Next Article in Journal
Tailoring the Scattering Response of Optical Nanocircuits Using Modular Assembly
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Progress on Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Vibration Energy Harvesting and Vibration Sensing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 17
10.3390/nano12172961
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Facile Zn and Ni Co-Doped Hematite Nanorods for Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation

by
Joan Talibawo
1,2,
Pannan I. Kyesmen
2,
Marie C. Cyulinyana
1 and
Mmantsae Diale
2,*
1
African Centre of Excellence in Energy and Sustainable Development, University of Rwanda, KN 67 Street Nyarugenge, P.O. Box 3900, Kigali 4285, Rwanda
2
Department of Physics, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(17), 2961; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172961
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 7 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 27 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic New Materials and Advanced Applications in Photocatalysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, we report the effect of zinc (Zn) and nickel (Ni) co-doping of hydrothermally synthesized hematite nanorods prepared on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates for enhanced photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting. Seeded hematite nanorods (NRs) were facilely doped with a fixed concentration of 3 mM Zn and varied concentrations of 0, 3, 5, 7, and 9 mM Ni. The samples were observed to have a largely uniform morphology of vertically aligned NRs with slight inclinations. The samples showed high photon absorption within the visible spectrum due to their bandgaps, which ranged between 1.9–2.2 eV. The highest photocurrent density of 0.072 mA/cm2 at 1.5 V vs. a reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) was realized for the 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs sample. This photocurrent was 279% higher compared to the value observed for pristine hematite NRs. The Mott–Schottky results reveal an increase in donor density values with increasing Ni dopant concentration. The 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs sample produced the highest donor concentration of 2.89 × 1019 (cm−3), which was 2.1 times higher than that of pristine hematite. This work demonstrates the role of Zn and Ni co-dopants in enhancing the photocatalytic water oxidation of hematite nanorods for the generation of hydrogen.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Solar water splitting is one of the promising technologies for the green and sustainable production of hydrogen, a clean chemical energy carrier with a relatively high gravimetric energy density of 143 MJ kg−1 [1]. The technology uses photoactive electrodes for photon absorption in a PEC cell setup that also comprises an aqueous electrolyte, a reference electrode, and a counter electrode usually made of platinum. During photocatalysis, when the photoelectrode absorbs photons with energy equivalent to or more than its bandgap, electron–hole (e−/H+) pairs are generated in the electrode. If the photoelectrode is an n-type semiconductor, the photogenerated electrons are excited from the valence band into the conduction band, leaving behind holes. The electrons move through an external circuit to the counter electrode, whereas the holes shift to the photoelectrode–electrolyte interface. This results in the oxidation of water at the photoanode and, consequently, the reduction of H+, leading to the evolution of hydrogen at the counter electrode of the PEC device [2,3]. An effective photoelectrode material is expected to have a favorable bandgap that allows for high photon absorption in the visible spectrum to enable sufficient photogeneration of the charge carriers required to perform photo-induced redox reactions for hydrogen production [4,5].
Therefore, when choosing a photoelectrode material for PEC applications, it is important to carefully consider the key optical and other catalytic properties of the photocatalyst [6,7]. In addition, the earth abundance of the material is also critical for the sustainability of hydrogen production via PEC reactions [8]. Hematite is one of the highly investigated metal oxides for use as photoanode material for PEC reactions because of its favorable bandgap (1.9–2.1 eV), which is capable of absorbing ~40% of photons in the visible region [9], abundance in nature, stability in a broad pH range, and non-toxicity [10]. However, the PEC performance of hematite is greatly hampered by the ultrafast charge recombination in its bulk and surface because of its short hole-diffusion path of 2–20 nm, poor electrical conductivity, and slow PEC kinetics for oxygen evolution, among others [11]. In a bid to enhance the performance of hematite electrodes, a range of strategies has been studied, such as using heterostructures [12,13], nanoscale engineering [14], seed layers [15], and elemental doping [16].
Nanoscale engineering of semiconductor materials used in PEC water splitting has been outstanding among other strategies [17]. With this strategy, nanostructures such as nanosheets [18], nanoparticles [19], and nanorods (NRs) [20] are among the widely investigated structures for PEC applications because of their explicit and unique potential in modifying the properties of hematite for enhanced photon absorption and charge transport. NRs are one of the promising nanostructures investigated for PEC water splitting because they provide a wider surface area for photocatalytic reactions [21,22]. NRs have also been reported to exhibit better e−/H+ mobility than nanospheres [9]. Moreover, when NR films are subjected to high-temperature annealing for a short time, their crystallinity is improved, which directly enhances charge carrier transport during PEC reactions [23]. Although several techniques, such as electrochemical deposition [24], pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [25], and spray pyrolysis [26], have been used for the preparation of various hematite electrodes, the hydrothermal technique is considered to be flexible, simple, and inexpensive for the fabrication of NRs [27,28].
The use of seed layers between substrates and a semiconductor photoanode has been reported to enhance their photocurrent outputs through the suppression of charge recombination at the substrate–semiconductor interface [29]. For example, it has been demonstrated that synthesizing hematite film over tungsten trioxide (WO3)-seeded FTO increased its photocurrent density by 125% [30]. Relatedly, zinc (Zn)-seeded substrates have been reported to enhance the nucleation and growth of vertically oriented Zn NRs [31,32]. However, not much has been explored on the PEC properties of hematite NRs grown on hematite-seeded FTO substrates. In addition, the use of seed layers comprising different elements from those of the NRs could induce doping at relatively elevated temperatures from the ion species of the seed layer [33]. It is therefore important to use the same material element for the NRs film and maintain the seed layer in controlled conditions to avoid indirect doping. Furthermore, elemental doping of the photoelectrodes is another approach to improve the electrical conductivity and photon absorption of hematite nanostructures [27,34]. In addition, doping has been reported to suppress the recombination of e−/H+ pairs and consequently improve the photocurrent densities of hematite NRs [35]. The influence of various metal and non-metal dopants, such as Sn [36], sulfur (S) [37], and silver (Ag) [3], has been investigated. For example, a comparative study by Jinzhan et al. (2016) on the effect of different metal atom dopants on the PEC performance of hydrothermally synthesized hematite NRs demonstrated improved photocurrent outputs with titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), and Sn dopants [38]. Doping hematite films with Zn in work conducted by Aadesh et al. (2017) doubled the photocurrent density of the bare films to 0.81 mA/cm2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE as a result of enhanced charge transport [10]. Moreover, Zn has been reported to be among the best dopants for enhancing the photocurrent density of hematite films [3,26]. In addition, investigations on Ni doping of hematite NRs resulted in a 1.3-fold improvement in photocurrent density compared to that of the undoped NRs, which was further doubled to 1.28 mA/cm2 by co-doping with cobalt (Co) [39]. The review by Shengnan et al. also demonstrates that facile doping of hematite with a suitable element enhances charge separation and transport dynamics, which consequently boosts its PEC performance [40]. However, despite the numerous research studies conducted on the effect of different dopants on the PEC performance of hematite NRs, no work has been reported on the effect of Ni and Zn as surface co-dopants of hematite towards improving the semiconductor photocatalytic properties.
In this work, hydrothermally synthesized hematite NRs were co-doped with Zn and Ni to enhance their PEC performance. First, 3 mM Zn and 3, 5, 7, and 9 mM Ni dopants were spin-coated over pristine hematite NRs to obtain the Zn and Zn/Ni co-doped NR samples. The 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs samples exhibited the highest photocurrent of 72 mA/cm2 at 1.5 V vs. RHE due to the high donor density 2.89 × 1019 (cm−3) observed for the films. Based on the known literature, no work has been reported on the effect of facile Zn and Ni co-doping of hematite NRs that were hydrothermally grown over a hematite seed layer for the enhancement of PEC performance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Substrate Preparation

Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), sodium nitrate (NaNO3), zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O), and nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2·6H2O) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, South Africa, and used as received. The FTO substrates were first cleaned in an ultrasonic bath using sodium stearate (C18H35NaO2) soap solution, followed by deionized water (DI), ethanol, and finally acetone for ten minutes each. The substrates were then air-dried using nitrogen gas.

2.2. Experimental Procedure

Hematite seed layers were grown over the FTO substrates by spin coating a precursor solution of 0.05 M FeCl3.6H2O in ethanol at 5000 rpm. The process was repeated 8 times to grow the desired thickness of the seed layers, with 5 min intervals of drying at 70 °C in a laboratory oven. The hematite seed layers were then annealed at 550 °C for 1 h, followed by gradual cooling to room temperature. Figure 1a illustrates the experimental procedures for the preparation of the hematite seed layers on FTO substrates via spin coating.
The FTO substrates with the deposited hematite seed layers were placed at the bottom of an autoclave filled with 45 mL of an aqueous solution of thoroughly mixed 0.15 M FeCl3·6H2O and 1 M NaNO3, with the conducting side facing upwards. The autoclave was sealed and placed in a laboratory oven set to a temperature of 100 °C for 8 h to grow yellowish films of FeOOH on FTO. The deposited films were rinsed several times with DI water to remove the extra reactants and dried thereafter in a laboratory oven at 70 °C for 10 min. The FeOOH layers were then annealed at 500 °C for 2 h to obtain pristine hematite NRs (Figure 1b).
Dopant concentrations of 3, 5, 7, and 9 mM were prepared from Ni(NO3)2·6H2O using ethanol as a solvent to serve as the Ni ion source. In addition, a 3 mM solution of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O was dissolved in ethanol and used as the Zn co-dopant ion source. Based on previous results, a 5–15% atomic composition of facile zinc dopant transformed the conventional n-type hematite film into a p-type photoanode [41]. This study selected an arbitrary but constant low dopant concentration of 3 mM Zn in order to preserve the n-type nature of the prepared hematite films. Two drops of the Zn dopant solution were spin-coated over the annealed hematite NR films for 30 s at 5000 rpm. The films were then dried in an oven at 70 °C for 10 min and subsequently annealed at 550 °C for 1 h to obtain the 3 mM Zn-doped NR samples. Furthermore, the 3 mM Zn-doped hematite NR samples were also spin-coated with two drops of 3, 5, 7, and 9 mM Ni dopant solutions, dried, and annealed in the same manner as the Zn-doped hematite films to obtain the 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, 3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni, 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, and 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NR co-doped samples, respectively. To avoid contamination of the samples, the pristine hematite NRs and the doped samples were annealed in separate tubes. Figure 2 shows the schematic representation of the doping and annealing process of the hematite NRs.

2.3. Characterization

The morphology of the as-prepared samples was examined using a Zeiss Ultra PLUS field-emission scanning electron (FESEM) microscope at 2 kV. Elemental composition analysis of the pristine and doped hematite NRs was performed using a Zeiss Crossbeam, which was connected to an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system. The structural properties of the samples were investigated using a Bruker D2 Phaser X-ray diffractometer and a WITec alpha 300 RAS+ confocal micro-Raman microscope. An Agilent Cary-60 UV-vis spectrophotometer was used to measure the light absorption of the NRs within a 200–800 nm wavelength range.
PEC measurements were obtained using a VersaSTAT 3F potentiostat from Princeton Applied Research in a three-electrode cell with 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) electrolyte, a 2 × 2 cm platinum (Pt) wire mesh as the counter electrode, and a silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) reference electrode. A Newport Oriel, LCS-100™ solar simulator, calibrated to 1 sun at 100 mW/cm2, was used as the light source. The light was directed at the quartz window of the PEC cell, which allowed the illumination of a 0.49 cm2 surface area of the pristine and doped hematite photoelectrodes. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) measurements in the dark and under illumination were taken to study the current–voltage characteristics of the samples. All potential values were translated to the RHE scale according to Equation (1) [10].
V R H E = V A g / A g C l + ( 0.059 p H ) + V A g / A g C l 0
where V R H E represents potential in the RHE, V   A g / A g C l 0 = 0.1976 V at a standard temperature of 25 °C, V A g / A g C l   is the potential obtained from the experimental measurements using Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, and the p H of the electrolyte is 13.6. The photocurrent measurement for pristine hematite NRs was used as the baseline result in the analysis of the photoresponse of the Zn and Zn/Ni co-doped samples. Mott–Schottky studies were conducted on the pristine and doped hematite samples in the dark at a constant frequency of 10,000 Hz, an AC amplitude potential of 10 mV, and a DC potential range of −1.2 to 0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl. Electrochemical impedance measurements were conducted on illuminated photoanode samples using a 10 mV potential amplitude within a frequency range of 10,000 to 0.1 Hz at 0.23 V vs. Ag/AgCl.

3. Results

3.1. NR Morphology and Seed Layer Thickness

The surface morphologies of the pristine, Zn-doped, and Zn/Ni co-doped hematite NRs are shown in Figure 3. The NRs were generally closely packed in clusters and vertically aligned over the hematite seed layers. All samples exhibited similar morphology despite the variation in Ni dopant concentrations. This suggests that the surface morphology of the samples was only influenced by the hydrothermal reaction [42]. Similarly, studies by Feng Cheng et al. and other researchers confirmed that facile doping of hematite NRs with Ni had no effect on their surface morphology [39,43]. This was attributed to low Ni dopant concentrations loaded over the hematite NRs that limited the formation of particles and eventual agglomeration over the hematite films [44].
An average film thickness of ~ 127   nm was obtained for the seed layers using a profilometer alpha step.

3.2. XRD Structural Characterization

To investigate the phase of the prepared pristine and doped hematite NRs, the XRD diffraction patterns of the samples given in Figure 4 were analyzed. The XRD results show the rhombohedral crystalline structure of hematite indexed to (104), (110), (116), (214), (300), and (125) planes with 2-theta peaks at 33.15°, 35.61°, 54.09°, 62.45°, 63.99°, and 66.03°, respectively, in line with XPert high score plus software analysis for the samples (reference code: 00-033-0664). The peaks correlate to the R-3C (167) space group with uniform lattice parameters of 0.50356 nm for a and b and 0.1374 nm for c. The peaks at (104), (110), (214), and (300) planes also match the rhombohedra crystalline phases of pristine and doped hematite NRs according to JCPDS card no. 24-0072 [38]. All samples show comparable intensities for the peaks in the (110) plane. It is in this plane that higher preferential charge separation and transport for PEC water splitting is reported [28,45]. The similar intensities observed across the peaks could be attributed to the uniform annealing temperature used during sample preparation, which can directly impact the sample’s crystallinity and charge mobility [46]. There were no observable peak shifts across the XRD patterns, in agreement with earlier reports [38]. This observation is an indication that the dopants had no significant impact on the structure of the hematite NRs [38,39]. The peaks did not show phases of Ni and Zn, implying that the dopants were incorporated into the hematite lattice and had no effect on the hematite crystal structure [28,47]. We attribute the successful incorporation of dopants within the crystal structure of hematite to the small concentrations and volume of Zn and Ni used during sample preparation [48]. In addition, Ni, Zn, and Fe have similar chemical properties since they belong to the same group of transition metals and the fourth period of the periodic table [39]. The intensity of the 3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni NR sample peaks was observed to be weak relative to others. This phenomenon is likely due to the lowest crystallite size presented by the sample [47]. Peaks labeled with asterisks (*) correspond to the SnO2 phase from the FTO substrate [48].
The Debye–Scherer relation in Equation (2) was used to determine the average crystallite sizes, where D is the crystallite size, K is a constant (0.9), λ is the wavelength of CuKα X-rays equal to 0.15418 nm, β is the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the preferential peak in radians, and θ is the Bragg angle [49].
D = K λ β c o s θ
The crystallite sizes obtained were between 7.62 and 28.29 nm, as shown in Figure 5. The three most intense peaks of hematite, (104), (110), and (116), were used in the estimation of the crystal sizes of the films. The sizes generally decreased down to the value of 7.62 nm with increasing dopant concentration for the 3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni NRs sample. This observation is consistent with previous findings obtained for tin (Sn)-doped hematite films [43]. Studies conducted by Lassoued et al. (2018) further reveal that the decrease in crystallite sizes with the increase in Ni dopant concentration is a result of enhanced nucleation of particles in the host sample [50]. However, a further increase in Ni dopant concentration for 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs and 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NRs samples resulted in an increase in the crystal sizes relative to the value observed for 3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni NRs. This may be associated with the agglomeration of tiny crystallites due to the high Ni dopant concentration used in the film preparation [51].

3.3. Raman Characterization

Raman spectroscopy was carried out to further examine the effects of Zn and Ni dopants on the crystalline hematite phase. The Raman spectra of all the samples are presented in Figure 6. The seven Raman vibrational modes of hematite were observed at 225, 247, 293, 299, 412, 498, and 613 m cm−1 in all of the samples’ spectra. The A1g vibrational modes are associated with the peaks at 225 and 498 cm−1. The five Eg modes observed for the samples correspond to the peaks at 247, 293, 299, 412, and 613 cm−1, respectively [52]. No additional vibrational modes other than those of hematite were observed. This further confirms the absence of impurities and the possibility of defects in the prepared NRs, in agreement with the XRD analysis of the films. A slight blue shift of the peaks was observed for the doped NRs samples compared to the pristine hematite NRs. This shift is similar to observations reported for copper (Cu)- [53] and chromium (Cr)-doped [54] hematite films and is attributed to the incorporation of the dopants in the hematite lattice. Initially, an increase in peak intensities was observed for the 3 mM Zn and 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni NRs samples compared to the pristine hematite NRs. However, a remarkable reduction in the peak intensity of the 3 mM Zn/5 Mm Ni NR sample was observed relative to other samples. This is in agreement with reports that the Raman intensities are directly proportional to crystallite sizes [55,56]. Moreover, a similar trend of results was noted for the crystallite sizes of the doped NR samples. However, despite the pristine hematite sample presenting the largest crystallite size, its intensity was the second lowest after that of the 3 mM Zn/5 Mm Ni NRs. This is ascribed to adjustments in the hematite surface and grain boundary disorientations due to the surface passivation effect of the dopants of the doped NRs relative to that of the pristine hematite NRs [57]. Furthermore, a weak LO phonon mode was noticed at about 660 cm−1 for the doped hematite NRs. Based on previously reported results, this peak is likely attributed to surface defects or stress as a result of the dopants [54].

3.4. Elemental Composition

EDS analysis of the undoped and doped hematite NRs samples was conducted to establish the composition of the different chemical elements in the samples. The chemical species of iron (Fe) and oxygen (O) for hematite and tin (Sn) from tin oxide (SnO2) on FTO substrates were observed for all of the NRs samples. The Fe and O k-line signals were observed at 6.42 and 0.53 keV, respectively, and correspond to previous findings [58]. The EDS results also show the Zn element in the 3 mM Zn NRs sample. In addition, Zn and Ni were detected in the spectra of all Zn/Ni co-doped NRs, as shown in Figure 7.
Additionally, Table 1 shows the different atomic percentage compositions of the pristine and doped NR samples. Although the atomic composition of Zn was not uniform across the samples, that of Ni increased with the increase in concentration, similar to the stoichiometric increase in dopant concentrations used. No other elements were detected. This implies that the nickel and zinc dopants were successfully incorporated into the hematite NRs, and hence, it further validates the purity of the samples depicted by the Raman and XRD analysis of the films.

3.5. UV-Vis Absorption

The light absorption of the pristine hematite NRs and the 3 mM Zn, 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, 3 mM Zn/5 Mm Ni, 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, and 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni doped NRs samples was investigated within a 350–800 nm wavelength range, and the results are shown in Figure 8. All absorption spectra show peaks at about 400 nm. This is consistent with the reported wavelength of the maximum photon absorption for hematite [59], assigned to Fe3+ d-d transitions [58,60]. The onset absorption wavelength for all samples was approximately 600 nm. The UV-vis absorption properties of NRs showed no direct correlation between the absorbance and the dopant concentrations. Nevertheless, the observed variations in photon absorption by the samples might be associated with differences in light scattering at the surface of the hematite NRs due to changes in their particle sizes, film thickness, and other intrinsic modifications resulting from Zn/Ni doping [61,62].
The bandgap values for the samples were estimated using the expression
E g ( eV ) = 1240 λ ( nm )
where Eg is the bandgap, 1240 is a constant obtained from the product of Planck’s constant (h = 4.14 × 10−15 eV) and the speed of light (c = 3 × 108), and λ is the wavelength obtained from the intercept of the extrapolated linear section of the absorption spectrum on the wavelength axis [3]. The bandgaps obtained were 1.90, 1.92, 1.92, 1.95, 1.99, and 1.98 eV for pristine hematite, 3 mM Zn, 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, 3 mM Zn/5 Mm Ni, 3 mM Zn/7mM Ni, and 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NRs samples, respectively. The values obtained are within the bandgap range of 1.9–2.2 eV of hematite [63].

3.6. PEC Measurements

3.6.1. LSV Measurements

To investigate the PEC performance of the pristine and Zn/Ni co-doped hematite NRs, LSV measurements were performed on the prepared samples in dark and light conditions, and the results are shown in Figure 9. The dark currents were notably small compared to the corresponding photocurrent density values under illumination. Upon irradiation, the pristine hematite exhibited a photocurrent of 0.019 mA/cm2 at 1.5 V vs. RHE. There was no significant difference in photocurrent densities observed for the 3 mM Zn-doped and pristine hematite NRs samples. This was likely due to the low Zn dopant concentration of 3 mM used in the preparation of the doped sample. Previous studies have also shown that the application of very low dopant volumes presents no significant effects on the properties of the host material [64]. The introduction of additional Ni dopant concentrations to the 3 mM Zn NRs samples yielded better photocurrent densities. The photocurrent densities increased with increasing Ni dopant concentration. The 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs sample presented the highest photocurrent of 0.072 mA/cm2 at 1.5 V vs. RHE. This photocurrent density was 279% higher when compared to the value observed for pristine hematite and 3 mM Zn-doped NRs films. This improvement could be due to enhanced surface reaction kinetics at the interface of 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs films with the electrolyte [38]. Moreover, related studies on hematite NRs films facilely doped with Ni and chromium (Cr) suggest that the incorporation of the dopants suppresses the recombination of electrons and holes by modifying the semiconductor interface to inhibit the density of surface states [50,65]. The photocurrent density, however, dropped with the 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NRs sample to 0.061 mA/cm2 at 1.5 V vs. RHE. This result revealed the occurrence of the maximum Ni dopant level for hematite NRs. For the 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NRs samples, the Ni dopant concentration exceeded the optimal level, which likely increased the recombination centers at the semiconductor–electrolyte interface, resulting in a drop in photocurrent density [65]. The 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs sample exhibited the lowest onset potential of 1.32 V vs. RHE, which is paramount in offsetting the energy barrier across the semiconductor–electrolyte interface for enhanced charge transport [66].

3.6.2. Mott–Schottky Analysis

Figure 10 shows the Mott–Schottky plots of the as-prepared pristine and doped hematite NRs samples. The positive slopes of the plots confirmed the n-type nature of hematite [13,42]. Table 2 shows the flat band potential ( V f b ) and the donor density ( N D ) results obtained from the Mott–Schottky plots of the samples. The V f b values were derived from the x-axis intercepts of the extrapolated linear sections of the plots, whereas the N D values were worked out from the slopes of the plots, in line with the Mott–Schottky relation given in Equation (4):
C − 2 = 2 e ε ε 0 A 2 N D ( V − V f b − k T e )
where C is the space charge capacitance, e is the electron charge, ε is the dielectric constant ( ε = 80 for hematite), ε 0 is the permittivity of free space, A represents the surface area of the electrode, N D is the donor density, V is applied voltage, E f b is flat band potential, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature in kelvin [38].
The flat band potential is a key parameter for PEC semiconductor electrode materials since they reflect the hole transport mechanism occurring at the electrode surface region [67]. As a baseline sample, the pristine hematite NRs presented a V f b of −0.43 V vs. RHE. An increase of 0.41 V was realized in V f b when the Zn dopant was introduced for the 3 mM Zn NR sample. This is quite contrary to other reports [26,68] and might be attributed to the low dopant concentration used. However, a cathodic shift in V f b values was observed with increasing Ni dopant concentration. The 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni and 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs produced the lowest and second lowest V f b values of −0.70 and −0.65 V vs. RHE, respectively. According to Kumari et. al., this could be linked to enhanced hole transport at the NR–electrolyte interface during oxygen evolution [26].
The N D values of the pristine hematite NRs, 3 mM Zn, 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, 3 mM Zn/5 Mm Ni, 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, and 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NRs samples are shown in Table 1. All N D values of the doped samples are within the same order of magnitude of 1019 cm−3. The initial introduction of the Zn dopant for the 3 mM Zn NR sample lowered the N D of the NRs by 22.5% compared to 1.38 × 1019 (cm−3) obtained for the pristine hematite NRs, which is consistent with observations by Kumari et al. [69]. While Zn dopants are responsible for enhancing charge separation in the bulk and interface of the hematite photoanode, the reduction in N D is attributed to its low water oxidation potential as a p-type element [70]. Additionally, the results show that an increase in the nickel dopant concentration of the Zn-doped samples significantly increased the N D values across the hematite NRs samples. The maximum N D value of 2.89 × 1019 (cm−3) was obtained for the 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NR sample, which was 2.1 times higher than that of the pristine hematite NRs. This observation indicates that the varied Ni dopant concentrations were well integrated into hematite as ionized donors and likely established energy traps within the films [71]. The increase in N D values will directly improve the conductivity of the co-doped samples and their PEC activity [72]. This is the key reason for the maximum photocurrent density obtained for the 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni co-doped films. Furthermore, increasing the dopant concentration within optimized proportions has been reported to increase the photocurrent density of hematite films [41]. However, a 7% reduction in N D was observed for the 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NRs compared to that of 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs. Higher dopant concentrations are associated with a greater tendency for the dopant ions to bind to oxygen, leading to the formation of metal oxides [73]. This phenomenon could have led to the decrease in the N D value for the 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NRs, since metal oxides hinder the deep penetration of dopants into the bulk of the film. A similar trend toward a slight reduction in N D with increasing Ni doping concentration has previously been reported for hematite films and was attributed to the possible formation of a blocking layer by the dopant, consequently limiting their light absorption and PEC activity [44].
To further examine the Zn/Ni dopant effect on the charge mobility dynamics at the surface interface of the hematite NRs films, electrochemical impedance measurements were conducted. The plots obtained from the as-prepared photoanodes are shown in Figure 11. The 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs exhibited the smallest diameter, indicative of the lowest resistance to charge transport for this sample. This further confirms the highest photocurrent density for the 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs photoanode [3]. The pristine hematite NRs revealed the largest path, in agreement with previous observations for typical n-type semiconductor photoanodes in PEC setups [74]. The largest path is associated with the highest resistance to the transfer of holes to the semiconductor–electrolyte interface for oxidation. Generally, the Zn/Ni co-dopant proportions enhanced the charge transfer at the hematite–electrolyte interface.

4. Conclusions

Hematite NRs were hydrothermally synthesized over spin-coated seed layers and co-doped with a constant concentration of 3 mM Zn and varied concentrations of 0, 3, 5, 7, and 9 mM Ni. The doped samples were annealed at 550 °C for 1 h. The samples presented a largely uniform morphology of vertically aligned NRs with slight inclinations. There was no significant effect of the facile Zn/Ni co-dopants on the surface morphologies of the NRs. The XRD analysis revealed a hematite crystalline phase of good purity for all samples, which was further confirmed by the Raman spectra of the films. The photon absorption of the pristine and doped NRs samples was high within the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum and is related to their estimated bandgap range of 1.9–2.2 eV. The 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs co-doped sample exhibited the highest PEC performance with a photocurrent density of 0.072 mA/cm2 at 1.5 V vs. RHE. The high ND value estimated for the 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs sample was the key reason for the improved photocatalytic activity observed for the films. Overall, this study presents a new approach to enhancing the PEC activity of hematite NRs by facile co-doping with Zn and Ni.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.T., P.I.K., M.C.C. and M.D.; formal analysis, J.T. and P.I.K.; methodology, J.T.; project administration, M.D.; supervision, M.C.C. and M.D.; writing—original draft, J.T.; writing—review and editing, J.T., P.I.K., M.C.C. and M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the African Centre of Excellence in Energy and Sustainable Development at the University of Rwanda, Department of Physics—University of Pretoria, The National Research Foundation, competitive program for rated researcher project number 118520; NRF-DST SARCHI grant number 115463, the Organization for Women in Science for the Developing World (OWSD), and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).

Data Availability Statement

The data generated and or analyzed in this work can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest in this work and consent to its submission.

References

  1. Kment, S.; Riboni, F.; Pausova, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Han, H.; Hubicka, Z.; Krysa, J.; Schmuki, P.; Zboril, R. Photoanodes Based on TiO2 and α-Fe2O3 for Solar Water Splitting-Superior Role of 1D Nanoarchitectures and of Combined Heterostructures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3716–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yang, Y.; Niu, S.; Han, D.; Liu, T.; Wang, G.; Li, Y. Progress in Developing Metal Oxide Nanomaterials for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nyarige, J.S.; Paradzah, A.T.; Krüger, T.P.J.; Diale, M. Mono-Doped and Co-Doped Nanostructured Hematite for Improved Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, H.; Qu, Y.; Zeid, T.; Duan, X. Towards Highly Efficient Photocatalysts Using Semiconductor Nanoarchitectures. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6732–6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tamirat, A.G.; Rick, J.; Dubale, A.A.; Su, W.N.; Hwang, B.J. Using Hematite for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: A Review of Current Progress and Challenges. Nanoscale Horiz. 2016, 1, 243–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bak, T.; Nowotny, J.; Rekas, M.; Sorrell, C.C. Photo-Electrochemical Hydrogen Generation from Water Using Solar Energy. Materials-Related Aspects. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2002, 27, 991–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fu, Y.; Dong, C.L.; Lee, W.Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, P.; Zhao, L.; Shen, S. Nb-Doped Hematite Nanorods for Efficient Solar Water Splitting: Electronic Structure Evolution versus Morphology Alteration. ChemNanoMat 2016, 2, 704–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jang, Y.J.; Lee, J.S. Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting with P-Type Metal Oxide Semiconductor Photocathodes. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1835–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tofanello, A.; Shen, S.; De Souza, F.L.; Vayssieres, L. Strategies to Improve the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod-Based Photoanodes. APL Mater. 2020, 8, 040905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, A.P.; Saini, N.; Mehta, B.R.; Carraro, G.; Barreca, D. Hematite Thin Film Photoanodes for Visible Light Water Photooxidation: Effects of Zn Doping and Hydrogen Treatment. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 8959–8966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barroso, M.; Pendlebury, S.R.; Cowan, A.J.; Durrant, J.R. Charge Carrier Trapping, Recombination and Transfer in Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Water Splitting Photoanodes. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 2724–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kyesmen, P.I.; Nombona, N.; Diale, M. Heterojunction of Nanostructured α-Fe2O3/CuO for Enhancement of Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 863, 158724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.-J.; Braun, A.B. Covalent S—O Bonding Enables Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance of Cu2S/Fe2O3 Heterojunction for Water SplittingUntEpAlq3mcemibb0x8Q. Small 2021, 17, 30. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lin, Y.; Yuan, G.; Liu, R.; Zhou, S.; Sheehan, S.W.; Wang, D. Semiconductor Nanostructure-Based Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: A Brief Review. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011, 507, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Talibawo, J.; Nyarige, J.S.; Kyesmen, P.I.; Cyulinyana, M.C.; Diale, M. The Behavior of Hydrothermally Synthesized Hematite Nanorods Prepared on Spin Coated Seed Layers. Mater. Res. Express 2022, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Suman; Chahal, S.; Singh, S.; Goel, P.; Kumar, A.; Singh, O.; Kumar, P. Understanding the Role of Ni Ions on the Photocatalytic Activity and Dielectric Properties of Hematite Nanostructures: An Experimental and DFT Approach. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2021, 156, 110118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rauf, A.; Adil, M.; Mian, S.A.; Rahman, G.; Ahmed, E.; MohyUd Din, Z.; Qun, W. Tuning the Optoelectronic Properties of Hematite with Rhodium Doping for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Using Density Function Theory Approach. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peerakiatkhajohn, P.; Yun, J.H.; Chen, H.; Lyu, M.; Butburee, T.; Wang, L. Stable Hematite Nanosheet Photoanodes for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6405–6410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nyarige, J.S.; Krüger, T.P.J.; Diale, M. Structural and Optical Properties of Hematite and L-Arginine/Hematite Nanostructures Prepared by Thermal Spray Pyrolysis. Surf. Interfaces 2020, 18, 100394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cui, X.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Zuo, S.; Zhu, W. Hematite Nanorods with Tunable Porous Structure: Facile Hydrothermal-Calcination Route Synthesis, Optical and Photocatalytic Properties. Powder Technol. 2014, 266, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Swathi, S.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Ravi, G.; Babu, E.S.; Velauthapillai, D.; Alharbi, S.A. Morphological Exploration of Chemical Vapor–Deposited P-Doped ZnO Nanorods for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 6521–6527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mulmudi, H.K.; Mathews, N.; Dou, X.C.; Xi, L.F.; Pramana, S.S.; Lam, Y.M.; Mhaisalkar, S.G. Controlled Growth of Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Nanorod Array on Fluorine Doped Tin Oxide: Synthesis and Photoelectrochemical Properties. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 951–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ito, N.M.; Carvalho, W.M.; Muche, D.N.F.; Castro, R.H.R.; Dalpian, G.M.; Souza, F.L. High Temperature Activation of Hematite Nanorods for Sunlight Driven Water Oxidation Reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 25025–25032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Qin, D.D.; Li, Y.L.; Wang, T.; Li, Y.; Lu, X.Q.; Gu, J.; Zhao, Y.X.; Song, Y.M.; Tao, C.L. Sn-Doped Hematite Films as Photoanodes for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6751–6755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Malviya, K.D.; Klotz, D.; Dotan, H.; Shlenkevich, D.; Tsyganok, A.; Mor, H.; Rothschild, A. Influence of Ti Doping Levels on the Photoelectrochemical Properties of Thin-Film Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Photoanodes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 4206–4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumari, S.; Tripathi, C.; Singh, A.P.; Chauhan, D.; Shrivastav, R.; Dass, S.; Satsangi, V.R. Characterization of Zn-Doped Hematite Thin Films for Photoelectrochemical Splitting of Water. Curr. Sci. 2006, 91, 1062–1064. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, S.; Cai, J.; Liu, Y.; Gao, M.; Cao, F.; Qin, G. Tuning Orientation of Doped Hematite Photoanodes for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 179, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, L.; Xiao, J.; Huang, H.; Huang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y. Enhanced Efficiency of Hematite Photoanode for Water Splitting with the Doping of Ge. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 12646–12652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Milan, R.; Cattarin, S.; Comisso, N.; Baratto, C.; Kaunisto, K.; Tkachenko, N.V.; Concina, I. Compact Hematite Buffer Layer as a Promoter of Nanorod Photoanode Performances. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Y.F.; Zhu, Y.K.; Lv, C.X.; Lai, S.J.; Xu, W.J.; Sun, J.; Sun, Y.Y.; Yang, D.J. Enhanced Visible-Light Photoelectrochemical Performance via Chemical Vapor Deposition of Fe2O3 on a WO3 Film to Form a Heterojunction. Rare Met. 2020, 39, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bidier, S.A.; Hashim, M.R.; Al-Diabat, A.M.; Bououdina, M. Effect of Growth Time on Ti-Doped ZnO Nanorods Prepared by Low-Temperature Chemical Bath Deposition. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2017, 88, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Soltanmoradi, A.; Bakhtiargonbadi, F.; Esfahani, H.; Moakhar, R.S. Effects of Microstructure and Stoichiometry of ZnO Electrospun Seed Layer on the Photoelectrical and Photoelectrochemical Properties of ZnO Nanorods Grown on the FTO Substrate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 267, 124718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, Z.; Wu, S.; Xiao, C.; Li, L.; Li, X. Underlayer Engineering into the Sn-Doped Hematite Photoanode for Facilitating Carrier Extraction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 7306–7313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ling, Y.; Li, Y. Review of Sn-Doped Hematite Nanostructures for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahn, H.J.; Yoon, K.Y.; Kwak, M.J.; Park, J.; Jang, J.H. Boron Doping of Metal-Doped Hematite for Reduced Surface Recombination in Water Splitting. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11932–11939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, M.; Yang, Y.; Ling, Y.; Qiu, W.; Wang, F.; Liu, T.; Song, Y.; Liu, X.; Fang, P.; Tong, Y.; et al. Morphology and Doping Engineering of Sn-Doped Hematite Nanowire Photoanodes. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 2490–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xia, C.; Jia, Y.; Tao, M.; Zhang, Q. Tuning the Band Gap of Hematite α-Fe2O3 by Sulfur Doping. Phys. Lett. Sect. A Gen. At. Solid State Phys. 2013, 377, 1943–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Su, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Feng, B.; Chen, Y.; Guo, L. On the Role of Metal Atom Doping in Hematite for Improved Photoelectrochemical Properties: A Comparison Study. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 101745–101751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cheng, F.; Li, X. Effects of in Situ Co or Ni Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Arrays. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, S.; Xu, W.; Meng, L.; Tian, W.; Li, L. Recent Progress on Semiconductor Heterojunction-Based Photoanodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Small Sci. 2022, 2, 2100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.C.; Kuo, C.L.; Hsu, Y.K. Facile Preparation of Zn-Doped Hematite Thin Film as Photocathode for Solar Hydrogen Generation. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 768, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, X.; Gao, W.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, L.; Claverie, J.P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Sang, Y. Efficient Photo-Electrochemical Water Splitting Based on Hematite Nanorods Doped with Phosphorus. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 248, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Krehula, S.; Ristić, M.; Mitar, I.; Wu, C.; Li, X.; Jiang, L.; Wang, J.; Sun, G.; Zhang, T.; Perović, M.; et al. Synthesis and Properties of Ni-Doped Goethite and Ni-Doped Hematite Nanorods. Croat. Chem. Acta 2018, 91, 389–401. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, Q.; Bian, J.; Zhang, N.; Ng, D.H.L. Loading Ni(OH)2 on the Ti-Doped Hematite Photoanode for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 155, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, J.J.; Hu, Y.; Toth, R.; Fortunato, G.; Braun, A. A Facile Nonpolar Organic Solution Process of a Nanostructured Hematite Photoanode with High Efficiency and Stability for Water Splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 2821–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shi, X.; Zhang, K.; Shin, K.; Moon, J.H.; Lee, T.W.; Park, J.H. Constructing Inverse Opal Structured Hematite Photoanodes via Electrochemical Process and Their Application to Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 11717–11722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pourghahramani, P.; Forssberg, E. Microstructure Characterization of Mechanically Activated Hematite Using XRD Line Broadening. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2006, 79, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, H.; Kim, K.H.; Choi, W.H.; Moon, B.C.; Kong, H.J.; Kang, J.K. Cobalt-Phosphate Catalysts with Reduced Bivalent Co-Ion States and Doped Nitrogen Atoms Playing as Active Sites for Facile Adsorption, Fast Charge Transfer, and Robust Stability in Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 44366–44374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kyesmen, P.I.; Nombona, N.; Diale, M. Modified Annealing Approach for Preparing Multi-Layered Hematite Thin Films for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Mater. Res. Bull. 2020, 131, 110964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lassoued, A.; Lassoued, M.S.; García-Granda, S.; Dkhil, B.; Ammar, S.; Gadri, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Ni-Doped α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles through Co-Precipitation Method with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 5726–5737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Amer, M.A.; Meaz, T.M.; Attalah, S.S.; Ghoneim, A.I. Annealing Effect on Structural Phase Transition of As-Synthesized Mg0.1Sr0.1Mn0.8Fe2O4 Nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 654, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. De Faria, D.L.A.; Venâncio Silva, S.; De Oliveira, M.T. Raman Microspectroscopy of Some Iron Oxides and Oxyhydroxides. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1997, 28, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yogi, A.; Varshney, D. Cu Doping Effect of Hematite (α-Fe2−XCuxO3): Effect on the Structural and Magnetic Properties. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2014, 21, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yogi, A.; Varshney, D. Magnetic and Structural Properties of Pure and Cr-Doped Haematite: α-Fe2−xCrxO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1). J. Adv. Ceram. 2013, 2, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Bellido-aguilar, D.A.; Tofanello, A.; Souza, F.L.; Negri, L.; José, C.; Constantino, L. Effect of Thermal Treatment on Solid–Solid Interface of Hematite Thin Fi Lm Synthesized by Spin-Coating Deposition Solution. Thin Solid Film. 2016, 604, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Group, S.S. Differing Effects of Particle Size and Shape in the Infrared and Raman Spectra of Kaolinite. Clay Miner. 1998, 33, 601–604. [Google Scholar]
  57. Tamirat, A.G.; Dubale, A.A.; Su, W.N.; Chen, H.M.; Hwang, B.J. Sequentially Surface Modified Hematite Enables Lower Applied Bias Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 20881–20890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nyarige, J.S.; Krüger, T.P.J.; Diale, M. Effects of L-Arginine Concentration on Hematite Nanostructures Synthesized by Spray Pyrolysis and Chemical Bath Deposition. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2020, 581, 411924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Formal, F.L.; Grätzel, M.; Sivula, K. Controlling Photoactivity in Ultrathin Hematite Films for Solar Water-Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zandi, O.; Hamann, T.W. The Potential versus Current State of Water Splitting with Hematite. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 22485–22503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhou, X.; Yang, H.; Wang, C.; Mao, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, G. Visible Light Induced Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B on One-Dimensional Iron Oxide Particles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 17051–17061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Phuan, Y.W.; Ibrahim, E.; Chong, M.N.; Zhu, T.; Lee, B.K.; Ocon, J.D.; Chan, E.S. In Situ Ni-Doping during Cathodic Electrodeposition of Hematite for Excellent Photoelectrochemical Performance of Nanostructured Nickel Oxide-Hematite p-n Junction Photoanode. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 392, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sivula, K.; Le Formal, F.; Grätzel, M. Solar Water Splitting: Progress Using Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Photoelectrodes. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 432–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Aragaw, B.A.; Pan, C.J.; Su, W.N.; Chen, H.M.; Rick, J.; Hwang, B.J. Facile One-Pot Controlled Synthesis of Sn and C Codoped Single Crystal TiO2 Nanowire Arrays for Highly Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 163, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shen, S.; Jiang, J.; Guo, P.; Kronawitter, C.X.; Mao, S.S.; Guo, L. Effect of Cr Doping on the Photoelectrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorod Photoanodes. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 732–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, Z.; Gao, C.; Li, Y.; Han, W.; Fu, W.; He, Y.; Xie, E. Enhanced Charge Separation and Transfer through Fe2O3/ITO Nanowire Arrays Wrapped with Reduced Graphene Oxide for Water-Splitting. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gahlawat, S.; Singh, J.; Yadav, A.K.; Ingole, P.P. Exploring Burstein-Moss Type Effects in Nickel Doped Hematite Dendrite Nanostructures for Enhanced Photo-Electrochemical Water Splitting. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 20463–20477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mirbagheri, N.; Wang, D.; Peng, C.; Wang, J.; Huang, Q.; Fan, C.; Ferapontova, E.E. Visible Light Driven Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation by Zn- and Ti-Doped Hematite Nanostructures. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 2006–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumari, S.; Singh, A.P.; Tripathi, C.; Chauhan, D.; Dass, S.; Shrivastav, R.; Gupta, V.; Sreenivas, K.; Satsangi, V.R. Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Response of Zn-Dotted Hematite. Int. J. Photoenergy 2007, 2007, 087467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhu, Q.; Yu, C.; Zhang, X. Ti, Zn Co-Doped Hematite Photoanode for Solar Driven Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 35, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.X.; Zhang, W.D. Photoelectrochemical Properties of Ni-Doped Fe 2O 3 Thin Films Prepared by Electrodeposition. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 59, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shen, S.; Zhou, J.; Dong, C.L.; Hu, Y.; Tseng, E.N.; Guo, P.; Guo, L.; Mao, S.S. Surface Engineered Doping of Hematite Nanorod Arrays for Improved Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Subramanian, A.; Gracia-Espino, E.; Annamalai, A.; Lee, H.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Choi, S.H.; Jang, J.S. Effect of Tetravalent Dopants on Hematite Nanostructure for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kim, J.Y.; Jun, H.; Hong, S.J.; Kim, H.G.; Lee, J.S. Charge Transfer in Iron Oxide Photoanode Modified with Carbon Nanotubes for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation: An Electrochemical Impedance Study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 9462–9468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation of hematite seed layers on FTO by spin coating and (b) hydrothermal synthesis of hematite NRs.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation of hematite seed layers on FTO by spin coating and (b) hydrothermal synthesis of hematite NRs.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g001
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g002 550
Figure 2. Illustration of Zn/Ni facile co-doping of hematite NRs.
Figure 2. Illustration of Zn/Ni facile co-doping of hematite NRs.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g002
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) pristine hematite NRs, (b) 3 mM Zn-doped NRs, and (c) 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, (d) 3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni, (e) 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, and (f) 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni co-doped NRs.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) pristine hematite NRs, (b) 3 mM Zn-doped NRs, and (c) 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, (d) 3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni, (e) 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, and (f) 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni co-doped NRs.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g003
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g004 550
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) pristine hematite NRs, (b) 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, (c) 3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni, (d) 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, (e) 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni, and (f) 3 mM Zn-doped NRs.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) pristine hematite NRs, (b) 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, (c) 3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni, (d) 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, (e) 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni, and (f) 3 mM Zn-doped NRs.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g004
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g005 550
Figure 5. Crystal sizes for pristine hematite NRs, 3 mM Zn, 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, 3 mM Zn/5 Mm Ni, 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, and 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NR samples.
Figure 5. Crystal sizes for pristine hematite NRs, 3 mM Zn, 3 mM Zn/3 mM Ni, 3 mM Zn/5 Mm Ni, 3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni, and 3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NR samples.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g005
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g006 550
Figure 6. Raman spectra of pristine and doped hematite NRs grown over hematite seed layers.
Figure 6. Raman spectra of pristine and doped hematite NRs grown over hematite seed layers.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g006
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g007 550
Figure 7. EDS analysis of pristine hematite and Zn- and Ni-doped NR samples.
Figure 7. EDS analysis of pristine hematite and Zn- and Ni-doped NR samples.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g007
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g008 550
Figure 8. Absorption spectra of hematite NRs co-doped with different Zn/Ni concentrations.
Figure 8. Absorption spectra of hematite NRs co-doped with different Zn/Ni concentrations.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g008
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g009 550
Figure 9. Photocurrent density plots of hematite NRs co-doped with different Zn/Ni concentrations.
Figure 9. Photocurrent density plots of hematite NRs co-doped with different Zn/Ni concentrations.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g009
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g010 550
Figure 10. Mott–Schottky spectra of seeded hematite NRs co-doped with different Zn/Ni concentrations.
Figure 10. Mott–Schottky spectra of seeded hematite NRs co-doped with different Zn/Ni concentrations.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g010
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g011 550
Figure 11. Electrochemical impedance Nyquist plots of pristine, Zn-doped, and Zn/Ni-doped hematite NR photoanodes.
Figure 11. Electrochemical impedance Nyquist plots of pristine, Zn-doped, and Zn/Ni-doped hematite NR photoanodes.
Nanomaterials 12 02961 g011
Table
Table 1. Chemical atomic composition (at %) of the pristine and doped hematite NRs.
Table 1. Chemical atomic composition (at %) of the pristine and doped hematite NRs.
NR SamplesElement (at%)
OFeSnZnNi
Pristine hematite NRs70.9014.0015.10--
3 mM Zn NRs70.7513.2615.940.05-
3 Mm Zn/3 Mm Ni NRs69.7617.2312.930.040.04
3 Mm Zn/5 Mm Ni NRs70.1813.1216.490.100.11
3 Mm Zn/7 Mm Ni NRs69.8714.0915.780.070.19
3 Mm Zn/3 Mm Ni NRs70.5012.6016.580.040.28
Table
Table 2. Flat band potential ( V f b )/V and donor densities N D × 1019/cm−3 of pristine and doped hematite NR samples synthesized over hematite seed layers.
Table 2. Flat band potential ( V f b )/V and donor densities N D × 1019/cm−3 of pristine and doped hematite NR samples synthesized over hematite seed layers.
NR Sample V f b (V) N D × 1019 (cm−3)
Pristine hematite NRs−0.431.38
3 mM Zn NRs−0.021.07
3 Mm Zn/3 Mm Ni NRs−0.361.55
3 mM Zn/5 mM Ni NRs−0.382.01
3 mM Zn/7 mM Ni NRs−0.652.89
3 mM Zn/9 mM Ni NRs−0.702.69
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Talibawo, J.; Kyesmen, P.I.; Cyulinyana, M.C.; Diale, M. Facile Zn and Ni Co-Doped Hematite Nanorods for Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2961. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172961

AMA Style

Talibawo J, Kyesmen PI, Cyulinyana MC, Diale M. Facile Zn and Ni Co-Doped Hematite Nanorods for Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(17):2961. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172961

Chicago/Turabian Style

Talibawo, Joan, Pannan I. Kyesmen, Marie C. Cyulinyana, and Mmantsae Diale. 2022. "Facile Zn and Ni Co-Doped Hematite Nanorods for Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation" Nanomaterials 12, no. 17: 2961. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172961

APA Style

Talibawo, J., Kyesmen, P. I., Cyulinyana, M. C., & Diale, M. (2022). Facile Zn and Ni Co-Doped Hematite Nanorods for Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation. Nanomaterials, 12(17), 2961. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172961

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop