Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Mechanical, Thermal and Antimicrobial Properties of Additively Manufactured Polylactic Acid with Optimized Nano Silica Content
Next Article in Special Issue
Simultaneous Removal of Arsenic and Manganese from Synthetic Aqueous Solutions Using Polymer Gel Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Nano-Magnetic NiFe2O4 and Its Photocatalytic Oxidation of Vanillyl Alcohol—Synthesis, Characterization, and Application in the Valorization of Lignin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication and Characterization of an Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells with POSS Passivating Hole Transport Layer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ALD Deposited ZnO:Al Films on Mica for Flexible PDLC Devices

1
Institute of Solid State Physics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Institute of Optical Materials and Technologies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
Department of Electrophysics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
4
Faculty of Engineering, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
5
Photonics Department, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(4), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11041011
Submission received: 7 March 2021 / Revised: 26 March 2021 / Accepted: 10 April 2021 / Published: 15 April 2021

Abstract

:
In this work, highly conductive Al-doped ZnO (AZO) films are deposited on transparent and flexible muscovite mica substrates by using the atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique. AZO-mica structures possess high optical transmittance at visible and near-infrared spectral range and retain low electric resistivity, even after continuous bending of up to 800 cycles. Structure performances after bending tests have been supported by atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis. Based on performed optical and electrical characterizations AZO films on mica are implemented as transparent conductive electrodes in flexible polymer dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) devices. The measured electro-optical characteristics and response time of the proposed devices reveal the higher potential of AZO-mica for future ITO-free flexible optoelectronic applications.

1. Introduction

Recent technological appeal for flexible, lightweight, inexpensive, enabling low-power consumption, and environmentally-friendly optoelectronics has stimulated intensive research on new generation optoelectronic devices. In this aspect, flexible transparent electrodes attracted extreme attention in numerous applications to mention among others touch screens, flat panel displays, organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), flexible sensors, solar cells, electronic skins, etc. [1,2,3]. Currently, indium-tin oxide (ITO) is the material of choice for transparent conducting electrodes, however, because of the several limitations like indium scarcity in nature, increasing cost of the production processing, and the brittleness due to the ITO’s ceramic structure, the need of alternative transparent and conductive layers to replace ITO is critically important. As the main requirements for flexible electrodes are high optical transparency, low electrical resistance, and mechanical bending stability without a substantial drop in electro-optical performance, it is essential to reach an optimized balance between the sheet resistance, optical transmittance, and bending ability, e.g., to realize precise interface layer-substrate.
The wide band-gap semiconductor zinc oxide possesses plentiful of useful properties that have attracted increasing attention in copious fields of research. The high transparency in visible spectra of ZnO combined with its tunable electrical conductivity enables its use in applications ranging from thin film transistors (TFTs) to functional layers in photovoltaics. ZnO can be used in optoelectronic applications in the near UV spectral range, including light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and photodetectors due to its direct band gap of 3.37 eV. Piezoelectric properties of ZnO allow applications in sensors and micro-electromechanical systems. Most of these applications are made possible by a rich compositional and functional diversity achievable by doping of ZnO with various elements. ZnO and doped ZnO can be prepared as thin films using a variety of techniques. The preparation methods, properties, and applications are recently reviewed in [4,5]. However, the increasingly rigorous requirements of the microelectronics industry, among other factors, have led to a sharp increase in the use of the atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique in various thin-film applications.
So far, in terms of transparent conductive layers, several promising materials for instance transparent conductive oxides (TCOs), conductive polymers, graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), etc., have been used as transparent electrodes possessing low resistance and high flexibility [6,7,8,9]. Among them, Al-doped zinc oxide (AZO) is mostly studied due to the high thermal stability, good resistance to hydrogen plasma damage, and lower fabrication cost, in comparison to the commercially available ITO layers [10]. In addition to similar electrical and optical properties to those of ITO, AZO has further advantages over ITO and some of the other common TCOs, including larger abundance, layers flexibility, and lack of toxicity [11]. Generally, AZO layers can be deposited by various methods as magnetron sputtering, sol-gel, pulsed laser deposition, metal-organic chemical vapor deposition at temperature interval between room temperature and 300 °C [12]. ALD technique is a deposition method relying on self-limiting reactions of specific precursors, characterized by exposing the substrate and growing layers to alternating organometallic precursors resulting in the sequential deposition of atomic layers onto the substrate surface [13]. The nature of the ALD reaction mechanism makes certain a high- quality pinhole-free coatings with an atomic-scale precision thickness control and excellent conformality onto large area arbitrary substrates with complex surface shapes, including 3D objects [14].
The current leading polymer materials for flexible optoelectronics, for example, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), and polyimide (PI) show several limitations concerning the processing temperature, inferior dimensional stability, and frequently substantial differences of the thermal expansion coefficients between the polymer substrate and conductive electrode layer [15]. The common drawback of the above organic materials is that they cannot tolerate elevated temperatures (typically higher than 200 °C) and suffer from degradation over time. In contrast, it is well-known that mica, a natural transparent inorganic crystalline material, possesses high flexibility due to its sheet/layered structure. As a result of the weak van der Waals interactions between the adjacent layers (weak interlayer bonding), mica is easy to peel off resulting in facile cleavage along the {001} planes [16], elastic (Young’s modulus of 200 GPa), and easily bendable that allows for a variety of flexible applications [17,18,19]. Moreover, mica possesses excellent optical transmittance in the ultraviolet–visible-infrared range, high-temperature stability (up to 600 °C for muscovite mica), high dimensional stability, and low cost [20]. In addition, mica is chemically inert, non-toxic, and more importantly, is compatible with almost all deposition techniques. Based on all of the above, mica appears to be an ideal substrate for flexible devices and wearable optoelectronic applications [21].
Across such applications, polymer dispersed liquid crystal-based structures have recently attracted considerable attention for applications as outdoor displays, projection displays, switchable privacy glasses, energy-saving windows, light shutters, etc. [22,23]. Usually, typical polymer dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC)-based devices use conventional transparent ITO layers as electrodes; however, due to the brittleness of the ITO, its implementation in flexible optoelectronics is complicated.
Aluminum-doped ZnO films were grown by atomic layer deposition on different polymer flexible substrates such as PET, PEN, polyimide (Kapton) [24,25,26,27,28]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no report on the ALD of AZO layers on flexible mica substrates.
Herein, we report the performances of AZO films synthesized by the ALD technique on mica substrates and applications in flexible polymer dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) structures. After deposition of AZO films on transparent mica, highly conductive and extremely foldable AZO electrodes were obtained, which displayed high optical transmittance and stable sheet resistance even after 800 cycles of bending. Sheet resistance was confirmed by the 4-point probe method and AFM analyses of the structure were conducted before and after bending tests. Based on performed characteristics, several flexible PDLC structures have been assembled and the measured electro-optical characteristics demonstrated great potential for future flexible optoelectronic applications.

2. Materials and Methods

AZO films were prepared by ALD using the Beneq TFS-200 system ((Beneq Group, Espoo, Finland)) on 34 µm-thick mica substrates at a deposition temperature of 200 °C. In addition, AZO films were deposited on 75 µm thick polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrates for reference. The deposition temperature for AZO on PET was 100 °C. A buffer layer of Al2O3 (~15 nm) was preliminary deposited, at the same temperature, by ALD to prevent the interdiffusion between PET and AZO. In the ALD process diethylzinc (DEZ, Zn(C2H5)2), trimethylaluminum (TMA, Al(CH3)3), and deionized water (H2O) were used as precursors for Zn, Al, and oxidant, respectively. Pure nitrogen was used as a carrier and purge gas at an average flow of 600 sccm. The Al-doping concentration in ZnO was adjusted by varying the number of DEZ/H2O and TMA/H2O cycles in a standard procedure for ALD processes [29] as follows: after 24 cycles of DEZ/H2O, a cycle of TMA/H2O was applied consisting of one so-called ‘supercycle’. The pulse durations for precursors reactions were the same of 200 ms for DEZ, TMA, and H2O, whereas the purging time after each precursor reaction was 2 s. The substrates were fixed with heat-resistant tape (specified temperature range −75 to +260 °C) in the ALD reaction chamber.
The AZO film thicknesses were obtained by ellipsometric measurements of AZO on Si reference substrates and simulations using an M-2000D spectroscopic ellipsometer (J.A. Woollam and Co., Lincoln, NE, USA). The film thickness and the optical constants were determined by fitting the experimental Ψ and Δ data [30].
The experimental Ψ and Δ data were analyzed using a three-layer model consisting of a Si substrate with SiO2 native oxide as a first layer, a ZnO layer as a second layer, and a roughness layer as a third layer. For the Si substrate and the native oxide, the data from the database of CompleteEASE Woollam data analysis software was used. The AZO layer was modeled using a PSemi-M0 and two Gaussian oscillators. The roughness layer for all samples is modeled by Bruggeman’s EMA (effective medium approximation). The thickness of AZO on mica was estimated to approximately 173 nm, while the thickness of AZO on PET was about 150 nm, respectively.
Crystal structures of AZO-Mica were investigated by powder X-ray diffraction. The diffraction patterns were collected on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (1.54056A) and LynxEye detector (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) within the 2Θ range from 5.3 to 80° and a constant step 0.02° 2Θ. The crystalline phase identification was performed with the Diffract-plus EVA using the ICDD-PDF2 Database. The surface topography and roughness of the as-grown films were examined by atomic force microscope (AFM) MFP-3D (Asylum Research, Oxford Instruments, NanoAnalysis 25.2 mi, High Wycombe, UK). A scanning electron microscope (SEM Philips 515, Koninklijke Philips N.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) was used to observe the morphologies of the prepared samples. The above structural measurements were performed also on AZO on PET for comparison.
The optical transmittance spectra were measured using an ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared (Shimadzu UV-VIS-NIR, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) spectrophotometer, at room temperature.
The bending test was performed using a computerized home-built bending setup, with an ESP301 control platform. In the bending test experiments, the transparent AZO-mica electrode edges were fixed between two clamps horizontally and the samples were bent by pushing the two clamps together up to a bending radius of 1.5 mm. The sheet resistance was measured using the four-point probe technique (Ossila Ltd., Sheffield, UK, system) before and after the bending test. The electro-optical properties of AZO on mica were further assessed before and after bending tests to evaluate the flexibility performance.
Based on the above characteristics, several AZO-mica substrates were selected for PDLC device assembly. First, the PDLC mixture was made by mixing UV-curable monomer NOA65 (Norland, n = 1.524, Norland Products, Cranbury, NJ, USA) and E7 nematic liquid crystal (LC, Merck, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at a 30:70 wt.% ratio, using polymerization-induced phase separation method. The LC/monomer mixture was injected into an empty cell assembled by two AZO-mica substrates separated with a mylar spacer (12 µm thick). Next, the cells were exposed to an ultraviolet light source (365 nm) with an intensity of 60 Mw/cm2 for 15 min to polymerize the UV-curable monomer NOA65. As a result, the phase separation leads to the formation of randomly dispersed LC droplets in a polymer matrix, which determines the unique behavior of PDLC devices, as will be discussed later.
The electro-optical modulation of assembled AZO on mica PDLC devices was measured by placing each one between a pair of apertures in optical set-up. A helium-neon laser (He-Ne) emitting at 633 nm was used as a light source. The change of transmittance was monitored by the photodetector placed behind the aperture as a function of the applied root-mean-square (RMS) alternating current (AC) voltage, at 1 kHz frequency. To measure the response and fall time, a rectangular pulse with a certain voltage in the working range (parameters discussed in Section 3.4) of the device was applied. The characteristic response and decay curves were recorded with a digital storage oscilloscope.

3. Results

3.1. Structural and Morphological Properties

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of AZO-mica and AZO on PET structures are presented in Figure 1a,b. As shown, the identification of AZO peaks is rather complicated due to the shadowing of the AZO reflection with the stronger signal of mica peaks or stronger PET substrate reflection. Hence, more detailed XRD patterns are shown in Figure 2a,b, where the diffraction peaks for ZnO hexagonal wurtzite structure with space group P63mc are detected. For AZO films on mica, the (100) peak at ~31.77° 2Θ is clearly visible. No other peaks for AZO were detectable. The crystalline structure of Al-doped ZnO films depends strongly on the deposition method and film composition. Concerning the AZO layers obtained by ALD, it was observed [31] that the undoped ZnO was preferentially (002) oriented, whereas the AZO films predominantly had the (100) orientation. The crystal orientations were influenced by the Al-doping. As Al2O3 was introduced, the (002) peak disappeared and the intensity of the (100) peak became dominant [32]. No traces of additional or impurity peaks were observed even in the logarithmic scale. The observation of only AZO (100) diffraction peaks on muscovite mica substrate suggests that AZO is growing on mica with preferable <100> orientation. The estimated lattice constants were a 3.215 ± 0.017 and c 5.245 ± 0.027. The average crystal grains size was calculated as ~59 nm.
In contrast, the XRD pattern of AZO layers on PET shows mostly reflections from the PET substrates and the weak AZO (100) peak. The estimated average crystalline grain size was ~20 nm. The estimated lattice constants were a 3.210 ± 0.001 and c 5.243 ± 0.003. The (002) and (101) peaks of AZO are not detectable and the AZO (110) peak was very weak, indicating the inferior crystallinity of AZO films deposited on PET at relatively lower substrate temperature. The AZO is growing on PET with preferable <100> orientation. It was also observed that the crystalline structure and preferred crystalline grain growth orientation of AZO on mica depend on the deposition method and process temperature and even allows van der Waals epitaxial growth [33].
The surface morphologies and root mean square (RMS) roughness values of blank mica and PET substrates, as well as AZO-mica and AZO on PET layers as-deposited and after bending of 800 cycles, are shown in Figure 3. Freshly cleaved muscovite mica has a very flat surface substrate as shown in Figure 3a, a prerequisite for the growth of high-quality AZO films. The surface roughness of AZO-mica (Figure 3b) does not change significantly after the bending test (Figure 3c). However, the surface roughness of AZO on PET (Figure 3e) increased almost two-fold, presumably due to the surface deformation during bending (Figure 3f).

3.2. Optical Properties

Transmittance spectra of AZO on mica and AZO on PET are shown in Figure 4. The spectra of blank mica and PET substrates are also included for reference. As can be seen, the absorption edges of AZO on mica and AZO on PET are shifted to the longer wavelengths (red shift) in comparison to the blank (reference) substrates. The absorption edge originates from the absorption corresponding to the direct transition of electrons from the valence band to the conduction band [34]. The optical transparency of AZO on mica is higher than those of AZO on PET together with the benefit of improved conductivity, discussed in the next sub-section.
We measured the transmittance spectra of AZO on mica and AZO on PET films after completed bending cycles and found there is no change in optical spectra. The data are presented as a dotted line for AZO on mica film for illustration purposes only.

3.3. Electrical Properties and Bending Test

The current vs. voltage (I–V) characteristics of AZO film on mica are presented in Figure S1 which confirms Ohmic behavior. Figure 5 shows that AZO on mica exhibits higher conductivity than AZO on PET, assumed to be due to the higher deposition temperature and improved crystallinity of the AZO film [33]. To verify the stability of AZO on mica against mechanical bending, a cycling bending test was performed (see Figure S2) As shown in Figure 5, the sheet resistance of AZO on mica remains almost constant, even after continuous bending of up to 800 times with a bending radius of 1.5 mm. It is supposed the stability is due to the unique layered structure of mica and flexibility of the AZO films. In contrast, the sheet resistance of AZO on PET monotonously increases with the number of bending cycles. As shown in Figure 3f, the RMS data of AFM suggested some deformations (cracks) during the bending test of AZO on PET causing probably breaks in the conductivity channels, i.e., the sheet resistance increases with bending cycles.

3.4. AZO on Mica for Assembling PDLC Devices

Based on the above performed structural, optical, and electrical characteristics, AZO on mica was applied for PDLC device assembly. The schematic structure of the device is shown in Figure 6a. An experimental optical set-up (shown in Figure 6b) was assembled to measure the transmittance dependence of PDLC devices as a function of the applied voltage.
In general, the PDLC structure can be reversibly switched between a light-scattering state and a transparent state by applying an external electric field, which results from a match or mismatch of refractive indices between the LC molecules and the polymer matrix (LC with positive dielectric anisotropy) [35,36]. This effect is due to the ability of applied voltage to re-orient the LC molecules inside the droplets in order to match the LC’s refractive index to that of the polymer matrix. When no external applied voltage is applied, due to the mismatch between the refractive indexes of LC molecules and polymer matrix, the randomly oriented LC molecules inside the polymer matrix scatter the incident light and caused PDLC film to appear opaque (“off state” shown in Figure 6c, left side). Under the application of an electric field, LC molecules inside the droplets are able to align towards the electric field direction such that the refractive indices between the polymer and ordinary axis of LC molecules match, resulting in a transparent state (“on state” shown at Figure 6c, right side).
A typical transmittance dependence as a function of the applied voltage of AZO on a mica PDLC device is shown in Figure 7a. The device functionality can be explained as follows: at the initial state (without an applied voltage (Voff)), the LC molecules in the PDLC structure are randomly oriented inside the droplets, which cause a light scattering effect when the light passes through the device. As a result, the opaque state (“off” state) appears. However, when a voltage is applied (Von), the electric field forces the LC’s nematic director to align along the direction of the electric field, allowing the light to pass through the LC droplets. As a result, the transparent state (“on” state) appears. This way, the transmitted light intensity through the PDLC structure can be controlled by the application of an external voltage.
Here, we defined the threshold voltage, Vth, as an applied voltage value required to reach 10% of the maximum transmittance T (T10%), e.g., to turn on the PDLC cell. Subsequently, the saturation voltage, Vsat, is the applied voltage value, required to reach 90% of the maximum transmittance T (T90%). The measured threshold voltage, Vth, of AZO on the mica PDLC device is around 5.8 V, and the saturation voltage, Vsat, is around 16.6 V (Figure 7a). These values are slightly better than the results presented at [26] for PDLC devices using AZO on PET.
In addition, the response time of the AZO on the mica PDLC device was measured using the set-up shown in Figure 6b. A rectangular pulse with a certain voltage in the working range (between the on and off states of the device) was applied, visualized by a digital oscilloscope. By measuring the transmitted light intensity during the time, a typical dynamic curve is obtained, where the red curve represents the voltage change and the black curve is the transmitted light intensity change (Figure 7b). We denote the response time τr as a rise time necessary for the intensity to reach 0.9 (or 90%) of the saturation intensity and the fall time τf to drop to 0.1 (or 10%) of the saturation intensity. The time required for transmittance to change from T10% to T90% is the response time. The obtained response time and the decay time values of ~78 ms and ~74 ms, respectively are in good agreement with those reported for PDLC-based devices using other transparent contacts [37,38,39].
To summarize, the AZO films on mica deposited by the ALD technique support excellent optical transparency, low sheet resistance, and bending stability. The PDLC device performance confirms the feasibility of AZO on mica structure as an alternative flexible transparent conductor.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we demonstrated a highly flexible light shutter device using PDLC and AZO on mica transparent conductive films. Structural, optical properties, and the sheet resistance bending durability of AZO on mica were systematically studied and discussed. Flexible PDLC devices were successfully fabricated, and the measured driving voltage and response time values show promising electro-optical functionality. The presented results opened the great potential for integration of AZO transparent conductive layers on mica substrates into the next generation ITO-free flexible optoelectronics.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11041011/s1, Figure S1: Current-voltage characteristic of AZO thin films deposited on mica substrate, Figure S2: (a,b) Photographs of the AZO on mica sample and (c) bending test experimental set-up, Video S1: Video demonstration supporting the flexibility of performed AZO on mica PDLC de-vice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M., D.Z.D., K.Y.H., S.H.L. and J.-Y.J.; methodology D.Z.D., B.B., Z.F.C., C.Y.H. and D.P.; software C.Y.H., Z.F.C., V.S. and B.N.; formal analysis, Z.F.C., C.Y.H., V.S., B.N., V.M., S.H.L.; resources D.Z.D., V.M. and S.H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Z.D. and V.M.; writing—review and editing V.M., D.Z.D., D.P., K.Y.H., S.H.L. and J.-Y.J.; visualization, D.Z.D., V.M., D.P., C.Y.H., V.S., B.N., B.B., K.Y.H., S.H.L. and J.-Y.J.; supervision V.M., D.P., K.Y.H., S.H.L. and J.-Y.J.; funding acquisition D.Z.D., V.M. and S.H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Bulgarian Science Fund under the projects KП-06-H-28/8, and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan under contract numbers: MOST 109-2811-E-009-120-546 and MOST 109-2927-I-009-507 (Bulgaria-Taiwan PPP project). Research equipment of Distributed Research Infrastructure INFRAMAT, part of the Bulgarian National Roadmap for Research Infrastructures, supported by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science was used in these investigations.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Ying-Hao Chu, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan for mica substrates, P. Terziyska for the thickness measurements and D. Kovacheva for XRD analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vidor, F.F.; Meyers, T.; Hilleringmann, U. Flexible Electronics: Integration processes for organic and inorganic semiconductor-based thin-film transistors electronics. Electronics 2015, 4, 480–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Lu, X.; Liu, M. Recent progress on flexible inorganic single-crystalline functional oxide films for advanced electronics. Mater. Horiz. 2019, 6, 911–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Du, Y.; Xu, J.; Paul, B.; Eklund, P. Flexible thermoelectric materials and devices. Appl. Mat. Today 2018, 12, 366–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tynell, T.; Karppinen, M. Atomic layer deposition of ZnO: A review. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2014, 29, 043001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, Z.; Banerjee, P. Review Article: Atomic layer deposition of doped ZnO films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2019, 37, 050802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ma, Y.; Zhi, L. Graphene-Based Transparent Conductive Films: Material Systems. Prep. Appl. Small Methods 2019, 3, 1800199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Stadler, A. Transparent conducting oxides-an up-to-date overview. Materials 2012, 5, 661–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Masis, M.M.; Wolf, S.D.; Robinson, R.W.; Ager, J.W.; Ballif, C. Transparent electrodes for efficient optoelectronics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3, 1600529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sharma, S.; Shriwastava, S.; Kumar, S.; Bhatt, K.; Tripathi, C.C. Alternative transparent conducting electrode materials for flexible optoelectronic devices. Opto-Electr. Rev. 2018, 26, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Minami, T. Transparent conducting oxide semiconductors for transparent electrodes. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2005, 20, S35–S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Minami, T. Substitution of transparent conducting oxide thin films for indium tin oxide transparent electrode applications. Thin. Solid Films 2008, 516, 1314–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gordon, P.G.; Balcic, G.; Lopinski, G.P.; Barry, S.T. Work function of doped zinc oxide films deposited by ALD. J. Mater. Res. 2020, 35, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Johnson, R.W.; Hultqvist, A.; Bent, S.F. A brief review of atomic layer deposition: From fundamentals to applications. Mater. Today 2014, 17, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. George, S.M. Atomic layer deposition: An overview. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ke, S.; Chen, C.; Fu, N.; Zhou, H.; Ye, M.; Lin, P.; Yuan, W.; Zeng, X.; Chen, L.; Huang, H. Transparent Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes on Muscovite Mica for High-Temperature-Processed Flexible Optoelectronic Devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 28406–28411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yen, M.; Bitla, Y.; Chu, Y.-H. Van der Waals heteroepitaxy on muscovite. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 234, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bitla, Y.; Chu, Y.-H. MICAtronics: A new platform for flexible X-tronics. Flat Chem. 2017, 3, 26–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bitla, Y.; Chu, Y.-H. van der Waals oxide heteroepitaxy for soft transparent electronics. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 18523–18544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Paul, B.; Khranovskyy, V.; Yakimova, R.; Eklund, P. Donor-doped ZnO thin films on mica for fully inorganic flexible thermoelectrics. Mater. Res. Lett. 2019, 7, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bitla, Y.; Chen, C.; Lee, H.-C.; Do, T.H.; Ma, C.-H.; Qui, L.V.; Huang, C.-W.; Wu, W.-W.; Chang, L.; Chiu, P.-W.; et al. Oxide Heteroepitaxy for Flexible Optoelectronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 32401–32407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chu, Y.H. Van der Waals oxide heteroepitaxy. NPJ Quantum Mater. 2017, 2, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Baetens, R.; Jelle, B.P.; Gustavsen, A. Properties, requirements, and possibilities of smart windows for dynamic daylight and solar energy control in buildings: State-of-the-art. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 8–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chung, S.H.; Noh, H.Y. Polymer-dispersed liquid crystal devices with graphene electrodes. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 32149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luka, G.; Witkowski, B.S.; Wachnicki, L.; Jakiela, R.; Virt, I.S.; Andrzejczuk, M.; Lewandowska, M.; Godlewski, M. Electrical and mechanical stability of aluminum-doped ZnO films grown on flexible substrates by atomic layer deposition. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2014, 186, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dhakal, T.; Nandur, A.; Christian, R.; Vanhart, D.; Vasekar, P.; Westgate, C.R. Growth of AZO on flexible substrate using ALD system as a transparent conducting oxide for solar cells. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2011, 1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, G.-B.; Song, S.H.; Lee, M.-W.; Kim, Y.-J.; Choi, B.-H. Characterization of physical and mechanical properties of Al2O3-doped ZnO (AZO) thin films deposited on transparent polyimide supports with various ALD process parameters. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 535, 147731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Marques, A.C.; Faria, J.; Perdigão, P.; Faustino, B.M.M.; Ritasalo, R.; Costabello, K.; da Silva, R.C.; Ferreira, I. Stability under humidity, UV-light and bending of AZO films deposited by ALD on Kapton. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blagoev, B.S.; Aleksandrova, M.; Terziyska, P.; Tzvetkov, P.; Kovacheva, D.; Kolev, G.; Mehandzhiev, V.; Denishev, K.; Dimitrov, D. Investigation of the structural, optical and piezoe-lectric properties of ALD ZnO films on PEN substrates. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 992, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Blagoev, B.S.; Dimitrov, D.Z.; Mehandzhiev, V.B.; Kovacheva, D.; Terziyska, P.; Pavlic, J.; Lovchinov, K.; Mateev, E.; Leclercq, J.; Sveshtarov, P. Electron transport in Al-doped ZnO nanolayers obtained by atomic layer deposition. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2016, 700, 012040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blagoev, B.S.; Vlakhov, E.; Videkov, V.; Tzaneva, B.; Łuka, G.; Witkowski, B.S.; Terziyska, P.; Leclercq, J.; Krajewski, T.A.; Guziewicz, E.; et al. Atomic layer deposition of ZnO: Al on PAA substrates. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2016, 764, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kwon, S.J. Effect of precursor-pulse on properties of Al-doped ZnO films grown by Atomic Layer Deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Banerjee, P.; Lee, W.-J.; Bae, K.-R.; Lee, S.B.; Rubloff, G.W. Structural, electrical, and optical properties of atomic layer deposition Al-doped ZnO films. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 043504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ke, S.; Xie, J.; Chen, C.; Lin, P.; Zeng, X.; Shu, L.; Fei, L.; Wang, Y.; Ye, M.; Wang, D. van der Waals epitaxy of Al-doped ZnO film on mica as a flexible transparent heater with ultrafast thermal response. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 031905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dong, B.-Z.; Hu, H.; Fang, G.-J.; Zhao, X.-Z.; Zheng, D.-Y.; Sun, Y.-P. Comprehensive investigation of structural, electrical, and optical properties for ZnO: Al films deposited at different substrate temperature and oxygen ambient. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 073711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Coates, D. Polymer-dispersed liquid crystals. J. Mater. Chem. 1995, 5, 2063–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pozhidaev, E.P.; Kaznacheev, A.V.; Torgova, S.I.; Kesaev, V.V.; Barbashov, V.A. Polymer dispersed liquid crystals with electrically controlled light scattering in the visible and near-infrared ranges. Opt. Mater. Express 2020, 10, 3030–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dimitrov, D.; Marinova, V.; Petrov, S.; Petrova, D.; Napoleonov, B.; Blagoev, B.; Strijkova, V.; Hsu, K.Y.; Lin, S.H. Atomic layer deposited Al-doped ZnO thin films for display applications. Coatings 2020, 10, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chiou, C.C.; Hsu, F.H.; Petrov, S.; Marinova, V.; Dikov, H.; Vitanov, P.; Dimitrov, D.; Hsu, K.Y.; Lin, Y.H.; Lin, S.H. Flexible light valves using polymer dispersed liquid crystals and TiO2/Ag/TiO2 multilayers. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 16911–16921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chiou, C.C.; Marinova, V.; Petrov, S.; Fidanova, C.; Angelova, I.; Petrova, D.; Dimitrov, D.Z.; Lin, S.H. Flexible and stretchable optoelectronic devices using graphene. In Proceedings of the SPIE, 20th International Conference and School on Quantum Electronics: Laser Physics and Applications, Nessebar, Bulgaria, 17–21 September 2019; p. 110471H. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. XRD of (a) AZO on mica and (b) AZO on PET (blank mica and PET are included as references).
Figure 1. XRD of (a) AZO on mica and (b) AZO on PET (blank mica and PET are included as references).
Nanomaterials 11 01011 g001
Figure 2. Detailed XRD patterns of (a) AZO on mica and (b) AZO on PET (blank mica and PET are included as references).
Figure 2. Detailed XRD patterns of (a) AZO on mica and (b) AZO on PET (blank mica and PET are included as references).
Nanomaterials 11 01011 g002
Figure 3. AFM images: (ac) AZO on mica (as-deposited and after bending) and blank mica and (df) AZO on PET (as-deposited and after bending test) and blank PET, respectively.
Figure 3. AFM images: (ac) AZO on mica (as-deposited and after bending) and blank mica and (df) AZO on PET (as-deposited and after bending test) and blank PET, respectively.
Nanomaterials 11 01011 g003
Figure 4. Transmittance spectra of AZO on mica and AZO on PET substrates. Transmittance spectra of mica and PET blank substrates are shown for reference (dash lines), as well as AZO on mica after bending (dot line). Inset image-photograph of AZO on mica substrate.
Figure 4. Transmittance spectra of AZO on mica and AZO on PET substrates. Transmittance spectra of mica and PET blank substrates are shown for reference (dash lines), as well as AZO on mica after bending (dot line). Inset image-photograph of AZO on mica substrate.
Nanomaterials 11 01011 g004
Figure 5. Sheet resistance dependence of the number of bending cycles for AZO on mica and AZO on PET layers.
Figure 5. Sheet resistance dependence of the number of bending cycles for AZO on mica and AZO on PET layers.
Nanomaterials 11 01011 g005
Figure 6. (a) Schematic structure of AZO on mica PDLC device (b) an experimental set-up to measure voltage-transmittance characteristics and the response time (c) principle of work demonstrating image of NCTU of AZO on mica PDLC device at “off” and “on” states. (Supplementary Materials Video S1, video demonstration (“off” and “on” states and flexibility)).
Figure 6. (a) Schematic structure of AZO on mica PDLC device (b) an experimental set-up to measure voltage-transmittance characteristics and the response time (c) principle of work demonstrating image of NCTU of AZO on mica PDLC device at “off” and “on” states. (Supplementary Materials Video S1, video demonstration (“off” and “on” states and flexibility)).
Nanomaterials 11 01011 g006
Figure 7. (a) Voltage-transmittance curve of AZO on mica PDLC device and (b) response time of AZO on mica PDLC device.
Figure 7. (a) Voltage-transmittance curve of AZO on mica PDLC device and (b) response time of AZO on mica PDLC device.
Nanomaterials 11 01011 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dimitrov, D.Z.; Chen, Z.F.; Marinova, V.; Petrova, D.; Ho, C.Y.; Napoleonov, B.; Blagoev, B.; Strijkova, V.; Hsu, K.Y.; Lin, S.H.; et al. ALD Deposited ZnO:Al Films on Mica for Flexible PDLC Devices. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11041011

AMA Style

Dimitrov DZ, Chen ZF, Marinova V, Petrova D, Ho CY, Napoleonov B, Blagoev B, Strijkova V, Hsu KY, Lin SH, et al. ALD Deposited ZnO:Al Films on Mica for Flexible PDLC Devices. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(4):1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11041011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dimitrov, Dimitre Z., Zih Fan Chen, Vera Marinova, Dimitrina Petrova, Chih Yao Ho, Blagovest Napoleonov, Blagoy Blagoev, Velichka Strijkova, Ken Yuh Hsu, Shiuan Huei Lin, and et al. 2021. "ALD Deposited ZnO:Al Films on Mica for Flexible PDLC Devices" Nanomaterials 11, no. 4: 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11041011

APA Style

Dimitrov, D. Z., Chen, Z. F., Marinova, V., Petrova, D., Ho, C. Y., Napoleonov, B., Blagoev, B., Strijkova, V., Hsu, K. Y., Lin, S. H., & Juang, J. -Y. (2021). ALD Deposited ZnO:Al Films on Mica for Flexible PDLC Devices. Nanomaterials, 11(4), 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11041011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop