Functioning Endocrine Outcome after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsellar Approach for Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Patient Demographics
3.2. Radiological Characteristics: Tumor Size and Knosp Grade
3.3. Extent of Resection
3.4. History of Previous Pituitary Surgery
3.5. Preoperative Pituitary Function
3.6. Postoperative Pituitary Function
3.7. Recovering Group Characteristics (Group 2)
3.8. Worsening Group Characteristics (Group 3)
3.9. Predictors of Pituitary Function Recovery or Worsening
3.10. Patients Affected by Silent and Functioning Tumor: Sub-Classification into the Three Groups According to Hormonal Secretion
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gao, Y.; Zhong, C.; Wang, Y.; Xu, S.; Guo, Y.; Dai, C.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Q.; Jiang, J. Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: A meta-analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 12, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goudakos, J.K.; Markou, K.D.; Georgalas, C. Endoscopic versus microscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2011, 36, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frank, G.; Pasquini, E.; Farneti, G.; Mazzatenta, D.; Sciarretta, V.; Grasso, V.; Faustini Fustini, M. The endoscopic versus the traditional approach in pituitary surgery. Neuroendocrinology 2006, 83, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DeKlotz, T.R.; Chia, S.H.; Lu, W.; Makambi, K.H.; Aulisi, E.; Deeb, Z. Meta-analysis of endoscopic versus sublabial pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 2012, 122, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y. Treatment outcomes of neuroendoscopic and microscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary adenomectomies and the effects on hormone levels. Minerva Surg. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molteni, G.; Sacchetto, A.; Saccardo, T.; Gulino, A.; Marchioni, D. Quality of Life Evaluation After Trans-Nasal Endoscopic Surgery for Skull Base Tumors. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2021, 35, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dallapiazza, R.F.; Grober, Y.; Starke, R.M.; Laws, E.R.; Jane, J.A. Long-term results of endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurgery 2015, 76, 42–52; discussion 52–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Netuka, D.; Masopust, V.; Fundová, P.; Astl, J.; Školoudík, D.; Májovský, M.; Beneš, V. Olfactory Results of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma: A Prospective Study of 143 Patients. World Neurosurg. 2019, 129, e907–e914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Layard Horsfall, H.; Lawrence, A.; Venkatesh, A.; Loh, R.T.S.; Jayapalan, R.; Koulouri, O.; Sharma, R.; Santarius, T.; Gurnell, M.; Dorward, N.; et al. Reported outcomes in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: A systematic review. Pituitary 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatemi, N.; Dusick, J.R.; Mattozo, C.; McArthur, D.L.; Cohan, P.; Boscardin, J.; Wang, C.; Swerdloff, R.S.; Kelly, D.F. Pituitary hormonal loss and recovery after transsphenoidal adenoma removal. Neurosurgery 2008, 63, 709–718; discussion 718–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iglesias, P.; Arcano, K.; Triviño, V.; García-Sancho, P.; Díez, J.J.; Cordido, F.; Villabona, C. Non-functioning pituitary adenoma underwent surgery: A multicenter retrospective study over the last four decades (1977–2015). Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2017, 41, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laws, E.R.; Iuliano, S.L.; Cote, D.J.; Woodmansee, W.; Hsu, L.; Cho, C.H. A Benchmark for Preservation of Normal Pituitary Function After Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenomas. World Neurosurg. 2016, 91, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Little, A.S.; Gardner, P.A.; Fernandez-Miranda, J.C.; Chicoine, M.R.; Barkhoudarian, G.; Prevedello, D.M.; Yuen, K.C.J.; Kelly, D.F.; TRANSSPHER Study Group. Pituitary gland recovery following fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: Results of a prospective multicenter study. J. Neurosurg. 2019, 133, 1732–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knosp, E.; Steiner, E.; Kitz, K.; Matula, C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: A magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993, 33, 610–617; discussion 617–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micko, A.S.G.; Wöhrer, A.; Wolfsberger, S.; Knosp, E. Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: Endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification. J. Neurosurg. 2015, 122, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Aken, M.O.; Lamberts, S.W.J. Diagnosis and treatment of hypopituitarism: An update. Pituitary 2005, 8, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tritos, N.A.; Biller, B.M.K. Current concepts of the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2021, 22, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartman, M.L.; Crowe, B.J.; Biller, B.M.K.; Ho, K.K.Y.; Clemmons, D.R.; Chipman, J.J.; HyposCCS Advisory Board; U.S. HypoCCS Study Group. Which patients do not require a GH stimulation test for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamas, C.; del Pozo, C.; Villabona, C. Neuroendocrinology Group of the SEEN Clinical guidelines for management of diabetes insipidus and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion after pituitary surgery. Endocrinol. Nutr. Organo Soc. Espanola Endocrinol. Nutr. 2014, 61, e15–e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jho, H.-D.; Carrau, R.L. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: Experience with 50 patients. J. Neurosurg. 1997, 87, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graffeo, C.S.; Dietrich, A.R.; Grobelny, B.; Zhang, M.; Goldberg, J.D.; Golfinos, J.G.; Lebowitz, R.; Kleinberg, D.; Placantonakis, D.G. A panoramic view of the skull base: Systematic review of open and endoscopic endonasal approaches to four tumors. Pituitary 2014, 17, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Komotar, R.J.; Starke, R.M.; Raper, D.M.S.; Anand, V.K.; Schwartz, T.H. Endoscopic skull base surgery: A comprehensive comparison with open transcranial approaches. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2012, 26, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batra, P.S.; Luong, A.; Kanowitz, S.J.; Sade, B.; Lee, J.; Lanza, D.C.; Citardi, M.J. Outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms. Laryngoscope 2010, 120, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asemota, A.O.; Ishii, M.; Brem, H.; Gallia, G.L. Comparison of Complications, Trends, and Costs in Endoscopic vs Microscopic Pituitary Surgery: Analysis from a US Health Claims Database. Neurosurgery 2017, 81, 458–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azad, T.D.; Lee, Y.-J.; Vail, D.; Veeravagu, A.; Hwang, P.H.; Ratliff, J.K.; Li, G. Endoscopic vs. Microscopic Resection of Sellar Lesions-A Matched Analysis of Clinical and Socioeconomic Outcomes. Front. Surg. 2017, 4, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansasuta, A.; Pokanan, S.; Punyawai, P.; Mahattanakul, W. Evolution of Technique in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma: A Single Institution Experience from 220 Procedures. Cureus 2018, 10, e2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nomikos, P.; Ladar, C.; Fahlbusch, R.; Buchfelder, M. Impact of primary surgery on pituitary function in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas—A study on 721 patients. Acta Neurochir. 2004, 146, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elshazly, K.; Kshettry, V.R.; Farrell, C.J.; Nyquist, G.; Rosen, M.; Evans, J.J. Clinical Outcomes After Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Giant Pituitary Adenomas. World Neurosurg. 2018, 114, e447–e456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do, H.; Kshettry, V.R.; Siu, A.; Belinsky, I.; Farrell, C.J.; Nyquist, G.; Rosen, M.; Evans, J.J. Extent of Resection, Visual, and Endocrinologic Outcomes for Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Recurrent Pituitary Adenomas. World Neurosurg. 2017, 102, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webb, S.M.; Rigla, M.; Wägner, A.; Oliver, B.; Bartumeus, F. Recovery of hypopituitarism after neurosurgical treatment of pituitary adenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 3696–3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nayak, P.; Montaser, A.S.; Hu, J.; Prevedello, D.M.; Kirschner, L.S.; Ghalib, L. Predictors of Postoperative Diabetes Insipidus Following Endoscopic Resection of Pituitary Adenomas. J. Endocr. Soc. 2018, 2, 1010–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yildirim, A.E.; Sahinoglu, M.; Ekici, I.; Cagil, E.; Karaoglu, D.; Celik, H.; Nacar, O.A.; Belen, A.D. Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas Are Really Clinically Nonfunctioning? Clinical and Endocrinological Symptoms and Outcomes with Endoscopic Endonasal Treatment. World Neurosurg. 2016, 85, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arafah, B.M.; Nekl, K.E.; Gold, R.S.; Selman, W.R. Dynamics of prolactin secretion in patients with hypopituitarism and pituitary macroadenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995, 80, 3507–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akin, S.; Isikay, I.; Soylemezoglu, F.; Yucel, T.; Gurlek, A.; Berker, M. Reasons and results of endoscopic surgery for prolactinomas: 142 surgical cases. Acta Neurochir. 2016, 158, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shin, S.S.; Tormenti, M.J.; Paluzzi, A.; Rothfus, W.E.; Chang, Y.-F.; Zainah, H.; Fernandez-Miranda, J.C.; Snyderman, C.H.; Challinor, S.M.; Gardner, P.A. Endoscopic endonasal approach for growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas: Outcomes in 53 patients using 2010 consensus criteria for remission. Pituitary 2013, 16, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jane, J.A.; Starke, R.M.; Elzoghby, M.A.; Reames, D.L.; Payne, S.C.; Thorner, M.O.; Marshall, J.C.; Laws, E.R.; Vance, M.L. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: Remission using modern criteria, complications, and predictors of outcome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 2732–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstetter, C.P.; Mannaa, R.H.; Mubita, L.; Anand, V.K.; Kennedy, J.W.; Dehdashti, A.R.; Schwartz, T.H. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg. Focus 2010, 29, E6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, P.G.; Kenning, E.; Andrews, D.W.; Yadla, S.; Rosen, M.; Evans, J.J. Outcomes after a purely endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg. Focus 2010, 29, E5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemergut, E.C.; Zuo, Z.; Jane, J.A.; Laws, E.R. Predictors of diabetes insipidus after transsphenoidal surgery: A review of 881 patients. J. Neurosurg. 2005, 103, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
# | Age | Sex | Maximum Diameters (mm) | KNOSP Grade | Resection | Functioning pitNET | Prior Surgery | Intraoperative CSF Leak | Type of Impairment after Surgery |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 53 | M | 15 | 1 | GTR | Yes (GH) | No | No | - |
2 | 43 | M | 19 | 0 | GTR | No | No | No | - |
3 | 43 | F | 20 | 0 | NTR | No | No | No | - |
4 | 47 | M | 25 | 2 | GTR | No | No | No | - |
5 | 33 | M | 51 | 4 | NTR | Yes (TSH) | No | No | - |
6 | 50 | F | 18 | 0 | GTR | Yes (ACTH) | No | No | - |
7 | 58 | F | 42 | 4 | GTR | Yes (PRL) | No | No | - |
8 | 30 | F | 18 | 1 | GTR | No | No | No | - |
9 | 69 | M | 12 | 1 | GTR | Yes (GH) | No | No | - |
10 | 72 | F | 13 | 1 | GTR | Yes (GH) | No | No | - |
11 | 64 | F | 12 | 0 | GTR | Yes (GH) | No | No | - |
12 | 25 | F | 21 | 1 | GTR | Yes (PRL) | No | Yes | - |
# | Age | Sex | Maximum Diameters (mm) | KNOSP Grade | Resection | Functioning pitNET | Prior Surgery | Intraoperative CSF Leak | Type of Impairment after Surgery |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 21 | M | 21 | 0 | GTR | Yes (PRL) | No | No | TSH, LH/FSH ↓ PRL ↑ |
2 | 60 | M | 58 | 2 | NTR | No | No | Yes | ACTH, TSH, LH/FSH ↓ |
3 | 52 | M | 12 | 0 | GTR | Yes (GH) | No | No | TSH, PRL ↓ GH/IGF-1 ↑ |
4 | 49 | M | 32 | 2 | GTR | No | No | No | ACTH, TSH, LH/FSH, PRL ↓ |
5 | 65 | M | 62 | 3 | NTR | No | Yes | Yes | ACTH, TSH, LH/FSH and GH/IGF-1 ↓ |
6 | 67 | F | 17 | 2 | GTR | No | Yes | No | TSH ↓ |
7 | 64 | F | 22 | 2 | GTR | Yes (PRL) | No | No | ACTH, TSH ↓ |
8 | 53 | M | 15 | 1 | GTR | Yes (GH) | No | No | ACTH, TSH, LH/FSH, PRL ↓ |
9 | 55 | M | 24 | 2 | GTR | No | No | No | ACTH, TSH, LH/FSH, GH/IGF-1 ↓ |
10 | 77 | M | 25 | 4 | GTR | No | No | No | ACTH ↓ |
11 | 51 | M | 15 | 2 | GTR | Yes (GH) | No | No | ACTH, TSH ↓ |
12 | 66 | M | 31 | 1 | GTR | No | No | No | ACTH ↓ |
13 | 67 | F | 28 | 4 | GTR | No | No | Yes | ACTH, TSH ↓ |
14 | 79 | M | 45 | 4 | STR | No | No | Yes | ACTH, TSH, LH/FSH, GH/IGF-1 ↓ |
Predictor | Group 1 | Group 2 | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
N. patients | 19 | 12 | |
Age in years, mean (±SD) | 60.5 (±12.7) | 48.9 (±15.1) | 0.0297 |
Male sex, number (%) | 11 (57.9%) | 4 (33.3%) | 0.2734 |
Maximum diameter, mm mean (±SD) | 31.2 (±13.9) | 22 (±12.1) | 0.0753 |
KNOSP grade | |||
0–2 | 13 | 10 | 0.4325 |
3–4 | 6 | 2 | |
Tumoral residual | 7 | 2 | 0.4184 |
Functioning pitNET | 3 | 8 | 0.007 |
Prior surgery | 6 | 0 | 0.0585 |
Intraoperative CSF leak | 4 | 1 | 0.6236 |
Predictor | Group 1 | Group 3 | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
N. patients | 19 | 14 | |
Age in years, mean (±SD) | 60.5 (±12.7) | 59 (±14.3) | 0.7577 |
Male sex, n (%) | 11 (57.9%) | 11 (78.6%) | 0.2783 |
Maximum diameter, mm mean (±SD) | 31.2 (±13.9) | 29.1 (±15.6) | 0.6819 |
KNOSP grade | |||
0–2 | 13 | 10 | 1 |
3–4 | 6 | 4 | |
Tumoral residual | 7 | 3 | 0.4551 |
Functioning pitNET | 3 | 5 | 0.2379 |
Prior surgery | 6 | 2 | 0.4157 |
Intraoperative CSF leak | 4 | 4 | 0.6951 |
Silent Tumors (29 Patients) | |||
Variables | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
N. patients | 16 | 4 | 9 |
Age in years, mean (± SD) | 64.5 (±9.1) | 40.75 (±7.41) | 65 (±9.55) |
Male sex, number (%) | 9 (56.25%) | 2 (50%) | 7 (77.8%) |
Maximum diameter, mm mean (± SD) | 31.81 (±15.17) | 20.5 (±3.10) | 35.8 (±15.69) |
KNOSP grade | |||
0−2 | 12 | 4 | 5 |
3−4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Tumoral residual | 6 | 1 | 3 |
Functioning Tumors (16 Patients) | |||
Variables | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
N. patients | 3 | 8 | 5 |
Age in years, mean (±SD) | 39 (±3.60) | 53 (±16.71) | 48.2 (±16.08) |
Male sex, number (%) | 2 (66.7%) | 2 (25%) | 4 (80%) |
Maximum diameter, mm mean (±SD) | 28 (±1.73) | 23 (±15.02) | 17 (±4.30) |
KNOSP grade | |||
0−2 | 1 | 6 | 5 |
3−4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Tumoral residual | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Molteni, G.; Caiazza, N.; Fulco, G.; Sacchetto, A.; Gulino, A.; Marchioni, D. Functioning Endocrine Outcome after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsellar Approach for Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2986. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082986
Molteni G, Caiazza N, Fulco G, Sacchetto A, Gulino A, Marchioni D. Functioning Endocrine Outcome after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsellar Approach for Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(8):2986. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082986
Chicago/Turabian StyleMolteni, Gabriele, Nicole Caiazza, Gianfranco Fulco, Andrea Sacchetto, Antonio Gulino, and Daniele Marchioni. 2023. "Functioning Endocrine Outcome after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsellar Approach for Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 8: 2986. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082986
APA StyleMolteni, G., Caiazza, N., Fulco, G., Sacchetto, A., Gulino, A., & Marchioni, D. (2023). Functioning Endocrine Outcome after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsellar Approach for Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(8), 2986. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082986