Next Article in Journal
The Properties of Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in the Raman Spectrum of Monolayer Graphene under Compression/Stretching Strain in Graphene/Piezoelectric Crystal Structures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Room-Temperature Synthesis of Highly-Efficient Eu3+-Activated KGd2F7 Red-Emitting Nanoparticles for White Light-Emitting Diode
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantum Cutting in KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ Green Phosphor

1
School of Physics and Electronic Information, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 235000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Green and Precise Synthetic Chemistry and Applications, Ministry of Education, Huaibei 235000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(2), 351; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020351
Submission received: 13 December 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 15 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Luminescent Nanomaterials for LEDs)

Abstract

:
Phosphors with a longer excitation wavelength exhibit higher energy conversion efficiency. Herein, quantum cutting KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ phosphors excited by middle-wave ultraviolet were synthesized via a hydrothermal method. All the KGd(CO3)2:xTb3+ phosphors remain in monoclinic structures in a large Tb3+ doping range. In the KGd(CO3)2 host, 6D3/2 and 6I17/2 of Gd3+ were employed for quantum cutting in sensitizing levels. The excited state electrons could easily transfer from Gd3+ to Tb3+ with high efficiency. There are three efficient excited bands for quantum cutting. The excited wavelengths of 244, 273, and 283 nm correspond to the transition processes of 8S7/26D3/2 (Gd3+), 8S7/26I17/2 (Gd3+), and 7F65F4 (Tb3+), and the maximum quantum yields of KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ can reach 163.5, 119, and 143%, respectively. The continuous and efficient excitation band of 273–283 nm can well match the commercial 275 nm LED chip to expand the usage of solid-state light sources. Meanwhile, the phosphor also shows good excitation efficiency at 365 nm in a high Tb3+ doping concentration. Therefore, KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ is an efficient green-emitting phosphor for ultraviolet-excited solid-state light sources.

1. Introduction

Gd3+, one of the most popular ions, was used to sensitize Tb3+ [1,2,3,4], Eu3+ [5,6], Dy3+ [7,8], and Sm3+ [9,10] in luminescence emission. There are four excited energy bands, 6GJ, 6DJ, 6IJ, and 6PJ, below 5200 cm−1 in a Gd3+ ion [11]. Energy level matching enables excited electrons to transfer between different excited states by resonance, cross-relaxation, and phonon assistance [9,12]. The higher the energy of the exciting light, the greater the possibility of the energy level matching. In much of the literature, vacuum ultraviolet and short-wave ultraviolet are widely used for efficient quantum cutting [4,13]. In the energy range of 4500–5200 cm−1, the higher energy band is ascribed to Gd3+ absorption of the 6GJ multiplet, which corresponds to the excitation light of vacuum or short-wave ultraviolet. Efficient emission of quantum cutting can be easily achieved with the assistance of 6GJ [13,14,15,16,17,18]. When the excited state energy is lower than 3900 cm−1, energy level matching is difficult to achieve for quantum cutting. Some of the literature describes quantum cutting assisted with the 6DJ and 6IJ energy bands in the Tb3+ emission. However, excited state ions can easily transfer from Gd3+ to Eu3+ and Dy3+ by nonradiative relation and energy transfer in the 6DJ and 6IJ energy bands [19,20]. Additionally, the 6IJ energy band consists of six energy levels: 6I15/2 (36,725 cm−1), 6I13/2 (36,711 cm−1), 6I11/2 (36,525 cm−1), 6I17/2 (36,461 cm−1), 6I9/2 (36,231 cm−1), and 6I7/2 (35,878 cm−1), which correspond to the theoretical excitation wavelengths of 272.4, 272.5, 273.9, 274.4, 276.1, and 278.8 nm in Gd3+ [11], respectively. The Gd3+ absorption of the 6IJ level matches well with the 275 nm LED solid-state light source, which can be used to break through the limitation of the mercury lamp for miniaturization and portability of the product.
Rare earth carbonate is an excellent optical material with high photoluminescence [21,22] and birefringence [23,24]. In this work, we reported on the quantum cutting of Gd3+ sensitized KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ phosphor in a relatively lower lever of 6DJ and 6IJ. In the phosphor, three important quantum cutting levels, 6IJ (Gd3+), 6DJ (Gd3+), and 5FJ (Tb3+), were systematically studied by the luminesce spectra, quantum yields, and decay curves. The detailed transfer processes of excited electrons between different energy levels are discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

KGd1-x(CO3)2:xTb3+ (x = 0, 0.005, 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, note as KGdC:xTb3+) phosphors were synthesized via a hydrothermal method with the raw materials Gd(NO3)3·6H2O (99.99%) and Tb(NO3)3·6H2O (99.99%). First, the nitrates of Gd(NO3)3 and Tb(NO3)3 were dissolved into deionized water. Second, the mixture was added to the K2CO3 solution (0.55 mol/L) under vigorous stirring. Third, diluted nitric acid was used to adjust the pH value (9.5) of the mixture solution. Finally, the reaction solution was transferred to an autoclave and heated at 200 °C for 8 h. Then, the precipitate was washed with deionized water and ethanol three times. The phosphor was dried at 60 °C (40 min) for the final product.
The crystal structures of KGd(CO3)2:xTb3+ were analyzed by the X-ray diffractometer in the range of 10–80° (PANalytical, Almelo, the Netherlands). The morphologies and energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) were imaged via cold field emission scanning electron microscopy (Regulus 8220, Hitachi High-Tech Co., Tokyo, Japan). The luminescent properties were measured by an FLS920 fluorescence spectrophotometer equipped with 450 W Xe-lamp (Edinburgh Instruments, Livingston, UK). Using BaSO4 as a reference, powder samples were placed in the PTFE powder vessels and slotted into the sample holder, and then the absolute quantum yields were measured by the integrating sphere within the FLS920 sample chamber in an indirect method. The lifetimes of KGd(CO3)2:xTb3+ were tested by the 60 W microsecond flashlamp (Edinburgh Instruments, Livingston, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Structures

Figure 1 shows the diffraction patterns of Tb3+-doped KGdC at x = 0.1 and 0.9. In the variation in Tb3+ doping concentration, the diffraction peaks of samples are almost the same. The crystal structures remain stable in a larger Tb3+ doping range. The most intense diffraction peak is located at the (110) crystal plane for all samples. All the diffraction patterns are consistent with the standard card of monoclinic KGd(CO3)2 (JCPDS:1-88-1422) [25]. As the Tb3+ concentration increased, the diffraction peak of the (110) crystal plane shifted to a large angle. With a similar ion radius, Gd3+ (1.05 Å) could be easily substituted by Tb3+ (1.04 Å) at an arbitrary proportion [26]. Pure phase KGdC:xTb3+ phosphors were successfully synthesized without any second phase.

3.2. Morphology

Figure 2 shows the morphologies of KGdC:xTb3+ with different Tb3+ doping concentrations. As shown in Figure 2a–f, most of the particles exhibit well-developed monoclinic crystal grains with a size of about 80–350 μm. When the Tb3+ doping concentration is increased, the morphology of grains changes slightly. All grains show good monoclinic structure in samples with different Tb3+ doping ratios. The size of monoclinic grains is relatively large, especially at x = 0.3. Although large grains are easy to fracture, the type of grains could be clearly identified. A small area of monoclinic grain was selected to demonstrate the existence of elements in KGdC:0.5Tb3+. In the element distribution maps, K, Gd and Tb were well-dispersed (Figure 2g–i). As shown in Figure 2j, the element content was similar to the original stoichiometric ratio.

3.3. Luminescence Spectra

In the low Tb3+ doping concentration, the interactions between the emission ions are weak, and the transfer process of the excited state electrons is easily traced. Figure 3 shows the luminescence properties of KGdC:xTb3+ at x = 0.005. The efficiently excited wavelengths are clearly shown in Figure 3a for the 542 nm emission. On the excitation spectrum, the intense excitation peaks are located at 244, 253, 273, 306, and 312 nm, corresponding to the Gd3+ transitions from 8S7/2 ground state to 6D3/2, 6D9/2, 6I17/2, 6P5/2, and 6P7/2 excited states [11], respectively. Additionally, the weak excitation peaks are located at 351, 368, and 376 nm, corresponding to the Tb3+ transitions from 7F6 to 5L9, 5L10, and 5G6 [27,28], respectively. However, the intense peaks of the entire exciting spectrum mainly consist in the absorption of Gd3+, which indicates a high transfer efficiency from Gd3+ to Tb3+. The contribution of Gd3+ is indicated by the emission spectra in Figure 3b. Under the excitations of 244, 253, 273, and 306 nm, most of the Gd3+ excited state electrons could transfer to Tb3+ with the typical luminescence emission of 542 nm. Another typical emission of Gd3+ at 312 nm could be observed in all spectra, which indicates that a fraction of high excited state electrons could depopulate to ground state through the 6P7/2 intermediate excited state.
As shown in Figure 4a, the peak intensities at 273 nm decreased rapidly with the increasing Tb3+ concentration in KGdC:xTb3+ phosphor monitored at 312 nm. The excitation intensities at 244, 253, and 273 nm are intense in low Tb3+ doping. When x is larger than 0.005, the excited intensities at 244 and 253 nm almost disappear. Furthermore, the exciting intensity at 273 nm also decreases rapidly. The excited intensity quenching of Gd3+ indicates that most excited state electrons cannot release energy through Gd3+ itself in a 312 nm emission at a high Tb3+ concentration.
Figure 4b shows the variations in exciting spectra under different Tb3+ concentrations in KGdC:xTb3+ phosphor monitored at 542 nm. At the lowest Tb3+ doping, the contribution to the Tb3+ emission is effective, with the intense absorption peaks of Gd3+ at 244, 253, 273, 306, and 312 nm. When the Tb3+ doping concentration is increased, the exciting peaks of short wavelength are slightly shifted to the longer wavelength from 244 to 249 nm, corresponding to the Tb3+ spin-allowed transition [29,30]. The other excitation peaks remain in the same position except for the variation in excitation intensity. The most obvious change is that the excitation intensities at 283 nm increased with the Tb3+ concentration, which corresponded to the abolishment of the Tb3+ spin-forbidden transition [22]. In the range of 300–380 nm, the exciting peaks were related to the f–f transition of Tb3+ [30]. Two excitation bands show strong absorption at high Tb3+ concentrations, which is suitable for the excitation of commercial 275 and 365 nm UV LED.
The typical emission intensities of KGdC:0.3Tb3+ at different excitation wavelengths are shown in Figure 4c. In the emission spectra of KGdC:0.3Tb3+, the 312 nm emission peak almost disappears for the excitation at 245, 273, and 283 nm. Meanwhile, the efficient emission intensities at 542 nm are about four times higher than those excited at 312 and 351 nm at x = 0.3. The relative emission intensities of KGdC:xTb3+ at 542 nm are shown in Figure 4d. As seen in the curves, the emission intensities at 245, 273, and 283 nm are relatively high. Especially for 245 nm excitation, the medium intensity of exciting light emitted the strongest emission light, which indicated that a higher efficient transfer existed between Gd3+ and Tb3+. For the excitation wavelengths of 273 and 283 nm, the phosphors exhibited a higher emission intensity in a wide range of Tb3+ doping. Moreover, the excitation spectrum of the phosphor is continuous in the range of 273 to 283 nm, which effectively matches the excitation of the 275 nm LED. For the excitation wavelength at 351 nm, the green emission intensity of phosphors slightly increased with increasing concentrations of Tb3+ ions without any concentration quenching. In addition, the decrease in emission intensity excited at 312 nm indicates that there is concentration quenching at this energy level in a high Tb3+ doping concentration.

3.4. Energy Level Diagram

Figure 5 shows the energy level diagram for the transitions of excited state electrons in the emission process. First, 244 nm photons are absorbed by Gd3+ in the 8S7/26D3/2 transition [31]. One of the excited state electrons in 6D3/2 depopulates to 6P7/2 in a non-radiation way; then, the electrons continually transfer to the 8S7/2 ground state, and emit 312 nm photons. Owing to the similar energy levels of 40,851 cm−1 (Gd3+, 6D3/2) [11] and 40,749 cm−1 (Tb3+, 5K8) [27], the other parts of the excited state electron transfer to the neighboring Tb3+ by resonance vibration. Then, the cross-relaxation occurs between two Tb3+: 5K8 + 7F65D4 + 5D4 (process 1) [21]. Finally, two excited state electrons in 5D4 are stimulated by one excited photon for the quantum cutting of 5D47FJ (J = 6, 5, 4, 3) with typical Tb3+ emission at 542 nm.
In the excitation of 253, 273, and 306 nm, the ground state electrons of Gd3+ are excited to 6D9/2, 6I17/2, and 6P5/2 levels, respectively. One of the excited electrons returns to the 6P7/2 in a non-radiation way for the 312 nm emission. Most excited state electrons are transferred to Tb3+ with high transfer efficiency [32]. The similar energy gaps of 6D9/2-5F3 (3200 cm−1) and 7F6-7F3 (3270 cm−1) are beneficial to the 6D9/2 electronic cross relation for the accumulation of 5F3 excited state electron populations in process 2 [27]. Meanwhile, 6I17/2 (Gd3+) excited state electrons also transfer to the adjacent 5F3 (Tb3+) level by resonance migration. Then, 5F3 excited state electrons relax to the 5F4 level. In process 3, the energy gaps between 5F4-5D4 (14,835 cm−1) and 7F0-5D4 (14,842 cm−1) are close enough for the cross-relation: 5F4 + 7F65D4 + 5D4 [27]. This is also another effective way to realize quantum cutting in KGdC:xTb3+ phosphor. As for the Gd3+, the excited state electrons in 6P7/2 reach the 5D4 level of Tb3+ by cross-relaxation and non-radiation transition in processes 4 and 5. Another exciting peak at 283 nm is attributed to the Tb3+ absorption from 7F6 to 5F4. The excited state electrons are directly transferred to the 5D4 level by cross-relaxation for the two-photon emission.

3.5. Quantum Yield

Figure 6 shows the quantum yields (QY) of KGdC:xTb3+ (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) under different excitation wavelengths. The results show that there are three efficient excitation bands in the quantum cutting process of KGdC:xTb3+. On the top curve, the initial value of QY reaches 132% at x = 0.05 under the 245 nm excitation. Moreover, under the optimal excitation wavelength, all QY values of KGdC:xTb3+ are greater than 100% and the maximum value is 163.5% at x = 0.5. This QY value is close to those of Tb3+-doped Ca9Y(PO4)7 (157%) [4], K2GdF5 (177%) [33], and KY(CO3)2 (177%) [22]. On the middle and lower curves, the exciting efficiency at 273 nm is greater than that at 283 nm only at x = 0.05. Quantum yields are greater than 100% in the Tb3+ doping range of 0.3–0.7. As for KGdC:0.5Tb3+, the maximum QYs are 119 and 143% under the excitations at 273 and 283 nm, respectively. In addition, the series of weak excitation peaks caused by the f–f transition of Tb3+ ions is also worthy of discussion. In the range of 320–390 nm, 351 nm is the typical excitation wavelength for Tb3+ emission. QY values increase with the increasing Tb3+ doping concentration. Compared with the other luminescent hosts, phosphate [34], fluoroborates [35], and silicate [36], concentration quenching does not occur in the KGC host with a high Tb3+ doping concentration. The unique structure of [REO8] polyhedral enables the sufficient distance between adjacent Tb3+ to avoid energy loss [21,23]. The maximum QY was 91.44% for KGdC:0.9Tb3+. It is interesting to confirm that the highly efficient excitation bands of quantum cutting are broad in KGdC host material, which is beneficial for choosing an appropriate exciting source for the application of solid-state lighting [37].

3.6. Decay Curve

Figure 7a shows the decay curves of KGdC:xTb3+ under excitation at 273 nm. The electronic depopulation of the 5D4 level is characterized by the decay curve. As shown in the figure, all decay curves could be fitted by the single exponential. The fitted lifetimes mainly originate from the decay process of excited state electrons at the 5D4 level. The values of a lifetime were shown in Figure 7b. In the excitation at 273 nm, the lifetime values of the 5D4 level first increase and then decrease with an increasing Tb3+ concentration. The dramatic change originates from the competition between the 6I17/2 (Gd3+) and 5F3 (Tb3+) levels. The lifetime value is small in a small number of Tb3+. When the Tb3+ doping concentration is increased, the energy transfers between Gd3+ and Tb3+ are efficiently enhanced [38]. The lifetimes increase with the increasing number of excited state electrons. When x is larger than 0.3, the high concentration of Tb3+ improves the cross-relaxation efficiency between two Tb3+. The rapid accumulation of excited state electrons decreases the energy lifetime of the 5D4 level. As for the excitation at 245 and 283 nm, there are two lower excitation intensities for the 312 nm emissions than that of 273 nm in low Tb3+ doping concentration (as shown in Figure 4a). The competition of excited state electrons between Gd3+ and Tb3+ is weak. The Gd3+ emission consumes a small number of excited state electrons, which results in a slight reduction in lifetime. When the Tb3+ doping concentration is further increased, the lifetime decreases rapidly in a shortened distance between Tb3+ ions [39].

4. Conclusions

Tb3+-doped KGd(CO3)2 phosphors with high quantum yields were prepared via a hydrothermal method. Tb3+ could substitute for Gd3+ in the KGd(CO3)2 crystal lattice at any proportion. In the Tb3+-doped KGd(CO3)2 material, Gd3+ is both an activated and sensitized ion. The energy transfer between Gd3+ and Tb3+ is highly efficient. Quantum cutting can be effectively triggered at three excitation bands: 245, 273, and 283 nm. Under excitation oat 245 nm, the quantum yield of KGdC:xTb3+ phosphor could reach 132% at x = 0.05, and the maximal value is 163.5% in the quantum cutting process of KGdC:0.5Tb3+. The excitation bands at 273 and 283 nm are continuous, which is consistent with the emission wavelength of commercial 275 nm LED. The highly efficient KGdC:Tb3+ phosphor could be potentially applied to the ultraviolet-excited solid-state light sources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L. and G.Z.; investigation, D.L. and Y.Z.; resources, D.L., J.Q. and L.H.; data curation, J.Q. and L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L.; writing—review and editing, D.L.; visualization, D.L.; supervision, D.L.; project administration, D.L.; funding acquisition, D.L. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province (KJ2020A0048) and Anhui Natural Science Foundation (2108085QA30).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province and the Anhui Natural Science Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bao, S.; Yu, H.; Gao, G.; Zhu, H.; Wang, D.; Zhu, P.; Wang, G. Rare-earth single atom based luminescent composite nanomaterials: Tunable full-color single phosphor and applications in WLEDs. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 3594–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van Do, P.; Quang, V.X.; Thanh, L.D.; Tuyen, V.P.; Ca, N.X.; Hoa, V.X.; Van Tuyen, H. Energy transfer and white light emission of KGdF4 polycrystalline co-doped with Tb3+/Sm3+ ions. Opt. Mater. 2019, 92, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jaiswal, S.R.; Nagpure, P.A.; Omanwar, S.K. Improvement of quantum efficiency through Gd3+ to Eu3+ energy transfer in YF3 phosphor. Luminescence 2021, 36, 1395–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, F.; Xie, J.; Li, G.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Tao, Y. Cation composition sensitive visible quantum cutting behavior of high efficiency green phosphors Ca9Ln(PO4)7:Tb3+ (Ln = Y, La, Gd). J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 872–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramakrishna, P.; Padhi, R.K.; Mohapatra, D.K.; Jena, H.; Panigrahi, B.S. Structural characterization, Gd3+Eu3+ energy transfer and radiative properties of Gd/Eu in codoped Li2O–ZnO–SrO–B2O3–P2O5 glass. Opt. Mater. 2022, 125, 112060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhong, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhu, J.; Cai, P.; Du, P. Room-Temperature Synthesis of Highly-Efficient Eu3+-Activated KGd2F7 Red-Emitting Nanoparticles for White Light-Emitting Diode. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Li, X.; Sun, X.; Li, J.-G. White-light emitting (Y,Gd)PO4:Dy3+ microspheres: Gd3+ mediated morphology tailoring and selective energy transfer and correlation of photoluminescence behaviors. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 110, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ye, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Wen, Z.; Cao, Z.; Cao, Z.; Shen, X.; Li, Y.; Yuan, X.; Wang, C.; et al. Optical temperature sensing based on phonon-assisted population of Dy3+ sensitized by Gd3+ in Gd2Ge2O7 nanophosphors. J. Lumin. 2020, 227, 117567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, P.; Bedyal, A.K.; Kumar, V.; Khajuria, Y.; Sharma, V.; Ntwaeaborwa, O.M.; Swart, H.C. Energy transfer mechanism from Gd3+ to Sm3+ in K3Gd(PO4)2:Sm3+ phosphor. Mater. Res. Express 2015, 2, 076202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wantana, N.; Kaewjaeng, S.; Kothan, S.; Kim, H.J.; Kaewkhao, J. Energy transfer from Gd3+ to Sm3+ and luminescence characteristics of CaO–Gd2O3–SiO2–B2O3 scintillating glasses. J. Lumin. 2017, 181, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Carnall, W.; Fields, P.; Rajnak, K. Electronic Energy Levels of the Trivalent Lanthanide Aquo Ions. II. Gd3+. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 4443–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Selvalakshmi, T.; Bose, A.C.; Velmathi, S. Effect of Eu3+ and Al3+ Concentrations on Photoluminescence of Gd2O3:Eu3+. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 5760–5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jaiswal, S.; Nagpure, P.; Omanwar, S. Energy Transfer Process in MgF2:Gd3+,Eu3+ Phosphor: Application to Visible Quantum Cutting. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Technol. 2021, 8, 272–276. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liang, W.; Wang, Y. Visible quantum cutting through downconversion in Eu3+-doped K2GdZr(PO4)3 phosphor. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 119, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hua, R.; Niu, J.; Chen, B.; Li, M.; Yu, T.; Li, W. Visible quantum cutting in GdF3:Eu3+ nanocrystals via downconversion. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 1642–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Shi, C.; Kirm, M.; True, M.; Vielhauer, S.; Zimmerer, G. Luminescent properties of Gd2SiO5 powder doped with Eu3+ under VUV–UV excitation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2005, 17, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wegh, R.T.; Donker, H.; Oskam, K.D.; Meijerink, A. Visible Quantum Cutting in LiGdF4:Eu3+ Through Downconversion. Science 1999, 283, 663–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van der Kolk, E.; Dorenbos, P.; Krämer, K.; Biner, D.; Guedel, H. High-resolution luminescence spectroscopy study of down-conversion routes in NaGdF4:Nd3+ and NaGdF4:Tm3+ using synchrotron radiation. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 125110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. You, F.; Zhang, X.; Peng, H.; Huang, S.; Huang, Y.; Tao, Y. Energy transfer and luminescent properties of Pr3+ and/or Dy3+ doped NaYF4 and NaGdF4. J. Rare Earths 2013, 31, 1125–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hachani, S.; Guerbous, L. Synthesis, Luminescence, and Energy Transfer Properties of YPO4:Gd3+, Eu3+ and YP3O9:Sm3+, Eu3+ Phosphors. J Fluoresc. 2019, 29, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, D.; Zhu, G.; Zhao, X. High efficiently color-tunable emission in KTb(CO3)2:Eu3+ phosphors. Opt. Mater. 2021, 119, 111310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, D.; Zhu, G. Quantum Cutting in Ultraviolet B-Excited KY(CO3)2:Tb3+ Phosphors. Materials 2022, 15, 6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, Y.; Hu, C.-L.; Fang, Z.; Chen, J.; Xie, W.-J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.-P.; Mao, J.-G. KRE(CO3)2 (RE = Eu, Gd, Tb): New mixed metal carbonates with strong photoluminescence and large birefringence. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 5645–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, L.; Peng, G.; Yan, T.; Luo, M.; Lin, C.; Ye, N. Three alkaline-rare earth cations carbonates with large birefringence in the deep UV range. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 742, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kutlu, I.; Kalz, H.-J.; Wartchow, R.; Ehrhardt, H.; Seidel, H.; Meyer, G. Kalium-Lanthanoid-Carbonate, KM(CO3)2 (M = Nd, Gd, Dy, Ho, Yb). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1997, 623, 1753–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shannon, R. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carnall, W.T.; Fields, P.R.; Rajnak, K. Electronic Energy Levels of the Trivalent Lanthanide Aquo Ions. III. Tb3+. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 4447–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gómez-Morales, J.; Fernández-Penas, R.; Acebedo-Martínez, F.J.; Romero-Castillo, I.; Verdugo-Escamilla, C.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Esposti, L.D.; Jiménez-Martínez, Y.; Fernández-Sánchez, J.F.; Iafisco, M.; et al. Luminescent Citrate-Functionalized Terbium-Substituted Carbonated Apatite Nanomaterials: Structural Aspects, Sensitized Luminescence, Cytocompatibility, and Cell Uptake Imaging. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, X. Color tuning of Ba2ZnSi2O7:Ce3+,Tb3+ phosphor via energy transfer. J. Lumin. 2014, 153, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Halmurat, D.; Yusufu, T.; Wang, Q.-l.; He, J.; Sidike, A. Rare earth ion Tb3+ doped natural sodium feldspar (NaAlSi3O8) Luminescent properties and energy transfer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhou, W.; Zhang, W.; Yin, M. Study on spectroscopic properties of GdOBr: RE3+ (RE = Eu, Tb, Ce). J. Rare Earths 2008, 26, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Omanwar, S.K.; Jaiswal, S.R.; Sawala, N.S.; Koparkar, K.A.; Bhatkar, V.B. Ultra-violet to visible quantum cutting in YPO4:Gd3+,Tb3+ phosphor via down conversion. Mater. Discov. 2017, 7, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jaiswal, S.R.; Sawala, N.S.; Nagpure, P.A.; Bhatkar, V.B.; Omanwar, S.K. Visible quantum cutting in Tb3+ doped BaGdF5 phosphor for plasma display panel. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron 2017, 28, 2407–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gao, T.; Zhang, L.; Qiao, Z.; Zhang, L.; Gan, S.; Huo, Q. Self-template construction of honeycomb-like mesoporous YPO4:Ln3+ (Ln = Eu, Tb) phosphors with tuneable luminescent properties. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 782, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, D.; Li, G.; Yang, W.; Huang, W.; Leng, Z.; Fang, S.; Li, L. Tunable photoluminescence properties and energy transfer of Ca5(BO3)3F: Tb3+/Eu3+ phosphors for solid state lighting. J. Lumin. 2019, 208, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, M.; Wang, L.; Ran, W.; Deng, Z.; Shi, J.; Ren, C. Tunable Luminescence in Sr2MgSi2O7: Tb3+,Eu3+ Phosphors Based on Energy Transfer. Materials 2017, 10, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Qiao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Xia, Z. Tuning of the Compositions and Multiple Activator Sites toward Single-Phased White Emission in (Ca9-xSrx)MgK(PO4)7: Eu2+ Phosphors for Solid-State Lighting. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 5006–5012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yaiphaba, N.; Ningthoujam, R.S.; Singh, N.R.; Vatsa, R.K. Luminescence Properties of Redispersible Tb3+-Doped GdPO4 Nanoparticles Prepared by an Ethylene Glycol Route. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 18, 2682–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cao, J.; Chen, W.; Xu, D.; Li, X.; Wei, R.; Chen, L.; Sun, X.; Guo, H. Transparent glass ceramics containing Lu6O5F8: Tb3+ nano-crystals: Enhanced photoluminescence and X-ray excited luminescence. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 101, 1585–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of KGdC:xTb3+ (x = 0.1, 0.9).
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of KGdC:xTb3+ (x = 0.1, 0.9).
Nanomaterials 13 00351 g001
Figure 2. (af) Morphologies of KGdC:xTb3+ (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9); (gi) Elemental mapping of K, Gd, and Tb; (j) Energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis.
Figure 2. (af) Morphologies of KGdC:xTb3+ (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9); (gi) Elemental mapping of K, Gd, and Tb; (j) Energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis.
Nanomaterials 13 00351 g002
Figure 3. Luminescence properties of KGdC:0.005Tb3+: (a) Excitation spectrum; (b) Emission spectra excited at 244, 253, 273, 306, and 312 nm.
Figure 3. Luminescence properties of KGdC:0.005Tb3+: (a) Excitation spectrum; (b) Emission spectra excited at 244, 253, 273, 306, and 312 nm.
Nanomaterials 13 00351 g003
Figure 4. Luminescence properties of KGdC:xTb3+ (a) Excited spectra monitored at 312 nm; (b) Excited spectra monitored at 542 nm; (c) Typical emission spectra of KGdC:0.3Tb3+ at different exciting wavelengths; (d) 542 nm emission intensities.
Figure 4. Luminescence properties of KGdC:xTb3+ (a) Excited spectra monitored at 312 nm; (b) Excited spectra monitored at 542 nm; (c) Typical emission spectra of KGdC:0.3Tb3+ at different exciting wavelengths; (d) 542 nm emission intensities.
Nanomaterials 13 00351 g004
Figure 5. Energy level diagram of KGdC:Tb3+.
Figure 5. Energy level diagram of KGdC:Tb3+.
Nanomaterials 13 00351 g005
Figure 6. Quantum Yields of KGdC:xTb3+ under different excitation wavelengths.
Figure 6. Quantum Yields of KGdC:xTb3+ under different excitation wavelengths.
Nanomaterials 13 00351 g006
Figure 7. Decay properties of KGdC:xTb3+ (a)decay curves; (b) Lifetimes of Tb3+ 5D4 level.
Figure 7. Decay properties of KGdC:xTb3+ (a)decay curves; (b) Lifetimes of Tb3+ 5D4 level.
Nanomaterials 13 00351 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, D.; Qian, J.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, G. Quantum Cutting in KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ Green Phosphor. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020351

AMA Style

Li D, Qian J, Huang L, Zhang Y, Zhu G. Quantum Cutting in KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ Green Phosphor. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(2):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Dechuan, Jian Qian, Lei Huang, Yumeng Zhang, and Guangping Zhu. 2023. "Quantum Cutting in KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ Green Phosphor" Nanomaterials 13, no. 2: 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020351

APA Style

Li, D., Qian, J., Huang, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, G. (2023). Quantum Cutting in KGd(CO3)2:Tb3+ Green Phosphor. Nanomaterials, 13(2), 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop