Next Article in Journal
Potential and Improvement of Maintenance Efficiency of Agricultural PTO Shafts by a New Digital Maintenance Assistant
Next Article in Special Issue
Responses of Alpine Soil Nitrification and Denitrification Rates to Nitrogen Addition Gradient—The Role of Functional Genes
Previous Article in Journal
Crop Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Case of Irish Potato and Maize
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interactive Effects of Soil Water, Nutrients and Clonal Fragmentation on Root Growth of Xerophilic Plant Stipa breviflora
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/agriculture13020226
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress of Soil and Vegetation Restoration Technology in Open-Pit Coal Mine: A Review

by
Daolong Xu
1,
Xiufen Li
2,
Jian Chen
1 and
Jianghua Li
1,*
1
National Engineering Laboratory for Cereal Fermentation Technology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Rd, Wuxi 214122, China
2
School of Environment and Civil Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(2), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020226
Submission received: 13 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 17 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Restoration of Degraded Grasslands and Sustainable Grazing)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Open-pit mining has caused extensive land destruction, including land abandonment and reduction in agricultural land, resulting in serious environmental problems. Ecological restoration and mine reclamation have become important components of the sustainable development strategies in Inner Mongolia, China. Therefore, the rehabilitation of mines and agricultural land is vital and has attracted widespread attention from the Chinese government. In this light, we reviewed the progress of mine restoration technologies in China in recent years and summarized the integrated technology of open-pit mine reclamation with microbial restoration technology as the core, ecological vegetation restoration as the essential, and soil restoration and improvement as the promotion. As a cost-effective and environmentally beneficial technique, combining the microbial recovery technology with vegetation and the recovery of vegetation and the improvement of the soil is widely recommended in the mining reclamation area. At the same time, we comprehensively analyzed the current status and progress of ecological restoration technology and put forward the development direction of green mining in the future. In conclusion, this review can provides guiding the sustainable development of green, ecological mines, as well as provide reference for mining reclamation and agricultural land restoration and other related fields.

1. Introduction

Coal resources have always been in a very important position in the structure of nonrenewable energy in the world [1,2]. China is the main coal energy consumer in the word and coal mining has made great contributions to local economic development for years [3]. According to the statistics, seventy-five percent of the added value of global coal production comes from open-pit coal mines. In China, open-pit coal production accounts for 15% of the total coal production [4]. At present, China has gained popularity as the world’s largest producer and consumer of coal resources [5,6]. According to forecasts, the total mineable coal reserves in China have a rate of hundreds of millions of tons per year [7]. For example, Inner Mongolia Shengli coalfield is 22.4 billion tons, which has the thickest coal seam and the largest reserves in China. It is also one of the coal fields exceeding 20 billion tons in Inner Mongolia. (Figure 1). The large-scale extraction of coal has put the country’s industry in a state of vigorous development and at the same time brings huge economic benefits. However, the long-term and large-scale exploitation of open-pit mines has severely damaged the topography and the natural ecosystem [8,9], such as vegetation degradation [10], soil erosion [11], desertification [12], collapses [13,14], heavy metal pollution [15,16], ground subsidence and air pollution [17]. In addition, coal mining can lead to a reduction in land use and the loss of biodiversity and habitat [18]. It follows that large-scale coal exploitation activities often lead to severe disturbances of the regional ecology equilibrium [19,20]. After coal mining, the refuse dumps’ soil is mostly deep below one hundred meters, and overburdens are devoid of soil characteristics [21], uneven particle size distribution, no soil aggregate structure and poor level of nutrients [22] (Figure 2). Accordingly, open-pit mining operations also change the physical and chemical properties of the soil by markedly destroying soil aggregates and reducing soil fertility [23]. Additionally, the coal gangue and refuse dumps generated by mining occupy a substantial land area [24,25], and not only destroy the geomorphological structure and the landscape, but also lead to the occurrence of soil erosion and geological disasters, including land damage, mudslides, landslides and rocky desertification [26,27]. Furthermore, open-pit mining causes substantial damage to surface vegetation; the direct effect is landscape fragmentation with the loss of grassland and agricultural land [28]. The waste residue and dust from coal mining will also pollute the soil around the mining area, and once the agricultural land is polluted, it is difficult to restore the soil quality by itself. Therefore, the ecological restoration of the mining areas is not only beneficial to the local economic and social stability, but also to the sustainable development of the mining area.
With the rapid development of modern society, the demand of coal resources is also increasing for people [29]. Massive coal exploitation severely damaged the grassland and its fragile biodiversity. The recovery and management of mines are important and have attracted much focus from the Chinese government. Thus, the improvement of open-pit coal mines has attracted widespread attention. Similarly, another study uncovered that the refuse dumps are considered to be the crucial players of ecological and environmental regression in and around coal mine areas [30]. The soil of the dump site lacks nutrition, and the soil microorganism is relatively rare. In accordance with previous studies, the core environmental issues that reduce plant growth are poor loamy soil of overburden dumps, denuded surfaces and low biomass [31]. Therefore, soil reconstruction is a major component of mine ecological remediation. As previously reported in the literature, we can improve physicochemical properties of the soil, including the soil aggregate stability [32], the moisture content [33], the number of soil layers [34] and the soil configuration [35], so as to improve the effect of vegetation restoration in mining areas [36].
Agricultural land resources are the material basis for human survival. So far, agricultural land has been seriously affected due to mining development. According to statistics, the part of agricultural land overlapping with mining areas in China accounts for about 40% of the country’s arable land area. More than 90% of the land destroyed by mining in China’s south–north transition zone is agricultural, and most of the coal mining areas in East and North China are in farmland [37,38]. The current reclamation rate of mining areas in China is less than 15%, and the area of land destroyed by mining is still growing rapidly every year, leading to a shortage of land resources. While coal mining brings economic development, it also poses a huge challenge to the quality of agricultural land [39,40]. Therefore, the application of mine ecological restoration technology not only has a positive effect on restoring arable land resources and protecting basic farmland, but also has an important significance in achieving sustainable development of human ecological environment protection.
Currently, many effective studies on vegetation restoration have been carried in mining areas [41,42]. These restoration technologies primarily include physical (change soil, electrodynamics and irrigation) [43], chemical (amendments using soil improver such as biochar, phosphate and limestone) [44], and biological (plant configuration pattern and effective microorganisms) [45]. Biological measures have focused on mycorrhizal symbiosis, and it has great potential to achieve other satisfactory ecological benefits [46]. However, in the actual ecological restoration of mines, a single restoration technology often has certain limitations and cannot achieve the restoration needs. Therefore, in the process of promoting ecological restoration of mining areas, the actual existence of the above complex problems, can not rely on a single method to solve [47].
In the present scenario, we comprehensively analyzed the previous studies, in response to many problems, such as landform destruction, fragile biodiversity, degradation of vegetation diversity, soil erosion, air pollution, and serious desertification caused by mining areas [48,49]. This review aimed to state the main technologies of soil improvement and function enhancement in mining areas, vegetation restoration and reconstruction, and maintaining the sustainable development of the ecosystem (Figure 3). We summarized the feasibility of ecological restoration technologies in mining areas from the perspective of vegetation, soil and microorganisms.

2. Soil Improvement and Function Promotion Technology

Soil is the basis for plant survival, and having fertile soil conditions is the key to vegetation growth and survival [50,51]. Many factors limit plant growth in these soils, including soil pH, toxic substances in the soil, lack of nutrients, etc., creating an environment in which basically no plants can survive. With the increase in national attention to ecological restoration in mining areas, the research on soil improvement technology in mining areas has become the focus of attention of many scholars.
In recent years, a large number of methods and measures have been verified about mine soil restoration, among which rebuilding soil structure and improving fertility by adopting methods such as replacing topsoil and adding amendments to improve and restore soil are the main measures in the ecological restoration process of mine sites at present [52]. As we all know, topsoil is an important part of soil. Therefore, many researchers focus on the improvement of the topsoil. Currently, many scholars believe that topsoil is thin and easily lost or degraded when backfilled or stored, and that the large area of the piled drainage field can no longer be replaced by the original topsoil [53]. Therefore, suitable topsoil needs to be found for replacement. Some scholars in India have used industrial sludge as a topsoil amendment by utilization of industrial waste ETP sludge (effluent treatment plant sludge) to provide a better substrate for the growth of different plant species, thus increasing the soil biomass and improving the soil biomass in a short period of time [30]. Moreover, after 3 years, ETP sludge changes the number of microorganisms: the bacterial population increased from 1.8 × 101 to 9.8 × 107 CFU/g, actinomycetes and fungi population increased from nil to 6.5 × 105 CFU/g and 6.5 × 101 to 7.5 × 106 CFU/g, respectively, as depicted in Table S1. Li et al. [54] showed that procuring an air-drying mixture of permafrost and coal gangue instead of expensive topsoil could meet the initial growth requirements of seeds and greatly improved soil nutrients. It has also been shown that tertiary weathered loess and selected unweathered gray sandstone [55], weathered brown sandstone, mixed sandstone and shale as soil substitutes, can all serve to improve soil improvement [56]. Take the example of a coal mine in Inner Mongolia, China. Taking the overlying soil layer of open pit coal mine as the substrate, different additives are added to improve the surface soil of landfill reclamation. The results showed that the optimal formula of the substitute material was a ratio of m (subclay):m (peat) = 20:1 and an applied microbial agent concentration of 0.15 kg/m2 [57]. This method has obvious effect on the improvement of mine surface soil. Lu et al. [58] found that optimum proportion was found to be soil: UCFA: MSLs = 70:20:10 and soil: UCFA: MSLs = 60:20:20; this achieved excellent results in the Baorixile open-pit mine remediation applications in Inner Mongolia, China (Figure S1). In addition, there are also good technical experiences in the engineering reclamation of soil, such as when piling and discharging soil, creating a slope resembling a pyramid, with the slope <35°, so as to avoid landslides and vegetation seed loss from the site.
Therefore, the reconstruction of topsoil and the addition of improver are important measures of soil improvement and function enhancement technology for coal mine disposal sites, and this method has an important role in promoting the restoration of soil vitality and changing soil microbial diversity in a short period of time for coal disposal sites.

3. Vegetation Restoration and Optimal Plant Configuration Pattern Technology

Vegetation restoration is the key to ecological reconstruction in the damaged area of open-pit coal mines, and it is also one of the most common and effective methods to improve the mining environment [59]. Through vegetation restoration and ecological rehabilitation, a stable and efficient artificial vegetation ecosystem is established in the mining area, which provides good ecological environment conditions for the survival of plants and animals [60]. The optimal configuration of vegetation is mainly through the ecological environment conditions of different mining areas, taking local materials according to local conditions, preferably selecting the dominant plants with strong local adaptability and in line with the physiological characteristics of plant growth. The spatial configuration model system of ecological restoration with high stability and sustainability and multiple levels is constructed [61].
At present, according to the research progress of vegetation restoration at home and abroad, vegetation restoration in mining areas should be integrated with artificial restoration means, and then treated by microbial reclamation means to restore the diversity of microorganisms and surface vegetation in mining areas, to screen plants with high tolerance or resistance (pioneer plants) [62,63], and to establish secondary plant communities (companion plants, dominant populations, subdominant populations) on the basis of the growth of pioneer plants, so as to achieve the purpose of ecological restoration. The principles of plant configuration for ecological restoration in mining areas are as follows: (1) the principle of resilience; (2) the principle of ecological adaptability; (3) the principle of plant diversity; (4) the principle of sustained stability of pioneer; (5) the guideline of combining native and exotic plants; (6) the principle of zoning of the site as well as functional rationality. Combined with the current research, the plants used for ecological restoration in mining areas are mainly herbaceous plants. In the process of mine restoration, planting herbs has the advantages of good restoration effect, strong water and soil conservation ability and relatively low investment [64]. On the other hand, we should also consider the law of vegetation development, different planting densities and different planting methods for different plants, and establish various configuration patterns such as shrub monoculture, a mixture of grass and irrigation, and a mixture of grass and seed, etc. The effect of mine vegetation restoration can be improved by selecting native plants with excellent drought resistance and barren resistance.
Based on the review of studies, to achieve vegetation restoration in mining areas, the type of plants has an important impact on the effect of vegetation restoration, so the ratio of different plant species should be considered [65,66]. Table 1 indicates that the ratio of the average abundance value of each plant species in the increased vegetation coverage area was used to determine the proportion of trees, shrubs and herbs to allocate [67]. In general, when selecting species for vegetation configuration, native herbs and shrubs with strong adaptability, fast growth and strong drought resistance should be chosen. It is suggested that trees should be planted properly after the site conditions of vegetation growth are effectively restored or the vegetation community structure tends to be stable.
Selecting suitable plant combinations for ecological restoration is an important link in rebuilding stable vegetation communities in open-pit mining areas. According to the previous experience of mine restoration, we concluded that in the process of land reclamation and ecological restoration in mining areas, for slopes with a slope ratio greater than 1:1.7, 3S-OER slope vegetation ecological protection was constructed by a combination of shrub and grass [68], and the mixed grass–bush–tree or bush–tree mode attained the best effect in regulating soil bulk density [69] (Figure 4). These results can improve the basic principles of land reclamation in mining areas and provide a basis for further optimizing land reclamation technology in practice [70]. Additionally, as reported in the previous literature, the vegetation community combination should pay attention to both the horizontal structure of plant diversity and the vertical structure of the combination of trees, shrubs and grasses, and also allocate some species with ornamental characteristics, so that the constructed vegetation system can form a stable vegetation community system and also enhance the landscape function to form a landscape effect with the characteristics of the drainage field landscape [71].
Therefore, the reasonable selection of plant species and configuration patterns used in the ecological restoration process of mining areas, the strict adherence to the development rules of local natural ecosystems, and the scientific establishment of plant configuration patterns to guide the self-recovery process of damaged vegetation systems are also important guidelines for improving the efficiency of vegetation restoration in research mining areas and various mining sites.

4. Soil Microbial Restoration Technology

Microbial reclamation technology is an important biological technology for comprehensive soil management and improvement in reclamation areas [72,73]. It takes advantage of the inoculation of microorganisms and can re-establish as well as restore the soil microbial system in the reclaimed area soil that has lost microbial activity by improving plant nutrient conditions and promoting plant growth and development while using the life activities of plant inter-root microorganisms [74]. Microorganisms increase the biological activity of the soil, accelerate the improvement of the soil in the reclamation area, accelerate the transformation process from natural soil to agricultural soil, ripen the raw soil, improve the soil fertility, and thus shorten the reclamation cycle [75,76]. Research has shown that agricultural land contaminated with pesticides and fertilizers can be degraded by microorganisms to reduce the concentration of chemical residues such as pesticides and fertilizers to a manageable level so that they can be used again for agricultural farming [77,78].
In the present study, the study of soil amendment by mycorrhizal fungi has become a hot topic of interest for many scholars [79,80,81]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are the most widespread and common soil microorganisms in natural soil, and they are a class of endophytic fungi belonging to mycorrhizal fungi [82]. Under the conditions of opencast coal mining with poor soil, symbiotic association can improve nutrient and water uptake efficiency [83], photosynthetic capacity and enzyme activity [84], enhance the root branching capacity and expand the root uptake range, thus promoting plant growth and improving vegetation recovery in mine reclamation areas [85]. It was found that AMF inoculation enhanced the ability of plants to adapt to different types of coal mine spoil complex adversities [86]. This may be due to the fact that in nutrient-deficient coal mine spoil soils, the AMF mycelial structures can help plant roots to extend their nutrient uptake surface area, thus contributing to the enhancement of nutrients in mycorrhizal plants. Bi et al. [87] found that inoculation with AM fungi increased the seed yield and aboveground biomass of wheat by 46.6% and 56.5%, respectively. In opencast coal mining with poor soil, symbiotic associations can improve the efficiency of nutrient and water uptake [88], improve photosynthetic capacity and enzyme activity [89], enhance root branching capacity, and expand the range of root uptake, thereby promoting plant growth and improving vegetation recovery in mine reclamation areas [90]. Song et al. [91] found that inoculation with AMF could significantly improve the biomass of maize and enhance the stress resistance of plants. The inoculation significantly increased the aboveground part by 28.3%, 34.8%, and 24.4%, respectively, while the underground part increased by 37.3%, 20.6%, and 34.8%, respectively (Table 2). In terms of mineral element uptake, a study by Janouskova et al. [92] pointed out that mycorrhizal structures can increase the utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus elements in the soil and enhance the uptake of nitrogen and potassium by plants in mineral soils. In addition, AMF can improve soil structure by reducing the dispersion of soil aggregates and increasing water and nutrient retention in soils, further benefiting plant growth [93].
Previous studies reported that inoculation of biological fertilizers (Glomus and Gigaspora were separately propagated in a green house in polypropylene) and application of amendments can reduce the toxicity of heavy metals in mines, e.g., chromium, zinc, and cadmium, were significantly reduced to 41%, 43%, and 40%, respectively [94]. Hence, biological fertilizers can be used as an important supporting material for mine remediation. However, mine restoration experiments have most often employed a narrow selection of microbial fertilizer, and examples of effective microbial fertilizers alongside their native host plants and tracking their co-development are lacking, especially inoculum AMF. Many people have studied that in the process of ecological restoration of mines, inoculation of AMF has a great role in promoting the restoration of plants and soil, which not only improves plant diversity but also improves soil fertility [95,96]. Based on the review of studies, some scholars demonstrate that the co-introduction of native plants and AMF is an effective way to establish species-rich vegetation in post-mining areas. The differences in the plant and AMF variables in response to the addition of seeds or soil inoculum and their interaction are summarized in Table S2 [97]. The table shows that the co-introduction of symbiotic partners resulted in the higher richness, diversity and abundance of plants and AMF than when either partner was introduced individually.
Therefore, the application of microbial technology to mine land reclamation has achieved better ecological effects. The development and use of some microbial agents for mine remediation has also become a research hotspot in this field [98,99]. These microbial products are non-toxic, environment-friendly, and act as potential tools for plant growth promotion and resilience. However, the microbial remediation conditions of mine ecology are harsh, the remediation time is long, the specific microorganisms are generally effective only for a single pollutant, and the selection of microorganisms is easily restricted by environmental conditions, which is not suitable for large-scale damage management. Accordingly, the microbial remediation technology needs further comprehensive and in-depth research; especially the pilot test of the microbial bacterial agent products and their industrialization still has a large limitation.

5. Efficient Management and Monitoring Technology

In recent years, the development of mine ecological restoration technology in China has gradually matured. Moreover, the level of post-remediation management and monitoring has been greatly improved. Effective management measures and timely feedback on the effectiveness of mine reclamation are also an important part of ecological restoration. This includes a series of management monitoring of plant growth, soil nutrition and irrigation [100]. In terms of vegetation management measures, to prevent the loss of sown grass seeds, a layer of grass thatch or fabric-resembling material is covered to protect the seeds from being blown away by the north wind and also to increase the soil temperature and improve seed germination and vegetation cover [101]. For example, we conducted relevant experiments in the open-pit dump of the Shengli Coal Mine in Inner Mongolia, where the slope was covered with straw, which significantly increased the seed germination rate (Figure 5).
At present, China’s post-mine ecological restoration results monitoring technology is still in the development stage. The most common way of environmental monitoring is still a relatively primitive field survey and satellite remote sensing images [102]. These methods are not only inefficient and costly, but also the timeliness and accuracy of the obtained data need to be improved [103]. Therefore, efficient and accurate detection technology plays an important role in improving the mine restoration effect. With the development of UAV technology, the advantages of its application in the process of mine rehabilitation are also reflected. Here, in Table 3, we also summarize and compare the advantages and disadvantages of manual surveying, satellite remote sensing and unmanned aerial vehicles’ remote sensing data collection based on previous research [104,105].
Accordingly, some emerging technologies such as satellite remote sensing and unmanned aerial vehicles have been widely used. For example, they have been used for ecological restoration monitoring, basic soil conditions in the target area monitoring, infrastructure layout monitoring, and plant growth conditions monitoring, etc. Wang et al. [106] used remote sensing data to monitor and evaluate vegetation restoration. Park and Choi [107] discussed the analysis of mine ecological restoration using data obtained from unmanned aerial vehicles. It has been proved that the technology not only collects data efficiently but also ensures real-time data. In the future, China’s management and monitoring technology in mine ecological restoration applications will be further deepened, and the focus of research will mainly include dynamic monitoring, comprehensive management and benefit assessment [108]. Through this technical means, we can give full play to the advantages of supervision, develop a reasonable restoration plan, and finally realize the optimal benefit assessment of mine reclamation.

6. Outlook

Ecological restoration of mines is a long-term and complex process and a worldwide challenge. Therefore, mine vegetation restoration and soil improvement are important research directions for future ecological construction and ecological protectors. This paper describes the technology of soil improvement and function enhancement based on the regulation mechanism of plant–microbial–soil interactions and the technical system of vegetation–soil feedback interactions monitoring and management and proposes the application prospect of soil restoration and improvement technology, vegetation community diversity reconstruction technology and microbial restoration technology in solving the ecological restoration of mines. Moreover, future research should integrate multi-level and multi-faceted studies on geology, hydrology, soil, vegetation, microorganisms, animals, and climate to explore mine remediation technology and the molecular mechanisms involved in it more comprehensively and deeply.
At the same time, combined with the current status and progress of mine ecological restoration technology, we propose some research and development directions for future mine restoration to lay the foundation for green and sustainable development of future mine development.
(1) Microbial remediation technology, as a green and efficient remediation pathway, has a broad prospect in the field of mine remediation. However, further research is needed on the acquisition of microbial strains and the tolerance of microorganisms to the environment. For example, some new autotrophic microbial strains can be obtained from factory sludge, domestic waste and solid waste through composting and fermentation technology. Microbial tolerance can be enhanced by artificial domestication or genetic modification techniques to enhance remediation efficiency.
(2) As an important indicator of mine remediation, the core of soil remediation is soil fertilization, improvement and maturation. The future application of soil organic fertilizer can effectively improve soil quality and can establish a mature soil–plant–microorganism biological system. However, we need to do further research on the mechanism and influencing factors of organic fertilizer for mine soil remediation in the future.
(3) Phytoremediation technology occupies an important position in the field of mine ecological restoration as an effective restoration pathway for green ecology and environmental protection. However, phytoremediation faces problems, such as long restoration periods and incomplete restoration, that still need to be solved. Future phytoremediation research can modify plant genes by genetic means to enhance plant tolerance and restoration ability (such as absorption and transformation), thus shortening the restoration cycle and improving restoration efficiency.
(4) Finally, our comprehensive evaluation methods of restoration effects still need further research. For example, in the future, we can combine some high-tech methods such as high-light remote sensing and AI to make a comprehensive evaluation of soil–soil characteristics and plant growth characteristics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agriculture13020226/s1, Figure S1: Requirements for plant growth experiments and determination of optimal scenarios [58]; Table S1: Microbial characteristics of the coal mine spoil [30]; Table S2: Differences in plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) variables in response to the addition of seeds or soil inoculum and their interaction. Degrees of freedom (df), F-statistics and p values are reported. Significance at 0.001 ***, 0.01 ** and 0.05 * levels shown. Ns—not significant. The results of generalized linear models with the addition of seeds and soil inoculum as fixed effects are shown [97].

Author Contributions

D.X.: investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review, and editing. X.L.: formal analysis. J.L. and J.C.: supervision, resources, writing—review, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shi, J.X.; Huang, W.P.; Han, H.J.; Xu, C.Y. Pollution control of wastewater from the coal chemical industry in China: Environmental management policy and technical standards. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, Z.H.; Lei, S.G.; Lu, Q.Q.; Zheng, F.B. Impacts of Large-Scale Open-Pit Coal Base on the Landscape Ecological Health of Semi-Arid Grasslands. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhen, Q.; Ma, W.M.; Li, M.M.; He, H.H.; Zhang, X.C.; Wang, Y. Effects of vegetation and physicochemical properties on solute transport in reclaimed soil at an opencast coal mine site on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 2015, 133, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, X.H.; Lei, S.G.; Liu, F.; Wang, W.Z. Analysis of Plant and Soil Restoration Process and Degree of Refuse Dumps in Open-Pit Coal Mining Areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Dominguez-Haydar, Y.; Armbrecht, I. Response of Ants and Their Seed Removal in Rehabilitation Areas and Forests at El Cerrejón Coal Mine in Colombia. Restor. Ecol. 2011, 19, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Luo, Z.B.; Ma, J.; Chen, F.; Li, X.X.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, Y.J. Adaptive Development of Soil Bacterial Communities to Ecological Processes Caused by Mining Activities in the Loess Plateau, China. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Huang, Y.F.; Zhang, S.W.; Zhang, L.P.; Zhang, H.Y.; Li, Z. Research progress on conservation and restoration of biodiversity in land reclamation of opencast coal mine. J. Agric. Mach. 2015, 46, 72–82. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ao, M.; Qiu, G.L.; Zhang, C.; Xu, X.H.; Zhao, L.; Feng, X.B.; Qin, S.; Meng, B. Atmospheric deposition of antimony in a typical mercury-antimony mining area, Shaanxi Province, Southwest China. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 245, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.B.; Sun, S. Study on the Reclamation and Ecological Reconstruction of Abandoned Land in Mining Area. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 514, 022073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lv, K.; Li, X.F.; Zhi, Y.B. Mechanism of Phytoremediation and Co-reconstruction for Waste Dump in Open-cast Collieries. J. Inn. Mong. Norm. Univ. 2019, 48, 458–464. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hou, X.Y.; Liu, S.L.; Zhao, S.; Dong, S.K.; Sun, Y.X.; Beazley, R. The alpine meadow around the mining areas on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau will degenerate as a result of the change of dominant species under the disturbance of open-pit mining. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xia, M.H.; Dong, S.G.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H. Study on evolution of groundwater-lake system in typical prairie open-pit coal mine area. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 4075–4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Luo, G.B.; Cao, Y.G.; Xu, H.X.; Yang, G.; Wang, S.F.; Haung, Y.H.; Bai, Z.K. Detection of soil physical properties of reclaimed land in open-pit mining area: Feasibility of application of ground penetrating radar. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hindersmann, B.; Achten, C. Urban soils impacted by tailings from coal mining: PAH source identification by 59 PAHs, BPCA and alkylated PAHs. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 1217–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sawut, R.; Tiyip, T.; Abliz, A.; Kasim, N.; Nurmemet, I.; Sawut, M.; Tashpolat, N.; Ablimit, A. Using regression model to identify and evaluate heavy metal pollution sources in an open pit coal mine area, Eastern Junggar, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rukeya, S.; Nijat, K.; Abdugheni, A.; Li, H.; Yalkun, A.; Maihemuti, B.; Shi, Q.D. Possibility of optimized indices for the assessment of heavy metal contents in soil around an open pit coal mine area. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform. 2018, 73, 14–15. [Google Scholar]
  17. Keller, D.H.; Zelanko, P.M.; Gagnon, J.E.; Horwitz, R.J.; Galbraith, H.S.; Velinsky, D.J. Linking otolith microchemistry and surface water contamination from natural gas mining. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.C.; Zhao, B.B.; Wang, Y.P. Nestedness of waterbird assemblages in the subsidence wetlands recently created by underground coal mining. Curr. Zool. 2019, 65, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Anawar, H.M. Sustainable rehabilitation of mining waste and acid mine drainage using geochemistry, mine type, mineralogy, texture, ore extraction and climate knowledge. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 158, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.Y.; Wang, J. Optimal sampling design for reclaimed land management in mining area: An improved simulated annealing approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Islam, N.; Rabha, S.; Subramanyam, K.S.V.; Saikia, B.K. Geochemistry and mineralogy of coal mine overburden (waste): A study towards their environmental implications. Chemosphere 2021, 274, 129736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Borrelli, P.; Panagos, P.; Ballabio, C.; Lugato, E.; Weynants, M.; Montanarella, L. Towards a pan-European assessment of land susceptibility to wind erosion. Land Degrad. Dev. 2016, 27, 1093–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, X.C.; Gu, X.W.; Wang, Q.; Gao, X.W.; Liu, J.P.; Wang, Z.K.; Wang, X.H. Production scheduling optimization considering ecological costs for open pit metal mines. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, L.; Zhang, P.; Hu, Y.G.; Zhao, Y. Vegetation and soil restoration in refuse dumps from open pit coal mines. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 94, 638–646. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, S.Y.; Shi, Y.; Niu, J.J.; Fan, L.Y. Influence of vegetation restoration models on soil nutrient of coal gangue pile: A case study of No.1 Coal Gangue Pile in Hedong, Shanxi. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2013, 68, 372–379. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, J.J.; Fu, M.C.; Hassani, F.P.; Zeng, H.; Geng, Y.H.; Bai, Z.K. Land Use-Based Landscape Planning and Restoration in Mine Closure Areas. Environ. Manag. 2011, 47, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Han, C.W.; Gao, Z.W.; Wu, Z.H.; Huang, J.; Liu, Z.Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, G.G. Restoration of damaged ecosystems in desert steppe open-pit coal mines: Effects on soil nematode communities and functions. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 4402–4416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chatterjee, S. Impact of open pit coal mining on the forest landscape ecology using spatial metrics: A study of Barabani CD block, West Bengal. Spat. Inf. Res. 2021, 29, 645–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dong, X.; Ba, T.L. Rapid analysis of coal characteristics based on deep learning and visible-infrared spectroscopy. Microchem. J. 2020, 157, 104880. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jambhulkar, H.P.; Hemlata, P. Eco-restoration approach for mine spoil overburden dump through biotechnological route. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Down, C.G.; Stocks, J. Environmental Impacts of Mining; Applied Science Publications: London, UK, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lv, G.; Xiao, P.; Li, Y.X.; Dong, L.; Du, X.P. Stability of topsoil aggregates under different reclamation modes in the dump of Haizhou opencast coal mine. Sci. Soil Water Conserv. 2018, 16, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sourkova, M.; Frouz, J.; Santruckova, H. Accumulation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus during soil formation on alder spoil heaps after brown-coal mining, near Sokolov (Czech Republic). Geoderma 2005, 124, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ahirwal, J.; Maiti, S.K. Assessment of soil properties of different land uses generated due to surface coal mining activities in tropical Sal (Shorearobusta) forest, India. Catena 2016, 140, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, L.; Zhang, P.P.; Hu, Y.G.; Zhao, Y. Soil water deficit and vegetation restoration in the refuse dumps of the Heidaigou open-pit coal mine, Inner Mongolia, China. Sci. Cold Arid. Reg. 2016, 8, 22–35. [Google Scholar]
  36. Feng, Y.; Wang, J.M.; Bai, Z.K.; Reading, L. Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2019, 191, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, Z.J.; Zhao, S.M.; Wang., P.Z.; Bi., R.T. Evaluation of the impacts of coal mining on farmland quality in mine-agriculture regions in China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 273–282. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, S.F.; Zhuang., Y.N.; Cao., Y.G.; Yang., K. Ecosystem Service Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis of a Typical Mine-Agriculture-Urban Compound Area in North Shanxi, China. Land 2022, 11, 1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, X.L.; Zhao, Y.L.; Hu, Z.Q.; Yu, Y.; Shao, F. Boundary demarcation of the damaged cultivated land caused by coal mining subsidence. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2014, 73, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hou, J.; Yu, H.C.; Mou, S.G.; Bian, Z.F. Spatial-temporal characteristics of land degradation and its influencing factors in coal mine areas in Western China. Coal Sci. Technol. 2020, 48, 206–216. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sur, I.M. Sustainable Ecological Restoration of Sterile Dumps Using Robinia pseudoacacia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 14021. [Google Scholar]
  42. Babau, A.M.; Micle, V.; Damian, G.E.; Sur, I.M. Preliminary Investigations Regarding the Potential of Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Leguminosae) in the Phytoremediation of Sterile Dumps. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2020, 21, 46–55. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen, F.; Yao, Q.; Tian, J.Y. Review of ecological restoration technology for mine tailings in China. Eng. Rev. 2016, 36, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen, M.M.; Zhang, S.R.; Liu, L.; Wu, L.P.; Ding, X.D. Combined organic amendments and mineral fertilizer application increase rice yield by improving soil structure, Pavailability and root growth in saline-alkaline soil-ScienceDirect. Soil Tillage Res. 2021, 212, 105060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Y.; Lei, S.G.; Chen, X.Y.; Long, L.L. Study of plant configuration pattern in guided vegetation restoration: A case study of semiarid underground mining areas in Western China. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 170, 106334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Neuenkamp, L.; Prober, S.M.; Price, J.N.; Zobel, M.; Standish, R.J. Benefits of mycorrhizal inoculation to ecological restoration depend on plant functional type, restoration context and time. Fungal Ecol. 2019, 40, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Basu, A.; Prasad, P.; Das, S.N.; Kalam, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S.; El Enshasy, H. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as Green Bioinoculants: Recent Developments, Constraints, and Prospects. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, Y.X. Land Destruction by Coal Mining in Shanxi and Its Prevention and Control Measure. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2007, 5, 408–411. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang, L.; Wang, J.M.; Bai, Z.K.; Lv, C.J. Effects of vegetation on runoff and soil erosion on reclaimed land in an opencast coal-mine dump in a loess area. Catena 2015, 128, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhu, S.C.; Zheng, H.X.; Liu, W.S.; Liu, C.; Guo, M.N. Plant-Soil Feedbacks for the Restoration of Degraded Mine Lands: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nadalia, D.; Pulunggono, H.B. Soil characteristics of post-mining reclamation land and natural soil without top soil. J. Degrad. Min. Lands Manag. 2020, 7, 2011–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wilson-Kokes, L.; Emerson, P.; DeLong, C.; Thomas, C.; Skousen, J. Hardwood tree growth after eight years on brown and gray mine soils in West Virginia. J. Environ. Qual. 2013, 42, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Raju, K.S.; Hasan, M. Role of Indian Bureau of Mines in protection of environment in the minerals sector. J. Mines Met. Fuels 2003, 51, 196–200. [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, Q.S.; Han, X.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, H.; Wang, X. Research on integration and application of key technologies of vegetation restoration in open-pit coal mine—A case study of external dump of Sheng li opencast coal mine. Environ. Ecol. 2021, 6, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nicolini, F.; Topp, W. Soil properties in plantations of sessile oak (Quercus petraea) and red oak (Quercus rubra) in reclaimed lignite open-cast mines of the Rhineland. Geoderma 2005, 129, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sena, K.; Barton, C.; Hall, S.; Angel, P.; Agouridis, C.; Warner, R. Influence of spoil type on afforestation success and natural vegetative recolonization on a surface coal mine in Appalachia, United States. Restor. Ecol. 2015, 23, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hu, Z.Q.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, X.Y.; Li, Y. Preparation of topsoil alternatives for open-pit coal mines in the Hulunbuir grassland area, China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 147, 103431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lu, X.; Zhou, W.; Qi, C.; Yang, M. Enhanced Plant Restoration in Open-Pit Mines Using Maize Straw and Ultrasonically Pre-Treated Coal Fly Ash. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qian, T.N.; Bagan, H.; Kinoshita, T.; Yamagata, Y. Spatial-temporal analyses of surface coal mining dominated land degradation in Holingol. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2014, 7, 1675–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Feng, H.B.; Zhou, J.W.; Zhou, A.G.; Bai, G.Y.; Li, Z.X.; Chen, H.N.; Su, D.H.; Han, X. Grassland Ecological Restoration Based on the Relationship between Vegetation and Its Below-ground Habitat Analysis in Steppe Coal Mine Area. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 78, 146221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, S.L.; Mi, J.X.; Hou, H.P.; Yang, Y.J. Research progress of mine ecological restoration—Based on the report of three consecutive world ecological restoration conferences. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 5611–5619. [Google Scholar]
  62. Winkler, N.; Weymann, W.; Auge, H.; Klotz, S.; Finkenbein, P.; Heilmeier, H. Drought resistance of native pioneer species indicates potential suitability for restoration of post-mining areas. Web Ecol. 2015, 14, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Hau, B.C.H.; Corlett, R.T. Factors affecting the early survival and growth of native tree seedlings planted on a degraded hillside grassland in Hong Kong, China. Restor. Ecol. 2003, 11, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Zhang, P.; Hu, Y.G.; Huang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, R.; Liu, M.L. Effect of vegetation reconstruction on soil respiration of Liu dumping site in an open pit coal mine. Ecol. Sci. 2016, 4, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang, L.; Lu, Z.H.; Tang, S.Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, R.T.; Huang, Y.K.; Shang, Z. Slope vegetation characteristics and community stability at different restoration years of open-pit coal mine waste dump. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2021, 41, 5764–5774. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang, J.M.; Wang, H.D.; Cao, Y.G.; Bai, Z.K.; Qin, Q. Effects of soil and topographic factors on vegetation restoration in opencast coal mine dumps located in a loess area. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wang, S.F.; Cao, Y.G.; Pietrzykowski, M.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Bai, Z.K. Spatial distribution of soil bulk density and its relationship with slope and vegetation allocation model in rehabilitation of dumping site in loess open-pit mine area. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhao, Y.; Chai, L.J.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.M. Technology and appli-cation for ecological rehabilitation on self-maintaining veg-etation restoratio. Land Reclam. Ecol. Fragile Areas 2017, 10, 255–257. [Google Scholar]
  69. Li, Q.S.; Han, X.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, H.J.; Wang, X.M. Research on integration and application of key technologies of Ecological restoration and Management of vegetation restoration in open-pit coal mine—A case study of the outfall of Shengli open-pit Mine. Environ. Ecol. 2021, 3, 7. [Google Scholar]
  70. Dong, Q.; Li, S.Q. Different vegetation under grass on the reclaimed land in An Tai Bao open-pit coal mine area Study on the ecological relationship of this plant community. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2018, 34, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hong, Z.A.; Cheng, Y.S.; Wang, B.C.; Sun, X.Y.; Wang, Y.J. Study on the integration of remote sensing monitoring and remediation mode for mine geological environment restoration and treatment in Liaoyuan City. Chin. J. Geomech. 2017, 23, 631–637. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bi, Y.L.; Xiao, L.; Guo, C.; Christie, P. Revegetation type drives rhizosphere arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil organic carbon fractions in the mining subsidence area of northwest China. Catena 2020, 195, 104791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, J.; Nan, J.; Xu, D.L.; Mo, L.; Zheng, Y.X.; Chao, L.M.; Qu, H.T.; Guo, Y.Q.; Li, F.S.; Bao, Y.Y. Response differences between soil fungal and bacterial communities under opencast coal mining disturbance conditions. Catena 2020, 194, 104779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mitra, D.; Djebaili, R.; Pellegrini, M.; Mahakur, B.; Sarker, A.; Chaudhary, P.; Khoshru, B.; Del Gallo, M.; Kitouni, M.; Barik, D.P.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Plant growth improvement and induction of resistance under stressful conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2021, 44, 1993–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Stoma, G.V.; Manucharova, N.A.; Belokopytova, N.A. Biological Activity of Microbial Communities in Soils of Some Russian Cities. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2020, 53, 760–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Abd El-Mageed, T.A.; Rady, M.M.; Taha, R.S.; Abd El Azeam, S.; Simpson, C.R.; Semida, W.M. Effects of integrated use of residual sulfur-enhanced biochar with effective microorganisms on soil properties, plant growth and short-term productivity of Capsicum annuum under salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 261, 108930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Turley, N.E.; Bell-Dereske, L.; Evans, S.E.; Brudvig, L.A. Agricultural land-use history and restoration impact soil microbial biodiversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 57, 852–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sur, I.M.; Micle, V.; Hegyi, A.; Lazarescu, A.V. Extraction of Metals from Polluted Soils by Bioleaching in Relation to Environmental Risk Assessment. Materials 2022, 15, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ben-Laouane, R.; Baslam, M.; Ait-El-Mokhtar, M.; Anli, M.; Boutasknit, A.; Ait-Rahou, Y.; Toubali, S.; Mitsui, T.; Oufdou, K.; Eahbi, S.; et al. Potential of Native Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Rhizobia, and/or Green Compost as Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Enhancers under Salinity. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, Y.X.; Bi, Y.L.; Shen, H.H.; Zhang, L.J. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhance Sea Buckthorn Growth in Coal Mining Subsidence Areas in Northwest China. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bhalla, S.; Garg, N. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and silicon alleviate arsenic toxicity by enhancing soil nutrient availability, starch degradation and productivity in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Mycorrhizal 2021, 31, 735–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dumbrell, A.J.; Nelson, M.; Helgason, T.; Dytham, C.; Fitter, A.H. Idiosyncrasy and overdominance in the structure of natural communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Is there a role for stochastic processes? J. Ecol. 2010, 98, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Estrada, B.; Barea, J.M.; Aroca, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. A native Glomus intraradices strain from a Mediterranean saline area exhibits salt tolerance and enhanced symbiotic efficiency with maize plants under salt stress conditions. Plant Soil 2013, 366, 333–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fard, S.E.; Yarnia, M.; Farahvash, F.; Behrouzyar, E.K.; Rashidi, V. Arbuscular Mycorrhizas and Phosphorus Fertilizer Affect Photosynthetic Capacity and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Peppermint Under Different Water Conditions. Acta Agrobot. 2021, 73, 7345. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhao, R.X.; Guo, W.; Bi, N.; Guo, J.Y.; Wang, L.X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect the growth, nutrient uptake and water status of maize (Zea mays, L.) grown in two types of coal mine spoils under drought stress. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 88, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Guo, W.; Zhao, R.X.; Fu, R.Y.; Bi, N.; Wang, L.X.; Zhao, W.J.; Guo, J.Y.; Zhang, J. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to the development of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in three types of coal mine spoils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 3592–3603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bi, Y.L.; Qiu, L.; Zhakypbek, Y.; Jiang, B.; Cai, Y.; Sun, H. Combination of plastic film mulching and AMF inoculation promotes maize growth, yield and water use efficiency in the semiarid region of Northwest China. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 201, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Caser, M.; Victorino, I.M.M.; Demasi, S.; Berruti, A.; Donno, D.; Lumini, E.; Bianciotto, V.; Scariot, V. Saffron Cultivation in Marginal Alpine Environments: How AMF Inoculation Modulates Yield and Bioactive Compounds. Agronomy 2019, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Sheng, M.; Tang, M.; Chen, H.; Tang, M. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 2008, 18, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, T.; Lin, G.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.L.; Zhang, S.B.; Chen, B.D. Relative importance of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Rhizophagus intraradices) and root hairs in plant drought tolerance. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Song, Z.H.; Bi, Y.L.; Zhang, J.; Gong, Y.L.; Yang, H.H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote the growth of plants in the mining associated clay. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Janouskova, M.; Rydlova, J.; Puschel, D.; Szakova, J.; Vosatka, M. Extraradical mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi radiating from large plants depresses the growth of nearby seedlings in a nutrient deficient substrate. Mycorrhiza 2011, 21, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Caravaca, F.; Alguacil, M.M.; Azcon, R.; Roldan, A. Formation of stable aggregates in rhizosphere soil of Juniperus oxycedrus: Effect of AM fungi and organic amendments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2006, 33, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Juwarkar, A.A.; Jambhulkar, H.P. Phytoremediation of coal mine spoil dump through integrated biotechnological approach. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4732–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kneller, T.; Harris, R.J.; Bateman, A.; Muñoz-Rojas, M. Science of the Total Environment Native-plant amendments and topsoil addition enhance soil function in postmining arid grasslands. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 744–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ohsowski, B.M.; Dunfield, K.; Klironomos, J.N.; Hart, M.M. Plant response to biochar, compost, and mycorrhizal fungal amendments in post-mine sandpits. Restor. Ecol. 2018, 26, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Vahter, T.; Bueno, C.G.; Davison, J.; Herodes, K.; Hiiesalu, I.; Kasari-Toussaint, L.; Oja, J.; Olsson, P.A.; Sepp, S.K.; Zobel, M.; et al. Co-introduction of native mycorrhizal fungi and plant seeds accelerates restoration of post-mining landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 57, 1741–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kong, J.; He, Z.; Chen, L.; Yang, R.; Du, J. Efficiency of biochar, nitrogen addition and microbial agent amendments in remediation of soil properties and microbial community in mine soils. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 9318–9331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Meier, S.; Moore, F.; Khan, N.; Gonzalez, M.E.; Medina, J.; Cumming, J.; Morales, A.; Duran, P.; Seguel, A.; Aponte, H.; et al. Effect of Poultry Manure Compost and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Cu Immobilization and Soil Microbial Communities in a Cu-Contaminated Soil Using the Metallophyte Oenothera Picensis. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 1957–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jin, L.Q.; Li, X.L.; Song, Z.H.; Sun, H.F.; Yang, X.G. Effects of different recovery years on the vegetation and soil characteristics of piling mining residuals mountain in alpine and coal mining region. Chin. J. Ecol. 2019, 38, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  101. Wang, W.; Liu, R.Y.; Gan, F.P.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, X.W.; Ding, L. Monitoring and Evaluating Restoration Vegetation Status in Mine Region Using Remote Sensing Data: Case Study in Inner Mongolia, China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shuai, S.; Zhang, Z.; Lyu, X.; Chen, S.I.; Ma, Z.C.; Xie, C.R. Remote sensing monitoring of vegetation phenological characteristics and vegetation health status in mine restoration areas. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2021, 37, 224–234. [Google Scholar]
  103. Qi, Y.N.; Liao, S.B.; Wang, Q.L. Research on evaluation of mining area ecological security based on GF-1 satellite imagery-taking Fushun West open-pit mine for example. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 783, 012128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rasmussen, J.; Azim, S.; Boldsen, S.K.; Nitschke, T.; Jensen, S.M.; Nielsen, J.; Christensen, S. The challenge of reproducing remote sensing data from satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the context of management zones and precision agriculture. Precis. Agric. 2021, 22, 834–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Liao, X.H.; Yue, H.Y.; Liu, R.G.; Luo, X.Y.; Luo, B.; Lu, M.; Ryan, B.; Ye, H.P. Launching an unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing data carrier:concept, key components and prospects. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2020, 13, 1172–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Park, S.; Choi, Y. Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Mining from Exploration to Reclamation: A Review. Minerals 2020, 10, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Han, Z.Y.; Han, L. Research progress in the application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles technology in mine restoration projects. Henan Sci. Technol. 2021, 40, 62–65. [Google Scholar]
  108. Fleisher, K.R.; Hufford, K.M. Monitoring Geomorphic and Traditional Post-Mine Reclamation using Digital Imagery: Vegetative Heterogeneity and Sampling Efficiency. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 73, 584–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agriculture 13 00226 g001 550
Figure 1. Image of the Shengli opencast coal mine in Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia of China.
Figure 1. Image of the Shengli opencast coal mine in Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia of China.
Agriculture 13 00226 g001
Agriculture 13 00226 g002 550
Figure 2. A large amount of spoil dumped at the periphery of the open pit after mining. (a) below 100 m of the pit. (b) soil with poor soil structure and nutrients.
Figure 2. A large amount of spoil dumped at the periphery of the open pit after mining. (a) below 100 m of the pit. (b) soil with poor soil structure and nutrients.
Agriculture 13 00226 g002
Agriculture 13 00226 g003 550
Figure 3. Interrelationship of mine ecological restoration technologies.
Figure 3. Interrelationship of mine ecological restoration technologies.
Agriculture 13 00226 g003
Agriculture 13 00226 g004 550
Figure 4. The configuration of grass and shrub vegetation on the slope of the dump.
Figure 4. The configuration of grass and shrub vegetation on the slope of the dump.
Agriculture 13 00226 g004
Agriculture 13 00226 g005 550
Figure 5. Application of seeded spoil dumps covered with fibrous straw mulch in revegetation. (a) Covering of the sowed with straw thatch. (b) Comparison of refuse dumps before and after restoration.
Figure 5. Application of seeded spoil dumps covered with fibrous straw mulch in revegetation. (a) Covering of the sowed with straw thatch. (b) Comparison of refuse dumps before and after restoration.
Agriculture 13 00226 g005
Table
Table 1. Restoration abundance threshold and plant allocation ratio at different site conditions [67].
Table 1. Restoration abundance threshold and plant allocation ratio at different site conditions [67].
Site ConditionsAbundance ValueAllocation Ratio
HerbShrub Herbs:Shrub
High elevation of sunny-steep slope0.10000.19601.4:2.8
High elevation of sunny-gentle slope0.11880.22051.3:2.4
High elevation of sunny-flat slope0.10910.26841.5:3.6
Low elevation of sunny-steep slope0.09490.20431.2:2.7
Low elevation of sunny-gentle slope0.09210.22441.1:2.7
Low elevation of sunny-flat slope0.09930.23201.4:3.3
High elevation of shady-steep slope0.08830.24171.9:5.1
High elevation of shady-gentle slope0.08290.26941.5:4.8
High elevation of shady-flat slope0.09000.26351.4:4.2
Low elevation of shady-steep slope0.06090.28061.4:6.4
Low elevation of shady-gentle slope0.07190.29041.2:5.0
Low elevation of shady-flat slope0.08500.27091.4:4.5
Table
Table 2. Effect of inoculation with AM fungi on plant biomass [91]. Notes: the lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Effect of inoculation with AM fungi on plant biomass [91]. Notes: the lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
ItemMycorrhizal
Infection Rate %		Mycelium
Density m g−1		Aboveground Biomass g plant−1Underground
Biomass g plant−1		Mycorrhizal
Responsiveness %
Top soil0 0 11.07 ± 1.1 b1.58 ± 0.04 b29.45
Top soil + M83 ± 3 a 3.61 ± 0.11 a83 ± 3 a 2.17 ± 0.13 a
Sandy soil0 0 8.17 ± 0.27 cd0.94 ± 0.13 cd25.48
Sandy soil + M83 ± 3 a3.88 ± 0.09 a10.16 ± 0.84 bc1.27 ± 0.07 c
Clay soil0 0 7.08 ± 0.59 d0.7 ± 0.06 d11.85
Clay soil + M80 ± 2 a1.54 ± 0.21 b7.86 ± 0.34 bcd0.82 ± 0.05 c
S_C soil0 0 10.57 ± 0.45 b1.61 ± 0.07 b34.83
S_C soil + M83 ± 3 a3.79 ± 0.13 a14.25 ± 0.8 a2.17 ± 0.14 a
Table
Table 3. A comparison of field investigation, satellite remote sensing, and unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing technologies.
Table 3. A comparison of field investigation, satellite remote sensing, and unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing technologies.
Evaluation IndicatorsField InvestigationSatellite Remote SensingUnmanned Aerial Vehicles Remote Sensing
Cost budgetHigh, surveying and mapping costs account for 15% of the total costModerate, requires a higher cost to completeLow operating cost and can be used multiple times
Work efficiencyInefficient and time-consumingGeneral efficiency,
has a time lag in regional monitoring.		Relatively high efficiency
simple and fast operation
AccuracyLower, there will be human errorGenerally
Influenced by many external factors		Higher, collect information efficiently
Data agingLow, long periodic tableGenerally,
longer cycle		High, timely and accurate data
Convenient and practicalInconvenient, the terrain is complex and it is difficult to collect informationBetter, convenient and practicalBetter, convenient and practical
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, D.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Li, J. Research Progress of Soil and Vegetation Restoration Technology in Open-Pit Coal Mine: A Review. Agriculture 2023, 13, 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020226

AMA Style

Xu D, Li X, Chen J, Li J. Research Progress of Soil and Vegetation Restoration Technology in Open-Pit Coal Mine: A Review. Agriculture. 2023; 13(2):226. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020226

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Daolong, Xiufen Li, Jian Chen, and Jianghua Li. 2023. "Research Progress of Soil and Vegetation Restoration Technology in Open-Pit Coal Mine: A Review" Agriculture 13, no. 2: 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020226

APA Style

Xu, D., Li, X., Chen, J., & Li, J. (2023). Research Progress of Soil and Vegetation Restoration Technology in Open-Pit Coal Mine: A Review. Agriculture, 13(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020226

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop