Next Article in Journal
Fibromyalgia: Understanding, Diagnosis and Modern Approaches to Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Subthreshold Laser Titration Database in a Population with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy and Dome-Shaped Macula
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Aripiprazole LAI or Paliperidone LAI for the Management of Patients Suffering from Bipolar I Disorder with Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

by
Vassilis Martiadis
1,*,
Enrico Pessina
2,
Fabiola Raffone
1,
Azzurra Martini
2,
Matteo Di Vincenzo
3,
Bianca Della Rocca
3,
Domenico De Berardis
4,
Carlo Ignazio Cattaneo
5 and
Gaia Sampogna
3
1
Department of Mental Health, Asl Napoli 1 Centro, 80125 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Mental Health, Asl Cuneo 2, 12042 Bra, Italy
3
Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
4
Department of Mental Health, Asl Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy
5
Department of Mental Health, Asl Biella, 13900 Biella, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 954; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030954 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 January 2025 / Revised: 30 January 2025 / Accepted: 31 January 2025 / Published: 2 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Bipolar disorder (BD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) often coexist, presenting significant challenges in treatment. OCD comorbidity in BD is associated with severe clinical features such as increased suicidality and impaired functioning. While selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are effective for OCD, they may increase manic shifts in BD patients. The use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics such as monthly aripiprazole (ARI-LAI) and monthly paliperidone (PP-LAI) has been proposed as a promising alternative for BD treatment, while their efficacy and safety in BD-OCD remain understudied. This study investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of ARI-LAI and PP-LAI as adjunctive therapies in this population. Methods: 27 BD-OCD patients were treated with ARI-LAI or PP-LAI, alongside mood stabilizers (MS) (lithium or sodium valproate), over a 24 week period. Clinical and psychopathological assessments were performed at baseline and regular intervals using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Safety and tolerability were evaluated using the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale. Results: Both treatments led to significant reductions in obsessive-compulsive symptoms and mood stabilization without manic episodes. ARI-LAI showed superior tolerability in terms of body weight gain compared to PP-LAI, with no significant differences in overall efficacy between the groups. Conclusions: This study is the first that investigated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive PP-LAI and ARI-LAI in this population highlighting their potential as effective and well-tolerated options for managing BD-OCD. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and refine treatment strategies for this complex population.

1. Introduction

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mental disorder associated with high levels of personal and social disability. According to recent estimates, the incidence of BD is up to 2.4% and patients require pharmacological and psychosocial integrated and personalized management plans. In many cases, patients suffering from BD present other clinical conditions in comorbidity, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety, depressive and personality disorders. Among these comorbid conditions, OCD is quite common with a prevalence varying from 11 to 21% [1,2]. The presence of comorbid OCD in the context of BD is associated with earlier onset, increased suicidal ideation and attempts, psychotic features, rapid cycling, alcohol-related problems and impaired functioning [3,4,5]. Moreover, treating comorbid BD-OCD patients might be particularly challenging since selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)–which represents the first-line treatment for OCD—may induce manic shifts, mixed states or cycle acceleration in patients with BD, especially when prescribed at high doses and for extended periods [6,7]. In particular, clomipramine and SSRIs have been associated with a 39% and 14% risk of inducing hypo/manic shifts in patients with BD [8]. More recently, a systematic review on the treatment of BD-OCD comorbidity found that pharmacological treatments for BD tend to be more effective and less harmful than OCD-specific treatments such as SSRIs [9]. Despite the scanty and heterogeneous evidence available to date, mood stabilization appears to be the primary goal in the treatment of BD-OCD patients [9].
As suggested by many international guidelines, the pharmacological management of patients with BD represents a challenge for clinicians, and several different drugs are indicated. Among the second generation antipsychotics, aripiprazole and paliperidone are commonly prescribed; both antipsychotics have demonstrated efficacy mainly in the management of manic episodes and prevention of manic swings in BD patients, while their effect on depressive polarity appears less robust [10]. According to Italian regulation, only oral prescription of atypical antipsychotics for patients with BD is considered “In label”, the use of long-acting formulation represents an off-label treatment [11].
A recent meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for acute mania showed that both oral aripiprazole and paliperidone outperformed placebo in reducing mania symptoms, with lower discontinuation rates due to ineffectiveness, and showed robust mood-stabilizing properties for the two atypical antipsychotics [12]. Moreover, aripiprazole and paliperidone are often used as augmentation strategies in OCD patients who do not respond to antidepressant treatment [13]. Some evidence suggests that second generation antipsychotics may act as mood stabilizers (MS) and provide anti-obsessive activity, which could be an effective treatment for OCD symptoms in BD patients [14]. Given that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has not yet approved any second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) for the treatment of BD, it would be interesting to investigate these pharmacological options in an Italian real-world setting. This could contribute to a deeper understanding of the clinical challenges associated with BD-OCD comorbidity.
To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no studies that have evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly aripiprazole LAI (ARI-LAI) and monthly paliperidone LAI (PP-LAI) in comorbid BD-OCD patients. Based on these premises, the present retrospective study has been conducted in order to assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive treatment with ARI-LAI or PP-LAI in reducing obsessive-compulsive symptomatology in a sample of real-world patients suffering from BD and comorbid OCD. The choice of LAI formulations over oral ones was based on their potential to improve treatment adherence, deliver consistent therapeutic plasma levels and reduce the risk of missed doses, which is particularly relevant in real-world settings where BD-OCD comorbidity may present additional challenges.

2. Materials and Methods

A retrospective design has been adopted. In particular, patients with a concurrent diagnosis of type I BD and OCD according to DSM-5 criteria [15] and fulfilling the following criteria were included: age 18–70 years, BD-OCD comorbidity, concomitant treatment with ARI-LAI or PP-LAI and sodium valproate or lithium, availability of clinical and psychopathological assessments at fixed intervals, and no concurrent antidepressant treatment. All patients were retrospectively evaluated over a 24-week period (baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12 and week 24) from prescription of ARI-LAI (300–400 mg/month) or PP-LAI (150–100 mg/month) to ongoing MS treatment (lithium or sodium valproate). ARI-LAI or PP-LAI were initiated during the acute phase of BD with concurrent moderate to severe obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Anxiolytics prescription was allowed for the short-term management of anxiety symptoms. ARI-LAI and PP-LAI dosages were consistent with those recommended for schizophrenia, as no established guidelines exist for BD-OCD patients. The dosages were chosen according to clinical judgment to achieve both mood stabilization and obsessive-compulsive symptoms reduction. Exclusion criteria were lack of clinical data before week 8 of the observation period. No other exclusion criteria were considered in order to reproduce as closely as possible the real population of BD-OCD.
Participants were recruited from the Community Mental Health Centers of Bra (northern Italy), Teramo (central Italy) and Naples (southern Italy), either by referral from a general practitioner or other psychiatrist, or by self-referral. All psychiatric diagnoses and clinical assessments, as well as decisions regarding LAI starting dosages and changes, were based on the clinical judgement of an expert psychiatrist (>10 years of clinical experience in the treatment of BD-OCD). Sodium valproate and lithium levels were monitored monthly to ensure therapeutic range (lithium: 0.5–0.8 mmol/L; sodium valproate: 50–100 mcg/L). Follow-up visits were performed according to usual clinical practice. Given the retrospective, real-world nature of the study, treatment decisions were not influenced and patients received usual outpatient care. The clinical records examined covered the period from January 2021 to July 2023.
All patients signed a written informed consent for their medical data to be treated anonymously for possible use in teaching or research. Written informed consent was also obtained for off-label treatment. The retrospective nature of the data collected did not require a precautionary request to the local Ethics Committee.
A review of medical records and interviews to patients’ referring clinicians were used to collect socio-demographic and clinical information on each subject. Control visits were conducted according to clinical practice during the 24-week follow-up period. The severity of clinical symptoms was assessed by a trained psychiatrist or psychologist using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) [16], the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) [17], the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) [18], the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) [19], and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) [20]. The safety and tolerability of adjunctive treatment with ARI-LAI and PP-LAI was assessed using the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale [21].
The primary outcome was the mean change in YBOCS scores from baseline to endpoint, measuring the efficacy of adjunctive ARI-LAI and PP-LAI.
General linear model for repeated measures was used to look for statistically significant changes in primary outcome during the observation period. The unpaired t-test was used to compare the efficacy of the two treatments. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS® software (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY, USA). Significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

The final sample consisted of 27 patients, mainly male (55.6%) with a mean age of 43.9 ± 11.5 (standard deviation, SD) years and a mean duration of the illness of 18.3 (±5.3) (Table 1). In 66.7% of cases (n = 18), patients were treated with lithium and 33.3% (n = 9) with sodium valproate; a small proportion of patients (18.5%) were prescribed anxiolytics for short-term management of anxiety symptoms with no significant inter-group difference; the bivariate analysis revealed no significant differences in socio-demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups.
Mean dosage of antipsychotics have been summarized in Table 2. No significant differences between the two groups were found from baseline to the 24-week endpoint for any of the psychopathological measures. The mean changes in HDRS, YBOCS, BPRS, YMRS and HARS total scores from baseline to endpoint (T24) are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 respectively. Changes in body weight (BW) and body mass index (BMI) from baseline to endpoint (T24) are summarized in Table 3. BW for the PP-LAI group increased from 77.3 ± 19.6 kg to 81.5 ± 19.7 kg, while BW for the ARI-LAI group increased from 70.1 ± 22.9 to 70.9 ± 22.3. The difference between the groups in the mean change in BW (kg) was statistically significant (4.2 ± 2.2 kg for the PP-LAI group vs. 0.8 ± 3.8 kg for the ARI-LAI group, p value = 0.007). BMI increased from 26.1 ± 5.4 to 27.4 ± 5.5 m2/kg for patients in the PP-LAI group and from 24.2 ± 7.6 to 24.6 ± 7.0 m2/kg for patients in the ARI-LAI group. A statistically significant difference was found in the percentage change in BMI between the two groups (5.5 ± 2.8% for the PP-LAI group vs. 1.7 ± 6.1% for the ARI-LAI group, p value = 0.036).

4. Discussion

The clinical management of patients with BD and comorbid OCD represents a relevant challenge for ordinary practice, due to the risk of pharmacological interactions among different drugs to be used. SSRIs, representing the first-line treatment for OCD—have been associated to the risk for hypo/manic switch, particularly at higher doses or over extended periods [8], and for mixed states and cycle acceleration [6,7]. Mood stabilization is widely considered to be the primary treatment goal [9]. However, evidence on the combined management of both BD and OCD remains heterogeneous. While oral atypical antipsychotics are currently used in managing BD-OCD comorbidity, there is still scope for further investigation into the potential benefits of their long-acting formulations. The safety and efficacy of second-generation LAI antipsychotics have been extensively studied in patients with schizophrenia [22,23,24]. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two second-generation LAI antipsychotics for the maintenance treatment of BD (risperidone microspheres, as monotherapy or add-on to a MS, and aripiprazole monohydrate, as monotherapy), whereas no second-generation LAI antipsychotic has been approved by the EMA for BD. A recent systematic review and expert consensus on the use of LAIs in patients with BD recommends the use of these formulations in people with type I BD, rapid-cycling BD and bipolar-type schizoaffective disorder. It also recommends their use in BD patients with poor adherence, multiple episodes, infrequent but severe episodes, residual symptoms while taking multiple oral medications, or a preference for LAIs over oral treatments [25]. However, despite the positive recommendations for second-generation LAI antipsychotics in BD, there are limitations and gaps in the available data on different agents. While ARI-LAIs have been tested in a large, double-blind, randomized trial with a 52-week open-label extension [26,27,28] and examined using national registry data [29], PP-LAIs have only been investigated in case series [30], a small retrospective mirror study [31] and studies using national registry data [29].
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of PP-LAI and ARI-LAI as adjunctive therapy to MS (lithium and sodium valproate) in type I BD patients with comorbid OCD. Despite the small sample size, these results provide valuable clinical information on two long-acting antipsychotics commonly used in the treatment of BD but understudied in patients with BD and even more so in those with BD—OCD comorbidity. The majority of patients were unemployed or unable to work, which is consistent with the poor level of functioning and quality of life in patients with comorbid conditions, compared with those affected either by BD or OCD alone [32]. In line with the study by Bramante et al. [33] reporting that episodic OCD is more frequently associated with BD, in our sample the majority of the sample had an episodic OCD.
At the end of the 24-week observation period, both groups showed a significant reduction in the severity levels of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, with a good mood stability. However, a recent 12-week randomized clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of oral risperidone and oral aripiprazole as adjunctive treatment for OCD in patients with BD [34] found that both oral antipsychotics can be used effectively without serious adverse effects. Another real-world prospective observational study published by Di Salvo et al. [35] reported that 12 weeks of oral aripiprazole added to lithium or sodium valproate can reduce OCD symptoms in patients with BD-OCD. In our study, the treatment response rate was 55.5% (n = 15), as measured by a ≥35% reduction in YBOCS total scores from baseline to Week 24, with no statistically significant differences between groups, demonstrating relevant efficacy for both adjunctive LAI treatments. The discontinuation LAIs have a narrow peak-to-trough fluctuation index and therefore more stable plasma levels: they are therefore thought to be better tolerated than immediate-release formulations [36]. In particular, monthly ARI-LAI have the most favorable peak-to-trough plasma concentration ratio compared to oral antipsychotics, but also to other LAIs at steady state [37]. The higher response rate may be partly explained by the higher adherence to treatment offered by LAI formulations compared with oral antipsychotics. However, this may have been influenced by sample size. Non-adherence to antipsychotics has always been a relevant issue, with an average non-adherence rate of 42% in BD patients [38]. A recent nationwide cohort study on adherence to MS and antipsychotics found a higher discontinuation rate with oral paliperidone compared to oral aripiprazole [39,40,41,42]. Our study did not find statistically significant differences between the two long-acting efficacy profiles, probably due to the limited sample size.
In terms of tolerability, there were no safety issues with treatment with either LAIs, although 48.2% of the total sample had medical comorbidity before starting antipsychotic treatment, mainly hypertension and diabetes. A significant difference in mean body weight and BMI variation was found, in contrast with Shymko et al. [43], highlighting a time-dependent increase in weight after 12 months of treatment in patients with first-episode psychosis. This difference should be due to our short follow-up period (24 vs. 52 weeks) and to the different clinical population considered. However, the impact of LAIs on BW and BMI in patients with BD deserves further studies, since weight gain represents one of the most common reasons for switching antipsychotic therapy. Our results provide clinicians with useful information about the effects of two commonly used LAIs on weight gain in a BD-OCD population that may be prone to adherence problems [44]. Regarding non-weight-related side effects, 22.2% of the total sample reported no side effects (9.1% in the PP-LAI group vs. 31.2% in the ARI-LAI group), supporting an overall good tolerability of both LAIs. While our findings suggest that both treatments were effective and well-tolerated, future studies should explore whether BD-OCD patients require different dosing strategies compared to those used in schizophrenia.
The present study has some limitations, which should be acknowledged. First, the small sample size may have influenced our results and limited their generalizability. Second, the limited follow-up period and the retrospective data collection should have coupled with data collected in a longitudinal real-world study. Third, the lack of routine laboratory tests in the ordinary clinical practice prevented the systematic evaluation of endocrine side effects. Future studies should include prolactin measurements and evaluation of metabolic tolerability to provide a more comprehensive safety profile of ARI-LAI and PP-LAI in BD-OCD patients.

5. Conclusions

Patients with BD and comorbid OCD present a unique clinical challenge due to the complex interplay between these conditions and the risks associated with pharmacological treatments. This study is the first to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive ARI-LAI and PP-LAI, in this population. The results demonstrate significant reductions in obsessive-compulsive symptoms and robust mood stabilization over a 24-week period, without evidence of hypomanic or manic shifts, underscoring the potential of LAI antipsychotics as effective and well-tolerated treatment options for BD-OCD. Key strengths of this study include its focus on a challenging and understudied population, the real-world setting providing practical insights for clinicians, and the detailed assessment of both efficacy and safety outcomes. Additionally, the findings provide valuable information on weight-related tolerability, which is a crucial factor influencing adherence in bipolar patients. The present study should be useful for promoting further rigorous, longitudinal and multicentric studies on the efficacy and effectiveness of LAI antipsychotics in treating patients with BD-OCD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M., E.P., G.S. and C.I.C.; methodology, C.I.C.; software, B.D.R. and M.D.V.; data curation, F.R., A.M. and D.D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, V.M.; writing—review and editing, G.S. and E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BDBipolar disorder
OCDObsessive-compulsive disorder
SSRISelective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
LAILong-acting injectable antipsychotic
ARIAripiprazole
PPPaliperidone
YBOCSYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
HDRSHamilton Depression Rating Scale
BPRSBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale
YMRSYoung Mania Rating Scale
HARS Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
BWBody weight
BMIBody mass index
SDStandard deviation
FDAFood & Drug Administration
EMAEuropean Medicines Agency

References

  1. Chen, Y.W.; Dilsaver, S.C. Comorbidity for obsessive-compulsive disorder in bipolar and unipolar disorders. Psychiatry Res. 1995, 59, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Amerio, A.; Stubbs, B.; Odone, A.; Tonna, M.; Marchesi, C.; Ghaemi, S.N. The prevalence and predictors of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 186, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zutshi, A.; Reddy, Y.C.; Thennarasu, K.; Chandrashekhar, C.R. Comorbidity of anxiety disorders in patients with remitted bipolar disorder. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2006, 256, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shashidhara, M.; Sushma, B.R.; Viswanath, B.; Math, S.B.; Reddy, Y.C. Comorbid obsessive compulsive disorder in patients with bipolar-I disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 174, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Di Salvo, G.; Pessina, E.; Aragno, E.; Martini, A.; Albert, U.; Maina, G.; Rosso, G. Impact of comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder on suicidality in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 290, 113088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Math, S.B.; Janardhan Reddy, Y.C. Issues in the pharmacological treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2007, 61, 1188–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pacchiarotti, I.; Bond, D.J.; Baldessarini, R.J.; Nolen, W.A.; Grunze, H.; Licht, R.W.; Post, R.M.; Berk, M.; Goodwin, G.M.; Sachs, G.S.; et al. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2013, 170, 1249–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Perugi, G.; Toni, C.; Frare, F.; Travierso, M.C.; Hantouche, E.; Akiskal, H.S. Obsessive-compulsive-bipolar comorbidity: A systematic exploration of clinical features and treatment outcome. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2002, 63, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Amerio, A.; Odone, A.; Marchesi, C.; Ghaemi, S.N. Treatment of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2014, 166, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sampogna, G.; Di Vincenzo, M.; Giuliani, L.; Menculini, G.; Mancuso, E.; Arsenio, E.; Cipolla, S.; Della Rocca, B.; Martiadis, V.; Signorelli, M.S.; et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs on the quality of life of patients with schizophrenia. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Keramatian, K.; Chakrabarty, T.; Yatham, L.N. Long-acting injectable second generation/atypical antipsychotics for the management of bipolar disorder: A systematic review. CNS Drugs 2019, 33, 431–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kishi, T.; Ikuta, T.; Matsuda, Y.; Sakuma, K.; Okuya, M.; Nomura, I.; Hatano, M.; Iwata, N. Pharmacological treatment for bipolar mania: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials. Mol. Psychiatry 2022, 27, 1136–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brakoulias, V.; Stockings, E. A systematic review of the use of risperidone, paliperidone and aripiprazole as augmenting agents for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2019, 20, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mucci, F.; Toni, C.; Favaretto, E.; Vannucchi, G.; Marazziti, D.; Perugi, G. Obsessive-compulsive disorder with comorbid bipolar disorders: Clinical features and treatment implications. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 5722–5730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodman, W.K.; Price, L.H.; Rasmussen, S.A.; Mazure, C.; Fleischmann, R.L.; Hill, C.L.; Heninger, G.R.; Charney, D.S. The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1989, 46, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1960, 23, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mueser, K.T.; Curran, P.J.; McHugo, G.J. Factor structure of the brief psychiatric rating scale in schizophrenia. Psychol. Assess. 1997, 9, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Young, R.C.; Biggs, J.T.; Ziegler, V.E.; Meyer, D.A. A rating scale for mania: Reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br. J. Psychiatry 1978, 133, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Thompson, E. Hamilton rating scale for anxiety (HAM-A). Occup. Med. 2015, 65, 601–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lingjaerde, O.; Ahlfors, U.G.; Bech, P.; Dencker, S.J.; Elgen, K. The UKU side effect rating scale. A new comprehensive rating scale for psychotropic drugs and a cross-sectional study of side effects in neuroleptic-treated patients. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 1987, 334, 1–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kishimoto, T.; Nitta, M.; Borenstein, M.; Kane, J.M.; Correll, C.U. Long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of mirror-image studies. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2013, 74, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Misawa, F.; Kishimoto, T.; Hagi, K.; Kane, J.M.; Correll, C.U. Safety and tolerability of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing the same antipsychotics. Schizophr. Res. 2016, 176, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Berardis, D.; Vellante, F.; Olivieri, L.; Rapini, G.; De Lauretis, I.; Orsolini, L.; Valchera, A.; Carano, A.; Bustini, M.; De Persis, S.; et al. The effect of paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable (PP-LAI) on “non-core” symptoms of schizophrenia: A retrospective, collaborative, multicenter study in the “real world” everyday clinical practice. Riv. Psichiatr. 2021, 56, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Chou, Y.H.; Chu, P.C.; Wu, S.W.; Lee, J.C.; Lee, Y.H.; Sun, I.W.; Chang, C.L.; Huang, C.L.; Liu, I.C.; Tsai, C.F.; et al. A systemic review and experts’ consensus for long-acting injectable antipsychotics in bipolar disorder. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci. 2015, 13, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Calabrese, J.R.; Sanchez, R.; Jin, N.; Amatniek, J.; Cox, K.; Johnson, B.; Perry, P.; Hertel, P.; Such, P.; Salzman, P.M.; et al. Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole once-monthly in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week randomized withdrawal study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2017, 78, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Calabrese, J.R.; Sanchez, R.; Jin, N.; Amatniek, J.; Cox, K.; Johnson, B.; Perry, P.; Hertel, P.; Such, P.; McQuade, R.D.; et al. Symptoms and functioning with aripiprazole once-monthly injection as maintenance treatment for bipolar I disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 227, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Calabrese, J.R.; Jin, N.; Johnson, B.; Such, P.; Baker, R.A.; Madera, J.; Hertel, P.; Ottinger, J.; Amatniek, J.; Kawasaki, H. Aripiprazole once-monthly as maintenance treatment for bipolar I disorder: A 52-week, multicenter, open-label study. Int. J. Bipolar Disord. 2018, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yan, T.; Greene, M.; Chang, E.; Hartry, A.; Touya, M.; Broder, M.S. All-cause hospitalization and associated costs in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder initiating long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2018, 34, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Buoli, M.; Ciappolino, V.; Altamura, A.C. Paliperidone palmitate depot in the long-term treatment of psychotic bipolar disorder: A case series. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2015, 38, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Caliskan, A.M.; Calisir, S.; Caliskan, S.; Arslan, M.; Inanli, I.; Eren, I. Impact of initiating long-acting injectable paliperidone palmitate on relapse and hospitalization in patients with bipolar I disorder: A mirror image retrospective study. Asian J. Psychiatry 2020, 54, 102457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amerio, A.; Odone, A.; Liapis, C.C.; Ghaemi, S.N. Diagnostic validity of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2014, 129, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bramante, S.; Rigardetto, S.; Borgogno, R.; Mehanović, E.; Pellegrini, L.; Albert, U.; Maina, G. Episodic obsessive-compulsive disorder and bipolar spectrum disorder: New evidence from a large Italian OCD sample. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 2023, 27, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khorshidian, F.; Hamidia, A.; Kheirkhah, F.; Moghadamnia, A.A.; Bijani, A.; Mirtabar, S.M.; Koutanaei, S.J. Comparison of aripiprazole and risperidone effectiveness in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder in patients with bipolar disorder: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Health Sci. Rep. 2023, 6, e1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Di Salvo, G.; Maina, G.; Pessina, E.; Teobaldi, E.; Barbaro, F.; Martini, A.; Albert, U.; Rosso, G. Aripiprazole augmentation to mood stabilizers for obsessive-compulsive symptoms in bipolar disorder. Medicina 2020, 57, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sheehan, J.J.; Reilly, K.R.; Fu, D.J.; Alphs, L. Comparison of the peak-to-trough fluctuation in plasma concentration of long-acting injectable antipsychotics and their oral equivalents. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 2012, 9, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  37. Correll, C.U.; Kim, E.; Kern Sliwa, J.; Hamm, W.; Gopal, S.; Mathews, M.; Venkatasubramanian, R.; Saklad, S.R. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of long-acting injectable antipsychotics for schizophrenia: An overview. CNS Drugs 2021, 35, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Saínza García, S.; Martínez-Cengotitabengoa, M.; López-Zurbano, S.; Zorrilla, I.; López, P.; Vieta, E.; González-Pinto, A. Adherence to antipsychotic medication in bipolar disorder and schizophrenic patients. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2016, 36, 355–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lintunen, J.; Lahteenvuo, M.; Tanskanen, A.; Tiihonen, J.; Taipale, H. Non-adherence to mood stabilizers and antipsychotics among persons with bipolar disorder: A nationwide cohort study. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 333, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luciano, M.; Sampogna, G.; Della Rocca, B.; Simonetti, A.; De Fazio, P.; Di Nicola, M.; Di Lorenzo, G.; Pepe, M.; Sambataro, F.; Signorelli, M.S.; et al. The impact of affective temperaments on suicidal ideation and behaviors: Results from an observational multicentric study on patients with mood disorders. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Di Vincenzo, M.; Sampogna, G.; Della Rocca, B.; Brandi, C.; Mancuso, E.; Landolfi, L.; Volpicelli, A.; Di Cerbo, A.; Fiorillo, A.; Luciano, M. What influences psychological functioning in patients with mood disorders? The role of clinical, sociodemographic, and temperamental characteristics in a naturalistic study. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2022, 21, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Favaretto, E.; Bedani, F.; Brancati, G.; De Berardis, D.; Giovannini, S.; Scarcella, L.; Martiadis, V.; Martini, A.; Pampaloni, I.; Perugi, G.; et al. Synthesizing 30 years of clinical experience and scientific insight on affective temperaments in psychiatric disorders: State of the art. J. Affect. Disord. 2024, 362, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shymko, G.; Grace, T.; Jolly, N.; Dobson, L.; Hacking, D.; Parmar, A.; Kapi, P.; Waters, F. Weight gain and metabolic screening in young people with early psychosis on long-acting injectable antipsychotic medication (aripiprazole vs. paliperidone). Early Interv. Psychiatry 2021, 15, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Perkins, A.; Khandker, R.; Overley, A.; Solid, C.; Chekani, F.; Roberts, A.; Dexter, P.; Boustani, M.; Hulvershorn, L. Association of antipsychotic-related weight gain with treatment adherence and switching using electronic medical records data. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 2023, 25, 22m03310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. HDRS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.01; PP-LAI p < 0.01; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Figure 1. HDRS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.01; PP-LAI p < 0.01; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Jcm 14 00954 g001
Figure 2. YBOCS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.01; PP-LAI p < 0.01; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Figure 2. YBOCS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.01; PP-LAI p < 0.01; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Jcm 14 00954 g002
Figure 3. BPRS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.001; PP-LAI p < 0.001; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Figure 3. BPRS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.001; PP-LAI p < 0.001; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Jcm 14 00954 g003
Figure 4. YMRS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.01; PP-LAI p < 0.01; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Figure 4. YMRS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.01; PP-LAI p < 0.01; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Jcm 14 00954 g004
Figure 5. HARS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.01; PP-LAI p < 0.01; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Figure 5. HARS total scores in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups across timepoints (weeks). (GLM for repeated measures; ARI-LAI p < 0.01; PP-LAI p < 0.01; ARI-LAI vs. PP-LAI p > 0.5).
Jcm 14 00954 g005
Table 1. Participants’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.
Table 1. Participants’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.
Global Sample
(n = 27)
PP-LAI
(n = 16)
ARI-LAI
(n = 11)
Gender, female, % (N)44.4 (12)37.5 (6)54.5 (6)
Age, M (SD)43.9 (11.5)44.6 (11.7)42.8 (11.7)
Living situation, % (N)
Single
Married
Separated
Widowed

70.4 (19)
11.1 (3)
14.8 (4)
3.7 (1)

81.3 (13)
6.3 (1)
12.5 (2)
0 (0)

54.5 (6)
18.2 (2)
18.2 (2)
9.1 (1)
Children, yes, % (N)25.9 (7)18.8 (3)36.4 (4)
Years of education, M (SD)13.0 (1.2)11.9 (0.7)14.7 (2.7)
Occupation, % (N)
Unemployed
Blue collar
Homemaker
Farmer
Clerk
Student
Retired
Unable to work

22.2 (6)
22.2 (6)
3.7 (1)
3.7 (1)
3.7 (1)
3.7 (1)
7.4 (2)
33.3 (9)

31.3 (5)
12.5 (2)
6.3 (1)
6.3 (1)
6.3 (1)
0 (0)
6.3 (1)
31.3 (5)

9.1 (1)
36.4 (4)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
9.1 (1)
9.1 (1)
36.4 (4)
Suicide attempt, yes, % (N)48.1 (13)43.8 (7)54.5 (6)
Psychiatric comorbidities, % (N)
No
Anxiety
Gambling
Anorexia nervosa
Dysmorphophobia
Skin picking

63.0 (17)
3.7 (1)
7.4 (2)
11.1 (3)
11.1 (3)
3.7 (1)

62.5 (10)
0 (0)
12.5 (2)
12.5 (2)
12.5 (2)
0 (0)

63.6 (7)
9.1 (1)
0 (0)
9.1 (1)
9.1 (1)
9.1 (1)
Mood stabilizer % (N)
Lithium
Valproate

66.7 (18)
33.3 (9)

62.5 (10)
37.5 (6)

72.7 (8)
27.3 (3)
OCD Course % (N)
Episodic
Chronic

62.9 (17)
27.1 (10)

56.2 (9)
33.8 (7)

81.8 (9)
18.2 (2)
Table 2. LAI antipsychotics dosages across timepoints (weeks).
Table 2. LAI antipsychotics dosages across timepoints (weeks).
T0 (n = 27)T4 (n = 27)T8 (n = 26)T12 (n = 24)T24 (n = 22)
PP-LAI,
yes, % (N)
50 mg
75 mg
100 mg
150 mg


0 (0)
0 (0)
62.5 (10)
37.5 (6)


0 (0)
25 (4)
50 (8)
25 (4)


20.0 (3)
13.3 (2)
53.3 (8)
13.3 (2)


23.1 (3)
7.7 (1)
53.8 (7)
15.4 (2)


25.0 (3)
8.3 (1)
50.0 (6)
16.7 (2)
ARI-LAI
yes, % (N)
300 mg
400 mg


0 (0)
100 (11)


0 (0)
100 (11)


9.1 (1)
90.9 (10)


9.1 (1)
90.9 (10)


10.0 (1)
90.0 (10)
Table 3. Body weight and BMI variations in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups.
Table 3. Body weight and BMI variations in PP-LAI and ARI-LAI groups.
PP-LAI (n = 16)
Mean (DS)
ARI-LAI (n = 11)
Mean (DS)
p Value
BW T0 (kg)77.3 (19.6)70.1 (22.9)0.388
BW T24 (kg)81.5 (19.7)70.9 (22.3)0.206
BMI T026.1 (5.4)24.2 (7.6)0.446
BMI T2427.4 (5.5)24.6 (7.0)0.242
Mean BW variation (kg)4.2 (2.2)0.8 (3.8)0.007
Mean BW variation (%)5.6 (2.7)1.6 (6.2)0.029
BMI variation (m2/kg)1.3 (0.9)0.4 (1.7)0.073
BMI variation (%)5.5 (2.8)1.7 (6.1)0.036
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martiadis, V.; Pessina, E.; Raffone, F.; Martini, A.; Di Vincenzo, M.; Della Rocca, B.; De Berardis, D.; Cattaneo, C.I.; Sampogna, G. Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Aripiprazole LAI or Paliperidone LAI for the Management of Patients Suffering from Bipolar I Disorder with Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030954

AMA Style

Martiadis V, Pessina E, Raffone F, Martini A, Di Vincenzo M, Della Rocca B, De Berardis D, Cattaneo CI, Sampogna G. Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Aripiprazole LAI or Paliperidone LAI for the Management of Patients Suffering from Bipolar I Disorder with Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(3):954. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030954

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martiadis, Vassilis, Enrico Pessina, Fabiola Raffone, Azzurra Martini, Matteo Di Vincenzo, Bianca Della Rocca, Domenico De Berardis, Carlo Ignazio Cattaneo, and Gaia Sampogna. 2025. "Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Aripiprazole LAI or Paliperidone LAI for the Management of Patients Suffering from Bipolar I Disorder with Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 3: 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030954

APA Style

Martiadis, V., Pessina, E., Raffone, F., Martini, A., Di Vincenzo, M., Della Rocca, B., De Berardis, D., Cattaneo, C. I., & Sampogna, G. (2025). Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Aripiprazole LAI or Paliperidone LAI for the Management of Patients Suffering from Bipolar I Disorder with Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(3), 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030954

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop