Next Article in Journal
Facile Photochemical Syntheses of Conjoined Nanotwin Gold-Silver Particles within a Biologically-Benign Chitosan Polymer
Previous Article in Journal
Piezoresistive Load Sensing and Percolation Phenomena in Portland Cement Composite Modified with In-Situ Synthesized Carbon Nanofibers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low-Temperature Vapor-Phase Synthesis of Single-Crystalline Gold Nanostructures: Toward Exceptional Electrocatalytic Activity for Methanol Oxidation Reaction

1
Department of Chemistry, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Korea
2
Bionanotechnology Research Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 34141, Korea
3
Department of Nanobiotechnology, KRIBB School of Biotechnology, UST, Daejeon 34113, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(4), 595; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040595
Submission received: 9 March 2019 / Revised: 3 April 2019 / Accepted: 6 April 2019 / Published: 10 April 2019

Abstract

:
Au nanostructures (Au NSs) have been considered promising materials for applications in fuel cell catalysis, electrochemistry, and plasmonics. For the fabrication of high-performance Au NS-based electronic or electrochemical devices, Au NSs should have clean surfaces and be directly supported on a substrate without any mediating molecules. Herein, we report the vapor-phase synthesis of Au NSs on a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrate at 120 °C and their application to the electrocatalytic methanol oxidation reaction (MOR). By employing AuCl as a precursor, the synthesis temperature for Au NSs was reduced to under 200 °C, enabling the direct synthesis of Au NSs on an FTO substrate in the vapor phase. Considering that previously reported vapor-phase synthesis of Au NSs requires a high temperature over 1000 °C, this proposed synthetic method is remarkably simple and practical. Moreover, we could selectively synthesize Au nanoparticles (NPs) and nanoplates by adjusting the location of the substrate, and the size of the Au NPs was controllable by changing the reaction temperature. The synthesized Au NSs are a single-crystalline material with clean surfaces that achieved a high methanol oxidation current density of 14.65 mA/cm2 when intimately supported by an FTO substrate. We anticipate that this novel synthetic method can widen the applicability of vapor-phase synthesized Au NSs for electronic and electrochemical devices.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Au nanostructures (Au NSs) have been widely used for applications in electronics, electrochemistry, plasmonics, biomedical sensing, etc. [1,2,3,4,5]. In particular, Au NSs have been considered promising catalysts for the methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) because Au NSs do not form poisoning intermediates during electrocatalytic reactions [6,7,8,9]. Therefore, various kinds of Au NSs have been synthesized and applied to electrocatalytic reactions to improve catalytic activities [10,11,12,13]. According to previous studies, the intrinsic properties of Au NSs, such as their size, shape, and lattice plane, highly influence the catalytic activity of Au NSs [14,15,16,17]. In addition, the interface structure between Au NSs and the supporting electrode is critical to the improvement of the electrocatalytic activity since the interface structure significantly affects electron transfer from Au NSs to the conductive substrate and vice versa [18,19,20]. Moreover, clean Au NS surfaces are important to increase the number of effective collisions between reactants and catalytic active sites on the Au NS surface [21,22,23,24]. Thus, an ideal electrocatalytic Au NS should have a well-defined morphology, crystallinity, clean surfaces, and direct interface with a substrate.
For the synthesis of Au NSs, solution-phase synthetic methods have been commonly employed because these methods enable large-scale synthesis of Au NSs and control of the NS morphology by using ligand molecules [25,26,27]. However, ligand molecules often inhibit the catalytic activity of Au NSs since ligand molecules can interrupt electron transfer and collision with reactants [23,28,29,30,31]. In addition, the agglomeration of Au NSs can also lower the efficiency of catalytic reactions [32,33,34]. Recently, vapor-phase synthesis of Au NSs has emerged as a promising synthesis technique because vapor-phase synthetic methods can produce surfactant-free, single-crystalline, ultraclean, ultraflat, and morphology-tunable Au NSs [35,36,37,38,39]. Although the Au NSs synthesized in a vapor phase exhibit excellent physicochemical properties, they have rarely been applied to electrocatalytic reactions because vapor-phase-grown Au NSs are mainly deposited on nonconductive and temperature-stable substrates. The vapor-phase growth temperature of Au NSs is high (over 1000 °C) and, thus, versatile electrically conductive substrates, such as indium tin oxide and fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO), cannot be utilized [35,40]. Some papers reported the lowed temperature (below 1000 °C) [41,42]. While the adoption of an organometallic compound as a precursor allows a reaction temperature below ~500 °C, the decomposition of the organometallic compound generates byproducts that adsorb on the Au surfaces [43]. If we can routinely synthesize high-quality Au NSs on a conductive substrate in a vapor phase, the product may be a promising Au NS-based catalytic electrode.
Herein, we report a novel vapor-phase synthesis of Au NSs in the temperature range from 120 to 200 °C and the electrocatalytic MOR application of Au NSs. The use of AuCl as a precursor enabled an organic-molecule-free synthesis of Au NSs on an FTO substrate at low temperature. The synthetic reactions were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis, which confirmed the disproportionation reaction of AuCl. We found that Au nanoparticles (NPs) and nanoplates could be selectively synthesized depending on the location of the substrate, and the size of the Au NPs could be controlled by the reaction temperature. Importantly, Au NPs on an FTO substrate were employed as a catalytic electrode for the MOR, and the electrode exhibited a current density of 14.65 mA/cm2, which is 33 times higher than that obtained with commercial Au NPs on an FTO substrate. This proposed vapor-phase synthetic method for Au NSs enables the direct growth of single-crystalline and clean Au NSs on a desired substrate and is a promising approach for the development of electrocatalysts and electrochemical sensing platforms based on Au NSs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Au NPs on an FTO Substrate

The FTO coated glass slides, an electrically conductive substrate, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (No. 735159, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The FTO substrates were sonicated in acetone, ethanol, and water for 30 min, washed with acetone, and dried by N2. To synthesize Au NPs on a clean FTO substrate, 1.5 mg of fresh AuCl powder (99.9%, Aldrich) was placed in the center of the heating zone in a furnace with a 1 inch diameter inner quartz tube, and an FTO substrate was placed 15–20 mm from the AuCl powder toward the downstream side. Next, the furnace was heated to the desired temperature and maintained for 30 min under a flow of Ar (150 sccm). The pressure of the chamber was 0.7 Torr.

2.2. Synthesis of Au Nanoplates on an FTO Substrate

The FTO substrates were sonicated in acetone, ethanol, and water for 30 min, washed with acetone, and dried by N2. To synthesize Au nanoplates on a clean FTO substrate, 1.5 mg of fresh AuCl powder was placed in the center of the heating zone in a furnace, and an FTO substrate was placed 3–5 mm from the AuCl powder toward the downstream side. Next, the furnace was heated to 200 °C and maintained at that temperature for 30 min under a flow of Ar (150 sccm). The pressure of the chamber was 0.7 Torr.

2.3. Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) Measurements

All electrochemical analyses were carried out in the ambient atmosphere using a three-electrode cell consisting of vapor-phase-grown Au NP/FTO or colloidal Au NP/FTO as the working electrode, Pt wire as the auxiliary electrode, and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode. For vapor-phase-grown Au NP/FTO, the FTO substrate was partially coated with an epoxy resin after the reaction in furnace system to prevent contact between the solution and the electrode clamp. The vapor-phase-grown Au NP/FTO electrode was prepared as described above. The colloidal Au NP/FTO electrode was prepared by dropwise evaporation of Au NPs stabilized suspension in citrate buffer (20 nm, Aldrich) on an FTO substrate, rinsing with water, and drying with N2. The electrochemical active surface area of the Au NPs was measured in 3 mL of a 0.1 M KOH (Junsei, Tokyo, Japan) aqueous solution by cyclic scanning from −0.1 to 0.5 V (for vapor-phase Au NP/FTO) or 0.45 V (for colloidal Au NP/FTO) (vs. SCE, Rosemead, CA, USA). Before measurements, the 0.1 M KOH and methanol solutions were purged with N2 for 30 min. The electrooxidation of methanol was measured by cyclic scanning from −0.15 to 0.5 V (vs. SCE).

2.4. Instrumentation

Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Nova 230 (CA, USA). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) images, and electron diffraction patterns were taken on a TECNAI TF30 ST transmission electron microscope (Hilsboro, OR, USA) operated at 300 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were obtained with a D/MAX-2500 instrument (RIGAKU, Auburn Hills, MI, USA). The cross-sectional TEM image of the Au nanoplate was obtained using a Helios Nanolab 450 F1 microscope (FEI company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were obtained from K-alpha (Thermo VG Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was recorded using a computer-controlled CHI643B electrochemical analyzer (Austin, TX, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of the vapor-phase synthesis of Au NSs. AuCl powder was placed in the heating zone of a horizontal quartz tube furnace system, and the FTO substrate was positioned 3–20 mm away from the AuCl powder. For the synthesis of Au NSs, the system was heated to 120–200 °C under an Ar gas flow of 150 sccm. The pressure of the chamber was maintained at 0.7 Torr. After reacting for 30 min, single-crystalline Au NSs were obtained on an FTO substrate. As shown in Figure 1, we could synthesize single-crystalline Au nanoplates and Au NPs. The morphology can be controlled by adjusting the distance between the AuCl precursor and the FTO substrate. When the substrate was placed 15–20 mm away from the AuCl, only Au NPs were grown on the substrate. When the substrate was closer (3–5 mm) to the precursor, Au nanoplates were obtained on the substrate. The previous literature suggested that the flux of the precursor can affect the morphology of noble metal NSs during vapor-phase growth [35]. In this experiment, the morphology of the Au NSs can also be controlled by the flux of the AuCl.
Au commonly exists in nature as Au0, Au1+, and Au3+ [44]. Previously, our group evaporated a Au slug (Au0) at temperatures greater than 1000 °C and successfully synthesized several kinds of Au NSs [40]. Wang et al. employed HAuCl4, in which Au is in a +3 oxidation state, as a starting material for the vapor-phase synthesis of Au NSs [45]. Although the use of HAuCl4 lowered the reaction temperature to ~500 °C, the temperature was still too high for the synthesis of Au NSs on an FTO substrate. To synthesize Au NSs on an FTO substrate in a vapor phase, we used AuCl as a precursor because the disproportionation reaction of AuCl can occur under mild conditions [46,47,48]. As a result, single-crystalline Au NPs and nanoplates were successfully synthesized at temperatures below 200 °C.
To investigate whether AuCl disproportionated to produce metallic Au (Au0) during the experiment, we analyzed the XPS spectra of the substrates after chemically reacting in the experimental system. Figure 2 shows the XPS spectra obtained for the substrates placed in or out of the heating zone. Substrate A was positioned approximately 10 mm from the AuCl powder, and substrate B was positioned approximately 250 mm from the precursor (inset of Figure 2). For substrate A, only the binding energy peaks corresponding to metallic Au (Au0) were measured. For substrate B, peaks corresponding to Au3+ and Cl were also observed [49,50]. The XPS results suggest that AuCl can supply Au atoms to substrate A by the disproportionation reaction of AuCl (3AuCl → 2Au + AuCl3) [38,51]. The resultant 2 Au atoms (Au0) were deposited on the FTO substrate immediately after the disproportionation reaction occurred because the reaction temperature of this synthetic method was below 200 °C. The remaining AuCl3 vapor was carried by the carrier gas flow and condensed on substrate B. This growth mechanism indicates that the amount of Au0 can be varied by changing the substrate location and the reaction temperature. Therefore, we could selectively synthesize Au NPs and nanoplates by adjusting the substrate location, and we could control the size of the NPs by changing the reaction temperature.
Figure 3a shows SEM images of the Au NPs grown on FTO substrates. The as-synthesized Au NPs were well dispersed on the substrates without aggregation. The X-ray diffractogram also suggests that crystalline Au NSs were synthesized on an FTO substrate (Figure S1) [52]. Interestingly, the SEM images show that the size of the Au NPs increased as the reaction temperature increased. Figure 3b is the plot of the average size of the Au NPs versus the reaction temperature. The average size of the Au NPs linearly increased from 23 ± 3.9 nm to 36 ± 4.2 nm, 44 ± 4.7 nm, and 59 ± 5.3 nm as the reaction temperature increased from 120 to 150, 170, and 200 °C, respectively. The linear fit line was determined to be y = 0.457x − 32.90 with an R2 value of 0.998. As the reaction temperature increases, more of the AuCl precursor may be vaporized, and thus, a more concentrated AuCl vapor could be supplied to the substrate, leading to an increase in the Au NP size.
The Au NPs synthesized on an FTO substrate were further investigated by a TEM analysis. First, we obtained a cross-sectional HR-TEM image of a Au NP on an FTO substrate using focused ion beam milling (Figure 4a). The cross-sectional HR-TEM image clearly showed that the Au NP directly interfaced with the FTO substrate without any space. This perfect contact can ensure excellent electron- transfer between the Au NPs and the substrate [18,19]. We also obtained a TEM image of Au NPs that were detached from the substrate after sonication for 30 min (Figure 4b–d). The HR-TEM analysis results suggested that the planes of the polyhedral Au NPs were uniformly enclosed by the Au (111) lattice plane. Moreover, the fast Fourier transformation (FFT) patterns clearly showed the single-crystalline nature of the Au NPs (insets of Figure 4c,d).
Figure 5a shows the SEM image of free-standing Au nanoplates synthesized on an FTO substrate. The Au nanoplates were densely grown on the substrate and have well-defined shapes. The TEM image and selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the nanoplate indicated that there are diffraction pattern originated from 1/3{422} reflection (inner small points in Figure 5b) [53]. The spots are displayed due to the stacking faults parallel to the (111) basal plane of nanoplate. Additionally, the cross-sectional HR-TEM image of the Au nanoplate confirmed that the thickness of the Au nanoplates was measured to be only ~15 nm, which is much thinner than the thickness of previous Au nanoplates (average thickness of 100 nm) synthesized in a vapor phase at high temperature (Figure 5c). The surface planes of the Au nanoplates were arranged by a Au (111) crystal plane, which corresponded to the TEM results of the Au NPs. Because Au (111) is the most stable crystal plane among the Au crystal planes, the Au NSs were faceted with the Au (111) planes during the synthesis. Previously, it was reported that the disproportionation reaction of AuCl can be autocatalyzed on a Au surface [44]. Therefore, the growth of the Au nanoplates could be induced by the autocatalyzed reaction of AuCl under the conditions of a high AuCl vapor flux. During the Au nanoplate synthesis reaction, Au nuclei particles may first form on the substrate. Then, the AuCl vapor collides with the Au nuclei particles and catalyzes the disproportionation of AuCl. Since AuCl disproportionation is more active on the high-energy crystal plane of Au, an enlargement of the Au (111) plane might be favored, and Au nanoplates may be formed. The proposed synthetic method can provide single-crystalline Au NSs without surfactants and allows us to control the morphology and size of the NSs even at a low temperature of 200 °C; therefore, this method may open new routes for the vapor-phase synthesis of noble metal NSs and their applications.
The electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol has been widely studied for the construction of direct methanol fuel cells [11,54,55]. During the past decade, Pt has been commonly employed as a catalytic material for the electrooxidation of methanol [56,57,58]. Although Pt-based catalysts show high catalytic activity for the MOR in acidic media, they often suffer from strong chemisorption of poisoning intermediates during the reaction [59,60]. Au-based catalysts exhibit high activity in alkaline media and are free from the formation of poisoning intermediates during the electrooxidation of methanol [9,44,61,62]. Therefore, many studies have reported using Au NSs as catalysts for the electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol [10,11,63,64,65]. Since the Au NPs prepared in this study have the properties necessary to function as an electrocatalyst for the MOR, such as clean surfaces, a direct interface with an FTO substrate, and single crystallinity, we examined the electrocatalytic activity of the Au NPs for the MOR. By employing vapor-phase-grown Au NPs on an FTO substrate as a catalytic electrode, CV curves for the MOR were measured in a 0.1 M KOH + 1.5 M methanol solution. For comparison, we also prepared a catalytic electrode by dropwise evaporation of commercial colloidal Au NPs on an FTO substrate. Since the size of the Au NPs can significantly influence the catalytic activity, two kinds of Au NPs were prepared with the same average diameter of 20 nm. Additionally, a bare FTO substrate was tested as an electrode to verify that the bare FTO substrate shows no electrocatalytic activity for the MOR (Figure S2). The red line in Figure 6a is the CV curve for the MOR with the vapor-phase-grown Au NPs, and the blue line is the CV curve for the commercial Au NPs. The inset is a magnified image of the CV curve of the commercial Au NPs. The oxidation current density and onset potential for the MOR clearly indicate the outstanding electrocatalytic activity of the vapor-phase-grown Au NPs. The oxidation current density of the Au NPs was calculated by dividing the measured currents by the electrochemical active surface areas (ECSAs) of the electrodes [66]. The ECSAs of the vapor-phase grown and commercial Au NPs were obtained from the CV curves in a 0.1 M KOH solution (Figure S3). It is noteworthy that the oxidation current density of the vapor-phase-grown Au NPs (14.65 mA/cm2) was 33 times higher than that of the commercial Au NPs (0.44 mA/cm2). Furthermore, the vapor-phase-grown Au NPs showed an approximately 0.15 V lower onset potential than the commercial Au NPs, meaning that the oxidation of methanol started earlier when the vapor-phase-grown Au NPs were used.
After the CV measurements, SEM images of catalytic electrodes were obtained (Figure 6b,c). The vapor-phase-grown Au NPs were well dispersed on an FTO substrate, but the commercial Au NPs were slightly aggregated. The agglomeration would contribute to the low electrocatalytic activity of the commercial Au NPs [67,68]. To the best of our knowledge, the oxidation current density of 14.65 mA/cm2 obtained in this experiment is the highest value among those measured in the same media using Au-based electrodes, including self-supported nanoporous Au film electrodes [11], polycrystalline Au electrodes [13], and nanoporous Au electrodes prepared by dealloying Au-Ag [10]. The excellent catalytic activity of the Au NPs can be attributed to the combination of their clean surfaces [21,728, facets well-arranged by the Au (111) plane [69,70], and intimate contact with the FTO substrate. Consequently, we expect that this Au NS-based electrode can be a versatile tool for various catalytic and electrochemical applications.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we report the low-temperature vapor-phase synthesis of single-crystalline Au NSs on a conductive substrate and their electrocatalytic application to the MOR. The use of AuCl as a precursor enabled the synthesis of Au NSs at temperatures below 200 °C through the disproportionation reaction of AuCl. In this method, Au nanoplates and Au NPs can be selectively synthesized by adjusting the location of the substrate. Moreover, the size of the Au NPs is controllable by varying the reaction temperature. The SEM, TEM, and XPS analyses elucidated the growth mechanism of the Au NSs in the low-temperature vapor phase. Surprisingly, the vapor-phase-grown Au NPs had an oxidation current density of 14.65 mA/cm2 for the electrocatalytic MOR. This value is 33 times higher than that obtained from commercial Au NPs. Additionally, the vapor-phase-grown Au NPs showed a 0.15 V lower onset potential than the commercial Au NPs, which indicates the exceptional catalytic performance of the vapor-phase-grown Au NP electrode. We anticipate that this new synthetic approach could expand vapor-phase synthesis of noble metal NSs and their applications to a variety of electrocatalytic or electrochemical reactions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/4/595/s1; Figure S1: XRD spectrum of the Au NPs synthesized on an FTO substrate, Figure S2: CV curves obtained with a bare FTO substrate in the absence (blue) and presence (red) of 1.5 M methanol in 0.1 M KOH (scan rate = 50 mV/s), Figure S3: CV curves obtained with vapor-phase-grown Au NP electrodes (red) and commercial Au NP electrode (blue) in a solution of 0.1 M KOH (scan rate = 50 mV/s).

Author Contributions

S.Y. takes the lead through the whole experiments. K.P. performed the CV measurements. B.K. and T.K. conceived of the idea and supervised the project. S.Y. and T.K. mainly wrote the manuscript and all authors provided feedback and helped the completion of the final manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (NRF-2019R1C1C1006867), the Center for BioNano Health-Guard funded by the MSIT of Korea as Global Frontier Project (H-GUARD_2013M3A6B2078950), the Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF funded by MSIT of Korea (NRF-2018M3A9E2022821), the First-Mover Program for Accelerating Disruptive Technology Development through the NRF funded by MSIT of Korea (NRF-2018M3C1B9069834), and KRIBB initiative Research Program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Love, J.C.; Estroff, L.A.; Kriebel, J.K.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Whitesides, G.M. Self-assembled monolayers of thiolates on metals as a form of nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1103–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cantale, V.; Simeone, F.C.; Gambari, R.; Rampi, M.A. Gold nano-islands on FTO as plasmonic nanostructures for biosensors. Sens. Actuator B 2011, 152, 206–213. [Google Scholar]
  3. Diaz-Morales, O.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; de Munck, C.; Koper, M.T. Electrochemical water splitting by gold: Evidence for an oxide decomposition mechanism. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 2334–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Harbi, E.; Aziz, M.; Oyama, M.; El-Naggar, A.; AlZayed, N.; Wojciechowski, A.; Kityk, I. Gold nanoparticles deposited on fluorine-doped tin oxide substrates as materials for laser operated optoelectronic devices. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2013, 24, 2422–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Talley, C.E.; Jackson, J.B.; Oubre, C.; Grady, N.K.; Hollars, C.W.; Lane, S.M.; Huser, T.R.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N.J. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering from individual Au nanoparticles and nanoparticle dimer substrates. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1569–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rodriguez, P.; Kwon, Y.; Koper, M.T. The promoting effect of adsorbed carbon monoxide on the oxidation of alcohols on a gold catalyst. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, J.; Lou, Y.; Maye, M.M.; Zhong, C.-J.; Hepel, M. An EQCN assessment of electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol at nanostructured Au–Pt alloy nanoparticles. Electrochem. Commun. 2001, 3, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hernández, J.; Solla-Gullón, J.; Herrero, E.; Aldaz, A.; Feliu, J.M. Methanol oxidation on gold nanoparticles in alkaline media: Unusual electrocatalytic activity. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 52, 1662–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Borkowska, Z.; Tymosiak-Zielinska, A.; Nowakowski, R. High catalytic activity of chemically activated gold electrodes towards electro-oxidation of methanol. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 2613–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Ma, H.; Ding, Y. Nanostructured porous gold for methanol electro-oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 10382–10388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, C.; Jia, F.; Ai, Z.; Zhang, L. Direct oxidation of methanol on self-supported nanoporous gold film electrodes with high catalytic activity and stability. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 6065–6067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yan, S.; Zhang, S.; Lin, Y.; Liu, G. Electrocatalytic performance of gold nanoparticles supported on activated carbon for methanol oxidation in alkaline solution. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 6986–6993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jena, B.K.; Raj, C.R. Synthesis of flower-like gold nanoparticles and their electrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of methanol and the reduction of oxygen. Langmuir 2007, 23, 4064–4070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Negishi, Y.; Nakazaki, T.; Malola, S.; Takano, S.; Niihori, Y.; Kurashige, W.; Yamazoe, S.; Tsukuda, T.; Häkkinen, H. A critical size for emergence of nonbulk electronic and geometric structures in dodecanethiolate-protected Au clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1206–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tang, Y.; Cheng, W. Nanoparticle-modified electrode with size-and shape-dependent electrocatalytic activities. Langmuir 2013, 29, 3125–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, J.; Gong, J.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, J.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lu, X.; Tang, Z. Shape-dependent electrocatalytic activity of monodispersed gold nanocrystals toward glucose oxidation. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6894–6896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, M.; Lei, B.; Ren, F.; Chen, P.; Shen, Y.; Guan, B.; Du, Y.; Li, T.; Liu, M. Branched Au nanostructures enriched with a uniform facet: Facile synthesis and catalytic performances. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Park, J.Y.; Renzas, J.; Hsu, B.B.; Somorjai, G.A. Interfacial and chemical properties of Pt/TiO2, Pd/TiO2, and Pt/GaN catalytic nanodiodes influencing hot electron flow. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 15331–15336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, J.Y.; Renzas, J.; Contreras, A.; Somorjai, G.A. The genesis and importance of oxide–metal interface controlled heterogeneous catalysis; the catalytic nanodiode. Top. Catal. 2007, 46, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Donoeva, B.G.; Ovoshchnikov, D.S.; Golovko, V.B. Establishing a Au nanoparticle size effect in the oxidation of cyclohexene using gradually changing Au catalysts. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2986–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elliott, E.W., III; Glover, R.D.; Hutchison, J.E. Removal of thiol ligands from surface-confined nanoparticles without particle growth or desorption. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3050–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Muglali, M.I.; Bashir, A.; Rohwerder, M. A study on oxygen reduction inhibition at pyridine-terminated self assembled monolayer modified Au(111) electrodes. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 2010, 207, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Niu, Z.; Li, Y. Removal and Utilization of Capping Agents in Nanocatalysis. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aliaga, C.; Park, J.Y.; Yamada, Y.; Lee, H.S.; Tsung, C.-K.; Yang, P.; Somorjai, G.A. Sum Frequency Generation and Catalytic Reaction Studies of the Removal of Organic Capping Agents from Pt Nanoparticles by UV–Ozone Treatment. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 6150–6155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, Y.; Fernandes, A.A.; Erbe, A. Control of shape and surface crystallography of gold nanocrystals for electrochemical applications. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 113, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grzelczak, M.; Pérez-Juste, J.; Mulvaney, P.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Shape control in gold nanoparticle synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nikoobakht, B.; El-Sayed, M.A. Preparation and Growth Mechanism of Gold Nanorods (NRs) Using Seed-Mediated Growth Method. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 1957–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cargnello, M.; Chen, C.; Diroll, B.T.; Doan-Nguyen, V.V.T.; Gorte, R.J.; Murray, C.B. Efficient Removal of Organic Ligands from Supported Nanocrystals by Fast Thermal Annealing Enables Catalytic Studies on Well-Defined Active Phases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6906–6911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ansar, S.M.; Ameer, F.S.; Hu, W.; Zou, S.; Pittman, C.U.; Zhang, D. Removal of Molecular Adsorbates on Gold Nanoparticles Using Sodium Borohydride in Water. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1226–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiao, X.; Pan, S.; Jang, J.S.; Fan, F.-R.F.; Bard, A.J. Single Nanoparticle Electrocatalysis: Effect of Monolayers on Particle and Electrode on Electron Transfer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 14978–14982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Horibe, T.; Zhang, J.; Oyama, M. Effects of Capping Reagents on the Electron Transfer Reactions on Gold Nanoparticle-Attached Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes. Electroanalysis 2007, 19, 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakaso, K.; Han, B.; Ahn, K.H.; Choi, M.; Okuyama, K. Synthesis of non-agglomerated nanoparticles by an electrospray assisted chemical vapor deposition (ES-CVD) method. J. Aerosol Sci. 2003, 34, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Goodman, D.W. Model Studies in Catalysis Using Surface Science Probes. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gong, J. Structure and Surface Chemistry of Gold-Based Model Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2987–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yoo, Y.; Lee, H.; Lee, H.; Lee, M.; Yang, S.; Hwang, A.; Kim, S.-I.; Park, J.Y.; Choo, J.; Kang, T.; et al. Surfactant-Free Vapor-Phase Synthesis of Single-Crystalline Gold Nanoplates for Optimally Bioactive Surfaces. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 8747–8756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Okumura, M.; Nakamura, S.; Tsubota, S.; Nakamura, T.; Azuma, M.; Haruta, M. Chemical vapor deposition of gold on Al2O3, SiO2, and TiO2 for the oxidation of CO and of H2. Catal. Lett. 1998, 51, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jen Cho, S.; Suri, A.; Mei, X.; Ouyang, J. In situ deposition of gold nanostructures with well-defined shapes on unfunctionalized reduced graphene oxide through chemical reduction of a dry gold precursor with ethylene glycol vapor. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 1201–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Y.; Tian, X.; Zeng, W.; Zhu, X.; Hu, H.; Duan, H. Vapor-phase preparation of gold nanocrystals by chloroauric acid pyrolysis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 439, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kang, T.; Min Yoo, S.; Kang, M.; Lee, H.; Kim, H.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, B. Single-step multiplex detection of toxic metal ions by Au nanowires-on-chip sensor using reporter elimination. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 3077–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yoo, Y.; Seo, K.; Han, S.; Varadwaj, K.S.K.; Kim, H.Y.; Ryu, J.H.; Lee, H.M.; Ahn, J.P.; Ihee, H.; Kim, B. Steering Epitaxial Alignment of Au, Pd, and AuPd Nanowire Arrays by Atom Flux Change. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Makela, M.; Hatanpaa, T.; Mizohata, K.; Raisanen, J.; Ritala, M.; Leskela, M. Thermal Atomic Layer Deposition of Continuous and Highly Conducting Gold Thin Films. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 6130–6136. [Google Scholar]
  42. Makela, M.; Hatanpaa, T.; Ritala, M.; Leskela, M. Potential gold(I) precursors evaluated for atomic layer deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2017, 35, 01B112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Griffiths, M.B.; Koponen, S.E.; Mandia, D.J.; McLeod, J.F.; Coyle, J.P.; Sims, J.J.; Giorgi, J.B.; Sirianni, E.R.; Yap, G.P.; Barry, S.T. Surfactant directed growth of gold metal nanoplates by chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 6116–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gammons, C.H.; Yu, Y.; Williams-Jones, A.E. The disproportionation of gold(I) chloride complexes at 25 to 200 °C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61, 1971–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, X.; Li, Z.; Shang, Z.; Duan, H. Vapor-phase preparation of single-crystalline thin gold microplates using HAuCl4 as the precursor for plasmonic applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 74937–74943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Patnaik, P. Handbook of Inorganic Chemicals; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lu, X.; Tuan, H.Y.; Korgel, B.A.; Xia, Y. Facile synthesis of gold nanoparticles with narrow size distribution by using AuCl or AuBr as the precursor. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1584–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bergamini, G.; Ceroni, P.; Balzani, V.; Gingras, M.; Raimundo, J.-M.; Morandi, V.; Merli, P.G. Synthesis of small gold nanoparticles: Au(i) disproportionation catalyzed by a persulfurated coronene dendrimer. Chem. Commun. 2007, 40, 4167–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hee Shin, D.; Min Kim, J.; Wook Jang, C.; Hwan Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Choi, S.-H. Annealing effects on the characteristics of AuCl3-doped graphene. J. App. Phys. 2013, 113, 064305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, S.M.; Kim, K.K.; Jo, Y.W.; Park, M.H.; Chae, S.J.; Duong, D.L.; Yang, C.W.; Kong, J.; Lee, Y.H. Role of anions in the AuCl3-doping of carbon nanotubes. Acs Nano 2011, 5, 1236–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Parkhomenko, R.; Morozova, B.N.; Zharkova, I.G.; Shubin, V.Y.; Trubin, S.; Kriventsov, V.; Kuchumov, M.B.; Koretskaya, P.T.; Igumenov, I. Deposition of Au Thin Films and Nanoparticles by MOCVD. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2012, 18, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ali Umar, A.; Oyama, M. Formation of Gold Nanoplates on Indium Tin Oxide Surface: Two-dimensional Crystal Growth from Gold Nanoseed Particles in the Presence of Poly (vinylpyrrolidone). Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 818–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Germain, V.; Li, J.; Ingert, D.; Wang, Z.L.; Pileni, M.P. Stacking Faults in Formation of Silver Nanodisks. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 8712–8720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kwon, T.; Jun, M.; Kim, H.Y.; Oh, A.; Park, J.; Baik, H.; Joo, S.H.; Lee, K. Vertex-Reinforced PtCuCo Ternary Nanoframes as Efficient and Stable Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction and the Methanol Oxidation Reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, H.; Yang, S.; Vajtai, R.; Wang, X.; Ajayan, P.M. Pt-decorated 3D architectures built from graphene and graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets as efficient methanol oxidation catalysts. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 5160–5165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yang, L.; Yang, W.; Cai, Q. Well-Dispersed PtAu Nanoparticles Loaded into Anodic Titania Nanotubes: A High Antipoison and Stable Catalyst System for Methanol Oxidation in Alkaline Media. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 16613–16617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, J.; Zhang, X.-B.; Wang, Z.-L.; Wang, L.-M.; Xing, W.; Liu, X. One-step and rapid synthesis of “clean” and monodisperse dendritic Pt nanoparticles and their high performance toward methanol oxidation and p-nitrophenol reduction. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 1549–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hsu, C.-H.; Liao, H.-Y.; Wu, Y.-F.; Kuo, P.-L. Benzylamine-Assisted Noncovalent Exfoliation of Graphite-Protecting Pt Nanoparticles Applied as Catalyst for Methanol Oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 2169–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Siyu, H.; Ying, C. Electrochemical Catalytic Oxidation Performance of a Nanoporous Gold Electrode. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2015, 44, 2156–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kita, H.; Ye, S.; Sugimura, K. Effects of adsorbed CO on the electrode reactions at a platinum electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1991, 297, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kwon, Y.; Lai, S.C.; Rodriguez, P.; Koper, M.T. Electrocatalytic oxidation of alcohols on gold in alkaline media: Base or gold catalysis? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6914–6917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ketchie, W.C.; Fang, Y.-L.; Wong, M.S.; Murayama, M.; Davis, R.J. Influence of gold particle size on the aqueous-phase oxidation of carbon monoxide and glycerol. J. Catal. 2007, 250, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zope, B.N.; Hibbitts, D.D.; Neurock, M.; Davis, R.J. Reactivity of the Gold/Water Interface during Selective Oxidation Catalysis. Science 2010, 330, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pedireddy, S.; Lee, H.K.; Tjiu, W.W.; Phang, I.Y.; Tan, H.R.; Chua, S.Q.; Troadec, C.; Ling, X.Y. One-step synthesis of zero-dimensional hollow nanoporous gold nanoparticles with enhanced methanol electrooxidation performance. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nagaraju, D.; Lakshminarayanan, V. Electrochemically grown mesoporous gold film as high surface area material for electro-oxidation of alcohol in alkaline medium. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 14922–14926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Trasatti, S.; Petrii, O. Real surface area measurements in electrochemistry. Pure Appl. Chem. 1991, 63, 711–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Daniel, M.-C.; Astruc, D. Gold nanoparticles: Assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lou, Y.; Maye, M.M.; Han, L.; Luo, J.; Zhong, C.-J. Gold–platinum alloy nanoparticle assembly as catalyst for methanol electrooxidation. Chem. Commun. 2001, 473–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jebaraj, A.J.J.; de Godoi, D.R.M.; Scherson, D.A. Pronounced Surface Sensitivity of Hydroxylamine Oxidation on Gold Single-Crystal Electrodes in Acidic and Neutral Aqueous Solutions. Acs Catal. 2012, 2, 911–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, Y.; Schuhmann, W.; Hassel, A.W. Electrocatalysis on gold nanostructures: Is the {1 1 0} facet more active than the {1 1 1} facet? Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 2036–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the vapor-phase synthesis of Au nanostructures (NSs) at low temperature. When the substrate was placed 15–20 mm away from AuCl, Au NPs were grown on the substrate. When the substrate was placed 3–5 mm away from AuCl, Au nanoplates were obtained on the substrate.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the vapor-phase synthesis of Au nanostructures (NSs) at low temperature. When the substrate was placed 15–20 mm away from AuCl, Au NPs were grown on the substrate. When the substrate was placed 3–5 mm away from AuCl, Au nanoplates were obtained on the substrate.
Nanomaterials 09 00595 g001
Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra obtained for two substrates placed in or out of the heating zone. Substrate A was positioned approximately 10 mm away from AuCl, and substrate B was positioned approximately 250 mm away from the precursor (inset). The binding energy peaks corresponding to Au0 were measured on substrate A (magenta). Binding energy peaks corresponding to Au3+ and Cl were measured on substrate B (blue).
Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra obtained for two substrates placed in or out of the heating zone. Substrate A was positioned approximately 10 mm away from AuCl, and substrate B was positioned approximately 250 mm away from the precursor (inset). The binding energy peaks corresponding to Au0 were measured on substrate A (magenta). Binding energy peaks corresponding to Au3+ and Cl were measured on substrate B (blue).
Nanomaterials 09 00595 g002
Figure 3. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the Au nanoparticles (NPs) grown on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates. The size of the Au NPs increased as the reaction temperature increased from 120 to 200 °C. Scale bar is 200 nm. (b) Plot of the average size of the Au NPs versus the reaction temperature. The average size of the Au NPs increased from 23 ± 3.9 nm to 36 ± 4.2 nm, 44 ± 4.7 nm, and 59 ± 5.3 nm with the increase in the reaction temperature. The linear fit line is also shown (blue). Data represent the mean plus standard deviation from twenty measurements.
Figure 3. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the Au nanoparticles (NPs) grown on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates. The size of the Au NPs increased as the reaction temperature increased from 120 to 200 °C. Scale bar is 200 nm. (b) Plot of the average size of the Au NPs versus the reaction temperature. The average size of the Au NPs increased from 23 ± 3.9 nm to 36 ± 4.2 nm, 44 ± 4.7 nm, and 59 ± 5.3 nm with the increase in the reaction temperature. The linear fit line is also shown (blue). Data represent the mean plus standard deviation from twenty measurements.
Nanomaterials 09 00595 g003
Figure 4. (a) Cross-sectional high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) image of Au NPs on an FTO substrate. The Au NPs directly interfaced with the FTO substrate without any space; (b) TEM image of Au NPs detached from the FTO substrate; (c,d) HR-TEM images of Au NPs obtained from the (c) orange and (d) blue boxes of (b). Insets are fast Fourier transformation (FFT) patterns of the Au NPs.
Figure 4. (a) Cross-sectional high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) image of Au NPs on an FTO substrate. The Au NPs directly interfaced with the FTO substrate without any space; (b) TEM image of Au NPs detached from the FTO substrate; (c,d) HR-TEM images of Au NPs obtained from the (c) orange and (d) blue boxes of (b). Insets are fast Fourier transformation (FFT) patterns of the Au NPs.
Nanomaterials 09 00595 g004
Figure 5. (a) SEM image of free-standing Au nanoplates synthesized on an FTO substrate. The inset is a magnified SEM image of the Au nanoplates; (b) TEM image and selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (inset) of the Au nanoparticles; and (c) cross-sectional HR-TEM image of the Au nanoplate.
Figure 5. (a) SEM image of free-standing Au nanoplates synthesized on an FTO substrate. The inset is a magnified SEM image of the Au nanoplates; (b) TEM image and selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (inset) of the Au nanoparticles; and (c) cross-sectional HR-TEM image of the Au nanoplate.
Nanomaterials 09 00595 g005
Figure 6. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves obtained with vapor-phase-grown Au NP electrodes (red) and commercial Au NP electrodes (blue) in a solution of 0.1 M KOH + 1.5 M methanol (scan rate = 50 mV/s). Inset is the magnified CV curve for commercial Au NPs; (b,c) SEM images of (b) vapor-phase-grown Au NP electrodes and (c) commercial Au NP electrodes after the CV measurements. The vapor-phase-grown Au NPs were well dispersed on the FTO substrate, but the commercial Au NPs were slightly aggregated.
Figure 6. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves obtained with vapor-phase-grown Au NP electrodes (red) and commercial Au NP electrodes (blue) in a solution of 0.1 M KOH + 1.5 M methanol (scan rate = 50 mV/s). Inset is the magnified CV curve for commercial Au NPs; (b,c) SEM images of (b) vapor-phase-grown Au NP electrodes and (c) commercial Au NP electrodes after the CV measurements. The vapor-phase-grown Au NPs were well dispersed on the FTO substrate, but the commercial Au NPs were slightly aggregated.
Nanomaterials 09 00595 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, S.; Park, K.; Kim, B.; Kang, T. Low-Temperature Vapor-Phase Synthesis of Single-Crystalline Gold Nanostructures: Toward Exceptional Electrocatalytic Activity for Methanol Oxidation Reaction. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040595

AMA Style

Yang S, Park K, Kim B, Kang T. Low-Temperature Vapor-Phase Synthesis of Single-Crystalline Gold Nanostructures: Toward Exceptional Electrocatalytic Activity for Methanol Oxidation Reaction. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(4):595. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Siyeong, Kkotchorong Park, Bongsoo Kim, and Taejoon Kang. 2019. "Low-Temperature Vapor-Phase Synthesis of Single-Crystalline Gold Nanostructures: Toward Exceptional Electrocatalytic Activity for Methanol Oxidation Reaction" Nanomaterials 9, no. 4: 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040595

APA Style

Yang, S., Park, K., Kim, B., & Kang, T. (2019). Low-Temperature Vapor-Phase Synthesis of Single-Crystalline Gold Nanostructures: Toward Exceptional Electrocatalytic Activity for Methanol Oxidation Reaction. Nanomaterials, 9(4), 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040595

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop