Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Cu2ZnSnSe4 by Non-Vacuum Method for Photovoltaic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Blue Titania: The Outcome of Defects, Crystalline-Disordered Core-Shell Structure, and Hydrophilicity Change
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MWCNTs Composites-Based on New Chemically Modified Polysulfone Matrix for Biomedical Applications

by
Simona Luminita Nica
1,*,
Mirela-Fernanda Zaltariov
1,
Daniela Pamfil
1,
Alexandra Bargan
1,
Daniela Rusu
1,
Delia Mihaela Raţă
2,
Constantin Găină
1 and
Leonard Ionut Atanase
2,*
1
Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, 41A Grigore GhicaVoda Alley, 700487 Iasi, Romania
2
Faculty of Medical Dentistry, Apollonia University of Iasi, Pacurari Street, No. 11, 700511 Iasi, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(9), 1502; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091502
Submission received: 21 March 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 21 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section 2D and Carbon Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is a non-toxic biosynthetic polymer. Due to the hydrophilic properties of the PVA, its utilization is an easy tool to modify the properties of materials inducing increased hydrophilicity, which can be noticed in the surface properties of the materials, such as wettability. Based on this motivation, we proposed to obtain high-performance composite materials by a facile synthetic method that involves the cross-linking process of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with and aldehyde-functionalized polysulfone(mPSF) precursor, prior to incorporation of modified MWCNTs with hydrophilic groups, thus ensuring a high compatibility between the polymeric and the filler components. Materials prepared in this way have been compared with those based on polyvinyl alcohol and same fillers (mMWCNTs) in order to establish the influence of the polymeric matrix on the composites properties. The amount of mMWCNTs varied in both polymeric matrices between 0.5 and 5 wt%. Fourier transformed infrared with attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR) was employed to confirm the changes noted in the PVA, mPSF and their composites. Hemolysis degree was investigated in correlation with the material structural features. Homogenous distribution of mMWCNTs in all the composite materials has been confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. The hydrophilicity of both composite systems, estimated by the contact angle method, was influenced by the presence of the filler amount mMWCNTs in both matrices (PVA and mPSF). Our work demonstrates that mPSF/mMWCNTs and PVA/mMWCNTs composite could be used as water purification or blood-filtration materials.

1. Introduction

Development of materials as porous polymeric membranes to be used in some particular applications (blood filtration, water purification, etc.) rely on different preparation techniques [1,2], which are well-controlled. It is important to know how the targeted liquid will act on the surface of the obtained material. Recently, the fabrication processes of materials with controlled wettability have been widely exploited [3,4]. The choice in adjustment of the polymers surface in terms of wettability [5,6] is often employed. To this is added equally the design of a specific architecture possessing adequate functionalities and a good permeability, essential for blood filtration membranes [7,8]. Different physical (plasma treatment, physical coating, immobilization of nanoparticles) and chemical (reaction between the newly introduced surface functional groups, photoinitiation, redox) approaches for surface modification have been reported [9]. Relevant work describing the implementation of a new method to prepare composites with a complex structure was reported by Donchak and co-workers [10], who have chosen to introduce amino groups on the surface of MWCNTs, which were later reacted with the carboxylic groups of the polymeric matrix, improving the tensile strength and the elasticity of the composites.
In another approach, Melnyk and co-workers [11] described an optimized procedure to prepare cross-linked hydrogel membranes based on poly(vinylpyrrolidone)-graft-poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) designed for drug delivery systems.
One of most representative class of materials recognized for their specific applications in membranes for blood purification is polysulfones (PSFs) [12], even if they are hydrophobic and manifest a lack of compatibility with blood [13,14,15,16,17]. To improve their biocompatibility, especially preventing the occurrence of coagulation cascade and thrombosis phenomena [18,19], different approaches had been investigated. One of them is functionalization of polysulfones with quaternary ammonium groups to obtain hemocompatible polymeric membranes with higher porosity and hydrophilicity [20]. An increased biocompatibility with blood was reported by Qi et al. [21], who incorporated antioxidant compounds (resveratrol). The reported membranes showed a high efficiency in blood filtration (about 90.33% urea, 89.50% creatinine, 74.60% lysozyme, and 90.47% BSA) and in reducing of the oxidative stress. In another approach, Zhong et al. [22] reported polysulfone-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (PSF-b-PEG) ultrafiltration membranes for hemodialysis by non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) method in the absence of any additives. Another synthetic polymer that received attention as possible blood-filtration material is polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [23,24], which possesses required characteristics for biomedical applications such as mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and non-toxicity [25].
The embedding of different fillers [26] in polymer matrices to obtain composite membranes is another way to improve separation properties of membranes. Among them, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), a class of materials with tubular structures, received great interest. In this respect, composites based on multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) seem to have a multitude of practical uses [27,28,29]. Despite different opinions of the researcher regarding the toxicity of CNTs, the composite membranes based on MWCNTs proved their utility in medicine in cancer treatment [30], bio-sensing [31], hyperthermia induction [32], antibacterial therapy [33], bone tissue engineering [34], and blood-contacting devices [35]; in respirators, allowing the free exchange of air and CO2 and preventing the transmission of viruses and bacteria; in drug delivery of small molecules, proteins, or nucleic acids; and in protein purification and selective permeation [36]. MWCNTs have a hydrophobic nature. Surface charge influences the biological performance [37], so their applications as biomaterials demand surface functionalization. As a consequence, the solubility in solvents and their biocompatibility are improved [38]. Detailed information regarding biocompatibility of functionalized MWCNTs (denoted here mMWCNTs) can be found in the literature [39]. Much less discussed and evaluated is the hemocompatibility of mMWCNTs. These represent a mandatory requirement for materials, as tests referring to hemocompatibility can prove either their failure or their success in biomedical applications. The surrounding tissue is perturbed by the implanted “foreign” biomaterial. Therefore, implanted blood-contacting devices may produce thrombo-inflammation. It has been demonstrated that materials having hydrophilic surfaces are resistant to blood protein adsorption [40]. The advantage conferred by the surface functionalization of MWCNTs shows a decrease intoxicity and improvement of antifouling properties [41]. Literature data revealed the utilization of carbon nanotubes in microfluidic devices with higher efficiency (80%) in plasma separation from blood. The intrinsic porosity of CNTs of approximately 93% resulted from the inter-tubular distances lower than 90 nm [42]. Electroanalytical devices based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes also proved to be efficient in rapid detection and L-tyrosine monitorization in tyrosinemia diagnosis, with a high degree of reusability (97%) [43] and in blood glucose in humans with a higher selectivity than the grapheme-based biosensors, with MWCNTs being a superior electrode material [44].
CNTs are also used as carriers in drug delivery systems. Functionalized MWCNTs conjugated with inorganic nanoparticles (iron oxide) or biological molecules (biotin) have been investigated for doxorubicin loading and release. CNTs can be intravenously administered, showing some cytotoxic and genotoxic side effects, producing increased intracellular ROS species, DNA damage, and some inflammation at concentrations up to 50 μg/mL [45]. Pulmonary inhalation of MWCNTs has also altered rat heart rate variation, affecting the nervous system [46]. In-depth studies have shown, however, that a specific functionalization of MWCNTs was beneficial in permeation of the blood-brain barrier. The cell viability tests proved that these mMWCNTs were safe; no cytotoxic effects were reported. On the contrary, they showed the ability to function as central nervous system-targeting drug release materials [47]. The main advantage is related to their unique and controlled structure and intrinsic porosity, which can be promoted in preparation of stable drug delivery systems and blood devices. Another strong point is that MWCNTs can be easily functionalized and compatibilized with different functional groups/substrates, so they are accessible in different applications. In addition, their embedding in polymeric matrices proved to increase the thermal stability, flexibility, and stability of materials.
The advantage of the composites used as membrane separation materials in blood purification processes relies on their high permeability, easy fabrication, good biocompatibility, fast adsorption rate, and high adsorption capacity of nanomaterials [48].
Based on the literature background, the current paper aims to obtain and characterize new composite materials for applications in water purification membranes or blood-contacting materials. Our strategy is based on original aspects that arise from the chemical modification of the PSF (mPSF) by introduction of PVA segments as side chains. With this procedure, we expect to improve the wettability and porosity of the prepared materials. Moreover, the properties of these membranes were further enhanced by the addition of multiwall carbon nanotubes that were chemically functionalized with -OH groups. For comparison purposes, the PVA/mMWCNTs nanocomposite system was also analyzed. All tested composite materials were evaluated in terms of wettability, water sorption properties, and hemocompatibility. These new materials open new perspectives for improving the performance of current membranes used for water purification membranes or blood filtration.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Commercial multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs, 95% purity, PD15L5-20) with an outer diameter of 15 ± 5 nm and a length of 5–20 µm were purchased from NanoLABInc (Waltham, MA, USA) and used as received.
Polysulfone (Udel 3500P, Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), p-formaldehyde (95%, Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), chlorotrimethylsilane (99%, Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), tin (IV)chloride (99%, Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) (viscosity-average molecular weight 77,000–79,000 g/mol, DH = 98%, Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), p-toluenesulfonic acid (pTSA, 97%, Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP, Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), chloroform, and sodium bicarbonate (Chemical Company, Iasi, Romania) were used as received.

2.2. MWCNTs Modification and Composite Synthesis

To produce MWCNTs functionalized with hydroxyl groups (mMWCNTs), pristine MWCNTs were reacted in a H2O2 solution, according to a reported method [49].
Chloromethylated polysulfone (ClMePSF) was prepared according to existing literature data [36,50] through an approach described below. Subsequently, aldehyde-functionalized polymer (APSF) was obtained by direct-oxidation of ClMePSF in DMSO, in the presence of NaHCO3, according to [51] (Scheme 1).
Chloromethylated polysulfone (PSF-ClMe): In a typical reaction, polysulfone (5 g) was dissolved in chloroform (200 mL) in a round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer, reflux condenser, and thermometer. The solution was heated at 50 °C under nitrogen atmosphere and then p-formaldehide (3 g), chloromethylsilane (14 mL), and thin (IV) chloride (0.6 g) were added to the polymer solution. After 50 h at 50 °C, the mixture was poured into methanol and the solid product washed well with methanol and dried at 60–65 °C. The degree of substitution of –CH2Cl groups was evaluated using 1H-NMR spectroscopy and was estimated at around 1.2. Subsequently, aldehyde-functionalized polymer (APSF) was obtained by direct-oxidation of PSF-ClMe in DMSO, in the presence of NaHCO3, according to [51] (Scheme 1). A typical synthesis, PSF-ClMe (5 g) was dissolved in DMSO (120 mL), and sodium bicarbonate (2.1 g) was added. The reaction mixture was maintained at 130 °C for 12 h, and then poured into water.
By acetalization of PVA with APSF in NMP, mPSF was obtained. The PSF-PVA mixture was defined as mPSF, and the mass ratio of APSF:PVA was 1:1. APSF (0.3 g) and PVA (0.3 g) were dissolved in NMP individually to form a solution of 6.5%. The two solutions were then mixed together at room temperature, and, subsequently, pTSA was added and heated at 60 °C for 8 h. The mPSF membranes were prepared by solution casting method as follows: To a solution of mPSF (0.6 g) in NMP (8 mL), an appropriate amount of mMWCNTs was added to obtained mPSF/mMWCNTs composition of 0.1, 1, 3, and 5% (Figure 1). The mixtures were sonicated at 60 °C for 30 min to form a black viscous homogeneous solution, then were cast on the glass plates and dried at 80 °C for 12 h. The obtained mPSF membranes were then thoroughly washed with water and dried at 80 °C for other 8 h.

2.3. Methods

Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR–FTIR) measurements were carried out on a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a ZnSe crystal. The spectra were recorded in ATR (attenuated total reflectance) mode in the 4000–600 cm 1 range, with a resolution of 4 cm 1 and 32 scans, at room temperature.
The static contact angle experiments were performed on KSV CAM 200 goniometer at room temperature (25 °C). The sessile-drop method involved the utilization of two test liquids (water and ethylene glycol) that were handled with separate testing syringes to avoid cross-contamination. A liquid droplet of 1 μL was formed at the end of the syringe and carefully deposited onto the surface of prepared film samples, and then the image of droplet was taken by a coupled device camera in order to measure the contact angle. Tests were repeated three times on different surfaces.
To obtain the surface tension parameters, the Fowkes method/model [52] was employed as shown in Equations (1) and (2):
( 1 + cos θ ) · γ l v 2 = γ s v d · γ l v d + γ s v p · γ l v p
γ s v =   γ s v d + γ s v p
where θ is the contact angle formed by a liquid on the solid surface samples and γplv, γdlv, γpsv, and γdsv are the polar and dispersed components of the liquid and solid phases, respectively.
Solid-liquid interfacial tension ( γ s l ) is defined in Equation (3):
γ s l   = ( γ l p γ s p ) 2 + ( γ l d γ s d ) 2
The spreading coefficient, S c , is defined by Equation (4):
S c = γ s γ s l γ l
Water adsorption/desorption isotherms of all composite systems were registered using a Dynamic Vapor Sorption (DVS)Analyzer (IGAsorp, Hiden Analytical, Warrington, UK) equipped with an ultrasensitive microbalance to measure the weight changes when the relative humidity is varied. Before sorption experiments, the samples were dried at 25 °C in flowing nitrogen (250 mL/min) until equilibrium at RH < 1%. The relative humidity (RH) was then slowly increased from 0 to 90%, in 10% humidity steps, with every step having a pre-established equilibrium time between 40 and 60 min. The sorption equilibrium was obtained for each step. After that, the RH was decreased and desorption isotherms were registered.
The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) kinetic model [53] was applied to calculate the surface area and monolayer of the synthesized materials according to Equation (5):
W = W m · C · RH ( 1 RH ) · ( 1 RH + C · RH )
where W is the weight of sorbed water, W m is weight of water forming a monolayer, C is the sorption constant, and RH is the relative humidity.
The surface morphology of the materials was examined by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) type Quanta 200 (FEI), operating at 20 kV with secondary electrons in low vacuum mode, the magnification being indicated on each micrograph. The SEM micrographs were performed on uncoated samples fixed on aluminum stubs.

2.4. Hemolysis Assay

The compatibility of the obtained films with human red blood cells (RBCs) and their potential effects on erythrocyte lysis were evaluated by the hemolysis test using a spectrophotometric method adapted from Chhatri et al. [54] and Rata et al. [55].To perform this test, a healthy, non-smoking volunteer was selected from whom 5 mL of blood was collected, after prior institutional ethical approval and adequate informed consent. The blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min and washed several times with normal saline solution (0.9% NaCl) to remove plasma and to obtain erythrocytes. The purified erythrocytes were re-suspended in normal saline to obtain 25 mL of erythrocyte suspension. All the investigated films had a spherical shape with a diameter of 5 mm and were transferred into Eppendorf tubes, over which 0.5 mL of erythrocytes suspension and 0.5 mL of normal saline solution were added. Positive control samples, with 100% lysis, were prepared by adding 0.5 mL of 2% Triton X-100 solution over 0.5 mL of erythrocyte suspension. Negative control samples, with 0% lysis, were prepared by adding 0.5 mL of saline solution over 0.5 mL of erythrocyte suspension. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h and gently shaken once every 30 min to ensure continuous contact between the films and the blood. After the incubation time, the samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and 100 μL of supernatant was incubated for 30 min at room temperature to allow oxidation of hemoglobin. The absorbance of oxyhemoglobin in supernatants was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm using a Nanodrop One UV-Vis Spectrophotometer. All samples were analyzed in triplicate.
The percentage of hemolysis was calculated using Equation (6):
Hemolysis   ( % ) = Abs sample Abs negative   control Abs pozitive   control Abs negative   control × 100
Membrane materials were classified into three categories based on their hemolytic index as follows: (1) hemolytic materials which show hemolysis (%) > 5%; (2) slightly hemolytic materials with hemolysis (%) between 2% and 5%; (3) non-hemolytic materials with hemolysis (%) < 2% (American Society for Testing and Materials 2000) [56].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. ATR–FTIR Characterization of Polymeric Matrices

The IR data of the polymeric matrices and composites are summarized in Table 1.
The IR absorptions of PVA and mPSF-based matrices in the 4000–2500 cm 1 region are generally due to O-H and C-H vibrations. The O-H stretching produces a broad band at about 3350 cm 1 and is the result of the presence of intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonding. The precise position of the O-H band is dependent on the strength of the hydrogen bonds within the matrix (Figure 2a). The band is blue shifted at 3340 cm 1 in the spectrum of mPSF matrix as a result of the H-bond interactions between PVA and APSF.
The bands at 2920 cm 1 and 2856 cm 1 are assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric C-H stretching vibrations within PVA, APSF, and mPSF matrices, whereas the bands at 3100 cm 1 , 3070 cm 1 , and 3030 cm 1 are due to the aromatic C-H stretching vibrations in the structure of APSF and mPSF (Figure 2a).
In the 1800–600 cm 1 spectral region of the polymeric matrices, strong characteristic peaks for PVA at 1733 cm 1 and 1670 cm 1 are due to the incompletely hydrolyze of PVA (the C=O vibrations from acetate groups) [57], 1696 cm 1 characteristic for aldehyde CH=O group in the APSF matrix, as well as other specific bands for C-O stretching vibration band in the structure of poly(vinyl acetate) mPSF matrix 1190–1148 cm 1 . The complete transformation of the carbonyl CH=O group into the acetal was evidenced by the disappearance of the band at 1696 cm 1 in the spectrum of APSF. In addition, acetals have a characteristic strong band at 1106 cm 1 due to a C-H deformation vibration being perturbed by the neighboring C-O groups (Figure 2b).
Aromatic C=C stretching vibrations occur in the region 1650–1427 cm 1 , and the skeletal vibrations due to the conjugation can be seen at 1585 cm 1 .
The bands observed at 1383–1290 cm 1 and 1170–1148 cm 1 are due to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the SO 2 group overlapped with the C-O stretching vibrations.
Other bands refer to the in-plane O-H deformation vibration coupled with C-H/C-O wagging vibration (1440–1260 cm 1 ) and C-H rocking vibrations and aromatic ring, whereas the bands at 850–720 and 700–580 cm 1 refer to the =C-CH- in-plane deformation vibration, phenoxy (Ph-O) band, and C-H out-of-plane and ring deformation vibrations [58].

3.2. ATR–FTIR Characterization of Composites

The O-H region of the composites reveal an increase in the filler concentration of the O-H groups by increasing of the concentration of mMWCNTs as compared with the polymeric matrix (Figure 3a). The interaction of the mMWCNTs with the polymeric matrix through H bonding is highlighted by the blue shift of the band at 3350 with 30 cm 1 .
As depicted in Figure 3b, all spectra show two absorption bands at 1733 and 1668 cm 1 , which are attributed to C=O of acetate groups present in the PVA matrix. For the PVA/mMWCNTs composites system, the absorption due to the carbonyl groups is detected at 1657 cm 1 , whereas that assigned to the acetate is detected at 1713 cm 1 , indicating a physical bonding through H-bonds of the functionalized mMWCNTs with the polymeric matrix. More than that, a decreasing in the absorption band at 1657 cm 1   with an increase of the mMWCNTs concentration can be observed, which indicates that the mMWCNTs have been successfully embedded in the polymeric matrix (Figure 3b). In the 1600–1200 cm 1 spectral range of the PVA/mMWCNTs composite, the bands at 1506 cm 1 , 1435, and 1305 cm 1 assigned to the O-H deformation vibration and bonded OH groups indicated the successful incorporation of the MWCNTs (Figure 3c).
In the 1200–600 cm 1 spectral range, a new band at 1140 cm 1   appears in the spectra of mMWCNTs composites, being assigned to the PVA (C-O crystallinity) [59], whereas the bands at 1060 cm 1 , 984 cm 1 , and 913 cm 1 attributed to the C-O stretching are diminished in the spectra of composites (Figure 3d).
For the mPSF/mMWCNTs composites, the absorption peak assigned to –OH stretching at 3340 cm 1 indicated the presence of the hydroxyl groups, whose concentration increases as compared with the matrix (Figure 4a). Characteristic peaks for C=O stretching, C=C stretching, and O-H deformation vibrations are also detected at 1729 cm 1 , 1713 cm 1 , and 1654 cm 1 , respectively (Figure 4b).
In the 1500−600 cm 1 range, the mPSF/mMWCNTs composites have very similar absorption bands: 1487 cm 1 (O-H deformation vibration coupled with C-O and C-H wagging vibration), 1429 cm 1 and 1407 cm 1 (C-C stretching in aromatic rings), 1373 cm 1 (C-SO2-C asymmetric stretching), 1298 cm 1 (S-O stretching), 1240 cm 1 (C-O-C symmetric stretching) (Figure 4c), 1148 cm 1 (C-SO2-C symmetric stretching), 1104 cm 1 , 1096 cm 1 , 1032 cm 1 , 1012 cm 1 , and 834 cm 1 (aliphatic C-O-C, aromatic C-H bending and rocking), 750–650 cm 1 (C-H out-of-plane deformation vibrations) (Figure 4d), proving that after embedding the mMWCNTs in the matrix, the chemical structure of the mPSF did not change [60].
The differences in composition of the PVA and mPSF matrices before and after embedding of mMWCNTs were highlighted by using the method of IR spectral subtraction of the spectra, and the results are indicated in Figure 5. In this case, the resulting subtraction spectrum will correspond to the difference between the spectrum of the initial matrix and the spectrum of the composites. Spectra were processed by using Bruker OPUS 6.5 software. It can be seen that the main differences between the initial matrix and composites consist of the characteristic bands of O-H groups (O-H stretching at about 3300 cm 1 and 1643 cm 1 , O-H deformation vibration at 1510 cm 1 , 1306 cm 1 , 930 cm 1 , and 814 cm 1 ) (Figure 5).

3.3. Wettability and Surface Free Energy Analysis

In bio-applications, surface characteristics of polymeric materials are considerably influenced by the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance. Contact angle analysis was performed in order to determine the surface tension of the pure polymer matrices and of the OH modified MWCNTs (mMWCNTs) composites. In addition to this, the wettability properties of the materials, here under study, affect water sorption and hemocompatibility. Table 2 presents experimental data regarding contact angles measured on the surface of prepared matrices and corresponding composites. The standard deviations (SD) were calculated from the values measured in three different positions on the surface region of each sample material. Values are given in Table 2. For all samples, standard deviations are below 2°. It was observed that majority of the probes present low SD indicating more homogenous surfaces. As a consequence, low local heterogeneities exist. For mPSF/mMWCNTs composites (5 wt%), the increased SD is attributed to an increasing amount of surface inhomogeneity. In this situation, the surface hydroxyl group density decreases [61]. An opposite trend was observed for the last measurement in the system PVA/mMWCNTs.
A lower water contact angle indicates a more hydrophilic material surface. As showed in Table 2, the pure PVA matrix has a relatively hydrophilic behavior ( θ   <   90 ° ). Because PVA is a hydrophilic polymer, it is expected that such properties will be maintained when it is used to functionalize polysulfone (denoted here mPSF). However, polysulfone has a hydrophobic character ( θ   >   90 ° ). The influence of H-bonding interactions onto the surface hydrophobicity of the materials was deeply investigated by Nakamura et al. [62]. Based on this study and also on FTIR spectra, the hydrophobicity of the mPSF sample is attributed to the formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions between OH groups of the PVA and APSF moieties. The surface wettability is known to be strongly affected by the surface chemistry of the carbon-based materials [63,64]. The necessity to improve the interfacial polymer-filler interactions led to the development of several chemical routes of MWCNTs functionalization [65,66]. In this study, the matrix was compatibilized with the filler by its functionalization with hydrophilic OH groups. It is observed that PVA/mMWCNTs composite system presents a gradual decrease in the water contact angle with the increase percent of the filler amount (0.5, 1, and 2.5 wt%),leading to an improvement of the surface hydrophilicity. This behavior could be associated to the increase in surface polarity ( γ s p ) as there are fewer polar groups in PVA to interact with those of the modified filler, so more polar groups from mMWCNTs remain available on the composite film surface.
In contrast, the mPSF/mMWCNTs nanocomposites display an easy increase in water contact angle after more filler addition in the system. The new mPSF matrix has more polar groups that can interact with the hydroxyls of the filler. For this reason, upon reinforcement, fewer polar groups remain at the sample surface. This could explain the contact angle data for this composite system that reflect an easy increase in surface hydrophobicity upon mMWCNTs addition up to 2.5 wt%. In the case of all composites containing 5 wt% mMWCNTs, the water contact angle is suddenly increasing. At this composition, the introduced filler particles begin to agglomerate and interact not only by van der Waals forces, but also by means of hydrogen bonding, leaving unavailable polar groups at the sample surface.
The contact angle and wettability analyses provide important information regarding the applicability of materials in surface related applications. According to the work of Khan et al. [67], the problem of hydrophilicity of PVA-based materials for biomedical purposes was analyzed. They show that filtration of biological fluids should have an absorbency level from 70 to 100 water contact angle.
Table 3 illustrates the calculated data regarding the polar and disperse surface tension components of all the studied samples. For the PVA/mMWCNTs composite system, it is observed that the polar component is gradually increasing as the mMWCNTs percent increases (0.5, 1, and 2.5 wt%), whereas the dispersive component decreases. For the other composite system (mPSF/mMWCNTs), the polar component is slightly decreased as compared to the dispersive one. However, for both types of composites containing 5 wt% mMWCNTs, a significant increase in the surface dispersive character as supported by the water contact angle data was observed.
γt = total surface free energy, γ s v d = dispersive or non-polar component, γ s v p = polar component, γsl = solid-liquid interfacial tension, Sc = spreading coefficient.
The hydrophobic/hydrophilic nature of the synthesized materials can be further analyzed by calculating several parameters that are derived from surface tension polar and disperse components (Equations (1)–(3)).
Table 3 contains the calculated values of the   γ s l and Sc parameters. As in the case of water contact angle data and surface tension parameters, the interfacial surface tension ranges similarly with reinforcement degree of mMWCNTs. The spreading coefficient ( S c ) describes the mechanisms related to wetting of a liquid when placed on the solid surface of the polymer, reflecting the thermodynamic stability of a liquid layer in contact with the solid material. For positive values of S c , the surface presents preponderant adhesive character so the fluid spreading is taking place (complete wetting);conversely for negative values of this parameter, the cohesive properties prevail and partial wetting is noticed. For all samples, the spreading coefficient presents negative values, indicating prevalent cohesion interactions at the interface in detriment to water/sample adhesion interactions.

3.4. Adsorption Isotherms

Adsorption/desorption isotherms were registered to obtain information about the water sorption behavior [68] for PVA, mPSF, and their corresponding mMWCNTs composite systems. These results are shown in Figure 6.
According to IUPAC classification [69], the sorption/desorption curves exhibit a type-IV shape for all studied materials. This is specifically for capillary condensation and physical multilayer adsorption [70]. In addition, all of the samples display hysteresis between sorption and desorption (classified as H2-typein combination with H3-type) [71,72] being characteristic of porous solid structures [73]. The hysteresis of type H2 is due to network effects [74] given by the complex pore structures existing in both types of composite samples (PVA/mMWCNTs and mPSF/mMWCNTs) at low values of RH, where a low water sorption is observed. An indicator of the presence of the macropores is given by the shape of the H3 hysteresis (up to 30 RH%) observed in all prepared materials. In addition, the interspace between the different mMWCNTs filled into both matrices could be responsible for this H3-type of hysteresis. Beyond 30 RH%, one may notice a sharp increase in water sorption, for all nanocomposite systems. Unclosed hysteresis for the first isotherms found for both nanocomposite systems show an irreversible adsorption of water, which is similar to the work reported by Inagaki et al. [75]. As a consequence, the rehydration of the sample surface takes place [75].
Comparison of the DVS data obtained for the pure PVA and mPSF matrices reveal the peculiarities of each polymer structure. In the case of PVA, the main chain is connected to non-bulky side groups that enable a certain degree of intrinsic porosity. The latter is considerable smaller compared to the porosity of mPSF, which has a rigid backbone linked to bulky substituents. The differences in intrinsic porosities are reflected in distinct sorption characteristics of the unfilled and corresponding reinforced samples. It was reported that water absorbed in carbon filled materials follow the Dubinin–Serpinsky (D-S) mechanism [76].
The structure of the material affects the water sorption behavior [77,78]. Table 4 displays the pore diameter and the BET analysis of the nanocomposites materials. Analyzing the results, a gradual increase in the pore size diameter as the mMWCNTs filler amount were added in the PVA matrix (from 0.5 to 2.5 wt%) was observed simultaneously with a sharp decrease in the surface area for all the nanocomposite materials.
The enhancement of pore diameters is attributed to the combined effects given by the nano-confinements and surface functionalization of the MWCNTs [79]. There are some direct strategies to create porosity in the polymer composites. Some of these include utilization of templates, etching and hydrolytic processes, polymeric blending, or introduction/removal of ordered solid compounds intensively applied to obtain tailored pore shapes and dimensions. The “reverse template” approaches led to regular and uniform size pores with possibility to increase the pore diameter by variation in fillers size. Closely interconnected and regular pores in polysulfones have been achieved by introducing different inorganic fillers (salts) into the polymer matrix [80].
However, an in-depth understanding on the dependence of the surface features with the porosity of polysulfones embedding CNTs is still lacking. Reporting data showed that these membranes are useful in selective separation processes of gases, ions, or molecules. The modification of polysulfones induced an increased hydrophilicity and, as a result, an increased antifouling behavior. Some of these membranes are successfully applied in sea-water desalination, the CNTs incorporation proving a better flux, a high mechanical strength, and acid resistance. Moreover, the composites membranes with CNTs showed a high efficiency by phase inversion, being the preferred candidates for pressure retarded systems and osmosis. [81].
In our samples, the decrease in BET area could be explained by the blockage of the pore due to creation of polar OH groups formed on the surface of the MWCNTs material. For the latest sample in the PVA/mMWCNTs composite system, an insignificant decrease in the pore diameter was recorded. A different behavior was evidenced in the case of the samples from the mPSF/mMWCNTs nanocomposite system. The decrease in pore size diameter with the increase in filler amount of mMWCNTs into mPSF matrix associated with the increase in the surface area was observed. However, there was no significant change in pore diameter for both 0.5 and 1 wt% mMWCNTs filler embedding in mPSF matrix.

3.5. Morphological Analysis

Changing the mobility of the polymer chain will induce the modification of the structural properties of the final nanocomposite [82]. Figure 7 displays the morphology of the composite systems containing different amounts of mMWCNTs filler in the PVA matrix. A uniform structure is observed for all the PVA/mMWCNTs composite systems. This indicates that MWCNTs are spread homogeneously throughout the entire surface of the material after their functionalization with polar groups (OH). The OH groups created on the surface of MWCNTs interact very well with the OH groups of the PVA matrix (as shown in the FTIR analysis), preventing their agglomeration into the matrix. The dark spots observed on the SEM images are mMWCNTs.
Figure 8 shows the morphology of the composite system containing different amounts of mMWCNTs filler in the mPSF matrix. Similarly, a more dense and compact morphology with a homogenous distribution of mMWCNTs filler amount was shown for the mPSF/mMWCNTs composite system. The pores clearly observed on the surface of the materials indicate a porous material, which is necessary for the targeted application. This is in accordance with the work reported by Wang [83]. The porous structure of this sample was attributed to the compaction of the polymer network during the synthesis process.

3.6. In Vitro Hemolysis Assay

Hemocompatibility of the materials constitutes an important feature for their use in blood-contacting applications. The hemolysis assay was performed for the materials containing 1 wt% and 5 wt% mMWCNTsin both the mPSF and PVA matrices. The test results are shown in Figure 9 and were expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). It is observed that all tested materials are non-hemolytic. For PVA/mMWCNTs nanocomposite systems, a degree of hemolysis that varied between 1.2 and 1.75% was observed. These results were attributed to the highly hydrophilic surface of the material, being well correlated with the contact angle measurements discussed above. The mPSF/mMWCNTs nanocomposite system having the highest filler loadings (5 wt%) in matrix showed a slightly hemolytic behavior. These materials had a degree of hemolysis in the range 1.01–2.3%. As expected, PVA-based systems have a lower degree of hemolysis. We can conclude that both systems have a good compatibility with blood.

4. Conclusions

New mPSF/mMWCNTs nanocomposite materials designed for water purification or blood-contacting materials were prepared. The characteristics of the prepared materials were compared with those of PVA/mMWCNTs composites. Important structural differences, mainly on O-H vibrations, in the composition of the PVA and mPSF matrices before and after embedding of mMWCNTs fillers in different concentration were evidenced by using the IR spectral subtraction of the spectra. An increased hydrophilicity of the materials was observed after the incorporation of mMWCNTs into PVA and mPSF matrices. The DVS analysis revealed that the water sorption behavior of the studied systems is affected by the structure of the material. All of the systems presented a type-IV isotherm with hysteresis between sorption and desorption (classified as H2-type in combination with H3-type) in the case of both nanocomposite materials. SEM images showed more dense and compact morphology with homogenous distribution of mMWCNTs filler amounts into the mPSF matrix as compared with PVA/mMWCNTs materials. The presence of pores onto the surface of the mPSF material indicated porous material, which is necessary for the pursued applications. Hemolysis results showed that all tested materials are non-hemolytic, concluding that both composite systems have a good compatibility with blood.

Author Contributions

S.L.N.: writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; M.-F.Z.: investigation, validation, writing—original draft; D.P.: investigation, validation, writing—original draft; A.B.: investigation, validation, writing—original draft; D.R.: investigation, validation, writing—original draft; D.M.R.: investigation, validation, writing—original draft; C.G.: conceptualization, writing—original draft; L.I.A.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was performed with the support of Romanian Academy Project “Polymer materials. Correlations of structure, morphology, optical and electrical properties” (P8.3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Tan, X.; Rodrigue, D. A Review on Porous Polymeric Membrane Preparation. Part I: Production Techniques with Polysulfone and Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride). Polymers 2019, 11, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Tweddle, T.A.; Kutowy, O.; Thayer, W.L.; Sourirajan, S. Polysulfone Ultrafiltration Membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1983, 22, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. MacGregor-Ramiasa, M.N.; Vasilev, K. Questions and Answers on the Wettability of Nano-Engineered Surfaces. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1700381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Makvandi, P.; Iftekhar, S.; Pizzetti, F.; Zarepour, A.; Zare, E.N.; Ashrafizadeh, M.; Agarwal, T.; Padil, V.V.; Mohammadinejad, R.; Sillanpaa, M.; et al. Functionalization of polymers and nanomaterials for water treatment, food packaging, textile and biomedical applications: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 583–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, J.; Zhang, K.; Wang, K.; Xie, Z.; Ladewig, B.P.; Wang, H. Fabrication of polyethersulfone-mesoporous silica nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes with antifouling properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 423–424, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wenten, I.G.; Aryanti, P.T.P.; Khoiruddin, K.; Hakim, A.N.; Himma, N.F. Advances in Polysulfone-Based Membranes for Hemodialysis. J. Membr. Sci. Res. 2016, 2, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stamatialis, D.F.; Papenburg, B.J.; Gironés, M.; Saiful, S.; Bettahalli, S.N.; Schmitmeier, S.; Wessling, M. Medical applications of membranes: Drug delivery, artificial organs and tissue engineering. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 308, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Koga, Y.; Fujieda, H.; Meguro, H.; Ueno, Y.; Aoki, T.; Miwa, K.; Kainoh, M. Biocompatibility of Polysulfone Hemodialysis Membranes and Its Mechanisms: Involvement of Fibrinogen and Its Integrin Receptors in Activation of Platelets and Neutrophils. Artif. Organs. 2018, 42, E246–E258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kochkodan, V.; Johnson, D.J.; Hilal, N. Polymeric membranes: Surface modification for minimizing (bio)colloidal fouling. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 206, 116–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Donchaka, V.; Stetsyshyna, Y.; Bratychak, M.; Brozac, G.; Harhaya, K.; Stepinaa, N.; Kostenkoa, M.; Voronova, S. Nanoarchitectonics at surfaces using multifunctional initiators of surface-initiated radical polymerization for fabrication of the nanocomposites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 5, 100104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Melnyk, Y.; Stetsyshyn, Y.; Skorokhoda, V.; Nastishin, Y. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-graft-poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) hydrogel membranes for encapsulated forms of drugs. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kheirieh, S.; Asghari, M.; Afsari, M. Application and modification of polysulfone membranes. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2018, 34, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abdelrasoul, A.; Doan, H.; Lohi, A.; Cheng, C. Morphology Control of Polysulfone Membranes in Filtration Processes: A Critical Review. Chem. Bio. Eng. 2015, 2, 22–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Albu, R.M.; Avram, E.; Musteata, V.E.; Homocianu, M.; Ioan, S. Opto-electrical properties of some quaternizedpolysulfones. High Perform. Polym. 2011, 23, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ioan, S.; Albu, R.M.; Avram, E.; Stoica, I.; Ioanid, E.G. Surface characterization of quaternizedpolysulfone films and biocompatibility studies. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 121, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Albu, R.M.; Avram, E.; Stoica, I.; Ioanid, E.G.; Ioan, S. Miscibility and morphological properties of quaternizedpolysulfone blends with polystyrene and poly(4-vinylpyridine). Polym. Compos. 2011, 32, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Filimon, A.; Albu, R.M.; Avram, E.; Ioan, S. Impact of association phenomena on the thermodynamic properties of modified polysulfones in solutions. J. Macromol. Sci. B 2013, 52, 545–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shiohara, A.; Prieto-Simon, B.; Voelcker, N.H. Porous polymeric membranes: Fabrication techniques and biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 2129–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zweigart, C.; Boschetti-de-Fierro, A.; Hulko, M.; Nilsson, L.G.; Beck, W.; Storr, M.; Krause, B. Medium Cut-Off Membranes -Closer to the Natural Kidney Removal Function. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 2017, 40, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Filimon, A.; Stoica, I.; Onofrei, M.D.; Bargan, A.; Dunca, S. Quaternized polysulfones-based blends: Surface properties and performance in life quality and environmental applications. Polym. Test. 2018, 71, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qi, X.; Yanga, N.; Luo, Y.; Jia, X.; Zhao, J.; Xia, F.; Li, C.; Zhao, Y. Resveratrol as a plant type antioxidant modifier for polysulfone membranes to improve hemodialysis-induced oxidative stress. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 123, 111953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhong, D.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y. Additive-free preparation of hemodialysis membranes from block copolymers of polysulfone and polyethylene glycol. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 618, 118690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Amri, C.; Mudasir, M.; Siswanta, D.; Roto, R. In Vitro hemocompatibility of PVA-alginate ester as a candidate for hemodialysis membrane. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 82, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Azhar, O.; Jahan, Z.; Sher, F.; Niazi, M.B.K.; Kakar, S.J.; Shahid, M. Cellulose acetate-polyvinyl alcohol blend hemodialysis membranes integrated with dialysis performance and high biocompatibility. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 126, 112127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tolba, E.; Abd-Elhady, B.M.; Elkholy, B.; Elkady, H.; Eltonsi, M. Biomimetic synthesis of guided-tissue regeneration hydroxyapatite/polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposite scaffolds: Influence of alginate on mechanical and biological properties. J. Am. Sci. 2010, 6, 239–249. [Google Scholar]
  26. Arahman, N.; Rosnelly, C.M.; Yusni, Y.; Fahrina, A.; Silmina, S.; Ambarita, A.C.; Bilad, M.R.; Gunawan, P.; Rajabzadeh, S.; Takagi, R.; et al. Ultrafiltration of α-Lactalbumin Protein: Acquaintance of the Filtration Performance by Membrane Structure and Surface Alteration. Polymers 2021, 13, 3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ates, M.; Eker, A.A.; Eker, B. Carbon nanotube-based nanocomposites and their applications. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2017, 31, 1977–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Salehi, E.; Heidary, F.; Daraei, P.; Keyhani, M.; Behjomanesh, M. Carbon nanostructures for advanced nanocomposite mixed matrix membranes: A comprehensive overview. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2019, 36, 723–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pacheco, M.J.; Vences, L.J.; Moreno, H.; Pacheco, J.O.; Valdivia, R.; Hernández, C. Hernández Review: Mixed-Matrix Membranes with CNT for CO2 Separation Processes. Membranes 2021, 11, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mazloum-Ardakani, M.; Tavakolian-Ardakani, Z.; Sahraei, N.; Moshtaghioun, S.M. Fabrication of an ultrasensitive and selective electrochemical aptasensor to detect carcinoembryonic antigen by using a new nanocomposite. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 129, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hao, L.; Li, S.S.; Wang, J.; Tan, Y.; Bai, L.; Liu, A. MnO2/multi-walled carbon nanotubes based nanocomposite with enhanced electrocatalytic activity for sensitive amperometric glucose biosensing. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 878, 114602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tiwaree, M.; Seal, P.; Borah, J.P.; Paul, N. Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes and its Nanocomposites for Hyperthermia studies. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Y.; Li, Q.-q.; Zhang, H.; Yu, S.-P.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.-Z. Research progress on the use of micro/nano carbon materials for antibacterial dressings. New Carbon. Mater. 2020, 35, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sanchez, A.G.; Prokhorov, E.; Luna-Barcenas, G.; Hernández-Vargas, J.; Román-Doval, R.; Mendoza, S.; Rojas-Chávez, H. Chitosan-hydroxyapatite-MWCNTs nanocomposite patch for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 28, 102615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Matin, A.A.; Biparva, P.; Gheshlaghi, M.; Khosrowshahi, E.M.; Farhadi, K. Monolithic mixed matrix membrane based on polyethersulfone/functionalized MWCNTs nanocomposite as an SPME fiber: Application to extract chlorophenols from human urine and serum samples followed by GC-ECD. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2020, 1150, 122190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Marand, E. Method for Making Oriented Carbon Nanotube/Polymer Nano-Composite Membranes. US Patent WO2008028155a2, 6 March 2008. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pilehvar, S.; Rather, J.A.; Dardenne, F.; Robbens, J.; Blust, R.; de Wael, K. Carbon nanotubes based electrochemical aptasensing platform for the detection of hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyl in human blood serum. Biosens. Bioelectron 2014, 54, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abuilaiwi, F.A.; Laoui, T.; Al-Harthi, M.; Atieh, M.A. Modification and functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) via fischer esterification. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2010, 35, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  39. Khan, F.S.A.; Mubarak, N.M.; Khalid, M.; Walvekar, R.; Abdullah, E.C.; Ahmad, A.; Karri, R.R.; Pakalapati, H. Functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes and hydroxyapatite nanorods reinforced with polypropylene for biomedical application. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Anzar, N.; Hasan, R.; Tyagi, M.; Yadav, N.; Narang, J. Carbon nanotube—A review on Synthesis, Properties and plethora of applications in the field of biomedical science. Sens. Int. 2020, 1, 100003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gholami, S.; Llacuna, J.L.; Vatanpour, V.; Dehqan, A.; Paziresh, S.; Cortina, J.L. Impact of a new functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on antifouling and permeability of PVDF nanocomposite membranes for dye wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 2022, 294, 133699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yeh, Y.-T.; Lin, Z.; Zheng, S.-Y.; Terrones, M. A carbon nanotube integrated microfluidic device for blood plasma extraction. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. García-Carmona, L.; Moreno-Guzmán, M.; Sierra, T.; González, M.C.; Escarpa, A. Filtered carbon nanotubes-based electrodes for rapid sensing and monitoring of L-tyrosine in plasma and whole blood samples. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 259, 762–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zheng, D.; Vashist, S.K.; Dykas, M.M.; Saha, S.; Al-Rubeaan, K.; Lam, E.; Luong, J.H.T.; Fwu-Shan, S. Graphene versus Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Electrochemical Glucose Biosensing. Materials 2013, 6, 1011–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kim, J.S.; Song, K.S.; Yu, I.J. Multiwall Carbon Nanotube-Induced DNA Damage and Cytotoxicity in Male Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes. Int. J. Toxicol. 2016, 35, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zheng, W.; McKinney, W.; Kashon, M.L.; Pan, D.; Castranova, V.; Kan, H. The effects of inhaled multi-walled carbon nanotubes on blood pressure and cardiac function. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Shityakov, S.; Salvador, E.; Pastorin, G.; Förster, C. Blood–brain barrier transport studies, aggregation, and molecular dynamics simulation of multiwalled carbon nanotube functionalized with fluorescein isothiocyanate. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 1703–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ju, J.; Liang, F.; Zhang, X.; Sun, R.; Pan, X.; Guan, X.; Cui, G.; He, X.; Li, M. Advancement in separation materials for blood purification therapy. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 27, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Choi, E.Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, C.K. Fabrication and properties of polycarbonate composites with polycarbonate grafted multi-walled carbon nanotubes by reactive extrusion. Polymer 2015, 60, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gaina, C.; Gaina, V.; Ionita, D. Chemical modification of chloromethylated polysulfone via click reactions. Polym. Int. 2011, 60, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Popa, A.; Avram, E.; Cozan, V.; Pascariu, A.; Parvulescu, V. Aminophosphonate polymer-silica obtained by “one pot” of polysulphone functionalized with aldehyde. Mater. Plast. 2007, 44, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fowkes, F.M. Additivity of Intermolecular Forces at Interfaces. I. Determination of the Contribution to Surface and Interfacial Tensions of Dispersion Forces in Various Liquids. J. Phys. Chem. 1963, 67, 2538–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P.H.; Teller, E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chhatri, A.; Bajpai, A.K.; Shandhu, S.S.; Jain, N.; Biswas, J. Cryogenic fabrication of savlon loaded macroporous blends of alginate and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Swelling, deswelling and antibacterial behaviors. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rata, D.M.; Cadinoiu, A.N.; Atanase, L.I.; Bacaita, S.E.; Mihalache, C.; Daraba, O.M.; Gherghel, D.; Popa, M. “In vitro” behaviour of aptamer-functionalized polymeric nanocapsules loaded with 5-fluorouracil for targeted therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, C103, 109828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kamoun, E.A.; Kenawy, E.R.S.; Tamer, T.M.; El-Meligy, M.A.; MohyEldin, M.S. Poly (vinyl alcohol)-alginate physically crosslinked hydrogel membranes for wound dressing applications: Characterization and bio-evaluation. Arab. J. Chem. 2015, 8, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Blout, E.R.; Karplus, R. The Infrared Spectrum of Polyvinyl Alcohol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 862–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Socrates, G. Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies, 3rd ed.; Formerly of Brunel; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA; University of West London: Middlesex, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tretinnikov, O.N.; Zagorskaya, S.A. Determination of the degree of crystallinity of poly(vinyl alcohol) by FTIR spectroscopy. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2012, 79, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wei, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, S. A novel method of surface modification to polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane by preadsorption of citric acid or sodium bisulfate. Membr. Water. Treat. 2012, 3, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Takeda, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Hayasaka, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Surface OH group governing wettability of commercial glasses. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 1999, 249, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nakamura, S.; Tsuji, Y.; Yoshizawa, K. Role of Hydrogen-Bonding and OH−π Interactions in the Adhesion of Epoxy Resin on Hydrophilic Surfaces. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 26211–26219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, M.; Meng, L.; Ma, L.; Yang, X.; Huang, Y.; Ryu, J.E.; Shankar, A.; Li, T.; Yan, C.; Guo, Z. Layer-by-layer grafting CNTs onto carbon fibers surface for enhancing the interfacial properties of epoxy resin composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 154, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Narayanan, K.B.; Park, G.T.; Han, S.S. Electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol)/reduced graphene oxide nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Colloids Surf. B 2020, 191, 110994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Díez-Pascual, A.M. Chemical Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes with Polymers: A Brief Overview. Macromol 2021, 1, 64–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Eskandari, P.; Abousalman-Rezvani, Z.; Roghani-Mamaqani, H.; Salami-Kalajahi, M. Polymer-functionalization of carbon nanotube by in situ conventional and controlled radical polymerizations. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2021, 294, 102471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Khan, M.Q.; Kharaghani, D.; Nishat, N.; Sanaullah; Shahzad, A.; Hussain, T.; Kim, K.O.; Kim, I.S. The fabrications and characterizations of antibacterial PVA/Cu nanofibers composite membranes by synthesis of Cu nanoparticles from solution reduction, nanofibers reduction and immersion methods. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 075051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bergaoui, M.; Nakhli, A.; Benguerba, Y.; Khalfaoui, M.; Erto, A.; Soetaredjo, F.E. Novel Insights into the Adsorption Mechanism of Methylene Blue onto Organo-Bentonite: Adsorption Isotherms Modeling and Molecular Simulation. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 272, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sing, K.S.W. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1982, 54, 2201–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Donohue, M.D.; Aranovich, G.L. Classification of Gibbs adsorption isotherms. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 1998, 77, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cychosz, K.A.; Thommes, M. Progress in the Physisorption Characterization of Nanoporous Gas Storage Materials. Res. Green Ind. Processes Rev. 2018, 4, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sangwichien, C.; Aranovich, G.L.; Donohue, M.D. Density functional theory predictions of adsorption isotherms with hysteresis loops. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. 2002, 206, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zdravkov, B.D.; Čermák, J.J.; Šefara, M.; Janků, J. Pore classification in the characterization of porous materials: A perspective. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2007, 5, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Inagaki, S.; Fukushima, Y.; Kuroda, K. Adsorption Isotherm of Water Vapor and Its Large Hysteresis on Highly Ordered Mesoporous Silica. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 1996, 180, 623–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Berezkina, Y.F.; Dubinin, M.M.; Sarakhov, A.I. Adsorption of vapors on model nonporous adsorbents with a physically modified surface, IV. Low-temperature adsorption of argon vapors on graphitized carbon black with preadsorbed water or methanol. Izv.AkadNauk SSSR SerKhim 1969, 18, 2653–2661. [Google Scholar]
  77. Bradley, R.H.; Andreu, A.; Cassity, K.; Osbeck, S.; Andrews, R.; Johnston, M.M.C. Dependence of Water Vapour Adsorption on the Polarity of the Graphene Surfaces of Multi-wall Carbon Nanotubes. Adsorp. Sci. Technol. 2010, 28, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ahamed, M.A.A.; Perera, M.S.A.; Matthai, S.K.; Ranjith, P.G.; Li, D.Y. Coal composition and structural variation with rank and its influence on the coal-moisture interactions under coal seam temperature conditions—A review article. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 180, 901–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Calixte, E.I.; Samoylova, O.N.; Shuford, K.L. Confinement and surface effects of aqueous solutions within charged carbon nanotubes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 12204–12212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Vainrot, N.; Li, M.; Isloor, A.M.; Eisen, M.S. New Preparation Methods for Pore Formation on Polysulfone Membranes. Membranes 2021, 11, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mangukiya, S.; Prajapati, S.; Kumar, S.; Aswal, V.K.; Murthy, C.N. Polysulfone-based composite membranes with functionalized carbon nanotubes show controlled porosity and enhanced electrical conductivity, Applied Polymer Science. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rubel, R.I.; Ali, H.; Jafor, A.; Alam, M. Carbon nanotubes agglomeration in reinforced composites: A review. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2019, 6, 756–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, Z.; Xu, L.; Qi, C.; Zhao, C. Fabrication of MWCNTs-polysulfone composite membranes and its application in the removal of bisphenol A. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 065101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of synthetic pathways for preparation of mPSF polymer.
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of synthetic pathways for preparation of mPSF polymer.
Nanomaterials 12 01502 sch001
Figure 1. Structure of mPSF/mMWCNTs composite.
Figure 1. Structure of mPSF/mMWCNTs composite.
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g001
Figure 2. The ATR-IR spectra of PVA, APSF, and mPSF matrices in the 4000–2000 cm 1 (a) and 1800–500 cm−1 (b) spectral ranges.
Figure 2. The ATR-IR spectra of PVA, APSF, and mPSF matrices in the 4000–2000 cm 1 (a) and 1800–500 cm−1 (b) spectral ranges.
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g002
Figure 3. ATR–FTIR spectra of the PVA/mMWCNTs composite system in the O-H spectral region (a), 1800–1500 cm−1 (b), 1600–1200 cm−1 (c), and 1200–600 cm−1 (d) spectral range.
Figure 3. ATR–FTIR spectra of the PVA/mMWCNTs composite system in the O-H spectral region (a), 1800–1500 cm−1 (b), 1600–1200 cm−1 (c), and 1200–600 cm−1 (d) spectral range.
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g003
Figure 4. ATR–FTIR spectra of mPSF and mPSF–based composite system in the 4000–2000 cm−1 (a), 1800–1500 cm−1 (b), 1600–1200 cm−1 (c), and 1200–600 cm−1 (d) spectral ranges.
Figure 4. ATR–FTIR spectra of mPSF and mPSF–based composite system in the 4000–2000 cm−1 (a), 1800–1500 cm−1 (b), 1600–1200 cm−1 (c), and 1200–600 cm−1 (d) spectral ranges.
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g004
Figure 5. The subtracted IR spectra of PVA and PVA/mMWCNTs composites (a) and mPSF and mPSF/mMWCNTs composites (b).
Figure 5. The subtracted IR spectra of PVA and PVA/mMWCNTs composites (a) and mPSF and mPSF/mMWCNTs composites (b).
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g005
Figure 6. Sorption isotherms for PVA, mPSF, and their composites, PVA/mMWCNTs and mPSF/mMWCNTs.
Figure 6. Sorption isotherms for PVA, mPSF, and their composites, PVA/mMWCNTs and mPSF/mMWCNTs.
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g006
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image ofPVA/mMWCNTs composite system nanocomposites containing different filler amount of mMWCNTs: (a) 0.5 wt%, (b) 1 wt%, (c) 2.5 wt%, and (d) 5 wt%.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image ofPVA/mMWCNTs composite system nanocomposites containing different filler amount of mMWCNTs: (a) 0.5 wt%, (b) 1 wt%, (c) 2.5 wt%, and (d) 5 wt%.
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g007
Figure 8. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image ofmPSF/mMWCNTs composite system nanocomposite containing different filler amount of mMWCNTs: (a) 0.5 wt%, (b) 1 wt%, (c) 2.5 wt%, and (d) 5 wt%.
Figure 8. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image ofmPSF/mMWCNTs composite system nanocomposite containing different filler amount of mMWCNTs: (a) 0.5 wt%, (b) 1 wt%, (c) 2.5 wt%, and (d) 5 wt%.
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g008
Figure 9. Hemolysis results for samples based on mPSF (a) and PVA (b).
Figure 9. Hemolysis results for samples based on mPSF (a) and PVA (b).
Nanomaterials 12 01502 g009
Table 1. Assignments of the IR characteristicbands of thePVA, APSF, mPSF, PVA/mMWCNTs, and mPSF/mMWCNTs composites.
Table 1. Assignments of the IR characteristicbands of thePVA, APSF, mPSF, PVA/mMWCNTs, and mPSF/mMWCNTs composites.
AssignmentPVAAPSFmPSFPVA/mMWCNTsmPSF/mMWCNTs
0.5%1%2.5%5%0.5%1%2.5%5%
υ(O–H)3350-334033203320332033203340334033403340
δ(O–H) + (C-O-H)bending1668
1490
1330
-1663
1490
1330
1506
1435
1305
1506
1435
1305
1506
1435
1305
1506
1435
1305
1506
1429
1298
1506
1429
1298
1506
1429
1298
1506
1429
1298
δ(O–H)out-of-plane654-654660660660660687687687687
υ(C–H)aliphatic2920
2856
2920
2875
2920
2856
2924
2850
2924
2850
2924
2850
2924
2850
2924
2858
2924
2858
2924
2858
2924
2858
υ(C–H)aromatic-3100
3070
3030
3100
3070
3030
----3100
3070
3030
3100
3070
3030
3100
3070
3030
3100
3070
3030
δ(C–H)142714301427
1106
14291429142914291430143014301430
(C–H)scissoring14401440144014351435143514351487148714871487
(C–H)twisting1300130013001298
830
1305
830
1305
830
1305
830
1300
837
1300
837
1300
837
1300
837
(C–H)rocking12371237123712471247124712471240124012401240
υ(C=O)acetate1733
1670
17301724
1670
1713
1657
1713
1657
1713
1657
1713
1657
1729
1713
1729
1713
1729
1713
1729
1713
υ(C=O)aldehyde-16961693
1663
----1654165416541654
υ(C-O)10591148
1106
1190
1148
1092
1140
984
1092
1140
984
1092
1140
984
1092
1140
984
1096
1032
1012
1096
1032
1012
1096
1032
1012
1096
1032
1012
υ(C-C-O)829-829913913913913834834834834
υ(C=C)-1650–14271650–1427----1654–14071654–14071654–14071654–1407
υ(C=C-CH-)
δ(C=C-CH-)in-plane
δ(C=C-CH-)out-of-plane
-1585
850–720
700–580
1585
850–720
700–580
----1586
800–700
700–580
1586
800–700
700–580
1586
800–700
700–580
1586
800–700
700–580
υasymmetric(SO2)-1383
1290
1383
1290
----1373
1298
1373
1298
1373
1298
1373
1298
υsymmetric(SO2) 1170
1148
1170
1148
----1170
1148
1170
1148
1170
1148
1170
1148
υ(C–S-)-726726--- 712712712712
Table 2. The measured values of contact angles (θ) for PVA, mPSF, and corresponding mMWCNTs composite systems.
Table 2. The measured values of contact angles (θ) for PVA, mPSF, and corresponding mMWCNTs composite systems.
MaterialsContact Angle Values (°)
WaterEthylene Glycol
PVA68 ± 0.2548 ± 0.54
mPSF95 ± 0.3067 ± 0.83
Filler amount (wt%)PVA/mMWCNTs composite system
0.566 ± 0.4734 ± 0.41
164 ± 0.9843 ± 0.70
2.558 ± 1.5340 ± 1.81
577 ± 0.4948 ± 0.77
Filler amount (wt%)mPSF/mMWCNTs composite system
0.562 ± 1.1236 ± 0.54
168 ± 0.6242 ± 0.65
2.580 ± 0.4353 ± 1.19
582 ± 0.7551 ± 0.89
Table 3. Surface free energy and their components (mN/m) of all pure materials and their corresponding composites withmMWCNTs.
Table 3. Surface free energy and their components (mN/m) of all pure materials and their corresponding composites withmMWCNTs.
Materials γ sv d γ sv p γ t γ s l S c
PVA14.120.7234.827.54−45.52
mPSF26.691.6328.3234.73−79.21
Filler amount (wt%)PVA/mMWCNTs composite system
0.524.8715.2940.1610.54−43.18
114.3223.6037.925.99−40.87
2.510.9631.7342.694.12−34.23
525.678.6034.2717.87−56.4
Filler amount (wt%)mPSF/mMWCNTs composite system
0.518.27622.07140.3476.13−38.583
119.8516.7536.69.34−45.54
2.523.3978.15131.5518.40−59.65
529.605.0634.6524.53−62.68
Table 4. The results of BET data for PVA, mPSF, and their corresponding composites.
Table 4. The results of BET data for PVA, mPSF, and their corresponding composites.
MaterialsW (%)rpm (nm)BET Data
Area (m2/g)Monolayer (g/g)
PVA30.40381.54394.9950.1125
mPSF16.36112.89113.1160.0322
Filler amount (wt%)PVA/mMWCNTsnanocomposite system
0.520.59261.92214.5100.0611
117.98272.38151.0990.04304
2.521.47672.70159.0450.0453
516.3232.61125.2220.0357
Filler amount (wt%)mPSF/mMWCNTsnanocomposite system
0.515.12892.49121.3510.0346
114.91122.47119.7690.0341
2.511.09951.70130.3970.0371
512.91382.09123.6600.0352
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nica, S.L.; Zaltariov, M.-F.; Pamfil, D.; Bargan, A.; Rusu, D.; Raţă, D.M.; Găină, C.; Atanase, L.I. MWCNTs Composites-Based on New Chemically Modified Polysulfone Matrix for Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091502

AMA Style

Nica SL, Zaltariov M-F, Pamfil D, Bargan A, Rusu D, Raţă DM, Găină C, Atanase LI. MWCNTs Composites-Based on New Chemically Modified Polysulfone Matrix for Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(9):1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091502

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nica, Simona Luminita, Mirela-Fernanda Zaltariov, Daniela Pamfil, Alexandra Bargan, Daniela Rusu, Delia Mihaela Raţă, Constantin Găină, and Leonard Ionut Atanase. 2022. "MWCNTs Composites-Based on New Chemically Modified Polysulfone Matrix for Biomedical Applications" Nanomaterials 12, no. 9: 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091502

APA Style

Nica, S. L., Zaltariov, M. -F., Pamfil, D., Bargan, A., Rusu, D., Raţă, D. M., Găină, C., & Atanase, L. I. (2022). MWCNTs Composites-Based on New Chemically Modified Polysulfone Matrix for Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials, 12(9), 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091502

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop