Analyzing Consumer Motivations and Behaviors Towards Upcycled Food from an Environmental Sustainability Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development
2.1. Value–Attitude–Behavior Model (VAB)
2.1.1. Health Values and Attitudes Toward Upcycled Foods
2.1.2. The Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Upcycled Foods and Green Behavioral Intentions
2.2. Green Perceived Value (GPV)
2.3. Product Novelty (PN)
2.4. Ethical Consumption (EC)
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Framework
3.2. Questionnaire Development
3.3. Sample and Data Collection
3.4. Methods of Data Analysis
4. Analysis and Results
4.1. Measurement Model: Reliability and Validity
4.2. Model Fit Test
4.3. Overall Model Path Analysis
4.4. Mediation Effect Test
5. Discussion
5.1. The Impact of Health Values on Attitudes Toward Upcycled Reconstructed Foods
5.2. The Impact of Attitudes Toward Upcycled Reconstructed Foods on Green Behavioral Intentions
5.3. The Impact of Green Perceived Value on Green Behavioral Intentions
5.4. The Impact of Product Novelty on Green Behavioral Intentions
5.5. The Impact of Ethical Consumption on Green Behavioral Intentions
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
6.1. Research Conclusions
6.2. Implications for Stakeholders
- Industry Stakeholders: Our findings are particularly valuable for food producers, manufacturers, and marketers involved in the upcycled food sector. By emphasizing health benefits, obtaining certifications for ethical practices, and focusing on the practical applications of their products, these companies can connect better with their target audience and enhance consumer trust.
- Policy Makers: The insights gained from our research can also benefit policymakers and governmental organizations focused on sustainable practices and food waste reduction initiatives. By recognizing the factors influencing consumer behavior towards upcycled food, policies can be developed or refined to encourage greater adoption of and support for circular food systems.
- Health and Nutrition Advocates: The findings of this study emphasize the importance of health communication in promoting upcycled food. As such, health professionals, nutritionists, and organizations advocating healthier eating can leverage this research to promote the benefits of upcycled food as part of a balanced diet, enhancing public awareness of its nutritional advantages.
- Academic Community: By addressing the existing literature gap on upcycled food in Taiwan, our research contributes to the academic discourse surrounding sustainable consumption practices. Scholars and researchers can use our findings as a foundation for further studies in this area, fostering additional exploration of consumer behavior and sustainability within different contexts.
- Consumers: Our findings provide valuable insights for Taiwanese consumers, particularly those who are health conscious or motivated by ethical considerations. Understanding how health values and moral consumption influence perceptions and behavioral intentions can help them make informed choices and encourage the acceptance of upcycled food.
- Environmental Organizations: Non-profit organizations that focus on environmental sustainability can also find our results useful. By understanding consumer motivations related to moral consumption and green behavior, these organizations can tailor their advocacy and educational efforts to promote upcycled food as a sustainable choice.
6.3. Research Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Garske, B.; Heyl, K.; Ekardt, F.; Weber, L.M.; Gradzka, W. Challenges of food waste governance: An assessment of European legislation on food waste and recommendations for improvement by economic instruments. Land 2020, 9, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez Garcia, S.L.; Raghavan, V. Green extraction techniques from fruit and vegetable waste to obtain bioactive compounds—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 6446–6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Food and Agriculture Organization. The UN Food Systems Summit+2 Stocktaking Moment Opens at FAO with a Call to Accelerate Action. Available online: https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/the-un-food-systems-summit-2-stocktaking-moment-opens-at-fao-with-a-call-to-accelerate-action/en (accessed on 24 July 2023).
- Veldhuizen, L.J.; Giller, K.E.; Oosterveer, P.; Brouwer, I.D.; Janssen, S.; van Zanten, H.H.; Slingerland, M. The Missing Middle: Connected action on agriculture and nutrition across global, national and local levels to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 2. Glob. Food Secur. 2020, 24, 100336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yela Aránega, A.; Ferraris, A.; Baima, G.; Bresciani, S. Guest editorial: Sustainable growth and development in the food and beverage sector. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 2429–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upcycled Food Association. Growing the Upcycled Food Economy. Available online: https://www.upcycledfood.org/ (accessed on 24 June 2023).
- Coderoni, S.; Perito, M.A. Approaches for reducing wastes in the agricultural sector. An analysis of Millennials’ willingness to buy food with upcycled ingredients. Waste Manag. 2021, 126, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thorsen, M.; Skeaff, S.; Goodman-Smith, F.; Thong, B.; Bremer, P.; Mirosa, M. Upcycled foods: A nudge toward nutrition. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grasso, S.; Pintado, T.; Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Ruiz-Capillas, C.; Herrero, A.M. Characterisation of muffins with upcycled sunflower flour. Foods 2021, 10, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nogueira, A.; Alves, F.; Vaz-Fernandes, P. The contribution of up-cycled food waste to a balanced diet of low-income households. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peschel, A.O.; Aschemann-Witzel, J. Sell more for less or less for more? The role of transparency in consumer response to upcycled food products. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, S.; Ye, H.; Deutsch, J.; Ayaz, H.; Suri, R. Consumers’ willingness to pay for upcycled foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 86, 104035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asioli, D.; Grasso, S. Do consumers value food products containing upcycled ingredients? The effect of nutritional and environmental information. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 91, 104194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodman-Smith, F.; Bhatt, S.; Moore, R.; Mirosa, M.; Ye, H.; Deutsch, J.; Suri, R. Retail Potential for Upcycled Foods: Evidence from New Zealand. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Chung, T.; Lai, P. Go Sustainability—Willingness to Pay for Eco–Agricultural Innovation: Understanding Chinese Traditional Cultural Values and Label Trust Using a VAB Hierarchy Model. Sustainability 2022, 15, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raman, R.; Das, P.; Mandal, S.; Vijayan, V.; Amritesh, A.; Nedungadi, P. The impact of Gen Z’s pro-environmental behavior on sustainable development goals through tree planting. Sustain. Futures 2024, 8, 100251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Der Gaast, K.; Jansma, J.E.; Wertheim-Heck, S. Between ambitions and actions: How citizens navigate the entrepreneurial process of co-producing sustainable urban food futures. Agric. Hum. Values 2023, 40, 1287–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carra, M.; Botticini, F.; Pavesi, F.C.; Maternini, G.; Pezzagno, M.; Barabino, B. A comparative cycling path selection for sustainable tourism in Franciacorta. An. Integr. AHP-ELECTRE Method. Transp. Res. Procedia 2023, 69, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Hall, C.M.; Kwon, O.; Sohn, K. Space tourism: Value-attitude-behavior theory, artificial intelligence, and sustainability. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 77, 103654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brouwer, A.R.; D’Souza, C.; Singaraju, S.; Arango-Soler, L.A. Value Attitude Behaviour and Social Stigma in the Adoption of Veganism: An Integrated Model. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022, 97, 104479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govaerts, F.; Olsen, S.O. Consumers’ values, attitudes and behaviours towards consuming seaweed food products: The effects of perceived naturalness, uniqueness, and behavioural control. Food Res. Int. 2023, 165, 112417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Román-Augusto, J.A.; Garrido-Lecca-Vera, C.; Lodeiros-Zubiria, M.L.; Mauricio-Andia, M. Green Marketing: Drivers in the Process of Buying Green Products—The Role of Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, Green WOM and Green Perceived Value. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashish, M.E.; Abdou, A.H.; Mohamed, S.A.; Elenain, A.S.; Salama, W. The Nexus between Green Perceived Quality, Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, and Customers’ Green Behavioral Intentions in Eco-Friendly Hotels: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 16195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pancić, M.; Serdarušić, H.; Ćućić, D. Green Marketing and Repurchase Intention: Stewardship of Green Advertisement, Brand Awareness, Brand Equity, Green Innovativeness, and Brand Innovativeness. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.; Shim, E.; Kim, J.; Nam, H. The influence of product innovation messages on the intention to purchase incumbent products. J. Innov. Knowl. 2021, 6, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Z.; Sun, X.; Wang, J.; Su, W.; Li, G. Factors Affecting Green Purchase Intention: A Perspective of Ethical Decision Making. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 11151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taufik, D.; Rood, R.; Dagevos, H.; Bouwman, P.E.; Reinders, M.J. Effects of abstract and concrete communication on moral signalling and purchase intention of upcycled food products. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2023, 8, 100110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yilmaz, E.; Kahveci, D. Consumers’ purchase intention for upcycled foods: Insights from Turkey. Future Foods 2022, 6, 100172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cela, N.; Giorgione, V.; Fassio, F.; Torri, L. Impact of circular economy information on sensory acceptability, purchase intention and perceived value of upcycled foods by young consumers. Food Res. Int. 2024, 175, 113765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Huang, Y.; Cai, X.; Song, Y.; Jiang, H.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Q. Using Imagination to Overcome Fear: How Mental Simulation Nudges Consumers’ Purchase Intentions for Upcycled Food. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellali, W.; Koraï, B. The impact of innovation level and emotional response on upcycled food acceptance. Food Qual. Prefer. 2023, 107, 104849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, S.; Ye, H.; Deutsch, J.; Jeong, H.; Zhang, J.; Suri, R. Food Waste and Upcycled Foods: Can a Logo Increase Acceptance of Upcycled Foods? J. Food Prod. Mark. 2021, 27, 188–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homer, P.M.; Kahle, L.R. Psychology, A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 54, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Hall, M. Do value-attitude-behavior and personality affect sustainability crowdfunding initiatives? J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harris, F.; Roby, H.; Dibb, S. Sustainable clothing: Challenges, barriers and interventions for encouraging more sustainable consumer behaviour. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2016, 40, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mason, M.C.; Paggiaro, A. Investigating the role of festivalscape in culinary tourism: The case of food and wine events. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 1329–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thøgersen, J.; Zhou, Y. Chinese consumers’ adoption of a ‘green’ innovation—The case of organic food. J. Mark. Manag. 2012, 28, 313–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, M.F.; To, W. An extended model of value-attitude-behavior to explain Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slade, P. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite 2018, 125, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haas, B.J.; Dobin, A.; Li, B.; Stransky, N.; Pochet, N.; Regev, A. Accuracy Assessment of Fusion Transcript Detection via Read-Mapping and de Novo Fusion Transcript Assembly-Based Methods. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nystrand, B.T.; Olsen, S.O. Consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward consuming functional foods in Norway. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 80, 103827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topolska, K.; Florkiewicz, A.; Filipiak-Florkiewicz, A. Functional Food—Consumer Motivations and Expectations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021, 18, 5327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985; pp. 11–39. [Google Scholar]
- Ghose, A.; Chandra, B. Models for Predicting Sustainable Durable Products Consumption Behaviour: A Review Article. Vision 2020, 24, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nafees, L.; Hyatt, E.M.; Garber, L.L.; Das, N.; Boya, U.O. Motivations to buy organic food in emerging markets: An exploratory study of urban Indian Millennials. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 96, 104375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margariti, K.; Hatzithomas, L.; Boutsouki, C. Elucidating the Gap between Green Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior through the Prism of Greenwashing Concerns. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, H.J.; Choi, Y.J.; Oh, K.W. Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer ‘Attitude–Behavioral Intention’ Gap. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amer, E.A.A.A.; Meyad, E.M.A.; Meyad, A.M.; Mohsin, A. The impact of natural resources on environmental degradation: A review of ecological footprint and CO2 emissions as indicators. Front. Environ. Sci. 2024, 12, 1368125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, W.; Luo, X.; Riaz, M.U. On the factors influencing green purchase intention: A meta-analysis approach. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraccascia, L.; Ceccarelli, G.; Dangelico, R.M. Green products from industrial symbiosis: Are consumers ready for them? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 189, 122395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Lee, J. The effects of consumers’ perceived values on intention to purchase upcycled products. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, Y.; Uniyal, D.P.; Sangroya, D. Investigating consumers’ green purchase intention: Examining the role of economic value, emotional value and perceived marketplace influence. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 328, 129638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhamad, A.M.; Junoh, M.; Salha, T. Green products and intention of consumers: Overview point. Glob. Islam. Econ. Mag. 2019, 80, 24–35. [Google Scholar]
- Taufik, D.; Bouwman, E.P.; Reinders, M.J.; Noppers, E.H.; Dagevos, H. Leveraging intrinsically rewarding symbolic attributes to promote consumer adoption of plant-based food innovations. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2022, 4, 100050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S. Testing the effects of reciprocal norm and network traits on ethical consumption behavior. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2020, 32, 1611–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogiemwonyi, O.; Jan, M.T. The Correlative Influence of Consumer Ethical Beliefs, Environmental Ethics, and Moral Obligation on Green Consumption Behavior. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Adv. 2023, 19, 200171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshtaghian, H.; Bolton, K.; Rousta, K. Upcycled food choice motives and their association with hesitancy towards consumption of this type of food: A Swedish study. Br. Food J. 2024, 126, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berki-Kiss, D.; Menrad, K. Ethical consumption: Influencing factors of consumer’s intention to purchase Fairtrade roses. Clean. Circ. Bioecon. 2022, 2, 100008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Cheng, G.; Wang, C. The influence of moral identity on green consumption. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1020333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, C.D.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, H. How green intrinsic and extrinsic motivations interact, balance and imbalance with each other to trigger green purchase intention and behavior: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, M.; Yadav, P.S. Understanding the role of individual concerns, attitude, and perceived value in green apparel purchase intention; the mediating effect of consumer involvement and moderating role of generation Z&Y. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2023, 9, 100120. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, M.L. Structural Equation Modeling: AMOS Operation and Application; Wu-Nan Book: Taipei, Taiwan, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2015; ISBN 1462523358. [Google Scholar]
- National Development Council. Gender Statistics Section. Available online: https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/Custom_Detail_Search.aspx?t=6&n=240&sms=0 (accessed on 4 July 2024).
- Ministry of the Interior. Population-Related Statistics. Available online: https://www.moi.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=3922 (accessed on 10 March 2024).
- Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. In 2024, the Average Number of Employed Workers Was 8.17 Million, and the Average Total Monthly Salary per Person Was NTD58,545. Available online: https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=3602&s=233027 (accessed on 19 February 2024).
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parashar, S.; Singh, S.; Sood, G. Examining the role of health consciousness, environmental awareness and intention on purchase of organic food: A moderated model of attitude. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 386, 135553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Wang, S.; Yu, Y. Consumer’s intention to purchase green furniture: Do health consciousness and environmental awareness matter? Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 704, 135275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Imtiyaz, H.; Soni, P.; Yukongdi, V. Role of sensory appeal, nutritional quality, safety, and health determinants on convenience food choice in an academic environment. Foods 2021, 10, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wijekoon, R.; Sabri, M.F. Determinants That Influence Green Product Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowag, J. Research Handbook on Sustainability and Competition Law; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Mweshi, G.K.; Sakyi, K. Application of Sampling Methods for The Research Design. Arch. Bus. Res. 2020, 8, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Privitera, J. Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed.; SAGE: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 245–260. [Google Scholar]
- Çınar, K. Customer Based Brand Equity Models in Hotel Industry: A Literature Review. In Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 281–288. ISBN 978-3-030-36125-9. [Google Scholar]
- Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students, 8th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Country | Theory/Factor | Key Findings | References |
---|---|---|---|
The Netherlands | Moral signalling theory, Environmental product benefits, Health product benefits | The promotion of specific environmental or nutritional benefits associated with upcycled foods enhances consumers’ willingness to purchase these products. | Taufik et al. [27] |
Turkey | Sociodemographic, lifestyle characteristics | Generation, gender, and commitment to recycling at home influenced the willingness to purchase upcycled foods. | Yilmaz & Kahveci [28] |
Italy | Circular economy information, Perceived value, Purchase intention, Sensory acceptability | Disgust sensitivity negatively affected the willingness to buy upcycled foods. | Cela et al. [29] |
China | Cue utility theory, Mental Simulation, Consumers’ Inspiration, Future Self-Continuity | Consumers’ product evaluation and purchase intentions for upcycled food in the mental simulation group significantly increased. | Yang et al. [30] |
Canada | Innovation level, Emotional response | The higher the level of innovation the less intention to consume upcycled foods. | Hellali & Korai [31] |
America | Perceived quality, Appropriately designed upcycled logo | An appropriate upcycled logo is a necessary and key element in marketing communications about these foods. | Bhatt et al. [32] |
n = 297 | Item | Population | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 127 | 42.8 |
Female | 170 | 57.2 | |
Age | 20 years and below | 21 | 7.1 |
21–30 years | 69 | 23.2 | |
31–40 years old | 106 | 35.7 | |
41–50 years old | 76 | 25.6 | |
51–60 years | 19 | 6.4 | |
61 years and above | 6 | 2.0 | |
Education Level | High school/vocational or below | 65 | 21.89 |
College/university | 204 | 68.7 | |
Master’s or above | 28 | 9.4 | |
Personal monthly income | Less than NTD20,000 | 51 | 17.2 |
NTD20,001–40,000 | 114 | 38.4 | |
NTD40,001–60,000 | 85 | 28.6 | |
NTD60,001–80,000 | 25 | 8.4 | |
NTD80,001–100,000 | 12 | 4.0 | |
Above NTD 100,001 | 10 | 3.4 |
Variables/Items | Standardized Factor Loading | CR | AVE | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|
Health Values (HV) | 0.890 | 0.729 | 0.836 | |
1. I often pay attention to my health. | 0.827 *** | |||
2. I have a strong interest in healthy foods. | 0.862 *** | |||
3. I consider the impact of my dietary choices on health. | 0.872 *** | |||
Attitude towards Upcycled Foods (AUF) | 0.876 | 0.545 | 0.828 | |
4. I believe that upcycled foods are environmentally friendly. | 0.706 *** | |||
5. I think the existence of upcycled foods is necessary. | 0.822 *** | |||
6. I believe that upcycled foods are aligned with current trends. | 0.808 *** | |||
7. I think upcycled food is healthier. | 0.748 *** | |||
8. I believe that upcycled food is cost-effective. | 0.757 *** | |||
Green Perceived Value (GPV) | 0.862 | 0.678 | 0.751 | |
9. I believe that upcycled food has a positive impact on the environment. | 0.861 *** | |||
10. In my opinion, upcycled foods have a positive taste. | 0.721 *** | |||
11. Overall, upcycled foods possess high green values. | 0.879 *** | |||
Product Novelty (PN) | 0.881 | 0.651 | 0.819 | |
12. I believe that upcycled foods have significantly different qualities than other products (e.g., environmental friendliness and innovation). | 0.836 *** | |||
13. I think upcycled foods offer some uncommon ingredients (e.g., sake lees, tofu dregs, and fruit peels). | 0.814 *** | |||
14. I believe that upcycled food integrates innovative ideas and concepts. | 0.834 *** | |||
Moral Consumption (MC) | 0.904 | 0.703 | 0.857 | |
15. I believe that moral values affect consumers’ choices. | 0.743 *** | |||
16. I chose green products to protect the environment. | 0.862 *** | |||
17. I feel guilty if I choose eco-friendly products. | 0.855 *** | |||
Green Behavioral Intentions (GBI) | 0.917 | 0.735 | 0.878 | |
18. When I shop for products, I check the ingredient labels to confirm whether they contain environmentally harmful substances. | 0.860 *** | |||
19. I prefer green products because their quality is superior to that of non-green ones. | 0.884 *** | |||
20. I prioritize the purchase of green products. | 0.877 *** |
Mean | Standard Deviation | UV | HV | ATT | SN | PBC | PN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HV | 5.382 | 1.039 | 0.854 | |||||
AUF | 5.517 | 0.886 | 0.569 ** | 0.738 | ||||
GPV | 5.148 | 0.929 | 0.565 ** | 0.849 ** | 0.823 | |||
PN | 5.414 | 0.855 | 0.532 ** | 0.754 ** | 0.763 ** | 0.807 | ||
MC | 5.136 | 1.067 | 0.594 ** | 0.637 ** | 0.609 ** | 0.601 ** | 0.838 | |
GBI | 5.019 | 1.118 | 0.649 ** | 0.612 ** | 0.587 ** | 0.521 ** | 0.805 ** | 0.857 |
Hypothesized Paths | Unstandardized Coefficient | S.E. | C.R. | p | Standardized Coefficients | β | Verification Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1: HV→AUF | 0.607 | 0.068 | 8.873 | <0.001 | 0.705 *** | 0.705 *** | Supported |
H2: AUF→GBI | 0.381 | 0.113 | 3.377 | <0.001 | 0.280 *** | 0.280 *** | Supported |
H3: GPV→GBI | −0.207 | 0.084 | −2.461 | 0.014 | −0.153 | −0.153 | Unsupported |
H4: PN→GBI | 0.064 | 0.089 | 0.725 | 0.469 | 0.017 | 0.017 | Unsupported |
H5: MC→GBI | 1.263 | 0.144 | 8.798 | <0.001 | 0.374 *** | 0.374 *** | Supported |
AUF | GBI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
HV | 0.569 *** | 0.649 *** | 0.445 *** | |
AUF | 0.612 *** | 0.359 *** | ||
R2 | 0.324 | 0.421 | 0.374 | 0.508 |
Agj R2 | 0.322 | 0.419 | 0.372 | 0.505 |
F | 141.442 *** | 214.578 *** | 176.596 *** | 151.845 *** |
Degrees of Freedom | (296) | (296) | (296) | (296) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huang, W.-S.; Tsai, T.-Y.; Lai, K.-L.; Chen, H.-S. Analyzing Consumer Motivations and Behaviors Towards Upcycled Food from an Environmental Sustainability Perspective. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1967. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111967
Huang W-S, Tsai T-Y, Lai K-L, Chen H-S. Analyzing Consumer Motivations and Behaviors Towards Upcycled Food from an Environmental Sustainability Perspective. Agriculture. 2024; 14(11):1967. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111967
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Wen-Shin, Tzung-You Tsai, Kung-Ling Lai, and Han-Shen Chen. 2024. "Analyzing Consumer Motivations and Behaviors Towards Upcycled Food from an Environmental Sustainability Perspective" Agriculture 14, no. 11: 1967. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111967
APA StyleHuang, W. -S., Tsai, T. -Y., Lai, K. -L., & Chen, H. -S. (2024). Analyzing Consumer Motivations and Behaviors Towards Upcycled Food from an Environmental Sustainability Perspective. Agriculture, 14(11), 1967. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111967