Next Article in Journal
2D MXene Nanosheets with ROS Scavenging Ability Effectively Delay Osteoarthritis Progression
Previous Article in Journal
Electrospun Amorphous Solid Dispersions with Lopinavir and Ritonavir for Improved Solubility and Dissolution Rate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of TiO2 Nanoparticle-Enhanced Palm and Soybean Biodiesel Blends for Emission Mitigation and Improved Combustion Efficiency

by
Ramozon Khujamberdiev
and
Haeng Muk Cho
*
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan 31080, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(19), 1570; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191570
Submission received: 2 September 2024 / Revised: 22 September 2024 / Accepted: 26 September 2024 / Published: 28 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Nanomaterials for Energy and Environmental Applications)

Abstract

:
The use of biodiesel as an alternative to conventional diesel fuels has gained significant attention due to its potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving energy sustainability. This study explores the impact of TiO2 nanoparticles on the emission characteristics and combustion efficiency of biodiesel blends in compression ignition (CI) engines. The fuels analyzed include diesel, SB20 (soybean biodiesel), SB20 + 50 TiO2 ppm, SB20 + 75 TiO2 ppm, PB20 (palm biodiesel), PB20 + 50 TiO2 ppm, and PB20 + 75 TiO2 ppm. Experiments were conducted under a consistent load of 50% across engine speeds ranging from 1000 to 1800 RPM. While TiO2 nanoparticles have been widely recognized for their ability to enhance biodiesel properties, limited research exists on their specific effects on soybean and palm biofuels. This study addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive analysis of emissions, including NOX, CO, CO2, and HC, as well as exhaust gas temperature (EGT), across various engine speeds and nanoparticle concentrations. The results demonstrate that TiO2 nanoparticles lead to a reduction in CO emissions by up to 30% and a reduction in HC emissions by 21.5% at higher concentrations and engine speeds. However, this improvement in combustion efficiency is accompanied by a 15% increase in CO2 emissions, indicating more complete fuel oxidation. Additionally, NOX emissions, which typically increase with engine speed, were mitigated by 20% with the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles. Exhaust gas temperatures (EGTs) were also lowered, indicating enhanced combustion stability. These findings highlight the potential of TiO2 nanoparticles to optimize biodiesel blends for improved environmental performance in CI engines.

1. Introduction

Biofuels, derived from organic materials such as plants and animal fats, present a renewable and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. They have garnered attention due to their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance energy security, and promote environmental sustainability. Biodiesel, a major category of biofuels, can be produced from various feedstocks including palm oil and soybean oil. These biofuels can be directly used in existing diesel engines with minimal modifications, offering a significant reduction in carbon footprint compared to conventional fossil fuels [1,2,3]. Despite these advantages, biofuels face several challenges such as higher nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions and lower oxidation stability compared to fossil fuels. These limitations require biofuel properties to be further optimized to meet emission standards and improve engine performance [4,5].
To address these challenges, the addition of nanoparticles to biofuels has shown promising results in enhancing fuel properties and engine performance. Nanoparticles, due to their small size and large surface area, act as effective catalysts and lubricants, leading to better combustion efficiency and reduced emissions. Nanoparticles, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), cerium oxide, and aluminum oxide, have been extensively studied for their ability to improve fuel atomization, air–fuel mixing, and ignition delay reduction. These improvements contribute to higher engine efficiency, increased power output, and reduced harmful emissions such as NOX and particulate matter [1,6].
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have emerged as a particularly effective additive for enhancing biofuel properties. TiO2 nanoparticles improve the thermal and oxidative stability of biodiesel, leading to more efficient combustion and reduced engine wear. The catalytic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles facilitate oxidation reactions during combustion, promoting more complete fuel combustion and reducing the formation of unburned hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon deposits. Studies have shown that TiO2 nanoparticles can significantly enhance the combustion characteristics of biodiesel, resulting in improved fuel economy and lower emissions of pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) [6,7].
The mechanism behind the improvement is largely attributed to the high surface area of TiO2 nanoparticles, which provides more active sites for catalytic reactions. This leads to better oxidation of fuel molecules and higher combustion efficiency. Additionally, TiO2 nanoparticles stabilize combustion temperatures, reducing NOX formation, which is typically associated with high-temperature combustion [8,9]. Research indicates that the inclusion of TiO2 nanoparticles in biodiesel blends results in significant improvements in engine performance and emission characteristics. For instance, a study on Mahua biodiesel blended with TiO2 nanoparticles demonstrated enhanced combustion efficiency and reduced emissions at varying injection pressures [10]. Another study on tamarind oil biodiesel with TiO2 and alcoholic fuel additives showed similar benefits, with notable reductions in NOX and particulate emissions [9].
Moreover, TiO2 nanoparticles have been used as catalysts in the synthesis of biodiesel, enhancing the conversion efficiency and quality of the biofuel. For instance, TiO2-catalyzed biodiesel production using Carthamus tinctorius L. oil showed significant improvements in yield and purity [11].
Comparative studies have highlighted the superior performance of TiO2 nanoparticle-enhanced biodiesel over traditional biodiesel and diesel blends. For example, the use of TiO2 nanoparticles in biodiesel from Eichhornia crassipes led to improved engine performance and lower emissions across various operating conditions [12]. Similarly, an experimental evaluation of Semecarpus anacardium biodiesel with TiO2 nanoparticles demonstrated enhanced stability and physicochemical properties, contributing to better engine performance [13].
The potential of TiO2 nanoparticles in biodiesel applications is further supported by their role in reducing soot and NOX emissions in advanced engine technologies. The incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles in biodiesel blends has shown to be effective in engines equipped with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) systems, significantly lowering emissions without compromising engine performance [14].

The Objectives of This Study

This study aims to investigate the emission and performance characteristics of TiO2 nanoparticles in palm and soybean biofuel in a compression ignition (CI) engine. The specific objectives are as follows:
  • To evaluate the influence of TiO2 nanoparticles on the reduction in harmful emissions (CO, HC, and NOX) and the enhancement in combustion efficiency in soybean and palm biodiesel blends.
  • To explore the potential of TiO2 nanoparticles in mitigating NOX emissions and lowering exhaust gas temperatures (EGTs), particularly at higher engine speeds.

2. Literature Review

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have been extensively studied for their potential to enhance the properties of biofuels. The integration of TiO2 nanoparticles into biodiesel has shown significant improvements in combustion efficiency, emission reduction, and engine performance, largely due to their catalytic properties, which enhance oxidation stability. Several studies highlight the role of TiO2 nanoparticles in acting as catalysts that improve the oxidation stability of biodiesel, which is crucial for efficient combustion and reduced emissions.
Several studies have highlighted the specific benefits of TiO2 nanoparticles in biodiesel blends. Rajak et al. (2020) discussed the benefits of using TiO2 nanoparticles in first-generation biodiesel blends, including palm and soybean oils, highlighting enhanced combustion characteristics and lower emissions [15]. Building on this, Lai et al. (2023) demonstrated that green fuel blends with TiO2 nanoparticles significantly optimized diesel engine performance and reduced pollutants [6]. These findings suggest that TiO2 nanoparticles not only improve the combustion process but also address the persistent issue of high NOX emissions typically associated with biodiesel combustion, offering a more sustainable alternative to traditional diesel.
In comparative studies, TiO2 nanoparticles have demonstrated superior performance when used in combination with other additives. Pullagura et al. (2022) conducted a comparative study on the use of TiO2 nanoparticles and alcoholic fuel additives in biodiesel-diesel blends, showing that TiO2 nanoparticles improved the combustion efficiency and reduced NOX emissions [9]. Bayindirli et al. (2023) also reported that TiO2 nanoparticles enhanced the thermophysical properties and combustion performance of biodiesel [2]. These studies underline the versatility of TiO2 nanoparticles in improving various aspects of biodiesel performance, from thermal stability to emission control.
Previous studies have established the baseline performance of palm and soybean biodiesel in compression ignition (CI) engines, laying the groundwork for exploring further enhancements with TiO2 nanoparticles. For instance, Bari and Zhang (2020) evaluated the performance of CI engines using palm oil biodiesel, reporting improved combustion efficiency and reduced emissions compared to traditional diesel fuels [16]. Similarly, Kumar et al. (2022) assessed the performance, emissions, and combustion attributes of CI engines using palm biodiesel blends and found significant improvements in engine efficiency and a reduction in harmful emissions such as NOX and HC [17]. However, when TiO2 nanoparticles are introduced into these biodiesel blends, the improvements become even more pronounced as the catalytic activity of the nanoparticles further enhances combustion stability and reduces emissions, particularly under high engine loads.
In the case of soybean oil-based biodiesel, extensive research has also confirmed its effectiveness in reducing emissions and improving engine performance. Seraç et al. (2020) conducted a comprehensive evaluation of soybean biodiesel blends in CI engines and reported enhanced performance and lower emissions compared to conventional diesel [18]. Vellaiyan (2020) investigated the combustion, performance, and emissions of a diesel engine fueled with soybean biodiesel and its water blends, finding significant reductions in NOX and particulate matter emissions [19].
A study by Hussain et al. (2020) demonstrated that the addition of 50 ppm of TiO2 nanoparticles to soybean biodiesel blends increased the brake thermal efficiency by 20.66% while reducing CO and HC emissions by 30% and 21.5%, respectively. However, their study also noted a slight increase in NOX emissions due to the higher combustion temperatures associated with more efficient fuel oxidation [20].
Further research conducted by Lin and Lin in 2023 explored the performance of soybean biodiesel emulsions with TiO2 nanoparticles, revealing a significant reduction in NOX and particulate matter emissions. Their experiments indicated that TiO2-enhanced soybean biodiesel reduced CO emissions by 25% and NOX emissions by 3.75% compared to conventional diesel fuel [21]. The influence of TiO2 nanoparticles, combined with biodiesel’s inherent oxygen content, contributes to the reduction in unburned hydrocarbons, thus minimizing the environmental impact of biodiesel use in CI engines.
The addition of TiO2 nanoparticles to palm biodiesel blends has been widely studied for its potential to reduce harmful emissions in diesel engines. For example, Venu et al. (2019) demonstrated that palm biodiesel blended with TiO2 nanoparticles and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) significantly reduced NOX emissions, a common challenge in biodiesel combustion. The catalytic action of TiO2 nanoparticles improves oxidation reactions, reducing unburned hydrocarbons (HCs) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions in palm biodiesel blends [22]. In addition, Mujtaba et al., 2020 found that the inclusion of TiO2 nanoparticles in palm–sesame biodiesel blends resulted in a 32.09% reduction in CO emissions and a 25.4% decrease in HC emissions compared to regular biodiesel [23]. These reductions in emissions are crucial for making biodiesel blends more viable for use in commercial diesel engines, where regulatory limits on pollutants are becoming increasingly stringent.
Furthermore, the impact of TiO2 nanoparticles on particulate matter (PM) emissions has been explored. Fayad et al. (2023) showed that the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles to biodiesel blends reduced the total concentration of particulate matter by 26.74% compared to standard diesel fuel [11]. The synergistic effect of TiO2 nanoparticles and EGR systems has been shown to lower NOX emissions by up to 21.83% and significantly reduce PM concentrations [14]. Research indicates that TiO2 nanoparticles play a crucial role in improving both gaseous and particulate emissions, making palm biodiesel blends more environmentally sustainable when used in compression ignition engines.

Identification of Research Gaps

Despite extensive research indicating the benefits of TiO2 nanoparticles in enhancing biodiesel properties, there remains a significant gap in understanding their specific impact on palm and soybean biofuels. Current studies often generalize the effects of TiO2 without delving into how these nanoparticles influence the combustion efficiency of these biofuels. Furthermore, while reductions in emissions such as NOX and particulate matter have been noted, a comprehensive analysis of all emission profiles, including CO, HC, and soot particles, is lacking. This study aims to fill these gaps by providing detailed evaluations of the combustion processes and emission characteristics of CI engines fueled with TiO2-enhanced palm and soybean biodiesels.
In addition, while there are indications of improved engine performance metrics like power output and fuel consumption with TiO2-enhanced biodiesels, specific data for palm and soybean biodiesel blends are insufficient. This study seeks to systematically assess these performance metrics and explore the long-term sustainability and economic feasibility of using TiO2 nanoparticles in these biofuels. By addressing the stability, cost implications, and lifecycle impact of TiO2 integration, this research will offer a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits and challenges, contributing valuable insights into the optimization of biofuels for sustainable engine performance.

3. Methodology

3.1. Biofuel Production

In Figure 1, the production of biodiesel from palm oil utilizing a laboratory-scale transesterification process is illustrated. The experimental setup comprised a 1000 mL flask equipped with a thermometer and a magnetic stirrer (Topscien, Ningbo, China, Model MS300) to ensure uniform mixing. Initially, 1000 mL of palm oil was heated to 65 °C in the flask. Subsequently, a solution of potassium hydroxide (12.75 g from Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) dissolved in 255 mL of methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, ≥99.9% purity, suitable for high-performance liquid chromatography) was added to the preheated oil. The reaction mixture was maintained under continuous stirring for 2 h. Following the reaction, the mixture was transferred to a separating funnel to separate the glycerol layer. The resulting esters were washed twice: first with warm water containing 5% acetic acid and then with plain water to purify the methyl esters. The final step involved drying the ester at 100 °C to remove any remaining alcohol and water, culminating in the production of biodiesel from palm oil.
Similarly, the synthesis of biodiesel from soybean oil was conducted using a comparable one-stage alkaline transesterification method. The apparatus included a 500 mL flask, also equipped with a thermometer and magnetic stirrer. In this instance, 500 mL of soybean oil was combined with a solution of 135 mL methanol and 2.5 g potassium hydroxide, maintaining a 10:1 molar ratio. The mixture was heated to 55 °C and stirred at a constant rate of 700 RPM for 2 h. After the reaction, the mixture was subjected to the same separation process using a funnel to remove the glycerol layer. The esters were then purified through two washes: one with warm water mixed with 5% acetic acid and the other with plain water. The final drying step at 100 °C removed any residual alcohol and water, resulting in the production of biodiesel from soybean oil.

3.2. Incorporation of TiO2 Nanoparticles

The incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles into soybean oil was a carefully controlled process designed to ensure a uniform dispersion of the nanoparticles within the biodiesel blend. The TiO2 nanoparticles used were AEROXIDE TiO2 P25 (Evonik Degussa, Essen, Germany). Initially, the TiO2 nanoparticles were mixed with soybean oil using an ultrasonic mixer (Branson Ultrasonics, Model 2510E-MT, Danbury, CT, USA) for one hour. Ultrasonic mixing is a crucial step as it uses high-frequency sound waves to create cavitation bubbles in the liquid, which collapse and produce intense shear forces. These forces help to break apart any nanoparticle agglomerates, ensuring that the nanoparticles are evenly distributed throughout the soybean oil. This process was repeated to prevent any settling or clumping of the nanoparticles within the blend, as uniform dispersion is key to maintaining the desired properties of the fuel. Prior to testing, the nano blend was vigorously shaken and stirred for an additional two hours, further ensuring that the nanoparticles remained in suspension and did not settle. This method of incorporating TiO2 nanoparticles aimed to improve the fuel’s combustion characteristics and stability, potentially enhancing the overall performance of the biodiesel.
The process of incorporating TiO2 nanoparticles into palm oil biodiesel followed a similar methodology to that used with soybean oil, with specific adjustments made to accommodate the properties of palm oil. TiO2 nanoparticles, prepared through a chemical precipitation method, were first mixed into the palm oil using an ultrasonic mixer for one hour. The ultrasonic mixer facilitated the even distribution of nanoparticles by breaking down any potential clumps, thus preventing agglomeration. The mixing process was repeated to ensure the consistency and stability of the nano blend, as an uneven distribution could lead to performance inconsistencies. Additionally, to avoid settling of the nanoparticles, the mixture was subjected to vigorous shaking and stirring for two hours before any experimental testing. This step was critical in maintaining a stable dispersion as it ensured the nanoparticles were well suspended and did not settle at the bottom of the container. The incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles into palm oil was carried out with the aim of enhancing the biodiesel’s properties, potentially improving the combustion efficiency, reducing emissions, and increasing fuel stability. Specific concentration levels of TiO2 nanoparticles (50 ppm and 75 ppm) were selected to explore their impacts on the biodiesel’s performance characteristics.
The quantities of TiO2 nanoparticles selected for the study—50 ppm and 75 ppm—were carefully chosen to investigate the effects of varying concentrations on the biodiesel’s performance. These specific concentrations were selected based on previous research and preliminary studies, which indicated that these levels are effective in enhancing fuel properties without causing adverse effects, such as the clogging of fuel injectors or increased viscosity:
  • A concentration of 50 ppm: This moderate concentration was selected to evaluate the balance between catalytic enhancement and potential changes in fuel properties, such as viscosity and stability. It provides insights into optimal nanoparticle loading that can deliver noticeable benefits without compromising the fuel’s quality.
  • A concentration of 75 ppm: The highest concentration was chosen to explore the upper limits of TiO2 incorporation. This level helps in understanding the maximum potential benefits and any possible drawbacks, such as increased costs or technical challenges, associated with higher nanoparticle loading.
The detailed characteristics of the TiO2 nanoparticles and the soybean and palm oil blends are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.

3.3. Experimental Setup

Figure 2 depicts the experimental setup used in this study, highlighting a detailed array of components essential for accurately measuring and analyzing the performance of a four-cylinder, four-stroke electronic engine. The core of the setup is the engine itself, which is connected to an eddy current dynamometer that applies varying loads to the engine. Torque measurements are precisely recorded using a load cell and a dedicated torque measurement device. Engine speed is tracked using an RPM sensor and displayed on an RPM display. Exhaust gasses are routed through an exhaust pipe and analyzed for gas composition and smoke levels using a gas emission analyzer and a smoke analyzer, respectively.
The engine receives fuel from a fuel tank, with fuel consumption being closely monitored by a load cell for fuel weight and shown on a fuel weight display. The air intake system and fuel injector work together to ensure the precise delivery of air and fuel to the engine. Additionally, a propeller shaft is included in the setup, likely serving the purpose of transmitting power from the engine. This comprehensive arrangement is meticulously designed to provide in-depth insights into the engine’s performance across various operating conditions.

3.4. Engine Specifications

The engine specifications detailed in Table 3 describe a four-cylinder, four-stroke power unit with electronic control, a common setup in modern vehicles that effectively balances efficiency and performance. Manufactured by Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. in Seoul, Republic of Korea, this engine utilizes a sequential fuel injection system and follows a 1-3-4-2 firing order. This specific firing sequence helps minimize engine vibrations and enhances operational smoothness. With a displacement of 1995 cc, the engine is within the mid-range capacity for contemporary automotive engines, offering a good compromise between power and fuel efficiency. The high compression ratio of 16:1 indicates that the engine is optimized for high efficiency and may be designed to run on premium fuels. The bore and stroke are measured at 84 mm and 90 mm, respectively, suggesting a slightly over-square design that can improve engine responsiveness and potentially allow for higher RPMs. Overall, the engine’s features are tailored to provide a balanced mix of performance and efficiency, making it suitable for a wide range of driving scenarios.
This research employed a standard internal combustion engine without any modifications to ensure that the findings accurately represent the performance and emissions characteristics of engines commonly found in real-world conditions. This approach allows for a precise evaluation of different biodiesel blends alongside regular diesel, reflecting how these fuels perform in engines as they are typically configured. By avoiding any alterations to the engine, this study maintains the original design specifications, making the results highly relevant and applicable to the majority of engines currently in use. This decision ensures that the conclusions drawn from this research are both reliable and widely transferable.

3.5. Error Analysis and Uncertainty

During the experimental trials, the lubricating oil temperature was carefully controlled and consistently maintained within a narrow range of 85 to 90 °C. The engine was operated continuously for 15 min, during which detailed observations were made and recordings systematically documented. To minimize potential discrepancies in the data, a rigorous evaluation of uncertainty was conducted. A critical aspect of this process was the calibration of all instruments involved, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the experimental results.
To further enhance the reliability of the findings, measurements were taken multiple times, with a minimum of four repetitions for each experiment. These repeated readings were averaged to calculate the arithmetic mean, which formed the foundation for a subsequent data analysis. This approach helped mitigate the impact of any anomalies or outliers, providing a more accurate representation of the experimental outcomes.
The detailed analysis of error and uncertainty for the smoke meter and gas analyzer is presented in Table 4. This table highlights the precision of these instruments, accounting for possible deviations and inaccuracies inherent in the measurement processes. By quantifying the uncertainty ranges and potential error margins, this table offers a clear insight into the reliability and limitations of the collected data. This comprehensive assessment is crucial for interpreting the experimental results with the necessary scientific rigor, ensuring that the conclusions drawn are both accurate and valid within the specified uncertainty bounds.
To assess the engine’s emission parameters, a CGA-4500 gas analyzer from the Republic of Korea was utilized. This sophisticated device employs Non-Dispersive Infrared (NDIR) technology to measure carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations ranging from 0.00 to 10.00% and carbon dioxide (CO2) levels between 0.0 and 20.0%. Additionally, it is capable of detecting hydrocarbons (HCs) within the range of 0 to 10,000 parts per million (ppm). The analyzer also features an electrochemical sensor for measuring oxygen (O2) levels from 0.00 to 25.00% and another electrochemical sensor specifically for quantifying nitric oxide (NOX) emissions, which can range from 0 to 5000 ppm.
For the acquisition of digital emission data, a probe was strategically positioned within the exhaust pipeline to ensure accurate sampling. Smoke emissions were measured using a dedicated smoke meter, providing data on the particulate content. To monitor the temperature of the exhaust gasses, a k-type thermocouple was employed. Together, these instruments allowed for a comprehensive analysis of the engine’s emission characteristics across various operational conditions, enabling a thorough evaluation of both its performance and environmental impact.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Emission Analysis

4.1.1. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emissions

Figure 3 indicates that CO emissions generally decrease as the RPM increases across all fuel types. Among the fuel types, the base diesel fuel (B0) consistently shows the highest CO emissions at each RPM level, while the biofuels, particularly those with added TiO2 nanoparticles, exhibit lower CO emissions. For instance, at 1000 RPM, the amount of CO emissions for SB20 is 0.178%, but with the addition of 75 mg of TiO2, the amount of emissions reduces significantly to 0.1%. A similar trend is observed with PB20, where CO emissions drop from 0.174% to 0.11% with the addition of 75 mg of TiO2.
CO emissions reduced by 43.82% for SB20 with 75 mg of TiO2 at 1000 RPM, while PB20 showed a 36.78% reduction under similar conditions.
These findings are consistent with previous studies, which have shown that TiO2 nanoparticles enhance oxidative reactions, leading to a reduction in CO emissions. For instance, Jayabalaji and Shanmughasundaram in 2019 observed that incorporating TiO2 into biodiesel blends markedly reduced CO emissions due to the catalytic properties of the nanoparticles, which improve the combustion process [24]. Likewise, the research conducted by Gunasekar et al. (2019) confirmed that the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles in biodiesel blends can effectively lower CO emissions by promoting the oxidation of carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide during combustion [25].

4.1.2. Hydrocarbon (HC) Emissions

In Figure 4, it is evident that there is a consistent decrease in HC emissions as the RPM increases for all fuel types. Among the fuels, pure diesel (B0) exhibits the highest HC emissions at each RPM level, while the biofuels show lower HC emissions. The incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles into the biofuels further reduces HC emissions, with the highest concentration of TiO2 (75 mg) yielding the lowest emissions. For instance, at 1000 RPM, SB20 emits 56 ppm of HC, while the SB20 + 75 TiO2 blend reduces this value to 47 ppm. Similarly, PB20 shows 64 ppm of HC emissions at 1000 RPM, which drops to 44 ppm with the addition of 75 mg of TiO2.
At the highest RPM of 1800, the trend remains clear, with SB20 + 75 TiO2 and PB20 + 75 TiO2 displaying the lowest HC emissions at 28 ppm and 30 ppm respectively. The addition of 75 mg TiO2 to SB20 resulted in a 16.07% reduction in HC emissions at 1000 RPM, while PB20 with 75 mg of TiO2 showed a 31.25% reduction. These results suggest that TiO2 nanoparticles significantly improve the combustion efficiency, leading to lower hydrocarbon emissions across all tested biofuels.
The reduction in HC emissions with the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles can be attributed to the improved oxidation and combustion efficiency provided by these nanoparticles. Nanoparticles help achieve more complete combustion, thereby reducing the amount of unburned hydrocarbons in the exhaust. The same trend was observed in previous research that demonstrated the effectiveness of TiO2 nanoparticles in reducing HC emissions. For instance, the research conducted by Sarma et al. (2023) showed that the incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles into biodiesel blends led to a significant reduction in HC emissions due to enhanced combustion processes [26]. Similarly, Kurre et al. (2023) found that TiO2 nanoparticles contributed to lower HC emissions by improving the oxidation of hydrocarbons during combustion [27].

4.1.3. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions

In Figure 5, a clear trend is observed where CO2 emissions increase as the RPM rises across all fuel types. Among the biofuels, the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles results in higher CO2 emissions compared to the base fuels, suggesting a more complete combustion process facilitated by the nanoparticles. For example, at 1000 RPM, SB20 emits 5.6% of CO2, but this increases to 6.8% with the addition of 75 mg of TiO2. Similarly, PB20 emits 5.2% of CO2 at 1000 RPM, which increases to 6.7% when 75 mg of TiO2 is added.
At the highest RPM of 1800, the trend is consistent, with SB20 + 75 TiO2 emitting 8.8% of CO2 compared to 4.4% for the base diesel (B0). Similarly, PB20 + 75 TiO2 shows 8.7% of CO2 emissions at 1800 RPM, highlighting the impact of TiO2 in enhancing the combustion efficiency, thereby increasing CO2 emissions due to more complete fuel oxidation.
CO2 emissions increase by 21.43% for SB20 and 28.85% for PB20 with 75 mg of TiO2 at 1000 RPM.
These findings corroborate previous research showing that TiO2 nanoparticles enhance combustion efficiency, leading to increased CO2 emissions as a greater proportion of carbon is fully oxidized during the combustion process. This outcome was observed in studies by Fangsuwannarak et al. (2020) and Madhuri et al. (2023), where the addition of TiO2 to biofuels resulted in higher CO2 emissions due to the improved catalytic combustion [28,29].

4.1.4. Nitrogen Oxide (NOX) Emissions

Figure 6 indicates that NOX emissions increase with higher RPMs across all fuel types. Among the fuels, the base diesel (B0) consistently has the lowest NOX emissions, while the pure SB20 biofuel exhibits the highest emissions, reaching 904 ppm at 1800 RPM. The introduction of TiO2 nanoparticles generally leads to a reduction in NOX emissions for both SB and PB biofuels. For example, at 1000 RPM, SB20 emits 722 ppm of NOX, which decreases to 685 ppm when 75 mg of TiO2 is added.
Similarly, PB20 follows this trend, with NOX emissions decreasing from 781 ppm to 687 ppm at 1200 RPM with the addition of 75 mg of TiO2. At higher RPMs, the reduction in NOX emissions becomes more pronounced, particularly in the SB20 + 75 TiO2 and PB20 + 75 TiO2 blends, which consistently show lower emissions compared to their pure biofuel versions. The addition of TiO2 resulted in a 5.12% reduction in NOX emissions for SB20 and 12.03% for PB20 at 1000 RPM.
These data are compared with findings from other studies in biofuel research, where the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles has been shown to improve combustion efficiency and reduce NOX emissions due to the catalytic properties of the nanoparticles. For example, Prasetya et al. (2023) demonstrated that incorporating TiO2 nanoparticles in palm biodiesel blends resulted in a reduction in NOX emissions due to enhanced catalytic activity during combustion [30]. Similarly, Razzaq et al. (2023) support the idea that TiO2 can effectively reduce NOX emissions when used in biodiesel blends, particularly under high engine loads [31]. However, the data also align with the observations made by Mehregan and Moghiman in 2020, who noted that the impact of TiO2 nanoparticles varies significantly depending on the specific conditions, such as the type of biodiesel and engine operating parameters [32]. Thus, while TiO2 nanoparticles can be effective in reducing NOX emissions, their efficacy is influenced by factors such as the biofuel type and engine speed.

4.1.5. Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT)

Figure 7 reveals that the EGT increases as the RPM rises for all fuel types. Pure SB20 exhibits a consistently higher EGT compared to base diesel (B0), reaching up to 283 °C at 1800 RPM. However, when TiO2 nanoparticles are added, the EGT decreases for both SB and PB biofuels. For example, at 1000 RPM, the EGT for SB20 is 112 °C, but it drops to 89 °C with the addition of 75 mg of TiO2. Similarly, PB20 shows an EGT of 103 °C at 1000 RPM, which decreases to 82 °C when 75 mg of TiO2 is added.
As the engine speed increases, this trend of a reduced EGT with TiO2 nanoparticle addition continues. At 1800 RPM, SB20 + 75 of TiO2 results in an EGT of 195 °C compared to 283 °C for pure SB20. Likewise, PB20 + 75 of TiO2 has an EGT of 195 °C, which is significantly lower than the 304 °C temperature observed for pure PB20. The addition of TiO2 to SB20 at 1000 RPM resulted in a 20.54% reduction in the EGT, while PB20 showed a 25.24% reduction.
The reduction in EGT with the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles can be attributed to the improved combustion efficiency provided by the nanoparticles, which promotes more complete combustion and less heat being carried away by exhaust gasses. This aligns with previous research findings, where TiO2 nanoparticles were shown to enhance combustion characteristics, leading to lower EGTs. Studies such as those by Sarma et al. (2023) have demonstrated that the inclusion of TiO2 nanoparticles in biodiesel blends effectively lowers EGTs by improving combustion efficiency [26].

5. Conclusions

The comprehensive analysis conducted in this study underscores the significant impact of TiO2 nanoparticles on the emission characteristics and combustion efficiency of soybean (SB) and palm (PB) biodiesel blends in compression ignition (CI) engines. Across all test conditions, the incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles consistently resulted in lower emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons (HC). This reduction is attributed to the enhanced catalytic oxidation process facilitated by TiO2 nanoparticles, which promotes more complete combustion. These findings are particularly noteworthy as they suggest that even at higher engine speeds, where emissions typically increase, the presence of TiO2 can help maintain lower pollutant levels.
In addition to reducing CO and HC emissions, this study observed an increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions with the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles. While higher CO2 emissions might seem counterintuitive to the goals of emission reduction, they actually indicate more efficient fuel combustion as more carbon is being fully oxidized. This trade-off highlights the dual role of TiO2 nanoparticles in both reducing incomplete combustion by-products and ensuring more complete fuel utilization.
A critical finding from this study is the reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions, which are typically challenging to control in biodiesel combustion. NOX emissions generally rise with an increasing engine speed due to higher combustion temperatures. However, the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles demonstrated a mitigating effect, particularly at higher concentrations and RPMs, suggesting that these nanoparticles can help manage peak combustion temperatures and reduce NOX formation. This effect is crucial for meeting stringent emission regulations without compromising engine performance.
By improving combustion efficiency, reducing harmful emissions, and managing exhaust temperatures, these nanoparticles offer a promising pathway toward more sustainable and efficient biodiesel usage in diesel engines. Future research could explore the long-term effects of TiO2 nanoparticle use on engine wear and the potential for further optimizing nanoparticle concentrations to balance emissions and performance. The insights gained from this study can inform the development of next-generation biodiesel formulations that align with global efforts to reduce carbon footprints and promote cleaner energy solutions in the transportation sector.

6. Future Scope

While this study offers important insights into the effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on biofuel emissions and performance, several areas merit further research:
-
The Fate of TiO2 Nanoparticles: Future studies should investigate whether TiO2 nanoparticles remain in the soot, are filtered, or are emitted into the atmosphere post-combustion.
-
Fuel Consumption: Future research should evaluate the impact of TiO2 on fuel economy, which was not assessed in this study.
-
Smoke and Particulate Emissions: Measuring smoke opacity and particulate matter emissions will provide a more comprehensive understanding of TiO2’s environmental impact.
-
Stability, Costs, and Life Cycle Impact: Studies should assess the long-term stability, cost-effectiveness, and environmental life cycle of TiO2-enhanced biofuels.
-
Nanoparticle Dispersion: While ultrasonic mixing was used to disperse TiO2, future work should employ techniques like SEM or TEM to verify nanoparticle distribution and long-term stability in biofuels.
-
Sample Testing: Testing each fuel sample three times would improve statistical reliability. Future studies should aim to carry out triplicate testing to enhance data robustness.
-
The Uniformity of TiO2 Dispersion: Variations in viscosity and calorific value may result from slight inconsistencies in nanoparticle dispersion. Future work will focus on advanced testing to ensure better uniformity in the samples.
These areas provide significant opportunities to further optimize the integration of TiO2 nanoparticles into biofuels for improved engine performance and environmental sustainability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K.; methodology, R.K.; software, R.K.; validation, R.K. and H.M.C.; formal analysis, R.K.; investigation, R.K.; resources, H.M.C.; data curation, R.K.; writing—original draft preparation, R.K.; writing—review and editing, R.K. and H.M.C.; visualization, R.K.; supervision, H.M.C.; project administration, H.M.C.; funding acquisition, H.M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2022H1A7A2A02000033).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

kg/m3Kilograms per cubic meter (density)
cStCentistokes (viscosity)
°CDegrees Celsius (flash point)
ppmParts per million (nanoparticle concentration)
MJ/kgMegajoules per kilogram (calorific value)
%Percentage
NOXNitrogen oxide
COCarbon monoxide
HCHydrocarbon
CO2Carbon dioxide
EGTExhaust gas temperature
CI EngineCompression ignition engine
TiO2Titanium dioxide
SB2020% soybean biodiesel and 80% diesel blend
SB20 + 50 ppm TiO2SB20 blend with 50 ppm TiO2 nanoparticles
SB20 + 75 ppm TiO2SB20 blend with 75 ppm TiO2 nanoparticles
PB2020% palm biodiesel and 80% diesel blend
PB20 + 50 ppm TiO2PB20 blend with 50 ppm TiO2 nanoparticles
PB20 + 75 ppm TiO2PB20 blend with 75 ppm TiO2 nanoparticles

References

  1. El-Adawy, M. Effects of diesel-biodiesel fuel blends doped with zinc oxide nanoparticles on performance and combustion attributes of a diesel engine. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 80, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bayindirli, C.; Celik, M.; Zan, R. Optimizing the thermophysical properties and combustion performance of biodiesel by graphite and reduced graphene oxide nanoparticle fuel additive. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2023, 37, 101295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zheng, F.; Cho, H.M. The Effect of Different Mixing Proportions and Different Operating Conditions of Biodiesel Blended Fuel on Emissions and Performance of Compression Ignition Engines. Energies 2024, 17, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, K.; Cho, H. Comparative Analysis of Performance and Emission Characteristics of Biodiesels from Animal Fats and Vegetable Oils as Fuel for Common Rail Engines. Energies 2024, 17, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khujamberdiev, R.; Cho, H. Impact of Biodiesel Blending on Emission Characteristics of One-Cylinder Engine Using Waste Swine Oil. Energies 2023, 16, 5489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lai, C.-M.; Loo, D.L.; Teoh, Y.H.; How, H.G.; Le, T.D.; Nguyen, H.T.; Ghfar, A.A.; Sher, F. Optimization and performance characteristics of diesel engine using green fuel blends with nanoparticles additives. Fuel 2023, 347, 128462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sandhi, R.S.; Chebattina, K.R.R.; Sambana, N.R.; Vadapalli, S.; Pullagura, G.; Pathem, U.C. Evaluation of TiO2 nanoparticles as an additive in diesel-n-butanol-Bombax ceiba biodiesel blends for enhance performance and emissions control of a CI engine. Int. J. Heat Technol. 2021, 39, 1930–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, F.; Cho, H.M. The Comprehensive Effects of Nano Additives on Biodiesel Engines—A Review. Energies 2024, 17, 4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pullagura, G.; Bikkavolu, J.; Vadapalli, S.; Chebattina, K.R.R.; Kuchipudi, V. Comparative study of TiO2 nanoparticles and alcoholic fuel additives-biodiesel-diesel blend for combustion, performance, and emission improvements. Int. J. Heat Technol. 2022, 40, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Simhadri, K.; Rao, P.S.; Paswan, M. Improving the combustion and emission performance of a diesel engine with TiO2 nanoparticle blended Mahua biodiesel at different injection pressures. Int. J. Thermofluids 2024, 21, 100563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jan, H.A.; Saqib, N.U.; Khusro, A.; Sahibzada, M.U.K.; Rauf, M.; Alghamdi, S.; Almehmadi, M.; Khandaker, M.U.; Bin Emran, T.; Mohafez, H. Synthesis of biodiesel from Carthamus tinctorius L. oil using TiO2 nanoparticles as a catalyst. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2022, 34, 102317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jain, A.; Bora, B.J.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, P.; Medhi, B.J.; Farooque, A.A.; Tirth, V.; Senthilkumar, N.; Peyyala, P.K. Impact of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles addition in Eichhornia Crassipes biodiesel used to fuel compression ignition engine at variable injection pressures. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2023, 49, 103295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Illipilla, M.; Lankapalli, S.V.P.; Sagari, J. Influence of dispersant-mixed TiO2 nanoparticles on stability and physicochemical properties of Semecarpus anacardium biodiesel blend. Int. Nano Lett. 2022, 13, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fayad, M.A.; Sobhi, M.; Chaichan, M.T.; Badawy, T.; Abdul-Lateef, W.E.; Dhahad, H.A.; Yusaf, T.; Isahak, W.N.R.W.; Takriff, M.S.; Al-Amiery, A.A. Reducing soot nanoparticles and NOx emissions in CRDI diesel engine by incorporating TiO2 nano-additives into biodiesel blends and using high rate of EGR. Energies 2023, 16, 3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rajak, U.; Verma, T.N. Influence of combustion and emission characteristics on a compression ignition engine from a different generation of biodiesel. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2019, 23, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bari, S.; Zhang, C. Analysis of Performance and Emission of Diesel Engines Operating on Palm Oil Biodiesel. SAE Int. J. Adv. Curr. Pract. Mobil. 2020, 2, 1862–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, P.V.; Ashok, B.; Vignesh, R.; Bhasker, J.P.; Kumar, A.N. Evaluation of performance, emissions and combustion attributes of CI engine using palmyra biodiesel blend with distinct compression ratios, EGR rates and nano additives. Fuel 2022, 321, 124092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Seraç, M.R.; Aydın, S.; Şevik, S. Evaluation of comparative combustion, performance, and emission of soybean-based alternative biodiesel fuel blends in a CI engine. Renew. Energy 2019, 148, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vellaiyan, S. Combustion, performance and emission evaluation of a diesel engine fueled with soybean biodiesel and its water blends. Energy 2020, 201, 117633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hussain, F.; Soudagar, M.E.; Afzal, A.; Mujtaba, M.A.; Fattah, I.; Naik, B.; Mulla, M.H.; Badruddin, I.A.; Khan, T.M.; Raju, V.D.; et al. Enhancement in Combustion, Performance, and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Ce-ZnO Nanoparticle Additive Added to Soybean Biodiesel Blends. Energies 2020, 13, 4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, C.; Lin, K. Comparison of the Engine Performance of Soybean Oil Biodiesel Emulsions Prepared by Phase Inversion Temperature and Mechanical Homogenization Methods. Processes 2023, 11, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Venu, H.; Subramani, L.; Raju, V.D. Emission reduction in a DI diesel engine using exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) of palm biodiesel blended with TiO2 nano additives. Renew. Energy 2019, 140, 245–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mujtaba, M.; Masjuki, H.H.; Kalam, M.A.; Noor, F.; Farooq, M.; Ong, H.C.; Gul, M.; Soudagar, M.E.M.; Bashir, S.; Fattah, I.M.R.; et al. Effect of Additivized Biodiesel Blends on Diesel Engine Performance, Emission, Tribological Characteristics, and Lubricant Tribology. Energies 2020, 13, 3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jayabalaji, G.; Shanmughasundaram, P. Effect of Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nano-Fluid on Performance and Emission Features of a Diesel Engine Operated on Aphanizomenon Flos Biodiesel-Diesel Blend. Mater. Sci. Forum 2019, 969, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gunasekar, P.; Manigandan, S.; Ilangovan, N.; Nithya, S.; Devipriya, J.; Saravanan, W.S. Effect of TiO2 and nozzle geometry on diesel emissions fuelled with biodiesel blends. Int. J. Ambient. Energy 2019, 40, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sarma, C.J.; Sharma, P.; Bora, B.J.; Bora, D.K.; Senthilkumar, N.; Balakrishnan, D.; Ayesh, A.I. Improving the combustion and emission performance of a diesel engine powered with mahua biodiesel and TiO2 nanoparticles additive. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 72, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kurre, S.K.; Yadav, J.K.; Khan, M.K.; Yadav, P.; Munaf Dhebar, M.; Rawat, B.S. Experimental evaluation of performance and emission of diesel engine fueled with nano-material titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles supplemented diesel-biodiesel-ethanol blends. Mater. Today Proc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fangsuwannarak, K.; Fangsuwannarak, T.; Khotbut, Y. Effect of Nano-TiO2 Additives Blended in Palm Biodiesel on Compression Ignition Engine Performance. J. Clean Energy Technol. 2020, 8, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Madhuri, R.J.; Naik, J.V.; Roa, V. Effects of Aloe Vera Biodiesel Blends with TiO2 on the Emission and Performance Characteristics of a DI Diesel Engine. Biotechnol. J. Int. 2023, 27, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Prasetya, H.; Apriyanto, H.; Agustina, L. Determination of optimum technologies implementation scenarios toward net zero emissions in palm oil biodiesel production. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1187, 012029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Razzaq, L.; Abbas, M.M.; Waseem, A.; Jauhar, T.A.; Fayaz, H.; Kalam, M.A.; Soudagar, M.E.; Silitonga, A.S.; Husnain, S.U.; Ishtiaq, U. Influence of varying concentrations of TiO2 nanoparticles and engine speed on the performance and emissions of diesel engine operated on waste cooking oil biodiesel blends using response surface methodology. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mehregan, M.; Moghiman, M. Experimental investigation of the distinct effects of nanoparticles addition and urea-SCR after-treatment system on NOx emissions in a blended-biodiesel fueled internal combustion engine. Fuel 2020, 262, 116609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biodiesel production: palm oil and soybean oil.
Figure 1. Biodiesel production: palm oil and soybean oil.
Nanomaterials 14 01570 g001
Figure 2. Experimental setup.
Figure 2. Experimental setup.
Nanomaterials 14 01570 g002
Figure 3. CO emission fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Figure 3. CO emission fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Nanomaterials 14 01570 g003
Figure 4. HC emission fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Figure 4. HC emission fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Nanomaterials 14 01570 g004
Figure 5. CO2 emission fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Figure 5. CO2 emission fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Nanomaterials 14 01570 g005
Figure 6. NOX emission fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Figure 6. NOX emission fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Nanomaterials 14 01570 g006
Figure 7. EGT fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Figure 7. EGT fluctuations with varying engine speed.
Nanomaterials 14 01570 g007
Table 1. Nanoparticle (TiO2) properties.
Table 1. Nanoparticle (TiO2) properties.
DetailProperties
Name (TiO2)Nanoparticles of titanium dioxide
AppearanceWhite
Purity of TiO296%
Particle size20–50 nm
Surface area>42 m2/g
Melting point>233 °C
Table 2. Fuel characteristics.
Table 2. Fuel characteristics.
Fuel TypeDensity (kg/m3)Viscosity (cSt)Flash Point (°C)Cetane NumberCalorific Value (MJ/kg)Ester Content (%)
Diesel0.8202.875848.745.515-
SB200.8342.92795243.53696.2
SB20 + 50 ppm TiO20.8413.198653.543.60796.5
SB20 + 75 ppm TiO20.8463.278953.843.69596.8
PB200.8623.108251.543.20197.1
PB20 + 50 ppm TiO20.8683.368852.943.27297.4
PB20 + 75 ppm TiO20.8723.459153.243.33597.7
Table 3. Engine specification and data points.
Table 3. Engine specification and data points.
ParametersSpecifications
Engine TypeElectronic, four-cylinder, four-stroke type
Injection Sequence1-3-4-2
Stroke Length (mm)90
Bore (mm)84
Compression Ratio16:1
Displacement (cc)1995
Table 4. Measuring range and precision of smoke meter and gas analyzer.
Table 4. Measuring range and precision of smoke meter and gas analyzer.
Exhaust EmissionRangeResolutionAccuracy and Uncertainties
CO0.00–10.00%±0.001%
HC0–10,000ppm±1 ppm
CO20.0–20.0%±0.01%
O20.00–25.00%±0.01%
NOX0–5000ppm±1 ppm
Smoke0–100%±0.05%
Thermocouple (K-Type)0–1200±0.1 °C
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khujamberdiev, R.; Cho, H.M. Evaluation of TiO2 Nanoparticle-Enhanced Palm and Soybean Biodiesel Blends for Emission Mitigation and Improved Combustion Efficiency. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191570

AMA Style

Khujamberdiev R, Cho HM. Evaluation of TiO2 Nanoparticle-Enhanced Palm and Soybean Biodiesel Blends for Emission Mitigation and Improved Combustion Efficiency. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(19):1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khujamberdiev, Ramozon, and Haeng Muk Cho. 2024. "Evaluation of TiO2 Nanoparticle-Enhanced Palm and Soybean Biodiesel Blends for Emission Mitigation and Improved Combustion Efficiency" Nanomaterials 14, no. 19: 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191570

APA Style

Khujamberdiev, R., & Cho, H. M. (2024). Evaluation of TiO2 Nanoparticle-Enhanced Palm and Soybean Biodiesel Blends for Emission Mitigation and Improved Combustion Efficiency. Nanomaterials, 14(19), 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop