Content Management Systems Performance and Compliance Assessment Based on a Data-Driven Search Engine Optimization Methodology
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Related Background
2.1. Libraries, Archives, and Museums Websites
2.2. Prior Efforts and Research Gaps
3. Methodology
- In the first stage, we try to define a set of underlying variables for each of the proposed factors capable of affecting the total website SEO score. We describe three different factors that compile the Total Website SEO Performance construct, namely Content Curation, Speed, and Security factor. A further investigation and several reliability analysis tests are taking place regarding the internal consistency and the discriminant validity of the proposed variables and how they fit into each factor. This will expand potential research approaches to adopt this framework expecting relatively similar results concerning other domains’ websites performance.
- In the second stage, a descriptive data summarization for each proposed factor takes place for initial performance estimations and exploratory purposes. Practically, this will allow administrators to understand their websites’ SEO performance status through the extraction of detailed quantitative information for each of the involved variables set under the three different factors.
- At the third stage, assuming that there are differences among the adopted CMSs, we have developed diagnostic predictive models that estimate the possible potential impact of each factor on the SEO performance.
3.1. Data Collection and Sample
3.2. Validity and Reliability Assessment
3.3. Predictive Regression Models
4. Results
4.1. Validation of the Proposed Factors
4.2. Descriptive Data Summarization for Initial Performance Estimations
4.3. Predictive Regression Models
5. Discussion
Future Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
LAMs | Libraries, Archives and Museums |
SEO | Search Engine Optimization |
CMS | Content Management Systems |
EMOTIVE | Emotive Virtual cultural Experiences through personalized storytelling |
ViMM | Virtual Multimodal Museum |
KMO | Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin |
EFA | Exploratory Factor Analysis |
HTTPS | Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure |
HTML | HyperText Markup Language |
HSTS | HTTP Strict Transport Security |
XSS | Cross-site scripting |
MIME | Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions |
URL | Uniform Resource Locator |
CSS | Cascading Style Sheets |
ALT | Alternative Text |
References
- Di Franco, P.D.G.; Matthews, J.L.; Matlock, T. Framing the past: How virtual experience affects bodily description of artefacts. J. Cult. Herit. 2016, 17, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krstic, N.; Maslikovic, D. Pain points of cultural institutions in search visibility: The case of Serbia. Libr. Hi Tech News 2018, 37, 496–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarraf, S. A survey of museums on the web: Who uses museum websites? Curator Mus. J. 1999, 42, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiang, H.H.; Tsaih, R.H.; Han, T.S. Chapter 5—Measurement development of service quality for museum websites displaying artifacts. In Managing Innovation and Cultural Management in the Digital Era; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2012; pp. 100–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardissono, L.; Kuflik, T.; Petrelli, D. Personalization in cultural heritage: The road travelled and the one ahead. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 2012, 22, 73–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Drivas, I.C.; Sakas, D.P.; Giannakopoulos, G.A.; Kyriaki-Manessi, D. Big data analytics for search engine optimization. Big Data Cogn. Comp. 2020, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Järvinen, J.; Karjaluoto, H. The Use of Web Analytics for Digital Marketing Performance Measurement. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2015, 50, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mavridis, T.; Symeonidis, A.L. Identifying valid search engine ranking factors in a Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 context for building efficient SEO mechanisms. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2015, 41, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voorbij, H. The use of web statistics in cultural heritage institutions. Perform. Meas. Metr. 2010, 11, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- W3Techs, Usage Statistics of Content Management Systems. Available online: https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Moreno, L.; Martinez, P. Overlapping factors in search engine optimization and web accessibility. Online Inf. Rev. 2013, 37, 564–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Petras, V.; Hill, T.; Stiller, J.; Gäde, M. Europeana—A search engine for digitized cultural heritage material. Datenbank Spektrum. 2017, 17, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Europeana. About Us. Available online: https://www.europeana.eu/en/about-us (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- CrossCult. Project Background. Available online: https://www.crosscult.eu/en/about/background/ (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- EMOTIVE. Emotive Virtual Cultural Experiences through Personalized Storytelling. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/727188 (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- ViMM. Virtual Multimodal Museum Project. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/727107 (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- Google. About Google Cultural Institute. Available online: https://about.artsandculture.google.com/ (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- Lehman, K.; Roach, G. The Strategic Role of Electronic Marketing in the Australian Museum Sector. Museum Manag. Curatorsh. 2011, 26, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balasubramanian, A.; Sabarish, B.A. A Study on the Impact of Google Search on the Reading Habits of Academicians. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2016, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakhshi, H.; Throsby, D. Culture of Innovation: An Economic Analysis of Innovation in Arts and Cultural Organizations; Research Report, NESTA. 2010. Available online: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/culture-of-innovation/ (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- Hume, M.; Mills, M. Building the Sustainable IMuseum: Is the Virtual Museum Leaving Our Museums Virtually Empty? Int. J. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Mark. 2011, 16, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marty, P.F. Museum Websites and Museum Visitors: Digital Museum Resources and Their Use. Museum Manag. Curatorsh. 2008, 23, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Padilla-Meléndez, A.; Del Águila-Obra, A.R. Web and Social Media Usage by Museums: Online Value Creation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlou, V. The Educational Potential of Museum Websites: Building an Instrument for Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Views. Museum Manag. Curatorsh. 2012, 27, 291–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matošević, G.; Dobša, J.; Mladenić, D. Using Machine Learning for Web Page Classification in Search Engine Optimization. Future Internet 2021, 13, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drivas, I.C.; Sakas, D.P.; Giannakopoulos, G.A.; Kyriaki-Manessi, D. Search Engines’ Visits and Users’ Behavior in Websites: Optimization of Users Engagement with the Content; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dean, J.A.; Anderson, C.; Battle, A. Ranking Documents Based on User Behavior and/or Feature Data. U.S. Patent US7716225B1, 2010. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7716225B1/en (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- Vállez, M.; Ventura, A. Analysis of the SEO visibility of university libraries and how they impact the web visibility of their universities. J. Acad. Librariansh. 2020, 46, 102171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datig, I. Revitalizing library websites and social media with content strategy: Tools and recommendations. J. Electron. Resour. Librarianship 2018, 30, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchanan, S. A toolkit to effectively manage your website: Practical advice for content strategy. Weave J. Libr. User Exp. 2017, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arlitsch, K.; OBrien, P.; Rossmann, B. Managing search engine optimization: An introduction for library administrators. J. Libr. Adm. 2013, 53, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onaifo, D.; Rasmussen, D. Increasing libraries’ content findability on the web with search engine optimization. Libr. Hi Tech 2013, 31, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, J.A.; Rossmann, D. The open SESMO (search engine & social media optimization) project: Linked and structured data for library subscription databases to enable web-scale discovery in search engines. J. Web Librariansh. 2017, 11, 172–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhuay-Quispe, J.; Quispe-Riveros, D.; Bautista-Ynofuente, L.; Pacheco-Mendoza, J. Metadata quality and academic visibility associated with document type coverage in institutional repositories of Peruvian universities. J. Web Librarianship 2017, 11, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bekavac, I.; Praničević, D.G. Web Analytics Tools and Web Metrics Tools: An Overview and Comparative Analysis. Croat. Oper. Res. Rev. 2015, 37, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- del García, M.R.; García-Nieto, J.; Aldana-Montes, J.F. An Ontology-Based Data Integration Approach for Web Analytics in e-Commerce. Expert Syst. Appl. 2016, 63, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pauwels, K.; Ambler, T.; Clark, B.H.; LaPointe, P.; Reibstein, D.; Skiera, B.; Wierenga, B.; Wiesel, T. Dashboards as a Service: Why, What, How, and What Research Is Needed? J. Serv. Res. 2009, 12, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neely, A.; Bourne, M. Why Measurement Initiatives Fail. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2000, 4, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luh, C.J.; Yang, S.A.; Huang, T.L.D. Estimating Google’s search engine ranking function from a search engine optimization perspective. Online Inf. Rev. 2016, 40, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, L. Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability in Qualitative Research. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2015, 4, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melchers, R.E.; Beck, A.T. Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; ISBN 9781119265993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aven, T. Improving the foundation and practice of reliability engineering. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 2017, 231, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M. Improving Website Structure through Reducing Information Overload. Decis. Support Syst. 2018, 110, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viduka, D.; Kraguljac, V.; Lavrnić, I. Security Challenges behind the Development and Increased Use of Open Source Web Content Management Systems. J. Inf. Organ. Sci. 2020, 44, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marjuni, A.; Fanani, A.Z.; Nurhayati, O.D. Implementation of Text Copy Prevention on Content Management System Based Website. J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. 2018, 10, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
- Distante, D.; Risi, M.; Scanniello, G. Enhancing Navigability in Websites Built Using Web Content Management Systems. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 2014, 24, 493–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Black, E.L. Selecting a Web Content Management System for an Academic Library Website. Inf. Technol. Libr. 2011, 30, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Patel, S.K.; Prajapati, J.B. Joomla, Drupal and WordPress SEO Comparison. J. Comput. Technol. Appl. 2018, 9, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
- Patel, S.K.; Rathod, V.R.; Parikh, S. Joomla, Drupal and WordPress—A Statistical Comparison of Open Source CMS. In Proceedings of the TISC 2011, 3rd International Conference on Trendz in Information Sciences and Computing, Chennai, India, 8–9 December 2011; pp. 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saura, J.R.; Palos-Sánchez, P.; Cerdá Suárez, L.M. Understanding the Digital Marketing Environment with KPIs and Web Analytics. Future Internet 2017, 9, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wilson, S. SEO Best Practices. CheckBot. 2021. Available online: https://www.checkbot.io/guide/seo/ (accessed on 19 June 2021).
- Dziuban, C.D.; Shirkey, E.C. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol. Bull. 1974, 81, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razali, N.M.; Wah, Y.B. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J. Stat. Model. Anal. 2011, 2, 21–33. [Google Scholar]
- von Hippel, P.T. Mean, Median, and Skew: Correcting a Textbook Rule. J. Stat. Educ. 2005, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gatignon, H. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In Statistical Analysis of Management Data; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 59–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şimşek, G.G.; Noyan, F. McDonald’s ωt, Cronbach’s α, and generalized θ for composite reliability of common factors structures. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 2013, 42, 2008–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ursachi, G.; Horodnic, I.A.; Zait, A. How Reliable Are Measurement Scales? External Factors with Indirect Influence on Reliability Estimators. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 20, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Callender, J.C.; Osburn, H.G. An empirical comparison of coefficient alpha, Guttman’s lambda-2, and MSPLIT maximized split-half reliability estimates. J. Educ. Meas. 1979, 16, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revelle, W.; Zinbarg, R.E. Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the Glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika 2009, 74, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, S.R.; Zhang, X. Testing for Normality in Linear Regression Models. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 2010, 80, 1101–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, A.F.; Finan, C. Linear Regression and the Normality Assumption. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2018, 98, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Noordzij, M.; Tripepi, G.; Dekker, F.W.; Zoccali, C.; Tanck, M.W.; Jager, K.J. Sample size calculations: Basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 1388–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, M.J.; Julious, S.A.; Altman, D.G. Estimating Sample Sizes for Binary, Ordered Categorical, and Continuous Outcomes in Two Group Comparisons. BMJ 1995, 311, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bedeian, A.G.; Mossholder, K.W. Simple question, not so simple answer: Interpreting interaction terms in moderated multiple regression. J. Manag. 1994, 20, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seber, G.A.; Lee, A.J. Linear Regression Analysis, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 327–329. [Google Scholar]
- Drivas, I.C.; Sakas, D.P.; Giannakopoulos, G.A. Display Advertising and Brand Awareness in Search Engines: Predicting the Engagement of Branded Search Traffic Visitors. In Business Intelligence and Modelling. IC-BIM 2019; Sakas, D.P., Nasiopoulos, D.K., Taratuhina, Y., Eds.; Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strzelecki, A. Content Delivery Networks in Cross-border e-Commerce. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2020, 4, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwangsawad, A.; Jattamart, A.; Nusawat, P. The Performance Evaluation of a Website using Automated Evaluation Tools. In Proceedings of the 4th Technology Innovation Management and Engineering Science International Conference (TIMES-iCON), Bangkok, Thailand, 11–13 December 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eurostat. Culture Statistics—2019 Edition; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019; pp. 154–157. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/10177894/KS-01-19-712-EN-N.pdf/915f828b-daae-1cca-ba54-a87e90d6b68b (accessed on 25 April 2021).
- Eurostat Statistics Explained. Culture Statistics—Government Expenditure on Cultural, Broadcasting and Publishing Services. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Culture_statistics_-_government_expenditure_on_cultural,_broadcasting_and_publishing_services (accessed on 25 April 2021).
- Mandal, S. Designing and developing digital content management system through open source software and standards. Parameters 2018, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
Research Context Issues | Contribution Needed |
---|---|
Staff low familiarization with SEO strategies and web analytics [2]. Reduced managerial capabilities in understanding SEO factors and the possible interrelationships between them [6,7,37,50]. | A novel SEO framework for better understanding and highlighting the importance of SEO for libraries, archives, and museums. |
Deployed examinations regarding websites performance for SEO purposes with a limited number of cases, while also involving a small number of variables that affect visibility and findability [28,32,33,34]. | Further research efforts are needed to involve a large sample of websites in experiments for estimating SEO performance and involving additional variables that influence visibility and findability. |
Lack of methodological framework to manage the voluminous size of websites and the impact on SEO for greater visibility and findability levels [6]. | A clear and understandable SEO framework is needed to manage websites with a large amount of content and a lack of proper technical curation. |
Lack of SEO methodological framework that expresses statistical significance in terms of reliability, validity, and consistency within the involved variables for potential replication purposes [41,42]. | Establish an SEO data-driven framework and integration with other strategies for visibility and findability expansion on the Web. |
Limited research efforts in CMSs comparisons and their impact on websites’ overall SEO performance in terms of their content curation, speed loading time, and security level [48,49]. | Further examination of websites and the adopted CMSs is needed regarding their impact on SEO performance and identifying faults that impact the visibility and findability levels. |
Content Curation Factor | Speed Factor | Security Factor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Variable Loading | Variables | Variable Loading | Variables | Variable Loading |
Set page titles | Avoid temporary redirects | 0.565 | Use content sniffing protection | 0.594 | |
Use optimal length titles | Use compression | 0.592 | Use clickjack protection | 0.590 | |
Use unique titles | 0.661 | Use minification | 0.584 | Use HTTPS | 0.680 |
Set H1 headings | 0.630 | Avoid render-blocking JavaScript | 0.545 | Hide server version data | 0.611 |
Use one H1 heading per page | 0.656 | Use long caching times | 0.596 | Avoid mixed content | 0.756 |
Use optimal length H1 headings | 0.627 | Avoid duplicate resources | 0.605 | Use HSTS | 0.821 |
Use unique H1 headings | 0.706 | Avoid plugins | 0.528 | Use HSTS preload | |
Set page descriptions | 0.653 | Avoid resource redirects | 0.571 | Use XSS protection | 0.761 |
Use optimal length descriptions | 0.674 | Use valid HTML | 0.569 | Use secure password forms | 0.504 |
Use unique descriptions | 0.823 | Use valid CSS | Set MIME types | ||
Set canonical URLs | 0.760 | Avoid recompressing data | |||
Avoid duplicate page content | 0.813 | Avoid excessive inline JavaScript | 0.558 | ||
Avoid thin content pages | 0.791 | Avoid excessive inline CSS | 0.523 | ||
Set image ALT text | 0.753 | Avoid CSS @import | 0.529 | ||
Set mobile scaling | 0.806 | Avoid internal link redirects | |||
Use short URLs | 0.770 | ||||
0.792 * <0.001 ** <0.001 *** | 0.582 * <0.001 ** <0.023 *** | 0.627 * <0.001 ** <0.001 *** |
Factors | McDonald’s | Cronbach’s | Guttman’s -2 | Guttman’s -6 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Content Curation | 0.762 | 0.765 | 0.781 | 0.824 |
Speed | 0.452 | 0.454 | 0.480 | 0.520 |
Security | 0.613 | 0.604 | 0.628 | 0.605 |
Variables | Mean | Std. Deviation | Skewness | Shapiro-Wilk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Use unique titles | 57.164 | 33.4 | −0.389 | 0.897 |
Set H1 headings | 72.258 | 35.934 | −1.135 | 0.720 |
Use one H1 heading per page | 58.012 | 39.847 | −0.425 | 0.814 |
Use optimal length H1 headings | 70.853 | 34.742 | −1.12 | 0.763 |
Use unique H1 headings | 34.982 | 34.936 | 0.415 | 0.838 |
Set page descriptions | 36.396 | 40.23 | 0.523 | 0.78 |
Use optimal length descriptions | 19.537 | 29.302 | 1.494 | 0.709 |
Use unique descriptions | 17.947 | 28.711 | 1.532 | 0.678 |
Set canonical URLs | 26.07 | 41.107 | 1.047 | 0.613 |
Avoid duplicate page content | 76.962 | 27.661 | −1.339 | 0.79 |
Avoid thin content pages | 68.164 | 34.975 | −0.807 | 0.813 |
Set image ALT text | 67.513 | 40.601 | −0.846 | 0.718 |
Set mobile scaling | 82.167 | 35.449 | −1.771 | 0.527 |
Use short URLs | 78.337 | 26.985 | −1.392 | 0.77 |
Variables | Mean | Std. Deviation | Skewness | Shapiro-Wilk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Avoid_temporary redirects | 71.012 | 37.511 | −0.923 | 0.742 |
Use compression | 73.93 | 41.85 | −1.126 | 0.593 |
Use minification | 55.466 | 25.025 | 0.036 | 0.979 |
Avoid render-blocking JavaScript | 16.792 | 34.533 | 1.804 | 0.516 |
Use long caching times | 41.079 | 44.76 | 0.346 | 0.721 |
Avoid duplicate resources | 80.754 | 31.58 | −1.499 | 0.652 |
Avoid plugins | 98.689 | 8.848 | −9.889 | 0.125 |
Avoid resource redirects | 82.713 | 34.193 | −1.806 | 0.533 |
Use valid HTML | 30.789 | 39.613 | 0.726 | 0.721 |
Avoid excessive inline JavaScript | 81.683 | 34.298 | −1.709 | 0.566 |
Avoid excessive inline CSS | 97.123 | 15.807 | −5.887 | 0.169 |
Avoid CSS @import | 93.006 | 17.327 | −3.827 | 0.519 |
Variables | Mean | Std. Deviation | Skewness | Shapiro-Wilk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Use content sniffing protection | 27.44 | 39.151 | 0.967 | 0.684 |
Use clickjack protection | 40.305 | 47.868 | 0.383 | 0.653 |
Use HTTPS | 76.05 | 41.919 | −1.232 | 0.549 |
Hide server version data | 56.44 | 45.489 | −0.231 | 0.727 |
Avoid mixed content | 90.19 | 20.775 | −2.704 | 0.537 |
Use HSTS | 18.692 | 36.277 | 1.597 | 0.541 |
Use XSS protection | 23.378 | 38.13 | 1.178 | 0.621 |
Use secure password forms | 85.088 | 30.547 | −1.965 | 0.542 |
Variable | Coefficient | F | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Constant (Total Website SEO Performance) | 20.953 | 0.786 | 414.469 | <0.001 |
Content Curation Factor | 0.647 | |||
Constant | 25.703 | 0.279 | 43.783 | <0.001 |
Speed Factor | 0.481 | |||
Constant | 44.109 | 0.286 | 45.216 | <0.001 |
Security Factor | 0.317 |
Variable | Coefficient | F | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Constant (Total Website SEO Performance) | 23.097 | 0.688 | 213.727 | <0.001 |
Content Curation Factor | 0.664 | |||
Constant | 45.357 | 0.155 | 17.818 | <0.001 |
Speed Factor | 0.309 | |||
Constant | 51.035 | 0.329 | 47.481 | <0.001 |
Security Factor | 0.270 |
Variable | Coefficient | F | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Constant (Total Website SEO Performance) | 13.369 | 0.759 | 220.858 | <0.001 |
Content Curation Factor | 0.743 | |||
Constant | 33.887 | 0.399 | 46.396 | <0.001 |
Speed Factor | 0.491 | |||
Constant | 50.542 | 0.295 | 24.935 | <0.001 |
Security Factor | 0.295 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Drivas, I.; Kouis, D.; Kyriaki-Manessi, D.; Giannakopoulos, G. Content Management Systems Performance and Compliance Assessment Based on a Data-Driven Search Engine Optimization Methodology. Information 2021, 12, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12070259
Drivas I, Kouis D, Kyriaki-Manessi D, Giannakopoulos G. Content Management Systems Performance and Compliance Assessment Based on a Data-Driven Search Engine Optimization Methodology. Information. 2021; 12(7):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12070259
Chicago/Turabian StyleDrivas, Ioannis, Dimitrios Kouis, Daphne Kyriaki-Manessi, and Georgios Giannakopoulos. 2021. "Content Management Systems Performance and Compliance Assessment Based on a Data-Driven Search Engine Optimization Methodology" Information 12, no. 7: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12070259
APA StyleDrivas, I., Kouis, D., Kyriaki-Manessi, D., & Giannakopoulos, G. (2021). Content Management Systems Performance and Compliance Assessment Based on a Data-Driven Search Engine Optimization Methodology. Information, 12(7), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12070259