Next Article in Journal
Two-Dimensional Sb Modified TiO2 Nanorod Arrays as Photoanodes for Efficient Solar Water Splitting
Next Article in Special Issue
Behaviors of AlGaN Strain Relaxation on a GaN Porous Structure Studied with d-Spacing Crystal Lattice Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Antifouling Systems Based on a Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane-Based Hexyl Imidazolium Salt Adsorbed on Copper Nanoparticles Supported on Titania
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/nano13071292
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Charge Transfer in MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 Heterojunctions for High-Performance Solar Cells

by
Hua Li
1,
Chao Ding
1,2,*,
Dong Liu
1,
Shota Yajima
1,
Kei Takahashi
1,
Shuzi Hayase
1 and
Qing Shen
1,*
1
Faculty of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan
2
Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(7), 1292; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071292
Submission received: 2 March 2023 / Revised: 30 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semiconductor Nanomaterials for Optoelectronic Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3) perovskite quantum dots (QDs) have become one of the most promising materials for optoelectronics. Understanding the dynamics of the charge transfer from MAPbI3 QDs to the charge transport layer (CTL) is critical for improving the performance of MAPbI3 QD photoelectronic devices. However, there is currently less consensus on this. In this study, we used an ultrafast transient absorption (TA) technique to investigate the dynamics of charge transfer from MAPbI3 QDs to CTL titanium dioxide (TiO2), elucidating the dependence of these kinetics on QD size with an injection rate from 1.6 × 1010 to 4.3 × 1010 s−1. A QD solar cell based on MAPbI3/TiO2 junctions with a high-power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 11.03% was fabricated, indicating its great potential for application in high-performance solar cells.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Metal halide perovskite semiconductor materials have been extensively investigated for potential applications in photovoltaics (PVs) [1,2], light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [3,4], detectors [5,6,7], and lasers [8,9]. To date, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of bulk perovskite solar cells (PSCs) has been rapidly improved to 25.7%, which is comparable to that of large-scale commercial crystalline silicon solar cells [10]. Nevertheless, although progress has been achieved over the past few years, some challenges remain unsolved, such as instability resulting from moisture/thermal sensitivity, which hinders commercial applications [11]. The low-dimensional perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) possess new attractive features compared with their bulk counterparts, such as improved defect tolerance [12], enhanced stability [13], high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) [14], and tunable bandgaps over the whole spectrum region [15,16]. More importantly, wide bandgap tunability makes PQDs particularly suitable when acting as a top cell in tandem solar cells [17]. The PQDs with precise size control and high PLQY have been successfully synthesized to date [14,18,19]. Apart from formamidinium lead triiodide (FAPbI3) and Cesium lead triiodide (CsPbI3 QDs), methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI3) QDs, as one of the most promising materials has also been used in solar cells due to an appropriate Goldschmidt tolerance factor (τ is approximately 0.91) and low-temperature processing preparation [20,21].
To fully comprehend the fundamental photophysical process and take advantages of the unique properties of these QDs in photovoltaic devices, it is generally designed as heterojunction that QDs selectively contact other metal oxides (MOs) such as NiOx, TiO2 or ZnO, where the MOs work as the charge transport layer (CTL) [19,22,23]. These QD/MO heterojunctions are an integral part of the QD solar cells, in which the main photogenerated charge carriers transfer from QDs to the QD/CTL interface, are extracted by the CTL, and must finally be collected by the electrodes [24]. The dynamic competition between charge transfer and charge recombination is a critical determinant of photovoltaic device performance. Therefore, a deep understanding of the electronic interactions of QDs with the CTL is crucial to enhancing the performance of MAPbI3 QD-based optoelectronics. The electron injection rate from bulk MAPbI3 to TiO2 has been explored in several works [25,26]. However, little is known concerning the photoexcited carrier transfer kinetics at the MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 heterojunction. Powerful ultrafast transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy enables us to study charge transfer dynamics [22,27,28]. In this study, we investigated the charge injection dynamics from MAPbI3 QDs to TiO2 for the first time, and the charge transfer rate of various sizes of QDs was determined and found to increase from 1.6 × 1010 to 4.3 × 1010 s−1 with the average QD size decreasing from 13.3 to 9.4 nm. Finally, A solar cell based on MAPbI3/TiO2 junctions with a PCE of 11.03% was fabricated, indicating an efficient charge transfer through these junctions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Lead (II) iodide (PbI2, 99.99%) was purchased from high-purity chemicals. The 9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD, ≥99.5%) was purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Methylammonium acetate (MA-acetate, >98%) and formamidinium iodide (FAI, >99.0%) were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Corporation (TCI, Tokyo, Japan). Oleic acid (OA; 90%, technical grade), oleylamine (OAm, 70%, technical grade), 1-Octadecene (ODE, 90%, technical grade) and chlorobenzene (CB, anhydrous, 99.8%), Bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide lithium salt (Li-TFSI) and 4-tert-butylpyridine (4-TBP; 96%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Tokyo, Japan). Hexane (Guaranteed Reagent), methyl acetate (MeOAc, 99.5%, anhydrous), octane (Wako special grade), ethyl acetate (EtOAc, 99.5%, anhydrous) and lead nitrate (Pb (NO3)2, 99.9%) were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan). The 30NR-D titania paste was purchased from Greatcell Solar Materials (Queanbeyan, Australia). Al-Nanoxide A/SP was purchased from Solaronix. All chemicals were used as received.

2.2. Colloidal Synthesis of MAPbI3 Quantum Dots (QDs)

At first, a 50 mL three-neck flask was charged with 1 g of MA-acetate and 20 mL of OA, and the mixture was dried for 1 min at room temperature (RT) and then heated to 80 °C under nitrogen until all the MA-acetate had reacted with OA, and the MAOA precursor was obtained (it must be preheated to 60 °C before injection). Subsequently, 0.344 g of PbI2 and 20 mL of ODE were loaded into a 50 mL three-neck flask and degassed under a vacuum for 1 h at 120 °C. A total of 6 mL of OA and 3 mL of OAm were injected at 120 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. After the complete solubilization of PbI2, the mixture was cooled down to 60, 80 or 100 °C, and a 4, 5, or 6 mL MAOA precursor solution was swiftly injected (the volume ratio of MAOA precursor and the injection temperature were regulated to control the QDs size). About 10 s later, the reaction mixture was quenched with an ice-water bath. The crude QD solution was divided into two tubes, and the mixture of 1 mL Toluene together with 5 mL MeOAc was added to each tube, followed by centrifugation at 9300 rpm for 4 min 20 s. The supernatant was discarded, and the precipitate was dried with nitrogen and then dispersed in hexane (the precipitate was dispersed in octane to prepare the MAPbI3 QD solar cells). The obtained QD solution was kept in a refrigerator until use.

2.3. Fabrication of the QDs/MOs Heterojunction

Mesoporous TiO2 and Al2O3 films were prepared according to our previous reports [19,23]. Briefly, the purchased 30NR-D titania paste was diluted by ethanol and was deposited on a glass substrate via the doctor blade method using mending tape as a spacer before it was then dried at 180 °C for 10 min. Finally, the dried films were calcined in the air at 500 °C for 30 min. The preparation method of the Al2O3 film was similar to that of TiO2. The QDs/MOs heterojunction was obtained by directly adsorbing the QDs on MOs; that is, the mesoporous TiO2 or Al2O3 films were immersed in a MAPbI3 QD colloidal solution in hexane for 8 h, subsequently, the adsorbed QD films were rinsed in hexane and dried with nitrogen.

2.4. Fabrication of the MAPbI3 QD Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells

The FTO glass substrates were cleaned with successive sonication in ethanol, acetone, and 2-propanol for 20 min, respectively, and then treated in an ultraviolet-ozone chamber for 10 min before use. The compact TiO2 layer with approximately 50 nm was deposited on FTO substrates and annealed at 450 °C for 30 min [29]. The MAPbI3 colloidal QD solution in octane with a concentration of 100 mg/mL was spin-cast on TiO2 at 2000 rpm for 20 s in a nitrogen glovebox; the resulting film was dipped into a Pb (NO3)2 in MeOAc saturated solution for 5 s, rinsed with neat MeOAc 3 times, and dried at 2000 rpm for 20 s. The above QD deposition process was repeated four times to achieve the desired film thickness. After that, the films were soaked in FAI in EtOAc saturated solution for 10 s, and dried at 2000 rpm for 20 s. The spiro-OMeTAD (0.09 g of spiro-OMeTAD, 1 mL of chlorobenzene, 22 μL of Li-TFSI (520 mg/mL) and 36 μL of 4-TBP) was then spin-cast on the QD absorber layers at 5000 rpm 30 s. Finally, the Au electrode with a thickness of 80 nm was deposited using thermal evaporation. The active surface area of the solar cells was 0.16 cm2.

2.5. Characterization

The morphologies of MAPbI3 QDs and MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 nanoparticles were obtained using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM-2100F, Akishima, Japan). The UV-vis absorption spectra for all samples were measured by a spectrophotometer (HITACHI, U-3900H, Tokyo, Japan). The phase identification was performed on a powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, TTR-III, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of the QD solution was obtained with an integrating sphere of an Absolute PL Quantum Yield Spectrometer system (C11347, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan), and the excitation power was 0.1 mW. The photoelectron yield spectra (PYS) were recorded by an ionization energy measurement system (Model BIP-KV205, Bunkoukeiki Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Time-resolved PL (TRPL) spectra were characterized by a NIR PL lifetime spectrometer (C12132, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). The J–V curves measurement of MAPbI3 quantum dot solar cell was performed on a Keithley 2400 digital source meter (Tektronix, Tokyo, Japan) under AM 1.5 irradiation at a scan step of 0.05 V, and the device area of 0.16 cm2 was defined using a black metal aperture. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) measurements were carried out using monochromatic illumination (300 W xenon arc lamp through Nikon G250 monochromator, Tokyo, Japan). Transient absorption (TA) measurements were carried out using a femtosecond (fs) TA setup. The pump and probe pulses were delivered by a titanium/sapphire laser (CPA-2010, Clark-MXR Inc., Dexter, MI, USA) with a pulse width of 150 fs, a wavelength of 775 nm, and a repetition rate of 1000 HZ. The laser light was split into two parts; one part was incident on a sapphire plate to produce white light for the probe beam. The other part was used as a pump pulse (wavelength can be tuned from 290 nm to 3 μm) converted from an optical parametric amplifier (a TOAPS from Quantronix, Hamden, CT, USA). The pump light was used to excite the sample. A silicon photodiode was exploited to collect the probe light passed through the sample. In this work, a pump light with a wavelength of 470 nm was used to excite all the samples. The intensity of pump light varied from 119 μJ/cm2 to 1.5 μJ/cm2.

3. Results and Discussion

Various sizes of MAPbI3 QDs were synthesized by a modified hot-injection approach (details can be found in Section 2), as illustrated in Figure 1 [30]. Figure 2a–c shows the representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and their corresponding size distribution histogram of MAPbI3 QDs of three sizes: all QDs are nearly cubic shapes. The average size of small (S), medium (M) and large (L) MAPbI3 QDs are 9.4 ± 1.3, 11.3 ± 1.7 and 13.3 ± 1.5 nm, respectively, which are bigger than the exciton Bohr diameter of MAPbI3 (~5.6 nm) [31]; thus these QDs are in the weaker confinement regime. A high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) pattern of L-MAPbI3 QDs (Figure 2d) shows a lattice plane spacing of 0.31 nm corresponding to the (200) plane of the cubic MAPbI3 QDs [32]. The clear lattice fringes indicate the high crystallinity of the MAPbI3 QDs.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement was performed to further identify the crystallinity of obtained MAPbI3 QDs, as presented in Figure 3a, and all three sizes of MAPbI3 QDs showed a pure cubic phase [33,34]. The typical diffraction peaks at 2θ with 14.10°, 28.51°, 31.75°, 40.68° and 43.16° corresponded to (100), (200), (210), (220) and (300), respectively. Furthermore, both the normalized absorption and steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra of MAPbI3 QDs in hexane with different sizes exhibited continuous tunability, as can be seen in Figure 3b. To determine the optical band gap energy of various sizes of MAPbI3 QDs, the dependency of (αhv)2 upon the incident photons energy hv was plotted, as depicted in Figure 3c, and the band gap (Eg) was estimated by extrapolating the linear part of (αhv)2 versus (hv) [35]. As shown in Table 1, the Eg of small, medium, and large MAPbI3 QDs was 1.75 eV, 1.71 eV, and 1.67 eV, correspondingly. Analogously, the PL peak positions of various sizes of QDs were tuned from 722 to 758 nm. As-prepared MAPbI3 QDs display a high PLQY of 97.8 ± 1.9%, 95.7 ± 3.5% and 96.6 ± 2.9% for large, medium, and small QDs (Table 1), respectively; after being saved in ambient conditions for 12 months, they still exhibited 84.2 ± 1.7%, 81.1 ± 1.5%, and 86.0 ± 1.8% (Figure 3d), correspondingly, suggesting the high quality of these QDs. The adsorption of QDs on the Al2O3 or TiO2 substrate was carried out by immersing the films in a hexane colloidal solution of MAPbI3 QDs for 8 h before rinsed using hexane and drying with nitrogen (details are provided in Section 2.3) [19,23]. The HRTEM in Figure 2e also confirmed that MAPbI3 QDs had been successfully and chemically adsorbed on TiO2 (lattice plane spacing of 0.31 and 0.35 nm is associated with the (200) and (101) plane of cubic MAPbI3 QDs and TiO2, respectively). This monolayer adsorption can ensure that the charge transfer dynamics at the interface of QDs and CTL can be studied without other complicated processes.
To confirm the thermodynamical feasibility of charge transfer from all MAPbI3 QDs to TiO2, firstly, the photoelectron yield spectra (PYS) of all QDs were measured, and the valence band energy level of each QD sample was obtained from the extrapolation of the linear portion of each spectrum, as shown in Figure 4a. The band gap of all QDs was determined from the Tauc plots, as discussed above. For the TiO2, similarly, the band gap and position of the valence band maximum (VBM) were determined by the Tauc plot (Figure 4b) and PYS spectra (Figure 4c), respectively. All sizes of MAPbI3 QDs showed a shallow conduction band (CB) energy level (−3.87, −3.81, −3.75 eV for large, medium and small QDs, respectively) compared to that of TiO2 (−4.19 eV), which were in favor of the charge transfer, while the Al2O3 acted as a charge-transfer barrier for its high CB edge (electron injection is not thermodynamically feasible) [19,36,37]. Figure 4d–e schematically exhibits the available charge transfer pathway in MAPbI3 QDs. Therefore, a comparison of the charge transfer dynamics of the QD solution, adsorbed on Al2O3 as well as TiO2 films, allows us to estimate the transfer rate of the carrier from QDs to TiO2.
In particular, as shown in Figure 5a–c, an obvious PL quenching of MAPbI3 QDs adsorbed on insulating Al2O3 films was observed. Considering that there was no charge transfer between QDs and Al2O3, this quenched PL may result from the absence of surface ligands of QDs attached to Al2O3 films, which can lead to the introduction of nonradiative recombination sites. As expected, the MAPbI3 QDs adsorbed on TiO2 shows great PL quenching compared to the QD solution and that attached on Al2O3 films (Figure 5a–c), suggesting that the effective charge transfer occurred in QDs/TiO2 heterojunctions [19,23].
In addition, time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) measurements were employed to examine the carrier kinetics of various sizes of MAPbI3 QDs and QDs/MOs heterojunction, as shown in Figure 6a–c. All the decay curves of various sizes of QDs as well as QDs/Al2O3 were well fitted by a biexponential model (y = A1exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2), where A1 and A2 are constant, τ1 and τ2 represent lifetime, and t is time), and the obtained parameters were listed in Table 2. Since there was nearly a 100% PLQY of all sizes of MAPbI3 QDs mentioned above, the nonradiative recombination process of the carrier could be neglected; thus, the fast process (τ1, approximately 50 ns) with dominant contribution (>90%) of all three sized QDs could be ascribed to the radiative recombination of excitons (electron–hole pairs), while the slower process may have resulted from the quasi-free carrier radiative recombination, due to the weaker quantum confinement effect of these QDs. (The photoexcited excitons of QDs can rapidly dissociate to become quasi-free carriers, which then decay through bimolecular recombination) [19,38]. The average lifetimes were calculated by τ a v e = ∑ A i τ i 2 ∑ A i τ i , and those of all QD solution were similar (68~80 ns). In particular, it was found that the QDs attached to Al2O3 showed a shorter average lifetime (18~23 ns) than those of the QD solution, which was caused by the introduced defects. In addition, the decay curves of QDs/TiO2 heterojunctions were fitted using a mono-exponential equation (Table 2). As can be seen from Figure 6a–c, the QDs attached on TiO2 films present a much shorter PL lifetime (<2.8 ns) than those adsorbed on Al2O3 as well as the QD solution, which gives important evidence that the effective charge transfer occurred in this heterojunction and indicates that the charge transfer process was the dominant route of the photoexcited carrier in QDs/TiO2.
Nevertheless, the nanosecond timescale is difficult when revealing charge transfer dynamics in the QDs/TiO2 heterojunction. Thus, femtosecond transient absorption (TA) measurements were carried out at an excitation wavelength of 470 nm. The three-body Auger recombination process may appear at a higher excitation intensity, and this process generally is much faster than the bimolecular recombination, thus, can possibly overlap with the charge transfer process, which makes the discussion complicated [39]. First, the excitation intensity was adjusted from 119 to 1.5 μJ/cm2 to avoid the fast Auger recombination. As shown in Figure 7a, the fast decay component appeared in TA responses when the excitation intensity was larger than 3.0 μJ/cm2, and became more significant with the increase in intensity. When the excitation intensity was adjusted to 3.0 μJ/cm2, the fast decay process disappeared, and the normalized TA decay curves overlapped as well, which suggested that the Auger recombination was eliminated. The TA spectra of all sizes of QDs in hexane, QDs attached on the Al2O3 and TiO2 were collected 5 ps after band gap excitation under 1.5 μJ/cm2 and are exhibited in Figure 7b–d. The wavelength of each bleaching maximum of TA spectra coincides with that of the lowest excitation state transition of absorption spectra (Table 1). All TA kinetic curves of QD solution and QDs/Al2O3 monitored at each bleaching maximum can be well fitted by the single-exponential function (Figure 7e–g): y = A0 exp (−t/τ) + y0. As shown in Table 3, the fitting lifetimes of the large, medium, and small MAPbI3 QD colloidal solution are 123, 150 and 134 ps, respectively. Considering the absence of Auger recombination, these lifetimes can be assigned to the nonradiative combination (i.e., carrier trapping in defect states), although this process has been ignored in the nanoscale (the results in TRPL characterization). The constant component (lifetime >> 1 ns) can be attributed to radiative recombination. For the TA decay of QDs/Al2O3, the fitted lifetimes (278, 291, and 253 ps for large, medium, and small QDs/Al2O3, respectively) with an amplitude from 51% to 60% were considered to originate from the nonradiative recombination, whereas the constant part may mostly reflect the radiative recombination processes. In the case of QDs/TiO2, the TA kinetics of all sized QDs/TiO2 were determined to be biexponential (y = A1exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2) + y0) (Figure 7e–g), as shown in Table 3, an additional faster decay of the signal traces with the lifetime of 62, 36, and 23 ps for large, medium, and small QDs, separately, was obtained. The fitting of the later slower parts of decay curves with a time constant of 215~331 ps was close to those of the QDs/Al2O3, which could be assigned to the nonradiative recombination. Thus, the fast parts of kinetics could be attributed to the charge transfer process from QDs to TiO2. The rate of charge transfer (kCT) from QDs to TiO2 could be calculated from: 1/τ1, those of large, medium, and small QDs were 1.6 × 1010, 2.8 × 1010and 4.3 × 1010 s−1, correspondingly. It is worth noting that the kCT of MAPbI3 QDs depends on the QD size. This was perhaps caused by the different free energy forces (−ΔG) of these QDs/TiO2 systems. According to the Marcus theory, the kCT is a function of ΔG, which is the free energy change between the donor and acceptor and associated with the QDs size [40,41]. We calculated the ΔG through the following Equations:
Δ G = Δ E e l e c t r o n + e 2 2 R Q D + 2.179 e 2 ε Q D R Q D − e 2 4 R Q D + h ε a c c e p t o r − 1 ε a c c e p t o r + 1
Δ E e l e c t r o n = C B M a c c e p t o r − C B M Q D
where ΔEelectron is the energy difference between the conduction band edge of the acceptor semiconductor TiO2 and QDs, e is the elementary charge, RQD represents the radius of QDs, h is the distance between QDs and TiO2 (the radius of QDs is very large compared to h; thus, it can be set to 0), and the εacceptor and εQD are the dielectric permittivity of TiO2 and QDs (εTiO2 = 80, εQD = 26) [42,43]. We obtained the ΔG value using Equations (1) and (2), as shown in Figure 7h, and the value was −0.09, −0.11 and −0.13 eV for small, medium, and large QDs.
Finally, we successfully fabricated the QD solar cell with the structure of glass/FTO/TiO2/QDs/spiro-OMeTAD/Au with the active area of 0.16 cm2 (the details of the fabrication can be found in Section 2.4) using the medium size of QDs. The representative J–V curve is presented in Figure 8a, and the MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2-based solar cell achieved a high PCE of 11.03%, with a Jsc of 14.31 mA/cm2, Voc of 1.15 V, and fill factor (FF) of 67%, which demonstrated a significant enhancement over the same composition QD solar cells [21]. Figure 8b shows the external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectrum of this device, which is in good agreement with the Jsc value obtained from the J–V curve. Additionally, the MAPbI3 QD-based solar cell device exhibited high stability, which could maintain ~81% of its initial PCE after 115 days of storage under an atmosphere with a humidity of <30% (Figure 8c–f). According to the previous experimental and theoretical studies, the efficiency of perovskite solar cells could be significantly improved through the application of metallic nanoparticles in the perovskite layer, or at the interface between the charge transfer layer and absorber layer due to the optical plasmon photovoltaic effect and intrinsic electric plasmonic effects [44,45]. Furthermore, the binding energy of the excitons could be reduced through the plasmons of metallic nanoparticles and the rapid dissociation of excitons that took place at the interface of the charge (electron or hole) transport layer and perovskite layer, which could significantly increase the photo-current of perovskite solar cells [45]. For PQD solar cells, low carrier mobility is the main reason for such lower Jsc than that of bulk perovskite solar cells. Hence, the PQD solution dopped with metallic nanoparticles and the interface between the PQD layer and charge transport layer modified by metallic nanoparticles produced promising approaches for increasing the photocurrent of PQD solar cells and further optimizing the efficiency of PQD solar cell devices.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the charge transfer dynamics of MAPbI3 QD/MOs were comprehensively investigated using a TA characterization method. Effective charge injection in MAPbI3 QD/TiO2 heterojunctions was observed, and the size dependence of the rate of the charge transfer from QDs to TiO2 was further verified in our work. The rate of the charge transfer from large (13.3 ± 1.5 nm), medium (11.3 ± 1.7 nm), and small (9.4 ± 1.3 nm) QDs to TiO2 were determined to be 1.6 × 1010, 2.8 × 1010, and 4.3 × 1010 s−1, respectively. Furthermore, a high PCE of 11.03% based on QDs/TiO2 junctions was also achieved, demonstrating the great potential of using MAPbI3 QDs in high-performance photovoltaic devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.D., Q.S. and H.L.; methodology, H.L., C.D., S.Y., D.L. and K.T.; software, H.L., D.L. and K.T.; validation, H.L.; formal analysis, H.L.; investigation, H.L.; resources, S.H. and Q.S.; data curation, H.L. and Q.S.; writing, H.L.; visualization, H.L.; supervision, Q.S.; project administration, Q.S.; funding acquisition, Q.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) under grant number (nedo p20015), the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Mirai program (JPMJMI17EA), JSPS MEXT KAKENHI Grant Numbers (20H02565, 17H02736), JST SPRING (Grant Number JPMJSP2131), MEXT Scholarship (Student Development Program for Multifaceted International Collaboration Hubs, 92006007294).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, H.; Wu, G.; Li, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, D.; Liu, S.F. Additive engineering to grow micron-sized grains for stable high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1901241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Min, H.; Lee, D.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, G.; Lee, K.S.; Kim, J.; Paik, M.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, M.G.; et al. Perovskite solar cells with atomically coherent interlayers on SnO2 electrodes. Nature 2021, 598, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, S.; Kakekhani, A.; Park, J.; Park, J.; Lee, Y.-H.; Xu, H.; Nagane, S.; Wexler, R.B.; Kim, D.-H.; et al. Comprehensive defect suppression in perovskite nanocrystals for high-efficiency light-emitting diodes. Nat. Photonics 2021, 15, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Y.; Dong, Y.; Zhu, T.; Ma, D.; Proppe, A.; Chen, B.; Zheng, C.; Hou, Y.; Lee, S.; Sun, B.; et al. Bright and stable light-emitting diodes based on perovskite quantum dots in perovskite matrix. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 15606–15615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bi, C.; Kershaw, S.V.; Rogach, A.L.; Tian, J. Improved Stability and Photodetector Performance of CsPbI3 Perovskite Quantum Dots by Ligand Exchange with Aminoethanethiol. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1902446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heo, J.H.; Shin, D.H.; Park, J.K.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, S.J.; Im, S.H. High-performance next-generation perovskite nanocrystal scintillator for nondestructive x-ray imaging. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1801743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, C.; Acar, O.; Shih, W.Y.; Shih, W.-H. Stabilization of MAPbI3 Nanocrystals by Dual Ligands for Photodetectors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 10334–10343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, L.; Meng, L.; Chen, L.; Huang, S.; Wu, X.; Dai, G.; Deng, L.; Han, J.; Zou, B.; Zhang, C.; et al. Ultralow-threshold and color-tunable continuous-wave lasing at room-temperature from in situ fabricated perovskite quantum dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 3248–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Du, W.; Shi, J.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X. Perovskite Quantum Dot Lasers. InfoMat 2019, 2, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  11. Meng, L.; You, J.; Yang, Y. Addressing the stability issue of perovskite solar cells for commercial applications. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fu, L.; Li, H.; Wang, L.; Yin, R.; Li, B.; Yin, L. Defect passivation strategies in perovskites for an enhanced photovoltaic performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 4017–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wei, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Lin, J. An overview on enhancing the stability of lead halide perovskite quantum dots and their applications in phosphor-converted LEDs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 310–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, C.; Kobayashi, S.; Izuishi, T.; Nakazawa, N.; Toyoda, T.; Ohta, T.; Hayase, S.; Minemoto, T.; et al. Highly luminescent phase-stable CsPbI3 perovskite quantum dots achieving near 100% absolute photoluminescence quantum yield. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 10373–10383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. QAkkerman, A.; Raino, G.; Kovalenko, M.V.; Manna, L. Genesis, challenges and opportunities for colloidal lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chun, F.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Li, W.; Xie, M.; Peng, X.; Yan, C.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Yang, W. Internally-externally defects-tailored MAPbI3 perovskites with highly enhanced air stability and quantum yield. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Suri, M.; Hazarika, A.; Larson, B.W.; Zhao, Q.; Vallés-Pelarda, M.; Siegler, T.D.; Abney, M.K.; Ferguson, A.J.; Korgel, B.A.; Luther, J.M. Enhanced open-circuit voltage of wide-bandgap perovskite photovoltaics by using alloyed (FA1−XCsX)Pb(I1−XBrX)3 quantum dots. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 1954–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hassan, Y.; Ashton, O.J.; Park, J.H.; Li, G.; Sakai, N.; Wenger, B.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Noel, N.K.; Song, M.H.; Lee, B.R.; et al. Facile Synthesis of Stable and Highly Luminescent Methylammonium Lead Halide Nanocrystals for Efficient Light Emitting Devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ding, C.; Liu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Hirotani, D.; Rin, X.; Hayase, S.; Minemoto, T.; Masuda, T.; Wang, R.; Shen, Q. Photoexcited hot and cold electron and hole dynamics at FAPbI3 perovskite quantum dots/metal oxide heterojunctions used for stable perovskite quantum dot solar cells. Nano Energy 2020, 67, 104267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kieslich, G.; Sun, S.; Cheetham, A.K. Solid-state principles applied to organic–inorganic perovskites: New tricks for an old dog. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 4712–4715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rubino, A.; Calio, L.; Calvo, M.E.; Miguez, H. Ligand-Free MAPbI3 Quantum Dot Solar Cells Based on Nanostructured Insulating Matrices. Sol. Rrl. 2021, 5, 2100204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tvrdy, K.; Frantsuzov, P.A.; Kamat, P.V. Photoinduced electron transfer from semiconductor quantum dots to metal oxide nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, C.; Toyoda, T.; Ogomi, Y.; Ripolles, T.S.; Hayase, S.; Minemoto, T.; Yoshino, K.; Dai, S.; et al. Ultrafast Electron Injection from Photoexcited Perovskite CsPbI3 QDs into TiO2 Nanoparticles with Injection Efficiency near 99%. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dana, J.; Anand, P.; Maiti, S.; Azlan, F.; Jadhav, Y.; Haram, S.K.; Ghosh, H.N. Inhibiting Interfacial Charge Recombination for Boosting Power Conversion Efficiency in CdSe{Au} Nanohybrid Sensitized Solar Cell. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 122, 13277–13284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, L.; McCleese, C.; Kovalsky, A.; Zhao, Y.; Burda, C. Femtosecond time-resolved transient absorption spectroscopy of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films: Evidence for passivation effect of PbI2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 12205–12208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Makuta, S.; Liu, M.; Endo, M.; Nishimura, H.; Wakamiya, A.; Tachibana, Y. Photo-excitation intensity dependent electron and hole injections from lead iodide perovskite to nanocrystalline TiO2 and spiro-OMeTAD. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, K.; Liang, G.; Shang, Q.; Ren, Y.; Kong, D.; Lian, T. Ultrafast Interfacial Electron and Hole Transfer from CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 12792–12795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ding, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Kitabatake, Y.; Hayase, S.; Toyoda, T.; Wang, R.; Yoshino, K.; Minemoto, T.; Shen, Q. Understanding charge transfer and recombination by interface engineering for improving the efficiency of PbS quantum dot solar cells. Nanoscale Horiz. 2018, 3, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hazarika, A.; Zhao, Q.; Gaulding, E.A.; Christians, J.A.; Dou, B.; Marshall, A.R.; Moot, T.; Berry, J.J.; Johnson, J.C.; Luther, J.M. Perovskite quantum dot photovoltaic materials beyond the reach of thin films: Full-range tuning of a-site cation composition. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 10327–10337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eperon, G.E.; Jedlicka, E.; Ginger, D.S. Biexciton Auger Recombination Differs in Hybrid and Inorganic Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hirasawa, M.; Ishihara, T.; Goto, T.; Uchida, K.; Miura, N. Magnetoabsorption of the lowest exciton in perovskite-type compound (CH3NH3)PbI3. Physica B Condens. Matter. 1994, 201, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, L.Y.; Mu, Y.F.; Guo, X.X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Z.M.; Zhang, M.; Lu, T.B. Encapsulating Perovskite Quantum Dots in Iron-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 9491–9495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wei, H.; DeSantis, D.; Wei, W.; Deng, Y.; Guo, D.; Savenije, T.J.; Cao, L.; Huang, J. Dopant compensation in alloyed CH3NH3PbBr3-xClx perovskite single crystals for gamma-ray spectroscopy. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Baikie, T.; Fang, Y.; Kadro, J.M.; Schreyer, M.; Wei, F.; Mhaisalkar, S.G.; Graetzel, M.; White, T.J. Synthesis and crystal chemistry of the hybrid perovskite (CH3NH3)PbI3 for solid-state sensitised solar cell applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 5628–5641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Toma, M.; Ursulean, N.; Marconi, D.; Pop, A. Structural and optical characterization of Cu doped ZnO thin films deposited by RF magnetron sputtering. J. Electr. Eng. 2019, 70, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Yang, Y.; Rodriguez-Cordoba, W.; Xiang, X.; Lian, T. Strong electronic coupling and ultrafast electron transfer between PbS quantum dots and TiO2 nanocrystalline films. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Leventis, H.C.; O’Mahony, F.; Akhtar, J.; Afzaal, M.; O’Brien, P.; Haque, S.A. Transient optical studies of interfacial charge transfer at nanostructured metal oxide/PbS quantum dot/organic hole conductor heterojunctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2743–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Elward, J.M.; Chakraborty, A. Effect of Dot Size on Exciton Binding Energy and Electron-Hole Recombination Probability in CdSe Quantum Dots. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4351–4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Sui, N.; Wang, Y.; Chi, X.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Ji, W.; Zou, L.; Zhang, H. Exciton Relaxation Dynamics in Photo-Excited CsPbI3 Perovskite Nanocrystals. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zidek, K.; Zheng, K.; Ponseca, C.S., Jr.; Messing, M.E.; Wallenberg, L.R.; Chabera, P.; Abdellah, M.; Sundstrom, V.; Pullerits, T. Electron transfer in quantum-dot-sensitized ZnO nanowires: Ultrafast time-resolved absorption and terahertz study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12110–12117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zheng, K.; Žídek, K.; Abdellah, M.; Zhang, W.; Chábera, P.; Lenngren, N.; Yartsev, A.; Pullerits, T. Ultrafast Charge Transfer from CdSe Quantum Dots to p-Type NiO: Hole Injection vs Hole Trapping. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 18462–18471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Robertson, J. High dielectric constant oxides. EPJ Appl. Phys. 2004, 28, 265–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Govinda, S.; Kore, B.P.; Bokdam, M.; Mahale, P.; Kumar, A.; Pal, S.; Bhattacharyya, B.; Lahnsteiner, J.; Kresse, G.; Franchini, C.; et al. Behavior of Methylammonium Dipoles in MAPbX3 (X = Br and I). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 4113–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Laska, M.; Krzemińska, Z.; Kluczyk-Korch, K.; Schaadt, D.; Popko, E.; Jacak, W.A.; Jacak, J.E. Metallization of solar cells, exciton channel of plasmon photovoltaic effect in perovskite cells. Nano Energy 2020, 75, 104751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jacak, J.E.; Jacak, W.A. Routes for Metallization of Perovskite Solar Cells. Materials 2022, 15, 2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g001 550
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of synthesizing MAPbI3 quantum dots.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of synthesizing MAPbI3 quantum dots.
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g001
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g002 550
Figure 2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and corresponding size distribution histograms of (a) small, (b) medium, and (c) large size of MAPbI3 QDs. (d) High-resolution TEM pattern of the large MAPbI3 QD. (e) High-resolution TEM image of QDs/TiO2 composite.
Figure 2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and corresponding size distribution histograms of (a) small, (b) medium, and (c) large size of MAPbI3 QDs. (d) High-resolution TEM pattern of the large MAPbI3 QD. (e) High-resolution TEM image of QDs/TiO2 composite.
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g002
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns of various sizes of MAPbI3 QDs. (b) Normalized UV-visible absorption and steady-state photoluminescence spectra of various sizes of MAPbI3 QDs. (c) Tauc plot of the optical band gap energy for various size of MAPbI3 QDs calculated by extrapolation of the linear part of (αhv)2 versus (hv). (d) The evolution of PLQY for various size of MAPbI3 QD colloidal solution saved in ambient conditions.
Figure 3. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns of various sizes of MAPbI3 QDs. (b) Normalized UV-visible absorption and steady-state photoluminescence spectra of various sizes of MAPbI3 QDs. (c) Tauc plot of the optical band gap energy for various size of MAPbI3 QDs calculated by extrapolation of the linear part of (αhv)2 versus (hv). (d) The evolution of PLQY for various size of MAPbI3 QD colloidal solution saved in ambient conditions.
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g003
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) PYS spectra of various size of MAPbI3 QDs. The valence band energy level of measured QD sample was obtained from the extrapolation of the linear portion in the spectrum. (b) Tauc plot of the optical band gap energy for mesoporous TiO2 film calculated by extrapolation of the linear part of (αhv)2 versus (hv). (c) PYS spectrum of mesoporous TiO2 film. (d) Schematic energy level diagram of the effective transfer pathway of photogenerated carrier in MAPbI3 QDs adsorbed on TiO2 and Al2O3 films, CBM is conduction band minimum, VBM represents valence band maximum. (e) Diagram of relative energy levels of MAPbI3 QDs of three kinds of size, TiO2 and Al2O3.
Figure 4. (a) PYS spectra of various size of MAPbI3 QDs. The valence band energy level of measured QD sample was obtained from the extrapolation of the linear portion in the spectrum. (b) Tauc plot of the optical band gap energy for mesoporous TiO2 film calculated by extrapolation of the linear part of (αhv)2 versus (hv). (c) PYS spectrum of mesoporous TiO2 film. (d) Schematic energy level diagram of the effective transfer pathway of photogenerated carrier in MAPbI3 QDs adsorbed on TiO2 and Al2O3 films, CBM is conduction band minimum, VBM represents valence band maximum. (e) Diagram of relative energy levels of MAPbI3 QDs of three kinds of size, TiO2 and Al2O3.
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g004
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g005 550
Figure 5. The absorption and PL spectra of (a) L-MAPbI3 QD solution, L-MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 and L-MAPbI3 QDs/Al2O3, (b) M-MAPbI3 QD solution, M-MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 and M-MAPbI3 QDs/Al2O3, (c) S-MAPbI3 QD solution, S-MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 and S-MAPbI3 QDs/Al2O3.
Figure 5. The absorption and PL spectra of (a) L-MAPbI3 QD solution, L-MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 and L-MAPbI3 QDs/Al2O3, (b) M-MAPbI3 QD solution, M-MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 and M-MAPbI3 QDs/Al2O3, (c) S-MAPbI3 QD solution, S-MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 and S-MAPbI3 QDs/Al2O3.
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g005
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g006 550
Figure 6. Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) decay of (a) large, (b) medium, (c) small MAPbI3 QD solution, adsorbed on TiO2 and Al2O3.
Figure 6. Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) decay of (a) large, (b) medium, (c) small MAPbI3 QD solution, adsorbed on TiO2 and Al2O3.
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g006
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) The transient absorption (TA) kinetics of large size of MAPbI3 QDs under different excitation intensities (1.5~119 μJ/cm2), fast decay processes of TA responses appear when the excitation intensity is larger than 3.0 μJ/cm2, and become significant as the intensity increases. TA spectra of various sizes of (b) MAPbI3 QDs dispersed in hexane, (c) QDs/Al2O3, (d) QDs/TiO2 recorded at 5 ps and excited at 470 nm with an excitation intensity of 1.5 μJ/cm2. TA decay curves of (e) large, (f) medium and (g) small QD colloidal solution, attached on TiO2 and Al2O3. (h) Charge transfer rate constant (kCT) of MAPbI3 QDs as a function of the free energy change (−ΔG).
Figure 7. (a) The transient absorption (TA) kinetics of large size of MAPbI3 QDs under different excitation intensities (1.5~119 μJ/cm2), fast decay processes of TA responses appear when the excitation intensity is larger than 3.0 μJ/cm2, and become significant as the intensity increases. TA spectra of various sizes of (b) MAPbI3 QDs dispersed in hexane, (c) QDs/Al2O3, (d) QDs/TiO2 recorded at 5 ps and excited at 470 nm with an excitation intensity of 1.5 μJ/cm2. TA decay curves of (e) large, (f) medium and (g) small QD colloidal solution, attached on TiO2 and Al2O3. (h) Charge transfer rate constant (kCT) of MAPbI3 QDs as a function of the free energy change (−ΔG).
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g007
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) The J–V curve and (b) corresponding EQE of MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2-based solar cell. Evolution of the normalized (c) short-circuit current density (Jsc), (d) open-circuit voltage (Voc), (e) fill factor (FF) and (f) power conversion efficiency (PCE) of QD solar cell, which was kept in a dry cabinet (<30% humidity) and measured in ambient air.
Figure 8. (a) The J–V curve and (b) corresponding EQE of MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2-based solar cell. Evolution of the normalized (c) short-circuit current density (Jsc), (d) open-circuit voltage (Voc), (e) fill factor (FF) and (f) power conversion efficiency (PCE) of QD solar cell, which was kept in a dry cabinet (<30% humidity) and measured in ambient air.
Nanomaterials 13 01292 g008
Table
Table 1. The determined band gap, PL peak position and corresponding PLQY of three-sized MAPbI3 QDs.
Table 1. The determined band gap, PL peak position and corresponding PLQY of three-sized MAPbI3 QDs.
MAPbI3 QDsEg (eV)λPL (nm)PLQY (%)
L-QD solution1.6775897.8 ± 1.9
M-QD solution1.7174095.7 ± 3.5
S-QD solution1.7572296.6 ± 2.9
Table
Table 2. The fitted parameters of TRPL decay profiles for various sizes of MAPbI3 QD solution, QDs/TiO2 and QDs/Al2O3. The decay curves were fitted by a biexponential (y = A1exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2)) and single-exponential model (y = A1 exp (−t/τ1)), where A1 and A2 are constant, τ1 and τ2 represent lifetime, t is time. τave is average lifetime calculated by τ a v e = ∑ A i τ i 2 ∑ A i τ i .
Table 2. The fitted parameters of TRPL decay profiles for various sizes of MAPbI3 QD solution, QDs/TiO2 and QDs/Al2O3. The decay curves were fitted by a biexponential (y = A1exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2)) and single-exponential model (y = A1 exp (−t/τ1)), where A1 and A2 are constant, τ1 and τ2 represent lifetime, t is time. τave is average lifetime calculated by τ a v e = ∑ A i τ i 2 ∑ A i τ i .
MAPbI3 QDsA1 (%)τ1 (ns)A2 (%)τ2 (ns)τave (ns)
L-QD solution92.050.88.0177.080.1
L-QDs/Al2O367.24.232.828.723.0
L-QD/TiO21002.8––2.8
M-QD solution93.551.96.5163.371.9
M-QDs/Al2O373.74.026.324.918.4
M-QDs/TiO21002.4––2.4
S-QD solution93.748.56.3159.768.7
S-QDs/Al2O370.64.329.425.119.0
S-QDs/TiO21001.4––1.4
Table
Table 3. The fitted parameters of TA kinetics for various size of MAPbI3 QD colloidal solution, QDs/TiO2 and QDs/Al2O3. The decay curves were fitted by single-exponential (y = y0 + A1 exp(−t/τ1)) or biexponential model (y = A1 exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2) + y0), where y0, A1, A2 are constant, τ1 and τ2 represent lifetime, t is time.
Table 3. The fitted parameters of TA kinetics for various size of MAPbI3 QD colloidal solution, QDs/TiO2 and QDs/Al2O3. The decay curves were fitted by single-exponential (y = y0 + A1 exp(−t/τ1)) or biexponential model (y = A1 exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2) + y0), where y0, A1, A2 are constant, τ1 and τ2 represent lifetime, t is time.
MAPbI3 QDsA1τ1 (ps)A2τ2 (ps)y0kCT (s−1)
L-QD solution0.08123––0.92–
L-QDs/Al2O30.51278––0.49–
L-QD/TiO20.40620.413310.191.6 × 1010
M-QD solution0.09150––0.91–
M-QDs/Al2O30.55291––0.45–
M-QDs/TiO20.49360.402870.112.8 × 1010
S-QD solution0.09134––0.91–
S-QDs/Al2O30.60253––0.40–
S-QDs/TiO20.53230.382150.094.3 × 1010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Ding, C.; Liu, D.; Yajima, S.; Takahashi, K.; Hayase, S.; Shen, Q. Efficient Charge Transfer in MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 Heterojunctions for High-Performance Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071292

AMA Style

Li H, Ding C, Liu D, Yajima S, Takahashi K, Hayase S, Shen Q. Efficient Charge Transfer in MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 Heterojunctions for High-Performance Solar Cells. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(7):1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Hua, Chao Ding, Dong Liu, Shota Yajima, Kei Takahashi, Shuzi Hayase, and Qing Shen. 2023. "Efficient Charge Transfer in MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 Heterojunctions for High-Performance Solar Cells" Nanomaterials 13, no. 7: 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071292

APA Style

Li, H., Ding, C., Liu, D., Yajima, S., Takahashi, K., Hayase, S., & Shen, Q. (2023). Efficient Charge Transfer in MAPbI3 QDs/TiO2 Heterojunctions for High-Performance Solar Cells. Nanomaterials, 13(7), 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13071292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop