Canaloplasty in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Can It Still Be Considered a Good Choice?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Inclusion Criteria
2.2. Surgical Technique
2.3. Main Outcome Measures
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Johnson, M.C.; Kamm, R.D. The role of Schlemm’s canal in aqueous outflow from the human eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1983, 24, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Edmunds, B.; Thompson, J.R.; Salmon, J.F.; Wormald, R.P. The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. I. Sample and methods. Eye 1999, 13, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cairns, J.E. Trabeculectomy preliminary report of a new method. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1968, 66, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayala, M. Lower Success in Trabeculectomies in Exfoliation Compared with Primary Open-angle Glaucoma Patients in Sweden. J. Glaucoma. 2021, 30, e237–e245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, F.; Tang, G.; Zhan, H.; Yan, X.; Ma, L.; Geng, Y. The Effects of Trabeculectomy on Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 2020, 1723691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lewis, R.A.; von Wolff, K.; Tetz, M.; Koerber, N.; Kearney, J.R.; Shingleton, B.; Samuelson, T.W. Canaloplasty: Circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults. Interim clinical study analysis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2007, 33, 1217–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lewis, R.A.; von Wolff, K.; Tetz, M.; Koerber, N.; Kearney, J.R.; Shingleton, B.; Samuelson, T.W. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults. Two-year interim clinical study analysis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2009, 35, 814–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieshaber, M.C.; Pienaar, A.; Olivier, J.; Stegmann, R. Canaloplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma: Long term outcome. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2010, 94, 1478–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieshaber, M.C.; Fraenkl, S.; Schoetzau, A.; Flammer, J.; Orgül, S. Circumferential viscocanalostomy and suture canal distension (canaloplasty) for whites with open-angle glaucoma. J. Glaucoma 2011, 20, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, R.A.; von Wolff, K.; Tetz, M.; Koerber, N.; Kearney, J.R.; Shingleton, B.; Samuelson, T.W. Canaloplasty. Three-year results of circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J. Cataract. Refrac. Surg. 2011, 37, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bull, H.; von Wolff, K.; Körber, N.; Tetz, M. Three-year canaloplasty outcomes for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: European study results. Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2011, 249, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brusini, P.; Caramello, G.; Benedetti, S.; Tosoni, C. Canaloplasty in Open-angle Glaucoma: Mid-term Results from a Multicenter Study. J. Glaucoma 2016, 25, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brusini, P. Canaloplasty in Open-Angle Glaucoma Surgery: A Four-Year Follow-Up. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 469609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Seuthe, A.M.; Szurman, P.; Januschowski, K. Canaloplasty with Suprachoroidal Drainage in Patients with Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma—Four Years Results. Curr. Eye Res. 2021, 46, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hasanov, J.V.; Kasimov, E.M. Late results of phaco-canaloplasty in patients with concomitant advanced pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and cataract. Vestn. Oftalmol. 2018, 134, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łazicka-Gałecka, M.; Kamińska, A.; Gałecki, T.; Guszkowska, M.; Dziedziak, J.; Szaflik, J.; Szaflik, J.P. Canaloplasty—Efficacy and Safety in an 18-Month Follow Up Period, and Analysis of Outcomes in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Pigmentary Glaucoma and Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2022, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brusini, P.; Filacorda, S. Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for Classifying Functional Damage in Glaucoma. J. Glaucoma 2006, 15, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gillmann, K.; Meduri, E.; Niegowski, L.J.; Mermoud, A. Surgical Management of Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma: A Review of Current Clinical Considerations and Surgical Outcomes. J. Glaucoma 2021, 30, e32–e39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayed, M.S.; Lee, R.K. Recent Advances in the Surgical Management of Glaucoma in Exfoliation Syndrome. J. Glaucoma 2018, 27 (Suppl. 1), S95–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desai, M.A.; Lee, R.K. The Medical and Surgical Management of Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 2008, 48, 95–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kornmann, H.L.; Gedde, S.J. Surgical Management of Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 2014, 54, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferguson, T.J.; Swan, R.; Ibach, M.; Schweitzer, J.; Sudhagoni, R.; Berdahl, J.P. Trabecular microbypass stent implantation with cataract extraction in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2017, 43, 622–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hepşen, İ.F.; Güler, E.; Yalçin, N.G.; Kumova, D.; Aktaş, Z.P. Modified 360-degree Suture Trabeculotomy for Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma: 12-Month Results. J. Glaucoma 2016, 25, e408–e412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharkawi, E.; Lindegger, D.J.; Artes, P.H.; Lehmann-Clarke, L.; El Wardani, M.; Misteli, M.; Pasquier, J.; Guarnieri, A. Outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma: 24-month follow-up. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 105, 977–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansouri, K.; Gillmann, K.; Rao, H.L.; Guidotti, J.; Mermoud, A. Prospective Evaluation of XEN Gel Implant in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma. J. Glaucoma 2018, 27, 869–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ibáñez-Muñoz, A.; Soto-Biforcos, V.S.; Chacón-González, M.; Rúa-Galisteo, O.; Arrieta-Los Santos, A.; Lizuain-Abadía, M.E.; Del Río Mayor, J.L. One-year follow-up of the XEN implant with mitomycin-C in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma patients. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 29, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drolsum, L. Deep sclerectomy in patients with capsular glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2003, 81, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rekonen, P.; Kannisto, T.; Puustjärvi, T.; Teräsvirta, M.; Uusitalo, H. Deep sclerectomy for the treatment of exfoliation and primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2006, 84, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suominen, S.M.; Harju, M.P.; Vesti, E.T. Deep sclerectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 26, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Studeny, P.; Baxant, A.D.; Vranova, J.; Kuchynka, P.; Pokorna, J. Deep sclerectomy with nonabsorbable implant (T-Flux) in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 2017, 6923208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klink, T.; Panidou, E.; Kanzow-Terai, B.; Klink, J.; Schlunck, G.; Grehn, F.J. Are There Filtering Blebs After Canaloplasty? J. Glaucoma 2012, 21, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- King, A.J.; Rotchford, A.P.; Alwitry, A.; Moodie, J. Frequency of bleb manipulations after trabeculectomy surgery. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007, 91, 873–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voykov, B.; Rohrbach, J.M. Revisionsmöglichkeiten nach Kanaloplastik. Ophthalmologe 2016, 113, 910–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Samuelson, T.W. Extreme intraocular pressure, mild glaucoma, and previous canaloplasty with indwelling suture: August consultation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2018, 44, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kagemann, L.; Wollstein, G.; Ishikawa, H.; Bilonick, R.A.; Brennen, P.M.; Folio, L.S.; Gabriele, M.L.; Schuman, J.S. Identification and Assessment of Schlemm′s Canal by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 4054–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kagemann, L.; Wollstein, G.; Ishikawa, H.; Nadler, Z.; Sigal, I.A.; Folio, L.S.; Schuman, J.S. Visualization of the conventional outflow pathway in the living human eye. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 1563–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials; Shaarawy, T.M.; Sherwood, M.B.; Grehn, F. (Eds.) Kugler Publication: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; p. 19. [Google Scholar]
Post-operative IOP | |||
---|---|---|---|
≤ 21 mmHg | ≤ 18 mmHg | ≤ 16 mmHg | |
After 2 years (67 eyes) | 54 (80.6%) | 49 (73.1%) | 41 (61.2%) |
After 3 years (54 eyes) | 50 (92.6%) | 43 (79.6%) | 31 (57.4%) |
After 4 years (42 eyes) | 35 (83.3%) | 29 (69.0%) | 23 (54.8%) |
Post-operative IOP | |||
---|---|---|---|
≤ 21 mmHg | ≤ 18 mmHg | ≤ 16 mmHg | |
After 2 years (67 eyes) | 28 (41.8%) | 26 (38.8%) | 24 (35.8%) |
After 3 years (54 eyes) | 22 (40.7%) | 20 (37.0%) | 14 (25.9%) |
After 4 years (42 eyes) | 9 (21.4%) | 9 (21.4%) | 9 (21.4%) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Brusini, P.; Papa, V.; Zeppieri, M. Canaloplasty in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Can It Still Be Considered a Good Choice? J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092532
Brusini P, Papa V, Zeppieri M. Canaloplasty in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Can It Still Be Considered a Good Choice? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(9):2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092532
Chicago/Turabian StyleBrusini, Paolo, Veronica Papa, and Marco Zeppieri. 2022. "Canaloplasty in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Can It Still Be Considered a Good Choice?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 9: 2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092532
APA StyleBrusini, P., Papa, V., & Zeppieri, M. (2022). Canaloplasty in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Can It Still Be Considered a Good Choice? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(9), 2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092532