Next Article in Journal
The Response of Grain Yield and Quality of Water-Saving and Drought-Resistant Rice to Irrigation Regimes
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Fungicides and Fungicide Application Methods to Manage Phytophthora Blight of Pigeonpea
Previous Article in Journal
Pathways and Drivers of Gross N Transformation in Different Soil Types under Long-Term Chemical Fertilizer Treatments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pathogenic and Genetic Characterization of Fusarium verticillioides Strains Collected from Maize and Sorghum Kernels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/agriculture13020301
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Fungicide Screening of a New Pathogen That Causes Leaf Spot on Rehmannia glutinosa

by
Tao Dou
1,†,
Yubiao Cai
1,†,
Xuhong Song
2,
Futao Gao
1,
Yajun Zhao
1,
Jiafang Du
1,
Fengqing Wang
1,
Xuanzhen Li
1,
Shiheng An
1,
Xinming Yin
1,
Xiangyang Liu
1,* and
Zhongyi Zhang
3
1
Wenhua Road Campus, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
2
Chongqing Academy of Chinese Materia Medica, Chongqing 400065, China
3
College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agriculture 2023, 13(2), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020301
Submission received: 17 November 2022 / Revised: 1 January 2023 / Accepted: 18 January 2023 / Published: 26 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Management of Fungal Diseases in Crops)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Outbreaks of leaf spot disease occurred in Rehmannia glutinosa fields in Henan Province, China, in 2019, with the incidence ranging from 20% to 40%. R. glutinosa plants with diseased leaves were collected, and 25 isolates were obtained. Pathogenicity tests, morphological observations, and phylogenetic analyses were conducted to identify the pathogens, and the biological characteristics and control agents of the pathogens were studied. Five isolates of pathogenic fungi were isolated. Three isolates were identified as Fusarium equiseti, which is a new pathogen causing R. glutinosa leaf disease; the other two isolates were identified as Fusarium acuminatum. The mycelia of F. equiseti grew fastest on Czapek medium, and the optimal temperature and pH were 25 °C and 10.0, respectively. The mycelia of F. equiseti grew from 5 °C t o 35 °C, and the lethal temperature was 55 °C. The optimal carbon and nitrogen sources were soluble starch and peptone, respectively. Eight fungicides had inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth of F. equiseti and F. acuminatum. Prochloraz had higher activities against F. equiseti and F. acuminatum, with EC50 values of 0.139 mg·L−1 and 0.123 mg·L−1, respectively. These results provide useful information that will aid the development of management strategies to control leaf diseases of R. glutinosa caused by F. equiseti and F. acuminatum.

1. Introduction

Rehmannia glutinosa Libosch is a perennial herbaceous plant cultivated in Asia, including China [1]. The root tuber of R. glutinosa is rich in phenylethanol glycosides, iridoid glycosides, polysaccharides, and other chemical components, and it has various pharmacological effects on the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, central nervous, immune, and visceral systems [2,3,4]. R. glutinosa has a long history of cultivation in many China provinces, including Henan, Shandong, Shanxi, and Shaanxi [5]. R. glutinosa cultivated in Wen County, Henan Province is known as one of the four famous “Huai” medicines, which is famous worldwide for its high efficacy [6].
Replanted disease seriously limits the production and cultivation of R. glutinosa. Replanted R. glutinosa often suffers from disease, and this decreases the yield, quality, and accumulation of active ingredients [7]. Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium proliferatum may cause root rot in R. glutinosa, which can induce the rotting of both the stem and roots and eventually result in the widespread death of R. glutinosa in fields [8,9]. Phoma herbarum and Ascochyta molleriana may cause ring rot in R. glutinosa, which is observed more frequently on the bottom leaves, and this can lead to the formation of large disease spots [10]. Septoria digitalis may cause spot blight in R. glutinosa. The spots associated with spot blight are round or irregular, and many black conidia are scattered around the spots [11]. Plectosphaerella cucumerina may infect entire R. glutinosa plants and induce wilting; plants will rot and die when the disease is serious [12]. Alternaria alternata may cause brown spot in R. glutinosa, which is characterized by the formation of round or irregular brown spots on the leaves, with yellow halos at the edges of the spots [13].
Few studies have examined strategies to control diseases of R. glutinosa. The main approach used to control diseases of R. glutinosa is to reduce the nutrient sources of pathogenic fungi and the occurrence of diseases through crop rotations with wheat and corn. Only three fungicides registered in China can be used for the control of R. glutinosa diseases: metalaxyl-M∙hymexazol 32% solution (for treating seeds), fluazinam∙iprodione 40% aqueous suspension concentrate, and Bacillus subtilis 1 billion spores/g wettable powder. These three fungicides have been used to control root rot in R. glutinosa; however, there are no registered fungicides for leaf spot disease (http://www.chinapesticide.org.cn/hysj/index.jhtml, accessed on 21 January 2023). Most farmers use fungicides according to their own experience, yet this is often not effective for controlling the various diseases of R. glutinosa [8]. In 2019, outbreaks of leaf spot disease occurred in R. glutinosa fields in Henan Province, China. In this study, a new pathogen causing leaf spot disease in R. glutinosa was isolated and identified. The biological characteristics of the new isolated pathogenic fungus were studied. To screen fungicides that could be used to control the leaf disease caused by Fusarium spp. in R. glutinosa, the activities of eight fungicides against the new pathogen and F. acuminatum causing the leaf blight of R. glutinosa were determined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Isolation

In July 2019, R. glutinosa plants with typical leaf disease symptoms were collected from the R. glutinosa fields in Wen County (35°03′31″N, 113°07′17″E), Wuzhi (36°09′21″N, 114°71′47″E), and Yuanyang (35°07′00″N, 113°57′23″E), Henan Province, China.
Pathogens were isolated and purified following the procedures of Guo [14], with minor modifications. Briefly, infected leaf samples were cleaned with sterile water 3 times and then dried with sterile absorbent paper. Pieces of infected leaf tissues (5 × 5 mm) were carefully removed from lesion junctures using sterile scalpels. Next, infected leaf sample tissues were surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 s and 2% sodium hypochlorite for 90 s, rinsed three times with sterilized distilled water, and incubated on PDA containing 50 μg·mL−1 cephalosporin. The plates were incubated at 25 °C with a 12-h photoperiod. After mycelia grew, single-root hyphal tip growth points from the colony edges were picked under a stereomicroscope for cultivation to obtain purified isolates.

2.2. Pathogenicity Determination

Healthy R. glutinosa plants (5–8 leaves) were used to test the pathogenicity of each isolate. Mycelial plugs (4 mm in diameter) from 4-day-old cultures grown on PDA were placed on the leaf surfaces of 15 R. glutinosa plants that had been injured by a sterile needle. Three healthy leaves on each plant were selected, and one mycelial plug was placed on each leaf. PDA-only plugs placed on the leaf surfaces of 15 plants served as controls. The plants were placed in a growth chamber at 25 °C with 80% to 85% relative humidity under a 12-h photoperiod for 6 to 8 days [15]. Disease symptoms on the leaves were observed daily after inoculation with mycelial plugs. Subsequently, the diseased leaves were collected, and the pathogenic fungi were re-isolated and identified to fulfil Koch’s postulates.

2.3. Morphological Observations of Pathogens

For the morphological observations, a mycelial plug with a 4 mm diameter was taken from the edge of each 4-day-old colony and cultured on PDA at 25 °C. The morphology and growth of the fungal colonies were recorded regularly every day. The conidiophores and conidia of the pathogen were observed, and the sizes were measured under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-S) after each colony had been cultured on PDA for 15 days.

2.4. DNA Extraction and Multiple Sequence Analysis of Pathogens

The fungal genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method [16] from mycelia cultured on PDA for 5 days. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence was amplified using the primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [17] from the total genomic DNA of each isolate. The primers TUB2T1 (5′-AACATGCGTGAGATTGTAAGT-3′) and Bt2b (5′-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3′) [18,19] were used to amplify the β-tubulin (Tub) sequence. The primers EF-728F (5′-CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG-3′) and EF-986R (5′-TACTTGAAGGAACCCTTACC-3′) [20] were used to amplify the elongation factor 1-α (EF1-α) sequence.
The PCR reaction mixture contained 22 μL of 1.1 × T3 Super PCR Mix (Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 1 μL of each primer, and 1 μL of DNA template. The ITS region’s amplification reaction program was as follows: pre-denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 55 °C for 10 s, and extension at 72 °C for 10 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 2 min. The annealing temperatures of the EF1-α and Tub genes were 55 °C and 53 °C, respectively, and the reaction steps and other temperatures were the same as those for ITS amplification. The amplified products were detected using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and sequenced. DNA sequence homology searches were performed using online BLAST searches of GenBank, and the corresponding ITS regions, Tub, and EF1-α sequences were downloaded (Table 1). A multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW [21]. The aligned sequences were concatenated using the Concatenate Sequence tool after the trimAI modification [22]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 7.0 [23]. Verticillium dahliae was used as the outgroup, and branch support was evaluated using 1000 bootstrap replicates.

2.5. Determination of the Optimal Growth Conditions of the Pathogen

The mycelial plugs used in this study were all cut from the margins of the pathogenic fungal colonies that had grown for 4 days on PDA and achieved diameters of 4 mm. Each isolate was incubated at a constant temperature for 4 days and the experiment was conducted using three replicates. The diameters of the colonies were measured using the cross method.
To characterize the effects of different media on mycelial growth, the mycelial plugs were inoculated onto PDA, PSA, PCA, OA, CMA, CZ, and WA medium [12] (Table 2) and cultured at 25 °C. To clarify the effect of light on mycelial growth, the mycelial plugs were inoculated onto the center of the PDA, and the illumination conditions included all light, half-light, and all dark. The colonies were cultured at 25 °C. To investigate the effect of pH on mycelial growth, 1 mol L−1 HCl and NaOH were used to adjust the pH of the PDA to 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11. Mycelial plugs were then inoculated on the PDA at various pH levels and cultured at 25 °C. To clarify the effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on mycelial growth, CZ medium with glucose, maltose, fructose, sucrose, lactose, and soluble starch as the sole carbon source was used. Media with different nitrogen sources were made using equal amounts of sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, protein, glycine, cysteine, ammonium chloride, ammonium sulfate, and ammonium nitrate as the sole nitrogen source. The mycelial plugs were inoculated on the center of the CZ and cultured at 25 °C. To clarify the effect of temperature on mycelial growth, mycelial plugs were inoculated on the center of the PDA and cultured in constant temperature incubators set at 5 °C, 10 °C, 15 °C, 20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, and 40 °C. To determine the lethal mycelial temperature, mycelial plugs were placed in water baths set at 40 °C, 43 °C, 46 °C, 49 °C, 52 °C, 55 °C, 58 °C, and 61 °C for 10 min. They were then transferred to the PDA for constant temperature cultivation at 25 °C, and colony growth was observed and recorded daily. After the approximate lethal mycelial temperature was determined, the temperature gradient interval was reduced to 1 °C to more precisely determine the lethal temperature.

2.6. Bioassays

The inhibitory activities of eight fungicides against pathogens were determined using the mycelial growth rate method [33,34]. Thiophanate-methyl was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, and the solution was diluted to five concentrations (Table 3) containing 1% dimethyl sulfoxide. Boscalid (250 mg), chlorothalonil (250 mg), and five other fungicides (25 mg each) were dissolved in 1 mL of acetone and then diluted into five concentrations containing 2% acetone solution. The diluted solution and PDA were mixed at a 1:9 volume ratio and then poured into 9 cm Petri dishes. After solidification, a 4 mm mycelial plug was cut from the edge of a 4-day-old colony and reverse-inoculated into the center of the Petri dish. Petri dishes without fungicides (containing 1% dimethyl sulfoxide or 2% acetone) were used as experimental controls. Each treatment was repeated in triplicate. The dishes were then incubated at 25 °C for 4 days. Colony diameters on each plate were measured in two perpendicular directions, and the diameter of the original mycelial plug (4 mm) was subtracted from this measurement. The growth inhibition rates were calculated using the following formula:
% Inhibition rate of mycelial growth = 100 × (Colony diameter of control group − colony diameter of experimental group)/(Colony diameter of control group-4 mm).

2.7. Data Analyses

The logarithmic value of each concentration of each test agent was used as the independent variable (X), and the probability value of the mycelial growth inhibition rate was used as the dependent variable (Y) to establish the virulence regression equation. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 23.0 software (SPSS Inc., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) for Windows. The median effective concentrations (EC50) were determined by regression analyses of the inhibition rates against the log10 concentrations of the fungicides. A one-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among variables, including EC50 values, obtained under different culture conditions, such as culture medium, temperature, pH, light, and carbon and nitrogen sources.

3. Results and Analyses

3.1. Pathogen Isolation and Pathogenicity Determination

Twenty-five isolates were obtained from the diseased leaf samples (Figure S1). The pathogenicity tests showed that R. glutinosa could be infected by five isolates, including HHAUF210502 and HHAUF210507 isolated from Wenxian, HHAUF210515 and HHAUF210509 isolated from Wuzhi, and HHAUF210513 isolated from Yuanyang. Previously, we reported that leaf spot of R. glutinosa can be induced by Fusarium acuminatum HHAUF210502 [35].
Leaves of R. glutinosa inoculated with HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, and HHAUF210513 showed similar symptoms. After 2 days, they developed dark brown spots at the inoculation site. The spots were surrounded by leaf veins and formed irregular polygons, and developed clear boundaries. Small amounts of white mycelia emerged on the backs of the leaf lesions. After 7 days, the spots gradually expanded and turned tawny, and the leaves withered and wrinkled at the spots (Figure 1A–C). Two days after R. glutinosa was inoculated with HHAUF210502 and HHAUF210515, there were round or irregular plaques at the inoculation site, which were dark brown, rotten, and perforated, and these were accompanied by pink mycelia. After 7 days, the leaves became green and shrunk (Figure 1D,E). These lesions were similar to those observed on leaves in the field (Figure S2), and the control leaves remained symptomless. The fungi were reisolated from the diseased leaves, thereby satisfying Koch’s postulates.

3.2. Morphological Characterization of the Pathogens

The colony morphology of HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, and HHAUF210513 was similar. The pathogens developed aerial mycelia, which were white. The colonies were white at the beginning and gradually became light camel-colored over time, and the mycelium of HHAUF210513 was sparse compared with the other two isolates (Figure 2(A1–A3)). Macroconidia (17.4–46.2 × 2.3–4.2 µm) were sickle-shaped, curved at both ends, enlarged in the middle, and had three to five septa (Figure 2(B1–B3)). There were few elliptical microconidia (7.5–11.8 × 1.8–2.9 µm) with zero to one septa (Figure 2(B1–B3)). The chlamydospores (4.8–8.2 µm) were oblate and were arranged in strings among the mycelia (Figure 2(C1–C3)). The typical phialids–conidiophores arose from the mycelia (Figure 2(D1–D3)). HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, and HHAUF210513 were preliminarily identified as F. equiseti on the basis of morphological characteristics.
Both HHAUF210502 and HHAUF210515 developed abundant aerial mycelia that were fleece-shaped; the mycelia were white and had a slight bulge in the center of the colony. The colonies were initially red. The center of the colony gradually became dark brown, and the margin became dark brown to earth yellow (Figure 2(A4,A5)). Macroconidia (17.3–24.5 × 3.6–5.8 µm) were sickle-shaped, slightly pointed at both ends, and had three to eight septa (Figure 2(B4,B5)). Microconidia (5.6–10.7 × 3.0–4.4 µm) were ovoid and had zero to one septa (Figure 2(B4,B5)). The chlamydospores (7.2–13.6 µm) were oblate and were arranged in strings among the mycelia (Figure 2(C4,C5)). The typical phialids–conidiophores arose from the mycelia (Figure 2(D4,D5)). HHAUF210502 and HHAUF210515 were preliminarily identified as F. acuminatum on the basis of morphological characteristics.

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis of Pathogens

To identify these pathogens, their total genomic DNA was used as a template for PCR amplification and sequencing. We obtained 687 bp (ITS, MZ543968), 1479 bp (Tub, MZ547046), and 576 bp (EF1-α, MZ547045) fragments for HHAUF210507; 677 bp (ITS, OP846523), 962 bp (Tub, OP837539), and 562 bp (EF1-α, OP837542) fragments for HHAUF210509; 684 bp (ITS, OP846524), 962 bp (Tub, OP837540), and 562 bp (EF1-α, OP837543) fragments for HHAUF210513; 567 bp (ITS, MZ351204), 960 bp (Tub, MZ366376), and 290 bp (EF1-α, MZ366377) fragments for HHAUF210502; and 566 bp (ITS, OP846525), 960 bp (Tub, OP837541), and 290 bp (EF1-α, OP837544) fragments for HHAUF210515. A BLAST analysis showed that the similarity of fragments belonging to HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, and HHAUF210513 with previously submitted F. equiseti sequences (KJ396338, MK334366, and KP732017) was 99% to 100%, and the similarity of the fragments belonging to HHAUF210502 and HHAUF210515 with previously submitted F. acuminatum sequences (KU852603, OM956058, and MH822061) was 99% to 100%. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using ITS (398 bp), Tub (295 bp), and EF1-α (220 bp) sequences (Figure 3). HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, and HHAUF210513 were clustered in the same evolutionary clade with F. equiseti UP-PA002, HGUP17361.1, and MAFF 236434, with 99% bootstrap support. Thus, on the basis of the morphological and molecular characteristics, HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, and HHAUF210513 isolated from diseased leaves of R. glutinosa in Wen County, Henan Province, China, were identified as F. equiseti. HHAUF210502 and HHAUF210515 were clustered in the same evolutionary clade with F. acuminatum IBE000006 and LD1508081502, with 93% bootstrap support. Thus, on the basis of the morphological and molecular characteristics, HHAUF210502 and HHAUF210515 isolated from diseased leaves of R. glutinosa in Wen County, Henan Province, China, were identified as F. acuminatum.

3.4. The Optimal Growth Conditions of F. equiseti

The mycelial colonies of F. equiseti isolated from R. glutinosa completely covered the medium in each plate after 5 days under different light treatments. The growth rate was fastest when the light:dark ratio was 1:1, with the colony diameter reaching 7.19 cm after 4 days. This was significantly larger than the diameters achieved under all light or all dark conditions (Figure 4A). The isolate was not sensitive to alkalinity, and grew normally even under strong alkaline conditions. The optimal pH for mycelial growth was 10.0, and the average colony diameter was 6.85 cm after 4 days. Under acidic conditions, the mycelial growth rate slowed as the pH decreased, and mycelia did not grow at a pH of 3 (Figure 4B). The isolate grew between 5 °C and 35 °C, and the optimal growth temperature was 25 °C. The colony diameter reached 6.53 cm at 25 °C after 4 days, and this was significantly larger than diameters achieved at other temperatures (Figure 4C). Mycelia stopped growing at 40 °C, and the lethal mycelial temperature was 55 °C. The isolate could grow on PDA, PSA, PCA, OA, CMA, CZ, and WA medium. The growth rate on CZ was the fastest, and the whole plate was covered by a white colony after 5 days. The colony diameter was 6.86 cm after 4 days. This was significantly larger than diameters achieved on other tested media (Figure 4D). However, the mycelia on CZ were sparse and in poor condition. The colonies cultured on PSA were pale orange-red, and the mycelia were dense. The average colony diameter (6.06 cm) was smaller on PSA than on CZ, PDA, and PCA. The colony diameter on PDA was 6.53 cm after 4 days, and the mycelia were white and dense. PDA might be the most suitable medium for the growth of F. equiseti. When soluble starch was used as the carbon source, the mycelia were dense and grew the fastest, and the average colony diameter was 7.31 cm. The utilization rate of fructose by the isolate was the lowest, and the average colony diameter was only 5.78 cm (Figure 4E). When peptone was used as the nitrogen source, the mycelia were the densest and grew the fastest, and the average colony diameter was 7.54 cm after 4 days. When cysteine was used as the nitrogen source, mycelia grew the slowest, and the average colony diameter was only 4.69 cm after 4 days, which was significantly smaller than colonies observed when other nitrogen sources were used (Figure 4F).

3.5. Activities of Fungicides against F. equiseti and F. acuminatum

Eight fungicides conventionally used in agricultural fields were screened for their antifungal activities against F. equiseti and F. acuminatum, and all eight of the tested agents had inhibitory activities against both pathogens (Table 4 and Table 5). Among the eight fungicides, prochloraz was most effective in suppressing the mycelial growth of F. equiseti (EC50 of 0.139 mg·L−1) and F. acuminatum (EC50 of 0.123 mg·L−1). This was followed by tebuconazole and flusilazole, with EC50 values of 0.194 and 0.318 mg·L−1 for F. equiseti, respectively, and with EC50 values of 0.617 and 0.688 mg·L−1 for F. acuminatum, respectively. Pyraclostrobin also had strong inhibitory activity, with EC50 values of 4.671 and 2.22 mg·L−1 for F. equiseti and F. acuminatum, respectively. The antifungal activities of trifloxystrobin and thiophanate-methyl were lower, with EC50 values of 25.158 and 35.261 mg·L−1 for F. equiseti, respectively, and with EC50 values of 21.505 and 37.249 mg·L−1 for F. acuminatum, respectively. The antifungal activities of boscalid and chlorothalonil were the lowest, with EC50 values of 204.807 and 215.96 mg·L−1 for F. equiseti, respectively, and with EC50 values of 173.158 and 147.666 mg·L−1 for F. acuminatum, respectively.

4. Discussion

F. equiseti is an important pathogen worldwide; it infects wheat, barley, maize, rice, and other crops and causes diseases, such as root rot, stem rot, and head blight [36,37,38]. It also infects vegetable and fruit crops and causes diseases such as chili wilt [39], coriander stem and root rot [40], postharvest Fusarium rot of mandarin [41], and leaf spots on mango [42]. Some trees, such as Aleppo pine [43] and Avicennia marina [44], can also be infected by F. equiseti. Chinese medicinal herbs are damaged by F. equiseti infections. For example, dieback disease on Dendrobium officinale [14], discoloration of Panax quinquefolius roots [45], and shoot blight of Atractylode schinensis [46] are serious diseases. This study reports for the first time the occurrence of leaf spot on R. glutinosa caused by F. equiseti. The symptoms of leaf spot were described, and the pathogen was identified using morphological and molecular characteristics.
Disease in R. glutinosa caused by F. equiseti was mainly observed in late July and August. During the early stage of infection, dark brown spots with distinct boundaries appeared at the leaf tips. As the disease developed, the disease spots gradually expanded into irregular polygons and were surrounded by veins. Parts of the disease spots produced small amounts of white aerial mycelia. The disease spots gradually spread along the veins. The leaves withered and wrinkled, and finally the aboveground part of R. glutinosa completely died. This is similar to the leaf disease caused by F. acuminatum; however, the lesions caused by F. acuminatum do not show obvious boundaries, and the lesions spread faster. Members of the Fusarium genus have often been blamed for the root rot of R. glutinosa [9]; however, when treated with F. equiseti spore suspensions, the roots of R. glutinosa grew healthily without rotting. This characteristic of leaf-specific infections suggests that foliar spraying could control R. glutinosa diseases caused by F. equiseti. In this study, F. equiseti isolated from R. glutinosa leaves only caused leaf spot disease, which appears to represent a special case. Therefore, the biological characteristics of the isolate were further studied.
F. equiseti isolated from R. glutinosa grew fastest at 25 °C and pH of 9–12, with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod. The highest utilization rates were achieved with soluble starch and peptone. The optimal medium for the growth of this isolate might be PDA. Significant differences were observed in the lethal mycelial temperature (55 °C), optimal growth temperature, and carbon source between F. acuminatum and F. equiseti isolated from the leaves of R. glutinosa. The light-related characteristics of F. equiseti isolated in this study differed from those of F. equiseti, which causes shoot blight of A. schinensis [46] and the isolate causing maize ear rot [47]. The isolate that causes shoot blight of A. schinensis grows vigorously in full light, whereas the isolate that causes maize ear rot grows in total darkness. This difference may be related to the differences in the plant organs targeted for infection. In addition, the optimum pH for the growth of F. equiseti isolated in this study was similar to that of the isolate causing shoot blight of A. schinensis, with both growing vigorously at a pH of 8 to 12. However, the isolate causing maize ear rot grows vigorously at a lower pH (6 to 7). These differences may be related to the species, geographical distribution, or growth habits of the host. F. equiseti may have a wide host range. Therefore, the optimal strategy for controlling the spread of F. equiseti depends on the isolate. These three isolates had the same optimal growth temperature range of 25–30 °C, which is consistent with the temperature of the luxuriant leaf period and root enlargement period of R. glutinosa from July to August [9]. The number of leaves on R. glutinosa increases rapidly in July and August, which provides favorable conditions for pathogen infection. Thus, water and fertilizer management in early July requires attention when developing strategies to prevent and control disease. F. equiseti isolated in this study was highly adaptable to alkaline conditions, and its growth rate declined as the pH decreased, indicating that acidic conditions may inhibit the leaf spot of R. glutinosa caused by F. equiseti. The pH of the medium after colonization by F. equiseti isolated in this study was detected, and the isolate significantly reduced the pH of the medium. It was then maintained at pH 8, suggesting that F. equiseti isolated in this study has the ability to reduce soil alkalinity.
The bioassays showed that the selected eight fungicides had antifungal effects against F. equiseti and F. acuminatum, and the same fungicide had similar antifungal levels against the two Fusarium species; these data indicate that these fungicides could be used for the control of most Fusarium species. Triazole fungicides are effective for controlling Fusarium spp. [48,49]. Flusilazole and tebuconazole selected in this study have high antifungal activities against F. equiseti and F. acuminatum, which is consistent with the results of a previous study [48]. In addition, Mengesha et al. [50] reported that tebuconazole is effective for controlling wheat scab; thus, triazole fungicides such as flusilazole and tebuconazole could be used to control leaf spot of R. glutinosa caused by Fusarium spp. In our study, prochloraz showed high antifungal activity against F. equiseti and F. acuminatum. Prochloraz is commonly used to control plant leaf diseases caused by Fusarium spp. [51]. Mateo et al. [52] found that prochloraz had a stronger inhibitory effect on the growth of F. langsethiae mycelia than tebuconazole, which is similar to the results of our study. Therefore, prochloraz could also be used as a fungicide to control the leaf spot of R. glutinosa caused by Fusarium spp. Malandrakis et al. [53] determined the antifungal activity of nine fungicides against F. solani; the EC50 of pyraclostrobin was 5 mg·L−1, and the EC50 of boscalid and thiophanate-methyl was more than 100 mg·L−1, which is similar to the results of our study. Liao et al. [54] suggested that thiophanate-methyl might effectively inhibit the mycelial growth of F. solani, the pathogen of roselle root rot, whereas Ghosal et al. [55] found that thiophanate-methyl weakly inhibited the spore germination of F. oxysporum. These contrasting results might be related to the species of pathogen, indicating that thiophanate-methyl is not suitable for the control of all Fusarium spp. Few studies have examined the antifungal activity of chlorothalonil against Fusarium spp. The results of our study indicate that chlorothalonil had a weak inhibitory effect on F. equiseti and F. acuminatum compared with other fungicides; thus, it should not be used as a control agent. Given that the results of laboratory bioassays do not always provide an accurate reflection of control efficacies in the field, field trials must be conducted.

5. Conclusions

In sum, five isolates of pathogenic fungi were isolated from diseased leaves of R. glutinosa plants, and a new pathogen causing leaf disease of R. glutinosa was identified as F. equiseti. The biological characteristics of F. equiseti were clarified, and control agents against F. equiseti and F. acuminatum were screened. Among the eight fungicides, prochloraz had the highest antifungal activity against F. equiseti and F. acuminatum. Our data expand our understanding of leaf diseases in R. glutinosa and will promote the development of management strategies for controlling leaf diseases of R. glutinosa caused by F. equiseti.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agriculture13020301/s1, Figure S1: Morphological characteristics of the other 20 isolates of fungi; Figure S2: Symptoms of leaf spot disease of Rehmannia glutinosa in the field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L. (Xiangyang Liu) and X.Y.; methodology, T.D., X.S., Y.C., Y.Z. and X.L. (Xiangyang Liu); investigation, F.G., X.S. and Z.Z.; data curation, T.D., J.D., F.W., X.L. (Xuanzhen Li) and X.L. (Xiangyang Liu); writing—original draft preparation, T.D., X.S., Y.C., F.G. and J.D.; writing—review and editing, T.D., Y.C., S.A. and X.L. (Xiangyang Liu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Scientific Research Projects of Henan Province (21B210002) and the Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project of Henan Agricultural University (KJCX2020A13), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-27), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YF1700705).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ying Zhao, Yuehua Geng, Shengli Ding, and Bingjian Sun at College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University for their help in pathogen identification and preservation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Wang, F.; Li, M.; Zhang, J.; Gu, L.; Zhang, L.; Tu, W.; Zhang, Z. Assaying the potential autotoxins and microbial community associated with Rehmannia glutinosa replant problems based on its ‘autotoxic circle’. Plant Soil. 2016, 407, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Matsumoto, M.; Shoyama, Y.; Nishioka, I.; Iwai, H.; Wakimoto, S. Identification of viruses infected in Rehmannia glutinosa Libosch. var purpurea Makino and effect of virus infection on root yield and iridoid glycoside contents. Plant Cell Rep. 1989, 7, 636–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, R.; Li, M.; Jia, Z. Rehmannia glutinosa: Review of botany, chemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 117, 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gong, W.; Zhang, N.; Cheng, G.; Zhang, Q.; He, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, L. Rehmannia glutinosa Libosch extracts prevent bone loss and architectural deterioration and enhance osteoblastic bone formation by regulating the IGF-1/PI3K/mTOR pathway in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Liu, C.; Ma, R.; Wang, L.; Zhu, R.; Liu, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, S.; Tang, J.; Li, Y.; et al. Rehmanniae Radix in osteoporosis: A review of traditional Chinese medicinal uses, phytochemistry, pharmacokinetics and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 198, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xia, Z.; Li, C.; Hu, S.; Chen, S.; Xu, Y. The complete chloroplast genome of Chinese medicine cultivar species of Rehmannia glutinosa (Orobanchaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2021, 6, 290–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Z. Differential miRNA expression in Rehmannia glutinosa plants subjected to continuous cropping. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Huang, Y. Occurrence and control of common diseases of Rehmannia glutinosa. Henan Agric. 2006, 8, 22. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Kang, C.; Li, M. Unraveling the characteristics of the microbial community and potential pathogens in the rhizosphere soil of Rehmannia glutinosa with root rot disease. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 130, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, J.; Ye, H.; Qin, Y.; Wu, G. Investigation on the disease of medicinal plants in Sichuan province and pathogen identification Ⅱ. A list of medicinal plant diseases. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2008, 21, 359–363. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, T. Prevention and control of Rehmannia spot blight and fusarium wilt. Bull. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2002, 10, 31. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dou, T.; Cai, Y.; Gong, M.; Cui, J.; Du, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J. Identification of the pathogen causing Rehmannia glutinosa wilt and screening of fungicides. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 2022, 52, 638–647. [Google Scholar]
  13. Du, J.; Nian, W.; Zhou, Z.; Dou, T.; Song, G.; Gu, L.; Li, M.; Wang, M.; Geng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Leaf Spot Disease Caused by Alternaria alternata on Rehmannia glutinosa in China. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, M.; Li, B.; Wang, R.; Liu, P.; Chen, Q. Occurrence of dieback disease caused by Fusarium equiseti on Dendrobium officinale in China. Crop Prot. 2020, 137, 105209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Xu, J.; Crous, P.W. Pestalotiopsis revisited—ScienceDirect. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 79, 121–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Arif, R.; Pani, D.R.; Zaidi, N.W.; Singh, U.S. PCR-Based identification and characterization of Fusarium sp. associated with mango malformation. Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2011, 2011, 141649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. White, T.J.; Bruns, S.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  18. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. O’Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1997, 7, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Capella-Gutierrez, S.; Silla-Martinez, J.M.; Gabaldon, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sudhir, K.; Glen, S.; Koichiro, T. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhao, Z.; Lu, G. Fusarium sinensis sp. nov., a new species from wheat in China. Mycologia 2008, 100, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lombard, L.; van der Merwe, N.A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Generic concepts in Nectriaceae. Stud. Mycol. 2015, 80, 189–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Stefańczyk, E.; Sobkowiak, S.; Brylińska, M.; Śliwka, J. Diversity of Fusarium spp. associated with dry rot of potato tubers in Poland. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 145, 871–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Watanabe, M.; Yonezawa, T.; Sugita-Konishi, Y.; Kamata, Y. Utility of the phylotoxigenic relationships among trichothecene-producing Fusarium species for predicting their mycotoxin-producing potential. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2013, 30, 1370–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nuangmek, W.; Aiduang, W.; Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Kiatsiriroat, T.; Lumyong, S. First report of fruit rot on cantaloupe caused by Fusarium equiseti in Thailand. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2019, 85, 259–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Watanabe, M.; Yonezawa, T.; Lee, K.I.; Kumagai, S.; Hara-Kudo, Y. Molecular phylogeny of the higher and lower taxonomy of the Fusarium genus and differences in the evolutionary histories of multiple genes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Aktaruzzaman, M.; Afroz, T.; Lee, Y.G.; Kim, B.S. Morphological and molecular characterization of Fusarium tricinctum causing postharvest fruit rot of pumpkin in Korea. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2018, 84, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Watanabe, M.; Yonezawa, T.; Lee, K.-i.; Kumagai, S.; Sugita-Konishi, Y.; Goto, K.; Hara-Kudo, Y. Evaluation of genetic markers for identifying isolates of the species of the genus Fusarium. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 2500–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tran, V.T.; Braus-Stromeyer, S.A.; Timpner, C.; Braus, G.H. Molecular diagnosis to discriminate pathogen and apathogen species of the hybrid Verticillium longisporum on the oilseed crop Brassica napus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 4467–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Machuca, A.; Durán, N. Optimization of some parameters influencing Thermoascus aurantiacus growth: Effects of lignin-related compounds. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1996, 16, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, K.; Jiang, S.; Pu, T.; Fan, L.; Ye, M. Antifungal activity of phenolic monoterpenes and structure-related compounds against plant pathogenic fungi. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 1423–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cai, Y.; Dou, T.; Gao, F.; Du, J.; Wang, F.; Nian, W.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X. Identification and biological characteristics of a pathogen causing leaf blight of Rehmannia glutinosa. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2022, 47, 1824–1830. [Google Scholar]
  36. Swamy, S.D.; Mahadevakumar, S.; Hemareddy, H.B.; Amruthesh, K.N.; Mamathab, S.; Kunjetic, S.G.; Swapnilb, R.; Kumard, T.V.; Lakshmidevi, N. First report of Fusarium equiseti–the incitant of post flowering stalkrot of maize (Zea mays L.) in India. Crop Prot. 2020, 129, 105035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Parikh, L.; Kodati, S.; Eskelson, M.J.; Adesemoye, A.O. Identification and pathogenicity of Fusarium spp. In row crops in Nebraska. Crop Prot. 2018, 108, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Avila, C.F.; Moreira, G.M.; Nicolli, C.P.; Gomes, L.B.; Abreu, L.M.; Pfenning, L.H.; Haidukowski, M.; Moretti, A.; Logrieco, A.; Ponte, E. Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex associated with brazilian rice: Phylogeny, morphology and toxigenic potential. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 306, 108267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hami, A.; Rasool, R.S.; Khan, N.A.; Mansoor, S.; Masoodi, K.Z. Morpho-molecular identification and first report of Fusarium equiseti in causing chilli wilt from Kashmir (Northern Himalayas). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, L.; Gao, W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y. First report of stem and root rot of coriander caused by Fusarium equiseti in China. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moosa, A.; Farzand, A.; Khan, S.A.; Ahmad, T.; Aslam, H.M.U.; Saeed, S.; Shafique, M.; Masroor, A.; Akhtar, S. First report of postharvest Fusarium rot of mandarin (Citrus reticulata ‘Kinnow’) caused by Fusarium equiseti in Pakistan. Plant Dis. 2021, 15, 4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, Z.; Yu, Z.; Li, Q.; Tang, L.; Luo, S. Fusarium species associated with leaf spots of mango in China. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 150, 104736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lazreg, F.; Belabid, L.; Sanchez, J.; Gallego, E.; Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Elhaitoum, A. First report of Fusarium equiseti causing damping-off disease on Aleppo pine in Algeria. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lu, N.; Huang, Q.; He, H.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y. First report of black stem of Avicennia marina caused by Fusarium equiseti in China. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Goswami, R.S.; Punja, Z.K. Molecular and biochemical characterization of defense responses in ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) roots challenged with Fusarium equiseti. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 72, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wen, X.; Qi, H.; Sun, W.; Liu, Y.; Feng, L.; Meng, T.; Han, Z.; Cao, J.; Wang, J. Identification and biological characteristics of the pathogen (Fusarium equiseti) causing shoot blight of Atractylodes chinensis. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2020, 22, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jin, S.L.; Guo, C.; Wei, H.; Guo, M.; He, F. Isolation, identification and biological characteristics of Fusarium equiseti from maize ear rot samples. Acta Agrestia Sin. 2014, 22, 182–187. [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, C.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Luo, J.; Liu, C. Toxicity, bioactivity of triazole fungicide metconazole and its effect on mycotoxin production by Fusarium verticillioides: New perspective from an enantiomeric level. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 828, 154432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Muellenborn, C.; Steiner, U.; Ludwig, M.; Oerke, E. Effect of fungicides on the complex of Fusarium species and saprophytic fungi colonizing wheat kernels. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 120, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mengesha, G.G.; Abebe, S.M.; Lera, Z.T.; Shertore, M.M.; Fedilu, K.B.; Tadesse, Y.B.; Mekonnen, A.A.; Esho, A.G.M.; Cheleko, D.C.; Silassie, A.B.W. Integration of host resistance, fungicides, and spray frequencies for managing Fusarium head blight of bread wheat under field conditions in southern Ethiopia. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cendoya, E.; Nichea, M.J.; Monge, M.d.P.; Zachetti, V.G.L.; Chiacchiera, S.M.; Ramirez, M.L. Effect of fungicides commonly used for Fusarium head blight management on growth and fumonisin production by Fusarium proliferatum. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2021, 53, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mateo, E.M.; Valle-Algarra, F.M.; Mateo, R.; Jimenez, M.; Magan, N. Effect of fenpropimorph, prochloraz and tebuconazole on growth and production of T-2 and HT-2 toxins by Fusarium langsethiae in oat-based medium. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 151, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Malandrakis, A.; Daskalaki, E.R.; Skiada, V.; Papadopoulou, K.K.; Kavroulakis, N. A Fusarium solani endophyte vs fungicides: Compatibility in a Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici-tomato pathosystem. Fungal Biol. 2018, 122, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liao, X.; Hou, W.; Tang, X.; Zhao, Y. Identification of the roselle root rot pathogen and its sensitivity to different fungicides. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ghosal, D.; Tarafder, M.; Datta, B. Fusarium oxysporum isolates showed varied benzimidazole fungicides sensitivity under low temperature and heavy metal stress. Rhizosphere 2020, 15, 100227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agriculture 13 00301 g001 550
Figure 1. Symptoms of Rehmannia glutinosa leaves inoculated with pathogens at 7 days. (A) Leaves inoculated with HHAUF210507; (B) leaves inoculated with HHAUF210509; (C) leaves inoculated with HHAUF2105013; (D) leaves inoculated with HHAUF210502; (E) leaves inoculated with HHAUF2105015; (F) control.
Figure 1. Symptoms of Rehmannia glutinosa leaves inoculated with pathogens at 7 days. (A) Leaves inoculated with HHAUF210507; (B) leaves inoculated with HHAUF210509; (C) leaves inoculated with HHAUF2105013; (D) leaves inoculated with HHAUF210502; (E) leaves inoculated with HHAUF2105015; (F) control.
Agriculture 13 00301 g001
Agriculture 13 00301 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphological characteristics of pathogens. (A) The front (left) and back (right) of a colony; (B) macroconidia and microconidia; (C) chlamydospores; (D) conidiophores. B, C and D are indicated by arrows. Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 correspond to HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, HHAUF210513, HHAUF210502, and HHAUF210515, respectively.
Figure 2. Morphological characteristics of pathogens. (A) The front (left) and back (right) of a colony; (B) macroconidia and microconidia; (C) chlamydospores; (D) conidiophores. B, C and D are indicated by arrows. Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 correspond to HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, HHAUF210513, HHAUF210502, and HHAUF210515, respectively.
Agriculture 13 00301 g002
Agriculture 13 00301 g003 550
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree inferred from concatenated ITS, Tub, and EF1-α sequences using the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap values (%) presented at the branches were calculated from 1000 replications. Values below 50% are hidden. The scale bar indicates a 5% sequence difference.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree inferred from concatenated ITS, Tub, and EF1-α sequences using the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap values (%) presented at the branches were calculated from 1000 replications. Values below 50% are hidden. The scale bar indicates a 5% sequence difference.
Agriculture 13 00301 g003
Agriculture 13 00301 g004 550
Figure 4. Biological characteristics of F. equiseti. (A) Light condition; (B) pH; (C) temperature; (D) medium; (E) carbon source; (F) nitrogen source. Different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA.
Figure 4. Biological characteristics of F. equiseti. (A) Light condition; (B) pH; (C) temperature; (D) medium; (E) carbon source; (F) nitrogen source. Different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA.
Agriculture 13 00301 g004
Table
Table 1. Isolates used for phylogenetic analyses in the study and their GenBank accession numbers.
Table 1. Isolates used for phylogenetic analyses in the study and their GenBank accession numbers.
SpeciesStrainGenBank Accession NumbersReference
ITSTubEF1-α
F. acuminatumIBE000006EF531232EF531244EF531237[24]
F. acuminatumLD1508081502MF523230MF523225MF523228NP
F. acuminatumHHAUF210502MZ351204MZ366376MZ366377•
F. acuminatumHHAUF210515OP846525OP837541OP837544•
F. ambrosiumCBS 571.94KM231801KM232063KM231929[25]
F. avenaceumM127KP265352KP710634KP674195[26]
F. equisetiHHAUF210507MZ543968MZ547046MZ547045•
F. equisetiHHAUF210509OP846523OP837539OP837542•
F. equisetiHHAUF210513OP846524OP837540OP837543•
F. equisetiHGUP17361.1MK069606MK069604MK069605NP
F. equisetiMAFF 236434AB586999AB587047AB674277[27]
F. equisetiUP-PA002MH521295MH521296MH521297[28]
F. graminearumM216AKP295509KP765707KP400687[26]
F. incarnatumMAFF 236386AB820720AB820712AB820704[27]
F. incarnatumMAFF 236521AB586988AB587036AB674267[29]
F. oxysporumM228KP264651KP674278KP400703[26]
F. poaeFRCT-0796AB586983AB587072AB674301[29]
F. redolensZ318KP264660KP674235KP400713[26]
F. sambucinumM120KP265348KP710630KP674191[26]
F. solaniZ141KP265362KP710644KP674205[26]
F. tricinctumSPF001MG990937MG990938MG990939[30]
F. tricinctumSPF003MG704912MG704913MG704914[30]
F. tricinctumMAFF 235.551AB587030AB587079AB674262[31]
F. verticillioidesCBS 114579KU604025KU603860KU711696NP
Verticillium dahliaeVd8HE972024KF555285KM408514[32]
•: GenBank accession numbers of HHAUF210502, HHAUF210507, HHAUF210509, HHAUF2105013, and HHAUF210515. NP: unpublished.
Table
Table 2. Formulation of the media.
Table 2. Formulation of the media.
MediumFormulation
PDApeeled potato, 200 g; glucose, 20 g; agar powder, 20 g,
distilled water to 1 L
PSApeeled potato, 200 g; sucrose, 20 g; agar powder, 20 g,
distilled water to 1 L
PCApeeled potato, 20 g; peeled carrot, 20 g; agar powder, 20 g,
distilled water to 1 L
OAoatmeal, 30 g; agar powder, 20 g, distilled water to 1 L
CMAcorn flour, 50 g; agar powder, 15 g, distilled water to 1 L
CZNaNO3, 3 g; K2HPO4•3H₂O, 1 g; MgSO4•7H2O, 0.5 g; KCl, 0.5 g; FeSO4•7H₂O, 0.01 g; sucrose, 30 g; agar powder, 20 g,
distilled water to 1 L
WAagar powder, 20 g, distilled water to 1 L
Table
Table 3. Fungicides and experimental concentration gradients.
Table 3. Fungicides and experimental concentration gradients.
FungicidesManufacturerConcentration Gradient (mg·L−1)
Thiophanate-methyl (97% a.i.)Anhui Guangxin Agrochemical Co., Ltd.5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160
Boscalid (97% a.i.)Hebei Lansheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd.12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400
Prochloraz (97% a.i.)Jiangxi Huihe Chemical Co., Ltd.0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8
Flusilazole (97% a.i.)Shandong Audley Chemical Co., Ltd.0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4
Tebuconazole (97% a.i.)Xinyi Youlian Chemical Co., Ltd.0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8
Trifloxystrobin (97% a.i.)Nanjing Kangmanlin Chemical Co., Ltd.1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32
Pyraclostrobin (98% a.i.)Hebei Chengyue Chemical Co., Ltd.0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8
Chlorothalonil (98% a.i.)Anhui Guangxin Agrochemical Co., Ltd.12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400
Table
Table 4. Antifungal activities of fungicides against F. equiseti.
Table 4. Antifungal activities of fungicides against F. equiseti.
FungicidesRegression
Equation		EC50 (mg·L−1)Correlation
Coefficient		95% Confidence
Intervals (mg·L−1)
Thiophanate-methyl (97% a.i.)Y = 2.704 + 1.484X35.2610.97029.552~42.074
Boscalid (97% a.i.)Y = 3.637 + 0.590X204.8070.990118.740~353.260
Prochloraz (97% a.i.)Y = 6.140 + 1.329X0.1390.9860.082~0.234
Flusilazole (97% a.i.)Y = 5.769 + 1.548X0.3180.9800.257~0.395
Tebuconazole (97% a.i.)Y = 5.817 + 1.146X0.1940.9910.118~0.317
Trifloxystrobin (97% a.i.)Y = 4.548 + 0.323X25.1580.9637.797~81.173
Pyraclostrobin (98% a.i.)Y = 4.711 + 0.432X4.6680.9952.175~10.020
Chlorothalonil (98% a.i.)Y = 3.266 + 0.743X215.9600.987163.783~340.970
Table
Table 5. Antifungal activities of fungicides against F. acuminatum.
Table 5. Antifungal activities of fungicides against F. acuminatum.
FungicidesRegression
Equation		EC50 (mg·L−1)Correlation
Coefficient		95% Confidence
Intervals (mg·L−1)
Thiophanate-methyl (97% a.i.)Y = 2.582 + 1.539X37.2490.97419.764~70.204
Boscalid (97% a.i.)Y = 2.317 + 1.199X173.1580.99464.197~467.060
Prochloraz (97% a.i.)Y = 5.606 + 0.667X0.1230.9800.050~3.313
Flusilazole (97% a.i.)Y = 5.186 + 1.142X0.6880.9870.313~1.511
Tebuconazole (97% a.i.)Y = 5.237 + 1.131X0.6170.9950.225~1.690
Trifloxystrobin (97% a.i.)Y = 4.968 + 0.774X21.5050.9833.641~127.012
Pyraclostrobin (98% a.i.)Y = 4.723 + 0.799X2.2230.9870.686~7.203
Chlorothalonil (98% a.i.)Y = 3.298 + 0.785X147.6660.96639.031~558.666
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dou, T.; Cai, Y.; Song, X.; Gao, F.; Zhao, Y.; Du, J.; Wang, F.; Li, X.; An, S.; Yin, X.; et al. Characterization and Fungicide Screening of a New Pathogen That Causes Leaf Spot on Rehmannia glutinosa. Agriculture 2023, 13, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020301

AMA Style

Dou T, Cai Y, Song X, Gao F, Zhao Y, Du J, Wang F, Li X, An S, Yin X, et al. Characterization and Fungicide Screening of a New Pathogen That Causes Leaf Spot on Rehmannia glutinosa. Agriculture. 2023; 13(2):301. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dou, Tao, Yubiao Cai, Xuhong Song, Futao Gao, Yajun Zhao, Jiafang Du, Fengqing Wang, Xuanzhen Li, Shiheng An, Xinming Yin, and et al. 2023. "Characterization and Fungicide Screening of a New Pathogen That Causes Leaf Spot on Rehmannia glutinosa" Agriculture 13, no. 2: 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020301

APA Style

Dou, T., Cai, Y., Song, X., Gao, F., Zhao, Y., Du, J., Wang, F., Li, X., An, S., Yin, X., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Characterization and Fungicide Screening of a New Pathogen That Causes Leaf Spot on Rehmannia glutinosa. Agriculture, 13(2), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop