Next Article in Journal
Can Rural Industrial Integration Alleviate Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution? Evidence from Rural China
Previous Article in Journal
Trehalose as a Stabilizer of the Lipid Composition of Membranes and the Composition of the Cytosol of Frozen/Thawed Rooster Spermatozoa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatiotemporal Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Applications in Punjab, Pakistan

1
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
2
Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, PMAS Arid Agricultural University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
3
Department of Engineering for Crop Production, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy, 14469 Potsdam, Germany
4
Agricultural Systems and Engineering, Department of Food, Agriculture and Bioresources, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
5
Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Mechanical, Biomedical and Design Engineering, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
7
Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(7), 1388; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071388
Submission received: 23 May 2023 / Revised: 10 July 2023 / Accepted: 11 July 2023 / Published: 12 July 2023

Abstract

:
Estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is a key element in water resources management and crop water requirement which, in turn, affects irrigation scheduling. ETo is subject to the influence of various climatic parameters including minimum temperature (Tmin), maximum temperature (Tmax), relative humidity (RH), windspeed (WS), and sunshine hours (SH). Usually, the influence of the climatic parameters and a dominating climatic factor influencing ETo is estimated on yearly basis. However, in diverse climatic regions, ETo varies with the varying climate. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the spatiotemporal variation in the influence of the climatic parameters on ETo in Punjab, Pakistan, for the period 1950–2021, specifically focusing on decennial, annual, and monthly patterns. The study area was divided into five agroclimatic zones. The Penman–Monteith model was used to estimate ETo. The influence was assessed using geographic weighted regression (GWR) and multiscale geographic weighted regression (MGWR) as the primary methods. As per results from MGWR, ETo in Punjab was highly influenced by the Tmin, Tmax, and WS. Additionally, annual ETo exhibited a higher value in southern Punjab in comparison to northern Punjab, with a range of 2975 mm/year in the cotton–wheat zone to 1596 mm/year in the rain-fed zone. Over the course of the past seventy years, Punjab experienced an average increasing slope of 5.18 mm/year in ETo. Tmin was the highest monthly dominant factor throughout the year, whereas WS and SH were recorded to be the dominant factor in the winters, specifically. All in all, accurate estimation of ETo, which serves as an essential component for crop water requirement, could potentially help improve the irrigation scheduling of crops in the agroclimatic zones.

1. Introduction

The determination of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) holds significant importance in the realm of remote sensing applications and the regulation of agricultural water usage. In crop water management, it is customary to employ a theoretical grass reference crop possessing specific attributes as a benchmark surface for the purpose of approximating ETo [1]. The estimation of ETo holds significant value in the management of hydrological and agricultural water systems. Nonetheless, it is imperative to conduct a thorough evaluation of the quantity of water necessary for the growth of any given crop [1]. Accurately determining ETo across different land use regions is crucial for efficient management of water resources [2]. Methods for transferring water vapor, such as soil water balance [3,4] and remote sensing techniques [5], have been employed to quantify ETo. In addition, several hybrid techniques have been used for forecasting ETo [6,7].The accurate computation of ETo is a complicated undertaking that entails the consideration of multiple meteorological variables. Several regions around the world have reported the spatiotemporal variation in the climatic parameters, mainly including temperature [8], which ultimately impacts ETo. Consequently, the development of a precise empirical model that can effectively account for the complexities of the process is a challenging task, as noted in reference [9]. Additionally, climate change plays a significant role in disturbing the surrounding environment in different ways [10], including depleting water levels [11,12], a disturbed hydrological cycle which includes ETo [13,14] as an important component, and ultimately economic loss [15].
A variety of interpolation techniques are employed in GIS software, each distinguished by the models utilized to forecast unknown values on the basis of sample points. The inverse distance weighted (IDW) and Kriging techniques are among the most frequently employed methods. The inverse distance weighting (IDW) method is a deterministic interpolation technique that relies on nearby reference point measurements or established mathematical formulae to evaluate the texture of the resulting interpolation area [16]. Kriging is a geostatistical method that incorporates the spatial configuration of sample points by assigning weights that differ according to their respective locations. Kriging methodology not only generates an interpolated or predicted surface but also provides a level of precision or confidence in the estimates, which is in contrast to the IDW interpolation technique. The spatiotemporal estimation of ETo across 41 stations in Pakistan was investigated by Shah et al. [17] during the period of 2006 to 2015. The research discovered that ETo demonstrated variability and manifested both positive and negative trends across various seasons in multiple regions of Pakistan. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) could potentially serve as a more appropriate technique for addressing this issue with greater precision. The authors Fotheringham et al. (2017) [18] presented a method called multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) to tackle the issues arising from nonstationary connections and heterogeneity. This particular model has the ability to precisely replicate the effects of different independent variables on a dependent variable with regards to spatial variability.
The MGWR method has garnered considerable interest from diverse fields owing to its efficacy in modeling the spatial associations among multiple dependent and independent variables [18]. The effectiveness of ETo estimation models is inherently connected to the specific meteorological conditions of a given location, as stated in reference [19]. Therefore, it is crucial to ascertain appropriate models that are contingent on the accessibility of meteorological data. The significance of ETo on hydrological processes and water resources is particularly noteworthy in predominantly arid regions of Pakistan, surpassing its impact in other climatic zones. The exacerbation of droughts and aridity presents a formidable challenge to the sustainable development of agriculture and water resources in Pakistan, a nation heavily reliant on agriculture. Accurate estimation of ETo is essential for efficient monitoring and management of droughts and aridity. The inadequacy of meteorological information has posed a difficulty in accurately determining ETo across various regions of Pakistan. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate suitable ETo models that can be suggested for ETo estimation in diverse areas. The weather in Pakistan varies between different seasons on a monthly level, which makes it difficult to understand the influence of climatic parameters and the dominant factor influencing ETo in each month. One of the major difficulties in water resources management is the accurate estimation and forecasting of ETo. However, the most recent estimation of ETo and the dominant factor influencing it on a monthly level are missing, which negatively impacts water resources management ultimately impacting the end-user.
According to the studied literature, it can be safely assumed that up-to-date estimations of the reference evapotranspiration and, especially, of the monthly influence of a dominant factor (out of minimum temperature, maximum temperature, relative humidity, windspeed, and sunshine hours) on ETo for Punjab, Pakistan, are missing. Therefore, this study investigates the spatiotemporal variation of reference evapotranspiration across Punjab, Pakistan. Furthermore, spatial variation in the monthly impact of influencing parameters on ETo and the dominant factor have been estimated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The selection of Punjab, Pakistanm for the analysis of the impact of influencing parameters on ETo is justified by the fact that agriculture constitutes a significant proportion of the country’s overall exports [20], with Punjab contributing to 60% of this portion [20], as depicted in Figure 1. Moreover, Punjab has attempted to tackle the problems of food security for many years; therefore, the assessment of the influence of climatic conditions on crop production in such an agriculture-rich region is imperative. Furthermore, accurate ETo estimation in this region can aid in decision making about irrigation scheduling, water allocation for different crops, and the scheduling of other agricultural activities [21]. Moreover, this study assesses the behavior of ETo in five different agroclimatic zones of Punjab, with 36 selected study points, i.e., districts of the province. Different approaches can be used for the classification of Punjab districts into regions, such as dividing Punjab into three regions, north, central, and south, or disintegrating rural Punjab into north and south. In ref. [22], Amjad et al. used the methodology of Pinckney [23] to classify rural areas of Punjab province into five agroclimatic or crop zones. The agroclimatic zones of the Punjab were classified according to the published report by the International Food Policy Research Institute.
The categorization of various zones is primarily determined by the primary kharif season crop, as wheat dominates the rabi season in most regions. The kharif season in Pakistan encompasses the time frame from April to September, during which monsoon rains are prevalent. In contrast, the rabi season occurs from October to March, featuring cooler temperatures and reduced precipitation. Agricultural activities during the rabi season heavily rely on irrigation methods for crop cultivation. In regions where irrigation is practiced, rice and cotton are the predominant kharif crops of utmost importance. Rice cultivation exhibits a propensity for prevalence in regions characterized by elevated water tables, dense soils, and copious precipitation, whereas cotton production is commonly observed in arid locales. Therefore, a significant differentiation can be observed between regions that are suitable for rice cultivation and those that are suitable for cotton cultivation. Based on these two crops, i.e., cotton and rice, alternating with the dominant crop, wheat, two zones, namely, the cotton–wheat zone and rice–wheat zone, were created. The cotton–wheat zone, located in the southern and southwestern regions of Punjab, exhibits a climatic pattern characterized by hot summers and cool winters. The precipitation in this region is comparatively lower than that in the rice–wheat zone, rendering it conducive for the cultivation of cotton during the kharif season and wheat during the rabi season. The rice–wheat zone, predominantly situated in the central and eastern regions of Punjab, exhibits a climate distinguished by warm summers and mild winters. The monsoon season is characterized by a substantial precipitation pattern that occurs during the kharif season, creating favorable conditions for the cultivation of rice. In contrast, the rabi season is characterized by lower levels of precipitation, making it conducive for the cultivation of wheat.
A distinct geographical region, with Faisalabad at its center, exhibits favorable conditions for cultivating multiple kharif crops, without any single crop exerting dominance. This region has been categorized as the mixed-crop zone. The region exhibits a confluence of climatic conditions observed in different zones.
The rain-fed zone or the barani region is deemed distinctive owing to its dependence on precipitation for agricultural purposes. The rain-fed zone situated in the northern and northwestern regions of Punjab exhibits a climate characterized by higher aridity. The precipitation levels in this particular region are constrained.
Furthermore, the region adjacent to the left bank of the Indus River in Punjab, characterized by limited irrigation infrastructure and lower levels of agricultural activity, is recognized as a distinct area referred to as the low-intensity zone. The climate in this zone is characterized by aridity, resulting in minimal precipitation. It is imperative to acknowledge that the aforementioned descriptions offer a comprehensive outline of the climatic conditions prevalent in the agroclimatic zones of Punjab. However, it is crucial to recognize that there may be deviations within each zone due to localized factors, including but not limited to elevation, proximity to water bodies, and microclimatic circumstances. The delineation of the five agroclimatic zones, namely, the low-intensity zone, the rice–wheat zone, the mixed-crop zone, the cotton–wheat zone, and the rain-fed zone, is attributed to the variations in growing climatic conditions and agricultural practices observed from north to south. Table 1 presents the average values of the five climatic parameters influencing ETo for the period 1950–2021 for the five agroclimatic zones.
The low-intensity zone includes the districts Bhakkar, Dera Ghazi Khan, Layyah, Mianwali, Muzaffargarh, and Rajanpur, with 32.3 °C, 17.8 °C, 44.9%, 11.9 h, 3.2 m/s, and 6.5 mm/day of Tmax, Tmin, RH, SH, WS, and ETo, respectively, with an average for the period of 1950–2021. The rice–wheat zone includes districts Gujranwala, Gujrat, Hafizabad, Kasur, Lahore, Mandi Bahauddin, Nankana Sahib, Narowal, Sheikhupura, and Sialkot, with 30.4 °C, 17.3 °C, 67.4%, 11.9 h, 3.4 m/s, and 5.4 mm/day of Tmax, Tmin, RH, SH, WS, and ETo, respectively. The mixed-crop zone includes the districts Chiniot, Faisalabad, Jhang, Khushab, Okara, Sargodha, and Toba Tek Singh, with 31.8 °C, 18.0 °C, 57.3%, 11.9 h, 3.6 m/s, and 6.1 mm/day of Tmax, Tmin, RH, SH, WS, and ETo, respectively. The cotton–wheat zone includes the districts Bahawalnagar, Bahawalpur, Khanewal, Lodhran, Multan, Pakpattan, Rahim Yar Khan, Sahiwal, and Vehari, with 32.9 °C, 18.4 °C, 40.4%, 11.9 h, 2.8 m/s, and 6.4 mm/day of Tmax, Tmin, RH, SH, WS, and ETo, respectively. The rain-fed zone includes the districts Attock, Chakwal, Jhelum, and Rawalpindi, with 28.8 °C, 15.4 °C, 74.1%, 12.0 h, 4.0 m/s, and 5.0 mm/day of Tmax, Tmin, RH, SH, WS, and ETo, respectively.

2.2. Data Collection

For the estimation of ETo, satellite data were used. The data of 5 different climatic parameters were obtained from 2 online sources (summarized details of the data sources are presented in Table 2). For minimum temperature (Tmin) and maximum temperature (Tmax), the satellite data were obtained from the Climatic Research Unit gridded Time Series (CRU–TS). However, for relative humidity (RH) and windspeed (WS), the satellite data were obtained from National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) (NCEP–NCAR) Reanalysis 1 for Punjab. For further analyses, data points were extracted for the 36 districts (categorized into 5 agroclimatic zones as per [22,23]) in the Punjab from 1950 to 2021. Figure 2 illustrates the workflow of the presented study. The present study assessed the decadal patterns of ETo spanning from 1950 to 2021. In order to analyze the trend of reference evapotranspiration, the available data were divided into seven distinct decades spanning 1950 to 2021. Additionally, the data were further categorized into five distinct zones, namely, the cotton–wheat zone, the low-intensity zone, the rice–wheat zone, the mixed-crop zone, and the rain-fed zone, all of which are located within the Punjab province of Pakistan.

2.2.1. ETo Estimation

In this study, the standard Penman–Monteith (PM) model was utilized to calculate the reference evapotranspiration in mm/day. It was developed in the mid-1960s by Allen and Tideman, and it combines both energy and mass balance principles [26]. The PM ETo model is given as Equation (1). Details of the parameters are available in the literature [26].
E T o = 0.408 R n G + γ 900 T + 273 u 2 ( e s e a ) + γ ( 1 + 0.34 u 2 )
where ETo is the reference evapotranspiration in mm day−1; Δ is the slope of the vapor pressure curve in kPa °C −1; Rn is the net radiation at the crop surface in MJ m2 day−1; G is the soil heat flux density in MJm2.day−1, which is considered as 0 [1]; γ is the psychrometric constant in kPa °C −1; T is the mean air temperature, which is determined from minimum and maximum temperatures in °C; u2 is the wind speed at a height of 2 m height in ms−1; es is the saturation vapor pressure in kPa; and ea is the actual vapor pressure in kPa.

2.2.2. Trend Analysis

The present investigation employed a prevalent technique for trend analysis, namely, linear regression, due to its ability to detect and measure patterns in data across temporal dimensions. Through the application of a linear model to the dataset, researchers are able to approximate the pace and orientation of variation in a given variable that is of significance. The aforementioned approach proves to be especially advantageous in the examination of extended patterns in climatic parameters, such as ETo. In this study, the Mann–Kendall (MK) test was employed to identify fluctuations in the timeseries data [27]. The Sen’s slope technique has been utilized in combination with the MK test to examine patterns in ETo data. The technique, formulated by Sen in 1968, offers a computation of the pace of alteration in a given variable across a period [28]. This study employs linear trend analysis to examine the Punjab region, utilizing the linear regression method for the period spanning 1950 to 2021.

2.2.3. Data Quality and Integrity Assessment

In the current scenario, data were analyzed through basic statistical methods such as minimum and maximum values, range, mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis. Table 3 presents an overview of the descriptive statistics of the climatic parameters for the estimation of ETo for Punjab, Pakistan, for the period 1950–2021. The analysis conducted and presented in Table 3 demonstrates that the studied variables exhibited varying skewness values, encompassing both positive and negative values. This suggests the presence of asymmetry in the distributions of these variables. Moreover, the kurtosis values indicate that the climatic variables demonstrate either a distribution with lower peak and heavier tails (platykurtic) or a distribution with higher peak and lighter tails (leptokurtic).

2.2.4. Spatial Distribution of ETo

The utilization of spatial visualization techniques for ETo distribution analysis facilitates the identification of regions with elevated water demand and potential depletion or overuse of water resources [1]. Furthermore, it has the potential to identify regions with favorable temperature [29] and humidity conditions for cultivating various crops, thereby facilitating crop selection and land-use management. The utilization of Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) for the purpose of interpolating ETo data and creating spatial representations of ETo across various regions of Pakistan has been extensively documented in numerous studies [30]. As a result, the ETo data underwent spatial interpolation using the IDW interpolation technique in the ArcGIS software, as opposed to more intricate methods such as Kriging. This process yielded evapotranspiration maps for various climatic periods spanning from 1950 to 2021, which are presented in Figure 3 for the purpose of change analysis.

2.2.5. Spatial Relationship between Climatic Variables and ETo

The present study employed Pearson’s correlation coefficient to establish the correlation between the influencing parameters and the reference evapotranspiration. This coefficient was preferred over other methods of evaluating linear relationships due to its distinct advantages. The utilization of Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) is widespread in the assessment of models in studies related to ETo, as evidenced by several studies [31]. The requisite quantity of data for establishing a correlation is comparatively lower than in other techniques of data assessment, typically ranging from three to seven variable pairs [32]. Furthermore, it has the capability to conduct an analysis on a considerable number of variables without causing substantial overstatement of outcomes [32]. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the impact of ambient weather variables on the computed ETo. Bois et al. [33] have discussed several techniques for performing sensitivity analyses, which have been documented in the literature. In this study, a monthly analysis was performed to establish a correlation between the influencing parameters and ETo. The mathematical expression denoting the Pearson correlation is represented by Equation (2):
r = i = 1 N ( x x ) ( y y ) i = 1 N ( x x ) 2 i = 1 N ( y y ) 2
In this study, the observed climatic variable was denoted as x and the estimated ETo was represented as y; x and y are their subsequent mean values. Similarly, the coefficients were used to determine the most influential climatic variables on ETo in the study areas.

3. Results

3.1. Trend of ETo

Figure 4 depicts the results of the Mann–Kendall trend analysis applied to annual ETo in the five agroclimatic zones of Punjab for analyzing the heterogeneity of the timeseries ETo. In Figure 4a, a heterogeneity in the year 2000 was observed in ETo for Punjab during the period of 1950 to 2021. The sudden fluctuation in the trend of ETo could be attributed to the changing climate, which ultimately impacts the climatic parameters which influence ETo. Figure 4b shows cumulative trend of ETo for the period of 1950–2021, which is increasing through the time period. A lowest ETo of 2094.12 mm/year was observed in the year 1963 for the Punjab, whereas the highest ETo, i.e., 2691.26 mm/year, was observed in 2021, which clearly illustrates the impact of rising temperatures. Similarly, trends of the ETo for the five agroclimatic zones are presented in Figure 4; all of the zones show rapidly increasing trends of ETo except in the low-intensity zone, which could be attributed to lower precipitation in the area. The agroclimatic zones comprising the respective districts are also presented in Figure 4.

3.2. Decennial ETo

The data presented in Figure 5 indicate a decadal pattern that demonstrates a rise in ETo throughout the duration of the study. The cartographic representation of the 1950s (depicted in Figure 5a) revealed a diminished ETo in the rain-fed and rice–wheat zones (i.e., 1328.03 mm/year), whereas the southwestern region exhibited relatively elevated values (i.e., 2370.56 mm/year). Figure 5b illustrates the fluctuation of difference in ETo during the second decade (1960–1969) throughout Punjab with respect to the ETo base year 1950s. The study noted that the highest difference in the ETo values across the northern and southern regions were found in the cotton–wheat zone, with Rahim Yar Khan particularly exhibiting a 10.19 mm/year elevated ETo compared to the base year. The mixed crop zone, also known as the central region, typically exhibited a moderate-to-low level of ETo. In majority of the cotton–wheat zone, the difference ETo was negative (up to −91.31 mm/year) compared to the base year (illustrated in Figure 5b). The results obtained during the time frame of 1970–1979 indicate a rise in the difference of ETo in the rice–wheat zone and rain-fed zone (i.e., up to 116.26 mm/year) when compared to the base year. This is illustrated in Figure 5c. During the fourth decade spanning 1980 to 1989, there was an observed increase in the difference of ETo in comparison to the base year 1950s, as illustrated in Figure 5d. The highest positive difference in observed ETo was 84.77 mm/year in the rice–wheat zone, rain-fed zone, and somewhat in the mixed-crop zone compared to the base year. As depicted in Figure 5e, the rate of difference in ETo exhibited an increasing trend from the northern region to the southern region (i.e., from 115.74 mm/year to −79.35 mm/year, respectively), or from the rain-fed zone to the cotton–wheat and low-intensity zone during the period 1990–1999. Drastically elevated trends in the difference of ETo were observed in the year 2000–2009 compared to the base year 1950s, as shown in Figure 5f. Typically, rain-fed zone was the most affected zone (i.e., 234.73 mm/year), followed by the rice–wheat zone (i.e., 200.8 mm/year), compared to the base year 1950s. According to Figure 5g, the highest difference in ETo was observed in the northern region (i.e., 734.57 mm/year) compared to the southern region (320.29 mm/year) in the year 2010–2021 relative to the base year 1950s. Finally, Figure 5h illustrates the ETo levels in the period of 2010–2021. i.e., 2690.85 mm/year in the southern region of the area, whereas 2042.86 mm/year was recorded in the northern regions of the area. Over the course of the past decade, the cotton–wheat and low-intensity zones have exhibited the highest ETo values, whereas the mixed-crop zone has demonstrated a moderate rate (i.e., 2400 mm/year to 2500 mm/year) with slight anomaly in the Jhang district. Conversely, the rice–wheat zone in the northeastern region and the rain-fed zone in the northwestern region have displayed relatively low ETo rates; however, they were the most affected zones when compared to the base year 1950s due to climate change. The rate of reference evapotranspiration is directly proportional to temperature, resulting in a significant fluctuation in ETo rate during the month of September as supported by the findings of previous research [34]. As per the data presented in Figure 5, the highest evapotranspiration rate recorded was 2690.8 mm/year in the year 2010–2021. Prior research has identified comparable patterns that align with the results of the current investigation. Table 4 presents the decennial pattern of ETo in relation to the five agroclimatic zones in Punjab, Pakistan, spanning from 1950 to 2021.

3.3. Sensitivity Analysis

3.3.1. Geographic Weighted Regression (GWR)

In order to examine the relationship between the distribution of ETo and its influencing factors, a correlation analysis was conducted using Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) at 36 district points. Subsequently, maps were generated using Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) gridding. Figure 6 presents the resultant maps that illustrate the correlation between ETo and various climatic parameters for the time period 1950–2021. A correlation ranging from 0.29 to 0.89 with standard deviation of 0.1 was observed between ETo and Tmin reported in Figure 6a. According to Figure 6a, low correlation (i.e., 0.29) was observed in the southern region of the area covering most of the cotton–wheat zone and the low-intensity zone. This could be attributed to the gradual change in elevation from north to south, which is known to impact ETo. In Figure 6b, a good correlation ranging 0.78 to 0.91 with standard deviation of 0.03 was observed between ETo and Tmax. According to Figure 6b, the correlation trend follows a similar direction as that of ETo and Tmin; however, the minimum value of the correlation is raised to 0.78, covering most of the cotton–wheat zone, the low-intensity zone, and the mixed-crop zone. This could be attributed to the changing climate and rising temperatures across the country. A correlation ranging from 0.67 to 0.89 with standard deviation of 0.05 was observed between ETo and RH reported in Figure 6c. A minimum correlation of 0.67 was observed between ETo and RH in the central region of the mixed-crop zone, whereas a correlation of 0.7 to 0.8 was observed between ETo and RH in most of the cotton–wheat zone, the low-intensity zone, and the mixed-crop zone. In the rain-fed and rice–wheat zones, a correlation of 0.8 to 0.89 was observed between ETo and RH. This trend could be attributed to the frequent rainfall events in the northern region of the area leading to increased RH compared to the infrequent rainfall events in the southern region leading to drier conditions and lesser RH. According to Figure 6d, a correlation ranging from 0.29 to 0.63, with standard deviation 0.06, was observed between ETo and WS. Minimum correlation, i.e., 0.29, was observed in the southern region of the cotton–wheat zone and the low-intensity zone due to lesser windspeed in these southern regions of the area. A moderate correlation of 0.6 was observed between ETo and WS in the central Punjab region, comprising some districts of the cotton–wheat, low-intensity, and rice–wheat zones. This could be attributed to typically higher windspeeds in these regions due to their geographical location and the location of the Himalayan ranges. In the northern region of the area, namely, the rain-fed zone and the rice–wheat zone, a correlation of 0.3 to 0.4 was observed between ETo and WS.

3.3.2. Multiscale Geographic Weighted Regression (MGWR)

The MGWR model was utilized to estimate ETo in Punjab from 1950–2021, and Figure 7 displays the monthly distribution of the relative contribution of minimum temperature (Tmin) in this estimation. The findings presented in Figure 7a demonstrate the varying levels of contribution of Tmin during the month of January across different regions, ranging from 0.17% to 0.75%. The study revealed that ETo was significantly impacted by the rain-fed and low-intensity zones, whereas the rice–wheat and mixed-crop zones exhibited a relatively lower level of influence. Figure 7b demonstrated a comparable pattern where the minimum temperature (Tmin) had an impact on ETo during February. The range of this impact was between 0.18% and 0.76%, indicating a significant level of contribution in both the rain-fed and cotton–wheat zones. During the month of March, the contribution of Tmin varied between 0.15 to 0.74%. The rain-fed zone was observed to be the most affected, as depicted in Figure 7c. The impact of Tmin during the month of April is depicted in Figure 7d, revealing a significant influence on the rain-fed, low-intensity, and cotton–wheat zones, with a range of 0.17% to 0.71%. The rice–wheat zone, rain-fed zone, low-intensity zone, and mixed-crop zone experienced significant impact in May, with an overall range of 0.22% to 0.76%, as illustrated in Figure 7e. During the month of June, the Tmin had an impact on the value, which varied between 0.31% and 0.85%. The rice–wheat zone, low-intensity zone, and rain-fed zone were the areas that were most affected, as shown in Figure 7f. The data presented in Figure 7g indicate that the values observed for July ranged between 0.25% and 0.80%. The rice–wheat zone and mixed-crop zones exhibited comparatively lower levels of influence, whereas the remaining zones were subject to significant impact. According to Figure 7h, the contribution of Tmin during the month of August varied across different regions, with values ranging from 0.32% to 0.85%. The study revealed that the rain-fed zone had a significant impact on ETo, whereas the remaining zones exhibited a comparatively lower level of contribution. Figure 7i illustrates the impact of Tmin on ETo for the month of September. The observed values exhibited a significant level of contribution within the rain-fed zone, ranging from 0.27% to 0.86%. The rain-fed zone in October exhibited a similar pattern, with the highest impact ranging from 0.22% to 0.72%, as shown in Figure 7j. The influence of Tmin on ETo was observed in November, with values ranging from 0.16% to 0.72%, as depicted in Figure 7k. The rice–wheat zone, cotton–wheat zone, low-intensity zone, and mixed-crop zone were found to have experienced the least amount of impact. Finally, it should be noted that the impact of Tmin on ETo in the rain-fed region remained consistently significant throughout the month of December, exhibiting the greatest level of influence. The observed values exhibited a range between 0.16% and 0.75%, with the mixed-crop zone displaying the least amount of impact, as depicted in Figure 7l.
The findings derived from Figure 7 demonstrate that the impact of climatic variables on ETo exhibits variability on a monthly basis. Figure 8 depicts the dominant factor that exerted the highest influence on ETo on a monthly basis from 1950 to 2021 in the region of Punjab, Pakistan.
According to Figure 8, the dominant factor varied across space and time. In terms of monthly variation, WS was the dominant factor across most of the Punjab in January, as shown in Figure 8a. However, in February, SH was observed to be the dominant factor across majority of the 36 districts in Punjab, as shown in Figure 8b. Similar to January, WS dominated the influence on ETo across Punjab in March, as shown in Figure 8c. According to Figure 8d, the WS and SH were the most prominent dominant factors out of the five climatic parameters influencing ETo in April across Punjab. In May, Tmin, SH, and WS were the most dominant factors spread across Punjab (shown in Figure 8e). This could be linked to longer solar days, higher wind speed across the plains, and temperature variation due to start of summer months. In June, Tmin was the most dominant factor influencing ETo across Punjab, shown in Figure 8f. Similarly, in July, Tmin and Tmax were the driving factors influencing reference evapotranspiration across Punjab as shown in Figure 8g. In August, Tmin and WS were the most dominant factors shown in Figure 8h. According to Figure 8i, in September, Tmin, Tmax, and WS were the most dominant factors influencing different agroclimatic zones of the Punjab. According to Figure 8j, in October, in the low intensity zone, SH was the driving factor, whereas in the upper Punjab, RH was the driving factor influencing ETo. In other zones, Tmin and SH were observed to be influencing ETo. In November, a mix–up of Tmin, Tmax, WS, and SH influenced ETo at different stations across Punjab, as shown in Figure 8k; however, WS and SH were the most common dominant factors at majority of the stations. According to Figure 8l, WS and SH were the dominant factors impacting ETo across Punjab in December.

4. Discussion

Tmin series showed more significant trends, which is in accordance with the global trend over the previous decades. The overall pattern assessment revealed that annual Tmin had a considerable influence on ETo in the rain-fed zone. ETo is impacted in the heavy rainfall [35,36] seasons due to variations in relative humidity. To address the varying influence, the GWR technique was used, which can be effective in allowing model parameters to vary across space [18]. This approach can provide valuable insights into the complex spatial patterns of ETo and its influencing factors, which can aid in developing more accurate and localized water management strategies. The correlation of climatic factors to ETo findings demonstrates that all parameters have a substantial influence on ETo [37]. According to the findings by Hupet et al. [38], it has been observed that radiation has a significant influence on ETo. Since minimum temperature remains unchanged as much during the wet season as it does during the period of dryness, it has a greater influence on ETo during the dry season. Therefore, the impact of Tmin was observed on ETo via MGWR and its subsequent influence from the month of January to December for the study period 1950–2021. According to Zhang et al. [39], ETo was highly influenced by Tmin and Tmax across China on an annual basis. The study provided a detailed dominant factor analysis throughout the study period (1970–2014) in China. However, the study failed to correlate the impact of monthly variation of weather conditions/seasons on the influencing ability of the climatic parameters. The present study assesses this impact on a monthly basis. Furthermore, the estimated reference evapotranspiration could be correlated with measured ETo from any of the stations for reference. Additionally, in future research directions, the estimated spatiotemporal ETo (which serves as an essential component in the crop water requirement estimation) could help in the estimation of zone- and crop-specific irrigation scheduling across Punjab. Ultimately, based on the study, the estimation of the amount of water required for irrigation purpose would help the relevant policymakers to better allocate the water resources in the country.

5. Conclusions

Maximum Tmax, Tmin, RH, WS, and ETo (i.e., 33.9 °C, 18.7 °C, 76.5%, 4.2 m/s, and 7.6 mm/day, respectively) were observed across the study area. The highest ETo was observed in the southern regions of the area. The range of ETo was also higher in the southern region (i.e., up to 5.57 mm/day). As per GWR, Tmax had the highest correlation (i.e., 0.91) with ETo in the mixed-crop zone. As per the MGWR, Tmin, Tmax, and WS had the highest influence on ETo throughout different regions in Punjab. Throughout the study period, ETo showed an increasing trend. In addition, a heterogeneity was observed in the ETo trend in year 2001. Out of the five agroclimatic zones, the cotton–wheat zone observed the highest ETo due to the higher temperatures in the region. In terms of a monthly dominant factor, the highest overall dominant factor was Tmin, whereas WS and SH were the highest observed dominant factors in the winters, specifically. It was concluded that Tmin and Tmax had the highest overall influence on ETo in Punjab. In addition to these parameters, WS was also observed to be the highest dominant factor influencing ETo on a monthly basis. In terms of future research directions, the ultimate goal of the proposed study was to investigate the zone- and crop-specific irrigation scheduling which incorporates ETo as an essential component.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A. and S.Q.; Data curation, H.A., S.Q. and N.R.; Formal analysis, H.A., S.Q. and B.K.; Funding acquisition, R.R.S., M.S., S.M.I. and M.I.; Investigation, H.A.; Methodology, H.A., M.S. and M.U.K.; Project administration, M.S., S.M.I. and M.I.; Resources, M.S.; Software, H.A., S.Q., N.R. and M.U.K.; Supervision, R.R.S., M.S., M.I. and M.U.K.; Validation, R.R.S. and M.S.; Visualization, H.A., S.Q., R.R.S., M.S., S.M.I., M.I. and M.U.K.; Writing—original draft, H.A., S.Q. and N.R.; Writing—review and editing, S.Q., N.R., R.R.S., M.S., B.K., S.M.I., M.I. and M.U.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R100), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R100), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Innovate UK’s Energy Catalyst Programme (Ayrton Funding provided by the Foreign, Commonwealth Development Office through their Transforming Energy Access Programme) and UK aid for the support and funding provided for the research project titled ‘Hybrid Energy Powered Smart Irrigation System for Smallholder Farmers’ (Project number: 10039507). This financial support from Innovate UK’s Energy Catalyst Programme has played a pivotal role in facilitating the successful execution of our research. The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the Leibniz Association, Germany.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration—Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements—FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998; Volume 300, p. D05109. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wu, B.; Quan, Q.; Yang, S.; Dong, Y. A social-ecological coupling model for evaluating the human-water relationship in basins within the Budyko framework. J. Hydrol. 2023, 619, 129361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zakir-Hassan, G.; Punthakey, J.F.; Shabir, G.; Yasmeen, F.; Sultan, M.; Ashraf, H.; Sohoo, I.; Majeed, F. Physicochemical Investigation of Rainfall for Managed Aquifer Recharge in Punjab (Pakistan). Water 2022, 14, 2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zakir, G.; Kahlown, M.A.; Punthakey, J.F.; Shabir, G.; Aziz, M.; Sultan, M.; Ashraf, H.; Majeed, F. Evaluation of hydraulic efficiency of lined irrigation channels—A case study from Punjab, Pakistan. Hydrol. Res. 2023, 54, 523–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elnmer, A.; Khadr, M.; Kanae, S.; Tawfik, A. Mapping daily and seasonally evapotranspiration using remote sensing techniques over the Nile delta. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 213, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Karbasi, M.; Jamei, M.; Ali, M.; Malik, A.; Yaseen, Z.M. Forecasting weekly reference evapotranspiration using Auto Encoder Decoder Bidirectional LSTM model hybridized with a Boruta-CatBoost input optimizer. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 107121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Malik, A.; Jamei, M.; Ali, M.; Prasad, R.; Karbasi, M.; Yaseen, Z.M. Multi-step daily forecasting of reference evapotranspiration for different climates of India: A modern multivariate complementary technique reinforced with ridge regression feature selection. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 272, 107812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Z.; Liu, Z.; Yin, L.; Zheng, W. Statistical analysis of regional air temperature characteristics before and after dam construction. Urban Clim. 2022, 41, 101085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Muhammad Adnan, R.; Chen, Z.; Yuan, X.; Kisi, O.; El-Shafie, A.; Kuriqi, A.; Ikram, M. Reference Evapotranspiration Modeling Using New Heuristic Methods. Entropy 2020, 22, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pei, Y.; Qiu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, D.; Tang, B.; Wang, F.; Cao, M. Elevation dependence of landslide activity induced by climate change in the eastern Pamirs. Landslides 2023, 20, 1115–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, S.; Lyu, Y.; Sha, H.; Xiu, L. Seismic performance assessment of unsaturated soil slope in different groundwater levels. Landslides 2021, 18, 2813–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Q.; Song, D.; Yuan, C.; Nie, W. An image recognition method for the deformation area of open-pit rock slopes under variable rainfall. Measurement 2022, 188, 110544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Wu, X.; Zscheischler, J.; Guo, S.; Chen, X. A standardized index for assessing sub-monthly compound dry and hot conditions with application in China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2021, 25, 1587–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, J.; Wang, L.; Zhong, X.; Yao, T.; Qi, J.; Wang, Y.; Xue, Y. Quantifying the major drivers for the expanding lakes in the interior Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xie, X.; Huang, L.; Marson, S.M.; Wei, G. Emergency response process for sudden rainstorm and flooding: Scenario deduction and Bayesian network analysis using evidence theory and knowledge meta-theory. Nat. Hazards 2023, 117, 3307–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Samanta, S.; Pal, D.K.; Lohar, D.; Pal, B. Interpolation of climate variables and temperature modeling. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2012, 107, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saeed Shah, S.M.; El-Morshedy, M.; Mansoor, W. Spatial-Temporal Interpolation of Reference Evapotranspiration for Pakistan. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 5488725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fotheringham, A.S.; Brunsdon, C.; Charlton, M. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  19. Muhammad, M.K.I.; Nashwan, M.S.; Shahid, S.; Ismail, T.b.; Song, Y.H.; Chung, E.-S. Evaluation of Empirical Reference Evapotranspiration Models Using Compromise Programming: A Case Study of Peninsular Malaysia. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Finance Division, Government of Pakistan. Pakistan Economic Survey 2021-22; Finance Division, Government of Pakistan: Islamabad, Pakistan, 2022; p. 548. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nagappan, M.; Gopalakrishnan, V.; Alagappan, M. Prediction of reference evapotranspiration for irrigation scheduling using machine learning. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2020, 65, 2669–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Amjad, R.; Arif, G.M.; Mustafa, U. Does the labor market structure explain differences in poverty in rural Punjab? Lahore J. Econ. 2008, SE, 139–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pinckney, T.C. The Demand for Public Storage of Wheat in Pakistan; International Food Policy Reseasrch Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 1989; Volume 77. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, Q.; Kong, D.; Singh, V.P.; Shi, P. Response of vegetation to different time-scales drought across China: Spatiotemporal patterns, causes and implications. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2017, 152, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kalnay, E.; Kanamitsu, M.; Kistler, R.; Collins, W.; Deaven, D.; Gandin, L.; Iredell, M.; Saha, S.; White, G.; Woollen, J.; et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1996, 77, 437–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Allen, R. Penman–Monteith Equation. In Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment; Hillel, D., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 180–188. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mann, H.B. Nonparametric Tests Against Trend. Econometrica 1945, 13, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sen, P.K. Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall’s Tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1968, 63, 1379–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, C.; Wang, Z.; Ji, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, Q.; Qing, D. Coupled improvements on hydrodynamics and water quality by flowing water in towns with lakes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 46813–46825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ashraf, A.; Ahmed, A.; Mukhtar, A.; Iqbal, M. Changing Pattern of Agroclimate in Pakistan and Measures for Agriculture Sustainability. Pak. J. Meteorol. 2023, 2023, 15. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, L.; Cui, Y.; Xiang, Z.; Zheng, S.; Traore, S.; Luo, Y. Short-term forecasting of daily crop evapotranspiration using the ‘Kc-ETo’ approach and public weather forecasts. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2018, 64, 903–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Harrell, F.E. Regression Modeling Strategies; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 330, p. 14. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bois, B.; Pieri, P.; Van Leeuwen, C.; Wald, L.; Huard, F.; Gaudillere, J.P.; Saur, E. Using remotely sensed solar radiation data for reference evapotranspiration estimation at a daily time step. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zhang, F.; Geng, M.; Wu, Q.; Liang, Y. Study on the spatial-temporal variation in evapotranspiration in China from 1948 to 2018. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, X.; Guo, S.; Qian, S.; Wang, Z.; Lai, C.; Li, J.; Liu, P. Long-range precipitation forecast based on multipole and preceding fluctuations of sea surface temperature. Int. J. Climatol. 2022, 42, 8024–8039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, G.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Sang, L.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, X.; Qiu, D. The isotopes of precipitation have climate change signal in arid Central Asia. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2023, 225, 104103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, Y.; Bárdossy, A.; Zhang, K. Sensitivity of hydrological models to temporal and spatial resolutions of rainfall data. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 23, 2647–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hupet, F.; Vanclooster, M. Effect of the sampling frequency of meteorological variables on the estimation of the reference evapotranspiration. J. Hydrol. 2001, 243, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, L.; Traore, S.; Cui, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, G.; Liu, B.; Fipps, G.; Karthikeyan, R.; Singh, V. Assessment of spatiotemporal variability of reference evapotranspiration and controlling climate factors over decades in China using geospatial techniques. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 213, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of the study area and location of the 36 district stations and delineation of the five agroclimatic zones in Punjab, Pakistan.
Figure 1. Illustration of the study area and location of the 36 district stations and delineation of the five agroclimatic zones in Punjab, Pakistan.
Agriculture 13 01388 g001
Figure 2. Workflow of the presented study for the estimation of ETo.
Figure 2. Workflow of the presented study for the estimation of ETo.
Agriculture 13 01388 g002
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of average annual (1950–2021) (a) Tmax (°C), (b) Tmin (°C), (c) RH (%), (d) WS (m/s), (e) ETo (mm/day), and (f) range of ETo (mm/day). Note: range represents the difference between the highest and lowest ETo (mm/day) at a specific station throughout the study period (1950–2021).
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of average annual (1950–2021) (a) Tmax (°C), (b) Tmin (°C), (c) RH (%), (d) WS (m/s), (e) ETo (mm/day), and (f) range of ETo (mm/day). Note: range represents the difference between the highest and lowest ETo (mm/day) at a specific station throughout the study period (1950–2021).
Agriculture 13 01388 g003
Figure 4. Illustration of (a) homogeneity test of ETo in Punjab, (b) overall trend of ETo in Punjab, (c) ETo trend in the cotton–wheat zone, (d) ETo trend in the low-intensity zone, (e) ETo trend in the rice–wheat zone, (f) ETo trend in the mixed-crop zone, and (g) ETo trend in the rain-fed zone using the Mann–Kendall trend test for the period 1950–2021. Note: names of the districts included in respective agroclimatic zones are presented in each graph.
Figure 4. Illustration of (a) homogeneity test of ETo in Punjab, (b) overall trend of ETo in Punjab, (c) ETo trend in the cotton–wheat zone, (d) ETo trend in the low-intensity zone, (e) ETo trend in the rice–wheat zone, (f) ETo trend in the mixed-crop zone, and (g) ETo trend in the rain-fed zone using the Mann–Kendall trend test for the period 1950–2021. Note: names of the districts included in respective agroclimatic zones are presented in each graph.
Agriculture 13 01388 g004
Figure 5. Decadal patterns of ETo spanning from 1950 to 2021 for Punjab, Pakistan: (a) base ETo for 1950s; (b) difference in ETo for 1960s; (c) difference in ETo for 1970s; (d) difference in ETo for 1980s, (e) difference in ETo for 1990s; (f) difference in ETo for 2000s; (g) difference in ETo for 2010–21; and (h) ETo for 2010–21. Note: the difference in ETo is relative to the ETo of base year 1950s.
Figure 5. Decadal patterns of ETo spanning from 1950 to 2021 for Punjab, Pakistan: (a) base ETo for 1950s; (b) difference in ETo for 1960s; (c) difference in ETo for 1970s; (d) difference in ETo for 1980s, (e) difference in ETo for 1990s; (f) difference in ETo for 2000s; (g) difference in ETo for 2010–21; and (h) ETo for 2010–21. Note: the difference in ETo is relative to the ETo of base year 1950s.
Agriculture 13 01388 g005
Figure 6. Spatial variation of Pearson’s correlation coefficient between ETo and (a) Tmax, (b) Tmin, (c) RH, and (d) WS, using geographic weighted regression for 1950–2021 in Punjab, Pakistan.
Figure 6. Spatial variation of Pearson’s correlation coefficient between ETo and (a) Tmax, (b) Tmin, (c) RH, and (d) WS, using geographic weighted regression for 1950–2021 in Punjab, Pakistan.
Agriculture 13 01388 g006
Figure 7. Spatial and monthly influence of Tmin on ETo using multiscale geographic weighted regression for the month of (a) January, (b) February, (c) March, (d) April, (e) May, (f) June, (g) July, (h) August, (i) September, (j) October, (k) November, (l) December for 1950–2021 in Punjab, Pakistan.
Figure 7. Spatial and monthly influence of Tmin on ETo using multiscale geographic weighted regression for the month of (a) January, (b) February, (c) March, (d) April, (e) May, (f) June, (g) July, (h) August, (i) September, (j) October, (k) November, (l) December for 1950–2021 in Punjab, Pakistan.
Agriculture 13 01388 g007
Figure 8. Illustration of the spatial and monthly variation in the dominant factor out of the five climatic parameters on ETo using multiscale geographic weighted regression (MGWR) for the month of (a) January, (b) February, (c) March, (d) April, (e) May, (f) June, (g) July, (h) August, (i) September, (j) October, (k) November, (l) December for the period 1950–2021.
Figure 8. Illustration of the spatial and monthly variation in the dominant factor out of the five climatic parameters on ETo using multiscale geographic weighted regression (MGWR) for the month of (a) January, (b) February, (c) March, (d) April, (e) May, (f) June, (g) July, (h) August, (i) September, (j) October, (k) November, (l) December for the period 1950–2021.
Agriculture 13 01388 g008
Table 1. Summary of the climatic parameters (1950–2021) for the five agroclimatic zones in Punjab, Pakistan.
Table 1. Summary of the climatic parameters (1950–2021) for the five agroclimatic zones in Punjab, Pakistan.
Agroclimatic ZoneMaximum Temperature Tmax
(°C)
Minimum Temperature Tmin
(°C)
Relative Humidity RH
(%)
Sunshine Hours SH
(h)
Windspeed WS
(m/s)
Reference Evapotranspiration ETo
(mm/day)
Cotton–wheat zone32.9718.4440.411.992.856.49
Rice–wheat zone30.4717.3567.4911.993.475.47
Low-intensity zone32.3517.8644.9911.993.296.52
Mixed-crop zone31.818.0257.3711.993.626.15
Rain-fed zone28.8915.4574.17124.045.03
Table 2. Summary of the data sources used in this study.
Table 2. Summary of the data sources used in this study.
Dataset NameVariablesTemporal ExtentSpatial ResolutionRef.
CRU–TSTmin, Tmax1901–2021All land areas (excluding Antarctica) at 0.5° resolution[24]
NCEP–NCAR Reanalysis 1
(Data provided by the NOAA PSL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their website at https://psl.noaa.gov (accessed on 28 January 2023))
RH and WS1948–2021All land areas (excluding Antarctica) at 2.5° resolution[25]
Sunshine hours
(calculated)
SH
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the climatic parameters for the estimation of ETo for Punjab, Pakistan, for the period of 1950–2021.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the climatic parameters for the estimation of ETo for Punjab, Pakistan, for the period of 1950–2021.
VariableMeanSt. Dev.MinimumMaximumRangeSkewnessKurtosis
Tmin (°C)17.6310.51616.42618.7742.348–0.14–0.47
Tmax (°C)31.4960.49930.16832.4122.243–0.25–0.46
RH (%)55.7472.52949.40761.94412.537–0.330.02
WS (m/s)3.38190.51372.35194.31331.9615–0.32–1.19
ETo (mm/year)2339.7149.12094.12691.3597.10.63–0.34
Table 4. Decennial trend of ETo against each of the five agroclimatic zones from 1950 to 2021 in Punjab, Pakistan.
Table 4. Decennial trend of ETo against each of the five agroclimatic zones from 1950 to 2021 in Punjab, Pakistan.
Agroclimatic ZoneETo (mm/year) per DecadeETo Trend (mm/year)
1950–19501960–19691970–19791980–19891990–19992000–20092010–20211950–2021
Low-intensity zone2243223022212220228722272237Agriculture 13 01388 i001
Cotton–wheat zone2157209620682072212322932323Agriculture 13 01388 i002
Rice–wheat zone1999199021002097210520702046Agriculture 13 01388 i003
Rain-fed zone1801180519041850187319561965Agriculture 13 01388 i004
Mixed-crop zone2064204421172114217321642149Agriculture 13 01388 i005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ashraf, H.; Qamar, S.; Riaz, N.; Shamshiri, R.R.; Sultan, M.; Khalid, B.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Imran, M.; Khan, M.U. Spatiotemporal Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Applications in Punjab, Pakistan. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071388

AMA Style

Ashraf H, Qamar S, Riaz N, Shamshiri RR, Sultan M, Khalid B, Ibrahim SM, Imran M, Khan MU. Spatiotemporal Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Applications in Punjab, Pakistan. Agriculture. 2023; 13(7):1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ashraf, Hadeed, Saliha Qamar, Nadia Riaz, Redmond R. Shamshiri, Muhammad Sultan, Bareerah Khalid, Sobhy M. Ibrahim, Muhammad Imran, and Muhammad Usman Khan. 2023. "Spatiotemporal Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Applications in Punjab, Pakistan" Agriculture 13, no. 7: 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071388

APA Style

Ashraf, H., Qamar, S., Riaz, N., Shamshiri, R. R., Sultan, M., Khalid, B., Ibrahim, S. M., Imran, M., & Khan, M. U. (2023). Spatiotemporal Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Applications in Punjab, Pakistan. Agriculture, 13(7), 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop