Next Article in Journal
Rifabutin-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers as a Tool in Oral Anti-Mycobacterial Treatment of Crohn’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Nanostructured and Spiky Gold Shell Growth on Magnetic Particles for SERS Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oxygen Content-Controllable Synthesis of Non-Stoichiometric Silicon Suboxide Nanoparticles by Electrochemical Anodization

Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(11), 2137; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112137
Submission received: 8 October 2020 / Revised: 23 October 2020 / Accepted: 23 October 2020 / Published: 27 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Synthesis, Interfaces and Nanostructures)

Abstract

:
A facile route to producing non-stoichiometric silicon suboxide nanoparticles (SiOx NPs, 0 < x < 1) with an adjustable oxygen content is proposed. The process is based on electrochemical anodization involving the application of a strong electric field near the surface of a Si electrode to directly convert the Si electrode into SiOx NPs. The difference in ion mobility between oxygen species (O2− and OH), formed during anodization, causes the production of non-stoichiometric SiOx on the surface of the Si while, simultaneously, fluoride ions in the electrolyte solution etch the formed SiOx layer, generating NPs under the intense electric field. The adjustment of the applied voltage and anodization temperature alters the oxygen content and the size of the SiOx NPs, respectively, allowing the characteristics of the NPs to be readily controlled. The proposed approach can be applied for mass production of SiOx NPs and is highly promising in the field of batteries and optoelectronics.

1. Introduction

Nanoparticles are highly valuable for an extensive range of applications due to their high specific surface area. Silicon suboxide nanoparticles (SiOx NPs, 0 < x < 1), in particular, exhibit unique electrical, optical, chemical, and mechanical properties, allowing the particles to be actively used as semiconductors and a coating material [1,2,3]. The properties of SiOx NPs are heavily dependent on the oxidation state of the Si [4,5,6], which determines the oxygen content of the NPs.
SiOx NPs are being studied largely for their application as the anode material in lithium-ion batteries to potentially meet the high demand for batteries with higher capacity and longer service life [1,4,7,8,9]. Currently, the batteries are reported to have a high charge capacity [2,10,11,12] and a low volume expansion ratio [8,13]. Lithium oxides (e.g., Li2O and Li4SiO4), produced by Li ion insertion into SiOx during initial charging, serve to buffer volume changes, improving charge cycle performance [14,15]. It has been previously reported that the charge capacity and coulombic efficiency increase while the cyclability of the batteries decreases as the oxygen content of SiOx NPs decreases [4,8,10,13]. Therefore, the optimal oxygen content of SiOx NPs must be considered in order to produce efficient lithium-ion batteries.
SiOx NPs are also commonly applied as anti-reflective coating due to their attractive optical properties [16,17]. Many studies have found that the refractive index of SiOx decreases as the oxygen content increases [3,18]. Therefore, being able to alter the oxygen content of SiOx NPs allows the refractive index of the NPs to be controllable and, with adjustable refractive index, applications of SiOx NPs are diverse in the field of optics. Furthermore, the anti-reflectivity of SiOx NPs is not limited to a particular wavelength; the NPs can improve the photovoltaic efficiency at various wavelengths [6,19].
The excellent passivating property of SiOx NPs also makes the NPs suitable for incorporation into organic light-emitting diodes [3,6,20]. SiOx NPs are chemically and mechanically stable in general, but by adjusting the oxygen content of the NPs, the reactivity of the NPs can be increased. In addition, SiOx NPs have abundant oxygen vacancies, allowing the NPs to be potentially utilized as a sensing material [21,22,23]. Oxygen vacancies become more prevalent and electrical conductivity increases as the oxygen content of SiOx NPs decreases [24,25]. Both the passivating and insulating properties of SiOx play an important role in determining the sensitivity and selectivity of gas sensing, thus, synthesizing SiOx NPs with adjustable oxygen content is highly important.
Si is not very reactive at low temperatures; therefore, conventional SiOx NPs synthesis procedures involve high-temperature reactions. The high-temperature reactions can be classified into two categories: melting-condensation [9] and chemical vapor deposition [1,2,4]. In the former, Si (or Si mixed with silica) is melted and oxygen is injected. The formed molten SiOx is then evaporated, after which, the vaporized SiOx is condensed rapidly and extracted in the form of NPs. In the chemical vapor deposition reaction, microwave is used to induce the plasma state of Si-based precursors, allowing oxygen to be deposited into Si. Non-stoichiometric SiOx is created by altering the pressure and the amount of oxygen present during the reaction, and the volatile molecules are extracted as NPs. Nonetheless, both approaches have difficulties fabricating SiOx particles smaller than 200 nm, are highly time-consuming, and require complicated setups for housing high-temperature systems.
In this paper, we propose the use of anodization, an electrochemical process, to synthesize SiOx NPs with adjustable oxygen content. Anodization is typically employed to fabricate a uniform nanostructured (nanotubular or nanoporous) oxide layer on metallic surfaces [26,27,28,29]. The two key reactions required to form nanostructures are oxidation and etching. When a metal surface is oxidized, etching agents in the electrolyte react with the oxide layer to form nanostructures. A recent study reported that metal oxide NPs can be directly obtained from anodizing metal wires [30]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no attempts to synthesize oxide NPs from anodizing poorly conductive metalloids like Si. In addition, unlike the previously synthesized metal-based NPs (e.g., Al2O3, TiO2, ZrO2, etc.), the SiOx NPs synthesized in this work are non-stoichiometric. The anodization process provides multiple advantages, such as immediacy, simplicity, capability to synthesize at low temperatures, and economic efficiency, over the conventional procedures. In this study, we have successfully synthesized SiOx NPs with adjustable oxygen content and size, and the NPs will have significant applications in the fields of batteries and optoelectronics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Doped Si is conductive enough to allow for anodization. P-type Si is generally used, but n-type Si can also be employed under specific illumination conditions [31,32]. To simplify the experimental process, boron-doped p-type Si wafers (<100>) with a resistance of 0.001–0.003 Ω cm (Tasco, Miami, FL, USA) were used in this work. In order to generate a very intense electric field adjacent to Si, the wafers were cut into 1.0 mm × 0.5 mm thin rods with a high aspect ratio by arc discharging in water. Halogen elements are generally used as etching agents, thus, in this study, fluorine anions from reagent-grade ammonium fluoride (NH4F) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were chosen. The electrolyte solution was prepared with deionized (DI) water.

2.2. SiOx NPs Preparation

Prior to anodization, Si rods were sonicated in acetone and ethanol for 5 min each, followed by rinsing with DI water to remove any impurities present on the surfaces of the rods. The rods were then dried under a nitrogen stream and no further treatments were performed on the rods. Anodization was performed in 10 M NH4F aqueous solution with a typical two-electrode setup employing a Si rod as the anode and a platinum sheet (10 mm × 40 mm × 0.5 mm) as the cathode (Figure 1a). The two electrodes were placed 10 mm apart and a voltage was applied with a 900 W DC power supply (OPS-3003, ODA Technologies, Incheon, Korea). The anodization process was carried out at a temperature that was kept constant using a thermostatic bath (RW-3040G, Lab. Companion, Daejeon, Korea) and was maintained for 1 h. During anodization, NPs could be observed precipitating. After anodization, the NPs were extracted by vacuum filtration. The NPs were then rinsed thoroughly with DI water and dried in a desiccator at room temperature under vacuum.

2.3. Characterization

The synthesized NPs and the surface morphology of a Si rod before and after anodization were characterized using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Magellan400, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The size of the NPs was determined from FESEM images collectively containing at least 100 particles utilizing the ImageJ software (Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA) [33]. The elemental composition of the anodized Si rod surface was deduced using an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX) equipped with the FESEM. Further investigation into the morphology and crystallinity of the NPs were carried out with a transmission electron microscope (TEM, Titan cubed G2 60-300, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Chemical bonds present in the NPs were analyzed with an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, K-alpha, Thermo VG Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for Al Kα radiation (1486.7 eV).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Silicon Oxide NPs

Electrochemical anodization was performed on a Si rod at a constant voltage and temperature of 7.5 V and 10 °C, respectively. After completion of the process, the surface of the Si rod was examined for any changes. It was visibly noticeable that the rod became shorter and lost its luster due to etching and oxidation, respectively (digital photographs shown beside Figure 1b,c). Figure 1b,c shows FESEM images of the surface of the Si rod before and after anodization. The initially smooth surface of the rod became highly rough after anodization. EDX spectrum, shown in Figure 1d, confirms that the roughness indeed arises from the silicon oxide layer that has formed on the surface of the rod. The anodization experiment was then repeated, but at different voltages of 7.5, 10.0, and 12.5 V. The temperature at which the process was carried out was also set to 5 °C to mitigate the local heat buildup resulting from the high electrical resistance of Si. In all cases, precipitation was observed; Figure 2a shows that the formed precipitate consists of individual particles with a size of less than 100 nm. The intense electric field near the Si surface allows the silicon oxide layer to be extracted as NPs. The obtained FESEM image was adjusted to have high contrast for size distribution analysis. Each particle was assumed to be spherical and the diameter of each particle was calculated using ImageJ. From the high contrast image, as shown in Figure S1, it was determined that the NPs were approximately 41.4, 62.2, and 71.8 nm in diameter with only a slight variance when synthesized at constant voltages of 7.5, 10.0, and 12.5 V, respectively (Figure 2d). A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that the local electrolyte temperature changes as the applied voltage varies due to Joule heating becoming more prevalent as the voltage rises. Investigation into the crystallinity of particles suggests that the particles have no specific crystallographic orientation as shown in the high-resolution TEM image (Figure 2b). The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern, shown in the inset of Figure 2b, further confirms that the particles are amorphous. The XPS measurement of the synthesized particles was collected to identify the elements present; prominent Si and O peaks can be observed in the XPS spectrum (Figure 2c). The wt% of Si and O vary slightly with the applied voltage (Table S1). The result supports that the particles are SiOx. The observable carbon peaks near 285 eV can be attributed to the membrane filter utilized to extract the particles and the copper tape used during the XPS measurement, and the sharp peak near 150 eV can be attributed to plasmons [34]. No peaks corresponding to the presence of nitrogen and fluorine, two elements found in the electrolyte, can be observed. From these results, it can be concluded that SiOx NPs can be directly synthesized via anodization.

3.2. Control of Oxygen Content in SiOx NPs

The oxygen content of SiOx can be described as the average oxidation number of Si. The oxidation number is expressed as the x-value in “SiOx”. The x-value has a significant effect on the properties of SiOx. In Si, the Si atoms are arranged in tetragonal formations with four atoms surrounding an atom. When Si is oxidized, the four surrounding atoms are replaced with O atoms. The number of replacements that occur determines the oxidation number of Si, and this number can range from 0 to 4; the possible resulting states are Si-(Si4), Si-(Si3O), Si-(Si2O2), Si-(SiO3), and Si-(O4). The binding energy varies slightly for each oxidation state. According to the random-bonding model, SiOx is a combination of the five states and is amorphous. In this connected SiOx state, Si-(Si3O), Si-(Si2O2), Si-(SiO3), and Si-(O4) can be expressed as Si2O, SiO, Si2O3, and SiO2, respectively. The frequency distribution of the five oxidation states determines the oxidation number, meaning that the x-value can be adjusted by carefully controlling the production of each oxidation state. Through Si 2p scanning, the x-value can be determined employing the equation given in Equation (1).
x = 0.0 × a + 0.5 × b + 1.0 × c + 1.5 × d + 2.0 × e a + b + c + d + e ,
where a, b, c, d, and e are the peak areas of Si0, Si1+, Si2+, Si3+, and Si4+ peaks, respectively. There are two distinguishable Si0 peaks resulting from spin-orbital splitting into Si 2p1/2 and Si 2p3/2; the peak ratio between these two peaks is approximately 1:2, respectively [34]. Table 1 provides Si 2p peak information for each oxidation state. The binding energy of each peak varies slightly with the x-value, but the variance is insignificant [35].
Si 2p spectra, shown in Figure 3, visualizes the chemical-bond distributions of SiOx NPs synthesized at different anodization voltages. All spectra were referred to the C 1s line (285 eV). Six peaks can be found in each spectrum with the highest peaks located near 99 and 103 eV, the former of which corresponds to the amalgamation of Si 2p1/2 and Si 2p3/2 peaks. The presence of these two prominent peaks are attributed to Si–Si bonding and O–Si–O bonding. Much less noticeable peaks can be found near 100, 101, and 102 eV, indicating relatively little formation of Si2O, SiO, and Si2O3. Thus, the result supports that the most frequent oxidation state present in the NPs is the +4 (SiO2) state, excluding the zero-oxidation state. This uneven formation of oxidation states can be explained as SiO2 being the most stable oxidation state. Furthermore, as anodization voltage increases, SiO2 peak becomes even more dominant. The x-values of SiOx synthesized at voltages of 7.5, 10.0, and 12.5 V were calculated to be 0.42 ± 0.05, 0.64 ± 0.09, and 0.89 ± 0.09, respectively, indicating that the oxygen content of SiOx NPs increases with rising anodization voltage.
The mechanism behind the oxygen content change resulting from anodization voltage adjustment is visualized in Figure 4. During anodization, anions of oxygen species (O2− and OH) are created by field-assisted deprotonation of water [26,39,40]. It is generally accepted that ion mobility greatly affects the oxidation process during anodization [41,42]. Ion mobility, in a solution, is directly proportional to the charge of the ion and inversely proportional to the mass of the ion. Thus, O2− ions are transported much more quickly than OH under a constant electric field. This difference in mobility between the two anions leads to the observed variations in oxygen content of SiOx. As depicted in Figure 4a, at a low voltage, the low electric field produces little O2−, while also allowing the formed anions to recombine with H3O+. In addition, there is not a significant difference in mobility between the two aforementioned anions under low electric field. These two factors permit OH to readily bond with Si without having to compete with O2−, leading to the formation of Si–OH bonds, which are very soluble in the aqueous solution. Figure 4b shows that as the voltage rises, the electric field increases, producing more anions and increasing the mobility difference between O2− and OH. With the higher mobility, O2− outcompetes OH and O–Si–O bonds become more dominant (SiO2 in Figure 3c).

3.3. Size Control of SiOx NPs

When SiOx NPs were synthesized at a voltage and temperature of 7.5 V and 5 °C, respectively, the particles were on average 41.4 nm in diameter. Fabrication at higher temperatures increases the size of the synthesized NPs as shown in Figure 5; when fabricated at the temperatures of 25, 45, and 65 °C, the average sizes of the synthesized NPs were 99.2, 147.0, and 192.3 nm, respectively. Additionally, more spherical NPs were observed as the fabrication temperature rose. The x-value, however, was generally unaffected by the temperature.
Anodization temperature is typically one of the most important factors regarding the morphology of the synthesized oxides. When anodization occurs at a high temperature, the aqueous electrolyte solution has a low viscosity, allowing a high diffusion of F, an etching agent [43]. Consequently, a high etching rate leads to a high oxidation rate [28,43], ultimately resulting in a production of large particles. Thus, through the adjustment of the anodization temperature, the size of the synthesized SiOx NPs can be controlled.

4. Conclusions

Controlling the oxygen content of SiOx NPs allows the NPs to exhibit diverse properties. We successfully synthesized non-stoichiometric SiOx NPs by anodizing a doped Si rod in an aqueous electrolyte solution. A silicon oxide layer formed on the surface of the rod after anodization, indicating that oxidation and etching took place, and the electric field induced near the surface led to the production of NPs. Raising the applied voltage increased the oxygen content of the synthesized SiOx NPs, a phenomenon that can be attributed to the greater generation and higher mobility of O2− in comparison to OH under a high electric field. Furthermore, a higher anodization temperature caused more diffusion of F, subsequently increasing the etching rate and the size of the synthesized NPs significantly. The anodization process, described in this work, is much simpler than the conventional procedures and can be used to quickly mass-produce SiOx NPs by implementing a large number of Si electrodes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/11/2137/s1, Figure S1: FESEM images and their high contrast counterparts of SiOx NPs synthesized at voltages of (a) 7.5 V, (b) 10.0 V, and (c) 12.5 V at a constant temperature of 5 °C, Table S1: Wt% of the elements in SiOx NPs synthesized at voltages of (a) 7.5 V, (b) 10.0 V, and (c) 12.5 V at a constant temperature of 5 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, J.L. and S.O.C.; formal analysis and investigation, J.L., S.Y.L. and H.Y.J.; writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government, grant numbers NRF-2019M2D2A1A02058174 and NRF-2020M2D8A2069727.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jung, C.-O.; Park, D.-W. Synthesis of SiOx Powder Using DC Arc Plasma. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2013, 13, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shin, D.H.; Choi, Y.S.; Ku, D.J.; Hong, Y.C.; Lee, B.J. Synthesis of SiOx Nano-Powders Using a Microwave Plasma Torch at Atmospheric Pressure. Soft Nanosci. Lett. 2016, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tomozeiu, N. Silicon oxide (SiOx, 0 < x < 2): A challenging material for optoelectronics. In Optoelectronics—Materials and Techniques; Predeep, P., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; pp. 55–98. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zarchi, M.; Ahangarani, S. Effect of Oxygen Concentration on the Structure and Optical Properties of SiOx Coatings. Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. 2018, 54, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nesheva, D. Photoluminescence from SiOx layers containing amorphous silicon nanoparticles. Phys. Status Solidi A 2012, 209, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Klingsporn, M.; Kirner, S.; Villringer, C.; Abou-Ras, D.; Costina, I.; Lehmann, M.; Stannowski, B. Resolving the nanostructure of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposited nanocrystalline SiOx layers for application in solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 223104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rahaman, O.; Mortazavi, B.; Rabczuk, T. A first-principles study on the effect of oxygen content on the structural and electronic properties of silicon suboxide as anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 307, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, Z.; Yu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; He, R.; Xu, M.; Feng, S.; Li, S.; Zhou, L.; Mai, L. Silicon oxides: A promising family of anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 285–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jang, B.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, J.S. SiOx Nanoparticles Synthesized by an Evaporation and Condensation Process Using Induction Melting of Silicon and Gas Injection. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2013, 13, 3690–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, J.; Takeda, Y.; Imanishi, N.; Capiglia, C.; Xie, J.Y.; Yamamoto, O. SiOx-based anodes for secondary lithium batteries. Solid State Ion. 2002, 152, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seong, I.W.; Yoon, W.Y. Electrochemical behavior of a silicon monoxide and Li-powder double layer anode cell. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 6143–6147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Duy, N.; Jung, S.; Nga, N.T.; Son, D.N.; Cho, J.; Lee, S.; Lee, W.; Yi, J. The investigation of an amorphous SiOx system for charge storage applications in nonvolatile memory at low temperature process. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2010, 175, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chou, C.-Y.; Hwang, G.S. Lithiation behavior of silicon-rich oxide (SiO1/3): A first-principles study. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3435–3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, L.; Su, T.; Xu, L.; Liu, M.; Du, H.-B. Two-dimensional ultra-thin SiOx (0 < x < 2) nanosheets with long-term cycling stability as lithium ion battery anodes. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 4341–4344. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tie, X.; Han, Q.; Liang, C.; Li, B.; Zai, J.; Qian, X. Si@SiOx/Graphene Nanosheets Composite: Ball Milling Synthesis and Enhanced Lithium Storage Performance. Front. Mater. 2018, 4, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bräuer, G. Large area glass coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 1999, 112, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, W.T.; Boswell, R.; Samoc, M.; Samoc, A.; Wang, R.P. The effect of defects on the optical nonlinearity of thermally poled SiOx thin films. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 5474–5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miyazaki, H. Refractive index and dielectric constant of SiOx films deposited by reactive sputtering. Phys. Chem. Glasses Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. B 2010, 51, 136–137. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, S.; Yao, Y.; Hu, D.; Lian, W.; Qian, H.; Jie, J.; Wei, Q.; Ni, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xie, L. Application of silicon oxide on high efficiency monocrystalline silicon PERC solar cells. Energies 2019, 12, 1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Han, S.; Grozea, D.; Huang, C.; Lu, Z.H.; Wood, R.; Kim, W.Y. Al:SiO thin films for organic light-emitting diodes. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mehonic, A.; Buckwell, M.; Montesi, L.; Munde, M.S.; Gao, D.; Hudziak, S.; Chater, R.J.; Fearn, S.; McPhail, D.; Bosman, M. Nanoscale Transformations in Metastable, Amorphous, Silicon-Rich Silica. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 7486–7493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mehonic, A.; Shluger, A.L.; Gao, D.; Valov, I.; Miranda, E.; Ielmini, D.; Bricalli, A.; Ambrosi, E.; Li, C.; Yang, J.J. Silicon oxide (SiOx): A promising material for resistance switching? Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yuan, Z.; Bariya, M.; Fahad, H.M.; Wu, J.; Han, R.; Gupta, N.; Javey, A. Trace-Level, Multi-Gas Detection for Food Quality Assessment Based on Decorated Silicon Transistor Arrays. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1908385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tsigkourakos, M.; Bousoulas, P.; Aslanidis, V.; Skotadis, E.; Tsoukalas, D. Ultra-Low Power Multilevel Switching with Enhanced Uniformity in Forming Free TiO2−x-Based RRAM with Embedded Pt Nanocrystals. Phys. Status Solidi A 2017, 214, 1700570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lai, Y.; Qiu, W.; Zeng, Z.; Cheng, S.; Yu, J.; Zheng, Q. Resistive switching of plasma-treated zinc oxide nanowires for resistive random access memory. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kim, J.; Kim, B.; Oh, C.; Ryu, J.; Kim, H.; Park, E.; No, K.; Hong, S. Effects of NH4F and distilled water on structure of pores in TiO2 nanotube arrays. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Su, Z.; Zhou, W. Formation, morphology control and applications of anodic TiO2 nanotube arrays. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 8955–8970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sulka, G.D. Highly ordered anodic porous alumina formation by self-organized anodizing. In Nanostructured Materials in Electrochemistry; Eftekhari, A., Ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; Volume 1, pp. 1–116. [Google Scholar]
  29. Park, Y.J.; Ha, J.M.; Ali, G.; Kim, H.J.; Addad, Y.; Cho, S.O. Controlled fabrication of nanoporous oxide layers on zircaloy by anodization. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ali, G.; Park, Y.J.; Kim, J.W.; Cho, S.O. A Green, General, and Ultrafast Route for the Synthesis of Diverse Metal Oxide Nanoparticles with Controllable Sizes and Enhanced Catalytic Activity. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 6112–6122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Canham, L. Handbook of Porous Silicon, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chazalviel, J.-N.; Ozanam, F. Electrochemically formed porous silica. Materials 2011, 4, 825–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moulder, J.F.; Stickle, W.F.; Sobol, P.E.; Bomben, K.D. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, 1st ed.; Chastain, J., Ed.; Perkin-Elmer Corp.: Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  35. Himpsel, F.j.; McFeely, F.R.; Taleb-Ibrahimi, A.; Yarmoff, J.A.; Hollinger, G. Microscopic structure of the SiO2/Si interface. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 38, 6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, W.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, T. Evolution of Si suboxides into Si nanocrystals during rapid thermal annealing as revealed by XPS and Raman studies. J. Cryst. Growth 2009, 311, 1296–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barranco, A.; Mejías, J.A.; Espinós, J.P.; Caballero, A.; Gonzalez-Elipe, A.R.; Yubero, F. Chemical stability of Sin+ species in SiOx (x < 2) thin films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Films 2001, 19, 136–144. [Google Scholar]
  38. López, J.A.L.; Valerdi, D.E.V.; Lara, A.B.; Salgado, G.G.; Hernández-de la Luz, A.D.; Sánchez, A.M.; Gracia, F.J.F.; Dominguez, M.A. Optical and compositional properties of SiOx films deposited by HFCVD: Effect of the hydrogen flow. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 2309–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Roy, P.; Berger, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 nanotubes: Synthesis and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2904–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Radtke, A.; Bal, M.; Jędrzejewski, T. Novel titania nanocoatings produced by anodic oxidation with the use of cyclically changing potential: Their photocatalytic activity and biocompatibility. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Sahrin, N.T.; Nawaz, R.; Kait, C.F.; Lee, S.L.; Wirzal, M.D.H. Visible Light Photodegradation of Formaldehyde over TiO2 Nanotubes Synthesized via Electrochemical Anodization of Titanium Foil. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, F.; Zhang, L.; Metzger, R.M. On the growth of highly ordered pores in anodized aluminum oxide. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 2470–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yin, H.; Liu, H.; Shen, W.Z. The large diameter and fast growth of self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays achieved via electrochemical anodization. Nanotechnology 2009, 21, 035601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) An illustration showing the two-electrode anodization process for SiOx nanoparticle (NP) synthesis. FESEM images of a Si rod surface (b) before and (c) after anodization (digital images shown on the right). (d) EDX spectrum of the Si rod surface after anodization at a constant voltage and temperature of 7.5 V and 10 °C, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) An illustration showing the two-electrode anodization process for SiOx nanoparticle (NP) synthesis. FESEM images of a Si rod surface (b) before and (c) after anodization (digital images shown on the right). (d) EDX spectrum of the Si rod surface after anodization at a constant voltage and temperature of 7.5 V and 10 °C, respectively.
Nanomaterials 10 02137 g001
Figure 2. (a) FESEM image, (b) high-resolution TEM image (inset: SAED pattern), and (c) XPS survey spectrum of SiOx NPs synthesized at a temperature of 5 °C and a constant voltage of 10.0 V. (d) Average particle size of synthesized SiOx NPs as a function of anodization voltage.
Figure 2. (a) FESEM image, (b) high-resolution TEM image (inset: SAED pattern), and (c) XPS survey spectrum of SiOx NPs synthesized at a temperature of 5 °C and a constant voltage of 10.0 V. (d) Average particle size of synthesized SiOx NPs as a function of anodization voltage.
Nanomaterials 10 02137 g002
Figure 3. XPS spectra and digital photographs of SiOx NPs synthesized at voltages of (a) 7.5 V, (b) 10.0 V, and (c) 12.5 V at a constant temperature of 5 °C.
Figure 3. XPS spectra and digital photographs of SiOx NPs synthesized at voltages of (a) 7.5 V, (b) 10.0 V, and (c) 12.5 V at a constant temperature of 5 °C.
Nanomaterials 10 02137 g003
Figure 4. Illustrations of how oxygen content is affected by the anodization voltage ((a) low voltage and (b) high voltage).
Figure 4. Illustrations of how oxygen content is affected by the anodization voltage ((a) low voltage and (b) high voltage).
Nanomaterials 10 02137 g004
Figure 5. FESEM images of NPs synthesized at temperatures of (a) 5 °C, (b) 25 °C, (c) 45 °C, and (d) 65 °C at a constant voltage of 7.5 V (insets: digital photographs of synthesized SiOx NPs dispersed in DI water). (e) The size distributions of synthesized NPs.
Figure 5. FESEM images of NPs synthesized at temperatures of (a) 5 °C, (b) 25 °C, (c) 45 °C, and (d) 65 °C at a constant voltage of 7.5 V (insets: digital photographs of synthesized SiOx NPs dispersed in DI water). (e) The size distributions of synthesized NPs.
Nanomaterials 10 02137 g005
Table 1. Si 2p peak information for different oxidation states (0 to 4).
Table 1. Si 2p peak information for different oxidation states (0 to 4).
Oxidation StateGroupBinding Energy (eV) [34,36,37,38]
Si0Si98.9 (Si 2p3/2) and 99.5 (Si 2p1/2)
Si1+Si2O100.0
Si2+SiO101.0
Si3+Si2O3102.1
Si4+SiO2103.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Jeong, H.Y.; Cho, S.O. Oxygen Content-Controllable Synthesis of Non-Stoichiometric Silicon Suboxide Nanoparticles by Electrochemical Anodization. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2137. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112137

AMA Style

Lee J, Lee SY, Jeong HY, Cho SO. Oxygen Content-Controllable Synthesis of Non-Stoichiometric Silicon Suboxide Nanoparticles by Electrochemical Anodization. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(11):2137. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jaewoo, Sang Yoon Lee, Heon Yong Jeong, and Sung Oh Cho. 2020. "Oxygen Content-Controllable Synthesis of Non-Stoichiometric Silicon Suboxide Nanoparticles by Electrochemical Anodization" Nanomaterials 10, no. 11: 2137. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112137

APA Style

Lee, J., Lee, S. Y., Jeong, H. Y., & Cho, S. O. (2020). Oxygen Content-Controllable Synthesis of Non-Stoichiometric Silicon Suboxide Nanoparticles by Electrochemical Anodization. Nanomaterials, 10(11), 2137. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112137

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop