Next Article in Journal
Progress in the Elimination of Organic Contaminants in Wastewater by Activation Persulfate over Iron-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks
Previous Article in Journal
Glassy-like Transients in Semiconductor Nanomaterials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Optimization of Ni-Based Nano Metal–Organic Frameworks as a Superior Electrode Material for Supercapacitor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Aluminum-Ion Storage Properties of N-Doped Titanium Dioxide Electrode in Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(5), 472; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14050472
Submission received: 11 December 2023 / Revised: 10 January 2024 / Accepted: 22 January 2024 / Published: 5 March 2024

Abstract

:
Aqueous aluminum-ion batteries (AIBs) have great potential as devices for future large-scale energy storage systems due to the cost efficiency, environmentally friendly nature, and impressive theoretical energy density of Al. However, currently, available materials used as anodes for aqueous AIBs are scarce. In this study, a novel sol-gel method was used to synthesize nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (N-TiO2) as a potential anode material for AIBs in water. The annealed N-TiO2 showed a high discharge capacity of 43.2 mAh g−1 at a current density of 3 A g−1. Analysis of the electrode kinetics revealed that the N-TiO2 anodes exhibited rapid diffusion of aluminum ions, low resistance to charge transfer, and high electronic conductivity, enabling good rate performance. The successful implementation of a nitrogen-doping strategy provides a promising approach to enhance the electrochemical characteristics of electrode materials for aqueous AIBs.

1. Introduction

The growing energy demand has promoted the advancement of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and the widespread application of commercial products. However, limited lithium resources urgently require sustainable solutions like lithium recovery and the development of high-performance and safer alternatives to LIBs [1,2,3,4]. Therefore, effective alternative rechargeable battery technologies are urgently required to leverage the earth’s more abundant elements [5]. The potential of rechargeable aluminum-ion batteries (AIBs) for grid energy storage has been explored owing to aluminum’s high theoretical mass specific capacity of 2980 mAhg−1 induced by exchanging three electrons during the electrochemical reaction [6,7].
Due to the fact that the standard electrode potential of Al3+/Al is less than that of H+/H2 (−1.68 V), the reaction between aluminum foil and acid or alkali aqueous solutions produces H2 [8,9,10]. Therefore, electrochemical stripping or deposition of Al in a standard aqueous solution is not possible. To ensure compatibility with the Al anode, the standard electrolyte is the ionic liquid AlCl3/[EMIM]Cl, which possesses a broader electrochemical window and exerts a moderate corrosive effect on the Al surface, thereby stimulating the Al striping and plating reaction [11]. These ionic liquid electrolytes, on the other hand, are not recommended for use in large-scale energy storage systems because of their exorbitant expense and possible environmental repercussions [12]. Therefore, alternative aqueous electrolytes that are non-combustible and have low toxicity are urgently required for inexpensive rechargeable AIBs [13,14]. Another significant drawback that restricts the utility of AIBs is their inadequate cathode materials, which results in a low energy density [15]. At present, the cathode materials of aqueous aluminum-ion batteries mainly include transition metal oxides (TiO2 [16], V2O5 [17], and MoO3 [18]), transition metal sulfides and selenides (Mo6S8 [19], FeS2 [20], Co9S8 [21], CoSe2 [22], and Cu2−xSe [23]), Prussian blue analogues (CuHCF [12], K0.02 Cu[Fe(CN)6]0.7 3.7H2O [8], FeFe(CN)6 [24], and K2CoFe(CN)6 [25]), and organic materials (polyaniline [26], polyimide [27], and polypyrrole [28]). While Prussian blue analogues offer benefits such as affordability, safety, and environmental friendliness, their unsuitability for use in AABs is due to their inherently limited electrochemical capacity [29]. Frequent reports have detailed the investigation of aluminum-ion batteries constructed with carbon materials. The main method used by researchers to improve the specific capacity and rate performance of carbon materials is to regulate their various properties [30]. However, the limited specific capacity of carbon-based materials hinders their further advancement. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated by researchers that a number of conductive polymer materials are capable of storing aluminum via a redox mechanism. The reported polypyrene material with four fused aromatic rings has a reversible capacity comparable to that of graphite electrodes (>100 mAh g−1) [31]. Nevertheless, the limited density of active sites in conductive polymer materials using anionic energy storage limits the maximum capacity of the material [32]. Hence, it is advantageous to investigate cathode materials to achieve AIBs with superior energy density and long-term stability.
Recent research has focused on TiO2 due to its advantageous properties, including chemical stability, environmental tolerance, affordability, simplicity of synthesis, and high capacity [33]. The utilization of nanostructured TiO2 materials as electrodes for aqueous AIBs has been extensively documented. Because of its significant negative redox potential (approximately −1.20 V/−0.10 V vs. Ag/AgCl) and its considerable theoretical capacity for storage aluminum, TiO2 is considered to be a highly sought-after material for anode applications. The common phase structures of TiO2 are anatase, rutile, and brookite phases [34]. The intercalation voltage of rutile is 0.06~0.77 V, and the intercalation voltage of anatase is 0.03~0.79 V, which leads to the theoretical capacity of anatase higher than that of rutile [35]. However, the electronic conductivity of TiO2 with various phase structures is known to be poor, and efforts have been made to enhance it [36,37]. To improve the poor electronic conductivity of TiO2, Lahan et al. [38] combined TiO2 with highly conductive nano-silver, graphene (rGO), and carbon nanotube (CNT) materials to prepare rGO@TiO2, CNT@TiO2, and Ag@TiO2 composite materials, and then separately studied their aluminum-ion storage performance. The results show that ultrafast diffusion of Al3+ in TiO2 can be induced by the combination of TiO2 and rGO (<2 wt%). Electrochemical studies show that the rGO@TiO2 electrode has the best performance in 0.25 mol L−1 AlCl3 electrolyte. Ojeda et al. [39] synthesized nano-TiO2 with different anatase and rutile phase ratios via a two-step polyacrylic acid gel method using titanium chloride as the titanium source at room temperature. The findings indicate that the TiO2 nanoparticles with high specific surface area have excellent rate performance, and the larger the proportion of rutile structure in mixed-phase titanium dioxide, the higher the capacity of the material. Using a hydrothermal process, Mahdi Kazazi et al. [40] successfully synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles with a notable degree of crystallinity and a substantial specific surface area at current densities of 0.05 A g−1. Consequently, the discharge capacity achieved was 180 mAh g−1. A.W. Holland et al. [41] have examined the aluminum store capabilities of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles with two particle sizes of 5 nm and 25 nm. TiO2 nanoparticles with a size of 5 nm exhibited an intriguing capacity. Liu et al. [9] have also investigated the performance of anatase nano-titanium dioxide array tubes for aluminum-ion storage in 1 mol L−1 AlCl3 electrolyte. The nano-titanium dioxide array tube can be reversibly implanted with the small-radius space effect of Al3+. A detailed description is given in this work to clarify the aluminum storage mechanism in titanium dioxide array tubes. Electrochemical studies revealed that the titanium dioxide array tube has a discharge capacity of 75 mAh g−1.
Although research on TiO2 anodes in aqueous AIBs has made some progress, the present anode material possesses the drawbacks of limited capacity and inadequate cycle stability, which are far from meeting the application requirements of aqueous aluminum- ion batteries. Herein, a novel nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (N-TiO2) was effectively produced via a simple sol-gel method and assessed as an anode for aqueous AIBs. The anode exhibits a reversible charge capacity of 43.2 mAh g−1 and demonstrates a consistent cycling life at 3 A g−1. In addition to the aluminum storage mechanism in the N-TiO2 anode was investigated using electrochemical testing and structural characterization techniques.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Synthesis of N-TiO2

In a typical experiment, the raw material terabutyl titanate (20 mL) was put into 80 mL of absolute ethanol, then stirred for 5 min to form a homogeneous and pale yellow solution, defined as solution A. Solution B was a mixed solution composed of absolute ethanol (20 mL), deionized water (20 mL), and 3 mL concentrated HNO3. After solutions A and B were mixed, a pale yellow gel was formed, and the precursor powders were obtained after drying at 80 °C under vacuum conditions. Finally, the precursor powders were sintered at 450 °C for approximately 2 h in air at a heating rate of 3 °C per min. As a result of this process, N-TiO2 was successfully obtained.

2.2. Structure Characterization of Materials

The crystal structure of N-TiO2 was characterized by X-ray diffraction with Cu-Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å, Rigaku SmartLab, Tokyo, Japan). The morphologies and microstructures of the materials were examined using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JSM-760FPlus, Jeol, Peabody, MA, USA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G2 F20 H-800, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The chemical composition of the materials was investigated using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) examination was conducted using a Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) Nexsa multipurpose photoelectron spectrometer equipped with an analyzer pass energy of 29.4 eV. Raman spectra were obtained from a Horiba LabRAM HR800 with a 532 nm He-Ne laser (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). The structure of the functional groups in the samples was examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

The N-TiO2 electrode slurry was fabricated using a combination of 80 wt% active material, 10 wt% super carbon, and 10 wt% polyvinylidene fluoride in 1-Methyl-2-pyrrole solution. Subsequently, the slurry was uniformly applied onto a titanium foil and subjected to vacuum drying at 120 °C for 12 h. The mass of the active material for a round sheet with a diameter of 10 mm was approximately 0.455 mg. The electrochemical performance of the electrodes was evaluated using a three-electrode device. The counter electrode was a platinum electrode, whereas the reference electrode was an Ag/AgCl electrode. The working electrode, on the other hand, consisted of an N-TiO2 electrode. The electrolyte employed was a mixed aqueous solution comprising 1M AlCl3. Galvanostatic charging/discharging (GCD) measurements were performed using a battery tester (CT-2001A, LAND, Wuhan, China). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were conducted on an electrochemical workstation (PARSTAT MC). The frequency spanned from 0.01 Hz to 100 kHz, while the perturbation amplitude was 5 mV. Electrochemical experiments were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Morphology

The synthesis of the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2 was conducted according to the procedure outlined in Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials). X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique was used to analyze the crystal structure and crystallinity of the N-TiO2 xerogel and N-TiO2 annealed at 450 °C. The diffraction patterns of the N-TiO2 xerogel sample and N-TiO2 annealed at 450 °C, as shown in Figure 1a, exhibit distinct peaks at various angles. These peaks correspond to the crystal planes of anatase TiO2, specifically (101), (103), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), (116), (220), (215), and (224), as identified by the (ICDD PDF No. 71-1166) [42]. Furthermore, a weak characteristic diffraction peak at 30.8° was observed for the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2 materials. This characteristic peak originates from brookite-structured TiO2 [43,44], implying that there was a small amount of brookite TiO2 in the two N-TiO2 samples. In addition, a new XRD diffraction peak at 27.5° can be observed in the annealed N-TiO2 sample, which belongs to the characteristic peak of rutile TiO2 [45]. XRD analysis indicated that the main phase of the two N-TiO2 samples was anatase TiO2. A minute quantity of brookite TiO2 was detected in the N-TiO2 xerogel sample, whereas the annealed N-TiO2 sample contained minute quantities of both brookite and rutile TiO2. According to group theory analysis, the optical vibration mode of anatase TiO2 can be described as A1g(R) + A2g(ia)g + B1g(R) + Eg(R) + A2u(IR) + 2B1l(ia) + 3Eu(IR) [46]. In addition to the infrared vibration mode, six Raman characteristic peaks of Eg(1), Eg(2), B1g(1), A1g, B1g(2), and Eg(3) can be observed in Raman spectra [47]. Figure 1b shows the Raman spectra of the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2 samples. The Raman vibration mode signals at 142, 195, 394, 515, and 637 cm−1 of the two N-TiO2 samples correspond to the Eg(1), Eg(2), B1g(1), A1g + B1g(2), and Eg(3) mode signals of anatase TiO2 [48,49]. This indicates that the two N-TiO2 samples possess anatase structures, which is consistent with the XRD results.
The structure of the functional groups in the samples was analyzed using FTIR, as depicted in Figure 1c. The infrared absorption signals observed in the range of 458–742 cm−1 were attributed to the Ti-O vibration [50,51]. The bending vibration of C-OH is commonly ascribed to the band situated at 1385 cm−1 [52]. The N-TiO2 xerogel exhibited a significantly enhanced signal compared to the annealed N-TiO2, mostly attributed to the presence of residual alcohols on the surface of the N-TiO2 xerogel specimen. The observed bands at waves of 3425 cm−1, 3230 cm−1, and 1626 cm−1 can be ascribed to the presence of sp2-coordinated graphite structured carbon. This suggests that the TiO2 material underwent water dissociation, leading to the formation of hydroxyl groups [52]. The N-TiO2 xerogel exhibited stronger infrared signals at 3230 cm−1 and 1626 cm−1 compared to the annealed N-TiO2 sample at 3425 cm−1 and 1626 cm−1, respectively. These results indicate that annealing considerably reduces the quantity of hydroxyl groups present on the surface of TiO2 [53].
Figure 1d illustrates the XPS spectra of both the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2 samples. The survey XPS spectra exhibit peaks at 32.6, 58.6, 284.8, 458.8, 529.8, 560.8, 979.5, and 1102.5 eV, which correspond to the Ti, C, and O elements of N-TiO2, respectively [54]. According to the XPS results, the annealed N-TiO2 sample exhibited an atomic ratio of N:O:Ti of 0.83:66.34:32.82. From the Ti 2p high-resolution XPS spectra (Figure 1e), the peaks located at 458.8 eV and 464.4 eV are attributed to Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 bonds, respectively, suggesting the oxidation state of Ti in the two samples is +4. A discernible peak at an energy level of 400.5 eV is observed in the plotted N 1s spectra, as depicted in Figure 1f, and corresponds to the Ti-N-O chemical bond, indicating that N is successfully doped into TiO2 [55]. Furthermore, the presence of residual nitric acid on the surface of the N-TiO2 xerogel sample is confirmed by the signal peak at 406.9 eV. It can be seen that nitric acid was completely volatilized after annealing at 450 °C.
The two N-TiO2 samples’ particle sizes and morphologies were examined using SEM (see Figure 2a,b,d,e). The SEM image (Figure 2a) reveals that the N-TiO2 xerogel is composed of micro-sized particles with a continuous folding morphology. After mid-temperature annealing at 450 °C, the large particles of the xerogel are broken into nano-sized particles, which helps to increase the number of reaction sites and accelerate the diffusion of aluminum ions due to its larger specific surface area and shorter pathway. Further investigation into the structural features of the two N-TiO2 samples was conducted using TEM and HRTEM, as shown in Figure 2c and f, respectively. The (101) crystal plane of the N-TiO2 xerogel can be observed in Figure 2c, and the crystal plane spacing was 0.350 nm. As shown in Figure 2f, the annealed N-TiO2 had higher crystallinity, and the (101) crystal plane spacing was 0.351 nm. Figure 2g shows the EDS spectrum and element mapping of the N-TiO2 sample annealed at 450 °C, proving that the N element was successfully doped into titanium dioxide. The EDS energy spectrum captures the electronic signal peak of the N element, providing further evidence that the N element has been effectively altered. This aligns with the results obtained from the XPS analysis.

3.2. Electrochemical Properties

The CV curves of the two N-TiO2 anodes for aqueous AIBs at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1 are shown in Figure 3a,b. The redox peaks at −0.83 V/−1.09 V and −0.97 V/−1.17 V are observed for the N-TiO2 xerogel anode in Figure 3a, indicating the two-step insertion and extraction reactions of Al3+ in the N-TiO2 is carried out in two steps. The peaks at −1.09 V and −1.17 V represent the two-step intercalation reaction of Al3+, and the peaks at −0.97 V and −0.83 V represent the two-step deintercalation reaction of Al3+. The redox peaks can be observed at −0.80 V/−1.10 V and −0.99 V/−1.21 V for the annealed N-TiO2 anode (Figure 3b). Compared with the N-TiO2 xerogel anode, the redox peak pair was more obvious, which was due to the enhanced crystallinity of the annealed N-TiO2.
To determine the electrochemical performance of the two N-TiO2 anodes, measurements of galvanostatic discharge and charge were conducted within a voltage range of −1.3 to −0.1 V. The discharge/charge curves of the N-TiO2 anodes are depicted in Figure 3c,d. The discharge and charge curves of the N-TiO2 xerogel anode (Figure 3c) do not show distinct plateau features, indicating that a portion of the aluminum storage capacity in the N-TiO2 xerogel anode is due to pseudocapacitive behavior. This typical slope-line feature is in line with the CV curve of the N-TiO2 xerogel anode. The discharge-charge curves of the annealed N-TiO2 anode displayed in Figure 3d present two obvious discharge/charge platforms at −0.99 V/−1.21 V. This was attributed to the annealing treatment, which improved the crystallinity of the N-TiO2. The discharge/charge platforms at −0.80 V/−1.10 V were not observed in the profiles because of the large polarization at high current density. The initial coulombic efficiency of the annealed N-TiO2 was 53%. The reason for the low coulombic efficiency was the precipitation of H2, irreversible reduction of Ti4+ to Ti2+ during charging, and oxidation of Ti3+ in the electrolyte containing dissolved O2. This is consistent with previous reports [7].
Figure 3e illustrates the cycle performance of the two N-TiO2 anodes operating at a current density of 3 A g−1. The annealed N-TiO2 anode exhibited a first reversible capacity of 43.2 mAh g−1. After 100 cycles, the capacity remained at 16 mAh g−1. The cycle performance of the annealed N-TiO2 anode was superior to that of the N-TiO2 xerogel anode because of the greater crystallinity and improved electronic conductivity of the annealed N-TiO2. The specific capacity of annealed N-TiO2 is also superior to that of previously reported materials, as shown in Table 1.
The CV technique was employed at different scan rates ranging from 20 to 110 mV s−1, as depicted in Figure 4a. The area-specific capacity of the CV curve originates from the total amount of charge stored by the Faraday process and non-Faraday process. The Faraday process includes capacitance behavior occurring on the surface of the electrodes and ion diffusion control behavior occurring in the bulk phase of the electrode materials. For electrochemical reactions strictly controlled by diffusion, the current value satisfies the following equation [61,62]:
i = nFAC · D 1 / 2 v 1 / 2 α n α F RT 1 / 2 π 1 / 2 χ bt = a v b   b = 0.5
For the electrochemical reaction completely controlled by the capacitance effect, the current value satisfies the following equation [63]:
i = AC d v = a v   b = 1.0
Variables a and b denote adjustable parameters, while v represents the sweep rate. For the Faraday process with both capacitance behavior and diffusion behavior, its b value is between 0.5 and 1.0 [19]. Therefore, we can determine the Faraday process type of the electrode by analyzing the b value. To establish the correlation between the peak current (log (ip)) and sweep rate (log (v)), both variables were subjected to logarithmic transformation, as illustrated in Figure 4b. The b values of the cathode and anode peaks are calculated to be 0.66 and 0.56, respectively, indicating that the capacity of the annealed N-TiO2 anode is jointly controlled by the capacitance behavior and diffusion behavior during the entire discharge and charge process. The calculation of the b value at various potentials was carried out using Equation (1), as illustrated in Figure 4c. The steps involving Al-ion diffusion control are primarily observed within the potential ranges of −0.45 V to −0.50 V and −0.80 V to −1.3 V during discharge. In the remaining potential intervals, the electrochemical reaction is mainly governed by the combined control of the ion diffusion behavior and pseudo-capacitance behavior. During the charging process, the predominant step that is controlled by ion diffusion occurs within the potential range of −1.00 V to −1.30 V. On the other hand, the storage of aluminum is mostly governed by the behavior of capacitance within the potential range of −0.40 V to −0.90 V.
The proportion of capacitance behavior and ion-diffusion-controlled behavior can be estimated using the following equation [64]:
I V = k 1 v + k 2 v 1 / 2
At a given potential V, I(V), k1v, and k2v1/2 represent the total current response, current caused by surface capacitive effects, and current response caused by ion diffusion-controlled behavior, respectively.
The above equation can also be reformulated as [65]
I V / v 1 / 2 = k 1 v 1 / 2 + k 2
By plotting I(V)/v1/2 and v1/2 at different potentials, as shown in Figure 4d, it is possible to determine the values of k1 and k2 from the linear relationships and then calculate the volt-ampere relationship curve of the capacitance behavior at different potentials, as shown in Figure 4e. The plot clearly demonstrates that the majority of the capacitance contribution is focused within the range of −0.4 V to −0.95 V. This observation aligns with previous estimations of the b value at various potentials. The capacitance contribution ratios (Figure 4f) of the annealed N-TiO2 anode at various sweep rates of 20 to 100 mV s−1 are 44.4%, 50.2%, 55.0%, 58.3%, 61.0%, 64.5%, 66.1%, 68.9%, and 70.2%, respectively.
To further analyze the Al-ion kinetic behavior in the two N-TiO2 anodes, EIS was conducted in a frequency range of 0.01 Hz–100 kHz with an amplitude of 5 mV, as shown in Figure 5a. The plots exhibit a depressed semicircular pattern at high frequencies, which corresponds to the charge-transfer resistance (Rct) and capacitance (CPE1). Additionally, a sloping line is observed at low frequencies, indicating the presence of diffusion-controlled Warburg impedance (Zw) associated with Al3+ ions. The results demonstrate that the N-TiO2 xerogel anode has a higher charge transfer resistance compared to the annealed N-TiO2 anode. Figure 5b shows the linear curve between ω−1/2 and Z′. We compared the diffusion rates of Al3+ in the two electrodes according to the slope. The smaller the slope, the higher the diffusion rate. The observation of Figure 5b reveals that the N-TiO2 xerogel electrode exhibits a steeper slope, indicating a reduced diffusion rate of Al3+ ions in the N-TiO2 xerogel electrode. The annealed N-TiO2 electrode has a lower charge transfer resistance and higher Al3+ diffusion rate, suggesting better electrochemical performance.

4. Conclusions

In summary, novel nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (N-TiO2) was successfully synthesized via a simple sol-gel technique and assessed as an anode material for AIBs. In contrast to the N-TiO2 xerogel, N-TiO2 annealed at 450 °C exhibited enhanced crystallinity, reduced particle size, and greater electronic conductivity. The annealed N-TiO2 anode possesses an initial reversible charge capacity of 43.2 mAh g−1 at 3 A g−1. The electrode kinetics study indicated that the Al ion storage behavior of the annealed N-TiO2 anode was controlled by both the surface pseudo-capacitance behavior and ion diffusion behavior. The annealed N-TiO2 anode had a smaller charge transfer resistance and a higher aluminum-ion diffusion rate, which indirectly proves its superior electrochemical performance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14050472/s1. Figure S1. The schematic synthesis of the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2 samples. Figure S2. UV diffuse reflectance spectra of the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2. Figure S3. (a,b) High resolution XPS spectra of C 1s, O 1s for the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.J. and X.W.; methodology, R.L.; software, L.J.; validation, L.J., F.Z., P.L., F.W. and J.D.; formal analysis, X.W.; investigation, D.L.; resources, Q.Y.; data curation, L.J.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W.; writing—review and editing, J.D.; visualization, L.J.; supervision, R.L.; project administration, F.Z.; funding acquisition, J.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52362029), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (No. 2019GXNSFDA245014), Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Materials and Guilin University of Electronic Technology, China (No. 221005-Z), and Innovation Project of GUET Graduate Education (No. 2023YCXS153).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Muldoon, J.; Bucur, C.B.; Gregory, T. Quest for nonaqueous multivalent secondary batteries: Magnesium and beyond. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11683–11720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Suo, L.; Borodin, O.; Gao, T.; Olguin, M.; Ho, J.; Fan, X.; Luo, C.; Wang, C.; Xu, K. “Water-in-salt” electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries. Science 2015, 350, 938–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Ji, Y.; Ma, J.; Yu, H. Emerging Nonaqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries: Challenges, Status, and Perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1706310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, X.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, R.; Li, Y.; Wu, F.; Wu, C. Electrolytes for rechargeable aluminum batteries. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022, 128, 100960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, R.; Xu, C.; Wu, X.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, X.; Wang, F.; Yao, Q.; Sadeeq Balogun, M.; Lu, Z.; Deng, J. Aluminum-ion storage reversibility in a novel spinel Al2/3Li1/3Mn2O4 cathode for aqueous rechargeable aluminum batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 53, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kong, D.; Fan, H.; Ding, X.; Hu, H.; Zhou, L.; Li, B.; Chi, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Realizing a long lifespan aluminum-ion battery through the anchoring effect between Polythiophene and carboxyl modified carbon nanotube. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 395, 139212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, X.; Qin, N.; Wang, F.; Li, Z.; Qin, J.; Huang, G.; Wang, D.; Liu, P.; Yao, Q.; Lu, Z.; et al. Reversible aluminum ion storage mechanism in Ti-deficient rutile titanium dioxide anode for aqueous aluminum-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 37, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Xiang, K.; Xing, W.; Carter, W.C.; Chiang, Y.M. Reversible Aluminum-Ion Intercalation in Prussian Blue Analogs and Demonstration of a High-Power Aluminum-Ion Asymmetric Capacitor. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 5, 1401410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, S.; Hu, J.J.; Yan, N.F.; Pan, G.L.; Li, G.R.; Gao, X.P. Aluminum storage behavior of anatase TiO2 nanotube arrays in aqueous solution for aluminum ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9743–9746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, C.; Hou, C.-C.; Chen, L.; Kaskel, S.; Xu, Q. Rechargeable Al-ion batteries. EnergyChem 2021, 3, 100049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Angell, M.; Zhu, G.; Lin, M.C.; Rong, Y.; Dai, H. Ionic Liquid Analogs of AlCl3 with Urea Derivatives as Electrolytes for Aluminum Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 30, 1901928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tang, W.; Deng, L.; Guo, L.; Zhou, S.; Jiang, Q.; Luo, J. Reversible aqueous aluminum metal batteries enabled by a water-in-salt electrolyte. Green Energy Environ. 2023, in press. [CrossRef]
  13. Jiao, S.; Lei, H.; Tu, J.; Zhu, J.; Wang, J.; Mao, X. An industrialized prototype of the rechargeable Al/AlCl3-[EMIm]Cl/graphite battery and recycling of the graphitic cathode into graphene. Carbon 2016, 109, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Agiorgousis, M.L.; Sun, Y.-Y.; Zhang, S. The Role of Ionic Liquid Electrolyte in an Aluminum–Graphite Electrochemical Cell. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, X.; Wang, B.; Gong, D.; Xu, Z.; Lu, B. Graphene Nanoribbons on Highly Porous 3D Graphene for High-Capacity and Ultrastable Al-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, N.; Wu, F.; Wang, Z.; Ling, L.; Yang, H.; Gao, Y.; Guo, S.; Suo, L.; Li, H.; Xu, H.; et al. Reversible Al3+ storage mechanism in anatase TiO2 cathode material for ionic liquid electrolyte-based aluminum-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 51, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gu, S.; Wang, H.; Wu, C.; Bai, Y.; Li, H.; Wu, F. Confirming reversible Al3+ storage mechanism through intercalation of Al3+ into V2O5 nanowires in a rechargeable aluminum battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2017, 6, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Joseph, J.; O’Mullane, A.P.; Ostrikov, K. Hexagonal Molybdenum Trioxide (h-MoO3) as an Electrode Material for Rechargeable Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 6002–6008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jadhav, A.L.; Xu, J.H.; Messinger, R.J. Quantitative Molecular-Level Understanding of Electrochemical Aluminum-Ion Intercalation into a Crystalline Battery Electrode. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 2842–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, Z.; Hu, Z.; Jiao, R.; Tang, Z.; Dong, P.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Li, H. Tailoring multi-layer architectured FeS2@C hybrids for superior sodium-, potassium- and aluminum-ion storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 22, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. An, C.; Wang, M.; Li, W.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y. Large-scale Co9S8@C hybrids with tunable carbon thickness for high-rate and long-term performances of an aqueous battery. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 3741–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yao, L.; Ju, S.; Xu, T.; Yu, X. Spatial Isolation-Inspired Ultrafine CoSe2 for High-Energy Aluminum Batteries with Improved Rate Cyclability. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 13662–13673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, J.; Ren, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y. Phase Engineering of Nonstoichiometric Cu2-xSe as Anode for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 18507–18516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Zhang, D.; Niu, F.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Yang, J. FeFe(CN)6 Nanocubes as a Bipolar Electrode Material in Aqueous Symmetric Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chempluschem 2017, 82, 1170–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ru, Y.; Zheng, S.; Xue, H.; Pang, H. Potassium cobalt hexacyanoferrate nanocubic assemblies for high-performance aqueous aluminum ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lv, H.; Yang, S.; Li, C.; Han, C.; Tang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Li, H.; Zhi, C. Suppressing passivation layer of Al anode in aqueous electrolytes by complexation of H2PO4 to Al3+ and an electrochromic Al ion battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 39, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiong, T.; He, B.; Zhou, T.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Xin, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Wei, L. Stretchable fiber-shaped aqueous aluminum ion batteries. EcoMat 2022, 4, e12218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, P.; Chen, Z.; Ji, Z.; Feng, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Hu, M.; Wang, H.; Gan, W.; Huang, Y. A flexible aqueous Al ion rechargeable full battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 373, 580–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wessells, C.D.; Huggins, R.A.; Cui, Y. Copper hexacyanoferrate battery electrodes with long cycle life and high power. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ambroz, F.; Macdonald, T.J.; Nann, T. Trends in Aluminium-Based Intercalation Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Walter, M.; Kravchyk, K.V.; Bofer, C.; Widmer, R.; Kovalenko, M.V. Polypyrenes as High-Performance Cathode Materials for Aluminum Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1705644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bitenc, J.; Lindahl, N.; Vizintin, A.; Abdelhamid, M.E.; Dominko, R.; Johansson, P. Concept and electrochemical mechanism of an Al metal anode–organic cathode battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jia, B.E.; Thang, A.Q.; Yan, C.; Liu, C.; Lv, C.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, J.; Chen, J.; Pan, H.; Yan, Q. Rechargeable Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Battery: Progress and Outlook. Small 2022, 18, e2107773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Žerjav, G.; Žižek, K.; Zavašnik, J.; Pintar, A. Brookite vs. rutile vs. anatase: What`s behind their various photocatalytic activities? J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tang, W.; Xuan, J.; Wang, H.; Zhao, S.; Liu, H. First-principles investigation of aluminum intercalation and diffusion in TiO2 materials: Anatase versus rutile. J. Power Sources 2018, 384, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. He, Q.; Sun, Z.; Shi, X.; Wu, W.; Cheng, J.; Zhuo, R.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Performance Enhancement of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2 for Lithium-Ion Batteries Investigated by a Film Electrode Model. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 2717–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Y.; Sang, S.; Wu, Q.; Lu, Z.; Liu, K.; Liu, H. The electrochemical behavior of Cl assisted Al3+ insertion into titanium dioxide nanotube arrays in aqueous solution for aluminum ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 143, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lahan, H.; Boruah, R.; Hazarika, A.; Das, S.K. Anatase TiO2 as an Anode Material for Rechargeable Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries: Remarkable Graphene Induced Aluminum Ion Storage Phenomenon. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 26241–26249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ojeda, M.; Chen, B.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Xuan, J.; Wang, H. A Hydrogel Template Synthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticles for Aluminium-ion Batteries. Energy Procedia 2017, 105, 3997–4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kazazi, M.; Abdollahi, P.; Mirzaei-Moghadam, M. High surface area TiO2 nanospheres as a high-rate anode material for aqueous aluminium-ion batteries. Solid. State Ion. 2017, 300, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Holland, A.W.; McKerracher, R.; Cruden, A.; Wills, R.G.A. TiO2 nanopowder as a high rate, long cycle life electrode in aqueous aluminium electrolyte. Mater. Today Energy 2018, 10, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tong, M.-H.; Chen, Y.-X.; Lin, S.-W.; Zhao, H.-P.; Chen, R.; Jiang, X.; Shi, H.-Y.; Zhu, M.-L.; Zhou, Q.-Q.; Lu, C.-Z. Synchronous electrochemical anodization: A novel strategy for preparing cerium doped TiO2 nanotube arrays toward visible-light PEC water splitting. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 463, 142793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, X.-J.; Yang, W.-Y.; Li, F.-T.; Xue, Y.-B.; Liu, R.-H.; Hao, Y.-J. In Situ Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Porous N-TiO2/g-C3N4 Heterojunctions with Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 17140–17150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lu, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Yang, X.; Su, Y. Synthesis of Mesoporous Anatase TiO2 Sphere with High Surface Area and Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2017, 33, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tang, X.; Chu, W.; Qian, J.; Lin, J.; Cao, G. Low Temperature Synthesis of Large-Size Anatase TiO2 Nanosheets with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities. Small 2017, 13, 1701964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, C.Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.Y. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering effect for Ag/TiO2 composite particles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1999, 147, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, H.L.; Yang, J.Y.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, Y.B.; Lu, B.; Ma, G.H. Raman study of phase transformation of TiO2 rutile single crystal irradiated by infrared femtosecond laser. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 7497–7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, N.; Zou, X.; Liu, M.; Wei, L.; Shen, Q.; Bibi, R.; Xu, C.; Ma, Q.; Zhou, J. Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Hydrogenation of CO2 into Methane over a Pd/Ce-TiO2 Nanocomposition. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 25795–25804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ren, Y.; Shi, X.; Xia, P.; Li, S.; Lv, M.; Wang, Y.; Mao, Z. In Situ Raman Investigation of TiO2 Nanotube Array-Based Ultraviolet Photodetectors: Effects of Nanotube Length. Molecules 2020, 25, 1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Santhosh Kumar, R.; Govindan, K.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Kim, A.R.; Kim, J.-S.; Yoo, D.J. Fe3O4 nanorods decorated on polypyrrole/reduced graphene oxide for electrochemical detection of dopamine and photocatalytic degradation of acetaminophen. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 556, 149765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tamilarasi, S.; Kumar, R.S.; Cho, K.-B.; Kim, C.-J.; Yoo, D.J. High-performance electrochemical detection of glucose in human blood serum using a hierarchical NiO2 nanostructure supported on phosphorus doped graphene. Mater. Today Chem. 2023, 34, 101765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Singh, M.K.; Mehata, M.S. Phase-dependent optical and photocatalytic performance of synthesized titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles. Optik 2019, 193, 163011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nasir, M.; Bagwasi, S.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, F.; Tian, B.; Zhang, J. Characterization and activity of the Ce and N co-doped TiO2 prepared through hydrothermal method. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 236, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Deng, X.; Wei, Z.; Cui, C.; Liu, Q.; Wang, C.; Ma, J. Oxygen-deficient anatase TiO2@C nanospindles with pseudocapacitive contribution for enhancing lithium storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 4013–4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Q.; He, H.; Luan, J.; Tang, Y.; Huang, D.; Peng, Z.; Wang, H. Synergistic effect of N-doping and rich oxygen vacancies induced by nitrogen plasma endows TiO2 superior sodium storage performance. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 309, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. He, Y.J.; Peng, J.F.; Chu, W.; Li, Y.Z.; Tong, D.G. Retracted Article: Black mesoporous anatase TiO2 nanoleaves: A high capacity and high rate anode for aqueous Al-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 1721–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, S.; Kravchyk, K.V.; Pigeot-Rémy, S.; Tang, W.; Krumeich, F.; Wörle, M.; Bodnarchuk, M.I.; Cassaignon, S.; Durupthy, O.; Zhao, S.; et al. Anatase TiO2 Nanorods as Cathode Materials for Aluminum-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 6428–6435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Holland, A.; McKerracher, R.; Cruden, A.; Wills, R. Electrochemically Treated TiO2 for Enhanced Performance in Aqueous Al-Ion Batteries. Materials 2018, 11, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, S.; Pan, G.L.; Li, G.R.; Gao, X.P. Copper hexacyanoferrate nanoparticles as cathode material for aqueous Al-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 959–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gao, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Bai, Y.; Zhu, N.; Guo, S.; Suo, L.; Li, H.; Xu, H.; Wu, C. The Compensation Effect Mechanism of Fe-Ni Mixed Prussian Blue Analogues in Aqueous Rechargeable Aluminum-Ion Batteries. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 732–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Xiong, H.; Slater, M.D.; Balasubramanian, M.; Johnson, C.S.; Rajh, T. Amorphous TiO2 Nanotube Anode for Rechargeable Sodium Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2560–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Forghani, M.; Donne, S.W. Complications When Differentiating Charge Transfer Processes in Electrochemical Capacitor Materials: Assessment of Cyclic Voltammetry Data. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A1370–A1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xia, X.; Chao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhan, J.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Z.X.; Tu, J.; Fan, H.J. Generic Synthesis of Carbon Nanotube Branches on Metal Oxide Arrays Exhibiting Stable High-Rate and Long-Cycle Sodium-Ion Storage. Small 2016, 12, 3048–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Augustyn, V.; Simon, P.; Dunn, B. Pseudocapacitive oxide materials for high-rate electrochemical energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1597–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, T.; Wu, Z.; Xiang, W.; Wang, E.; Chen, T.; Guo, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, B. Cauliflower-like MnO@C/N composites with multiscale, expanded hierarchical ordered structures as electrode materials for Lithium- and Sodium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 246, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2. (b) Raman and (c) FTIR spectra of the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2. (d) XPS spectra and high-resolution spectra of (e) Ti 2p, (f) N 1s for the two N-TiO2 samples.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2. (b) Raman and (c) FTIR spectra of the N-TiO2 xerogel and annealed N-TiO2. (d) XPS spectra and high-resolution spectra of (e) Ti 2p, (f) N 1s for the two N-TiO2 samples.
Nanomaterials 14 00472 g001
Figure 2. (a,b) SEM and (c) HRTEM images of the N-TiO2 xerogel. (d,e) SEM and (f) HRTEM images of annealed N-TiO2. (g) TEM-EDS element mapping of annealed N-TiO2.
Figure 2. (a,b) SEM and (c) HRTEM images of the N-TiO2 xerogel. (d,e) SEM and (f) HRTEM images of annealed N-TiO2. (g) TEM-EDS element mapping of annealed N-TiO2.
Nanomaterials 14 00472 g002
Figure 3. Electrochemical properties of the two N-TiO2 anodes. (a) CV curve at 9 mV s−1 of the N-TiO2 xerogel and (b) annealed N-TiO2. (c) The charge-discharge curves of the N-TiO2 xerogel and (d) annealed N-TiO2 at 3 A g−1. (e) Cycle performance.
Figure 3. Electrochemical properties of the two N-TiO2 anodes. (a) CV curve at 9 mV s−1 of the N-TiO2 xerogel and (b) annealed N-TiO2. (c) The charge-discharge curves of the N-TiO2 xerogel and (d) annealed N-TiO2 at 3 A g−1. (e) Cycle performance.
Nanomaterials 14 00472 g003
Figure 4. (a) CV curves of annealed N-TiO2 anodes at different sweep rates. (b) Correlation between log (ip) and log (v) values for N-TiO2 that has been annealed. (c) b values of annealed N-TiO2 at different potentials. (d) The plot of i/v1/2v1/2 of the annealed N-TiO2. (e) Proportion of capacitance behavior (gray) and diffusion-controlled behavior (green) of annealed N-TiO2 at a sweep rate of 20 mV s−1. (f) The capacitance contribution of the annealed N-TiO2 at 20–110 mV s−1.
Figure 4. (a) CV curves of annealed N-TiO2 anodes at different sweep rates. (b) Correlation between log (ip) and log (v) values for N-TiO2 that has been annealed. (c) b values of annealed N-TiO2 at different potentials. (d) The plot of i/v1/2v1/2 of the annealed N-TiO2. (e) Proportion of capacitance behavior (gray) and diffusion-controlled behavior (green) of annealed N-TiO2 at a sweep rate of 20 mV s−1. (f) The capacitance contribution of the annealed N-TiO2 at 20–110 mV s−1.
Nanomaterials 14 00472 g004
Figure 5. (a) EIS plots and corresponding (b) Z′–ω−1/2 plots of the two N-TiO2 anodes.
Figure 5. (a) EIS plots and corresponding (b) Z′–ω−1/2 plots of the two N-TiO2 anodes.
Nanomaterials 14 00472 g005
Table 1. Comparison of electrochemical properties of N-TiO2 and other similar materials in aqueous aluminum-ion batteries.
Table 1. Comparison of electrochemical properties of N-TiO2 and other similar materials in aqueous aluminum-ion batteries.
ElectrodeSaltsConcentrationSpecific Capacity (mAh g−1)Capacity RetentionRefs.
TiO2-NTAsAlCl31 M75 (4 mA cm−2)-[37]
G-TiO2AlCl31 M33 (6.25 A g−1)-[56]
Ti-deficient rutile TiO2NaCl, AlCl31:178.3 (3 A g−1)-[7]
TiO2AlCl3, EMIMCl1:140 (500 mA g−1)75% (100 Cycles)[57]
TiO2AlCl3, KCl1:115.3 (10 A g−1)-[58]
CuHCFAl2(SO4)30.5 M46.9 (200 mA g−1)54.9% (1000 Cycles)[59]
KNHCFAl(OTF)35 M46.5 (20 mA g−1)52% (500 Cycles)[60]
N-TiO2AlCl31 M43.2 (3 A g−1)37% (100 Cycles)This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jian, L.; Wu, X.; Li, R.; Zhao, F.; Liu, P.; Wang, F.; Liu, D.; Yao, Q.; Deng, J. Enhanced Aluminum-Ion Storage Properties of N-Doped Titanium Dioxide Electrode in Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14050472

AMA Style

Jian L, Wu X, Li R, Zhao F, Liu P, Wang F, Liu D, Yao Q, Deng J. Enhanced Aluminum-Ion Storage Properties of N-Doped Titanium Dioxide Electrode in Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(5):472. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14050472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jian, Le, Xibing Wu, Ruichun Li, Fangzheng Zhao, Peng Liu, Feng Wang, Daosheng Liu, Qingrong Yao, and Jianqiu Deng. 2024. "Enhanced Aluminum-Ion Storage Properties of N-Doped Titanium Dioxide Electrode in Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries" Nanomaterials 14, no. 5: 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14050472

APA Style

Jian, L., Wu, X., Li, R., Zhao, F., Liu, P., Wang, F., Liu, D., Yao, Q., & Deng, J. (2024). Enhanced Aluminum-Ion Storage Properties of N-Doped Titanium Dioxide Electrode in Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials, 14(5), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14050472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop