Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Irradiation on the Improvement in Oxidation Behavior of MX-ODS Steel in Liquid Pb
Next Article in Special Issue
Towards High-Performance Photo-Fenton Degradation of Organic Pollutants with Magnetite-Silver Composites: Synthesis, Catalytic Reactions and In Situ Insights
Previous Article in Journal
Redox-Modified Nanostructured Electrochemical Surfaces for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Complex Biological Fluids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hybrid-Mechanism Synergistic Flexible Nb2O5@WS2@C Carbon Nanofiber Anode for Superior Sodium Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metal–Organic Framework Nanomaterials as a Medicine for Catalytic Tumor Therapy: Recent Advances

by
Jiaojiao Zhang
1,
Meiyu Li
2,
Maosong Liu
1,
Qian Yu
2,*,
Dengfeng Ge
3 and
Jianming Zhang
1,*
1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
School of Life Science, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3
Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, 31 Ji’nan Rd, Dongying 257034, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(9), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090797
Submission received: 12 March 2024 / Revised: 28 April 2024 / Accepted: 1 May 2024 / Published: 3 May 2024

Abstract

:
Nanomaterials, with unique physical, chemical, and biocompatible properties, have attracted significant attention as an emerging active platform in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Amongst them, metal–organic framework (MOF) nanostructures are particularly promising as a nanomedicine due to their exceptional surface functionalities, adsorption properties, and organo-inorganic hybrid characteristics. Furthermore, when bioactive substances are integrated into the structure of MOFs, these materials can be used as anti-tumor agents with superior performance compared to traditional nanomaterials. In this review, we highlight the most recent advances in MOFs-based materials for tumor therapy, including their application in cancer treatment and the underlying mechanisms.

1. Introduction

Cancer, a leading cause of high mortality rates, poses a significant threat to human life [1,2,3]. Timely diagnosis and effective treatment strategies are imperative. The field of nanomedicine has witnessed rapid advancements via the development of sophisticated nanomaterials and a deeper understanding of tumor pathogenesis. The application of nanomaterials in tumor therapy is garnering increased attention [4,5]. Rationally designed nanomaterials can significantly improve the stability of drugs in complex physiological environments and their accumulation at tumor sites by increasing permeability and retention efficacy [6,7,8]. Specifically, the use of metal–organic framework (MOF) nanomaterials has emerged as a promising avenue for drug-free therapeutic diagnostic nanoplatforms in cancer treatment [9].
MOFs are a class of porous crystalline materials with periodic network microstructures constructed by the self-assembly of inorganic metal centers (e.g., metal ions or metal clusters) and organic ligands. The organic ligands and metal centers, acting as the pillars and nodes, respectively, are connected via covalent bonds to form a grid structure with a certain topology. MOFs, as a combination of the rigidity of inorganic materials and the flexibility of organic materials, exhibit exceptional potential across various domains, including optics, catalysis, energy, and biomedicine [10,11], and biotechnology [12,13]. In the realm of biomedicine, MOFs offer numerous advantages, such as high porosity, a large specific surface area, biocompatibility, high drug loading capacity, inherent biodegradability, low cytotoxicity, controlled release patterns, thermochemical stability, and facile surface functionalization [14,15,16]. These characteristics facilitate the integration of functional components like drugs, light/sound sensitizers, nanocatalysts, and targeted molecules for diverse tumor therapies [17,18].
The application of MOFs in cancer therapy represents a rapidly evolving and cutting-edge field within biomedical research. Key challenges and opportunities in MOF-based cancer diagnosis and therapy are being explored, focusing on frequently studied MOFs like Isoreticular MOF (IRMOF), Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF), Materials of Institute Lavoisier (MIL), and porous coordination network (PCN), University of Oslo (UiO) [19]. Additionally, various anti-tumor therapies, such as drug delivery (DD), chemodynamic therapy (CDT), sonodynamic therapy (SDT), photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), starvation therapy (ST), and multimodal synergistic therapy (MST), have been investigated, elucidating the roles and efficacy of MOFs in these treatment modalities (Figure 1) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
This review focuses on recent advances in MOF-based nanomedicine for cancer treatment. It begins with a brief introduction to the unique features of MOFs and subsequently delves into their representative applications in cancer therapy. The review concludes by highlighting challenges in the research domain and proposing intriguing future research directions. The aim is to provide a valuable reference for the development of safe and efficient biomedicines, encouraging broader bio-application of these nanomaterials.

2. Properties of MOFs

Various synthetic methods result in diverse morphologies, structures, and pore sizes of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), influencing their functionalities and potential applications. Commonly employed synthesis techniques encompass the hydrothermal/solvent thermal method, mechanochemical method, ultrasonic synthesis method, microwave synthesis method, ion thermal method, template method, and vapor deposition method [27,28]. By judiciously selecting methods and conditions, targeted performance can be achieved in MOFs. Additionally, these methods can be combined with other manipulations, such as surface modification and drug loading, to further broaden MOFs’ applications in the biomedical field [14].
In essence, MOFs are composed of metal ions coordinated with organic ligands, offering controllable size and shape, along with the ability to adjust chemical properties, such as functional groups, acidity, hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, and surface charge [29]. MOFs exhibit exceptionally high porosity and specific surface area, reaching up to 10,000 m2 g−1 and a porosity of up to 90% [30]. The extensive surface area and chemical functional groups of MOFs facilitate their modification and functionalization [31]. Some MOFs display piezoelectric responses, converting small pressure changes into significant charge or voltage outputs that interact with mediators in the tumor microenvironment (TME) [32]. Various MOFs and their derived materials with diverse structural morphologies have been designed, including superporous structures, core–shell structures, hollow structures, electric networks, and multilayer structures (Figure 2) [33].
The super porous structure comprises multi-stage adjustable pore sizes, such as large pores, medium pores, and micropores, providing MOFs with high specific surface area, pore volume, and good diffusion performance [34,35,36]. Core–shell structures harness the synergistic effect of the core and shell to optimize performance [37,38]. Hollow structures reduce mass transfer distances and offer more active sites for reactions. Moreover, the cavity structure of MOFs can be used to enrich substrates, enhancing the efficiency and selectivity of reactions [39]. The interaction between metal ions and organic ligands in MOFs can regulate electron conduction and charge transport in electrical networks, thereby improving their electrical properties [40,41]. The structural diversity of multilayers provides abundant active sites, larger specific surface area and pore volume, and better chemical stability, compared to the counterparts composed of monolayer and few-layer structures, rendering them a versatile platform for various applications [42].

3. Advances in MOFs for Tumor Therapy

3.1. MOFs for Drug Delivery

The pore structure of MOFs can be strategically designed to encapsulate and regulate the release rate of drug molecules, enhancing drug stability and mitigating toxic side effects. This renders MOFs a promising DD platform for various cancer therapies [43,44,45]. MOF-based drug delivery can be broadly categorized into three main routes: (1) direct encapsulation of the drug within the pores; (2) covalent coupling of the drug and ligand; (3) drug release from MOFs via a trigger-mediated process [46,47].
In addressing challenges such as multidrug resistance (MDR), poor cellular uptake, and insufficient intracellular drug release in cancer treatment, innovative approaches have been explored. For instance, Peng et al. [48] developed a defect-rich Fe-based MOF-red blood cell (MOF-RBC) membrane-camouflaged nanoplatform (Figure 3a). Pseudolaric acid B (PAB) acts as an organic connector, encapsulating a ferroptosis drug to trigger ferroptosis and overcome MDR. This MOF-based nanoplatform can chemically degrade in the TME, working in tandem with released Fe3+ and PAB to enhance ferroptosis damage. In another study, Zhang et al. [49] synthesized a Bi-based MOF (SU-101) with low toxicity and active photo properties, utilizing ellagic acid (EA) as an organic linker (Figure 3b). Hydrogen bonds between the C=O group in EA and the OH group in ciprofloxacin resulted in an 85.8% loading value of the drug. Moreover, breaking these hydrogen bonds upon light exposure achieved a controlled release rate of up to 95.56%, indicating SU-101’s suitability for drugs that can form hydrogen bonds in drug delivery. Additionally, Xu et al. [46] synthesized a heavy metal-based nanoscale MOF (nMOF; Hf-TP-SN) by covalently bonding organic linkers with 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptosine (SN38) prodrugs (Figure 3c). This nanomedicine can be employed in both radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CT), responding to X-ray stimuli.

3.2. MOFs for Chemodynamic Therapy

CDT relies predominantly on transition metal ions (Fe2+, Mn2+, Cu+, Co2+, etc.), which directly convert overexpressed H2O2 in tumor cells into highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (•OH) through Fenton or Fenton-like reactions [50,51]. The •OH, as the most active oxygen species (ROS), can effectively kill cancer cells by irreversibly damaging deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) [52]. Unlike other therapeutic strategies requiring external energy input, CDT is activated by chemical energy conversion within the tumor tissue, avoiding the rapid decay of energy input during treatment [53].
MOFs, formed by the self-assembly of metal ions/clusters and organic ligands through coordination bonds, serve as a valuable metal ion source for CDT. Du et al. [54] engineered a synergetic nanocatalytic therapy nanoplatform (COS@MOF) based on a Fe-based MOF, etched by thiamine pyrophosphate (Figure 4a). COS@MOF exhibited an enhanced Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio and catalytic activity for ROS production, thereby improving CDT efficiency. In addition to Fe ions, Cu ions play a vital role in CDT. In Figure 4b, Cu+ was directly doped into the folic acid (FA) modified UiO-66 matrix loaded with a chemotherapy drug (tirapazamine; TPZ). Under ultrasound (US), the rates of Fenton-like reaction and ROS generation increased, enhancing CDT efficiency. Furthermore, US promoted cell death by accelerating drug release and disrupting cell membranes [55].
However, the catalytic activity of single metal ions may be insufficient, prompting exploration of the synergistic effect of mixed metal ions for enhanced catalytic ability to generate ROS from H2O2 in CDT. Chen et al. [56] fabricated Mn/Fe-based MOFs (Figure 4c), releasing Mn2+/4+ and Fe2+/3+ under the influence of H+ and glutathione (GSH) in the TME, thus improving CDT. Metal ions in MOFs, such as Mn2+/4+, can react with H2O2 in a Fenton-like manner, generating cytotoxic •OH that further enhances CDT [57].
To boost CDT efficacy, developing a strategy with highly efficient H2O2 self-regulating ability is crucial [58]. Gao et al. [59] encapsulated Doxorubicin (DOX) and CaO2 nanoparticles (NPs) in a cobalt-based MOF (ZIF-67) (Figure 4d). ZIF-67, being pH-sensitive, decomposes in the acidic tumor environment, releasing Co2+ and DOX. CaO2 NPs react with H2O to form O2 and H2O2, with the generated H2O2 further catalyzed by Co2+ ions to yield highly toxic •OH radicals through a Fenton-like reaction. Simultaneously, the produced O2 alleviates hypoxia conditions in tumors, extending the therapeutic efficacy of DOX. In another approach, Zhao et al. [52] introduced biomimetic H2O2 self-regulating NPs, using a Fe-based MOF (MIL-101) as a carrier for the drug Juglone (JUG) (Figure 4e). In the acidic TME, JUG and Fe3+ were cleaved and released. JUG induced apoptosis, increased H2O2 yield in cells, and Fe3+ promoted the conversion of H2O2 to •OH, accelerating apoptosis and enhancing the anti-tumor effect of CDT.
Figure 4. (a) The preparation process of COS@MOF and its application in nano-catalyzed tumor therapy [54]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (b) Schematic illustration of multiple treatment methods under ultrasound action [55]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (c) Synthesis method and intracellular mechanism of cascade nanoreactor [56]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (d) Synthesis of nanocatalytic drugs and enhancement of CT/CDT [59]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (e) Preparation process of nanomedicine and its application in synergistic therapy [52]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 4. (a) The preparation process of COS@MOF and its application in nano-catalyzed tumor therapy [54]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (b) Schematic illustration of multiple treatment methods under ultrasound action [55]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (c) Synthesis method and intracellular mechanism of cascade nanoreactor [56]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (d) Synthesis of nanocatalytic drugs and enhancement of CT/CDT [59]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (e) Preparation process of nanomedicine and its application in synergistic therapy [52]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g004

3.3. MOFs for Sonodynamic Therapy

SDT operates in an oxygen-dependent manner, US to induce energy state changes and electron transformations in sonosensitizers, generating ROS that cause irreversible cell damage [60,61,62]. SDT is a novel and attention-worthy approach to cancer therapy, offering deep penetration, in vitro operation, minimal side effects, high precision, and non-invasiveness as an alternative to traditional cancer therapies [63,64,65].
Liang et al. [66] engineered a defect-rich Ti-based MOF (D-MOF(Ti)) to enhance sound sensitivity for improved SDT (Figure 5a). The narrow band gap (2.49 eV) of D-MOF(Ti) promotes electron-hole separation, boosting ROS yield under US. D-MOF(Ti) also exhibits high Fenton-like activity due to Ti3+, achieving CDT. The synergistic effects of enhanced Fenton-like reactions and US acting as an excitation source for SDT contribute significantly to the TME. In another study, Ti-based MOFs (MIL) loaded with Ag NPs (MIL@Ag) demonstrated high electron-hole pair separation efficiency, leading to increased ROS generation under US irradiation (Figure 5b). This enhanced electron transfer and separation efficiency facilitated SDT with a high generation of ROS compared to pure MIL [67].
Piezoelectric MOFs can be employed in SDT, generating an internal electric field under US that favors charge mobility [68]. Deposition of Au NPs on UiO-66 efficiently generated ROS under US, attributed to the internal electric field induced by piezoelectric UiO-66. This enhanced the catalytic efficiency of Au NPs, showcasing the potential for inhibiting solid tumor growth in SDT (Figure 5c) [69]. Hypoxic microenvironments limit the efficacy of SDT. To address this, oxygen-independent free radical generators have been explored [70,71]. Based on this principle, Zhang et al. [71] synthesized a hypoxia-responsive Cu-MOF loaded with sonosensitizers (chlorin e6, Ce6) that can release Cu2+ and Ce6 selectively under hypoxic TME. This system remained stable under normal oxygen partial pressure (Figure 5d). The dual effects of Ce6-initiated SDT and Cu2+-induced CDT selectively killed cancer cells. Another approach involved constructing a US-responsive dual-sonosensitizer nanoplatform by loading the oxygen-independent free radical generator 2,2’-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-propane]dihydrochloride (AIPH) on Zr-MOF (Figure 5e). This dual-sonosensitizer nanoplatform improved SDT effectiveness in hypoxic environments and performed well in preclinical and clinical trials for treating pancreatic cancer [72]. The dual-sonosensitizer characteristics of Zr-MOF made it capable of producing singlet oxygen (1O2) for killing tumor cells when stimulated by US. Moreover, AIPH was decomposed to generate alkyl radicals that can destroy cancer cells even under hypoxic conditions. The decomposition can also generate N2 bubbles, which can reduce the cavitation threshold and enhance the acoustic cavitation effect. This, in turn, can facilitate the Zr-MOF@AIPH penetration at the tumor site.
In a novel strategy, Zhuang et al. [73] synthesized acoustochemical nanotherapeutic prodrug MOF (MCA) NPs. MCA connected a camptothecin (CPT) prodrug with an azobenzene (Azo) bond into the mesopore of an acoustic sensitizer MOF. Under US stimulation, MCA underwent sonosensitizer-mediated SDT, converting O2 to cytotoxic ROS. Subsequently, the nontoxic prodrug CPT2-Azo was released, exacerbating the anoxic microenvironment. This process promoted the cleavage of hypoxia-responsive prodrug CPT2-Azo, transforming it from a "non-toxic" to a "toxic" chemotherapy prodrug, ultimately improving therapeutic efficacy (Figure 5f).
Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation process and SDT mechanism of D-MOF(Ti) [66]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (b) Schematic illustration of MIL@Ag-PEG synthesis and mechanism of SDT and rapid wound healing [67]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic illustration of UiO-66-Au NPs used to enhance piezoelectric SDT and nanozyme catalytic therapy [69]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (d) Schematic illustration of preparation and cancer therapy of hypoxic responsive Cu-MOF nanosystems [71]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (e) Schematic illustration of Zr-MOF@AIPH synthesis and anti-tumor therapy [72]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (f) The mechanism of SDT and hypoxia-responsive drug therapy under US [73]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation process and SDT mechanism of D-MOF(Ti) [66]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (b) Schematic illustration of MIL@Ag-PEG synthesis and mechanism of SDT and rapid wound healing [67]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic illustration of UiO-66-Au NPs used to enhance piezoelectric SDT and nanozyme catalytic therapy [69]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (d) Schematic illustration of preparation and cancer therapy of hypoxic responsive Cu-MOF nanosystems [71]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (e) Schematic illustration of Zr-MOF@AIPH synthesis and anti-tumor therapy [72]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (f) The mechanism of SDT and hypoxia-responsive drug therapy under US [73]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g005

3.4. MOFs for Photothermal therapy

PTT is a tumor hyperthermic ablation strategy that directly kills cancer cells by converting photon energy into heat, offering non-invasiveness and spatiotemporal controllability [74,75,76]. In the context of MOF combination treatment nanosystems, Figure 6a presents polydopamine (PDA)-modified MOF NPs designed for the delivery of the chemical piperlongumine (PL) and photosensitizer (PS) [77]. The MOF serves as an excellent PL carrier and a source of iron donation. The combination of MOF and PL effectively amplifies CDT through the Fenton reaction, resulting in a large amount of ROS. Excess iron, combined with external light and heat, activates the anti-tumor immune response, enhances anti-tumor effects, and induces thermal death of tumor cells. Another multifunctional nanostructure, zirconia-iron porphyrinic metal–organic skeleton (Zr-FeP MOF), generates abundant ROS, including •OH and 1O2 under near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation, with a high photothermal conversion efficiency of 33.7%, efficiently inhibiting tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo (Figure 6b) [78].
Optically active hydrogen tetrachloride (TCPC) ligands assembled into the prototype structure of Hf-UiO-66, as shown in Figure 6c, resulted in TCPC-UiO with highly efficient photodynamic and photothermal therapeutic effects. The Hf element, with high photothermal conversion efficiency, good photostability, and biocompatibility, as well as strong X-ray attenuation ability, endowed TCPC-UiO with significant anti-tumor effects in in vivo experiments on H22 tumor-bearing mice, achieving a tumor inhibition rate of up to 90% [79].
Hypothermic PTT (HPTT), a non-invasive treatment method, is depicted in Figure 6d. Zhang et al. [80] decorated UiO-66 with the photothermal agent indocyanine green (ICG) through physical adsorption, encapsulated it with a biodegradable MnO2 layer (UMI), and attached catalytically active enzyme glucose oxidase (GOx) to the UMI NPs. Upon 808 nm laser irradiation in in vitro tests, the intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) decreased due to the photothermal effect of ICG. The introduction of GOx further reduced ATP levels, diminishing heat shock proteins (HSPs)-mediated heat resistance. The MnO2 layer decomposed H2O2 into O2 in the tumor, enhancing the effects of HPTT and starvation therapy (ST).

3.5. MOFs for Photodynamic Therapy

PDT involves using irradiated light of a specific wavelength to activate PS, which releases cytotoxic ROS via photochemical reactions, inducing apoptosis or necrosis in tumor tissue cells and triggering cell death [78]. Porphyrin, acting as a metal–organic backbone for organic linkers, serves as a PS and PDT carrier. Porphyrin-based PS-modified multifunctional MOF NPs can effectively avoid PS accumulation, significantly improving PDT accuracy [79]. Designed with tunable structures and high porosity, porphyrin-based MOFs integrate PSs in periodic arrays, making them promising therapeutic nanoagents for cancer PDT [80].
Wang et al. [81] prepared ultrasmall porphyrin-based MOF quantum dots (MOF QDs) using a liquid phase stripping method (Figure 7a). MOF QDs generated twice as much effective ROS as MOF NPs under the same light irradiation conditions. Controlled experiments demonstrated significantly prolonged survival time in mice treated with a combination of MOF QDs and light, showcasing the favorable PDT efficacy of MOF QDs in cancer therapy. Additionally, the crystal structure of MOF QDs influenced renal clearance and tumor accumulation capacity in vivo. Tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (TCPP) is an efficient PS producing 1O2. Hang et al. [82] prepared a two-dimensional (2D) porphyrin-based MOF (Zn-TCPP MOF) as PS, achieving controlled photodynamic properties from neutral to acidic environments (Figure 7b). In an acidic environment, the decomposed MOF structure released TCPP, effectively generating 1O2, inducing cancer cell apoptosis, and enhancing photodynamic activity.
Liu et al. [83] reported a core–shell nanohybrid by assembling DOX-encapsulated ZIF-8 on the surface of Zr (IV)-based porphyrinic MOFs (labeled as PCN@D/ZIF) (Figure 7c). The acidic pH-response degradation of ZIF-8 promoted DOX release (>80%) in the acidic TME. Porphyrinic MOFs, when exposed to light, produced abundant 1O2, enhancing CDT/PDT therapeutic efficacy. Luo et al. [84] revealed a significant enhancement of PDT efficacy by downscaling the size of PS from three-dimensional (3D) MOF NPs to 2D nano metallic organic layers (MOLs) (Figure 7d). MOLs with a monolayer structure produced more ROS and exhibited significantly higher cytotoxicity than MOF NPs. In a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer, Hf-MOLs showed a 49.1% greater tumor inhibition, an 80% higher cure rate with 16.3-fold lower metastasis potential than Hf-MOF NPs.
As shown in Figure 7e, a NIR light-activated PDT nanoplatform was designed based on porphyrinic MOFs and upconversion (UC) NPs, combined with a mitochondrial targeting strategy. This nanostructure integrated the advantages of efficient energy transfer from UCNPs to MOF domains and surface functionalization with triphenylphosphine (TPP), a mitochondrial targeting ligand, for a targeted effect. The nanoplatform allowed the generation of 1O2 with an ablation of an 808 nm laser to minimize the overheating effect. Importantly, mitochondria-targeted PDT initiated the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, resulting in superior therapeutic efficacy over non-targeted treatments [85].
A hypoxia-responsive MOF containing an azobenzene group as an organic linker (UiO-AZB) was reported [86]. In this system, the surface of UiO-AZB was modified with chlorin e6 (Ce6)-conjugated human serum albumin (HSA), and tirapazamine (TPZ) was encapsulated into UiO-AZB as a hypoxia-activated prodrug. The resulting nanosystem (UiO-AZB/HC-TPZ) efficiently produced 1O2 upon 660 nm light irradiation and induced severe hypoxia in tumors. This process (Figure 7f) triggered the degradation of the frameworks and the controlled release of activated TPZ for chemotherapy, leading to improved antitumor treatment through the combination of PDT and hypoxia-activated chemotherapy.

3.6. MOFs for Starvation Therapy

ST is a is a novel approach utilizing MOFs-based nanomedicines to treat cancer by introducing glucose oxidase (GOx) into the tumor site. This process aims to consume glucose within the tumor, depriving tumor cells of their energy supply and leading to cell death due to starvation [87,88]. In the ST system, GOx catalyzes the conversion of glucose to highly reactive gluconic acid and H2O2, and these chemicals continue to activate CT and CDT modes [89,90].
For example, Huo et al. [91] integrated Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs) into GOx and DOX, effectively protecting GOx activity for DD (Figure 8a). GOx enzymes played vital roles in inhibiting mitochondrial energy metabolism and promoting ROS accumulation by facilitating glucose acidification, degradation of MOF, and subsequent release of Zn2+, consequently enhancing the synergistic effect of ST combined with CT. Additionally, Ni et al. [92] proposed a nano pH-responsive intelligent Fenton configuration with the synergistic effect of ST by encapsulating GOx onto a Fe3O4@MIL-100 heterojunction (denoted as FMG). The encapsulated GOx successfully activated the ST process and further enhanced the CDT efficiency (Figure 8b).

3.7. MOFs for Multimodal Synergistic Therapy

Currently, addressing the complex cancer system is challenging for a single therapeutic modality due to the complexity, heterogeneity, and diversity of TMEs. Consequently, cancer treatment has evolved from a past single treatment model to the current paradigm of MST to improve therapeutic efficacy. The integration of multiple therapeutic modalities onto a single nanoplatform is promising and represents emerging nanotechnology, as opposed to simply physically mixing modalities to achieve a simple additive therapeutic effect [93,94,95].
For instance, Gao et al. [96] modified Prussian blue (PB) on the surface of UiO-66-NH2 (UiO-66-NH2/PB) for imaging-guided synergistic therapy involving CT, PTT, and CDT (refer to Figure 9a). This hybrid serves a dual functionality as a drug carrier, loading DOX via hydrogen bonding and releasing it in the acidic medium of tumors due to protonation. Additionally, it functions as a Fenton-like agent, eliminating cancer cells by catalyzing endogenous H2O2 into •OH in tumor cells. This process is accompanied by the generation of O2, which regulates hypoxia and enhances the anticancer efficiency of released DOX.
In another endeavor, Geng et al. [97] prepared a CuS@Cu-MOF/PEG nanocomposite serving as an integrated thermosensitive nanoplatform (Figure 9b). This nanohybrid exhibits distinct characteristics compared to previous MOF nanoagents: (1) a wider NIR absorption wavelength and higher thermal conversion efficiency for PTT; (2) characterized by Fenton-like reactions, it exhibits higher photothermal effects and accelerates the rate of therapeutic response; (3) the large surface area allows for high DOX-loading ability, facilitating CT; (4) tumors can be monitored by photoacoustic and thermal imaging after injection of the nanohybrids. In sum, the synergistic effects of PTT/CDT/CT inhibit tumor growth, making the CuS@Cu-MOF/PEG nanocomposite an effective multifunctional theranostic nanoagent for MST.
Similarly, as shown in Figure 9c, the integration of mixed Mn, Cu, Zn, and MnO2 in the MOF (Mn/Cu/Zn-MOF@MnO2) has been employed to load ICG as a photosensitizer for collaborative PTT, PDT, CDT, and guided multimodal imaging [98]. In this system, the mixed-valence metal ions undergo a Fenton-like reaction for CDT, catalyzing the generation of O2, relieving tumor hypoxia, and depleting GSH. This results in a ‘turn on’ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ICG enclosed in the hollow structure enables photothermal conversion for photothermal imaging and PTT. Once released at the tumor site, fluorescence imaging and enhanced PDT with self-supplied O2 are observed from ICG.
Gas therapy (GT), as a rapidly emerging therapeutic modality, has been widely explored in the biomedical field. In this context, Wang et al. designed a unique H2O2-responsive CO gas generator for synergistic therapy (Figure 9d). Manganese carbonyl (MnCO) and GOx were loaded on Zr-based MOFs (designated as UiO-67-bpy). GOx can consume glucose to produce gluconic acid and H2O2, leading to ST. Meanwhile, H2O2 can cause the release of CO, which damages mitochondria and leads to apoptosis of tumor cells. The Mn2+ species involved in CDT produce highly toxic •OH through Fenton-like reactions. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that the multifunctional CO gas-controllable release nanoplatform (CORM@GOx) achieved the combined ST/CDT/GT effect [57].

4. Summary and Outlook

This paper outlines recent advances in MOFs as nanomedicine for tumor treatment, via DD, CDT, PTT, PDT, SDT, ST, and MST. The preponderance of MOFs is featured with their unique structural characteristics, multifunctionality, efficient loading capacity, and precise targeting. These advantages enable broad application prospects for MOFs as nanomedicine. However, to realize the full potential of MOFs in tumor therapy, it is essential to address some key challenges, such as the safety, immune response, targeting accuracy, morphology, and large-scale synthesis of MOFs.
First, like other nanomaterial systems for bio-research, their long-term in vivo safety and toxicity need to be fully explored. These materials usually undergo a slow degradation process and cannot be easily excreted from the body, presenting a potential bio-risk. Currently, the therapeutic effect of MOFs has only been studied at the cellular and animal levels. Most studies emphasize the short-term toxicity, ignoring the long-term and acute toxicity of MOFs, which is not conducive to the widespread application of MOFs in tumor therapy. Moreover, their accumulation in the organs may result in side effects, which may cause damage to normal cells.
Secondly, evaluating the biocompatibility and immunogenicity of MOFs is essential. Some MOFs may provoke an immune response by themselves or through their degradation products in the body. Therefore, understanding the complex interactions between MOFs and the immune system is critical for optimizing their use in biomedical applications.
Thirdly, the challenge of targeting accuracy should not be overlooked. The stability and drug release behavior of MOFs can be affected by dynamic changes in the internal environment, such as pH, temperature, and ion concentration, during the delivery of therapeutic drugs to target tissues. This necessitates extensive research into surface modification, ligand selection, and drug release mechanisms to enhance the targeting precision of MOFs, ensuring that drugs are delivered accurately and effectively to the tumor site while minimizing effects on non-target tissues.
Fourth, the influence of the MOF morphology or structure on the material–cell interaction should be optimized to enhance the overall therapeutic results. In general, the materials with a size <100 nm are favorable for endocytic cell uptake and the following drug transport or dynamic treatment process intracellularly. Larger MOFs might be retained within the body for extended periods, potentially leading to accumulation in organs and compromising organ function. It is advisable to select or optimize the size of MOFs based on the characteristics of tumor cells to increase therapeutic efficacy. Ultra-small or 2D nanostructures, such as quantum dots or nanosheets, may facilitate stronger material–cell interactions than conventional nanoparticles, potentially leading to enhanced treatment effects. Therefore, innovating the structure or components of MOFs to enhance safety, loading capacity, or activity remains a key research priority.
Lastly, significant efforts should be directed toward developing more economically viable techniques for synthesizing MOFs on a large scale. The synthesis process, affected by factors like solvents, temperature, and pressure, involves numerous variables including organic ligands, solvent types, and ratios, which influence the controllable design and synthesis of MOFs. While the solvent thermal method is commonly used, there is a need for new, optimized synthesis methods that allow precise control over these factors and variables. This will enhance the reliability and cost-effectiveness of MOF production. To further investigate the properties and performance of MOFs as biomedical agents, developing reliable and cost-effective synthetic strategies is crucial.
In conclusion, despite the challenges, there is optimism that ongoing research will overcome these obstacles. The unique properties of MOFs hold promise for the development of efficient, safe, and economically viable nanomedicine for cancer treatment. Future investigations should contribute to advancing the understanding and applications of MOFs in the field of tumor therapy.

Funding

All authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Nos. 22075126 and 22350710187) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (G2022014098L).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Niu, X. Application of artificial intelligence for improving early detection and prediction of therapeutic outcomes for gastric cancer in the era of precision oncology. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2023, 93, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, P.; Li, H.; Bu, W. A Forward Vision for Chemodynamic Therapy: Issues and Opportunities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023, 62, e202210415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Y.; Zang, P.; Yang, D.; Zhang, R.; Gai, S.; Yang, P. The fundamentals and applications of piezoelectric materials for tumor therapy: Recent advances and outlook. Mater. Horiz. 2023, 10, 1140–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xia, Y.; Fu, S.; Ma, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N. Application of Nano-Delivery Systems in Lymph Nodes for Tumor Immunotherapy. Nanomicro Lett. 2023, 15, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, X.; Li, S. Nanomaterials in tumor immunotherapy: New strategies and challenges. Mol. Cancer 2023, 22, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, J.; Wang, Q.; Han, Y.; Jiang, L.; Lu, S.; Wang, B.; Qian, W.; Zhu, M.; Huang, H.; Qian, P. Development and application of nanomaterials, nanotechnology and nanomedicine for treating hematological malignancies. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2023, 16, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cheng, Y.; Qu, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Xu, T.; Zheng, H.; Ye, P.; He, M.; Tong, Y.; Ma, Y.; Bao, A. Functional Materials for Subcellular Targeting Strategies in Cancer Therapy: Progress and Prospects. Adv. Mater. 2023, e2305095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, Q.; Liu, M.; Jiang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, J. Application of Gold Nanostructures in Biomedicine. In Materials Science and Technology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, C.; Guo, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Fu, C. Delivering metal ions by nanomaterials: Turning metal ions into drug-like cancer theranostic agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 494, 215332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, M.; Sun, T.; Peng, T.; Wu, J.; Li, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Sun, S. Fe-NC Single-Atom Catalyst with Hierarchical Porous Structure and P–O Bond Coordination for Oxygen Reduction. ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 4531–4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, S.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Mu, Z.; Long, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; et al. Harvesting mechanical energy for hydrogen generation by piezoelectric metal–organic frameworks. Mater. Horiz. 2022, 9, 1978–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Q.; Wang, L.; Su, Y.; Dong, W.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y. Ultrahigh Enzyme Loading Metal-Organic Frameworks for Deep Tissue Pancreatic Cancer Photoimmunotherapy. Small 2023, 20, e2305131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dastneshan, A.; Rahiminezhad, S.; Naderi Mezajin, M.; Nouri Jevinani, H.; Akbarzadeh, I.; Abdihaji, M.; Qahremani, R.; Jahanbakhshi, M.; Asghari Lalami, Z.; Heydari, H.; et al. Cefazolin encapsulated UIO-66-NH2 nanoparticles enhance the antibacterial activity and biofilm inhibition against drug-resistant S. aureus: In vitro and in vivo studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 455, 140544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fu, D.-Y.; Liu, X.; Zheng, X.; Zhou, M.; Wang, W.; Su, G.; Liu, T.; Wang, L.; Xie, Z. Polymer-metal-organic framework hybrids for bioimaging and cancer therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 456, 214393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gong, X.; Wang, J.; Yang, L.; Li, L.; Gao, X.; Sun, X.; Bai, J.; Liu, J.; Pu, X.; Wang, Y. Enhanced Chemodynamic Therapy Mediated by a Tumor-Specific Catalyst in Synergy with Mitophagy Inhibition Improves the Efficacy for Endometrial Cancer. Small 2023, 19, e2301497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ding, M.; Liu, W.; Gref, R. Nanoscale MOFs: From synthesis to drug delivery and theranostics applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 190, 114496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, J.; Dai, D.; Zhang, X.; Teng, L.; Ma, L.; Yang, Y.W. Multifunctional metal-organic framework (MOF)-based nanoplatforms for cancer therapy: From single to combination therapy. Theranostics 2023, 13, 295–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, S.L.; Jiang, P.; Jiang, F.L.; Liu, Y. Recent Advances in Nanomaterial-Based Nanoplatforms for Chemodynamic Cancer Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2100243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duan, H.; Wang, F.; Xu, W.; Sheng, G.; Sun, Z.; Chu, H. Recent advances in the nanoarchitectonics of metal-organic frameworks for light-activated tumor therapy. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 16085–16102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liang, S.; Yao, J.; Liu, D.; Rao, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z. Harnessing Nanomaterials for Cancer Sonodynamic Immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2211130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, J.; Wang, T.; Chen, F.; Zhang, K. Tumor microenvironment-triggered intratumoral in-situ biosynthesis of inorganic nanomaterials for precise tumor diagnostics. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 484, 215115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, J.; Chen, G.; Zhao, L.; Huang, G.; Liu, H.; Liu, B.; Miao, Y.; Li, Y. Recent Advances in Nanoplatform Construction Strategy for Alleviating Tumor Hypoxia. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, 2300089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bian, Y.; Liu, B.; Ding, B.; Wang, M.; Yuan, M.; Ma, P.A.; Lin, J. Tumor Microenvironment-Activated Nanocomposite for Self-Amplifying Chemodynamic/Starvation Therapy Enhanced IDO-Blockade Tumor Immunotherapy. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2303580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bian, S.; Zheng, X.; Liu, W.; Gao, Z.; Wan, Y.; Li, J.; Ren, H.; Zhang, W.; Lee, C.-S.; Wang, P. pH-Responsive NIR-II phototheranostic agents for in situ tumor vascular monitoring and combined anti-vascular/photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 2023, 303, 122380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McPeck, M.; Smaldone, G.C. Continuous infusion aerosol delivery of prostacyclins during mechanical ventilation: Challenges, limitations, and recent advances. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2022, 19, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cuccia, A.D.; McPeck, M.; Lee, J.A.; Smaldone, G.C. Multidrug Aerosol Delivery During Mechanical Ventilation. J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv. 2023, 36, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. He, S.; Wu, L.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Xiong, T.; Liu, J.; Huang, C.; Xu, H.; Sun, H.; Chen, W.; et al. Metal-organic frameworks for advanced drug delivery. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 2362–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fan, W.; Wang, K.-Y.; Welton, C.; Feng, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Kang, Z.; Zhou, H.-C.; Wang, R.; et al. Aluminum metal–organic frameworks: From structures to applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 489, 215175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tabish, T.A.; Hussain, M.Z.; Fischer, R.A.; Casini, A. Mitochondria-targeted metal–organic frameworks for cancer treatment. Mater. Today 2023, 66, 302–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wiśniewska, P.; Haponiuk, J.; Saeb, M.R.; Rabiee, N.; Bencherif, S.A. Mitigating metal-organic framework (MOF) toxicity for biomedical applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 471, 144400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, Y.; Li, D.; Wu, L.; Yin, X.; Zhang, X.; Patterson, L.H.; Zhang, J. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Gene Therapy and Detection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2212277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Q.; Tian, Y.; Yao, M.; Fu, J.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Y. Bimetallic Organic Frameworks of High Piezovoltage for Sono-Piezo Dynamic Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2301784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ren, S.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Huang, Z.; Lin, T.; Huang, Y.; Yang, J.; Hong, Y.; Liu, J. State of the Art and Prospects in Metal-Organic Framework-Derived Microwave Absorption Materials. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, X.; Verma, G.; Chen, Z.; Hu, B.; Huang, Q.; Yang, H.; Ma, S.; Wang, X. Metal-organic framework nanocrystal-derived hollow porous materials: Synthetic strategies and emerging applications. Innovation 2022, 3, 100281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ma, L.; Huang, C.; Yao, Y.; Fu, M.; Han, F.; Li, Q.; Wu, M.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.; Ma, H. Self-assembled MOF microspheres with hierarchical porous structure for efficient uranium adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 314, 123526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ruan, J.; Dou, T.; Zhang, M.; Shao, W.; Chen, Z.; Guo, H.; Wang, J.; Wei, W.; Qiao, W. Tailored design of 2D MOF derived carbon boosting the low temperature plasma catalysis for water treatment: The role of graphitization and hierarchical porous structure. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 470, 144316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, S.; Falahati, M.; Cho, W.C.; Vahdani, Y.; Siddique, R.; Sharifi, M.; Jaragh-Alhadad, L.A.; Haghighat, S.; Zhang, X.; ten Hagen, T.L.M.; et al. Core–shell inorganic NP@MOF nanostructures for targeted drug delivery and multimodal imaging-guided combination tumor treatment. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 321, 103007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, Z.; Chen, C.; Li, B.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Shen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, S. A core–shell 2D-MoS2@MOF heterostructure for rapid therapy of bacteria-infected wounds by enhanced photocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 139127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, H.; Zheng, F.; Xue, G.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Tang, Z. Recent advances in hollow metal-organic frameworks and their composites for heterogeneous thermal catalysis. Sci. China Chem. 2021, 64, 1854–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, X.; Liang, Q.; Chen, L.; Tang, J.; Liu, J.; Tang, M.; Wang, Z. PEO-Based Solid-State Electrolytes Reinforced by High Strength, Interconnected MOF Networks. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 4881–4891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, H.; Yao, Z.; Zhou, J.; Yi, P.; Wei, B.; Lei, L.; Mao, Y. Enhanced microwave absorption of epoxy composite by constructing 3D Co–C–MWCNTs derived from metal organic frameworks. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 1426–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lyu, S.; Guo, C.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Yang, B.; Lei, L.; Wang, L.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, T.; Hou, Y. Exceptional catalytic activity of oxygen evolution reaction via two-dimensional graphene multilayer confined metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zeng, Y.; Wang, C.; Lei, K.; Xiao, C.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, W.; Wu, L.; Huang, J.; Li, W. Multifunctional MOF-Based Microneedle Patch With Synergistic Chemo-Photodynamic Antibacterial Effect and Sustained Release of Growth Factor for Chronic Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, e2300250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Figueroa-Quintero, L.; Villalgordo-Hernandez, D.; Delgado-Marin, J.J.; Narciso, J.; Velisoju, V.K.; Castano, P.; Gascon, J.; Ramos-Fernandez, E.V. Post-Synthetic Surface Modification of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Their Potential Applications. Small Methods 2023, 7, e2201413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. He, M.; Li, K.; Yang, J.; Wang, Q.; Gu, J. Photodynamic and Its Concomitant Ion-Interference Synergistic Therapies Based on Functional Hierarchically Mesoporous MOFs. Small 2022, 18, e2204295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xu, Z.; Zhen, W.; McCleary, C.; Luo, T.; Jiang, X.; Peng, C.; Weichselbaum, R.R.; Lin, W. Nanoscale Metal-Organic Framework with an X-ray Triggerable Prodrug for Synergistic Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 18698–18704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ding, S.; Khan, A.I.; Cai, X.; Song, Y.; Lyu, Z.; Du, D.; Dutta, P.; Lin, Y. Overcoming blood–brain barrier transport: Advances in nanoparticle-based drug delivery strategies. Mater. Today 2020, 37, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Peng, H.; Zhang, X.; Yang, P.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Feng, N.; Yang, W.; Tang, J. Defect self-assembly of metal-organic framework triggers ferroptosis to overcome resistance. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 19, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, P.; Zheng, Z.; Cheng, H.; Qin, X.; Zhang, X.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B. A biocompatible bismuth based metal-organic framework as efficient light-sensitive drug carrier. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 617, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, J.; Liu, L.; Gu, L.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, Z.; Sun, B.; Wang, X.; Sun, T. Dual-responsive metal organic framework for electrically-enhanced cascade catalytic tumor therapy. Mater. Today Adv. 2023, 17, 100329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, S.; Yang, M.; Chen, J.; Feng, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Y. Two-Dimensional FePS3 Nanosheets as an Integrative Sonosensitizer/Nanocatalyst for Efficient Nanodynamic Tumor Therapy. Small 2023, 19, e2204992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, L.; Li, Z.; Wei, J.; Xiao, Y.; She, Y.; Su, Q.; Zhao, T.; Li, J.; Shao, J. Juglone-loaded metal-organic frameworks for H2O2 self-modulating enhancing chemodynamic therapy against prostate cancer. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 133057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Di, X.; Pei, Z.; Pei, Y.; James, T.D. Tumor microenvironment-oriented MOFs for chemodynamic therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 484, 215098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Du, J.; Zhou, M.; Chen, Q.; Tao, Y.; Ren, J.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, H. Disrupting Intracellular Iron Homeostasis by Engineered Metal-Organic Framework for Nanocatalytic Tumor Therapy in Synergy with Autophagy Amplification-Promoted Ferroptosis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2215244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Gong, H.; Gai, S.; Shen, R. Tirapazamine-loaded UiO-66/Cu for ultrasound-mediated promotion of chemodynamic therapy cascade hypoxia-activated anticancer therapy. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2023, 634, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, W.J.; Gupta, D.; Yang, M.; Yang, F.; Feng, N.; Song, J.; Wood, M.J.A.; Qiu, L.; Chen, J. A Purposefully Designed pH/GSH-Responsive MnFe-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks as Cascade Nanoreactor for Enhanced Chemo-Chemodynamic-Starvation Synergistic Therapy. Small 2023, 19, e2303403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.; Jing, D.; Yang, J.; Zhu, S.; Shi, J.; Qin, X.; Yin, W.; Wang, J.; Ding, Y.; Chen, T.; et al. Glucose oxidase-amplified CO generation for synergistic anticancer therapy via manganese carbonyl-caged MOFs. Acta Biomater. 2022, 154, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, F.; He, T.; Gong, S.; Shen, M.; Ma, S.; Huang, X.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Wu, Q.; Gong, C. A tumor pH-responsive autocatalytic nanoreactor as a H2O2 and O2 self-supplying depot for enhanced ROS-based chemo/photodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2022, 154, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gao, S.; Jin, Y.; Ge, K.; Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Dai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Liang, X.; Zhang, J. Self-Supply of O2 and H2O2 by a Nanocatalytic Medicine to Enhance Combined Chemo/Chemodynamic Therapy. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1902137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, K.; Zhou, A.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Ning, X. An Intelligent Cell-Derived Nanorobot Bridges Synergistic Crosstalk Between Sonodynamic Therapy and Cuproptosis to Promote Cancer Treatment. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 3038–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, W.; Pan, X.; Yang, H.; Wang, H.; Wu, Q.; Zheng, L.; Xu, B.; Wang, J.; Shi, X.; Bai, F.; et al. Bioactive Metal-Organic Frameworks with Specific Metal-Nitrogen (M-N) Active Sites for Efficient Sonodynamic Tumor Therapy. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 20003–20012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pu, Y.; Yin, H.; Dong, C.; Xiang, H.; Wu, W.; Zhou, B.; Du, D.; Chen, Y.; Xu, H. Sono-Controllable and ROS-Sensitive CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing for Augmented/Synergistic Ultrasound Tumor Nanotherapy. Advanced Materials 2021, 33, 2104641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhan, G.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, Z.; Yong, T.; Bie, N.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Gan, L.; et al. Biomimetic sonodynamic therapy-nanovaccine integration platform potentiates Anti-PD-1 therapy in hypoxic tumors. Nano Today 2021, 38, 101195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xiao, Z.; Chen, Q.; Yang, Y.; Tu, S.; Wang, B.; Qiu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, Q.; Ai, K. State of the art advancements in sonodynamic therapy (SDT): Metal-Organic frameworks for SDT. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 449, 137889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zeng, Y.; Ouyang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Tan, L.; Liu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, S. Defective Homojunction Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Highly Efficient Sonodynamic Therapy. Small Methods 2023, 7, e2201248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liang, S.; Xiao, X.; Bai, L.; Liu, B.; Yuan, M.; Ma, P.; Pang, M.; Cheng, Z.; Lin, J. Conferring Ti-Based MOFs with Defects for Enhanced Sonodynamic Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2100333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Meng, X.; Sun, S.; Gong, C.; Yang, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Dong, H. Ag-Doped Metal-Organic Frameworks’ Heterostructure for Sonodynamic Therapy of Deep-Seated Cancer and Bacterial Infection. ACS Nano 2022, 17, 1174–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Yan, K.; Zhu, K. Recent advancements in the use of novel piezoelectric materials for piezocatalytic and piezo-photocatalytic applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2024, 341, 123335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cai, L.; Du, J.; Han, F.; Shi, T.; Zhang, H.; Lu, Y.; Long, S.; Sun, W.; Fan, J.; Peng, X. Piezoelectric Metal-Organic Frameworks Based Sonosensitizer for Enhanced Nanozyme Catalytic and Sonodynamic Therapies. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 7901–7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pan, X.; Wang, W.; Huang, Z.; Liu, S.; Guo, J.; Zhang, F.; Yuan, H.; Li, X.; Liu, F.; Liu, H. MOF-Derived Double-Layer Hollow Nanoparticles with Oxygen Generation Ability for Multimodal Imaging-Guided Sonodynamic Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 13557–13561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, K.; Meng, X.; Yang, Z.; Dong, H.; Zhang, X. Enhanced cancer therapy by hypoxia-responsive copper metal-organic frameworks nanosystem. Biomaterials 2020, 258, 120278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, C.; Xin, L.; Li, J.; Cao, J.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Luo, J.; Zeng, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Metal-Organic Framework (MOF)-Based Ultrasound-Responsive Dual-Sonosensitizer Nanoplatform for Hypoxic Cancer Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022, 11, e2101946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhuang, F.; Ma, Q.; Dong, C.; Xiang, H.; Shen, Y.; Sun, P.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Lu, B.; Chen, Y.; et al. Sequential Ultrasound-Triggered and Hypoxia-Sensitive Nanoprodrug for Cascade Amplification of Sonochemotherapy. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 5439–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Deng, H.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Yang, J.; Wei, Y.; Ma, S.; Shen, Q. Chemodynamic and Photothermal Combination Therapy Based on Dual-Modified Metal-Organic Framework for Inducing Tumor Ferroptosis/Pyroptosis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 24089–24101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, K.; Meng, X.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Dong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, H.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, X. Metal–Organic Framework Nanoshuttle for Synergistic Photodynamic and Low-Temperature Photothermal Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1804634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zheng, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, M.; Lei, P.; Liu, F.; Xie, Z. Nanoscale Mixed-Component Metal–Organic Frameworks with Photosensitizer Spatial-Arrangement-Dependent Photochemistry for Multimodal-Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 6867–6876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Shu, W.; Yang, Y.-S.; Zhu, H.-L.; Shao, C. A self-supplied O2 versatile nanoplatform for GOx-mediated synergistic starvation and hypothermal photothermal therapy. Mater. Des. 2022, 222, 111067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pan, W.L.; Tan, Y.; Meng, W.; Huang, N.H.; Zhao, Y.B.; Yu, Z.Q.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, W.H.; Sun, B.; Chen, J.X. Microenvironment-driven sequential ferroptosis, photodynamic therapy, and chemotherapy for targeted breast cancer therapy by a cancer-cell-membrane-coated nanoscale metal-organic framework. Biomaterials 2022, 283, 121449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ren, S.Z.; Zhu, X.H.; Wang, B.; Liu, M.; Li, S.K.; Yang, Y.S.; An, H.; Zhu, H.L. A versatile nanoplatform based on multivariate porphyrinic metal-organic frameworks for catalytic cascade-enhanced photodynamic therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 4678–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Sun, Q.; Hou, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shen, W.; Yin, D. Heparin-Coated Photosensitive Metal-Organic Frameworks as Drug Delivery Nanoplatforms of Autophagy Inhibitors for Sensitized Photodynamic Therapy against Breast Cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 55577–55590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, H.; Yu, D.; Fang, J.; Cao, C.; Liu, Z.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Renal-Clearable Porphyrinic Metal-Organic Framework Nanodots for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 9206–9217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hang, L.; Zhang, T.; Wen, H.; Liang, L.; Li, W.; Ma, X.; Jiang, G. Controllable photodynamic performance via an acidic microenvironment based on two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks for photodynamic therapy. Nano Res. 2020, 14, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, B.; Liu, Z.; Lu, X.; Wu, P.; Sun, Z.; Chu, H.; Peng, H. Controllable growth of drug-encapsulated metal-organic framework (MOF) on porphyrinic MOF for PDT/chemo-combined therapy. Mater. Des. 2023, 228, 111861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Luo, T.; Fan, Y.; Mao, J.; Yuan, E.; You, E.; Xu, Z.; Lin, W. Dimensional Reduction Enhances Photodynamic Therapy of Metal-Organic Nanophotosensitizers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 5241–5246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Liu, C.; Liu, B.; Zhao, J.; Di, Z.; Chen, D.; Gu, Z.; Li, L.; Zhao, Y. Nd3+ -Sensitized Upconversion Metal-Organic Frameworks for Mitochondria-Targeted Amplified Photodynamic Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 2634–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yang, G.; Bindra, A.K.; Phua, S.Z.F.; Liu, J.; Wu, H.; Wang, D.; Qian, C.; Liu, G.; Zhao, Y. Light-Triggered Hypoxia-Responsive Nanoscale Metal-Organic Frameworks for Highly Efficient Antitumor Treatment. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 11, 2201043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wan, X.; Song, L.; Pan, W.; Zhong, H.; Li, N.; Tang, B. Tumor-Targeted Cascade Nanoreactor Based on Metal–Organic Frameworks for Synergistic Ferroptosis–Starvation Anticancer Therapy. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 11017–11028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Chang, X.; Tang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Mu, W.; Tang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X. Precise Starving Therapy via Physiologically Dependent Photothermal Conversion Promoted Mitochondrial Calcification Based on Multi-Functional Gold Nanoparticles for Effective Tumor Treatment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2303596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jiang, S.; He, Q.; Li, C.; Dang, K.; Ye, L.; Zhang, W.; Tian, Y. Employing the thiol-ene click reaction via metal-organic frameworks for integrated sonodynamic-starvation therapy as an oncology treatment. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 65, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhou, G.; Li, M. Near-Infrared-II Plasmonic Trienzyme-Integrated Metal–Organic Frameworks with High-Efficiency Enzyme Cascades for Synergistic Trimodal Oncotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2200871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Huo, T.; Leilei, C.; Nie, H.; Li, W.; Lin, C.; Akhtar, M.; Huang, R. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Antioxidation Dyshomeostasis-Enhanced Tumor Starvation Synergistic Chemotherapy Achieved using a Metal–Organic Framework-Based Nano-Enzyme Reactor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 3675–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ni, W.; Jiang, K.; Ke, Q.; Su, J.; Cao, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, C. Development of an intelligent heterojunction fenton catalyst for chemodynamic/starvation synergistic cancer therapy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 141, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Peng, C.; Zhang, S.; Chen, S.; Qian, X.; Luo, W.; Dan, Q.; Ren, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Tumor microenvironments self-activated nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for ferroptosis based cancer chemodynamic/photothermal/chemo therapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 3231–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, C.; Xue, F.; Wang, M.; An, L.; Wu, D.; Tian, Q. 2D Cu-Bipyridine MOF Nanosheet as an Agent for Colon Cancer Therapy: A Three-in-One Approach for Enhancing Chemodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 38604–38616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Geng, T.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Shi, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zeng, L. Ultrasmall gold decorated bimetallic metal–organic framework based nanoprobes for enhanced chemodynamic therapy with triple amplification. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 2249–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Gao, H.; Chi, B.; Tian, F.; Xu, M.; Xu, Z.; Li, L.; Wang, J. Prussian Blue modified Metal Organic Frameworks for imaging guided synergetic tumor therapy with hypoxia modulation. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 853, 157329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Geng, P.; Yu, N.; Macharia, D.K.; Meng, R.; Qiu, P.; Tao, C.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Lian, W. MOF-derived CuS@Cu-MOF nanocomposites for synergistic photothermal-chemodynamic-chemo therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 441, 135964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cheng, Y.; Wen, C.; Sun, Y.-Q.; Yu, H.; Yin, X.-B. Mixed-Metal MOF-Derived Hollow Porous Nanocomposite for Trimodality Imaging Guided Reactive Oxygen Species-Augmented Synergistic Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2104378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Main scope of the frequently studied MOFs and corresponding various antitumor therapies.
Figure 1. Main scope of the frequently studied MOFs and corresponding various antitumor therapies.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g001
Figure 2. MOFs with different microstructures [33]. Copyright 2022, Springer.
Figure 2. MOFs with different microstructures [33]. Copyright 2022, Springer.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g002
Figure 3. (a) Preparation and therapeutic schematic illustration of a multi-drug delivery nanoplatform disguised with MOF membrane [48]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (b) The light triggered the drug release mechanism of SU-101. (O1-5 represents different oxygen atoms in SU-101) [49]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (c) Synthesis of Hf-TP-SN-nMOF and release mechanism of SN38 [46]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. (a) Preparation and therapeutic schematic illustration of a multi-drug delivery nanoplatform disguised with MOF membrane [48]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (b) The light triggered the drug release mechanism of SU-101. (O1-5 represents different oxygen atoms in SU-101) [49]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (c) Synthesis of Hf-TP-SN-nMOF and release mechanism of SN38 [46]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g003
Figure 6. (a) Preparation process and application mechanism of MOF nanosystem in vivo tumor therapy [74]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic illustration for multimode imaging diagnosis and combination of HPTT and PDT for cancer treatment [75]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (c) Synthesis of TCPC-UiO and its mechanism in antitumor [76]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (d) Synthesis of multifunctional nanoplatform and schematic diagram for enhanced low-temperature PTT and ST [77]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 6. (a) Preparation process and application mechanism of MOF nanosystem in vivo tumor therapy [74]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic illustration for multimode imaging diagnosis and combination of HPTT and PDT for cancer treatment [75]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (c) Synthesis of TCPC-UiO and its mechanism in antitumor [76]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (d) Synthesis of multifunctional nanoplatform and schematic diagram for enhanced low-temperature PTT and ST [77]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g006
Figure 7. (a) Design of MOF quantum dots and schematic illustration of their use to enhance PDT [81]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (b) The mechanism of 2D Zn-TCPP MOF in vivo PDT [82]. Copyright 2021, Springer. (c) Schematic illustration of CN@D/ZIF NPs synthesis and PDT/CT combined therapy [83]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (d) The structures of Hf-MOL and Hf-MOF [84]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (e) Mechanism illustration of upconversion MOFs activated by 808 nm NIR and mitochondria-targeted enhancement of PDT [85]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (f) Synthesis of nanotherapeutic system and photo-activated hypoxia-responsive of tumor DD schematic [86]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 7. (a) Design of MOF quantum dots and schematic illustration of their use to enhance PDT [81]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (b) The mechanism of 2D Zn-TCPP MOF in vivo PDT [82]. Copyright 2021, Springer. (c) Schematic illustration of CN@D/ZIF NPs synthesis and PDT/CT combined therapy [83]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (d) The structures of Hf-MOL and Hf-MOF [84]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (e) Mechanism illustration of upconversion MOFs activated by 808 nm NIR and mitochondria-targeted enhancement of PDT [85]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (f) Synthesis of nanotherapeutic system and photo-activated hypoxia-responsive of tumor DD schematic [86]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g007
Figure 8. (a) Schematic illustration of enhanced ST synergistic CT with mitochondrial dysfunction and antioxidant imbalance [91]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic illustration of FMG enhancing CDT and accelerating ST synergistic cancer therapy [92]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.
Figure 8. (a) Schematic illustration of enhanced ST synergistic CT with mitochondrial dysfunction and antioxidant imbalance [91]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic illustration of FMG enhancing CDT and accelerating ST synergistic cancer therapy [92]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g008
Figure 9. (a) Schematic illustration of synthesis and synergistic therapeutic strategy of UiO-66-NH2/PB [96], Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (b) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of DOX/CuS@Cu-MOF/PEG and its application in PTT/CDT/CT synergistic therapy [97]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (c) Schematic illustration of PTI/FLI/MRI combined with PTT/PDT/CDT treatment [98]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (d) Synthesis of H2O2-responsive nanoplatform and its application in ST/CDT/GT synergistic therapy [57]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 9. (a) Schematic illustration of synthesis and synergistic therapeutic strategy of UiO-66-NH2/PB [96], Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (b) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of DOX/CuS@Cu-MOF/PEG and its application in PTT/CDT/CT synergistic therapy [97]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (c) Schematic illustration of PTI/FLI/MRI combined with PTT/PDT/CDT treatment [98]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (d) Synthesis of H2O2-responsive nanoplatform and its application in ST/CDT/GT synergistic therapy [57]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 14 00797 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Liu, M.; Yu, Q.; Ge, D.; Zhang, J. Metal–Organic Framework Nanomaterials as a Medicine for Catalytic Tumor Therapy: Recent Advances. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090797

AMA Style

Zhang J, Li M, Liu M, Yu Q, Ge D, Zhang J. Metal–Organic Framework Nanomaterials as a Medicine for Catalytic Tumor Therapy: Recent Advances. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(9):797. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090797

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jiaojiao, Meiyu Li, Maosong Liu, Qian Yu, Dengfeng Ge, and Jianming Zhang. 2024. "Metal–Organic Framework Nanomaterials as a Medicine for Catalytic Tumor Therapy: Recent Advances" Nanomaterials 14, no. 9: 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090797

APA Style

Zhang, J., Li, M., Liu, M., Yu, Q., Ge, D., & Zhang, J. (2024). Metal–Organic Framework Nanomaterials as a Medicine for Catalytic Tumor Therapy: Recent Advances. Nanomaterials, 14(9), 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14090797

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop