Next Article in Journal
Facile Synthesis of NixCo3−xS4 Microspheres for High-Performance Supercapacitors and Alkaline Aqueous Rechargeable NiCo-Zn Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Field-Effect Control of Single-Layer WS2 Optical Features by hBN Full Encapsulation
Previous Article in Journal
Trends in the Development of Electronic Noses Based on Carbon Nanotubes Chemiresistors for Breathomics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Radiation-Induced Nucleation and Growth of CaSi2 Crystals, Both Directly during the Epitaxial CaF2 Growth and after the CaF2 Film Formation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Light-Trapping-Enhanced Photodetection in Ge/Si Quantum Dot Photodiodes Containing Microhole Arrays with Different Hole Depths

by
Andrew I. Yakimov
1,*,
Victor V. Kirienko
1,
Dmitrii E. Utkin
1,2 and
Anatoly V. Dvurechenskii
1,2
1
Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
Physical Department, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(17), 2993; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172993
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 27 August 2022 / Published: 30 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Semiconductor Nano-Structures)

Abstract

:
Photodetection based on assemblies of quantum dots (QDs) is able to tie the advantages of both the conventional photodetector and unique electronic properties of zero-dimensional structures in an unprecedented way. However, the biggest drawback of QDs is the small absorbance of infrared radiation due to the low density of the states coupled to the dots. In this paper, we report on the Ge/Si QD pin photodiodes integrated with photon-trapping hole array structures of various thicknesses. The aim of this study was to search for the hole array thickness that provided the maximum optical response of the light-trapping Ge/Si QD detectors. With this purpose, the embedded hole arrays were etched to different depths ranging from 100 to 550 nm. By micropatterning Ge/Si QD photodiodes, we were able to redirect normal incident light laterally along the plane of the dots, therefore facilitating the optical conversion of the near-infrared photodetectors due to elongation of the effective absorption length. Compared with the conventional flat photodetector, the responsivity of all microstructured devices had a polarization-independent improvement in the 1.0–1.8-μm wavelength range. The maximum photocurrent enhancement factor (≈50× at 1.7 μm) was achieved when the thickness of the photon-trapping structure reached the depth of the buried QD layers.

1. Introduction

Uncooled Si quantum dot (QD) photodetectors (QDIPs) containing Ge QDs as an active absorbing element are capable of detecting optical radiation in the near-infrared (NIR) wavelength range (1.2–2.0 μm) [1,2,3,4] and can be used for development of efficient methods for transmitting information in television and telephone networks, the Internet, and optical computers. Despite the superior features of photodetectors with QDs, the QDIP’s currently achieved sensitivity to IR radiation is small, which results from the low density of the states associated with QDs and from the limited QD absorption thickness. To increase the absorption and hence the responsivity of low-absorbance devices, miscellaneous structures have been incorporated into photodetertors [5]. Plasmonic metasurfaces [6,7,8,9] and photon-trapping structures [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] have been demonstrated to be effective in reinforcement of photoresponses. The disadvantages of metallic metasurfaces that allow conversion of the incident electromagnetic radiation into the surface plasmons are high ohmic losses in the metal [18] and a small penetration depth of the plasmon field to the semiconductor, particularly for short wavelengths. Another efficient solution is to ensure a longer path of light through the detector using all-dielectric photon-trapping structures, which offer a low-loss alternative to plasmon elements [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Micro- and nanohole arrays on the detector’s surface enable light trapping with the generation of the lateral modes. The propagation of photons in the larger lateral dimension elongates the effective absorption length and enhances photon–material interaction, benefitting the increased optical absorption.
In a recent study, we reported on the vertical Ge/Si QD pin photodiodes with self-assembled Ge quantum dots grown on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate for photodetection in the NIR telecommunication wavelength range [25]. The photon-trapping 2D hole arrays were introduced into QDIPs to convert the incident electromagnetic radiation to the lateral collective modes. Compared with the non-photon-trapping counterpart, the photon-trapping QDIP exhibited an ≈30× responsivity enhancement at a wavelength of around 1.6 μm. A typical QDIP contains multiple stacks of buried QD layers as well as heavily doped contact regions at the top and bottom (Figure 1a). The microscale holes are etched through the top contact and absorbing layers for promoting lateral propogating modes. By changing the hole depth, one can tune the vertical spreading of the laterally traveling modes across detector. Using a light-trapping structure with holes passing through the QD absorber is beneficial to optical field confinement within the QD active region but at the expense of a decreased number of QDs, which results in less absorption. Thus, there is a trade-off between the amount of absorbing semiconductors remaining after etching and the enhanced light intensity in the region of the QDs. This work is a continuation of the research outlined in a previous paper [25]. Here, to address the trade-off, we analyzed and compared light-trapping enhanced Ge/Si QDIPs with different hole depths. By incorporating a circular hole array structure in square lattice with an optimal hole depth to the heterostructure, the photoresponse in the NIR wavelength range can be significantly enhanced. It has been demonstrated that the maximum photocurrent enhancement (50× at 1.7 μm) is achieved when the thickness of the photon-trapping structure reaches the depth of the buried QD layers. The dependence of the photoresponse on the polarization of the incident radiation has also been examined.

2. Materials and Methods

The light-trapping QDIPs were typical vertical mesa-type photodiodes fabricated by a solid source molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) using a Riber SIVA-21 system. In the experiments, a (001)-oriented SOI wafer with a 200-nm top silicon film and 2000-nm buried silicon oxide was used as the substrate. The sample geometry is shown in Figure 1a. The insulator platform plays the role of a bottom reflector and can enhance the absorption of normal incident light. Meanwhile, the employment of an SOI substrate makes possible the vertical Fabry–Pérot resonances between the SOI substrate and the top surface. The preparation started with a 20-nm-thick undoped Si layer. Then, the boron-doped ( 5 × 10 18 cm 3 ) p-type Si bottom contact layer with a 500 nm thickness was grown at 600 °C. The active region of the QDIPs was composed of 10 stacks of Ge quantum dots separated by 10-nm Si barriers and was sandwiched in between the 200-nm-thick intrinsic buffer and cap Si layers fabricated at 500 °C and 400 °C, respectively. Each Ge QD layer consisted of a nominal Ge thickness of about 0.9 nm and formed at 250 °C at a rate of 0.04 nm/s by self-assembling in the Stranski–Krastanov growth mode. The QDs had a hut-like shape with a lateral size of 9.4 ± 3.2 nm and a height of about 1 nm. The surface density of the QDs was 5.2 × 10 11 cm 2 . The average Ge content of 88% and the in-plane strain ε | | = 0.036 in the Ge nanoclusters were determined from Raman scattering experiments using an approach developed in [26]. Finally, an Sb-doped 50-nm-thick n-Si top contact layer (∼10 19 cm 3 ) was grown at 400 °C to form a pin diode structure. Note that the QD active region with a thickness of 90 nm was located at a distance of h QD = 260 nm below the Si–air surface (Figure 2). Details on the structure growth can be found in [4,25,27].
After the MBE growth, the wafers were processed into 700-μm diameter vertical pin QDIPs (Figure 1b). The hole arrays were etched to different depths ranging from 100 to 550 nm with a cylindrical shape profile, serving as the photon-trapping structures. It has been shown previously that Ge/Si QDIPs cover the NIR spectral range up to 1.6–1.8 μm [4,25]. In the present experiments, we fixed the hole diameter at 1300 nm and lattice periodicity at 1700 nm. The surface morphology was controlled by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Some representative images are shown in Figure 1c–f. The air holes were produced by means of the reactive ion etching of the Si and Ge layers through a metallic template. The template was a 30-nm-thick perforated Cr film formed on the surface of the heterostructure by electron beam lithography, deposition of the metal in av acuum, and the subsequent lift-off process. The hole arrays had the square lattice symmetry with hole depths h = 100, 200, 270, 315, 380, and 550 nm. A reference QDIP without any texture pit was also fabricated for comparison of the device performance. The top and bottom ohmic contacts were made using Au evaporated onto the sample surface and annealing at 350 °C for 5 min in an Ar atmosphere. An optical image of the fabricated device is displayed in Figure 1b. The photocurrent measurements were performed at room temperature. The normal-incidence photoresponse was obtained using a Bruker Vertex 70 Fourier spectrometer with a spectral resolution of 30 cm 1 along with an SR570 low-noise current preamplifier. A halogen lamp was used as a source of radiation. The photocurrent spectra were calibrated with a deuterated L-alanine-doped triglycine sulfate detector. The responsivity was determined by illuminating the samples with InGaAsP LEDs (Roithner Laser Technik), which were emitting at 1.3 and 1.55 μm. The room temperature dark current was tested as a function of a bias voltage between −2 V and +2 V by a Keithley 6430 Sub-Femtoamp Remote SourceMeter.

3. Results and Discussion

The reflection spectra of the devices with and without photon-trapping hole arrays are plotted in Figure 3. The incident depolarized the IR light-illuminated detectors from their front sides. The spectra were normalized by the reflection intensity spectrum of the Au flat mirror. As illustrated in Figure 3, large oscillations were observed on the spectra of the reference QDIP and the light-trapping device with shallow holes (h = 100 nm), providing evidence for the strong vertical resonances between the SOI substrate and top surface. The spectra resembled each other, and a slight difference in the peak position was caused by different effective refractive indices. The light in the detector’s active region experienced a strong reflection at the SiO 2 /Si and air/Si interfaces, creating a resonant cavity. The point of Figure 3 is to demonstrate that when the holes were deeper than 100 nm, the light-trapping QDIPs had lower reflection (10–20%) and much weaker vertical resonance, suggesting a successful conversion of an initial incident vertical plane wave to an ensemble of lateral collective modes, which are less dependent on constructive or destructive optical interference [28].
Figure 4 depicts the measured responsivity spectra of the detectors with flat and textured surfaces. A broad photoresponse in the NIR spectral range up to 1.8 μm was due to interband transitions between the electron states in the conduction band and the hole states bound inside Ge QDs [4]. Similar to the reflection spectra, the photocurrent characteristics of the control QDIP consisted of sharp resonances caused by the vertical cavity effect. With the incorporation of a light-trapping microstructure, the vertical resonances became less pronounced due to generation of the lateral guided modes. To test the polarization dependence of the spectral response, we measured the responsivity characteristics of the QDIPs under a linear polarized light with different polarization angles. We used a KRS-5 polarizer which was placed in the path of the IR beam to select the desired beam polarization. As shown in Figure 4h, the photocurrent spectra did not change with the polarization angles due to the structure symmetry of the hole arrays.
To gain clear insights into the enhancement from the light-trapping structures, the enhancement factor was analyzed. To obtain the hole-induced photoresponse enhancement factor, the experimental responsivity spectra were normalized to the reference spectrum of the control sample with a flat surface. The photocurrent enhancement at 2.5 V is plotted in Figure 5a. The enhancement spectrum of the 270-nm hole device at a 0 V bias is also shown by the black broken line. We found that the photocurrent enhancement in the photovoltaic regime was small, and it increased with the increasing reverse bias and ceased to depend on the voltage as the reverse bias voltage reached ≈1 V. This observation can be explained by electrically controlled overlap between the depletion layer and the light-trapping region [29].
At bias voltages larger than 1 V, the detector response was greatly enhanced by embedding the photon-trapping structure, where the maximum enhancement rate was obtained at wavelengths of around 1.7 μm. Compared with the conventional flat QDIP, the responsivity of all microstructured devices had broadband (10 − 20)× improvement at the wavelength range from 1.0 to about 1.6 μm and enhancement of 50× at 1.7 μm for the QDIP with h = 270 nm. It is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the maximum enhancement occurred when λ p , where p is the periodicity of the light-trapping structure. Under this condition, a photonic crystal was formed. Photonic crystals allow slow Bloch modes with a group velocity of photons close to zero, resulting in a strong enhancement in light–matter interaction [30,31,32].
In Figure 5b, we plot the enhancement factor integrated over the wavelength range from 1.6 to 1.8 μm. An important result is that the better improvement in responsivity was reached at h h QD , or when the air holes reached the depth of the buried QD layers. At small h values, the photocurrent enhancement mainly came from vertical resonance with a small contribution from the lateral modes, which was consistent with the measured result for the reflection spectra. At h > 100 nm, the multiple absorption enhancement could not be explained by the anti-reflection property alone, and the waveguiding effects began to dominate. When the holes were formed by etching through the entire Ge/Si layer, the number of QDs in the active region (and hence the absorption) was reduced. Aside from that, at large h values, the surface recombination of the photogenerated carriers was increased due to the increase in the hole surface area, which also led to a decrease in responsivity.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we introduced light-trapping microstructures into vertical Ge/Si pin photodiodes with self-assembled Ge quantum dots grown on an SOI substrate. The hole arrays with different depths ranging from 100 nm to 550 nm served as the light-trapping structures by promoting laterally propogating modes. We addressed the trade-off between the amount of absorbing QD layers remaining after etching the holes and the enhanced light intensity in the region of the QDs due to the generation of guiding collective modes. Compared with a flat detector without holes, a photocurrent enhancement of about 50 times at 1.7 μm was achieved when the thickness of the photon-trapping structure reached the depth of the buried QD layers. The independence of the optical response from the polarization of the incident radiation was also established.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.I.Y.; methodology, V.V.K. and D.E.U.; investigation, A.I.Y. and V.V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I.Y.; writing—review and editing, V.V.K., A.V.D. and D.E.U.; visualization, D.E.U.; supervision, A.V.D.; funding acquisition, A.V.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (grant 19-12-00070-Π.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Research and Study Center “Nanotechnology” at Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (TUSUR) and the Multiple-Access Center “Nanostructures” at the Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics for the provision of technological and diagnostic equipment. The SEM experiments were performed at the Analytical and Technological Research Center in the Physics Department of Novosibirsk State University. We are thankful to Ishutkin S.V. from TUSUR for his help with electron beam lithography.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
QDQuantum dot
IRInfrared
QDIPQuantum dot infrared photodetector
MBEMolecular beam epitaxy
SEMScanning electron microscopy
AFMAtomic force microscopy
LEDLight-emitting diode

References

  1. Tong, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, K. Normal-incidence Ge quantum-dot photodetectors at 1.5 μm based on Si substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 1189–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alguno, A.; Usami, N.; Ujihara, T.; Fujiwara, K.; Sazaki, G.; Nakajima, K.; Shiraki, Y. Enhanced quantum efficiency of solar cells with self-assembled Ge dots stacked in multilayer structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 1258–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Elfving, A.; Hansson, G.; Ni, W.X. SiGe (Ge-dot) heterojunction phototransistors for efficient light detection at 1.3–1.55 μm. Physica E 2003, 16, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yakimov, A.I.; Kirienko, V.V.; Bloshkin, A.A.; Dvurechenskii, A.V.; Utkin, D.E. Near-infrared photoresponse in Ge/Si quantum dots enhanced by localized surface plasmons supported by aluminium nanodisks. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 143101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Livache, C.; Martinez, B.; Goubet, N.; Gréboval, C.; Qu, J.; Chu, A.; Royer, S.; Ithurria, S.; Silly, M.G.; Dubertret, B.; et al. A colloidal quantum dot infrared photodetector and its use for intraband detection. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Atwater, H.A.; Polman, A. Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tong, J.; Suo, F.; Ma, J.; Tobing, L.; Qian, L.; Zhang, D. Surface plasmon enhanced infrared photodetection. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2019, 2, 180026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, D.; Koh, Y.R.; Kudyshev, Z.A.; Maize, K.; Kildishev, A.V.; Boltasseva, A.; Shalaev, V.M.; Shakouri, A. Spatial and temporal nanoscale plasmonic heating quantified by thermoreflectance. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3796–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, H.; Kang, Y.; Meng, T.; Tian, C.; Wei, G. High photon absorptivity of quantum dot infrared photodetectors achieved by the surface plasmon effect of metal nanohole array. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 98. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao, Y.; Cansizoglu, H.; Polat, K.G.; Ghandiparsi, S.; Kaya, A.; Mamtaz, H.H.; Mayet, A.S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yamada, T.; et al. Photon-trapping microstructures enable high-speed high-efficiency silicon photodiodes. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cansizoglu, H.; Bartolo-Perez, C.; Gao, Y.; Ponizovskaya Devine, E.; Ghandiparsi, S.; Polat, K.G.; Mamtaz, H.H.; Yamada, T.; Elrefaie, A.F.; Wang, S.Y.; et al. Surface-illuminated photon-trapping high-speed Ge-on-Si photodiodes with improved efficiency up to 1700 nm. Photonics Res. 2018, 6, 734–742. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cansizoglu, H.; Ponizovskaya Devine, E.; Gao, Y.; Ghandiparsi, S.; Yamada, T.; Elrefaie, A.F.; Wang, S.Y.; Islam, M.S. A new paradigm in high-speed and high-efficiency silicon photodiodes for communication – Part I: Enhancing photon-material interaction via low-dimensional structures. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghandiparsi, S.; Elrefaie, A.F.; Mayet, A.S.; Landolsi, T.; Bartolo-Perez, C.; Cansizoglu, H.; Gao, Y.; Mamtaz, H.H.; Golgir, H.R.; Ponizovskaya Devine, E.; et al. High-speed high-efficiency pin photodiodes for short-reach optical interconnects in data centers. IEEE J. Lightwave Tech. 2019, 37, 5748–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, H.; Xu, S.; Lin, Y.; Huang, Y.C.; Son, B.; Chen, Q.; Guo, X.; Lee, K.H.; Gon, S.C.; Gong, X.; et al. High-efficiency GeSn/Ge multiple-quantum-well photodetectors with photon-trapping microstructures operating at 2 μm. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 10280–10293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Suo, F.; Tong, J.; Chen, X.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, D.H. Hole array enhanced dual-band infrared photodetection. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 6424–6433. [Google Scholar]
  16. Suo, F.; Tong, J.; Zhang, D.H. Photon-trapping array for enhanced midwave infrared photoresponse. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 505105. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhou, H.; Chen, Q.; Wu, S.; Zhang, L.; Guo, X.; Son, B.; Tan, C.S. Grating and hole-array enhanced germanium lateral p-i-n photodetectors on an insulator platform. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 4706–4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khurgin, J.B. Replacing noble metals with alternative materials in plasmonic and metamaterials: How good an idea? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2017, 375, 20160068. [Google Scholar]
  19. Krasnok, A.E.; Miroshnichenko, A.E.; Belov, P.A.; Krishar, Y.S. All-dielectric optical nanoantennas. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 20599–20604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Moitra, P.; Slovick, B.; Ya, Z.G.; Krishnamurthy, S. Experimental demonstration of a broadband all-dielectric metamaterial perfect reflector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 171102. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jahani, S.; Jacob, Z. All-dielectric metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Decker, M.; Staude, I. Resonant dielectric nanostructures: A low-loss platform for fucntional nanophotonics. J. Opt. 2016, 18, 103001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kamali, S.M.; Arbabi, E.; Arbabi, A.; Faraon, A. A review of dielectric optical metasurfaces for wavefront control. Nanophotonics 2018, 7, 1041–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, M.; Fan, Q.; Yu, L.; Xu, T. Polarization-independent infrared micro-lens array based on all-silicon metasurfaces. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 10738–10744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yakimov, A.I.; Kirienko, V.V.; Bloshkin, A.A.; Utkin, D.E.; Dvurechenskii, A.V. Near-infrared photoresponse in Ge/Si quantum dots enhanced by photon-trapping hole arrays. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yakimov, A.I.; Nikiforov, A.I.; Dvurechenskii, A.V.; Ulyanov, V.V.; Volodin, V.A.; Groetzschel, R. Effect of growth rate on the morphology and structural properties of hut-shaped Ge islands in Si(001). Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 4743–4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Yakimov, A.I.; Kirienko, V.V.; Armbrister, V.A.; Bloshkin, A.A.; Dvurechenskii, A.V. Photoconductive gain and quantum efficiency of remotely doped Ge/Si quantum dot photodetectors. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 105032. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zang, K.; Jiang, X.; Huo, Y.; Ding, X.; Morea, M.; Chen, X.; Lu, C.Y.; Ma, J.; Zhou, M.; Xia, Z.; et al. Silicon single-photon avalanche diodes with nanostructured light trapping. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tong, J.; Tobing, L.; Zhang, D. Electrically controlled enhancement in plasmonic mid-infrared photodiode. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 5452–5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamada, T.; Ponizovskaya Devine, E.; Ghandiparsi, S.; Bartolo-Perez, C.; Mayet, A.S.; Cansizoglu, H.; Gao, Y.; Ahamed, A.; Wang, S.Y.; Islam, M.S. Modeling of nanohole silicon pin/nip photodetectors: Steady state and transient characteristics. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 365201. [Google Scholar]
  31. Baba, T. Slow light in photonic crystals. Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Duché, D.; Escoubas, L.; Simon, J.J.; Torchio, P.; Vervisch, W.; Flory, F. Slow Bloch modes for enhancing the absorption of light in thin films for photovoltaic cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 193310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the pin QDIP structure on an SOI wafer with holes etched through the top n- and i-layers. (b) Optical image of a Ge/Si QDIP with a photon-trapping structure (top view). (cf) Zoomed-in SEM images and (gj) AFM profiles of the square lattice of circular holes with different hole depths h. The hole diameter is 1300 nm, and the lattice periodicity is 1700 nm. The hole depth is (c,g) 100 nm, (d,h) 200 nm, (e,i) 380 nm, and (f,j) 550 nm.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the pin QDIP structure on an SOI wafer with holes etched through the top n- and i-layers. (b) Optical image of a Ge/Si QDIP with a photon-trapping structure (top view). (cf) Zoomed-in SEM images and (gj) AFM profiles of the square lattice of circular holes with different hole depths h. The hole diameter is 1300 nm, and the lattice periodicity is 1700 nm. The hole depth is (c,g) 100 nm, (d,h) 200 nm, (e,i) 380 nm, and (f,j) 550 nm.
Nanomaterials 12 02993 g001
Figure 2. SEM micrograph of the active region of a Ge/Si QDIP with a 550-nm hole depth.
Figure 2. SEM micrograph of the active region of a Ge/Si QDIP with a 550-nm hole depth.
Nanomaterials 12 02993 g002
Figure 3. Reflection spectra of the Ge/Si QDIPs with and without photon-trapping microstructure from 1 to 2 μm. The hole depths are 100, 200, 315, 380, and 550 nm.
Figure 3. Reflection spectra of the Ge/Si QDIPs with and without photon-trapping microstructure from 1 to 2 μm. The hole depths are 100, 200, 315, 380, and 550 nm.
Nanomaterials 12 02993 g003
Figure 4. Responsivity spectra of the Ge/Si QDIPs (a) without and (bh) with photon-trapping hole arrays. The hole depths were (b) 100, (c) 200, (d) 270, (e) 315, (f) 380, and (g) 550 nm. (h) Responsivity spectra of the light-trapping device with h = 380 nm at different polarization angles. The reverse bias was 2 V.
Figure 4. Responsivity spectra of the Ge/Si QDIPs (a) without and (bh) with photon-trapping hole arrays. The hole depths were (b) 100, (c) 200, (d) 270, (e) 315, (f) 380, and (g) 550 nm. (h) Responsivity spectra of the light-trapping device with h = 380 nm at different polarization angles. The reverse bias was 2 V.
Nanomaterials 12 02993 g004
Figure 5. (a) Photocurrent enhancement spectra at 2.5 V of photon-trapping devices with different hole depths relative to the control detector. The photocurrent enhancement of the 270-nm hole device at a 0-V bias is shown by the black broken line. (b) Enhancement factor integrated over wavelengths in the range of 1.6–1.8 μm as a function of the hole depth h. The active region of the Ge quantum dots is inside the blue area. h QD is the distance from the surface to the QD active region’s location. The maximum enhancement was observed when h h QD .
Figure 5. (a) Photocurrent enhancement spectra at 2.5 V of photon-trapping devices with different hole depths relative to the control detector. The photocurrent enhancement of the 270-nm hole device at a 0-V bias is shown by the black broken line. (b) Enhancement factor integrated over wavelengths in the range of 1.6–1.8 μm as a function of the hole depth h. The active region of the Ge quantum dots is inside the blue area. h QD is the distance from the surface to the QD active region’s location. The maximum enhancement was observed when h h QD .
Nanomaterials 12 02993 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yakimov, A.I.; Kirienko, V.V.; Utkin, D.E.; Dvurechenskii, A.V. Light-Trapping-Enhanced Photodetection in Ge/Si Quantum Dot Photodiodes Containing Microhole Arrays with Different Hole Depths. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172993

AMA Style

Yakimov AI, Kirienko VV, Utkin DE, Dvurechenskii AV. Light-Trapping-Enhanced Photodetection in Ge/Si Quantum Dot Photodiodes Containing Microhole Arrays with Different Hole Depths. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(17):2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172993

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yakimov, Andrew I., Victor V. Kirienko, Dmitrii E. Utkin, and Anatoly V. Dvurechenskii. 2022. "Light-Trapping-Enhanced Photodetection in Ge/Si Quantum Dot Photodiodes Containing Microhole Arrays with Different Hole Depths" Nanomaterials 12, no. 17: 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172993

APA Style

Yakimov, A. I., Kirienko, V. V., Utkin, D. E., & Dvurechenskii, A. V. (2022). Light-Trapping-Enhanced Photodetection in Ge/Si Quantum Dot Photodiodes Containing Microhole Arrays with Different Hole Depths. Nanomaterials, 12(17), 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172993

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop