated greywater water are listed in Table 3, which was provided by Jiangsu Longmem Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. (Changzhou, China).

2.3. The Electrolysis System

The mechanism of the electro-Fenton (E-Fenton) method [40] involves the reduction of O2 to H2O2 at the cathode, which produces •OH radicals via the subsequent Fenton reaction involving Fe2+. These radicals then oxidize organic matter to CO2 and H2O or small organic molecules [41,42].
O 2 + 2 e + 2 H +     H 2 O 2
H 2 O 2 + F e 2 +     F e 3 + + O H + O H
The dioxygen required for Reaction (1) can be supplied to the cathode of the electrolysis reactor by means of external aeration or produced on the anode according to Reactions (3) or (4).
2 H 2 O     O 2 + 4 H + + 4 e
4 O H     O 2 + 2 H 2 O + 4 e
The constructed E-Fenton system with 3D electrodes is capable of degrading pollutants in different ways [43,44]. In addition to the direct oxidation at the anode, the cathode has strong adsorption and catalytic properties, which can reduce the dissolved oxygen present in the system to H2O2. In the presence of H2O2 and added Fe2+ ions, •OH radicals are generated during the Fenton reaction and oxidize the organic matter. In addition, the electric field between the main electrodes can also cause the activated carbon particles to be charged with positive and negative charges due to the fact of electrostatic induction, forming an independent miniature electrolytic cell. As a result, electrochemical redox reactions can proceed simultaneously on the surface of each particle. The mechanism of the electrolysis reaction is presented in Figure 1.

2.4. Electro-Fenton Process for Greywater Using Three-Dimensional Electrodes

2.4.1. Pretreatment of the Particle Electrodes

In this experiment, the activated carbon particles were repeatedly washed several times beforehand in order to avoid the adsorption effect of the activated carbon on the effectiveness of the 3D electrodes in treating greywater. The cleaned activated carbon was ultrasonically treated in the greywater. Each ultrasonic treatment step was carried out for 3 h. After three repeated ultrasonic treatments, the adsorption of activated carbon was considered to have reached saturation.

2.4.2. Three-Dimensional Electrodes

In this experiment, a homemade 3D electrode reactor was used. The reactor was built from transparent organic glass and had a usable volume of 1.5 L. A stainless-steel plate was used as the anode, and a graphite plate with a thickness of 2 mm and an effective treatment area of 70 cm2 was used as the cathode.
The prepared greywater was added to the catalytic reactor, followed by the addition of the weighed quantity of granulated activated carbon. The experimental device is shown in Figure 1.

2.5. Electro-Fenton Process for Greywater Using Three-Dimensional Electrodes

The analysis methods of water quality correlation are shown in Table 3. The CODCr of the greywater was determined by the potassium dichromate method [45] using a CODCr detector (HACH DR3900, Loveland, CO, USA). The conductivity of the greywater was analyzed by a conductivity meter (HACH HQ40d, Loveland, CO, USA). The voltage in the 3D electrode system was provided by a DC regulated power supply (GWINSTEK GPS-3030DD).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Effect of Electrode Spacing on the Degree of Greywater Treatment

The effectiveness of the proposed treatment in decreasing chemical oxygen demand (CODCr) and other characteristics of greywater was studied by varying the process parameters within reasonable limits: voltage, 5–11 V; treatment time, 0–5 h; interelectrode spacing of 3, 5, and 7 cm; activated carbon loading of 10 g. The results are presented in Figure 2.
As can be seen in Figure 2, with the increase in interelectrode spacing, the CODCr removal of greywater increased [46]. When the other variables were kept constant, this was mainly due to the small distance between electrodes and the low energy of the electrolytic system, which affected the mass transfer efficiency. With the increase in the distance between electrodes, the mass transfer process became more intensive due to the concentration gradient between organic matter and solution. This improved the efficiency of the degradation of the organic pollutants.

3.2. Effect of Different Factors on the Degree of Greywater Treatment

3.2.1. The Treatment Time

At early stages of the treatment process, CODCr removal increased rapidly with the increase in processing time. After a period of time, the CODCr removal basically remained unchanged. This was mainly because the concentration of organic matter in the system gradually decreased during electrolysis and the catalytic effect diminished. The results are shown in Figure 3a.

3.2.2. Applied Voltage

With the increase in voltage, the CODCr removal efficiency initially tended to increase but then decreased. The voltage affected the amount and rate of •OH production. If the voltage was too small, the voltage on the particle electrode was insufficient, resulting in less •OH and a weaker catalytic effect. Thus, the voltage at the particle electrode could not reach the anode or cathode. Contact between the particle electrode causes short circuiting, which reduces the efficiency of the electrolytic process, and a high voltage. The electrodes were subject to side reactions, such as hydrogen evolution reactions, which affected the current efficiency and reduced the effectiveness of the CODCr removal.

3.2.3. Activated Carbon Loading

With the increase in activated carbon loading, the CODCr removal from the greywater by the 3D electrodes showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing but basically remained above 60%. The highest CODCr removal of 85.7% was achieved at 10 g of activated carbon. This was mainly because the amount of particle electrodes added affects the electrolysis efficiency of the system. The lower the activated carbon loading, the fewer reaction sites are involved in the reaction, resulting in a lower electrolysis efficiency of the system. When the activated carbon loading increased, there were more reaction sites in the system, shortening the mass transfer distance between pollutants. However, when the activated carbon loading was excessive, the increased resistance caused the system to have side effects, resulting in a higher temperature of the system, thus reducing the electrolysis rate.
From Table 4, it can be seen that the 3D electrochemical process had a higher CODCr removal efficiency than the conventional 2D electrochemical process in the treatment of wastewater.

3.3. Changes in the Electrical Conductivity of Greywater during Treatment

The conductivity of greywater changes depending on its salt content. As the electrocatalytic process proceeded, more of the solute in solution was ionized, and the conductivity increased. However, in general, the change in conductivity is small and negligible (Figure 4).

3.4. Changes in the Turbidity of Greywater during Treatment

As can be seen in Figure 5, the turbidity of the treated water decreased rapidly during the first 1–2 h of treatment. However, it started to decrease more gradually during the subsequent 3 h of treatment (i.e., 2–5 h since the beginning of the process). The greywater turbidity was significantly reduced during the electrocatalytic process due to the loose and porous structure of activated carbon [51] (Figure 1). The atomic force field on its surface was not saturated with surface energy and, thus, the surface energy was reduced via adsorption of molecules. As the treatment time increased, the turbidity of treated water decreased, and the adsorption capacity of activated carbon gradually reached saturation.

3.5. Box–Behnken Design and Response Surface Methodology

Through previous experiments, it is found that when the interelectrode spacing was 7 cm, the voltage was 9 V, the activated carbon loading was 10 g, and the process period was 2 h, the CODCr of greywater treated using the 3D electrode decreased by 85%. Further optimization of the process parameters—voltage, treatment time, and activated carbon loading—was performed using the Box–Behnken experimental design and the response surface methodology (RSM). The values for these three factors in run 3, as obtained from the steepest ascent path (Table 5), were taken as the central points. The respective low and high levels for each factor were coded as shown in Table 6. Fitting the experimental data using regression analysis gave the following second-order polynomial equation:
Y = 85.68 5.42 A + 8.81 B + 2.41 C + 0.57 A B + 0.53 A C + 2.05 B C 15.82 A 2 8.94 B 2 11.64 C 2
where Y is the predicted CODCr removal; A, B, and C are the code variables for voltage, time, and activated carbon loading, respectively.
The obtained F-value of 1671.80 implies that the model was significant. There was only a 0.01% chance that such a large F-value was due to the fact of noise. Based on the F-values for A, B, and C, the relative influence of the three factors on CODCr removal followed the order: time > voltage > activated carbon loading. The “predicted R-squared” value of 0.9938 was in reasonable agreement with the “adjusted R-squared” value of 0.9989”, i.e., the difference was less than 0.2. The p-value is usually used to test the significance of a variable. The smaller the p-value, the more significant the corresponding variable. As shown in Table 7, the p-values for A, B, and C were much less than 0.0001, indicating that the voltage, time, and activated carbon loading are important process parameters influencing the removal of CODCr.

3.6. Results of the Response Surface Optimization of the Proposed Greywater Treatment Method

The response surfaces are presented in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 in the form of 3D surfaces and contour plots. As can be seen from the figures, the response surfaces were convex with each plot representing an optimal condition, and the variables had maxima. In addition, Figure 8 shows a better ellipse, indicating better interaction between the variables representing time and activated carbon loading. However, the interaction between voltage, time, and activated carbon loading was not significant, which is consistent with the results of the response surface analysis. The response surface analysis showed that the greywater CODCr decreased by 88.51% at a voltage of 8.68 V, treatment duration of 2.50 h, and an activated carbon loading of 10.28 g.

4. Conclusions

A method for greywater treatment using 3D electrodes was developed and applied with good results. Single-factor experiments show that the treatment duration, voltage, and activated carbon loading are three key factors influencing the CODCr level of greywater. The Box–Behnken design and the response surface method were used for more advanced optimization of the three factors listed above and to determine the optimal reaction conditions. Specifically, it was found that for a voltage of 8.7 V, a treatment duration of 2.5 h, and an activated carbon loading of 10.3 g, the CODCr decreased by 88.5%. When the interelectrode spacing, voltage, treatment duration, and activated carbon loading were 7 cm, 9 V, 2 h, and 10 g, respectively, the CODCr of treated greywater decreased by 85.6%. The experimental values and the predicted values coincided well.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, W.L. and P.Z.; software P.Z.; validation, formal analysis, investigation and resources W.L. and P.Z.; data curation, writing—original draft preparation and visualization P.Z.; supervision, project administration and funding acquisition W.W.; writing—review and editing, W.L. and W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Project (Tianjin, China) (grant number: 18YFJLCG00170) and the Introduction and Cultivation of Leading Innovative Talents in Changzhou City (Jiangsu, China) (grant number: CQ20200021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zou, L.-Q. Present situation and policy of water resources in China. Sci. Technol. Inf. 2013, 16, 120–122. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaldellis, J.K.; Kondili, E.M. The water shortage problem in the Aegean archipelago islands: Cost-effective desalination prospects. Desalination 2007, 216, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. El-Sayed, M.K.; Mansour, R.S. Water Scarcity as a Non-traditional Threat to Security in the Middle East. India Q. A J. Int. Aff. 2017, 73, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meister, U. Demand and Supply—A Brief Overview. In Introducing Competition into the Piped Water Market: A Theoretical Analysis of Common Carriage and Franchise Bidding; Deutscher Universitätsverlag: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2006; pp. 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, Y.-H.; Zhu, S.-K.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, M.-H.; Kinhoun, J.J.R.; Qian, T.-T.; Fan, B. Constructed wetland treatment of source separated washing wastewater in rural areas of southern China, Separation and Purification Technology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 272, 118725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silva, M.M.D.; Cristovão, L.; Marinho, D.; Esteves, E.; Martins, D. Reduction of carbon emissions in a mediterranean urban wastewater treatment plant. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2021, 251, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  7. Singh, P.K.; Deshbhratar, P.B.; Ramteke, D.S. Effects of sewage wastewater irrigation on soil properties, crop yield and environment. Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 103, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Olaolu, T.D.; Akpor, O.B.; Akor, C.O. Pollution Indicators and Pathogenic Microorganisms in Wastewater Treatment: Implication on Receiving Water Bodies. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2014, 2, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lokhande, R.S.; Singare, P.U.; Pimple, D.S. Pollution in Water of Kasardi River Flowing along Taloja Industrial Area of Mumbai, India. World Environ. 2012, 1, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhou, D.; Yu, M.; Yu, J.-B.; Li, Y.-Z.; Guan, B.; Wang, X.-H.; Wang, Z.-K.; Lv, Z.-B.; Qu, F.-Z.; Yang, J.-S. Impacts of inland pollution input on coastal water quality of the Bohai Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 765, 142691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muthukumar, C.; Balasubramaniyan, S.; Garlapati, D.; Bharathi, M.D.; Kumar, B.C.; James, R.A.; Ramu, K.; Ramanamurthy, M.V. Impact of untreated sewage and thermal effluent discharges on the air-sea CO2 fluxes in a highly urbanized tropical coastal region. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 175, 113166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Okoh, A.I.; Sibanda, T.; Gusha, S.S. Inadequately treated wastewater as a source of human enteric viruses in the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 2620–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Svraka, S.; Duizer, E.; Vennema, H.; de Bruin, E.; van der Veer, B.; Dorresteijn, B.; Koopmans, M. Etiological role of viruses in outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis in The Netherlands from 1994 through 2005. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 1389–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Pooja, G.; Kumar, P.S.; Prasannamedha, G.; Varjani, S.; Vo, N.V. Sustainable approach on removal of toxic metals from electroplating industrial wastewater using dissolved air flotation. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 295, 113147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alalwan, H.A.; Kadhom, M.A.; Alminshid, A.H. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using agricultural byproducts. J. Water Supply Res. Technol.-Aqua 2020, 69, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alwared, A.I.; Abdulrazzaq, N.; Al-Sabbagh, B. Micro-Bubble Flotation for Removing Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution: Artificial Neural Network Modeling and Kinetic of Flotation. Iraqi J. Chem. Pet. Eng. 2019, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Teh, C.Y.; Budiman, P.M.; Shak, K.P.Y.; Wu, T.Y. Recent advancement of coagulation–flocculation and its application in wastewater treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 4363–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ayekoe, C.Y.P.; Robert, D.; Lanciné, D.G. Combination of coagulation-flocculation and heterogeneous photocatalysis for improving the removal of humic substances in real treated water from Agbô River (Ivory-Coast). Catal. Today 2017, 281, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mahvi, A.H.; Maleki, A.; Roshani, B. Removal of Anionic Surfactants in Detergent Wastewater by Chemical Coagulation. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2004, 7, 2222–2226. [Google Scholar]
  20. Khan, S.A.R.; Ponce, P.; Yu, Z.; Golpîra, H.; Mathew, M. Environmental technology and wastewater treatment: Strategies to achieve environmental sustainability. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, S.; Zhong, S.-T.; Li, Z.-H. Pilot Tests on the Treatment of Bath Wastewater by a Membrane Bioreactor. Membranes 2021, 11, 85. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ortiz, M.; Raluy, R.G.; Serra, L.; Uche, J. Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: Wastewater and water-reuse in a small town. Desalination 2007, 204, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, H.; Gao, Y.; Sun, L.-C. Highly Active Three-Dimensional NiFe/Cu2O Nanowires/Cu Foam Electrode for Water Oxidation. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1475–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhan, J.-H.; Li, Z.-X.; Yu, G.; Pan, X.-J.; Wang, J.-L.; Zhu, W.; Han, X.; Wang, Y.-J. Enhanced treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater by combining three-dimensional electrochemical process with ozonation to in situ regenerate granular activated carbon particle electrodes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 208, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, C.; Jiang, Y.-H.; Li, Y.-L.; Hu, Z.-X.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, M.-H. Three-dimensional electrochemical process for wastewater treatment: A general review. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 455–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, X.-W.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.-S.; Lan, T.-X.; Dai, J. Effect of Three-Dimensional Electrochemistry on Removal of Ammonia-Nitrogen in Swine Wastewater. Technol. Water Treat. 2019, 45, 118–121. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, B.; Kong, W.-P.; Ma, H.-Z. Electrochemical treatment of paper mill wastewater using three-dimensional electrodes with Ti/Co/SnO2-Sb2O5 anode. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 146, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deng, Y.; Zhu, X.; Chen, N.; Feng, C.-P.; Wang, H.-S.; Kuang, P.-J.; Hu, W.-W. Review on electrochemical system for landfill leachate treatment: Performance, mechanism, application, shortcoming, and improvement scheme. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 745, 140768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chai, Y.-Z.; Qin, P.-F.; Wu, Z.-B.; Bai, M.; Li, W.-J.; Pan, J.-J.; Cao, R.-Y.; Chen, A.-W.; Jin, D.-D.; Peng, C. A coupled system of flow-through electro-Fenton and electrosorption processes for the efficient treatment of high-salinity organic wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 267, 118683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, J.; Niu, Z.-Q.; Wang, Y.-H. Study on Purifying and Reusing of Bath-Swill Wastewater. J. Taiyuan Univ. Technol. 2007, 38, 327–328. [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang, S.-Y.; Huang, Q.; Chen, S.-B. UBF Process for Treatment of High Concentration Printing and Dyeing Wastewater. China Water Wastewater 2012, 28, 80–82. [Google Scholar]
  32. Singh, S.; Ahammed, M.M.; Shaikh, I.N. Combined coagulation and intermittent sand filtration for on-site treatment of greywater. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1114, 012031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aydin, M.I.; Ozaktac, D.; Yuzer, B.; Doğu, M.; Inan, H.; Okten, H.E.; Coskun, S.; Selcuk, H. Desalination and Detoxification of Textile Wastewater by Novel Photocatalytic Electrolysis Membrane Reactor for Ecosafe Hydroponic Farming. Membranes 2021, 12, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shariati, F.P.; Mehrnia, M.R.; Salmasi, B.M.; Heran, M.; Wisniewski, C.; Sarrafzadeh, M.H. Membrane bioreactor for treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing acetaminophen. Desalination 2010, 250, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yao, J.-C.; Mei, Y.; Jiang, J.-H.; Xia, G.-H.; Chen, J. Process Optimization of Electrochemical Treatment of COD and Total Nitrogen Containing Wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Minh, B.Q.; Long, N.N.; Hien, P.V.; Dung, N.T. Rapid and efficient treatment of wastewater from fish sauce-manufacturing factories by using the electrochemical oxidation process. Vietnam. J. Chem. 2019, 57, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, Y.; Yu, H.-J.; Zhao, Y.-P. Study on Optimization of Degradation of Landfill Leachate by Electrochemical Oxidation Process with Response Surface Methodology. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 989–994, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vepsäläinen, M.; Ghiasvand, M.; Selin, J.; Pienimaa, J.; Repo, E.; Pulliainen, M.; Sillanpää, M. Investigations of the effects of temperature and initial sample pH on natural organic matter (NOM) removal with electrocoagulation using response surface method (RSM). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 69, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, M.-S.; Liu, C.; Fan, M.; Liu, M.-L.; Shen, S.-T. Optimization of Nanofiltration Hollow Fiber Membrane Fabrication Process Based on Response Surface Method. Membranes 2022, 12, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ding, S.-L.; Zhao, Z.; Tian, Q.-Q.; Li, D.-Q.; Ren, H.-J. Effect of iron-carbon micro-electrolysis-fenton on the dewatering performance of sludge. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 47126–47135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Beyazt, N.; Atmaca, K. COD and Color Removal from Landfill Leachate by photo- electro-Fenton Process. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2021, 16, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Louhichi, B.; Gaied, F.; Mansouri, K.; Jeday, M.R. Treatment of textile industry effluents by Electro-Coagulation and Electro-Fenton processes using solar energy: A comparative study. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, Y.; Yu, H.-C.; Xu, D.-Y.; Zheng, X.-Q. Degradation of Landfill Leachate by Combined Three-Dimensional Electrode and Electro-Fenton. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 347–353, 440–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, M.-R.; Qin, X.; Cui, J.-X.; Guo, R.; Guo, C.-R.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Li, T.-H. Three-dimensional Electro-Fenton degradation for fulvic acids with Cu-Fe bimetallic aerogel-like carbon as particle electrode and catalyst: Electrode preparation, operation parameter optimization and mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Administration, S.E.P. Monitoring and Analysis Method of Water and Wastewater, 4th ed.; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  46. Moreno-Casillas, H.A.; Cocke, D.L.; Gomes, J.A.G.; Morkovsky, P.; Parga, J.R.; Peterson, E. Electrocoagulation mechanism for COD removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 56, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wei, L.-Y.; Guo, S.-H.; Yan, G.-X.; Chen, C.-M.; Jiang, X.-Y. Electrochemical pretreatment of heavy oil refinery wastewater using a three-dimensional electrode reactor. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 8615–8620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lv, W.-W.; Huangfu, Z.-J.; Wang, K.-K. Efficient degradation of indigo wastewater by one-step electrochemical oxidation and electro-flocculation. Pigment. Resin Technol. 2020, 50, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kushwaha, J.P.; Srivastava, V.C.; Mall, I.D. Organics removal from dairy wastewater by electrochemical treatment and residue disposal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 76, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saleh, M.; Yildirim, R.; Isik, Z.; Karagunduz, A.; Dizge, N. Optimization of the electrochemical oxidation of textile wastewater by graphite electrodes by response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Water Sci. Technol. 2021, 84, 1245–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Isik, Z.; Unal, B.O.; Karagunduz, A.; Keskinler, B.; Dizge, N. Electrochemical Treatment of Textile Dye Bath Wastewater Using Activated Carbon Cloth Electrodes. Avicenna J. Environ. Health Eng. 2020, 7, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the electrocatalytic reactor.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the electrocatalytic reactor.
Membranes 12 00514 g001
Figure 2. Effect of the process parameters on CODCr at different values for the interelectrode spacing: (a) 3; (b) 5; (c) 7 cm.
Figure 2. Effect of the process parameters on CODCr at different values for the interelectrode spacing: (a) 3; (b) 5; (c) 7 cm.
Membranes 12 00514 g002
Figure 3. The effects of the process parameters on CODCr removal: (a) treatment time; (b) the CODCr degradation process; (c) voltage; (d) activated carbon loading.
Figure 3. The effects of the process parameters on CODCr removal: (a) treatment time; (b) the CODCr degradation process; (c) voltage; (d) activated carbon loading.
Membranes 12 00514 g003
Figure 4. Effect of treatment time on the electrical conductivity (the activated carbon loading was 10 g, the interelectrode spacing was 7 cm, and the voltage was 9 V).
Figure 4. Effect of treatment time on the electrical conductivity (the activated carbon loading was 10 g, the interelectrode spacing was 7 cm, and the voltage was 9 V).
Membranes 12 00514 g004
Figure 5. Effect of treatment time on the turbidity of greywater (the activated carbon loading was 10 g, the interelectrode spacing was 7 cm, and the voltage was 9 V).
Figure 5. Effect of treatment time on the turbidity of greywater (the activated carbon loading was 10 g, the interelectrode spacing was 7 cm, and the voltage was 9 V).
Membranes 12 00514 g005
Figure 6. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of voltage and time on CODCr removal. The level of activated carbon loading was 10.28 g.
Figure 6. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of voltage and time on CODCr removal. The level of activated carbon loading was 10.28 g.
Membranes 12 00514 g006
Figure 7. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of voltage and activated carbon loading on CODCr removal. The time level was 2.50 h.
Figure 7. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of voltage and activated carbon loading on CODCr removal. The time level was 2.50 h.
Membranes 12 00514 g007
Figure 8. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of time and activated carbon loading on CODCr removal. The voltage was 8.68 V.
Figure 8. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot showing the effects of time and activated carbon loading on CODCr removal. The voltage was 8.68 V.
Membranes 12 00514 g008
Table 1. Comparison of CODCr 1 removal efficiency of different target pollutants by different physiochemical treatment processes.
Table 1. Comparison of CODCr 1 removal efficiency of different target pollutants by different physiochemical treatment processes.
Treatment ProcessTarget PollutantsKey Processing ConditionsCODCr Removal (%)Reference
C–ISF 2GreywaterCS 9 = 2.97 mm,
Gravel = 8.38 mm
80[32]
PE-MBR 3Textile wastewaterMR 10 = 462 cm252.0[33]
ELA-MBR 4Pharmaceutical wastewaterMR = 40 cm250[34]
DEC 5Industrial wastewaterCC 11 = 1000 mg·L−1,
j 12 = 10 mA·cm−2,
pH = 6
79.1[35]
2-DET 6PSM 8 wastewaterj = 30 mA·cm−2,
HRT 13 = 60 min,
pH = 8
57.2[36]
3-DET 7Paper mill wastewaterj = 167 mA·cm−2,
pH = 11,
T = 20 °C
86.3[27]
1 Chemical Oxygen Demand. 2 Coagulation and intermittent sand filtration. 3 Photocatalytic electrolysis membrane reactor. 4 External loop airlift membrane bioreactor. 5 Divided electrolysis cell. 6 Two-dimensional electrochemical technology. 7 Three-dimensional electrochemical technology. 8 Fish sauce manufacturing. 9 Coarse sand. 10 Membrane area. 11 Chloride concentration. 12 Current density. 13 Reaction time.
Table 2. Composition of the simulated greywater.
Table 2. Composition of the simulated greywater.
ComponentsConcentration (g/L)ComponentsConcentration (g/L)
Glucose1.8Lactic acid0.7
Urea1.7KH2PO40.4
NaCl2.1Fatty acids8.0
KCl0.8Mg2SO40.2
CaCl20.1Shower gel1.0
Cholesterol0.5--
Table 3. Characteristics of the simulated greywater.
Table 3. Characteristics of the simulated greywater.
pHTurbidity (NTU 1)CODCr 2 (mg/L)TDS 3 (μS/cm)
3–3.5189–227420–9953904–6389
1 Nephelometric turbidity unit. 2 Chemical oxygen demand. 3 Total inorganic carbon.
Table 4. Comparison of CODCr removal efficiency between 2D and 3D electrode reactors.
Table 4. Comparison of CODCr removal efficiency between 2D and 3D electrode reactors.
Reactor TypesWastewatersConditionsCODCr Removal (%)Reference
2D 1HOR 3 wastewaterj 4 = 30 mA·cm−2, T = 60 °C, HRT 5 = 100 min30.8[47]
2DIndigo wastewaterU = 9 V, HRT = 60 min, NC 6 = 5 g/L60.3[48]
2DDairy wastewaterj = 2730 mA·cm−2, pH = 7, HRT = 50 min70[49]
2DTextile wastewaterj = 15 mA·cm−2, pH = 5, HRT = 120 min77.7[50]
3D 2GreywaterU = 9 V, GAC 7 = 10 g, ES 8 = 7 cm, HRT = 120 min85This work
1 Two-dimensional electrochemical reactor. 2 Three-dimensional electrochemical reactor. 3 Heavy oil refinery. 4 Current density. 5 Reaction time. 6 NaCl concentration. 7 Granular activated carbon. 8 Electrode spacing.
Table 5. Factors and levels in the response surface experiment.
Table 5. Factors and levels in the response surface experiment.
FactorVariableLow Level (g/L)High Level (g/L)
VoltageA711
TimeB13
Activated carbon loadingC812
Table 6. Levels of each variable and corresponding CODCr removal efficiency obtained from the Box–Behnken design.
Table 6. Levels of each variable and corresponding CODCr removal efficiency obtained from the Box–Behnken design.
RUNCoded Variable LevelReal Variable LevelCODCr Removal (%)
ABCVoltage (V)Time (h)Activated Carbon Loading (g)PredictedExperimental
10−1−191855.9355.60
2000921086.6885.60
31101131064.8964.60
40−11911256.6556.90
5000921085.6885.70
6−110731074.5974.80
7000921086.6885.30
801−193869.4569.20
9−1−10711058.1158.40
10000921085.6886.00
111−101111046.1145.90
121011121255.7455.70
1310−1112849.8650.40
14011931278.3878.70
15000921085.6885.80
16−101721265.5465.00
17−10−172861.7661.80
Table 7. ANOVA results for the CODCr removal.
Table 7. ANOVA results for the CODCr removal.
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model3096.309344.031671.80<0.0001
A-Voltage235.441235.441144.13<0.0001
B-Time621.281621.283019.07<0.0001
C-Activated carbon time46.56146.56226.26<0.0001
AB1.3211.326.430.0389
AC1.1011.105.360.0538
BC16.81116.8181.69<0.0001
A21053.1111053.115117.52<0.0001
B2336.521336.521635.30<0.0001
C2570.481570.482772.22<0.0001
R2 = 0.9995, R2 (adjusted) = 0.9989; R2 (predicted) = 0.9938.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, P. Three-Phase Three-Dimensional Electrochemical Process for Efficient Treatment of Greywater. Membranes 2022, 12, 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050514

AMA Style

Li W, Wang W, Zhang P. Three-Phase Three-Dimensional Electrochemical Process for Efficient Treatment of Greywater. Membranes. 2022; 12(5):514. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Weiyang, Wei Wang, and Peng Zhang. 2022. "Three-Phase Three-Dimensional Electrochemical Process for Efficient Treatment of Greywater" Membranes 12, no. 5: 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050514

APA Style

Li, W., Wang, W., & Zhang, P. (2022). Three-Phase Three-Dimensional Electrochemical Process for Efficient Treatment of Greywater. Membranes, 12(5), 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050514

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop