Next Article in Journal
Multi-Purpose Nanovoid Array Plasmonic Sensor Produced by Direct Laser Patterning
Previous Article in Journal
Carboxylic Acid Functionalization at the Meso-Position of the Bodipy Core and Its Influence on Photovoltaic Performance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/nano9101347
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Durable Ordered Ta2O5 Nanotube Arrays Decorated with Bi2S3 Quantum Dots

by
Mateusz A. Baluk
1,
Marek P. Kobylański
1,*,
Wojciech Lisowski
2,
Grzegorz Trykowski
3,
Tomasz Klimczuk
4,
Paweł Mazierski
1 and
Adriana Zaleska-Medynska
1,*
1
Department of Environmental Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland
2
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Science, Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
3
Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland
4
Department of Solid State Physics, Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(10), 1347; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101347
Submission received: 18 July 2019 / Revised: 26 August 2019 / Accepted: 16 September 2019 / Published: 20 September 2019
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
One of the most important challenges in the fabrication of ordered tantalum pentaoxide (Ta2O5) nanotube arrays (NTs) via the electrochemical method is the formation of nanotubes that adhere well to the Ta substrate. In this paper, we propose a new protocol that allows tight-fitting Ta2O5 nanotubes to be obtained through the anodic oxidation of tantalum foil. Moreover, to enhance their activity in the photocatalytic reaction, in this study, they have been decorated by nontoxic bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs) via a simple successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed that quantum dots with a size in the range of 6–11 nm were located both inside and on the external surfaces of the Ta2O5 NTs. The effect of the anodization time and annealing conditions, as well as the effect of cycle numbers in the SILAR method, on the surface properties and photoactivity of Ta2O5 nanotubes and Bi2S3/Ta2O5 composites have been investigated. The Ta2O5 nanotubes decorated with Bi2S3 QDs exhibit high photocatalytic activity in the toluene degradation reaction, i.e., 99% of toluene (C0 = 200 ppm) was degraded after 5 min of UV-Vis irradiation. Therefore, the proposed anodic oxidation of tantalum (Ta) foil followed by SILAR decorating allows a photocatalytic surface, ready to use for pollutant degradation in the gas phase, to be obtained.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

An increased level of air pollutants requires new materials and methods to be developed, which can be applied for gas phase treatment. Heterogeneous photocatalysis seems to be an example of green technology that is still being developed, and current research in this field is focused on finding novel active photocatalysts [1]. Ta2O5 is a wide-band-gap (Eg) semiconductor (Eg = 3.9 eV) [2], which could be an alternative for commonly used titanium dioxide. Although pristine Ta2O5 can only be excited by UV irradiation with a wavelength below 318 nm, its advantage is the high photoactivity attributed to its band structure, i.e., relatively higher conduction band position than that of TiO2, which can result in the generation of electrons with a higher potential [3]. Hence, Ta2O5 looks like a good candidate for the photocatalytic decomposition of pollutants in the gas and aqueous phases [4] or for hydrogen evolution [4,5]. Moreover, Ta2O5 could be applied as corrosion-resistant material [6], thin-film catalyst [7], anti-reflective coating [8,9], an element of ultra-large-scale integrated circuits [10], or semiconductor precursor [11]. Nanostructured Ta2O5, in the form of a powder or thin film, can be fabricated by the sol–gel approach [9], hydrothermal method [12], chemical vapour deposition [13], or anodic oxidation of tantalum foil [14,15]. The superiority of powdered Ta2O5 comes from its well-developed surface area, but powdered nanoparticles are difficult to separate from the reaction environment after the photocatalytic process and, consequently, it is difficult to reuse those photocatalysts. Otherwise, nanotube arrays obtained by the anodization of Ta foil could be easily removed from the reaction medium, regenerated, and re-used. Therefore, Ta2O5 NTs, obtained via the anodic oxidation of tantalum foil, are promising materials that can be used as a photocatalyst to decompose the noxious substances present in the gas phase. Furthermore, the electrochemical method of NT preparation is simple, repeatable, and low-cost [5], and it allows the nanotube dimension to be controlled by differing the process conditions. Additionally, it allows ordered NTs characterized by a highly developed surface area and high stability to be obtained during photocatalytic processes, as well as representing a possibility of regeneration after photocatalytic tests [16].
Nonetheless, the main disadvantage of Ta2O5 NTs is their weak adhesion to the substrate, i.e., to the tantalum foil [17,18]. This problem was already observed in the first report, which mentioned the anodization of tantalum foil [19], and has not been solved. Therefore, the synthesis of nanotubes tightly adhering to the surface is one of the main challenges in the work aimed at developing ordered nanotubes made of tantalum oxide for photocatalytic purposes. There are several factors affecting surface properties of Ta2O5 nanotubes obtained through anodic oxidation, such as the (i) electrolyte composition [20], (ii) time, temperature, and applied voltages during anodization [21], and (iii) annealing condition [5]—all of which could alter the adhesion of NTs to the Ta base. As mentioned above, the electrolyte composition plays a crucial role in the NT mechanism formation and it was found that the presence of F− ions, responsible for chemical etching, is necessary for the formation of a nanotubular structure. Sulphuric acid (H2SO4), compared to other acids, is characterized by thermodynamic stability, and it is responsible for the homogeneous growth of nanotubes [22]. Sodium fluoride and fluoric acid are the most common compounds used as sources of F−. These anions allow [TaF7]2− to be created during the growth of nanotubes. The electrolyte solution should also include compounds which are able to increase the viscosity of the electrolyte (e.g., ethylene glycol or glycerine) and conductivity. The synthesis parameters, such as the applied voltages, temperatures, and times of anodization, strongly influence the length of NTs and, consequently, the adhesion of nanotube arrays. A higher applied voltage during an anodic oxidation causes more intensive etching of the tantalum foil and directly influences the dissolution degree of oxide layers and elongates NTs. However, if the nanotubes are too long, they will be able to be peeled from a tantalum sheet. Therefore, it could be concluded that a suitable procedure of anodic oxidation of a tantalum sheet is key for the synthesis of an adherent layer of Ta2O5 nanotubes. Furthermore, photocatalytic activity enhancement could be reached by nanotube decoration by quantum dots, such as Bi2S3 QDs (Eg = 1.3–1.7 eV, depending on the size of QDs). This type of QD can be obtained by the SILAR method [23,24,25,26], via an aqueous colloidal route [27,28] or chemical bath deposition [29]. However, the SILAR method is the most appropriate for linking the semiconductor as nanotube arrays with QDs and allows the amount of deposited nanodots to be controlled [30]. Thus far, Bi2S3 QDs have been utilized to enhance the photoactivity of a photocatalyst in the degradation of pollutants in water [23,31] and a gaseous phase [23,32], photocatalytic hydrogen generation [31], and CO2 photoconversion to isopropanol [33], and as a photoelectrode to remove a polysulfide electrolyte [34].
In view of this, the effect of electrochemical oxidation parameters, such as the applied voltage value, time of anodization, and annealing conditions (atmosphere type and temperature), on the Ta2O5 nanotube morphology and adherence have been systematically investigated. To confirm the beneficial effect of nanotube modification by quantum dots, Bi2S3 QDs were deposited using between one and three SILAR cycles. To the best of our knowledge, for the first time, the Bi2S3 QDs/Ta2O5 NTs composite was obtained and tested by the decomposition of volatile organic compounds (e.g., toluene) present in the gas phase. A comprehensive analysis and correlation of synthesis parameters with surface properties of nanotubes allowed the most suitable protocol to be found for the preparation of highly adhered and highly photoactive Ta2O5 nanotubes. To evaluate the stability of the obtained composite, the efficiency of toluene degradation on the Bi2S3/Ta2O5 sample was analysed in three subsequent cycles.

2. Materials and Methods

Tantalum foil (0.5 mm thickness, 99.9% purity) was purchased from HMW Hauner Metallische Werkstoffe (Röttenbach, Germany) toluene, sulfuric acid 96%, glycerine 99.5%, acetone, methanol, and isopropanol were purchased P.P.H. “STANLAB” (Lublin, Poland); and ammonium fluoride 98+% was purchased from ACROS ORGANICS (Geel, Belgium).
The tantalum foil was cut into pieces of a size of 3 × 2 cm. Subsequently, pieces of Ta foil were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath in acetone, isopropanol, methanol, and deionized water (<5 µS), respectively, for 10 min in each solvent. Then, the tantalum foils were dried with an air stream. The anodising system consisted of a piece of Ta foil as a working electrode, platinum mesh as a counter electrode, and silver chloride electrode as a reference electrode. The anodization was performed in electrolytes composed of sulphuric acid (90 vol%), glycerine (5 vol%), deionized water (5 vol%), and ammonium fluoride (0.27 M) for 5 to 10 min at 10 to 20 V using a programmable DC source (MCP M10-QS1005). Then, the NTs were rinsed with deionized water, dried in air for 24 h, and cleaned in an ultrasonic bath in deionized water (0–1 min), dried in air at 80 °C for 24 h, and finally, annealed at 450–900 °C (heating rate 2 °C/min) in various atmospheres—air, NH3, N2, or H2—for 1 h.
The Ta foil obtained at 15 V for 5 min was cleaned in an ultrasonic bath in deionized water for 1 h to remove the NTs layer. Then, the sheet was dried in air and anodised again in the same conditions. Prepared nanotubes were cleaned in deionized water in an ultrasonic bath (1 min), dried in air in 80 °C (24 h), and annealed at 450 °C (heating rate 2 °C/min) in N2 for 1 h. The Bi2S3 QDs were deposited on the NT surface via the SILAR method. The NT pieces were immersed in the 0.05 M solution of BiNO3 for 30 s, and then rinsed in acetone, dried, and immersed in the 0.01 M solution of sodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na2S∙9H2O). The procedure was repeated up to three times and, finally, the samples were dried at 80 °C.
The diffusion reflectance spectra (DRS) were registered with the UV-VIS Spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan) SHIMADZU UV-2600, in the wavelength range from 250 to 600 nm, and barium sulphate was used as a reference sample. The photoluminescence (PL) measurements were performed using a LS-50B Luminescence Spectrometer equipped with a Xenon discharge lamp. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL JSM-7610F (Tokyo, Japan), and TEM with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX), FEI Europe, model TecnaiF20 X-Twin (Eindhoven, Neatherlands), were used to analyse the morphology of the obtained materials. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were registered with a PHI 5000 VersaProbeTM (ULVAC-PHI) spectrometer (Chigasaki, Japan) with monochromatic Al Kλ radiation (hν = 1486.6 eV). The X-ray beam was focused to a diameter of 100 µm, and the measured area was defined as 250 µm × 250 µm. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were used to determine the crystal structures of obtained samples. An experiment was carried out in the range of 2θ = 20°–80° with an X-ray diffractometer (Xpert PROMPD, Philips, Royston, United Kingdom) equipped with Cu Kλ radiation (λ = 1.5404 Å).
The measurement of photocatalytic activity of NTs was determined in the model reaction of the photodegradation of toluene. The experiment was carried out in a flat stainless-steel reactor (30 mL) containing a quartz window, a septum, valves, and teflon gaskets. A UV-Vis irradiation source was a Xenon lamp (Oriel 1000 W, Hamamatsu, Japan). The distance between samples and the source of light was 30 cm, and the irradiation intensity was 100 mW/cm2. The prepared NT sample was placed inside the reactor and toluene-polluted air (C0 = 200 or 400 ppm) was flowed through the reactor for 1 min. The flow rate was 30 mL/min. Then, the reactor was kept in the dark for 30 min to achieve an adsorption–desorption equilibrium. In total, 200 µL of samples was collected at 5 min intervals from the start of exposure. Analysis of the toluene concentration was performed using a gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector and capillary column (from Restek, 30 m, with 5% diphenyl and 95% dimethyl polysiloxane). Nitrogen was used as a carrier gas (flow rate of nitrogen was 40 mL/min). The selected samples were studied in terms of toluene photodegradation under monochromatic light. Samples with a dimension of 1 × 0.5 cm were placed in the Teflon reactor with a quartz window (0.5 × 1.5 cm), filled with a gas phase containing toluene (C0 = 200 ppm), followed by a 30 min dark experiment (to achieve adsorption equilibrium) and 30 min irradiation by wavelengths equal to 318 nm (1.2 mW/cm2) and 730 nm (2 mW/cm2). The 1000 W Xe lamp (Oriel) equipped with a monochromator (MSH 300 LOT Quantum Design, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as an irradiation source.
The measurements of the stability of photocatalysts were determined for the most active samples: NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h and NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR_1x. The experiment was prepared as described above; however, a sample was collected at every 1.5 min interval from the start of exposure to UV-Vis irradiation for 15 min. Three processes were carried out without regeneration of the photocatalyst and three processes with the regeneration of NTs after each photocatalytic experiment.

3. Results

A series of Ta2O5 NTs samples were obtained via the anodic oxidation of tantalum foil in H2SO4 solution containing F− anions. The SEM images presented in Figure 1 show the effect of the applied voltage, annealing conditions (atmosphere, temperature, and time), removal of the initial layer by an ultrasonic bath, and time of anodization on the morphology and adhesive properties of the as-prepared nanotubes. Sample labelling, preparation conditions, and the dimensions of all the obtained nanotubes are presented in Table 1. The results clearly show that the external and internal diameters of the nanotubes, as well as the walls’ thickness, were similar, and they did not depend on the annealing condition. On the other hand, the length of NTs increased as the time of anodization and value of applied voltage increased. The longest nanotubes were formed when the Ta foil was anodized under 20 V for 10 min, followed by 1 h calcination at 450 °C (NTs_20 V_10 min_no_cleaned_Air_450 °C_1 h). However, these nanotubes were characterized by weak adhesion and consequently, they were easily detached from the surface, which means that they are not suitable for photocatalytic treatment of the gas phase (Figure 1a). Importantly, it was observed that the annealing temperature increased from 450 to 600 °C and then, to 750 °C, causing defragmentation of the NT arrays and their base surface tantalum foil (Figure 1b). Further tests showed that the durability of Ta2O5 nanotubes is also strongly affected by the duration of anodic oxidation. Nanotubes that formed after the application of 15 V for 5 min were uniform and strongly adhered to tantalum foil, while increasing the oxidation time to 10 min resulted in the formation of nanotubes easily disassembled from the surface (Figure 1c). The SEM images presented in Figure 1d–e confirm that time and atmosphere during annealing at 450 °C do not affect the morphology and adhesion of the NTs. Therefore, subsequent experiments were carried out for time of anodization and applied voltage, which were reduced to 5 min and 15 V, respectively, and the annealing temperature was no higher than 450 °C. Among all tested conditions, only this synthesis mode allowed a strongly adhered NT layer to be obtained, which could be easily operated in a photocatalytic reaction and regenerated. The thickness of NT arrays, which was obtained under 15 V for 5 min, is in the range of 1.68–2.19 µm. The length of nanotubes fabricated in two-step anodization is equal to 1.15 µm.
During the anodic oxidation of tantalum foil, the current density curve was registered for samples fabricated under 10, 15, and 20 V (Figure S1a). To deeply understand the formation mechanism of the NTs, SEM images of the surface were produced for the sheet, for which anodization was stopped at characteristic points of the current density curve during anodic oxidation under 15 V (Figure S1b). Initially, the current density sharply declined, which is characteristic of the first stage of anodization, when the compact layer of tantalum oxide is formed. Subsequently, the second stage occurred after 20 s of anodization, when the current density increased due to reaction of the fluoric anions with tantalum oxide. After this step, a soluble complex [TaF6]− was created and pits of nanotubes were formed. The third stage, represented as a plateau, represents the growth of nanotubes. The UV-Vis reflectance spectra registered in the range of 250–600 nm for NTs are shown in Figure S2a. The nanotubes exhibited a characteristic signal in the region from 250 to 300 nm [35], which is attributed to the excitation of electrons from the valence band (VB) band to conduction band (CB), in addition to the wide peak in the region of 300–600 nm. Figure S2b presents the PL spectra in the range of 300–700 nm for NTs. This experiment was carried out to estimate the electron–hole recombination rate. The more intense signal represents faster recombination of photogenerated charge carriers and consequently, it could indicate lower photocatalytic activity [36]. The signal at about 430 nm was attributed to the recombination of electrons and holes present in the traps and at the valence band edge, respectively [4]. Based on the results, it could be concluded that samples obtained under 15 V and calcined at 450 °C exhibited the lowest recombination rate. This suggested that this condition of synthesis of NTs is the most suitable for the fabrication of the most photoactive NT layer.
The elemental composition and chemical nature of elements detected in the surface layer of Ta2O5 NTs material were carefully investigated using XPS. Selected samples annealed in various gases (N2, NH3, O2, and air) and samples modified by Bi2S3 quantum dots (QDs) were studied. The results are summarized in Table S1 and Table 2. Only small chemical modifications in the surface layer of Ta2O5 NTs were observed after annealing in various gas atmospheres (Table S1, Figure S3). A slightly larger than average surface amount of nitrogen was detected for samples annealed in N2 and NH3 (see samples NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h and NTs_15 V_5 min_NH3_450 °C_1 h, respectively, in Table S1). The sample NTs_15 V_5 min_Air_450 °C_1 h, on the other hand, exhibits a larger concentration of fluorine compounds, which originated from the preparation procedure. The Ta2O5 NTs are well-characterized by the main Ti5+ fraction of the Ta 4f spectra (Ta 4f7/2 signal at 26.4 eV) [37,38,39,40]. We also note a small contribution of Ta1+ and Ta0 surface species [39,40] (Table S1). The effect of the modification of Ta2O5 NTs by Bi2S3 QDs in the following SILAR cycles is reflected by the high-resolution (HR) spectra of Bi 4f, O 1s, and Ta 4f presented in Figure 2 and summarized in Table 2. The Bi 4f spectra revealed three chemical states of Bi Bi0, Bi2 S3, and Bi2O3, represented by the Bi 4f7/2 signals at 157.0, 158.0, and 159.5 eV, respectively [37]. Unfortunately, the Bi 4f spectra are partially overlapped by the S 2p signals attributed to sulfide and sulfate species (S 2p3/2 signals located at 163.5 and 168.5 eV, respectively [38]). Additionally, in the binding energy (BE) range of Ta 4f spectra, additional signals of the Bi 3d and O 2s are detected (Figure 2). However, after deconvolution, both spectra evidenced the heavy coating of the Ta2O5 by the Bi2S3 after the third SILAR cycle. The Bi 4f spectrum shows the Bi2S3 fraction as a major contribution of Bi species and the Ta 4f spectrum is overlapped by the strong Bi 5d signals. Moreover, the sulfate fraction of S 2p is not detected and instead of the main O 1s signal related to Ta2O5 (BE close to 530.5 eV [38,41,42], a weaker oxygen peak appears in the O 1s spectrum (at 529.9 eV), which is characteristic for the Bi–O bond [37].
XRD studies were conducted on all samples and the patterns are presented in Figure 3, Figures S4 and S5. Figure 3 shows a pattern of the Ta foil before (top) and after (bottom) the anodization process. Open circles represent experimental data points and the solid line is the LeBail model. As expected, only reflections of Ta metal are found for untreated foil.
Ta reflections, but with different relative intensities, are also present after the anodization process. The estimated lattice parameter for Ta metal (Im-3m) a = 3.3258(3) Å is slightly larger than that reported in the literature [43]. There are only two strong XRD reflections present (marked by arrows) that cannot be attributed to the Ta phase. We have taken all 11 inorganic crystal sructure database (ICSD) records of Ta2O5 as a starting model for the LeBail analysis and the results have not been satisfied. This somehow surprising result might be explained by the low crystallinity or very thin layer of Ta2O5. The best fit was obtained for the Ta4O phase (Pmmm), with two reflections indexed by (300) and (400) indices, suggesting a strong preferential orientation. With two (h00) XRD peaks, only the a lattice parameter for Ta4O was refined, and the obtained value a = 7.220 Å is in good agreement with that reported in [38]. The relative intensity change of the XRD reflections of Ta metal might suggest that there are preferential crystallographic planes for the growth of a new phase.
There are no evident changes in the XRD patterns as a result of using different voltages (Figure S4a) and Ta2O5 NTs modified by Bi2S3 QDs (Figure S5). Pure Ta2O5 was found in a powder collected after calcination at 650 °C and 1000 °C (Figure S4b).
The photocatalytic activity of NTs is presented in Figure S6. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that all of the samples presented highly efficient toluene photodegradation. To exclude the effect of toluene adsorption at the surface of the photocatalyst, the amount of adsorbed toluene was measured for the most active sample in the blank test (Figure S7). After 30 min in the dark, about 16% of toluene was adsorbed on the surface of Ta2O5 NTs. The samples were prepared under various circumstances, such as the applied voltage, cleaning the NTs after anodization in an ultrasonic bath, the presence of Bi2S3 QDs, the annealing atmosphere, the temperature, and the time of annealing, as well as the anodization procedure—one-step anodization vs. two-step anodization. Additionally, the results of the photodegradation of toluene after 5 min of irradiation are presented in Figure S6, where it can be seen that most of the toluene was decomposed within a short time. NTs obtained under a voltage in the range of 10–20 V indicated that the NTs obtained at 15 V showed the highest activity in the photodegradation of toluene. This may be affected by the NTs that possessed the optimal length, as well as strong adhesion. The nanotubes anodized at 20 V are less effective, despite their greater length. This may have been caused by detaching the nanotubes from the tantalum sheet during annealing or drying. The lowest photoactivity was observed for the sample anodized at 10 V, whose length was the shortest. Based on the above, it could be concluded that the optimal value of applied voltages during anodization of the Ta sheet is 15 V. Moreover, a comparison of the morphology of samples fabricated with and without cleaning in an ultrasonic bath indicated that the removal of initial oxide layers from the NT surface improved the photocatalytic activity of the material, because during cleaning by ultrasound, the compact oxide layer was removed from the NTs and the entire surface of the NTs was exposed for irradiation. Analysis of the dependence of annealing atmosphere and time on the photocatalytic properties of NTs indicated that the atmosphere during annealing displayed an insignificant role in the resultant photocatalytic properties of NTs. The photoactivity of NTs slightly decreases for annealing atmosphere in the following order: nitrogen, hydrogen, ammonia, and air. The differences in the photoactivity of samples annealed at various temperatures were very insignificant, i.e., 94.48% and 95.36% of toluene degradation efficiency for samples annealed at 300 °C and 450 °C, respectively. Moreover, increasing the temperature to over 450 °C causes the destruction of a sample with NTs (as discussed earlier), so the photoactivity of these samples was not measured. Based on the photoactivity results, it could be concluded that 1 h was the most optimal NTs annealing time, because samples annealed for 3 h were characterised by a lower photoactivity. The difference is not so significant; after 5 min of irradiation, the photodegradation of toluene was 94.20% and 94.08% for samples annealed at 300 °C and 450 °C, respectively. The least significant factor, which was analysed to find the most optimal condition for the fabrication of the NTs, was the synthesis of nanotubes by two-step anodization. This route of synthesis included removing the NT layer from the tantalum foil after anodic oxidation and subsequently performing the next anodization. Based on the results, it could be concluded that samples obtained using this one-step method were characterised by a higher photoactivity. The highest photoactivity of the obtained NTs is likely to be directly related to the length of NTs, equal to 1.15 and 1.27 nm for samples fabricated in one-step and two-step anodization, respectively. The efficiency of the toluene photodegradation in the range of 0–30 min is presented in Table S2.
The modification of NTs by Bi2S3 QDs enhanced the photocatalytic properties of the material. It was observed that after 5 min of irradiation, almost 100% of toluene was degraded. Therefore, to prove that the modification of Ta2O5 by Bi2S3 QDs increased the photoactivity, additional experiments with a higher initial concentration of toluene (C0 = 400 ppm) were carried out. It was clearly observed that almost 100% of toluene was degraded after 30 min of irradiation over the Bi2S3 QD-modified Ta2O5 NTs, while the same duration of irradiation over pristine Ta2O5 NTs resulted in only 64% toluene degradation (Figure S8). However, the efficiency decreased with an increasing number of SILAR cycles. Based on the SEM images, it could be concluded that an increase in the number of SILAR cycles resulted in the aggregation of Bi2S3 particles on the NT surface, as shown in Figure 4. Consequently, the NT active layer was blocked by Bi2S3 particles and the irradiation was unable to penetrate the entire surface of the NTs. To confirm the presence of Bi2S3 QDs on the NT surface, TEM analysis was carried out. Figure 5 presents nanodots homogenously deposited on the wall of the NTs. The size of QDs is in the range of 10–11 nm and about 6 nm for 1–2 cycles and three SILAR cycles, respectively. It was not known that the size of nanoparticles decreased after three SILAR cycles. Typically, the size of nanoparticles increases when also increasing the number of SILAR cycles. Moreover, EDX analysis additionally confirmed the presence of Bi2S3 QDs (Table S3).
To evaluate the stability of the NTs during irradiation and their ability to regenerate after photocatalytic tests, the photodegradation of toluene during three cycles was investigated. The experiment was performed with and without regeneration of the photocatalyst by UV-Vis irradiation of the NTs for 1 h. Based on the results, it could be concluded that the photocatalytic activity of the unregenerated NTs decreased after each experiment (Figure 6a). This could have been caused by the surface being blocked by adsorbed by-products formed during toluene photodegradation [43,44]. However, the irradiation of the photocatalyst allowed NTs to regenerate and provided a constant efficiency of toluene degradation during irradiation. A similar dependence was observed for NTs modified by QDs. The results clearly indicated that NTs modified by QDs could be used several times for photocatalytic testing in the gas phase—however, the activities slightly decreased after each experiment. SEM analysis proved that the surface of the photocatalyst did not change, i.e., the nanotube structure was stable, after a few photocatalytic cycles (Figure S9).
The proposed mechanism of toluene photodegradation over Bi2S3 QDs/Ta2O5 NT composites is presented in Figure 7. Based on the literature [45], it could be concluded that the level of VB and CB of Ta2O5 is −3.9 and −7.8 eV in vacuum, respectively. Therefore, electrons of unmodified Ta2O5 NTs during UV-Vis irradiation were excited from the VB to its CB and the reactive pairs of electrons–holes were created. Then, electrons from CB were able to react with oxygen to create superoxide radicals O2−, because the potential required to produce O2− is −4.17 eV in vacuum. Additionally, the position of the VB band of Ta2O5 is suitable for the creation of •OH radicals from water present in the reaction system, because of humidity of the air. These reactive species were mainly responsible for the decomposition of toluene (Figure 7a). The band gap of Bi2S3 QDs is in the range of 1.3–1.7 eV. Moreover, the CB and VB level of the QDs is −4.1 and −5.7 eV in vacuum, respectively. Therefore, the mechanism of photodecomposition for NTs modified by Bi2S3 QDs (Figure 7b) is similar to the excitation of pristine nanotubes. The photoinduced holes of Ta2O5 reacted with water to create the OH. On the other hand, the photoexcited electrons from the CB of Ta2O5 reacted with oxygen, and then generated superoxide radicals O2−. Moreover, electrons from the CB of Ta2O5 migrated to the CB of Bi2S3 and finally, reacted with oxygen to produce superoxide radicals and decomposed toluene. Therefore, enhanced photoactivity of the Bi2S3 QDs/Ta2O5 NT composite could be attributed to the simultaneous excitation of both semiconductors and the separation of photoinduced pairs of electron–holes from Ta2O5 due to the migration of electrons from the CB of Ta2O5 to the CB of Bi2S3. To confirm the role of the Bi2S3 quantum dots in the photoexcitation step, experiments with monochromatic light were also performed. In those experiments, toluene was irradiated in the presence of Ta2O5 NTs and Bi2S3 QDs/Ta2O5 NTs using a wavelength from UV (318 nm) and a visible range (730 nm, which corresponds to the excitation of Bi2S3 QDs). It was observed that 71% of toluene was degraded after 30 min of irradiation by 318 nm over Ta2O5 NT, while samples modified by Bi2S3 QDs resulted in degradation of 89% of toluene. What is truly interesting is that we found that the irradiation of toluene over Bi2S3 QDs/Ta2O5 NTs using a 730 nm wavelength resulted in 39% toluene degradation. For unmodified samples, the toluene concentration decreased by about 14%, probably due to adsorption of the nanotube surface and photoreactor walls (Figure 6b). To exclude the effect of toluene photolysis (UV) and adsorption at the photoreactor walls (UV and Vis), additional reference experiments (without a photocatalyst) were performed. It was observed that 25% and 6% of toluene disappeared during irradiation by a wavelength equal to 318 and 730 nm, respectively. Therefore, the most remarkable result to emerge from this data is that the enhanced photoactivity of the Bi2S3 QDs/Ta2O5 NT composite results from the simultaneous excitation of Ta2O5 NTs and Bi2S3 QDs under UV and Vis irradiation, respectively. Moreover, the observed photoactivity could be correlated with the size of quantum dots. It is well-known that the band gap of quantum dots decreases upon an increase in their size [30]. This can explain the lower photoactivity of a sample containing smaller quantum dots, i.e., a narrower band gap increases the energy distance between semiconductors and, consequently, they cannot interact with each other effectively, but this point requires further investigation.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the adhered Ta2O5 nanotube arrays were obtained by the anodic oxidation of tantalum foil. The various factors, which could influence the morphology and stability of the photocatalyst, were analysed to find the most suitable condition for the synthesis of very photoactive layers for the decomposition of pollutants present in the gas phase. The most active samples were obtained under 15 V during the anodization of tantalum foil for 5 min. Subsequently, the NTs were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath and annealed in a nitrogen atmosphere for 1 h. This procedure allowed the nanostructures to be obtained, of which the external and internal diameters were 41 and 19 nm, respectively, and the thickness of the NT layer was 1.27 µm. Moreover, the photocatalyst could be utilized several times after regeneration. The modification of Ta2O5 NTs by Bi2S3 QDs enhances the photoactivity of the materials—however, when the amount of Bi2S3 in the sample is higher than 2.37 at. %, the photocatalytic properties decrease.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/10/1347/s1: Figure S1: (a) Current-density–time response for anodizing tantalum foil in the range of 10–20 V. (b) The mechanism of synthesizing tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) nanotube arrays (NTs) by the anodising method (15 V, 5 min). Figure S2: Optical properties: UV-Vis-DRS, photoluminescence spectra of tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) nanotube arrays (NTs) (a,b) and NT-modified bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3). Figure S3: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of nanotube arrays (NTs) annealed in different atmospheres. Figure S4: (a) X-ray diffraction patterns for MIB samples after the anodization process performed at 10 V, 15 V, and 20 V. (b) X-ray diffraction patterns for MIB samples calcinated at 450 °C, 650 °C, and 1000 °C. Open circles represent experimental data, whereas the solid red line is the LeBail profile fit. Figure S5: X-ray diffraction patterns for MIB samples after the modification of bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs). Open circles represent experimental data, and the solid red line is the LeBail profile fit obtained with the two models used: Ta (Im-3m) and Ta4O (Pmmm) are shown by black and blue vertical bars, respectively. Figure S6: Photocatalytic activity of the nanotube arrays (NTs) after 5 min (orange) and 30 min (green) of irradiation. Figure S7: Efficiency of toluene removal in blank tests and during photodegradation (C0 = 200 ppm). Figure S8: Kinetics of toluene degradation during irradiation over pristine tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) nanotubes and bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs)/Ta2O5 nanotube arrays (NTs) for an initial toluene concentration of 400 ppm. Figure S9: Surface of the samples (a) before and (b) after three cycles of photodegradation for NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 1x. Table S1: Elemental composition (in at. %) in the surface layer of N2, NH3, H2, and air post-deposition annealed tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) nanotube arrays (NTs). The relative contribution of Ta oxide states (in %) was evaluated after deconvolution of the Ta 4f X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS spectra). Table S2: Efficiency of the photodegradation of toluene upon irradiation with an Xe lamp (1000 W). Table S3: Size of quantum dots (QDs) and elemental composition (EDX) for nanotube arrays (NTs) modified by QDs.

Author Contributions

A.Z.-M. supervised and directed the project; A.Z.-M. and M.P.K. conceived the concept; M.A.B., M.P.K., W.L., G.T. and T.K. performed experiments; M.A.B., M.P.K. and P.M. analyzed data; M.A.B. and M.P.K. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; M.A.B., M.P.K. and A.Z.-M. wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Polish National Science Center, grant number No.2016/23/B/ST8/03336 entitled “Mechanism of quantum dots excitation in photocatalytic reaction”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Colmenares, J.C.; Yi-Jun, X. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hisatomi, T.; Kubota, J.; Domen, K. Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7520–7535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Noda, Y.; Lee, B.; Domen, K.; Kondo, J.N. Synthesis of Crystallized Mesoporous Tantalum Oxide and Its Photocatalytic Activity for Overall Water Splitting under Ultraviolet Light Irradiation. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 5361–5367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Dai, W.; Wu, G.; Guan, N.; Li, L. Fabrication of Ta2O5 films on tantalum substrate for efficient photocatalysis. Catal. Commun. 2015, 65, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gonçalves, R.V.; Migowski, P.; Wender, H.; Eberhardt, D.; Weibel, D.E.; Sonaglio, F.C.; Zapata, M.J.M.; Dupont, J.; Feil, A.F.; Teixeira, S.R. Ta2O5 Nanotubes Obtained by Anodization: Effect of Thermal Treatment on the Photocatalytic Activity for Hydrogen Production. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 14022–14030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chaneliere, C.; Autran, J.L.; Devine, R.A.B.; Balland, B. Tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) thin films for advanced dielectric applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 1998, 22, 269–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baltes, M.; Kyto, A.; Weckhuysen, B.M.; Schoonheydt, R.A.; Van Der Voort, P.; Vansant, E.F. Supported Tantalum Oxide and Supported Vanadia-tantala Mixed Oxides: Structural Characterization and Surface Properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Azim, O.A.; Abdel-Aziz, M.M.; Yahia, I.S. Structure and optical analysis of Ta2O5 deposited on infrasil substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4829–4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kesmez, Ö.; Akarsu, E.; Çamurlu, H.E.; Yavuz, E.; Akarsu, M.; Arpaç, E. Preparation and characterization of multilayer anti-reflective coatings via sol-gel process. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 3183–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ezhilvalavan, S.; Tseng, T.Y. Preparation and properties of tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) thin films for ultra large scale integrated circuits (ULSIs) application—A review. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 1999, 10, 9–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kato, H.; Asakura, K.; Kudo, A. Highly Efficient Water Splitting into H2 and O2 over Lanthanum-Doped NaTaO3 Photocatalysts with High Crystallinity and Surface Nanostructure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3082–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duan, J.; Shi, W.; Xu, L.; Mou, G.; Xin, Q.; Guan, J. Hierarchical nanostructures of fluorinated and naked Ta2O5 single crystalline nanorods: Hydrothermal preparation, formation mechanism and photocatalytic activity for H2 production. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, J.; Wei, A.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, H. Structural and electrical properties of Ta2O5 thin films prepared by photo-induced CVD. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011, 34, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, K.; Schmuki, P. Highly ordered nanoporous Ta2O5 formed by anodization of Ta at high temperatures in a glycerol/phosphate electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 542–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Su, Z.; Grigorescu, S.; Wang, L.; Lee, K.; Schmuki, P. Fast fabrication of Ta2O5 nanotube arrays and their conversion to Ta 3 N 5 for efficient solar driven water splitting. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 50, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kobylański, M.P.; Mazierski, P.; Malankowska, A.; Kozak, M.; Diak, M.; Winiarski, M.J.; Klimczuk, T.; Lisowski, W.; Nowaczyk, G.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. TiO2–CoxOy composite nanotube arrays via one step electrochemical anodization for visible light–induced photocatalytic reaction. Surf. Interfaces 2018, 12, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, W.; Macak, J.M.; Schmuki, P. High aspect ratio ordered nanoporous Ta2O5 films by anodization of Ta. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El-Sayed, H.A.; Birss, V.I. Controlled Interconversion of Nanoarray of Ta Dimples and High Aspect Ratio Ta Oxide Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1350–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Young, L. Anodic oxide films. Influence of the film present before anodization. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1957, 53, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Horwood, C.A.; El-Sayed, H.A.; Birss, V.I. Precise electrochemical prediction of short tantalum oxide nanotube length. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 132, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grigorescu, S.; So, S.; Yoo, J.E.; Mazare, A.; Hahn, R.; Schmuki, P. Open top anodic Ta3N5 nanotubes for higher solar water splitting efficiency. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 182, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Namur, R.S.; Reyes, K.M.; Marino, C.E.B. Growth and Electrochemical Stability of Compact Tantalum Oxides Obtained in Different Electrolytes for Biomedical Applications. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Mazierski, P.; Nadolna, J.; Nowaczyk, G.; Lisowski, W.; Winiarski, M.J.; Klimczuk, T.; Kobylański, M.P.; Jurga, S.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Highly Visible-Light-Photoactive Heterojunction Based on TiO2 Nanotubes Decorated by Pt Nanoparticles and Bi2S3 Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 17215–17225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singh, N.; Sharma, J.; Tripathi, S.K. Synthesis of Bi2S3 quantum dots for sensitized solar cells by reverse SILAR. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1728, 020423. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, Z.J.; Li, R.; Landfester, K.; Zhang, K.A.I. Porous conjugated polymer via metal-free synthesis for visible light-promoted oxidative hydroxylation of arylboronic acids. Polymer 2017, 126, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lv, P.; Fu, W.; Yang, H.; Sun, H.; Chen, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhou, X.; Tian, L.; Zhang, W.; Li, M.; et al. Simple synthesis method of Bi2S3/CdS quantum dots cosensitized TiO2 nanotubes array with enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic activity. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 7548–7555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ramanery, F.P.; Mansur, A.A.P.; Mansur, H.S.; Carvalho, S.M.; Fonseca, M.C. Biocompatible Fluorescent Core-Shell Nanoconjugates Based on Chitosan/Bi2S3 Quantum Dots. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Syed Abuthahir, K.A.Z.; Jagannathan, R. Reverse-loop impedance profile in Bi2S3 quantum dots. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 121, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Narayanan, R.; Deepa, M.; Friebel, F.; Srivastava, A.K. A CdS/Bi2S3 bilayer and a poly (3,4- ethylenedioxythiophene)/S2− interface control quantum dot solar cell performance. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 105, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bajorowicz, B.; Kobylański, M.P.; Gołabiewska, A.; Nadolna, J.; Zaleska-Medynska, A.; Malankowska, A. Quantum dot-decorated semiconductor micro- and nanoparticles: A review of their synthesis, characterization and application in photocatalysis. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kadam, S.R.; Panmand, R.P.; Sonawane, R.S.; Gosavi, S.W.; Kale, B.B. A stable Bi2S3 quantum dot–glass nanosystem: Size tuneable photocatalytic hydrogen production under solar light. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 58485–58490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bajorowicz, B.; Kowalska, E.; Nadolna, J.; Wei, Z.; Endo, M.; Ohtani, B.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Preparation of CdS and Bi2S3 quantum dots co-decorated perovskite-type KNbO3 ternary heterostructure with improved visible light photocatalytic activity and stability for phenol degradation. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 15232–15245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, Y.; Xin, F.; Chen, J.; Xiang, T.; Yin, X. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 in isopropanol on Bi2S3 quantum dots/TiO2 nanosheets with exposed {001} facets. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 1863–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zumeta-Dubé, I.; Ruiz-Ruiz, V.F.; Díaz, D.; Rodil-Posadas, S.; Zeinert, A. TiO2 sensitization with Bi2S3 quantum dots: The inconvenience of sodium ions in the deposition procedure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 11495–11504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, L.; Sun, X.; Tu, H.; Jia, Q.; Gong, H.; Guan, J. Synchronous etching-epitaxial growth fabrication of facet-coupling NaTaO3/Ta2O5 heterostructured nanofibers for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 184, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liqiang, J.; Yichun, Q.; Baiqi, W.; Shudan, L.; Baojiang, J.; Libin, Y.; Wei, F.; Honggang, F.; Jiazhong, S. Review of photoluminescence performance of nano-sized semiconductor materials and its relationships with photocatalytic activity. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 1773–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Naumkin, A.; Kraut-Vass, A.; Gaarenstroom, S.C.P. NIST X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database 20 Version, 4.1; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2012. Available online: https://srdata.nist.gov/xps/ (accessed on 1 August 2019).
  38. Gonçalves, R.V.; Wojcieszak, R.; Uberman, P.M.; Teixeira, S.R.; Rossi, L.M. Insights into the active surface species formed on Ta2O5 nanotubes in the catalytic oxidation of CO. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Simpson, R.; White, R.G.; Watts, J.F.; Baker, M.A. XPS investigation of monatomic and cluster argon ion sputtering of tantalum pentoxide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 405, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, X.; Li, W.; Huang, J.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; Hu, P. Superstructure Ta2O5 mesocrystals derived from (NH4)2Ta2O3F6 mesocrystals with efficient photocatalytic activity. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 1948–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sarraf, M.; Razak, B.A.; Nasiri-Tabrizi, B.; Dabbagh, A.; Kasim, N.H.A.; Basirun, W.J.; Sulaiman, E.B. Nanomechanical properties, wear resistance and in-vitro characterization of Ta2O5 nanotubes coating on biomedical grade Ti–6Al–4V. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 66, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schönberg, N.; Overend, W.G.; Munthe-Kaas, A.; Sörensen, N.A. An X-Ray Investigation of the Tantalum-Oxygen System. Acta Chem. Scand 1954, 8, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Brauer, G.; Zapp, K.H. Die Nitride des Tantals. ZAAC J. Inorg. Gen. Chem. 1954, 277, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nischk, M.; Mazierski, P.; Gazda, M.; Zaleska, A. Ordered TiO2 nanotubes: The effect of preparation parameters on the photocatalytic activity in air purification process. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 674–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, Y.; Liu, P.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, F.; Ni, L.; Yan, Y.; Huo, P. Construction of amorphous Ta2O5/g-C3N4 nanosheet hybrids with superior visible-light photoactivities for organic dye degradation and mechanism insight. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 170, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g001 550
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of nanotube arrays (NTs): the effect of (a) applied voltage, (b) annealing temperature, (c) anodization time, and (d) annealing duration, (e) annealing atmosphere on the morphology and adhesive properties of tantalum pentaoxide (Ta2O5) nanotubes.
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of nanotube arrays (NTs): the effect of (a) applied voltage, (b) annealing temperature, (c) anodization time, and (d) annealing duration, (e) annealing atmosphere on the morphology and adhesive properties of tantalum pentaoxide (Ta2O5) nanotubes.
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g001
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of nanotube array (NT)-modified bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs).
Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of nanotube array (NT)-modified bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs).
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g002
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g003 550
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns for the Management Information Base (MIB) sample before (top) and after (bottom) the anodization process. Open circles represent experimental data, whereas the solid red line is a LeBail profile fit with two models used: Ta (Im-3m) and Ta4O (Pmmm) shown by black and blue vertical bars, respectively.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns for the Management Information Base (MIB) sample before (top) and after (bottom) the anodization process. Open circles represent experimental data, whereas the solid red line is a LeBail profile fit with two models used: Ta (Im-3m) and Ta4O (Pmmm) shown by black and blue vertical bars, respectively.
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g003
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g004 550
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images and schematic representation of the surface of nanotube arrays (NTs) modified by quantum dots (QDs).
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images and schematic representation of the surface of nanotube arrays (NTs) modified by quantum dots (QDs).
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g004
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g005 550
Figure 5. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images for nanotube arrays (NTs) modified by bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs).
Figure 5. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images for nanotube arrays (NTs) modified by bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs).
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g005
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g006 550
Figure 6. Photocatalytic activity of selected samples, shown as toluene degradation: (a) photocatalyst stability during three irradiation cycles for NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h and NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 1x. (b) Efficiency of toluene removal over Ta2O5 nanotube arrays (NTs) and bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs)/Tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) NTs samples and in the blank tests (toluene photolysis in the absence of a photocatalyst) under monochromatic light—318 nm and 730 nm.
Figure 6. Photocatalytic activity of selected samples, shown as toluene degradation: (a) photocatalyst stability during three irradiation cycles for NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h and NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 1x. (b) Efficiency of toluene removal over Ta2O5 nanotube arrays (NTs) and bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) quantum dots (QDs)/Tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) NTs samples and in the blank tests (toluene photolysis in the absence of a photocatalyst) under monochromatic light—318 nm and 730 nm.
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g006
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g007 550
Figure 7. Proposed photodegradation mechanism for (a) nanotube arrays (NTs) and (b) NTs modified by quantum dots (QDs).
Figure 7. Proposed photodegradation mechanism for (a) nanotube arrays (NTs) and (b) NTs modified by quantum dots (QDs).
Nanomaterials 09 01347 g007
Table
Table 1. Sample labels, synthesis conditions, morphology, and photoactivity of bare and quantum dot (QD)-decorated nanotube arrays (NTs).
Table 1. Sample labels, synthesis conditions, morphology, and photoactivity of bare and quantum dot (QD)-decorated nanotube arrays (NTs).
Sample LabelPreparation Conditions During Anodic Oxidation (AO)External Diameter
(nm)		Internal Diameter
(nm)		Thickness
(nm)		Length
(µm)		Ta2O5 NTs Adhesion to Ta FoilToluene Decomposition (%)
5 min of Irradiation15 min of Irradiation
NTs_10 V_10 min_no_cleaned_Air_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 10 V, t = 10 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in air (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)44 ± 327 ± 29 ± 11.00 ± 0.13High64.22 ± 3.2790.51 ± 3.27
NTs_15 V_10 min_ no_cleaned Air_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 10 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in air (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)46 ± 624 ± 211 ± 23.18 ± 0.09High93.55 ± 2.3897.83 ± 1.29
NTs_20 V_10 min_ no_cleaned Air_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 20 V, t = 10 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in air (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)48 ± 328 ± 310 ± 16.00 ± 0.19Weak91.05 ± 3.3596.82 ± 2.45
NTs_10 V_10 min_N2_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 10 V, t = 10 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)45 ± 520 ± 311 ± 21.74 ± 0.02Weak68.38 ± 0.3594.65 ± 1.91
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)41 ± 419 ± 310 ± 21.27 ± 0.05High95.36 ± 1.2298.73 ± 0.47
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_3 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 450 °C; t = 3 h)48 ± 225 ± 410 ± 11.78 ± 0.11High91.03 ± 0.4798.98 ± 0.06
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_600 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 600 °C; t = 1 h)39 ± 223 ± 310 ± 21.21 ± 0.03Very weakSample was unstable
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_750 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 750 °C; t = 1 h)40 ± 321 ± 210 ± 11.43 ± 0.02Very weakSample was unstable
NTs_15 V_10 min_N2_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)42 ± 321 ± 210 ± 23.31 ± 0.08High92.74 ± 1.0996.81 ± 0.35
NTs_15 V_5 min_Air_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in air (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)49 ± 723 ± 410 ± 21.46 ± 0.20High91.86 ± 2.1697.50 ± 2.40
NTs_15 V_5 min_N H3_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in NH3 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)47 ± 519 ± 313 ± 12.19 ± 0.07High93.37 ± 0.4298.90 ± 0.00
NTs_15 V_5 min_ H2_450 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in H2 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)44 ± 621 ± 310 ± 11.68 ± 0.03High94.20 ± 3.4398.09 ± 0.03
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_300 °C_1 hAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 300 °C; t = 1 h)47 ± 524 ± 311 ± 12.25 ± 0.06High94.08 ± 0.4297.36 ± 0.25
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_two_stepAO (I step: U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), removing of NTs layer, AO (II step, U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h)46 ± 524 ± 410 ± 11.15 ± 0.05Weak89.28 ± 0.1496.53 ± 0.30
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 1xAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h), 1 cycle of SILAR50 ± 431 ± 310 ± 11.42 ± 0.03High99.17 ± 0.14100
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 2xAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h), 2 cycles of SILAR41 ± 428 ± 38 ± 11.61 ± 0.11High71.56 ± 1.12100
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 3xAO (U = 15 V, t = 5 min.), ultrasonically cleaned (1 min.), dried (T = 80 °C, t = 24 h), and annealed in N2 (T = 450 °C; t = 1 h), 3 cycles of SILARCoated with Bi2S3 layer1.40 ± 0.05HighInactive
Table
Table 2. Elemental composition (in at. %) of the surface layer of NTs_15V_5min_N2_450 °C samples before and after subsequent SILAR cycles. The chemical states of Bi and Ta (in %) were evaluated after deconvolution of the Bi 4f and Ta 4f X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra, respectively.
Table 2. Elemental composition (in at. %) of the surface layer of NTs_15V_5min_N2_450 °C samples before and after subsequent SILAR cycles. The chemical states of Bi and Ta (in %) were evaluated after deconvolution of the Bi 4f and Ta 4f X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra, respectively.
Sample LabelElemental Composition (at. %)Bi 4f7/2 Fractions (%)Ta 4f7/2 Fractions (%)
TaOCSBiResidue
(F, N, Na) 		Bi0
157.0 ± 0.2 eV		Bi2S3
158.0 ± 0.3 eV		Bi2O3
159.5 ± 0.3 eV		Ta2O5_Surf
27.0 ± 0.1 eV		Ta2O5
26.2 ± 0.2 eV		Ta1+
22.1 ± 0.1 eV		Ta0
21.0 ± 0.3 eV
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h22.4446.0024.313.10-4.15000096.841.721.44
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 1x15.7958.2011.026.262.376.362.2846.5051.2223.5573.421.861.17
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 2x16.2457.4712.135.662.635.873.2153.1043.6924.8172.511.910.77
NTs_15 V_5 min_N2_450 °C_1 h_QDs_SILAR 3x0.6329.4726.7215.1422.605.441.2476.5822.1819.6180.3900

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baluk, M.A.; Kobylański, M.P.; Lisowski, W.; Trykowski, G.; Klimczuk, T.; Mazierski, P.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Fabrication of Durable Ordered Ta2O5 Nanotube Arrays Decorated with Bi2S3 Quantum Dots. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101347

AMA Style

Baluk MA, Kobylański MP, Lisowski W, Trykowski G, Klimczuk T, Mazierski P, Zaleska-Medynska A. Fabrication of Durable Ordered Ta2O5 Nanotube Arrays Decorated with Bi2S3 Quantum Dots. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(10):1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baluk, Mateusz A., Marek P. Kobylański, Wojciech Lisowski, Grzegorz Trykowski, Tomasz Klimczuk, Paweł Mazierski, and Adriana Zaleska-Medynska. 2019. "Fabrication of Durable Ordered Ta2O5 Nanotube Arrays Decorated with Bi2S3 Quantum Dots" Nanomaterials 9, no. 10: 1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101347

APA Style

Baluk, M. A., Kobylański, M. P., Lisowski, W., Trykowski, G., Klimczuk, T., Mazierski, P., & Zaleska-Medynska, A. (2019). Fabrication of Durable Ordered Ta2O5 Nanotube Arrays Decorated with Bi2S3 Quantum Dots. Nanomaterials, 9(10), 1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101347

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop