Next Article in Journal
Evolutionary Progress of Silica Aerogels and Their Classification Based on Composition: An Overview
Next Article in Special Issue
Theoretical Studies on the Quantum Capacitance of Two-Dimensional Electrode Materials for Supercapacitors
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in ZnO Nanomaterial-Mediated Biological Applications and Action Mechanisms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pyro-Phototronic Effect for Advanced Photodetectors and Novel Light Energy Harvesting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Optically Active Telecom Defects in MoTe2 Fewlayers at Room Temperature

1
State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
2
Department of Electrical and Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
3
NanoPhoton—Center for Nanophotonics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
4
Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience (MC2), Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(9), 1501; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091501
Submission received: 25 March 2023 / Revised: 21 April 2023 / Accepted: 26 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023

Abstract

:
The optical and electrical properties of semiconductors are strongly affected by defect states. The defects in molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe 2 ) show the potential for quantum light emission at optical fiber communication bands. However, the observation of defect-related light emission is still limited to cryogenic temperatures. In this work, we demonstrate the deep defect states in MoTe 2 fewlayers produced via a standard van der Waal material transfer method with a heating process, which enables light emission in the telecommunication O-band. The optical measurements show evidence of localized excitons and strong interaction among defects. Furthermore, the optical emission of defects depends on the thickness of the host materials. Our findings offer a new route for tailoring the optical properties of two-dimensional materials in optoelectronic applications.

1. Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) hold great potential for applications in the field of optoelectronics and quantum technologies due to their large spin-orbit coupling [1], strong excitonic effect [2,3], and the crossover from indirect to direct bandgap [4,5]. The van der Waals structure allows for the engineering of artificial quantum materials for investigating novel physics by stacking various 2D materials and can be interfaced with quantum devices through integration with photonic structures [6]. The stacking of TMD monolayers into moiré superlattices allows for the electronic band engineering of a periodic 2D lattice of potential wells that facilitates the formation of identical quantum emitter arrays, by trapping the excitons within the potential wells [7,8]. Additionally, the excitons can be trapped by defects in 2D materials, which makes them behave as single photon emitters (SPEs). SPEs in TMDs were first observed at the edges of tungsten diselenide (WSe 2 ) monolayers at temperatures below 30 K [9,10,11,12]. Reportedly, a higher working temperature up to ∼150 K could be achieved by improving the photoluminescence (PL) emission efficiency via defect density engineering and Purcell enhancement [13,14]. In stark contrast, the SPEs in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) show a working temperature up to room temperature and even higher, which is attributed to the deep defect states that have large energy spacing with a conduction band minimum and a valence band maximum [15]. The semiconducting (2H phase) MoTe 2 has a relatively small optical bandgap (∼1.1 eV) [16] and holds promise for integration with silicon photonics including the realization of photodetectors and lasers [17,18,19].
The bulk semiconducting MoTe 2 has an indirect bandgap that becomes direct when the material is in the form of a monolayer [16]. Because the Mo-Te bonds are relatively weak, the thickness of the MoTe 2 can be tailored layer by layer by laser etching [20]. Furthermore, the potential barrier between the semiconducting and the semimetallic (1T’) phase MoTe 2 is smaller than other TMDs such as MoS 2 , WS 2 , MoSe 2 , and WSe 2 . The controllable phase transition from the 2H phase to the 1T’ phase could reduce the contact resistance. Such control over the phase of the material could be exploited in optoelectronic devices by using a 2H-MoTe 2 as the channel and a 1T’-MoTe 2 as the electrode [21].
The presence of defects affects both the electrical and optical properties of the MoTe 2 . The resulting mid-gap trap states hinder the transport of the photocurrent [22] of MoTe 2 -based FETs. On the other hand, the defects in the MoTe 2 fewlayers can be activated by localized strain and form SPEs with emission wavelengths at optical fiber communication (OFC) bands at low temperatures [23]. To achieve the reliable performance of devices, understanding the impact of these defects is of significance. However, the optical properties of telecom defects in MoTe 2 fewlayers at room temperature have remained unexplored.
In this work, we demonstrate the emergence of deep defect states in MoTe 2 fewlayers assembled with the standard transfer technique with an additional heating process. In power-dependent and time-resolved PL measurements, we observed evidence of defect-bound excitons at room temperature. Additionally, their emission wavelengths were located in the fiberoptic O-band. The results could possibly offer a new path toward room-temperature quantum emitters for quantum information processing on a silicon platform and for light emission at OFC bands.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Fabrication

Semiconducting MoTe 2 and hBN flakes were mechanically exfoliated from bulk crystal (HQ Graphene) with Scotch tape and transferred to a Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp by the previously reported dry-transfer method [24]. The fewlayer MoTe 2 was identified by optical contrast and aligned with the bottom hBN flake with a home-built transfer setup. When the fewlayer MoTe 2 was beside the bottom hBN flake, we heated the substrate to 100 C. The fewlayer MoTe 2 made contact with the hBN flake due to the thermal expansion of the PDMS stamp. After the materials were in contact, and the temperature was stable, the heater was switched off, and the PDMS stamp gradually peeled off, leaving the fewlayer MoTe 2 on top of the hBN flake. To avoid the oxidation of the MoTe 2 flake as shown in a previous report [25], we transferred an additional hBN flake on top to form a sandwich structure that isolated the MoTe 2 flake from the air (mainly oxygen and water).

2.2. Optical Measurements

To optically excite the MoTe 2 flakes, a 532 nm continuous-wave (CW) laser was focused on the sample with a 50× objective (Olympus, LCPLN50XIR). The emitted light was collected using a multimode fiber and then sent to a near-IR spectrometer equipped with a nitrogen-cooled CCD. The sample was placed in a close-loop cryostat for temperature-dependent PL measurements. The time-resolved PL measurements were performed using a time-correlated single-photon counting technique with a time tagger. We excited the sample with a 640 nm pulsed laser (LDH-IB-640-B, PicoQuant) with a pulse width of <90 ps and a repetition rate of 40 MHz. A 900 nm longpass filter was used to block the excitation, and the signal with a wavelength longer than 1300 nm was sent to a single-photon detector (id220-FR, iDQ).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Generation of Deep Defect States

Figure 1a shows the fabrication process of the fewlayer MoTe 2 samples introduced with defects. It should be emphasized that the sample was heated to 100 C when the MoTe 2 was close to hBN, and the contact was achieved by the thermal expansion of the PDMS stamp. To prevent oxidation-induced device performance degradation, an additional hBN flake was transferred to the top of the MoTe 2 /hBN flake by fabrication without the heating process and formed a sandwich structure. Figure 1b shows an optical microscope image of Sample 1. The layer number distribution is marked by color-coded regions, which were identified by the optical contrast and PL emission wavelength. Under the optical pumping with a 532 nm CW laser, we observed two emission peaks P1 and P2 with an energy spacing of ∼117 meV (Figure 1c). The emission wavelength of P1 is associated with free A excitons in MoTe 2 [16]. Regarding the origin of the P2 peak, we propose that the PL emission of MoTe 2 flake is strongly mediated by the defect states generated during the transfer process and that the large energy spacing (i.e., deep defect states in the bandgap) enables the observation of the PL emission at room temperature. Note that the generation of a P2 peak was reproduced in Sample 2 (see Figure A1).

3.2. Characterizations of Defects

To confirm the presence of defect states in the MoTe 2 flake, we performed power-dependent PL measurements. Figure 2a shows the PL spectrum of Sample 1 fitted to a bi-Gaussian function. The extracted integrated PL intensity of the two peaks as a function of the excitation power is plotted in Figure 2b. The P2 peak saturated with the increasing pump power, in good agreement with previously measured defect-bound excitons [11]. Furthermore, we found that the defects not only trapped the excitons but also affected the PL emission of the free excitons. With the increasing pump power, the emission photon energy of the P1 peak showed a clear blue shift (Figure 2d). We mainly attribute this energy shift to the enhanced repulsive exciton–exciton interaction [26] owing to the high density of defects. This interpretation is supported by the significant linewidth broadening of the P2 peak (Figure 2c).
Through the time-resolved PL dynamics measurements shown in Figure 3a, we measured the lifetime of the defect-bound excitons (i.e., P2). The extracted lifetime was about 115 ps, which was limited by the time resolution of our setup and was much shorter than the findings in previous works [9,11]. This can be attributed to the high density of the defects, which increased the nonradiative recombination rate. Interestingly, we found that both emission peaks showed a blue shift when decreasing the temperature from 297 K to 5 K, but the PL emission intensity and emission linewidth remained almost constant (Figure 3b). This behavior suggests the existence of strong phonon scattering, which can be caused by a high defect density. Further work is needed to obtain a deeper understanding of the physical mechanisms, which is beyond the scope of this work.
To further explore the mechanism of the generation of defects, we stacked the MoTe 2 / hBN heterostructure on the SiO 2 /Si substrate without a heating process (Sample 3), as a reference sample. By heating the sample to 100 C under an ambient environment, we found that the PL emission diminished over time, and no additional peaks were found (Figure 3c and Figure A2), indicating that the generation of optically active defects was not related to heat-induced oxidization. Therefore, we conclude that the defects were generated due to the thermal expansion-induced strain from the PDMS stamp.
The optical properties of the host MoTe 2 crystal depend on its thickness [16]. In the PL measurements of Sample 1, we found a clear redshift in the emission energy with the increased layer number (see Figure A3). Moreover, the increasing linewidth and energy shift in the emission line with the excitation power suggests the potential interactions in the defective Sample 1. We expect that the PL emission of defects was also modulated by the number of layers of the MoTe 2 flake. The PL spectra of the MoTe 2 fewlayers with different numbers of layers are shown in Figure 4a. The presence of defects was confirmed by the pump-power-dependent saturation behavior (Figure 4b). Compared to the PL emission of defects in the 2L-MoTe 2 , the defect emission increased for thicker layers. This emission intensity difference could be explained by two possible mechanisms: (1) the 2L-MoTe 2 oxidized faster than the thicker layers [25], resulting in a weaker PL emission; (2) the thicker flakes were more mechanically stable [27] and gave rise to fewer defects generated during the assembly process, which would reduce the nonradiative recombinations. Similar to the 2L-MoTe 2 , the emission linewidth of the 4L- and 5L- MoTe 2 showed a linewidth narrowing effect at pump powers above 1000 μ W, as shown in Figure 4c. Figure 4d shows the continuous redshift in the defect emission from the 4L- and 5L-MoTe 2 , which mainly arose from the plasma-induced bandgap renormalization and the strong phonon scattering. Furthermore, the 1L- and 2L-MoTe 2 were found to be direct band gap semiconductors, and the 3L-MoTe2 had an indirect bandgap [28]. The emission energy of the P2 peak of the 4L- and 5L-MoTe 2 was almost the same at a relatively low excitation power (<2000 μ W, see Figure 4d) and significantly lower than that of the 2L-MoTe 2 , which could possibly be attributed to the different band structures for these MoTe 2 flakes.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we found the defect-mediated PL emission from the MoTe 2 fewlayers, and the generation of defects was related to the transfer process. The short lifetime and the weak PL emission indicate a prominent nonradiative recombination process in our system. A new defect engineering technique such as the bombardment of a high-energy electron beam [14] is needed to control the defect density and study the physical mechanisms of defect–defect, defect–exciton, and defect-mediated exciton–exciton interactions contributing to the complex emission behavior. Moreover, reducing the defect density could possibly significantly enhance the PL emission [13], offering a new path towards quantum light sources at room temperature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.F.; methodology, Y.L.; software, Q.L. and Y.L.; formal analysis, Q.L. and Y.L.; investigation, Y.L., Q.L. and S.X.; resources, Y.L.; data curation, Y.L.; writing-original draft preparation, H.F., S.X. and J.L.; writing—review and editing, H.F. and J.L.; visualization, Q.L. and Y.L.; supervision, H.F. and J.L.; project administration, H.F. and J.L.; funding acquisition, H.F., S.X. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Olle Engkvists stiftelse; the Carl Tryggers stiftelse; the Chalmers Excellence Initiative Nano; the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 11974436); the Independent Research Fund Denmark (project no. 9041-00333B, 2032-00351B); the Danish National Research Foundation (project DNRF147).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Reproducibility of the defect emission from the MoTe 2 flake (Sample 2). (a) Optical microscope image. (b) PL spectrum at room temperature.
Figure A1. Reproducibility of the defect emission from the MoTe 2 flake (Sample 2). (a) Optical microscope image. (b) PL spectrum at room temperature.
Nanomaterials 13 01501 g0a1
Figure A2. Normalized PL spectra of Sample 3. The small blueshift of the emission line is possibly due to the release of the tensile strain in the MoTe 2 after heating.
Figure A2. Normalized PL spectra of Sample 3. The small blueshift of the emission line is possibly due to the release of the tensile strain in the MoTe 2 after heating.
Nanomaterials 13 01501 g0a2
Figure A3. The integrated PL intensity (a), linewidth (b), and emission photon energy (c) of the P1 peak of Sample 1 as a function of the excitation power.
Figure A3. The integrated PL intensity (a), linewidth (b), and emission photon energy (c) of the P1 peak of Sample 1 as a function of the excitation power.
Nanomaterials 13 01501 g0a3

References

  1. Xu, X.; Yao, W.; Xiao, D.; Heinz, T. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ramasubramaniam, A. Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 115409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chernikov, A.; Berkelbach, T.C.; Hill, H.M.; Rigosi, A.; Li, Y.; Aslan, B.; Reichman, D.R.; Hybertsen, M.S.; Heinz, T.F. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic rydberg series in monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 076802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mak, K.F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T.F. Atomically thin MoS2: A new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 136805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Splendiani, A.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Kim, J.; Chim, C.-Y.; Galli, G.; Wang, F. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1271–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Geim, A.K.; Grigorieva, I.V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 2013, 499, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tran, K.; Moody, G.; Wu, F.; Lu, X.; Choi, J.; Kim, K.; Rai, A.; Sanchez, D.A.; Quan, J.; Singh, A.; et al. Evidence for moiré excitons in van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 2019, 567, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, Q.; Fang, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fischer, M.; Li, J.; Hagel, J.; Brem, S.; Malic, E.; Stenger, N.; et al. A room-temperature moiré interlayer exciton laser. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.01266. [Google Scholar]
  9. Srivastava, A.; Sidler, M.; Allain, A.V.; Lembke, D.S.; Kis, A.; Imamoğlu, A. Optically active quantum dots in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koperski, M.; Nogajewski, K.; Arora, A.; Cherkez, V.; Mallet, P.; Veuillen, J.-Y.; Marcus, J.; Kossacki, P.; Potemski, M. Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe2 structures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. He, Y.-M.; Clark, G.; Schaibley, J.R.; He, Y.; Chen, M.-C.; Wei, Y.-J.; Ding, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yao, W.; Xu, X.; et al. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chakraborty, C.; Kinnischtzke, L.; Goodfellow, K.M.; Beams, R.; Vamivakas, A.N. Voltage-controlled quantum light from an atomically thin semiconductor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Luo, Y.; Liu, N.; Li, X.; Hone, J.C.; Strauf, S. Single photon emission in WSe2 up 160 k by quantum yield control. 2D Mater. 2019, 6, 035017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Parto, K.; Azzam, S.I.; Banerjee, K.; Moody, G. Defect and strain engineering of monolayer WSe2 enables site-controlled single-photon emission up to 150 K. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aharonovich, I.; Englund, D.; Toth, M. Solid-state single-photon emitters. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ruppert, C.; Aslan, B.; Heinz, T.F. Optical properties and band gap of single-and few-layer MoTe2 crystals. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6231–6236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bie, Y.-Q.; Grosso, G.; Heuck, M.; Furchi, M.M.; Cao, Y.; Zheng, J.; Bunandar, D.; Navarro-Moratalla, E.; Zhou, L.; Efetov, D.K.; et al. A MoTe2-based light-emitting diode and photodetector for silicon photonic integrated circuits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 1124–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, D.; Sun, H.; Fan, F.; Feng, J.; Wang, Z.; Ning, C.-Z. Room-temperature continuous-wave lasing from monolayer molybdenum ditelluride integrated with a silicon nanobeam cavity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 987–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fang, H.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Zhou, L.; Liu, L.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Krauss, T.F.; Wang, Y. 1305 nm few-layer MoTe2-on-silicon laser-like emission. Laser Photonics Rev. 2018, 12, 1800015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Duerloo, K.-A.N.; Li, Y.; Reed, E.J. Structural phase transitions in two-dimensional mo-and w-dichalcogenide monolayers. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, J.; Liu, K. Recent progress in two-dimensional mote2 hetero-phase homojunctions. Nanomaterials 2021, 12, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ghimire, M.K.; Ji, H.; Gul, H.Z.; Yi, H.; Jiang, J.; Lim, S.C. Defect-affected photocurrent in mote2 fets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 10068–10073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhao, H.; Pettes, M.T.; Zheng, Y.; Htoon, H. Site-controlled telecom-wavelength single-photon emitters in atomically-thin MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Castellanos-Gomez, A.; Buscema, M.; Molenaar, R.; Singh, V.; Janssen, L.; Van Der Zant, H.S.J.; Steele, G.A. Deterministic transfer of two-dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Mater. 2014, 1, 011002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fang, H.; Liu, J.; Lin, Q.; Su, R.; Wei, Y.; Krauss, T.F.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Laser-like emission from a sandwiched MoTe2 heterostructure on a silicon single-mode resonator. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sie, E.J.; Steinhoff, A.; Gies, C.; Lui, C.H.; Ma, Q.; Rosner, M.; Schonhoff, G.; Jahnke, F.; Wehling, T.O.; Lee, Y.-H.; et al. Observation of exciton redshift–blueshift crossover in monolayer WS2. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 4210–4216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, K.; Wu, J. Mechanical properties of two-dimensional materials and heterostructures. J. Mater. Res. 2016, 31, 832–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lezama, I.G.; Arora, A.; Ubaldini, A.; Barreteau, C.; Giannini, E.; Potemski, M.; Morpurgo, A.F. Indirect-to-direct band gap crossover in few-layer mote2. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2336–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The generation of defect states in the MoTe 2 flake. (a) Schematic of the sample fabrication process. (b) Bright-field microscope image of Sample 1. The color-coded regions represent the 2L-MoTe 2 (purple), 4L-MoTe 2 (blue), and 5L-MoTe 2 (red). (c) PL emission of the hBN encapsulated 2L-MoTe 2 .
Figure 1. The generation of defect states in the MoTe 2 flake. (a) Schematic of the sample fabrication process. (b) Bright-field microscope image of Sample 1. The color-coded regions represent the 2L-MoTe 2 (purple), 4L-MoTe 2 (blue), and 5L-MoTe 2 (red). (c) PL emission of the hBN encapsulated 2L-MoTe 2 .
Nanomaterials 13 01501 g001
Figure 2. Power-dependent PL emission of the processed 2L-MoTe 2 . (a) Bi-Gaussian fit of the PL spectrum. Power-dependent integrated PL intensity (b), emission linewidth (c), and photon energy (d).
Figure 2. Power-dependent PL emission of the processed 2L-MoTe 2 . (a) Bi-Gaussian fit of the PL spectrum. Power-dependent integrated PL intensity (b), emission linewidth (c), and photon energy (d).
Nanomaterials 13 01501 g002
Figure 3. Features of the defect-bound excitons. (a) PL decay curve of the defects fitted with a single exponential function. (b) PL spectra at cryogenic and room temperatures. (c) The heating effect on the PL emission of the MoTe 2 fewlayer of Sample 3.
Figure 3. Features of the defect-bound excitons. (a) PL decay curve of the defects fitted with a single exponential function. (b) PL spectra at cryogenic and room temperatures. (c) The heating effect on the PL emission of the MoTe 2 fewlayer of Sample 3.
Nanomaterials 13 01501 g003
Figure 4. The layer-dependent PL emission of defects. (a) The layer-dependent PL spectrum under the same pump power. The power-dependent integrated PL intensity (b), emission linewidth (c), and emission photon energy (d) of the defect states in the 4L-MoTe 2 and 5L-MoTe 2 .
Figure 4. The layer-dependent PL emission of defects. (a) The layer-dependent PL spectrum under the same pump power. The power-dependent integrated PL intensity (b), emission linewidth (c), and emission photon energy (d) of the defect states in the 4L-MoTe 2 and 5L-MoTe 2 .
Nanomaterials 13 01501 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lei, Y.; Lin, Q.; Xiao, S.; Li, J.; Fang, H. Optically Active Telecom Defects in MoTe2 Fewlayers at Room Temperature. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091501

AMA Style

Lei Y, Lin Q, Xiao S, Li J, Fang H. Optically Active Telecom Defects in MoTe2 Fewlayers at Room Temperature. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(9):1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lei, Yuxin, Qiaoling Lin, Sanshui Xiao, Juntao Li, and Hanlin Fang. 2023. "Optically Active Telecom Defects in MoTe2 Fewlayers at Room Temperature" Nanomaterials 13, no. 9: 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091501

APA Style

Lei, Y., Lin, Q., Xiao, S., Li, J., & Fang, H. (2023). Optically Active Telecom Defects in MoTe2 Fewlayers at Room Temperature. Nanomaterials, 13(9), 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13091501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop