Next Article in Journal
New Perspectives for the Consolidation of Mural Paintings in Hypogea with an Innovative Aqueous Nanolime Dispersion, Characterized by Compatible, Sustainable, and Eco-Friendly Features
Next Article in Special Issue
New Insights into N-Doped Porous Carbons as Both Heterogeneous Catalysts and Catalyst Supports: Opportunities for the Catalytic Synthesis of Valuable Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Phonon Dominated Thermal Transport in Metallic Niobium Diselenide from First Principles Calculations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flexible and Lightweight Carbon Nanotube Composite Filter for Particulate Matter Air Filtration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Flexible and Stretchable Carbon-Based Sensors and Actuators for Soft Robots

1
School of Information Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
2
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Energy Efficient and Custom AI IC, Shanghai 201210, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(2), 316; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020316
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 8 January 2023 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Carbon-Based Nanocomposite and Applications)

Abstract

:
In recent years, the emergence of low-dimensional carbon-based materials, such as carbon dots, carbon nanotubes, and graphene, together with the advances in materials science, have greatly enriched the variety of flexible and stretchable electronic devices. Compared with conventional rigid devices, these soft robotic sensors and actuators exhibit remarkable advantages in terms of their biocompatibility, portability, power efficiency, and wearability, thus creating myriad possibilities of novel wearable and implantable tactile sensors, as well as micro-/nano-soft actuation systems. Interestingly, not only are carbon-based materials ideal constituents for photodetectors, gas, thermal, triboelectric sensors due to their geometry and extraordinary sensitivity to various external stimuli, but they also provide significantly more precise manipulation of the actuators than conventional centimeter-scale pneumatic and hydraulic robotic actuators, at a molecular level. In this review, we summarize recent progress on state-of-the-art flexible and stretchable carbon-based sensors and actuators that have creatively added to the development of biomedicine, nanoscience, materials science, as well as soft robotics. In the end, we propose the future potential of carbon-based materials for biomedical and soft robotic applications.

1. Introduction

Due to the superior softness and elasticity compared to conventional rigid silicon-based semiconductor devices, flexible and stretchable electronics have received great attention in the past few decades [1,2], especially in the community of electrical and computer engineering [3,4], materials science [5,6], chemistry [7,8], biology and biomedical engineering [9,10,11]. Devices manufactured from flexible materials or structures have the mechanical capability to intrinsically bend, twist, stretch, and compress while maintaining excellent electrical properties and working performance, which has greatly expanded the applications and opened up new opportunities for various novel electronic devices [12,13]. In particular, the rapid development of synthetic chemistry and materials science has led to a huge number of polymeric materials being devised and employed as substrates for fabricating flexible devices, such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) [14,15], polyimide (PI) [16,17], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [18,19], and hydrogel-based materials [20,21]. Additionally, the introduction of conducting polymer composites, such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), as well as other organic semiconducting materials, has impressively made possible intrinsically stretchable transistors and thus logic circuits [22,23,24,25]. In addition to the aspect of material selection, the structural optimization of devices, such as wavy [26,27], kirigami and origami structures [28,29], and mesh structure configuration [30,31], also greatly contribute to bulk material stretchability and sensitivity for flexible sensors by adding to the degrees of freedom of individual sensing units [32,33]. Since such electronic devices retain outstanding properties of flexibility, biocompatibility, stability, and robustness [34,35], they have extended to several application fields including wearable devices [36,37], soft robotics [38,39], and energy harvesting [40,41], where such devices make up for the defects of stiff electronic devices.
Carbon-based materials have gradually grown prominent in the field of study for their excellent biocompatibility, wearability, and conductivity while being integrated together with polymers or elastomers as composite substrates [42,43,44]. It has been shown at the beginning of this century that carbon nanotubes can be constituents for flexible transistors and electrodes owing to their outstanding properties in carrier mobility, electrical conductivity, surface area, and versatility [45,46]. Researchers have now expanded the scope of their study to various low-dimensional carbon nanomaterials and their derivatives, such as graphene, reduced-graphene oxide, and carbonized films [47,48]. Different types of carbon nanomaterials possess distinctively different mechanical and physical properties and are applied in diverse fields. Two of the most significant applications are sensors and actuators, which interestingly implement the conversion of electric signals and other forms of energy in opposite ways between the environment and the input/output units of the system. Flexible carbon-based electronic devices are considered to take advantage of both carbon materials and soft substrates so that they have innovative applications, such as flexible piezoresistive electronic skin [49], self-healing strain sensor for monitoring organism movement [50], and carbon-coated substrates for biomedical sensing and implant [51]. These applications pave the way for state-of-the-art flexible and stretchable wearable devices, as well as soft robotics.
In this review, we begin with an introduction of applying carbon-based materials to flexible and stretchable electronics in Section 1. Then in Section 2, the synthetic methods of three commonly used low-dimensional carbon materials, namely carbon dots, carbon nanotubes, and graphene, as well as the fabrication methods of merging them with polymers, are discussed in detail. We further summarize the recent progress of carbon-based flexible devices in terms of soft robotic sensors and actuators in Section 3 and Section 4, respectively. Representatives of sensing and actuating for different purposes are categorized and described so as to demonstrate the significance of employing carbon-based materials. Finally, in Section 5, we present the potential challenges of flexible and stretchable devices based on carbon nanomaterials and give an outlook of the potential future novel devices.

2. Materials Synthesis and Fabrication

During the discovery of materials for soft robotic devices, in addition to carbon nanomaterials, numerous low dimensional materials have been explored in depth, such as transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) [52], nanowires (NWs) [53], metal films [54], and colloidal quantum dots (QDs) [55]. TMDCs, as layered two-dimensional materials, have fascinating electronic and optical properties, rendering TMDCs especially popular in sensing applications. In particular, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2 are common TMDCs and were discovered to be well-suited for transistors, sensors, inverters, and photodetectors [56,57,58]. NWs used to be assembled in functional electronic devices, and now their benefits to flexible electronics have been revealed [59]. One of the most regularly used types is silver nanowire (AgNW) due to its high conductivity and transmittance as well as the stretchability acquired from its geometry and low dimensionality, resulting in its wide use in flexible electrodes, wearable strain and temperature sensors [60,61,62]. Other than that, flexible transparent electrodes can be conveniently and inexpensively fabricated with deposited metal films and stretchable substrates, provided that metallic thin films perform better than indium tin oxide (ITO) in cost and stability [63,64]. As colloidal QDs excel in electronic and optical properties, they are advisable for electronic and optoelectronic devices with low cost, large area and good flexibility [65,66].
However, among materials used in flexible devices, carbon-based materials are reported to have advantages in affordability, simplicity in fabrication and extraordinary functional performance. Their superiority makes them widely used for realizing flexibility and good performance simultaneously, with relatively low cost, non-toxicity, promising mechanical and electronic properties [67,68]. Carbon-based materials are derived from such a huge family that numbers of materials have been detected and synthesized on the basis of the element carbon, including various forms of carbon nanotubes [69], carbon onions [70], carbon nanohorns [71], graphene [72], and carbon dots [73], particularly since the first discovery of buckminsterfullerene in 1985 [74].
In this section, we introduce three major basic low dimensional carbon-based materials, namely zero-dimensional (0D) material carbon dots, one-dimensional (1D) material carbon nanotubes, and two-dimensional (2D) material graphene, as well as discussing the synthesis of each nanomaterial and the fabrication methods of integrating them with soft substrates. Since these three carbon-based materials share some common synthetic approaches, Table 1 is presented to compare the differences of several synthetic methods, where their advantages and drawbacks are listed.

2.1. Carbon Dots

Carbon dot is a 0D nanostructure with characteristic size lower than 10 nm [88], accidentally discovered by Xu et al. during the procedure of purifying single-walled carbon nanotubes in 2004 [73]. In contrast with some typical III-V or II-VI semiconductor quantum dots involving heavy metals, such as CdSe, carbon dots are greener and safer when in contact with biomass [89]. Therefore, carbon dots have engaged in a wide range of biological and biochemical applications in view of their excellent properties in aspects of toxicity, chemical inertness, and biocompatibility [90,91].
The fabrication techniques of carbon dots can be generally categorized into top-down and bottom-up approaches. In particular, top-down approaches reduce larger bulk materials to smaller sophisticated shapes and structures, including arc discharge, laser ablation, and electrochemical or chemical oxidation; in contrast, bottom-up approaches convert or assemble smaller building block structures into carbon dots, in which thermal, microwave-assisted, and template are instances of methods [77,92,93]. The schematic diagrams of some mentioned typical synthetic approaches are shown in Figure 1a–c.
Carbon nanotube-derived carbon dots were acquired through oxidizing arc-discharge soot early in 2004 [73], followed by laser ablation being proposed in 2006, where the carbon target was exposed in water vapor and the carrier gas was argon [95]. Subsequently, there appeared to be a breakthrough in bottom-up methods. Carbon dots were first obtained from combustion by Liu et al. in 2007, in which organic objects, such as ethanol and candle, were burned in the first place. Then the soot from burn was collected, and carbon dots could be generated though oxidation treatment [96,97]. Additionally, the diverse properties of carbon dots, in terms of emitting fluorescence and reaction to specific substances, can be decided by burning from different precursors [98,99,100].

2.2. Carbon Nanotubes

After the discovery of fullerene in 1985, this C60 species was expected to have high chemical and practical value [74]. In 1991, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), were discovered by Iijima, which are 1D carbon nanomaterials based on the fullerene structure [69,101]. CNTs can be made from rolling graphite sheets in a few different ways to realize the diverse atomic arrangement and size of the tube. Therefore, CNTs possess distinctive mechanical and electronic properties [102]. They can be classified into three types by the number of layers, which were named as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs), and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [103]. Additionally, according to the rolling orientation of CNTs, SWCNTs can be further categorized by chirality, namely zig-zag, chiral, and armchair form [104]. Considering their outstanding behavior in tensile strength, electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity resulted from the 1D structure and covalent bonding, devices containing CNTs are supposed to have favorable stretchability, durability and reaction speed [105,106].
Figure 1d,f show that CNTs share a few similar synthetic methods with carbon dots, such as arc discharge and laser ablation. In the arc discharge evaporation method, two graphite electrodes, both connected to the power supply, are placed in a reactor with helium. When the reactor is heated to 4000 K and the power is switched on, carbon starts to vaporize, producing CNTs as one of the products. It is measured to have a yield rate higher than 75% and produces CNTs with fewer structural defects [69]. In laser ablation, another commonly used approach first discovered in 1996, a transition metal doped graphite rod is vaporized in an oven at 1200 °C. Although this method only results in a 70% yield rate, which is slightly lower than that of the arc discharge method, it can produce SWCNTs with higher purity [107].
Apart from the plasma-based synthesis mentioned above, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) proved to be reliable and capable of achieving large-area, highly ordered and isolated CNTs in 1996. The substrate is made of mesoporous silica containing embedded iron nanoparticles and heated to 700 °C. Acetylene mixed in nitrogen is pumped into the chamber and decomposes to carbon atoms. The deposition of carbon atoms on the prepared substrate forms CNTs [108].

2.3. Graphene

Graphene is an atomically thick sheet of carbon atoms, discovered through the exfoliating of graphite in 2004 [72,109]. On account of the great electronic, mechanical, thermal and optical properties, e.g., high mechanical strength, electronic mobility, and optical transparency, graphene is well-suited for electrodes, transistors, batteries, and supercapacitors [110,111,112,113].
Similar to carbon dots, graphene can also be synthesized using various top-down and bottom-up strategies. On the one hand, mechanical exfoliation [84], liquid-phase exfoliation [83], and the unzipping of CNTs [114] are typical examples of top-down methods, sharing the working principle in common that larger precursors are destroyed for nano-sized graphene. Therefore, products fabricated from top-down approaches depend on precursors to a large extent [115]. Mechanical exfoliation is the earliest proposed method, where graphene was obtained from graphite [116,117]. The exfoliation can be divided into transverse and longitudinal according to the direction of force applied on the material surface [118]. Another exfoliation method is liquid-phase exfoliation, which was discovered in 2008 by Hernandez [119]. It consists of multiple steps, i.e., dispersing graphite in organic solutions, exfoliating the graphene, and purifying the product [120]. The schematics of liquid-phase exfoliation and mechanical exfoliation are shown in Figure 1g,h, respectively. From another point of view, considering the fact that CNTs are rolled graphite sheets, producing graphene by unzipping CNTs is easy to understand [121], as shown in Figure 1i. The unzipping step refers to cutting the internal bonds in the structure of CNTs and can be achieved by processes such as chemical attack, plasma etching, and laser irradiation [122,123]. On the other hand, the bottom-up synthesizing approaches include CVD, laser-assisted methods, and epitaxial growth [124]. CVD suggests that graphene films grow on metal substrates at high temperature, while graphene can also have epitaxial growth on SiC wafers, Cu/Ni, and Pt films. The high cost and complexity of operation are the two major challenges for bottom-up methods [125,126,127].

2.4. Stretchability

For the purpose of making use of carbon-based materials in soft robotic devices with collectively high yield and tensile strength, integrating carbon nanomaterials or composites with soft polymeric substrates is the most general and convenient scheme [128]. Various fabrication techniques have been utilized to achieve the incorporation, e.g., CVD [129], solution-based [130], and printing methods [131], which will be discussed respectively in this subsection.
It has been presented that graphene can be directly grown on soft substrates through CVD. Firstly, the PI substrate is prepared by coating liquid PI on glass and baking it several times at different temperatures. Secondly, Cu ink containing Cu nanoparticles is coated on the PI substrate. Last, plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD) is used for graphene growth on Cu ink [132].
Drop-casting, spray-coating, and spin-coating are a series of solution-based methods. Gu et al. used spray-coating method to develop a CNT-embedded Ecoflex film and made the thin film into a wearable strain sensor. The fabrication process of the elastomer is shown in Figure 2b, and it is mainly composed of mixing CNTs and isopropyl alcohol (IPA), spray-coating of the CNT-IPA solution on a petri dish, and adding Ecoflex prepolymer to the CNT film. After curing the mixture for 3 h at room temperature, a CNT-embedded Ecoflex film is formed, provided with good stretchability and sensitivity for sensors [133]. Compared to spray-coating, drop-casting is easier to control and more suitable for fabricating small-area films [134]. Flexible graphene-based films with excellent electromagnetic interference were manufactured by Song et al. in 2021. As shown in Figure 2c, reduced graphene oxide (rGO), AgNWs and CNTs, acting as conductive fiber, were stirred in ethanol solutions, and then the solution mixture was drop-casted on PET substrate to form a flexible carbon-based film [135].
Furthermore, printing is considered to be a convenient deposition method. A flexible carbon-based film can be fabricated by inkjet-printing composite containing CNTs onto a PI substrate [138]. A wide range of printing technologies can be employed in different steps so that nearly the whole fabricating process can be accomplished through printing. The research group successively utilized inkjet printing, insulator printing, and aerosol jet printing to produce the substrate, make the electrodes, and print SWCNT ink onto the PI substrate so as to form a fully printed low-voltage SWCNT CMOS inverter [139]. As shown in Figure 2d, printing by functional ink containing MWCNTs and PDMS can be a method to fabricate flexible sensor [137].
Other than incorporating carbon materials with soft substrates, the assembly method can also contribute to the better stretchability and performance of devices. Hu et al. enhanced the stretchability simply by prestretching the VHB tape, a kind of polyacrylate polymer. The film electrodes were prepared by spray-coating CNTs onto stretchable films. After assembling films with electrodes onto the prestretched tape and releasing the tape, the electrodes will be wrinkled, therefore equipping the device with higher stretchability [140].

3. Sensing with Carbon Materials

Sensors usually serve as significant detection tools that equip soft robots with biomimicking sensations and perceptions by converting different types of signals, e.g., physical and chemical signals, into electrical ones. They are responsible for reacting to stimuli as well as digitizing, quantifying, and visualizing the changes of targeting variables. As wearable electronics and smart devices have been hot topics in recent years, flexible and stretchable sensors are in great demand for research [141]. Functional materials widely used in flexible sensors include TMDCs [142], MXenes [143], NWs [144], and colloidal QDs [145]. Meanwhile, tremendous progress has been made in carbon-based flexible sensors [146], involving sensing toward pressure, strain, temperature, and humidity [147,148]. The rapid developing pace reveals the carbon material’s promising capabilities in easy processing, excellent electrical conductivity, and high sensing sensitivity [149]. For example, the addition of carbon nitride nanosheets in a hydrogel-based flexible sensor contributes to better tensile strength and toughness, providing hydrogel with better integration of its features [150]. Moreover, owing to the low toxicity and biocompatibility of carbon materials, carbon-based sensors especially excel in biological applications [151,152]. A few typical examples of flexible sensors based on carbon materials will be given in this section, and the categories to be discussed are listed in Figure 3.
As flexible and stretchable sensors always need to be bent, stretched, or compressed for at least hundreds of thousands of cycles, the mechanical robustness is a significant factor for a soft sensor. It can be enhanced by improving current synthetic approaches. Meanwhile, when sensing depends on the resistance, capacitance, and other electrical properties, power units are necessary and will decrease the convenience and portability of sensors. In this way, self-powered sensors can have great competence. More efforts are needed so that it can have more beneficial applications in electronic skin and outdoor research.

3.1. Imaging

Bioimaging is a form of biosensing and refers to visualizing biological activity, which helps with detecting and framing internal structures of cells, tissues and organisms [162]. Due to the excellent electroluminescent and photoluminescent effect, carbon dots are proposed to possess great chemical, biological and optical properties, and thus exhibit excellent performance and potential in nanomedicine [163]. The observed fluorescence emission wavelength of carbon dots falls in a wide range of 375–550 nm [164,165]. The features of light emission, attachment to cell surface, and bio-friendliness render carbon dots capable of imaging and biolabeling of bacteria and cells, and at the same time not influencing the health of the observer [166,167,168]. In a recent research study in which carbon dots were employed as agents for in vivo imaging, it was observed that the agents were excreted from the mouse several hours after injection, confirming the biosecurity of carbon dots [169]. As Figure 3a shows, prepared N-doped carbon dots can selectively detect Fe(III) in a water solution [153]. Furthermore, functionalizing carbon dots to make selective response to specific ions, e.g., Cr(VI), Fe(III) and Cu(II), has been evaluated to enhance the sensitivity and selectivity respectively by more than 12 and 7 times [170]. Based on their imaging and sensing performance, carbon dots can be built into flexible fluorescence sensing platforms, fluorescent nanoprobes, and can also be extended to cancer cell imaging, cancer marker detection, and early warning of tumor [171,172,173,174,175]. Moreover, it has been proved that the aggregation of carbon dots in solution will mostly cause the quench of fluorescence. Since the fluorescence capability is especially significant in imaging, the quenching effect of the carbon dots concentration ought to be prohibited, which can be achieved by avoiding π-π stacking between molecules from controlling the molecular conformation [176].
In addition, a flexible imaging system can also be realized through the integration of CNTs. As shown in Figure 3b, poly(vinyl alcohol) and CNTs were combined to fabricate flexible thermal detectors, which makes use of the photo-thermoelectric effect of the composite and paves the way toward thermal imaging and other biomedical applications [154]. Similar to the condition of carbon dots, when applying CNTs to in vitro and in vivo imaging, aggregated CNTs appear to obtain lower fluorescence intensity and lower toxicity than dispersed CNTs [177]. In this way, finding out the moderate degree of aggregation can provide proper fluorescence and relatively low toxicity, which is important in biologically relevant sensing and imaging.

3.2. Electronic Skin

Electronic or epidermal skin is an important aspect of wearable electronics with a focus on the real-time monitoring of human physiological signals, enabling tactile sensations for soft robots [178]. Due to the fact that the sensors embedded in electronic skin monitor various types of signals and gather a huge amount of information, it brings much convenience to daily health monitoring and medical diagnosis. As electronic skin has to conform to the movement trends of human epidermis, the used materials need to withstand twisting and stretching while providing a similar Young’s modulus to human skins and tissues. Varieties of sensors with different functions, including pressure sensors, strain sensors, and temperature sensors, are integrated to bring capability to simulate the “feeling” of actual skin [179]. Simultaneously, good biocompatibility and a certain degree of durability are necessary for electronic skin since it is a device in contact with human skin and will be exposed to long-term and repetitive movements [180].
Considering that detecting human health needs several vital physiological indicators, the electronic skin should be provided with multiple sensing capabilities. Firstly, it can be accomplished by applying a sensor array containing different types of sensors in one flexible substrate, which is a common fabrication strategy [181]. Alternative methods to integrate various sensing in one single sensor have also been found. In the multifunctional sensor, the CNT/PDMS film served as a sensing layer, and the sensor could react to external pressure and temperature change [182].

3.2.1. Pressure Sensor

The basic sensing mechanism of pressure sensors is converting the change of physical pressure into electrical signals, and the transduction can be carried out in different forms, e.g., piezoresistivity, piezoelectricity, triboelectricity and capacitance [183]. Taking the piezoresistive pressure sensor as an example, it suggests that the applied pressure will change the size of the contact area, thus causing the change of the resistance value [184].
According to a study in 2019, a pressure sensor, with a wide working range of 0–30 kPa and high sensitivity of 51.23 kPa−1, can be easily fabricated by evenly dropping carbon black onto airlaid papers for several times. The sensor presented to be elastic and flexible due to the porous network structure of the airlaid paper, and the number of stacked layers influenced the sensing sensitivity and flexibility. Attaching this sensor to a human neck or wrist can achieve voice recognition or pulse monitoring, as shown in Figure 3c [155]. Different from the multilayer flat structure, the microsphere structure may provide better sensing performance. The pressure sensor consisting of two copper electrodes and sandwiched CNT-wrapped PDMS microspheres was discovered to have fast response and good durability through dynamic loading tests. Compared to the plane-to-plane structure, its plane-to-microsphere structure presents a more significant decline in electrical resistance change in response to applied pressure. As the working principle of such sensing is achieved by the observation of material resistance change in response to pressure change, more dramatic resistance decline of the plane-to-microsphere structure results in higher sensitivity, about 15 times higher than the one of the plane-to-plane structure [185].
Capacitive pressure sensors are also widely used, relying on the capacitance change caused by external pressure stimuli. A carbon-based printed capacitive sensor was fabricated in 2021, where carbon fiber was 3D printed to be electrodes, presenting short response time of 60 ms, and excellent stability of withstanding 1000 cycles. Figure 3d shows its multiple applications with human motions, including bending of the thumb, knee, and elbow, as well as different hand-holding patterns [156].

3.2.2. Strain Sensor

Considering that both strain and pressure sensors sense the changes caused by external strain or pressure applied on the surface, strain sensors analogously depend on varying trends of resistivity, capacitance, and piezoelectricity. Among these categories, resistive and capacitive types are more frequently used [186].
Huge efforts have been made in devising various fabrication methods in order to make enhancements to the sensing performance, mainly in terms of flexibility, sensitivity, durability, and working range. By depositing Ag nanoparticles and CNTs on PDMS, a strain sensor can be created with good stability, high sensitivity, and stretchability of 98.5% [187]. Three-dimensional printing also provides an alternative approach with low cost, easy operation and high efficiency [188]. Printing MWCNT-polymer composites layer by layer and curing them though ultraviolet can produce a pyramid configuration. A strain sensor based on this printed structure was found to enjoy a high sensitivity of 8.939, a wide detectable strain range of 0.01% to 60% and a high durability of 10,000 cycles [147].
By 2018, a strain sensor fabricated on carbonized conductive crepe paper was measured to reach high flexibility, high durability, and fast response time at 115 ms [32]. Photographs of the sensor attaching to the wrist for sensing its bending and stretching can be seen in Figure 3e. Subsequently in 2021, the response time was further reduced to 60 ms. The strain sensor was made up of carbon black embedded flexible film, as shown in Figure 3f, along with a wide workable stretching range of up to 160% [157].

3.2.3. Temperature Sensor

In human health monitoring, one of the most considerable indicators is body temperature, so temperature sensors are considered essential components in electronic skin. Temperature sensors are categorized as four types with regard to their sensing units, namely thermistors, transistors, capacitive, and thermocouple devices. Sensing through thermistors is widely used in wearable devices due to its high sensitivity, and its sensing function depends on whether the resistance changes positively or negatively with the temperature [189]. For example, printing CNT-graphene oxide ink onto PET substrate can form an ultrathin and ultrasensitive temperature sensor, where CNTs in proper proportion provide the sensor with a negative temperature coefficient [190].
Progress has been made in improving the sensing accuracy and independency from the application of massive external strain in sensing temperature changes. The measured inaccuracy reduced to 1 °C with strain up to 60% in 2018 by applying an innovative voltage readout scheme, and the stretchable circuits were made from SWCNTs [191]. Soon after, in 2021, a newly designed aligned electrospun carbon nanofiber film was utilized in temperature sensor. The flexible sensor presents high responsive to temperature among multiple stimulus, high accuracy near to thermometers, fast response time, and outstanding durability [192].
It is worth mentioning that the change in thermal resistance can also be utilized as an indicator of the binding of biomolecules, which gives rise to novel wearable biomedical and healthcare devices. In particular, sensors using screen-printed graphite electrodes have enabled the accurate and low-cost diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases based on the binding of cardiac biomarker troponin and molecularly imprinted nanoparticles [193].

3.3. Gas Sensor

Gas sensing is of the resistive type, as the specific gas changes the surface conductance when interacting with the sensing layer [194]. Carbon-based gas sensors have a wide range of testable objects, such as NO2, H2S, CO2, and NH3 [195]. Taking the NO2 detector as an instance, the resistance of the sensor showed a difference between the conditions with air and NO2, making the sensor acquire selectivity of the tested gas, high response of 24.82%, and long-term sensing stability. At the same time, the sensor was fabricated by depositing a polypyrrole and nitrogen-doped MWCNT composite onto the PI substrates so that it achieved excellent stretchability [196]. Furthermore, a NO2 gas sensor reported in 2022 reached better sensing and stretching performance. The gas sensor was made from depositing MWCNTs with CeO2 powders onto silicon rubber. Its response time to NO2 demonstrated to decrease from 36.6 s to 25.6 s with stretching the sensor from 0% to 100%, and the detecting range is quite large [197].
Moreover, printing technology renders possibilities to fully print gas sensor with low cost and low power consumption. A thin film transistor containing CNTs was printed though an aerosol jet printer, and the side gates were printed by Ag ink. The sensor was provided with high sensitivity to H2S, high response at room temperature, and extremely low power consumption, demonstrating great competitive strength [198]. Similar fabrication strategies can be applied to sensors for other gases, such as NH3. The gas sensor fabricated by aerosol jet printing SWCNT ink appeared to have extremely high response and outstanding selectivity of NH3 [199].

4. Soft Robotic Actuation with Carbon Materials

Actuators are devices that respond to various stimuli, including heat [200], pressure [201], light [202], humidity [203], electricity [204], and magnetism [205]. Carbon-based soft robotic actuators mainly consist of carbon nanomaterials and flexible substrates. For example, a multi-responsive actuator made up of a graphene oxide film and a layer containing mixed CNTs and PDMS was proposed in 2018, and it could produce reversible deformation under thermal, light, and humidity conditions [206]. Another actuator had displacement in response to voltage stimulation or light irradiation, in which CNTs were blade-coated to achieve orderly direction. It demonstrated bending deformation larger than 10 mm under external stimulus, having great inspiration for bionic soft robotics [207].
Thanks to their flexibility and stretchability, soft robotic actuators behave better than their rigid peers in fields of biomimicry and soft robotics [208,209], as do the actuators containing carbon nanomaterials. This section presents actuation reacting to heat, light irradiation, and piezoelectricity.
Although these reported soft robotic actuators present an outstanding and obvious response to external stimuli, most of them are still on the centimeter or millimeter length scale, as shown in Figure 4, which remains to be greatly improved in the future. The internal structural design, use of materials, and the actuating mechanisms are among the factors that could be taken into account. Further, the minimization of soft actuators can benefit their applications in bio-related areas, especially under in vivo circumstances.

4.1. Thermal Actuation

Considering that the actuating mechanism of thermal actuation is converting thermal energy into kinetic energy and creating motion, materials involved should demonstrate expansion or contraction in response to thermal stimulation. For instance, hydrogel is regarded as a promising candidate for wearable electronics due to its reaction to thermal change [216]. In thermal actuation, the stimulation is usually provoked by change in ambient temperature or heat generated by electricity [217].
According to the introduced actuating mechanism, when applying voltage to conductive films, thermal-induced expansion or contraction will take place as the current flow heats up the films. The degree of deformation is closely related to the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), which is a material property. In a multi-layer structure, the mismatch of CTEs between the layers will result in bending, as shown in Figure 4a. The carbon-based film is often treated as the conductive layer because of its excellent electrical conductivity, as well as being responsible for transferring heat between multiple layers due to its extreme sensitivity to heat. With relatively lower CTE, the carbon layer is less stretched than polymeric layers, leading to the bending deformation of carbon-based flexible films [210,218]. For instance, a typical electro-thermal actuator can be made up of three layers, namely the CNT layer, Kapton® layer, and shape memory polymer (SMP) layer. The applied voltage heats the CNT layer and heat transfers, making the SMP layer become flexible and finally inducing the bending [219]. Electro-thermal actuation excels in terms of the low applied voltage since a composite layer of CNTs and PDMS can achieve a large deformation at as low as 8 V bias [220]. In addition, the bending radius is influenced and controlled by multiple factors, involving the applied voltage, the layer thickness, and the CTE of different materials. In this case, the actuator can accomplish specific robotic motions, such as grasping and releasing objects [210].

4.2. Photo-Actuation

Photo-actuation is an easily implemented actuation method and basically relies on either the photochemical reactions or the photothermal effects of materials [221,222]. Although photothermal actuators similarly make use of the thermal sensitivity of materials with electro-thermal ones, they behave better at enabling contactless manipulation [223].
The fabrication of photo-actuators can be carried out by merging two films with different CTEs together, such as SWCNTs and polycarbonate. The photo energy absorbed by SWCNT film converts to thermal energy, resulting in the deformation of different extents [224]. Similarly, composites of liquid crystal elastomer and CNTs can be constructed into a light-powered soft robot. When the composite film was exposed to light irradiation, the surface facing the light had higher temperature than the opposite side, prompting the film to contract unevenly and therefore bend toward the light source. On the basis of the bending motion, the tiny robot can perform various locomotion under different illumination modes like a worm, including crawling, contraction, and jumping, as is shown in Figure 4d [213]. The carrying capacity has also been exceedingly enhanced in 2022, being reported to uphold loads more than 4600 times of the actuator’s own weight. The composite film created by depositing CNTs onto a liquid crystal elastomer fiber displayed excellent photo-actuating behavior, and therefore it can be employed as artificial muscles [212].
It has also been proposed that precise functions other than functional movements, such as printing, can be realized by properly designing and utilizing photo-actuators. For example, a type of photo-actuated pen array made from CNT-PDMS composite realized massively parallel molecular dip-pen nanolithography. The pen would locally expand and print ink on the substrate when specific ones were exposed to light [225].

4.3. Piezoelectricity

Piezoelectric materials, by nature, are able to convert mechanical strain into electricity energy. This capability of energy transduction can be utilized in piezo-resistive strain sensors, nanogenerators, supercapacitors, and applications revolving around energy harvesting. Interestingly, inverse piezoelectric materials geometrically respond to voltages applied, which can be used to build piezo-actuators for soft robots [226,227].
Piezo-actuators are established on voltage-induced motion or the deformation of inverse piezoelectric materials. Advances have been made to improve their actuating performance. Merging the MWCNT solution into polyvinylidene fluoride and distributing in the axial direction contribute to better bending capability, measured as bending to 24 μm in response to an electric field of 4 V/μm [215]. Types and quantities of materials can make a difference; for instance, adding a different amount of few-layer graphene into silicone rubber with different tensile modulus will change the conductivity and thus influence the actuating motion [228].
Due to the energy conversion allowed by the piezoelectric effect, piezoelectric batteries can also realize self-charging simply through bending or patting themselves. In nanogenerators, carbon-based materials are significant components of electrodes. Taking the one published in 2019 as an example, both the cathode material and anode material were carbon treated for higher electronic conductivity [229]. In addition to nanogenerators, carbon materials can also be used as flexible electrodes in supercapacitors, one of the energy harvesting applications. Graphene oxide-based electrodes were proved to have high rate capability in a supercapacitor proposed in 2020 [230]. Another flexible self-chargeable supercapacitor proposed in 2021 adopted electrodes fabricated by directly growing Co-Fe2O3 particles on activated carbon cloth. The assembled supercapacitor can charge itself with great durability of bending for 420 cycles, and the self-charging process is displayed in Figure 4e [214].

5. Conclusions and Outlook

In conclusion, we summarized the foundational development, fabrication methods of carbon-based materials, and their vital roles in novel soft robotic sensors and actuators in this review. Different from their rigid counterparts, these flexible and stretchable devices have made possible a great number of soft robotic applications. However, more in-depth study is yet to be done in order to tackle the following challenges:
(1)
The further miniaturization of devices.
This requires a complete and compact integration of perception and motion systems of soft robots by joint efforts from the communities of materials science, chemistry, physics, mechanical engineering and electrical engineering. In particular, the physical dimensions of flexible and stretchable sensing unit will have to shrink to a greater extent such that the sensors become fully implantable and biocompatible for in vivo perception. As for the motion or actuation component, a more rapid response to external stimuli is needed for robotic manipulation in order to perform intricate operations and surgeries.
(2)
The mechanical robustness of devices.
While carbon materials, such as CNT yarns, possess outstanding tensile strength, the collective mechanical robustness of the entire device needs to be further improved from a synthetic perspective. More sophisticated flexible carbon composite materials remain to be discovered to exhibit high mechanical yield stress, as well as outstanding electronic properties, such as carrier mobility for carbon-based semiconductors in applications for state-of-the-art optoelectronic devices and field effect transistors.
(3)
The power efficiency of sensing and actuation unit.
Importantly, we can only make self-sustained devices when they are fully self-powered and untethered. It is worth mentioning that the power supply system plays a vital role here in that the device performance and portability is greatly hindered by very limited battery lifetime and power density. This could potentially lead to completely untethered ultralow power electronic skins with built-in flexible power supply.
Once these issues are properly resolved, the compliant carbon materials could then turn into a state-of-the-art brain–computer interface (BCI), micro-/nano-wearable and implantable sensors, and smart textiles. We expect further evolution and extraordinary technical improvement in the use of carbon-based materials in state-of-the-art entirely stretchable electronics devices and soft robots, in terms of design, fabrication and applications, in the next 10 to 20 years.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.C.; investigation, X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z.; writing—review and editing, W.C.; visualization, X.Z.; supervision, W.C.; project administration, W.C.; funding acquisition, W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 62205204. This research was also funded by ShanghaiTech University Start-up Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support from the School of Information Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rogers, J.A.; Someya, T.; Huang, Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 2010, 327, 1603–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wu, W. Stretchable electronics: Functional materials, fabrication strategies and applications. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2019, 20, 187–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cho, H.; Lee, Y.; Lee, B.; Byun, J.; Chung, S.; Hong, Y. Stretchable strain-tolerant soft printed circuit board: A systematic approach for the desisgn rules of stretchable interconnects. J. Inf. Disp. 2020, 21, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fang, R.; Wang, J. Flexible structural engineering of PPy-NiCo-LDH@ Mxene for improved capacitive deionization and efficient hard water softening process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 280, 119828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yu, L.; Parker, S.; Xuan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, S.; Tousi, M.; Manteghi, M.; Wang, A.; Jia, X. Flexible multi-material fibers for distributed pressure and temperature sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Děkanovský, L.; Elashnikov, R.; Kubiková, M.; Vokatá, B.; Švorčík, V.; Lyutakov, O. Dual-action flexible antimicrobial material: Switchable self-cleaning, antifouling, and smart drug release. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1901880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Restaino, S.M.; White, I.M. A critical review of flexible and porous SERS sensors for analytical chemistry at the point-of-sample. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1060, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Behera, N.; Duan, J.; Jin, W.; Kitagawa, S. The chemistry and applications of flexible porous coordination polymers. EnergyChem 2021, 3, 100067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zamprogno, P.; Wüthrich, S.; Achenbach, S.; Thoma, G.; Stucki, J.D.; Hobi, N.; Schneider-Daum, N.; Lehr, C.-M.; Huwer, H.; Geiser, T. Second-generation lung-on-a-chip with an array of stretchable alveoli made with a biological membrane. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, Y.; Sun, F.; Jia, C.; Zhao, T.; Mao, Y. A Stretchable and Self-Healing Hybrid Nano-Generator for Human Motion Monitoring. Nanomaterials 2021, 12, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, J.; Yu, Y.; Cai, L.; Wang, Y.; Shi, K.; Shang, L.; Pan, J.; Zhao, Y. Microfluidics for flexible electronics. Mater. Today 2021, 44, 105–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, W.; Ota, H.; Kiriya, D.; Takei, K.; Javey, A. Flexible electronics toward wearable sensing. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Y.; He, K.; Chen, G.; Leow, W.R.; Chen, X. Nature-inspired structural materials for flexible electronic devices. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 12893–12941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, J.; Hou, X.; Cui, M.; Shi, S.; He, J.; Sun, Y.; Wang, C.; Chou, X. Flexible PDMS-based triboelectric nanogenerator for instantaneous force sensing and human joint movement monitoring. Sci. China Mater. 2019, 62, 1423–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Pignanelli, J.; Schlingman, K.; Carmichael, T.B.; Rondeau-Gagné, S.; Ahamed, M.J. A comparative analysis of capacitive-based flexible PDMS pressure sensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 285, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Debbarma, S.; Nabavi, S.; Bhadra, S. A wireless flexible electrooculogram monitoring system with printed electrodes. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Virtual Conference, 17–20 May 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmiedt, R.E.; Qian, C.; Behr, C.; Hecht, L.; Dietzel, A.; Sinapius, M. Flexible sensors on polymide fabricated by femtosecond laser for integration in fiber reinforced polymers. Flex. Print. Electron. 2018, 3, 025003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, S.; Lin, P.; Zhao, L.; Wang, C.; Liu, D.; Liu, F.; Sun, P.; Liang, X.; Liu, F.; Yan, X. The room temperature gas sensor based on Polyaniline@ flower-like WO3 nanocomposites and flexible PET substrate for NH3 detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 259, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kinner, L.; Bauch, M.; Wibowo, R.A.; Ligorio, G.; List-Kratochvil, E.J.; Dimopoulos, T. Polymer interlayers on flexible PET substrates enabling ultra-high performance, ITO-free dielectric/metal/dielectric transparent electrode. Mater. Des. 2019, 168, 107663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cui, C.; Fu, Q.; Meng, L.; Hao, S.; Dai, R.; Yang, J. Recent progress in natural biopolymers conductive hydrogels for flexible wearable sensors and energy devices: Materials, structures, and performance. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 4, 85–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, L.; Xu, T.; Zhang, X. Multifunctional conductive hydrogel-based flexible wearable sensors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 134, 116130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vosgueritchian, M.; Lipomi, D.J.; Bao, Z. Highly conductive and transparent PEDOT: PSS films with a fluorosurfactant for stretchable and flexible transparent electrodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huseynova, G.; Hyun Kim, Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, J. Rising advancements in the application of PEDOT: PSS as a prosperous transparent and flexible electrode material for solution-processed organic electronics. J. Inf. Disp. 2020, 21, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yang, D.; Ma, D. Development of organic semiconductor photodetectors: From mechanism to applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1800522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lv, G.; Wang, H.; Tong, Y.; Dong, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, P.; Tang, Q.; Liu, Y. Flexible, conformable organic semiconductor proximity sensor array for electronic skin. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 2000306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Wang, B. Durable, Sensitive, and Wide-Range Wearable Pressure Sensors Based on Wavy-Structured Flexible Conductive Composite Film. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2020, 305, 2000206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, L.; Wang, H.; Wu, P.; Huang, W.; Gao, W.; Fang, F.; Cai, N.; Chen, R.; Zhu, Z. Wearable flexible strain sensor based on three-dimensional wavy laser-induced graphene and silicone rubber. Sensors 2020, 20, 4266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dijvejin, Z.A.; Kazemi, K.K.; Alasvand Zarasvand, K.; Zarifi, M.H.; Golovin, K. Kirigami-enabled microwave resonator arrays for wireless, flexible, passive strain sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 44256–44264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hong, Y.; Wang, B.; Lin, W.; Jin, L.; Liu, S.; Luo, X.; Pan, J.; Wang, W.; Yang, Z. Highly anisotropic and flexible piezoceramic kirigami for preventing joint disorders. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf0795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhong, Z.; Ko, P.; Youn, H.; Kim, A.; Woo, K. Fabrication of Highly Flat, Flexible Mesh Electrode for Use in Photovoltaics. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. -Green Technol. 2021, 8, 1711–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bae, K.; Jeong, J.; Choi, J.; Pyo, S.; Kim, J. Large-Area, Crosstalk-Free, Flexible Tactile Sensor Matrix Pixelated by Mesh Layers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 12259–12267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, S.; Song, Y.; Ding, D.; Ling, Z.; Xu, F. Flexible and anisotropic strain sensor based on carbonized crepe paper with aligned cellulose fibers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, M.; Sun, Z.; Chen, T.; Lee, C. Low cost exoskeleton manipulator using bidirectional triboelectric sensors enhanced multiple degree of freedom sensory system. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pal, R.K.; Pradhan, S.; Narayanan, L.; Yadavalli, V.K. Micropatterned conductive polymer biosensors on flexible PDMS films. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 259, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, X.; Yu, J.; Cui, Y.; Li, W. Research progress of flexible wearable pressure sensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 330, 112838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, T. Flexible sensing electronics for wearable/attachable health monitoring. Small 2017, 13, 1602790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, S.; Qi, J.; Fan, S.; Qiao, Z.; Yeo, J.C.; Lim, C.T. Flexible wearable sensors for cardiovascular health monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2100116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Yang, X.; Chen, W. Flexible actuators for soft robotics. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2020, 2, 1900077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lee, Y.; Song, W.; Sun, J.-Y. Hydrogel soft robotics. Mater. Today Phys. 2020, 15, 100258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, W.; Feng, P.; Chen, J.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, B. Electrically conductive hydrogels for flexible energy storage systems. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 88, 220–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, J.; Zha, J.; Zeng, Z.; Tan, C. Recent advances in wearable self-powered energy systems based on flexible energy storage devices integrated with flexible solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 18887–18905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, T.; Cho, M.; Yu, K.J. Flexible and stretchable bio-integrated electronics based on carbon nanotube and graphene. Materials 2018, 11, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, C.; Xia, K.; Wang, H.; Liang, X.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, Y. Advanced carbon for flexible and wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1801072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, S.; Qiu, L.; Cheng, H.-M. Carbon-based fibers for advanced electrochemical energy storage devices. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 2811–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Artukovic, E.; Kaempgen, M.; Hecht, D.; Roth, S.; Grüner, G. Transparent and flexible carbon nanotube transistors. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 757–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Zhu, S.; Ni, J.; Li, Y. Carbon nanotube-based electrodes for flexible supercapacitors. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 1825–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Das, C.M.; Kang, L.; Ouyang, Q.; Yong, K.T. Advanced low-dimensional carbon materials for flexible devices. InfoMat 2020, 2, 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Xie, P.; Yuan, W.; Liu, X.; Peng, Y.; Yin, Y.; Li, Y.; Wu, Z. Advanced carbon nanomaterials for state-of-the-art flexible supercapacitors. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 36, 56–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhu, E.; Liu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Xiong, C.; Yang, Q. Supertough and ultrasensitive flexible electronic skin based on nanocellulose/sulfonated carbon nanotube hydrogel films. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 6311–6318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, F.; Liu, X.; Gu, H. Multi-Network Poly (β-cyclodextrin)/PVA/Gelatin/Carbon Nanotubes Composite Hydrogels Constructed by Multiple Dynamic Crosslinking as Flexible Electronic Devices. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2022, 307, 2100724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Joshi, P.; Riley, P.R.; Denning, W.; Shukla, S.; Khosla, N.; Narayan, J.; Narayan, R. Laser-patterned carbon coatings on flexible and optically transparent plastic substrates for advanced biomedical sensing and implant applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 2965–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jiang, D.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Qian, Z.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, R. Flexible electronics based on 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 89–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, J.L.; Hassan, M.; Liu, J.W.; Yu, S.H. Nanowire assemblies for flexible electronic devices: Recent advances and perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cordill, M.J.; Kreiml, P.; Mitterer, C. Materials Engineering for Flexible Metallic Thin Film Applications. Materials 2022, 15, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tang, X.; Ackerman, M.M.; Shen, G.; Guyot-Sionnest, P. Towards infrared electronic eyes: Flexible colloidal quantum dot photovoltaic detectors enhanced by resonant cavity. Small 2019, 15, 1804920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, H.; Zavabeti, A.; Quan, H.; Zhu, W.; Wei, H.; Chen, D.; Ou, J.Z. Recent advances in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides for biological sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 142, 111573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zheng, L.; Wang, X.; Jiang, H.; Xu, M.; Huang, W.; Liu, Z. Recent progress of flexible electronics by 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Res. 2021, 15, 2413–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Daus, A.; Vaziri, S.; Chen, V.; Köroğlu, Ç.; Grady, R.W.; Bailey, C.S.; Lee, H.R.; Schauble, K.; Brenner, K.; Pop, E. High-performance flexible nanoscale transistors based on transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jia, C.; Lin, Z.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. Nanowire electronics: From nanoscale to macroscale. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 9074–9135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, W.; Zhang, H.; Shi, S.; Xu, J.; Qin, X.; He, Q.; Yang, K.; Dai, W.; Liu, G.; Zhou, Q. Recent progress in silver nanowire networks for flexible organic electronics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 4636–4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Han, J.; Yang, J.; Gao, W.; Bai, H. Ice-Templated, Large-Area Silver Nanowire Pattern for Flexible Transparent Electrode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2010155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yin, R.; Yang, S.; Li, Q.; Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Han, J.; Liu, C.; Shen, C. Flexible conductive Ag nanowire/cellulose nanofibril hybrid nanopaper for strain and temperature sensing applications. Sci. Bull. 2020, 65, 899–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bi, Y.G.; Liu, Y.F.; Zhang, X.L.; Yin, D.; Wang, W.Q.; Feng, J.; Sun, H.B. Ultrathin metal films as the transparent electrode in ITO-free organic optoelectronic devices. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1800778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ji, C.; Liu, D.; Zhang, C.; Jay Guo, L. Ultrathin-metal-film-based transparent electrodes with relative transmittance surpassing 100%. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Liu, M.; Yazdani, N.; Yarema, M.; Jansen, M.; Wood, V.; Sargent, E.H. Colloidal quantum dot electronics. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kagan, C.R.; Lifshitz, E.; Sargent, E.H.; Talapin, D.V. Building devices from colloidal quantum dots. Science 2016, 353, aac5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Hou, H.; Xu, W.; Duan, G.; He, S.; Liu, K.; Jiang, S. Recent progress in carbon-based materials for supercapacitor electrodes: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 173–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fu, X.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Sun, X.; Peng, H. Flexible solar cells based on carbon nanomaterials. Carbon 2018, 139, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ugarte, D. Curling and closure of graphitic networks under electron-beam irradiation. Nature 1992, 359, 707–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Iijima, S.; Yudasaka, M.; Yamada, R.; Bandow, S.; Suenaga, K.; Kokai, F.; Takahashi, K. Nano-aggregates of single-walled graphitic carbon nano-horns. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 309, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.-e.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Xu, X.; Ray, R.; Gu, Y.; Ploehn, H.J.; Gearheart, L.; Raker, K.; Scrivens, W.A. Electrophoretic analysis and purification of fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube fragments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12736–12737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kroto, H.W.; Heath, J.R.; O’Brien, S.C.; Curl, R.F.; Smalley, R.E. C60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature 1985, 318, 162–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Reyes, D.; Camacho, M.; Camacho, M.; Mayorga, M.; Weathers, D.; Salamo, G.; Wang, Z.; Neogi, A. Laser ablated carbon nanodots for light emission. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Chrzanowska, J.; Hoffman, J.; Małolepszy, A.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Kowalewski, T.A.; Szymanski, Z.; Stobinski, L. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes by the laser ablation method: Effect of laser wavelength. Phys. Status Solidi 2015, 252, 1860–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ge, G.; Li, L.; Wang, D.; Chen, M.; Zeng, Z.; Xiong, W.; Wu, X.; Guo, C. Carbon dots: Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 6553–6575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Arora, N.; Sharma, N. Arc discharge synthesis of carbon nanotubes: Comprehensive review. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2014, 50, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. de Medeiros, T.V.; Manioudakis, J.; Noun, F.; Macairan, J.-R.; Victoria, F.; Naccache, R. Microwave-assisted synthesis of carbon dots and their applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 7175–7195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xia, C.; Zhu, S.; Feng, T.; Yang, M.; Yang, B. Evolution and synthesis of carbon dots: From carbon dots to carbonized polymer dots. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1901316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chernyak, S.; Podgornova, A.; Dorofeev, S.; Maksimov, S.; Maslakov, K.; Savilov, S.; Lunin, V. Synthesis and modification of pristine and nitrogen-doped carbon dots by combining template pyrolysis and oxidation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 507, 145027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Y. Synthesis of CNTs on stainless steel microfibrous composite by CVD: Effect of synthesis condition on carbon nanotube growth and structure. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 160, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Li, Z.; Young, R.J.; Backes, C.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhukov, A.A.; Tillotson, E.; Conlan, A.P.; Ding, F.; Haigh, S.J. Mechanisms of liquid-phase exfoliation for the production of graphene. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 10976–10985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cheng, C.; Jia, P.; Xiao, L.; Geng, J. Tandem chemical modification/mechanical exfoliation of graphite: Scalable synthesis of high-quality, surface-functionalized graphene. Carbon 2019, 145, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yi, M.; Shen, Z. A review on mechanical exfoliation for the scalable production of graphene. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 11700–11715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Gholizadeh, A.B.; Brownless, J.; Fu, Y.; Cai, W.; Han, Y.; Duan, T.; Wang, Y.; Ling, H. Photoluminescent Semiconducting Graphene Nanoribbons via Longitudinally Unzipping Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 52892–52900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, H.; Wang, H.S.; Ma, C.; Chen, L.; Jiang, C.; Chen, C.; Xie, X.; Li, A.-P.; Wang, X. Graphene nanoribbons for quantum electronics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2021, 3, 791–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kang, Z.; Lee, S.-T. Carbon dots: Advances in nanocarbon applications. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 19214–19224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Desmond, L.J.; Phan, A.N.; Gentile, P. Critical overview on the green synthesis of carbon quantum dots and their application for cancer therapy. Environ. Sci. Nano 2021, 8, 848–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sharma, A.; Das, J. Small molecules derived carbon dots: Synthesis and applications in sensing, catalysis, imaging, and biomedicine. J. Nanobiotechnology 2019, 17, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Liu, M.L.; Chen, B.B.; Li, C.M.; Huang, C.Z. Carbon dots: Synthesis, formation mechanism, fluorescence origin and sensing applications. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 449–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lin, X.; Xiong, M.; Zhang, J.; He, C.; Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Kuang, Y.; Yang, M.; Huang, Q. Carbon dots based on natural resources: Synthesis and applications in sensors. Microchem. J. 2021, 160, 105604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mansuriya, B.D.; Altintas, Z. Carbon Dots: Classification, Properties, Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications in Health Care—An Updated Review (2018–2021). Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jiang, K.; Wang, Y.; Gao, X.; Cai, C.; Lin, H. Facile, quick, and gram-scale synthesis of ultralong-lifetime room-temperature-phosphorescent carbon dots by microwave irradiation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6216–6220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sun, Y.-P.; Zhou, B.; Lin, Y.; Wang, W.; Fernando, K.S.; Pathak, P.; Meziani, M.J.; Harruff, B.A.; Wang, X.; Wang, H. Quantum-sized carbon dots for bright and colorful photoluminescence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7756–7757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, H.; Ye, T.; Mao, C. Fluorescent carbon nanoparticles derived from candle soot. Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 6593–6595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Huang, L.; Zheng, G.; Zhang, P.; Jin, Y.; Jiao, Z.; Sun, X. Study on the fluorescence properties of carbon dots prepared via combustion process. J. Lumin. 2019, 206, 608–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rong, M.-C.; Zhang, K.-X.; Wang, Y.-R.; Chen, X. The synthesis of B, N-carbon dots by a combustion method and the application of fluorescence detection for Cu2+. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2017, 28, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sarswat, P.K.; Free, M.L. Light emitting diodes based on carbon dots derived from food, beverage, and combustion wastes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 27642–27652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cheng, C.; Xing, M.; Wu, Q. A universal facile synthesis of nitrogen and sulfur co-doped carbon dots from cellulose-based biowaste for fluorescent detection of Fe3+ ions and intracellular bioimaging. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 99, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Aqel, A.; Abou El-Nour, K.M.; Ammar, R.A.; Al-Warthan, A. Carbon nanotubes, science and technology part (I) structure, synthesis and characterisation. Arab. J. Chem. 2012, 5, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Thostenson, E.T.; Ren, Z.; Chou, T.-W. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1899–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Rathinavel, S.; Priyadharshini, K.; Panda, D. A review on carbon nanotube: An overview of synthesis, properties, functionalization, characterization, and the application. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 268, 115095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gu, Y.; Ma, L.; Yan, M.; He, C.; Zhang, J.; Mou, J.; Wu, D.; Ren, Y. Strategies for improving friction behavior based on carbon nanotube additive materials. Tribol. Int. 2022, 176, 107875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shoukat, R.; Khan, M.I. Carbon nanotubes: A review on properties, synthesis methods and applications in micro and nanotechnology. Microsyst. Technol. 2021, 27, 4183–4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yamada, T.; Hayamizu, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yomogida, Y.; Izadi-Najafabadi, A.; Futaba, D.N.; Hata, K. A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Thess, A.; Lee, R.; Nikolaev, P.; Dai, H.; Petit, P.; Robert, J.; Xu, C.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, S.G.; Rinzler, A.G. Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science 1996, 273, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Li, W.; Xie, S.; Qian, L.X.; Chang, B.; Zou, B.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, R.; Wang, G. Large-scale synthesis of aligned carbon nanotubes. Science 1996, 274, 1701–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Geim, A.K. Graphene: Status and prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Fan, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5979–6004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Olabi, A.G.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Wilberforce, T.; Sayed, E.T. Application of graphene in energy storage device—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tiwari, S.K.; Sahoo, S.; Wang, N.; Huczko, A. Graphene research and their outputs: Status and prospect. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2020, 5, 10–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wu, D.-Y.; Shao, J.-J. Graphene-based flexible all-solid-state supercapacitors. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 557–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mohammadi, S.; Kolahdouz, Z.; Darbari, S.; Mohajerzadeh, S.; Masoumi, N. Graphene formation by unzipping carbon nanotubes using a sequential plasma assisted processing. Carbon 2013, 52, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lee, X.J.; Hiew, B.Y.Z.; Lai, K.C.; Lee, L.Y.; Gan, S.; Thangalazhy-Gopakumar, S.; Rigby, S. Review on graphene and its derivatives: Synthesis methods and potential industrial implementation. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2019, 98, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Farjadian, F.; Abbaspour, S.; Sadatlu, M.A.A.; Mirkiani, S.; Ghasemi, A.; Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi, M.; Mozaffari, N.; Karimi, M.; Hamblin, M.R. Recent developments in graphene and graphene oxide: Properties, synthesis, and modifications: A review. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 10200–10219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Gao, E.; Lin, S.-Z.; Qin, Z.; Buehler, M.J.; Feng, X.-Q.; Xu, Z. Mechanical exfoliation of two-dimensional materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2018, 115, 248–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lim, J.Y.; Mubarak, N.; Abdullah, E.; Nizamuddin, S.; Khalid, M. Recent trends in the synthesis of graphene and graphene oxide based nanomaterials for removal of heavy metals—A review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 66, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hernandez, Y.; Nicolosi, V.; Lotya, M.; Blighe, F.M.; Sun, Z.; De, S.; McGovern, I.T.; Holland, B.; Byrne, M.; Gun’Ko, Y.K. High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Monajjemi, M. Liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) of graphite towards graphene: An ab initio study. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 230, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Silva, A.A.; Pinheiro, R.A.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Baldan, M.R.; Trava-Airoldi, V.J.; Corat, E.J. Graphene sheets produced by carbon nanotubes unzipping and their performance as supercapacitor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 446, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kumar, N.; Salehiyan, R.; Chauke, V.; Botlhoko, O.J.; Setshedi, K.; Scriba, M.; Masukume, M.; Ray, S.S. Top-down synthesis of graphene: A comprehensive review. FlatChem 2021, 27, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Wang, X. Cutting and unzipping multiwalled carbon nanotubes into curved graphene nanosheets and their enhanced supercapacitor performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 6827–6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zhang, F.; Yang, K.; Liu, G.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Li, S.; Li, R. Recent Advances on Graphene: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2022, 160, 107051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Lin, L.; Peng, H.; Liu, Z. Synthesis challenges for graphene industry. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zhang, X.; Wu, T.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhu, H.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, R.; Niu, T.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. Epitaxial growth of 6 in. single-crystalline graphene on a Cu/Ni (111) film at 750 °C via chemical vapor deposition. Small 2019, 15, 1805395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kang, H.; Tang, P.; Shu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Sui, Y.; Hu, S.; Wang, S. Epitaxial growth of wafer scale antioxidant single-crystal graphene on twinned Pt (111). Carbon 2021, 181, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yan, T.; Wu, Y.; Yi, W.; Pan, Z. Recent progress on fabrication of carbon nanotube-based flexible conductive networks for resistive-type strain sensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 327, 112755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, Z.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, D.; Dou, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Yu, Z.; Kang, J.; Li, W.; Chou, S. High-yielding carbon nanofibers grown on NIPS-derived porous nickel as a flexible electrode for supercapacitors. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 2976–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, X.; Li, D.; Liu, K.; Tong, J.; Yi, X. Flexible graphene-coated carbon fiber veil/polydimethylsiloxane mats as electrothermal materials with rapid responsiveness. Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. 2019, 2, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Turkani, V.S.; Maddipatla, D.; Narakathu, B.B.; Bazuin, B.J.; Atashbar, M.Z. A carbon nanotube based NTC thermistor using additive print manufacturing processes. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 279, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lu, C.-H.; Leu, C.-M.; Yeh, N.-C. Single-Step Direct Growth of Graphene on Cu Ink toward Flexible Hybrid Electronic Applications by Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 6951–6959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gu, J.; Kwon, D.; Ahn, J.; Park, I. Wearable strain sensors using light transmittance change of carbon nanotube-embedded elastomers with microcracks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 12, 10908–10917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Eslamian, M.; Soltani-Kordshuli, F. Development of multiple-droplet drop-casting method for the fabrication of coatings and thin solid films. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2018, 15, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Song, C.; Meng, X.; Chen, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhan, Q.; Sun, Y.; Lu, W.; Dai, Y. Flexible, graphene-based films with three-dimensional conductive network via simple drop-casting toward electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos. Commun. 2021, 24, 100632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lee, E.; Lee, S.G.; Cho, K. Direct growth of substrate-adhered graphene on flexible polymer substrates for soft electronics. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 4451–4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Sekine, T.; Abe, M.; Muraki, K.; Tachibana, S.; Wang, Y.-F.; Hong, J.; Takeda, Y.; Kumaki, D.; Tokito, S. Microporous induced fully printed pressure sensor for wearable soft robotics machine interfaces. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2020, 2, 2000179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Li, Q.; Luo, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.-M. Carbon based polyimide nanocomposites thin film strain sensors fabricated by ink-jet printing method. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 300, 111664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Gao, T.; Deng, J.; Li, X.; Ren, Y.; Gu, W.; Robin, M.; Zhao, J. Printed solid state electrolyte carbon nanotube thin film transistors for sub-1 V fully printed flexible CMOS inverters. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 6852–6862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Hu, X.; Yang, F.; Wu, M.; Sui, Y.; Guo, D.; Li, M.; Kang, Z.; Sun, J.; Liu, J. A Super-Stretchable and Highly Sensitive Carbon Nanotube Capacitive Strain Sensor for Wearable Applications and Soft Robotics. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2100769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Tang, J. Carbon nanotube-based flexible electronics. In Flexible, Wearable, and Stretchable Electronics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 137–156. [Google Scholar]
  142. Goswami, P.; Gupta, G. Recent progress of flexible NO2 and NH3 gas sensors based on transition metal dichalcogenides for room temperature sensing. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 23, 100726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wang, Y.; Yue, Y.; Cheng, F.; Cheng, Y.; Ge, B.; Liu, N.; Gao, Y. Ti3C2T x MXene-Based Flexible Piezoresistive Physical Sensors. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 1734–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Yang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, D.; Wei, R.; Mai, X.; Pan, D.; Vupputuri, S.; Weng, L.; Naik, N.; Guo, Z. Ultra-sensitive flexible sandwich structural strain sensors based on a silver nanowire supported PDMS/PVDF electrospun membrane substrate. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 2752–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhang, S.; Chen, M.; Mu, G.; Li, J.; Hao, Q.; Tang, X. Spray-Stencil Lithography Enabled Large-Scale Fabrication of Multispectral Colloidal Quantum-Dot Infrared Detectors. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2101132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Erdem, Ö.; Derin, E.; Zeibi Shirejini, S.; Sagdic, K.; Yilmaz, E.G.; Yildiz, S.; Akceoglu, G.A.; Inci, F. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials and Sensing Tools for Wearable Health Monitoring Devices. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2100572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Xiao, T.; Qian, C.; Yin, R.; Wang, K.; Gao, Y.; Xuan, F. 3D printing of flexible strain sensor array based on UV-curable multiwalled carbon nanotube/elastomer composite. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021, 6, 2000745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhao, X.-F.; Wen, X.-H.; Sun, P.; Zeng, C.; Liu, M.-Y.; Yang, F.; Bi, H.; Li, D.; Ma, R.-G.; Wang, J.-C. Spider web-like flexible tactile sensor for pressure-strain simultaneous detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 10428–10436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Li, C.; Yang, S.; Guo, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, H.; Zuo, X.; Fan, Z.; Liang, H.; Pan, L. Flexible, multi-functional sensor based on all-carbon sensing medium with low coupling for ultrahigh-performance strain, temperature and humidity sensing. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 130364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bao, S.; Gao, J.; Xu, T.; Li, N.; Chen, W.; Lu, W. Anti-freezing and antibacterial conductive organohydrogel co-reinforced by 1D silk nanofibers and 2D graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets as flexible sensor. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 411, 128470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kumar, S.; Pavelyev, V.; Tripathi, N.; Platonov, V.; Sharma, P.; Ahmad, R.; Mishra, P.; Khosla, A. Recent advances in the development of carbon nanotubes based flexible sensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 047506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hu, B.; Chen, W.; Zhou, J. High performance flexible sensor based on inorganic nanomaterials. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 176, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Shan, F.; Xia, H.; Xie, X.; Fu, L.; Yang, H.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yu, X. Novel N-doped carbon dots prepared via citric acid and benzoylurea by green synthesis for high selectivity Fe (III) sensing and imaging in living cells. Microchem. J. 2021, 167, 106273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhang, M.; Yeow, J.T. Flexible Polymer–Carbon Nanotube Composite with High-Response Stability for Wearable Thermal Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 26604–26609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Han, Z.; Li, H.; Xiao, J.; Song, H.; Li, B.; Cai, S.; Chen, Y.; Ma, Y.; Feng, X. Ultralow-cost, highly sensitive, and flexible pressure sensors based on carbon black and airlaid paper for wearable electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 33370–33379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, R.; Dong, K.; Panahi-Sarmad, M.; Li, S.; Xiao, X. Three-Dimensional Printing of a Flexible Capacitive Pressure Sensor Array in the Assembly Network of Carbon Fiber Electrodes and Interlayer of a Porous Polyurethane Dielectric. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 3999–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Schubert, D.W. Highly sensitive ultrathin flexible thermoplastic polyurethane/carbon black fibrous film strain sensor with adjustable scaffold networks. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Liu, G.; Tan, Q.; Kou, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Lv, W.; Dong, H.; Xiong, J. A flexible temperature sensor based on reduced graphene oxide for robot skin used in internet of things. Sensors 2018, 18, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Ben-Shimon, Y.; Ya’akobovitz, A. Flexible and bio-compatible temperature sensors based on carbon nanotube composites. Measurement 2021, 172, 108889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Xue, L.; Wang, W.; Guo, Y.; Liu, G.; Wan, P. Flexible polyaniline/carbon nanotube nanocomposite film-based electronic gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 244, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Ma, J.; Fan, H.; Li, Z.; Jia, Y.; Yadav, A.K.; Dong, G.; Wang, W.; Dong, W.; Wang, S. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline on the ethylenediamine modified polyethylene terephthalate fibers for a flexible room temperature ammonia gas sensor with high responses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 334, 129677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Malik, N.; Arfin, T.; Khan, A.U. Graphene nanomaterials: Chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. In Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery and Therapy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 373–402. [Google Scholar]
  163. Li, H.; Yan, X.; Kong, D.; Jin, R.; Sun, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y.; Lu, G. Recent advances in carbon dots for bioimaging applications. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020, 5, 218–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Liang, X.; Li, N.; Zhang, R.; Yin, P.; Zhang, C.; Yang, N.; Liang, K.; Kong, B. Carbon-based SERS biosensor: From substrate design to sensing and bioapplication. NPG Asia Mater. 2021, 13, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chahal, S.; Macairan, J.-R.; Yousefi, N.; Tufenkji, N.; Naccache, R. Green synthesis of carbon dots and their applications. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 25354–25363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Kasouni, A.; Chatzimitakos, T.; Stalikas, C. Bioimaging applications of carbon nanodots: A review. C 2019, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Das, P.; Bose, M.; Ganguly, S.; Mondal, S.; Das, A.K.; Banerjee, S.; Das, N.C. Green approach to photoluminescent carbon dots for imaging of gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 195501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Hola, K.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Giannelis, E.P.; Zboril, R.; Rogach, A.L. Carbon dots—Emerging light emitters for bioimaging, cancer therapy and optoelectronics. Nano Today 2014, 9, 590–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Qin, K.; Zhang, D.; Ding, Y.; Zheng, X.; Xiang, Y.; Hua, J.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, X.; Li, B.; Wei, Y. Applications of hydrothermal synthesis of Escherichia coli derived carbon dots in in vitro and in vivo imaging and p-nitrophenol detection. Analyst 2020, 145, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Zheng, X.; Ren, S.; Wang, L.; Gai, Q.; Dong, Q.; Liu, W. Controllable functionalization of carbon dots as fluorescent sensors for independent Cr (VI), Fe (III) and Cu (II) ions detection. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2021, 417, 113359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhang, Z.; Liu, G.; Li, X.; Zhang, S.; Lü, X.; Wang, Y. Design and synthesis of fluorescent nanocelluloses for sensing and bioimaging applications. ChemPlusChem 2020, 85, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Amin, N.; Afkhami, A.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Amin, A.; Madrakian, T. Flexible electrospun nanofibrous film integrated with fluorescent carbon dots for smartphone-based detection and cellular imaging application. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 260, 119944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Pirsaheb, M.; Mohammadi, S.; Salimi, A. Current advances of carbon dots based biosensors for tumor marker detection, cancer cells analysis and bioimaging. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 115, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Jia, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Liang, K.; Nan, F.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Ge, J.; Wang, P. Recent advances and prospects of carbon dots in cancer nanotheranostics. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 449–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Li, J.; Yang, S.; Liu, Z.; Wang, G.; He, P.; Wei, W.; Yang, M.; Deng, Y.; Gu, P.; Xie, X. Imaging cellular aerobic glycolysis using carbon dots for early warning of tumorigenesis. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Ru, Y.; Waterhouse, G.I.; Lu, S. Aggregation in carbon dots. Aggregate 2022, 3, e296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Gravely, M.; Kindopp, A.; Hubert, L.; Card, M.; Nadeem, A.; Miller, C.; Roxbury, D. Aggregation Reduces Subcellular Localization and Cytotoxicity of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 19168–19177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zhang, S.; Li, S.; Xia, Z.; Cai, K. A review of electronic skin: Soft electronics and sensors for human health. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 852–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Kim, K.; Jung, M.; Kim, B.; Kim, J.; Shin, K.; Kwon, O.-S.; Jeon, S. Low-voltage, high-sensitivity and high-reliability bimodal sensor array with fully inkjet-printed flexible conducting electrode for low power consumption electronic skin. Nano Energy 2017, 41, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Yang, J.C.; Mun, J.; Kwon, S.Y.; Park, S.; Bao, Z.; Park, S. Electronic skin: Recent progress and future prospects for skin-attachable devices for health monitoring, robotics, and prosthetics. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1904765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Kim, D.-H.; Lu, N.; Ma, R.; Kim, Y.-S.; Kim, R.-H.; Wang, S.; Wu, J.; Won, S.M.; Tao, H.; Islam, A. Epidermal electronics. Science 2011, 333, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Feng, Q.; Zhang, C.; Yin, R.; Yin, A.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, Z.; Li, K.; Zhao, W. Self-Powered Multifunctional Electronic Skin Based on Carbon Nanotubes/Poly (dimethylsiloxane) for Health Monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 21406–21417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Duan, Y.; He, S.; Wu, J.; Su, B.; Wang, Y. Recent progress in flexible pressure sensor arrays. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Cao, M.; Su, J.; Fan, S.; Qiu, H.; Su, D.; Li, L. Wearable piezoresistive pressure sensors based on 3D graphene. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 126777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Xu, M.; Gao, Y.; Yu, G.; Lu, C.; Tan, J.; Xuan, F. Flexible pressure sensor using carbon nanotube-wrapped polydimethylsiloxane microspheres for tactile sensing. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 284, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Wang, J.; Lu, C.; Zhang, K. Textile-based strain sensor for human motion detection. Energy Environ. Mater. 2020, 3, 80–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Zhang, S.; Zhang, H.; Yao, G.; Liao, F.; Gao, M.; Huang, Z.; Li, K.; Lin, Y. Highly stretchable, sensitive, and flexible strain sensors based on silver nanoparticles/carbon nanotubes composites. J. Alloy Compd. 2015, 652, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Kadry, H.; Wadnap, S.; Xu, C.; Ahsan, F. Digital light processing (DLP) 3D-printing technology and photoreactive polymers in fabrication of modified-release tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 135, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Chen, Z.; Zhao, D.; Ma, R.; Zhang, X.; Rao, J.; Yin, Y.; Wang, X.; Yi, F. Flexible temperature sensors based on carbon nanomaterials. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 1941–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zhao, B.; Sivasankar, V.S.; Dasgupta, A.; Das, S. Ultrathin and ultrasensitive printed carbon nanotube-based temperature sensors capable of repeated uses on surfaces of widely varying curvatures and wettabilities. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 10257–10270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Zhu, C.; Chortos, A.; Wang, Y.; Pfattner, R.; Lei, T.; Hinckley, A.C.; Pochorovski, I.; Yan, X.; To, J.W.-F.; Oh, J.Y. Stretchable temperature-sensing circuits with strain suppression based on carbon nanotube transistors. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Lee, J.-H.; Chen, H.; Kim, E.; Zhang, H.; Wu, K.; Zhang, H.; Shen, X.; Zheng, Q.; Yang, J.; Jeon, S. Flexible temperature sensors made of aligned electrospun carbon nanofiber films with outstanding sensitivity and selectivity towards temperature. Mater. Horiz. 2021, 8, 1488–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. McClements, J.; Seumo Tchekwagep, P.M.; Vilela Strapazon, A.L.; Canfarotta, F.; Thomson, A.; Czulak, J.; Johnson, R.E.; Novakovic, K.; Losada-Pérez, P.; Zaman, A. Immobilization of molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles onto surfaces using different strategies: Evaluating the influence of the functionalized interface on the performance of a thermal assay for the detection of the cardiac biomarker troponin I. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 27868–27879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Yaqoob, U.; Phan, D.-T.; Uddin, A.I.; Chung, G.-S. Highly flexible room temperature NO2 sensor based on MWCNTs-WO3 nanoparticles hybrid on a PET substrate. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 221, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Pandhi, T.; Chandnani, A.; Subbaraman, H.; Estrada, D. A review of inkjet printed graphene and carbon nanotubes based gas sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Liu, B.; Liu, X.; Yuan, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Su, Y.; Ma, J.; Tai, H. A flexible NO2 gas sensor based on polypyrrole/nitrogen-doped multiwall carbon nanotube operating at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 295, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Molina, A.; Al-Sardar, M.; Rodriguez-Gonzalez, V.; Escobar-Barrios, V.; Zakhidov, A.; Mtz-Enriquez, A.; Encinas, A.; Oliva, J. Efficient NO2 detection and the sensing mechanism of stretchable/biodegradable MWCNT based sensors decorated with CeO2 nanoparticles. Synth. Met. 2022, 287, 117091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Geng, Y.; Ren, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Portilla, L.; Fang, Y.; Zhao, J. Highly sensitive and selective H2S sensors with ultra-low power consumption based on flexible printed carbon-nanotube-thin-film-transistors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 360, 131633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Ren, Y.; Li, M.; Li, X.; Geng, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J. High-performance flexible fully-printed all-carbon thin film transistors and ultrasensitive NH 3 sensors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 2133–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Lu, H.; Li, Z.; Qi, X.; Xu, L.; Chi, Z.; Duan, D.; Islam, M.Z.; Wang, W.; Jin, X.; Zhu, Y. Flexible, electrothermal-driven controllable carbon fiber/poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) shape memory composites for electromagnetic shielding. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 207, 108697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Zhou, P.; Lin, J.; Zhang, W.; Luo, Z.; Chen, L. Pressure-Perceptive Actuators for Tactile Soft Robots and Visual Logic Devices. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2104270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Zhou, P.; Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Lin, J.; Luo, Z.; Liu, C.; Jiang, K. Monolithic superaligned carbon nanotube composite with integrated rewriting, actuating and sensing multifunctions. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 2456–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Jia, G.; Zheng, A.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, L. Flexible, biocompatible and highly conductive MXene-graphene oxide film for smart actuator and humidity sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 346, 130507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Che, X.; Wu, M.; Yu, G.; Liu, C.; Xu, H.; Li, B.; Li, C. Bio-inspired water resistant and fast multi-responsive Janus actuator assembled by cellulose nanopaper and graphene with lignin adhesion. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 133672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Wu, H.; Luo, J.; Huang, X.; Wang, L.; Guo, Z.; Liang, J.; Zhang, S.; Xue, H.; Gao, J. Superhydrophobic, mechanically durable coatings for controllable light and magnetism driven actuators. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 603, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Wang, W.; Xiang, C.; Zhu, Q.; Zhong, W.; Li, M.; Yan, K.; Wang, D. Multistimulus responsive actuator with GO and carbon nanotube/PDMS bilayer structure for flexible and smart devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 27215–27223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Li, H.; Li, R.; Wang, K.; Hu, Y. Dual-Responsive Soft Actuator Based on Aligned Carbon Nanotube Composite/Graphene Bimorph for Bioinspired Applications. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2100166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Hashem, R.; Kazemi, S.; Stommel, M.; Cheng, L.K.; Xu, W. A Biologically Inspired Ring-Shaped Soft Pneumatic Actuator for Large Deformations. Soft Robot. 2022, 9, 807–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Sang, M.; Liu, G.; Liu, S.; Wu, Y.; Xuan, S.; Wang, S.; Xuan, S.; Jiang, W.; Gong, X. Flexible PTFE/MXene/PI soft electrothermal actuator with electromagnetic-interference shielding property. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 414, 128883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Li, X.; Cui, H.; Liu, G.; Xu, H.; Wu, X.; Yao, W.; Zhong, B.; Huang, X. Electro-thermally driven flexible robot arms based on stacking-controlled graphite nanocomposites. Carbon 2019, 152, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Wang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, P.; Pan, Y.; Guo, X. Stretchable Sensors and Electro-Thermal Actuators with Self-Sensing Capability Using the Laser-Induced Graphene Technology. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 41283–41295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Yu, Y.; Li, L.; Liu, E.; Han, X.; Wang, J.; Xie, Y.-X.; Lu, C. Light-driven core-shell fiber actuator based on carbon nanotubes/liquid crystal elastomer for artificial muscle and phototropic locomotion. Carbon 2022, 187, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ahn, C.; Liang, X.; Cai, S. Bioinspired design of light-powered crawling, squeezing, and jumping untethered soft robot. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1900185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Zhou, D.; Wang, F.; Yang, J.; Fan, L.-z. Flexible solid-state self-charging supercapacitor based on symmetric electrodes and piezo-electrolyte. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 126825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Sharafkhani, S.; Kokabi, M. High performance flexible actuator: PVDF nanofibers incorporated with axially aligned carbon nanotubes. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 222, 109060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, X.; Liu, H.; Li, H. Multiple-stimuli-responsive and cellulose conductive ionic hydrogel for smart wearable devices and thermal actuators. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 13, 1353–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Brown, J.J.; Bright, V.M. Thermal Actuators. In Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology; Bhushan, B., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 2680–2697. [Google Scholar]
  218. Ning, W.; Wang, Z.; Liu, P.; Zhou, D.; Yang, S.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Fan, S.; Jiang, K. Multifunctional super-aligned carbon nanotube/polyimide composite film heaters and actuators. Carbon 2018, 139, 1136–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Sachyani Keneth, E.; Scalet, G.; Layani, M.; Tibi, G.; Degani, A.; Auricchio, F.; Magdassi, S. Pre-programmed tri-layer electro-thermal actuators composed of shape memory polymer and carbon nanotubes. Soft Robot. 2020, 7, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Aouraghe, M.A.; Mengjie, Z.; Qiu, Y.; Fujun, X. Low-voltage activating, fast responding electro-thermal actuator based on carbon nanotube film/PDMS composites. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2021, 3, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Hu, Y.; Li, Z.; Lan, T.; Chen, W. Photoactuators for direct optical-to-mechanical energy conversion: From nanocomponent assembly to macroscopic deformation. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10548–10556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Yang, M.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, J.; Fang, Z.; Fang, L.; Yu, D.; Li, Q. Photoresponsive Actuators Built from Carbon-Based Soft Materials. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Xiao, X.; Ma, H.; Zhang, X. Flexible Photodriven Actuator Based on Gradient–Paraffin-Wax-Filled Ti3C2T x MXene Film for Bionic Robots. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 12826–12835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Zhang, X.; Yu, Z.; Wang, C.; Zarrouk, D.; Seo, J.-W.T.; Cheng, J.C.; Buchan, A.D.; Takei, K.; Zhao, Y.; Ager, J.W. Photoactuators and motors based on carbon nanotubes with selective chirality distributions. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Huang, Z.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.A.; Alsharif, N.; Wu, X.; Peng, Z.; Cheng, X.; Wang, P.; Brown, K.A.; Wang, Y. Photoactuated pens for molecular printing. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Kumar, V.; Lee, G.; Choi, J.; Lee, D.-J. Studies on composites based on HTV and RTV silicone rubber and carbon nanotubes for sensors and actuators. Polymer 2020, 190, 122221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Sezer, N.; Koç, M. A comprehensive review on the state-of-the-art of piezoelectric energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2021, 80, 105567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Kumar, V.; Lee, D.-J. High-actuation displacement with high flexibility for silicone rubber and few layer graphene composites. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 309, 111956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Zhou, D.; Xue, L.; Wang, L.; Wang, N.; Lau, W.-M.; Cao, X. Self-chargeable sodium-ion battery for soft electronics. Nano Energy 2019, 61, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Okhay, O.; Tkach, A.; Gallo, M.J.H.; Otero-Irurueta, G.; Mikhalev, S.; Staiti, P.; Lufrano, F. Energy storage of supercapacitor electrodes on carbon cloth enhanced by graphene oxide aerogel reducing conditions. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of typical fabrication techniques for 0D, 1D, and 2D carbon–based materials. (top) Carbon dots. (a) Figure for laser ablation: Reproduced from [75] with permission, copyright 2016, Springer Nature. (b) Figure for microwave–assisted method: (A) Schematic of the preparation process and purification of carbon dots; (B) Images of the crude product under different irradiation conditions; (C) Images of purified carbon dots after ceasing UV irradiation. Reproduced from [94] with permission, copyright 2018, John Wiley and Sons. (c) Figure for template method: Reproduced from [81] with permission, copyright 2019, Elsevier. (middle) Carbon nanotubes. (d) Figure for arc discharge: Reproduced from [78] with permission, copyright 2014, Elsevier. (e) Figure for chemical vapor deposition: Reproduced from [82] with permission, copyright 2018, Elsevier. (f) Figure for laser ablation: Reproduced from [76] with permission, copyright 2015, John Wiley and Sons. (bottom) Graphene. (g) Figure for liquid–phase exfoliation: Reproduced from [83] with permission, copyright 2020, ACS. (h) Figure for mechanical exfoliation: Reproduced from [84] with permission, copyright 2019, Elsevier. (i) Figure for unzipping of carbon nanotubes: Reproduced from [86] with permission, copyright 2021, ACS.
Figure 1. Schematic of typical fabrication techniques for 0D, 1D, and 2D carbon–based materials. (top) Carbon dots. (a) Figure for laser ablation: Reproduced from [75] with permission, copyright 2016, Springer Nature. (b) Figure for microwave–assisted method: (A) Schematic of the preparation process and purification of carbon dots; (B) Images of the crude product under different irradiation conditions; (C) Images of purified carbon dots after ceasing UV irradiation. Reproduced from [94] with permission, copyright 2018, John Wiley and Sons. (c) Figure for template method: Reproduced from [81] with permission, copyright 2019, Elsevier. (middle) Carbon nanotubes. (d) Figure for arc discharge: Reproduced from [78] with permission, copyright 2014, Elsevier. (e) Figure for chemical vapor deposition: Reproduced from [82] with permission, copyright 2018, Elsevier. (f) Figure for laser ablation: Reproduced from [76] with permission, copyright 2015, John Wiley and Sons. (bottom) Graphene. (g) Figure for liquid–phase exfoliation: Reproduced from [83] with permission, copyright 2020, ACS. (h) Figure for mechanical exfoliation: Reproduced from [84] with permission, copyright 2019, Elsevier. (i) Figure for unzipping of carbon nanotubes: Reproduced from [86] with permission, copyright 2021, ACS.
Nanomaterials 13 00316 g001
Figure 2. Fabrication techniques for merging carbon–based materials with soft substrate: (a) Use PECVD for direct graphene growth on flexible substrates. Reproduced from [136] with permission, copyright 2019, ACS. (b) Spray–coating for MWCNT–embedded Ecoflex films: (i) Using petri dish as the substrate; (ii) Spray–coating of CNT–IPA solution on petri dish; (iii) Pouring of Ecoflex on the substrate; (iv) Schematic of the MWCNT–embedded Ecoflex film. Reproduced from [133] with permission, copyright 2019, ACS. (c) Drop–casting for preparing flexible rGO/CNT/AgNW films. Reproduced from [135] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier. (d) Use printing technologies for fabricating pressure sensors: (A) Preparation process of MWCNT–PDMS ink; (B) Electrode formulation by printing; (C) Sensing formulation by printing; (D) Images of printed electrode and sensing layer. Reproduced from [137] with permission, copyright 2020, John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 2. Fabrication techniques for merging carbon–based materials with soft substrate: (a) Use PECVD for direct graphene growth on flexible substrates. Reproduced from [136] with permission, copyright 2019, ACS. (b) Spray–coating for MWCNT–embedded Ecoflex films: (i) Using petri dish as the substrate; (ii) Spray–coating of CNT–IPA solution on petri dish; (iii) Pouring of Ecoflex on the substrate; (iv) Schematic of the MWCNT–embedded Ecoflex film. Reproduced from [133] with permission, copyright 2019, ACS. (c) Drop–casting for preparing flexible rGO/CNT/AgNW films. Reproduced from [135] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier. (d) Use printing technologies for fabricating pressure sensors: (A) Preparation process of MWCNT–PDMS ink; (B) Electrode formulation by printing; (C) Sensing formulation by printing; (D) Images of printed electrode and sensing layer. Reproduced from [137] with permission, copyright 2020, John Wiley and Sons.
Nanomaterials 13 00316 g002
Figure 3. Applications of carbon–based sensors: (a) N–doped carbon dots for Fe(III) sensing and imaging in living cells. Reproduced from [153] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier. (b) Flexible polymer–CNT thermal sensor. Reproduced from [154] with permission, copyright 2018, ACS. (c) Highly sensitive and flexible pressure sensor built with carbon black. Reproduced from [155] with permission, copyright 2019, ACS. (d) Flexible capacitive pressure sensor with carbon fiber electrodes. Reproduced from [156] with permission, copyright 2021, ACS. (e) Flexible strain sensor based on carbonized conductive crepe paper. Reproduced from [32] with permission, copyright 2018, John Wiley & Sons. (f) Flexible carbon–based strain sensor with faster response. Reproduced from [157] with permission, copyright 2021, Springer Nature. (g) Flexible temperature sensor made of reduced graphene oxide. Reproduced from [158] with permission, copyright 2018, MDPI. (h) Flexible CNT–based temperature sensor with bio–compatibility. Reproduced from [159] with permission, copyright 2020, Elsevier. (i) Highly sensitive and flexible NH3 sensor. Reproduced from [160] with permission, copyright 2016, Elsevier. (j) Flexible MWCNT–based NH3 sensor, showing the sensing mechanism. Reproduced from [161] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Figure 3. Applications of carbon–based sensors: (a) N–doped carbon dots for Fe(III) sensing and imaging in living cells. Reproduced from [153] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier. (b) Flexible polymer–CNT thermal sensor. Reproduced from [154] with permission, copyright 2018, ACS. (c) Highly sensitive and flexible pressure sensor built with carbon black. Reproduced from [155] with permission, copyright 2019, ACS. (d) Flexible capacitive pressure sensor with carbon fiber electrodes. Reproduced from [156] with permission, copyright 2021, ACS. (e) Flexible strain sensor based on carbonized conductive crepe paper. Reproduced from [32] with permission, copyright 2018, John Wiley & Sons. (f) Flexible carbon–based strain sensor with faster response. Reproduced from [157] with permission, copyright 2021, Springer Nature. (g) Flexible temperature sensor made of reduced graphene oxide. Reproduced from [158] with permission, copyright 2018, MDPI. (h) Flexible CNT–based temperature sensor with bio–compatibility. Reproduced from [159] with permission, copyright 2020, Elsevier. (i) Highly sensitive and flexible NH3 sensor. Reproduced from [160] with permission, copyright 2016, Elsevier. (j) Flexible MWCNT–based NH3 sensor, showing the sensing mechanism. Reproduced from [161] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 13 00316 g003
Figure 4. Typical actuation mechanisms for carbon–based soft robots: (left) (a) Flexible robotic hand based on graphene nanoplates and PI, demonstrating the bending mechanism of electro–thermal actuators. Reproduced from [210] with permission, copyright 2019, Elsevier. (b) Graphene–based electro–thermal actuator. Reproduced from [211] with permission, copyright 2022, ACS. (middle) (c) CNT–based light–driven fiber actuator. Reproduced from [212] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier. (d) Worm–like photo–actuated soft robot that can realize crawling, squeezing, and jumping. Reproduced from [213] with permission, copyright 2019, John Wiley & Sons. (right) (e) Flexible self–charging supercapacitor based on carbon cloth, showing the self–charging process: (A) Schematic of the supercapacitor composition; (B) Reaction to external force and generation of piezoelectric field; (C) Migration of electrolyte ions and charging; (D) Continuous migration of electrolyte ions and charging after external force is ceased; (E) New equilibrium after migration; (F) Piezoelectric field disappears and the supercapacitor returns to initial state. Reproduced from [214] with permission, copyright 2020, Elsevier. (f) Piezo–actuator containing aligned CNTs. Reproduced from [215] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Figure 4. Typical actuation mechanisms for carbon–based soft robots: (left) (a) Flexible robotic hand based on graphene nanoplates and PI, demonstrating the bending mechanism of electro–thermal actuators. Reproduced from [210] with permission, copyright 2019, Elsevier. (b) Graphene–based electro–thermal actuator. Reproduced from [211] with permission, copyright 2022, ACS. (middle) (c) CNT–based light–driven fiber actuator. Reproduced from [212] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier. (d) Worm–like photo–actuated soft robot that can realize crawling, squeezing, and jumping. Reproduced from [213] with permission, copyright 2019, John Wiley & Sons. (right) (e) Flexible self–charging supercapacitor based on carbon cloth, showing the self–charging process: (A) Schematic of the supercapacitor composition; (B) Reaction to external force and generation of piezoelectric field; (C) Migration of electrolyte ions and charging; (D) Continuous migration of electrolyte ions and charging after external force is ceased; (E) New equilibrium after migration; (F) Piezoelectric field disappears and the supercapacitor returns to initial state. Reproduced from [214] with permission, copyright 2020, Elsevier. (f) Piezo–actuator containing aligned CNTs. Reproduced from [215] with permission, copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 13 00316 g004
Table 1. Fabrication methods of carbon dots, CNTs and graphene.
Table 1. Fabrication methods of carbon dots, CNTs and graphene.
Fabrication MethodsProductsAdvantagesDisadvantagesRef.
Laser ablationCarbon dots, CNTsRapid process and effectiveness;
Facile control of production yield by varying laser wavelength
Sophisticated equipment setup;
High temperature and pressure;
Poor size control;
Not suitable for mass production
[75,76]
Arc dischargeCarbon dots, CNTsHighly fluorescent carbon dots;
High water solubility;
High-quality CNT production
Sophisticated equipment setup;
High temperature and pressure;
Difficult product purification
[77,78]
Microwave-assisted methodCarbon dotsTunable particle hydrophobicity;
Fast process;
Low cost;
Environmental protection
Poor size control;
Low production yield
[79]
Template methodCarbon dotsBetter size control of carbon dots;
size was more uniform;
High water solubility;
Facile tuning of emission color by adjusting temperature and oxidation time
High cost;
Low production yield;
Complicated product separation
[80,81]
Chemical Vapor DepositionCNTsEven growth on irregular surfaces;
High purity;
High production yield;
Suitable for mass production
Sophisticated equipment setup;
High temperature requirement;
[82]
Liquid-phase exfoliationGrapheneModerate quality and cost;
Suitable for mass production
Low production yield;
Small graphene lateral dimensions
[83]
Mechanical exfoliationGrapheneScalable and sustainable;
Low structural defects;
Low cost;
High production yield
Fragmentation effects;
Relatively low efficiency
[84,85]
Unzipping of CNTsGrapheneFacile synthetic processes;
Low cost;
Well-defined nanoribbon geometry;
Excellent candidates for electronics
Complex synthetic mechanism;
Low-throughput characterization
[86,87]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, X.; Cao, W. Flexible and Stretchable Carbon-Based Sensors and Actuators for Soft Robots. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020316

AMA Style

Zhou X, Cao W. Flexible and Stretchable Carbon-Based Sensors and Actuators for Soft Robots. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(2):316. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020316

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Xinyi, and Wenhan Cao. 2023. "Flexible and Stretchable Carbon-Based Sensors and Actuators for Soft Robots" Nanomaterials 13, no. 2: 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020316

APA Style

Zhou, X., & Cao, W. (2023). Flexible and Stretchable Carbon-Based Sensors and Actuators for Soft Robots. Nanomaterials, 13(2), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020316

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop