Next Article in Journal
Facile Preparation and Characterization of Carbon Fibers with Core-Shell Structure from Graphene-Dispersed Isotropic Pitch Compounds
Next Article in Special Issue
Tunable Duplex Metalens Based on Phase-Change Materials in Communication Range
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Flexible, Lightweight, Magnetic Mushroom Gills and Coral-Like MXene–Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites for EMI Shielding Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improving Upconversion Efficiency Based on Cross-Patterned Upconversion Material Slot Waveguides on a Silicon Layer

Department of Physics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(4), 520; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040520
Submission received: 1 March 2019 / Revised: 24 March 2019 / Accepted: 28 March 2019 / Published: 3 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanophotonics and Its Applications)

Abstract

:
Upconversion (UC) materials can be used to harvest near-infrared (NIR) light and convert it into visible light. Although this improves optical device operating spectral range and efficiency, e.g., solar cells, typical UC material conversion efficiency is too low for practical devices. We propose a cross-patterned slot waveguide constructed from UC material embedded in a high index semiconductor layer to improve UC. Since the slot waveguide mode is induced in the low index UC slot, NIR absorption (~970 nm) increased 25-fold compared with film structures. Furthermore, the spontaneous emission enhancement rate at 660 nm increased 9.6-fold compared to the reference film due to resonance excited in the UC slot (Purcell effect). Thus, the proposed UC slot array structure improved UC efficiency 240-fold considering absorption and emission enhancements. This double resonance UC improvement can be applied to practical optical devices.

1. Introduction

Upconversion (UC) materials convert lower energy light, which cannot be used in optical devices due to active material spectral response limitations, to higher energy light that can be effectively captured. Hence, they have been studied in many fields, including bio-imaging [1,2,3] and energy harvesting [4,5,6,7,8,9]. However, UC material absorption and emission rates are not high enough for practical uses in optical devices [10]. Although many studies have proposed improving UC efficiency by controlling material composition or doping [11,12], efficiency remains insufficient for practical devices. On the other hand, strong optical fields induced in nanophotonic structures have been shown to improve UC efficiency [13,14]. Strong electric fields at incident wavelength increase light–matter interaction in UC materials, enhancing absorption efficiency. Strong electric fields at emission wavelengths can also enhance the emission rate through the Purcell effect [15,16]. Significant UC efficiency improvements have been demonstrated for plasmon resonances in metallic structures [7,17] and Mie resonances in UC material dielectric rods [18,19,20,21].
In particular, more sophisticated UC layer design rules are required for effective UC material application in solar cells. The conventional solar cell active layer absorbs visible light and should be retained with minimum modification to retain the original efficiency with respect to visible light. However, solar cell UC material layers should provide high conversion efficiency from near-infrared (NIR) to visible light [4,5,22,23].
Therefore, we propose a cross-patterned UC slot waveguide structure on a solar cell with a high refractive index semiconductor active layer, e.g., silicon. This structure maintained the original active layer visible light absorption, since the UC material had a small area filling factor (0.0975). However, the introduced UC slot waveguide structure will significantly enhance the conversion efficiency due to the strong electric field in the low refractive index slot waveguide. In particular, the proposed structure strongly enhanced NIR (980 nm) absorption and visible emission (660 nm) from coupling with slot waveguide modes.

2. Upconversion Material Absorption Enhancement

In this paper, we used a home-made three-dimensional (3D) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method for simulations of the proposed structure. Spatial resolution of 5 nm was used both for the absorption and emission simulations. In the simulations of the absorption, periodic boundary conditions with a square unit cell were assumed for X and Y axes to represent the proposed periodic structure, and the perfectly matched layer (PML) was on the Z axis to indicate infinite free space. The incident light was represented by a planewave monochromatic source with changing the wavelength. In the simulations of the emission, PML boundary conditions were applied to X, Y, and Z axis to represent infinite space and the horizontal simulation domain was 10 × 10 square lattices of the structure to avoid the periodic interference effect of a dipole source. All light from a dipole source can escape into free space less than 10 lattice period. A linearly-polarized dipole source with an emission wavelength was placed in the region of the UC slot. For the calculations of total output, the Poynting vector was integrated over the surface of the rectangular box including the proposed structure, where the surface was separated 100 nm away from the structure.
Figure 1a shows the proposed cross-patterned UC slot waveguides in a thin silicon layer to enhance UC material conversion efficiency. The UC slot waveguide array forms a square lattice to provide polarization-independent absorption for incident light. Figure 1b,c shows two strong light absorption peaks when Ex polarized incident light propagates into the structure, e.g., structure with w = 380 nm, h = 200 nm, and t = 20 nm exhibits peaks at 660 nm and 970 nm (P1 and P2 respectively). Hence, the proposed UC slot waveguide has two resonance modes. The lattice design ensures differently polarized incident light, e.g., Ey polarization, is maintained.
Resonant wavelengths can be controlled by changing the silicon block width or height as shown in Figure 1b,c, respectively. For w = 300 to 380 nm at fixed h = 200 nm, P1 and P2 redshift from 620–660 nm and 850–970 nm, respectively; whereas for h = 160 to 240 nm at fixed w = 380 nm, P1 and P2 increase 630–730 nm and 880–1040 nm, respectively.
Figure 1 shows that structure parameters, w = 380 nm and h = 200 nm correspond to 660 nm and 970 nm, emission and absorption peaks, respectively, for the proposed material construction using Er3+/Yb3+ doped NaYF4 UC material [24]. The simulation assumed experimentally determined UC material and silicon refractive indexes [25,26], fitted to Drude-Lorentz and Drude-critical point models, respectively. Figure 2a confirms 660 nm and 970 nm resonance for the w = 380 nm, h = 200 nm, and t = 20 nm structure. We employed a freestanding UC film with thickness = 40 nm and the same volume as the UC slots on Si blocks as the reference structure. The reference film exhibited absorbance <1.2% over the investigated wavelength region, whereas the proposed UC slot structure exhibited strongly enhanced absorption ≈30% at 970 nm, even with the low filling factor = 0.0975 (ratio between UC slot area and total area).
Figure 2b,c shows that the resonance electric field profiles for 970 nm incident light exhibit strongly enhanced Ex polarized incident light in the UC slot array. Electric field intensity was strongly concentrated in the low index UC slot region rather than the high index Si block region, due to the slot waveguide mode, with maximum enhanced electric field intensity ≈30× incident wave intensity. Thus, the induced waveguide mode provides strong electric field intensity at lower index layers for vertically polarized incident light for the high-low-high index dielectric layer waveguide [27,28,29].
Figure 3 shows the absorption dependencies on the UC slot width (t) and refractive index (n) of the block material. When the width (t) increases from 20 nm to 30 nm, 40 nm, and 50 nm, the absorption peak shifts from 970 nm to 983 nm, 940 nm, and 930 nm, showing the complicated wavelength shift behavior, a slight blue shift, and large red shifts in sequence (Figure 3a). This shift is attributed to the fact that the effective index of the slot mode becomes higher in the smaller width [27] and the confinement factor has a maximum value in a certain slot width [28]. The absorbance reaches 30% for the slots with the width of 20 nm and 30 nm and is approximately 20% for the slots with the width of 40 nm and 50 nm, respectively. However, considering the area-filling factors, 0.0975, 0.141, 0.181, and 0.219 of the UC material for the widths of 20 nm, 30 nm, 40 nm, and 50 nm, the slot with t = 20 nm shows the highest absorbance per unit UC volume. In the slot with a width of 50 nm, the other mode is also observed at a wavelength of 1065 nm.
On the other hand, as the refractive index of the block material increases from 3.0 (blue), and silicon (black), to 3.8 (red), the absorption peak shifts to the longer wavelength and the absorbance decrease slightly from 33% and 30%, to 28%. The optical dielectric function of the silicon includes the material dispersion depending on the wavelength.

3. Proposed Upconversion Slot Array Spontaneous Emission Enhancement

We investigated converted visible light (660 nm) emission properties by calculating spontaneous emission (SE) for a dipole source excited in the UC slot array structure and reference UC film. The randomly polarized dipole SE emitters were represented by linear superposition of Ex, Ey, and Ez polarized dipole sources, and SE enhancement rates for horizontally polarized (Ex) or perpendicularly polarized (Ez) 660 nm dipole emitters were investigated. As expected, Ey polarized dipole emitter shows the same SE enhancement as the Ex polarized dipole source due to square lattice geometry. SE enhancement can be calculated as
R SE = P UC P B u lk ,
where P U C and P B u lk are the dipole source emitted powers in the UC slot array and bulk UC material structure, respectively. We assume the bulk UC fills the entire space, and the corresponding SE is the natural decay rate. The total output power from the dipole source can be estimated by integrating the structure’s outgoing Poynting vectors. We scanned the position of the dipole source with 5 nm spatial resolution and set the calculation region to 1/8 of a unit cell to take advantage of the structure symmetry, as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4a–c shows SE enhancement as a function of the Ex dipole source position. As Ex polarized incident light excites the slot waveguide mode along the y-direction UC slot, strong SE enhancement only occurs in the y direction (Figure 4a). SE in the x-direction slot is similar to that for bulk UC.
Figure 4b,c shows that SE is strongly enhanced at the UC slot vertical edges (Figure 4b, red), with maximum SE enhancement ≈24 × bulk UC, and average enhancement over slot = 10.36. The Ey dipole source has the same spatial SE dependence as Ex, aside from 90° rotation, whereas Ez dipole source emission is enhanced toward UC slot vertical center, with maximum and average enhancement = 2.7 and 1.9, respectively.
The SE enhancement rate of the cross-patterned UC slot array was enhanced 7.54-fold compared with bulk UC material considering Ex, Ey, and Ex dipole sources. In contrast, 40-mm-thick reference film provided 0.99 and 0.24 enhancements for Ex and Ez dipole sources, respectively, providing 0.74 average enhancement. Thus, the proposed UC slot construction provided 9.6 × the reference film structure enhancement. Table 1 compares UC slot array and reference film structure absorption and emission rates at 970 nm and 660 nm.
We estimated the total wavelength conversion efficiency enhancement as the combination of absorption (25) and SE (9.6) enhancement, i.e., total enhancement ≈240.
To identify the mechanism for the strong SE enhancement for Ex and Ey polarized dipole sources, we investigated the resonance mode excited in the UC slot array by placing a dipole source in the slot. Figure 5a shows the resultant electric field intensity mode profile in the XZ plane for y = 200 nm for the 660 nm mode.
A strong electric field occurs at the top and bottom of the UC slot (Figure 5a, dark red). SE enhancement along the z-direction in the UC slot (Figure 4c and Figure 5b, blue curve) can be explained by the Purcell effect due to the electric field intensity mode profile (Figure 5b, black curve). Since the Purcell effect is due to the electric field parallel to the dipole direction of an emitter, the similar spatial distributions for the resonant mode and SE enhancement confirm that the enhancement originates from the Purcell effect.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we designed a cross-patterned UC material slot array structure to enhance UC for practical solar cell and similar devices using Er3+/Yb3+ doped NaYF4 on silicon substrate. The proposed device achieved 25-fold enhanced incident light (970 nm) absorption and 9.6-fold SE enhancement of 660 nm emission compared with a reference 40-mm-thick uniform UC layer. These large enhancements originated from the two resonance slot modes targeted to match the UC material absorption and emission wavelengths. The double resonant modes provided overall 240-fold increased UC from the proposed cross-patterned UC slot array embedded in the silicon layer.
The proposed structure can be implemented by introducing UC material in the pre-defined air slots of the silicon layer using an atomic layer deposition [30] or growing amorphous silicon layer on the soft lithographically nanopatterned UC slot using the sol-gel method [31].
The enhanced wavelength conversion can be practically applied for photovoltaic devices based on surface plasmons and Mie resonances as well as slot mode, and the optical efficiency enhancement can be applied to various optical phenomena such as down conversion [32,33,34] and second harmonic generation [35,36,37].

Author Contributions

Y.K. and K.M. performed simulations and wrote the manuscript. Y.J.L. and S.H. designed the structures and performed the simulations. S.-H.K. supervised all simulations and revised the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government under Grants NRF-2016R1C1B2007007.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nyk, M.; Kumar, R.; Ohulchanskyy, T.Y.; Bergey, E.J.; Prasad, P.N. High Contrast in Vitro and in Vivo Photoluminescence Bioimaging Using Near Infrared to Near Infrared Up-Conversion in Tm3+ and Yb3+ Doped Fluoride Nanophosphors. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3834–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xiong, L.-Q.; Chen, Z.-G.; Yu, M.-X.; Li, F.-Y.; Liu, C.; Huang, C.-H. Synthesis, characterization, and in vivo targeted imaging of amine-functionalized rare-earth up-converting nanophosphors. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 5592–5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fang, W.; Wei, Y. Upconversion nanoparticle as a theranostic agent for tumor imaging and therapy. J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 2016, 09, 1630006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. van Sark, W.G.; de Wild, J.; Rath, J.K.; Meijerink, A.; Schropp, R.E. Upconversion in solar cells. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, Y.Y.; Fückel, B.; MacQueen, R.W.; Khoury, T.; Clady, R.G.C.R.; Schulze, T.F.; Ekins-Daukes, N.J.; Crossley, M.J.; Stannowski, B.; Lips, K.; et al. Improving the light-harvesting of amorphous silicon solar cells with photochemical upconversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Goldschmidt, J.C.; Fischer, S. Upconversion for photovoltaics—A review of materials, devices and concepts for performance enhancement. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2015, 3, 510–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, K.-T.; Park, J.-H.; Kwon, S.J.; Kwon, H.-K.; Kyhm, J.; Kwak, K.-W.; Jang, H.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Han, J.S.; Lee, S.-H.; et al. Simultaneous Enhancement of Upconversion and Downshifting Luminescence via Plasmonic Structure. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2491–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schulze, T.F.; Schmidt, T.W. Photochemical upconversion: Present status and prospects for its application to solar energy conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 103–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andrews, D.L.; Curutchet, C.; Scholes, G.D. Resonance energy transfer: Beyond the limits. Laser Photon. Rev. 2011, 5, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shalav, A.; Richards, B.S.; Trupke, T.; Krämer, K.W.; Güdel, H.U. Application of NaYF4:Er3+ up-converting phosphors for enhanced near-infrared silicon solar cell response. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 013505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, C.; Kong, X.; Liu, X.; Tu, L.; Wu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, K.; Zeng, Q.; Zhang, H. Li+ ion doping: An approach for improving the crystallinity and upconversion emissions of NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+ nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8084–8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sun, Q.-C.; Mundoor, H.; Ribot, J.C.; Singh, V.; Smalyukh, I.I.; Nagpal, P. Plasmon-Enhanced Energy Transfer for Improved Upconversion of Infrared Radiation in Doped-Lanthanide Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, G.Y.; Jung, K.; Jang, H.S.; Kyhm, J.; Han, I.K.; Park, B.; Ju, H.; Kwon, S.J.; Ko, H. Upconversion luminescence enhancement in plasmonic architecture with random assembly of metal nanodomes. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 2071–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Park, K.; Jung, K.; Kwon, S.J.; Jang, H.S.; Byun, D.; Han, I.K.; Ko, H. Plasmonic Nanowire-Enhanced Upconversion Luminescence for Anticounterfeit Devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 7836–7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Purcell, E.M.; Torrey, H.C.; Pound, R.V. Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys. Rev. 1946, 69, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gérard, J.M.; Gayral, B. Strong Purcell effect for InAs quantum boxes in three-dimensional solid-state microcavities. J. Lightw. Technol. 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, Y.J.; Moon, K.; Kwon, S.-H. Enhanced Conversion Process in a Sub-wavelength Thin Upconversion Layer by Using Metamaterial Mirror. Plasmonics 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moon, K.; Lee, Y.; Hong, S.; Kwon, S.-H.; Moon, K.; Lee, Y.J.; Hong, S.; Kwon, S.-H. Wavelength Conversion Enhancement Achieved by Using Resonance in an Array of Nanocylinders. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saboktakin, M.; Ye, X.; Chettiar, U.K.; Engheta, N.; Murray, C.B.; Kagan, C.R. Plasmonic Enhancement of Nanophosphor Upconversion Luminescence in Au Nanohole Arrays. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 7186–7192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aouani, H.; Rahmani, M.; Navarro-Cía, M.; Maier, S.A. Third-harmonic-upconversion enhancement from a single semiconductor nanoparticle coupled to a plasmonic antenna. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Melik-Gaykazyan, E.V.; Shcherbakov, M.R.; Shorokhov, A.S.; Staude, I.; Brener, I.; Neshev, D.N.; Kivshar, Y.S.; Fedyanin, A.A. Third-harmonic generation from Mie-type resonances of isolated all-dielectric nanoparticles. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 375, 20160281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fischer, S.; Goldschmidt, J.C.; Löper, P.; Bauer, G.H.; Brüggemann, R.; Krämer, K.; Biner, D.; Hermle, M.; Glunz, S.W. Enhancement of silicon solar cell efficiency by upconversion: Optical and electrical characterization. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 044912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. de Wild, J.; Meijerink, A.; Rath, J.K.; van Sark, W.G.J.H.M.; Schropp, R.E.I. Towards upconversion for amorphous silicon solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 1919–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Haase, M.; Schäfer, H. Upconverting Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5808–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sokolov, V.I.; Zvyagin, A.V.; Igumnov, S.M.; Molchanova, S.I.; Nazarov, M.M.; Nechaev, A.V.; Savelyev, A.G.; Tyutyunov, A.A.; Khaydukov, E.V.; Panchenko, V.Y. Determination of the refractive index of β-NaYF4/Yb3+/Er3+/Tm3+ nanocrystals using spectroscopic refractometry. Opt. Spectrosc. 2015, 118, 609–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schinke, C.; Christian Peest, P.; Schmidt, J.; Brendel, R.; Bothe, K.; Vogt, M.R.; Kröger, I.; Winter, S.; Schirmacher, A.; Lim, S.; et al. Uncertainty analysis for the coefficient of band-to-band absorption of crystalline silicon. AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 067168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Xu, Q.; Almeida, V.R.; Panepucci, R.R.; Lipson, M. Experimental demonstration of guiding and confining light in nanometer-size low-refractive-index material. Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Feng, N.-N.; Michel, J.; Kimerling, L.C. Optical Field Concentration in Low-Index Waveguides. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2006, 42, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anderson, P.A.; Schmidt, B.S.; Lipson, M. High confinement in silicon slot waveguides with sharp bends. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 9197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Giedraityte, Z.; Tuomisto, M.; Lastusaari, M.; Karppinen, M. Three- and Two-Photon NIR-to-Vis (Yb,Er) Upconversion from ALD/MLD-Fabricated Molecular Hybrid Thin Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 8845–8852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Park, H.; Yoo, G.Y.; Kim, M.-S.; Kim, K.; Lee, C.; Park, S.; Kim, W. Thin film fabrication of upconversion lanthanide-doped NaYF4 by a sol-gel method and soft lithographical nanopatterning. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 728, 927–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wegh, R.; Donker, H.; van Loef, E.V.; Oskam, K.; Meijerink, A. Quantum cutting through downconversion in rare-earth compounds. J. Lumin. 2000, 87–89, 1017–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oskam, K.; Wegh, R.; Donker, H.; van Loef, E.V.; Meijerink, A. Downconversion: A new route to visible quantum cutting. J. Alloys Compd. 2000, 300–301, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Richards, B.S. Luminescent layers for enhanced silicon solar cell performance: Down-conversion. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 1189–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kozlovsky, W.J.; Nabors, C.D.; Byer, R.L. Efficient second harmonic generation of a diode-laser-pumped CW Nd:YAG laser using monolithic MgO:LiNbO/sub 3/external resonant cavities. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1988, 24, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thyagarajan, K.; Rivier, S.; Lovera, A.; Martin, O.J.F. Enhanced second-harmonic generation from double resonant plasmonic antennae. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 12860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Celebrano, M.; Wu, X.; Baselli, M.; Großmann, S.; Biagioni, P.; Locatelli, A.; De Angelis, C.; Cerullo, G.; Osellame, R.; Hecht, B.; et al. Mode matching in multiresonant plasmonic nanoantennas for enhanced second harmonic generation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Proposed cross-patterned upconversion (UC) material slot waveguide structure on silicon thin layer, where w and h are the width and height of each silicon layer block, respectively, and t is the slot thickness; simulated Er3+/Yb3+ doped NaYF4 UC material slot absorbance spectra for different (b) widths and (c) heights.
Figure 1. (a) Proposed cross-patterned upconversion (UC) material slot waveguide structure on silicon thin layer, where w and h are the width and height of each silicon layer block, respectively, and t is the slot thickness; simulated Er3+/Yb3+ doped NaYF4 UC material slot absorbance spectra for different (b) widths and (c) heights.
Nanomaterials 09 00520 g001
Figure 2. (a) Simulated absorption spectra for the proposed upconversion (UC) slot structure and reference film; the UC device exhibits emission and absorption resonances at 660 and 970 nm, respectively; (b) and (c) electric field intensity profiles for 970 nm incident light; maximum field intensity is almost 30 times that of the incident light.
Figure 2. (a) Simulated absorption spectra for the proposed upconversion (UC) slot structure and reference film; the UC device exhibits emission and absorption resonances at 660 and 970 nm, respectively; (b) and (c) electric field intensity profiles for 970 nm incident light; maximum field intensity is almost 30 times that of the incident light.
Nanomaterials 09 00520 g002
Figure 3. (a) Absorption spectra for different slot widths (t). Here, width of 380 nm and height of 200 nm are used. (b) Absorption spectra for different refractive indexes (n) of the block material.
Figure 3. (a) Absorption spectra for different slot widths (t). Here, width of 380 nm and height of 200 nm are used. (b) Absorption spectra for different refractive indexes (n) of the block material.
Nanomaterials 09 00520 g003
Figure 4. Spontaneous emission (SE) enhancement as functions of Ex dipole source location; (b) is SE enhancement in the XZ plane at y = 200 nm corresponding to (a); (c) is SE enhancement along the z-direction for (b).
Figure 4. Spontaneous emission (SE) enhancement as functions of Ex dipole source location; (b) is SE enhancement in the XZ plane at y = 200 nm corresponding to (a); (c) is SE enhancement along the z-direction for (b).
Nanomaterials 09 00520 g004
Figure 5. (a) Electric field intensity in the 660 nm resonance mode XZ plane (y = 200 nm). (b) Electric field intensity and spontaneous emission (SE) enhancement from Figure 3c along the z-direction at the UC slot center (y = 200 nm).
Figure 5. (a) Electric field intensity in the 660 nm resonance mode XZ plane (y = 200 nm). (b) Electric field intensity and spontaneous emission (SE) enhancement from Figure 3c along the z-direction at the UC slot center (y = 200 nm).
Nanomaterials 09 00520 g005
Table 1. Incident light (970 nm) absorption and spontaneous emission (SE, 660 nm) enhancement for the proposed upconversion (UC) slot array and 40-mm-thick reference UC film.
Table 1. Incident light (970 nm) absorption and spontaneous emission (SE, 660 nm) enhancement for the proposed upconversion (UC) slot array and 40-mm-thick reference UC film.
ProcessPolarizationUC Slot ArrayReference UC Film Multiplier
Absolute absorption (970 nm) 0.300.012×25
SE enhancement (660 nm)Ex10.360.99×10.5
Ey10.360.99×10.5
Ez1.90.24×7.9
Average SE enhancement 7.540.74×9.6
Wavelength conversion efficiency ×242.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.; Moon, K.; Lee, Y.J.; Hong, S.; Kwon, S.-H. Improving Upconversion Efficiency Based on Cross-Patterned Upconversion Material Slot Waveguides on a Silicon Layer. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040520

AMA Style

Kim Y, Moon K, Lee YJ, Hong S, Kwon S-H. Improving Upconversion Efficiency Based on Cross-Patterned Upconversion Material Slot Waveguides on a Silicon Layer. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(4):520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Youngsoo, Kihwan Moon, Young Jin Lee, Seokhyeon Hong, and Soon-Hong Kwon. 2019. "Improving Upconversion Efficiency Based on Cross-Patterned Upconversion Material Slot Waveguides on a Silicon Layer" Nanomaterials 9, no. 4: 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040520

APA Style

Kim, Y., Moon, K., Lee, Y. J., Hong, S., & Kwon, S. -H. (2019). Improving Upconversion Efficiency Based on Cross-Patterned Upconversion Material Slot Waveguides on a Silicon Layer. Nanomaterials, 9(4), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040520

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop