State of Agricultural E-Government Services to Farmers in Tanzania: Toward the Participatory Design of a Farmers Digital Information System (FDIS)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
“The use of ICT to enhance work efficiency and improve service delivery in order to meet the needs of the public in a responsive and transparent manner. e-Government is expected to facilitate the interaction between the Government and its clients including the citizens (G2C) and business communities (G2B), as well as within the public administration itself (G2G)”.
2. Methods
3. Results
3.1. M-Kilimo Application
- To access the prices of agriculture products: the farmer selects the price and the type of crop to receive a summary of the different markets and price information.
- To sell: the farmers select this option to indicate the amount they want to sell (in kilograms, sacks, or tons) and the price. This information is made available to the public, and potential buyers can consult it and contact the farmer to achieve their business goal.
- To buy: the farmers can select the agriculture products they wish to buy and receive a list of sellers with full details, such as contact and crop information.
- Advisory service: stakeholders (farmers or buyers) can submit their requests by selecting the type of agriculture activity (crop farming, livestock keeping, or fishing), then write and submit a request. The system forwards the request to the sender’s ward or district extension worker for a response. Requests that have not been answered at the ward level for a certain period of time are automatically transferred to the sender’s district and regional level, and to the MoA for a response. Extension workers at all levels can also direct the requests to experts for answers.
3.2. A Call Center
3.3. Digital Fertilizer Subsidy Distribution System (DFSDS)
4. Discussion
4.1. General Observations
4.2. Toward a Farmers Digital Information System (FDIS)
4.3. Implications of the Study Findings
- e-Government services should involve key stakeholders from the earliest stages of design to understand the social, infrastructural, and environmental contexts for successful and sustainable implementation.
- e-Government services should not be introduced to users unannounced. The government must use its resources to raise awareness and educate users about the importance of these services, while gathering their opinions on the changes.
- Closely examine the working environment, including the availability of digital devices and the cost of Internet for service providers such as extension workers.
- The proposed digital services must be well planned and designed to enable their successful use on existing platforms.
- The government should invest in awareness campaigns to influence the use of e-services and achieve the service objective for targeted stakeholders.
- The government should implement an integrated digital platform with comprehensive data that meet the needs and enables stakeholders’ access to all essential services in the complete farming cycle.
4.4. Limitations of the Study
4.5. Future Work
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- FAO. Global Agriculture Towards 2050; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Human Rights Watch Ukraine/Russia: As War Continues, Africa Food Crisis Looms. Available online: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/04/28/ukraine/russia-war-continues-africa-food-crisis-looms (accessed on 18 August 2023).
- Tsan, M.; Totapally, S.; Hailu, M.; Addom, B.K. The Digitalisation of African Agriculture Report 2018-2019; CTA/Dalberg Advisors: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- The World Bank. Agriculture and Food: Agriculture Can Help Reduce Poverty, Raise Incomes and Improve Food Security for 80% of the World’s Poor, Who Live in Rural Areas and Work Mainly in Farming. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/overview (accessed on 18 August 2023).
- Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/recommendation-on-digital-government-strategies.htm?_ga=2.169594276.420743823.1634550268-35763740.1631621228 (accessed on 18 October 2021).
- United Nations Digital Government. Available online: https://publicadministration.un.org/en/ict4d (accessed on 18 August 2023).
- United Republic of Tanzania. Tanzania e-Government Strategy; President’s Office-Public Service Management: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2013.
- Alshehri, M.; Drew, S. Implementation of E-Government: Advantages and Challenges. In Proceedings of the IASK E-ALT2010 Conference Proceedings, Oviedo, Spain, 8–10 November 2010; Griffith: Brisbane, Australia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Johansen, E. A Study of the Impacts of E-Governance on the Economy, Trends, and Perspective; MPRA Paper No. 116884; Wilkie Edge Publishers: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M.A.; Siddique, M.N.A. Online Fertilizer Recommendation System (OFRS): A Step towards Precision Agriculture and Optimized Fertilizer Usage by Smallholder Farmers in Bangladesh. Eur. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, S. E-Government in India: The Need to Ponder Current e-Government Uptake. Future E-Gov. Learn. Past 2016, 4, 35–46. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, C.; He, Y.; Li, J. Technological Revolution in the Field: Green Development of Chinese Agriculture Driven by Digital Information Technology (DIT). Agriculture 2023, 13, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO KALRO Launches 14 Mobile Apps to Transform Agriculture|E-Agriculture. Available online: https://www.fao.org/e-agriculture/news/karlo-launches-14-mobile-apps-transform-agriculture (accessed on 15 November 2021).
- Mushi, G.E.; Serugendo Di Marzo, G.; Burgi, P.-Y. Digital Technology and Services for Sustainable Agriculture in Tanzania: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushi, G.E.; Serugendo, G.D.M.; Burgi, P.-Y. Data Management System for Sustainable Agriculture among Smallholder Farmers in Tanzania: Research-in-Progress. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2023, 29, 558–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Msuya, C.P. Changes in the Agricultural Sector and Extension Workers Roles: Implications to Training Sector in Tanzania. Tanzan. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 20, 126–137. [Google Scholar]
- Mushi, G.E.; Burgi, P.-Y.; Di Marzo, G. Digital technology and services for sustainable agriculture in Tanzania. 2023. Mendeley Data, V1. [CrossRef]
- Anaeto, F.C.; Asiabaka, C.C.; Nnadi, F.N.; Ajaero, J.O.; Aja, O.O.; Ugwoke, F.O.; Ukpongson, M.U.; Onweagba, A.E. The Role of Extension Officers and Extension Services in the Development of Agriculture in Nigeria. J. Ofagricult. Res. 2012, 1, 180–185. [Google Scholar]
- Kinuthia, B.K. Agricultural Input Subsidy and Outcomes for Farmers in Tanzania; United Nations University: Nairobi, Kenya, 2020; p. 36. [Google Scholar]
- Dira Makini Mifuko. 400 ya Mbolea ya Ruzuku Yakamatwa Ikitoroshwa Nchini. Dira Makini 2022. Available online: https://www.diramakini.co.tz/2022/11/mifuko-400-ya-mbolea-ya-ruzuku.html (accessed on 15 August 2023).
- Bernardi, R.; Papadopoulos, T. Failure in the Design and Implementation of Government ICT Projects in Africa: A Complexity Theory Perspective; IMC International Information Management Corporation: Coventry, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Makoza, F.; Chigona, W. Analysing Barriers in the Implementation of National ICT Policy: Case of Malawi; IIMC International Information Management Corporation: Cape Town, South Africa, 2016; p. 12. [Google Scholar]
- Silver, L.; Johnson, C. Internet Connectivity Seen as Having Positive Impact on Life in Sub-Saharan Africa; Spring 2017 Global Attitudes Survey; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Burattini, B.; Perin, G.; Alvarenga, K.; Valiyaparambil, V. Digital Innovations in Delivering Social Protection in Rural Areas: Lessons for Public Provisioning during the Post-Pandemic Recovery and Beyond; International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG): Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Friday, E.; Adewale, S.; Mary, A. The Power of USSD: A Solution to African Financial Transaction Problems. Eur. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2023, 11, 43–56. [Google Scholar]
- Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics National Sample Census of Agriculture 2019/20—Main Report. Available online: https://www.nbs.go.tz/index.php/en/census-surveys/agriculture-statistics/661-2019-20-national-sample-census-of-agriculture-main-report (accessed on 18 August 2023).
- Guo, G.; Wen, Q.; Zhu, J. The Impact of Aging Agricultural Labor Population on Farmland Output: From the Perspective of Farmer Preferences. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 2015, e730618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, B.; Mishra, A.K.; Luo, B. Aging Population, Farm Succession, and Farmland Usage: Evidence from Rural China. Land Use Policy 2018, 77, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission Ageing of Europe’s Farmers Remains a Major Challenge in Rural Areas. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/news/ageing-europes-farmers-remains-major-challenge-rural-areas-2021-04-08_en (accessed on 22 August 2023).
- Chandra, R.; Collis, S. Digital Agriculture for Small-Scale Producers. Commun. ACM 2021, 64, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillpatrick, T.; Boğa, S.; Aldanmaz, O. How Can Blockchain Contribute to Developing Country Economies? A Literature Review on Application Areas. Economics 2022, 10, 105–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krithika, L.B. Survey on the Applications of Blockchain in Agriculture. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Category | Frequency (n) | (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Location (Regions) | Mbeya | 4 | 18 |
Rukwa | 4 | 18 | |
Iringa | 3 | 14 | |
Tanga | 3 | 14 | |
Morogoro | 2 | 9 | |
Manyara | 2 | 9 | |
Ruvuma | 2 | 9 | |
Mjini Magharibi | 2 | 9 | |
Location status (ward level) | Rural | 15 | 68 |
Semi-urban | 7 | 32 | |
Urban | 0 | 0 | |
Gender | Male | 14 | 64 |
Female | 8 | 36 | |
Age group (years) | 21–30 | 3 | 14 |
31–40 | 3 | 14 | |
41–50 | 10 | 45 | |
51–60 | 4 | 18 | |
61 and older | 2 | 9 | |
Educational level | No formal education | 0 | 0 |
Primary education | 17 | 76 | |
Secondary education | 4 | 18 | |
Diploma | 1 | 6 | |
Farming activity (occupation) | Maize farming | 9 | 41 |
Rice (paddy) farming | 8 | 36 | |
Wheat farming | 5 | 23 | |
Farm size | Below 3 hectares | 1 | 5 |
4–6 hectares | 14 | 64 | |
7–9 hectares | 7 | 31 |
Name of the Platform | When Launched | Registered Stakeholders | Usage Statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M-Kilimo application | May 2020 | Farmers | 7,269,106 | Number of consultations (advisory services) | 75,623 |
Extension workers and experts | 9985 | ||||
Customers | 24,523 | ||||
Agricultural products sellers | 26,927 | Replied queries | 73,839 |
Name of the Platform | When Launched | Registered Stakeholders | Usage Statistics | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A call center | (July 2022) | All agricultural stakeholders are encouraged to call for suggestions, complains, request information, or seek professional advice | Total calls | 5202 |
Callbacks | 2301 |
Name of the Platform | When Launched | Registered Stakeholders | Usage Statistics | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Digital Fertilizer Subsidy Distribution System (DFSDS) | September 2022 | Farmers | 2,828,300 | Over 350,000 farmers received subsidies by 16 January 2023 |
Importers | 29 | |||
Manufacturers | 3 | |||
Agro-dealers | 3181 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mushi, G.E.; Burgi, P.-Y.; Di Marzo Serugendo, G. State of Agricultural E-Government Services to Farmers in Tanzania: Toward the Participatory Design of a Farmers Digital Information System (FDIS). Agriculture 2024, 14, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030475
Mushi GE, Burgi P-Y, Di Marzo Serugendo G. State of Agricultural E-Government Services to Farmers in Tanzania: Toward the Participatory Design of a Farmers Digital Information System (FDIS). Agriculture. 2024; 14(3):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030475
Chicago/Turabian StyleMushi, Gilbert Exaud, Pierre-Yves Burgi, and Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo. 2024. "State of Agricultural E-Government Services to Farmers in Tanzania: Toward the Participatory Design of a Farmers Digital Information System (FDIS)" Agriculture 14, no. 3: 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030475
APA StyleMushi, G. E., Burgi, P.-Y., & Di Marzo Serugendo, G. (2024). State of Agricultural E-Government Services to Farmers in Tanzania: Toward the Participatory Design of a Farmers Digital Information System (FDIS). Agriculture, 14(3), 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030475