Next Article in Journal
Severe Infection in Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease: A Retrospective Multicenter French Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived Extracellular Vesicles (MSC-EVs) in Normal and Abnormal Hematopoiesis and Their Therapeutic Potential
Previous Article in Journal
Parafoveal and Peripapillary Perfusion Predict Visual Field Recovery in Chiasmal Compression due to Pituitary Tumors
Previous Article in Special Issue
MSC Based Therapies—New Perspectives for the Injured Lung
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Cell-Expansion and Inflammation on The Immune-Biology of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

1
Department of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
2
Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 121 Boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgium
3
Genetics and Immune Cell Therapy Unit, Faculty of Sciences, University Mohammed Premier, Oujda 60000, Morocco
4
Osteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 900 Saint-Denis, R11.424, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
5
Laboratory of Clinical Cell Therapy, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Co-first authors.
Co-senior authors.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(3), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030696
Submission received: 8 January 2020 / Revised: 30 January 2020 / Accepted: 21 February 2020 / Published: 4 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells in Immunity and Disease)

Abstract

:
Background: As a cell-based therapeutic, AT-MSCs need to create an immuno-reparative environment appropriate for tissue repair. In the presence of injury, MSCs may have to proliferate and face inflammation. Clinical application requires repeated administrations of a high number of cells with a well-established immune profile. Methods: We have established an immuno-comparative screening by determining the expression of 28 molecules implicated in immune regulation. This screening was performed during cell-expansion and inflammatory priming of AT-MSCs. Results: Our study confirms that AT-MSCs are highly expandable and sensitive to inflammation. Both conditions have substantially modulated the expression of a panel of immunological marker. Specifically, CD34 expression was substantially decreased upon cell-passaging. HLA-ABC, CD40 CD54, CD106, CD274 and CD112 were significantly increased by inflammation. In vitro cell-expansion also significantly altered the expression profile of HLA-DR, CD40, CD62L, CD106, CD166, HLA-G, CD200, HO-1, CD155 and ULBP-3. Conclusion: This study points out the response and characteristics of MSCs following expansion and inflammatory priming. It will strength our knowledge about the molecular mechanisms that may improve or hamper the therapeutic potential of MSCs. These immunological changes need to be further characterized to guarantee a safe cellular product with consistent quality and high therapeutic efficacy.

1. Introduction

The use of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as a cellular therapeutic product is actually harboring relevant perspectives and challenges. MSCs are undifferentiated, multipotent postnatal cells that reside within their niche between differentiated cells of the specific organ or tissue [1]. Normally they are found in a quiescent state and they will be activated in the case of disease or tissue damage, in order to repair the affected organ(s) or tissue(s) [2]. MSCs are defined by their self-renewal and in vitro differentiation potential. They also have a favorable phenotype and immunoregulatory profile. Therefore, their therapeutic potential is explored for cell-based therapies going from tissue repair, over regenerative medicine to immunomodulation [3,4,5]. MSCs reside within several human tissues, including the bone marrow, the skin, the umbilical cord and adipose tissue. When isolated for therapeutic purposes, important parameters should be considered, such as accessibility of the organ/tissue, the safety of the collection procedure and the amount of MSCs that can be isolated. Adipose tissue (AT) represents an ideal source for MSC isolation, as it is ubiquitously present in every human, and high numbers of MSCs can be harvested by using a minimally invasive procedure (liposuction) [6,7]. Moreover, some factors are believed to be relevant regarding the therapeutic success of using cultured MSCs: targeting the right donor population, addressing the optimal culture conditions and selecting the patient population that is most likely to give a positive therapeutic response [8].
MSCs, including AT-MSCs, are often investigated as cellular therapeutic product for managing diseases in which different environmental signals, such as inflammation, contribute to tissue damage [9]. Inflammation is likely to regulate several features of stem cells and thus to play an important role in health and disease [10]. Importantly, it can shape stem cells and stemness during infection and beyond. Furthermore, clinical applications of MSCs demand repeated administrations and large amounts of cells. This implies in vitro expansion of the obtained AT-MSCs throughout serial passaging [11]. Accordingly, the safety and efficiency of AT-MSCs as therapeutic products are closely related to their profile. We previously indicated that some immunobiological criteria that define MSCs may contribute to reach the right therapeutic issue [12]. The expression and modulation of molecules belonging to the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) family, co-stimulatory pathway, cell–cell interaction pattern and immunoregulatory factors are of importance in governing the immunological behavior of MSCs [13]. Several immune-related molecules are involved in graft rejection and tissue repair. Recognition of foreign HLA class I and II molecules are critical for the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and allograft rejection. They operate as primary targets of the immune response and play a role in lymphocytes’ activation throughout co-stimulatory molecules [11,14,15]. It is now recognized that the communication of AT-MSCs with the environment is an essential part of their tissue repair process. MSCs can actively sense their surroundings and modulate, accordingly, their fate and behavior. In the presence of injury, AT-MSCs may have to proliferate (cell-expansion), as well as respond to inflammatory signals (inflammation), in order to create an immuno-reparative microenvironment. It is therefore important to understand the effect of cell-expansion and inflammation on the immune-biology of MSCs, in order to maximize their beneficial outcomes. In comparison to previous studies, this is the first time that these two relevant features of MSCs are explored and, most importantly, investigated in combination. The immunological profile of the AT-MSCs, obtained by Ficoll gradient centrifugation, was evaluated by flow cytometric analyses, under these two conditions. The expression of cell adhesion molecules, immune regulatory molecules and natural killer ligands were thus investigated. A detailed characterization of AT-MSCs under these conditions, with 28 examined markers, is therefore presented. Several changes and alterations within the expression profiles of these molecules are observed during cell-expansion and inflammation. Such an analysis will greatly help us to understand the molecular mechanisms that may improve or hamper the therapeutic potential of AT-MSCs, contributing thus to the efforts in developing a quality, safe and efficient cellular-therapeutic product.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Adipose Tissue Collection

After the patients signed informed consent forms, we collected lipoaspirate from male and female patients (age range 26–46 [36 ± 9] years) undergoing elective liposuction. The procedure was run in cooperation with the Department of Plastic Surgery of the UZ-Brussels (Brussels, Belgium) and the ATLAS clinic (Brussels, Belgium).

2.2. Isolation and Cultivation of AT-MSCs

AT-MSCs were isolated from 6 patients, as previously reported [16]. In brief, 125 mL of liposuction material was extensively washed by centrifugation (3 min at 600 g), using equal volumes of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove erythrocytes. The samples were incubated for 45 min, at 37 °C, with dissociation medium (1:1), that is, 125 mL aliquots of fat + 125 mL of dissociation medium. The latter consists of 1% (v/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Diegem, Belgium) and 1 mg/mL collagenase A (Roche Applied Science, Vilvoorde, Belgium) in PBS. The digested tissue was then passed through a mesh filter, to remove connective tissue debris. Subsequently, the filtrate was centrifuged for 10 min, at 600 g (4 °C), and the supernatant is removed. In the classical Ficoll gradient protocol, the cells were suspended in 50 mL of PBS supplemented with 1% (v/v) BSA and centrifuged again for 10 min, at 600 g (4 °C), after which the pellet was resuspended in 30 mL of PBS and supplemented with 1% (v/v) BSA. The cell suspension was then carefully brought on top of 15 mL of Ficoll gradient solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and centrifuged for 20 min, at 1000 g (4 °C). Upon centrifugation, the top layer was removed and the AT-MSCs were collected in 50 mL of PBS supplemented with 1% (v/v) BSA. The cell suspension was centrifuged for 10 min, at 600 g (8 °C), after which the supernatant was removed. The cell pellet was cultured in a 58 cm2 Petri dish (Greiner Bio One, Vilvoorde, Belgium) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Lonza, Braine-1′Alleud, Belgium) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Perbio Science, Erembodegem-Aalst, Belgium), 7.33 IU/mL of benzyl penicillin (Continental Pharma, Brussels, Belgium), 50 μg/mL of streptomycin sulphate (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2.5 μg/mL of Fungizone (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium). This stage is referred to as the primary culture (PM). After 5 days of culture at 37 °C, under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air, non-adherent cells were removed by replacing the medium. Throughout the culture period, the growth medium was changed once a week. Culture was pursued until 90% confluence was reached. Then, the cells were harvested, using TrypLE Select, and counted, using a 0.4% (w/v) trypan blue dye solution (Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were replated at a low-density of 1000 cells/cm2 (= passage 1). Cell populations were expanded and cultured in a similar way, until passage (P) 4.

2.3. Pro-Inflammatory Stimulation

The influence of an inflammatory signal on AT-MSCs was performed as described before [17]. Briefly, AT-MSCs were incubated for 18 h, with a pro-inflammatory cytokine cocktail containing 25 ng/mL of interleukin (IL)-1β (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), 50 ng/mL of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, 3000 U/mL or 10 ng/mL of interferon (IFN)-α and 1000 U/mL or 50 ng/mL of IFN-γ (all from Prospec Inc., Rehovot, Israel). After that, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed so they became available for further culture or analysis.

2.4. Flow Cytometric Analysis

The expression profile of 28 molecules was addressed by flow cytometry on a MacsQuant analyzer (MiltenyiBiotec, GmbH, Bergisch, Germany), using fluorochrome labeled monoclonal antibodies (Supplementary Table S1), as previously described [18]. Both the percentage (%) of positive cells and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each molecule were determined. The MFI represents the amount of each marker per cell that is present within the population.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

For statistical comparison of the flow cytometric analyses concerning the immunophenotype of the normal versus the pro-inflammatory conditions and the effect of in vitro expansion, a two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons was performed. A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 is considered statistically significant (Prism v5.0d, Graph-Pad Software, USA).

3. Results

The phenotype of AT-MSCs was assessed by examining the constitutive expression of well-known immunological surface markers and immune regulatory molecules during in vitro expansion (PM-P1-P2-P3-P4), in the presence and absence of a pro-inflammatory signal. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM for each investigated marker in Supplementary Table S2 (percentage positive cells) and Supplementary Table S3 (MFI). These tables contain the data obtained for each passage (PM-P4) in the normal and the pro-inflammatory conditions.

3.1. Hematopoietic and Stromal Markers

AT-MSCs are reported to be positive for the hematopoietic stem cell marker cluster of differentiation (CD) 34. Such expression is likely to decrease during culture, until its disappearance [19]. We confirmed that the percentage of AT-MSCs expressing CD34 significantly decreases during in vitro expansion, both in normal and pro-inflammatory conditions. However, no significant differences could be detected in the amount of CD34 molecules expressed per cell. Furthermore, it was observed that, neither inflammation nor in vitro expansion has an impact on the expression of the stromal markers CD73 and CD105 (Figure 1; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

3.2. Human Leukocyte Antigens

Under normal conditions, AT-MSCs express HLA-ABC and intracellular (i) HLA-G, whilst a very-low to low expression is seen for HLA-DR and membrane bound (m) HLA-G, respectively. In vitro expansion of AT-MSCs significantly decreases the expression of HLA-DR, mHLA-G and iHLA-G. Indeed, for HLA-DR and iHLA-G, this is observed during the first passage only, whereas for mHLA-G, the expression further decreases for two more consecutive passages. For both HLA-DR and mHLA-G, this observation is also true in the pro-inflammatory conditions. In addition, pro-inflammatory stimulation significantly increases the expression of HLA-ABC per cell in AT-MSCs over the entire in vitro expansion period (Figure 2; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

3.3. Co-Stimulatory Molecules

Under normal conditions, the co-stimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, CD134 and CD252 are only expressed by a low to very low percentage of AT-MSCs, whereas approximately 50% of AT-MSCs express CD40. Inflammation specifically affects the expression of the co-stimulatory molecule CD40 because a significant upregulation is detected for all the consecutive passages upon priming of AT-MSCs with inflammation. Moreover, for PM, a significant increase is observed upon pro-inflammatory stimulation for the amount of CD40 that is expressed per cell. Furthermore, in vitro expansion of AT-MSCs significantly decreases the expression of CD40 and CD80, and CD40 and CD86, respectively, in normal and pro-inflammatory conditions. No significant changes in CD134 and CD252 expression could be observed (Figure 3; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

3.4. Cell Adhesion Molecules

Concerning the cell adhesion molecules, a significantly higher percentage of cells expressing CD54, CD58 and CD106 was detected during the in vitro expansion, when the AT-MSCs were exposed to a pro-inflammatory cytokine cocktail, as compared to the control conditions. For CD54, this is also observed for the amount of protein expressed per cell. Under normal conditions, the percentage of AT-MSCs expressing CD54 significantly increased during the in vitro expansion, whereas the percentage of cells expressing CD29, CD44, CD62L and CD166 significantly decreased. Similar results were also obtained under pro-inflammatory conditions, where the percentage of AT-MSCs expressing CD29, CD58, CD62L, CD106, CD146 and CD166 significantly decreased over one or more consecutive passages during the in vitro expansion period (Figure 4; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). No significant changes in CD49e and CD102 expression could be noted (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

3.5. Immunoregulatory Molecules

Under normal conditions, a significant percentage of AT-MSCs expressed CD200, CD274 and heme oxygenase (HO)-1, but their expression significantly decreased during in vitro expansion. This is also observed for CD200 and HO-1 in the pro-inflammatory condition. On the other hand, CD39 was only expressed by a very low percentage of AT-MSCs. Upon pro-inflammatory stimulation, the percentage of cells expressing CD274 significantly increased by approximately threefold, reaching around 90% of the cell population. A significant twofold increase was also observed for the amount of CD274 proteins expressed per cell (Figure 5; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

3.6. Natural Killer (NK) Ligands

Within the PM of AT-MSCs under normal conditions, a high percentage of cells constitutively expressed the NK ligands CD112 and CD155. In contrast, only a low percentage of AT-MSCs expressed UL16 binding protein3 (ULBP-3). In addition, a significant decrease in the percentage of AT-MSCs expressing these three markers was observed during the in vitro expansion. This was also the case for CD155 and ULBP-3 primed with a pro-inflammatory cocktail. In the presence of inflammation, a significantly higher amount of AT-MSCs expressed CD112. However, no significant differences in protein expression per cell could be observed for all three markers (Figure 6; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

4. Discussion

Stem-cell-based therapy has been the aim of deep investigation, leading to new hopes in the field of medicine. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are progenitors’ cells with important biological properties and are thus considered to be a promising new strategy for disease management [1]. In presence of injury, MSCs may have to proliferate and to face inflammatory signals. Safe and efficient clinical applications require repeated administrations of a large amounts of cells (enrichment), with a well-established identify and responsive profile [19]. The communication of stem cells with their environment is an essential element in the plasticity of their properties. In line, inflammation is likely to control hematopoietic stem cell fate in health and disease conditions. Inflammatory signaling is deeply associated with the function and maintenance of the blood and other tissues, by regulating fate decisions at the stem cell level [20]. Thus, understanding the influence of inflammation and tissue-resident progenitors’ cells is an important issue [21]. Monitoring the inflammatory status of the patients at the time of MSC injection is required to improve the therapeutic effect [22].
Cellular therapy implies the investigation of the immunological profile and the immunomodulatory properties of the concerned cell population to guarantee the safety of the patient. This information is also indispensable in order to increase the success rate of the cell-based therapy by minimizing host rejection [23,24]. Since tissue or organ damage often goes hand-in-hand with inflammation, the behavior of the cells to be transplanted must be acquainted in an inflammatory environment before cell-based therapy can take place [25,26,27]. Due to their immunomodulatory and low immunogenicity profile, MSCs are generally recognized as an attractive therapeutic cell product [28]. To be suitable as a proper tissue source for cell-based therapy, some criteria need to be fulfilled. As such, MSCs need to be harvested in large amounts by utilization of a minimal invasive technique. Furthermore, the isolated MSCs must show high expansion potential and a specific panel of immune-related markers that are necessary for transplantation [7]. The tissue origin of MSCs, as well as their harvesting procedures, is also critical in determining their therapeutic potential. Thus, standardization of MSC isolation and culture methods is highly recommended [3,5,29,30,31,32]. Historically, bone marrow is the best known and characterized source of MSCs. However, the isolation of bone-marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) is invasive and the yield of harvested BM-MSCs remains low. Therefore, alternative sources have been proposed. Among them, adipose tissue forms a possible alternative for bone marrow, since it is ubiquitously present in every human, and high amount of MSCs can be obtained by liposuction, which is less invasive than bone marrow aspiration. On top of that, the lipoaspirate is considered to be medical waste, making adipose tissue an ideal source of MSCs [6,7,13]. Since the number of clinical applications using AT-MSCs is increasing, it is of main importance that the safety and full definition of this cell population is addressed [4,33,34,35]. In vitro expansion is of relevance to allow suitable amount of AT-MSCs for transplantation. It is clear from the literature that this in vitro expansion of MSCs can lead to distinct changes in MSCs phenotype [33], so defining expansion and environmental conditions, which are important for the biology of the cells, have to be considered when these cells are intended to be used for clinical scale-up [36].
In this study, AT-MSCs, obtained by the Ficoll gradient centrifugation method, were characterized concerning their immunophenotypical properties, when cultivated under normal and inflammatory conditions. Furthermore, the effect of cell expansion was examined. For this purpose, changes in the immunophenotype of AT-MSCs were determined by using flow cytometric analysis.
First of all, we found that the protein expression of HLA-ABC, CD40, CD54, CD106, CD274 and CD112 is significantly upregulated by AT-MSCs in a pro-inflammatory environment, whereas CD34, HLA-DR, HLA-G, CD40, CD62L, CD106, CD166, CD200, HO-1, CD155, and ULBP-3 expression is significantly altered during in vitro expansion.
For long time, CD34 was specified as a hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells marker, but evidence of its expression on BM-MSCs was indicated in the literature. Nevertheless, CD34 expression decreases to get totally lost in higher passages [6]. Due to these facts, CD34 expression is almost ubiquitously related to hematopoietic cells. The prevailing school of thought states that MSCs do not express CD34. However, robust data highlight a CD34 expression not only by MSCs but by several other non-hematopoietic cell types [37]. The CD34 positive cells may define a specific subset of progenitor cells with enhanced adhesive and homing properties, which are likely to mimic lymphocyte homing to the inflammatory sites [38,39].
Human leukocyte antigens (e.g., HLA-ABC and HLA-DR) and co-stimulatory molecules (e.g., CD40) play an important role in GVHD and allograft rejection, since they operate as targets and activators, respectively, of the immune system [11,14,15]. We found that HLA-DR expression in AT-MSCs significantly decreases during in vitro expansion, suggesting that the culture is becoming purer and therefore less immunogenic. Our findings are in accordance with previous flow cytometry studies that detected poor to negative expression of HLA-DR on expanded BM-MSCs [40]. Similarly, another study reported a very week level of HLA-DR mRNA expression on AT-MSCs, at only early passages (P2) [11]. Expansion rather than inflammation have decreased the expression of HLA-G in AT-MSCs. In contrast, we have recently demonstrated that hepatocytes and hepatogenic differentiated adult-derived human liver stem/progenitor cells (ADHLSCs) showed constitutive HLA-G expression that increased after the third step of differentiation. Both cell types were capable of inhibiting the proliferative response of PBMCs at least in part, through HLA-G [41].
CD40 is a transmembrane receptor of the TNF superfamily and expressed on a variety of antigen presenting cells (APCs). It binds to its ligand CD40L in order to facilitate the immune response [42]. Nevertheless, an increase of CD40 alone is not enough to evoke a complete T-lymphocyte activation, since a number of other co-stimulatory molecules are necessary [43]. Even upon inflammatory stimulation of AT-MSCs, no significant expression was observed of other co-stimulatory molecules necessary for an immune-response activation, including CD80, CD86 and CD134.
We and others have reported that AT-MSCs express a large panel of CAMs, enabling them to interact with activated immune cells and to respond to inflammatory signals [44,45]. These cellular interactions are important for their immunosuppressive functioning. Therefore, changes in the expression of CAMs, such as CD54 (ICAM1), CD62L (LECAM1), CD106 (VCAM1) and CD166 (ALCAM), could have a significant impact on their immunomodulatory properties. Similar upregulation of CAMs has been reported on MCSs from other tissue source, such as WJ-MSCs after stimulation inflammatory cytokines [45]. The passage number in normal conditions seems to affect differently the expression of other CAM marker in a cell-type-dependent manner. While our study showed a decreased percentage of cells expressing CD29 and CD44, almost 100% of human MSCs derived from bone marrow expressed these markers, regardless of passage number, but expression of CD106 was somehow variable [24,46].
Immunomodulation is also regulated by the expression of regulatory factors such as HO-1 and CD274, of which we found that the expression is affected by in vitro expansion and inflammation, respectively. HO-1 is known as antioxidant, cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory enzyme. HO-1 may act by decreasing TNFα levels in parallel to a significant increase of IL-10 [47]. As such, a decreased HO-1 expression during in vitro expansion could therefore lead to a reduced immunomodulatory capacity of AT-MSCs. Although continuous passaging of AT-MSCs has been reported to decrease the immunosuppressive capabilities of MSCs, findings suggest that AT-MCSs may represent an advantageous immunosuppressive agent over BM-MSCs and a preferred source for regenerative medicine application [11].
CD274, also referred to as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), is suggested to hamper an immune response. Binding of the PD-L1 molecule to the PD-1 receptor will downregulate T-lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine secretion [48]. Hence, its increased expression in AT-MSCs in a pro-inflammatory environment suggests an upregulated immunosuppressive capacity. Inflammatory stimuli (reviewed in [49]) has been shown to regulate the functions of MSCs by modulating their phenotype and secretome.
Finally, NK cells play an important role in both the innate and adaptive immunity against the allograft, since they can recognize autologous and allogeneic objects and are able of killing targets. Cross-interaction and modulation are occurring during NK cells and AT-MSCs co-culture. In the presence of AT-MSCs, the expression profile of ligands and receptors relevant for NK cell biology was significantly modulated. IFN-γ and TNF-α secretions were significantly increased, while the proliferation of NK cells was slightly diminished [50]. For this purpose, the NK cells are endowed with activating receptors that will bind specific NK ligands, allowing cell activation [51]. In this study, we report that inflammation enhances the expression of the NK ligand CD112 on AT-MSCS. This finding suggests a possible increased NK-mediated cytotoxity against AT-MSCs, especially in a pro-inflammatory environment, and consequently their elimination upon transplantation. This NK-mediated lysis will also trigger the production of cytokines. Nevertheless, NK-mediated lysis of AT-MSCs in a pro-inflammatory environment might be inhibited to a certain extent as a result of the upregulation of HLA class I molecules (HLA-ABC) [52]. Furthermore, we observed that in vitro expansion downregulates the expression of the NK ligands CD155 and ULBP-3 and thus potentially makes them more tolerant toward NK cells. Further investigations in the influence of inflammatory signals, which fluctuate considerably during tissue damage, on the immuno-biology of MSCs will accelerate the development of promising cell-therapy strategies [53]. It is now recognized that the communication of AT-MSCs with the environment is an essential part of their tissue-repair process. MSCs can actively sense their surroundings and modulate, accordingly, their fate and behavior. In presence of injury, AT-MSCs may have to proliferate (cell-expansion), as well as respond to inflammatory signals (inflammation), in order to create an immuno-reparative microenvironment. It is therefore important to understand the effect of cell-expansion and inflammation on the immune-biology of MSCs, in order to maximize their beneficial outcomes. In comparison to previous studies, this is the first time that these two relevant features of MSCs are explored and, most importantly, investigated in combination. The immunological profile of the AT-MSCs, obtained by means of the standard Ficoll gradient centrifugation was characterized by flow cytometric analyses, under these two conditions. The expression of cell adhesion molecules, immune regulatory molecules and natural killer ligands were thus investigated. A detailed characterization of AT-MSCs under these conditions, with 28 examined markers, is therefore presented. Several changes and alterations within the expression profiles of these molecules are observed during cell-expansion and inflammation. Such an analysis will greatly help to understand the molecular mechanisms that may improve or hamper the therapeutic potential of AT-MSCs, contributing thus to the efforts in developing a quality, safe and efficient cellular-therapeutic product.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/3/696/s1. Table S1: List of antibodies, Table S2: Percentage (%) of positive cells for each marker, Table S3: Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each marker

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.D.K. and M.N.; Data curation, K.B. and M.M.; Formal analysis, D.M.A. and J.D.K.; Funding acquisition, V.R. and L.L.; Methodology, R.M.R.; Project administration, T.V., D.B., P.L., N.M., V.R. and L.L.; Resources, H.F. and L.L.; Software, R.M.R.; Supervision, T.V., D.B., P.L., N.M. and M.N.; Validation, D.M.A. and H.F.; Visualization, M.M.; Writing – original draft, K.B.; Writing – review & editing, R.M., J.D.K. and M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from grants of the Scientific Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Le Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique‛ (FRSM, Télévie), Les Amis de l’Institut Bordet‛, “La Chaire en Arthrose de l’Université de Montréal”, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant MOP-130293), the Research Council (OZR) of the VrijeUniversiteit Brussel (VUB) and the Inter-University Attraction Pole program of the Belgian Science Policy Office (IAP-HEPRO BELSPO).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Patrick Wilikins and Jan Heiremans (ATLAS clinic) for the kind donation of human adipose tissue samples, upon informed consent of the involved patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ALCAMactivated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule
APCantigen presenting cell
ATadipose tissue
AT-MSCsadipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells
BM-MSCsbone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells
BSAbovine serum albumin
CAMcell adhesion molecule
CDcluster of differentiation
GVHDgraft-versus-host disease
HLAhuman leukocyte antigen
HOheme oxygenase
iintracellular
ICAMintercellular adhesion molecule
IFNinterferon
ILinterleukin
LECAMleukocyte endothelial cell adhesion molecule
mmembrane bound
MFImean fluorescence intensity
MSCsmesenchymal stromal cells
NKnatural killer
Ppassage
PBSphosphate-buffered saline
PD-Lprogrammed death ligand
PMprimary culture
SDstandard deviation
SEMstandard error of the mean
TNFtumor necrosis factor
ULBPUL16 binding protein
VCAMvascular cell adhesion molecule

References

  1. Najar, M.; Bouhtit, F.; Melki, R.; Afif, H.; Hamal, A.; Fahmi, H.; Merimi, M.; Lagneaux, L. Mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy: New perspectives and challenges. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Oh, M.; Nor, J.E. The perivascular niche and self-renewal of stem cells. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Christodoulou, I.; Kolisis, F.N.; Papaevangeliou, D.; Zoumpourlis, V. Comparative evaluation of human mesenchymal stem cells of fetal (Wharton’s jelly) and adult (adipose tissue) origin during prolonged in vitro expansion: Considerations for cytotherapy. Stem Cells Int. 2013, 2013, 246134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Siegel, G.; Kluba, T.; Hermanutz-Klein, U.; Bieback, K.; Northoff, H.; Schafer, R. Phenotype, donor age and gender affect function of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. BMC Med. 2013, 11, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Trivanovic, D.; Jaukovic, A.; Popovic, B.; Krstic, J.; Mojsilovic, S.; Okic-Djordjevic, I.; Kukolj, T.; Obradovic, H.; Santibanez, J.F.; Bugarski, D. Mesenchymal stem cells of different origin: Comparative evaluation of proliferative capacity, telomere length and pluripotency marker expression. Life Sci. 2015, 141, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Baer, P.C. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells: An update on their phenotype in vivo and in vitro. World J. Stem Cells 2014, 6, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kolaparthy, L.K.; Sanivarapu, S.; Moogla, S.; Kutcham, R.S. Adipose tissue—Adequate, accessible regenerative material. Int. J. Stem Cells 2015, 8, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nemeth, K. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for immune-modulation: The donor, the recipient, and the drugs in-between. Exp. Dermatol. 2014, 23, 625–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lane, S.W.; Williams, D.A.; Watt, F.M. Modulating the stem cell niche for tissue regeneration. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Michael, S.; Achilleos, C.; Panayiotou, T.; Strati, K. Inflammation shapes stem cells and stemness during infection and beyond. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Purandare, B.; Teklemariam, T.; Zhao, L.; Hantash, B.M. Temporal HLA profiling and immunomodulatory effects of human adult bone marrow- and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Regen. Med. 2014, 9, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fayyad-Kazan, H.; Faour, W.H.; Badran, B.; Lagneaux, L.; Najar, M. The immunomodulatory properties of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells are defined according to multiple immunobiological criteria. Inflamm. Res. 2016, 65, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Najar, M.; Raicevic, G.; Fayyad-Kazan, H.; De Bruyn, C.; Bron, D.; Toungouz, M.; Lagneaux, L. Immune-related antigens, surface molecules and regulatory factors in human-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: The expression and impact of inflammatory priming. Stem Cell Rev. 2012, 8, 1188–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Delarosa, O.; Dalemans, W.; Lombardo, E. Toll-like receptors as modulators of mesenchymal stem cells. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhuang, Y.; Li, D.; Fu, J.; Shi, Q.; Lu, Y.; Ju, X. Comparison of biological properties of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells from early and late passages: Immunomodulatory ability is enhanced in aged cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Najar, M.; Rodrigues, R.M.; Buyl, K.; Branson, S.; Vanhaecke, T.; Lagneaux, L.; Rogiers, V.; De Kock, J. Proliferative and phenotypical characteristics of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells: Comparison of Ficoll gradient centrifugation and red blood cell lysis buffer treatment purification methods. Cytotherapy 2014, 16, 1220–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raicevic, G.; Rouas, R.; Najar, M.; Stordeur, P.; Boufker, H.I.; Bron, D.; Martiat, P.; Goldman, M.; Nevessignsky, M.T.; Lagneaux, L. Inflammation modifies the pattern and the function of Toll-like receptors expressed by human mesenchymal stromal cells. Hum. Immunol. 2010, 71, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Najar, M.; Raicevic, G.; Id Boufker, H.; Stamatopoulos, B.; De Bruyn, C.; Meuleman, N.; Bron, D.; Toungouz, M.; Lagneaux, L. Modulated expression of adhesion molecules and galectin-1: Role during mesenchymal stromal cell immunoregulatory functions. Exp. Hematol. 2010, 38, 922–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Busser, H.; Najar, M.; Raicevic, G.; Pieters, K.; Velez Pombo, R.; Philippart, P.; Meuleman, N.; Bron, D.; Lagneaux, L. Isolation and characterization of human mesenchymal stromal cell subpopulations: Comparison of bone marrow and adipose tissue. Stem Cells Dev. 2015, 24, 2142–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pietras, E.M. Inflammation: A key regulator of hematopoietic stem cell fate in health and disease. Blood 2017, 130, 1693–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kizil, C.; Kyritsis, N.; Brand, M. Effects of inflammation on stem cells: Together they strive? EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Cao, W.; Shi, Y. Plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells in immunomodulation: Pathological and therapeutic implications. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sharpe, M.E.; Morton, D.; Rossi, A. Nonclinical safety strategies for stem cell therapies. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012, 262, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Y.K.; Ogando, C.R.; Wang See, C.; Chang, T.Y.; Barabino, G.A. Changes in phenotype and differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells aging in vitro. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Le Blanc, K.; Davies, L.C. Mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune response. Immunol. Lett. 2015, 168, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Pluchino, S.; Cossetti, C. How stem cells speak with host immune cells in inflammatory brain diseases. Glia 2013, 61, 1379–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Naaldijk, Y.; Johnson, A.A.; Ishak, S.; Meisel, H.J.; Hohaus, C.; Stolzing, A. Migrational changes of mesenchymal stem cells in response to cytokines, growth factors, hypoxia, and aging. Exp. Cell Res. 2015, 338, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Najar, M.; Raicevic, G.; Fayyad-Kazan, H.; Bron, D.; Toungouz, M.; Lagneaux, L. Mesenchymal stromal cells and immunomodulation: A gathering of regulatory immune cells. Cytotherapy 2016, 18, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bortolotti, F.; Ukovich, L.; Razban, V.; Martinelli, V.; Ruozi, G.; Pelos, B.; Dore, F.; Giacca, M.; Zacchigna, S. In vivo therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells depends on the source and the isolation procedure. Stem Cell Rep. 2015, 4, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lee, M.W.; Kim, D.S.; Yoo, K.H.; Kim, H.R.; Jang, I.K.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Son, M.H.; Lee, S.H.; Jung, H.L.; et al. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell gene expression patterns vary with culture conditions. Blood Res. 2013, 48, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Davies, O.G.; Cooper, P.R.; Shelton, R.M.; Smith, A.J.; Scheven, B.A. Isolation of adipose and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells using CD29 and CD90 modifies their capacity for osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. J. Tissue Eng. 2015, 6, 2041731415592356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Balint, R.; Richardson, S.M.; Cartmell, S.H. Low-density subculture: A technical note on the importance of avoiding cell-to-cell contact during mesenchymal stromal cell expansion. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015, 9, 1200–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Patrikoski, M.; Sivula, J.; Huhtala, H.; Helminen, M.; Salo, F.; Mannerstrom, B.; Miettinen, S. Different culture conditions modulate the immunological properties of adipose stem cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2014, 3, 1220–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kalinina, N.; Kharlampieva, D.; Loguinova, M.; Butenko, I.; Pobeguts, O.; Efimenko, A.; Ageeva, L.; Sharonov, G.; Ischenko, D.; Alekseev, D.; et al. Characterization of secretomes provides evidence for adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells subtypes. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015, 6, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Begic, A.; Isfoss, B.L.; Lonnerod, L.K.; Vigen, A.; Moskaug, J.O. Survival and inflammatory response in adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-enriched mouse fat grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2016, 4, e1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Andreeva, E.; Andrianova, I.; Rylova, J.; Gornostaeva, A.; Bobyleva, P.; Buravkova, L. Proinflammatory interleukins’ production by adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: The impact of cell culture conditions and cell-to-cell interaction. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2015, 33, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sidney, L.E.; Branch, M.J.; Dunphy, S.E.; Dua, H.S.; Hopkinson, A. Concise review: Evidence for CD34 as a common marker for diverse progenitors. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1380–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gangenahalli, G.U.; Singh, V.K.; Verma, Y.K.; Gupta, P.; Sharma, R.K.; Chandra, R.; Luthra, P.M. Hematopoietic stem cell antigen CD34: Role in adhesion or homing. Stem Cells Dev. 2006, 15, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. AbuSamra, D.B.; Aleisa, F.A.; Al-Amoodi, A.S.; Jalal Ahmed, H.M.; Chin, C.J.; Abuelela, A.F.; Bergam, P.; Sougrat, R.; Merzaban, J.S. Not just a marker: CD34 on human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells dominates vascular selectin binding along with CD44. Blood Adv. 2017, 1, 2799–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. El-Sayed, M.; El-Feky, M.A.; El-Amir, M.I.; Hasan, A.S.; Tag-Adeen, M.; Urata, Y.; Goto, S.; Luo, L.; Yan, C.; Li, T.S. Immunomodulatory effect of mesenchymal stem cells: Cell origin and cell quality variations. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lombard, C.A.; Sana, G.; LeMaoult, J.; Najar, M.; Ravau, J.; André, F.; Bouhtit, F.; Daouya, M.; Loustau, M.; Najimi, M.; et al. Human Hepatocytes and Differentiated Adult-Derived Human Liver Stem/Progenitor Cells Display In Vitro Immunosuppressive Properties Mediated, at Least in Part, Through the Nonclassical HLA Class I Molecule HLA-G. J. Immunol. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, K.; Huang, J.; Gong, W.; Zhang, L.; Yu, P.; Wang, J.M. CD40/CD40L dyad in the inflammatory and immune responses in the central nervous system. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2006, 3, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Frauwirth, K.A.; Thompson, C.B. Activation and inhibition of lymphocytes by costimulation. J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 109, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. De Kock, J.; Meuleman, P.; Raicevic, G.; Rodrigues, R.M.; Branson, S.; Meganathan, K.; De Boe, V.; Sachinidis, A.; Leroux-Roels, G.; Vanhaecke, T.; et al. Human skin-derived precursor cells are poorly immunogenic and modulate the allogeneic immune response. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 2215–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, Q.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Tong, H.; Ma, L.; Zhang, Y.; Shan, F.; Meng, Y.; Yuan, Z. Comparative analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells from fetal-bone marrow, adipose tissue, and Warton’s jelly as sources of cell immunomodulatory therapy. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2016, 12, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bara, J.J.; Richards, R.G.; Alini, M.; Stoddart, M.J. Concise review: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells change phenotype following in vitro culture: Implications for basic research and the clinic. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1713–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tamion, F.; Richard, V.; Renet, S.; Thuillez, C. Protective effects of heme-oxygenase expression against endotoxic shock: Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-α and augmentation of interleukin-10. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2006, 61, 1078–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Freeman, G.J.; Long, A.J.; Iwai, Y.; Bourque, K.; Chernova, T.; Nishimura, H.; Fitz, L.J.; Malenkovich, N.; Okazaki, T.; Byrne, M.C.; et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Madrigal, M.; Rao, K.S.; Riordan, N.H. A review of therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell secretions and induction of secretory modification by different culture methods. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Najar, M.; Fayyad-Kazan, M.; Merimi, M.; Meuleman, N.; Bron, D.; Fayyad-Kazan, H.; Lagneaux, L. Reciprocal immuno-biological alterations occur during the co-culture of natural killer cells and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Cytotechnology 2019, 71, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pende, D.; Castriconi, R.; Romagnani, P.; Spaggiari, G.M.; Marcenaro, S.; Dondero, A.; Lazzeri, E.; Lasagni, L.; Martini, S.; Rivera, P.; et al. Expression of the DNAM-1 ligands, Nectin-2 (CD112) and poliovirus receptor (CD155), on dendritic cells: Relevance for natural killer-dendritic cell interaction. Blood 2006, 107, 2030–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Spaggiari, G.M.; Capobianco, A.; Becchetti, S.; Mingari, M.C.; Moretta, L. Mesenchymal stem cell-natural killer cell interactions: Evidence that activated NK cells are capable of killing MSCs, whereas MSCs can inhibit IL-2-induced NK-cell proliferation. Blood 2006, 107, 1484–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Shi, Y.; Cao, J.; Wang, Y. Rethinking regeneration: Empowerment of stem cells by inflammation. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 22, 1891–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of endothelial/stromal markers in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in non-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 1. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of endothelial/stromal markers in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in non-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Jcm 09 00696 g001
Figure 2. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of human leukocyte antigens in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 2. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of human leukocyte antigens in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Jcm 09 00696 g002
Figure 3. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of co-stimulatory molecules in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 3. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of co-stimulatory molecules in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Jcm 09 00696 g003
Figure 4. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of cell adhesion molecules in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). # Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 4. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of cell adhesion molecules in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). # Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Jcm 09 00696 g004
Figure 5. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of immunoregulatory molecules in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 5. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of immunoregulatory molecules in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Jcm 09 00696 g005
Figure 6. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of natural killer ligands in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 6. Impact of inflammation and cell passaging on the expression of natural killer ligands in AT-MSCs. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and the protein expression per cell (MFI). The values are expressed as mean ± SD and originate from six different AT-MSC donors. * Significantly higher percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to regular AT-MSCs (p-value < 0.05). ## Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in regular AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05). $$ Significantly lower percentage or amount per cell in inflammation-stimulated AT-MSCs compared to the consecutive passage (p-value < 0.05).
Jcm 09 00696 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buyl, K.; Merimi, M.; Rodrigues, R.M.; Moussa Agha, D.; Melki, R.; Vanhaecke, T.; Bron, D.; Lewalle, P.; Meuleman, N.; Fahmi, H.; et al. The Impact of Cell-Expansion and Inflammation on The Immune-Biology of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030696

AMA Style

Buyl K, Merimi M, Rodrigues RM, Moussa Agha D, Melki R, Vanhaecke T, Bron D, Lewalle P, Meuleman N, Fahmi H, et al. The Impact of Cell-Expansion and Inflammation on The Immune-Biology of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(3):696. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buyl, Karolien, Makram Merimi, Robim M. Rodrigues, Douâa Moussa Agha, Rahma Melki, Tamara Vanhaecke, Dominique Bron, Philippe Lewalle, Nathalie Meuleman, Hassan Fahmi, and et al. 2020. "The Impact of Cell-Expansion and Inflammation on The Immune-Biology of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 3: 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030696

APA Style

Buyl, K., Merimi, M., Rodrigues, R. M., Moussa Agha, D., Melki, R., Vanhaecke, T., Bron, D., Lewalle, P., Meuleman, N., Fahmi, H., Rogiers, V., Lagneaux, L., De Kock, J., & Najar, M. (2020). The Impact of Cell-Expansion and Inflammation on The Immune-Biology of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(3), 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030696

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop