Next Article in Journal
New Insights into the Fouling of a Membrane during the Ultrafiltration of Complex Organic–Inorganic Feed Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Large-Scale Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks: Challenges and Opportunities
Previous Article in Journal
A Note on Vestigial Osmotic Pressure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pervaporation Polyvinyl Alcohol Membranes Modified with Zr-Based Metal Organic Frameworks for Isopropanol Dehydration
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/membranes13030333
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing Hydrogen Sulfide Detection at Room Temperature Using ZIF-67-Chitosan Membrane

by
Ashraf Ali
1,
Ahmed Alzamly
2,
Yaser E. Greish
2,3,
Reem H. Alzard
2,
Hesham F. El-Maghraby
2,3,
Naser Qamhieh
1 and
Saleh T. Mahmoud
1,*
1
Department of Physics, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Chemistry, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
3
Department of Ceramics, National Research Centre, Cairo 68824, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2023, 13(3), 333; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030333
Submission received: 14 February 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Porous MOF/COF for Membrane Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Developing new materials for energy and environment-related applications is a critical research field. In this context, organic and metal–organic framework (MOF) materials are a promising solution for sensing hazardous gases and saving energy. Herein, a flexible membrane of the zeolitic imidazole framework (ZIF-67) mixed with a conductivity-controlled chitosan polymer was fabricated for detecting hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas at room temperature (RT). The developed sensing device remarkably enhances the detection signal of 15 ppm of H2S gas at RT (23 °C). The response recorded is significantly higher than previously reported values. The optimization of the membrane doping percentage achieved exemplary results with respect to long-term stability, repeatability, and selectivity of the target gas among an array of several gases. The fabricated gas sensor has a fast response and a recovery time of 39 s and 142 s, respectively, for 15 ppm of H2S gas at RT. While the developed sensing device operates at RT and uses low bias voltage (0.5 V), the requirement for an additional heating element has been eliminated and the necessity for external energy is minimized. These novel features of the developed sensing device could be utilized for the real-time detection of harmful gases for a healthy and clean environment.

1. Introduction

Human health has been, and always will be, under threat because of human activities. The exhaust from industries as well as the vehicles and byproducts emanating from various processes in refineries and other industries have made the environment more hostile every day. The presence of harmful and toxic gases in the environment must be constantly monitored to avoid any unforeseen adverse effects. Therefore, materials that can be used to detect these harmful gases in the atmosphere from among the non-harmful ones play a considerably important role.
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is one of the most hazardous gases originating from industrial processes involving crude petroleum, natural gas, and landfills [1,2,3,4]. H2S also evolves from wastewater treatment, tanneries, glue and dye production, and drilling and mining industries [4,5,6,7]. Even at low concentrations, exposure to H2S can cause many adverse outcomes, ranging from loss of consciousness to certain death. Thus, the threat posed by H2S not only requires real-time monitoring but also calls for immediate presentment, which would signify the difference between life and death in these situations.
Materials that exhibit changes in their physical and or optical properties are critical candidates for sensing materials in gas-sensing devices [8,9]. Ideal candidates have properties that enhance the interaction between the sensing material and the target gas molecules. One of these properties that have proven advantageous is material porosity. Materials such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) synthesized by linking metal cations or metal clusters with organic linkers possess this desirable porosity [10,11]. Another class of material that originates from the same family are zeolitic imidazole frameworks (ZIFs), which comprise inorganic metal cations (M2+) and imidazolate-type ligands [12,13]. These materials exhibit promising features, such as chemical resistance and very large surface areas [13]. Currently, more than 150 novel imidazolate MOFs structures have been synthesized [13,14]. The literature demonstrates that among the available ZIFs, ZIF-67 and ZIF-8 have been used as sensing materials for gas-sensing applications [15,16,17]. The structural properties that complement the task at hand are extreme stability with a very high surface area and easy synthesis [12,18,19,20]. In comparison with conventional sensing materials, such as conducting polymers and semiconductor metal oxides, ZIF-based structures provide advantages, such as high sensitivity, selectivity, and stability [21,22,23,24,25].
The chitosan (CS) polymer, along with ionic liquid (IL) glycerol, reportedly detects H2S gas at 15 ppm at an operating temperature of 80 °C [26]. Meanwhile, the literature demonstrates that the density of ZIF structures affects the number of active sites that facilitate the detection of H2S at room temperature (RT) [10]. The incorporation of IL into the matrix enhances the conductivity of the sensing material in detecting the target gas. Conventionally, ZIF-67 has not been used to detect H2S gas [13,27,28] but rather other VOC gases [27,28,29,30,31,32] and inorganic gases [33,34,35]. It has also been used in water purification [15,36,37,38,39] CO2 detection and separation [14,40,41,42,43], organic dyes [19,36,44], electrochemical sensors [16,45,46], and energy applications [23,47,48]. To the best of our knowledge, ZIF-67 has not been reported in combination with CS for H2S gas detection applications.
The main objectives of this study are to enhance the detection of H2S gas in the CS–IL matrix by doping it with varying concentrations of ZIF-67 in terms of weight% (wt%) and reduce the operating temperature for energy saving. This work demonstrates a novel achievement of a response percentage of 273% at 100 ppm of H2S operating at RT. The evaluation of other parameters shows that the detection limit is 15 ppm, which is far below the dangerous concentration (100 ppm) of this harmful gas in air. Furthermore, the sensor exhibited a fast response time of 39 s, and excellent stability and selectivity toward H2S gas. As the sensor operates at RT and requires a low bias voltage of 0.5 V, the operation and production costs of the sensor are drastically reduced.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All chemicals, including cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2 6H2O) and 2-methylimidazole (Hmim), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, U.S.A and used as received. Chitosan (Mw = 50,000–190,000 Da) and acetic acid were purchased from Polysciences, Warrington, PA, U.S.A. Glycerol ionic liquid (IL) was purchased from Quarek Corp, London, UK.

2.2. Synthesis of the ZIF-67 Powder

In a typical synthesis, ZIF-67 was prepared following a previously reported procedure [49]. Here, 0.45 g of (Co(NO3)2 6H2O) was first dissolved in 3 mL of deionized (DI) water. Another 5.5 g of 2-mythelimidazole (Hmim) was dissolved separately in 20 mL of DI water. The metal solution was then added dropwise to the linker solution after both were dissolved completely. The mixed solution was stirred for 24 h at RT. The resulting purple product was then isolated through centrifugation, and it was washed thrice with DI water and methanol subsequently. The sample was then activated in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 24 h.

2.3. Synthesis of the Membranes

The synthesized ZIF-67 was dispersed by varying wt% values in distilled water (DW) using a vortex shaker, and acetic acid was added to make a 3% solution. Then, 0.8 gms of CS was added along with 2 mL of glycerol IL. The synthesized 40 mL solution was kept under continuous stirring at 1450 RPM at RT for 24 h. The solution was then transferred to a petri dish and place in an oven at 70 °C for 18 h. The resultant membrane was subjected to various characterizations discussed in previous sections. CS–IL was doped with 2, 4, 5, and 6 wt% of ZIF-67 and fabricated following the above-mentioned protocols. The thickness of the membrane was measured and is tabulated in Table 1. Figure 1 shows a 1 × 1 piece of the membrane, demonstrating its flexibility.

2.4. Characterization

A Rigaku MiniFlex benchtop X-ray diffractometer with a CuKα radiation tube (λ = 1.542 Å) running at 40 kV over the range from 2–60° (2θ) and a rate of 2 °C min−1 was used to record the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) of ZIF-67. The surface morphology of the activated sample and its elemental analysis were analyzed using the scanning electron microscopy instrument the Quattro ESEM equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector operating at a high vacuum and a 30 kV accelerating voltage. Under a nitrogen atmosphere, the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of ZIF-67- and the ZIF-doped CS–IL membranes were obtained using a Mettler Toledo TGA2 analyzer, where the sample was kept in an aluminum pan adjusted to a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 and a heat range from 25 °C to 600 °C. The surface area and porosity were evaluated using N2 adsorption experiments, where the amount of gas adsorbed (cm2 g−1) was identified by the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm as a function of relative pressure (P/P0). P is the N2 equilibrium pressure, and P0 is the saturated vapor pressure at 77 K. The sample was further activated under vacuum for 4 h and heated at 100 °C before the measurements.

2.5. Sensor Fabrication and H2S Gas Sensing Test

The sensing membranes (as 1 cm2 square pieces) were fabricated into sensor prototypes by placing them between a copper sheet serving as a bottom electrode and a stainless steel mesh serving as a top electrode [10,11]. The configuration was fastened using Kapton tape. The device was placed inside the gas chamber, and the electrical probes were then connected. The chamber was sealed to prevent any gas leakage and to maintain the humidity inside close to 0%. The gas testing sequences were executed using the LabVIEW software, which served as the interface between the computer and Keithley Instruments source measurement unit (KI 236). Mass flow controllers were deployed to expose the device to controlled amounts of test and flush gas. All through the testing sequences, the device was provided with a base voltage of 0.5 V and maintained at RT.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of ZIF-67 Powder

The phase structure and purity of the prepared ZIF-67 sample were evaluated using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns, which were compared with simulated ones (Figure 2a). The obtained diffraction patterns were in good agreement with the simulated patterns, confirming the successful synthesis of ZIF-67, which exhibits a cubic crystal system with unit cell parameters of a = b = c = 16.9589 Å [43,47].
The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis of the ZIF-67 powder (Figure 2b) shows a slight shift in the bands in comparison with those in the reported literature [15,16,17,50]. The spectra show a distinctive peak for the ZIF-67 at 415 cm−1 [17], which denotes the Co–N bond stretching vibration. The band at 751 cm−1 is assigned to the C=N stretching vibration, whereas the band at 1300 cm−1 corresponds to C=C stretching [15,38]. The band at 1415 cm−1 is attributed to CH3 bending vibration [39].
The thermal analysis of the ZIF-67 powder was conducted between RT and 600 °C (Figure 2c). Two weight drops were observed in the as-synthesized powder. The first drop of approximately 10% in weight loss was attributed to water molecules evaporating from the framework pores. A drastic decrease in weight was then observed between 390 °C and 540 °C (60% weight loss), indicating the total decomposition of the organic linker from the material. The remaining 40% weight was related to the metal oxide formed upon increasing the temperature.
Nitrogen sorption measurements were conducted to confirm the micropore characteristics of ZIF-67. As shown in Figure 2d, the isotherm loop indicated a micropore ZIF-67 material following a type I isotherm with a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area of 804.17 m2/g and a maximum pore volume of 0.391 cm3/g, which is comparative to those reported in the literature [23,42,44,49]. The sudden uptake at a relative pressure of approximately 0.4 could be related to the physisorbed liquid nitrogen on the material surface of the nanoparticles [49,51].
The morphological characterization (Figure 3a) of the as-prepared ZIF-67 shows agglomerates as nanoparticles, similar to those in previous reports [23,36,42,44,49]. Moreover, the presence of each expected element in the structure can be confirmed using energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis (Figure 3b).

3.2. Characterization of the ZIF-67-Doped CS–IL Membrane

The XRD pattern of the 4 wt% ZIF-67-doped membrane (Figure 4a) shows a broad peak of the amorphous CS material that matches those of the reported literature [52]. Moreover, weak peaks of ZIF-67 particles were also made out as they were deeply embedded into the membrane. Figure 4b shows the FTIR analysis of the doped membrane. The spectra show vibrational modes of C–H bending at 658 cm−1, C–O stretching at 1158 cm−1 and 1654 cm−1, CH3 bending at 1414 cm−1 [38], a dimer OH at 2877 cm−1, and a C=C stretching mode at 1330 cm−1 [15,19,39,52]. The membrane showed relative peaks of ZIF-67 and CS [52], denoting the incorporation of ZIF-67 into the matrix.
Figure 4c shows the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the doped membrane, recording a weight loss at approximately 100 °C attributed to the loss of adsorbed water molecules. The second loss in weight at up to 300 °C can be imputed to the decomposition of the organic groups in the membrane. There is a gradual loss in weight beyond 390 °C, which suggests the decomposition of the remainder of the linkers.
The CS–IL membranes were doped with different wt% values of ZIF-67 and subjected to 100 ppm of H2S gas to evaluate the optimum doping percentage. Table 1 records the sensitivity comparison of the membranes, and 4 wt% doping produced the best result. The thickness of the membranes was also measured using a screw gauge and are as tabulated below.
Initial SEM analysis showed dark spots embedded in the membrane, which was suspected to be ZIF particles. The surface of the membrane was mechanically etched using SiC sandpaper to ascertain this attribution. Figure 5a shows the SEM analysis of etched 4 wt% ZIF-67-doped CS–IL membrane. The elemental analysis of the etched membrane showed the presence of ZIF-67 particles (Figure 5e), and the mapping of the membrane ascertained the presence of the ZIF (Figure 5b–d).

3.3. Gas Sensing Performance

The sensor prototype was fabricated as detailed in our previous reports [10,11]. The sensor response toward H2S gas among other test gases was evaluated. Initially, CS doped with varying wt% of ZIF-67 was exposed to varying concentrations of H2S gas and synthetic air to evaluate the response in the presence and absence of the test gas. The sensor response was evaluated using Equation (1):
S   ( % ) = R g − R a R a × 100 = Δ R R a × 100
where Ra is the resistance of the sensor in synthetic air and Rg is the resistance in the presence of the test gas. The sensor showed a very good response toward H2S gas. In this regard, Hani et al. reported that CS along with IL recorded a sensitivity of 200% toward 100 ppm of H2S and the lowest detection limit of 15 ppm with the operating temperature of 80 °C [26]. In this work, membranes were doped with 2, 4, 5, and 6 wt% of ZIF-67, which showed sensitivity toward H2S gas. The 4 wt% doping showed the best response toward the test gas at RT. The response values toward 100 ppm of H2S were 143% (2 wt%), 273% (4 wt%), 80% (5 wt%), and 7% (6 wt%) at RT, as detailed in Table 1. As the 4 wt% doping exhibited the best response, this membrane was further investigated in terms of the other aspects of the sensor’s parameters.
The sensitivity aspect showed that the membrane showed a lower response of 15 ppm at RT (Figure 6). The inset shows the sensitivity values with respect to the gas concentration. Further tests were conducted at 100 ppm to evaluate the response toward the other test gases.
The selectivity parameter evaluated that the sensor is highly selective towards H2S gas, which can be attributed to the inclusion of ZIF-67 crystallites. ZIF-67 provides additional basic sites for the adsorption of the acidic H2S protons via extended H-bonding formation, which is elaborated in the upcoming gas sensing mechanism section. The membrane also showed good repeatability and long-term stability when subjected to tests over 21 days (Figure 7b). Long-term stability tests show that the response of the sensor decreases slightly but always recovers when left undisturbed for 48 h. Nonetheless, the response of the sensor was very high compared with that of the previous study by Hani et al. [26], which had CS–IL as a standalone membrane detecting H2S at an operating temperature of 80 °C.
The repeatability and stability aspects of the tests were conducted with exposure to five cycles of 100 ppm of H2S gas with the flushing of synthetic air in between each cycle to remove any residual gas molecules. The recorded response was 260.84 ± 0.54%, determining the repeatability aspect of the sensor as seen in Figure 8a. Because the lower response of the sensor was 15 ppm of H2S gas, the response and recovery time were also calculated from the data and were determined to be 39 s and 142 s, respectively (Figure 8b). The response time is defined as the time required for the sensor to attain 90% of its maximum response, whereas the recovery time is the time required for the sensor to recover to 10% of its baseline resistance after the target gas is stopped. Table 2 summaries the comparison of the reported literature with the current work to elucidate the performance of the sensor. Room temperature operation of the sensor with a low bias voltage makes it ideal for infield deployment as the operational and manufacturing costs are greatly reduced.

3.4. Gas Sensing Mechanism

The mechanism of the standalone CS–IL membrane was as outlined by Hani et al. [26]. The basic -NH2 groups along the chitosan chains provide sites of interaction with the protons of the acidic H2S gas molecules through H-bonding. This is further augmented with the presence of the highly hydroxylated ionic liquid. This interaction results in the enhanced charge transfer across the membrane, hence, improved gas sensitivity.
In the current study, the chitosan matrix containing IL was further improved via the inclusion of ZIF-67 crystallites. The presence of N atoms present in the linker (2-Hmim) of the ZIF-67 provides additional basic sites for the adsorption of the acidic H2S protons via extended H-bonding formation. Therefore, the homogeneous distribution of the ZIF-67 crystallites within the chitosan matrix, as schematically presented in Figure 9, explains the enhanced sensitivity of the ZIF-67-doped chitosan membrane. In comparison to the report by Hani et al. [26], the inclusion of ZIF-67 crystallites enhanced the sensitivity of the matrix towards 100 ppm of H2S gas from 200% at 80 °C to 273% at RT. Our results show a consistent improvement in gas sensing with an increase in the proportion of ZIF-67 in the composite membrane up to 4 wt%. Upon increasing the concentration of ZIF-67 in the composite above 4 wt%, a decrease in gas sensitivity was observed, which could be related to the intrinsic resistance of the ZIF-67, whose effect dominated the behavior of the composite membrane, leading to the observed decline in the gas sensitivity of the membrane towards the target gas.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a flexible membrane from ZIF-67 mixed with the CS–IL solution was prepared for use as a highly sensitive and low-power-consumption gas sensor for environmental applications. ZIF-67 doped into the CS–IL matrix enhanced the sensing of H2S gas among other analytes. The addition of ZIF-67 into the organic matrix provided additional O–H groups, which subsequently enhanced the sensitivity response of the prototype with RT being considered as the operational temperature. The new sensor detected H2S gas at as low as 15 ppm at RT with a heightened response. The sensor demonstrated a good response, with response and recovery times of 39 and 142 s, respectively. The other aspects of the sensor, such as its long-term stability, repeatability, and selectivity, proved the enhanced performance of the material when compared with previously reported materials. Moreover, as the sensor works at RT and requires a low bias voltage of 0.5 V, the operational and production costs were significantly reduced for energy saving. The composite membrane is also known for its ecofriendly nature and can be commissioned as a real-time detection device for practical field applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.T.M.; Data curation, A.A. (Ashraf Ali); Formal analysis, A.A. (Ashraf Ali); Funding acquisition, S.T.M.; Investigation, A.A. (Ashraf Ali) and R.H.A.; Methodology, A.A. (Ashraf Ali) and R.H.A.; Project administration, S.T.M.; Supervision, A.A. (Ahmed Alzamly), Y.E.G., N.Q. and S.T.M.; Validation, A.A. (Ashraf Ali), A.A. (Ahmed Alzamly), Y.E.G. and N.Q.; Visualization, A.A. (Ashraf Ali) and Y.E.G.; Writing—original draft, A.A. (Ashraf Ali); Writing—review and editing, A.A. (Ashraf Ali), A.A. (Ahmed Alzamly), Y.E.G., H.F.E.-M., N.Q. and S.T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the United Arab Emirates University with Grant Code USRP-G00003232 and fund code 31R238-R238M4.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yamazoe, N. Toward innovations of gas sensor technology. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 108, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Young, J.A. Hydrogen Sulfide. J. Chem. Educ. 2005, 82, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dockery, D.W.; Schwartz, J.; Spengler, J.D. Air pollution and daily mortality: Associations with particulates and acid aerosols. Environ. Res. 1992, 59, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cheng, Z.; Sun, Z.; Zhu, S.; Lou, Z.; Zhu, N.; Feng, L. The identification and health risk assessment of odor emissions from waste landfilling and composting. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 1038–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eun, S.; Reinhart, D.R.; Cooper, C.D.; Townsend, T.G.; Faour, A. Hydrogen sulfide flux measurements from construction and demolition debris (C&D) landfills. Waste Manag. 2007, 27, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Panza, D.; Belgiorno, V. Hydrogen sulphide removal from landfill gas. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2010, 88, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, Q.; Townsend, T. Factors affecting temporal H2S emission at construction and demolition (C&D) debris landfills. Chemosphere 2014, 96, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jadhav, H.S.; Bandal, H.A.; Ramakrishna, S.; Kim, H. Critical Review, Recent Updates on Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-67 (ZIF-67) and Its Derivatives for Electrochemical Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2107072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, F.I.; Awwad, F.; Greish, Y.E.; Mahmoud, S.T. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas sensor: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 19, 2394–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, A.; Alzamly, A.; Greish, Y.E.; Bakiro, M.; Nguyen, H.L.; Mahmoud, S.T. A Highly Sensitive and Flexible Metal–Organic Framework Polymer-Based H2S Gas Sensor. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 17690–17697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ali, A.; AlTakroori, H.H.; Greish, Y.E.; Alzamly, A.; Siddig, L.A.; Qamhieh, N.; Mahmoud, S.T. Flexible Cu3(HHTP)2 MOF Membranes for Gas Sensing Application at Room Temperature. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Park, K.S.; Ni, Z.; Côté, A.P.; Choi, J.Y.; Huang, R.; Uribe-Romo, F.J.; Chae, H.K.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 10186–10191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Shi, T.; Hussain, S.; Ge, C.; Liu, G.; Wang, M.; Qiao, G. ZIF-X (8, 67) based nanostructures for gas-sensing applications. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Phan, A.; Doonan, C.J.; Uribe-Romo, F.J.; Knobler, C.B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Synthesis, Structure, and Carbon Dioxide Capture Properties of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 43, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Omer, A.M.; El-Monaem, E.M.A.; El-Latif, M.M.A.; El-Subruiti, G.M.; Eltaweil, A.S. Facile fabrication of novel magnetic ZIF-67 MOF@aminated chitosan composite beads for the adsorptive removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 265, 118084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qin, Y.; Wang, X.; Zang, J. Room-temperature ethanol sensor based on ZIF-67 modified silicon nanowires with expanded detection range and enhanced moisture resistance. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2021, 765, 138302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, R.; Ma, T.; Zhao, S.; Rong, H.; Tian, Y.; Zhu, G. Uniform and stable immobilization of metal-organic frameworks into chitosan matrix for enhanced tetracycline removal from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, K.; Mousavi, B.; Luo, Z.; Phatanasri, S.; Chaemchuen, S.; Verpoort, F. Characterization and properties of Zn/Co zeolitic imidazolate frameworks vs. ZIF-8 and ZIF-67. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 952–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Du, X.-D.; Wang, C.-C.; Liu, J.-G.; Zhao, X.-D.; Zhong, J.; Li, Y.-X.; Li, J.; Wang, P. Extensive and selective adsorption of ZIF-67 towards organic dyes: Performance and mechanism. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 506, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matatagui, D.; Sainz-Vidal, A.; Gràcia, I.; Figueras, E.; Cané, C.; Saniger, J. Chemoresistive gas sensor based on ZIF-8/ZIF-67 nanocrystals. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 274, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shi, Q.; Chen, Z.; Song, Z.; Li, J.; Dong, J. Synthesis of ZIF-8 and ZIF-67 by Steam-Assisted Conversion and an Investigation of Their Tribological Behaviors. Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 698–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saliba, D.; Ammar, M.; Rammal, M.; Al-Ghoul, M.; Hmadeh, M. Crystal Growth of ZIF-8, ZIF-67, and Their Mixed-Metal Derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1812–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhong, G.; Liu, D.; Zhang, J. The application of ZIF-67 and its derivatives: Adsorption, separation, electrochemistry and catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 1887–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, K.; Olson, D.H.; Seidel, J.; Emge, T.J.; Gong, H.; Zeng, H.; Li, J. Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks for Kinetic Separation of Propane and Propene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10368–10369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bibi, S.; Pervaiz, E.; Ali, M. Synthesis and applications of metal oxide derivatives of ZIF-67: A mini-review. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 2253–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abu-Hani, A.F.; Greish, Y.E.; Mahmoud, S.T.; Awwad, F.; Ayesh, A.I. Low-temperature and fast response H2S gas sensor using semiconducting chitosan film. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bai, S.; Tian, K.; Tian, Y.; Guo, J.; Feng, Y.; Luo, R.; Li, D.; Chen, A.; Liu, C.C. Synthesis of Co3O4/TiO2 composite by pyrolyzing ZIF-67 for detection of xylene. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; Li, K.; Luo, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, H.; Gao, L.; Duan, G. Synthesis of Co3O4/ZnO nano-heterojunctions by one-off processing ZIF-8@ ZIF-67 and their gas-sensing performances for trimethylamine. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 308, 127657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nguyen, D.-K.; Lee, J.-H.; Doan, T.L.-H.; Nguyen, T.-B.; Park, S.; Kim, S.S.; Phan, B.T. H2 gas sensing of Co-incorporated metal-organic frameworks. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 523, 146487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, E.-X.; Yang, H.; Zhang, J. Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework as Formaldehyde Gas Sensor. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 5411–5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ding, D.; Xue, Q.; Lu, W.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, J.; Pan, X.; Tao, B. Chemically functionalized 3D reticular graphene oxide frameworks decorated with MOF-derived Co3O4: Towards highly sensitive and selective detection to acetone. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 259, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lü, Y.; Zhan, W.; He, Y.; Wang, Y.; Kong, X.; Kuang, Q.; Xie, Z.; Zheng, L. MOF-Templated Synthesis of Porous Co3O4 Concave Nanocubes with High Specific Surface Area and Their Gas Sensing Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 4186–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Choi, S.-J.; Choi, H.-J.; Koo, W.-T.; Huh, D.; Lee, H.; Kim, I.-D. Metal–organic framework-templated PdO-Co3O4 nanocubes functionalized by SWCNTs: Improved NO2 reaction kinetics on flexible heating film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40593–40603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tan, J.; Hussain, S.; Ge, C.; Wang, M.; Shah, S.; Liu, G.; Qiao, G. ZIF-67 MOF-derived unique double-shelled Co3O4/NiCo2O4 nanocages for superior Gas-sensing performances. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 303, 127251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qin, C.; Wang, B.; Wu, N.; Han, C.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Tian, Q.; Shen, S.; Li, P.; Wang, Y. Metal-organic frameworks derived porous Co3O4 dodecahedeons with abundant active Co3+ for ppb-level CO gas sensing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 506, 144900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lin, K.-Y.A.; Chang, H.-A. Ultra-high adsorption capacity of zeolitic imidazole framework-67 (ZIF-67) for removal of malachite green from water. Chemosphere 2015, 139, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, K.-Y.A.; Chang, H.-A. Zeolitic Imidazole Framework-67 (ZIF-67) as a heterogeneous catalyst to activate peroxymonosulfate for degradation of Rhodamine B in water. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 53, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yoon, S.; Calvo, J.J.; So, M.C. Removal of Acid Orange 7 from Aqueous Solution by Metal-Organic Frameworks. Crystals 2018, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ediati, R.; Elfianuar, P.; Santoso, E.; Sulistiono, D.O.; Nadjib, M. Synthesis of MCM-41/ZIF-67 composite for enhanced adsorptive removal of methyl orange in aqueous solution. In Mesoporous Materials-Properties and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  40. Song, X.; Yu, J.; Wei, M.; Li, R.; Pan, X.; Yang, G.; Tang, H. Ionic Liquids-Functionalized Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework for Carbon Dioxide Adsorption. Materials 2019, 12, 2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dmello, M.E.; Sundaram, N.G.; Kalidindi, S.B. Assembly of ZIF-67 Metal-Organic Framework over Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Synergistic Chemiresistive CO2 Gas Sensing. Chem. A Eur. J. 2018, 24, 9220–9223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Meshkat, S.; Kaliaguine, S.; Rodrigue, D. Comparison between ZIF-67 and ZIF-8 in Pebax® MH-1657 mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 235, 116150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Banerjee, R.; Phan, A.; Wang, B.; Knobler, C.; Furukawa, H.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. High-Throughput Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks and Application to CO2 Capture. Science 2008, 319, 939–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, Q.; Ren, S.; Zhao, Q.; Lu, R.; Hang, C.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, H. Selective separation of methyl orange from water using magnetic ZIF-67 composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 333, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Meng, W.; Wen, Y.; Dai, L.; He, Z.; Wang, L. A novel electrochemical sensor for glucose detection based on Ag@ZIF-67 nanocomposite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 260, 852–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sohouli, E.; Karimi, M.S.; Khosrowshahi, E.M.; Rahimi-Nasrabadi, M.; Ahmadi, F. Fabrication of an electrochemical mesalazine sensor based on ZIF-67. Measurement 2020, 165, 108140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duan, C.; Yu, Y.; Hu, H. Recent progress on synthesis of ZIF-67-based materials and their application to heterogeneous catalysis. Green Energy Environ. 2022, 7, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, H.; Zheng, M.; Tang, H.; Xu, B.; Tang, Y.; Pang, H. Amorphous Intermediate Derivative from ZIF-67 and Its Outstanding Electrocatalytic Activity. Small 2020, 16, 1904252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Qian, J.; Sun, F.; Qin, L. Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) nanocrystals. Mater. Lett. 2012, 82, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Askari, N.; Beheshti, M.; Mowla, D.; Farhadian, M. Fabrication of CuWO4/Bi2S3/ZIF67 MOF: A novel double Z-scheme ternary heterostructure for boosting visible-light photodegradation of antibiotics. Chemosphere 2020, 251, 126453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Diring, S.; Furukawa, S.; Takashima, Y.; Tsuruoka, T.; Kitagawa, S. Controlled Multiscale Synthesis of Porous Coordination Polymer in Nano/Micro Regimes. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 4531–4538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kumar, S.; Koh, J. Physiochemical, Optical and Biological Activity of Chitosan-Chromone Derivative for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 6102–6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Cui, W.; Kang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Cui, X. Facile synthesis of porous cubic microstructure of Co3O4 from ZIF-67 pyrolysis and its Au doped structure for enhanced acetone gas-sensing. Phys. E Low Dimensional Syst. Nanostructures 2019, 113, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Ji, X.; Sui, Y.; Wei, F.; Qi, J.; Meng, Q.; Ren, Y.; He, Y. Nickel/cobalt bimetallic metal-organic frameworks ultrathin nanosheets with enhanced performance for supercapacitors. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 825, 154069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, M.; Shen, Z.; Zhao, X.; Duanmu, F.; Yu, H.; Ji, H. Rational shape control of porous Co3O4 assemblies derived from MOF and their structural effects on n-butanol sensing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xiao, J.; Diao, K.; Zheng, Z.; Cui, X. MOF-derived porous ZnO/Co3O4 nanocomposites for high performance acetone gas sensing. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 8535–8546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Membranes 13 00333 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) A 1 cm × 1 cm piece of the fabricated membrane, (b) demonstration of the flexibility of the membrane.
Figure 1. (a) A 1 cm × 1 cm piece of the fabricated membrane, (b) demonstration of the flexibility of the membrane.
Membranes 13 00333 g001
Membranes 13 00333 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Comparison of the X-ray diffraction patterns, (b) Fourier transform infrared spectra of the as-synthesized ZIF–67 powder, (c) thermogravimetric analysis curves, and (d) Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area analysis of the ZIF–67 powder.
Figure 2. (a) Comparison of the X-ray diffraction patterns, (b) Fourier transform infrared spectra of the as-synthesized ZIF–67 powder, (c) thermogravimetric analysis curves, and (d) Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area analysis of the ZIF–67 powder.
Membranes 13 00333 g002
Membranes 13 00333 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Scanning electron microscopy images of ZIF-67 obtained at 4 µm, (b) energy-dispersive X-ray spectra of the ZIF-67 powder.
Figure 3. (a) Scanning electron microscopy images of ZIF-67 obtained at 4 µm, (b) energy-dispersive X-ray spectra of the ZIF-67 powder.
Membranes 13 00333 g003
Membranes 13 00333 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern, (b) Fourier transform infrared spectra, and (c) thermogravimetric analysis curves of the ZIF–67-doped CS–IL membrane.
Figure 4. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern, (b) Fourier transform infrared spectra, and (c) thermogravimetric analysis curves of the ZIF–67-doped CS–IL membrane.
Membranes 13 00333 g004
Membranes 13 00333 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) SEM image of the ZIF-67-doped CS–IL membrane, (b–d) elemental mapping of the membrane showing carbon, oxygen, and cobalt, respectively, (e) EDX spectra of the membrane.
Figure 5. (a) SEM image of the ZIF-67-doped CS–IL membrane, (b–d) elemental mapping of the membrane showing carbon, oxygen, and cobalt, respectively, (e) EDX spectra of the membrane.
Membranes 13 00333 g005
Membranes 13 00333 g006 550
Figure 6. The sensitivity response of the sensor showing a lower limit of 15 ppm of H2S gas. The inset shows the response values of the membrane toward varying H2S concentrations.
Figure 6. The sensitivity response of the sensor showing a lower limit of 15 ppm of H2S gas. The inset shows the response values of the membrane toward varying H2S concentrations.
Membranes 13 00333 g006
Membranes 13 00333 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Selectivity of the ZIF-67-doped CS-IL membrane sensor towards 100 ppm of different gases, (b) long-term stability of the membrane for 21 days.
Figure 7. (a) Selectivity of the ZIF-67-doped CS-IL membrane sensor towards 100 ppm of different gases, (b) long-term stability of the membrane for 21 days.
Membranes 13 00333 g007
Membranes 13 00333 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Repeatability of the sensor at 100 ppm of H2S, (b) response (red) and recovery (green) time calculated for 15 ppm of H2S gas at RT.
Figure 8. (a) Repeatability of the sensor at 100 ppm of H2S, (b) response (red) and recovery (green) time calculated for 15 ppm of H2S gas at RT.
Membranes 13 00333 g008
Membranes 13 00333 g009 550
Figure 9. Sensing mechanism of the ZIF-67-doped CS–IL membrane.
Figure 9. Sensing mechanism of the ZIF-67-doped CS–IL membrane.
Membranes 13 00333 g009
Table
Table 1. Comparison of sensing for different doping percentages at 100 ppm of H2S gas.
Table 1. Comparison of sensing for different doping percentages at 100 ppm of H2S gas.
Doping wt% (x)ThicknessSensing
CS + IL + (x)ZIF-67μmResponse
S%
2268 ± 3143 ± 1
4262 ± 6273 ± 6
5270 ± 580 ± 2
6283 ± 57 ± 2
Table
Table 2. Sensor performance comparison with reported values in the literature.
Table 2. Sensor performance comparison with reported values in the literature.
Sensor/MaterialDerivativesTarget GasOptimum
Operating
Temperature (°C)		Detection Limit (ppm)Ref.
CS/IL-H2S8015[26]
ZIF-67Au/Co3O4Acetone220100[53]
Co3O4/FGH25050[31]
Co3O4Ethanol300200[32]
Co3O4200100[54]
-Formaldehyde150100[30]
Co3O4n-Butanol10021[55]
ZIF-67/ZIF-8-H218090[20]
ZnO/Co3O4Acetone2751[56]
ZIF-67/Ni-CoCo3O4/NiCo2O4H2S25050[34]
ZIF-67Co3O4CO18090[35]
SnO2/ZIF-67-CO22055000[41]
CS/IL/ZIF-67-H2S2315THIS WORK
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ali, A.; Alzamly, A.; Greish, Y.E.; Alzard, R.H.; El-Maghraby, H.F.; Qamhieh, N.; Mahmoud, S.T. Enhancing Hydrogen Sulfide Detection at Room Temperature Using ZIF-67-Chitosan Membrane. Membranes 2023, 13, 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030333

AMA Style

Ali A, Alzamly A, Greish YE, Alzard RH, El-Maghraby HF, Qamhieh N, Mahmoud ST. Enhancing Hydrogen Sulfide Detection at Room Temperature Using ZIF-67-Chitosan Membrane. Membranes. 2023; 13(3):333. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030333

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ali, Ashraf, Ahmed Alzamly, Yaser E. Greish, Reem H. Alzard, Hesham F. El-Maghraby, Naser Qamhieh, and Saleh T. Mahmoud. 2023. "Enhancing Hydrogen Sulfide Detection at Room Temperature Using ZIF-67-Chitosan Membrane" Membranes 13, no. 3: 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030333

APA Style

Ali, A., Alzamly, A., Greish, Y. E., Alzard, R. H., El-Maghraby, H. F., Qamhieh, N., & Mahmoud, S. T. (2023). Enhancing Hydrogen Sulfide Detection at Room Temperature Using ZIF-67-Chitosan Membrane. Membranes, 13(3), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030333

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop