Next Article in Journal
Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry
Next Article in Special Issue
Industrial and Bioenergy Crops for Bioeconomy Development
Previous Article in Journal
Phosphate-Solubilizing Enterobacter ludwigii AFFR02 and Bacillus megaterium Mj1212 Rescues Alfalfa’s Growth under Post-Drought Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact Assessment of the Long-Term Fallowed Land on Agricultural Soils and the Possibility of Their Return to Agriculture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/agriculture11060488
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening of Functional Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extracts from Perennial Herbaceous Crops

by
Mateusz Ostolski
1,
Marek Adamczak
1,*,
Bartosz Brzozowski
1 and
Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski
2,3
1
Department of Process Engineering Equipment and Food Biotechnology, Faculty of Food Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Jan Heweliusz St. 1, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
2
Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland
3
Centre for Bioeconomy and Renewable Energies, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2021, 11(6), 488; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060488
Submission received: 22 April 2021 / Revised: 18 May 2021 / Accepted: 21 May 2021 / Published: 25 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations and Perspectives of Industrial and Bioenergy Crops for Bioeconomy Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The bio-based economy concept requires using biomass not only for energy production but also for bioactive compound extraction, application or biotransformation. This study analyzed the possibility of obtaining bioactive compounds from biomass before its transformation into biofuel. This involved an analysis of the total content of polyphenols (TPC), flavonoids (TFC), and spectral analysis using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (QATR- FTIR) as well as analysis of the antioxidant activity of extracts from selected perennial herbaceous crops cultivated on marginal lands in Poland. The extracts were obtained by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction (scCO2) or scCO2 with water as a cosolvent (scCO2/H2O) from biomass of the following plants: Helianthus salicifolius, Silphium perfoliatum, Helianthus tuberosus, Miscanthus × giganteus, Miscanthus sacchariflorus, Miscanthus sinensis and Spartina pectinata. The biomass was harvested twice during the growing period (June and October) and once after the end of the growing period (February). For most of the analyzed extracts obtained from biomass at the growing stage using scCO2 or scCO2/H2O, a higher TPC was noted than for samples of semi-wood or straw biomass obtained after the end of the growing period. Higher contents of polyphenolic compounds were recorded in extracts obtained using scCO2/H2O. A positive correlation between TPC and antioxidant activity was noted for the analyzed substrates. Flavonoid contents varied in the analyzed samples, and higher contents were generally obtained in scCO2 extracts from biomass harvested at the beginning of the growing period. A high diversity of extract compositions was confirmed by spectral analysis. The presented data can be used at the initial stage of planning a biorefinery.

1. Introduction

One of the most attractive renewable sources of energy is plant biomass, particularly perennial plants that are not used in food production [1,2,3]. However, as the data show, the profitability of producing energy from plant biomass is not always satisfactory. Therefore, consideration should be given to both its multidirectional use and solutions appropriate for sustainable technologies [4]. Perennial plants, including perennial herbaceous crops, offer a wide variety of environmental benefits when compared with annual species. Due to economic reasons resulting from the single-purpose use of perennial plants as solid biofuel, they are currently mainly cultivated on an experimental scale (excluding Miscanthus × giganteus). However, the possibility of multidirectional use of these species as substrates for biogas plants, second-generation biofuels or bioproducts (with regard to the content of specific compounds) has been increasingly more frequently indicated.
The great diversity of polyphenolic compound structures determines their varied biological activity. Polyphenols are widespread compounds that are safe, cheap and effective for many applications. The contribution of polyphenols to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms, prostate diseases and osteoporosis has been confirmed, and their role in the prevention of diabetes mellitus and neurodegenerative diseases has been suggested [5,6,7]. Polyphenols can also be used in the food industry as natural antioxidants that delay food spoilage [8]. There has been great interest in the use of plant extracts or selected polyphenols in the synthesis of metal nanoparticles [9]. It is also possible that the poor stability, solubility and bioavailability of polyphenols could be solved by the application of encapsulation, e.g., synthetic polyphenol-loaded nanoparticles [10].
Antioxidants can be synthesized in vivo or taken as dietary antioxidants in the form of mainly phenols and polyphenols from plants, i.e., from the stems, roots, bark, leaves, fruits and seeds [11]. It is estimated that two-thirds of the world’s plant species display medicinal importance, and almost all of these have excellent antioxidant potential. The antioxidant activity of polyphenols results from a direct reaction with ROS or the stimulation of natural processes that contribute to an improvement in the cellular resistance to oxidative stress [12].
These compounds reduce the virulence of microorganisms, inhibit biofilm formation [13], inhibit quorum sensing [14] and neutralize bacterial toxins [15].
There is no information on extracts obtained using supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) from perennial industrial crops (PIC), particularly from herbaceous crops. These plants can be used for the production of food and pharmaceuticals and as renewable energy sources. However, no analyses are available on the effects of the growing phase on the efficiency of polyphenolic compound extraction using scCO2. The cultivation and application of new plants could influence and protect the natural environment [16]. For example, H. tuberosus exhibits varied pharmacological properties. It displays, inter alia, aperient, cholagogue, diuretic, spermatogenic, stomachic and tonic effects and has been used in folk medicine for the treatment of diabetes and rheumatism [17]. Moreover, extracts of H. tuberosus L. exhibit antibacterial, antifungal and antineoplastic activities. The leaves and tubers of Jerusalem artichoke are rich sources of phenolic and flavonoid compounds. The leaves contain much higher concentrations of those substances compared to the tubers [18]. Research on the biological activity of S. perfoliatum extracts has confirmed their antifungal as well as wound healing accelerating properties. Their antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) bacteria has also been noted [19], along with the positive effect of S. perfoliatum extracts on the stability of sunflower oil fatty acid composition [20].
The cultivation conditions and the harvesting period affect the chemical composition of plant biomass, including polyphenolic compounds [21]. The large number of components of plant extracts requires the selection of appropriate extraction techniques, which play a crucial role in the qualitative and quantitative characterization of the product. To the authors’ knowledge, there are no studies on the general characteristics of bioactive polyphenolic compounds obtained by green extraction technique using scCO2 from S. pectinata and H. salicifolius, and there is limited information on polyphenols from other analyzed biomasses. The presented data can be used at the initial stage of planning a biorefinery. Lignocellulosic biomass was delignified during extraction using organic solvents and scCO2 at temperatures above 150 °C. A higher degree of lignin removal was demonstrated in extractions using pure scCO2 than with scCO2/water [22].
The current study aimed to screen the polyphenolic compound content and antioxidant activity in extracts obtained using supercritical carbon dioxide from the biomass of perennial herbaceous crops collected in three different phases of plant growth. Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (QATR-FTIR) spectral analyses of the selected extracts were performed to obtain data on the general characteristics of functional groups of bioactive compounds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

The following chemical reagents were used in the experiments: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, ≥99%, Stanlab, Lublin, Poland), methanol (≥99%, Stanlab), Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Aktyn, Suchy Las, Poland), sodium carbonate (≥99%, Stanlab), gallic acid (≥98%, Sigma Aldrich, Poznan, Poland), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, (DPPH, Sigma Aldrich), quercetin (≥95% Sigma Aldrich) and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox, ≥98%, Sigma Aldrich).

2.2. Harvesting of the Plant Material

The biomass of the following species of herbaceous (semi-woody) crops was extracted: Helianthus salicifolius A. Dietr, Silphium perfoliatum L., Helianthus tuberosus L., Miscanthus × giganteus J.M. Greef & M. Deuter, Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Maxim.) Hack, Miscanthus sinensis (Thunb.) Andersson and Spartina pectinata Bosc ex Link. Perennial crops were obtained from the experimental fields of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, located in north-eastern Poland. The details of the sample preparation and extraction were presented by Stolarski et al. [22] and recently by Malm et al. [23] and Ostolski et al. [24]. Entire plants were harvested three times in one year (2018) within one field experiment, where plants regrew following consecutive harvests. One-year-old plants that grew throughout the entire vegetation period of 2017 were harvested in the third decade of February 2018 (biomass C). The collected biomass was in the form of straw or semi-wood featuring a moisture content of approximately 20%. In the third decade of June 2018 (biomass A), a three-month-old biomass in the form of young green shoots was collected from the previously (February 2018) harvested field. Finally, in the third decade of October 2018 (biomass B), crop regrowth in the form of young green shoots was gathered from the plots harvested in June 2018. The moisture content of the biomass obtained in June and October ranged from 60% to 70%. Each biomass was dried in a convection dryer (Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) at 40 °C for 7 consecutive days to achieve a moisture content below 10%, followed by grinding in a hammer mill using a 1 mm sieve.

2.3. Extraction Conditions

The experiments were carried out in a pilot plant extractor with two high-pressure extraction vessels, each with a capacity of approximately 40 dm³ (NATEX, Ternitz, Austria). Biomass batches of 5 kg were prepared, and supercritical extraction was performed under the following conditions: 40 °C and 33 MPa using scCO2 or scCO2 and 40% (w/w based on biomass weight) water (scCO2/H2O) [23,24]. The water from the collected extracts was evaporated using a vacuum evaporator at 50 °C.
To prepare the working solution, 50 mg of the extracts was mixed in 1 cm³ of DMSO (24 h, 1400 rpm, 22 °C). A 9 cm³, 5% (w/v) aqueous solution of DMSO was added to the obtained solution, which yielded the final extract concentration of 10 mg/cm³. The samples prepared in this manner were mixed for 1 h to dissolve the extract. Afterwards, the samples were filtered through a cellulose filter and used for analyses or stored at 4 °C until further analyses.

2.4. Determination of Total Polyphenol Content

The total polyphenol content (TPC) was measured using a modified method described by Singleton and Rossi [25]. Briefly, 0.1 cm³ of extract, 0.5 cm³ of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and 0.4 cm³ of 7.5% (w/v) aqueous sodium carbonate solution were added to 5 cm³ Eppendorf tubes. Samples were degassed by vigorous mixing (IKA MS3 basic). After 30 min incubation in the dark, counted from the moment sodium carbonate solution was added, absorbance was measured at λ = 756 nm (Beckman DU 650 spectrophotometer, Fullerton, CA, USA). The results were expressed as gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE/g d.m. of extract).

2.5. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content (TFC) was measured using the method described by Lamaison and Carnat [26]. Briefly, 0.4 cm³ of extract and 0.8 cm³ of 2% (w/v) AlCl3 × 6H2O methanol solution were added to 2 cm³ Eppendorf tubes. After 10 min of incubation in the dark, counted from the moment the complexing reagent (AlCl3 × 6H2O) was added, absorbance was measured at λ = 430 nm (Beckman DU 650 spectrophotometer). The results were determined as quercetin equivalent (QE) and expressed in mg QE/g d.m. of extract.

2.6. Antioxidant Capacity Assay (DPPH Test)

The radical scavenging activity was determined using a modified method described by Blois [27]. To 2 cm³ Eppendorf tubes, 1 cm³ of extract solution and 1 cm³ of DPPH radical solution (0.05 mM) were added. After 30 min incubation in the dark, counted from the moment DPPH was added, absorbance at λ = 517 nm was measured. The results were expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (mg Trolox/g d.m. of extract).

2.7. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (QATR-FTIR) Analysis

Spectroscopic measurements were performed by an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) method. The transmittance of plant extract samples (5–6 mg) was measured using a FTIR (IRSpirit-T, Schimadzu, Duisburg, Germany) spectrometer equipped with a QATR-S accessory with a diamond crystal and a DLATGS detector with a germanium-coated KBr beam splitter. Each sample was scanned 25 times within the wavelength range of 4000.0 to 400.0 cm−1 at the resolution of 4.0 cm−1 using the Happ–Genzel function. Sample spectra obtained with the application of LabSolutions IR software (ver. 2.23, Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany) were corrected, smoothed with the seven-point Savitzky–Golay algorithm and normalized.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (SD). The same letter indicated results that were not statistically different within the parameter under analysis, Bonferroni ANOVA test, p < 0.05. A multidimensional principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation was also applied. All analyses were performed using the STATISTICA, ver. 13.3 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids

Phenolic compounds are essential for plant functions because they are involved in oxidative stress reactions, defensive systems, growth and development [28]. The problem with phenolic compound definition, classification and chemical characterization was presented in a review by Quideau et al. [29]. It has already been shown that raffinate obtained after extraction of polyphenols using scCO2 could be used as a stable and valuable substrate in a biorefinery or for energy production [22]. The scCO2 extraction removes significant amounts of lipids, terpenes, steroids and resin acids that easily undergo autoxidation, which consequently improves both the quality of biofuel and pyrolysis [30,31,32]. The results of the current study indicate varied polyphenol content in extracts obtained during a one-year-long experiment depending on both the harvest period and the extraction conditions (Table 1). The aim of crop harvesting at different times was to compare the obtained extract activities in relation to the biomass harvest time and to demonstrate the plant’s ability to regrow after harvest at different times of the year (in different growth phases). The study presented in this paper focused only on assessing extract activity. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is limited information on polyphenols from other analyzed biomasses. The highest polyphenol content (p < 0.05) was obtained in the scCO2/H2O extract from S. pectinata (168.18 ± 6.26 mg GAE/g d.m.) harvested in June, i.e., at the beginning of the vegetation period, while the lowest content was noted for the extract of M. giganteus straw harvested in February, obtained by extraction using only scCO2 (1.24 ± 0.06 mg GAE/g d.m. of the extract). For most of the analyzed extract samples (scCO2 or scCO2/H2O) obtained from biomass harvested during the growing period, a statistically significantly higher polyphenol content was noted than those for the semi-wood or straw samples collected in February. Only the extracts from S. perfoliatum semi-wood biomass (scCO2) and H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus straw (scCO2/H2O) were characterized by higher polyphenol content than the extracts from biomass harvested during the growing period (p = 0.05) (Table 1 and Table S1). In another study, the highest polyphenol content in an ethanol extract of Jerusalem artichoke leaves was 4.5–5.7 mg GAE/g d.m. [33], i.e., approximately 2–6-fold lower than the polyphenol content in a supercritical extract of biomass of this species in the current study (Table 1). The contents of polyphenols in scCO2/H2O extracts from H. salicifolius and H. tuberosus obtained by Malm et al. [23] under the same conditions were similar to those reported in the present study, i.e., the values were lower for the former (13.75 mg GAE/g of extract) and higher for the latter (33.06 mg GAE/g of extract) plant.
A low content of polyphenols was identified in a water extract of the aboveground parts of M. sinensis at the flowering phase (1.1795 ± 0.1608% (% d.m. equivalent of pyrogallol)) [34]. A high content of polyphenolic compounds is not a prerequisite for the development of a biorefinery concept. Substrates for biotechnological processes with a low polyphenol content or effective methods of polyphenol extraction preceding the bioprocess are often sought. Based on the analysis of cinnamates in the leaves, stems and flowers of M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus, it is suggested that an assay could be useful for selecting plants with low contents of antimicrobial phenols that may be a good feedstock for fermentation [35].
Higher contents of polyphenolic compounds were noted in extracts obtained using scCO2/H2O (Figure 1a, marked area, unfilled triangles). The application of this extraction type resulted in an increase in polyphenol content, particularly in the extracts from biomass harvested during the growing period, i.e., in June and October (Table 1). Supercritical fluid extraction is an environment-friendly technology used for the extraction of bioactive compounds from natural products and may provide an alternative to conventional extraction methods. Supercritical fluids exhibit unique characteristics, good solvent properties, a high diffusion coefficient, low viscosity and negligible value of the surface tension coefficient. Modifications of the pressure or temperature produce considerable changes in the fluid properties, including selectivity. These properties enable rapid mass transfer and an increased capability to penetrate the sample matrix, which yields rapid and efficient extraction [36]. The advantage of scCO2 is its ability to produce extracts free of solvent residue. Because CO2 is a gas at ambient temperature and pressure, it is capable of minimizing the thermal degradation of bioactive compounds. Supercritical CO2 is safe for human health and the environment and is reusable, inert, nontoxic, nonflammable and noncorrosive [37]. However, CO2 is a weak solvent for the extraction of polar compounds, including polyphenolic compounds. A frequently proposed solution to this problem is the use of a cosolvent, a modifier that changes the solvent properties. For the extraction of polar compounds such as alkaloids, glycosides, saccharides and cyclitols, water and various organic solvents that are soluble in supercritical fluid have been used as a cosolvent, e.g., methanol, ethanol, acetone and acetonitrile. This modification usually requires the adaptation of extraction conditions to the new solvent composition and its critical parameters. The addition of water as a cosolvent modifies the polarity of the mixture and increases the efficiency of extraction of polar polyphenolic compounds. For the first time, scCO2 was used for the extraction of polyphenols from grape marc, but the effective and selective extraction of proanthocyanidins required a 15% addition of water to the scCO2 [38]. The antioxidant and biocidal properties of extracts obtained from H. salicifolius and H. tuberosus with scCO2/H2O were presented in [23]. Generally, higher contents of polyphenols were obtained in willow and poplar biomass samples after extraction with scCO2 and water compared to extraction with scCO2 alone [24].
The highest TFC was obtained in the scCO2 extract from M. × giganteus harvested at the beginning of the growing period (June) (10.62 ± 0.09 mg QE/g d.m.) (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The application of scCO2 extraction enabled an increase in flavonoid content compared to extraction using scCO2/H2O when biomass from the beginning of the growing period (June) was used as the substrate. However, when biomass from October and February was used as the extraction substrate, no correlation was found between the solvent used and the selective flavonoid extraction (Table 2 and Figure 1b). Moreover, it was demonstrated that flavonoids from pomelo peel were preferentially separated by scCO2 at 80 °C and a pressure of 39 MPa with 85% aqueous ethanol as a modifier [39]. The lowest statistically significant (p < 0.05) flavonoid content was obtained following extraction using scCO2/H2O from all of the plants harvested at the beginning of the growing period except for S. pectinata (Table 2 and Table S2).
The chemical composition of the studied plants depend on the environmental conditions, growing period, etc. [40]. Changes in the chemical composition affect the biological activity of a plant and the possibility of obtaining active compounds. The effect of the season on the chemical composition, and thus bioactivity, can be attributed to climate change, i.e., the temperature, the soil moisture content, precipitation and the plant growth period [41]. A significant seasonal variation of phenolic compounds was observed in the leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja, and the highest phenolic content was recorded in May, July and November [42]. A seasonal variation was observed in the synthesis of secondary metabolites in Phillyrea angustifolia, and the highest oleuropein content was confirmed during the winter period [43]. Similarly, Pacifico et al. [44] demonstrated that an extract of Calamintha nepeta harvested during the winter period was characterized by a higher acacetin content. The season can affect the chemical composition of plants in different ways, and the possible changes in the chemical composition can occur over several years. A quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds in extracts of Vaccinium myrtillus demonstrated relatively small seasonal variations in the composition of phenolic compounds or their absence, while significant changes in the composition were observed over two successive years [45].
The availability of water can also impact the synthesis of polyphenolic compounds by the plants. The relationships between the synthesis of polyphenolic compounds by the plants and the hydration are unclear and are determined by their parameters. High temperatures (30–40 °C) can prevent flavonoid synthesis by inhibiting gene expression and enzyme activity [46], while low temperatures can induce flavonoid biosynthesis (although in the absence of light, the synthesis of these compounds is inhibited) [47].

3.2. Antioxidant Activity

The extracts obtained using a mixture of scCO2/H2O, in which an increased polyphenolic compound content was also noted, exhibited the highest antioxidant activity (Table 3 and Table S3, Figure 1a). The highest antioxidant activity (p < 0.05) was noted for the extract from S. pectinata (1289.5 ± 34.35 mg Trolox/g d.m.) harvested at the beginning of the growing period, and the lowest was in the extract from S. perfoliatum semi-wood biomass (22.85 ± 0.62 mg Trolox/g d.m.). Regardless of the biomass species or the extraction technique applied, the extracts obtained from plants harvested in June (the beginning of the growing period) were characterized by the highest antioxidant activity (Table 3).
The accumulation, quantity and activity of phenolic compounds in the plant raw material are determined by the previously mentioned factors, primarily the substrate, plant species, the method of biomass preparation and the growth conditions. Antioxidant activity is primarily determined by the content of bioactive phenolic compounds. The current study found a positive correlation between the polyphenolic compound content and the antioxidant activity (r = 0.80), regardless of the type of raw material, the harvest date or the extraction conditions. In other studies, the antioxidant activity was closely related to the TPC and TFC in Nyctanthes arbor-tristis (Harsingar) leaf extracts used in Indian traditional medicine [48]. Zhang et al. [49] analyzed differences in the contents of polyphenols and flavonoids as well as the antioxidant activity in pomegranate leaves. In the period between April and September, the polyphenol and flavonoid contents decreased and then gradually increased. The antioxidant activity of extracts was also significantly correlated with the polyphenolic compound content (r = 0.80).
In the extracts obtained using scCO2/H2O, a high polyphenol content of over 40 mg GAE/g d.m. was obtained from S. perfoliatum and M. sacchariflorus harvested in June, from M. sinensis and S. pectinata harvested during the growing period (June and October) and from M. × giganteus harvested at each of the analyzed dates (Figure 1a). No statistical relationship was found between TFC and antioxidant activity (Figure 1b). The antioxidant activity over 600 mg Trolox/g d.m. was obtained for extracts with a flavonoid content of approximately 2, or over 6 mg QE/g d.m. (Figure 1b, marked area, unfilled triangles). The scCO2 extract with the highest flavonoid content (from M. × giganteus) from biomass obtained at the beginning of the growing period (June) was characterized by a low antioxidant activity of 104.83 Trolox/g d.m. Therefore, it can be initially concluded that it is the qualitative composition rather than the content that probably determines the antioxidant activity.
The principal components PC1 and PC2 for extracts obtained using scCO2 (Figure 2a) or scCO2/H2O (Figure 2b) explained 86.5% (53.8% and 32.7%) and 91.5% (68.3% and 23.2%) of data sets, respectively. However, a great dispersion of the results based on the previous analyses was noticeable. PC1 represents TPC and the PC2 represents antioxidant activity (DPPH). The TPC and TFC values in the extracts obtained using scCO2 were positively correlated with the antioxidant activity (Figure 2a). A negative correlation for TFC and a positive correlation for TPC were demonstrated with the antioxidant activity in the extracts obtained using scCO2 and water.
There are many parameters that influence this assay of antioxidant capacity. Lignin is a polymer constructed of aromatic subunits that account for its radical scavenging activity and was not analyzed in the studied samples [50]. A high content of lignin was determined in an extract from M. × giganteus and Panicum virgatum L. obtained by different methods in [51]. The presence of residual carbohydrates as well as aliphatic hydroxyls, along with lignin structural monomers, can cause an overestimation of antioxidant capacity.

3.3. FTIR Analysis

Selected extracts (scCO2 and scCO2/H2O) from the plants harvested in June and characterized by a high content of phenolic compounds were used for the identification of functional groups present in extract components. Peak characteristic of functional group bonds in FTIR spectra were identified (Figures S1–S14 and Table S4), classified into nine types groups and assigned a functional group based on data presented in the literature (Table 4) [52,53,54,55,56,57]. An analysis of FTIR spectra indicated absorption within the wavelength region corresponding to vibrations of bonds present in the principal components of lignocellulose biomass, i.e., saccharides, lignins, proteins and lipids. Absorption within the wavelength region from 3421 to 3335 cm−1, characteristic of O–H and N–H stretching bonds occurring in saccharides, proteins and polyphenols (Table 4) [55,56,57], was noted in scCO2 and scCO2/H2O extracts from H. salicifolius, H. tuberosus and M. sinensis, scCO2 extracts from M. × giganteus and scCO2/H2O extracts from S. perfoliatum and S. pectinata. All of the examined extracts displayed absorption within the wavelength region from 3070 to 2849 cm−1, corresponding to vibrations of the C–H stretching bonds present in the functional groups of CH2 and CH3 as well as in aromatic rings and the O–CH3 bonds in lipids, lignins, saccharides and esters (Table 4) [52,53,54,55,56,57]. The existence of ester bonds in all of the studied extracts was confirmed by the excitation in the wavelength region from 1748 to 1648 cm−1, which corresponds to polyesters and lignins (Table 4) [55,56,57]. This region is also characteristic of vibrations of the C–N stretching bonds present in proteins and the unconjugated cis C=C bonds in alkenyl groups (Table 4) [52,54,57]. The FTIR spectra of scCO2 extracts from H. salicifolius, scCO2 and scCO2/H2O extracts from H. tuberosus and scCO2/H2O extracts from S. pectinata displayed absorbance within the wavelength region from 1602 to 1514 cm−1, corresponding to vibrations of the C–C and C=C stretching bonds occurring in aromatic rings and the COO− stretching bonds in phenols, pectins and lignins (Table 4) [53,55,56].
An excitation within the wavelength region from 1464 to 1291 cm−1 was recorded for all of the analyzed extracts, which confirms the presence of the functional groups occurring in the compounds, including triterpenoids, polysaccharides, pectins, lignins, lipids, tertiary alcohols, proteins and phenols (Table 4) [52,53,54,55,56,57]. The largest number of peaks within this wavelength region was noted for scCO2 extracts from S. perfoliatum (1464, 1445, 1377, 1310 and 1291 cm−1), while the lowest number of peaks was recorded for scCO2/H2O extracts from H. tuberosus (1374 cm−1). Vibrations of the C–O, C–N, C–C and >PO2 stretching bonds, O–H bending bonds and aromatic C–O bonds (Table 4) [52,53,54,55,56,57] within the wavelength from 1271 to 1117 cm−1, occurring in triterpenoids, phospholipids, polysaccharides, pectins, lignins, proteins and phenolic groups, were detected in all extract samples. However, for extracts obtained from M. sinensis, M. × giganteus and M. sacchariflorus, only one peak was detected (approximately 1170 cm−1) regardless of the solvent used. Excitation within the region from 1104 to 1013 cm−1, caused by vibrations of the C–O, C–N and >PO2 stretching bonds and aromatic C–H stretching bonds characteristic of phospholipids, polysaccharides, pectins, aliphatic amines and phenols (Table 4) [54,55,56,57], was recorded in all analyzed extracts. The FTIR spectra indicated that the number of excitations recorded for isoprenoid bonds was greater for scCO2 extracts than for scCO2/H2O extracts, and this was the case for all the analyzed extracts except for extracts from S. pectinata. The scCO2/H2O extract from S. perfoliatum did not display the presence of isoprenoids. Within the wavelength region from 501 to 427 cm−1, absorbance corresponding to vibrations of the S–S stretching bonds and C–OH3 torsion bonds occurring in polysulfides, aryl disulfides and methoxy groups (Table 4) [52,53] was detected for extracts from H. salicifolius (scCO2), H. tuberosus (scCO2 or scCO2/H2O) and S. pectinata (scCO2/H2O).

4. Conclusions

The presented data indicate varying contents of polyphenolic compounds in the biomass extracts of perennial herbaceous crops depending on the harvest term in the growing period. The varying quality of extract compositions determined by FTIR analysis was noted, which depended on the performance of extraction using scCO2 or the same supercritical solvent combined with water. This information can enable the utilization of the studied biomass for not only the production of bioenergy but also to obtain valuable components of foodstuffs, medicines and cosmetics. However, a comprehensive analysis of the properties and chemical composition (particularly the flavonoid content) of the extracts as well as the relationship between the composition and the properties of the extracts is necessary. Moreover, it is important to study the influence of the extracts on microorganisms and enzymes to determine the cytotoxicity, apoptotic effect and safety of their use. Further development of selective techniques for the extraction of polyphenols, hydrocarbons, fatty acids and acylglycerols from biomass (particularly using scCO2) or of the extract fractioning method is also possible.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agriculture11060488/s1, Table S1. The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) for the influence of substrate, extraction conditions and harvest time (A) June, (B) October, (C) February on total polyphenol concentration (TPC), Table S2. The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) for the influence of substrate, extraction conditions and harvest time (A) June, (B) October, (C) February on total flavonoid concentration (TFC), Table S3. The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) for the influence of substrate, extraction conditions and harvest time (A) June, (B) October, (C) February on antioxidant activity (DPPH assay), Table S4. Wavenumbers of QATR-FTIR peaks of supercritical plant extracts (scCO2 and scCO2/H2O) harvested in June, Figure S1. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2 extract from H. salicifolius harvested in June, Figure S2. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2/H2O extract from H. salicifolius harvested in June, Figure S3. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2 extract from S. perfoliatum harvested in June, Figure S4. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2/H2O extract from S. perfoliatum harvested in June, Figure S5. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2 extract from H. tuberosus harvested in June, Figure S6. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2/H2O extract from H. tuberosus harvested in June, Figure S7. QATR- FTIR spectrum of the scCO2 extract from M. × giganteus harvested in June, Figure S8. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2/H2O extract from M. × giganteus harvested in June, Figure S9. QATR- FTIR spectrum of the scCO2 extract from M. sinensis harvested in June, Figure S10. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2/H2O extract from M. sinensis harvested in June, Figure S11. QATR- FTIR spectrum of the scCO2 extract from M. sacchariflorus harvested in June, Figure S12. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2/H2O extract from M. sacchariflorus harvested in June, Figure S13. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2 extract from S. pectinata harvested in June, Figure S14. QATR-FTIR spectrum of the scCO2/H2O extract from S. pectinata harvested in June.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.; methodology, M.O., B.B. and M.A.; formal analysis, B.B. and M.A.; investigation, M.O.; resources, M.O., B.B. and M.A.; data curation, M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, B.B., M.J.S. and M.A.; visualization, M.O., B.B. and M.A.; supervision. M.A.; project administration, B.B. and M.A.; funding acquisition. M.A. and M.J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National (Polish) Centre for Research and Development (NCBiR), titled “Environment, agriculture and forestry”, project: BIOproducts from lignocellulosic biomass derived from MArginal land to fill the Gap In the Current national bioeconomy, No. BIOSTRATEG3/344253/2/NCBR/2017.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering (grant No. 30.610.007-110), for the materials and the Supercritical Extraction Department, ŁUKASZEWICZ Research Network—New Chemical Syntheses Institute (Puławy, Poland), for the extracts.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Keoleian, G.A.; Volk, T.A. Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: Life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2005, 24, 385–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stolarski, M.J.; Warmiński, K.; Krzyżaniak, M. Energy value of yield and biomass quality of poplar grown in two consecutive 4-year harvest rotations in the north-east of Poland. Energies 2020, 13, 1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Stolarski, M.J.; Niksa, D.; Krzyżaniak, M.; Tworkowski, J.; Szczukowski, S. Willow productivity from small- and large-scale experimental plantations in Poland from 2000 to 2017. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 101, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. James, L.K.; Swinton, S.M.; Thelen, K.D. Profitability analysis of cellulosic energy crops compared with corn. Agron. J. 2010, 102, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Scalbert, A.; Manach, C.; Morand, C.; Rémésy, C.; Jiménez, L. Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45, 287–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Madunić, J.; Madunić, I.V.; Gajski, G.; Popić, J.; Garaj-Vrhovac, V. Apigenin: A dietary flavonoid with diverse anticancer properties. Cancer Lett. 2018, 413, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anhê, F.F.; Desjardins, Y.; Pilon, G.; Dudonné, S.; Genovese, M.I.; Lajolo, F.M.; Marette, A. Polyphenols and type 2 diabetes: A prospective review. PharmaNutrition 2013, 1, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marranzano, M.; Rosa, R.L.; Malaguarnera, M.; Palmeri, R.; Tessitori, M.; Barbera, A.C. Polyphenols: Plant sources and food industry applications. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 4125–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mittal, A.K.; Chisti, Y.; Banerjee, U.C. Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Milinčić, D.D.; Popović, D.A.; Lević, S.M.; Kostić, A.Ž.; Tešić, Ž.L.; Nedović, V.A.; Pešić, M.B. Application of polyphenol-loaded nanoparticles in food industry. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Krishnaiah, D.; Sarbatly, R.; Nithyanandam, R. A review of the antioxidant potential of medicinal plant species. Food Bioprod. Process. 2011, 89, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gessner, D.K.; Ringseis, R.; Eder, K. Potential of plant polyphenols to combat oxidative stress and inflammatory processes in farm animals. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 101, 605–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. González de Llano, D.; Liu, H.; Khoo, C.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V.; Bartolomé, B. Some new findings regarding the antiadhesive activity of cranberry phenolic compounds and their microbial-derived metabolites against uropathogenic bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 2166–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhu, J.; Huang, X.; Zhang, F.; Feng, L.; Li, J. Inhibition of quorum sensing, biofilm, and spoilage potential in Shewanella baltica by green tea polyphenols. J. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fleitas Martínez, O.; Cardoso, M.H.; Ribeiro, S.M.; Franco, O.L. Recent advances in anti-virulence therapeutic strategies with a focus on dismantling bacterial membrane microdomains, toxin neutralization, quorum-sensing interference and biofilm inhibition. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kowalska, G.; Pankiewicz, U.; Kowalski, R. Evaluation of chemical composition of some Silphium, L. species as alternative raw materials. Agriculture 2020, 10, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Pan, L.; Sinden, M.R.; Kennedy, A.H.; Chai, H.; Watson, L.E.; Graham, T.L.; Kinghorn, A.D. Bioactive constituents of Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke). Phytochem. Lett. 2009, 2, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z.; Furman-Toczek, D.; Zagórska-Dziok, M. Antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity of Jerusalem artichoke tubers and leaves extract on HaCaT and BJ fibroblast cells. Lipids. Health Dis. 2018, 17, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Kowalski, R.; Kędzia, B. Antibacterial activity of Silphium perfoliatum extracts. Pharm. Biol. 2007, 45, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kowalski, R. Silphium, L. extracts–composition and protective effect on fatty acids content in sunflower oil subjected to heating and storage. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 820–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmad, P.; Jaleel, C.A.; Salem, M.A.; Nabi, G.; Sharma, S. Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2010, 30, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stolarski, M.J.; Warmiński, K.; Krzyżaniak, M.; Tyśkiewicz, K.; Olba-Zięty, E.; Graban, Ł.; Lajszner, W.; Załuski, D.; Wiejak, R.; Kamiński, P.; et al. How does extraction of biologically active substances with supercritical carbon dioxide affect lignocellulosic biomass properties? Wood Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 519–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Malm, A.; Grzegorczyk, A.; Biernasiuk, A.; Baj, T.; Rój, E.; Tyśkiewicz, K.; Dębczak, A.; Stolarski, M.J.; Krzyżaniak, M.; Olba-Zięty, E. Could supercritical extracts from the aerial parts of Helianthus salicifolius A. Dietr. and Helianthus tuberosus L. be regarded as potential raw materials for biocidal purposes? Agriculture 2021, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ostolski, M.; Adamczak, M.; Brzozowski, B.; Wiczkowski, W. Antioxidant activity and chemical characteristics of supercritical CO2 and water extracts from willow and poplar. Molecules 2021, 26, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lamaison, J.L.; Carnat, A. The amount of main flavonoids in flowers and leaves of Crataegus monogyna Jacq. and Crataegus laevigata (Poiret) DC. (Rosaceae). Pharm. Acta Helv. 1990, 65, 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  27. Blois, M.S. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 1958, 181, 1199–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rasouli, H.; Farzaei, M.H.; Mansouri, K.; Mohammadzadeh, S.; Khodarahmi, R. Plant cell cancer: May natural phenolic compounds prevent onset and development of plant cell malignancy? A literature review. Molecules 2016, 21, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Quideau, S.; Deffieux, D.; Douat-Casassus, C.; Pouységu, L. Plant polyphenols: Chemical properties, biological activities, and synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 586–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aggarwal, S.; Johnson, S.; Hakovirta, M.; Sastri, B.; Banerjee, S. Removal of water and extractives from softwood with supercritical carbon dioxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 3170–3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Trubetskaya, A.; Budarin, V.; Arshadi, M.; Magalhães, D.; Kazanç, F.; Hunt, A.J. Supercritical extraction of biomass as an effective pretreatment step for the char yield control in pyrolysis. Renew. Energy 2021, 170, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Attard, T.M.; Bukhanko, N.; Eriksson, D.; Arshadi, M.; Geladi, P.; Bergsten, U.; Budarin, V.L.; Clark, J.H.; Hunt, A.J. Supercritical extraction of waxes and lipids from biomass: A valuable first step towards an integrated biorefinery. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 177, 684–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Showkat, M.M.; Falck-Ytter, A.B.; Strætkvern, K.O. Phenolic acids in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): Plant organ dependent antioxidant activity and optimized extraction from leaves. Molecules 2019, 24, 3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Balcerek, M.; Rąk, I.; Majtkowska, G.; Majtkowski, W. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic compounds in extracts of selected grasses (Poaceae). Herba Pol. 2009, 55, 215–220. [Google Scholar]
  35. Parveen, I.; Wilson, T.; Donnison, I.S.; Cookson, A.R.; Hauck, B.; Threadgill, M.D. Potential sources of high value chemicals from leaves, stems and flowers of Miscanthus sinensis ‘Goliath’ and Miscanthus sacchariflorus. Phytochem 2013, 92, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Uwineza, P.A.; Waśkiewicz, A. Recent advances in supercritical fluid extraction of natural bioactive compounds from natural plant materials. Molecules 2020, 25, 3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tyśkiewicz, K.; Konkol, M.; Rój, E. The application of supercritical fluid extraction in phenolic compounds isolation from natural plant materials. Molecules 2018, 23, 2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Da Porto, C.; Decorti, D.; Natolino, A. Water and ethanol as co-solvent in supercritical fluid extraction of proanthocyanidins from grape marc: A comparison and a proposal. J Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 87, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. He, J.-Z.; Shao, P.; Liu, J.-H.; Ru, Q.-M. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of flavonoids from pomelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) peel and their antioxidant activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 13065–13078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miguez, F.E.; Villamil, M.B.; Long, S.P.; Bollero, G.A. Meta-analysis of the effects of management factors on Miscanthus×giganteus growth and biomass production. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148, 280–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lemos, M.F.; Lemos, M.F.; Pacheco, H.P.; Endringer, D.C.; Scherer, R. Seasonality modifies rosemary’s composition and biological activity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 70, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cao, Y.; Fang, S.; Fu, X.; Shang, X.; Yang, W. Seasonal variation in phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja. Forests 2019, 10, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Scognamiglio, M.; D’Abrosca, B.; Fiumano, V.; Golino, M.; Esposito, A.; Fiorentino, A. Seasonal phytochemical changes in Phillyrea angustifolia L.: Metabolomic analysis and phytotoxicity assessment. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 8, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pacifico, S.; Galasso, S.; Piccolella, S.; Kretschmer, N.; Pan, S.-P.; Marciano, S.; Bauer, R.; Monaco, P. Seasonal variation in phenolic composition and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Calamintha nepeta (L.) Savi. Food Res. Int. 2015, 69, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bujor, O.C.; Le Bourvellec, C.; Volf, I.; Popa, V.I.; Dufour, C. Seasonal variations of the phenolic constituents in bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) leaves, stems and fruits, and their antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2016, 213, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dela, G.; Or, E.; Ovadia, R.; Nissim-Levi, A.; Weiss, D.; Oren-Shamir, M. Changes in anthocyanin concentration and composition in ‘Jaguar’ rose flowers due to transient high-temperature conditions. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fu, B.; Ji, X.; Zhao, M.; He, F.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, P.; Niu, L. The influence of light quality on the accumulation of flavonoids in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) leaves. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. Biol. 2016, 162, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rathee, J.S.; Hassarajani, S.A.; Chattopadhyay, S. Antioxidant activity of Nyctanthes arbor-tristis leaf extract. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1350–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yu, J. Changes in bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities in pomegranate leaves. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 123, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vazquez-Olivo, G.; López-Martínez, L.X.; Contreras-Angulo, L.; Heredia, J.B. Antioxidant capacity of lignin and phenolic compounds from corn stover. Waste Biomass Valori. 2019, 10, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vanderghem, C.; Jacquet, N.; Richel, A. Can lignin wastes originating from cellulosic ethanol biorefineries act as radical scavenging agents? Aust. J. Chem. 2014, 67, 1693–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Coates, J. Interpretation of infrared spectra. In A Practical Approach; Meyers, R.A., Ed.; Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2006; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hayat, J.; Akodad, M.; Moumen, A.; Baghour, M.; Skalli, A.; Ezrari, S.; Belmalha, S. Phytochemical screening, polyphenols, flavonoids and tannin content, antioxidant activities and FTIR characterization of Marrubium vulgare L. from 2 different localities of Northeast of Morocco. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Huck, C.W. Advances of infrared spectroscopy in natural product research. Phytochem. Lett. 2015, 11, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nogales-Bueno, J.; Baca-Bocanegra, B.; Rooney, A.; Hernández-Hierro, J.M.; Byrne, H.J.; Heredia, F.J. Study of phenolic extractability in grape seeds by means of ATR-FTIR and Raman spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Rodrigues, V.H.; de Melo, M.M.R.; Portugal, I.; Silva, C.M. Extraction of Eucalyptus leaves using solvents of distinct polarity. Cluster analysis and extracts characterization. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 135, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Thummajitsakul, S.; Samaikam, S.; Tacha, S.; Silprasit, K. Study on FTIR spectroscopy, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and anti-amylase activity of extracts and different tea forms of Garcinia schomburgkiana leaves. LWT 2020, 134, 110005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agriculture 11 00488 g001 550
Figure 1. Interaction between (a) total polyphenol content (TPC), (b) total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity determined in scCO2/H2O (∆) and scCO2 (●) extracts from perennial herbaceous crops. DPPH - 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.
Figure 1. Interaction between (a) total polyphenol content (TPC), (b) total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity determined in scCO2/H2O (∆) and scCO2 (●) extracts from perennial herbaceous crops. DPPH - 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.
Agriculture 11 00488 g001
Agriculture 11 00488 g002 550
Figure 2. Principal component analysis of total polyphenol content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity (DPPH) of extracts obtained with (a) scCO2 or (b) scCO2/H2O. Points 1–21 present samples obtained from Helianthus salicifolius, Silphium perfoliatum, Helianthus tuberosus, Miscanthus × giganteus, Miscanthus sacchariflorus, Miscanthus sinensis and Spartina pectinate harvested in June (A), October (B) and February (C).
Figure 2. Principal component analysis of total polyphenol content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity (DPPH) of extracts obtained with (a) scCO2 or (b) scCO2/H2O. Points 1–21 present samples obtained from Helianthus salicifolius, Silphium perfoliatum, Helianthus tuberosus, Miscanthus × giganteus, Miscanthus sacchariflorus, Miscanthus sinensis and Spartina pectinate harvested in June (A), October (B) and February (C).
Agriculture 11 00488 g002
Table
Table 1. Influence of extraction conditions (scCO2 or scCO2/H2O) and harvest time ((A) June, (B) October and (C) February) on total polyphenol content (TPC)* in extracts from herbaceous species.
Table 1. Influence of extraction conditions (scCO2 or scCO2/H2O) and harvest time ((A) June, (B) October and (C) February) on total polyphenol content (TPC)* in extracts from herbaceous species.
Plant MaterialTPC (mg GAE/g d.m.)
scCO2scCO2/H2O
ABCABC
Helianthus salicifolius20.22 ± 0.20 d25.02 ± 0.31 a11.92 ± 0.16 i27.51 ± 0.11 h36.08 ± 0.15 g15.2 ± 0.62 j
Silphium perfoliatum11.33 ± 0.07 j13.99 ± 0.24 h17.37 ± 0.54 f58.37 ± 1.11 e21.59 ± 0.15 i18.25 ± 0.32 i,j
Helianthus tuberosus16.50 ± 0.06 g16.01 ± 0.23 g8.47 ± 0.11 k27.57 ± 0.38 h18.34 ± 0.23 i,j26.26 ± 0.36 h
Miscanthus × giganteus22.17 ± 0.18 c12.2 ± 0.19 i1.24 ± 0.06 o73.91 ± 0.96 c51.33 ± 0.69 f90.75 ± 0.71 b
Miscanthus sinensis19.01 ± 0.20 e17.11 ± 0.28 f8.84 ± 0.35 k90.98 ± 2.05 b65.36 ± 1.26 d26.61 ± 0.60 h
Miscanthus sacchariflorus19.55 ± 0.17 d,e5.95 ± 0.23 l4.86 ± 0.09 m64.64 ± 0.97 d21.91 ± 0.59 i14.43 ± 0.51 j
Spartina pectinata23.93 ± 0.14 b23.46 ± 0.22 b3.82 ± 0.16 n168.18 ± 6.26 a92.47 ± 1.46 b6.17 ± 0.07 k
* Mean values of three different determinations followed by standard deviation are presented. The different letters in the same group indicate statistically significant differences between the samples (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Influence of extraction conditions (scCO2 or scCO2/H2O) and harvest time ((A) June, (B) October and (C) February) on total flavonoid content (TFC)* in extracts from herbaceous species.
Table 2. Influence of extraction conditions (scCO2 or scCO2/H2O) and harvest time ((A) June, (B) October and (C) February) on total flavonoid content (TFC)* in extracts from herbaceous species.
Plant MaterialTFC (mg QE/g d.m.)
scCO2scCO2/H2O
ABCABC
Helianthus salicifolius2.41 ± 0.06 m1.29 ± 0.07 o3.80 ± 0.04 i0.95 ± 0.02 l,m5.62 ± 0.01 d2.99 ± 0.09 g,h
Silphium perfoliatum2.05 ± 0.05 n2.90 ± 0.03 k7.28 ± 0.09 b1.39 ± 0.02 k5.92 ± 0.05 c6.95 ± 0.11 a
Helianthus tuberosus4.79 ± 0.02 g5.57 ± 0.05 e3.03 ± 0.11 j,k1.11 ± 0.05 l5.54 ± 0.04 d5.56 ± 0.64 d
Miscanthus × giganteus10.62 ± 0.09 a3.14 ± 0.03 j1.19 ± 0.03 g1.87 ± 0.03 i6.25 ± 0.11 b3.46 ± 0.06 f
Miscanthus sinensis6.05 ± 0.05 d6.12 ± 0.03 d4.31 ± 0.01 h1.91 ± 0.03 i6.97 ± 0.11 a3.71 ± 0.12 f
Miscanthus sacchariflorus6.61 ± 0.07 c2.23 ± 0.02 m,n3.07 ± 0.03 j,k1.46 ± 0.02 j,k4.38 ± 0.06 e3.16 ± 0.07 g
Spartina pectinata5.15 ± 0.11 f6.62 ± 0.05 c2.64 ± 0.06 l1.71 ± 0.03 i,j0.78 ± 0.01 m2.78 ± 0.08 h
* Mean values of three different determinations followed by standard deviation are presented. The different letters in the same group indicate statistically significant differences between the samples (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Influence of extraction conditions (scCO2 or scCO2/H2O) and harvest time ((A) June, (B) October and (C) February) on antioxidant activity (DPPH assay)* in extracts from herbaceous species.
Table 3. Influence of extraction conditions (scCO2 or scCO2/H2O) and harvest time ((A) June, (B) October and (C) February) on antioxidant activity (DPPH assay)* in extracts from herbaceous species.
Antioxidant Activity Using the DPPH Method (mg Trolox/g d.m.)
Plant MaterialscCO2scCO2/H2O
ABCABC
Helianthus salicifolius183.04 ± 7.77 f9.04 ± 1.95 n34.02 ± 0.21 m582.50 ± 34.76 h420.78 ± 2.94 i23.01 ± 0.13 n
Silphium perfoliatum215.55 ± 4.54 e28.62 ± 1.01 m136.47 ± 0.59 j1110.64 ± 47.27 c383.25 ± 3.17 j,k22.85 ± 0.62 n
Helianthus tuberosus290.43 ± 2.25 d139.48 ± 4.82 i,j167.18 ± 2.25 g980.24 ± 25.15 d389.94 ± 0.51 j305.99 ± 0.67 l
Miscanthus × giganteus104.83 ± 2.97 k56.31 ± 1.52 i31.56 ± 0.24 m1134.86 ± 33.73 c919.02 ± 1.48 f359.16 ± 20.86 k
Miscanthus sinensis384.94 ± 5.52 b146.69 ± 1.20 h,i369.83 ± 3.76 c1170.19 ± 17.96 b958.81 ± 1.87 d,e368.78 ± 5.65 j,k
Miscanthus sacchariflorus399.41 ± 2.67 a57.20 ± 4.56 i382.05 ± 2.67 a805.72 ± 31.51 g426.86 ± 1.94 i276.91 ± 2.10 m
Spartina pectinata208.44 ± 5.21 e150.07 ± 2.74 h166.43 ± 0.85 g1289.50 ± 34.35 a953.15 ± 1.66 e37.85 ± 0.16 n
* Mean values of three different determinations followed by standard deviation are presented. The different letters in the same group indicate statistically significant differences between the samples (p < 0.05). DPPH - 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.
Table
Table 4. Identification of functional groups of supercritical plant extracts (scCO2 and scCO2/H2O) harvested in June (analysis based on literature [52,53,54,55,56,57]).
Table 4. Identification of functional groups of supercritical plant extracts (scCO2 and scCO2/H2O) harvested in June (analysis based on literature [52,53,54,55,56,57]).
GroupWavenumbers (cm−1)Plant ExtractBond TypeFunctional Group
scCO2scCO2/H2O
14000–3100H. salicifolius, H. tuberosus,
M. × giganteus, M. sinensis		H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. sinensis, S. pectinata		O–H, N–H stretchingPolyphenolic, carbohydrates, proteins
23100–2800H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		C–H stretching in CH2 and CH3;
C–H aromatic stretching; O–CH3		Lipids, lignins, carbohydrates, esters
31750–1650H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		C=O ester stretching; C–N stretching;
cis C=C unconjugated		Polyesters, lignins, proteins, alkenyl groups
41610–1500-H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, S. pectinata		C–C, C=C aromatic stretching;
COO− stretching		Phenolic groups, pectins, lignins
51500–1290H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		CH2 scissoring, bending, out of plane;
C–H in >CH–; C–H in –CH3;
C–H, CH2, CH3 deformations;
C=C–C aromatic ring stretching;
O–H bending; N–H, C–N		triterpenoids, phenyl groups, polysaccharides, pectins, lipids, lignins, tertiary alcohols, proteins
61260–1100H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		C–O, C–N, C–C, >PO2 stretching;
O–H bending; C–O ring vibrations		Phenyl groups, lignins, pectins, triterpenoids, polysaccharides, phospholipids, proteins
71100–1000H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		C–O, C–N stretching;
C–H aromatic stretching; >PO2 stretching		Phenolic groups, phospholipids, polysaccharides, pectins, aliphatic amines
81000–510H. salicifolius, S. perfoliatum,
H. tuberosus, M. × giganteus,
M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		H. salicifolius, H. tuberosus,
M. × giganteus, M. sinensis,
M. sacchariflorus, S. pectinata		C–H aromatic stretching; –CH2–; –HC–;
cis –CH; trans C–H out of plane		Isoprenoids
9510–400H. salicifolius, H. tuberosusH. tuberosus, S. pectinataS–S stretching; C–OH3 torsion Aryl disulfides, polysulfides, methoxy groups
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ostolski, M.; Adamczak, M.; Brzozowski, B.; Stolarski, M.J. Screening of Functional Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extracts from Perennial Herbaceous Crops. Agriculture 2021, 11, 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060488

AMA Style

Ostolski M, Adamczak M, Brzozowski B, Stolarski MJ. Screening of Functional Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extracts from Perennial Herbaceous Crops. Agriculture. 2021; 11(6):488. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ostolski, Mateusz, Marek Adamczak, Bartosz Brzozowski, and Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski. 2021. "Screening of Functional Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extracts from Perennial Herbaceous Crops" Agriculture 11, no. 6: 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060488

APA Style

Ostolski, M., Adamczak, M., Brzozowski, B., & Stolarski, M. J. (2021). Screening of Functional Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extracts from Perennial Herbaceous Crops. Agriculture, 11(6), 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop