Next Article in Journal
Nickel-Based Selenides with a Fractal Structure as an Excellent Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Water Splitting
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Characterization and Prediction with Neural Network Modeling of Various Stoichiometries of Perovskite Materials Using a Hyperregression Method
Previous Article in Journal
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Spontaneous Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease in an Interleukin-2 Receptor α−/− Transgenic Mouse Model Using Targeted Microbubbles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ethanol Solvothermal Treatment on Graphitic Carbon Nitride Materials for Enhancing Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Performance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/nano12020282
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

SnS2 Nanoparticles and Thin Film for Application as an Adsorbent and Photovoltaic Buffer

by
Sreedevi Gedi
1,†,
Salh Alhammadi
1,†,
Jihyeon Noh
1,
Vasudeva Reddy Minnam Reddy
1,
Hyeonwook Park
1,
Abdelrahman Mohamed Rabie
2,
Jae-Jin Shim
1,
Dohyung Kang
1,* and
Woo Kyoung Kim
1,*
1
School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea
2
Petrochemical Department, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Nasr City, Cairo 11727, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(2), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12020282
Submission received: 13 November 2021 / Revised: 10 January 2022 / Accepted: 12 January 2022 / Published: 17 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Performance of Nanocomposite for Optoelectronic Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Energy consumption and environmental pollution are major issues faced by the world. The present study introduces a single solution using SnS2 for these two major global problems. SnS2 nanoparticles and thin films were explored as an adsorbent to remove organic toxic materials (Rhodamine B (RhB)) from water and an alternative to the toxic cadmium sulfide (CdS) buffer for thin-film solar cells, respectively. Primary characterization tools such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Raman, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy were used to analyze the SnS2 nanoparticles and thin films. At a reaction time of 180 min, 0.4 g/L of SnS2 nanoparticles showed the highest adsorption capacity of 85% for RhB (10 ppm), indicating that SnS2 is an appropriate adsorbent. The fabricated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) device with SnS2 as a buffer showed a conversion efficiency (~5.1%) close to that (~7.5%) of a device fabricated with the conventional CdS buffer, suggesting that SnS2 has potential as an alternative buffer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Global energy consumption is anticipated to increase dramatically over the next few decades. This is primarily due to the expected global population expansion as well as the economic and industrial growth of developing nations, among other factors. According to a new report from the International Energy Agency (IEA), worldwide energy consumption has declined by approximately 1% in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic and is expected to increase by approximately 5% in the coming years [1]. Sustainable energy sources are growing rapidly, but not fast enough to meet the significant increase in global energy demand, resulting in a dramatic increase in coal consumption that threatens to increase carbon dioxide emissions from the energy industry to historic levels. Electricity generation from PV technology is more affordable than that from non-renewable fossil fuel sources. As a result, it is necessary to advance the field of photovoltaic (PV) research by utilizing sustainable materials.
Notably, solar technologies based on Cu(In, Ga)Se2 (CIGS) thin-film semiconducting materials are available at a price comparable to or lower than that of standard silicon modules [2]. The typical structure of CIGS thin film technology comprises a bottom contact layer made of molybdenum (Mo), a p-type CIGS absorber layer (1–3 μm), a thin n-type cadmium sulfide (CdS) buffer layer, a zinc oxide (ZnO)-based transparent window layer [3], and top metal contacts. Generally, conventional CdS buffer is produced by chemical bath deposition (CBD), which shields the absorber layer from direct current (DC) sputtering damage and alters the surface of the CIGS absorber [4]. In addition, the chemical bath eliminates natural oxides from the surface of the CIGS during CdS deposition [5]. CdS can also develop a suitable band alignment with CIGS and transparent conductive oxide [6]. Currently, the world-record efficiency of CIGS solar cells using conventional CdS buffer is approximately 23.35% [7] at the laboratory scale. However, CdS has a few disadvantages. Because of its relatively low band gap (Eg) (2.4 eV), some of the incident light is absorbed by the CdS buffer (parasitic light absorption), which reduces the available photocurrent (loss in short circuit current of 2 mA/cm2) [8]. Further, there is a decrease in the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of CIGS cells with a CdS buffer in the blue region (350–550 nm) owing to the strong recombination of minority carriers (holes) in the window and buffer layers of CIGS cells [5]. However, the primary disadvantage of CdS buffer is its toxicity, which raises concerns on environmental and human health factors [9]. To resolve the disadvantages mentioned above, it is critical to replace the standard CdS buffer layer with one that is environmentally benign, affordable, and provides a significantly higher bandgap compared with CdS.
Another major concern confronting the world is the contamination of water by organic dye solutions that are disposed by the textile, paint, leather, and paper industries [10,11]. Dyes are coloring agents that can be used to tint other materials. Cationic dyes can dissociate into positively charged ions in an aqueous solution, whereas anionic dyes dissociate into negatively charged ions in an aqueous solution. The primary distinction between cationic and anionic dyes is that cationic dyes are basic and anionic dyes are acidic. By combining basic and acidic dyes, neutral dyes are created. Rhodamine B (RhB), methyl orange (MO), and neutral phenol red (PR) are all examples of cationic, anionic, and neutral dyes, respectively [12]. These dyes are highly toxic substances that are harmful to human health, marine life, and the environment [13]. Therefore, dyes must be removed from aqueous solutions prior to disposal. There are different physical [14], chemical [15], and biological [16] decolorization methods that have been used to purify wastewater that contains dyes. Indeed, most dyes are chemically stable for their intended purposes and are challenging to break down biologically [17]. As a result, photocatalysis [18,19], chemical oxidation [20], and adsorption [21] are the primary methods for removing dyes from aqueous solutions. Adsorption is viable for removing hazardous dyes from aqueous solutions as it is simple to conduct, inexpensive, environmentally benign, efficient, and requires little energy [22].
To address the two distinct types of challenges faced by the world, the authors suggested a single material as the solution. Tin disulfide (SnS2) is a benign, affordable, and simple binary IV–VI group metal chalcogenide with a band gap of ~2.9 eV and an n-type conductivity. It consists of earth abundant elements with easily controllable chemical stoichiometry and high chemical and environmental stability. It showed a peculiar CdI2-type layered structure, with tin atoms sandwiched between two layers of hexagonally arranged close-packed sulfur atoms [23]. It forms an Ohmic contact with metals without current losses. In addition, excellent structural flexibility, broader spectral response, and better thermal stability of SnS2 make it a competitive non-toxic substitute for various applications, such as solar cells, field effect transistors, thin film diodes, high-speed photodetectors, lithium-sodium ion batteries, supercapacitors, catalysts, and gas sensors [24,25,26,27,28]. Because of its appropriate band gap, it transmits most of the solar radiation to the absorber and minimizes the parasitic absorption loss. It has carrier density of the order of 1019 cm−3 and electron affinity of 4.1 eV [29] to achieve sufficient type-inversion within the absorber surface and to make a favorable conduction band offset (CBO, 0–0.4 eV) with the absorber, respectively [30]. Further, it is chemically stable in both acidic and neutral aqueous solutions [21]. Therefore, SnS2 has the potential to be a promising non-toxic buffer in solar cells [29,31] and an effective adsorbent for the degradation of organic pollutants [32].
In this paper, we present the synthesis of SnS2 nanoparticles using a facile chemical precipitation approach. Subsequently, SnS2 thin films were formed by spin coating the SnS2 nanoparticles. Further, the SnS2 nanoparticles were investigated as a possible adsorbent for removing a toxic dye, Rhodamine B (RhB), from an aqueous solution. In addition, SnS2 thin films were explored as a buffer layer for CIGS solar cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Stannous chloride (SnCl4·5H2O, AR, purity 99.0%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and thioacetamide (C2H5NS, AR, purity ≥ 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as Sn and S precursors, respectively. Trisodium citrate (Na3C6H5O7, AR, purity 99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as chelating agent. These compounds were utilized as supplied without additional purification and stored in a humidity-controlled desiccator.

2.2. Synthesis of SnS2 Nanoparticles for Adsorbent Application

The procedure for the synthesis of SnS2 nanoparticles is shown in Figure 1. A simple chemical precipitation method was used to synthesize SnS2 nanoparticles. For a typical synthesis, 0.1 M of stannous chloride, 0.8 M of thioacetamide, and 1 M of trisodium citrate were aggressively stirred on the magnetic hot plate. The solution was allowed to react for 50 min at a constant temperature of 60 °C with a solution pH of 2. The SnS2 nanoparticles were collected and cleaned using deionized water before drying in a vacuum oven at 70 °C for 4 h. Finally, the as-synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles exhibited a golden yellow hue. The SnS2 nanoparticles/powder was collected in a vial and desiccated for further analyses.

2.3. Preparation of SnS2 Thin Film for Photovoltaic Application

The as-synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles were used for the preparation of SnS2 thin films by spin coating. SnS2 thin film deposition was accomplished by sonicating the SnS2 nanoparticles dispersed in 2 mL ethanol. Then, the resultant ink was spread out over a pre-cleaned glass substrate and a Mo/CIGS absorber. The preparation process of the SnS2 thin-film is shown in Figure 2. The SnS2 film deposited on a glass substrate was used to analyze the structural and optical properties, and the film on the Mo/CIGS absorber was utilized as a buffer during the construction of a CIGS solar cell for device analysis. The experiments for the synthesis of SnS2 nanoparticles and thin films were repeated, and both of the experimental results showed good reproducibility.

2.4. Characterization Details

Characterization of SnS2 nanoparticles/thin films was done using the following techniques. The phase and elemental purity of the SnS2 nanoparticles were analyzed using a Raman spectrometer (Jobin-Yvon Lab Ram HR 800, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Altrincham, UK), respectively. The structural, morphological and optical properties of the SnS2 thin films were studied using a Seifert 3003TT X-ray diffractometer (Almelo, The Netherlands) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å), scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) and UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Cary 5000, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), respectively. The changes in the absorbance spectra of RhB in aqueous solution in the presence of SnS2 nanoparticles were recorded on a UV-Vis absorption spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-3010, Tokyo, Japan). The photovoltaic performance of the CIGS device with SnS2 thin film as a buffer layer was studied using illumination current density, and the voltage (J–V) characteristics were evaluated using a Solar Simulator (McScience K201 LAB50, Suwon, Korea) under AM 1.5 and 100 mW/cm2 illumination, where the light intensity was calibrated using an Si standard reference cell.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SnS2 Nanoparticles for Adsorbent Application

3.1.1. Growth of SnS2 Nanoparticles

The following growth process is hypothesized for the synthesis of SnS2 nanoparticles. The chelating agent trisodium citrate complexes the Sn4+ ions from stannous chloride in the first stage. The following stage involves the release of S2− ions into the bath as a result of thioacetamide hydrolysis. The precipitation interaction between Sn4+ and S2− leads to the production of SnS2 nanoparticles in the final stage. The following equations describe the growth stages of the entire process:
SnCl4∙5H2O + Na3C6H5O7 ⟺ Sn (Na3C6H5O7)4+ + 4Cl− + 5H2O
CH3CSNH2 + H2O ⇌ CH3CONH2 + H2S
H2S + H2O ⇌ H3O+ + HS−
HS− ⇌ H+ + S2−
HS− + OH− ⇌ H2O + S2−
Sn4+ + S2− → SnS2

3.1.2. Phase Purity Confirmation of SnS2 Nanoparticles

The phase purity of the prepared nanoparticles was confirmed using Raman spectroscopy. The Raman spectrum of the as-synthesized nanoparticles in the region of 100–400 cm−1 is shown in Figure 3. The spectrum reveals that the as-prepared SnS2 nanoparticles exhibited a broad peak at 310 cm−1, which corresponds to the Raman mode associated with the hexagonal structure of SnS2. The phonon mode at 310 cm−1 is attributed to the vertical plane vibration (A1g) of the Sn–S bonds [31]. The detected Raman phonon mode was consistent with that of the previous reports [29].

3.1.3. Elemental Purity Confirmation of SnS2 Nanoparticles

XPS was used to characterize the composition of the prepared nanoparticles. No significant peaks representing the contaminants were found in the spectra, suggesting that the impurity level was less than the XPS resolution limit (1 at %). Figure 4a shows a typical high-resolution spectrum of the as-synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles with binding energy ranging from 0 to 1000 eV. The wide spectrum revealed numerous peaks, such as S 2s, double S 2p, Sn 3s, doublet Sn 3p, doublet Sn 3d, and Sn 4d, indicating that the synthesized nanoparticles contain Sn and S elements. The peaks linked to C and O were possibly caused by ambient pollution. No other peaks corresponding to other elemental impurities were found in the spectrum. Figure 4b,c show the narrow XPS scans of the Sn 3d and S 2p peaks, respectively. A core-level scan of the Sn 3d doublet revealed two peaks with binding energies of 486.3 eV and 494.6 eV, corresponding to the Sn 3d5/2 and Sn 3d3/2 energy levels of Sn atoms in the Sn4+ valence state, respectively. The peak splitting energy of Sn 3d5/2 and Sn 3d3/2 levels was approximately 8.3 eV. The binding energies of Sn 3d doublets and their spin energy separations were similar to the values reported [33]. A complete spectrum of the S 2p core level revealed two peaks with binding energies of 162.5 eV and 161.2 eV, which correspond to the S 2p5/2 and S 2p3/2 energy levels of S atoms in the Sn2− valence state, respectively, which is consistent with the energies of the S2−–Sn4+ bond, confirming the presence of a single-phase SnS2 in the synthesized nanoparticles [34].

3.1.4. SnS2 Nanoparticles as Adsorbent for Organic Pollutants (RhB Dye)

The adsorption of RhB dye from an aqueous solution was carried out at room temperature (approximately 25 °C). Typically, 0.4 g of SnS2 nanoparticles was added to a 1 L aqueous solution containing 10 ppm of RhB. The absorbance of RhB was monitored using UV-Vis spectroscopy for 30–180 min. The absorption spectrum of the RhB solution containing SnS2 nanoparticles is shown in Figure 5a. The absorbance spectra indicated here were taken for few drops of RhB solution after being centrifuged at a high speed (10,000 RPM for 15 min). So, the SnS2 nanoparticles in the sample are resting at the bottom of the sample, meaning there is no peak (at ~427 nm) related to SnS2. The intensity of the absorption band at 552 nm decreased linearly with the increase in time, showing that the RhB solution gradually degraded over the SnS2 adsorbent. The absorption intensity of the peak decreased by approximately 35% in the presence of SnS2 nanoparticles at 30 min. After 60 min, the degree of decolorization was 78%. After 90 min, the degree of decolorization increased to 90%, and then at 180 min, it reached 96%, suggesting that the majority of the RhB had been degraded. Discoloration of the solution might occur as a result of the dye chromogen being destroyed. Similar degradation of RhB with the increasing Zn doping concentration in SnS2 nanoparticles was observed in a previous report [35].
The degradation of the RhB solution agrees with the pseudo-first-order kinetics [36,37], ln(C/C0) = −kt, where C0 and C are the initial and actual concentrations of RhB, k is the rate constant, and t is the degradation time. The normalized concentration of the solution equals the normalized maximum absorbance; therefore, the remaining ratio C/C0 is replaced with A/A0. The C/C0 with respect to reaction time obtained by monitoring the RhB absorption peak at 552 nm is shown in Figure 5b. It is clear that, during the initial 30 min, the concentration of RhB decreased by 65%. Further, the concentration of RhB decreased by 80% and 85% at 120 min and 180 min, respectively. Therefore, within 180 min of reaction time, SnS2 nanoparticles showed the highest adsorption capacity (21.25 mg/g) for RhB, indicating that it is an appropriate adsorbent for the removal of RhB.
The adsorption capacity of SnS2 nanoparticles was compared to that of other reported nanoparticles and nanocomposites in Table 1, which demonstrated that the adsorption performance of the SnS2 nanoparticles synthesized in the present work was similar to that of other nanocomposites and superior to that of other NP adsorbents.

3.2. SnS2 Thin Films for Photovoltaic Application

The results obtained in Section 3.1 concluded that the synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles have a high degree of composition and phase purity. Therefore, the as-synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles were spin coated to obtain the SnS2 thin film. The as-synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles showed a granular morphology with the particle size of ~52 nm and the as-prepared SnS2 thin film on CIGS showed a tiny grain texture with uniformity, as displayed in Figure 6. The structural and optical properties of the SnS2 films are described in the following sections.

3.2.1. Crystal Structure of SnS2 Thin Film

X-ray diffraction was used to determine the crystal structure of the as-grown SnS2 film, and the matching profile is shown in Figure 7. The diffraction pattern indicated that the SnS2 film was polycrystalline, with significant peaks at 15.02°, 28.18°, 32.54°, and 49.69° corresponding to the (0 0 1), (1 0 0), (1 0 1), and (1 1 0) planes, respectively, and exhibited a hexagonal crystal structure [20]. The SnS2 peaks observed in the XRD profile are consistent with those found in the standard JCPDS card No. 23-0677. The film lacked any peaks associated with other secondary phases such as SnS and Sn2S3, suggesting that the SnS2 film generated in this work is free of contaminants [45].

3.2.2. Optical Band Gap of SnS2 Thin Film

Figure 8a shows the optical transmittance spectrum of the as-grown SnS2 film recorded in the wavelength range of 300–1000 nm. A sharp decrease in the transmittance spectrum revealed that the as-grown SnS2 film showed an average optical transmittance of approximately 90% above the fundamental absorption edge. The average transmittance difference between CdS and SnS2 films in the visible light region is around 11%, which is a small discrepancy that could be attributed to scattering losses. The steep absorption edge in the spectrum indicates that the film has a direct optical transition between the parabolic bands. To evaluate the energy band gap (Eg) of the thin film, (αhυ)p was plotted against the photon energy (hυ), where p is an integer, whose value indicates the type of optical transition occurring in the thin film. In the present study, the nature of the transition was found to be direct with p = 1/2, and the energy band gap was calculated using plots of (αhυ)2 versus hυ (Figure 8b), where the extrapolation of the (αhυ)2 plot onto the hυ axis provides the band gap. The evaluated optical energy band gap of the as-prepared SnS2 film was approximately 2.8 eV, which is consistent with previously reported findings [23]. Figure 8a,b show the transmittance spectra and corresponding band gap graph of the conventional CdS buffer. Although the transmittance of the standard CdS buffer was similar to that of the SnS2 film, the absorption edge of the CdS film was at a longer wavelength than that of the SnS2 film. The band gap determined from the (αhυ)2 versus hυ plot of CdS was approximately 2.2 eV [46], which is marginally less than the band gap of the SnS2 film. In other words, SnS2 has a wider band gap than the conventional CdS buffer, which enables the transmission of a more significant fraction of the solar spectrum to the absorber.

3.2.3. SnS2 Thin Film as a Buffer in CIGS Solar Cell

In this study, two CIGS thin-film solar cells were fabricated with structures as glass/Mo/CIGS/CdS (conventional buffer)/i-ZnO/AZO/Ag/Ni and glass/Mo/CIGS/SnS2 (buffer from the present work)/i-ZnO/AZO/Ag-Ni using conventional CdS buffer and SnS2 buffer, respectively. Our earlier article [47] detailed the procedure for fabricating a CIGS absorber. Initially, a two-stage technique was used to construct a CIGS light absorber on an Mo substrate. Subsequently, the chemical bath deposition (CBD) method produced a 70 nm thick CdS buffer. The complete deposition conditions for CBD-grown CdS are described in a previous report [48]. A 50 nm thick layer of SnS2 buffer was spin-coated onto the CIGS absorber following the procedure reported in Section 2.2. The devices were then finished by radio frequency (RF)/DC sputtering of i-ZnO/ZnO/Al transparent conducting layers and e-beam evaporation of an Ni/Al grid.
The J–V characteristics of the CIGS devices made with conventional CdS buffer (CIGSCdS) and SnS2 buffer (CIGSSnS2) are shown in Figure 9. The CIGSCdS exhibited an efficiency of 7.5% with an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.51 V, a short circuit current density (JSC) of 27 mAcm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 54%, while the CIGSSnS2 showed an efficiency of 5.1% with a VOC of 0.41 V, JSC of 26 mA cm−2, and FF of 49%. The performance parameters of CIGSSnS2 and CIGSCdS are summarized in Table 2. The results indicated that the CIGSSnS2 device with the SnS2 buffer prepared in this study exhibited comparable results to that of the CIGSCdS. However, the CIGSSnS2 device exhibited a considerable drop in shunt resistance (Rsh), suggesting the direct contact between the window layer and absorber possibly raised from plasma damage during window layer preparation and shunt paths caused by pinholes in SnS2 buffer [49]. As FF is very sensitive to Rsh among the device parameters [50], it is reduced by approximately 5% in the case of the CIGSSnS2 device. On the other hand, the effect of Rsh is less considerable on the JSC, which is mainly governed by optical and recombination losses. The optical losses are caused by the reflection from the device surface and absorption by the AZO window and SnS2 buffer layers. Electron–hole pairs are generated when photons hit the CIGS absorber, and some of the produced charge carriers are not collected, but are lost as a result of recombination. The recombination loss is indicative of the quality of the SnS2/CIGS junction (measure of VOC) and is most sensitive to buffer thickness [49]. The plasma damage of SnS2 and pinholes may create the AZO/CIGS interface as strong recombination centers. This kind of recombination loss may decrease with the increasing SnS2 thickness. According to a previous report [33], the increase in the thickness of the CdS buffer layer resulted in increased light absorption loss by CdS, but decreased reflection loss. Therefore, SnS2 thickness optimization is necessary to minimize the photocurrent loss by recombination to ensure the quality of the CIGS/SnS2 junction and to improve the performance characteristics of the CIGSSnS2 device.

4. Conclusions

Tin disulfide (SnS2), a simple binary metal chalcogenide, was proposed as a viable adsorbent for removing toxic dyes from water and as a buffer for Cd-free thin-film solar cells owing to its abundance, low-cost, non-toxicity, and chemical stability. The current study explored the synthesis of SnS2 nanoparticles and the deposition of SnS2 thin films using a chemical precipitation method and spin-coating technique, respectively. The XPS and Raman studies indicated the existence of Sn and S in the synthesized nanoparticles together with a pure SnS2 phase (characteristic Raman mode at 310 cm−1). The XRD and optical studies showed that the as-synthesized SnS2 thin films had a hexagonal crystal structure with (001) as the preferred orientation and an optical band gap of 2.8 eV. At 180 min of reaction time, 0.4 g/L of SnS2 nanoparticles demonstrated 96% decolorization and 85% adsorption capacity for RhB (10 ppm), revealing that the majority of the RhB was degraded; therefore, SnS2 is a suitable adsorbent. The fabricated CIGS device with SnS2 (50 nm) as buffer exhibited an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.41 V, a short circuit current density (JSC) of 25.67 mA cm−2, a fill factor (FF) of 49%, and a conversion efficiency (η) of 5.1%, demonstrating that SnS2 is an alternative buffer. The authors intend to dope the nanoparticles and optimize the thickness of the SnS2 buffer layer in future studies to (i) increase the adsorption capacity of SnS2 nanoparticles and (ii) improve the performance of the CIGSSnS2 device.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G. and V.R.M.R.; Methodology, S.G.; Data curation, S.G., S.A., J.N. and H.P.; Analysis and data processing, S.G., S.A., V.R.M.R., A.M.R. and J.N.; Resources, J.-J.S. and W.K.K.; Funding acquisition, W.K.K. and D.K.; Supervision, W.K.K.; Writing—original draft, S.G.; Proof reading and editing, V.R.M.R.; Writing final version—review and editing, W.K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Priority Research Centers Program (grant number 2014R1A6A1031189) and Basic Science Research Program (2020R1I1A3051997) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea. The authors also acknowledge that the e-beam evaporator and DC/RF sputtering system at Yeungnam University, Regional Innovation Center (RIC) for Solar Cell/Module were employed for solar cell fabrication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be available upon request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IEA. Global Electricity Demand Is Growing Faster than Renewables, Driving Strong Increase in Generation from Fossil Fuels. Available online: https://www.iea.org/news/global-electricity-demand-is-growing-faster-than-renewables-driving-strong-increase-in-generation-from-fossil-fuels (accessed on 28 October 2021).
  2. CIGS-PV-Net CIGS Thin-Film Photovoltaics-News. Available online: http://cigs-pv.net/%0Ahttp://files/98/CIGS-WhitePaper.pdf%0Ahttp://files/100/cigs-pv.net.html (accessed on 28 October 2021).
  3. Jung, H.; Park, Y.; Gedi, S.; Reddy, V.R.M.; Ferblantier, G.; Kim, W.K. Al-doped zinc stannate films for photovoltaic applications. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moon, D.; Gedi, S.; Alhammadi, S.; Minnam Reddy, V.R.; Kim, W.K. Surface passivation of a Cu(In,Ga)Se2 photovoltaic absorber using a thin indium sulfide layer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 510, 145426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Witte, W.; Spiering, S.; Hariskos, D. Substitution of the CdS buffer layer in CIGS thin-film solar cells. Vák. Forsch. Prax. 2014, 26, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schock, H.-W.; Noufi, R. CIGS-based solar cells for the next millennium. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2000, 8, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Solar Frontier Achieves World Record CIGS Thin-Film Solar Cell Efficiency of 23.35%. Available online: https://www.solar-frontier.com/eng/news/2019/0117_press.html (accessed on 30 October 2021).
  8. Orgassa, K.; Rau, U.; Nguyen, Q.; Werner Schock, H.; Werner, J.H. Role of the CdS buffer layer as an active optical element in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2002, 10, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tötsch, W. Cadmium—Towards a rational use of a toxic element. Environ. Manag. 1990, 14, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, S.; Liu, K.; Hu, L.; Teng, F.; Yu, P.; Zhu, Y. Superior adsorption and regenerable dye adsorbent based on flower-like molybdenum disulfide nanostructure. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Liu, R.; Zhang, B.; Mei, D.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J. Adsorption of methyl violet from aqueous solution by halloysite nanotubes. Desalination 2011, 268, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dutta, S.; Gupta, B.; Srivastava, S.K.; Gupta, A.K. Recent advances on the removal of dyes from wastewater using various adsorbents: A critical review. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 4497–4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hao, O.J.; Kim, H.; Chiang, P.-C. Decolorization of Wastewater. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 30, 449–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lei, C.; Pi, M.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J. Synthesis of hierarchical porous zinc oxide (ZnO) microspheres with highly efficient adsorption of Congo red. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 490, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yuan, X.; Zhou, C.; Jin, Y.; Jing, Q.; Yang, Y.; Shen, X.; Tang, Q.; Mu, Y.; Du, A.-K. Facile synthesis of 3D porous thermally exfoliated g-C3N4 nanosheet with enhanced photocatalytic degradation of organic dye. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 468, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bulai, I.M.; Venturino, E. Biodegradation of organic pollutants in a water body. J. Math. Chem. 2016, 54, 1387–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arshadi, M.; Mousavinia, F.; Amiri, M.J.; Faraji, A.R. Adsorption of methyl orange and salicylic acid on a nano-transition metal composite: Kinetics, thermodynamic and electrochemical studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 483, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Baruah, M.; Ezung, S.L.; Supong, A.; Bhomick, P.C.; Kumar, S.; Sinha, D. Synthesis, characterization of novel Fe-doped TiO2 activated carbon nanocomposite towards photocatalytic degradation of Congo red, E. coli, and S. aureus. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 38, 1277–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, L.; Yuan, H.; Zou, L.; Chen, F.; Hu, X. Adsorption and visible light-driven photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B in aqueous solutions by Ag@AgBr/SBA-15. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 706–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wan, D.; Li, W.; Wang, G.; Chen, K.; Lu, L.; Hu, Q. Adsorption and heterogeneous degradation of rhodamine B on the surface of magnetic bentonite material. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 349, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, S.; Yang, B.; Liu, Y. Synthesis of a hierarchical SnS2 nanostructure for efficient adsorption of Rhodamine B dye. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 507, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hua, M.; Zhang, S.; Pan, B.; Zhang, W.; Lv, L.; Zhang, Q. Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 211–212, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lindwall, G.; Shang, S.L.; Kelly, N.R.; Anderson, T.; Liu, Z.K. Thermodynamics of the S–Sn system: Implication for synthesis of earth abundant photovoltaic absorber materials. Sol. Energy 2016, 125, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Tripathi, S.; Kumar, B.; Dwivedi, D.K. Numerical simulation of non-toxic In2S3/SnS2 buffer layer to enhance CZTS solar cells efficiency by optimizing device parameters. Optik 2021, 227, 166087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Wei, Z. Photoresponsive field-effect transistors based on multilayer SnS2 nanosheets. J. Semicond. 2017, 38, 34001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sánchez-Juárez, A.; Tiburcio-Silver, A.; Ortiz, A. Fabrication of SnS2/SnS heterojunction thin film diodes by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films 2005, 480, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, Y.; Cheng, H.; Gao, S.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Q.; Leu, Q.; Lei, F.; Yao, T.; He, J.; Wei, S.; et al. Freestanding tin disulfide single-layers realizing efficient visible-light water splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8727–8731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ou, J.Z.; Ge, W.; Carey, B.; Daeneke, T.; Rotbart, A.; Shan, W.; Wang, Y.; Fu, Z.; Chrimes, A.F.; Wlodarski, W.; et al. Physisorption-based charge transfer in two-dimensional SnS2 for selective and reversible NO2 gas sensing. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 10313–10323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gedi, S.; Minna Reddy, V.R.; Pejjai, B.; Jeon, C.-W.; Park, C.; Ramakrishna Reddy, K.T. A facile inexpensive route for SnS thin film solar cells with SnS2 buffer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 372, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Minnam Reddy, V.R.; Lindwall, G.; Pejjai, B.; Gedi, S.; Kotte, T.R.R.; Sugiyama, M.; Liu, Z.K.; Park, C. α-SnSe thin film solar cells produced by selenization of magnetron sputtered tin precursors. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 176, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gedi, S.; Minnam Reddy, V.R.; Pejjai, B.; Park, C.; Jeon, C.W.; Kotte, T.R.R. Studies on chemical bath deposited SnS2 films for Cd-free thin film solar cells. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 3713–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, Z.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, T. SnS2 nanosheet-based microstructures with high adsorption capabilities and visible light photocatalytic activities. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 24640–24648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matyszczak, G.; Fidler, A.; Polesiak, E.; Sobieska, M.; Morawiec, K.; Zajkowska, W.; Lawniczak-Jablonska, K.; Kuzmiuk, P. Application of sonochemically synthesized SnS and SnS2 in the electro-Fenton process: Kinetics and enhanced decolorization. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2020, 68, 105186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Crist, B.V.; Crisst, D.B.V. Handbook of Monochromatic XPS Spectra; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2000; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lather, R.; Jeevanandam, P. Synthesis of Zn2+ doped SnS2 nanoparticles using a novel thermal decomposition approach and their application as adsorbent. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 891, 161989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bayati, M.R.; Golestani-Fard, F.; Moshfegh, A.Z. Visible photodecomposition of methylene blue over micro arc oxidized WO3–loaded TiO2 nano-porous layers. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 382, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Du, W.; Deng, D.; Han, Z.; Xiao, W.; Bian, C.; Qian, X. Hexagonal tin disulfide nanoplatelets: A new photocatalyst driven by solar light. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, K.P.; Gupta, S.; Singh, A.K.; Sinha, S. Experimental design and response surface modeling for optimization of Rhodamine B removal from water by magnetic nanocomposite. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 165, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jinendra, U.; Bilehal, D.; Nagabhushana, B.M.; Kumar, A.P. Adsorptive removal of Rhodamine B dye from aqueous solution by using graphene–based nickel nanocomposite. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sun, H.; Cao, L.; Lu, L. Magnetite/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites: One step solvothermal synthesis and use as a novel platform for removal of dye pollutants. Nano Res. 2011, 4, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Tsuzuki, T.; Tang, B.; Hou, X.; Sun, L.; Wang, X. Reduced graphene oxide/ZnO composite: Reusable adsorbent for pollutant management. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 3084–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Oyetade, O.A.; Nyamori, V.O.; Martincigh, B.S.; Jonnalagadda, S.B. Effectiveness of carbon nanotube–cobalt ferrite nanocomposites for the adsorption of rhodamine B from aqueous solutions. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 22724–22739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kerkez, Ö.; Bayazit, Ş.S. Magnetite decorated multi-walled carbon nanotubes for removal of toxic dyes from aqueous solutions. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2014, 16, 2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Konicki, W.; Siber, D.; Narkiewicz, U. Removal of Rhodamine B from aqueous solution by ZnFe2O4 nanocomposite with magnetic separation performance. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 2017, 19, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jeong, D.; Reddy, V.R.M.; Pallavolu, M.R.; Cho, H.; Park, C. Investigation on the performance of SnS solar cells grown by sputtering and effusion cell evaporation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 1066–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alhammadi, S.; Jung, H.; Kwon, S.; Park, H.; Shim, J.-J.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, M.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, W.K. Effect of Gallium doping on CdS thin film properties and corresponding Cu(InGa)Se2/CdS:Ga solar cell performance. Thin Solid Films 2018, 660, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Park, Y.; Ferblantier, G.; Slaoui, A.; Dinia, A.; Park, H.; Alhammadi, S.; Kim, W.K. Yb-doped zinc tin oxide thin film and its application to Cu(InGa)Se2 solar cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 815, 152360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alhammadi, S.; Moon, K.; Park, H.; Kim, W.K. Effect of different cadmium salts on the properties of chemical-bath-deposited CdS thin films and Cu(InGa)Se2 solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2017, 625, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cho, K.S.; Jang, J.; Park, J.H.; Lee, D.-K.; Song, S.; Kim, K.; Eo, Y.-J.; Yun, J.H.; Gwak, J.; Chung, C.-H. Optimal CdS buffer thickness to form high-quality CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 junctions in solar cells without plasma damage and shunt paths. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 23983–23988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ghorpade, U.; Suryawanshi, M.; Shin, S.W.; Gurav, K.; Patil, P.; Pawar, S.; Hong, C.W.; Kim, J.H.; Kolekar, S. Towards environmentally benign approaches for the synthesis of CZTSSe nanocrystals by a hot injection method: A status review. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of SnS2 nanoparticles synthesis.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of SnS2 nanoparticles synthesis.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g001
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of SnS2 thin film preparation.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of SnS2 thin film preparation.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g002
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g003 550
Figure 3. Raman spectrum of SnS2 nanoparticles.
Figure 3. Raman spectrum of SnS2 nanoparticles.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g003
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Full-scan XPS spectrum and high-resolution scan of the (b) Sn 3d core level and (c) S 2p core level of SnS2 nanoparticles.
Figure 4. (a) Full-scan XPS spectrum and high-resolution scan of the (b) Sn 3d core level and (c) S 2p core level of SnS2 nanoparticles.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g004
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Absorbance spectra of the RhB in aqueous solution at different reaction times and (b) degradation of the RhB solution over SnS2 nanoparticles.
Figure 5. (a) Absorbance spectra of the RhB in aqueous solution at different reaction times and (b) degradation of the RhB solution over SnS2 nanoparticles.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g005
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM surface image of as-synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles and SnS2 thin film.
Figure 6. SEM surface image of as-synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles and SnS2 thin film.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g006
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g007 550
Figure 7. XRD profile of SnS2 thin film.
Figure 7. XRD profile of SnS2 thin film.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g007
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Optical transmittance spectrum and (b) (αhυ)2 vs. hυ plots of SnS2 and CdS thin films.
Figure 8. (a) Optical transmittance spectrum and (b) (αhυ)2 vs. hυ plots of SnS2 and CdS thin films.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g008
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g009 550
Figure 9. The J–V characteristics of the CIGS devices with conventional CdS and SnS2 buffer.
Figure 9. The J–V characteristics of the CIGS devices with conventional CdS and SnS2 buffer.
Nanomaterials 12 00282 g009
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the adsorption capacity of SnS2 nanoparticles with other adsorbent nanoparticles and nanocomposites.
Table 1. Comparison of the adsorption capacity of SnS2 nanoparticles with other adsorbent nanoparticles and nanocomposites.
AdsorbentAdsorption Capacity (mg/g)Ref.
Fe3O4/carbon nanocomposite29.48[38]
Ni/rGO nanocomposite65.31[39]
Fe3O4/rGO nanocomposite13.15[40]
ZnO/rGO nanocomposites32.6[41]
CoFe2O4/MWCNT nanocomposites35.91[42]
CoFe2O4 NPs5.17
Fe3O4/MWCNT nanocomposites11.44[43]
ZnFe2O4 NPs12.1[44]
SnS2 NPs21.25Present work
Table
Table 2. Solar cell performance parameters of CIGS devices with conventional CdS and SnS2 buffer.
Table 2. Solar cell performance parameters of CIGS devices with conventional CdS and SnS2 buffer.
Solar Cell Performance ParametersType of Buffer Layer
CIGS/CdSCIGS/SnS2
Short circuit current density, JSC (mAcm−2)27.125.7
Open-circuit voltage, VOC (V)0.510.41
Fill factor, FF (%)53.849.0
Efficiency, η (%)7.55.1
Shunt resistance, RSh (Ω cm2)929255
Series resistance, RS (Ω cm2)14.513.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gedi, S.; Alhammadi, S.; Noh, J.; Minnam Reddy, V.R.; Park, H.; Rabie, A.M.; Shim, J.-J.; Kang, D.; Kim, W.K. SnS2 Nanoparticles and Thin Film for Application as an Adsorbent and Photovoltaic Buffer. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12020282

AMA Style

Gedi S, Alhammadi S, Noh J, Minnam Reddy VR, Park H, Rabie AM, Shim J-J, Kang D, Kim WK. SnS2 Nanoparticles and Thin Film for Application as an Adsorbent and Photovoltaic Buffer. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(2):282. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12020282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gedi, Sreedevi, Salh Alhammadi, Jihyeon Noh, Vasudeva Reddy Minnam Reddy, Hyeonwook Park, Abdelrahman Mohamed Rabie, Jae-Jin Shim, Dohyung Kang, and Woo Kyoung Kim. 2022. "SnS2 Nanoparticles and Thin Film for Application as an Adsorbent and Photovoltaic Buffer" Nanomaterials 12, no. 2: 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12020282

APA Style

Gedi, S., Alhammadi, S., Noh, J., Minnam Reddy, V. R., Park, H., Rabie, A. M., Shim, J. -J., Kang, D., & Kim, W. K. (2022). SnS2 Nanoparticles and Thin Film for Application as an Adsorbent and Photovoltaic Buffer. Nanomaterials, 12(2), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12020282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop