Next Article in Journal
Polydopamine Doping and Pyrolysis of Cellulose Nanofiber Paper for Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Nanocarbon with Improved Yield and Capacitive Performances
Previous Article in Journal
Anisotropy of 3D Columnar Coatings in Mid-Infrared Spectral Range
Previous Article in Special Issue
Surface-Functionalized Separator for Stable and Reliable Lithium Metal Batteries: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A Strategic Approach to Use Upcycled Si Nanomaterials for Stable Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries

1
Energy Storage Materials Center, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju 52851, Korea
2
Department of Applied Chemistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
3
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(12), 3248; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123248
Submission received: 7 November 2021 / Revised: 17 November 2021 / Accepted: 27 November 2021 / Published: 30 November 2021

Abstract

:
Silicon, as a promising next-generation anode material, has drawn special attention from industries due to its high theoretical capacity (around 3600 mAh g−1) in comparison with conventional electrodes, e.g., graphite. However, the fast capacity fading resulted by a large volume change hinders the pragmatic use of Si anodes for lithium ion batteries. In this work, we propose an efficient strategy to improve the cyclability of upcycled Si nanomaterials through a simple battery operation protocol. When the utilization degree of Si electrodes was decreased, the electrode deformation was significantly alleviated. This directly led to an excellent electrochemical performance over 100 cycles. In addition, the average charge (delithation) voltage was shifted to a lower voltage, when the utilization degree of electrodes was controlled. These results demonstrated that our strategic approach would be an effective way to enhance the electrochemical performance of Si anodes and improve the cost-effectiveness of scaling-up the decent nanostructured Si material.

1. Introduction

In order to reduce greenhouse gas emission from the combustion of fossil fuels, the efficient use of electric energy without carbon emission has become more important than ever [1,2]. The rechargeable lithium-ion battery (LIB) is one of the most promising energy storage systems to support the net-zero carbon emissions. LIBs have a decent energy density and an excellent cycle durability, in comparison with other energy storage devices. However, the limited theoretical specific capacity of conventional electrode materials, e.g., graphite and LiCoO2, is the biggest hurdle before achieving the high energy density of LIBs [3]. During the last few years, the adoption of silicon (Si) as an anode has been in the spotlight due to its relatively low working potential (~0.4 V vs. Li/Li+) and high theoretical capacity (3600 mAh g−1) at the lithiation phase of Li15Si4 [4,5,6]. Unfortunately, the capacity fading originated from the significant volume change of Si electrodes during cycling discourages the use of pure Si electrodes [7].
To improve the electrochemical stability of Si electrodes, material research, such as the use of nano-sized Si, Si/carbon composite and surface-modified Si, has been extensively conducted [8,9,10,11,12]. Among these options, the nano-sized Si is considered the most attractive candidate. The serious electrode fracturing could be circumvented even during a repetitive lithiation/delithiation process, if the Si is below a certain critical size (150 nm) [9,13]. The surface modification of Si powder with a conductive material can further enhance the electrochemical performance in terms of cycle stability and rate capability [8,12]. Although the previous strategies of optimizing Si electrodes have shown a significant improvement in electrochemical properties, there are still remaining challenges with regard to scalability and cost-effectiveness before moving onto industrial applications [14].
Recycling/upcycling industrial wastes is a promising strategy to improve the scalability as well as address the inherent problems of bulk Si electrodes. Among many of the industrial wastes, Si sawdust derived from the photovoltaic (PV) industry would be a strong anode candidate, since approximately 40% of the Si ingot turns into waste after sawing [15,16]. A number of researchers have attempted to use the recycled Si for anode electrodes. However, further material processes such as composite-manufacturing, carbon-coating and NH4F treatment are additionally required to achieve decent electrochemical performances [14,16,17]. Considering this point, a simpler and more effective methodology should be proposed to improve the cost-effectiveness of material preparation.
In this work, we demonstrate an efficient approach to improve the electrochemical performances of upcycled Si nanomaterials as well as to reduce the material preparation cost. Nanostructured Si dust (NSD) was used as an active material without any further treatment. NSD has a similar capacity compared to bulk Si, but is capable of delivering a much better cycle retention than bulk Si. In addition, NSD has a strong advantage in reducing the manufacturing cost. The utilization degree (i.e., state of charge) of Si was controlled by changing the lower cut-off voltage. The Si anode with a different utilization degree showed a reduced volume change and improved cycle performances. The specific capacity of anodes reached more than 1500 mAh/g, which is a higher value than that of conventional Si materials, such as Si/C and SiOx [12,18]. In addition, it was confirmed that the average charge potential of the anode was decreased under the controlled condition. It leads to a higher nominal voltage of full cells and, thus, an improvement in energy density.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows a schematic illustration of the yielding process of NSD produced as a by-product from the manufacturing process of the Si wafer for a solar cell. The Si sludge with coolant solution is formed during the sawing process of the Si ingot, to make the Si wafer. After drying process under inert conditions, NSD powder can be obtained. As shown in Figure 1(b1–b3), NSD has a block-like morphology with a particle size below 1 μm. The distribution of the particle size of NSD was measured by particle-size analysis (Figure S1). The size of Si dust is ranging from 200 nm to 10 μm.
Since the majority of NSD is composed of nano Si, it is capable of maintaining the electrode structure without serious pulverization after multiple cycles. It is likely that NSD with block-like structure could enhance the cycle performance, since the nanostructured Si is able to alleviate stress formed during lithiation [11]. Most of the synthetic methods for designing the 2D-nanostructured Si have limitations on mass production, due to tricky and expensive procedures. In this regard, the preparation approach of upcycling Si sludge into nanostructured Si has a number of advantages in terms of commercialization.
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis were employed to confirm the presence of impurities in the NSD. There was no noticeable impurity peak in the EDX result (Figure 1c). The XRD result (Figure 1c) also supports that NSD has the typical crystalline structure of Si (JCPDS No. 27-1402), without impurity phases [19].
Although the unique nanostructure and size distribution of NSD is beneficial to mitigate the stress generated during cycling, severe volume change still remains due to the large amount of Li+ incorporation into the Si. In order to investigate the influence of the lithium uptake degree on electrochemical performances, the state of charge (SOC) was controlled by changing the lower cut-off voltage. The cut-off voltage of pristine NSD (100% SOC), NSD-SOC70 (70% SOC) and NSD-SOC50 (50% SOC) were 0.01 V, 0.10 V and 0.12 V, respectively. The electrochemical properties of NSD electrodes were examined using 2032 coin-type half-cells. NSD-anode electrodes served as working electrodes and pure lithium metal foil was used as reference/counter electrodes. The initial discharge–charge curves of each electrode at 0.1 C are presented in Figure 2a. All electrodes exhibited two voltage plateaus at near ~0.1 and ~0.4 V in the lithiation and de-lithiation curves, which corresponds to the alloy reaction of the crystalline Si with lithium [8]. Additionally, there are no noticeable plateaus associated with side reaction, except for the SEI formation or impurity plateaus. Pristine NSD, NSD-SOC70 and NSD-SOC50 electrodes exhibited initial charge (de-lithiation) capacities of 3312 mAh/g, 1960 mAh/g and 1617 mAh/g, respectively. The cycle test was conducted at a current rate of 0.5 C (1 C = 2000 mAh/g) for 100 cycles (Figure 2b). The formation process (at 0.1 C for 1 cycle and at 0.2 C for 1cycle) was conducted to electrochemically activate the anode electrode and form a stable SEI layer before the cycling test. The capacities of pristine NSD, NSD-SOC70 and NSD-SOC50 electrodes retained 50.3%, 91.5% and 101.7% of initial charge capacity after 100 cycles, respectively. The capacity retention of NSD-SOC50 electrode showed more than 100% of its initial charge capacity due to the partial activation of the anode electrode. The partial activation of the electrode is capable of enhancing the cycle performance of the practical cell, since inactivated Si replaces dead Si during cycling. The high-capacity retention of SOC-controlled electrodes (NSD-SOC70 and NSD-SOC50) is attributed to the efficient prevention of material fracture and electrode pulverization arising from the volumetric change. Mechanically stable electrodes are beneficial to keep maintaining the structural integrity of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer during cycling, which is one of the most important aspects to design Si anodes [20].
To compare the electrochemical performances between electrodes, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were carried out after 1 and 100 cycles in the frequency range from 250 kHz to 10 mHz with an amplitude of 5 mV. Nyquist plots obtained from EIS are plotted in Figure 3. The x-intercept of a semicircle indicates an Ohmic resistance and the diameter of the semicircle corresponds to a charge transfer resistance (Rct) [21,22]. The initial charge transfer resistances of pristine NSD, NSD-SOC70 and NSD-SOC50 electrodes are 95.5 Ω, 98.9 Ω and 117.4 Ω, respectively. The highest charge transfer resistance of NSD-SOC50 is related to the partial activation of anode. The changing ratio of charge transfer resistance of each electrode before and after cycling is significantly different. After 100 cycles, the pristine NSD has the highest charge transfer resistance (365.1 Ω) in comparison with NSD-SOC70 (190.1 Ω) and NSD-SOC50 (183.7 Ω). The huge increase in resistance indicates the degradation of the pristine NSD electrode (i.e., material fracture, electrode crack, unstable SEI, electrolyte depletion), which is attributed by the volume change of the Si electrode. Considering this result, the step to modulate the utilization degree of electrodes facilitates the stable cycling of electrodes as well as stabilizes the SEI layer during cycling.
In order to investigate the swelling behavior in terms of utilization degree, we measured the thickness change of each electrode after lithiation (Figure 4). After lithiation, the NSD electrode exhibited 73.7% of electrode swelling when compared to the as-received electrode. On the other hand, NSD-SOC70 and NSD-SOC50 showed a reduced swelling ratio of 55.5% and 44.4%, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results also corroborated that the electrode with controlled utilization degree maintained its structural integrity, even after a cycle. These results can be inferred from the morphology of electrode, i.e., material crack (Figure S1). In general, the reduced expansion of electrodes can minimize the pulverization of electrode components and provide an improved cycle stability. As shown in Figure 4, each electrode was still expanded even after the full delithiation. Pristine NSD, NSD-SOC70 and NSD-SOC50 had electrode-swelling ratios of 57.9%, 38.9% and 27.8%, respectively. This is because the delithiated Si electrode could not recover its original configuration due to the irreversible structural transformation. However, an interesting thing to note is that electrodes with controlled utilization degree are relatively more beneficial to maintaining the electrode structure than the fully charged NSD. It is reported that the structure distortion of electrodes accelerates a fading capacity. Moreover, the electrode swelling could raise safety issues caused by separator deformation or battery package breakage [23,24]. The enhanced structure resilience of electrodes with a controlled utilization degree can address the concerns with regard to capacity fading and safety problem.
The nominal voltage of LIBs is an important factor to determine energy density. However, the operating voltage of the Si anode is an intrinsic property, which cannot be changed by material engineering. Unlike the previous approach, controlling the utilization degree would be the only way to enhance the nominal voltage because the desired voltage plateaus range can be easily optimized according to the requirements. Figure 5 compares the voltage profiles of a pristine NSD electrode and controlled NSD electrodes with different utilization degrees (NSD-SOC50). NSD-SOC50 shows a lower average charge voltage (0.418 V) than pristine NSD (0.457 V), which leads to a higher nominal discharge voltage in full cells. This would contribute to an improvement in energy density.
In summary, we proposed an efficient strategy in order to improve the overall electrochemical performances and to practically use the upcycled Si nanomaterial (NSD) as an anode. The proposed battery operation protocol, i.e., control of utilization degree, was applied to the NSD electrodes. An NSD electrode has a similar specific capacity and superior cycle performance when compared to the previously reported bulk Si material. It is because the volume change of Si materials is significantly mitigated, leading to an improved electrical contact between the Si electrode and current collector. Apart from the electrochemical performance, our approach has a strong benefit in terms of fabrication cost, since the nanostructured Si material can be easily obtained and scaled up from the industrial waste. Considering these beneficial features, our proposed strategy would provide a key for designing Si materials suitable for a next-generation lithium ion battery and advance the development of practical Si anodes in a near future.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Preparation of Nanostructured Si Dust Anode Electrode

Nanostructured Si dust was provided by TRS Co. Ltd. and used as an anode material without further treatment. The slurry was prepared by mixing 80% Si, 10% Super P and 10% polyacrylic acid (Mv ~450,000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), as well as deionized (DI) water, with a planetary mixer. This as-prepared slurry was laminated onto a copper foil via tape-casting. The casted electrode was dried in a vacuum oven at 100 °C for 3 h. The mass loading level of the Si electrode was 1.6 mg/cm2.

3.2. Characterization

The morphology of NSD was analyzed using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, MIRA II LMH, TESCAN, Brno-Kohoutovice, Czech Republic). The chemical composition was characterized using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK, attached to the FESEM). The crystallographic structure of NSD was investigated using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Particle size analysis (PSA, LA-950V2, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) was used to measure the particle-size distribution of NSD.

3.3. Measurement of Electrochemical Performance

Coin-type half-cells (2032R type) were fabricated to evaluate the electrochemical performances of anode electrodes. Lithium metal foil served as both the reference and counter electrode. Polyolefin membrane and 1.15 M lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6) in ethylene carbonate-ethylmethyl carbonate-dimethyl carbonate (EC-EMC-DMC, 2:4:4 vol%), containing 12.5 wt% of FEC, were used as separator and electrolyte. The amount of electrolyte was 100 μL. The electrochemical properties were characterized under the galvanostatic mode at 0.5 C. Pre-cycling was conducted to form a stable SEI layer for three cycles (one cycle at 0.1 C, one cycle at 0.2 C and one cycle at 0.5 C). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was evaluated in the frequency range from 250 kHz to 10 mHz at amplitude of 5 mV.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11123248/s1, Figure S1: Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of utilization degree controlled electrode for before and after cycling.

Author Contributions

J.K. (Junghwan Kim) and J.K. (Jisoo Kwon) conceived of the idea; J.K. (Junghwan Kim), J.K. (Jisoo Kwon) and M.J.K. performed the experiments; J.K. (Junghwan Kim), J.K. (Jisoo Kwon), M.J.K., M.J.O., D.S.J., K.C.R., J.J., P.J.K. and J.C. analyzed the results; J.K. (Junghwan Kim), J.K. (Jisoo Kwon), P.J.K. and J.C. wrote the paper. P.J.K. and J.C. guided and supervised the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2021M3H4A3A02086100) and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1F1A1059892).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Davis, S.J.; Lewis, N.S.; Shaner, M.; Aggarwal, S.; Arent, D.; Azevedo, I.L.; Benson, S.M.; Bradley, T.; Brouwer, J.; Chiang, Y.-M.; et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 2018, 360, eaas9793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Choi, J.; Kim, P.J. A Roadmap of Battery Separator Development: Past and Future. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 100858, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tzeng, Y.; Chen, R.; He, J.-L. Silicon-Based Anode of Lithium Ion Battery Made of Nano Silicon Flakes Partially Encapsulated by Silicon Dioxide. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.; Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices. Science 2011, 334, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tarascon, J.M.; Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001, 414, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Argyropoulos, D.-P.; Zardalidis, G.; Giotakos, P.; Daletou, M.; Farmakis, F. Study of the Role of Void and Residual Silicon Dioxide on the Electrochemical Performance of Silicon Nanoparticles Encapsulated by Graphene. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McDowell, M.T.; Lee, S.W.; Nix, W.D.; Cui, Y. 25th Anniversary Article: Understanding the Lithiation of Silicon and Other Alloying Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4966–4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Son, I.H.; Hwan Park, J.; Kwon, S.; Park, S.; Rümmeli, M.H.; Bachmatiuk, A.; Song, H.J.; Ku, J.; Choi, J.W.; Choi, J.-M.; et al. Silicon carbide-free graphene growth on silicon for lithium-ion battery with high volumetric energy density. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, X.H.; Zhong, L.; Huang, S.; Mao, S.X.; Zhu, T.; Huang, J.Y. Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1522–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, T.; Choi, J.; Paik, U. Freestanding rGO-SWNT-STN Composite Film as an Anode for Li Ion Batteries with High Energy and Power Densities. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 2380–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ryu, J.; Chen, T.; Bok, T.; Song, G.; Ma, J.; Hwang, C.; Luo, L.; Song, H.-K.; Cho, J.; Wang, C.; et al. Mechanical mismatch-driven rippling in carbon-coated silicon sheets for stress-resilient battery anodes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shi, L.; Pang, C.; Chen, S.; Wang, M.; Wang, K.; Tan, Z.; Gao, P.; Ren, J.; Huang, Y.; Peng, H.; et al. Vertical Graphene Growth on SiO Microparticles for Stable Lithium Ion Battery Anodes. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3681–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Keller, C.; Desrues, A.; Karuppiah, S.; Martin, E.; Alper, J.P.; Boismain, F.; Villevieille, C.; Herlin-Boime, N.; Haon, C.; Chenevier, P. Effect of Size and Shape on Electrochemical Performance of Nano-Silicon-Based Lithium Battery. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, S.E.; Jang, I.-S.; Kang, Y.C.; Chun, J.; Jung, D.-S. Residual silica removal and nanopore generation on industrial waste silicon using ammonium fluoride and its application to lithium-ion battery anodes. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 419, 129389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yoko, A.; Oshima, Y. Recovery of silicon from silicon sludge using supercritical water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 75, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, H.; Zheng, L.; Zhan, J.; Du, N.; Liu, W.; Ma, J.; Su, L.; Wang, L. Recycling silicon-based industrial waste as sustainable sources of Si/SiO2 composites for high-performance Li-ion battery anodes. J. Power Sources 2020, 449, 227513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Zhu, M.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Xie, S.; Wang, L.; Yang, X.; He, X.; Sun, Y. Recycling of Lignin and Si Waste for Advanced Si/C Battery Anodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 57055–57063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, K.H.; Shon, J.; Jeong, H.; Park, H.; Lim, S.J.; Heo, J.S. Improving the cyclability of silicon anodes for lithium-ion batteries using a simple pre-lithiation method. J. Power Sources 2020, 459, 228066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sekar, S.; Aqueel Ahmed, A.T.; Inamdar, A.I.; Lee, Y.; Im, H.; Kim, D.Y.; Lee, S. Activated Carbon-Decorated Spherical Silicon Nanocrystal Composites Synchronously-Derived from Rice Husks for Anodic Source of Lithium-Ion Battery. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Choi, J.W.; Aurbach, D. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.; Choi, J.; Song, T.; Paik, U. Stackable, three dimensional carbon–metal oxide composite for high performance supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 20459–20464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choi, J.; Lee, S.; Ha, J.; Song, T.; Paik, U. Sol–gel nanoglues for an organic binder-free TiO2 nanofiber anode for lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3230–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chae, S.; Ko, M.; Kim, K.; Ahn, K.; Cho, J. Confronting Issues of the Practical Implementation of Si Anode in High-Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries. Joule 2017, 1, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, D.; Kondo, A.; Lee, S.; Myeong, S.; Sun, S.; Hwang, I.; Song, T.; Naito, M.; Paik, U. Controlled swelling behavior and stable cycling of silicon/graphite granular composite for high energy density in lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 457, 228021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of yielding process of NSD, (b1b3) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of NSD, (c) energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) results of NSD, (d) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern and (e) particle size distribution (PSD) of NSD.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of yielding process of NSD, (b1b3) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of NSD, (c) energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) results of NSD, (d) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern and (e) particle size distribution (PSD) of NSD.
Nanomaterials 11 03248 g001
Figure 2. Electrochemical performances of NSD electrodes with different utilization degrees. (a) Initial cycle voltage profiles at 0.1 C, (b) cycle retention at 0.5 C and (c) Coulombic efficiency at 0.5 C.
Figure 2. Electrochemical performances of NSD electrodes with different utilization degrees. (a) Initial cycle voltage profiles at 0.1 C, (b) cycle retention at 0.5 C and (c) Coulombic efficiency at 0.5 C.
Nanomaterials 11 03248 g002
Figure 3. Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) of NSD electrodes before (a) and after cycling (b).
Figure 3. Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) of NSD electrodes before (a) and after cycling (b).
Nanomaterials 11 03248 g003
Figure 4. Swelling behavior of NSD electrodes.
Figure 4. Swelling behavior of NSD electrodes.
Nanomaterials 11 03248 g004
Figure 5. Normalized charge voltage profiles of a pristine NSD electrode and a controlled NSD electrode with different utilization degrees (NSD-SOC50).
Figure 5. Normalized charge voltage profiles of a pristine NSD electrode and a controlled NSD electrode with different utilization degrees (NSD-SOC50).
Nanomaterials 11 03248 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.; Kwon, J.; Kim, M.J.; O, M.J.; Jung, D.S.; Roh, K.C.; Jang, J.; Kim, P.J.; Choi, J. A Strategic Approach to Use Upcycled Si Nanomaterials for Stable Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3248. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123248

AMA Style

Kim J, Kwon J, Kim MJ, O MJ, Jung DS, Roh KC, Jang J, Kim PJ, Choi J. A Strategic Approach to Use Upcycled Si Nanomaterials for Stable Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(12):3248. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Junghwan, Jisoo Kwon, Min Ji Kim, Min Ju O, Dae Soo Jung, Kwang Chul Roh, Jihyun Jang, Patrick Joohyun Kim, and Junghyun Choi. 2021. "A Strategic Approach to Use Upcycled Si Nanomaterials for Stable Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries" Nanomaterials 11, no. 12: 3248. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123248

APA Style

Kim, J., Kwon, J., Kim, M. J., O, M. J., Jung, D. S., Roh, K. C., Jang, J., Kim, P. J., & Choi, J. (2021). A Strategic Approach to Use Upcycled Si Nanomaterials for Stable Operation of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials, 11(12), 3248. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop