Next Article in Journal
Green Synthesis of Lead Sulphide Nanoparticles for High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cell Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Construction of Hexagonal Prism-like Defective BiOCL Hierarchitecture for Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride
Previous Article in Journal
One A3B Porphyrin Structure—Three Successful Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/nano12111931
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tunable Carrier Transfer of Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Charge-Conducting CoV2O6∙2H2O for Photocatalytic O2 Evolution

by
Shaohong Zang
1,
Xiaorong Cai
1,
Mengshan Chen
1,
Dehong Teng
1,
Fei Jing
1,
Zhe Leng
1,*,
Yingtang Zhou
1 and
Feng Lin
2,*
1
Institute of Innovation & Application, National Engineering Research Center for Marine Aquaculture, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China
2
College of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(11), 1931; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111931
Submission received: 2 May 2022 / Revised: 23 May 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 5 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nanomaterials in Photodegradation)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photocatalytic water splitting is one of the promising approaches to solving environmental problems and energy crises. However, the sluggish 4e− transfer kinetics in water oxidation half-reaction restricts the 2e− reduction efficiency in photocatalytic water splitting. Herein, cobalt vanadate-decorated polymeric carbon nitride (named CoVO/PCN) was constructed to mediate the carrier kinetic process in a photocatalytic water oxidation reaction (WOR). The photocatalysts were well-characterized by various physicochemical techniques such as XRD, FT-IR, TEM, and XPS. Under UV and visible light irradiation, the O2 evolution rate of optimized 3 wt% CoVO/PCN reached 467 and 200 μmol h−1 g−1, which were about 6.5 and 5.9 times higher than that of PCN, respectively. Electrochemical tests and PL results reveal that the recombination of photogenerated carriers on PCN is effectively suppressed and the kinetics of WOR is significantly enhanced after CoVO introduction. This work highlights key features of the tuning carrier kinetics of PCN using charge-conducting materials, which should be the basis for the further development of photocatalytic O2 reactions.

1. Introduction

Water splitting by sunlight is considered a preeminent method for converting solar energy to chemical fuels that are environmentally friendly and sustainable. The challenge of solar-to-fuel conversion is the water oxidation half-reaction (WOR) with 4e−, a transfer that requires a large overpotential and leads to significant losses in the overall efficiency of water splitting [1,2]. The major limits of water oxidation catalysts are (1) the poor absorption of visible light, (2) the low mobility and high recombination of charge carriers, and (3) the low efficiency of the water oxidation reaction [3,4]. Although the inspiration for water splitting comes from nature through biomimetics, photocatalysts cannot be confined to biology. To bridge the gap between the economic viability and efficiency of the WOR catalysts, tremendous efforts have been made over the years [5]. For practical applications, the catalysts should be high-performance, stable, and environmentally friendly.
Polymeric carbon nitride (PCN), a popular photocatalyst consisting of the earth-abundant elements carbon and nitrogen, is consistent with a sustainable energy economy [6,7]. The extended π-conjugated systems of PCN are beneficial to mediate a charge transfer for artificial photocatalysis. The suitable bandgap (~2.7 eV) endows PCN to overcome the endothermic character of a water splitting reaction (~1.23 eV theoretically). However, as a non-metal material, the low electrical conductivity and rapid recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs that lead to the photoactivity of PCN are not as good as expected [8]. Several strategies have been adopted to improve the efficiency of PCN in photocatalytic water splitting [9,10,11,12,13]. For example, morphology control is used to regulate specific surface area and adjust energy band structure [14,15,16]. Cocatalyst loading is adopted to offer active catalytic sites and facilitate the kinetics of WOR [17]. Heterojunction construction is beneficial to improve charge separation and transmission efficiency [18,19,20].
Transition-metal vanadates have been widely used as magnetic materials and electrode materials because of environmental friendliness, the low cost of raw materials, and excellent charge transport properties [21,22,23,24]. Since the Andrukaitis group presented the lithium intercalation of five transition metal vanadates MexV2O6 (Me = Co, Ni, Mn, Cu, and Zn) [25], reports about cobalt vanadates mainly concentrate on lithium batteries, sensors, and electrocatalysts [26,27,28,29]. Cobalt vanadates acting as catalysts were explored by the Xing and Zhao group, which reported Co3V2O8 in electrocatalytic and photocatalytic WOR for the first time [30,31]. Pavliuk et al. designed CoV2O6/V2O5 and Co2V2O7/V2O5 in TiO2 films for electrocatalytic O2 evolution, which showed good stability and sustained high-current densities at relatively low overpotentials [32]. Shen et al. designed a CoV2O6–V2O5/NRGO−1 composite for electrochemical WOR with high efficiency in which CoV2O6 acted as an active site [33]. Recently, Mondal et al. established the structure-property relationship of CoV2O6 and Co3V2O8 for electrocatalytic O2 evolution, and the experimental results showed that the former was more active than the latter [34]. This is due to the more rapid etching phenomenon of the ([VO3]n)n− in CoV2O6 than that of the discrete [VO4]3− in Co3V2O8. These reports reveal that cobalt vanadates have excellent charge transfer performance, which organic polymers are lacking.
Herein, we report a CoV2O6∙2H2O (CoVO) hybriding with PCN by a facile immersion strategy to enhance the activity of photocatalytic water splitting to O2. In the CoVO/PCN hybrid system, CoVO acted as a conductive material to accelerate charge transportation and separation, which is favored for a water oxidation reaction. Moreover, the polarization curves revealed that the overpotential of the WOR was obviously decreased meaning the photocatalytic activity rate was further improved. The band gap of CoVO was narrow enough (~2.03 eV) to harvest solar light, which broadened the visible light absorption of the CoVO/PCN. The highest oxygen evolution rates of the CoVO/PCN samples were 467 and 200 μmol h−1 g−1 by UV and visible light irradiation, respectively, which were about 6.5 and 5.9 times that of the pure PCN (72 and 34 μmol h−1 g−1, respectively). The synthesis, structural characterization, physico- and electrochemical properties, and WOR performance of the hybrids will be presented in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

Materials: All chemicals were used without further purification.
Urea was purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). NH4VO3, TMClx·nH2O (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Mn) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All the reagents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification.

2.1. Synthesis of PCN

PCN was synthesized by a traditional thermal polymerization strategy following our previous report [35]. Urea (10 g) was put into a crucible and annealed at 550 °C for 2 h in the air. The obtained yellow powder was PCN.

2.2. Synthesis of Transition-Metal Vanadates (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Mn)

Transition-metal vanadates were synthesized by hydrothermal method [31,36]. NH4VO3 (4 mmol) was dissolved and stirred in deionized water (80 mL) at 80 °C. Then, TMClx·nH2O (0.8 mmol) was added and the solution was stirred and heated until a solution was obtained. The solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave and reacted at 180 °C for 12 h. After the reaction was over, the sample was centrifugated and washed with deionized water and ethanol at least three times. The solid was dried at 80 °C overnight.

2.3. Synthesis of CoVO/PCN

The CoVO/PCN photocatalysts were obtained by an immersion method [20]. The as-prepared PCN (500 mg) and CoVO (20 mg) were immersed separately in deionized water (2 mL). The two suspensions were placed in an ultrasound machine for 20 min. Then, different amounts of CoVO suspension were added to the above PCN suspension with continuous ultrasound. After evaporating and drying in an oven at 80 °C overnight, the final obtained solid was CoVO/PCN. The as-synthesized solids were marked as x wt% CoVO/PCN (x = 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10).
The other TMVO/PCN (TM: Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Mn) samples were obtained using the same method.

2.4. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements to manifest the crystal structure of photocatalysts were carried out on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with CuKa1 radiation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to observe morphological characteristics of photocatalysts was performed on an FEI Tencai 20 microscope. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to analyze the chemical state of photocatalysts was obtained using a Thermo ESCALAB250 instrument. Room-temperature photoluminescence spectra (PL) were obtained by an Edinburgh FI/FSTCSPC 920 spectrophotometer. UV-vis diffuse reflection spectra (UV/Vis DRS) to analyze optical properties of photocatalysts were operated by a Varian Cary 500 Scan UV/Vis system. Electrochemical tests were performed on a Shanghai Chenhua Electrochemical Workstation. The three-electrode cells contained a working electrode, a counter electrode (Pt plate), and a reference electrode (Ag/AgCl electrode).

2.5. Photoactivity for Water Oxidation Reaction

Photocatalytic WOR occurred in a Pyrex top-irradiation reaction vessel. The reaction temperature in the photocatalytic system was kept at room temperature by circulating condensed water. The light source for the experiment is a 300 W Xeon lamp. The working current of the lamp is 15 A (CEL-HXF300). Generated gases in the reaction were tested by gas chromatography (a thermal conductive detector and a 5Å molecular sieve column) in which the carrier gas was Argon. In this system, the catalyst (50 mg) was well-dispersed in distilled water (100 mL) and added electron scavenger AgNO3 (0.17g) and pH buffer agent La2O3 (0.2 g). Before being irradiated, the air in the reaction solution was removed by evacuating several times.

3. Results and Discussion

The powered XRD patterns of the x wt% CoVO/PCN hybrids are shown in Figure 1a. There are six individual peaks located at 2θ = 17.6, 21.8, 22.4, 26.0, 27.5, and 42.8°, corresponding to (101), (102), (022), (031), (122), and (134) of CoV2O6∙2H2O [36]. No impurity peaks of the prepared materials could be observed, illustrating that CoV2O6∙2H2O was well-crystallized with high purity. The reflection at 2θ = 13.0° of PCN corresponds to an in-plane repeating motif along the (100) direction and the peak at 2θ = 27.4° is the stacking of the CN-conjugated layers along the (002) direction [10]. The characteristic diffraction peaks of the CoVO/PCN samples match well to both CoVO and PCN, indicating that CoVO is attached to the surface of PCN. However, the relative intensity between the (101) and (022) planes drastically changed from CoVO to 10% CoVO/PCN. The intensification of the (101) and (022) peaks changed after the immersion treatment but their positions were not shifted. In addition, the (102), (031), and (122) peaks of CoVO were also intensified [37]. The main reason is that the secondary development of the crystal surface was promoted by heat treatment during the immersion process and the conclusion can be confirmed by the XRD of CoVO before and after immersion (Figure S1a).
The FT-IR spectra of the x wt% CoVO/PCN samples as well as those of pure CoVO and PCN are shown in Figure 1b. The peaks at 809 cm−1 and 1200 to 1600 cm−1 are corresponding to the s-triazine ring vibration and the vibration bands of the aromatic C–N heterocycles of PCN. The strong characteristic peaks located at 930 and 970 cm−1 of CoVO can be obviously observed in the hybrids with the content of CoVO increasing. The FT-IR spectra again proved that the CoVO/PCN hybrids were successfully constructed. The typical characteristic peaks of PCN shown in the XRD patterns and FT-IR spectra mean that the main graphitic structure of PCN does not change and the CoVO/PCN hybrids are successfully constructed [20].
TEM images were carried out to observe the morphology characteristics of the 3 wt% CoVO/PCN composite. As shown in Figure 2a–d, the crystal CoVO was loaded on the surface of the typical silk nanosheets of PCN. Evident crystalline could be viewed on the surface of the two-dimensional polymer directly. The TEM images of the CoVO/PCN solid showed that these interactions led to the formation of an intact interface between CoVO and PCN. Since the surface of the graphitic carbon nitride was fully intact with cobalt vanadate, the charge transfer between the vanadate semiconductor and polymeric carbon nitride will be unobstructed. Both TEM elemental mapping (Figure 2e) and EDX analysis (Figure S2) of CoVO/PCN showed Co, V, O, and C, N elements visually belonging to CoVO and PCN. The coexistence of CoVO lattices and amorphous PCN observed in Figure 2c,d illustrate that a tight heterojunction between CoVO and PCN was formed in the hybrid [38]. Additionally, the BET-specific surface areas of PCN and 3 wt% CoVO/PCN were 62 and 56 m2 g−1 (Figure S1b), respectively. The slight change in the BET-specific surface area is mainly because of the weak agglomeration of PCN during the immersion process. The TEM and EDX analysis illustrate that CoVO and PCN are successfully combined and the main structure of PCN does not change during the immersion process. The result is consistent with that of the analysis of the XRD and FT-IR spectra.
XPS analysis was attempted to determine the surface composition and chemical nature of the 3 wt% CoVO/PCN samples. Co 2p, V 2p, O 1s, C 1s, and N 1s could be observed in the complete survey spectrum (Figure 3a), which is in accordance with the EDX analysis. The Co 2p spectrum in Figure 3b is described as two peaks of Co 2P2/1 at 797.3 eV and Co 2P2/3 at 781.1 eV, with additional satellite peaks situated at 787.1 eV and 803.5 eV [36]. The V 2p spectrum in Figure 3c is located at 524.6 eV and 517.2 eV corresponding to the V 2p1/2 and V 2p3/2 [36,38]. The O 1s spectrum is shown in Figure 3d and can be split into three peaks at binding energies of 530.3 and 532.0 eV, which were attributed to the Co–O bond and the oxygen in the surface hydroxyl groups (C–OH) [28]. Furthermore, a high-resolution XPS analysis of C 1s and N 1s belonging to PCN was also carried out, as seen in Figure 3e. The peaks of C 1s can be divided into two peaks at binding energies of 288.0 and 284.7 eV, respectively. The former was assigned to the sp2 hybridized carbon of the triazine ring (N–C=N) of PCN and the latter was assigned to the C=C group of PCN [35,39]. In Figure 3f, four peaks of N 1s can be observed. The peak at 404.0 eV could have resulted from the charging effects or positive-charge localization in the heterocycles. The peak at 400.8 eV was due to the surface uncondensed C–N–H groups. The peak at 399.8 eV belonged to the tertiary N–(C)3 groups, whereas the peak at 398.5 eV corresponded to sp2-hybridized nitrogen (C=N–C) in aromatic triazine rings [39,40]. The last two forms of N and the sp2–C together constituted the heptazine heterocyclic melon ring (C6N7) units of polymeric carbon nitride [41]. Notably, decreased binding energy means higher electron cloud density. Therefore, the XPS data in Figure S3 revealed that there was a strong interaction between PCN and CoVO, and the electrons were moved from CoVO to PCN [20].
The photocatalytic performance of the as-prepared CoVO/PCN samples was examined by a water oxidation reaction. In the system, AgNO3 acts as an electron scavenger to short-cut the reduction side. The oxygen evolution rate of the composites in Figure 4a was much higher than that of pure PCN. Particularly, the 3 wt% CoVO/PCN sample showed the best performance of O2 evolution rate of 467 µmol h−1 g−1, whereas PCN is 74 µmol h−1 g−1 irradiated by UV light(λ > 300 nm). A series of reference experiments were operated under the same conditions. When the CoVO/PCN was not added to the system, no O2 gas was detected. These results illustrate that the WOR is driven by the CoVO/PCN photocatalyst. When the amount of CoVO in the hybrids increased to 10 wt%, the activity of the WOR decreased to 282 µmol h−1 g−1. Although it is still much higher than that of PCN, modification with excessive CoVO is unfavorable. This could be attributed to the light-blocking effect [42].
Furthermore, a long time test of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN sample was carried out with UV (λ > 300 nm) and visible light (λ > 420 nm) irradiation. The amounts of evolved O2 reached 1290 and 578 µmol g−1 of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN and 350 and 115 µmol g−1 of pristine PCN after 8 h persistent irradiation, as seen in Figure 4b. O2 can be continuously produced over the CoVO/PCN photocatalyst during light irradiation but the O2 amount per hour is obviously reduced. The O2 amount of the recycled sample shows a slightly reduced rate (Figure S4) because the amount of the electron scavenger AgNO3 was reduced. Moreover, Ag+ was reduced to Ag and loaded on the surface of PCN in the reaction, which hinders light absorption. The conclusion could also be confirmed by the XRD and DRS spectra of the recycled catalyst (Figure S5). The major structures of the CoVO/PCN samples showed no obvious changes except for the appearance of Ag peaks, which illustrated that the hybrids were stable during the photocatalytic process [43]. Other common transition metal vanadates (TMVO, TM: Fe3+, Ni2+, Cu2+ and Mn2+) obtained by a similar hydrothermal method were tested to drive the WOR under the same experimental conditions. The same amount of TMVO was adopted to combine with PCN (named TMVO/PCN). Although all the metal vanadates can enhance the activity of water oxidation to O2, the 3 wt% CoVO/PCN sample is still the best one (Figure S6). This may be due to the different chemical states of cobalt (Co2+, Co3+, and Co4+), which facilitate the redox transformation, thus leading to the optimal performance in photocatalytic WOR [44].
The photoactivity of WOR depends on visible light absorption, the photogenerated charge transfer rate, and recombination. So, UV-vis DRS, room temperature photoluminescence (PL), and photoelectrochemical analysis were adopted to further investigate the reasons for the enhanced photoactivity in WOR. In Figure 5a, the light absorption edge of CoVO/PCN samples showed a red-shift with an increasing amount of CoVO [12]. The optical absorption band edge was extended from 430 nm to 650 nm. The construction of the CoVO/PCN heterojunction is not only good for realizing a wide spectrum of visible-light absorption but also potentially promotes the production of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. In Figure 5b, the PL spectra of the CoVO/PCN samples were remarkably weaker than those of PCN, indicating that the recombination rate of the charge carriers in CoVO/PCN has been effectively restrained [39]. It is clearly demonstrated that charge separation and transfer in the CoVO/PCN samples are promoted, which is one of the reasons for the improved photoactivity.
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was implemented to explore the interfacial resistance between the photocatalyst electrode and the electrolyte solution. In Figure 5c, an obviously smaller interfacial resistance is received than that of pure PCN, which means the resistivity of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN is much smaller. The decreased impedance of the semiconductor is beneficial to the charge transfer and promotes the oxygen evolution kinetics [8,45]. The positive current in the 1.4–1.8 V versus Ag/AgCl (V vs. RHE) in the polarization curves in Figure 5d can be attributed to the oxygen evolution. The much-reduced overpotential of CoVO/PCN means that the excessive droving potentials of the photocatalytic water oxidation kinetics can be avoided [44,46]. The experimental results reveal that CoVO in the role of conductive material in the hybrids performs very well in photocatalytic WOR. To conclude, the excellent performance of the CoVO/PCN samples in the photocatalytic WOR is a result of the superior visible light absorption, faster charge transfer, fewer charge recombinations, and the smaller overpotential of WOR than that of undecorated PCN.
The band structure of CoVO was determined by Mott-Schottky plots and DRS spectra (Figure S7). Based on the experimental analysis, a possible photocatalytic mechanism of CoVO/PCN samples in WOR was proposed in Scheme 1. Irradiated by solar light, the photo-excited electrons generated from the conduction band of CoVO transfer to the PCN side and are obtained by Ag+. Meanwhile, the holes generated at the valence band of PCN moved to the CoVO side and reacted to O2. The conclusion is in accordance with the results of the XPS. Therefore, the construction of the CoVO/PCN heterojunction cannot only be conducive to the charge transfer but also restrains the charge recombinations and finally improves the photoactivity in WOR [47].

4. Conclusions

In summary, CoVO/PCN was constructed by a simple immersion method and performed significantly improved photoactivity for the water oxidation reaction. With the introduction of CoVO, the visible light absorption of PCN is broadened. Furthermore, the good charge-conducting property of CoVO not only accelerates the transmission and separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs but also restrains the recombination of electron-hole pairs in the hybrids. Moreover, it reduces the overpotential of photocatalytic water oxidation to O2, which is conducive to facilitating the reaction rate. The optimal photocatalytic O2 evolutions reach 467 and 200 μmol h−1 g−1 under UV and visible light irradiation, which are, respectively, a 6.5- and 5.9-fold enhancement of that of the undecorated PCN. This work explores the role of cobalt vanadates in photocatalytic water splitting and provides new ideas for the design of efficient photocatalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12111931/s1, Figure S1: (a) XRD pattern of CoVO before and after immersion, (b) BET specific surface areas of PCN and 3 wt% CoVO/PCN samples; Figure S2: EDX mapping of the 3 wt% CoVO/PCN sample; Figure S3: High-resolution XPS spectra of pure CoVO, PCN and the 3 wt% CoVO/PCN samples; Figure S4: Recycling OER ability of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN; Figure S5: (a) XRD spectra and (b) DRS spectra of the recycled CoVO/PCN sample; Figure S6: Photocatalytic O2 evolution curves of 3 wt% TMVO/PCN samples (TM: Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Mn); Figure S7: (a) Mott-Schottky plots of CoVO; (b) electronic band structure of the PCN and CoVO.

Author Contributions

S.Z. conceived and designed the experiments, paper writing, and revised the paper. X.C. and D.T. conducted experiments and characterization, and M.C. conducted data analysis. F.J. checked the grammar, and Y.Z. guided the paper writing. Z.L. and F.L. performed characterization and analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LQ22B03001); the Zhoushan Science and Technology Project (No. 2021C21008); the General Projects of Zhejiang Province (No. Y201942673); and the Fundamental Research Funds for Zhejiang Provincial Universities and Research Institutes (No. 2021JZ006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yingtang Zhou of Zhejiang Ocean University for providing assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References.

References

  1. Matsuoka, M.; Kitano, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Tsujimaru, K.; Anpo, M.; Thomas, J.M. Photocatalysis for new energy production: Recent advances in photocatalytic water splitting reactions for hydrogen production. Catal. Today 2007, 122, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, G.H.; Park, Y.S.; Yang, J.; Jang, M.J.; Jeong, J.; Lee, J.H.; Park, H.S.; Park, Y.H.; Choi, S.M.; Lee, J. Effects of annealing temperature on the oxygen evolution reaction activity of copper-cobalt oxide nanosheets. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, L.; Guo, C.; Ning, J.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, D.; Hu, Y. Oxygen-vacancy-assisted construction of FeOOH/CdS heterostructure as an efficient bifunctional photocatalyst for CO2 conversion and water oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 293, 120203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fang, Y.; Hou, Y.; Fu, X.; Wang, X. Semiconducting polymers for oxygen evolution reaction under light illumination. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 4204–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ran, J.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Earth-abundant cocatalysts for semiconductor-based photocatalytic water splitting. Chem Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7787–7812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Carlsson, J.M.; Domen, K.; Antonietti, M. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.; Grzelczak, M.; Hou, Y.; Maeda, K.; Domen, K.; Fu, X.; Antonietti, M.; Wang, X. Photocatalytic oxidation of water by polymeric carbon nitride nanohybrids made of sustainable elements. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, D.; Yang, L.; Chen, W.; Fang, Y.; Wang, X. Coating polymeric carbon nitride on conductive carbon cloth to promote charge separation for photocatalytic water splitting. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 3821–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Tsang, S.C.E. Recent progress and strategies for enhancing photocatalytic water splitting. Mater. Today Sustain. 2020, 9, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sahoo, M.; Babu, P.; Singh, C.P.; Krishnamurty, S.; Parida, K. Facile fabrication of nano silver phosphate on B-doped g-C3N4: An excellent p-n heterojunction photocatalyst towards water oxidation and Cr (VI) reduction. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 898, 162853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Qiu, C.; Chen, S.; Ling, X.; Su, C. Photocatalytic water-splitting coupled with alkanol oxidation for selective N-alkylation reactions over carbon nitride. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Fu, L.; Bai, F.; Zhou, B.; Wang, T.; Cheng, L.; et al. In-situ annealed "M-scheme" MXene-based photocatalyst for enhanced photoelectric performance and highly selective CO2 photoreduction. Nano Energy 2021, 83, 106532. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ran, J.; Ma, T.Y.; Gao, G.; Du, X.-W.; Qiao, S.Z. Porous P-doped graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets for synergistically enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3708–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, B.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, B.; Li, Q.; Tian, C.; Xie, Y.; Li, W.; Fu, H. Ultrathin porous carbon nitride bundles with an adjustable energy band structure toward simultaneous solar photocatalytic water splitting and selective phenylcarbinol oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 4815–4822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xia, J.; Mark, G.; Volokh, M.; Fang, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Shalom, M. Supramolecular organization of melem for the synthesis of photoactive porous carbon nitride rods. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 19511–19517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zinin, P.V.; Acosta-Maeda, T.E.; Misra, A.K.; Sharma, S.K. Enhancement of the anti-stokes fluorescence of hollow spherical carbon nitride nanostructures by high intensity green laser. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Hisatomi, T.; Vequizo, J.J.M.; Suzuki, S.; Chen, S.; Nakabayashi, M.; Lin, L.; Pan, Z.; Kariya, N.; et al. Sequential cocatalyst decoration on BaTaO2N towards highly-active Z-scheme water splitting. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Low, J.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A. Heterojunction photocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1601694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zuo, G.; Wang, Y.; Teo, W.L.; Xie, A.; Guo, Y.; Dai, Y.; Zhou, W.; Jana, D.; Xian, Q.; Dong, W.; et al. Enhanced photocatalytic water oxidation by hierarchical 2D-Bi2MoO6@2D-MXene Schottky junction nanohybrid. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zang, S.; Zhang, G.; Lan, Z.-A.; Zheng, D.; Wang, X. Enhancement of photocatalytic H2 evolution on pyrene-based polymer promoted by MoS2 and visible light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 251, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Denis, S.; Baudrin, E.; Orsini, F.; Ouvrard, G.; Touboul, M.; Tarascon, J.M. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of numerous classes of vanadates. J. Power Sources 1999, 81–82, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Heiland, M.; Seliverstov, A.; Schwarz, B.; Anjass, M.H.; Streb, C. Homogeneous and heterogeneous anion sensing by a molecular cobalt-vanadium oxide. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 2201–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yao, G.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, T. Nanostructured transition metal vanadates as electrodes for pseudo-supercapacitors: A review. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2021, 23, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Tong, Y.; Liu, X.; Zheng, J.; Han, D.; Li, H.; Niu, L. Recent advances in potassium-ion hybrid capacitors: Electrode materials, storage mechanisms and performance evaluation. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 41, 108–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Andrukaitis, E.; Cooper, J.P.; Smit, J.H. Lithium intercalation in the divalent metal vanadates MeV2O6 (Me=Cu, Co, Ni, Mn or Zn). J. Power Sources 1995, 54, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Laruelle, S.; Poizot, P.; Baudrin, E.; Briois, V.; Touboul, M.; Tarascon, J.-M. X-ray absorption study of cobalt vanadates during cycling usable as negative electrode in lithium battery. J. Power Sources 2001, 97–98, 251–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, S.; Cao, L.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, D.; Wang, X.; Guo, X.; Li, H. Fast potassium storage in porous CoV2O6 nanosphere@graphene oxide towards high-performance potassium-ion capacitors. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 40, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lv, X.; Huang, W.; Shi, Q.; Tang, L.; Tang, J. Synthesis of CoV2O6/CNTs composites via ultrasound as electrode materials for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 2388–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Chai, H.; Dong, H.; Xu, J.; Jia, D.; Zhou, W. Superior cycle stability performance of quasi-cuboidal CoV2O6 microstructures as electrode material for supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 27291–27297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xing, M.; Kong, L.; Liu, M.; Liu, L.; Kang, L.; Luo, Y. Cobalt vanadate as highly active, stable, noble metal-free oxygen evolution electrocatalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18435–18443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Du, X.; Han, R.; Ding, Y. Hexagonal assembly of Co3V2O8 nanoparticles acting as an efficient catalyst for visible light-driven water oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 19308–19314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ghiyasiyan-Arani, M.; Masjedi-Arani, M.; Salavati-Niasari, M. Size controllable synthesis of cobalt vanadate nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic activity for the degradation of organic dyes. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2016, 425, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pavliuk, M.V.; Mijangos, E.; Makhankova, V.G.; Kokozay, V.N.; Pullen, S.; Liu, J.; Zhu, J.; Styring, S.; Thapper, A. Homogeneous cobalt/vanadium complexes as precursors for functionalized mixed oxides in visible-light-driven water oxidation. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 2957–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shen, F.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Dong, L.; Li, Y.; Xu, Y.; Lan, Y. CoV2O6–V2O5 coupled with porous N-doped reduced graphene oxide composite as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mondal, A.; Ganguli, S.; Inta, H.R.; Mahalingam, V. Influence of vanadate structure on electrochemical surface reconstruction and OER performance of CoV2O6 and Co3V2O8. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 5381–5387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zang, S.; Zhang, G.; Yang, P.; Zheng, D.; Wang, X. Polymeric donor-acceptor heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution without using Pt cocatalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 6102–6107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, L.; Gonçalves, A.; Jaroniec, M. Identification of preferentially exposed crystal facets by X-ray diffraction. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 5585–5589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Perez-Molina, A.; Pastrana-Martinez, L.M.; Perez-Poyatos, L.T.; Morales-Torres, S.; Maldonado-Hodar, F.J. One-pot thermal synthesis of g-C3N4/ZnO composites for the degradation of 5-fluoruracil cytostatic drug under UV-LED irradiation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Luo, W.; Sun, T.; Xu, Y. Ultrathin crystalline covalent-triazine-framework nanosheets with electron donor groups for synergistically enhanced photocatalytic water splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 25381–25390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sohail, M.; Altalhi, T.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Taha, T.A.M.; El-Nasser, K.S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Boukhari, M.; Palamanit, A.; Hayat, A.; Amin, M.A.; et al. Nanostructure engineering via intramolecular construction of carbon nitride as efficient photocatalyst for CO2 reduction. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, F.; Hu, B.; Yang, C.; Zhang, J.; Hou, Y.; Wang, X. On-Surface polymerization of in-plane highly ordered carbon nitride nanosheets toward photocatalytic mineralization of mercaptan gas. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2101466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ming, H.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Yang, C.; Hou, Y.; Ding, K.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X. Tailored poly-heptazine units in carbon nitride for activating peroxymonosulfate to degrade organic contaminants with visible light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 311, 121341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kong, H.J.; Won, D.H.; Kim, J.; Woo, S.I. Sulfur-Doped g-C3N4/BiVO4 composite photocatalyst for water oxidation under visible light. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 1318–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sprick, R.S.; Chen, Z.; Cowan, A.J.; Bai, Y.; Aitchison, C.M.; Fang, Y.; Zwijnenburg, M.A.; Cooper, A.I.; Wang, X. Water oxidation with cobalt-loaded linear conjugated polymer photocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 18695–18700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, G.; Zang, S.; Wang, X. Layered Co(OH)2 deposited polymeric carbon nitrides for photocatalytic water oxidation. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, G.; Liu, M.; Heil, T.; Zafeiratos, S.; Savateev, A.; Antonietti, M.; Wang, X. Electron deficient monomers that optimize nucleation and enhance the photocatalytic redox activity of carbon nitrides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 14950–14954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lin, F.; Jing, X.; Wang, Y.; Zang, S. Polarization-induced carrier separation in conjugated polyimide for boosted visible light driven H2O2 production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 594, 153478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Powdered XRD patterns; (b) FT-IR spectra of x wt% CoVO/PCN samples (black: PCN, violet: 1 wt%, blue: 2 wt%, red: 3 wt%, green: 5 wt%, beige: 10 wt%, navy: CoVO*0.5, Peak intensity decreased by 0.5 times).
Figure 1. (a) Powdered XRD patterns; (b) FT-IR spectra of x wt% CoVO/PCN samples (black: PCN, violet: 1 wt%, blue: 2 wt%, red: 3 wt%, green: 5 wt%, beige: 10 wt%, navy: CoVO*0.5, Peak intensity decreased by 0.5 times).
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g001
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g002 550
Figure 2. (a–d) TEM images; (e) HRTEM mapping of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN sample.
Figure 2. (a–d) TEM images; (e) HRTEM mapping of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN sample.
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g002
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g003 550
Figure 3. High-resolution XPS spectra of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN samples (a) survey; (b) Co 2p; (c) V 2p; (d) O 1s; (e) C 1s; (f) N 1s.
Figure 3. High-resolution XPS spectra of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN samples (a) survey; (b) Co 2p; (c) V 2p; (d) O 1s; (e) C 1s; (f) N 1s.
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g003
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g004 550
Figure 4. Photocatalytic O2 evolution curves of (a) x wt% CoVO/PCN samples under UV irradiation (λ > 300 nm); (b) eight-hour continuous test of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN sample under UV (λ > 300 nm) and visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm).
Figure 4. Photocatalytic O2 evolution curves of (a) x wt% CoVO/PCN samples under UV irradiation (λ > 300 nm); (b) eight-hour continuous test of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN sample under UV (λ > 300 nm) and visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm).
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g004
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) UV-vis DRS spectra (inset: Taus plots); (b) PL spectra of x wt% CoVO/PCN samples; (c) EIS Nyquist curves; (d) Polarization curves of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN and PCN samples.
Figure 5. (a) UV-vis DRS spectra (inset: Taus plots); (b) PL spectra of x wt% CoVO/PCN samples; (c) EIS Nyquist curves; (d) Polarization curves of 3 wt% CoVO/PCN and PCN samples.
Nanomaterials 12 01931 g005
Nanomaterials 12 01931 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Possible charge carrier transfer route between PCN and CoVO.
Scheme 1. Possible charge carrier transfer route between PCN and CoVO.
Nanomaterials 12 01931 sch001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zang, S.; Cai, X.; Chen, M.; Teng, D.; Jing, F.; Leng, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, F. Tunable Carrier Transfer of Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Charge-Conducting CoV2O6∙2H2O for Photocatalytic O2 Evolution. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111931

AMA Style

Zang S, Cai X, Chen M, Teng D, Jing F, Leng Z, Zhou Y, Lin F. Tunable Carrier Transfer of Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Charge-Conducting CoV2O6∙2H2O for Photocatalytic O2 Evolution. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(11):1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111931

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zang, Shaohong, Xiaorong Cai, Mengshan Chen, Dehong Teng, Fei Jing, Zhe Leng, Yingtang Zhou, and Feng Lin. 2022. "Tunable Carrier Transfer of Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Charge-Conducting CoV2O6∙2H2O for Photocatalytic O2 Evolution" Nanomaterials 12, no. 11: 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111931

APA Style

Zang, S., Cai, X., Chen, M., Teng, D., Jing, F., Leng, Z., Zhou, Y., & Lin, F. (2022). Tunable Carrier Transfer of Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Charge-Conducting CoV2O6∙2H2O for Photocatalytic O2 Evolution. Nanomaterials, 12(11), 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111931

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop