Next Article in Journal
Impact of Pregnancy on Self-Efficacy and Personal Competence in the Context of Risk of Depression, Mental Health Status, and Satisfaction with Life
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Physical Activity and Cup Orientation on Metal Ion Release and Oxidative Stress in Metal-on-Metal and Ceramic-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/jcm13020531
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature

by
Francesco Weiss
1,†,
Bruno Pacciardi
1,†,
Giulia D’Alessandro
1,
Valerio Caruso
1,
Icro Maremmani
1,2,*,
Stefano Pini
1 and
Giulio Perugi
1
1
Psychiatric Unit 2, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy
2
G. De Lisio Institute of Behavioural Sciences, 56121 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 531; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020531
Submission received: 15 December 2023 / Revised: 8 January 2024 / Accepted: 13 January 2024 / Published: 17 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Depressive symptoms are a customary finding in hospitalized patients, particularly those who are undergoing long hospitalizations, underwent major surgical procedures or suffer from high levels of multimorbidity and frailty. The patients included in this case series shared high degrees of frailty-complexity and were evaluated within the ordinary consultation and liaison psychiatry service of the University Hospital in Pisa, Italy, from September 2021 to June 2023. Patients were administered at least one follow-up evaluation after a week and before discharge. To relate this case series to the extant literature, a comprehensive systematic review of vortioxetine safety and efficacy was performed. None of the six patients included developed serious safety issues, but one patient complained of mild-to-moderate nausea for some days after the vortioxetine introduction. Five out of six patients exhibited at least a slight clinical benefit as measured by the clinical global impression scale. Of the 858 entries screened via Scopus and Medline/PubMed, a total of 134 papers were included in our review. The present case series provides preliminary evidence for vortioxetine’s safety in this healthcare domain. The literature reviewed in this paper seems to endorse a promising safety profile and a very peculiar efficacy niche for vortioxetine in consultation and liaison psychiatry.

1. Introduction

Mood symptoms are highly prevalent in hospitalized patients and are often mutually associated with various medical comorbidities [1,2]. The complex polypathology of some of these inpatients poses an arduous challenge for specialists in the context of consultation and liaison (CL) psychiatry. As a matter of fact, the greater part of the available psychotropic agents entails a certain amount of risk linked to specific organ functions (e.g., heart repolarization time or haematological toxicity). Clinicians have to face a daily, more or less implicit, multivariate analysis to choose the best drugs for each particular case in terms of risk-benefit ratios [3]. Furthermore, the comorbid physical illnesses of these patients often determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations that may increase the risk of side effects and/or interactions. Moreover, methods of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are not available or not routinely performed for every single antidepressant [4]. The subsequent impossibility of monitoring systemic concentrations of drugs daily and assessing the pharmacokinetic phenotype represents a further major setback in CL psychopharmacology.
Vortioxetine is a relatively novel antidepressant developed by Lundbeck in 2002, with the experimental name Lu-AA21004 [5]. It was approved in September 2013 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and in December 2013 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). It is commonly classified as a serotonin modulator and stimulator (SMS) or a multimodal antidepressant. Its pharmacodynamic profile is unique, sharing a serotonin transporter (SERT) blocking activity with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) and adding a host of modulatory activities on serotonin receptors (5-HT). Of primary importance among these effects is that the 5-HT1A agonist and the 5-HT3 antagonist activities are considered key in reducing the classical latency of action of most antidepressants and ameliorating cognitive symptoms [6,7]. Vortioxetine is also a 5-HT1B partial agonist, 5-HT1D antagonist and 5-HT7 antagonist. It is fairly bioavailable when administered orally (about 75%), and its terminal half-life approximately amounts to 66 h [8]. It is approved for prescription at 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg daily doses, although caution should be applied in patients older than 65 for lack of data.
Vortioxetine seems a promising candidate for a favourable risk-benefit ratio in the treatment of depressive syndromes in hospitalized patients with a heavy burden of medical comorbidity [9]. A 2016 meta-analysis including 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1508 patients showed that vortioxetine was associated with a placebo-level incidence (1.2%) of serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients older than 55 [10]. Accordingly, this meta-analysis found no rate difference between vortioxetine and placebo in crucial variables such as changes in blood pressure, heart rate, electrocardiographic (ECG) intervals, liver markers and body weight. The most common TEAE are nausea and vomiting, whose incidence resulted in more or less twice as high for all-dose vortioxetine compared to placebo. Consistently, more up-to-date review accounts report similar results as to the vortioxetine safety and tolerability [11].
Considering this favourable efficacy/tolerability profile, the apparent paucity of studies addressing the use of vortioxetine in general hospital psychiatry is quite surprising. With this work, we tried to provide an innovative contribution to the subject using a twofold strategy. First, we present a case-series sample of multimorbid inpatients hospitalized for non-psychiatric conditions whose indication for psychiatric evaluation was depressive symptoms and whom we treated with different doses of vortioxetine. Second, we have performed a systematic PRISMA-compliant review to take stock of the available information, relate our experience with the current literature and outline possible paths for future research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Series

All of the patients included in this case series were assessed within the ordinary clinical activity of the consultation and liaison (CL) psychiatry service of the Pisa University Hospital (AOUP). Relevant first consultations were administered from September 2021 to June 2023. Patients were included considering the complexity of their general medical condition in comorbidity with depressive symptoms developed or recognized during the course of their hospitalization. Inclusion criteria were: (1) hospitalization for any medical condition; (2) two or more medical comorbidities; (3) a diagnosis of “Frailty Syndrome” according to the criteria operationalized by Fried et al. [12]; (4) a psychiatric consultation request for depressive symptoms; (5) eligibility for antidepressant treatment with vortioxetine (adult, non-pregnant patient); (6) at least one week of observation after vortioxetine introduction; (7) vortioxetine dose titrated to at least 5 mg per day; (8) no other antidepressant in combination (other classes of psychotropics were allowed).
Information about patients (personal data, diagnoses, treatments, course, and discharge) was collected from the ordinary clinical documentation (medical records and discharge letter) produced during their hospitalization, in line with the good clinical practice guidelines of the AOUP. All available data about medical diagnoses, surgical and pharmacological treatment, organ insufficiencies, blood testing, instrumental examinations and other specialistic consultations were collected upon the first psychiatric consultation. A complete psychiatric examination was performed, a clinical global impression (CGI) Field [13] severity scores were recorded, and psychotropic treatment was introduced. All patients received at least one further evaluation before discharge, during which CGI severity, CGI improvement and CGI efficacy index were filled out. Complications, possible TEAEs, and mental and physical conditions at discharge were documented in the clinical diary and discharge letter. The patient had expressed their consent to the use of anonymized clinical data for research purposes at the moment of their admission.

2.2. Systematic Review of the Literature

The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [14,15,16]. Search methods and results are highlighted in Figure 1.
First, a comprehensive literature search on PubMed and Scopus was performed from inception to 16 June 2023, cross-checking the obtained references. The systematic search was conducted using the following search string: “Vortioxetine AND (liver disease OR hepatic disease OR hepatopathy) or vortioxetine AND (kidney disease OR renal disease OR nephropathy) OR vortioxetine AND (heart disease OR cardiovascular disease OR cardiopathy) OR vortioxetine AND (brain disease OR encephalopathy OR stroke OR dementia OR neurodegeneration) OR vortioxetine AND (inpatients OR hospital OR medical condition) or vortioxetine AND (safety OR tolerability OR adverse)”.
We included all studies exploring the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine that supply original data. Taking as a reference the classification of clinical research proposed by Grimes and Schulz [17], we set the following inclusion criteria: descriptive observational studies (case series and case reports), analytical observational studies (cross-sectional, case–control and cohort studies), experimental studies (including open, single-blind, double-blind randomized, non-randomized, controlled and non-controlled studies). We concurrently posited the following exclusion criteria: non-English articles; studies recruiting subjects under the age of 18 years; review articles (including narrative and systematic reviews, pooled analyses, and meta-analyses); preclinical studies; study protocols; books and book chapters; expert opinions or consensus articles; other documents not exhibiting original data.

3. Results

3.1. Case Series

Six patients were included in this case series, four males and two females, aged between 64 and 77 years (arithmetic mean: 71.67 years). The main comorbidities and surgical procedures for each single patient are listed in Table 1.
Vortioxetine dose ranged from 5 to 10 mg per day, with four patients taking 10 mg/day and two patients taking 5 mg/day. Psychotropic (including opioids) and non-psychotropic co-prescribed medications for each patient are listed in Table 2.
The severity of depressive symptoms at baseline assessed with CGI severity scale ranged from 3 (“mildly ill”) to 5 (“markedly ill”). The CGI-Severity scores at follow-up resulted in a sensitive reduction, ranging from 2 (“borderline mentally ill”) to 4 (“moderately ill”). At discharge, CGI improvement scores were as follows: four patients were scored 2 (“much improved”), one was scored 3 (“minimally improved”), and one was scored 4 (“unchanged”). Considering the CGI efficacy index calculated at discharge, one patient scored 1 (“complete or nearly remission of symptoms with no side effects”), three patients scored 5 (“partial remission of symptoms with no side effects”), one patient scored 9 (“slight improvement with no side effects”), and one patient was scored 13 (“unchanged or worse with no side effects”). One safety issue was recorded (nausea in patient 06). Four patients were discharged at home, one transferred to a palliative care facility, and one transferred to an intermediate care facility. Efficacy and safety data are synthesized in Table 3.

3.2. Systematic Review of the Literature

The literature research with the above-presented string yielded a total of 858 articles, of which 299 were listed on PubMed and 559 were found on Scopus. After accurate duplicate screening, 243 duplicates were found and excluded. Of the remaining 615 records, 326 were excluded according to a priori exclusion criteria after abstract screening. Primary screening was performed manually, as no automation tool was employed. Excluded items were listed and subdivided into Reviews (n = 180), Meta-analyses (n = 47), Books and book chapters (n = 13), Preclinical studies (n = 10), Children and adolescents (n = 7), Study protocols (n = 8) and Other documents (n = 61). We sought to retrieve 289 papers, and we did not manage to retrieve eight entries. The resulting 281 articles underwent eligibility assessment via full-text examination, following which 148 articles were further excluded, and 134 studies were finally included in this review. Excluded items from eligibility assessment were listed and subdivided in: Non relevant (n = 103), Review articles (n = 31), non-English articles (n = 7), Preclinical (n = 4), Retracted (n = 3). Among the included articles, 72 were experimental studies, 45 were analytical observational studies, and 16 were descriptive observational studies. Open-label extension studies articles (n = 4) were conventionally included within experimental studies. Following snowballing research, we finally added a further article in the experimental studies category (n = 73), and the total number of entries included in the review reached n = 134. Since the main purpose of this work was to assess safety and tolerability issues, efficacy-related data will only be briefly summarized in the text, while safety-related findings will be exhibited in Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8 in an orderly manner.

3.2.1. Experimental Studies

A total of 73 records were included in this macro-category. Among these, 48 studies dealt with the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder. For analytical purposes, these studies were subdivided into (1) placebo-controlled studies without active reference and (2) controlled trials with active reference. Placebo-controlled studies without active reference (n = 25) were conducted starting in 2007. Among the studies (n = 12) that investigated the acute response to vortioxetine in major depression (6-, 8- and 12-week designs), four trials found a statistically significant advantage compared to placebo [18,19,20,21], two showed mixed results [22,23], and six provided no statistical difference between treatment and placebo [24,25,26,27,28], including one trial involving depressed patients with Alzheimer’s disease [29]. Three post hoc analyses (n = 3) based on one positive trial conducted in Japan found (a) that patients obtaining an early partial improvement with vortioxetine were more likely to be responders/remitters at 8 weeks [30]; (b) that vortioxetine was effective also on anxiety and anhedonic symptoms [31,32].
Efficacy data (no difference from placebo) of two further studies (n = 2) were not relevant to our review (celecoxib-placebo randomization as an “add-on” to open-label vortioxetine) [33,34], but one of the two showed that cross-titration switching to vortioxetine from other antidepressants is usually well-tolerated [34]. Among studies devoted to long-term treatment with vortioxetine (n = 8), randomized controlled studies (n = 3) exhibited favourable results in depressive relapse prevention [35,36,37]. Consistently, open-label extension studies demonstrated (n = 5) a clear clinical benefit in prolonging vortioxetine treatment after short-term response both in terms of symptoms amelioration (including anhedonia) and functional recovery [38,39,40,41,42].
Controlled trials with active reference (n = 23) were conducted starting from 2006, 21 (plus an “Erratum”) with an acute efficacy/safety design (<12 weeks). Some of these studies (n = 5) found vortioxetine to be superior in mood symptom reduction than the active comparator, including agomelatine [43,44], venlafaxine [45], desvenlafaxine [46] and duloxetine [47]. Other experiences (n = 4) found vortioxetine to be more effective in cognitive symptom reduction with respect to escitalopram, paroxetine, and duloxetine [48,49,50,51]. Half of these trials (n = 11) found no significant difference between vortioxetine compared to sertraline [52], venlafaxine [53,54], desvenlafaxine [55,56], escitalopram [55,56,57,58], vilazodone [57], and duloxetine [59,60,61,62], although duloxetine tended to perform better in these studies. Finally, a single study (n = 1) found low-dose (2.5 mg and 5 mg) vortioxetine significantly inferior to duloxetine 30 mg/day [63]. Lastly, we found a long-term (12 months) quasi-experimental investigation involving patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease, demonstrating that vortioxetine was more effective than escitalopram, paroxetine, bupropion, venlafaxine and sertraline (altogether considered) the amelioration of cognitive performances [64].
Other studies focused on functional outcomes rather than categorial diagnoses (n = 8) and are summarized in Table 4 [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72].
Table 4. Studies evaluating functional outcomes.
Table 4. Studies evaluating functional outcomes.
StudyFunctional OutcomeClinimetric ToolsResults
Theunissen et al., 2013 [66]Actual driving
Cognitive performance
Psychomotor performance		Actual driving test (SDLP)
Divided attention task
Psychomotor vigilance task		MIRT significantly impairs driving on day 2 but not on day 16 and prolongs reaction times in psychomotor vigilance and divided attention tasks compared to VOR and PLA.
Jacobsen et al., 2015 [72]TESDCSFQ-14VOR: significantly associated with greater improvement in sexual function in previously SSRI-treated patients compared to ESC.
Chokka et al., 2019 [69]Cognitive performance, workplace functioning, perceived disabilityDSST, PDQ-D-20, WLQ, WPAI, SDSVOR significantly improved outcomes in all clinimetric scales at 52 weeks.
Chokka et al., 2019 [70]Cognitive performance, workplace functioning, perceived disabilityDSST, PDQ-D-20, WLQ, WPAI, SDSVOR significantly improved outcomes in all clinimetric scales at 12 weeks.
Jacobsen et al., 2019 [65]TESDCSFQ-14 PAR: significantly higher incidence of TESD compared to VOR and PLA
VOR: not significantly higher incidence of TESD compared to PLA.
Jacobsen et al., 2019 [68]TESDCSFQ-14VOR: significantly associated with greater improvement in sexual function in previously SSRI-treated patients compared to ESC.
Nierenberg et al., 2019 [71]Cognitive performanceDSSTBoth SSRI and VOR improved cognitive performance. VOR did not significantly outperformed standard SSRIs.
Lenze et al., 2020 [67]Cognitive training augmentationNIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Fluid Cognition Composite Cognitive training plus VOR significantly improves performance compared to cognitive training plus PLA.
TESD: treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction; CSFQ-14 Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire Short-Form; PAR: paroxetine; VOR: vortioxetine; PLA: placebo; SDLP: standard deviation of lateral position; MIRT: mirtazapine; SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; ESC: escitalopram; DSST: Digit Symbol Substitution Test; PDQ-D-20: 20-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression; WLQ: Work Limitations Questionnaire; WPAI: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment; SDS: Sheehan Disability Scale.
A number of trials dealt with the effectiveness of vortioxetine in diagnoses other than depression (n = 10). Vortioxetine was found effective in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia [73], burning mouth syndrome [74] and irritable bowel syndrome [75] and ineffective in binge eating disorder (BED) [76] and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [77]. Moreover, among studies of vortioxetine in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) (n = 5), three 8-week trials exhibited negative results [78,79,80], while 8-week and 20-week trials showed a significant benefit over placebo [81,82]. Key information derived from experimental pharmacokinetics studies (n = 7) is summarized in Table 5 [83,84,85,86,87,88,89].
Table 5. Experimental pharmacokinetic studies.
Table 5. Experimental pharmacokinetic studies.
StudyHalf-Life (Hours)Tmax (Hours)Observations
Chen et al., 2013 [89]//Vortioxetine has no effect on drug metabolism catalyzed by CYP2D6, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Vortioxetine metabolism is influenced by CYP2D6 inhibitors and CYP3A4 inducers.
Wang et al., 2013 [88]58.58 (10 mg)
56.41 (40 mg)		8.10 (10 mg)
8.10 (40 mg)		Vortioxetine dosed 10 mg and 40 mg has no clinically significant effect on corrected QT.
Chen et al., 2015 [87]//Vortioxetine dosed 10 mg has no effect on aspirin or warfarin pharmacokinetics.
Wilson et al., 2015 [86]//Vortioxetine effects on sleep resemble those of paroxetine: reduced total sleep time, reduced total REM sleep, prolonged REM onset latency, and increased stage 1 sleep.
Chen et al., 2016 [85]//Vortioxetine has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of ethanol, diazepam and lithium and does not impact psychomotor performance compared with ethanol or diazepam alone.
Matsuno et al., 2018 [84]69.4 (5 mg)
66.0 (10 mg)
55.1 (20 mg)
56.6 (40 mg)		10.0 (5 mg)
10.0 10 mg)
9.0 (20 mg)
6.3 (40 mg)		Vortioxetine metabolism does not differ between sexes.
Vortioxetine exposure tends to be higher in the elderly.
No food effect on the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine.
Chen et al., 2018 [83]//Vortioxetine exposure tends to be about 25% higher in the elderly, blacks and females. Severe hepatic or renal impairment does not significantly alter vortioxetine disposition.
The most interesting findings were related to vortioxetine’s safety and tolerability in comparison with other agents. Throughout all of the experimental studies reviewed here, the most commonly reported TEAE during vortioxetine treatment was nausea, whose frequency was often significantly higher than under placebo. Other very commonly reported TEAEs were diarrhoea, headache, dry mouth, drowsiness, fatigue, dizziness, and insomnia, but their frequencies were often not significantly higher than under placebo. Vortioxetine was generally well-tolerated, with a tolerability profile at least equal or superior compared to other antidepressants and only mild-to-moderate adverse events. Vortioxetine was very rarely associated with severe adverse events in all studies, and severe adverse events were unlikely to be related to medication. One of the most iterated findings was that vortioxetine does not impair sexual function compared to placebo, whereas other serotonergic or dual antidepressants consistently did so. Table 6 summarizes data extracted from randomized trials reporting adverse events-related inferential statistics.
Table 6. Randomized studies (including both active-referenced and placebo-control studies) report inferential statistics relative to safety data.
Table 6. Randomized studies (including both active-referenced and placebo-control studies) report inferential statistics relative to safety data.
StudyComparatorSignificant TEAEs
(Vortioxetine vs. Comparator)		Non-Significant TEAEs
Alvarez et al., 2012 [54]PlaceboNausea, Vomiting, Hyperhidrosis.Headache, Dry mouth, Diarrhoea, Dizziness, Nasopharyngitis, Fatigue, Insomnia, Constipation, Blurred Vision, Anorgasmia.
Baldwin et al., 2012 [62]PlaceboNausea.Headache, Diarrhoea, Vomiting, Dizziness, Dry mouth, Somnolence, Nasopharyngitis, Constipation, Fatigue, Hyperhidrosis, Insomnia, Decreased appetite.
Boulenger et al., 2012 [37]PlaceboNausea. Headache, Nasopharyngitis, Dizziness, Dry mouth, Insomnia, Fatigue, Gastroenteritis.
Katona et al., 2012 [61]PlaceboNausea. Headache, Dizziness, Fatigue, Constipation, Dry mouth
Diarrhoea, Decreased appetite, Hyperhidrosis.
Boulenger et al., 2014 [60]PlaceboNausea, Dry mouth.Headache, Diarrhoea, Dry mouth, Dizziness, Fatigue, Hyperhidrosis.
Wang et al., 2015 [53]Venlafaxine(Higher in venlafaxine: decreased appetite, insomnia)Nausea, Dizziness, Headache, Dry mouth, Accidental overdose, Decreased appetite, Constipation.
Liebowitz et al., 2017 [22]PlaceboNausea. Anxiety, Depression, Irritability, Decreased appetite, Difficulty achieving orgasm, Headache, Increased appetite, Increased sleep, Insomnia, Migraine, Headache, Tingling, Tiredness, Constipation, Diarrhoea.
Borhannejad et al., 2020 [52]Sertraline//
Finally, Table 7 gathers differences in withdrawal rates due to adverse events between vortioxetine and other antidepressant agents.
Table 7. Discontinuations due to adverse events in head-to-head trials.
Table 7. Discontinuations due to adverse events in head-to-head trials.
StudyParticipantsVortioxetineComparator 1Comparator 2
Shin et al., 2023 [56]Vortioxetine = 42
Escitalopram = 42
Desvenlafaxine = 40		N = 1
(Vomiting = 1)		Escitalopram
N = 2		Desvenlafaxine
N = 3
Santi et al., 2023 [57]Vortioxetine = 20
Escitalopram = 18
Vilazodone = 18		N = 0Escitalopram
N = 0		Vilazodone
N = 0
McIntyre et al., 2023 [46]Vortioxetine = 309
Desvenlafaxine = 293		N = 6Desvenlafaxine
N = 3		/
Lee et al., 2022 [55]Vortioxetine = 40
Escitalopram = 43
Desvenlafaxine = 38		N = 2
(Vomiting = 1)
(Fatigue = 1)		Escitalopram
N = 3		Desvenlafaxine
N = 2
Borhannejad et al., 2020 [52]Vortioxetine = 30
Sertraline = 30		N = 0Sertraline
N = 0		/
Levada et al., 2019 [49]Vortioxetine = 41
Escitalopram = 25		N = 0Escitalopram
N = 0		/
Vieta et al., 2018 [58]Vortioxetine = 50
Escitalopram = 49		N = 3
(Not available)		Escitalopram
N = 1		/
Baune et al., 2018 [50]Vortioxetine = 48
Paroxetine = 54
Placebo = 48		N = 3
(Nausea = 2)		Paroxetine
N = 3
(2 serious adverse events)		Placebo
N = 1
Mahableshwarkar et al., 2015 [59]Vortioxetine = 301
Duloxetine = 152
Placebo = 161		N = 28
(Most common: nausea)		Duloxetine
N = 10		Placebo
N = 4
Mahableshwarkar et al., 2015 [51]Vortioxetine = 198
Duloxetine = 210
Placebo = 194		N = 7Duloxetine
N = 13		Placebo
N = 7
Wang et al., 2015 [53]Vortioxetine = 211
Venlafaxine = 226		N = 14Venlafaxine
N = 32		/
Boulenger et al., 2014 [60]Vortioxetine = 302
Duloxetine = 147
Placebo = 158		N = 27 *
(Most common: nausea)		Duloxetine
N = 7		Placebo
N = 7
Montgomery
et al., 2014 [44]		Vortioxetine = 253
Agomelatine = 246		N = 15
(Most common: nausea and vomiting)		Agomelatine
N = 23
(Most common: dizziness and headache)		/
Alvarez et al., 2012 [54]Vortioxetine = 208
Venlafaxine = 113
Placebo = 105		N = 10
(Not available)		Venlafaxine *
N = 16		Placebo
N = 4
Katona et al., 2012 [61]Vortioxetine = 156
Duloxetine = 151
Placebo = 145		N = 10
(Most common: nausea)		Duloxetine
N = 15		Placebo
N = 6
Baldwin et al., 2012 [62]Vortioxetine = 463
Duloxetine = 155
Placebo = 148		N = 43Duloxetine *
N = 19		Placebo
N = 12
* Difference from placebo reached statistical significance.

3.2.2. Analytical Observational Studies

A total of 45 records were included in this macro-category. The greatest part (n = 18) were studies related to various clinical outcomes in patients suffering from major depressive disorder. All of these studies reported high levels of safety and tolerability, with no unexpected TEAEs. A number of experiences demonstrated that vortioxetine was associated with significant improvements in affective, cognitive and functional outcomes in patients diagnosed with depression [90,91,92,93,94]. RELIEVE was an international (United States, Canada, Italy, France and, independently, China) observational, prospective 24-week study protocol involving adult patients with a diagnosis of major depression initiating treatment with vortioxetine in the context of routine clinical practice. The articles derived from this design (n = 6) are reports of significantly favourable functional outcomes (Digit Symbol Substitution Test, EuroQoL 5 dimensions five levels utility index, 5-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, Sheehan Disability Scale) in patients after twelve (eight in the Chinese study) and twenty-four weeks of treatment with vortioxetine [95,96,97,98,99,100].
Two studies dealt with outcomes related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): one showed that vortioxetine treatment in patients with post-COVID-19 major depression was associated with a significant reduction in depressive, cognitive and physical symptoms after three months [101]; the other reported data suggesting that vortioxetine is associated with a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptoms worsening after a COVID-19-related trauma compared to sertraline and trazodone [102]. An Italian study demonstrated that vortioxetine was associated with significantly higher therapeutic adherence relative to SSRIs and dual selective antidepressants (among the latter, the lowest risk of poor adherence was observed with sertraline and the highest with venlafaxine) [103]. A South Korean study with 3263 patients showed that improvement with vortioxetine treatment was associated with significant reductions in mood and cognitive symptoms after eight and twenty-four weeks, without any detrimental influence of age and liver dysfunction on safety and efficacy [104]. Vortioxetine was also associated with equal effectiveness in depression comorbid with GAD or alcohol use disorder [105,106]. Finally, a study reported data suggesting that vortioxetine adjunct to SSRIs is associated with a significant amelioration of depressive symptoms in patients resistant to SSRIs alone [107].
A group of studies dealt with vortioxetine use in psychiatric diagnoses other than unipolar depression (n = 7). These articles report encouraging results in the treatment of negative, cognitive and affective symptoms of schizophrenia [108,109,110], along with preliminary effectiveness in bipolar depression [111], burning mouth syndrome [112], postmenopausal depression [113], and panic disorder [114]. A further group of studies (n = 5) demonstrated that vortioxetine treatment is associated with affective and cognitive symptoms amelioration in patients with neurological conditions, including neurocognitive decline [115,116,117], Parkinson’s disease [118], and post-stroke depression [119]. Interestingly, three studies report data suggesting that vortioxetine could be an effective strategy to reduce SSRI-induced emotional blunting [120,121,122]. Finally, a large number of entries (n = 12) were pharmacovigilance studies or studies whose primary endpoints were safety/tolerability outcomes (main findings summarized in Table 8) [123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134].
Table 8. Summary of observational studies concerning safety and tolerability.
Table 8. Summary of observational studies concerning safety and tolerability.
StudyAimObservation 1Observation 2
Hughes et al., 2017 [126]Screening of online reviews of antidepressant users and user satisfaction as a marker of drug acceptability. VOR was associated with a higher frequency of itch, nausea, anxiety, agitation, crying, and headache compared to DUL and ESC. VOR was associated with a lower frequency of insomnia, sexual complains, emotional numbing, and motor disorders compared to DUL and ESC.
Greenblatt et al., 2018 [125]Comparison of VOR pharmacokinetics between obese subjects and control.VOR accumulation and washout half-lives were significantly longer (about 50%) in obese individuals. Possible pharmacodynamic interaction (serotonin toxicity) after VOR withdrawal might last longer than expected in obese individuals.
Mazhar et al., 2019 [133]FAERS database vigilance study on antidepressants risk of hyponatremia.VOR was significantly associated with a higher risk of hyponatremia (although probably overestimated). Relative to VOR, the risk of hyponatremia was higher for CLO, TRI, MIRT, SSRIs and SNRIs.
Miao et al., 2019 [132]Pharmacokinetics and safety of VOR in Chinese subjects compared to non-Chinese.VOR exposure was higher in the Chinese than non-Chinese population, but difference did not reach significance.Commonest side effects in 124 Chinese subjects were nausea (20.2%), dizziness (9.7%), dry mouth (5.6%), hyporexia (4%) and Diarrhoea (3.2%).
Woroń et al., 2019 [134]66 cases of interaction between antidepressants and cardiovascular medications. VOR linked to a case of hyponatremia (+HCTZ) and a case of nose/urinary bleeding (+WARF).Commonest interaction: bradycardia (SSRI + beta-blockers) and limb swelling (SSRI + amlodipine).
Bordet et al., 2020 [130]QT prolongation: VOR vs. SSRIs. The association between VOR and QT prolongation was non-significant.VOR bears a lower risk of inducing QT prolongation than SSRIs.
Eugene., 2020 [131]Association between 30 antidepressants and somnolence. VOR showed the lowest risk of somnolence (but no risk for levomilnacipran). Amoxapine showed the greatest association with somnolence, probably due to highest 5HT2A affinity.
Revet et al., 2020 [129]Antidepressants and movement disorders. VOR is significantly associated with bruxism (OR 4.71, 2.88–8.80). SSRIs are associated with a higher risk of movement disorders compared to first-generation antidepressants.
Seifert et al., 2021 [128]Psychotropic drug-induced hyponatremia Out of 501 patients on VOR, 1 case of hyponatremia was registered. Highest rates of hyponatremia were reported with CIT, VEN and ESC.
Ekhart et al., 2022 [123]VOR TEAE reporting pattern and comparison with SSRIs. Most frequent TEAE reported with VOR were nausea, vomiting, Diarrhoea and hypersensitivity (pruritus, rash). Withdrawal syndrome, hyponatremia, tremor and paresthesia less often reported for VOR than SSRIs.
Healy et al., 2022 [127]Adverse visual effects linked to antidepressants.A case of blurred vision still present 26 days after a single VOR dose. Most reports of persisting visual disorders involved SER, ESC, VEN, and FLU.
Quilichini et al., 2022 [124]Withdrawal syndrome risk with different antidepressants.VOR and AGO have the lowest risk of withdrawal syndrome.PAR, DES, VEN, and DUL have the highest risk of withdrawal syndrome.
TEAE: treatment-emergent adverse events; VOR: vortioxetine; SSRI: selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor; AGO: agomelatine; PAR: paroxetine; DES: desvenlafaxine; VEN: venlafaxine; DUL: duloxetine; SER: sertraline; ESC: escitalopram; FLU: fluoxetine. CIT: citalopram; AD: antidepressants. 5HT2A: 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A; MDD: major depressive disorder; FAERS: Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System; CLO: clomipramine; TRI: trimipramine; MIRT: mirtazapine; HCTZ: hydrochlorthiazide; WARF: warfarin.

3.2.3. Descriptive Observational Studies

A total of 16 records were included in this macro-category. Some of these (n = 7) include a case of hyperprolactinemia/galactorrhea [135], three cases of moderate-to-severe allergic skin reactions with petechial and pruritic features [136,137], a case of ingravescent acneiform eruption [138], a case of tinnitus [139], a case of acutely arising hemoptysis [140], and a case of restless leg syndrome [141]. There was also a report relating to a case of Call-Fleming syndrome or Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome (RCVS), which arose in a twenty-year-old woman seven weeks after vortioxetine introduction. The presentation was somewhat aspecific, with features of meningism (headache, photophobia), stroke-like motor deficits (hemiparesis and dysarthria) and intracranial hypertension (projectile vomiting) and completely resolved in three weeks with vortioxetine discontinuation and introduction of nimodipine 120 mg/day [142]. One report refers to two cases of Meige syndrome (bilateral orofacial dystonia with perioral dyskinesia and blepharospasm), which occurred in two sisters, both ten days after vortioxetine introduction and resolved a few days after vortioxetine discontinuation [143]. Vortioxetine was also associated with two cases of manic switch that occurred after vortioxetine introduction (10 mg/day) in two female patients previously diagnosed with unipolar depression [144,145]. One of the two patients had a history of multiple antidepressant treatments (escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and duloxetine) without evidence of former manic reactions.
Interestingly, for our purposes, vortioxetine was found safe in the case of a suicidal attempt by overdosage (250 mg), with no changes in blood pressure, electrocardiogram, creatinine and only modest changes in g-glutamyl-transferase levels (71 U/L twenty-four hours after ingestion) [146]. A case series showed that vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day) was safe and effective in a sample of nine patients suffering from epilepsy (seven cases were structural, and two were cryptogenetic) without any apparent destabilization of epileptic thresholds [147]. A report found a favourable outcome after three months 10 mg/day vortioxetine treatment in a patient with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder previously treated with paroxetine and melatonin without benefit [148]. Another paper described a case of severe vortioxetine-induced nausea successfully treated with mirtazapine in a patient with a history of multiple SSRI trials interrupted for sexual dysfunction. The combination of vortioxetine-mirtazapine was well-tolerated, and the patient achieved significant remission of mood, anxiety and sleep symptoms without any sexual complain [149]. Finally, a paper presented a case of fatally complicated hyponatremia in a 72 years old woman who had had previous episodes of severe hyponatremia with other psychotropics (fluoxetine, amitriptyline, mirtazapine and asenapine) [150].

4. Discussion

In this case, report, five out of six patients displayed some improvement in depressive symptoms and only one patient resulted to be unchanged. Among them, none of the subjects suffered from clinically significant TEAE after vortioxetine introduction. Vortioxetine treatment was associated with no safety issues and nausea was the only tolerability issue recorded (in patient 06). The severity of this TEAE was mild and did not entail antidepressant switch or discontinuation. All of the patients included had different and significant physical conditions that required hospitalization, but none of these conditions worsened during antidepressant treatment nor impairment of any organ system function was evidenced at follow up. This datum is even more captivating if considered in light of the significant level of frailty shared by the patients of our sample. Intriguingly, we observed a relatively short latency of therapeutic effects, consistently with preclinical evidence [151,152,153]. To the best of our knowledge there are no previous studies concerning vortioxetine use in patients hospitalized for general medical conditions. Our clinical experience seems to be in line with the available evidence regarding vortioxetine tolerability and provides preliminary support for a safe employment of vortioxetine in hospitalized patients with a significant level of clinical complexity and frailty.
Our literature review suggests that vortioxetine shows an efficacy profile different from other antidepressants. It is probably less effective than many other agents in reducing mood symptoms, but it seems to have unique properties on cognitive symptoms and negative symptoms, including emotional blunting [11]. Since a large part of hospitalized patients do not meet the criteria for severe depressive states (melancholia) and exhibit somewhat milder demoralization experiences close to adjustment disorders [154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162], wherein somatic symptoms, cognitive distortions and a weakening of attentive functions play a key role, vortioxetine could be much more tailored to these forms. On the other hand, melancholic patients are less likely to respond to vortioxetine and might need a more incisive kind of antidepressant, ideally, tricyclic antidepressants [163,164], provided that clinical conditions and access to TDM can safely allow for their employment. Thanks to its long half-life and strong serotonergic activity, vortioxetine also seems to be an option to cover the withdrawal symptoms of SSRIs. Eventually, as inferable from its very diversified pharmacodynamic profile, it seems to be of promising usefulness in patients that require a therapeutic switch for unacceptable behavioural toxicity, eminently SSRI-induced affective and motivational issues (including SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction).
All of the features above can give vortioxetine great momentum in CL psychiatry. Safety and tolerability are probably the main strengths of this drug [165,166,167]. The availability of pharmacokinetics and safety data relative to subjects with severe liver and kidney dysfunction provides the clinician with sound scientific evidence for its manageability in nephropathic and hepatopathic patients, for whom many psychotropics are often precluded or heavily restricted. The probable lack of significant effects on myocardium repolarization is also a considerable strength of this drug [168]. The frequency of electrolyte imbalances (namely hyponatremia) appears to be lower with vortioxetine than with SSRIs, although vortioxetine is still associated with a non-negligible amount of risk, especially when combined with sodium-wasting diuretics. Nonetheless, to implement the employment of vortioxetine as safely as possible, its most common side effects are to be carefully evaluated [169,170]. These appear to occur in two main clusters: gastrointestinal TEAEs (nausea, vomiting, Diarrhoea), which are type A dose-dependent reactions and can be severe in a minority of subjects, or hypersensitivity TEAE, which are mostly type B dose-independent reactions, oftentimes involving the integumentary system (pruritic symptoms, petechial rashes) and can also be severe. The former type of TEAE is predictable, tends to subside with time, is often treatable and does not always demand drug interruption, while the latter is unpredictable, could catch the clinician unawares and requires immediate drug discontinuation.
Vortioxetine seems to be linked to both favourable and unfavourable neurobehavioural side effects: on the one hand, it seems to promote cognitive and psychomotor performance, allegedly being one of the antidepressants with the mildest risk of diurnal sleepiness; on the other, vortioxetine seems to raise a non-negligible risk of mood lability, anxiety and agitation in a minority of patients. The effects on sleep structure seem to be similar to those of SSRIs, and the risk of a decline in sleep quality should always be sought.
A great advantage of vortioxetine compared to most SSRIs is its limited potential for pharmacokinetic interactions [8]. In the literature here reviewed, there was no evidence of significant inhibitory activity on any cytochrome p-450 isoenzyme, and the only remarkable interactions implicated pharmacodynamic mechanisms shared by all SSRIs, together with venlafaxine and duloxetine (increased risk of bleeding with antiplatelets or anticoagulants). Conversely, SSRIs (especially paroxetine, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine) are perpetrators of a host of interactions due to enzyme inhibition and subsequent victim drug-related overdosage toxicity.
The present work has several limitations. The largest part of these limitations is implied by the nature of the case series design (small sample, no inferential statistics allowed). Another important limitation is the lack of extant comparable data about vortioxetine use in hospitalized patients with high degrees of complexity and fragility. Furthermore, the adoption of strict inclusion criteria had a twofold consequence: on the one hand, it allowed the selection of particularly “high-risk” patients in which to assess safety and tolerability, but on the other, it might have led to a sample that does not mirror the largest part of clinical pictures encountered in daily medical practice. Another significant limitation was the relatively short observation time after vortioxetine introduction in some of our cases.

Author Contributions

B.P. and F.W. had the idea for the article and wrote the case series; F.W. and G.D. performed the literature search and data analysis; F.W. drafted the work, and finally, G.P., S.P., I.M., V.C., G.D. and B.P. revised the final draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

G.P. acted as a consultant to Lundbeck, Angelini, Sanofi Aventis, and Neuraxpharm. He received a scholarship/research support from Lundbeck and Angelini. He is a member of the speaker/advisory board of Sanofi-Aventis, Lundbeck, and Angelini. I.M. acted as a consultant to Camurus, CT Sanremo, Indivior, Lundbeck, and Molteni. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Gold, S.M.; Köhler-Forsberg, O.; Moss-Morris, R.; Mehnert, A.; Miranda, J.J.; Bullinger, M.; Steptoe, A.; Whooley, M.A.; Otte, C. Comorbid depression in medical diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ishak, W.W.; Collison, K.; Danovitch, I.; Shek, L.; Kharazi, P.; Kim, T.; Jaffer, K.Y.; Naghdechi, L.; Lopez, E.; Nuckols, T. Screening for Depression in Hospitalized Medical Patients. J. Hosp. Med. 2017, 12, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jakobsen, J.C.; Gluud, C.; Kirsch, I. Should antidepressants be used for major depressive disorder? BMJ Evid. Based. Med. 2020, 25, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pennazio, F.; Brasso, C.; Villari, V.; Rocca, P. Current Status of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Mental Health Treatment: A Review. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bang-Andersen, B.; Olsen, C.K.; Sanchéz, C. The Discovery of the Antidepressant Vortioxetine and the Research that Uncovered Its Potential to Treat the Cognitive Dysfunction Associated with Depression. In Successful Drug Discovery; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 189–214. ISBN 9783527341153/9783527800315. [Google Scholar]
  6. Okada, M.; Okubo, R.; Fukuyama, K. Vortioxetine Subchronically Activates Serotonergic Transmission via Desensitization of Serotonin 5-HT(1A) Receptor with 5-HT(3) Receptor Inhibition in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El Mansari, M.; Lecours, M.; Blier, P. Effects of acute and sustained administration of vortioxetine on the serotonin system in the hippocampus: Electrophysiological studies in the rat brain. Psychopharmacology 2015, 232, 2343–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, G.; Højer, A.-M.; Areberg, J.; Nomikos, G. Vortioxetine: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 57, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Baldwin, D.S.; Necking, O.; Schmidt, S.N.; Ren, H.; Reines, E.H. Efficacy and safety of vortioxetine in treatment of patients with major depressive disorder and common co-morbid physical illness. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 311, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nomikos, G.G.; Tomori, D.; Zhong, W.; Affinito, J.; Palo, W. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder in patients aged 55 years or older. CNS Spectr. 2016, 22, 348–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Diego-Adeliño, J.; Crespo, J.M.; Mora, F.; Neyra, A.; Iborra, P.; Gutiérrez-Rojas, L.; Salonia, S.F. Vortioxetine in major depressive disorder: From mechanisms of action to clinical studies. An updated review. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2021, 21, 673–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M146–M157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guy, W. ECDEU Assessment Manual; American Psychological Association (APA): Rockville, ML, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  14. Page, M.J.; Mckenzie, J.; Bossuyt, P.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.; Moher, D. Updating Guidance for Reporting Systematic Reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 Statement; Center for Open Science: Charlottesville, VA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009, 62, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009, 339, b2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Grimes, D.A.; Schulz, K.F. An overview of clinical research: The lay of the land. Lancet 2002, 359, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Henigsberg, N.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.; Chen, Y.; Thase, M.E. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 8-Week Trial of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Multiple Doses of Lu AA21004 in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2012, 73, 953–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Inoue, T.; Sasai, K.; Kitagawa, T.; Nishimura, A.; Inada, I. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of vortioxetine in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2020, 74, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Vieta, E.; Florea, I.; Schmidt, S.N.; Areberg, J.; Ettrup, A. Intravenous vortioxetine to accelerate onset of effect in major depressive disorder: A 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2019, 34, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mcintyre, R.S.; Lophaven, S.; Olsen, C.K. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vortioxetine on cognitive function in depressed adults. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 17, 1557–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liebowitz, M.R.; Careri, J.; Blatt, K.; Draine, A.; Morita, J.; Moran, M.; Hanover, R. Vortioxetine versus placebo in major depressive disorder comorbid with social anxiety disorder. Depress. Anxiety 2017, 34, 1164–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jacobsen, P.L.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Serenko, M.; Chan, S.; Trivedi, M.H. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vortioxetine 10 mg and 20 mg in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2015, 76, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rancans, E.; Zambori, J.; Dalsgaard, M.; Baayen, C.; Areberg, J.; Ettrup, A.; Florea, I. Intravenous vortioxetine to accelerate onset of effect in major depressive disorder: A 7-day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2020, 35, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nishimura, A.; Aritomi, Y.; Sasai, K.; Kitagawa, T.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week trial of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 5, 10, and 20 mg/day vortioxetine in adults with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 72, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Inoue, T.; Nishimura, A.; Sasai, K.; Kitagawa, T. Randomized, 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vortioxetine in Japanese adults with major depressive disorder, followed by a 52-week open-label extension trial. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 72, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.L.; Serenko, M.; Chen, Y.; Trivedi, M.H. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Doses of Vortioxetine in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2015, 76, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jain, R.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.L.; Chen, Y.; Thase, M.E. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-wk trial of the efficacy and tolerability of 5 mg vortioxetine in adults with major depressive disorder. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 16, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jeong, H.W.; Yoon, K.H.; Lee, C.H.; Moon, Y.S.; Kim, D.H. Vortioxetine Treatment for Depression in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci. 2022, 20, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Inoue, T.; Fujimoto, S.; Marumoto, T.; Kitagawa, T.; Ishida, K.; Nakajima, T.; Moriguchi, Y.; Fujikawa, K.; Watanabe, K. Early Improvement with Vortioxetine Predicts Response and Remission: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data from a Clinical Trial Conducted in Japan. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2021, 17, 3735–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Inoue, T.; Fujimoto, S.; Marumoto, T.; Kitagawa, T.; Ishida, K.; Nakajima, T.; Moriguchi, Y.; Fujikawa, K.; Watanabe, K. Therapeutic Potential of Vortioxetine for Anxious Depression: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data from a Clinical Trial Conducted in Japan. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2021, 17, 3781–3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Watanabe, K.; Fujimoto, S.; Marumoto, T.; Kitagawa, T.; Ishida, K.; Nakajima, T.; Moriguchi, Y.; Fujikawa, K.; Inoue, T. Therapeutic Potential of Vortioxetine for Anhedonia-Like Symptoms in Depression: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data from a Clinical Trial Conducted in Japan. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2022, 18, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baune, B.T.; Sampson, E.; Louise, J.; Hori, H.; Schubert, K.O.; Clark, S.R.; Mills, N.T.; Fourrier, C. No evidence for clinical efficacy of adjunctive celecoxib with vortioxetine in the treatment of depression: A 6-week double-blind placebo controlled randomized trial. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021, 53, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mills, N.T.; Sampson, E.; Fourrier, C.; Baune, B.T. Clinical Switching Strategies of Various Antidepressants to Vortioxetine in the PREDDICT Trial. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020, 24, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thase, M.E.; Jacobsen, P.L.; Hanson, E.; Xu, R.; Tolkoff, M.; Murthy, N.V. Vortioxetine 5, 10, and 20 mg significantly reduces the risk of relapse compared with placebo in patients with remitted major depressive disorder: The RESET study. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 303, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jacobsen, P.; Zhong, W.; Xu, R.; Nomikos, G. A novel study design for investigating relapse prevention in major depressive disorder: Preliminary data from the open-label period of a phase 4 vortioxetine study. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 266, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boulenger, J.-P.; Loft, H.; Florea, I. A randomized clinical study of Lu AA21004 in the prevention of relapse in patients with major depressive disorder. J. Psychopharmacol. 2012, 26, 1408–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mattingly, G.W.; Necking, O.; Schmidt, S.N.; Reines, E.; Ren, H. Long-term safety and efficacy, including anhedonia, of vortioxetine for major depressive disorder: Findings from two open-label studies. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2023, 39, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vieta, E.; Loft, H.; Florea, I. Effectiveness of long-term vortioxetine treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017, 27, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jacobsen, P.L.; Harper, L.; Chrones, L.; Chan, S.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R. Safety and tolerability of vortioxetine (15 and 20 mg) in patients with major depressive disorder: Results of an open-label, flexible-dose, 52-week extension study. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2015, 30, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alam, M.Y.; Jacobsen, P.L.; Chen, Y.; Serenko, M.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in major depressive disorder: Results of an open-label, flexible-dose, 52-week extension study. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2014, 29, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baldwin, D.S.; Hansen, T.; Florea, I. Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in the long-term open-label treatment of major depressive disorder. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2012, 28, 1717–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Papakostas, G.I.; Nielsen, R.Z.; Dragheim, M.; Tonnoir, B. Efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine versus agomelatine, categorized by previous treatment, in patients with major depressive disorder switched after an inadequate response. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2018, 101, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Montgomery, S.A.; Nielsen, R.Z.; Poulsen, L.H.; Häggström, L. A randomised, double-blind study in adults with major depressive disorder with an inadequate response to a single course of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor treatment switched to vortioxetine or agomelatine. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 2014, 29, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, G.; Zhao, K.; Reynaud-Mougin, C.; Loft, H.; Ren, H.; Eriksen, H.-L.F.; Ettrup, A. Successfully treated patients with vortioxetine versus venlafaxine: A simplified cost-effectiveness analysis based on a head-to-head study in Asian patients with major depressive disorder. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2020, 36, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mcintyre, R.S.; Florea, I.; Pedersen, M.M.; Christensen, M.C. Head-To-Head Comparison of Vortioxetine Versus Desvenlafaxine in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder with Partial Response to SSRI Therapy. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2023, 84, 23m14780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Christensen, M.C.; Loft, H.; Mcintyre, R.S. Vortioxetine improves symptomatic and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: A novel dual outcome measure in depressive disorders. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 227, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Shao, S.; Sun, B.; Sun, H. Clinical efficacy of Vortioxetine and escitalopram in the treatment of depression. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2022, 38, 1389–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Levada, O.A.; Troyan, A.S. Cognitive-functional relationships in major depressive disorder: Crucial data from a Ukrainian open-label study of vortioxetine versus escitalopram. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 250, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Baune, B.T.; Sluth, L.B.; Olsen, C.K. The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive performance in working patients with major depressive disorder: A short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 229, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Zajecka, J.; Jacobson, W.; Chen, Y.; Keefe, R.S.E. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Active-Reference, Double-Blind, Flexible-Dose Study of the Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Function in Major Depressive Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015, 40, 2025–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Borhannejad, F.; Shariati, B.; Naderi, S.; Shalbafan, M.; Mortezaei, A.; Sahebolzamani, E.; Saeb, A.; Hosein Mortazavi, S.; Kamalzadeh, L.; Aqamolaei, A.; et al. Comparison of vortioxetine and sertraline for treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients: A double-blind randomized trial. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2020, 45, 804–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, G.; Gislum, M.; Filippov, G.; Montgomery, S. Comparison of vortioxetine versus venlafaxine XR in adults in Asia with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind study. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2015, 31, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alvarez, E.; Perez, V.; Dragheim, M.; Loft, H.; Artigas, F. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, active reference study of Lu AA21004 in patients with major depressive disorder. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 15, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, S.H.; Jeon, S.W.; Shin, C.; Pae, C.U.; Patkar, A.A.; Masand, P.S.; An, H.; Han, C. Acute Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram Versus Desvenlafaxine and Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depression With Cognitive Complaint: A Rater-Blinded Randomized Comparative Study. Psychiatry Investig. 2022, 19, 268–280, Erratum in Psychiatry Investig. 2022, 19, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shin, C.; Jeon, S.W.; Lee, S.-H.; Pae, C.-U.; Hong, N.; Lim, H.K.; Patkar, A.A.; Masand, P.S.; An, H.; Han, C. Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram, Desvenlafaxine, and Vortioxetine in the Acute Treatment of Anxious Depression: A Randomized Rater-blinded 6-week Clinical Trial. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci. 2023, 21, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Santi, N.S.; Biswal, S.B.; Naik, B.N.; Sahoo, J.P.; Rath, B. An Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Open-Label Study of Vilazodone, Escitalopram, or Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder. Cureus 2023, 15, e37858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Vieta, E.; Sluth, L.B.; Olsen, C.K. The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive dysfunction in patients with inadequate response to current antidepressants in major depressive disorder: A short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study versus escitalopram. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 227, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.L.; Chen, Y.; Serenko, M.; Trivedi, M.H. A randomized, double-blind, duloxetine-referenced study comparing efficacy and tolerability of 2 fixed doses of vortioxetine in the acute treatment of adults with MDD. Psychopharmacology 2015, 232, 2061–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Boulenger, J.-P.; Loft, H.; Olsen, C.K. Efficacy and safety of vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), 15 and 20 mg/day: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced study in the acute treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2014, 29, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Katona, C.; Hansen, T.; Olsen, C.K. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced, fixed-dose study comparing the efficacy and safety of Lu AA21004 in elderly patients with major depressive disorder. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2012, 27, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Baldwin, D.S.; Loft, H.; Dragheim, M. A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, duloxetine-referenced, fixed-dose study of three dosages of Lu AA21004 in acute treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 22, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.L.; Chen, Y. A randomized, double-blind trial of 2.5 mg and 5 mg vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) versus placebo for 8 weeks in adults with major depressive disorder. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2013, 29, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cumbo, E.; Cumbo, S.; Torregrossa, S.; Migliore, D. Treatment effects of vortioxetine on cognitive functions in mild Alzheimer’s disease patients with depressive symptoms: A 12 month, open-label, observational study. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019, 6, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jacobsen, P.; Zhong, W.; Nomikos, G.; Clayton, A. Paroxetine, but not Vortioxetine, Impairs Sexual Functioning Compared with Placebo in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J. Sex. Med. 2019, 16, 1638–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Theunissen, E.L.; Street, D.; Højer, A.M.; Vermeeren, A.; Van Oers, A.; Ramaekers, J.G. A Randomized Trial on the Acute and Steady-State Effects of a New Antidepressant, Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), on Actual Driving and Cognition. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 93, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lenze, E.J.; Stevens, A.; Waring, J.D.; Pham, V.T.; Haddad, R.; Shimony, J.; Miller, J.P.; Bowie, C.R. Augmenting Computerized Cognitive Training with Vortioxetine for Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Psychiatry 2020, 177, 548–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jacobsen, P.L.; Nomikos, G.G.; Zhong, W.; Cutler, A.J.; Affinito, J.; Clayton, A. Clinical implications of directly switching antidepressants in well-treated depressed patients with treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction: A comparison between vortioxetine and escitalopram. CNS Spectr. 2019, 25, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chokka, P.; Bougie, J.; Proulx, J.; Tvistholm, A.H.; Ettrup, A. Long-term functioning outcomes are predicted by cognitive symptoms in working patients with major depressive disorder treated with vortioxetine: Results from the AtWoRC study. CNS Spectr. 2019, 24, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chokka, P.; Bougie, J.; Rampakakis, E.; Proulx, J. Assessment in Work Productivity and the Relationship with Cognitive Symptoms (AtWoRC): Primary analysis from a Canadian open-label study of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). CNS Spectr. 2019, 24, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nierenberg, A.A.; Loft, H.; Olsen, C.K. Treatment effects on residual cognitive symptoms among partially or fully remitted patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blinded, exploratory study with vortioxetine. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 250, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jacobsen, P.L.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Chen, Y.; Chrones, L.; Clayton, A.H. Effect of Vortioxetine vs. Escitalopram on Sexual Functioning in Adults with Well-Treated Major Depressive Disorder Experiencing SSRI-Induced Sexual Dysfunction. J. Sex. Med. 2015, 12, 2036–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Moazen-Zadeh, E.; Bayanati, S.; Ziafat, K.; Rezaei, F.; Mesgarpour, B.; Akhondzadeh, S. Vortioxetine as adjunctive therapy to risperidone for treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J. Psychopharmacol. 2020, 34, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Adamo, D.; Pecoraro, G.; Coppola, N.; Calabria, E.; Aria, M.; Mignogna, M. Vortioxetine versus other antidepressants in the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: An open-label randomized trial. Oral Dis. 2020, 27, 1022–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Seddighnia, A.; Tadayon Najafabadi, B.; Ghamari, K.; Noorbala, A.A.; Ebrahimi Daryani, N.; Kashani, L.; Akhondzadeh, S. Vortioxetine effects on quality of life of irritable bowel syndrome patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2019, 45, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Grant, J.E.; Valle, S.; Cavic, E.; Redden, S.A.; Chamberlain, S.R. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vortioxetine in the treatment of binge-eating disorder. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2019, 52, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Biederman, J.; Lindsten, A.; Sluth, L.B.; Petersen, M.L.; Ettrup, A.; Eriksen, H.-L.F.; Fava, M. Vortioxetine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study. J. Psychopharmacol. 2019, 33, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.L.; Serenko, M.; Chen, Y. A randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine 2.5 and 10 mg in acute treatment of adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. Exp. 2014, 29, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.L.; Chen, Y.; Simon, J.S. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced study of the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine in the acute treatment of adults with generalised anxiety disorder. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2013, 68, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rothschild, A.J.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.; Yan, M.; Sheehan, D.V. Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) 5 mg in generalized anxiety disorder: Results of an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in the United States. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 22, 858–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bidzan, L.; Mahableshwarkar, A.R.; Jacobsen, P.; Yan, M.; Sheehan, D.V. Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in generalized anxiety disorder: Results of an 8-week, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 22, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Baldwin, D.S.; Loft, H.; Florea, I. Lu AA21004, a multimodal psychotropic agent, in the prevention of relapse in adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2012, 27, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chen, G.; Nomikos, G.G.; Affinito, J.; Jacobson, W.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Xie, J. Effects of Intrinsic Factors on the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Vortioxetine. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2018, 7, 880–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Matsuno, K.; Nakamura, K.; Aritomi, Y.; Nishimura, A. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Vortioxetine Following Single- and Multiple-Dose Administration in Healthy Japanese Adults. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2018, 7, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chen, G.; Nomikos, G.G.; Affinito, J.; Zhao, Z. Lack of Effect of Vortioxetine on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ethanol, Diazepam, and Lithium. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2016, 55, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wilson, S.; Højer, A.-M.; Buchberg, J.; Areberg, J.; Nutt, D.J. Differentiated effects of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine on sleep architecture: Part 1, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison with paroxetine in healthy men. J. Psychopharmacol. 2015, 29, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chen, G.; Zhang, W.; Serenko, M. Lack of effect of multiple doses of vortioxetine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aspirin and warfarin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015, 55, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, Y.; Nomikos, G.G.; Karim, A.; Munsaka, M.; Serenko, M.; Liosatos, M.; Harris, S. Effect of Vortioxetine on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Adult Male Subjects: Results of a Thorough QT/QTc Study. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2013, 2, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, G.; Lee, R.; Højer, A.-M.; Buchbjerg, J.K.; Serenko, M.; Zhao, Z. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions involving vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), a multimodal antidepressant. Clin. Drug Investig. 2013, 33, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yang, Y.K.; Chen, C.-S.; Tsai, C.-F.; Chang, C.-M.; Lai, T.-J.; Lee, C.-T.; Lin, C.-C.; Lan, T.-H.; Herr, K.J. A Taiwanese study on real-world evidence with vortioxetine in patients with major depression in Asia (TREVIDA). Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2021, 37, 2163–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kim, H.; Baik, S.Y.; Kim, Y.W.; Lee, S.-H. Improved cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder after treatment with vortioxetine: A EEG study. Neuropsychopharmacol. Rep. 2022, 42, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bose, R.; Hamdani, S.U.; Minhas, F.A.; Herr, K.J. A comparison of real-world effectiveness of vortioxetine along the treatment algorithm for major depressive disorder. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2022, 38, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mccue, M.; Sarkey, S.; Eramo, A.; François, C.; Parikh, S.V. Using the Goal Attainment Scale adapted for depression to better understand treatment outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder switching to vortioxetine: A phase 4, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study. BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. De Carlo, V.; Vismara, M.; Grancini, B.; Benatti, B.; Bosi, M.F.; Colombo, A.; Viganò, C.A.; Dell’osso, B. Effectiveness, tolerability, and dropout rates of vortioxetine in comorbid depression: A naturalistic study. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. Exp. 2020, 35, e2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, G.; Xiao, L.; Ren, H.; Simonsen, K.; Ma, J.; Xu, X.; Guo, P.; Wang, Z.; Bai, L.; Heldbo Reines, E.; et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice: Results from the Single-Arm RELIEVE China Study. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2022, 18, 1939–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Almeida, S.S.; Christensen, M.C.; Simonsen, K.; Adair, M. Effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and co-morbid generalized anxiety disorder in routine clinical practice: A subgroup analysis of the RELIEVE study. J. Psychopharmacol. 2023, 37, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mattingly, G.W.; Ren, H.; Christensen, M.C.; Katzman, M.A.; Polosan, M.; Simonsen, K.; Hammer-Helmich, L. Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice: Results of the RELIEVE Study. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 824831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Polosan, M.; Rabbani, M.; Christensen, M.C.; Simonsen, K.; Ren, H. Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice: French Cohort Results from the Global RELIEVE Study. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2022, 18, 1963–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. De Filippis, S.; Pugliese, A.; Christensen, M.C.; Rosso, G.; Di Nicola, M.; Simonsen, K.; Ren, H. Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice in Italy: Results from the RELIEVE Study. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2022, 18, 1665–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mattingly, G.; Brunner, E.; Chrones, L.; Lawrence, D.F.; Simonsen, K.; Ren, H. Effectiveness of vortioxetine for major depressive disorder in real-world clinical practice: US cohort results from the global RELIEVE study. Front. Psychiatry 2023, 13, 977560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Di Nicola, M.; Pepe, M.; Montanari, S.; Spera, M.C.; Panaccione, I.; Simonetti, A.; Sani, G. Vortioxetine improves physical and cognitive symptoms in patients with post-COVID-19 major depressive episodes. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023, 70, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. De Filippis, S.; Lombardozzi, G.; Matrone, M.; Amici, E.; Trovini, G.; Perrini, F.; Di Giovanni, A.; Giovanetti, V.; Kotzalidis, G.D. Differential Response to Three Antidepressants in Patients with Major Depressive Episode Who Suffered COVID-19-Related Trauma. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2022, 20, 2393–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Di Nicola, M.; Dell’osso, B.; Peduto, I.; Cipelli, R.; Pugliese, A.C.; Signorelli, M.S.; Ventriglio, A.; Martinotti, G. Adherence to, and Persistence of, Antidepressant Therapy in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Results from a Population-based Study in Italy. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2023, 21, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Moon, S.W.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, K.Y.; Reines, E.H.; Lee, M.; Park, Y.J. Safety and effectiveness of vortioxetine for major depressive disorder: Real-world evidence from a population-based study in South Korea. Front. Psychiatry 2023, 14, 1075939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Christensen, M.C.; Schmidt, S.; Grande, I. Effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder comorbid with generalized anxiety disorder: Results of the RECONNECT study. J. Psychopharmacol. 2022, 36, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Di Nicola, M.; Pepe, M.; Panaccione, I.; Moccia, L.; Dattoli, L.; Molinaro, M.; Sani, G.; Janiri, L.; Mcintyre, R.S. Effect of vortioxetine in subjects with major depressive and alcohol use disorders: A 6-month retrospective analysis. CNS Spectr. 2020, 27, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. De Berardis, D.; Fornaro, M.; Anastasia, A.; Vellante, F.; Olivieri, L.; Rapini, G.; Serroni, N.; Orsolini, L.; Valchera, A.; Carano, A.; et al. Adjunctive vortioxetine for SSRI-resistant major depressive disorder: A “real-world” chart review study. Braz. J. Psychiatry 2020, 42, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bruno, A.; Zoccali, R.A.; Troili, G.M.; Scala, L.; Pandolfo, G.; Cedro, C.; Mento, C.; Santoro, V.; Spina, E.; Muscatello, M.R.A. Vortioxetine on Cognition in Schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2020, 40, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Reznik, A.M.; Syunyakov, T.S.; Mudrak, A.V.; Zakharov, N.B.; Popova, Z.B.; Khoroshilova, A.N.; Khurbatova, I.G.; Saifulina, A.M.; Eliseenko, A.M.; Matvievskaya, T.K.; et al. Treatment of Depression with Vortioxetine and Second Generation Antipsychotics During the Period of Remission Formation in Schizophrenia (Interim Data Analysis). Consort. Psychiatr. 2023, 4, 18–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Redaelli, S.; Porffy, L.; Oloyede, E.; Dzahini, O.; Lewis, G.; Lobo, M.; Whiskey, E.; Shergill, S.S. Vortioxetine as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2022, 12, 20451253221110014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Siwek, M.; Chrobak, A.; Sołtys, Z.; Dudek, D.; Krupa, A.; Rybakowski, J. A naturalistic, 24-week, open-label, add-on study of vortioxetine in bipolar depression. Psychiatr. Pol. 2022, 56, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Adamo, D.; Pecoraro, G.; Aria, M.; Favia, G.; Mignogna, M.D. Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Mood Disorders Associated with Burning Mouth Syndrome: Results of an Open-Label, Flexible-Dose Pilot Study. Pain Med. 2019, 21, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zizolfi, D.; Poloni, N.; Caselli, I.; Ielmini, M.; Lucca, G.; Diurni, M.; Cavallini, G.; Callegari, C. Resilience and recovery style: A retrospective study on associations among personal resources, symptoms, neurocognition, quality of life and psychosocial functioning in psychotic patients. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2019, 12, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Shah, A.; Northcutt, J. An open-label, flexible dose adaptive study evaluating the efficacy of vortioxetine in subjects with panic disorder. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2018, 17, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Cumbo, E.; Adair, M.; Åstrom, D.O.; Christensen, M.C. Effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and comorbid Alzheimer’s disease in routine clinical practice: An analysis of a post-marketing surveillance study in South Korea. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023, 14, 1037816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Christensen, M.C.; Schmidt, S.N.; Grande, I. Effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and early-stage dementia: The MEMORY study. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 338, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tan, S.N.; Tan, C. Vortioxetine improves cognition in mild cognitive impairment. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2021, 36, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Santos García, D.; Alonso Losada, M.G.; Cimas Hernando, I.; Cabo López, I.; Yáñez Baña, R.; Alonso Redondo, R.; Paz González, J.M.; Cores Bartolomé, C.; Feal Painceiras, M.J.; Íñiguez Alvarado, M.C.; et al. Vortioxetine Improves Depressive Symptoms and Cognition in Parkinson’s Disease Patients with Major Depression: An Open-Label Prospective Study. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Gamberini, G.; Masuccio, F.G.; Ferriero, G.; Cattaneo, D.; Solaro, C. Safety and efficacy of vortioxetine on depressive symptoms and cognition in post-stroke patients: A pilot study. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 286, 108–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Christensen, M.C.; Adair, M.; Loft, H.; Mcintyre, R.S. The Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI): Analysis of the clinically relevant response threshold in patients with major depressive disorder and emotional blunting using data from the COMPLETE study. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 323, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fagiolini, A.; Florea, I.; Loft, H.; Christensen, M.C. Effectiveness of Vortioxetine on Emotional Blunting in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder with inadequate response to SSRI/SNRI treatment. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 283, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Aşçibaşi, K.; Çökmüş, F.P.; Dikici, D.S.; Özkan, H.M.; Alçi, D.; Altunsoy, N.; Kuru, E.; Yüzeren, S.; Aydemir, Ö. Evaluation of Emotional Adverse Effects of Antidepressants. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2020, 40, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ekhart, C.; Van Hunsel, F.; Van Puijenbroek, E.; Chandler, R.; Meldau, E.-L.; Taavola, H.; Norén, G.N. Post-Marketing Safety Profile of Vortioxetine Using a Cluster Analysis and a Disproportionality Analysis of Global Adverse Event Reports. Drug Saf. 2022, 45, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Quilichini, J.-B.; Revet, A.; Garcia, P.; Bouquié, R.; Hamard, J.; Yrondi, A.; Montastruc, F. Comparative effects of 15 antidepressants on the risk of withdrawal syndrome: A real-world study using the WHO pharmacovigilance database. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 297, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Greenblatt, D.J.; Harmatz, J.S.; Chow, C.R. Vortioxetine Disposition in Obesity. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2018, 38, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hughes, S.; Lacasse, J.; Fuller, R.R.; Spaulding-Givens, J. Adverse effects and treatment satisfaction among online users of four antidepressants. Psychiatry Res. 2017, 255, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Healy, D.; Mangin, D.; Lochhead, J. Development and persistence of patient-reported visual problems associated with serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressants. Int. J. Risk Saf. Med. 2022, 33, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Seifert, J.; Letmaier, M.; Greiner, T.; Schneider, M.; Deest, M.; Eberlein, C.K.; Bleich, S.; Grohmann, R.; Toto, S. Psychotropic drug-induced hyponatremia: Results from a drug surveillance program—An update. J. Neural Transm. 2021, 128, 1249–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Revet, A.; Montastruc, F.; Roussin, A.; Raynaud, J.-P.; Lapeyre-Mestre, M.; Nguyen, T.T.H. Antidepressants and movement disorders: A postmarketing study in the world pharmacovigilance database. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bordet, C.; Rousseau, V.; Montastruc, F.; Montastruc, J.-L. QT prolongation and vortioxetine: A post-marketing study and comparison with other serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Psychopharmacol 2020, 237, 1245–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Eugene, A.R. Association of sleep among 30 antidepressants: A population-wide adverse drug reaction study, 2004-2019. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Miao, J.; Wang, G.; Hou, J.; Areberg, J.; Zhao, Y.; Højer, A.-M.; Ettrup, A. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Vortioxetine in the Chinese Population. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 3134–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Mazhar, F.; Pozzi, M.; Gentili, M.; Scatigna, M.; Clementi, E.; Radice, S.; Carnovale, C. Association of Hyponatraemia and Antidepressant Drugs: A Pharmacovigilance–Pharmacodynamic Assessment Through an Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database. CNS Drugs 2019, 33, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Woroń, J.; Siwek, M.; Gorostowicz, A. Adverse effects of interactions between antidepressants and medications used in treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Psychiatr. Pol. 2019, 53, 977–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ozkan, H.M. Galactorrhea and hyperprolactinemia during vortioxetine use: Case report. Turk. J. Biochem. 2018, 44, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Okumus, B. A serious dermatological side effect due to vortioxetine: A case report. J. Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 2020, 33, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Cetin, M.; Kose, S. Serious dermatological adverse effects of vortioxetine: Two cases. Psychiatry Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2018, 28, 355–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ay, R.; Aytas, O. Acneiform eruption associated with the use of vortioxetine. Psychiatry Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2018, 29, 226–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Woroń, J.; Jurkiewicz, D.; Rapiejko, P.; Lorkowska- Zawicka, B.; Tymiński, R.; Wordliczek, J. Drug-induced diseases in otolaryngology—Causes, clinical signs, treatment. Otolaryngol. Pol. 2021, 75, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Chung, K.H. Rapid onset of hemoptysis in a young man treated with vortioxetine. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2021, 75, 266–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Romigi, A.; Vitrani, G.; Caccamo, M.; Centonze, D. Restless Legs Syndrome Related to Vortioxetine. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2019, 39, 514–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Moodliar, S.; Naguy, A.; Alkhadhari, S. Vortioxetine-Related Call–Fleming Syndrome. Am. J. Ther. 2019, 28, e258–e260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kocamer Şahin, Ş.; Elboga, G.; Altindag, A. Meige Syndrome Related to Vortioxetine in 2 Sisters. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2019, 39, 679–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Tunc, E.B.; Tunc, S. Vortioxetine Induced Hypomania: A Case Presentation and Review of the Literature. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci. 2022, 20, 394–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Sobreira, G.; Oliveira, J.; Brissos, S. Vortioxetine-induced manic mood switch in patient with previously unknown bipolar disorder. Braz. J. Psychiatry 2017, 39, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Mazza, M.G.; Rossetti, A.; Botti, E.R.; Clerici, M. Vortioxetine overdose in a suicidal attempt: A case report. Medicine 2018, 97, e10788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Siwek, M.; Gorostowicz, A.; Bosak, M.; Dudek, D. Case Report: Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Epilepsy-Case Series. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 852042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Du, Y.; Jiang, J.; Ng, C.H.; Wu, L.; Zhang, P.; Xi, C.; Lai, J.; Xu, Y.; Hu, S.; Wang, Z. Vortioxetine improves rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: A case report. Medicine 2020, 99, e21003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Crapanzano, C.; Politano, A.; Amendola, C.; Koukouna, D.; Casolaro, I. Vortioxetine-induced nausea and its treatment: A case report. Arch. Clin. Psychiatry 2020, 47, 160–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Pelayo-Terán, J.M.; Martínez-Pérez, M.M.; Zapico-Merayo, Y. Safety in the use of antidepressants: Vortioxetine-induce hyponatremia in a case report. Rev. Psiquiatr. Salud Ment. Engl. Ed. 2017, 10, 219–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Schweimer, J.V.; Brouard, J.T.; Li, Y.; Sánchez, C.; Sharp, T. In vivo electrophysiological study of the targeting of 5-HT(3) receptor-expressing cortical interneurons by the multimodal antidepressant, vortioxetine. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2022, 55, 1409–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Riga, M.S.; Sánchez, C.; Celada, P.; Artigas, F. Involvement of 5-HT 3 receptors in the action of vortioxetine in rat brain: Focus on glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission. Neuropharmacology 2016, 108, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bétry, C.; Pehrson, A.L.; Etiévant, A.; Ebert, B.; Sánchez, C.; Haddjeri, N. The rapid recovery of 5-HT cell firing induced by the antidepressant vortioxetine involves 5-HT3 receptor antagonism. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 16, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Foster, P.; Oxman, T. A descriptive study of adjustment disorder diagnoses in general hospital patients. Ir. J. Psychol. Med. 1994, 11, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. O’donnell, M.L.; Agathos, J.A.; Metcalf, O.; Gibson, K.; Lau, W. Adjustment Disorder: Current Developments and Future Directions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Koenig, H.G.; O’connor, C.M.; Guarisco, S.A.; Zabel, K.M.; Ford, S.M. Depressive Disorder in Older Medical Inpatients on General Medicine and Cardiology Services at a University Teaching Hospital. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 1993, 1, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Koenig, H.G. Depression in Elderly Hospitalized Patients with Medical Illness. Arch. Intern. Med. 1988, 148, 1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Wetterling, T.; Junghanns, K. Affective disorders in older inpatients. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2004, 19, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Zimmerman, M.; Martinez, J.H.; Dalrymple, K.; Chelminski, I.; Young, D. “Subthreshold” Depression. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2013, 74, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Massa, E.; Donisi, C.; Liscia, N.; Madeddu, C.; Impera, V.; Mariani, S.; Scartozzi, M.; Lai, E. The Difficult Task of Diagnosing Depression in Elderly People with Cancer: A Systematic Review. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2021, 17, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Snyder, S.; Strain, J.J.; Wolf, D. Differentiating major depression from adjustment disorder with depressed mood in the medical setting. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 1990, 12, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Casey, P.; Maracy, M.; Kelly, B.D.; Lehtinen, V.; Ayuso-Mateos, J.-L.; Dalgard, O.S.; Dowrick, C. Can adjustment disorder and depressive episode be distinguished? Results from ODIN. J. Affect. Disord. 2006, 92, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Undurraga, J.; Vázquez, G.H.; Tondo, L.; Baldessarini, R.J. Antidepressant responses in direct comparisons of melancholic and non-melancholic depression. J. Psychopharmacol. 2020, 34, 1335–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Parker, G. ‘New’ and ‘old’ antidepressants: All equal in the eyes of the lore? Br. J. Psychiatry 2001, 179, 95–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Cipriani, A.; Furukawa, T.A.; Salanti, G.; Chaimani, A.; Atkinson, L.Z.; Ogawa, Y.; Leucht, S.; Ruhe, H.G.; Turner, E.H.; Higgins, J.P.T.; et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet 2018, 391, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Citrome, L. Vortioxetine for major depressive disorder: An indirect comparison with duloxetine, escitalopram, levomilnacipran, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vilazodone, using number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 196, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Kishi, T.; Ikuta, T.; Sakuma, K.; Okuya, M.; Hatano, M.; Matsuda, Y.; Iwata, N. Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 2023, 28, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Behlke, L.M.; Lenze, E.J.; Carney, R.M. The Cardiovascular Effects of Newer Antidepressants in Older Adults and Those with or At High Risk for Cardiovascular Diseases. CNS Drugs 2020, 34, 1133–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. He, H.; Wang, W.; Lyu, J.; Zheng, J.; Guo, L.; An, X.; Fan, Y.; Ma, X. Efficacy and tolerability of different doses of three new antidepressants for treating major depressive disorder: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2018, 96, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wagner, G.; Schultes, M.-T.; Titscher, V.; Teufer, B.; Klerings, I.; Gartlehner, G. Efficacy and safety of levomilnacipran, vilazodone and vortioxetine compared with other second-generation antidepressants for major depressive disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 228, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 13 00531 g001
Figure 1. Identification of studies via databases and registers.
Figure 1. Identification of studies via databases and registers.
Jcm 13 00531 g001
Table 1. Personal data, medical comorbidities and surgery in included patients.
Table 1. Personal data, medical comorbidities and surgery in included patients.
PatientAgeSexMedical ComorbiditySurgery during Hospitalization
P0165MHigh-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma
Pleuropulmonary infection
Pulmonary embolism		En-bloc resection of sarcoma (including the head of pancreas, duodenum, right kidney, right adrenal gland and right colon)
P0277MComplicated diverticulosis
Chronic ischemic heart disease
Atrial fibrillation
COPD
Chronic anemia
Type 2 diabetes mellitus		Sigmoidectomy
P0364FAdvanced endometrial carcinoma
Intestinal occlusion
Multiple electrolyte imbalance		Decompressive colostomy
P0477MClass 3 obesity
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Systemic arterial hypertension
Atrial fibrillation
Respiratory insufficiency
Burns (15% TBSA)		Multiple escharotomies and reconstructive procedures
P0574FChronic kidney disease
Recurrent urinary infections
Polymetastatic thyroid carcinoma		None
P0673MIschemic heart disease
Atrial fibrillation
Long QT
Thigh sarcoma
Type 2 diabetes mellitus		Thigh sarcoma excision
(limb-sparing surgery)
M: male; F: female; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; TBSA: total body surface area.
Table 2. Vortioxetine dose and co-prescribed psychotropic and non-psychotropic medications.
Table 2. Vortioxetine dose and co-prescribed psychotropic and non-psychotropic medications.
PatientVortioxetine DoseObservation LengthAssociated PsychotropicsNon-Psychiatric Pharmacotherapy
P015 mg4 weeksNoneBisoprolol
Pantoprazole
Enoxaparin
Ondansetron
P025 mg4 weeksDelorazepam 0.5 mg/dayPantoprazole
Metoprolol
Amiodarone
Linagliptin
Furosemide
Umeclidinium
Mesalazine
Warfarin
P0310 mg1 weekMorphine 40 mg/day
Buprenorphine Patch 70 mg/h
Pregabalin 75 mg/night		Ondansetron
Domperidone
Chemotherapy
(Doxorubicin and Cisplatin)
P0410 mg6 weeksMelatonin 2 mg/night
Pregabalin 150 mg/day		Pantoprazole
Olmesartan
Amlodipine
Furosemide
Amiodarone
P0510 mg1 weekLorazepam 1 mg/nightUrsodeoxycholic acid
Fondaparinux
Metoclopramide
Pantoprazole
Levothyroxine
P0610 mg8 weeksDivalproex 750 mg/day
Delorazepam 0.5 mg/night		Metformin
Ranolazine
Zofenopril/HCTZ
Pantoprazole
Metoprolol
Furosemide
Rivaroxaban
Table 3. Efficacy and safety data.
Table 3. Efficacy and safety data.
PatientCGI-S
Baseline		CGI-S
Follow-Up		CGI-ICGI-EISafety IssuesDischarge
P014321NoneDischarged to home
P023225NoneDischarged to home
P0344413NoneTransferred to palliative care facility
P044339NoneTransferred to intermediate care facility
P053225NoneDischarged to home
P065325NauseaDischarged to home
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Weiss, F.; Pacciardi, B.; D’Alessandro, G.; Caruso, V.; Maremmani, I.; Pini, S.; Perugi, G. The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020531

AMA Style

Weiss F, Pacciardi B, D’Alessandro G, Caruso V, Maremmani I, Pini S, Perugi G. The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(2):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020531

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weiss, Francesco, Bruno Pacciardi, Giulia D’Alessandro, Valerio Caruso, Icro Maremmani, Stefano Pini, and Giulio Perugi. 2024. "The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 2: 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020531

APA Style

Weiss, F., Pacciardi, B., D’Alessandro, G., Caruso, V., Maremmani, I., Pini, S., & Perugi, G. (2024). The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(2), 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020531

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop