This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessSystematic Review
The Use of Highly Porous 3-D-Printed Titanium Acetabular Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by
Peter Richard Almeida
Peter Richard Almeida 1,*,
Gavin J. Macpherson
Gavin J. Macpherson 1,2,
Philip Simpson
Philip Simpson 1,2,
Paul Gaston
Paul Gaston 1,2 and
Nick D. Clement
Nick D. Clement 1,2,*
1
Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
2
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 938; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030938 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 January 2025
/
Revised: 28 January 2025
/
Accepted: 29 January 2025
/
Published: 31 January 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: As the rate of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has risen, there has been a drive to improve the technology in the manufacturing of the implants used. One recent advance has been 3-D printing of trabecular titanium implants to improve implant stability and osteointegration. The aim of this study was to review the clinical and radiological outcomes of these acetabular implants in revision THA. Methods: A manual search of the databases of the US National Library of medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane library was performed. The following keywords of “revision total hip arthroplasty” AND “acetabulum” AND “titanium” AND “porous” were utilised. Results: In total, 106 abstracts were identified during manual search of databases. In total, 11 studies reporting 4 different implants, with a total of 597 operated joints in 585 patients were included in this review. There were 349 (59.7%) female patients, and the mean age per study ranged from 56.0 to 78.4 years. The all-cause survival rate was 95.52% (95% CI: 92.37–97.96) at a mean follow up of 3.8 years (95% CI: 2.6–5.1). The 40 cases that required re-operation included 17 (2.8%) for infection, 14 (2.3%) instability, 2 (0.3%) for shell migration and 5 (0.8%) for aseptic loosening. The most commonly used patient reported outcome measure was the Harris Hip Score with the mean post-operative score of 86.7 (95% CI: 84.3–89.1). Conclusion: Trabecular titanium acetabular implants, when used in revision THA, resulted in excellent short- to mid-term outcomes with improved hip specific outcomes and a survivorship of 95.52% over the reported follow-up period. Future prospective studies evaluating long term outcomes are needed to make comparisons between more established solutions used in revision THA.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Almeida, P.R.; Macpherson, G.J.; Simpson, P.; Gaston, P.; Clement, N.D.
The Use of Highly Porous 3-D-Printed Titanium Acetabular Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 938.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030938
AMA Style
Almeida PR, Macpherson GJ, Simpson P, Gaston P, Clement ND.
The Use of Highly Porous 3-D-Printed Titanium Acetabular Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(3):938.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030938
Chicago/Turabian Style
Almeida, Peter Richard, Gavin J. Macpherson, Philip Simpson, Paul Gaston, and Nick D. Clement.
2025. "The Use of Highly Porous 3-D-Printed Titanium Acetabular Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 3: 938.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030938
APA Style
Almeida, P. R., Macpherson, G. J., Simpson, P., Gaston, P., & Clement, N. D.
(2025). The Use of Highly Porous 3-D-Printed Titanium Acetabular Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(3), 938.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030938
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.