Next Article in Journal
The Safety and Impact of Raising the Urine Culture Reporting Threshold in Hospitalized Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Efficacy of Early Therapies against SARS-CoV-2 in Hematological Patients: A Real-Life Study from a COVID-19 Referral Centre in Northern Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Treatment and Supportive Care of POEMS Syndrome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Hospitalized Pediatric Patients in the First Five Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Single Center in Poland—1407 Cases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Associated with Mortality in Coronavirus-Associated Mucormycosis: Results from Mycotic Infections in COVID-19 (MUNCO) Online Registry

by
Shitij Arora
1,*,
Shivakumar Narayanan
2,
Melissa Fazzari
3,
Kranti Bhavana
4,
Bhartendu Bharti
4,
Shweta Walia
5,
Neetu Kori
5,
Sushila Kataria
6,
Pooja Sharma
6,
Kavya Atluri
7,
Charuta Mandke
8,
Vinod Gite
9,
Neelam Redkar
10,
Mayank Chansoria
11,
Sumit Kumar Rawat
12,
Rajani S. Bhat
13,
Ameet Dravid
14,
Yatin Sethi
15,
Chandan Barnawal
16,
Nirmal Kanti Sarkar
17,
Sunit Jariwala
18,
William Southern
1 and
Yoram Puius
19,† on behalf of the MUNCO Registry
add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Division of Hospital Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NW651, 111 E 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
2
Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
3
Division of Biostatistics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
4
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna 801507, Bihar, India
5
Maharaja Yeshwantrao Hospital, Indore 452010, Madhya Pradesh, India
6
Medanta Institute of Education & Research, Gurugram 122018, Haryana, India
7
Department of Bioinformatics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
8
Department of Ophthalmology, Hinduhridaysamrat Balasaheb Thackarey Medical College and Dr. Rustom Narsi Cooper Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai 400056, Maharashtra, India
9
Department of ENT, Hinduhridaysamrat Balasaheb Thackarey Medical College and Dr. Rustom Narsi Cooper Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai 400056, Maharashtra, India
10
Department of Medicine, Hinduhridaysamrat Balasaheb Thackarey Medical College and Dr. Rustom Narsi Cooper Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai 400056, Maharashtra, India
11
Department of Emergeny Medicine, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur 482003, Madhya Pradesh, India
12
Bundelkhand Medical College Sagar, Sagar 470001, Madhya Pradesh, India
13
Consultant Pulmonologist, Bangalore 560080, Karnataka, India
14
Noble Hospital, Pune 411013, Maharashtra, India
15
Venkateshwara Hospital, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075, Delhi, India
16
Associate Consultant and Academic Co-Ordinator Nepal MediCiti, Karyabinayak 44600, Nepal
17
Sarkari Kormochari Hospital, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
18
Biodesign and Innovation Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
19
Division of Infectious Diseases, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Collaborators of the MUNCO Registry is provided in the Acknowledgements.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(23), 7015; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237015
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 27 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19: Clinical Advances and Challenges)

Abstract

:
Background: COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. MUNCO is an international database used to collect clinical data on cases of CAM in real time. Preliminary data from the Mycotic Infections in COVID-19 (MUNCO) online registry yielded 728 cases from May to September 2021 in four South Asian countries and the United States. A majority of the cases (694; 97.6%) consisted of a mucormycosis infection. The dataset allowed for the analysis of the risk factors for adverse outcomes from CAM and this analysis is presented in this paper. Methods: The submission of cases was aided by a direct solicitation and social media online. The primary endpoints were full recovery or death measured on day 42 of the diagnosis. All patients had histopathologically confirmed CAM. The groups were compared to determine the contribution of each patient characteristic to the outcome. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to model the probability of death after a CAM diagnosis. Results: The registry captured 694 cases of CAM. Within this, 341 could be analyzed as the study excluded patients with an unknown CAM recovery status due to either an interruption or a lack of follow up. The 341 viable cases consisted of 258 patients who survived after the completion of treatment and 83 patients who died during the period of observation. In a multivariable logistic regression model, the factors associated with an increased risk of mortality include old age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.07, p = 0.001), history of diabetes mellitus (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.01–11.9, p = 0.02) and a lower BMI (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.82–0.98, p = 0.03). Mucor localized to sinus disease was associated with 77% reduced odds of death (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.09–0.57, p = 0.001), while cerebral mucor was associated with an increased odds of death (OR = 10.96, 95% CI 4.93–24.36, p = ≤0.0001). Conclusion: In patients with CAM, older age, a history of diabetes and a lower body mass index is associated with increased mortality. Disease limited to the sinuses without a cerebral extension is associated with a lower risk of mortality. Interestingly, the use of zinc and azithromycin were not associated with increased mortality in our study.

1. Introduction

As of 12 October 2022, over 619 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 6.5 million deaths have been globally reported [1]. The SARS-CoV-2 virus emerged in 2019, leading to the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. A co-infection of COVID-19 can cause a serious illness and impairment, especially in those who are immunocompromised. A significant increase in cases of mucormycosis, a relatively rare fungal infection, has been seen in patients with COVID-19, termed COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM). The pathophysiology is thought to be related to COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) and influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA). CAM emerged as a significant healthcare challenge, with more than 41,000 cases reported as of September 2021 in India alone [2]. It is a life-threatening infection and carries high morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors are associated with an increased likelihood of acquiring the disease and they are seen more commonly in patients with underlying immunosuppression corticosteroid therapy and uncontrolled diabetes, with or without diabetic ketoacidosis [3]. There are other suggested hypotheses, including the role of a zinc supplementation and iron overload states in CAM that remain untested. Zinc is a micronutrient for fungal growth and has been shown to augment growth in vitro [3,4].
Mortality, even with standard care, is high at around 45–50% for rhino-orbital disease, >90% for disseminated disease and it is higher for patients with malignancies (66%) or diabetes (45%) than for immunocompetent hosts (35%) [4]. Although India emerged as the epicenter for CAM, sporadic cases comprised of various mycotic infections aside from mucormycosis were reported from several countries across the world. We established an online registry (Mycotic Infections in COVID-19; MUNCO) to collect clinic–epidemiologic data on CAM and other fungal infections using an online reporting system in real time. Our findings from April to June 2021 were previously reported from the first 65 cases of CAM in the registry [5]. Due to the severity of CAM, urgency was placed on the data collection and analysis [5]. At the time, the number of reported cases available provided a limited ability to fully evaluate the risk factors associated with adverse outcomes in CAM. In this report, we sought to further evaluate the association of the clinic–epidemiologic factors associated with mortality in CAM.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Collection

Cases were collected from July 2021 to June 2022 via an online questionnaire submitted by international physicians to report the case and treatment of CAM in a known patient. This was collected through a REDCap database [6] at http://covidmucor.com, as previously described [5]. The cases were entered at the discretion of the reporting physician, but the case definition included a histopathologically confirmed infection. The outcomes were defined as a full recovery or death at the 6-month time point. Online solicitation for the cases was performed through social media and networking. The authors confirm that the ethical policies of the journal, as noted on the journal’s author guidelines page, have been adhered to and the appropriate ethical review committee approval has been received.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics such as the mean with standard deviation (SD), median with an inter-quartile range (IQR) and frequencies (n, %) were generated to summarize the patient characteristics both overall and stratified by the outcome (full recovery, death or a composite of death or vision loss). For each patient characteristic, the groups were formally compared via chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for the association (categorical), two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon test (continuous). A multivariable logistic regression model was estimated to model the probability of death after a CAM diagnosis during treatment using Firth’s penalized maximum likelihood estimates. Our primary variables of interest included a history of diabetes mellitus, obesity, the location of the disease, zinc and corticosteroid treatments which were examined along with a set of pre-selected covariates (age, location of and days to mucor infection and any known previous ICU stay) assumed to be potential confounders. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p-values corresponding to Wald chi-square tests for association were generated to summarize the effects. Two-sided p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, copyright 2016).

3. Results

A total of 694 patients diagnosed with CAM were recorded in the database. Of these, 353 patients were still alive but had an unknown CAM recovery status due to an interrupted or failure to follow-up, and were thus excluded. Thus, a total of 341 patients were retained in the analysis data set, consisting of 258 patients who successfully completed treatment and survived versus the 83 patients who died.
Table 1a compares the baseline characteristics between survivors and non-survivors as well as the overall dataset. The patient ages ranged from 38 to 64 and the mean age of all the CAM patients was 51.7 years (S.D. 13 years). In total, 79% of the patients were female. The mean body mass index was 24.7 (S.D. 4). Of the overall population, 31% were overweight, 8% were obese and 4.5% were classified as underweight based on their BMI. Among subjects with CAM, 84% (286 patients) were diabetic and 21% (72 patients) had hypertension. The median hemoglobin A1C was 8.8 (IQR 7.4–10.9). A total of 85% of the overall population was unvaccinated. Among the CAM patients with diabetes, 11 of them (3.2%) had a presentation with ketoacidosis at the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis. Other potential risk factors were observed infrequently, such as a history of cancer (0.3%), an organ transplant (2.1%) or an HIV infection (0.3%). The median time from a COVID-19 diagnosis to the diagnosis of CAM was 20 days (IQR 14–30). Patients with CAM had higher C-reactive protein [54.3 mg/L (IQR 22.6–98.5)] and ferritin levels [509 ng/mL (306–931)].
In total, 85.6% (292/341) of all patients were treated with corticosteroids for COVID-19. The median steroid dose was 50 mg prednisone equivalent, with 52% of the overall population receiving >10 days of steroid therapy. The missing data in our data set included vaccination status (11.7%), gender (0.6%), BMI (2.1%), days to mucormycosis infection (10.6%), CRP (49.6%), Ferritin (29.3%), A1c (31.4%), steroid dose (52.5%), steroid duration (30.2%) and steroid type (31.1%).
Overall, 83 patients died due to CAM (24.3%). The mean age of the non-survivors was 6.8 years higher than the survivors (56.9 vs. 50.1 years). The non-survivors had a lower BMI (23.87) than the survivors (25.01) and out of the 15 underweight patients, 10 were non-survivors (66.7%). The non-survivors also had a higher median A1C of 9.6 (IQR 8.3–11.8) compared to 8 (IQR 6.9–10.0) among the survivors. The median time from the COVID-19 diagnosis to the diagnosis of CAM was shorter (17 days, IQR 11–27) in non-survivors as compared to survivors (21 days, IQR 15–30, p = 0.007). The non-survivors also had higher levels of CRP and ferritin as compared to the survivors (median ferritin 85.1 mg/L, IQR 47–119 vs. 40.2 mg/L, IQR 18–70; median ferritin 763 ng/mL, IQR 373–1174 vs. 359.5 ng/mL, IQR 234–578, p < 0.001). Among those treated with corticosteroids, the non-survivors were treated with a higher median daily dose of 53 mg prednisone equivalent, (IQR 50–100) as compared to the survivors (median dose 50 mg prednisone equivalent, IQR 40–53.3), though a longer duration did not result in a higher mortality risk when looking at steroid courses ≥10 days or <10 days.
Table 1b includes the anatomical location of CAM. The most common site was sinus disease (307 patients, 90%) overall, in both the survivors and non-survivors. Out of the 307 patients with sinus disease, 239 (77.9%) were survivors while 68 (22.1%) were non-survivors. The non-survivors had a higher percentage of cerebral disease (67.3%) and pulmonary disease (75%). An orbital progression occurred in 183 patients (54%), while a cerebral extension occurred in 52 patients (15%). Rarer manifestations included pulmonary mucormycosis (12 patients, 3.5%) and cutaneous mucormycosis (4 patients, 1.2%), while 3 patients (0.9%) had gastric mucormycosis.
Table 1c shows the medications used during the course of treatment for CAM. These include amphotericin B (286 patients, 83.9%) with or without Posaconazole (202 patients, 59.2%). Isavuconazole (22 patients, 6.5%), voriconazole (6 patients, 1.8%) and surgery (258 patients, 75.7%) were also utilized as CAM treatment options. Liposomal amphotericin B was the most commonly used preparation of amphotericin (94.1%). We also noted the use of alternate formulations in combination with, or excluded, liposomal amphotericin B, including amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) and conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (16.4%). Ultimately, 258 (75.7%) patients received a surgical intervention, with this number consisting of 49 non-survivors (19%).
Table 1d shows the treatments given to patients for the management of COVID-19 prior to a diagnosis of CAM. Among COVID-19 therapies, there was no association with a higher risk of CAM mortality with any individual antiviral, antibiotic use or immunomodulator therapy use. Antiviral therapies included remdesivir (161 patients, 47.2%), favipiravir (93 patients, 27.3%) and ivermectin (146 patients, 42.8%). The antibiotics prescribed included azithromycin (97 patients, 28.4%) and doxycycline (138 patients, 40.5%).
In a multivariable logistic regression model (Table 2), a lower BMI (OR 0.9, p = 0.03) and a history of diabetes mellitus was associated with increased mortality (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.01–11.93, p = 0.02). Mucor localized to sinus disease was associated with a 77% reduced odds of death (OR = 0.23, p = 0.001). Neither azithromycin nor a zinc treatment were associated with the probability of death after adjustment.

4. Discussion

We present the risk factors for mortality from CAM from an online database of reported cases from centers predominantly located in South East Asia. Indeed, >70% of the reported cases in the literature have been from India [7]. Previous observational studies from urban centers in India have reported a 2.1-fold increase in the number of cases of mucormycosis as compared to previous years [8]. The overall mortality of cases in our registry, where data were ascertainable, was 24%. This is consistent with the other published reports [7,8,9]. The reported mortality has varied from 14% to 64% and may reflect different levels of COVID severity [10], CAM severity and the aggressiveness of a surgical intervention [11] and the time of the ascertainment of the data. Mortality was lowest (14–17%) in studies which reported a high level of surgical intervention and a low COVID-19 disease acuity [11,12]. At the 6-month follow-up, the mortality from CAM was 34% with a combined surgical and medical treatment [13].
While most studies have reported a high male preponderance in cases of CAM [7,8,11], the high female preponderance in this registry is unexplained and may reflect a reporting bias. Consistent with previous studies, our data shows a high proportion of patients with diabetes, and this has a significant association with a reduced survival. The increased risk of mucormycosis in diabetes is well described in earlier studies [8,9] in patients with or without COVID-19 [14,15]. While the exact mechanism is unknown, it is suggested that due to changes in the iron metabolism, pH and the diminished phagocytic response to fungi due to hyperglycemia, as well as increased endothelial receptor expression for fungal ligands, may facilitate angioinvasion [16]. There is a bidirectional relationship between COVID-19 and diabetes where SARS-CoV2 infection may facilitate a dysglycemic state and diabetes may increase the risk of the COVID-19 infection’s severity [7,16]. India has the second-largest number of adults aged 20–79 years with diabetes [17].
Interestingly, we did find that a lower BMI was associated with increased mortality. This is not entirely surprising since ketosis and the presence of beta-hydroxybutyrate likely worsen during COVID-19 associated malnutrition states and are known to increase the expression of the host and fungal receptors that contribute to an increased tissue invasiveness [18].
Higher levels of CRP and ferritin were found in non-survivors as compared to survivors. An elevated CRP may reflect elevated IL-6 levels, and both of these can perpetuate the inflammatory diabetogenic process of COVID-19 as well [19]. Since the time to a CAM diagnosis was shorter in non-survivors as compared to survivors, they could plausibly have still been in the heightened inflammatory phase, which may predispose to an invasive and severe disease.
Corticosteroids are known risk factors for mucormycosis. COVID-19 was treated with corticosteroids in 76–87% of the published data on CAM [8,11] and in the study by Patel et al., a corticosteroid dose was appropriate in only a third of treated COVID-19 patients [8]. In our analysis, neither a corticosteroid treatment dose nor its duration was associated with a decreased survival. Prior studies hypothesized that a zinc supplementation would increase the risk of mucormycosis as it may act as a micronutrient for fungal growth [20,21]. Interestingly, in our analysis, neither a zinc treatment nor azithromycin were associated with increased mortality.
Similar to the published data in non-CAM settings [14,22,23], a disease limited to the sinus and surgical debridement are associated with lower mortality, while a CNS extension was associated with a higher mortality risk. This was consistent with our analysis that cerebral disease had much higher odds for death. A surgical intervention has been shown to reduce mortality in CAM patients without CNS involvement, but also reduced the progression of disease in those with CNS involvement, though these data were limited in terms of the duration of the follow-up [11]. It should be noted that the CNS extension of a disease has been noted in 21–50% of case series of CAM [11,13,24,25], while in non-CAM, the CNS extension has been described in 21–25% of the published cases in reports where this is clearly delineated [14,26].
The strength of our study is the large multinational sample size providing real world data about the risks of mortality of CAM. The simple online interface allowed for a rapid deployment and implementation. Limitations include a potential selection bias due to diverse locations with variable access to specialty care in the setting of pandemic shortages, a lack of comparable registry data for an external validation, a lack of a separate verification for the integrity of data at the entry point and a lack of complete follow-up information. Nevertheless, with a lack of widely available data about the clinical course and risks of the adverse outcomes, we feel this is important to leverage such a registry acquisition to disseminate the knowledge of an emerging disease.

5. Conclusions

CAM emerged as a serious life-threatening infection in the middle of the pandemic and this registry was deployed in order to generate data sets that can answer some of the key clinic–epidemiologic questions in our understanding of this disease. In this paper, we discuss the factors associated with mortality in CAM and identify the sites of the disease, old age, a low BMI and a history of diabetes as factors associated with increased mortality. We also identify that the use of zinc is not associated with increased mortality in CAM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J., Y.P. and S.A.; Formal analysis, M.F.; Data curation, K.B., B.B., S.W., N.K., S.K., P.S., C.M., M.C., S.K.R., R.S.B., A.D., Y.S., C.B., N.K.S., S.J., V.G., N.R. and S.A.; Writing—original draft, S.N., K.A., W.S., Y.P. and S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Access to REDCap was paid for by the Einstein-Montefiore Institute for Clinical & Translational Research under grant no. UL1TR002556-06 to S.J.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Albert Einstein College of Medicine with approval number 2021-13086 for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived per IRB Approval.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to redcap policies.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Satchit Balsari, Pradeep Kasar, Manoj Mohanan and Amita Sudhir for assistance in the creation of the MUNCO registry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO COVID-19 Dashboard. 2022. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 10 August 2022).
  2. Hagan Ashley. COVID-19-Associated Mucormycosis: Triple Threat of the Pandemic. American Society of Microbiology. Published 15 July 2021. Available online: https://asm.org/Articles/2021/July/COVID-19-Associated-Mucormycosis-Triple-Threat-of (accessed on 2 October 2021).
  3. Jeong, W.; Keighley, C.; Wolfe, R.; Lee, W.L.; Slavin, M.A.; Kong, D.C.M.; Chen, S.C.-A. The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Roden, M.M.; Zaoutis, T.E.; Buchanan, W.L.; Knudsen, T.A.; Sarkisova, T.A.; Schaufele, R.L.; Sein, M.; Sein, T.; Chiou, C.C.; Chu, J.H.; et al. Epidemiology and Outcome of Zygomycosis: A Review of 929 Reported Cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 634–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Arora, S.; Hemmige, V.S.; Mandke, C.; Chansoria, M.; Rawat, S.K.; Dravid, A.; Sethi, Y.; Medikeri, G.; Jariwala, S.P.; Puius, Y.A. Online Registry of COVID-19–Associated Mucormycosis Cases, India, 2021. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 2963–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Harris, P.A.; Taylor, R.; Thielke, R.; Payne, J.; Gonzalez, N.; Conde, J.G. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform. 2009, 42, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. John, T.; Jacob, C.; Kontoyiannis, D. When uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and severe covid-19 converge: The perfect storm for mucormycosis. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Patel, A.; Agarwal, R.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Shevkani, M.; Xess, I.; Sharma, R.; Savio, J.; Sethuraman, N.; Madan, S.; Shastri, P.; et al. Multicenter Epidemiologic Study of Coronavirus Disease-Associated Mucormycosis, India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 2349–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Singh, A.K.; Singh, R.; Joshi, S.R.; Misra, A. Mucormycosis in COVID-19: A systematic review of cases reported worldwide and in India. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2021, 15, 102146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, Y.; Ganesh, V.; Kumar, S.; Patel, N.; Aggarwala, R.; Soni, K.D.; Trikha, A. Coronavirus Disease-Associated Mucormycosis from a Tertiary Care Hospital in India: A Case Series. Cureus 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Honavar, S.; Sen, M.; Sengupta, S.; Rao, R.; Kim, U.; Sharma, M.; Sachdev, M.; Grover, A.; Surve, A.; Budharapu, A.; et al. Epidemiology, clinical profile, management, and outcome of COVID-19-associated rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis in 2826 patients in India—Collaborative OPAI-IJO Study on Mucormycosis in COVID-19 (COSMIC), Report 1. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 69, 1670–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Budhiraja, S.; Aggarwal, M.; Mahajan, M.; Indrayan, A.; Jha, V.; Mittal, A.; Sachdeva, S.; Mrig, S.; Jain, A.; Gera, R.; et al. COVID-19 Outcomes in Pregnancy: A Review of 275 Screened Studies Profile of Mucormycosis Cases from a Network of Hospitals in North India amidst COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2021, S5, 4. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dave, T.V.; Nair, A.G.; Hegde, R.; Vithalani, N.; Desai, S.; Adulkar, N.; Kamal, S.; Mittal, R.; Bradoo, R.A. Clinical Presentations, Management and Outcomes of Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mucormycosis (ROCM) Following COVID-19: A Multi-Centric Study. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021, 37, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chakrabarti, A.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Das, A.; Panda, N.; Shivaprakash, M.R.; Kaur, A.; Varma, S.C.; Singhi, S.; Bhansali, A.; Sakhuja, V. Invasive zygomycosis in India: Experience in a tertiary care hospital. Postgrad. Med. J. 2009, 85, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Patel, A.; Kaur, H.; Xess, I.; Michael, J.; Savio, J.; Rudramurthy, S.; Singh, R.; Shastri, P.; Umabala, P.; Sardana, R.; et al. A multicentre observational study on the epidemiology, risk factors, management and outcomes of mucormycosis in India. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 944.e9–944.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Narayanan, S.; Chua, J.V.; Baddley, J.W. COVID-19 associated Mucormycosis (CAM): Risk factors and mechanisms of disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 74, 1279–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tandon, N.; Anjana, R.M.; Mohan, V.; Kaur, T.; Afshin, A.; Ong, K.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Thomas, N.; Bhatia, E.; Krishnan, A.; et al. The increasing burden of diabetes and variations among the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e1352–e1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ibrahim, A.S.; Spellberg, B.; Walsh, T.J.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, S16–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fröhlich, M.; Imhof, A.; Berg, G.; Hutchinson, W.L.; Pepys, M.B.; Boeing, H.; Muche, R.; Brenner, H.; Koenig, W. C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin 6, and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. JAMA 2001, 286, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Muthu, V.; Kumar, M.; Paul, R.A.; Zohmangaihi, D.; Choudhary, H.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Panda, N.K.; Pannu, A.K.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, S.; et al. Is there an association between zinc and COVID-19-associated mucormycosis? Results of an experimental and clinical study. Mycoses 2021, 64, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, S.; Acharya, S.; Jain, S.; Shukla, S.; Talwar, D.; Shah, D.; Hulkoti, V.; Parveen, S.; Patel, M.; Patel, S. Role of Zinc and Clinicopathological Factors for COVID-19-Associated Mucormycosis (CAM) in a Rural Hospital of Central India: A Case-Control Study. Cureus 2022, 14, e22528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Manesh, A.; Rupali, P.; Sullivan, M.O.; Raj, P.M.; Rupa, V.; George, B.; Michael, J.S. Mucormycosis—A clinicoepidemiological review of cases over 10 years. Mycoses 2019, 62, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bhansali, A.; Bhadada, S.; Sharma, A.; Suresh, V.; Gupta, A.; Singh, P.; Chakarbarti, A.; Dash, R.J. Presentation and outcome of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis in patients with diabetes. Postgrad. Med. J. 2004, 80, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Agrawal, G.; Ravani, S.; Leuva, P.; Modi, P.; Amin, K. Rise of the phoenix: Mucormycosis in COVID-19 times. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 69, 1563–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Moorthy, A.; Gaikwad, R.; Krishna, S.; Hegde, R.; Tripathi, K.K.; Kale, P.G.; Rao, P.S.; Haldipur, D.; Bonanthaya, K. SARS-CoV-2, Uncontrolled Diabetes and Corticosteroids—An Unholy Trinity in Invasive Fungal Infections of the Maxillofacial Region? A Retrospective, Multi-centric Analysis. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2021, 20, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nithyanandam, S.; Jacob, M.S.; Battu, R.R.; Thomas, R.K.; Correa, M.A.; D’Souza, O. Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis. A retrospective analysis of clinical features and treatment outcomes. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 51, 231–236. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics.
(a) Baseline variables between group with recovery and deceased
Baseline CharacteristicOverall
N = 341
Recovery
N = 258
Death
N = 83
p-Value #
Age in years51.72 (13.02)50.07 (12.70)56.88 (12.72)<0.001
Vaccinated46 (15.3%)34 (73.9%)12 (26.1%)0.71
Female269 (79.4%)204 (75.8%)65 (24.2%)0.79
Male70 (20.6%)52 (74.3%)18 (25.7%)
BMI kg/m224.76 (4.11)25.04 (4.19)23.87 (3.73)0.03
BMI Category:
Underweight (<18.8)15 (4.5%)5 (33.3%)10 (66.7%)0.001
Normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25)187 (56%)144 (77%)43 (23%)
Overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30)105 (31.4%)83 (79%)22 (21%)
Obese (≥30)27 (8.1%)22 (81.5%)5 (18.5%)
Comorbidities:
Hypertension72 (21.1%)50 (69.4%)22 (30.6%)0.17
DM286 (83.9%)208 (72.7%)78 (27.3%)0.004
DM with ketoacidosis11 (3.2%)3 (27.3%)8 (72.7%)0.001
Cancer1 (0.3%)0 (0%)1 (100%)0.08
Organ Transplant7 (2.1%)5 (71.4%)2 (28.6%)0.79
IDU4 (1.2%)1 (25%)3 (75%)0.05
HIV+1 (0.3%)1 (100%)0 (0%)0.57
Asthma3 (0.9%)2 (66.7%)1 (33.3%)0.72
Laboratory values:
CRP mg/L 54.3 (22.6–98.5)40.2 (18.0–69.6)85.1 (47.0–118.7)<0.001
Ferritin ug/L509 (306–931)359.5 (234–578)763 (372.9–1174)<0.001
A1c%8.8 (7.4–10.9)8.0 (6.9–10.0)9.6 (8.3–11.8)<0.001
Days from COVID-19 diagnosis to mucor20 (14–30)21 (15–30)17 (11–27)0.01
Corticosteroid Treatment292 (85.6%)219 (75%)73 (25%)0.49
Dose, prednisone equivalent50 (40–53.3)50 (40–53.3)53.3 (50–100)<0.001
Type: Dexamethasone132 (56.2%)101 (76.5%)31 (23.5%)0.43
Methylrednisone81 (34.5%)56 (69.1%)25 (30.9%)
Prednisone22 (9.4%)15 (68.2%)7 (31.8%)
Treatment duration 10+ days124 (52.1%)98 (79%)26 (21%)0.03
(b) Mucor location/severity between CAM recovered and deceased
Location(s) of Mucor InfectionOverall
N = 341 (100%)
Recovery
N = 258
Death
N = 83
p-Value #
Sinus307 (90%)239 (77.9%)68 (22.1%)0.005
Pulmonary12 (3.5%)3 (25%)9 (75%)0.001
Cutaneous4 (1.2%)2 (50%)2 (50%)0.229
Gastric3 (0.9%)3 (100%)0 (0%)0.324
Ophthalmic183 (53.7%)133 (72.7%)50 (27.3%)0.167
Cerebral52 (15.2%)17 (32.7%)35 (67.3%)0.001
(c) Medications administered to patients during course of treatment for CAM
Mucor Treatment(s)Overall
N = 341 (100%)
Recovery
N = 258
Death
N = 83
p-Value #
Amphotericin B286 (83.9%)217 (75.9%)69 (24.1%)0.833
Posaconazole202 (59.2%)164 (81.2%)38 (18.8%)0.004
Isavuconazole22 (6.5%)18 (81.8%)4 (18.2%)0.486
Surgery258 (75.7%)209 (81%)49 (19%)0.001
Voriconazole6 (1.8%)5 (83.3%)1 (16.7%)0.659
Amphotericin B regimen(s)
Amphotericin B deoxycholate47 (16.4%)37 (78.7%)10 (21.3%)0.617
Liposomal amphotericin B269 (94.1%)209 (77.7%)60 (22.3%)0.004
Amphotericin B lipid complex, ABLC39 (13.6%)27 (69.2%)12 (30.8%)0.297
Amphotericin B cholesteryl sulfate complex0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0.297
(d) Medications administered to patients during course of treatment for COVID-19
COVID-19 Treatment(s)Overall
N = 341 (100%)
Recovery
N = 258
Death
N = 83
p-Value #
Favipiravir93 (27.3%)76 (81.7%)17 (18.3%)0.110
Remdesivir161 (47.2%)121 (75.2%)40 (24.8%)0.837
Doxycycline138 (40.5%)105 (76.1%)33 (23.9%)0.880
Azithromycin97 (28.4%)74 (76.3%)23 (23.7%)0.865
Ivermectin146 (42.8%)118 (80.8%)28 (19.2%)0.055
Tocilizumab14 (4.1%)8 (57.1%)6 (42.9%)0.099
Itolizumab1 (0.3%)1 (100%)0 (0%)0.570
Zinc216 (63.3%)166 (76.9%)50 (23.1%)0.500
Other35 (10.3%)20 (57.1%)15 (42.9%)0.007
Data are presented as N (%), mean (SD) or median (25th–75th percentile). # Corresponds to a chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for association (categorical), two-sample t-test (mean (SD) presented) or Wilcoxon test (if median (IQR) presented. BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; IDU: injecting drug user; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; CRP: C-reactive protein; IQR: interquartile range.
Table 2. Logistic regression model for the probability of death.
Table 2. Logistic regression model for the probability of death.
Estimated Odds Ratiop-Value
Patient age, years1.04 (1.02, 1.07)0.001
Azithromycin treatment0.99 (0.49, 2.03)0.76
Zinc treatment0.76 (0.37, 1.57)0.46
History of DM3.47 (1.01, 11.93)0.02
BMI, kg/m20.90 (0.82, 0.98)0.03
Steroid treatment
Ref: no steroid treatment
1.67 (0.68, 4.12)0.22
Known ICU stay
Ref: no known ICU stay
1.50 (0.70, 3.25)0.16
Days to mucor (continuous)0.98 (0.96, 1.00)0.15
Location of mucor:
Sinus
Ref: not sinus
0.23 (0.09, 0.57)0.001
Ophthalmic
Ref: not ophthalmic
0.87 (0.45, 1.69)0.61
Cerebral
Ref: not cerebral
10.96 (4.93, 24.36)<0.0001
DM: diabetes mellitus; BMI: body mass index; ICU: intensive care unit.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arora, S.; Narayanan, S.; Fazzari, M.; Bhavana, K.; Bharti, B.; Walia, S.; Kori, N.; Kataria, S.; Sharma, P.; Atluri, K.; et al. Factors Associated with Mortality in Coronavirus-Associated Mucormycosis: Results from Mycotic Infections in COVID-19 (MUNCO) Online Registry. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7015. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237015

AMA Style

Arora S, Narayanan S, Fazzari M, Bhavana K, Bharti B, Walia S, Kori N, Kataria S, Sharma P, Atluri K, et al. Factors Associated with Mortality in Coronavirus-Associated Mucormycosis: Results from Mycotic Infections in COVID-19 (MUNCO) Online Registry. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(23):7015. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arora, Shitij, Shivakumar Narayanan, Melissa Fazzari, Kranti Bhavana, Bhartendu Bharti, Shweta Walia, Neetu Kori, Sushila Kataria, Pooja Sharma, Kavya Atluri, and et al. 2022. "Factors Associated with Mortality in Coronavirus-Associated Mucormycosis: Results from Mycotic Infections in COVID-19 (MUNCO) Online Registry" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 23: 7015. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237015

APA Style

Arora, S., Narayanan, S., Fazzari, M., Bhavana, K., Bharti, B., Walia, S., Kori, N., Kataria, S., Sharma, P., Atluri, K., Mandke, C., Gite, V., Redkar, N., Chansoria, M., Rawat, S. K., Bhat, R. S., Dravid, A., Sethi, Y., Barnawal, C., ... Puius, Y., on behalf of the MUNCO Registry. (2022). Factors Associated with Mortality in Coronavirus-Associated Mucormycosis: Results from Mycotic Infections in COVID-19 (MUNCO) Online Registry. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(23), 7015. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop