Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Adaptive Response on the Wear Behavior of PVD and CVD Coated Cutting Tools during Machining with Built Up Edge Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Performance Photodetectors Based on Nanostructured Perovskites
Previous Article in Journal
Quantum Dot–Polyfluorene Composites for White-Light-Emitting Quantum Dot-Based LEDs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advanced Surface Probing Using a Dual-Mode NSOM–AFM Silicon-Based Photosensor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Low Cost and Low Temperature Poly-Silicon Nanowire Sensor Arrays for Monolithic Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits Applications

1
School of Information Science and Technology, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China
2
Advanced Integrated Circuits R&D Center, Institute of Microelectronic of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials for Smart Sensing, General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing 101402, China
4
School of Microelectronics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(12), 2488; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122488
Submission received: 4 November 2020 / Revised: 4 December 2020 / Accepted: 7 December 2020 / Published: 11 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano Fabrications of Solid-State Sensors and Sensor Systems)

Abstract

:
In this paper, the poly-Si nanowire (NW) field-effect transistor (FET) sensor arrays were fabricated by adopting low-temperature annealing (600 °C/30 s) and feasible spacer image transfer (SIT) processes for future monolithic three-dimensional integrated circuits (3D-ICs) applications. Compared with other fabrication methods of poly-Si NW sensors, the SIT process exhibits the characteristics of highly uniform poly-Si NW arrays with well-controlled morphology (about 25 nm in width and 35 nm in length). Conventional metal silicide and implantation techniques were introduced to reduce the parasitic resistance of source and drain (SD) and improve the conductivity. Therefore, the obtained sensors exhibit >106 switching ratios and 965 mV/dec subthreshold swing (SS), which exhibits similar results compared with that of SOI Si NW sensors. However, the poly-Si NW FET sensors show the Vth shift as high as about 178 ± 1 mV/pH, which is five times larger than that of the SOI Si NW sensors. The fabricated poly-Si NW sensors with 600 °C/30 s processing temperature and good device performance provide feasibility for future monolithic three-dimensional integrated circuit (3D-IC) applications.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the application of semiconductor field-effect transistors (FET) sensors have attracted a lot of attention because of their ability to translate the interaction with target molecules on the FET surface to an electrical signal directly [1,2,3,4]. Silicon nanowires (Si NW) sensors have been considered as one of the most promising candidates for biochemical sensors [5,6,7,8,9], due to their large surface to volume (S/V) ratio, high sensitivity, and good biocompatibility [10,11]. In recent years, Si NW field-effect-transistor (FET) sensors have been used for the very high sensitivity detection of pH [12,13,14], gases [15,16,17] and DNA [18,19,20]. However, the conventional fabrication process with silicon-on-insulator (SOI) materials is complex and high-cost, and the nanometer patterns are usually formed by traditional low-efficiency electron beam lithography (EBL) process, which does not meet the demands of future mass production with a low cost and low efficiency. The spacer image transfer (SIT) process (also named self-aligned double or quadruple patterning) could achieve nanometer array with high efficiency and low cost, which are widely used in foundries [21,22,23]. In addition, there are no reports on the design or fabrication of Si NW sensors for monolithic three-dimensional integrated circuits (3D-ICs) application, which is one of the most convincing candidates for future application (see Figure 1). In order to achieve better performance of the system, the fabrication of top devices (Si NW sensor) usually need low-temperature processes to avoid a degradation on characteristics of bottom circuits (logic circuits and memory in Figure 1) [24]. However, there are no reports on the design or fabrication of Si NW sensor for monolithic 3D-ICs application.
In this paper, poly-silicon NW sensors with low cost and high efficiency are designed and fabricated using advanced spacer image transfer (SIT) [22,23,24] and low-temperature silicide techniques for monolithic 3D-IC application. The highest annealing temperature is not over 600 °C, which overcomes the problems of overheating the bottom transistor and the wires. The achieved poly-silicon NW sensors have good electrical properties, such as over six orders of magnitude in on-off ratio and 932 mV/dec of subthreshold swing (SS) by bias back-gate voltages.

2. Materials and Methods

Two types of Si NW sensors (poly-silicon and silicon-on-insulator (SOI)) were designed and fabricated, and the detailed fabrication flow is illustrated in Figure 2. The poly-silicon NW sensors were manufactured on p-type 200 mm Si (100) silicon wafers (see Figure 2a): Firstly, 145 nm SiO2 and 40 nm poly-silicon were deposited, respectively (see Figure 2b). The SOI Si NW sensors were manufactured on 200 mm SOI wafers featured with a 145-nm-thick buried oxide layer (BOX) and a 40-nm-thick top silicon layer. The fabrication process of the two types of devices was all the same in the flowing steps. During the fabrication of the Si NWs, a spacer image transfer (SIT) technology was chosen to form NW arrays patterns with high efficiency [25,26,27], and the detailed fabrication process flow is described as follows: sequential multi-layer SiO2/amorphous Si (α-Si)/Si3N4 films were deposited (see Figure 2c). Next, the conventional photolithography process (i-line) and dry etching processes were used to form rectangular arrays of Si3N4 and α-Si films (see Figure 2d). The top Si3N4 hard masks (HMs) were removed by a hot H3PO4 solution at 140 °C (see Figure 2e). A 30 nm Si3N4 film was deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) approach and then the corresponding Si3N4 reactive ion etching (RIE) was performed to form two SiNx spacers on both sides of α-Si (see Figure 2f,g). The α-Si material between two Si3N4 spacers was removed by tetramenthylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) (see Figure 2h). In order to obtain Si NW arrays, dry etching processes of SiO2 and Si were carried out, respectively (see Figure 2h). Afterward, the top HMs were removed using hot phosphoric acid and diluted hydrofluoroacid (DHF) solution, respectively (see Figure 2i). After the Si NW formation, a 5-nm-thick SiO2 was deposited on the Si NW followed by the deposition of a thick layer of Si3N4 (see Figure 2j,k). The Si3N4 film was etched by dry etching processes. A nickel platinum alloy (Ni0.95Pt0.05) was used to form metal silicide in the source and drain regions to reduce the parasitic of Si nanowires (see Figure 2l,m). Afterward, BF2+ ions with a heavy dose and low energy were implanted into the top silicided Si NWs and activated by low temperature rapid thermal annealing (RTA) to form Schottky barrier source and drain (SBSD) (about 600 °C/30 s annealing). For a better combination, the aluminum electrode was prepared by a sputtering process and the RIE process was performed (see Figure 2n,o). Subsequently, a layer of thick SiO2 was deposited, and the source drain contact holes were opened by photolithography and etching processes (see Figure 2p,q). Finally, the gate with different channel lengths (5, 10 and 15 μm) was defined by photolithography and the open gate trench of the sensor to expose the sensitive area was achieved by RIE processes. The bounding of SD contact was carried out and a layer of 20-nm-thick HfO2 was deposited on the surface of the device (see Figure 2r). Figure 2s is a schematic top view of the device. Except for the source drain and gate trench of the devices, other areas were covered by a thick SiO2, which helps to improve the stability and reliability of the solution.
The cross-sectional views and top views of the device’s structures were observed using S-5500 and S-4800 scanning electron microscopes (SEM, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. The cross-sectional profiles of the final device were performed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Talos, Brno, Czech) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, FEI Talos, Brno, Czech). The electrical characterization was performed using a B1500A (Keysight, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) semiconductor parameter analyzer.

3. Results and Discussion

The images of the fabricated poly-Si NWs sensors by the SIT process are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3a,b shows top views of poly-Si NW arrays by SEM measurement. As can been seen from the images, highly uniform poly-Si NW arrays without any landing pads are achieved. The achieved poly-Si NW arrays using the SIT approach have high efficiency, low cost and smaller sizes compared with that of fabricated using the EBL process. Figure 3c shows a cross-sectional view of poly-Si NWs. Contrasted with previous work [28,29], the dimensions and the morphology of the fabricated Si NW arrays are well controlled and extraordinarily small, theoretically providing higher sensitivity for the fabricated poly-Si NW sensor. Figure 3d,e shows top views of poly-Si NW sensors arrays. The length of the electrode is 2 mm; the gate lengths (LGs) of poly-Si NW FETs are 5 μm, 10 μm, and 15 μm, respectively. The sensor current is increased and the device’s variations are reduced for the multi-channel poly-Si NW sensors.
Figure 4 shows the cross-sectional TEM image and the electron scattering spectrum (EDS) elemental mappings of the poly-Si NWs channel. According to the TEM image, the thicknesses of HfO2/SiO2 layers are 19.34 nm and 5.25 nm, respectively. The sizes of the well-controlled regular rectangle poly-Si NW is about 25 nm in width and 35 nm in length. Furthermore, the EDS analysis of Hf, O, poly-Si, and N elements demonstrates that the HfO2 and SiO2 films are very uniform and the interfaces are clear and flat without inter-diffusion. The well-controlled insulation layer could reduce the leakage current from liquid to device, providing a robust detection environment in the liquid.
Initial measurements of transfer and output curves (ID-VG and ID-VD) were performed by applying a bias gate voltage. In the measurement of the ID-VG curve, ID was measured at constant drain voltages (VD = −0.2 V, −1.2 V, −2.2 V), and the gate voltage was swept from 0 to −30 V. In the measurement of the ID-VD curves, the drain current was measured at constant gate voltages (VG from 0 to −20 V with a −2 V step), and the VD was swept from 0 to −5 V with a −0.2 V step.
The ID-VG and ID-VD curves by bias gate voltages of the p-type poly-Si NW sensors are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5a–c shows typical ID-VG curves of 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG poly-Si NW devices, respectively. As can be seen from the images, smooth and uniform p-type MOSFET curves were achieved for the sensors fabricated at low temperature. The Ion/Ioff ratios of poly-Si NW devices with the 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG are 5.68 × 106, 2.84 × 106 and 2.31 × 106, respectively. The corresponding extracted values of subthreshold swing (SS) are estimated to be 1070 mV/dec, 965 mV/dec and 956 mV/dec, respectively. Figure 5d depicts the ID-VD curves of poly-Si NW device 10-μm-LG. The drain current increases with increasing VG bias, implying that the carrier’s concentration inside Si NWs can be linearly adjusted, and devices prepared at low temperatures exhibit good FET electrical performance.
The ID-VG and ID-VD curves of the SOI Si NW for 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG are shown in Figure 6, respectively. As can be seen from the images, smooth p-type MOSFET curves are achieved for the sensors fabricate at low temperature. The Ion/Ioff ratios of 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG SOI Si NW devices are 1.47 × 108, 1.29 × 107 and 6.34 × 104, respectively, and extracted values of SSs are estimated to be 686 mV/dec, 767 mV/dec and 1120 mV/dec, respectively. Figure 6d depicts the ID-VD curves of the 10-μm-LG poly-Si NW device.
Figure 7 shows the extracted typical parameter comparison between the poly-Si NW and SOI Si NW sensors, e.g., the threshold voltage (Vth), SS, on-stage current (Ion) and Ion/off ratio, respectively. The Vths of 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG poly-Si NW devices are −8.06 V, −8.125 V and −7.87 V, respectively. The Vth of 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG SOI Si NW devices are −7.67 V, −7.95 V and −7.8 V, respectively. The values of Vths of poly-silicon devices with different LGs are similar to those of the SOI devices. The values of SSs of SOI devices are smaller than those of poly-Si devices and the Ion/Ioff is also larger. The performance of SOI devices is slightly better than that of low-temperature poly-silicon devices, which is caused by the monocrystalline silicon channel with a low channel resistance. The achieved results imply that the poly-Si NW sensors could be applied for future monolithic 3D-IC application.
Figure 8 shows the typical sensing characteristics of the poly-silicon nanowire sensors by analyzing different stranded pH solutions. In the measurement of the ID-VG curve and the gate voltage was swept from 0 to −10 V by top solution (see Figure 8a inserted image). The detection principle is to convert the sensor surface potential change introduced by a different pH solution into the current change in the semiconductor Si NW channel. The actual amount of charges depends on the concentration of specific ions in the solution (the concentration of H+ ion in the manuscripts). Therefore, the pH of the solutions could modulate the surface charge of the insulator/semiconducting interface consequently, resulting in a shift of the threshold voltage. The scheme of the test using the top liquid gate is shown in the inserted figure of Figure 8a. Due to the change of film surface potential of the channel, the poly-silicon nanowire sensors exhibit Vth shifts (see Figure 8a). If the added solution is acidic (alkaline), the ID-VG curve will shift to the right (left). After adding different pH buffers, the real-time response of ID is shown in Figure 8b. Taking the buffer solution with pH = 7 as a reference, when the pH buffer is acidic, a positive charge is introduced and the current of the p-type poly-silicon nanowire sensor increases. When the pH buffer is alkaline, a negative charge is introduced and the current decreases. The results are consistent with the transfer curve of the p-type poly-silicon nanowire sensor increases. The extracted change values of Vth and ID as a function of pH values are shown in Figure 8c,d, respectively. The changes of Vth and ID have approximate linearity with the pH values, and the sensitivity as high as about 178 ± 1 mV/pH, which is caused by the small size in Si NW and large surface to volume ratio.
Figure 9 shows the typical sensing characteristics of the SOI nanowire sensors by analyzing different stranded pH solutions. In the measurement of the ID-VG curve, the gate voltage was swept from 0 to −4 V by the top solution. Figure 9a shows that the threshold voltage shifts with the pH of the solution. The extracted threshold change is linear with the pH of the solution (see Figure 9b). A similar trend of Vth shift is obtained, but the values of changes are only about a fifth of the poly-silicon nanowire.
Table 1 shows system parameters comparison of the relevant reported results in recent years and our fabricated poly-silicon nanowire sensors. The SIT technique is used to form poly-silicon NW sensor arrays with 25 nm in width and 35 nm in length, which exhibits high efficiency and low cost than that of formed by EBL. Furthermore, the resistance and the device performance- the poly-silicon NW sensor is greatly improved by introducing SBSD techniques, which is attributed to achieve a larger Ion/Ioff ratio and smaller values of SSs. The results indicate that the poly-silicon NWs sensor fabricated by low-temperature annealing has much better characteristics than those of the sensors prepared by other methods, which attributed to its application for future monolithic 3D-IC applications.

4. Conclusions

In summary, low cost poly-Si NW sensors arrays are fabricated through an advanced SIT process with high efficiency than that formed by electron beam lithography, and the morphology of Si NW is well controlled with small sizes. Furthermore, a low-temperature flow (600 °C) with silicide and implantation is designed and carried out. Benefiting from the silicide and isolation processes, the poly-Si NW FET sensors show six orders of magnitude in switching ratio and a SS of 965 mV/dec, which is similar to the counterpart of the SOI Si NW sensor. In addition, the poly-Si NW FET sensors show the Vth shift as high as about 178 ± 1 mV/pH, which is five times larger than that of the SOI Si NW sensors. Therefore, the design and fabricated poly-Si NW sensor arrays approach provides a good option for its potential application of the monolithic 3D-ICs in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.T., Q.Z., J.Z., J.Y. (Jiang Yan); methodology, S.T., Q.Z., J.Z., J.L., S.W., Y.W., Z.Z., Q.W., H.Y., J.Y. (Jianglan Yang), M.F., S.Z., E.X.; data curation, S.T. and Q.Z.; writing original draft preparation, S.T.; writing review and editing, S.T., Q.Z. and Z.Z.; supervision, W.W., J.Y. (Jiang Yan) and H.T.; project administration, W.W.; funding acquisition, W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China (4182021), the Science and technology program of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission under grants Z201100006820084 and Z201100004220001, in part by the National Key Project of Science and Technology of China under grant 2017ZX02301007-001 and 2017ZX02315001-001, the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences under grant Y9YQ01R004, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grants 61874002 and 61904194, and 6187032253, and in part by the Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Microelectronic Devices and Integrated Technology, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant Y9YS05X002 and E0YS01X001.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Integrated Circuit Advanced Process Center (ICAC) at the Institute of Microelectronics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for the devices fabricated on their advanced 200 mm CMOS platform.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qin, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, T. Ultrasensitive Silicon Nanowire Sensor Developed by a Special Ag Modification Process for Rapid NH3 Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 28766–28773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jin, Y.; Gao, A.; Jin, Q.H.; Li, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.-L. Ultra-sensitive and selective Detection of Mercury Ion (Hg2+) using free-standing Silicon Nanowire Sensors. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 135501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, X.G.; Li, Y.Q.; Zhu, W.B.; Huang, P.; Wang, T.; Hu, N.; Fu, S.-Y. A wearable strain sensor based on a carbonized nano-sponge/silicone composite for human motion detection. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 6680–6685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Römhildt, L.; Zörgiebel, F.; Ibarlucea, B.; Vahdatzadeh, M.; Baraban, L.; Cuniberti, G.; Pregl, S.; Weber, W.M.; Mikolajick, T.; Opitz, J. Human α-thrombin detection platform using aptamers on a silicon nanowire field-effect transistor. In Proceedings of the Power and Timing Modeling, Optimization and Simulation (PATMOS), 2017 27th International Symposium on IEEE, Thessaloniki, Greece, 25–27 September 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Besteman, K.; Lee, J.; Wiertz, F.G.M.; Heering, H.A.; Dekker, C. Enzyme-Coated Carbon Nanotubes as Single-Molecule Biosensors. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 727–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cui, Y.; Wei, Q.; Park, H.; Lieber, C.M. Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species. Science 2001, 293, 1289–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hahm, J.; Lieber, C.M. Direct Ultrasensitive Electrical Detection of DNA and DNA Sequence Variations Using Nanowire Nanosensors. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patolsky, F.; Zheng, G.; Hayden, O.; Lakadamyali, M.; Zhuang, X.; Lieber, C.M. Electrical detection of single viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 14017–14022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lee, J.K.; Wang, I.; Huang, C.H.; Chen, Y.-F.; Huang, N.-T.; Lin, C.-T. Pre-Clinical Tests of an Integrated CMOS Biomolecular Sensor for Cardiac Diseases Diagnosis. Sensors 2017, 17, 2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. D’Andrea, C.; Lo Faro, M.J.; Bertino, G.; Ossi, P.M.; Neri, F.; Trusso, S.; Musumeci, P.; Galli, M.; Cioffi, N.; Irrera, A.; et al. Decoration of silicon nanowires with silver nanoparticles for ultrasensitive surface enhanced Raman scattering. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 375603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fazio, B.; D′Andrea, C.; Foti, A.; Messina, E.; Irrera, A.; Donato, M.G.; Villari, V.; Micali, N.; Maragò, O.M.; Gucciardi, P.G. SERS detection of Biomolecules at Physiological pH via aggregation of Gold Nanorods mediated by Optical Forces and Plasmonic Heating. Science 2016, 6, 26952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gogoi, P. Thermally deposited Ag-doped CdS thin film transistors with high-k rare-earth oxide Nd2O3 as gate dielectric. Semiconductors 2013, 47, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, W.J.; Tamagawa, T.; Gibson, M.; Furukawa, T. Effect of Al inclusion in HfO2 on the physical and electrical properties of the dielectrics. IEEE Electr. Device L 2002, 23, 649–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Serena, R.B.; Dipti, R.; Wouter, O.; César, P.G. High performance Fin-FET electrochemical sensor with high-k dielectric materials. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 303, 127215. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chiou, Y.K.; Chang, C.H.; Wang, C.C.; Lee, K.Y.; Wu, T.B.; Kwo, R.; Hong, M. Effect of Al incorporation in the thermal stability of atomic-layer-deposited HfO2 for gate dielectric applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2007, 154, G99–G102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.F.; Liu, X.J.; Zhang, W.Q.; Fu, Y.Y.; Li, A.D.; Li, H.; Wu, D. Comparison of the interfacial and electrical properties of HfAlO films on Ge with S and GeO2 passivation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 162903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Song, Z.R.; Cheng, X.H.; Zhang, E.X.; Xing, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Shen, D. Influence of preparing process on total-dose radiation response of high-k Hf-based gate dielectrics. Thin. Solid Film. 2008, 517, 465–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dalapati, G.K.; Sridhara, A.; Wong, A.S.W.; Chia, C.K. Plasma nitridation of HfO2 gate dielectric on p-GaAs substrates. ECS Trans. 2008, 16, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McNeill, D.W.; Bhattacharya, S.; Wadsworth, H.; Ruddell, F.H.; Mitchell, S.J.N.; Armstrong, B.M.; Gamble, H.S. Atomic layer deposition of hafnium oxide dielectrics on silicon and germanium substrates. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2007, 19, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tomida, K.; Popovici, M.; Opsomer, K.; Menou, N. Non-linear dielectric constant increase with Ti composition in high-k ALD-HfTiOx films after O2 crystallization annealing. Iop Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2010, 8, 012023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, J.-Y.; Seol, M.-L.; Baek, D.J.; Guo, Z.; Kim, C.-H.; Choi, S.-J.; Choi, Y.-K. A pH sensor with a double-gate silicon nanowire field-effect transistor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 083701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vu, X.T.; Eschermann, J.F.; Stockmann, R.; GhoshMoulick, R.; Offenhäusser, A.; Ingebrandt, S. Top-down processed silicon nanowire transistor arrays for biosensing. Phys. Status Solidi A Appl. Res. 2009, 206, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Galina, P.; Denis, P.; Vladimir, K.; Vitaly, G. Biosensor based on a silicon nanowire field-effect transistor functionalized by gold nanoparticles for the highly sensitive determination of prostate specific antigen. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 88, 283–289. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fenouillet-Beranger1, C.; Batude1, P.; Brunet1, L.; Mazzocchi1, V. Recent advances in low temperature process in view of 3D VLSI integration. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference, Burlingame, CA, USA, 10–13 October 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  25. Qingzhu, Z.; Hailing, T.; Huaxiang, Y.; Feng, W.; Hongbin, Z.; Qianhui, W.; Zhaohao, Z.; Wenwu, W. Si Nanowire Biosensors Using a FinFET Fabrication Process for Real Time Monitoring Cellular Ion Actitivies. IEDM 2018, 18, 679–682. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zafar, S.; D’Emic, C.; Jagtiani, A.; Kratschmer, E.; Miao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Mo, R.; Sosa, N.; Hamann, H.F.; Shahidi, G.; et al. Silicon Nanowire Field Effect Transistor Sensors with Minimal Sensor-to-Sensor Variations and Enhanced Sensing Characteristics. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 6577–6587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, N.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, J.; Tang, S.; Lv, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wei, F.; et al. O2 plasma treated biosensor for enhancing detection sensitivity of sulfadiazine in a high-ĸ HfO2 coated silicon nanowire array. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 306, 127464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo-Jun, Z.; Li, Z.; Min, J.H.; Zhan, H.H.L.; Guang, K.I.T.; Eu-Jin, A.L.; Tae, G.K.; Yu, C. Silicon nanowire biosensor for highly sensitive and rapid detection of Dengue virus. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 146, 138–144. [Google Scholar]
  29. Guo-Jun, Z.; Kevin, T.C.C.; Henry, Z.H.L.; Joon, M.H.; Ignatius, G.K.T.; Andy, E.-J.L.; Minkyu, J. Multiplexed detection of cardiac biomarkers in serum with nanowire arrays using readout ASIC. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 35, 218–223. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wong, W.S.; Raychaudhuri, S. Hybrid Si Nanowire/Amorphous Silicon FETs for Large-Area Image Sensor Arrays. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2214–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hakim, M.M.A.; Lombardini, M.; Sun, K. Thin Film Polycrystalline Silicon Nanowire Biosensors. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1868–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Salaün, A.-C.; Pichon, L.; Wenga, G. Polysilicon nanowires FET as highly-sensitive pH-sensor:modeling and measurements. Procedia Eng. 2014, 87, 911–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yen, L.C.; Pan, T.M.; Lee, C.H.; Chao, T.S. Label-free and real-time detection of ferritin using a horn-like polycrystalline-silicon nanowire field-effect transistor biosensor. Sens. Actuators B 2016, 230, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, G.; Yu, B.; Li, X.; Dong, X.; Xu, X.; Li, Z.; Huang, R.; Li, M. A photomemory by selective-assembling hybrid porphyrin-silicon nanowire field-effect transistor. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2020, 63, 169401:1–169401:3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of monolithic three-dimensional integrated circuits (3D-ICs): bottom logic circuits; middle memory and top silicon nanowire (Si NW) sensors.
Figure 1. Illustration of monolithic three-dimensional integrated circuits (3D-ICs): bottom logic circuits; middle memory and top silicon nanowire (Si NW) sensors.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g001
Figure 2. Fabrication flow of Si NW sensors. (a) 200 mm a p-type (100) silicon wafers, (b) deposition of SiO2 and α-Si films, (c) deposition of multi-layer SiO2/α-Si/Si3N4 films, (d) conventional lithography and reactive ion etching (RIE) of Si3N4/α-Si, (e) removal of photoresist (PR) and Si3N4 hard mask, (f) deposited of Si3N4 thin film, (g) anisotropic RIE of Si3N4 to form nanometer Si3N4 spacers, (h) remove the α-Si and RIE SiO2 and Si films, (i) removal of top hard masks (HMs), (j) deposition of 5 nm SiO2 film, (k) deposition of Si3N4 and i-line lithography, (l) RIE of Si3N4, (m) RIE of Si3N4 and forms metal silicide, (n) sputter metal, (o) RIE of metal, (p) deposition of HfO2 film, (q) formation of source and drain contact hole, (r) formation of Si NW channel and bonding and (s) top view of the designed Si NW sensors.
Figure 2. Fabrication flow of Si NW sensors. (a) 200 mm a p-type (100) silicon wafers, (b) deposition of SiO2 and α-Si films, (c) deposition of multi-layer SiO2/α-Si/Si3N4 films, (d) conventional lithography and reactive ion etching (RIE) of Si3N4/α-Si, (e) removal of photoresist (PR) and Si3N4 hard mask, (f) deposited of Si3N4 thin film, (g) anisotropic RIE of Si3N4 to form nanometer Si3N4 spacers, (h) remove the α-Si and RIE SiO2 and Si films, (i) removal of top hard masks (HMs), (j) deposition of 5 nm SiO2 film, (k) deposition of Si3N4 and i-line lithography, (l) RIE of Si3N4, (m) RIE of Si3N4 and forms metal silicide, (n) sputter metal, (o) RIE of metal, (p) deposition of HfO2 film, (q) formation of source and drain contact hole, (r) formation of Si NW channel and bonding and (s) top view of the designed Si NW sensors.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g002
Figure 3. Images of poly-Si NW sensors. (a,b) SEM images of poly-Si NW array in top view, (c) cross-sectional SEM image of poly-Si NWs, (d) top view of poly-Si NW arrays sensor by optical microscope, (e) SEM image of the final poly-Si NW arrays sensor in top view.
Figure 3. Images of poly-Si NW sensors. (a,b) SEM images of poly-Si NW array in top view, (c) cross-sectional SEM image of poly-Si NWs, (d) top view of poly-Si NW arrays sensor by optical microscope, (e) SEM image of the final poly-Si NW arrays sensor in top view.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g003
Figure 4. (a) TEM image of poly-Si NW channel of the device, (b) EDS elemental mappings of O, Si, Hf and N, respectively.
Figure 4. (a) TEM image of poly-Si NW channel of the device, (b) EDS elemental mappings of O, Si, Hf and N, respectively.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g004
Figure 5. (ac) ID-VG curves of the fabricated 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG p-type poly-Si NW sensors by back bias gate voltage, (d) typical ID-VD of the fabricated 10-μm-LG p-type poly-Si NW sensors.
Figure 5. (ac) ID-VG curves of the fabricated 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG p-type poly-Si NW sensors by back bias gate voltage, (d) typical ID-VD of the fabricated 10-μm-LG p-type poly-Si NW sensors.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g005
Figure 6. (ac) typical ID-VG curves of the fabricated 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG p-type SOI Si NW sensors by back gate bias, respectively, (d) typical ID-VD curves of the fabricated 10-μm-LG p-type SOI Si NW sensors.
Figure 6. (ac) typical ID-VG curves of the fabricated 5-μm-LG, 10-μm-LG and 15-μm-LG p-type SOI Si NW sensors by back gate bias, respectively, (d) typical ID-VD curves of the fabricated 10-μm-LG p-type SOI Si NW sensors.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g006
Figure 7. Comparison between low-temperature poly-silicon devices and SOI Si NW devices. (a) SS, (b) Vth, (c) Ion and (d) Ion/Ioff ratio.
Figure 7. Comparison between low-temperature poly-silicon devices and SOI Si NW devices. (a) SS, (b) Vth, (c) Ion and (d) Ion/Ioff ratio.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g007
Figure 8. (a) The transfer curves of the poly-Si NW sensor by analyzing different pH solutions, (b) real-time response of ID when adding different pH solutions, the inserted figure the transfer curves of the bias back gate voltage, (c,d) threshold voltage and drain current change under different pH solutions.
Figure 8. (a) The transfer curves of the poly-Si NW sensor by analyzing different pH solutions, (b) real-time response of ID when adding different pH solutions, the inserted figure the transfer curves of the bias back gate voltage, (c,d) threshold voltage and drain current change under different pH solutions.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g008
Figure 9. (a) The transfer curves of the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) sensor with different pH solutions, (b) threshold voltage under different pH solutions.
Figure 9. (a) The transfer curves of the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) sensor with different pH solutions, (b) threshold voltage under different pH solutions.
Nanomaterials 10 02488 g009
Table 1. A comparison of silicon nanowire sensors in recent years.
Table 1. A comparison of silicon nanowire sensors in recent years.
2011 [30]2012 [31]2014 [32]2016 [33]2020 [34]This Work
Insulation materialSiO2SiNxSiO2SiO2/Si3N4SiO2/Si3N4/SiO2SiO2SOI
Insulation thickness100 nm-80 nm50/65 nm-/150/7 nm145 nm
NWs materialSiSipoly-Sipoly-Sipoly-Sipoly-SiSi
Si NWs fabrication approachVLSRIEsidewall spacerRIEEBLSITSIT
Processing temperature---600 °C1050 °C600 °C600 °C
NWs size~90 nm--~40 nm40~50 nm~30 nm~30 nm
LG--100 nm10 μm400 nm10 μm10 μm
Ion/Ioff~105~104-2.03 × 1052.5 × 1052.84 × 1061.29 × 107
SS (mV/dec)25002300–3000-9751030965767
Vth change (V)--0.0870.0437-0.1780.0688
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, S.; Yan, J.; Zhang, J.; Wei, S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Fang, M.; Zhang, S.; Xiong, E.; Wang, Y.; et al. Fabrication of Low Cost and Low Temperature Poly-Silicon Nanowire Sensor Arrays for Monolithic Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits Applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122488

AMA Style

Tang S, Yan J, Zhang J, Wei S, Zhang Q, Li J, Fang M, Zhang S, Xiong E, Wang Y, et al. Fabrication of Low Cost and Low Temperature Poly-Silicon Nanowire Sensor Arrays for Monolithic Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits Applications. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(12):2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Siqi, Jiang Yan, Jing Zhang, Shuhua Wei, Qingzhu Zhang, Junjie Li, Min Fang, Shuang Zhang, Enyi Xiong, Yanrong Wang, and et al. 2020. "Fabrication of Low Cost and Low Temperature Poly-Silicon Nanowire Sensor Arrays for Monolithic Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits Applications" Nanomaterials 10, no. 12: 2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122488

APA Style

Tang, S., Yan, J., Zhang, J., Wei, S., Zhang, Q., Li, J., Fang, M., Zhang, S., Xiong, E., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Wei, Q., Yin, H., Wang, W., & Tu, H. (2020). Fabrication of Low Cost and Low Temperature Poly-Silicon Nanowire Sensor Arrays for Monolithic Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits Applications. Nanomaterials, 10(12), 2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop