Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Fruit Parameters of Four Cucurbita maxima Cultivars Grown in Poland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material
2.2. Field Experiments
2.3. Weather Conditions
2.4. Fertilization Regimes
2.5. Phenotypic Evaluation of the Fruit and Yield
2.6. Nitrates and Dry Matter Content in the Fruits
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization Dose on Fruit Traits
3.2. Cultivar Performance
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Decker-Walters, D.S.; Walters, T.W. Squash. In The Cambridge World History of Food; Kiple, K.F., Ornelas, K.C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 335–351. [Google Scholar]
- Paris, H.S. Overview of the origins and history of the five major cucurbit crops: Issues for ancient DNA analysis of archaeological specimens. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2016, 25, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Formiga, A.K.; Myers, J.R. Images and descriptions of Cucurbita maxima in Western Europe in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Plant Breed. Rev. 2019, 43, 317–356. [Google Scholar]
- Chomicki, G.; Schäfer, H.; Renner, S.S. Origin and domestication of Cucurbitaceae crops: Insights from phylogenies, genomics, and archaeology. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1240–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goldman, A. The Complete Squash; Artisan: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 32–75. [Google Scholar]
- Ferriol, M.; Picó, B. Pumpkin and winter squash. In Handbook of Plant Breeding; Prohens, J., Nuez, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 317–349. [Google Scholar]
- COBORU. Research Centre for Cultivar Testing, Słupia Wielka, Poland. Available online: https://www.coboru.gov.pl/ (accessed on 10 May 2024).
- FAOSTAT. FAO Statistics Database; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022; Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat (accessed on 28 June 2024).
- Seed World. Poland the Largest Producer of Pumpkins in the EU. Available online: https://www.seedworld.com/europe/2024/03/07/poland-the-largest-producer-of-pumpkins-in-the-eu/ (accessed on 21 August 2024).
- Kaur, S.; Panghal, A.; Garg, M.; Mann, S.; Khatkar, S.; Sharma, P.; Chhikara, N. Functional and nutraceutical properties of pumpkin—A review. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 50, 384–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, M.; Jain, S.; Tomar, R.; Prasad, G.B.K.S.; Yadav, H. Medicinal and biological potential of pumpkin: An updated review. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2010, 23, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, C.J.; Kim, H.W.; Hwang, K.E.; Song, D.H.; Ham, Y.K.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, Y.B.; Choi, Y.S. Effects of dietary fiber extracted from pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) on the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of reduced-fat frankfurters. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konopacka, D.; Seroczyńska, A.; Korzeniewska, A.; Jesionkowska, K.; Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K.; Płocharski, W. Studies on the usefulness of Cucurbita maxima for the production of ready-to-eat dried vegetable snacks with a high carotenoid content. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, I.A.; Kim, Y.S.; Choi, H.S.; Song, T.H.; Lee, S.K. Quality characteristics of sponge cake with added dried sweet pumpkin powders. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 19, 254–260. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1258/2011 of 2 December 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for nitrates in foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2011, L320, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
- Colla, G.; Kim, H.J.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Rouphael, Y. Nitrate in fruits and vegetables. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 237, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santamaria, P. Nitrate in vegetables: Toxicity, content, intake and EC regulation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biesiada, A.; Nawirska, A.; Kucharska, A.; Sokół-Łętowska, A. The effect of nitrogen fertilization methods on yield and chemical composition of pumpkin fruits before and after storage. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2009, 70, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biesiada, A.; Nawirska, A.; Kucharska, A.; Sokół-Łętowska, A. Chemical composition of pumpkin fruit depending on cultivar and storage. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2011, 18, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
- Directive HAT. The Council of the European Communities. Off. J. Eur. Communities 1991, L268, 56–68. [Google Scholar]
- Directive EU. EU Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy (2000/60/EC). Off. J. Eur. Union 2000, 22, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Mengel, K.; Kirkby, E.A.; Kosegarten, H.; Appel, T. Principles of Plant Nutrition; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Niewczas, J.; Mitek, M.; Korzeniewska, A.; Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. Characteristics of selected quality traits of novel cultivars of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima Duch.). Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2014, 64, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sady, W. Nawożenie Warzyw Polowych; Plantpress: Kraków, Poland, 2000. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- ISO 14673-3:2004; Milk and Milk Products—Determination of Nitrate and Nitrite Contents. International Standard Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
- Menegat, S.; Ledo, A.; Tirado, R. Greenhouse gas emissions from global production and use of nitrogen synthetic fertilizers in agriculture. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Caruso, G.; Conti, S.; La Rocca, G. Influence of crop cycle and nitrogen fertilizer form on yield and nitrate content in different species of vegetables. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2011, 25, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
- Lombardo, S.; Pandino, G.; Mauromicale, G. Optimizing nitrogen fertilization to improve qualitative performances and physiological and yield responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Oliel, G.; Kant, S.; Naim, M.; Rabinowitch, H.D.; Takeoka, G.R.; Buttery, R.G.; Kafkafi, U. Effects of ammonium to nitrate ratio and salinity on yield and fruit quality of large and small tomato fruit hybrids. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 27, 1795–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurga, B.; Kocoń, A. Czynniki wpływające na zawartość azotanów (V) i azotanów (III) w roślinach. Stud. Rap. IUNG-PIB 2013, 34, 8. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Donner, S.D.; Kucharik, C.J. Evaluating the impacts of land management and climate variability on crop production and nitrate export across the Upper Mississippi Basin. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2003, 17, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K.; Korzeniewska, A.; Gałecka, T. New varieties of winter squash (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) with a high content of dry matter, starch, protein and carotenoids. In Materials of 6th National Congress of Horticultural Plant Breeding—Plant Breeding for Improved Quality; DRUKPOL: Kraków, Poland, 1996; pp. 148–151. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Sztangret, J.; Korzeniewska, A.; Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. Assessment of yield, dry matter and carotenoids content in the new hybrids of winter squash (Cucurbita maxima Duch.). Folia Hort. 2001, 13, 433–437. [Google Scholar]
- Babik, J.; Kaniszewski, S.; Babik, I. The usefulness of vegetable species and cultivars for organic cultivation. Res. Agr. Eng. 2011, 53, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
- Jędrzejczyk, M.; Szmiel, M. Instrukcje Technologiczne Produkcji Wyrobów z Dyni; Centralny Ośrodek Badawczo Rozwojowy Ogrodnictwa: Warszawa, Poland, 1981. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
Source of Variation | Experiment/Year | Trait | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nitrate content (mg/kg) | Fruit Yield (kg/100 m2) | Fruit Weight (kg) | Fruit Number (n) | Fruit Length (cm) | Fruit Diameter (cm) | Fruit Flesh Thickness (cm) | |||||||||
Blocks | I/2021 | 2.30 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 5.45 | 0.27 | 0.45 | ||||||
II/2022 | 1.19 | 0.53 | 4.46 | 10.36 | * | 2.20 | 1.12 | 1.44 | |||||||
Factor A | I/2021 | 16.69 | * | 5.19 | * | 2.99 | 16.64 | ** | 13.31 | ** | 2.09 | 8.56 | * | ||
II/2022 | 35.26 | *** | 13.89 | ** | 56.16 | *** | 9.48 | * | 1.48 | 18.83 | ** | 3.12 | |||
Factor B | I/2021 | 15.74 | ** | 65.37 | *** | 151.74 | *** | 95.92 | *** | 169.76 | *** | 129.90 | *** | 96.64 | *** |
II/2022 | 9.12 | *** | 307.38 | *** | 851.87 | *** | 710.92 | *** | 197.60 | *** | 269.34 | *** | 139.63 | *** | |
Interaction A × B | I/2021 | 1.75 | 1.58 | 3.20 | * | 1.51 | 2.58 | * | 0.23 | 1.39 | |||||
II/2022 | 6.66 | *** | 1.81 | 4.94 | ** | 1.85 | 0.57 | 1.49 | 2.08 |
Nitrogen Dose (Factor A) | Experiment/Year | Trait | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nitrate content (mg/kg) | Fruit Yield (kg/100 m2) | Fruit Weight (kg) | Fruit Number (n) | Fruit Length (cm) | Fruit Diameter (cm) | Fruit Flesh Thickness (cm) | |||||||||
100% | I/2021 | 305.0 | c | 362.1 | b | 5.3 | a | 1.7 | b | 21.2 | a | 25.1 | a | 4.2 | a |
II/2022 | 492.6 | b | 266.8 | b | 5.4 | b | 1.3 | a | 20.6 | a | 25.5 | b | 4.3 | a | |
50% | I/2021 | 89.0 | a | 334.9 | b | 5.9 | b | 1.4 | a | 22.8 | b | 26.8 | b | 4.8 | b |
II/2022 | 260.2 | a | 275.5 | b | 5.6 | b | 1.3 | a | 21.7 | a | 26.4 | b | 4.4 | a | |
30% | I/2021 | 143.0 | b | 296.4 | a | 4.9 | a | 1.4 | a | 20.6 | a | 24.9 | a | 4.4 | a |
II/2022 | 129.3 | a | 235.1 | a | 4.7 | a | 1.3 | a | 20.6 | a | 24.2 | a | 4.2 | a |
Cultivar (Factor B) | Experiment/Year | Trait | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nitrate Content (mg/kg) | Fruit Yield (kg/100 m2) | Fruit Weight (kg) | Fruit Number (n) | Fruit Length (cm) | Fruit Diameter (cm) | Fruit Flesh Thickness (cm) | |||||||||
Bambino | I/2021 | 135.0 | b | 230.8 | a | 4.5 | b | 1.1 | a | 19.8 | b | 26.0 | b | 4.4 | b |
II/2022 | 309.5 | b | 220.7 | b | 4.8 | b | 1.1 | a | 20.4 | b | 25.7 | b | 3.8 | b | |
Otylia F1 | I/2021 | 293.0 | c | 394.6 | b | 6.9 | c | 1.2 | ab | 22.7 | c | 29.0 | c | 5.4 | c |
II/2022 | 389.0 | b | 322.0 | c | 7.2 | c | 1.0 | a | 23.5 | c | 29.0 | c | 6.1 | c | |
Justynka F1 | I/2021 | 27.0 | a | 230.3 | a | 2.0 | a | 2.4 | c | 14.8 | a | 18.4 | a | 3.4 | a |
II/2022 | 183.9 | a | 142.9 | a | 1.5 | a | 2.1 | b | 12.8 | a | 17.3 | a | 3.2 | a | |
Mammoth Gold | I/2021 | 261.0 | c | 468.7 | c | 7.4 | c | 1.3 | b | 28.9 | d | 29.0 | c | 4.7 | b |
II/2022 | 293.7 | b | 350.9 | d | 7.4 | c | 1.1 | a | 27.1 | d | 29.6 | c | 4.1 | b |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kaźmińska, K.; Korzeniewska, A.; Słomnicka, R.; Gniazdowska, A.; Bartoszewski, G. Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Fruit Parameters of Four Cucurbita maxima Cultivars Grown in Poland. Agriculture 2025, 15, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010042
Kaźmińska K, Korzeniewska A, Słomnicka R, Gniazdowska A, Bartoszewski G. Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Fruit Parameters of Four Cucurbita maxima Cultivars Grown in Poland. Agriculture. 2025; 15(1):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010042
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaźmińska, Karolina, Aleksandra Korzeniewska, Renata Słomnicka, Agnieszka Gniazdowska, and Grzegorz Bartoszewski. 2025. "Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Fruit Parameters of Four Cucurbita maxima Cultivars Grown in Poland" Agriculture 15, no. 1: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010042
APA StyleKaźmińska, K., Korzeniewska, A., Słomnicka, R., Gniazdowska, A., & Bartoszewski, G. (2025). Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Fruit Parameters of Four Cucurbita maxima Cultivars Grown in Poland. Agriculture, 15(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010042