Properties, Production, and Recycling of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers: Special Medical Applications
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Textile Fibers for Medical Applications
1.2. The Classification of These Different Regenerated Cellulose Fibers Is Based on Fiber Production Method
- Viscose fibers
- Lyocell
- Modal
- Cupro (Cuprammonium Rayon)
- Acetate
2. Production of RC
2.1. Production Methods of Viscose Fibers
2.2. Production Methods of Lyocell Fibers
2.3. Production Methods of Modal Fibers
2.4. Production Methods of Cupro Fibers
2.5. Production Methods of Acetate Fibers
3. Properties of Main Types Regenerated Cellulose Fibers
- Viscose rayon: Softness, good dyeability, and moderate strength.
- Modal: Stronger, more durable, and excellent moisture management.
- Lyocell (Tencel): High strength, environmentally friendly, and excellent moisture control.
- Acetate: Luxurious feel, moderate moisture absorption, and lower strength.
- Cuprammonium (Cupro): Silk-like texture, good drape, and moderate strength.
3.1. Viscose Rayon Fibers
- Softness and drapability: The lower crystallinity contributes to a softer and more drapable fabric, making viscose rayon ideal for clothing and textiles that require a fluid drape.
- Enhanced dyeability: The increased amorphous regions in viscose rayon fibers allow for better dye penetration, resulting in vibrant and uniform colors.
- Moisture absorption: Viscose rayon has good moisture-wicking properties, similar to cotton, providing comfort in clothing.
- Versatility: Its blend of properties makes viscose rayon suitable for a wide range of applications, from fashion garments to home textiles.
3.2. Modal Fibers
- Strength and durability: Higher crystallinity leads to increased tensile strength and durability, making modal fibers more robust and long-lasting. Modal fibers are stronger and more durable than viscose rayon, both wet and dry.
- Softness and smoothness: Despite the higher crystallinity, modal fibers retain a smooth, silky texture and soft hand feel, which is ideal for high-quality textiles and apparel, often used in premium fabrics.
- Dimensional stability: Modal fibers exhibit better dimensional stability, maintaining their shape and size after repeated washing and drying.
- Moisture absorption: Modal fibers have excellent moisture-wicking properties, providing superior comfort and breathability in clothing. Modal has excellent moisture-wicking properties, superior to cotton and viscose.
- Color retention: The enhanced structure allows modal fibers to hold dyes well, resulting in vibrant, long-lasting colors.
3.3. Lyocell (Tencel®) Fibers
- Strength and durability: The high degree of crystallinity provides lyocell fibers with exceptional tensile strength and durability, making them more resilient to wear and tear. The value of lyocell fiber tenacity is larger than for viscose and modal fibers, and is almost equal to polyester fiber. Lyocell is the only regenerated cellulose fiber with a wet tensile strength reaching the cotton wet strength. Lyocell has a significantly reduced elongation compared to viscose, but slightly above modal fibers.
- Softness and comfort: Despite their strength, lyocell fibers are also known for their smooth, soft texture, which enhances comfort in textiles and apparel. Lyocell fibers feature a fibrillar structure with microfibrils aligned parallel to the fiber axis because of a high degree of cellulose crystallinity, which allows lyocell fiber to easily develop a fibrillated surface under mechanical abrasion. Due to the high cellulose crystallinity produced via lyocell spinning, the moisture regain of lyocell fiber is slightly lower than for viscose.
- Moisture management: Lyocell fibers exhibit excellent moisture-wicking abilities, which help in maintaining dryness and comfort, making them suitable for activewear and intimate apparel.
- Biodegradability: The natural cellulose base and environmentally friendly production process contribute to the biodegradability of lyocell fibers, making them a sustainable choice.
- Sustainability: The solvent used in the production process is non-toxic and is recycled in a closed-loop system, making Tencel a more sustainable and environmentally friendly fiber.
- Versatility: The combination of strength, softness, and moisture management makes lyocell suitable for a wide range of applications, from fashion to home textiles.
- Environmental impact: The production process is more sustainable using a closed-loop system that recycles solvents.
3.4. Cuprammonium (Cupro) Fibers
- Softness and smoothness: Cupro fibers are known for their silk-like feel and smooth texture.
- Moisture absorption: Good moisture-wicking properties.
- Drape: Excellent drape and fluidity.
- Strength: Generally weaker compared to lyocell, but stronger than some types of viscose.
3.5. Cellulose Acetate Fiber
- Softness and drapability: The low crystallinity contributes a soft, smooth texture and excellent drapability, making acetate suitable for lightweight, flowy fabrics. Acetate fibers have a luxurious feel and a high sheen, and excellent drapability and fluidity.
- Sheen and luster: Acetate fibers have a natural sheen and luster, giving fabrics made from acetate an attractive, silky appearance.
- Moisture absorption: While not as absorbent as more crystalline cellulose fibers, acetate still has moderate moisture absorption, providing some level of comfort. It is moderate, though less effective compared to cotton and lyocell.
- Color retention: Acetate fibers take dyes well and retain color vibrantly, which is beneficial for fashion and decorative textiles.
- Resistance to shrinkage and wrinkling: The chemical structure of acetate fibers provides good resistance to shrinkage and wrinkling, enhancing their durability and ease of care.
- Strength: Lower tensile strength compared to other regenerated cellulose fibers.
4. Medical Applications of Main Regenerated Cellulose Fibers
- Viscose rayon: Common in textiles and nonwovens for its softness and absorbency. Viscose rayon fibers are used as wound dressings due to their absorbency and comfort and are employed in surgical drapes and gowns only in non-critical settings for their softness and cost-effectiveness.
- Lyocell (Tencel): Used in apparel and home textiles for its strength and moisture management. Lyocell fibers are advanced wound dressings due to biocompatibility and moisture management. As materials for surgical gowns and drapes, lyocell fibers are used in high-performance medical textiles.
- Modal: Employed in underwear and towels for its softness and absorbency. Modal fibers are used in high-performance medical textiles such as patients’ gowns and beddings, and for wound dressings due to softness and moisture management.
- Acetate: Used in fashion fabrics and linings for its luster and drape. Used in some medical linens for its softness.
- Cuprammonium fibers (cupro): Applied in luxury textiles and some technical fabrics for their softness and breathability. Used in high-end medical linens due to their softness—for luxury medical linens. Emerging applications due to their sustainability and performance for medical textiles.
- Viscose rayon: Used in sutures and surgical meshes for its absorbability and biocompatibility, but in general, the use of viscose is limited and usually not used for implantable materials due to lower durability and potential for degradation.
- Lyocell (Tencel): Ideal for tissue engineering scaffolds and surgical meshes due to its strength and biocompatibility. Lyocell fibers are utilized in scaffolds for tissue regeneration.
- Modal: Applied in implantable textiles and surgical dressings for its softness and flexibility. Generally not used for implantable materials or is limited in use.
- Acetate: Utilized in controlled release systems and biodegradable meshes for its biodegradability and film-forming capabilities. Limited used, not typically used for implantable materials due to lower durability.
- Cuprammonium fibers (cupro): Used in tissue engineering and surgical textiles for its softness and smoothness. Rarely used for implantable materials—limited use.
- Ioncell: Investigated for advanced applications in tissue engineering and surgical meshes due to its high strength and biocompatibility. Potential for implantable materials because of biocompatibility.
- Viscose rayon: Used in dialysis membranes and blood filtration due to high absorbency and biocompatibility, but general viscose fibers are not commonly used in extracorporeal devices.
- Lyocell (Tencel): Preferred for its strength and excellent biocompatibility in dialysis and blood filtration. The protectional applications of lyocell fibers for emerging uses in extracorporeal devices due to biocompatibility.
- Modal: Applied in specific blood filtration systems with good moisture absorption, but in general, not commonly used in extracorporeal devices or in limited use.
- Acetate: Utilized in niche applications for its softness and moderate moisture management. Not commonly used or in limited application.
- Cuprammonium fibers (cupro): Employed in high-performance dialysis membranes and specialized blood filtration systems due to their smooth texture. Limited application in extracorporeal devices, not commonly used.
- Ioncell: Emerging uses—potential applications in extracorporeal devices.
- Viscose rayon: Used in wound dressings, surgical drapes, and hygiene products for its absorbency and softness, and because of its comfort and absorbency, viscose fibers are utilized in hygiene products, such as sanitary pads and medical linens.
- Lyocell (Tencel): Applied in advanced wound care and hygiene products for its moisture management and biocompatibility. These fibers are used for hospital bedding and garments because of their comfort and performance.
- Modal: Used in hygiene products and medical textiles for its softness and absorbency; for sanitary pads and medical linens, these fibers are used for their high absorbency and comfort.
- Acetate: Utilized in wound dressings and some hygiene products for its softness and moisture management. Occasionally used in nonwoven hygiene products (sanitary products).
- Cuprammonium fibers (cupro): Employed in healthcare textiles and premium hygiene products for their softness and biocompatibility. Employed in certain high-end healthcare textiles.
5. The Newest Regenerated Cellulose Fibers Used for Medical Applications
- Nanocellulose fibers: Fibers are produced by breaking down cellulose into nanoscale dimensions. This can be performed through chemical, mechanical, or enzymatic methods. These fibers exhibit extraordinary mechanical properties, high surface area, and biocompatibility. These properties contribute to their suitability for various biomedical applications, such as wound dressings, tissue engineering scaffolds, and drug delivery systems. Applications: used in wound dressings, drug delivery systems, and tissue engineering scaffolds due to their high strength and ability to support cell growth [155,156].
- Regenerated cellulose nanofibers (RCNFs): RCNFs are produced using advanced methods to extract and refine cellulose fibers to the nanometer scale. They offer enhanced mechanical properties, high surface area, and improved interactions with biological tissues. These properties enhance their suitability for various medical applications, including wound care, tissue engineering, and drug delivery systems. Application: utilized in advanced wound care products, tissue engineering, and as carriers for drug delivery systems [157,158].
- Bioactive cellulose fibers: Bioactive cellulose fibers are engineered to incorporate active agents such as antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory agents within the cellulose matrix. These fibers provide additional therapeutic benefits beyond the structural support of traditional cellulose. Bioactive cellulose fibers are designed to have specific properties that enhance their performance in medical applications. These fibers are often functionalized with bioactive agents to provide additional therapeutic benefits, such as antimicrobial properties or enhanced healing. These properties contribute to their effectiveness in various medical applications, such as wound care, drug delivery systems, and implants. Applications: employed in wound dressings, surgical sutures, and implants to enhance healing and reduce infection [159,160].
- Electrospun cellulose nanofibers: Electrospinning techniques are used to produce ultra-fine cellulose fibers with diameters in the nanometer range. These fibers have high surface area–volume ratios, which are beneficial for medical applications. Electrospun cellulose nanofibers, produced using electrospinning techniques, possess specific properties that make them highly suitable for medical applications. These properties are crucial for their performance in areas such as tissue engineering, wound healing, and drug delivery. These properties make electrospun cellulose nanofibers highly effective for applications in tissue engineering, wound care, and drug delivery systems. Applications: used in creating scaffolds for tissue engineering, drug delivery systems, and wound care products [161,162].
- Lyocell-like fibers with enhanced functionalization: Recent advancements in lyocell-like fibers involve functionalizing the fibers with additional properties such as enhanced biocompatibility, controlled drug release, or specific mechanical attributes tailored for medical use. Applications: employed in a range of medical textiles, including wound dressings, surgical gowns, and drug delivery systems [163].
- Ioncell is a relatively new type of regenerated cellulose fiber produced using an ionic liquid process. The circularity of Ioncell fibers is generally high, reflecting their more regular cross-sectional shape compared to other regenerated cellulose fibers. Ioncell is a type of regenerated cellulose fiber produced using an ionic liquid-based process. This innovative process offers several advantages over traditional methods. The crystallinity of Ioncell fibers is typically high, often ranging from 50% to 60%. This high crystallinity is achieved through the controlled dissolution and regeneration process, which promotes the formation of well-ordered crystalline regions within the fiber. Applications: Applied in advanced hygiene products and medical textiles for their strength and durability. Used in certain medical textiles (healthcare textiles) for their properties [164,165].
6. Recycling and Challenges of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers for Medical Applications
- Class I (low risk): Basic dressings made from regenerated cellulose may fall under this classification.
- Class II (moderate risk): Absorbable regenerated cellulose sutures and hemostatic agents may fall under this classification.
- Class III (high risk): Regenerated cellulose materials used in critical applications, like internal implants, may require this classification.
6.1. Recycling of Viscose Rayon Fiber
6.2. Recycling of Lyocell (Tencel®) Fibers
6.3. Recycling of Modal Fibers
6.4. Recycling of Cupro Fibers
6.5. Recycling of Acetate Fibers
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Molla, S.; Abedin, M.M.; Siddique, I.M. Exploring the versatility of medical textiles: Applications in implantable and non-implantable medical textiles. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2024, 21, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarz, I.; Kovačević, S. Textile application: From need to imagination. In Textiles for Advanced Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M.T.; Shahid, M.A.; Limon, M.G.M.; Hossain, I.; Mahmud, N. Techniques, applications, and challenges in textiles for sustainable future. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2024, 10, 100230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherif, F.S. A New Prospects to Enhance the Commercial and Economical Status in Textile Industry. Int. Des. J. 2016, 6, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, H.; Hong, Y.; Yan, T.; Xie, X.; Zeng, X. A systematic review of biodegradable materials in the textile and apparel industry. J. Text. Inst. 2024, 115, 1173–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felgueiras, C.; Azoia, N.G.; Gonçalves, C.; Gama, M.; Dourado, F. Trends on the cellulose-based textiles: Raw materials and technologies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 608826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirvan, A.R.; Nouri, A. Medical textiles. Adv. Funct. Prot. Text. 2020, 291–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, J.; Kalyana Kumar, M. Polypropylene for high performance medical applications. Asian Text. J. 2005, 2, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, C.; Ginn, B.; Livingston, N.K.; Yao, Z.; Slavin, B.; King, M.W.; Chung, S.; Mao, H.Q. Medical fibers and biotextiles. In Biomaterials Science; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 575–600. [Google Scholar]
- Sundarraj, A.A.; Ranganathan, T.V. A review on cellulose and its utilization from agro-industrial waste. Drug Invent. Today 2018, 10, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
- Tofanica, B.M.; Belosinschi, D.; Volf, I. Gels, Aerogels and Hydrogels: A Challenge for the Cellulose-Based Product Industries. Gels 2022, 8, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Adnan, A.S.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.G.; Safrida, S.; Hossain, M.S.; Balakrishnan, V.; Gopakumar, D.A.; Abdullah, C.K.; Oyekanmi, A.A.; et al. A review on plant cellulose nanofibre-based aerogels for biomedical applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Y.; Han, G.; Wu, Q. Transitional properties of cotton fibers from cellulose I to cellulose II structure. BioResources 2013, 8, 6460–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zainul Armir, N.A.; Zulkifli, A.; Gunaseelan, S.; Palanivelu, S.D.; Salleh, K.M.; Che Othman, M.H.; Zakaria, S. Regenerated cellulose products for agricultural and their potential: A review. Polymers 2021, 13, 3586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Periyasamy, A.P.; Militky, J. Sustainability in regenerated textile fibers. In Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries: Sourcing Synthetic and Novel Alternative Raw Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 63–95. [Google Scholar]
- Ramamoorthy, S.K.; Skrifvars, M.; Persson, A. A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: Plant, animal and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polym. Rev. 2015, 55, 107–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, H.; Murray, R. Medical textiles. Text. Prog. 2020, 52, 1e127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, H.; Zhu, M.; Duan, B.; Zhang, L. Recent progress in high-strength and robust regenerated cellulose materials. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2000682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rostamitabar, M.; Seide, G.; Jockenhoevel, S.; Ghazanfari, S. Effect of Cellulose Characteristics on the Properties of the Wet-Spun Aerogel Fibers. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinho, E.; Soares, G. Functionalization of cotton cellulose for improved wound healing. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 1887–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, J.; Gultekinoglu, M.; Edirisinghe, M. Bacterial cellulose micro-nano fibres for wound healing applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 41, 107549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miao, J.; Pangule, R.C.; Paskaleva, E.E.; Hwang, E.E.; Kane, R.S.; Linhardt, R.J.; Dordick, J.S. Lysostaphin-functionalized cellulose fibers with antistaphylococcal activity for wound healing applications. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 9557–9567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ninan, N.; Muthiah, M.; Park, I.K.; Kalarikkal, N.; Elain, A.; Wong, T.W.; Thomas, S.; Grohens, Y. Wound healing analysis of pectin/carboxymethyl cellulose/microfibrillated cellulose based composite scaffolds. Mater. Lett. 2014, 132, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO/TR 11827:2012; Textiles—Composition Testing—Identification of Fibres. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
- Gupta, B.S. Textile fiber morphology, structure and properties in relation to friction. In Friction in Textile Material; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 3–36. [Google Scholar]
- Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H.P.; Bohn, A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3358–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mark, R.E. Viscose fiber production and its historical development. J. Text. Inst. 2001, 92, 68–75. [Google Scholar]
- Hämmerle, F.M. The cellulose gap (the future of cellulose fibers). Lenzing. Berichte 2011, 89, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
- Shaikh, T.; Chaudhari, S.; Varma, A. Viscose rayon: A legendary development in the manmade textile. Int. J. Eng. Res. 2012, 2, 675–680. [Google Scholar]
- Vartiainen, J.; Vähä-Nissi, M.; Harlin, A. Biopolymer films and coatings in packaging applications—A review of recent developments. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuen, T.H.; Lau, T.Y.; Ng, L.T. A Study on the Sterilization of Regenerated Cellulose Fiber for Medical Textiles. J. Ind. Text. 2018, 47, 1803–1820. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, G.; Huang, W.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Pang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H. Structure and properties of regenerated cellulose fibers from different technology processes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 2012–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fink, H.-P.; Weigel, P.; Purz, H.J.; Ganster, J. Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1473–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreze, T.; Malej, S. Structural characteristics of new and conventional regenerated cellulosic fibers. Text. Res. J. 2003, 73, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Sixta, H.; Lorenz, M. Properties and structure of viscose fibers spun from NMMO-cellulose solution. Cellulose 2004, 11, 163–172. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.G.; Bai, B.C.; In, S.J.; Lee, Y.S. Effects of an inorganic ammonium salt treatment on the flame-retardant performance of Lyocell fibers. Carbon Lett. 2016, 17, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.-H.; Zhang, Y.-G.; Cheng, B.-W.; Ren, Y.-L.; Zhang, Q.-Y.; Ding, C.; Peng, B. Preparation of durable and flame retardant Lyocell fibers by a one-pot chemical treatment. Cellulose 2018, 25, 6745–6758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sixta, H.; Michud, A.; Hummel, M.; Anghelescu-Hakala, A.; Haslinger, S.; Maunu, S. Ioncell-F: A High-strength regenerated cellulose fiber. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2015, 30, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahltig, B.; Textor, T. Silver-containing antimicrobial coatings for textiles. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 19265–19273. [Google Scholar]
- Shankar, S.; Rhim, J.W. Preparation of nanocellulose from micro-crystalline cellulose: The effect on antimicrobial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 200, 163–172. [Google Scholar]
- Sixta, H. Handbook of Pulp; Wiley-VCH: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, L.; Worrell, E.; Patel, M.K. Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose fibers. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2010, 55, 260–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Chen, C.; Duan, C.; Hu, H.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Stavik, J.; Ni, Y. Regenerated cellulose by the lyocell process, a brief review of the process and properties. BioResources 2018, 13, 4577–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.S.; Yun, C.; Lee, D.S. Characterization of the mechanical properties of lyocell and viscose fibers. J. Ind. Text. 2016, 45, 875–890. [Google Scholar]
- Müssig, J.; Haag, K. The tensile properties of lyocell made from wood pulp and from bamboo pulp fibers. Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2011, 42, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenau, T.; Potthast, A.; Sixta, H.; Kosma, P. The chemistry of side reactions and byproduct formation in the system NMMO/cellulose (Lyocell process). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1763–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eichhorn, S.J.; Baillie, C.A.; Zafeiropoulos, N.; Mwaikambo, L.Y.; Ansell, M.P.; Dufresne, A.; Entwistle, K.M. Review: Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 36, 2107–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siro, I.; Plackett, D. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: A review. Cellulose 2021, 17, 459–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrillo, F.; Colom, X.; Valldeperas, J.; Evans, D.; Huson, M.; Church, J. Structural characterization and properties of lyocell fibers after fibrillation and enzymatic defibrillation finishing treatments. Text. Res. J. 2003, 73, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edgar, K.J.; Zhang, H. Antibacterial modification of Lyocell fiber: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 250, 116932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Jin, X.; Dong, C. Preparation and properties of low fibrillated antibacterial Lyocell fiber. Arab. J. Chem. 2024, 17, 105658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parajuli, P.; Acharya, S.; Rumi, S.S.; Hossain, M.T.; Abidi, N. Regenerated cellulose in textiles: Rayon, lyocell, modal and other fibres. In Fundamentals of Natural Fibres and Textiles; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 87–110. [Google Scholar]
- Lenzing, A.G. Lenzing Modal®—The Fiber with a History of Innovation; Lenzing AG: Lenzing, Austria, 2020; Available online: https://www.lenzing.com/ (accessed on 21 July 2024).
- Woodings, C. Regenerated Cellulose Fibres; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, H.; Sun, T.; Zhou, J. Recent progress in regenerated cellulose fibers by wet spinning. Macromo. Mater. Eng. 2023, 308, 2300089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zemljic, L.F.; Sauperl, O.; Kreze, T.; Strnad, S. Characterization of regenerated cellulose fibers antimicrobial functionalized by chitosan. Text. Res. J. 2013, 83, 185–196.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamide, K.; Nishiyama, K. Cuprammonium processes. Regen. Cellul. Fibers 2001, 88–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hearle, J.W. Physical structure and fibre properties. Regen. Cellul. Fibres 2001, 18, 199. [Google Scholar]
- Seisl, S.; Hengstmann, R. Manmade Cellulosic Fibers (MMCF)—A Historical Introduction and Existing Solutions to a More Sustainable Production. In Sustainable Textile and Fashion Value Chains; Matthes, A., Beyer, K., Cebulla, H., Arnold, M.G., Schumann, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, M. Man-made cellulose fibre reinforcements (MMCFR). In Biocomposites for High-Performance Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 23–55. [Google Scholar]
- Oral, O.; Dirgar, E.; İlleez, A.A. Cupro fibers, properties and usage areas. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Innovative Textiles ICONTEX 2022, Izmir, Turkey, 18–19 May 2022; p. 26. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Xu, J.; Wang, K.; Cao, X.; Sun, R. Cellulose acetate fibers prepared from different raw materials with rapid synthesis method. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, S.; Thümmler, K.; Volkert, B.; Hettrich, K.; Schmidt, I.; Fischer, K. Properties and applications of cellulose acetate. In Macromolecular Symposia; WILEY-VCH Verlag: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; Volume 262, pp. 89–96. [Google Scholar]
- Wsoo, M.A.; Shahir, S.; Bohari, S.P.M.; Nayan, N.H.M.; Abd Razak, S.I. A review on the properties of electrospun cellulose acetate and its application in drug delivery systems: A new perspective. Carbohyd. Res. 2020, 491, 107978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gouda, M.; Hebeish, A.A.; Aljafari, A.I. Synthesis and characterization of novel drug delivery system based on cellulose acetate electrospun nanofiber mats. J. Ind. Text. 2014, 43, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Li, R.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, P. Facile preparation and performance study of antibacterial regenerated cellulose carbamate fiber based on N-halamine. Cellulose 2021, 28, 4991–5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Materials Market Report. Available online: https://textileexchange.org/app/uploads/2023/11/Materials-Market-Report-2023.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2024).
- Kim, T.; Kim, D.; Park, Y. Recent progress in regenerated fibers for “green” textile products. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 376, 134226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Lu, A.; Zhang, L. Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 169–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabbir, M.; Mohammad, F. Sustainable production of regenerated cellulosic fibres. In Sustainable Fibres and Textiles; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 171–189. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, Y.; Nasri-Nasrabadi, B.; You, X.; Wang, X.; Rainey, T.J.; Byrne, N. Regenerated cellulose fibers wetspun from different waste cellulose types. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 18, 2338–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Silva, R.; Vongsanga, K.; Wang, X.; Byrne, N. Understanding key wet spinning parameters in an ionic liquid spun regenerated cellulosic fibre. Cellulose 2016, 23, 2741–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauru, L.K.; Hummel, M.; King, A.W.; Kilpeläinen, I.; Sixta, H. Role of solvent parameters in the regeneration of cellulose from ionic liquid solutions. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2896–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Rosson, L.; Wang, X.; Byrne, N. Upcycling of waste textiles into regenerated cellulose fibres: Impact of pretreatments. J. Text. Inst. 2020, 111, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorade, V.; Chaudhary, B.; Parmaj, O.; Kale, R. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/viscose rayon filament biocomposite. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19, 1189–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eid, B.M.; Ibrahim, N.A. Recent developments in sustainable finishing of cellulosic textiles employing biotechnology. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 124701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J. Synthetic textile fibers: Regenerated cellulose fibers. In Textiles and Fashion; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 79–95. [Google Scholar]
- Lavanya, D.K.P.K.; Kulkarni, P.K.; Dixit, M.; Raavi, P.K.; Krishna, L.N.V. Sources of cellulose and their applications—A review. Int. J. Drug Formul. Res. 2011, 2, 19–38. [Google Scholar]
- Wilkes, A.G. The viscose process. Regen. Cellul. Fibres 2001, 37–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fechter, C.; Fischer, S.; Reimann, F.; Brelid, H.; Heinze, T. Influence of pulp characteristics on the properties of alkali cellulose. Cellulose 2020, 27, 7227–7241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hon, D.N.S. Cellulose and its derivatives: Structures, reactions, and medical uses. In Polysaccharides in Medicinal Applications; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 87–105. [Google Scholar]
- Dyer, J.; Smith, F.R. New Methods for Studying Particles in Viscose and Their Effects on Viscose Rayon Production. In Textile and Paper Chemistry and Technology; Published Online 2009; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington DC, USA, 1977; Volume 49, Chapter 1; pp. 3–19. [Google Scholar]
- Ozipek, B.; Karakas, H. Wet spinning of synthetic polymer fibers. In Advances in Filament Yarn Spinning of Textiles and Polymers; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 174–186. [Google Scholar]
- El Seoud, O.A.; Kostag, M.; Jedvert, K.; Malek, N.I. Cellulose regeneration and chemical recycling: Closing the “cellulose gap” using environmentally benign solvents. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2020, 305, 1900832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, M.I.H.; Ahmed, F.; Rahman, M.H. Surface Modification of Viscose Fabric with Silane Coupling Agents-An Aspect of Comfort Properties. ChemistrySelect 2024, 9, e202400727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emam, H.E.; El-Hawary, N.S.; Ahmed, H.B. Green technology for durable finishing of viscose fibers via self-formation of AuNPs. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 96, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gogoi, N.; Bhuyan, S. Medical textiles: It’s present and prospects. J. Pharm. Innov. 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durand, H.; Smyth, M.; Bras, J. Nanocellulose: A new biopolymer for biomedical application. Biopoly. Biomed. Biotechnol. Appl. 2021, 129–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendes, I.S.; Prates, A.; Evtuguin, D.V. Production of rayon fibres from cellulosic pulps: State of the art and current developments. Carbohyd. Polym. 2021, 273, 118466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sixta, H.; Iakovlev, M.; Testova, L.; Roselli, A.; Hummel, M.; Borrega, M.; van Heiningen, A.; Carmen, F.; Schottenberger, H. Novel concepts of dissolving pulp production. Cellulose 2013, 20, 1547–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X.; Bai, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, W. A review on raw materials, commercial production and properties of lyocell fiber. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perepelkin, K.E.E. Lyocell fibres based on direct dissolution of cellulose in N-methylmorpholine N-oxide: Development and prospects. Fibre Chem. 2007, 39, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayyed, A.J.; Gupta, D.; Deshmukh, N.A.; Mohite, L.V.; Pinjari, D.V. Influence of intensified cellulose dissolution process on spinning and properties of lyocell fibres. Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intensif. 2020, 155, 108063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadhav, S.; Lidhure, A.; Thakre, S.; Ganvir, V. Modified Lyocell process to improve dissolution of cellulosic pulp and pulp blends in NMMO solvent. Cellulose 2021, 28, 973–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foroughi, F.; Rezvani Ghomi, E.; Morshedi Dehaghi, F.; Borayek, R.; Ramakrishna, S. A review on the life cycle assessment of cellulose: From properties to the potential of making it a low carbon material. Materials 2021, 14, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rac-Rumijowska, O.; Fiedot, M.; Karbownik, I.; Suchorska-Woźniak, P.; Teterycz, H. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles in NMMO and their in situ doping into cellulose fibers. Cellulose 2017, 24, 1355–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janjic, S.; Kostic, M.; Vucinic, V.; Dimitrijevic, S.; Popovic, K.; Ristic, M.; Skundric, P. Biologically active fibers based on chitosan-coated lyocell fibers. Carbohyd. Polym. 2009, 78, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Röder, T.; Moosbauer, J.; Wöss, K.; Schlader, S.; Kraft, G. Man-made cellulose fibres–a comparison based on morphology and mechanical properties. Lenzing. Berichte 2013, 91, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Bali, G.; Meng, X.; Deneff, J.I.; Sun, Q.; Ragauskas, A.J. The effect of alkaline pretreatment methods on cellulose structure and accessibility. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colom, X.; Carrillo, F. Crystallinity changes in lyocell and viscose-type fibres by caustic treatment. Eur. Polym. J. 2002, 38, 2225–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.C.; Murthy, Z.V.P. Study of cellulosic fibres morphological features and their modifications using hemicelluloses. Cellulose 2017, 24, 3119–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Nie, Y.; Kang, Z.; Liu, X. Effects of coagulating conditions on the crystallinity, orientation and mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose fibers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 225, 1374–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isogai, A.; Bergström, L. Preparation of cellulose nanofibers using green and sustainable chemistry. Curr. Opin. Green Sust. Chem. 2018, 12, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, K.F.; Champramary, S.; Al Hasan, K.N.; Indic, B.; Ahmed, T.; Pervez, M.N.; Horvath, P.G.; Bak, M.; Sandor, B.; Hofmann, T.; et al. Eco-friendly production of cellulosic fibers from Scots pine wood and sustainable nanosilver modification: A path toward sustainability. Res. Eng. 2023, 19, 101244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strnad, S.; Šauperl, O.; Fras-Zemljič, L. Cellulose fibres functionalised by chitosan: Characterization and application. Biopolymers 2010, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyamoto, I.; Matsuoka, Y.; Matsui, T.; Saito, M.; Okajima, K. Studies on structure of cuprammonium cellulose III. Structure of regenerated cellulose treated by cuprammonium solution. Polym. J. 1996, 28, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karthik, T.; Gopalakrishnan, D. Environmental analysis of textile value chain: An overview. In Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing: Environmental and Social Aspects of Textiles and Clothing Supply Chain; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 153–188. [Google Scholar]
- Ide, S. Filter made of cuprammonium regenerated cellulose for virus removal: A mini-review. Cellulose 2022, 29, 2779–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.N.; Dowd, M.K.; Selling, G.W.; Biswas, A. Synthesis of cellulose acetate from cotton byproducts. Carbohyd. Polym. 2010, 80, 449–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homem, N.C.; Amorim, M.T.P. Synthesis of cellulose acetate using as raw material textile wastes. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 31 (Suppl. S2), S315–S317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawaz, H.; He, A.; Wu, Z.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Ullah, A.; Xu, F.; Xie, F. Revisiting various mechanistic approaches for cellulose dissolution in different solvent systems: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Biolog. Macromol. 2024, 273, 133012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Swapnil, S.I.; Datta, N.; Mahmud, M.M.; Jahan, R.A.; Arafat, M.T. Morphology, mechanical, and physical properties of wet-spun cellulose acetate fiber in different solvent-coagulant systems and in-situ crosslinked environment. J. Appl Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slejko, E.A.; Tuan, A.; Scuor, N. From waste to value: Characterization of recycled cellulose acetate for sustainable waste management. Waste Manag. Bull. 2024, 1, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolfs, J.; Meier, M.A. A more sustainable synthesis approach for cellulose acetate using the DBU/CO2 switchable solvent system. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 4410–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosan, B.; Michels, C.; Meister, F. Dissolution and forming of cellulose with ionic liquids. Cellulose 2008, 15, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Kang, Z.; Nie, Y.; Li, L. Fabrication of regenerated cellulose fibers with good strength and biocompatibility from green spinning process of ionic liquid. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2000741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.G.; Li, N.; Wu, G.; Lin, T.T.; Lee, A.M.X.; Yang, S.W.; Li, Z.; Luo, H.K. Carbon Dioxide Mediated Cellulose Dissolution and Derivatization to Cellulose Carbonates in a Low-pressure System. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2022, 3, 100186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; He, J.; Zhang, J. Application of ionic liquids for dissolving cellulose and fabricating cellulose-based materials: State of the art and future trends. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1273–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, B.; Zhao, P.; Hu, K.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, G. Dissolution of cellulose in aqueous NaOH/urea solution: Role of urea. Cellulose 2014, 21, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayseri, G.Ö.; Bozdoğan, F.; Hes, L. Performance properties of regenerated cellulose fibers. Text. Appar. 2010, 20, 208–212. [Google Scholar]
- Maher, R.R.; Warsman, R.H. The Chemistry of Textile Fibers, 2nd ed.; Printing; Royal Society Chem.: London, UK, 2015; pp. 127–128. ISBN 978-1-78262-023-5. [Google Scholar]
- Abu-Rous, M.; Cafuta, D.; Schuster, K.C. The role of the enhanced moisture absorption of regenerated cellulose fibers (MMCF) in textile comfort and the thermoregulation of the body. Lenzing. Berichte 2023, 98, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
- Oprea, M.; Voicu, S.I. Recent advances in composites based on cellulose derivatives for biomedical applications. Carbohyd. Polym. 2020, 247, 116683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kreze, T.; Jeler, S.; Strnad, S. Correlation between structure characteristics and adsorption properties of regenerated cellulose fibers. Mater. Res. Innov. 2002, 5, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gizaw, M.; Thompson, J.; Faglie, A.; Lee, S.Y.; Neuenschwander, P.; Chou, S.F. Electrospun fibers as a dressing material for drug and biological agent delivery in wound healing applications. Bioengineering 2018, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zemljič, L.F.; Kreže, T.; Strnad, S.; Šauperl, O.; Vesel, A. Functional Vellulose Fibers for Hygienic and Medical Applications. In Textiles: Types, Uses and Production Methods; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 467–487. [Google Scholar]
- de Araújo, A.M., Jr.; Braido, G.; Saska, S.; Barud, H.S.; Franchi, L.P.; Assunção, R.M.; Scarel-Caminaga, R.M.; Capote, T.S.O.; Messaddeq, Y.; Ribeiro, S.J. Regenerated cellulose scaffolds: Preparation, characterization and toxicological evaluation. Carbohyd. Polym. 2016, 136, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suñol, J.J.; Miralpeix, D.; Saurina, J.; Carrillo, F.; Colom, X. Thermal behavior of cellulose fibers with enzymatic or Na2CO3 treatment. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2005, 80, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, S.; Hillyer, M.B.; Condon, B.D. Method for identifying the triple transition (glass transition-dehydration-crystallization) of amorphous cellulose in cotton. Carbohyd. Polym. 2020, 228, 115374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huson, M.; Denham, C. The Glass Transition of Cotton. Cotton Fibres 2017, 43, 354. [Google Scholar]
- Roseveare, W.E.; Waller, R.C.; Wilson, J.N. Structure and Properties of Regenerated Cellulose. Text. Res. J. 1948, 18, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rebenfeld, L. Fibers and fibrous materials. In Textile Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; Volume 3, pp. 199–232. [Google Scholar]
- Latif, W.; Basit, A.; Rehman, A.; Ashraf, M.; Iqbal, K.; Jabbar, A.; Baig, S.A.; Maqsood, S. Study of mechanical and comfort properties of modal with cotton and regenerated fibers blended woven fabrics. J. Nat. Fibers 2019, 16, 836–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kıvrak, N.M.; Ozdıl, N.; Mengüç, G.S. Characteristics of the yarns spun from regenerated cellulosic fibers. Text. Appar. 2018, 28, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Shen, Y.; Edgar, K.J.; Yang, G.; Shao, H. Influence of cross-section shape on structure and properties of Lyocell fibers. Cellulose 2021, 28, 1191–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udomkichdecha, W.; Chiarakorn, S.; Potiyaraj, P. Relationships between fibrillation behavior of lyocell fibers and their physical properties. Text. Res. J. 2002, 72, 939–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, D.; Zhao, R.; Sarwar, M.I.; Ning, X. Cellulose-Based Nanofibers Electrospun from Cuprammonium Solutions. Preprint, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yimin, Q. Medical Textile Materials, 1st ed.; Elsevier, Textile Institute: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Rajendran, S.; Anand, S.C. Developments in Medical Textiles. Text. Prog. 2002, 32, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adanur, S. Wellington Sears Handbook of Industrial Textiles; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Anand, S.C. Medical Textile. In Proceedings of the 2nd international Conference, Bolton, UK, 24–25 August 1999; Anand, S.C., Ed.; Bolton Institute: Bolton, UK, 1999; pp. 1–256. [Google Scholar]
- Zhezhova, S.; Jordeva, S.; Golomeova Longurova, S.G.; Jovanov, S. Application of Technical Textile in Medicine. Tekst. Ind. 2021, 2, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guru, R.; Kumar, A.; Grewal, D.; Kumar, R. Study of the Implantable and Non-Implantable Application in Medical Textile. In Next-Generation Textiles; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Medival Textile by Orgiline. Available online: https://leartex.com/medical-textile/ (accessed on 21 July 2024).
- Tu, H.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Luo, L.; Duan, B.; Zhang, R. Recent progress in regenerated cellulose-based fibers from alkali/urea system via spinning process. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 296, 119942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.C.; Kim, D.; Lee, J.Y.; Zhai, L.; Kim, J. Effect of Wet Spinning and Stretching to Enhance Mechanical Properties of Cellulose Nanofiber Filament. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2019, 6, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alistair, J.R.; Subhash, C.A. Medical textiles. In Handbook of Technical Textiles; Bolton Institute: Bolton, UK, 2001; pp. 407–424. [Google Scholar]
- Parvin, F.; Islam, I.; Urmy, Z.; Ahmed, S. A study on the textile materials applied in human medical treatment. Eur. J. Physiother. Rehabil. Stud. 2020, 1, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudary, S.N.; Borkar, S.P. Textiles for extracorporeal devices. Indian Text. J. 2009, 65, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
- Medical Textiles Market Report by Product Type (Non-Woven, Knitted, Woven, and Others), Application (Implantable Goods, Non-Implantable Goods, Healthcare & Hygiene Products, and Others), and Region 2024–2032. Available online: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5946655/medical-textiles-market-report-product-type-non (accessed on 21 July 2024).
- Medical Textiles Market Report by Product Type (Non-Woven, Knitted, Woven, and Others), Application (Implantable Goods, Non-Implantable Goods, Healthcare & Hygiene Products, and Others), and Region 2024–2032. Available online: https://www.marketresearch.com/IMARC-v3797/Medical-Textiles-Product-Type-Non-36504686/ (accessed on 21 July 2024).
- Cullen, B.; Watt, P.W.; Lundqvist, C.; Silcock, D.; Schmidt, R.J.; Bogan, D.; Light, N.D. The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in chronic wound repair and its potential mechanism of action. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002, 34, 1544–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, Y.; Ye, D.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Huang, W.; Zhang, N.; Liu, S.; Zhang, L. Effectively promoting wound healing with cellulose/gelatin sponges constructed directly from a cellulose solution. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 7518–7528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chowdhury, N.A.; Al-Jumaily, A.M. Regenerated cellulose/polypyrrole/silver nanoparticles/ionic liquid composite films for potential wound healing applications. Wound Med. 2016, 14, 16–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abitbol, T.; Rivkin, A.; Cao, Y.; Nevo, Y.; Abraham, E.; Ben-Shalom, T.; Lapidot, S.; Shoseyov, O. Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 39, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Randhawa, A.; Dutta, S.D.; Ganguly, K.; Patil, T.V.; Patel, D.K.; Lim, K.T. A review of properties of nanocellulose, its synthesis, and potential in biomedical applications. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maharjan, B.; Park, J.; Kaliannagounder, V.K.; Awasthi, G.P.; Joshi, M.K.; Park, C.H.; Kim, C.S. Regenerated cellulose nanofiber reinforced chitosan hydrogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Carbohyd. Polym. 2021, 251, 117023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamel, D.; Khan, A.U.; Khan, A.N.; Waris, A.; Ilyas, M.; Ali, A.; Baset, A. Regenerated Cellulose and Composites for Biomedical Applications. In Regenerated Cellulose and Composites: Morphology-Property Relationship; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 265–311. [Google Scholar]
- Credou, J.; Berthelot, T. Cellulose: From biocompatible to bioactive material. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 4767–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kamel, S.A.; Khattab, T. Recent advances in cellulose-based biosensors for medical diagnosis. Biosensors 2020, 10, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anusiya, G.; Jaiganesh, R. A review on fabrication methods of nanofibers and a special focus on application of cellulose nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2022, 4, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meftahi, A.; Momeni Heravi, M.E.; Barhoum, A.; Samyn, P.; Najarzadeh, H.; Alibakhshi, S. Cellulose nanofibers: Synthesis, unique properties, and emerging applications. In Handbook of Nanocelluloses: Classification, Properties, Fabrication, and Emerging Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 233–262. [Google Scholar]
- Baye, B.; Tesfaye, T. The new generation fibers: A review of high performance and specialty fibers. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 9221–9235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michud, A.; Tanttu, M.; Asaadi, S.; Ma, Y.; Netti, E.; Kääriainen, P.; Persson, A.; Berntsson, A.; Hummel, M.; Sixta, H. Ioncell-F: Ionic liquid-based cellulosic textile fibers as an alternative to viscose and Lyocell. Text. Res. J. 2016, 86, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, E. Ioncell Fibres from Alternative Cellulose Sources for Nonwovens. Master’s Thesis, Kemian Tekniikan Korkeakoulu, Espoo, Finland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Elsayed, S.; Hellsten, S.; Guizani, C.; Witos, J.; Rissanen, M.; Rantamäki, A.H.; Varis, P.; Wiedmer, S.K.; Sixta, H. Recycling of superbase-based ionic liquid solvents for the production of textile-grade regenerated cellulose fibers in the lyocell process. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 14217–14227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Fan, W.; Miao, Y.; Dou, H.; Shi, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Hou, L.; Yu, X.; Lam, S.S.; et al. Closed-loop recycling of colored regenerated cellulose fibers from the dyed cotton textile waste. Cellulose 2023, 30, 2597–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Tian, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, L.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, Q. A Cost-Effective and Chemical-Recycling Approach for Facile Preparation of Regenerated Cellulose Materials. Nano Lett. 2024. 24, 9074–9081. [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Liu, S.; Liu, T.; Liu, T.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H. Eco-friendly post-consumer cotton waste recycling for regenerated cellulose fibers. Carbohyd. Polym. 2019, 206, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, C.; Wang, H.; Bu, F.; Cui, Q.; Li, J.; Liang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Yi, C. A regenerated cellulose fiber with high mechanical properties for temperature-adaptive thermal management. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 274, 133550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.enicbcmed.eu/sites/default/files/2023-01/A%20Study%20on%20technologies%20for%20recycling%20and%20re-use%20of%20textile%20scraps%20-%20TMA%20WP6.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2024).
- Forsberg, D.C.R.; Bengtsson, J.; Hollinger, N.; Kaldéus, T. Towards Sustainable Viscose-to-Viscose Production: Strategies for Recycling of Viscose Fibres. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Peng, J.; Liu, X.; Song, D.; Xu, W.; Zhu, K. Dissolving waste viscose to spin cellulose fibers. Polymers 2021, 237, 124349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- dos Santos, R.F.; Oliveira, F.R.; Rocha, M.R.D.; Velez, R.A.; Steffens, F. Reinforced cementitious composite using viscose rayon fiber from textile industry waste. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2022, 17, 15589250221115722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heikkilä, P.; Määttänen, M.; Jetsu, P.; Kamppuri, T.; Paunonen, S. Nonwovens from Mechanically Recycled Fibres for Medical Applications; VTT Research Report No. VTT-R-00923-20; VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland: Espoo, Finland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Lakshmanan, S.O.; Raghavendran, G. Regenerated Sustainable Fibres. In Sustainable Innovations in Textile Fibres. Textile Science and Clothing Technology; Muthu, S., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.; Fan, W.; Wang, H.; Shi, Y.; Wang, S.; Liew, R.K.; Ge, S. Recycling of bast textile wastes into high value-added products: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 3747–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wojciechowska, P. Fibres and textiles in the circular economy. In Fundamentals of Natural Fibres and Textiles; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 691–717. [Google Scholar]
- Bracciale, M.P.; de Caprariis, B.; Musivand, S.; Damizia, M.; De Filippis, P. Chemical Recycling of Cellulose Acetate Eyewear Industry Waste by Hydrothermal Treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2024, 63, 5078–5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues Filho, G.; Monteiro, D.S.; da Silva Meireles, C.; de Assunção, R.M.N.; Cerqueira, D.A.; Barud, H.S.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Messadeq, Y. Synthesis and characterization of cellulose acetate produced from recycled newspaper. Carbohyd. Polym. 2008, 73, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiji, S.; Maharajan, K.; Kadirvelu, K. Recent developments of bacterial nanocellulose porous scaffolds in biomedical applications. Nanocellulose Mater. 2022, 83–104. [Google Scholar]
- Farahani, M.; Shafiee, A. Wound healing: From passive to smart dressings. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2100477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boateng, J.S.; Matthews, K.H.; Stevens, H.N.; Eccleston, G.M. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: A review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 2892–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.K.; Chinnappan, A.; Jayathilaka, W.A.D.M.; Gosh, R.; Baskar, C.; Ramakrishna, S. Challenges and potential solutions for 100% recycling of medical textiles. Mater. Circ. Econ. 2021, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prete, S.; Dattilo, M.; Patitucci, F.; Pezzi, G.; Parisi, O.I.; Puoci, F. Natural and synthetic polymeric biomaterials for application in wound management. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Property | Regenerated Cellulose Fibers (Viscose, Lyocell, Modal, and Acetate) | Synthetic Fibers (Polypropylene and Polyester) | Natural Fibers (Cotton and Silk) | Scientific References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cost-effectiveness | Moderate cost, relatively inexpensive production due to large-scale manufacturing. | Low cost, very cheap due to petrochemical origin and established production lines. | High cost for premium fibers like silk; cotton can vary in price depending on the quality. | [19,20,21] |
Biodegradability | Highly biodegradable (especially lyocell and viscose); reduces environmental impact in disposable medical products. | Non-biodegradable; contributes to long-term environmental pollution (plastic waste). | Biodegradable, but cotton production has a significant environmental footprint (e.g., water usage). | [19,20,21] |
Biocompatibility | Excellent biocompatibility due to cellulose origin; minimal risk of allergic reactions or irritation. | Variable; some synthetic fibers may cause skin irritation or inflammation, especially in sensitive patients. | High biocompatibility; natural fibers like silk are hypoallergenic, but cotton can sometimes be harsh on sensitive skin. | [21,22,23] |
Absorbency | Excellent moisture absorption (e.g., lyocell and viscose); ideal for wound care and surgical dressings. | Poor moisture absorption; tends to repel liquids, which is useful in some protective textiles but not for wound care. | High absorbency (especially cotton); suitable for certain medical textiles but not as specialized as cellulose fibers. | [21,22,23] |
Sterilization compatibility | Can be sterilized via autoclaving, gamma radiation, and other methods without losing structural integrity (except acetate). | Excellent for sterilization; resistant to degradation by most sterilization methods. | Natural fibers like cotton can be sterilized but may lose structural integrity or shrink over time. Silk is more delicate in sterilization. | [19,20,22] |
Environmental sustainability | High sustainability (especially lyocell with closed-loop processing); lower chemical and energy inputs than synthetic fibers. | Poor sustainability due to petrochemical base and non-renewable resources used in production. | Mixed; cotton production is water-intensive, but silk is more environmentally friendly in small-scale production. | [19,20,23] |
Patient comfort | Soft, breathable, and skin-friendly; suitable for long-term wear in medical garments and wound dressings. | Less breathable and can cause skin irritation; often uncomfortable for long-term skin contact (e.g., hospital gowns). | High comfort for silk, but cotton can sometimes cause friction on sensitive or healing skin. | [21,22,23] |
Applications in the medical field | Used in wound dressings, surgical swabs, hygiene products, and biodegradable implants due to biocompatibility and absorbency. | Used in protective clothing, surgical masks, and other disposable medical products, but less suitable for direct skin contact. | Used in traditional bandages, sutures (silk), and some medical textiles, but less common in advanced medical applications. | [20,21,23] |
Durability | Moderate durability; can be engineered for strength in specific medical applications (e.g., lyocell scaffolds). | High durability; long-lasting and tear-resistant, ideal for protective gear like surgical drapes. | Variable; silk is strong but delicate, while cotton is less durable in clinical use due to wear and tear. | [19,20,22] |
Antimicrobial functionalization | Can be functionalized with antimicrobial agents (e.g., silver and iodine) for advanced wound care applications. | Often treated with antimicrobial agents, but additives may leach over time or be toxic. | Silk has natural antibacterial properties, while cotton may require treatment to gain antimicrobial properties. | [19,21,22] |
Characteristic | Cotton | Viscose Rayon | Modal | Lyocell | Tencel | Cupro | Acetate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Density, g/cm3 | 1.52 | 1.46–1.54 | 1.53 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.29–1.33 |
Tenacity, cN/tex | 19.5–35 | 8.8–24 | 34 | 30–45 | 36–44 | 9–28 | 12.8 |
Moisture regain, % | 7–8 | 11–14 | 11.8 | 10–13 | 11 | 11–12.5 | 6–7 |
Elongation, % | 7–14 | 17–30 | 12 | 12–18 | 16–18 | 6–25 | 24 |
Crystallinity, % | 60–70 | 30–40 | 40–48 | 50–65 | 50–65 | 30–40 | 20–30 |
Circularity of fiber cross-section * | 0.4–0.8 | 0.5–0.8 | closer to 1 | approaching 1 | approaching 1 | 0.7–0.9 | Lower circularity |
Type of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers Used | Application Areas |
---|---|
Viscose and lyocell | Absorbent pad for wound care |
Viscose, lyocell, and modal | Wound-contact layer |
Viscose | Base material for wound care |
Viscose and lyocell | Base material for pads and bandages |
Viscose and lyocell | Simple bandages |
Viscose and lyocell | High-support bandages |
Viscose and lyocell | Compression bandages |
Viscose and lyocell | Orthopedical bandages |
Viscose | Plasters |
Viscose and lyocell | Gauze dressing |
Viscose and cotton linters | Wadding |
Cotton linters | Virus removal filter |
Type of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers Used | Application Areas |
---|---|
Viscose | sutures |
Viscose, lyocell, and Ioncell | surgical meshes, e.g., for hernia |
Lyocell, cupro, and Ioncell | scaffolds for tissue engineering |
Modal | surgical dressings |
Acetate | controlled drug release systems |
Acetate | biodegradable meshes |
Cupro | surgical textiles |
Type of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers Used | Application Areas | Function |
---|---|---|
Hollow viscose | artificial kidney | remove waste products from patients’ blood |
Hollow viscose | artificial liver | separate and dispose of patients’ plasma, and supply fresh plasma |
Viscose, lyocell, and modal | hemodialysis membranes | the selective filtration of waste products from the blood |
Viscose, lyocell, modal, and acetate | peritoneal dialysis | to facilitate the exchange of waste products and electrolytes through the peritoneal membrane |
Viscose, lyocell, and modal | plasma filters | for removing proteins, toxins, and other unwanted substances from the blood |
Viscose, lyocell, and modal | dialyzer units | for both hemodialysis and hemofiltration |
Type of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers Used | Application Areas | Structure of the Fabric |
---|---|---|
Viscose | Surgical caps | Nonwoven |
Viscose | Surgical masks | Nonwoven |
Superabsorbent fibers and wood fluff, modal, lyocell, and acetate | Absorbent layer for incontinence diaper/sheet | Nonwoven |
Viscose and lyocell, modal, and cupro | Surgical swabs, drapes, and cloths/wipes, | Nonwoven |
Fiber Type | Primary Medical Application | Advantages | Challenges | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Viscose rayon | Wound care and surgical sponges | High absorbency and cost-effective | Residual chemicals from production | [21] |
Cupro | Bandages and medical textiles | Soft and hypoallergenic | Copper residue may require further purification | [152] |
Modal | Patient garments and hospital bedding | Durable and moisture-wicking | Moderate cost | [20] |
Lyocell | Advanced wound dressings and tissue scaffolds | Biodegradable and high absorbency | Limited production capacity | [153] |
Acetate | Medical packaging and drug delivery systems | Good barrier properties and biocompatible | Low absorbency | [154] |
Characteristic | Nanocellulose Fiber | Regenerated Cellulose Nanofibers (RCNFs) | Bioactive Cellulose Fibers | Electrospun Cellulose Nanofibers | Lyocell-like Fibers | Ioncell |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Density, g/cm3 | 1.5–1.6 | 1.5–1.6 | 1.5–1.6 | 1.5–1.6 | 1.48–1.52 | 1.5 |
Tenacity, cN/tex | 1 × 108–2 × 108 | 1 × 108–2 × 108 | 0.8 × 108–1.5 × 108 | 0.5 × 108–1.5 × 108 | 40–60 | 20.5–36.5 |
Moisture regain, % | 10–15 | 10–15 | 8–15 | 8–15 | 10–15 | 10–12 |
Elongation, % | 5–10 | 5–10 | 5–10 | 5–10 | 10–20 | 7–13 |
Crystallinity, % | 70–90 | 70–90 | 60–90 | 70–90 | 40–55 | 50–60 |
Circularity of fiber cross-section * | Close to 1 | Close to 1 | Close to 1 | Close to 1 | 0.8–1 | 0.7–0.9. |
Challenge | Description |
---|---|
Biocompatibility | Allergic reactions: Despite being generally biocompatible, some individuals may experience allergic reactions or sensitivities to regenerated cellulose fibers. |
Infection risk: Medical-grade regenerated cellulose fibers must be carefully processed to minimize the risk of infections or inflammatory responses. | |
Contamination and sterilization | Sterilization: Regenerated cellulose fibers used in medical applications must withstand sterilization processes (such as autoclaving or gamma irradiation) without degrading. Some fibers may degrade or lose their properties during these processes. |
Contamination: Ensuring the fibers are free from contaminants and pathogens is crucial, especially for applications like wound dressings and surgical materials. | |
Mechanical properties | Strength and durability: Some regenerated cellulose fibers may lack the mechanical strength and durability required for certain medical applications, such as surgical sutures and implants. |
Wear and tear: Medical textiles made from regenerated cellulose can be prone to wear and tear, which can impact their performance and safety. | |
Environmental impact | Environmental sustainability: The production of regenerated cellulose fibers involves the use of chemicals and processes that can have significant environmental impacts. Addressing the sustainability of these processes is crucial. |
Recycling: Recycling regenerated cellulose fibers, particularly those used in medical applications, poses challenges due to contamination and the need for specialized recycling systems. | |
Cost and economic viability | Cost: Regenerated cellulose fibers can be more expensive than other materials, particularly when high purity and specific properties are required for medical use. |
Economic viability: Balancing cost with the need for high-performance medical textiles can be challenging, especially in low-resource settings. | |
Process and quality control | Consistency and quality control: Ensuring consistency in fiber quality and performance is critical for medical applications, where variations can impact safety and efficacy. |
Manufacturing process: The complexity of manufacturing processes for regenerated cellulose fibers can affect their quality and performance. |
Category | Potential/Benefit | Emerging Technologies | Example | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine | RCFs like lyocell and bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) serve as scaffolds due to their porosity, strength, and biocompatibility. | Three-dimensional bioprinting enables customizable tissue scaffolds for skin regeneration and bone tissue. | Lyocell is explored for bone scaffolds, reducing recovery times in orthopedic surgeries. | [181] |
Smart wound dressings and wearable biosensors | Smart textiles with biosensors can monitor wound environment (pH, temperature, and moisture) in real time. | Wearable devices using RCFs with embedded electronics reduce the need for frequent inspections. | Lyocell-based smart wound dressings transmit real-time data to healthcare providers, reducing hospital visits. | [182] |
Drug delivery systems | RCFs (e.g., cupro and lyocell) allow for localized, controlled drug release, improving patient compliance. | Drug-eluting fibers release therapeutic agents over time, aiding in chronic wound care. | Cupro fibers in curcumin-loaded dressings for diabetic ulcers promoting healing and offering sustained drug release. | [183] |
Biodegradability and waste reduction | RCFs are biodegradable, breaking down without leaving harmful residues, and reducing medical waste. | RCFs in disposable medical textiles (e.g., gowns and bandages) help reduce plastic waste. | Lyocell gowns and drapes degrade faster than synthetic alternatives. | [184] |
Sustainable production processes | RCFs like lyocell use closed-loop processes where chemicals are recovered and recycled, reducing environmental impact. | Closed-loop production recycles over 99% of the solvent used, making lyocell eco-friendly. | Lyocell fiber production is a model for sustainable practices, aligning with global healthcare eco-initiatives. | [185] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Varnaitė-Žuravliova, S.; Baltušnikaitė-Guzaitienė, J. Properties, Production, and Recycling of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers: Special Medical Applications. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15110348
Varnaitė-Žuravliova S, Baltušnikaitė-Guzaitienė J. Properties, Production, and Recycling of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers: Special Medical Applications. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2024; 15(11):348. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15110348
Chicago/Turabian StyleVarnaitė-Žuravliova, Sandra, and Julija Baltušnikaitė-Guzaitienė. 2024. "Properties, Production, and Recycling of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers: Special Medical Applications" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 15, no. 11: 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15110348
APA StyleVarnaitė-Žuravliova, S., & Baltušnikaitė-Guzaitienė, J. (2024). Properties, Production, and Recycling of Regenerated Cellulose Fibers: Special Medical Applications. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 15(11), 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15110348