CFD Simulation and Optimization of the Leaf Collecting Mechanism for the Riding-Type Tea Plucking Machine
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Overall Structure of Tea Plucking Machine
2.2. Mathematical Model
2.3. Numerical Calculation
2.3.1. The Physical Model
- According to the working environment requirements of the air outlet part of the riding-type tea plucking machine in the tea garden, the working medium of the fluid is air, which belongs to the Newtonian flow type of fluid. It is assumed that the density and viscosity of the air are unchanged at the pressure of 102,325 Pa and the temperature of 26.85°, which is a certain value. The air density is 1.16 kg/m3. It is assumed that the working medium is a continuous, incompressible, viscous fluid when the fluid is flowing;
- Each part of the air outlet part is an absolute rigid body, and it will not deform when working. The interaction between the inner wall of the air outlet part and the working medium is ignored when the fluid flows;
- When tea is collected by outlet air, it is assumed that the air flow generated by the fan has a uniform air velocity, and the velocity inlet in the flow field area is kept constant in the simulation analysis. The air enters with constant velocity and ignores the heat exchange when the working medium air flows inside the air outlet component. That is, in the process of three-dimensional numerical simulation, the energy equation is not considered, but only the pressure field and velocity field of the flow field are solved;
- Due to manufacturing errors, there may be a very small amount of air leakage in the air outlet parts of riding-type tea plucking machines. However, when conducting numerical simulation, the model can be simplified as far as possible, or it can be in an ideal state, and the very small part of air leakage can be ignored.
2.3.2. Meshing
2.3.3. The Boundary Conditions
3. Results
3.1. Air Outlet Mechanism Model
3.1.1. Air Outlet Cavity Structure
3.1.2. Air Outlet Baffle Structure
3.2. Optimization of the Air Outlet Mechanism
3.2.1. Optimization of the Cavity Structure
3.2.2. Optimization of the Baffle Structure
3.3. Testing
4. Conclusions
- Due to the growth of tea in the growth process, the tea canopy is built into a certain radian. The key is how to evenly distribute the air flow from the fan to the outlet of the cutting table. The air outlet part is designed to be the same radian as the tea shed surface. Through the collision of air flow in the cavity and the design of the outlet gap, air delivery is realized. The velocity outlet is greater than the velocity inlet, which can meet the requirements of leaf collection;
- Through the structural design of installing a baffle on the air outlet plate, the free air flow is collected and moves upward along the baffle, so that the tea buds are blown into the collecting mechanism along the trend, realizing the diversion function and reducing the collision times between tea buds. Based on Box–Behnken’s central combination design theory, the working parameters of the air outlet system are optimized. The test results show that the main order of influence of the velocity outlet is the velocity inlet, the height of the outlet end, and the length of the inlet end. The optimal parameter combination is as follows: height of the outlet end X1, length of the inlet end X2, and velocity inlet are 0.01 m, 0.03 m, and 25 m/s, respectively. The corresponding velocity outlet is 53.35 m/s. Through fluid simulation, the distribution of the velocity flow field under different numbers of partitions is analyzed. When the number increases, the non-homogeneity can be significantly reduced. When the number exceeds four, the increase in the number does not significantly improve the uniformity of distribution. At the same time, considering that the air velocity outlet should not be too small, the structure of the air outlet parts is optimized, and 4 partitions are installed on the left and right sides to improve the internal flow field and improve the quality of tea buds;
- In order to achieve the minimum non-homogeneity of the air velocity outlet in each outlet area, the structure of the outlet air part of the tea plucking machine is optimized. The optimized mechanism simulated the velocity flow field, and compared with the test results, the velocity inlet accelerated from 13 m/s to 25 m/s, and the distribution law of velocity change in each region is consistent. The velocity inlet increased, and the velocity outlet also increased. That is, there is a certain positive relationship between the engine speed, fan speed, the velocity inlet of the air outlet mechanism, and the velocity outlet, so the effect of blade collection can be controlled by adjusting the engine speed (the faster the engine speed, the faster the fan speed). The increase of fan speed leads to an increase in the velocity inlet and velocity outlet of the collecting mechanism. The simulation and experimental results show that the mathematical model is relatively accurate, which provides a reliable theoretical basis for the optimal design of the tea plucking machine structure.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cabrera, C.; Artacho, R.; Ginmenez, R. Beneficial effects of green tea-a review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2006, 25, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, G.Z.; Dong, C.W.; Hu, B.; Zhu, H.K.; Yuan, H.B.; Jiang, Y.W.; Hao, G.S. Prediction of moisture content for congou black tea withering leaves using image features and nonlinear method. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, C.Y.; Qian, J.; Zhang, J.Y.; Wang, J.; Li, B.; Wei, Z.B. Moisture measurement of tea leaves during withering using multifrequency microwave signals optimized by ant colony optimization. J. Food Eng. 2022, 335, 111174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.T.; Chen, S.F. Localizing plucking points of tea leaves using deep convolutional neural networks. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 171, 105298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.K.; Zhao, L.G.; Li, J.; Shang, S.Q.; Ding, X.P.; Wang, T.W. Detection and classification of tea buds based on deep learning. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 192, 106547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Zou, L.; Wu, C.Y.; Jia, J.M.; Chen, J.N. Method of famous tea sprout identification and segmentation based on improved watershed algorithm. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 184, 106108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, N.; Sun, M.F.; Lu, C.Y.; Li, M.H.; Wang, Y.J.; Song, Y.; Ning, J.M.; Zhang, Z.Z. High-speed identification system for fresh tea leaves based on phenotypic characteristics utilizing an improved genetic algorithm. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 6858–6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.K.; Chen, S.F.; Kuo, Y.F.; Liu, T.L.; Lee, S.Y. Developing a guiding and growth status monitoring system for riding-type tea plucking machine using fully convolutional networks. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 191, 106540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, V.S. Integration of agro-techniques for higher plucker productivity and lower harvesting costs. Tea Sci. 2004, 3, 3–4. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Y.; Xiao, H.R.; Qin, G.M.; Song, Z.Y.; Ding, W.Q.; Mei, S. Developing Situations of Tea Plucking Machine. Engineering 2014, 6, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Ji, S.M.; Tan, D.P. Softness abrasive flow method oriented to tiny scale mold structural surface. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2012, 61, 975–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.L.; Xu, F.; Tan, D.P. A control method for agricultural greenhouse heating based on computational fluid dynamics and energy prediction model. Appl. Energy 2015, 141, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Li, L.; Yin, Z.C.; Xie, Z.W.; Wu, J.F.; Zhang, Y.C.; Tan, D.P. Investigation on the flow field regulation characteristics of the right-angled channel by impinging disturbance method. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2022, 236, 11196–11210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lian, G.P.; Thiru, A.; Parry, A.; Moore, S. CFD simulation of heat transfer and polyphenol oxidation during tea fermentation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2002, 34, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhekne, P.P.; Patwardhan, A.W. CFD model for transient flow fields around teabag during tea infusion. Food Bioprod. Process. 2021, 130, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaime, G.C.; José, A.G.; Christian, O.D.; Rubén, G.; Sergio, V.; Francisco, C.; Raúl, L. Numerical study of the thermolysis of catechins in green tea. J. Food Process Eng. 2019, 42, e13152. [Google Scholar]
- Weng, X.X.; Chen, C.Q.; Wang, G.; Wei, Z.B.; Jiang, L.; Hu, X.R. Numerical Simulation of Leaf Gathering Process of Fresh Leaf Collecting Pipeline Based on CFD–DEM. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2022, 53, 424–432. [Google Scholar]
- Vijayan, V.; Vivekanandan, M.; Venkatesh, R.; Rajaguru, K.; Antony, A.G. CFD modeling and analysis of a two-phase vapor separator. J. Anal. Calorim. 2021, 145, 2719–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daza-Gómez, M.A.M.; Pereyra, E.; Ratkovich, N. CFD simulation of two-phase gas/non-Newtonian shear-thinning fluid flow in pipes. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 506. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, S.M.; Weng, X.X.; Tan, D.P. Research on the precision processing method for softness abrasive two-phase flow based on LSM. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Chicago, IL, USA, 10–12 April 2010; pp. 53–57. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, W.P.; Launder, B.E. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1972, 15, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mullya, S.; Karthikeyan, G.; Ganachari, V. Simulation of flow-field and debris temperature analysis in micro-electrical discharge milling using slotted tools. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2022, 236, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ermakova, E.; Elberdov, T.; Rynkovskaya, M. Shape Optimization of a Shell in Comsol Multiphysics. Computation 2022, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, X.; Jia, X.; Li, Y. Wall Stresses in Cylinder of Stationary Piped Carriage Using COMSOL Multiphysics. Water 2019, 11, 1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.Y.; Su, N.N.; Wei, L.L.; Zhang, X.M.; Yin, Y.L.; Zhao, W.H. Study on the surface forming mechanism of the solid–liquid two-phase grinding fluid polishing pipe based on large eddy simulation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2019, 233, 2505–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, J.L.; Zhang, J.; Ding, G.F.; Qin, S.F.; Jiang, H.F. Determination of vehicle requirements of AGV system based on discrete event simulation and response surface methodology. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2021, 235, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, Z.; Gong, B. Uncertainty analysis of key factors affecting fracture height based on box-behnken method. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2020, 228, 106902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mechanism | Introduction |
---|---|
Plucking mechanism | Cutter motion and leaf sweep components |
Leaf collecting mechanism | Blower and outlet components |
Regulating mechanism | Adjust with the height of the tea canopy |
Walking mechanism | Walking through the crawler site |
Type | Item | Method or Value |
---|---|---|
Simulation parameters | Geometric space | 3D |
Number of grids | 599,122 | |
Turbulence model | Standard k-ε | |
Discretization method | Second order upwind | |
Wall model | No slip | |
Solver | Pressure and implicit solver | |
Temperature | 293 K | |
Density (solid-fresh leaf) | 532 kg/m3 | |
Poisson’s ratio (solid-fresh leaf) | 0.4 | |
Density (gas-air) | 1.22 kg/m3 | |
Viscosity (gas-air) | 1.225 × 10−5 Pa∙s | |
Boundary condition | Inlet boundary | Velocity inlet |
Velocity inlet | (13~25) m/s | |
Outlet boundary | Pressure-outlet | |
Pressure value | 102,325 Pa | |
Acceleration of gravity | 9.8 m/s2 |
Codes | Testing Factors | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
d/(m) | ll/(m) | l2/(m) | R/(m) | Velocity Inlet/(m∙s−1) | |
−1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.10 | 13.00 |
0 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 19.00 |
1 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 25.00 |
No. | Testing Factors | Y/(m∙s−1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | ||
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 24.98 |
2 | 0 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 25.16 |
3 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 29.94 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.92 |
5 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 29.89 |
6 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 30.32 |
7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 20.40 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 29.77 |
9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 29.94 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.92 |
11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 35.01 |
12 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 20.73 |
13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 29.77 |
14 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 25.12 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 33.19 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 46.29 |
17 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.98 |
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.92 |
19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.92 |
20 | −1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 28.64 |
21 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 40.52 |
22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 39.26 |
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 17.25 |
24 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 34.95 |
25 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 39.91 |
26 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 20.66 |
27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 29.71 |
28 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 34.43 |
29 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 34.66 |
30 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 39.88 |
31 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.43 |
32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 24.07 |
33 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 34.70 |
34 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 20.75 |
35 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 39.74 |
36 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 45.43 |
37 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 35.17 |
38 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 23.60 |
39 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 30.27 |
40 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.24 |
41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.92 |
42 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 20.24 |
43 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 38.93 |
44 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 24.61 |
45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.92 |
46 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34.08 |
Source | Velocity Outlet | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value | |
Model | 1996.67 | 20 | 99.83 | 88.26 | <0.0001 |
X1-d | 67.52 | 1 | 67.52 | 59.69 | <0.0001 |
X2-l1 | 1.51 | 1 | 1.51 | 1.33 | 0.2592 |
X3-l2 | 1.81 | 1 | 1.81 | 1.60 | 0.2176 |
X4-R | 320.45 | 1 | 320.45 | 283.28 | <0.0001 |
X5-v | 1500.25 | 1 | 1500.25 | 1326.27 | <0.0001 |
X1X2 | 0.0921 | 1 | 0.0921 | 0.0814 | 0.7777 |
X1X3 | 0.0390 | 1 | 0.0390 | 0.0345 | 0.8542 |
X1X4 | 11.57 | 1 | 11.57 | 10.23 | 0.0037 |
X1X5 | 2.21 | 1 | 2.21 | 1.95 | 0.1748 |
X2X3 | 0.0132 | 1 | 0.0132 | 0.0117 | 0.9148 |
X2X4 | 0.0004 | 1 | 0.0004 | 0.0003 | 0.9855 |
X2X5 | 0.0384 | 1 | 0.0384 | 0.0340 | 0.8553 |
X3X4 | 6.270 | 1 | 6.27 | 5.54 | 0.0267 |
X3X5 | 0.0001 | 1 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.9929 |
X4X5 | 9.880 | 1 | 9.88 | 8.73 | 0.0067 |
X12 | 60.630 | 1 | 60.63 | 53.60 | <0.0001 |
X22 | 0.0202 | 1 | 0.0202 | 0.0179 | 0.8946 |
X32 | 0.7677 | 1 | 0.7677 | 0.6786 | 0.4178 |
X42 | 0.0289 | 1 | 0.0289 | 0.0255 | 0.8744 |
X52 | 0.1674 | 1 | 0.1674 | 0.1480 | 0.7037 |
Residual | 28.28 | 25 | 1.13 | ||
Lack of fit | 28.28 | 20 | 1.41 | ||
Pure error | 0 | 5 | 0 | ||
Cor total | 2024.95 | 45 |
Model | Kestrel 2500 |
---|---|
Wind velocity | 0.4~60 m/s |
Resolution ratio | 0.01 m/s |
Response time | ≤3 s |
Detection precision | ±3% |
Area | Speed of engine/(r∙min−1) | ||||||||
1000 | 1500 | 2000 | |||||||
Velocity inlet/(m∙s−1) | |||||||||
13 | 19 | 25 | |||||||
Velocity outlet/(m∙s−1) | |||||||||
1 | 16.50 | 17.48 | 17.61 | 28.72 | 29.10 | 29.21 | 39.10 | 39.82 | 38.70 |
2 | 13.41 | 12.20 | 12.52 | 18.20 | 18.78 | 18.49 | 26.61 | 27.10 | 26.38 |
3 | 11.90 | 12.58 | 13.37 | 18.70 | 19.11 | 18.62 | 27.61 | 28.10 | 27.59 |
4 | 11.12 | 10.69 | 11.30 | 16.78 | 17.11 | 17.21 | 25.40 | 25.20 | 25.11 |
5 | 10.82 | 10.11 | 10.41 | 17.20 | 16.38 | 16.81 | 23.72 | 24.21 | 22.90 |
6 | 11.20 | 12.32 | 10.61 | 17.69 | 17.30 | 18.41 | 24.62 | 24.88 | 24.90 |
7 | 12.21 | 12.82 | 12.50 | 19.51 | 19.42 | 19.30 | 25.41 | 25.20 | 25.11 |
8 | 11.28 | 11.80 | 11.91 | 17.88 | 18.39 | 17.70 | 24.61 | 24.81 | 24.79 |
9 | 18.32 | 18.01 | 17.36 | 25.10 | 25.28 | 25.81 | 33.70 | 33.80 | 33.59 |
Velocity | 13 m/s | 19 m/s | 25 m/s | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | |||||
Area | |||||
1 | 2.71% | 0.69% | 1.02% | ||
2 | 3.67% | 1.08% | 1.00% | ||
3 | 4.05% | 1.06% | 0.80% | ||
4 | 2.01% | 0.91% | 0.44% | ||
5 | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.98% | ||
6 | 5.47% | 2.25% | 0.54% | ||
7 | 1.60% | 0.34% | 0.44% | ||
8 | 2.10% | 1.48% | 0.36% | ||
9 | 1.86% | 1.05% | 0.20% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Weng, X.; Tan, D.; Wang, G.; Chen, C.; Zheng, L.; Yuan, M.; Li, D.; Chen, B.; Jiang, L.; Hu, X. CFD Simulation and Optimization of the Leaf Collecting Mechanism for the Riding-Type Tea Plucking Machine. Agriculture 2023, 13, 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050946
Weng X, Tan D, Wang G, Chen C, Zheng L, Yuan M, Li D, Chen B, Jiang L, Hu X. CFD Simulation and Optimization of the Leaf Collecting Mechanism for the Riding-Type Tea Plucking Machine. Agriculture. 2023; 13(5):946. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050946
Chicago/Turabian StyleWeng, Xiaoxing, Dapeng Tan, Gang Wang, Changqing Chen, Lianyou Zheng, Mingan Yuan, Duojiao Li, Bin Chen, Li Jiang, and Xinrong Hu. 2023. "CFD Simulation and Optimization of the Leaf Collecting Mechanism for the Riding-Type Tea Plucking Machine" Agriculture 13, no. 5: 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050946
APA StyleWeng, X., Tan, D., Wang, G., Chen, C., Zheng, L., Yuan, M., Li, D., Chen, B., Jiang, L., & Hu, X. (2023). CFD Simulation and Optimization of the Leaf Collecting Mechanism for the Riding-Type Tea Plucking Machine. Agriculture, 13(5), 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050946