Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Field-Effect Control of Single-Layer WS2 Optical Features by hBN Full Encapsulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Facile Synthesis of ZnO/WO3 Nanocomposite Porous Films for High-Performance Gas Sensing of Multiple VOCs
Previous Article in Journal
A Study on the Dynamic Tunning Range of CVD Graphene at Microwave Frequency: Determination, Prediction and Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Wireless Detection of Surface Modification of Silicon Nanowires by an RF Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Study on Gas-Sensing Properties of 2D (MoS2, WS2)/PANI Nanocomposites-Based Sensor

by
Hemalatha Parangusan
1,
Jolly Bhadra
1,*,
Razen Amer Al-Qudah
2,
Elhassen Cheikh Elhadrami
3 and
Noora Jabor Al-Thani
1
1
Qatar University Young Scientists Center (QUYSC), Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
2
Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(24), 4423; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244423
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 11 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Nanomaterials for Sensing and Detection)

Abstract

:
NH3 is a highly harmful gas; when inhaled at levels that are too high for comfort, it is very dangerous to human health. One of the challenging tasks in research is developing ammonia sensors that operate at room temperature. In this study, we proposed a new design of an NH3 gas sensor that was comprised of two-dimensional (TMDs, mainly WS2 and MoS2) and PANI. The 2D-TMDs metal was successfully incorporated into the PANI lattice based on the results of XRD and SEM. The elemental EDX analysis results indicated that C, N, O, W, S and Mo were found in the composite samples. The bandgap of the materials decreased due to the addition of MoS2 and WS2. We also analyzed its structural, optical and morphological properties. When compared to MoS2 and PANI, the proposed NH3 sensor with the WS2 composite was found to have high sensitivity. The composite films also exhibited response and recovery times of 10/16 and 14/16 s. Therefore, the composite PANI/2D-TMDs is a suitable material for NH3 gas detection applications.

1. Introduction

One of the most common air pollutants that significantly affects the environment is ammonia (NH3), and there has recently been a great demand for monitoring and regulating this contaminant. It is a highly hazardous gas that is utilized in a variety of commercial and residential applications, including the compound fertilizer, synthetic fiber, biodiesel, energy plants’ and dye industry [1,2,3]. Additionally, exposure to excessive levels of ammonia gas can have harmful impacts on a human’s body, including eye irritation, the skin, throat and respiratory system [4,5]. Hence, exposed gas detection has a significant impact on environmental, health and safety issues. Therefore, it is essential to develop ammonia gas sensors for process and safety control in order to detect environmental pollution. Ammonia can be detected using a variety of monitoring techniques, including electrochemical methods, optical spectroscopy and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry [6,7,8]. In comparison to other sensing techniques, metal-oxide-based electrochemical approaches are more attractive because they can be integrated into portable sensors and have easy experimental procedures, quick reaction times and good stability. However, for typical metal-oxide-based sensors, such as TiO2, ZnO and SnO2, a high temperature is required to activate gas adsorption. The high operating temperature probably releases explosive or flammable analytics in addition to decreasing the sensor’s long-term stability [9,10]. Hence, it is crucial to develop sensors that can operate at room temperature.
As an alternative to metal oxide semiconductors for smart sensing applications, conducting polymers (CPs) have attracted more attention. This is because of their ability to operate at room temperature, their quick reaction and recovery periods, their low cost of production, how easily they can be deposited on a variety of substrates and their extensive chemical abilities for structural modification. Due to its simpler synthesis, high environmental stability and great electrical and electrochromic properties, PANI, in particular, has developed to be among the conducting polymers with the greatest technological significance [11]. It has been utilized extensively in gas-sensing and organic solar cell applications. One effective way to increase the detecting performance of gas sensors at room temperature is to fabricate PANI composites with 2D materials.
2D-TMDs (transition-metal dichalcogenides) have been shown to be attractive materials for gas-sensing applications because of their superior electrical conductivity, high surface-to-volume ratio and sensitive surfaces [12,13]. Both WS2 and MoS2 have recently demonstrated their promise and made significant advancements in the field of toxic-gas-sensing technologies [14]. TMDs materials are layered substances with strong covalent interlayer connections and weak interlayer van der Waals interactions. Each layer in TMDs is made up of three atomic planes: a triangle-shaped lattice of transition-metal atoms sandwiched between two triangle-shaped lattices of chalcogen atoms. This makes TMDs strong candidates for advanced electrical devices such as energy storage, optoelectronics and sensors as proof-of-concept devices [15,16]. To overcome some specific issues with conventional sensing materials, such as slow sensing response and poor selectivity, TMDs have been used as efficient chemical sensors [17]. TMDs have a variety of desirable features, such as variable nanoscale layer thickness, a high surface-to-volume ratio, ease of surface functionalization and high compatibility for device integration. These features are all essential for creating high-performance sensors for use in various analytics [18]. Keerthi et al. [19] prepared a hybrid heterostructure containing a La-MoS2-based gas sensor. When La was added to MoS2, its sensitivity towards toxic gases and volatile organic chemicals significantly increased. Using a 2D heterostructure, Cho et al. [20] developed a new chemical sensor that paves the way for an important sensing platform for wearable electronics. Recent research on WS2, MoS2 and their hybrid structures (functionalized nanofibers, Quantum dots and metal-doped nanoflower structures [21,22]) in gas-sensing applications shows significant sensitivity at low operating temperatures with particular selectivity to certain gases such as H2S and NH3 [23]. The lower operating temperature of sensors based on transition-metal chalcogenides. Because they typically have a lower bandgap and better conductivity, the oxides of the corresponding metals perform better than those oxides. Additionally, similar to semiconducting metal oxide sensors, the gas selectivity of TMDS is strongly associated to the affinities of surfaces for adsorbing various analytics and related surface charging/polarization effects. Additionally, it has been found that reversible doping of the chalcogenide lattice with heteroatoms, in addition to surface charging/polarization, can greatly contribute to sensing [24].
In this context, the development of an NH3 sensor using a composite PANI/2D-TMDs is the main focus of this research. We propose an easy, reliable, simple and low-cost material for the detection of gas. Furthermore, we investigate the gas-sensing performance of pure PANI and its nanocomposites. The prepared PANI/2D-TMDs composites are also analyzed to find their structural, morphological, optical and NH3-sensing properties using XRD, FTIR, SEM, TEM, UV-vis and sensing studies. The composite films were coated on ITO electrodes by the spin-coating method and tested for NH3 detection.

2. Materials and Methods

Aniline, Ammonium persulfate and HCL were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and Tungsten disulfide (WS2) powders were used for synthesis. All the chemicals were derived from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.1. Liquid-Exfoliated MoS2 and WS2 Sheets

Both MoS2 and WS2 (30 mg) powders and 50 mL of DMF were added to a 100 mL glass container, separately, and the bath sonication process was used to prepare the powders for dispersion. The mixture was processed in the sonication bath for 12 h because most of the un-exfoliated powders tended to settle at the bottom of the glass container. The mixture was then separated into the stable MoS2 and WS2 dispersion and the un-exfoliated sediments using a centrifuge at 4000 rpm for 10 min.

2.2. Synthesis of Liquid-Exfoliated Sheet/PANI Composites

The typical preparation procedure of pure PANI and its composites was as follows (Figure 1): 0.2 M aniline was added into 50 mL of 0.01 M Hydrochloric acid solution, and it was agitated in an ice bath for 2 h. The nanosheet dispersion was dropped into the aniline solution under vigorous stirring. The amount of dropped nanosheet dispersion varied in the range of 5–15 mL. The resulting suspension was stirred for 1 h. Ammonium persulfate (0.2 M), which served as the oxidant in this solution, was added dropwise while stirring continuously for a whole night. The precipitation was then filtered and washed with ethanol and DI water and vacuum oven dried at 60 °C for 6 h. The same process was used to synthesize pure PANI without the incorporation of nanosheets.

2.3. Materials’ Characterization

The prepared samples’ structural behavior was analyzed through an X-ray diffractometer (Empyrean, Panalytical, UK) with the PerkinElmer Spectrum 400 spectrophotometer. Fourier infrared transform (FTIR) spectrum was recorded in the 400–4000 cm−1 range. The surface morphologies of the samples were examined by using scanning electron microscopy (Nova Nano SEM 650) and transmission electron microscopy (JEOL JEM-3010). The gas sensor device fabrication and the testing system were similar to our previous report [25]. Re-patterned interdigitated ITO (Indium tin oxide/glass substrates) were purchased from Ossila for the fabrication of the sensor. The thickness of ITO on the glass substrate was 100 nm. Each substrate, with dimensions (20 mm × 15 mm), consisted of the five ITO-based interdigitated sensation electrodes, while each interdigitated sensation electrode was comprised of three channels with a size of 30 mm × 50 µm. The ITO substrate was cleaned sequentially in acetone and deionized water in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min before coating with the sensing materials.
Finally, the surface of the ITO was dried by nitrogen blow. The pure and composite powder (200 mg) was first dissolved in 2 mL of ethanol before being used to deposit the sensor film. Then, the solution was spin-coated onto the substrate at 5000 rpm for 60 s and dried at 60 °C for 1 h. Our group already optimized the spinning time and spinning velocity of the nanocomposite-based sensing film. The thickness of the composite films was recorded using profilometer (LEICA DCM8), and the average thickness was found to be 390 nm. Gas-sensing properties were tested by using an assembled experimental set up. The set up included Keithley 2400, source meter, measuring chamber and measuring devices. The Keithley 2400 measured the electrical properties of the fabricated sensors. Figure 2 shows the experimental set up for sensor measurement. The gas response, S, is defined as S = Rg/Ra, where Rg is the resistance of the sensor in the presence of gas. Ra is the resistance of the sensor in the presence of air.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Analysis

The structural properties of the PANI/MoS2 and PANI/WS2 composites were determined through XRD analysis, and their diffraction patterns are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3a displays the diffraction pattern for the PANI and PANI/MoS2 samples. The diffraction peaks at 20.5° and 25.3° correspond to (020) and (200) pure PANI crystalline planes, respectively. The diffraction peak at 25.3° could be attributed to PANI chains that are periodically perpendicular [26]. It is evident from the XRD pattern of the composite samples shown in Figure 3a that the main characteristic diffraction peaks of MoS2 were also found. The result demonstrates that the PANI/MoS2 nanocomposite were synthesized successfully. Similarly, the formation of PANI/WS2 composites was confirmed by using XRD patterns, and it is shown in Figure 3b.
The crystallite sizes of pure PANI and its composite samples were calculated using the Scherrer formula from the broadening of the diffraction peak of the (020) plane, and the values are listed in Table 1.
The Debye–Scherrer equation can be used to calculate the crystallite size (D)
D = ( 0.9 λ ) / β c o s θ
where λ is the wavelength of the incident X-ray (1.5406 Å), β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and θ is the diffraction angle. The formation of new nucleation centers by 2D-TMDs ions could be related to the reduction in crystallite size that occurs when 2D-TMDs are introduced into the PANI lattice [27]. Most notably, XRD data demonstrate that while the incorporation of 2D-TMDs had an effect on the PANI lattice, it had no negative effects on phase segregation, which may be a drawback for sensing applications.
The relation between the microstrain and the number of defects is directly proportional, and the following relation can be used to estimate the microstrain,
ε = β c o s θ 4
The calculated values of ε are shown in Table 1, and it is clear from the values that the microstrain increases as the 2D ion concentration increases. This, in turn, demonstrates that the lattice defects increase with the 2D ion concentration.
The dislocation density (δ) is calculated using the crystallite size (D), and its values are shown in Table 1 along with the following relation:
δ = 1 D 2
The structural parameters are shown in Table 1. There was a slight difference in the structural properties of the PANI/2D-TMDs composites compared to pure PANI, which can be attributed to the 2D atoms occupying different sites in the PANI lattice and the number of defect formations in PANI, which is favored for better gas sensing. These findings provide more evidence that, due to the increasing defects, the PANI/TMDs composites’ crystallite size decreased.
The chemical composition of and the interaction between pure PANI and its nanocomposites were analyzed by using FTIR spectroscopy. Figure 4a,b display the PANI and PANI/2D-TMDs hybrid FTIR spectra.
Peaks at 1461 cm−1 and 1551 cm−1 in the FTIR spectra of pure PANI correspond to the C=C and C=N and the vibrations of the benzenoid and quinoid rings, respectively. The plane bending vibrations -C-H could be the reason for the peak at 1289 cm−1. The peak at 1132 cm−1 suggests the development of a doped polymer [28]. The major peaks for both PANI and 2D-TMDs could be found in the FTIR range of the composite samples. These findings suggest that polyaniline and the matrix of the 2D material interact at the molecular level. In Figure 4a, the peaks at 604 cm−1 and 940 cm−1 are associated with the components Mo-S and S-S, respectively. The band positioned at 599 cm−1 is attributed to the W-S bond (Figure 4b).

3.2. Morphological Analysis

FE- SEM and TEM analyses were used to study the surface morphology of pure PANI and its nanocomposites. Figure 5a shows a typical FESEM image of pure PANI, revealing a large number of agglomerated nanoparticles. The FESEM images of the MoS2 and WS2 samples are shown in Figure 5b,d. Pure MoS2 and WS2 nanosheets are suitable as a substrate for anchoring other nanoparticles because they are wide enough and have lateral sizes of about 6–7 µm. In Figure 5d, WS2 nanosheets exhibit some evident folding, and one can conclude that they are few-layer materials. Figure 5c,e show the morphological behavior of the composite samples. The results indicate that the FE-SEM images show the nanosheets decorated with PANI nanoparticles in the composite. In both composite materials, the sheets were interconnected with nanoparticles, which allows gas to move into the inside of the material and enhances NH3 gas sensing.
Figure 6a shows the EDX results of the composite materials. The EDX results reveal that the sample consisted of the elements carbon, oxygen and nitrogen, which confirms PANI formation. Figure 6b,c show that the EDX patterns of PANI and its nanocomposites reveal the presence of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen and also Mo, S, W and S, indicating the successful synthesis of PANI/2D-TMDs.
TEM images were utilized to further elucidate the morphology of PANI and its nanosheet composite, as shown in Figure 7.
A TEM image of pure PANI is shown in Figure 7a. It shows nanoparticles with less agglomeration. The morphology of pure MoS2 and WS2 is shown in Figure 7b,d, which exhibits a huge micrometer-sized uneven sheet that was densely stacked. The layered structure of MoS2, WS2 and PANI nanoparticles, as well as their distinct presence, are shown in Figure 7c,e. The results demonstrate that PANI successfully polymerized on the surface of MoS2 and WS2, which suggests the interaction between the negatively charged liquid-exfoliated sheets and the positively charged anilinium hydrochloride cations.

3.3. Optical Analysis

The optical characteristics are essential in determining how the nanocomposites affect the absorption properties of the material. Figure 8a,c show the UV-vis absorption spectra of pure PANI and its nanosheet composites. The UV-vis absorption spectra of the PANI/WS2 nanocomposites and pure PANI (inset) are shown in Figure 8c. A strong absorption band was observed at 300–400 nm. These were the findings of the typical benzenoid ring π-π transition and the expected charge transference that occur between benzenoid and quinoid [29]. It is important to note that, in comparison to pure samples, the absorption peaks of the composite samples significantly increased above this range. The absorption peaks of the composite samples also shifted toward the longer wavelength region. The interaction between the hydroxyl groups of TMDs and the quinoid ring of emeraldine salt may be the reason for this red shift because it makes it easier for charges to be transferred from highly reactive imine groups at the quinoid unit of emeraldine salt to TMDs through partial hydrogen bonding [30].
The following equation was used to calculate the material’s band gap energy (Eg):
( α h ν ) n = A ( h ν E g )
The band gap of the samples was determined using Tauc’s plots (Figure 8b,d). The obtained Eg values of the samples are shown in Table 1, and it can be seen that Eg decreases for the composite samples. In other words, Eg exhibited a red shift as MoS2 and WS2 concentrations increased.
This is due to the lattice disorder caused by the substitution of MoS2 and WS2 ions with PANI ions, which results in defect energy levels below the conduction band edge and produces the red shift of the band gap energies [31]. The many-body processes that can decrease the band gap were demonstrated to be the result of electron interaction and impurity dispersion, which, in turn, led to the merging of an impurity band into the conduction band and, as a result, a decrease in the band gap.

3.4. Gas Sensing Studies

Among the several types of gas sensors are electrochemical gas sensors, contact combustion gas sensors and metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors. Conducting polymers (CPs)—one of them—have attracted more attention as an alternative solution to metal oxide semiconductors. This is because they operate at room temperature, with quick response and recovery times and low fabrication costs [32]. When a material absorbs certain gas molecules, its electrical characteristics can generally change. The concentration of dopants, the surface modification, crystallite size and chemical composition influence the sensing responses [33,34]. The operating temperature is a key indicator of how effectively sensors are working. The electrical resistance of PANI and its nanocomposites are studied as a function of ammonia (NH3) at room temperature in Figure 9a–d.
Figure 9b,d show the response to NH3 with concentrations ranging from 0.5 ppm to 2 ppm at room temperature. Due to the fact that the PANI film shows a p-type semiconductor characteristic when exposed to gas, the adsorbed NH3 gas molecules donate electrons to the PANI chains after adsorption, which results in a decrease in the carrier concentration of PANI and an increase in resistance. Compared with pure PANI and PANI/MoS2, the combination of PANI/WS2 hybrid film exhibited an improved response. As shown in Figure 9a,c, the response and recovery of the sensor to 2 ppm NH3 were about 31/34, 25/29, 22/27, 10/16, 22/23, 20/23 and 14/16 s, respectively. This shows that the response and recovery times of the sensor decreased as the MoS2 and WS2 concentration increased. In the narrowing bandgap materials, the substitution of MoS2 and WS2 ions into the PANI ions resulted in lattice disorder. The XRD and UV-vis spectra reveal that PANI/15 WS2 indicated more defects than the other materials. Consequently, the hybrid material significantly enhanced PANI’s gas-detecting capabilities.
The sensor’s long-term stability is a crucial factor in determining its practical application. The stability of the sensor towards 2 ppm NH3 at room temperature is shown in Figure 10a. It was observed that the gas response did not vary considerably over the duration of the measurement in 12 days, indicating the stability of the sensors based on PANI/MoS2 and PANI/WS2. The effect of humidity on the sensing performance of the sensor was investigated. At room temperature, the sensor’s response value to 2 ppm NH3 was tested for various relative humidity ranges of 10–70%. The result is presented in Figure 10b. The findings revealed that the response increased slightly as relative humidity increased. The results were attributed to the re-doping effect of water on acidified polyaniline. In addition, water can increase the rate at which PANI reacts with NH3.
Figure 11 shows the gas responses of the PANI, PANI/15 MoS2 and PANI/15 WS2 nanocomposite sensor towards ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, ethanol and acetone at room temperature, respectively. It was evident that the response to ammonia was significantly higher than that of the other tested gases, indicating that the nanocomposite sensor had strong selectivity for ammonia detection. One explanation could be that ammonia is more polarized than other gases because it has a single species lone electron pair.
According to the results, the NH3 molecule adsorption on the PANI/TMDs nanocomposite sensing film may be the reason for the resistance changing behaviors. When using a pure PANI sensor, the response is mainly due to protonation and deprotonation caused by the adsorption and desorption of NH3 gas molecules, respectively. Here, exposure to NH3 gas on the sensor surface caused the emeraldine salt form of PANI to change into the emeraldine base form. As a result, PANI’s resistance increased as its hole density decreased [35]. For hybrid films, gas sensing is primarily dependent on the trapping of NH3 gas molecules in the nanocomposite and the charge in the surface resistance of the nanocomposite when the gas adsorbs and reacts with it. This mechanism is in addition to the one discussed above. Exfoliated MoS2 and WS2 surfaces have several defects that could allow them to chemisorb ambient oxygen. Because NH3 is a donor molecule, it increases the resistance of the sensing layer by donating electrons to lower the concentration of holes in the sensing layer [36]. A comparison of the data showing the NH3 gas-sensing behavior of the present work with the literature reports on TMDs-based sensors is given in Table 2.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we prepared PANI and PANI/2D-TMDs by an in situ polymerization method, and the layered materials and transition-metal dichalcogenides MoS2 and WS2 were exfoliated and dispersed under sonication using DMF. The structural, morphological and compositional characteristics were successively studied. The XRD patterns of the samples indicate the formation of pure PANI and its nanocomposites. Defects in the lattice sites and the formation of new energy levels in the bandgap were due to the addition of MoS2 and WS2 to PANI. The surface morphology of the samples was investigated by TEM and SEM. It is concluded that the addition of 2D-TMDs has a significant impact on structural and optical properties, which also reveals a major impact on gas-sensing properties. A significant difference between the resistance values of the pure PANI and PANI/2D-TMDs was seen in the room-temperature sensing studies. It is revealed that the WS2-based NH3 sensor has higher sensitivity when compared to MoS2 and PANI. The proposed gas sensors have significant potential for use in industrial applications and the field of gas sensing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology and writimg original draft preparation, H.P.; Methodology, Software, R.A.A.-Q., E.C.E.; Conceptualization, review and editing, Project administration and funding acquisition J.B., N.J.A.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Qatar National Research Fund (Project number UREP 25-057-2-023). The funding achieved herein are solely the responsibility of the autors. The characterizations of this work are accomplished in the Central Laboratories Unit, Qatar University.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Qatar National Research Fund (project number UREP 25-057-2-023). The fundings achieved herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. The characterizations of this work were accomplished in the Central Laboratories Unit, Qatar University. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, H.; Shen, W.; Chen, X. A room temperature operated ammonia gas sensor based on Ag-decorated TiO2 quantum dot clusters. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 24519–24526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Davies, S.J.; Španěl, P.; Smith, D. Breath analysis of ammonia, volatile organic compounds and deuterated water vapor in chronic kidney disease and during dialysis. Bioanalysis 2014, 6, 843–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Asad, M.; Sheikhi, M.H. Highly sensitive wireless H2S gas sensors at room temperature based on CuO-SWCNT hybrid nanomaterials. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 231, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shao, F.; Hernandez-Ramirez, F.; Prades, J.D.; Morante, J.R.; Lopez, N. Assessment and modeling of NH3-SnO2 interactions using individual nanowires. Procedia Eng. 2012, 47, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Liu, X.; Chen, N.; Han, B.; Xiao, X.; Chen, G.; Djerdj, I.; Wang, Y. Nanoparticle cluster gas sensor: Pt activated SnO2 nanoparticles for NH 3 detection with ultrahigh sensitivity. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 14872–14880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Little, J.L.; Howard, A.S. Qualitative Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analyses Using Amines as Chemical Ionization Reagent Gases. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 24, 1913–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Passaro, V.M.; Dell’Olio, F.; De Leonardis, F. Ammonia optical sensing by microring resonators. Sensors 2007, 7, 2741–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sriramprabha, R.; Divagar, M.; Mangalaraj, D.; Ponpandian, N.; Viswanathan, C. Formulation of SnO2/graphene nanocomposite modified electrode for synergitic electrochemcial detection of dopamine. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2015, 6, 973–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maziarz, W.; Kusior, A.; Trenczek-Zajac, A. Nanostructured TiO2-based gas sensors with enhanced sensitivity to reducing gases. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 1718–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hang, N.T.; Zhang, S.; Noh, J.-S.; Yang, W. Study on the optimization of graphene sensors using Ag-nanostructures decoration. Thin Solid Film. 2018, 660, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharma, H.J.; Jamkar, D.V.; Kondawar, S.B. Electrospun nanofibers of conducting polyaniline/Al-SnO2 composites for hydrogen sensing applications. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2015, 10, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ko, K.Y.; Park, K.; Lee, S.; Kim, Y.; Woo, W.J.; Kim, D.; Song, J.-G.; Park, J.; Kim, H. Recovery improvement for large-area tungsten diselenide gas sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 23910–23917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ai, W.; Kou, L.; Hu, X.; Wang, Y.; Krasheninnikov, A.V.; Sun, L.; Shen, X. Enhanced sensitivity of MoSe2 monolayer for gas adsorption induced by electric field. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2019, 31, 445301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ravindra, N.M.; Tang, W.; Rassay, S. Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Properties and Applications. In Semiconductors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 333–396. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Lee, C.S. Interlayer nanoarchitectonics of two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides nanosheets for energy storage and conversion applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wang, Q.H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J.N.; Strano, M.S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Feng, J.; Peng, L.; Wu, C.; Sun, X.; Hu, S.; Lin, C.; Dai, J.; Yang, J.; Xie, Y. Giant moisture responsiveness of VS2 ultrathin nanosheets for novel touchless positioning interface. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1969–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, D.W.; Zhou, P.; Huang, J. Suspended SnS2 layers by light assistance for ultrasensitive ammonia detection at room temperature. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1801035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rathi, K.; Kumar, A.N.; Pal, K. Fabrication of flexible La-MoS2 hybrid-heterostructure based sensor for NO2 gas sensing at room temperature. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 395504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cho, B.; Kim, A.R.; Kim, D.J.; Chung, H.-S.; Choi, S.Y.; Kwon, J.-D.; Park, S.W.; Kim, Y.; Lee, B.H.; Lee, K.H. Two-dimensional atomic-layered alloy junctions for high-performance wearable chemical sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 19635–19642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cha, J.-H.; Choi, S.-J.; Yu, S.; Kim, I.-D. 2D WS 2-edge functionalized multi-channel carbon nanofibers: Effect of WS 2 edge-abundant structure on room temperature NO2 sensing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 8725–8732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yue, N.; Weicheng, J.; Rongguo, W.; Guomin, D.; Yifan, H. Hybrid nanostructures combining graphene–MoS 2 quantum dots for gas sensing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 8198–8203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, D.; Wu, J.; Li, P.; Cao, Y. Room-temperature SO2 gas-sensing properties based on a metal-doped MoS 2 nanoflower: An experimental and density functional theory investigation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 20666–20677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Asres, G.A.; Baldoví, J.J.; Dombovari, A.; Järvinen, T.; Lorite, G.S.; Mohl, M.; Shchukarev, A.; Pérez Paz, A.; Xian, L.; Mikkola, J.-P. Ultrasensitive H2S gas sensors based on p-type WS2 hybrid materials. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 4215–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Parangusan, H.; Bhadra, J.; Ahmad, Z.; Mallick, S.; Touati, F.; Al-Thani, N. Investigation of the structural, optical and gas sensing properties of PANI coated Cu–ZnS microsphere composite. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 26604–26612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, C.; Tai, H.; Zhang, P.; Ye, Z.; Su, Y.; Jiang, Y. Enhanced ammonia-sensing properties of PANI-TiO2-Au ternary self-assembly nanocomposite thin film at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Öztas, M.; Bedir, M. Thickness dependence of structural, electrical and optical properties of sprayed ZnO: Cu films. Thin Solid Film. 2008, 516, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khuspe, G.; Bandgar, D.; Sen, S.; Patil, V. Fussy nanofibrous network of polyaniline (PANi) for NH3 detection. Synth. Met. 2012, 162, 1822–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sambaza, S.; Maity, A.; Pillay, K. Visible light degradation of ibuprofen using PANI coated WO3@TiO2 photocatalyst. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2022, 26, 101563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, D.; Chu, Y.; Yang, L.; Liu, Y.; Lv, Z. Reversed micelle polymerization: A new route for the synthesis of DBSA–polyaniline nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 259, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, I.-T.; Hon, M.-H.; Teoh, L.G. The preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of radical-shaped CeO2/ZnO microstructures. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 4019–4024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sutar, D.; Padma, N.; Aswal, D.; Deshpande, S.; Gupta, S.; Yakhmi, J. Preparation of nanofibrous polyaniline films and their application as ammonia gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 128, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sarf, F. Metal Oxide Gas Sensors by Nanostructures. In Gas Sensors; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fan, C.; Sun, F.; Wang, X.; Huang, Z.; Keshvardoostchokami, M.; Kumar, P.; Liu, B. Synthesis of ZnO hierarchical structures and their gas sensing properties. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Li, Z.-F.; Blum, F.D.; Bertino, M.F.; Kim, C.-S.; Pillalamarri, S.K. One-step fabrication of a polyaniline nanofiber vapor sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 134, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Burman, D.; Ghosh, R.; Santra, S.; Ray, S.K.; Guha, P.K. Role of vacancy sites and UV-ozone treatment on few layered MoS2 nanoflakes for toxic gas detection. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 435502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, X.; Huang, B.; Wu, X.; Gu, D.; Li, X. Enhanced ammonia sensing properties of rGO/WS2 heterojunction based chemiresistive sensor by marginal sulfonate decoration. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 337, 129776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sharma, S.; Kumar, A.; Kaur, D. Room temperature ammonia gas sensing properties of MoS2 nanostructured thin film. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1953, 030261. [Google Scholar]
  39. Järvinen, T.; Lorite, G.S.; Peräntie, J.; Toth, G.; Saarakkala, S.; Virtanen, V.K.; Kordas, K. WS2 and MoS2 thin film gas sensors with high response to NH3 in air at low temperature. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 405501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Li, X.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J. WS2 nanoflakes based selective ammonia sensors at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 240, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, A.; Lv, S.; Jiang, L.; Liu, F.; Zhao, L.; Wang, J.; Hu, X.; Yang, Z.; He, J.; Wang, C. The gas sensor utilizing polyaniline/MoS2 nanosheets/SnO2 nanotubes for the room temperature detection of ammonia. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 332, 129444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jha, R.K.; Wan, M.; Jacob, C.; Guha, P.K. Ammonia vapour sensing properties of in situ polymerized conducting PANI-nanofiber/WS 2 nanosheet composites. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 735–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of PANI and PANI/2D-TMDs composites by in situ polymerization process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of PANI and PANI/2D-TMDs composites by in situ polymerization process.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of NH3 gas sensor measurement.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of NH3 gas sensor measurement.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of (a) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites and (b) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of (a) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites and (b) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of (a) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites and (b) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of (a) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites and (b) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g004
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscope images of (a) PANI, (b) MoS2, (c) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites, (d) pure WS2 and (e) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscope images of (a) PANI, (b) MoS2, (c) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites, (d) pure WS2 and (e) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g005
Figure 6. EDX analysis of (a) pure PANI, (b) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites and (c) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Figure 6. EDX analysis of (a) pure PANI, (b) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites and (c) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g006
Figure 7. Transmission electron microscope images of (a) PANI, (b) MoS2, (c) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites, (d) pure WS2 and (e) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Figure 7. Transmission electron microscope images of (a) PANI, (b) MoS2, (c) PANI/MoS2 nanocomposites, (d) pure WS2 and (e) PANI/WS2 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g007
Figure 8. UV-vis absorption spectra and Tauc’s plot of (a,b) PANI/MoS2 composites and (c,d) PANI/WS2 composites.
Figure 8. UV-vis absorption spectra and Tauc’s plot of (a,b) PANI/MoS2 composites and (c,d) PANI/WS2 composites.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g008
Figure 9. (a,c) Response and recovery graphs of pure PANI and its composites. (b,d) Response of PANI and its composites sensor towards NH3 gas concentrations (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 ppm) operating at room temperature.
Figure 9. (a,c) Response and recovery graphs of pure PANI and its composites. (b,d) Response of PANI and its composites sensor towards NH3 gas concentrations (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 ppm) operating at room temperature.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g009
Figure 10. (a) Long term stability of the sensors towards 2 ppm NH3 at room temperature, (b) The influence of humidity on the NH3 sensing properties of the sensitive films.
Figure 10. (a) Long term stability of the sensors towards 2 ppm NH3 at room temperature, (b) The influence of humidity on the NH3 sensing properties of the sensitive films.
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g010
Figure 11. Selectivity test of the gas sensor toward ammonia gas with various gases (Nitrogen dioxide, Ethanol and Acetone).
Figure 11. Selectivity test of the gas sensor toward ammonia gas with various gases (Nitrogen dioxide, Ethanol and Acetone).
Nanomaterials 12 04423 g011
Table 1. The structural and optical parameters for the prepared pure PANI and its nanocomposites.
Table 1. The structural and optical parameters for the prepared pure PANI and its nanocomposites.
SamplesMicrostrain × 10−3Dislocation Density × 1014 Lines/m2 Crystallite Size (nm)Band Gap Eg (eV)
Pure PANI0.82865.714541.832.50
PANI/5 MoS21.077710.666622.862.45
PANI/10 MoS21.661322.971920.162.38
PANI/15MoS22.673059.464418.962.29
PANI/5WS21.609821.186421.182.35
PANI/10WS22.016933.570117.532.26
PANI/15WS22.142038.855616.182.02
Table 2. NH3 gas-sensing performance of TMD-based systems.
Table 2. NH3 gas-sensing performance of TMD-based systems.
SI. NoMaterialGasResponse Time Recovery TimeRef
1rGO-WS2NH360 s300 min[37]
2MoS2 thin filmNH322 s30 s[38]
3MoS2, WS2NH35 min30 min[39]
4WS2 nanoflakesNH3120 s150 s[40]
5PANI/MoS2/SnO2NH321 s130 s[41]
6PANI/WS2NH3260 s790 s[42]
7PANI/TMDsNH310 s16 sThis work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parangusan, H.; Bhadra, J.; Al-Qudah, R.A.; Elhadrami, E.C.; Al-Thani, N.J. Comparative Study on Gas-Sensing Properties of 2D (MoS2, WS2)/PANI Nanocomposites-Based Sensor. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4423. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244423

AMA Style

Parangusan H, Bhadra J, Al-Qudah RA, Elhadrami EC, Al-Thani NJ. Comparative Study on Gas-Sensing Properties of 2D (MoS2, WS2)/PANI Nanocomposites-Based Sensor. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(24):4423. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parangusan, Hemalatha, Jolly Bhadra, Razen Amer Al-Qudah, Elhassen Cheikh Elhadrami, and Noora Jabor Al-Thani. 2022. "Comparative Study on Gas-Sensing Properties of 2D (MoS2, WS2)/PANI Nanocomposites-Based Sensor" Nanomaterials 12, no. 24: 4423. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244423

APA Style

Parangusan, H., Bhadra, J., Al-Qudah, R. A., Elhadrami, E. C., & Al-Thani, N. J. (2022). Comparative Study on Gas-Sensing Properties of 2D (MoS2, WS2)/PANI Nanocomposites-Based Sensor. Nanomaterials, 12(24), 4423. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244423

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop