Figure 1.
Structure and characteristics of broccoli plants: (a) broccoli florets; (b) leaves; (c) lateral branch; (d) broccoli plant; and (e) stem.
Figure 1.
Structure and characteristics of broccoli plants: (a) broccoli florets; (b) leaves; (c) lateral branch; (d) broccoli plant; and (e) stem.
Figure 2.
Measuring position of stem composition: (a) measuring position 1; (b) measuring position 2; and (j) measuring position 10.
Figure 2.
Measuring position of stem composition: (a) measuring position 1; (b) measuring position 2; and (j) measuring position 10.
Figure 3.
Transverse cross-section of a broccoli stem: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 3.
Transverse cross-section of a broccoli stem: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 4.
Stem samples for density measurement: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 4.
Stem samples for density measurement: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 5.
The experiment of measuring the density of broccoli stems: (a) measuring cylinder; and (b) electronic scale.
Figure 5.
The experiment of measuring the density of broccoli stems: (a) measuring cylinder; and (b) electronic scale.
Figure 6.
Geometric model of broccoli stem for tensile experiment.
Figure 6.
Geometric model of broccoli stem for tensile experiment.
Figure 7.
Model meshing results in workbench software.
Figure 7.
Model meshing results in workbench software.
Figure 8.
Schematic diagram of radial compression model of broccoli stem.
Figure 8.
Schematic diagram of radial compression model of broccoli stem.
Figure 9.
Schematic diagram of bending of broccoli stem.
Figure 9.
Schematic diagram of bending of broccoli stem.
Figure 10.
Tensile samples of broccoli stem: (a) stem; (b) rind; (c) xylem; and (d) pith.
Figure 10.
Tensile samples of broccoli stem: (a) stem; (b) rind; (c) xylem; and (d) pith.
Figure 11.
Tensile test of broccoli stem.
Figure 11.
Tensile test of broccoli stem.
Figure 12.
Radial compression experiment of broccoli stem: (a) upper indenter; (b) broccoli stem; and (c) fixed platform.
Figure 12.
Radial compression experiment of broccoli stem: (a) upper indenter; (b) broccoli stem; and (c) fixed platform.
Figure 13.
Three-point bending experiment of broccoli stem: (a) upper indenter; (b) broccoli stem; and (c) fixed support.
Figure 13.
Three-point bending experiment of broccoli stem: (a) upper indenter; (b) broccoli stem; and (c) fixed support.
Figure 14.
The distribution characteristics of broccoli stem size.
Figure 14.
The distribution characteristics of broccoli stem size.
Figure 15.
Relationship between the content—of epidermis, xylem and pith—and radial position.
Figure 15.
Relationship between the content—of epidermis, xylem and pith—and radial position.
Figure 16.
The stem model and its equivalent stress after tensile failure: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 16.
The stem model and its equivalent stress after tensile failure: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 17.
Characteristics of different materials after tensile fracture: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 17.
Characteristics of different materials after tensile fracture: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 18.
The tensile strength–displacement characteristic curve of model in tensile experiment.
Figure 18.
The tensile strength–displacement characteristic curve of model in tensile experiment.
Figure 19.
Equivalent stress of stem model in compression, with compression displacement of: (a) 0 mm; (b) 6.5 mm; (c) 13 mm; and (d) 19.5 mm.
Figure 19.
Equivalent stress of stem model in compression, with compression displacement of: (a) 0 mm; (b) 6.5 mm; (c) 13 mm; and (d) 19.5 mm.
Figure 20.
Equivalent stress and compressive strength characteristic curves of radial compression simulation process of broccoli stem.
Figure 20.
Equivalent stress and compressive strength characteristic curves of radial compression simulation process of broccoli stem.
Figure 21.
The broccoli stem model after bending failure: (a) equivalent stress of bending; and (b) bending strength.
Figure 21.
The broccoli stem model after bending failure: (a) equivalent stress of bending; and (b) bending strength.
Figure 22.
Equivalent stress and bending strength characteristic curves of bending simulation process of broccoli stem.
Figure 22.
Equivalent stress and bending strength characteristic curves of bending simulation process of broccoli stem.
Figure 23.
The broccoli stem with stretching failure: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 23.
The broccoli stem with stretching failure: (a) rind; (b) xylem; and (c) pith.
Figure 24.
The force–displacement characteristic curves of rind in tensile physical experiment.
Figure 24.
The force–displacement characteristic curves of rind in tensile physical experiment.
Figure 25.
The force–displacement characteristic curves of xylem in tensile physical experiment.
Figure 25.
The force–displacement characteristic curves of xylem in tensile physical experiment.
Figure 26.
The force–displacement characteristic curves of pith in tensile physical experiment.
Figure 26.
The force–displacement characteristic curves of pith in tensile physical experiment.
Figure 27.
The broccoli stem with compression failure: (a) before compression; (b) as the crack appears; and (c) when severely damaged.
Figure 27.
The broccoli stem with compression failure: (a) before compression; (b) as the crack appears; and (c) when severely damaged.
Figure 28.
Compression force and displacement characteristic curves of radial compression experiment process on broccoli stem.
Figure 28.
Compression force and displacement characteristic curves of radial compression experiment process on broccoli stem.
Figure 29.
Elastic modulus and compressive strength characteristic curves of radial compression experiment process of broccoli stem.
Figure 29.
Elastic modulus and compressive strength characteristic curves of radial compression experiment process of broccoli stem.
Figure 30.
The broccoli stem with bending failure.
Figure 30.
The broccoli stem with bending failure.
Figure 31.
The compression force–displacement characteristic curves of broccoli stem in bending experiment.
Figure 31.
The compression force–displacement characteristic curves of broccoli stem in bending experiment.
Table 1.
The parameters and symbols in the modeling and physical experiments.
Table 1.
The parameters and symbols in the modeling and physical experiments.
Symbol | Parameter | Symbol | Parameter |
---|
L | Sample length, mm | σc | Maximum shear stress, MPa |
W | Sample width, mm | Mmax | Maximum bending moment, N·m |
T | Sample thickness, mm | σmax | Bending strength (MPa) |
ρ | Density, kg·m−3 | d | Diameter of the broccoli, mm |
E | Elastic modulus, Pa | d1 | Thickness of rind, mm |
μ | Poisson’s ratio | d2 | Thickness of xylem, mm |
K | Bulk modulus, Pa | d3 | Diameter of the pith, mm |
G | Shear modulus, Pa | Δl | Maximum stretch deformation, m |
Rm | Maximum tensile stress, Pa | ymax | Maximum bending deformation, m |
Table 2.
Parameters of broccoli stem model for virtual tensile experiment.
Table 2.
Parameters of broccoli stem model for virtual tensile experiment.
Parameter | Symbol | Value |
---|
| | Rind | Xylem | Pith |
Sample length (mm) | L | 90 | 90 | 90 |
Sample width (mm) | W | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Sample thickness (mm) | T | 3.57 | 2.17 | 7 |
Density (kg/m3) | ρ | 1056.1 | 938.9 | 1009.9 |
Elastic modulus (Pa) | E | 2.68 × 107 | 1.288 × 108 | 7.5 × 106 |
Poisson’s ratio | μ | 0.3 | 0.43 | 0.3 |
Bulk modulus (Pa) | K | 2.231 × 107 | 1.0733 × 108 | 6.2703 × 106 |
Shear modulus (Pa) | G | 1.0297 × 107 | 4.9539 × 107 | 2.894 × 106 |
Maximum tensile stress (Pa) | Rm | 1.8314 × 106 | 1.911 × 106 | 3.23 × 105 |
Maximum shear stress (Pa) | σc | 7.141 × 105 | 2.2581 × 106 | 2.8086 × 105 |
Table 3.
Parameters of broccoli stem model for compression experiment.
Table 3.
Parameters of broccoli stem model for compression experiment.
Parameter | Symbol | Value |
---|
Sample length (mm) | L | 25 |
Sample diameter (mm) | W | 40 |
Density (kg/m3) | ρ | 1022.4 |
Elastic modulus (Pa) | E | 1.6 × 106 |
Poisson’s ratio | μ | 0.3 |
Bulk modulus (Pa) | K | 1.3672 × 106 |
Shear modulus (Pa) | G | 6.31 × 105 |
Maximum tensile stress (Pa) | Rm | 4.075 × 105 |
Maximum shear stress (Pa) | σc | 2.8086 × 105 |
Table 4.
Parameters of broccoli stem model for bending experiment.
Table 4.
Parameters of broccoli stem model for bending experiment.
Parameter | Symbol | Value |
---|
Sample length (mm) | L | 150 |
Sample diameter (mm) | W | 40 |
Density (kg/m3) | ρ | 1022.4 |
Elastic modulus (Pa) | E | 3.6 × 106 |
Poisson’s ratio | μ | 0.3 |
Bulk modulus (Pa) | K | 2.9682 × 106 |
Shear modulus (Pa) | G | 1.3699 × 106 |
Maximum tensile stress (Pa) | Rm | 4.075 × 105 |
Maximum shear stress (Pa) | σc | 7.055 × 105 |
Table 5.
Axial distribution of the content of broccoli stems.
Table 5.
Axial distribution of the content of broccoli stems.
Measuring Position | Diameter of Stem d (mm) | Rind | Xylem | Pith |
---|
Thickness d1 (mm) | Ratio Area (%) | Thickness d2 (mm) | Ratio Area (%) | Diameter d3 (mm) | Ratio Area (%) |
---|
1 | 30.78 | 2.09 | 25.32 | 3.32 | 32.63 | 19.96 | 42.05 |
2 | 34.03 | 2.45 | 26.62 | 2.64 | 24.17 | 23.87 | 49.20 |
3 | 37.33 | 2.30 | 23.13 | 2.31 | 20.17 | 28.11 | 56.70 |
4 | 39.11 | 2.96 | 28.03 | 2.07 | 16.84 | 29.04 | 55.13 |
5 | 41.01 | 4.03 | 35.41 | 2.40 | 17.44 | 28.16 | 47.15 |
6 | 42.07 | 3.70 | 32.12 | 2.04 | 15.04 | 30.58 | 52.84 |
7 | 41.98 | 3.59 | 31.24 | 2.15 | 15.94 | 30.51 | 52.82 |
8 | 40.82 | 2.98 | 27.11 | 2.10 | 16.51 | 30.65 | 56.38 |
9 | 36.99 | 2.39 | 24.22 | 1.54 | 13.80 | 29.12 | 61.97 |
10 | 35.96 | 2.49 | 25.73 | 1.54 | 14.03 | 27.91 | 60.24 |
Table 6.
Density of rind, xylem and pith of broccoli stem.
Table 6.
Density of rind, xylem and pith of broccoli stem.
Material | Sample | Volume (cm3) | Quality (g) | Density (g·cm−3) | The Average Density (kg·m−3) |
---|
Rind | 1 | 8 | 7.85 | 0.9813 | 1056.1 |
2 | 6 | 6.88 | 1.1467 |
3 | 5 | 5.65 | 1.1300 |
4 | 7 | 7.26 | 1.0371 |
5 | 7.5 | 7.39 | 0.9853 |
Xylem | 1 | 11 | 9.98 | 0.9073 | 938.9 |
2 | 12.5 | 10.72 | 0.8576 |
3 | 10 | 10.18 | 1.0180 |
4 | 9.5 | 8.95 | 0.9421 |
5 | 11.5 | 11.15 | 0.9696 |
Pith | 1 | 17.5 | 18.19 | 1.0394 | 1009.9 |
2 | 14 | 14.44 | 1.0314 |
3 | 24 | 23 | 0.9583 |
4 | 18.5 | 18.93 | 1.0232 |
5 | 20 | 19.94 | 0.9970 |
Table 7.
Tensile test results of broccoli stem.
Table 7.
Tensile test results of broccoli stem.
Material | Position | Sample | Maximum Tension force F (N) | Deformation Δl (×10−3m) | Tensile Strength σ (MPa) | Elastic Modulus E (MPa) |
---|
Value | Mean | Value | Mean |
---|
Rind | Bottom | 1 | 49.51 | 3.195 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 48.5 | 45.5 |
2 | 44.04 | 2.883 | 2.8 | 47.9 |
3 | 56.14 | 4.730 | 3.5 | 37.2 |
4 | 58.47 | 3.772 | 3.7 | 48.6 |
Middle | 1 | 45.30 | 3.588 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 25.3 | 26.8 |
2 | 48.07 | 3.768 | 1.9 | 25.5 |
3 | 45.09 | 3.741 | 1.8 | 24.1 |
4 | 44.61 | 2.773 | 1.8 | 32.2 |
Top | 1 | 51.32 | 4.966 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 28.2 | 27.2 |
2 | 57.94 | 5.594 | 3.2 | 28.2 |
3 | 48.07 | 6.123 | 2.6 | 21.4 |
4 | 65.05 | 5.744 | 3.5 | 30.9 |
Xylem | Bottom | 1 | 73.97 | 2.074 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 92.4 | 110.7 |
2 | 88.50 | 2.314 | 4.6 | 99.1 |
3 | 77.82 | 1.642 | 4.0 | 122.8 |
4 | 92.77 | 1.867 | 4.8 | 128.7 |
Middle | 1 | 117.18 | 2.095 | 7.7 | 6.2 | 184.5 | 128.8 |
2 | 80.65 | 2.466 | 5.3 | 107.9 |
3 | 92.73 | 2.364 | 6.1 | 129.4 |
4 | 87.96 | 3.103 | 5.8 | 93.5 |
Top | 1 | 20.04 | 3.262 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 25.4 | 19.2 |
2 | 16.12 | 4.222 | 1.3 | 15.8 |
3 | 15.62 | 3.522 | 1.3 | 18.3 |
4 | 13.77 | 3.264 | 1.1 | 17.4 |
Pith | Bottom | 1 | 28.23 | 4.623 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 6.2 | 6.7 |
2 | 30.79 | 3.657 | 0.6 | 8.6 |
3 | 32.56 | 4.786 | 0.7 | 6.9 |
4 | 24.99 | 5.265 | 0.5 | 4.8 |
Middle | 1 | 34.90 | 5.034 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 7.1 | 7.5 |
2 | 33.40 | 4.330 | 0.7 | 7.9 |
3 | 33.75 | 4.231 | 0.7 | 8.1 |
4 | 39.96 | 5.815 | 0.8 | 7.0 |
Top | 1 | 28.43 | 3.669 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 7.9 | 6.5 |
2 | 26.81 | 5.041 | 0.5 | 5.4 |
3 | 30.04 | 4.311 | 0.6 | 7.1 |
4 | 33.69 | 6.112 | 0.7 | 5.6 |
Table 8.
Experimental results of radial compression of broccoli stem.
Table 8.
Experimental results of radial compression of broccoli stem.
Measuring Position | Maximum Compression Force (N) | Deformation (mm) | Diameter (mm) | Strain | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Elastic Modulus of Compression (MPa) |
---|
1 | 414.733 | 8.136 | 30.78 | 0.26 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
2 | 553.522 | 10.893 | 38.99 | 0.28 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
3 | 430.491 | 10.496 | 42.26 | 0.25 | 0.4 | 1.6 |
4 | 319.942 | 9.198 | 42.57 | 0.22 | 0.3 | 1.4 |
5 | 304.097 | 9.489 | 38.67 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 1.3 |
6 | 243.372 | 7.388 | 35.92 | 0.21 | 0.3 | 1.3 |
Table 9.
Experimental results of bending of broccoli stem.
Table 9.
Experimental results of bending of broccoli stem.
| Maximum Bending Force F (N) | Maximum Deflection ymax (m) | Maximum Bending Moment Mmax (N·m) | Bending Strength σmax (MPa) | Elastic Modulus of Bending E (MPa) |
---|
Sample 1 | 500.220 | 25.8 | 51.0 | 6.8 | 2.7 |
Sample 2 | 449.588 | 24.2 | 45.9 | 6.1 | 2.6 |
Sample 3 | 401.441 | 20.6 | 40.9 | 6.7 | 3.6 |
Sample 4 | 549.894 | 23.1 | 56.1 | 7.9 | 3.6 |
Mean | 475.3 | 23.4 | 48.5 | 6.9 | 3.1 |
Standard deviation | 60.0 | 2.2 | 6.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
Table 10.
Comparison of broccoli stalk strength between virtual and physical experiments.
Table 10.
Comparison of broccoli stalk strength between virtual and physical experiments.
Load | Parameter | Virtual Experiments | Physical Experiment | Standard Deviation |
---|
Axial tension | Tensile strength (MPa) | Rind | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.28 |
Xylem | 1.7 | 6.2 | 3.18 |
Pith | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.42 |
Displacement (mm) | Rind | 2.5 | 3.5 | 0.71 |
Xylem | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.27 |
Pith | 2.2 | 4.8 | 1.84 |
Radial compression | Compressive strength (MPa) | | 0.59 | 0.4 | 0.13 |
Displacement (mm) | | 7.8 | 10.5 | 1.91 |
Bending | Bending strength (MPa) | | 1.3 | 6.9 | 3.96 |
Displacement (mm) | | 22.5 | 23.4 | 0.64 |