Next Article in Journal
RETRACTED: Amelioration of Experimentally Induced Arthritis by Reducing Reactive Oxygen Species Production through the Intra-Articular Injection of Water-Soluble Fullerenol
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Photovoltaic Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells Using Plasmonic Au@Pt@Au Core-Shell Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Engineering the Dimensional Interface of BiVO4-2D Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) Nanocomposite for Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Facile Synthesis and Optical Properties of CsPbX3/ZIF-8 Composites for Wide-Color-Gamut Display
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MAPbI3 Incorporated with Carboxyl Group Chelated Titania for Planar Perovskite Solar Cells in Low-Temperature Process

1
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(6), 908; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060908
Submission received: 28 May 2019 / Revised: 14 June 2019 / Accepted: 18 June 2019 / Published: 23 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Applications of Nanomaterials Based on Perovskites)

Abstract

:
Low-temperature, solution-processed, highly efficient hybrid organic/inorganic perovskite planar heterojunction solar cells were fabricated by incorporating reactive crystalline titania (h-TAc) into MAPbI3 layers. The h-TAc was prepared by the sol-gel reaction at low temperature followed by solvothermal treatment. The photoelectrical properties of the solar cells with h-TAc were analyzed. The incorporation with 0.85-wt% h-TAc showed the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE, 15.9%), increasing 69% compared to the pristine cell. The enhancement arose from large-grained microstructures, leading to a low rate of charge recombination. The carboxyl groups chelated on the surface of h-TAc revealed a strong attraction to lead ions, which are significantly helpful to MAPbI3 crystal growth.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Owing to their promising advantages such as low exciton binding energy, high charge carrier mobility [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], high absorption coefficient [8,9], and large charge carrier diffusion length [2,10,11], hybrid organic/inorganic perovskites have recently emerged as outstanding materials in photovoltaic technology [12,13,14]. Hence, the development of perovskite solar cells (PVSCs) with high power conversion efficiency (PCE) and cost-effectiveness is a challenging task that has become a very popular research area in the past few years [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. The maximum PCE of PVSCs in 2019 reached 24.2%, as confirmed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory [28]. In general, the quality of perovskite active layer with respect to morphology and crystallization strongly affects the performance of the PVSCs [1,29,30,31]. Significant progress has been made in the development of perovskite thin film quality, especially in preparation methods such as sequential deposition [18,32,33], dual source evaporation [29,34], solvent engineering [17], additive enhancement [35,36,37] and vapor-assisted solution processing [34] to achieve a high PCE. However, constructing highly crystallized perovskite thin film without defects is the key to obtaining a typical perovskite solar cell with satisfactory photovoltaic properties.
A well-defined grain structure, full surface coverage, and small surface roughness are essential aspects for high quality perovskite layers. Some efforts have been made to develop a new processing method for the preparation of crystalline perovskite thin films such as fast deposition—crystallization in which extra solvent has been dripped on the film during the high speed spin-coating process [38], solvent annealing by using N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) [39], rapid crystallization by solvent-solvent extraction [40], and induced crystallization by room-temperature mixed solvent vapor annealing [1]. Among these methods, solvent annealing and mixed solvent vapor annealing methods resulted in high PCE, indicating that solvent plays an important role in producing highly crystalline perovskite layer.
In our recent reports [41,42], highly reactive anatase TiO2 chelated by acetic acid (called as TAc) and the TAc treated by the solvothermal method (called as h-TAc) were incorporated into mesoporous TiO2 photoanodes in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), resulted in improved PCE. It was proven that the TAc/h-TAc increases the dye adsorption and decreases the charge transfer resistance, thereby improving the efficiency of DSSCs. In this study, we incorporated h-TAc into the perovskite active layer to improve significantly the PCE of the PVSCs. The h-TAc did not work as a mesoporous scaffold but reduced the electron/hole recombination in the perovskite layer. We have analyzed the effect of h-TAc on PVSCs and investigated the potential mechanism for h-TAc enhancement.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Indium Tin Oxide (ITO)-coated glass substrates (7 Ω sq−1) and Spiro-OMeTAD were purchased from Ruilong Inc. (Taiwan). PbI2, lithium-bis(trifluoromethyl-sulphonyl) imide (Li-TFSI) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Hydriodic acid and 4-tert-butylpyridine (tBP) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Shanghai, China). Methylamine and PbI2 (99%) were purchased from ACROS chemicals (Fukuoka, Japan). P25, ST-01 and 18NR-T were obtained commercially from Evonik (Essen, Germany), Ishihara Sangyou (Osaka, Japan) and Dyesol (Queanbeyan, Australia), respectively. All chemicals were used as received. CH3N3H3I was synthesized by using the reported procedures [38] and the synthetic procedures were given in the Supporting Information.

2.2. MAPbI3 Solution

The h-TAc was prepared by the sol-gel method [43], followed by the solvothermal method, as reported previously [42] (see Supporting Information). CH3NH3I (0.1616 g) and PbI2 (0.467 g) were mixed in DMF and stirred for one day, resulting in a yellow solution of MAPbI3. As-prepared MAPbI3 solution (1 g) was mixed with various h-TAc contents (0, 0.75, 0.85 and 1.00 wt%). For comparison, MAPbI3 solution with other TiO2 of 0.85 wt% (P25, ST-01 or 18NR-T, respectively) was also prepared in the same manner.

2.3. Device Fabrication

Typically, the ITO glass was etched with zinc powder and diluted HCl (6 M), then cleaned with detergent, ethanol and acetone. ZnO solution was synthesized by hydrolysis and condensation of zinc acetate dehydrate (>98%, ACS) by potassium hydroxide in methanol using a Zn2+:OH ratio of 1:1.72 according to the reported procedure [44,45]. The ZnO solution was deposited on the etched ITO glass and spin-coated for 30 s at 3000 rpm followed by annealing at 100 °C for 10 min. The coating was repeated for a total of two layers to complete a dense layer. Forty L of MAPbI3 solution was dropped on the ZnO-coated glass and then spin-coated for 30 s at 5000 rpm in a nitrogen-purged glove box during the end of last 5 s; 105 L of toluene was dropped as anti-solvent and then annealed at 105 °C for 5 min to form a dark brown and glossy active layer. Spiro-OMeTAD (80 mg), 4-tert-butylpyridine (28.5 μL), and A 520 mg mL−1 Li-TFSI (17.5 μL) in acetronitrile were mixed in 1 mL of chlorobenzene. Afterwards, 20 μL of the solution was added dropwise on the MAPbI3 layer at 2000 rpm for 30 s. Finally, a Ag electrode was thermally deposited on the device through a shadow mask to define the effective active area of the devices (0.04 cm2).

2.4. Measurements and Characterization

The particle size distribution of the h-TAc was determined using a dynamic light scattering analyzer (NanoPlus, Micromeritics). The crystalline phase of the h-TAc and MAPbI3 was characterized through X-ray diffraction (XRD) using an X-ray diffractometer (Miniflex II, Rigaku) and Cu K radiation. The morphology of the device was examined using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-6700F, JEOL). The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) characteristics were measured under irradiation of 100 mW cm−2 using a solar simulator (MFS-PV, Hong-Ming Technology) equipped with a source meter (Keithley 2400, Keithley Instruments). Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were measured over the frequency range of 50–100 kHz with a potential perturbation of 10 mV using an electrochemical workstation (Zennium, Zahner). The absorption and emission spectra of ITO glass coated with ZnO and MAPbI3 were determined using a UV-Vis spectrometer (V770, Jasco) and a fluorescence spectrometer (LS-55, Perkin Elmer), respectively. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of MAPbI3 layers were measured using fluorescence spectrophotometer (LS-55/45, PerkinElmer). The surface modification of TiO2 was examined using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Spectrum One, PerkinElmer). For lead absorption analysis, 6 mg of TiO2 (h-TAc, P25, ST-01 and 18NR-T) were coated onto the glass followed by annealing at 100 °C for 1 h. Then, the TiO2 samples were immersed in a solution of PbI2 in DMF (10 mg/mL). After 5 min of lead adsorption, the samples were dried at room temperature for 10 min. Then, the sample was immersed in nitric acid about 10 min to desorb the lead ions. The lead ions were detected from the solutions for different kinds of TiO2 using an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, OPtiMA 5100DV, Perkim Elmer).

3. Results and Discussion

The h-TAc, reactive anatase TiO2, was first synthesized in a low-temperature process by the sol-gel method and then put into an autoclave to improve its crystallinity. The particle-size distribution of the as-prepared h-TAc was over 55–115 nm, with an average diameter of 82.3 nm (Figure S1, Table S1). The h-TAc was incorporated into the active layer of conventional perovskite solar cells. The structure of a typical perovskite cell fabricated in this study is shown in Figure 1. The thicknesses of the layers for ZnO, MAPbI3, Spiro OMeTAD and evaporated Ag were approximately 52, 277, 348 and 96 nm, respectively. Observing in the cross-sectional image, the perovskite layer incorporated with h-TAc layer was sufficiently compact and dense. Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the morphology of the MAPbI3 layer with various h-TAc contents. The average crystal sizes of MAPbI3 with 0, 0.75, 0.85 and 1.00-wt% h-TAc incorporation, calculated form Figure 2, were 223.2 ± 42.9, 264.9 ± 58.1, 293.5 ± 34.6 and 243.8 ± 53.1 nm, respectively. Regardless of the amount of h-TAc in the perovskite layer, the crystal size became larger compared to the original one. 0.85-wt% h-TAc incorporation leads to a maximum crystal size. The XRD patterns of the perovskite layers with various h-TAc contents exhibited two peaks at 14.1° and 28.4° (Figure 3), corresponding to planes (110) and (220), respectively, of the perovskite structure of MAPbI3 [46]. No peak near 12.7°, attributed to PbI2 [47], was found on the curves. This result implies that h-TAc incorporation neither hinders the formation of crystal nor results in PbI2 separated out from MAPbI3.
The J-V curves of PVSCs with/without h-TAc incorporation are shown in Figure 4. The corresponding characteristic properties are summarized in Table 1. It was found that the PCEs of the cells were increased with increasing h-TAc content, reaching a maximum at 0.85-wt% h-TAc incorporation (PVSC-hTAc85), and decreased with further increases of h-TAc content. The PCE can be enhanced maximally to 69% (from 9.46% to 15.9%) due to the h-TAc incorporation. Observed in Table 1, the enhancement on PCE is mainly attributed to the increase of photocurrent density. Figure S2 shows PL spectra of MAPbI3 with various h-TAc contents under 380-nm excitation. The PL intensity decreased with increasing h-TAc content, but increased with further h-TAc increase. The order follows that of a reciprocal of the PCE. Among the PVSCs, the PVSC-hTAc85 exhibited the lowest PL intensity but the highest PCE. Since fluorescence quenching indicates a decrease of electron-hole recombination [48], the enhancement of PCE caused by the h-TAc incorporation may have resulted from the suppression of charge recombination. Figure 5 shows Nyquist plots of the EIS for the PVSCs. The resistances appearing sequentially from high to low frequency are external (R1), interface (R2) and charge recombination (R3), respectively, summarized in Table 1. With the increase of h-TAc content, R2 increased slightly, whereas R3 increased significantly. The result indicates that the h-TAc incorporation increases the interface resistance but lowers the rate of electron-hole recombination, which is consistent with the observation on PL analysis. According to SEM analysis (Figure 2), the suppression of charge recombination may be ascribed to the increase of crystal size. However, too much h-TAc incorporation and a decrease in crystal size result in a decrease of charge recombination resistance (PVSC-hTAc100). The decrease of the charge recombination rate did not lead to increasing Voc [49], which might result from the coverage increase of perovskite film to inhibit the penetration of hole-transport-material solution [50]. In general, TiO2 particles are coated on the cathode as a mesoporous layer for PVSC fabrication [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. In order to further realize the function of h-TAc on PVSCs, we also fabricated PVSCs with h-TAc as a mesoporous layer (PVSC-meso) instead of incorporating h-TAc into the perovskite layer. The fluorescent suppression was not observed for the PVSC-meso (Figure S3). Moreover, photoelectric properties were not improved using h-TAc as a mesoporous layer (Figure S4 and Table 2). The results indicate that the PCE of PVSCs is enhanced by h-TAc only when h-TAc is incorporated into the perovskite layer but not the mesoporous layer.
The TiO2 incorporation into the perovskite layer was further investigated by replacing h-TAc with different TiO2 (P25, ST01 and 18NR-T). The surface morphologies of different TiO2-incorporated perovskites layers were studied by SEM analysis (Figure S5). It was observed that the average crystal sizes for P25, ST-01 and 18NR-T were 254.2 ± 66.3, 213.9 ± 40.0 and 215.6 ± 37.5, respectively. These crystal sizes were far smaller than those for h-Tac-incorporated PVSCs. Figure S6 shows the PL spectra for the PVSCs with different TiO2 incorporations. The h-Tac-incorporated PVSCs exhibited the lowest emission, whereas 18NR-T-incorporated PVSCs had the highest one. Indeed, the PVSC-hTAc85 revealed superior PCE compared with the other TiO2-incorporated PVSCs (Figure 6 and Table 3). The PVSC-18NRT had very poor photoelectric properties and worse PCE than PVSC-ST01, although both of them had similar perovskite crystal sizes. This result may be because of the formation of void defects in the 18NR-T-incorporated layer (Figure S7) due to solvent problems in slurry. Except for the PVSC-18NRT, all of the TiO2-incorporated PVSCs had close values for the open-circuit voltages (VOC), indicating TiO2 incorporation does not affect Voc. However, the values of JSC were significantly different; the JSC of PVSC-hTAc85 was nearly two times as high as those of PVSC-P25 and PVSC-ST01. The Nyquist plot and the corresponding EIS analysis for the TiO2-incorporated PVSCs are shown in Figure 7 and Table 3, respectively. Compared with other TiO2-incorporated PVSCs, h-TAc-incorporated PVSC had the highest charge combination resistance, which suppressed the recombination of separated electrons and holes. This result led to a large charge current and thus high PCE. We analyzed the adsorption of lead ions on the various kinds of TiO2 through inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy ICP-OES measurement, as shown in Table 4. The h-TAc showed extraordinarily high adsorption of lead ions (51.2 ppm) compared to other TiO2. The crystalline h-TAc possessed carboxylic groups bonded with Bronsted acid sites of titania (Figure S8) [42]. Because the carboxylic groups carried by h-TAc may effectively adsorb lead ions, h-TAc nanoparticles can work seeds or chelating agents to stabilize the growth of perovskite crystals, resulting in larger crystal sizes, lower rates of charge recombination and therefore higher PCE. The effect is similar to the capping used to stabilize perovskite crystals reported in the literature [62]. Although further analysis has not been done, the characteristics for stabilizing the perovskite layer by incorporating h-TAc are in favor of large-scale fabrication.

4. Conclusions

We reported a simple and effective strategy that enabled significant improvement in the PCE of PVSCs by incorporating h-TAc to perovskite layers. The h-TAc incorporation increased the MAPbI3 crystal size and also suppressed the electron-hole recombination. Incorporation of 0.85-wt% h-TAc revealed a maximum improvement, being a 69% enhancement over the PCE. No obvious enhancement on the PCE was observed when the h-TAc was used as the mesoporous layer or replaced by other TiO2 to be incorporated into the perovskite layer. The carboxyl group chelated on h-TAc can effectively adsorb lead ions, leading to increasing crystal growth of MAPbI3, thereby resulting in reducing the rate of charge recombination and increasing the PCE.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/6/908/s1, Synthesis of CH3NH3I, Preparation of h-TAc, Table S1: Particle size distribution of h-TAc, Figure S1: Particle size distribution of h-TAc, Figure S2: PL spectra of MAPbI3 layers incorporated with various h-TAc amounts, Figure S3: PL spectra of PVSC, PVSC-meso, and PVSC-hTAc85, Figure S4: Photocurrent density-voltage curves of PVSC-meso, Figure S5: SEM images of MAPbI3 layers incorporated with various TiO2 of 0.85-wt%: (a,b) h-TAc, (c,d) P25, (e,f) ST01, (g,f) 18NR-T, Figure S6: PL spectra of MAPbI3 layers incorporated with different kinds of TiO2, Figure S7: Cross-sectional SEM image of PVSC-18NRT: Figure S8: FTIR spectra of h-TAc and P25.

Author Contributions

B.-T.L., R.-H.L. conceptualized the work and designed the experiments. P.-S.L. conducted the fabrication and measurement of the cells. H.-T.C. helped the measurement. R.B. wrote the draft manuscript and evaluated the data. B.-T.L. revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Minister of Science and Technology, the Republic of China (MOST 105-2221-E-224-059-MY3).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yu, H.; Liu, X.; Xia, Y.; Dong, Q.; Zhang, K.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Song, B.; Li, Y. Room-temperature mixed-solvent-vapor annealing for high performance perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M.J.P.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L.M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 2013, 342, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lin, Q.; Armin, A.; Nagiri, R.C.R.; Burn, P.L.; Meredith, P. Electro-optics of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2014, 9, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miyata, A.; Mitioglu, A.; Plochocka, P.; Portugall, O.; Wang, J.T.-W.; Stranks, S.D.; Snaith, H.J.; Nicholas, R.J. Direct measurement of the exciton binding energy and effective masses for charge carriers in organic–inorganic tri-halide perovskites. Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Heo, J.H.; Im, S.H.; Noh, J.H.; Mandal, T.N.; Lim, C.-S.; Chang, J.A.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, H.-J.; Sarkar, A.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; et al. Efficient inorganic–organic hybrid heterojunction solar cells containing perovskite compound and polymeric hole conductors. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Edri, E.; Kirmayer, S.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Gartsman, K.; Hodes, G.; Cahen, D. Elucidating the charge carrier separation and working mechanism of CH3NH3PbI3−xClx perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xing, G.; Mathews, N.; Sun, S.; Lim, S.S.; Lam, Y.M.; Grätzel, M.; Mhaisalkar, S.; Sum, T.C. Long-range balanced electron- and hole-transport lengths in organic-inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science 2013, 342, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jodlowski, A.D.; Roldán-Carmona, C.; Grancini, G.; Salado, M.; Ralaiarisoa, M.; Ahmad, S.; Koch, N.; Camacho, L.; de Miguel, G.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Large guanidinium cation mixed with methylammonium in lead iodide perovskites for 19% efficient solar cells. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 972–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. De Wolf, S.; Holovsky, J.; Moon, S.-J.; Löper, P.; Niesen, B.; Ledinsky, M.; Haug, F.-J.; Yum, J.-H.; Ballif, C. Organometallic halide perovskites: Sharp optical absorption edge and its relation to photovoltaic performance. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, H.; Cong, S.; Lou, Y.; Han, L.; Zhao, J.; Sun, Y.; Zou, G. Organic–inorganic hybrid interfacial layer for high-performance planar perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 31746–31751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Seo, J.-Y.; Domanski, K.; Correa-Baena, J.-P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Tress, W.; Abate, A.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: Improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1989–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Y.; Shin, I.; Hwang, I.-W.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Yang, M.-S.; Jung, Y.K.; Jang, J.-W.; Jeong, J.H.; Park, S.H.; et al. Single-crystal-like perovskite for high-performance solar cells using the effective merged annealing method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12382–12390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. D’Innocenzo, V.; Grancini, G.; Alcocer, M.J.P.; Kandada, A.R.S.; Stranks, S.D.; Lee, M.M.; Lanzani, G.; Snaith, H.J.; Petrozza, A. Excitons versus free charges in organo-lead tri-halide perovskites. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Snaith, H.J.; Lilliu, S. The Path to Perovskite on Silicon PV. Sci. Video Protoc. 2018, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, N.; Cheng, C.; Wei, H.; Liu, H.; Li, X.; Li, W.; Wang, L. Enhanced efficiency and stability of inverted perovskite solar cells by interfacial engineering with alkyl bisphosphonic molecules. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 42105–42112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Green, M.A.; Ho-Baillie, A.; Snaith, H.J. The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Yang, W.S.; Ryu, S.; Seok, S.I. Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Burschka, J.; Pellet, N.; Moon, S.-J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grätzel, M. The rise of highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grätzel, M. The light and shade of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, M.M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T.N.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 2012, 338, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lotsch, B.V. New light on an old story: Perovskites go solar. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 635–637. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hodes, G. Perovskite-based solar cells. Science 2013, 342, 317–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, H.; Azimi, H.; Hou, Y.; Ameri, T.; Przybilla, T.; Spiecker, E.; Kraft, M.; Scherf, U.; Brabec, C.J. Improved high-efficiency perovskite planar heterojunction solar cells via incorporation of a polyelectrolyte interlayer. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 5190–5193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chung, I.; Lee, B.; He, J.; Chang, R.P.H.; Kanatzidis, M.G. All-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency. Nature 2012, 485, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Brabec, C.J.; Gowrisanker, S.; Halls, J.J.M.; Laird, D.; Jia, S.; Williams, S.P. Polymer–fullerene bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3839–3856. [Google Scholar]
  27. Docampo, P.; Ball, J.M.; Darwich, M.; Eperon, G.E.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient organometal trihalide perovskite planar-heterojunction solar cells on flexible polymer substrates. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html, Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart (accessed on 22 June 2019).
  29. Liu, M.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature 2013, 501, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eperon, G.E.; Burlakov, V.M.; Docampo, P.; Goriely, A.; Snaith, H.J. Morphological control for high performance, solution-processed planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, W.; Saliba, M.; Moore, D.T.; Pathak, S.K.; Hörantner, M.T.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Alexander-Webber, J.A.; Abate, A.; et al. Ultrasmooth organic–Inorganic perovskite thin-film formation and crystallization for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, W.S.; Noh, J.H.; Jeon, N.J.; Kim, Y.C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S.I. High-performance photovoltaic perovskite layers fabricated through intramolecular exchange. Science 2015, 348, 1234–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, Y.; Islam, A.; Yang, X.; Qin, C.; Liu, J.; Zhang, K.; Peng, W.; Han, L. Retarding the crystallization of PbI2 for highly reproducible planar-structured perovskite solar cells via sequential deposition. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2934–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, Q.; Zhou, H.; Hong, Z.; Luo, S.; Duan, H.-S.; Wang, H.-H.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells via vapor-assisted solution process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 622–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liang, P.W.; Liao, C.Y.; Chueh, C.C.; Zuo, F.; Williams, S.T.; Xin, X.K.; Lin, J.; Jen, A.K.Y. Additive enhanced crystallization of solution-processed perovskite for highly efficient planar-heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3748–3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jeon, Y.-J.; Lee, S.; Kang, R.; Kim, J.-E.; Yeo, J.-S.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, S.-S.; Yun, J.-M.; Kim, D.-Y. Planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells with superior reproducibility. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Chang, C.-Y.; Chu, C.-Y.; Huang, Y.-C.; Huang, C.-W.; Chang, S.-Y.; Chen, C.-A.; Chao, C.-Y.; Su, W.-F. Tuning perovskite morphology by polymer additive for high efficiency solar cell. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 4955–4961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Manda, X.; Fuzhi, H.; Wenchao, H.; Yasmina, D.; Ye, Z.; Joanne, E.; Angus, G.W.; Udo, B.; Yi-Bing, C.; Leone, S. A fast deposition-crystallization procedure for highly efficient lead iodide perovskite thin-film solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9898–9903. [Google Scholar]
  39. Xiao, Z.; Dong, Q.; Bi, C.; Shao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, J. Solvent annealing of perovskite-induced crystal growth for photovoltaic-device efficiency enhancement. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6503–6509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, Y.; Yang, M.; Wu, W.; Vasiliev, A.L.; Zhu, K.; Padture, N.P. Room-temperature crystallization of hybrid-perovskite thin films via solvent-solvent extraction for high-performance solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8178–8184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, B.-T.; Chou, Y.-H.; Liu, J.-Y. Extremely enhanced photovoltaic properties of dye-sensitized solar cells by sintering mesoporous TiO2 photoanodes with crystalline titania chelated by acetic acid. J. Power Sources 2016, 310, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, B.-T.; Liou, J.-Y. High efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells with two-layer mesoporous photoanodes fabricated in a low temperature process. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 261, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, B.T.; Tang, S.J.; Yu, Y.Y.; Lin, S.H. High-refractive-index polymer/inorganic hybrid films containing high TiO2 contents. Colloids Surf. A 2011, 377, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Haase, M.; Weller, H.; Henglein, A. Photochemistry and radiation chemistry of colloidal semiconductors. 23. Electron storage on zinc oxide particles and size quantization. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Beek, W.J.; Wienk, M.M.; Kemerink, M.; Yang, X.; Janssen, R.A. Hybrid zinc oxide conjugated polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 9505–9516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rong, Y.; Tang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhong, X.; Venkatesan, S.; Graham, H.; Patton, M.; Jing, Y.; Guloy, A.M.; Yao, Y. Solvent engineering towards controlled grain growth in perovskite planar heterojunction solar cells. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 10595–10599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shirayama, M.; Kato, M.; Miyadera, T.; Sugita, T.; Fujiseki, T.; Hara, S.; Kadowaki, H.; Murata, D.; Chikamatsu, M.; Fujiwara, H. Degradation mechanism of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite materials upon exposure to humid air. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 115501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, X.; Hu, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, P.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Y. Low-temperature processed ultrathin TiO2 for efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 231, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Huang, R.; Lu, X.; Gao, X.; Shui, L.; Wu, S.; et al. Enhanced performance of CH3NH3PbI3−xClx perovskite solar cells by CH3NH3I modification of TiO2-perovskite layer interface. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Song, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Y.L.; Che, M.; Zhu, L.; Gu, X.Q.; Qiang, Y.H. Morphology modification of perovskite film by a simple post-treatment process in perovskite solar cell. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2017, 217, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guohua, D.; Tengling, Y.; Yulin, Y.; Li, S.; Debin, X.; Junhai, W.; Xiao, F.; Ruiqing, F. SiW12–TiO2 mesoporous layer for enhanced electron-extraction efficiency and conductivity in perovskite solar cells. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 2218–2225. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jeong, I.; Park, Y.H.; Bae, S.; Park, M.; Jeong, H.; Lee, P.; Ko, M.J. Solution-processed ultrathin TiO2 compact layer hybridized with mesoporous TiO2 for high-performance perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 36865–36874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gao, X.-X.; Ge, Q.-Q.; Xue, D.-J.; Ding, J.; Ma, J.-Y.; Chen, Y.-X.; Zhang, B.; Feng, Y.; Wan, L.-J.; Hu, J.-S. Tuning the Fermi-level of TiO2 mesoporous layer by lanthanum doping towards efficient perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 16881–16885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Abdi-Jalebi, M.; Dar, M.I.; Sadhanala, A.; Senanayak, S.P.; Giordano, F.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M.; Friend, R.H. Impact of a mesoporous titania–perovskite interface on the performance of hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 3264–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shaikh, S.F.; Kwon, H.-C.; Yang, W.; Mane, R.S.; Moon, J. Performance enhancement of mesoporous TiO2-based perovskite solar cells by ZnS ultrathin-interfacial modification layer. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 738, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Giordano, F.; Abate, A.; Correa Baena, J.P.; Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Im, S.H.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Hagfeldt, A.; Graetzel, M. Enhanced electronic properties in mesoporous TiO2 via lithium doping for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sun, X.; Xu, J.; Xiao, L.; Chen, J.; Zhang, B.; Yao, J.; Dai, S. Influence of the porosity of the TiO2 film on the performance of the perovskite solar cell. Int. J. Photoenergy 2017, 2017, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dagar, J.; Castro-Hermosa, S.; Gasbarri, M.; Palma, A.L.; Cina, L.; Matteocci, F.; Calabrò, E.; Di Carlo, A.; Brown, T.M. Efficient fully laser-patterned flexible perovskite modules and solar cells based on low-temperature solution-processed SnO2/mesoporous-TiO2 electron transport layers. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 2669–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ravishankar, S.; Gharibzadeh, S.; Roldán-Carmona, C.; Grancini, G.; Lee, Y.; Ralaiarisoa, M.; Asiri, A.M.; Koch, N.; Bisquert, J.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Influence of charge transport layers on open-circuit voltage and hysteresis in perovskite solar cells. Joule 2018, 2, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Misra, R.K.; Aharon, S.; Layani, M.; Magdassi, S.; Etgar, L. A mesoporous-planar hybrid architecture of methylammonium lead iodide perovskite based solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 14423–14429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Y.-Q.; Xu, S.-B.; Deng, J.-G.; Gao, L.-Z. Enhancing the efficiency of planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells via interfacial engineering with 3-aminopropyl trimethoxy silane hydrolysate. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 2017, 4, 170980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, H.; Shi, J.; Zhu, L.; Luo, Y.; Li, D.; Wu, H.; Meng, Q. Polystyrene stabilized perovskite component, grain and microstructure for improved efficiency and stability of planar solar cells. Nano Energy 2018, 43, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cross-sectional SEM image of a typical perovskite cell fabricated in this study.
Figure 1. Cross-sectional SEM image of a typical perovskite cell fabricated in this study.
Nanomaterials 09 00908 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of MAPbI3 layer incorporated with various h-TAc contents: (a,b) 0, (c,d) 75, (e,f) 85 and (g,h) 100 wt%. Scale bar: 100 nm.
Figure 2. SEM images of MAPbI3 layer incorporated with various h-TAc contents: (a,b) 0, (c,d) 75, (e,f) 85 and (g,h) 100 wt%. Scale bar: 100 nm.
Nanomaterials 09 00908 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of MAPbI3 layer incorporated with various h-TAc contents.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of MAPbI3 layer incorporated with various h-TAc contents.
Nanomaterials 09 00908 g003
Figure 4. Photocurrent density-voltage curves of PVSCs incorporating various h-TAc amounts in the active layer.
Figure 4. Photocurrent density-voltage curves of PVSCs incorporating various h-TAc amounts in the active layer.
Nanomaterials 09 00908 g004
Figure 5. Nyquist plots of the electrochemical impedance spectra of PVSCs incorporating various h-TAc amounts in the active layer.
Figure 5. Nyquist plots of the electrochemical impedance spectra of PVSCs incorporating various h-TAc amounts in the active layer.
Nanomaterials 09 00908 g005
Figure 6. Photocurrent density-voltage curves of PVSCs incorporating various kinds of TiO2 in the active layer.
Figure 6. Photocurrent density-voltage curves of PVSCs incorporating various kinds of TiO2 in the active layer.
Nanomaterials 09 00908 g006
Figure 7. Nyquist plots of the electrochemical impedance spectra of PVSCs incorporating various kinds of TiO2 in the active layer.
Figure 7. Nyquist plots of the electrochemical impedance spectra of PVSCs incorporating various kinds of TiO2 in the active layer.
Nanomaterials 09 00908 g007
Table 1. Photovoltaic characteristics of PVSCs incorporating various h-TAc amounts in the active layer.
Table 1. Photovoltaic characteristics of PVSCs incorporating various h-TAc amounts in the active layer.
Samplesh-TAc Content, wt%Average Crystal Size, nmVoc, VJsc, mA cm−2FF, %η, %R1, ΩR2, ΩR3, Ω
PVSC0223.2 ± 42.91.0216.057.89.550.0301.6645.6
PVSC-hTAc750.75264.9 ± 58.10.9916.960.010.041.0355.12689.0
PVSC-hTAc850.85293.5 ± 34.61.0222.6968.615.917.0379.16143.0
PVSC-hTAc1001.00243.8 ± 53.40.9919.552.610.01.7483.72284.0
Table 2. Photovoltaic characteristics of PVSCs using h-TAc as the mesoporous layer.
Table 2. Photovoltaic characteristics of PVSCs using h-TAc as the mesoporous layer.
Samplesthe Mesoporous LayerVoc, VJsc, mA cm−2FF, %η, %R1, ΩR2, ΩR3, Ω
PVSC-mesoh-TAc1.0013.553.37.237.0127.71793.0
Table 3. Photovoltaic characteristics of PVSCs incorporating different TiO2 into the active layer (0.85-wt%).
Table 3. Photovoltaic characteristics of PVSCs incorporating different TiO2 into the active layer (0.85-wt%).
SamplesKinds of TiO2Average Crystal Size, nmVoc, VJsc, mA cm−2FF, %η, %R1, ΩR2, ΩR3, Ω
PVSC-P25P25254.2 ± 66.30.9715.568.810.444.9468.02741.0
PVSC-ST01ST-01213.9 ± 40.00.9715.467.210.122.0517.02566.0
PVSC-18NRT18NR-T215.6 ± 37.50.8610.356.55.02.2404.6590.1
Table 4. Absorption of lead ions on different TiO2 determined by ICP-OES analysis.
Table 4. Absorption of lead ions on different TiO2 determined by ICP-OES analysis.
TiO2 Samplesh-TAcP25ST-0118NR-T
Lead ion, ppm51.227.176.967.15

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, P.-S.; Balamurugan, R.; Liu, B.-T.; Lee, R.-H.; Chou, H.-T. MAPbI3 Incorporated with Carboxyl Group Chelated Titania for Planar Perovskite Solar Cells in Low-Temperature Process. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060908

AMA Style

Li P-S, Balamurugan R, Liu B-T, Lee R-H, Chou H-T. MAPbI3 Incorporated with Carboxyl Group Chelated Titania for Planar Perovskite Solar Cells in Low-Temperature Process. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(6):908. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060908

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Pei-Shan, Rathinam Balamurugan, Bo-Tau Liu, Rong-Ho Lee, and Hsueh-Tao Chou. 2019. "MAPbI3 Incorporated with Carboxyl Group Chelated Titania for Planar Perovskite Solar Cells in Low-Temperature Process" Nanomaterials 9, no. 6: 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060908

APA Style

Li, P. -S., Balamurugan, R., Liu, B. -T., Lee, R. -H., & Chou, H. -T. (2019). MAPbI3 Incorporated with Carboxyl Group Chelated Titania for Planar Perovskite Solar Cells in Low-Temperature Process. Nanomaterials, 9(6), 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060908

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop