Next Article in Journal
Cobalt-Assisted Morphology and Assembly Control of Co-Doped ZnO Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Nanoscale Zinc Oxide Particles for Improving the Physiological and Sanitary Quality of a Mexican Landrace of Red Maize
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison Study on the Adsorption Capacity of Rhodamine B, Congo Red, and Orange II on Fe-MOFs

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
2
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anshun University, Anshun 561000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2018, 8(4), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040248
Submission received: 2 March 2018 / Revised: 12 April 2018 / Accepted: 14 April 2018 / Published: 17 April 2018

Abstract

:
Using a microwave-assisted ball-milling approach, Fe-based metal-organic frameworks (Fe-MOFs) were prepared from FeSO4·7H2O and trimesic acid. Scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry, X-ray, and thermogravimetric analysis were utilized to characterize the thermal stability and structure of the prepared Fe-MOFs. These Fe-MOFs were used to remove organic dyes from aqueous solutions. Specifically, they removed 96.97% of 23.3592 mg/L of Congo red in a 200 mL solution within 300 min of treatment with natural light at 15 °C. Likewise, 88.21 and 70.90% of 22.7527 mg/L of Orange II and 17.8326 mg/L of Rhodamine B, respectively, were removed from 200 mL solutions within 300 min of treatment at 15 °C. At 35 °C, 99.57, 95.98, and 99.38% of 23.3855 mg/L of Congo Red, 22.7365 mg/L of Orange II, and 17.9973 mg/L of Rhodamine B, respectively, were removed from 200 mL solutions within 300 min of treatment. The adsorption kinetics were investigated and the pseudo-first-order kinetic model was found to be superior to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Overall, using metal-organic frameworks to treat dye wastewater was found to be inexpensive, feasible, and efficient. Therefore, this material has future prospects in research and applications in the purification of wastewater.

1. Introduction

Clean water is a critical societal provision. The environment is currently significantly threatened by pollution, which is increasing daily as a result of continuing economic development, rapid urbanization, and a steadily increasing world population [1]. There is also a continuously increasing wasting of water resources made worse by water contamination with various pollutants, including inorganic and organic chemicals. Hexavalent chromium [2], dyes [3], herbicides/pesticides [4], and aromatics/organics [5,6] are typical chemicals that must be removed from wastewater. Of the dyes, many are toxic and even carcinogenic [7,8]. Rhodamine B (RhB), Orange II, and Congo red (CR) are common examples of organic dyes found in wastewater and industrial effluents. These dyes are widely used in rubbers, carpets, textiles, cosmetics, paper, plastics, and food. Due to their toxicity, these dyes directly destroy microbes or at least inhibit microbial catalytic performance.
In order to remove dyes from wastewater, a number of biological, chemical, catalysis [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], and physical methods have been investigated [7]. Common adsorbent materials include activated carbon, activated alumina, molecular sieves, metal hydroxides, silica gel, and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). MOFs, which consist of metal-oxo clusters or metal ions and organic linkers, have fascinating crystalline structures, tailorable chemistry, large specific surface areas, and good porosity [16]. MOFs have attracted much attention due to their uses in adsorption and catalysis and potential to be designed with a specific pore shape and size from multifunctional ligands and metal ions or metal ion clusters. The performances of MOFs can be controlled, to some extent, by cautiously tuning their structures and functionalities to allow for distant targets to be reached or to improve adsorbent properties. Another attractive characteristic of MOFs is the tunability of their physiochemical performance after the involved crystalline materials have already been formed [17,18,19,20].
Since the 1990s, MOFs have garnered significant research interest, not only due to their unique chemical structures and characteristics, but also their potential applications in a variety of research fields, including polymerization [21], drug delivery/biomedicine [22], catalysis [23], luminescence [24], adsorption/storage in the gas phase [25,26,27], chemical separation [16,28,29], magnetism [30], and liquid phases [31]. Recently, MOFs have also been recognized as prospective materials for the liquid-phase adsorption of various hazardous compounds [32], including sulfur- [33,34] and nitrogen- containing compounds [35], in both aqueous and non-aqueous media. MOFs can be prepared using microwave [36], chemical mechanical polishing [37], hydrothermal [38], ultrasonic [39], and mechanochemical methods [40] among others.
Microwave-assisted ball milling was first described by our laboratory and is based on a solid-liquid ball-milling (MSBM) approach that involves using a ball-milling machine in a microwave oven [41,42,43,44,45,46]. The coupling of mechanical milling with microwaves enables certain nanocrystal materials, such as magnetic and metal oxidation ferrite, to be generated at room temperature [47,48,49]. In the present study, MOF-based adsorptive removal of hazardous compounds, including RhB, Orange II, and CR, from aqueous media was investigated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Experimental Materials

Fe-MOFs were synthesized by microwave-assisted ball milling on the basis of a previously reported way [48]. H3BTC (98%) and FeSO4·7H2O were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), while potassium dichromate (≥99.8%) was purchased from Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). FeSO4·7H2O (0.0537 mol, 14.9297 g), trimesic acid (0.0358 mol, 7.5187 g), stainless steel balls (1350 g), and 800 mL deionized water were combined in a tetrafluoroethylene milling pot. Stir milling at 200 rpm and the microwave oven were started concurrently. After 40 min, the solution converted from a colorless liquid into a white solid and was stable in this form. This solid white compound was filtered, washed with water, added to a beaker containing ethanol, and then stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 3 h. This mixture was then filtered by suction and dried, and then the final product was collected, characterized, and used in experimental reactions.
Structure and morphology were characterized using X-ray diffraction (D-5000, Siemens, Chicago, IL, USA, Cu-Kα radiation), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (IRTracer-100, SHIMADZU, Shanghai, China), and field emission scanning electron microscopy (JSM-6700F, Tokyo, Japan). The particle thermogravimetric curves were obtained in an argon atmosphere at temperatures from 35 to 700 °C increasing at a rate of 5 °C/min using a NETZSCH STA 449C thermal analyzer (Selb, Germany).

2.2. Removal of Organic Dyes

Organic dyes were removed at approximately 15 °C and 35 °C in a 500 mL beaker. Sample (200 mg) was mixed with 200 mL of an approximately 20 mg/L organic dye aqueous solution while exposed to natural light and magnetic stirring. Every 30 min, a 10-mL sample of the dye solution was assessed at 220 V by ultraviolet spectrometry using a UV-2550 from Shimadzu Instruments Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China). The rate of dye removal was determined using C = (C0 − Ct)/C0 × 100%, where C0 represents the initial concentration of dye and Ct represents the concentration of dye after t minutes.
RhB, CR, and Orange II concentrations were measured using the UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550) at wavelengths of 554, 495.5, and 484.5 nm. The amount of adsorbed organic dye was calculated using the following equation [50].
q e = C 0 C e m v
where C0 and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of Cr(VI) in solution (ppm), respectively, V is the solution volume (L), and m is the adsorbent mass (g).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Fe-MOFs

In the present study, the H3BTC and FeSO4·7H2O reacted over the course of a few minutes during MSBM. After 40 min, the color of the reaction remained unchanged, indicating that Fe-MOFs production was complete. Notably, MSBM incurred faster reaction rates than observed in conventional synthesis approaches of generating Fe-MOFs [48,51], such as the solvothermal approach, where the rate was similar to other microwave-assisted approaches [52].
The reaction mechanism was simple. Due to the coupling of ball milling and microwaves, the H3BTC anions formed quickly through ionization in aqueous solutions and then attacked the metal cations from the salt, thus forming a coordination compound [53], primarily due to the carboxylate forming extended conjugate bonds that render the two oxygen atoms equivalent. However, the density of the electron cloud should have a symmetrical distribution. Because the three carboxyls groups are connected to the benzene ring when protonated, the resulting extended-bonds could more easily coordinate with metal ions and form coordination polymers.
The X-ray diffraction Fe-MOF spectrum presented in Figure 1 contains twelve strong absorption peaks. The three strong peaks present in the post-reaction spectrum did not overlap with those in the pre-reaction spectrum, confirming the formation of new materials. The morphology of the Fe-MOFs was assessed by scanning electron microscopy and is shown in Figure 2. At 1000×, randomly packed blade-shaped particles were observed. At 10,000×, the morphologies of the individual particles could be visualized.
Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out using a quartz pan. As shown in Figure 3, weight loss occurring in the argon atmosphere could be divided into two separate stages. The first stage, which occurred before 167 °C, was due to the loss of residual solvent molecules from the framework material from the solution-based synthesis [54,55]. The second stage, which started at 392 °C, occurred when the chemical bonds began to break and the carboxyl and benzene ring were lost. At 492 °C, the frame structure had completely collapsed.
The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms are shown in Figure 4. The specific surface areas was found to be 21.8900 m2/g, and the average pore diameter was 24.4233 nm. Moreover, it can be seen from Figure 4 that there are clear hysteresis loops indicating a mesoporous material. It can be seen from the figure that, before P/P0 = 0.7, N2 molecules were adsorbed on the inner surface of the mesoporous materials by a single layer to multiple layers. In the case of P/P0 = 0.8, the adsorption process increases, which reflects the size of the sample aperture and can also be used as the basis for the homogeneity of the mesoporous materials.
The structure of the Fe-MOF was tested via IR spectroscopy (as shown Figure 5). The corresponding peak of symmetric and anti-symmetric stretching vibrations to the carboxylate was observed at 1398 and 1558 cm−1, respectively. However, the electron density should be distributed symmetrically. When the three carboxyl groups in H3BTC are protonated because they take part in hydrogen bonding between inter- and intramolecular, the extended bonds of their corresponding anions can more easily form coordination polymers and metal ions.

3.2. Removal of Organic Dyes

Figure 6 shows that the removal efficiencies of RhB, Orange II, and CR by the MOFs reached 70.9, 88.21, and 96.97% at 15 °C and 99.38, 95.98, and 99.57% at 35 °C, respectively. Among these values, 86.28% of CR was removed within only 30 min. There are two major factors that influenced Fe-MOF adsorption of dyes. One factor is surface area, a factor that does not uniquely determine the adsorption capability of adsorbents. A second factor involved in the high adsorption capacity of Orange II and CR by Fe-MOFs was the π-electron donor/acceptor interactions with the MOF surfaces. Orange II and CR have C=C double bonds and π electrons. These π electrons are capable of easily interacting with the π electrons of the MOF-surface benzene rings through π-π electron coupling. These two dyes are also both cationic and anionic and exist as charged ions in an aqueous solution. Therefore, electrostatic attraction aids in the adsorption of dyes by Fe(II)-MOFs.
The adsorption of RhB, Orange II, and CR by the Fe-MOFs was studied. Figure 7 presents the plots of the pseudo-first-order model, ln (C/C0) = kt, of the RhB, Orange II, and CR adsorptions by the Fe-MOFs at initial dye concentrations (C0) of 20 ppm. Table 1 presents the kinetic constants (k1) and correlation coefficients (R2) calculated. Pseudo-first-order kinetic constants (k1) for Orange II adsorption by Fe-MOFs were larger than those for the other dyes at 15 and 35 °C. However, the kinetic constant for RhB was smaller than that for the other dyes despite having a faster adsorption. The kinetic constants for Fe-MOFs indicate that rapid adsorption occurred in the presence of high concentrations of the dyes; a similar phenomenon has been reported in previous publications [56,57,58,59].
Figure 8 presents the quantities (qt) of RhB, Orange II, and CR adsorbed by the Fe-MOFs over time (t), which were calculated using the following equations [50,60]:
q t = C 0 C t m v
t q t = t q e + 1 k 2 q e 2
where qt and qe represent the amounts (mg/g) of dye adsorbed by the adsorbents at time t and equilibrium, respectively. C0, Ct, and Ce represent the concentrations of liquid-phase dye (mg/L) initially, at time t, and at equilibrium, respectively. Meanwhile, m (g) and V (L) are the quality of the adsorbents and the volume (L) of the dye solution, respectively.
As shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, the adsorption capacity of the MOFs for the dye initially quickly increased, then gradually decelerated, and then reached adsorption equilibrium after prolonged contact. The kinetic constants (k2) and correlation coefficients (R2) calculated are presented in Table 1. There is the possibility that the original dye concentrations were high enough to serve as a driving force and surpass the resistance of the mass transfer between the liquidoid and solidoid [61].
The kinetics of adsorption is one of the most important parameters when describing an adsorbent. The results of this study indicate that adsorption of RhB, Orange II, and CR by Fe-MOFs is described well by the pseudo-first-order kinetic model and that the Fe-MOFs assessed are excellent at removing organic dyes. Dyes exist as charged ions in aqueous solutions and have benzene rings. Adsorption of dyes by Fe-MOFs may be a result of not only simple physical and chemical adsorption, but also the conjugation of dyes and MOFs. Dye contains C=C double bonds and π electrons and these π electrons can interact easily with the π electrons of Fe-MOF benzene rings through π-π electron coupling. Dye adsorption on the surface of the Fe-MOFs could occur with a face-to-face orientation through π-π conjugation until the equilibrium between adsorption and desorption has been reached. Therefore, electrostatic attraction also aids in dye adsorption by Fe-MOFs [62].

4. Conclusions

In summary, the microwave-assisted ball-milling approach proved to be an effective strategy and reliable for the synthesis of Fe-MOFs. The results show that the microwave-assisted ball milling process is an effective method for the simple and fast preparation of Fe-MOFs. The synthesised MOFs were measured for their capacity to remove organic dye solution from wastewater using natural light and the adsorption of dyes was analyzed with a pseudo-first-order model and a pseudo-second order model. By contrast, heating has good effect on the adsorption of dyes.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (14JJ1013) and the Joint Funds of Science and Technology Department of Guizhou Province with the People’s Government of Anshun City and Anshun University (LH [2016]7268).

Author Contributions

F.W and D.C. conceived and designed the experiments; F.W. performed the experiments; S.Z. and F.W. analyzed the data; Z.L. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; F.W. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bao, C.; Fang, C.-L. Water Resources Flows Related to Urbanization in China, Challenges and Perspectives for Water Management and Urban Development. Water. Resour. Manag. 2012, 26, 531–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maleki, A.; Hayati, B.; Naghizade, M.; Joo, H.S.W. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium by metal organic frameworks from aqueous solution. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 28, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gupta, V.K.; Suhas. Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal—A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2313–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Finizio, A.; Azimonti, G.; Villa, S. Occurrence of pesticides in surface water bodies, a critical analysis of the Italian national pesticide survey programs. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. He, M.-C.; Sun, Y.; Li, X.R.; Yang, Z.F. Distribution patterns of nitrobenzenes and polychlorinated biphenyls in water, suspended particulate matter and sediment from mid- and down-stream of the Yellow River (China). Chemosphere 2006, 65, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ahmaruzzaman, M. Adsorption of phenolic compounds on low-cost adsorbents—A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 143, 48–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Yue, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, C. Equilibrium and kinetic studies of methyl orange and methyl violet adsorption on activated carbon derived from Phragmites australis. Desalination 2010, 252, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mittal, A.; Malviya, A.; Kaur, D.; Mittal, J.; Kurup, L. Studies on the adsorption kinetics and isotherms for the removal and recovery of Methyl Orange from wastewaters using waste materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 148, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sanny, V.; Nasir Baig, R.B.; Mallikarjuna, N.N.; Christophe, L.; Rajender, S.V. Sustainable pathway to furanics from biomass via heterogeneous organo-catalysis. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 164–168. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tadele, K.; Verma, S.; Michael, A.G.; Rajender, S.V. A sustainable approach to empower the bio-based future: Upgrading of biomass via process intensification. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1624–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tadele, K.; Verma, S.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Gonzalez, M.A.; Varma, R.S. A rapid flow strategy for the oxidative cyanation of secondary and tertiary amines via C-H activation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sanny, V.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Varma, R.S. Porous nitrogen-enriched carbonaceous material from marine waste: Chitosan-derived carbon nitride catalyst for aerial oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13596. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanny, V.; Baig, R.B.N.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Varma, R.S. Fixation of carbon dioxide into dimethyl carbonate over titanium-based zeolitic thiophene-benzimidazolate framework. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 655. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar, S.; Verma, S.; Shawat, E.; Nessim, G.D.; Jain, S.L. Amino-functionalized carbon nanofibres as an efficient metal free catalyst for the synthesis of quinazoline-2,4(1H,3H)-diones from CO2 and 2-aminobenzonitriles. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 24670–24674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, S.; Verma, S.; Jain, S.L. Base-free direct formylation of aromatic iodides using CO2 as C1 source catalyzed by palladium nanoparticles grafted onto amino-functionalized nanostarch. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 2430–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rafatullah, M.; Sulaiman, O.; Hashim, R.; Ahmad, A. Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents, A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, Q.; Liu, D.; Zhong, C.; Li, J.-R. Development of Computational Methodologies for Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Application in Gas Separations. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 8261–8323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, Z.; Cohen, S.M. Postsynthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1315–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Du, D.-Y.; Qin, J.-S.; Li, S.-L.; Su, Z.-M.; Lan, Y.-Q. Recent advances in porous polyoxometalate-based metal-organic framework materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 4615–4632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Goestena, M.G.; Juan-Alcañiz, J.; Ramos-Fernandez, E.; Gupta, V.K.B.S.S.; Stavitski, E.; van Bekkum, H.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F. Sulfation of metal–organic frameworks, Opportunities for acid catalysis and proton conductivity. J. Catal. 2011, 281, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Britt, D.; Lee, C.; Uribe-Romo, F.J.; Furukawa, H.; Yaghi, O.M. Ring-opening reactions within porous metal-organic frameworks. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 6387–6389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Garcia, H. Catalysis by metal nanoparticles embedded on metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 5262–5284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Uemura, T.; Yanai, N.; Kitagawa, S. Polymerization reactions in porous coordination polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1228–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Khan, N.A.; Jun, J.W.; Jeong, J.H.; Jhung, S.H. Remarkable adsorptive performance of a metal-organic framework, vanadium-benzenedicarboxylate (MIL-47), for benzothiophene. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1306–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, J.-R.; Sculley, J.; Zhou, H.-C. Metal-organic frameworks for separation. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 869–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Van de Voorde, B.; Bueken, B.; Denayer, J.; De Vos, D. Adsorptive separation on metal-organic frameworks in the liquid phase. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5766–5788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hu, Z.; Deibert, B.J.; Li, J. Luminescent metal-organic frameworks for chemical sensing and explosive detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5815–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kurmoo, M. Magnetic metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1353–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Horcajada, P.; Gref, R.; Baati, T.; Allan, P.K.; Maurin, G.; Couvreur, P.; Férey, G.; Morris, R.E.; Serre, C. Metal-organic frameworks in biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1232–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sumida, K.; Rogow, D.L.; Mason, J.A.; McDonald, T.M.; Bloch, E.D.; Herm, Z.R.; Bae, T.-H.; Long, J.R. Carbon dioxide capture in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 724–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Li, J.-R.; Ma, Y.; McCarthy, M.C.; Sculley, J.; Yu, J.; Jeong, H.-K.; Balbuena, P.B.; Zhou, H.-C. Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 1791–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Suh, M.P.; Park, H.J.; Prasad, T.K.; Lim, D.-W. Hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 782–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Khan, N.A.; Hasan, Z.; Jhung, S.H. Adsorptive removal of hazardous materials using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 244–245, 444–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ahmed, I.; Khan, N.A.; Jhung, S.H. Graphite oxide/metal-organic framework (MIL-101), remarkable performance in the adsorptive denitrogenation of model fuels. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 14155–14161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cyshosz, K.A.; Wong-Foy, A.G.; Matzger, A.J. Liquid phase adsorption by microporous coordination polymers, removal of organosulfur compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6938–6939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khan, N.A.; Jhung, S.H. Effect of central metal ions of analogous metal-organic frameworks on the adsorptive removal of benzothiophene from a model fuel. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 260, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Seo, Y.K.; Hundal, G.I.; Jang, T.; Hwang, Y.K.; Jun, C.H.; Chang, J.S. Microwave synthesis of hybrid inorganic–organic materials including porous Cu3(BTC)2 from Cu(II)-trimesate mixture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 119, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yaghi, O.M.; Li, H.L.; Groy, T.L. Construction of Porous Solids from Hydrogen-Bonded Metal Complexes of 1,3,5-Benzenetricarboxylic Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9096–9101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schlesinger, M.; Schulze, S.; Hietschold, M.; Mehring, M. Evaluation of synthetic methods for microporous metal–organic frameworks exemplified by the competitive formation of [Cu2(BTC)3(H2O)3] and [Cu2(BTC)(OH)(H2O)]. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 132, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yuan, W.B.; Friscic, T.; Apperley, D.; James, S.L. High Reactivity of Metal–Organic Frameworks under Grinding Conditions, Parallels with Organic Molecular Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3916–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, Z.-Q.; Qiu, L.-G.; Xu, T.; Wu, Y.; Wang, W.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Jiang, X. Ultrasonic synthesis of the microporous metal–organic framework Cu3(BTC)2 at ambient temperature and pressure, An efficient and environmentally friendly method. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, D.; Ai, S.Y.; Liang, Z.; Wei, F.H. Preparation and photocatalytic properties of zinc oxide nanoparticles by microwave-assisted ball milling. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 3692–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, S.; Chen, D.; Wei, F. Synthesis of graphene oxide/metal-organic frameworks hybrid materials for enhanced removal of Methylene blue in acidic and alkaline solutions. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 698–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Kang, Z.T. A low temperature synthesis of MnFe2O4 nanocrystals by microwave-assisted ball-milling. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Chen, B.Y.; Kaqng, Z. Coupling Effect of Microwave and Mechanical Forces during the Synthesis of Ferrite Nanoparticles by Microwave-Assisted Ball Milling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 14179–14184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, Y.Z.; Kang, Z.T.; Chen, D. Synthesis and microwave absorbing properties of Mn-Zn nanoferrite produced by microwave assisted ball milling. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2014, 25, 4246–4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Y.Z.; Kang, Z.T.; Chen, D. Process of synthesizing high sayuration magnetization Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 by microwave-assisted ball milling. Mater. Lett. 2014, 133, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wei, F.H.; Chen, D.; Liang, Z.; Zhao, S.Q.; Luo, Y. Synthesis and characterization of metal–organic frameworks fabricated by microwave-assisted ball milling for adsorptive removal of Congo red from aqueous solutions. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 46520–46528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wei, F.H.; Chen, D.; Liang, Z.; Zhao, S.Q.; Luo, Y. Preparation of Fe-MOFs by microwave-assisted ball milling for reducing Cr(VI) in wastewater. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 16525–16531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Jiao, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Wu, Q.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z. Synthesis ofmagnetic nanoporous carbon from metal-organic framework for the fast removal of organic dye from aqueous solution. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 407, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, G.; Li, L.; Tao, C.Y. Effects of microwave heating on microstructures and structure properties of the manganese ore. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 657, 515–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. He, A.X.; Chen, G.; Chen, J.; Peng, J.H.; Srinivasakannan, C.; Ruan, R.S. A novel method of synthesis and investigation on transformation of synthetic rutile powders from Panzhihua sulphate titanium slag using microwave heating. Powder Technol. 2018, 323, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khan, N.A.; Jhung, S.H. Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with microwave or ultrasound: Rapid reaction, phase-selectivity, and size reduction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 285, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, Q.-Q.; Fan, H.-J.; Li, Y.-T.; Christensen, K.E.; Ren, T.-Z. Zn (Ce,Mn)-MOFs with (3,4,5)-connected 3-D topology network and test of photocatalysis on the reduction of Cr6+ by Zn (Ce)-MOFs. Polyhedron 2015, 92, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shi, L.; Hu, L.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, M.; Xu, J. Adsorptive Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution using a Ni-Metal Organic Framework Material. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2016, 37, 1226–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hameed, B.H.; Rahman, A.A. Removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from biomass material. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Srivastava, V.C.; Swamy, M.M.; Mall, I.D.; Prasad, B.; Mishra, I.M. Adsorptive removal of phenol by bagasse fly ash and activated carbon, equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. Colloid Surf. A 2006, 272, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Din, A.T.M.; Hameed, B.H.; Ahmad, A.L. Batch adsorption of phenol onto physiochemical-activated coconut shell. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 1522–1529. [Google Scholar]
  59. Haque, E.; Khan, N.A.; Talapaneni, S.N.; Vinu, A.; Jegal, J.; Jhung, S.H. Adsorption of phenol on mesoporous carbon CMK-3, effect of textural properties. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 31, 1638–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Haque, E.; Jun, J.W.; Jhung, S.H. Adsorptive removal of methyl orange and methylene blue from aqueous solution with a metal-organic framework material, iron terephthalate (MOF-235). J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Li, C.; Xiong, Z.-H.; Zhang, J.-M.; Wu, C.-S. The Strengthening Role of the Amino Group in Metal–Organic Framework MIL-53 (Al) for Methylene Blue and Malachite Green Dye Adsorption. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 3414–3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, T.; Cai, X.; Tan, S.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Yang, W. Adsorption characteristics of acrylonitrile, p-toluenesulfonic acid, 1-naphthalenesulfonic acid and methyl blue on graphene in aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD of Fe-based metal-organic frameworks (Fe-MOFs).
Figure 1. XRD of Fe-based metal-organic frameworks (Fe-MOFs).
Nanomaterials 08 00248 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of Fe-MOFs.
Figure 2. SEM images of Fe-MOFs.
Nanomaterials 08 00248 g002
Figure 3. Thermal analysis of Fe-MOFs.
Figure 3. Thermal analysis of Fe-MOFs.
Nanomaterials 08 00248 g003
Figure 4. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of Fe-MOFs.
Figure 4. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of Fe-MOFs.
Nanomaterials 08 00248 g004
Figure 5. IR spectra of Fe-MOFs.
Figure 5. IR spectra of Fe-MOFs.
Nanomaterials 08 00248 g005
Figure 6. Removal rates of Rhodamine B (RhB), Orange II, and Congo red (CR) by Fe-MOFs.
Figure 6. Removal rates of Rhodamine B (RhB), Orange II, and Congo red (CR) by Fe-MOFs.
Nanomaterials 08 00248 g006
Figure 7. Pseudo-first-order plots of dye adsorption over Fe-MOFs.
Figure 7. Pseudo-first-order plots of dye adsorption over Fe-MOFs.
Nanomaterials 08 00248 g007
Figure 8. Pseudo-second-order plots of dye adsorption over Fe-MOFs.
Figure 8. Pseudo-second-order plots of dye adsorption over Fe-MOFs.
Nanomaterials 08 00248 g008
Table 1. Kinetic constants (k) with correlation coefficients (R2).
Table 1. Kinetic constants (k) with correlation coefficients (R2).
Dyesk1k2R2
Pseudo-First-Order KineticPseudo-Second-Order Kinetic
15 °CRhB0.002470.074880.992510.99248
Orange II0.005750.045680.976340.99899
CR0.004830.043680.985980.99979
35 °CRhB0.006530.055760.995130.99832
Orange II0.006980.044240.992310.99746
CR0.01190.042720.992420.99908

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, F.; Chen, D.; Liang, Z.; Zhao, S. Comparison Study on the Adsorption Capacity of Rhodamine B, Congo Red, and Orange II on Fe-MOFs. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040248

AMA Style

Wei F, Chen D, Liang Z, Zhao S. Comparison Study on the Adsorption Capacity of Rhodamine B, Congo Red, and Orange II on Fe-MOFs. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8(4):248. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Fuhua, Ding Chen, Zhao Liang, and Shuaiqi Zhao. 2018. "Comparison Study on the Adsorption Capacity of Rhodamine B, Congo Red, and Orange II on Fe-MOFs" Nanomaterials 8, no. 4: 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040248

APA Style

Wei, F., Chen, D., Liang, Z., & Zhao, S. (2018). Comparison Study on the Adsorption Capacity of Rhodamine B, Congo Red, and Orange II on Fe-MOFs. Nanomaterials, 8(4), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop