Next Article in Journal
Fabrication and Characterisation of Calcium Sulphate Hemihydrate Enhanced with Zn- or B-Doped Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles for Hard Tissue Restoration
Previous Article in Journal
Conductometric Gas Sensor Based on MoO3 Nanoribbon Modified with rGO Nanosheets for Ethylenediamine Detection at Room Temperature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 15
10.3390/nano13152221
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improving Photovoltaic Performance of Hybrid Organic-Inorganic MAGeI3 Perovskite Solar Cells via Numerical Optimization of Carrier Transport Materials (HTLs/ETLs)

by
Tariq AlZoubi
1,*,
Bachar Mourched
1,*,
Mahmoud Al Gharram
2,
Ghaseb Makhadmeh
3 and
Osama Abu Noqta
4
1
College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait
2
Department of Physics, School of Basic Sciences and Humanities, German Jordanian University, Amman 11180, Jordan
3
Bio-Medical Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
4
MEU Research Unit, Middle East University, Amman 11831, Jordan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(15), 2221; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152221
Submission received: 6 July 2023 / Revised: 25 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 31 July 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, a hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite solar cell (PSC) based on methylammonium germanium triiodide (MAGeI3), which is composed of methylammonium ( C H 3 N H 3 + ) cations and germanium triiodide ( G e I 3 − ) anions, has been numerically studied using SCAPS-1d codes. An extensive investigation of various electron transport layers (ETLs) and hole transport layers (HTLs) was conducted to identify the most optimal device configuration. The FTO/ZnOS/MAGeI3/PEDOT-WO3 structure performed the highest efficiency of all combinations tested, with an impressive optimized efficiency of 15.84%. This configuration exhibited a Voc of 1.38 V, Jsc of 13.79 mA/cm2, and FF of 82.58%. J-V characteristics and external quantum efficiency (EQE) measurements indicate that this device offers superior performance, as it has reduced current leakage, improved electron and hole extraction characteristics, and reduced trap-assisted interfacial recombination. Optimum device performance was achieved at active layer thickness of 560 nm. These findings may also serve as a basis for developing lightweight and ultra-thin solar cells, in addition to improving overall efficiency. Furthermore, a comprehensive correlation study was conducted to evaluate the optimum thickness and doping level for both ZnOS-ETL and PEDOT-WO3-HTL. The photovoltaic performance parameters of the FTO/ZnOS/MAGeI3/PEDOT-WO3 structure were analyzed over a wide temperature range (275 K to 450 K). The structure exhibited stable performance at elevated operating temperatures up to 385 K, with only minimal degradation in PCE of approximately 0.42%. Our study underscores the promise of utilizing cost-effective and long-term stability materials like ZnOS and PEDOT-WO3 alongside the toxic-free MAGeI3 perovskite. This combination exhibits significant potential for eco-friendly PSC, paving the way for the development of highly efficient ultra-thin PSC.

1. Introduction

Recent progress and development of hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites solar cells has made a significant contribution to the field of photovoltaics. Their efficiency has increased dramatically from 4% to 26% in a relatively short amount of time [1,2,3,4]. In comparison, other technologies, such as Si PV technology, have taken a significantly longer time to achieve the same level of improvement [4,5,6,7,8]. As a result of this rapid and significant development, hybrid perovskite solar cells are expected to have a profound impact on the future of solar energy. Hybrid lead-based perovskites are based on the MAPbX3 formula, where MA is an organic or inorganic cation and X is a halide. These compounds exhibit exceptional optoelectronic properties, such as high optical absorption coefficients, low trap density, and shallow defect states [9,10,11,12,13,14]. In addition, these materials are highly promising for the future advancement of photovoltaics and solar energy as they can be processed from solutions at or near room temperature, as opposed to silicon solar panels, which require significantly higher deposition temperatures [15]. Several potential alternatives to conventional perovskites have emerged in recent years, including CH3NH3PbCl3, because of its exceptional properties, including high UV and visible absorption, adjustable band gaps, and long electron-hole diffusion lengths [16]. Metal halide perovskites are ideal candidates for the next advancement in PV technology for their ability to be processed from solutions and their low cost. Their durability, however, is affected by environmental factors, such as heat, moisture, and oxygen, as well as the use of lead, which is toxic. There are, however, numerous researcher in the field of photovoltaic technology who have recommended Bi, Ge, Sb, In, Ag, Te, or Sn as potential replacement elements with similar chemical and physical properties to lead [17,18]. The toxic-free nature of Ge-based perovskite solar cells, such as CH3NH3GeI3, has recently made them prospective candidates for the active layer in current PV devices technology. Therefore, Germanium-based perovskites present a viable alternative to traditional lead-based solar cells. A hybrid organic–inorganic germanium perovskite, MAGeI3, is a perovskite with adjustable bandgap that is easily synthesized by solution processing [19]. Additionally, MAGeI3 has demonstrated superior optical and electronic properties, improved electron and hole behavior, and superior hole behavior compared to other perovskite materials [20,21]. A further advantage of Ge is its ability to maintain stability even at elevated temperatures up to 150 °C, making it an ideal choice for many PSC applications [12]. As a result of these properties, germanium-based perovskite solar cells may prove to be both more efficient and more environmentally friendly in the future. As a result of the use of methylammonium germanium iodine perovskites (CH3NH3GeI3) as an active layer, Deepthi et al. achieved a remarkable power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 12.98% [22,23]. The result was achieved by combining a variety of ETL and HTL materials, along with powerful modeling tools such as SCAPS 1D.
The use of numerical simulations and modeling is essential for the advancement and optimization of solar cell technology. Using simulations to predict solar cell performance has many benefits, including optimizing design, reducing experimentation requirements, and improving understanding of physical processes [24]. Additionally, simulations are useful tools for assessing materials parameters and the potential for new materials. The accuracy of a simulation depends on the calibration of physical model parameters. The Solar Cell Capacitance Simulator (SCAPS-1D) offers a unique advantage by providing simulations under both light and dark conditions based on solving the Poisson and continuity equations, incorporating recombination mechanisms, batch calculations, and defect-level analysis [25,26]. The key to enhancing the efficiency of PSC (Perovskite Solar Cell) devices lies in the careful and strategic selection of both the absorber and carrier transport layers, particularly the electron transport layer (ETL) and hole transport layer (HTL), along with their respective thicknesses. It is crucial to find the most optimal combination of ETLs and HTLs to achieve significant improvements in device efficiency. Thus, ETLs and HTLs should be combined optimally for device efficiency improvement [27]. This can be accomplished by taking into account several parameters, such as the type of organic–inorganic materials used, their thickness, optical and electrical parameters, and their interfacial properties. PV performance is dependent on the exact combination of material parameters for each device configuration. Therefore, the different combinations of materials should be tested thoroughly in accordance with the desired properties.
Hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite solar cells require Hole Transport Layers (HTLs) in order to move holes efficiently from the active layer to the electrodes. The performance of HTL materials, particularly their electrical conductivity and hole mobility, significantly impacts the overall efficiency of these solar cells. Extensive research has revealed that optimizing HTL can lead to substantial improvements in perovskite solar cell efficiency by minimizing charge recombination and enhancing charge collection [28]. In fact, specific materials have been identified to exhibit exceptional Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) when employed as HTL in perovskite solar cell devices. These findings highlight the crucial role of HTLs in advancing perovskite solar cells’ performance and underscore the importance of selecting suitable materials for this purpose. It has been reported that certain materials have demonstrated extraordinary PCE when used as the HTL in PSC devices [17,18]. Other studies achieved an extraordinary PCE using materials like D-PBTTT-14 and PEDOT: PSS as HTL in the PSC device. For instance, PEDOT-WO3 is a combination of conductive polymer Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) and transition metal oxide tungsten trioxide (WO3) that has been widely used as a hole transport layer in organic photovoltaic cells. Known for its high electrical conductivity, stability, and compatibility with various organic materials, PEDOT-WO3 can enhance the performance of organic cells by decreasing charge recombination, improving charge transport, and limiting charge trap formation [18,28,29]. As a result, PEDOT-WO3 has demonstrated potential as a high-performance HTL in OPV cells and is expected to continue gaining popularity among researchers as new candidate for optimizing its properties are developed.
Efficient functioning of a solar cell depends a lot on the ability of electron transport layer (ETL) material to collect and move electrons to the electrodes. To ensure optimum performance of the cell, it is important that the ETL material remains stable under diverse operating conditions, including but not limited to high temperature, humidity, and light exposure. It should have low recombination rates to minimize the loss of carriers and to improve the efficiency of the cell and must match the absorption spectrum of the solar cell to improve light absorption and higher efficiency. In summary, the ETL material plays a crucial role in the overall efficiency of a solar cell. For instance, in lead-based perovskite solar cells, TiO2 was employed as an ETL, leading to a PCE of 17.46%. Another study showed an improvement in PCE to 17.08% by using SnO2 as an ETL material. The use of TiO2 as an ETL is, however, limited due to its low carrier mobility, high deposition temperature, and negative effects on device stability under UV light [30,31,32]. Therefore, its choice has a significant impact on the performance of the cell. As a consequence of their high costs and chemical instability, it is evident there is a high demand for cost-effective and more stable alternatives to high-temperature processed ETLs and HTLs.
This study investigates the impact of different transport layers, particularly PEDOT-WO3, on lead-free MAGeI3-based PSC devices under solar illumination at AM1.5. Our study focused on investigating a lead-free MAGeI3 perovskite solar cell (PSC) device structure, with the primary objective of identifying the ideal combination of carrier transport materials. We specifically explored various configurations of ETLs and HTLs, focusing on a hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite solar cell as the active material. PEDOT-WO3 demonstrates good stability and compatibility with the perovskite layer, enabling long-term device operation and enhanced device durability. It has high stability against moisture, low material cost, which can be deposited at low temperature [11,33,34]. Additionally, the absorber thickness of MAGeI3 is optimized to attain maximum efficiency in the proposed PSC device structure. The improvement of photovoltaic parameters in lead-free PSC devices is a sign of effective carrier transport layers with a noticeable EQE parameter for the simulated PSC. The structure of the paper is outlined as follows: the simulation parameters for PSC device structures are presented in Section 2, while the mathematical modeling and its results are discussed in Section 3.

2. Device Structure and Simulation Methodology

This study was conducted using the SCAPS-1D software package developed by researchers at the Department of Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS) at the University of Gent in Belgium [25]. Solar cells characterized by perovskites, CZTS, Si, CdTe, and CIGS have been successfully simulated with SCAPS-1D to determine their electrical and optical characteristics, performance, and spectral response. In fact, one of the major advantages of SCAPS is that the simulation results are in good agreement with the results of the corresponding experiments, such as those for perovskite, CZTS, Si, CdTe, and CIGS solar cells [34,35,36,37,38]. In this advanced numerical simulation tool, Poisson’s equation and the continuity equation are effectively solved, which allows us to accurately simulate the behavior of free electrons and holes in the conduction and valence bands. As part of its capabilities, it is possible to compute and observe various electrical properties and parameters crucial to the evaluation of solar cell performance, such as the current density–voltage curve (J-V curve), the energy band structure of the heterojunction, quantum efficiency (QE), open circuit voltages (Voc), short circuit currents (JSC), current density, power conversion efficiency (PCE), and fill factor (FF), among others. All simulated PSC structures were subjected to standard test conditions (STC), including a temperature of 300 K, an intensity of 1000 W/m2, and an air mass of AM1.5 G. The absorber layer (active layer MAGeI3) was positioned between the hole transport layer (HTL) and electron transport layer (ETL), enabling efficient energy conversion as shown in Figure 1.
The main objective of this study is to determine the optimal performance of a lead-free PSC using MAGeI3 as the active layer by employing an n-i-p structure and a variety of ETLs and HTLs. Based on SCAPS-1D algorithms and codes, the photovoltaic performance parameters of the lead-free MAGeI3 PSC were evaluated. As part of the evaluation process, the ETL and HTL materials were changed at different absorber thicknesses, bias voltages, and doping concentrations. As a result of this simulation study, a lead-free MAGeI3 PSC was designed and optimized using the parameters determined during the simulation study. For the reference model (FTO/TiO2/MAGeI3/PEDOT-WO3), the absorber layer thickness was initially set at 400 nm (as shown in Figure 1).
As shown in Table 1, all the basic physical parameters that have been incorporated into the simulation study of the proposed structure of MAGeI3 have been presented [12,32,33,34,35]. PSC devices achieve optimum performance when the interfacial properties and contacts of the devices are of the highest quality. Table 2 summarizes the parameters used in the model to account for interface defects at perovskite HTL/ MAGeI3/ETL interfaces. This allows for an accurate simulation of the actual device behavior and thus allows for the optimization of device parameters. Moreover, the simulation also provides a better understanding of the underlying physical mechanism of charge transport and recombination, which is critical for the optimization of PV device performance.
Two primary numerical studies were executed to enhance the performance of the MAGeI3-based PSC structure. The first study involved testing and comparing three alternative Electron Transport Layer (ETL) materials with the initial reference structure’s TiO2 (Titanium Dioxide) ETL. The evaluated materials included Tin Dioxide (SnO2), PC61 Phenyl-C61-Butyric Acid Methyl Ester (PC61PM), and Zinc Oxide Sulfide (ZnOS). Table 3 provides a summary of the parameters associated with these three novel ETL materials utilized in this study. However, the second numerical study involved testing and comparing three Hole Transport Layer (HTL) materials: Nickel Oxide (NiO), Spiro-OMeTAD (Spiro-2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)9,9′-spirobifluorene), and PEDOT (Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)), with the HTL of the initial reference structure, PEDOT-WO3 (Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):tungsten trioxide). Table 4 provides a comprehensive list of parameters associated with these four HTL materials [16,28].
The primary objectives of these studies are to improve the power conversion efficiency (PCE), replace the toxic absorber MAPbI3 with lead-free absorber (MAGeI3), and enhance the overall stability of the device. The reference model in this study utilizes TiO2-ETL because it is the most commonly used ETL material in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) technology and has shown promising results in terms of PCE. For instance, Himaa et al. reported a notable advancement in solar cell technology through the integration of TiO2/Perovskites and spiro-OMeTAD layers in an organic and inorganic perovskite solar cell, revealing maximum power conversion efficiencies of 18.16% for CH3NH3PbI3 and 9.56% for CH3NH3SnI3 [39]. Metal oxides, including TiO2 and SnO2, have received significant attention as electron transport layers (ETLs) in high-performance PSCs. Among these, TiO2 stands out as the most frequently used ETL in PSCs. However, to achieve optimal crystallinity and conductivity, TiO2 must be annealed at high temperatures, typically at 450 °C [40,41]. Likewise, SnO2 also requires post-annealing at temperatures exceeding 180 °C [42]. This high annealing temperature step adds complexity and cost to the device manufacturing process.
In this work, extensive simulations and analyses have been conducted to address these challenges by modifying the properties of various layers of the ETL, including TiO2, SnO2, PC61PM, and ZnOS. The high demand for cost-effective and chemically stable alternatives to conventional high-temperature processed ETLs and HTLs is evident due to their high costs and inherent chemical instability. In this context, PEDOT/WO3 has recently emerged as a focus in many experimental studies due to its exceptional properties and excellent long-term stability, which have been observed to have a direct impact during the injection/ejection process of the charge carrier into PEDOT/WO3 stacked structures. The first successful use of WO3 as a hole transfer layer for organic solar cells (OSCs) was reported by Stubhan et al. in 2012 [43]. This finding revealed that WO3 could effectively replace PEDOT: PSS, a commonly used material for this purpose. The research was further enhanced in 2018 by Zheng et al., who reported the development of an organic solar cell based on a water-based emulsion of PEDOT: PSS combined with WO3. The device demonstrated enhanced performance and prolonged carrier lifetime, which makes it a valuable advancement in PCSs [39]. As a result, the open-circuit voltage was increased and power conversion efficiency was improved. The combination of WOx:PEDOT:PSS increased device stability and temperature operation as well. Therefore, PEDOT-WO3 HTL is an attractive option for efficient and stable PCSs due to its excellent transparency, superior electrical properties, and environmental stability. Overall, these studies collectively contribute to the advancement of perovskite solar cell technology by exploring novel ETLs and HTLs alternatives with improved efficiency, stability, and cost-effectiveness.

3. Results and Discussion

Charge transporting layers (CTLs) of perovskite solar cells, including ETLs and HTLs, are crucial to their performance. Indeed, CTLs facilitate the injection of electrons or holes into electrodes by efficiently extracting electrons or holes. Thus, it is imperative to carefully select ETL/HTL materials to obtain the best performance from PSC structures. CTLs should have superior electrical conductivity, high mobility, large band gap, and high thermal stability to ensure the overall PSC stability and high performance. They should also possess a low work function and suitable energy level for efficient charge transport. Moreover, CTLs should be compatible with perovskite materials to maximize device performance. The CTLs should also be capable of forming an interfacial layer with the perovskite as well as forming a homogeneous film with a minimum number of defects or traps. This can help to reduce charge recombination and increase the device lifetime and efficiency. Another important feature of CTLs is their ability to block oxygen and moisture, preventing degradation of the device and preserving its optimal performance. The perovskite HTL/MAGeI3/ETL interfaces offer several advantages. The improved charge transport properties of these devices result in a reduction of recombination losses and an improvement in efficiency. In addition, controlling these interfaces has demonstrated enhanced resistance to environmental factors, such as humidity, light exposure, and temperature fluctuations, resulting in longer device lifetimes [44]. Further, they are designed to achieve optimal energy level alignment, an important factor in determining charge extraction and injection efficiency. Considering these benefits, the perovskite HTL/MAGeI3/ETL interfaces are a promising configuration for advanced and efficient lead-free MAGeI3 PV devices. The energy level alignment between the absorber (perovskite) and the electron transport layer ETL materials is a key factor highlighted in numerous studies [45,46]. This alignment is quantified by the conducting band offset (CBO), which represents the difference in electron affinity between the ETL/absorber or absorber/HTL. Thus, precise engineering and control of the interface between the ETL/HTL layers and perovskite are crucial for addressing the CBO and achieving high-efficiency planar perovskite solar cells [46]. One of the major challenges in these solar cells is recombination loss occurring across the interfaces, particularly at the ETL/absorber interface, which can result in voltage reduction [47]. Tackling this issue is essential for further optimizing the performance of planar perovskite solar cells. In this section, we present a comprehensive modeling and analysis of the influence of HTL and ETL materials on the performance of MAGeI3-based perovskite solar cells. During this investigation, we aim to gain a better understanding of the relationship between these materials and the efficiency of solar cells.

3.1. Effect of ETL Materials on PSC Photovoltaics Performance Parameters

A total of four different ETL materials were examined and compared to the reference structure’s ETL (TiO2). Table 3 presents a comprehensive overview of the electrical properties associated with these ETL materials. Figure 2b illustrates the current–voltage (J-V) characteristics of the device with respect to the ETL materials used in the reference sample.
With a short-circuit current density of 11.2 mA/cm2 and a VOC of 1.42 V, the ZnOS ETL material emerged as the top performer with PCE of 13.7%. This outstanding performance can be attributed to ZnOS’s favorable conduction band offset (CBO), which makes it an ideal material for use as an ETL.
Figure 2b inset presents a histogram illustrating the maximum Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE), showcasing that the structure with ZnOS as the ETL material exhibited the highest PCE compared to the other ETL materials. It is, however, essential to consider the impact of the different band alignments observed for various ETL materials, as shown in Figure 2a. Due to these variations in band alignments, the interface quality changes and subsequently affects the density of trap defect states. The defect density at the ETL–perovskite interface is closely correlated with the energy level alignment, which is referred to as the conducting band offset (CBO). The CBO represents the difference in electron affinity between the absorber material (MAGeI3) and ETL material. In order to achieve high-efficiency planar PSCs, proper interface engineering and control are vital at the ETL/absorber junction. A negative CBO indicates the formation of a spike-like structure at the ETL/absorber layer interface. This spike acts as a barrier for photo-generated electrons, preventing them from reaching the ETL/absorber interface. As a result, this barrier enhances photogeneration of free charge carriers and suppresses recombination rates at the interface, thereby reducing the Voc as shown in Figure 2b. With this spike structure, solar cells exhibit greater power conversion efficiency, as demonstrated with ZnOS and TiO2 as ETL materials that have positive CBO values of −0.32 eV and −0.02 eV, respectively. The high PCE observed with ZnOS as the ETL is due to its strong band bending capability as well as its ability to create a good interface potential for charge carrier separation. In contrast, a positive CBO indicates that the ETL’s CBO level is lower than that of the perovskite, leading to the formation of an energy cliff at the ETL/perovskite interface. This negative CBO was observed for SnO2 and PC61PM ETLs with CBO values of 0.08 eV. As a result, ETLs with a smaller built-in potential barrier result in less band bending and increased interface recombination, leading to a significant decrease in PCE, as observed for SnO2 and PC61PM ETLs. Additionally, ZnOS exhibits the highest electron mobility among the ETL materials studied, enabling faster extraction of photo-generated charge carriers to both electrodes. According to Figure 2c, the EQE improved even further as a result of enhanced electron mobility. Therefore, by establishing selective electron contact with the perovskite layer, the ZnOS ETL enhances the efficiency of electron extraction from the perovskite active layer while blocking holes. The effective electron extraction reduces carrier recombination, enhances carrier separation, and ultimately improves the performance of the device. For an ideal ETL, it is necessary to select an n-type semiconductor that exhibits a wide bandgap energy and is transparent to visible light. It should also demonstrate higher carrier mobility and electrical conductivity to ensure effective electron transportation at the front contact of the device. Remarkably, these criteria align perfectly with the characteristics of the ZnOS ETL, as depicted in Figure 2 and Table 3. The relationship between incident light wavelength and external quantum efficiency (EQE) is shown in Figure 2c. Quantum efficiency refers to the percentage of carriers that are collected from incident photons of a particular wavelength or energy. Notably, an enhancement in EQE from 69% to 83% was observed specifically at a wavelength of 350 nm, precisely coinciding with ZnOS bandgap energy. Due to its higher transparency at 350 nm, ZnOS captures more light at this wavelength than other ETLs. Consequently, more carriers are created and collected in the external circuit, resulting in a significant increase in the overall EQE.
The optimal ZnOS thickness and carrier concentration were determined by conducting a comprehensive correlation study that examined the influence of ZnOS thickness and carrier concentration on device performance. The doping level of ZnOS-ETL was systematically tuned across a range of 1012 cm−3 to 1019 cm−3, while the thickness was varied from 10 nm to 150 nm as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3a–d illustrates the influence of ZnOS thickness (x-axis) and doping concentration (y-axis) on photovoltaic performance parameters. The findings demonstrate that increasing the thickness of the ZnOS-ETL from 0.01 to 0.12 μm results in an increase in Jsc, ranging from 13.05 to 14.18 mA/cm2. Additionally, Figure 4a highlights that reducing the ETL thickness from 150 nm to 120 nm while maintaining a high doping concentration of 1019 cm−3 leads to an improvement in PCE, rising from 13.7% (Figure 4a) to 15.7% (Figure 5a). With respect to carrier concentration, both Voc and FF exhibit a substantial increase of 0.2 V and 11%, respectively.
In Figure 3c, the results clearly illustrate that increasing the thickness of the ZnOS-ETL from 0.01 to 0.15 μm leads to a noticeable increase in Jsc, ranging from 13.05 to 14.29 mA/cm². Additionally, increasing the concentration of doping has proven to be beneficial, since it reduces ZnOS thickness while achieving an impressive PCE of approximately 15.7%, as shown in Figure 3a (the red zone color). It is likely that this enhancement is due to the significantly improved conductivity of the ETL, which resulted in a more efficient collection of charge carriers at the front electrode. As thickness is increased from 10 nm to 150 nm for a carrier concentration of 1019 cm−3, Voc and FF almost reach saturation, with average values of 1.386 V and 82.4% (Figure 3b,d). These results suggest that further increasing the thickness beyond 150 nm may not significantly impact Voc and FF. These findings indicate that the device thickness should be limited to 150 nm for maximum Voc and FF. The findings indicate that thinner ETLs can offer equivalent performance while minimizing the amount of ETL material required. As a result, this reduction in material usage can significantly lower fabrication costs, making it a cost-effective approach for enhancing photovoltaic device efficiency.
The study concludes with the following statement. An increased concentration of donor carriers in the ETL enhances the efficiency of the perovskite solar cell (PSC). As a result of enhancing the conductivity of the ETL by increasing the doping concentration in the ETL, electrons are able to flow more easily between the absorber layer and the front electrode of the device. A study conducted by Xu et al. revealed that deep energy levels are formed at heterojunction interfaces when doping concentrations in ETLs are high, thereby reducing recombination and improving the overall performance of solar cells [48].
This comprehensive study and analysis led to a successful optimization of the ZnOS-ETL thickness by maintaining a high doping level (1019 cm−3). By reducing the thickness from 150 nm to 120 nm, we were able to maintain the highest PCE. Consequently, 120 nm was identified to be the optimum thickness for ZnOS ETL, maximizing overall solar cell performance.

3.2. Effect of HTL Materials on PSC Photovoltaics Performance Parameters

In perovskite solar cells, HTLs play an essential role in optimizing performance. Their primary function is to efficiently extract and transport photogenerated holes from the perovskite material to the back electrode, thereby minimizing charge recombination [37,38]. Many key requirements must be met in order for a material to qualify as a successful hole transport material. To ensure efficient hole extraction, the HTL should exhibit a favorable energy level alignment with the perovskite material. Additionally, it should possess high hole mobility and excellent conductivity, enabling effective charge transportation. Moreover, the HTL should demonstrate superior photo and stability, ensuring long-term reliability. The low production costs of materials are another desirable characteristic, making them an attractive alternative. Several organic and inorganic materials have been investigated as potential hole transport materials for the MaGeI3 PSC structure. These include Nickel Oxide (NiO), Spiro-OMeTAD (Spiro-2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)9,9′-spirobifluorene), and PEDOT (Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)). In the initial reference structure, the HTL employed was PEDOT-WO3 (Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): tungsten trioxide). Table 4 presents a comprehensive list of all parameters associated with these four HTL materials, providing a detailed overview of their characteristics and properties. Organic materials are commonly used as HTLs. They are known for their limited stability. The instability arises from organic materials’ morphological changes when exposed to thermal conditions, resulting in property changes. A promising approach to addressing HTL instability involves substituting organic materials with hybrid organic–inorganic materials such as PEDOT-WO3. By achieving this transition, the stability issues associated with hybrid HTL can be effectively overcome, leading to improved performance and durability of PSC. A comparison of the current–voltage (J-V) characteristics of various HTL alternatives with respect to the HTL materials used in the reference sample is shown in Figure 4.
In Figure 4a, a comprehensive representation of all band alignments at the interface between the PSC and the hole transport layer (HTL) is displayed. Photogenerated carriers are trapped by incomplete bonds at the interface of a solar cell, resulting in interface recombination loss. Interface defects are produced by lattice mismatches, grain boundaries of varying sizes, and impurities injected at the interface. This happens when the absorber and HTLs form a junction. Using different HTLs for conduction/valance band alignments allows for more interface engineering. Recombination at the interface is caused by the large valance band offset (VBO) between the HTL and absorber layer. Trap states at device interfaces cause interface recombination, resulting in a lower open circuit voltage (Voc). Figure 4a illustrates two possible interfaces between the absorber and different HTLs.
A cliff-like interface is formed when the electron affinity of the absorber is lower than the electron affinity of the HTL (-VBO) for PEDOT and Spiro-OMeTAD. The opposite effect occurs when the absorber’s electron affinity exceeds the HTL, resulting in a spike-like interface with a positive valance band offset (+VBO) for PEDOT-WO3 and TiO2, with PCE 13.59% and 11.13%, respectively. As the VBO increases, the band structure of the valence band at the interface undergoes a transition from a cliff-like structure to a spike-like structure. In Figure 4b, for hole flow towards the back contact, as VBO increases for NiO HTL, the spike height increases, resulting in an elevated resistance and reduced current. This resistance contributes to a loss in the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the solar cell. Featuring a moderate spike height, low resistance, and high current and Voc, the interface between PSC/PEDOT-WO3 demonstrated the best alignment of bands, leading to extremely high performance. In Figure 4b, it is evident that the photogenerated current density for PEDOT-WO3 HTL is notably higher (approximately 11 mA/cm²) compared to NiO HTL (approximately 9 mA/cm²) with very close Voc values. As a result, the FF for PEDOT-WO3 is significantly higher, contributing to a much higher PCE (13.59%) compared to NiO HTL (11.13%). It is important to note that both FF and current density are indeed directly proportional, as confirmed by the calculated PCE values in the histograms in the inset of Figure 4b. The higher PCE of PEDOT-WO3 compared to NiO is a result of its improved FF and current density, as indicated in the histograms.
The PEDOT-WO3 HTL material demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving a high-power conversion efficiency of 13.59% along with a short-circuit current density of 11.3 mA/cm2 and a Voc of 1.41 V. This remarkable outcome can be attributed to multiple factors that contribute to improved performance. Firstly, there is a notable reduction in current leakage, which minimizes the loss of charge carriers. Additionally, there is an enhancement in hole extraction characteristics, facilitating more efficient transport of positive charges. Furthermore, there is a decrease in trap-assisted interfacial recombination, which typically hinders the overall performance.
Figure 4c shows that only when the light wavelength is below 350 nm do the four HTLs have identical quantum efficiency behavior. In the specific context of wavelengths around 688 nm in the visible light spectrum, it becomes evident that PEDOT and PEDOT-WO3, in comparison to other Hole Transport Layers (HTLs), showcase superior transparency, resulting in remarkably high quantum efficiency. This enhanced performance can be directly attributed to the specific bandgap energy of these materials. Indeed, both materials exhibit remarkably close bandgap energies. Specifically, PEDOT possesses an energy gap of 1.75 eV, while PEDOT-WO3 has a slightly higher energy gap of 1.8 eV. Consequently, the observed behavior of the two curves can be attributed to this shared characteristic of their bandgap energies. However, PEDOT-WO3 demonstrated enhanced absorption behavior at wavelengths below 680 nm compared with bare PEDOT, along with a slightly higher external quantum efficiency (EQE). Therefore, considering the observed superior absorption behavior and slightly higher EQE, the PSC structure was designed incorporating PEDOT-WO3 as the preferred choice for the HTL material.
Figure 5a–d illustrates the impact of PEDOT-WO3 thickness (x-axis) and doping concentration (y-axis) on the photovoltaic performance parameters. The results reveal that increasing the thickness of the Hole Transport Layer (HTL) from 20 nm to 80 nm leads to a decrease in Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) when the HTL doping level is below 1019 cm−3. Our goal was to maintain high doping levels of 1019 cm−3 while optimizing the PEDOT-WO3 hole transport layer thickness. However, surpassing this doping level by increasing the concentration of donor carriers results in further reduction of PEDOT-WO3 thickness, with values as low as 20 nm. Interestingly, the device’s power conversion efficiency was observed to vary almost independently of the HTL layer thickness at this doping level (Figure 5a). This allowed us to achieve an impressive PCE of 15.8% at very low thicknesses. An ultra-thin PEDOT-WO3 HTL of 1019 cm−3 was determined to be the best value for the PSC structure, while an ultra-thin PEDOT-WO3 HTL of 20 nm was more cost-effective. These findings offer valuable insights for improving both the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the photovoltaic device.

3.3. Impact of ETL and HTL Materials as a Function of Absorber Thickness

An examination of the impact of different ETLs and HTLs on PCE was performed in this numerical study. The primary parameters of the materials integrated and incorporated in this research are presented in Table 3 and Table 4. These tables provide a comprehensive overview of the crucial material characteristics that were analyzed in our investigation. This study is focusing on analyzing the performance of each ETL/HTL material in relation to the thickness of the absorber layer (MAGeI3), which ranges from 150 nm to 1000 nm, as shown in Figure 2.
The results of this study showed that the optimal thickness of the absorber layer is 560 nm. Furthermore, the results indicated that the choice of ETL and HTL materials can significantly affect the overall device performance. Interestingly, it was observed that the power conversion efficiency of the device exhibited an upward trend as the absorber layer thickness increased from 150 nm to 600 nm, regardless of the ETL and HTL materials utilized. This phenomenon can be attributed to the higher rate of photogenerated charge carriers, resulting from an increased light absorption within the thicker active layer. Above an absorber thickness of 600 nm, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the device exhibited saturation and a slight degradation. This can be attributed to an increased recombination rate between electrons and holes as the MAGeI3 layer becomes thicker, occurring just before the electrons and holes reach the front and back electrodes of the device.
Figure 6a depicts that the ZnOS ETL material achieves the highest PCE at 15.81% at absorber thickness of 560 nm. These results strongly indicate that this specific configuration, with optimized band alignments, effectively reduces both optical and electrical losses within the device during operation under standard test conditions, as discussed in Section 2. Figure 6b clearly demonstrates that the maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.81% is observed for the PEDOT-WO3 HTL material. This finding highlights the effectiveness of this material in reducing the rate of recombination at the back side of the photovoltaic (PV) device.

3.4. Impact of Temperature on FTO/ZnOS/MAGeI3/PEDOT-WO3/Ag Structure

This section explores the influence of operating temperature on the FTO/ZnOS/MAGeI3/PEDOT-WO3/Ag PSC structure within the temperature range of 275 K to 450 K. Figure 7a–d illustrates the effects of temperature on important photovoltaic performance parameters, including PCE, FF, Voc, and Jsc.
Figure 5a–d illustrates the impact of PEDOT-WO3 thickness (x-axis) and doping concentration (y-axis) on the photovoltaic performance parameters. The results reveal that increasing the thickness of the Hole Transport Layer (HTL) from 20 nm to 80 nm leads to a decrease in Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) when the HTL doping level is below 1018 cm−3. However, surpassing this doping level by increasing the concentration of donor carriers results in further reduction of PEDOT-WO3 thickness, with values as low as 20 nm. These particular thickness and doping concentration values are considered optimal for the utilized PEDOT-WO3 HTL in this study.
The device’s PCE exhibited a decrease of 0.7% throughout the entire temperature range, demonstrating its high stability even at elevated temperatures. Remarkably, the PCE of the device experienced only a slight decrease of 0.4% at a temperature as high as 372 K, as demonstrated in Figure 7a. In contrast, Figure 7b reveals a substantial decline in Voc, with a reduction of 0.8 V observed within the investigated temperature range. The reduction in open circuit voltage can be attributed to an increase in the reverse saturation current density (Jo). This increase is primarily caused by two factors: a decrease in the semiconductor bandgap and an increase in the intrinsic carrier concentration (ni). These combined effects lead to a decrease in the open circuit voltage observed in the study [49]. The decrease in Voc as temperature increases is supported by Equation (1), which establishes a relationship between Voc and the saturation current Io [50,51].
V o c = n   V T l n ⁡ i p + I 0 I 0
where the symbol i p represents the photocurrent, I 0 denotes the saturated current, and n is the intrinsic concentration. This phenomenon results in an increase in the dark current in the PSC device. Furthermore, the temperature rise affects the material conductivity, leading to degradation in the performance of the PSC solar cell. Therefore, as the temperature increases, the band gap of the material decreases, resulting in an accelerated recombination of electrons and holes between the conduction and valence bands. These findings agree with previously reported studies on solar cells’ temperature-dependent performance [36,37]. Figure 7c illustrates that as the temperature increased, there was a significant decrease in Voc, ranging from 1.49 V to 1.4 V. However, Jsc and FF showed minimal change and exhibited a more saturated behavior, with FF values between 78% and 79% (Figure 7b,c) and a constant current density of 13.986 mA/cm2. Interestingly, the overall conversion efficiency of the perovskite solar cell (PSC) demonstrated good stability even at higher operating temperatures.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study focused on investigating a lead-free MAGeI3 perovskite solar cell (PSC) device structure, with the primary objective of identifying the ideal combination of carrier transport materials. We specifically explored various configurations of ETLs and HTLs, focusing on a hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite solar cell as the active material. After evaluating different configurations, we found that the FTO/ZnOS/MAGeI3/PEDOT-WO3 configuration exhibited the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) and proved to be the most suitable option. This optimized structure significantly reduced current leakage, increased carrier mobility, and improved electron and hole extraction efficiency, while also minimizing trap-assisted interfacial recombination. Additionally, by optimizing the active layer thickness to 560 nm, we further enhanced the solar cell performance. This work represents a significant step forward in the development of efficient, more stable, and ultra-thin perovskite solar cells, paving the way for their potential implementation in practical applications.

Author Contributions

Investigation: T.A. and B.M.; Supervision: T.A.; Project administration: T.A.; Writing—review and editing: T.A., B.M., M.A.G., G.M., and O.A.N.; Writing—original draft: T.A. and B.M. Methodology: T.A., Formal analysis: T.A., B.M., M.A.G., G.M. and O.A.N.; Conceptualization and Software: T.A.; Data curation: T.A., B.M., M.A.G., G.M. and O.A.N.; Visualization: T.A.; Validation: T.A. and B.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the [American University of the Middle East (AUM), Kuwait].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, X.-M.; Chen, N.; Ye, D.-N.; Zhong, A.-G.; Liu, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, S.-Y. Structurally Complementary Star-Shaped Unfused Ring Electron Acceptors with Simultaneously Enhanced Device Parameters for Ternary Organic Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 2023, 7, 2300143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, N.; Zhao, X.; Guo, Y.; Cai, G.; Wang, R. Distribution Network Expansion Planning Considering a Distributed Hydrogen-Thermal Storage System Based on Photovoltaic Development of the Whole County of China. Energy 2023, 278, 127761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gu, Q.; Li, S.; Gong, W.; Ning, B.; Hu, C.; Liao, Z. L-SHADE with Parameter Decomposition for Photovoltaic Modules Parameter Identification under Different Temperature and Irradiance. Appl. Soft Comput. 2023, 143, 110386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, J.; Zhou, S.; Jin, S.; Li, H.; Zhai, T. Crystal Organometal Halide Perovskites with Promising Optoelectronic Applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, K. Silicon Electro-Optic Micro-Modulator Fabricated in Standard CMOS Technology as Components for All Silicon Monolithic Integrated Optoelectronic Systems*. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2021, 31, 054001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kadam, K.D.; Rehman, M.A.; Kim, H.; Rehman, S.; Khan, M.A.; Patil, H.; Aziz, J.; Park, S.; Abdul Basit, M.; Khan, K.; et al. Enhanced and Passivated Co-Doping Effect of Organic Molecule and Bromine on Graphene/HfO2/Silicon Metal–Insulator–Semiconductor (MIS) Schottky Junction Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 10509–10517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rehman, M.A.; Park, S.; Khan, M.F.; Bhopal, M.F.; Nazir, G.; Kim, M.; Farooq, A.; Ha, J.; Rehman, S.; Jun, S.C.; et al. Development of Directly Grown-Graphene–Silicon Schottky Barrier Solar Cell Using Co-Doping Technique. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 11510–11522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Umari, P.; Mosconi, E.; De Angelis, F. Relativistic GW Calculations on CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3SnI3 Perovskites for Solar Cell Applications. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yin, W.-J.; Yang, J.-H.; Kang, J.; Yan, Y.; Wei, S.-H. Halide Perovskite Materials for Solar Cells: A Theoretical Review. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8926–8942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moustafa, M.; Alzoubi, T. Numerical Study of CdTe Solar Cells with P-MoTe2 TMDC as an Interfacial Layer Using SCAPS. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2018, 32, 1850269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alzoubi, T.; Qutaish, H.; Al-Shawwa, E.; Hamzawy, S. Enhanced UV-Light Detection Based on ZnO Nanowires/Graphene Oxide Hybrid Using Cost-Effective Low Temperature Hydrothermal Process. Opt. Mater. 2018, 77, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Benyoucef, M.; Alzoubi, T.; Reithmaier, J.P.; Wu, M.; Trampert, A. Nanostructured Hybrid Material Based on Highly Mismatched III–V Nanocrystals Fully Embedded in Silicon. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 2014, 211, 817–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Benyoucef, M.; Usman, M.A.U.; Alzoubi, T.; Reithmaier, J.P. Pre-patterned Silicon Substrates for the Growth of III–V Nanostructures. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 2012, 209, 2402–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M.J.P.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L.M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Electron-Hole Diffusion Lengths Exceeding 1 Micrometer in an Organometal Trihalide Perovskite Absorber. Science 2013, 342, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Vizza, M.; Pappaianni, G.; Giurlani, W.; Stefani, A.; Giovanardi, R.; Innocenti, M.; Fontanesi, C. Electrodeposition of Cu on PEDOT for a Hybrid Solid-State Electronic Device. Surfaces 2021, 4, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jin, H.; Debroye, E.; Keshavarz, M.; Scheblykin, I.G.; Roeffaers, M.B.J.; Hofkens, J.; Steele, J.A. It’s a Trap! On the Nature of Localised States and Charge Trapping in Lead Halide Perovskites. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ohara, K.; Yamada, T.; Tahara, H.; Aharen, T.; Hirori, H.; Suzuura, H.; Kanemitsu, Y. Excitonic Enhancement of Optical Nonlinearities in Perovskite CH3NH3PbCl3 Single Crystals. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019, 3, 111601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Saparov, B.; Mitzi, D.B. Organic–Inorganic Perovskites: Structural Versatility for Functional Materials Design. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 4558–4596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stoumpos, C.C.; Frazer, L.; Clark, D.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Rhim, S.H.; Freeman, A.J.; Ketterson, J.B.; Jang, J.I.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Hybrid Germanium Iodide Perovskite Semiconductors: Active Lone Pairs, Structural Distortions, Direct and Indirect Energy Gaps, and Strong Nonlinear Optical Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6804–6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nogay, G.; Sahli, F.; Werner, J.; Monnard, R.; Boccard, M.; Despeisse, M.; Haug, F.-J.; Jeangros, Q.; Ingenito, A.; Ballif, C. 25.1%-Efficient Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cell Based on a p-Type Monocrystalline Textured Silicon Wafer and High-Temperature Passivating Contacts. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 844–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bhattarai, S.; Das, T.D. Optimization of Carrier Transport Materials for the Performance Enhancement of the MAGeI3 Based Perovskite Solar Cell. Sol. Energy 2021, 217, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jayan, K.D.; Sebastian, V. Comparative Study on the Performance of Different Lead-Based and Lead-Free Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Theory Simul. 2021, 4, 2100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Azri, F.; Meftah, A.; Sengouga, N.; Meftah, A. Electron and Hole Transport Layers Optimization by Numerical Simulation of a Perovskite Solar Cell. Sol. Energy 2019, 181, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Burgelman, M.; Decock, K.; Khelifi, S.; Abass, A. Advanced Electrical Simulation of Thin Film Solar Cells. Thin Solid Film. 2013, 535, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Burgelman, M.; Nollet, P.; Degrave, S. Modelling Polycrystalline Semiconductor Solar Cells. Thin Solid Film. 2000, 361–362, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, Z.; Manser, J.S.; Wan, Y.; Kamat, P.V.; Huang, L. Spatial and Temporal Imaging of Long-Range Charge Transport in Perovskite Thin Films by Ultrafast Microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Dulgerbaki, C.; Oksuz, A.U. Efficient Electrochromic Materials Based on PEDOT/WO3 Composites Synthesized in Ionic Liquid Media. Electroanalysis 2014, 26, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, R.; Mujahid, M.; Duan, Y.; Wang, Z.-K.; Xue, J.; Yang, Y. A Review of Perovskites Solar Cell Stability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1808843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alzoubi, T.; Moustafa, M. Simulation Analysis of Functional MoSe2 Layer for Ultra-Thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells Architecture. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 34, 2050065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, K.-B.; Kim, M.; Lee, H.-C.; Park, S.-W.; Jeon, C.-W. Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) Solar Cell Devices on Steel Substrates Coated with Thick SiO2-Based Insulating Material. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 85, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Leijtens, X. A Generic Approach to InP-Based Photonic ICs. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Photonics Conference, Bellevue, WA, USA, 8 September 2013; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  33. AlZoubi, T.; Moghrabi, A.; Moustafa, M.; Yasin, S. Efficiency Boost of CZTS Solar Cells Based on Double-Absorber Architecture: Device Modeling and Analysis. Sol. Energy 2021, 225, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moustafa, M.; AlZoubi, T.; Yasin, S.; Waar, Z.A.; Moghrabi, A. Towards High-Efficiency CZTSe Solar Cells through the Optimization of the p-MoSe2 Interfacial Layer; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 2022, p. 012022. [Google Scholar]
  35. Moustafa, M.O.; Alzoubi, T. Numerical Simulation of Single Junction InGaN Solar Cell by SCAPS. Key Eng. Mater. 2019, 821, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Moustafa, M.; Al Zoubi, T.; Yasin, S. Exploration of CZTS-Based Solar Using the ZrS2 as a Novel Buffer Layer by SCAPS Simulation. Opt. Mater. 2022, 124, 112001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. AlZoubi, T.; Al-Gharram, M.; Moustafa, M. Insights into the Impact of Defect States and Temperature on the Performance of Kesterite-Based Thin-Film Solar Cells. Optik 2022, 264, 169442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yasin, S.; Abu Waar, Z.; Al Zoubi, T. Development of High Efficiency CZTS Solar Cell through Buffer Layer Parameters Optimization Using SCAPS-1D. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 1825–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zheng, Z.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Xie, S.; Wang, R.; Qin, Y.; Li, W.; Hong, L.; et al. A Highly Efficient Non-Fullerene Organic Solar Cell with a Fill Factor over 0.80 Enabled by a Fine-Tuned Hole-Transporting Layer. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kim, H.-S.; Park, N.-G. Parameters Affecting I–V Hysteresis of CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells: Effects of Perovskite Crystal Size and Mesoporous TiO2 Layer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2927–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Seo, J.-Y.; Uchida, R.; Kim, H.-S.; Saygili, Y.; Luo, J.; Moore, C.; Kerrod, J.; Wagstaff, A.; Eklund, M.; McIntyre, R.; et al. Boosting the Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells with CsBr-Modified Mesoporous TiO2 Beads as Electron-Selective Contact. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ahn, N.; Son, D.-Y.; Jang, I.-H.; Kang, S.M.; Choi, M.; Park, N.-G. Highly Reproducible Perovskite Solar Cells with Average Efficiency of 18.3% and Best Efficiency of 19.7% Fabricated via Lewis Base Adduct of Lead(II) Iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8696–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stubhan, T.; Li, N.; Luechinger, N.A.; Halim, S.C.; Matt, G.J.; Brabec, C.J. High Fill Factor Polymer Solar Cells Incorporating a Low Temperature Solution Processed WO3 Hole Extraction Layer. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 1433–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ding, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Kitabatake, Y.; Hayase, S.; Toyoda, T.; Yoshino, K.; Minemoto, T.; Katayama, K.; Shen, Q. Effect of the Conduction Band Offset on Interfacial Recombination Behavior of the Planar Perovskite Solar Cells. Nano Energy 2018, 53, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Moiz, S.A. Optimization of Hole and Electron Transport Layer for Highly Efficient Lead-Free Cs2TiBr6-Based Perovskite Solar Cell. Photonics 2022, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tai, Q.; Guo, X.; Tang, G.; You, P.; Ng, T.-W.; Shen, D.; Cao, J.; Liu, C.-K.; Wang, N.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Antioxidant Grain Passivation for Air-Stable Tin-Based Perovskite Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 806–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qiu, X.; Cao, B.; Yuan, S.; Chen, X.; Qiu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Wang, H.; Zeng, H.; Liu, J.; et al. From Unstable CsSnI3 to Air-Stable Cs2SnI6: A Lead-Free Perovskite Solar Cell Light Absorber with Bandgap of 1.48eV and High Absorption Coefficient. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 159, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Xu, L.; Molaei Imenabadi, R.; Vandenberghe, W.G.; Hsu, J.W.P. Minimizing Performance Degradation Induced by Interfacial Recombination in Perovskite Solar Cells through Tailoring of the Transport Layer Electronic Properties. APL Mater. 2018, 6, 036104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mousavi-Kamazani, M.; Zarghami, Z.; Salavati-Niasari, M. Facile and Novel Chemical Synthesis, Characterization, and Formation Mechanism of Copper Sulfide (Cu2S, Cu2S/CuS, CuS) Nanostructures for Increasing the Efficiency of Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 2096–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Djinkwi Wanda, M.; Ouédraogo, S.; Tchoffo, F.; Zougmoré, F.; Ndjaka, J.M.B. Numerical Investigations and Analysis of Cu2ZnSnS4 Based Solar Cells by SCAPS-1D. Int. J. Photoenergy 2016, 2016, e2152018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Chaurasiya, R.; Gupta, G.K.; Dixit, A. Ultrathin Janus WSSe Buffer Layer for W(S/Se)2 Absorber Based Solar Cells: A Hybrid, DFT and Macroscopic, Simulation Studies. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 201, 110076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed lead-free PCS based on the FTO/TiO2/PEDOT-WO3/Ag structure. (a) Illustrates the layer scheme. (b) Depicts the band alignments. (c) Shows the variations in conduction and valence bands, along with the energy gap, as a function of position.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed lead-free PCS based on the FTO/TiO2/PEDOT-WO3/Ag structure. (a) Illustrates the layer scheme. (b) Depicts the band alignments. (c) Shows the variations in conduction and valence bands, along with the energy gap, as a function of position.
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g001
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g002 550
Figure 2. Impact of the ETL materials on PSC performance: (a) ETLs bands alignment with respect to absorber (MAGeI3) layer. (b) J-V characteristics; the histograms in the inset depict the maximum Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) of PSC as a function of ETL materials. (c) External Quantum efficiency (EQE) for the simulated devices with different ETL materials.
Figure 2. Impact of the ETL materials on PSC performance: (a) ETLs bands alignment with respect to absorber (MAGeI3) layer. (b) J-V characteristics; the histograms in the inset depict the maximum Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) of PSC as a function of ETL materials. (c) External Quantum efficiency (EQE) for the simulated devices with different ETL materials.
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g002
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g003 550
Figure 3. Impact of the ETL (ZNOS) thickness and carrier concentration on key photovoltaic parameters: (a) Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE). (b) Open-Circuit Voltage (Voc). (c) Short-Circuit Current Density (Jsc). (d) Fill Factor (FF).
Figure 3. Impact of the ETL (ZNOS) thickness and carrier concentration on key photovoltaic parameters: (a) Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE). (b) Open-Circuit Voltage (Voc). (c) Short-Circuit Current Density (Jsc). (d) Fill Factor (FF).
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g003
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g004 550
Figure 4. Impact of the HTL materials on PSC performance: (a) HTLs bands alignment with respect to absorber (MAGeI3) layer. (b) J-V characteristics; the histograms in the inset depict the maximum Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) of PSC as a function of HTL materials. (c) External Quantum efficiency (EQE) for the simulated devices with different HTL materials.
Figure 4. Impact of the HTL materials on PSC performance: (a) HTLs bands alignment with respect to absorber (MAGeI3) layer. (b) J-V characteristics; the histograms in the inset depict the maximum Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) of PSC as a function of HTL materials. (c) External Quantum efficiency (EQE) for the simulated devices with different HTL materials.
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g004
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g005 550
Figure 5. Impact of the HTL (PEDOT-WO3) thickness and carrier concentration on key photovoltaic parameters: (a) Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE). (b) Open-Circuit Voltage (Voc). (c) Short-Circuit Current Density (Jsc). (d) Fill Factor (FF).
Figure 5. Impact of the HTL (PEDOT-WO3) thickness and carrier concentration on key photovoltaic parameters: (a) Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE). (b) Open-Circuit Voltage (Voc). (c) Short-Circuit Current Density (Jsc). (d) Fill Factor (FF).
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g005
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g006 550
Figure 6. Displays the influence of active layer thickness (MAGeI3) ranging from 100 nm to 1000 nm on power conversion efficiency (PCE). The PCE is studied with respect to the device configuration: FTO/(120 nm) ETL/(100–1000 nm) MAGeI3 (absorber)/(20 nm) HTL. The impact of absorber thickness is investigated as a function of: (a) Variation in applied ETL materials. (b) Variation in applied HTL materials.
Figure 6. Displays the influence of active layer thickness (MAGeI3) ranging from 100 nm to 1000 nm on power conversion efficiency (PCE). The PCE is studied with respect to the device configuration: FTO/(120 nm) ETL/(100–1000 nm) MAGeI3 (absorber)/(20 nm) HTL. The impact of absorber thickness is investigated as a function of: (a) Variation in applied ETL materials. (b) Variation in applied HTL materials.
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g006
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g007 550
Figure 7. Variation of photovoltaic parameters with temperature in the range of (280 K to 450 K): (a) Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE). (b) Open-Circuit Voltage (Voc). (c) Short-Circuit Current Density (Jsc). (d) Fill Factor (FF).
Figure 7. Variation of photovoltaic parameters with temperature in the range of (280 K to 450 K): (a) Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE). (b) Open-Circuit Voltage (Voc). (c) Short-Circuit Current Density (Jsc). (d) Fill Factor (FF).
Nanomaterials 13 02221 g007
Table
Table 1. A list of all physical parameters applied in the simulated reference model at 300 K.
Table 1. A list of all physical parameters applied in the simulated reference model at 300 K.
ParametersETL
(TiO2)		Absorber (MAGeI3)HTL
(PEDOT-WO3)
Thickness (μm)0.025 *0.4 *0.15
Bandgap (eV)3.201.31.8
Electron affinity (eV)3.93.923.4
Dielectric permittivity101018
CB effective DOS (cm−3)2 × 10201 × 10162.2 × 1018
VB effective DOS (cm−3)1 × 10191.8 × 10161.8 × 1019
Electron mobility (cm2/V·s)20160.045
Hole mobility (cm2/V·s)10100.045
Donor density ND (cm−3)1 × 1019 *1 × 1014 *0
Acceptor density NA (cm−3)01 × 1014 *1.8 × 1019
Defect typeSANeutralNeutral
Energetic distributionSingleGaussianGaussian
Defect density (cm−3)1 × 10151 × 10141 × 1015
* Variable field.
Table
Table 2. Interface defect parameters utilized in the simulation.
Table 2. Interface defect parameters utilized in the simulation.
ParametersHTL/MAGeI3
Interface		MAGeI3/ETL
Interface
Defect typeNeutralSingle Acceptor (SA)
Capture cross section of electrons (cm2)1 × 10−181 × 10−18
Capture cross section of holes (cm2)1 × 10−181 × 10−17
Reference for the defect energy level EtAbove EvAbove Ev
Energy with respect to reference (eV)0.60.6
Total density (cm−2)1 × 10151 × 1014
Table
Table 3. A list of all physical parameters applied in the simulation for ETL materials at 300 K.
Table 3. A list of all physical parameters applied in the simulation for ETL materials at 300 K.
ParametersApplied ETLs
TiO2SnO2PC61PMZnOS
Thickness (μm)0.025 *0.025 *0.025 *0.025 *
Bandgap (eV)3.203.62.13.5
Electron affinity (eV)3.9443.6
Dielectric permittivity1010189
CB effective DOS (cm−3)2 × 10202.2× 10182.2× 10182.2× 1018
VB effective DOS (cm−3)1 × 10191.8 × 10191.8 × 10191.8 × 1019
Electron mobility (cm2/V-s)20800.002100
Hole mobility (cm2/V-s)10150.00225
Donor density ND (cm−3)1 × 1018 *1 × 10181 × 10181 × 1018 *
Acceptor density NA (cm−3)0000
Defect typeSANeutralNeutralNeutral
Energetic distributionSingleGaussianGaussianGaussian
Defect density (cm−3)1 × 10151 × 10151 × 10151 × 1015
* Variable field.
Table
Table 4. A list of all physical parameters applied in the simulation for HTL materials at 300 K.
Table 4. A list of all physical parameters applied in the simulation for HTL materials at 300 K.
ParametersApplied HTLs
NiOSpiro-OMeTADPEDOTPEDOT-WO3
Thickness (μm)0.150.150.150.15 *
Bandgap (eV)3.82.881.751.8
Electron affinity (eV)1.462.053.43.45
Dielectric permittivity10.73318
CB effective DOS (cm−3)2.8 × 10182.2 × 10182.2 × 10182.2 × 1018
VB effective DOS (cm−3)1 × 10191.8 × 10191.8 × 10191.8 × 1019
Electron mobility (cm2/V-s)122 × 10−40.0450.045
Hole mobility (cm2/V-s)2.82 × 10−40.0450.045
Donor density ND (cm−3)0000
Acceptor density NA (cm−3)1 × 10181 × 10191× 10181 × 1018 *
Defect typeNeutralNeutralNeutralNeutral
Energetic distributionGaussianGaussianGaussianGaussian
Defect density (cm−3)1 × 10151 × 10151 × 10151 × 1015
* Variable field.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

AlZoubi, T.; Mourched, B.; Al Gharram, M.; Makhadmeh, G.; Abu Noqta, O. Improving Photovoltaic Performance of Hybrid Organic-Inorganic MAGeI3 Perovskite Solar Cells via Numerical Optimization of Carrier Transport Materials (HTLs/ETLs). Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152221

AMA Style

AlZoubi T, Mourched B, Al Gharram M, Makhadmeh G, Abu Noqta O. Improving Photovoltaic Performance of Hybrid Organic-Inorganic MAGeI3 Perovskite Solar Cells via Numerical Optimization of Carrier Transport Materials (HTLs/ETLs). Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(15):2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152221

Chicago/Turabian Style

AlZoubi, Tariq, Bachar Mourched, Mahmoud Al Gharram, Ghaseb Makhadmeh, and Osama Abu Noqta. 2023. "Improving Photovoltaic Performance of Hybrid Organic-Inorganic MAGeI3 Perovskite Solar Cells via Numerical Optimization of Carrier Transport Materials (HTLs/ETLs)" Nanomaterials 13, no. 15: 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152221

APA Style

AlZoubi, T., Mourched, B., Al Gharram, M., Makhadmeh, G., & Abu Noqta, O. (2023). Improving Photovoltaic Performance of Hybrid Organic-Inorganic MAGeI3 Perovskite Solar Cells via Numerical Optimization of Carrier Transport Materials (HTLs/ETLs). Nanomaterials, 13(15), 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop