Prediction of the Influence of Runner Tip Clearance on the Performance of Tubular Turbine
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Object
3. Computational Domain Discretization and CFD Settings
3.1. Grid Division and Validation
3.2. Setup of Numerical Simulation
3.3. Experimental-Numerical Verification
4. Influence of Different Tip Clearance Widths (hTC) on Internal Flow
4.1. Influence of Different Tip Clearance Widths (hTC) on Turbine Performance
4.2. Influence of Different Tip Clearance Widths(hTC) on Flow Pattern
4.2.1. Analysis of Leakage Flowrate and Average Leakage Velocity Caused by Tip Clearance
4.2.2. Comparison of Leakage Vortex Morphology
4.2.3. Comparison of Streamline and Turbulent Kinetic Energy
4.2.4. Comparison of the Pressure Distribution, Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Turbulence Eddy Frequency
- 1.
- Circumferential pressure distribution
- 2.
- Distribution of Circumferential Turbulent Kinetic Energy
- 3.
- Distribution of Circumferential Turbulence Eddy Frequency
5. Influence of Different Tip Clearance Widths (hTC) on Unsteady Flow Characteristics
5.1. Influence of Different Tip Clearance Widths (hTC) on Internal Pressure Pulsation
5.2. Pressure Pulsation Analysis of Different Tip Clearance Widths (hTC)
5.2.1. Time Domain Analysis of Pressure Pulsation
5.2.2. Frequency Domain Analysis of Pressure Pulsation
6. Influence of Different Tip Clearance Widths (hTC) on the Forces of Tubular Turbine
6.1. Influence of Different Tip Clearance Widths (hTC) on Axial Force
6.2. Influence of Different Tip Clearance Widths (hTC) on Radial Force
7. Conclusions
- (1)
- With the increase in tip clearance width, the performance of tubular turbine firstly decreases and then increases. When tip clearance width increases from 0 to 1.0 mm, tip leakage vertical flow becomes stronger. The internal flow in runner becomes more turbulent and disordered. The hydraulic loss in leakage is strong. As the tip clearance width increases, the minimum pressure in the tip clearance decreases gradually, and the turbulence eddy frequency decreases significantly, which is prone to the risk of tip vortex cavitation. The internal flow in runner will be more complex.
- (2)
- The tip clearance width has strong influence on pressure pulsation. A reasonable width will reduce pressure pulsation intensity. However, excessive tip clearance width (for example 1.0 mm) will cause severe pressure pulsation in the turbine, especially in the vaneless region between the runner and guide vane and the blade tip clearance of the runner because the flow is out of control, and the amplitude of pressure pulsation is extremely strong.
- (3)
- The force on a runner is affected by tip clearance width. If the width is larger, the average value of axial force is smaller. When tip clearance width increases from 0 to 1.0 mm, the average value of axial force decreases from 4325 N to 4025 N for about 7%. However, the pulsation amplitude of axial force does not strongly change with the variation of tip clearance width, the peak-to-peak values are about 25 N. However, the change in tip clearance width has great influence on the radial excitation force, with the increase of tip clearance width, the radial force decreases for about 50%.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Weitemeyera, S.; Kleinhan, D.; Vogta, T.; Agerta, C. Integration of Renewable Energy Sources in Future Power Systems: The Role of Storage. Renew. Energy 2015, 75, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhou, W. Hydropower in China at Present and Its Further Development. Energy 2010, 35, 4400–4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falcao, A.F.D. Wave Energy Utilization: A Review of the Technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 899–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, M.Z.; Delucchi, M.A. Providing All Global Energy with Wind, Water, and Solar Power, Part I: Technologies, Energy Resources, Quantities and Areas of Infrastructure, and Materials. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1154–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guney, M.S. Solar Power and Application Methods. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 776–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, R.; Wang, Z. Comparative numerical studies for the flow energy dissipation features in a pump-turbine in pump mode and turbine mode. J. Energy Storage 2021, 41, 102835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kan, K.; Zheng, Y.; Fu, S.; Liu, H.; Yang, C.; Zhang, X. Dynamic Stress of Impeller Blade of Shaft Extension Tubular Pump Device Based on Bidirectional Fluid-Structure Interaction. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2017, 31, 1561–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, X.; Wang, L.; Weng, K. Dynamic Characteristics Analysis of Tubular Turbine Based on Bidirectional Fluid-Solid Coupling. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2016, 32, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Y.; Wu, C.; Mu, M.; Yang, C. Research on Energy Characteristics of New-Type Bidirectional Shaft Tubular Turbine. South North Water Divers. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 11, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, R.; Wang, Z.; Luo, Y. Dynamic Stress Analysis of Francis Turbine with Partial Load. J. Hydroelectr. Eng. 2007, 26, 130–134. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, R.L.; Paterson, G. Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Flexible Turbomachinery. J. Fluids Struct. 2011, 27, 1376–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.Y.; Yoshimura, S.; Imai, R.; Katsura, H.; Yoshida, T.; Kato, C. Quantitative Evaluation of Flow-Induced Structural Vibration and Noise in Turbomachinery by Full-Scale Weakly Coupled Simulation. J. Fluids Struct. 2007, 23, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.S.; Bae, S.Y.; Kim, W.J.; Lee, S.L.; Kim, M.K. A Study on the Design Assessment of 50 kW Ocean Current Turbine using Fluid Structure Interaction Analysis. In Proceedings of the 26th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Beijing, China, 19–23 August 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Schmucker, H.; Flemming, F.; Coulson, S. Two-Way Coupled Fluid Structure Interaction Simulation of a Propeller Turbine. In Proceedings of the 25th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Politehnica University Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania, 20–24 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, X.; Li, C.; Tie, Y.; Zhang, W. Strength Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling of Axial Flow Pump Blades. J. Hydroelectr. Eng. 2012, 31, 222–226. [Google Scholar]
- Booth, T.C.; Dodge, P.R.; Hepworth, H.K. Rotor-Tip Leakage: Part I—Basic Methodology. J. Eng. Power 1982, 104, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rains, D.A. Tip Clearance Flows in Axial Compressors and Pumps, 2nd ed.; California Institute of Technology: Pasadena, CA, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Q.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Z. Numerical Evaluation of the Clearance Geometries Effect on the Flow Field and Performance of a Hydrofoil. Renew. Energy 2016, 99, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, X.; McCarter, A.A.; Lakshminarayana, B. Tip Clearance Effects in a Turbine Rotor: Part I—Pressure Field and Loss. J. Turbomach. 2001, 123, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chitrakar, S.; Thapa, B.S.; Dahlhaug, O.G.; Neopane, H.P. Numerical and Experimental Study of the Leakage Flow in Guide Vanes with Different Hydrofoils. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 2017, 4, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dreyer, M.; Decaix, J.; Münch-Alligné, C.; Farhat, M. Mind the Gap: A New Insight into the Tip Leakage Vortex using Stereo-PIV. Exp. Fluids 2014, 55, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decaix, J.; Balarac, G.; Dreyer, M.; Farhat, M.; Munch, C. RANS and LES Computations of the Tip-Leakage Vortex for Different Gap Widths. J. Turbul. 2015, 16, 309–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G. Vortical Structures in Turbomachinery Tip Clearance Flows; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Tan, D.; Chen, H.; Katz, J. Effects of Tip Gap Size on the Flow Structure in the Tip Region of an Axial Turbomachine. In Proceedings of the ASME-JSME-KSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, Seoul, Korea, 26–31 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Han, Y.; Tan, L.; Wang, Y. Blade Rotation Angle on Energy Performance and Tip Leakage Vortex in a Mixed Flow Pump as Turbine at Pump Mode. Energy 2020, 206, 118084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pichler, R.; Michelassi, V.; Sandberg, R.; Ong, J. Highly Resolved Large Eddy Simulation Study of Gap Size Effect on Low-Pressure Turbine Stage. J. Turbomach. 2018, 140, 021003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Tan, L. Tip Clearance on Pressure Fluctuation Intensity and Vortex Characteristic of a Mixed Flow Pump as Turbine at Pump Mode. Renew. Energy 2018, 129, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, D.; Wang, M.; Moin, P.; Mittal, R. Effects of Tip-Gap Size on the Tip-Leakage Flow in a Turbomachinery Cascade. Phys. Fluids 2006, 18, 105102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, X.; Li, Z.; Zhu, B.; Wang, W. Effect of Tip Clearance Size on Tubular Turbine Leakage Characteristics. Processes 2021, 9, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Ji, B.; Tsujimoto, Y. A Review of Cavitation in Hydraulic Machinery. J. Hydrodyn. 2016, 28, 335–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.; Bai, X.; Long, X.; Ji, B.; Peng, X.; Farhat, M. Large Eddy Simulation of the Tip-Leakage Cavitating Flow with an Insight on How Cavitation Influences Vorticity and Turbulence. Appl. Math. Model. 2020, 77, 788–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Shi, L.; Shi, W.; Zhao, R.; Wang, H.; van Esch, B.B. Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Tip Leakage Vortex Cavitation Cloud and Unstable Suction-side-perpendicular Cavitating Vortices in an Axial Flow Pump. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 2015, 77, 244–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaggero, S.; Tani, G.; Viviani, M.; Conti, F. A Study on the Numerical Prediction of Propellers Cavitating Tip Vortex. Ocean Eng. 2014, 92, 137–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, D.; Ma, W.; Liang, W.; Liao, W.; Wan, T. On 3D Flow Numerical Simulation of Bulb Tubular Turbine Considering and not Flange Clearance. Large Electr. Mach. Hydraul. Turbine 2007, 3, 31–35. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Xu, J.; Liu, W. The Analysis of Gap Simulation Technology on Tubular Turbine. Large Electr. Mach. Hydraul. Turbine 2011, 2, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
- Celik, I.B.; Ghia, U.; Roache, P.J.; Freitas, C.J.; Coleman, H.; Raad, P.E. Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty due to Discretization in CFD Applications. J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME 2008, 130, 078001. [Google Scholar]
- Oberkampf, W.L.; Roy, C.J. Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Main Parameters | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|
Rated Rotation Speed nr | 1043 | (r/min) |
Rated Flow Rate Qr | 1.07 | (m3/s) |
Rated Shaft Power Pr | 58.53 | (kW) |
Rated Head Hr | 6 | (m) |
Rated Efficiency ηr | 91.85% | (-) |
Runner Diameter D | 0.4 | (m) |
Tip Clearance Width hTC | 1 | (mm) |
Unit Rotation Speed n11 | 2.733 | (-) |
Unit Flow Rate q11 | 170.33 | (-) |
Specific Speed of Runner ns | 854.63 | (-) |
Grid Schemes | Nodes | Grid Refinement Factor | Fine-Grid Convergence Index |
---|---|---|---|
Coarse Grid Medium Grid Fine Grid | 1,449,192 3,470,402 7,696,901 | 1.338 | 1.127% |
1.304 | 0.255% |
Tested Parameters | Device Name | Precision |
---|---|---|
Flow Rate | Electromagnetic Flowmeter | ±0.18% |
Rotation Speed | Rotary Encoder | ±0.02% |
Shaft Power | Torque Meter | ±0.05% |
Pressure | Pressure Sensor | ±0.1% |
Parameters | Experimental Value | CFD Value | Error |
---|---|---|---|
Flow Rate (m3/s) | 1.07 | 1.02 | 4.91% |
Shaft Power (kW) | 58.53 | 55.38 | 5.38% |
Efficiency (%) | 91.85 | 92.13 | 0.3% |
y | x | Function |
---|---|---|
Qleak/Qin (%) | hTC (mm) | y = −3.118 × 10−5 + 0.001x |
Vleak/Vin-runner (%) | hTC (mm) | y = 1.424 + 0.274(1-e−x/0.318) + 0.274(1-e−x/0.318) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, X.; Ding, J.; Zhu, D.; Tao, R.; Wang, H.; Xiao, R. Prediction of the Influence of Runner Tip Clearance on the Performance of Tubular Turbine. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020136
Wu Y, Wang X, Yang X, Ding J, Zhu D, Tao R, Wang H, Xiao R. Prediction of the Influence of Runner Tip Clearance on the Performance of Tubular Turbine. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(2):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020136
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Yanzhao, Xiaohang Wang, Xiaolong Yang, Junfeng Ding, Di Zhu, Ran Tao, Huanmao Wang, and Ruofu Xiao. 2022. "Prediction of the Influence of Runner Tip Clearance on the Performance of Tubular Turbine" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, no. 2: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020136
APA StyleWu, Y., Wang, X., Yang, X., Ding, J., Zhu, D., Tao, R., Wang, H., & Xiao, R. (2022). Prediction of the Influence of Runner Tip Clearance on the Performance of Tubular Turbine. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020136