Next Article in Journal
Electroanalytical Overview: Electrochemical Sensing Platforms for Food and Drink Safety
Next Article in Special Issue
Smartphone-Based Chemiluminescent Origami µPAD for the Rapid Assessment of Glucose Blood Levels
Previous Article in Journal
Stability Assessment of Four Chimeric Proteins for Human Chagas Disease Immunodiagnosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/bios11080290
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Spectrophotometric Assays for Sensing Tyrosinase Activity and Their Applications

by
Yu-Fan Fan
1,†,
Si-Xing Zhu
2,†,
Fan-Bin Hou
1,
Dong-Fang Zhao
1,
Qiu-Sha Pan
1,
Yan-Wei Xiang
3,
Xing-Kai Qian
1,
Guang-Bo Ge
1 and
Ping Wang
1,*
1
Shanghai Frontiers Science Center for Chinese Medicine Chemical Biology, Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
2
Institute of Science, Technology and Humanities, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
3
School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biosensors 2021, 11(8), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11080290
Submission received: 9 July 2021 / Revised: 17 August 2021 / Accepted: 19 August 2021 / Published: 23 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enzyme-Based Biosensors and Their Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tyrosinase (TYR, E.C. 1.14.18.1), a critical enzyme participating in melanogenesis, catalyzes the first two steps in melanin biosynthesis including the ortho-hydroxylation of L-tyrosine and the oxidation of L-DOPA. Previous pharmacological investigations have revealed that an abnormal level of TYR is tightly associated with various dermatoses, including albinism, age spots, and malignant melanoma. TYR inhibitors can partially block the formation of pigment, which are always used for improving skin tone and treating dermatoses. The practical and reliable assays for monitoring TYR activity levels are very useful for both disease diagnosis and drug discovery. This review comprehensively summarizes structural and enzymatic characteristics, catalytic mechanism and substrate preference of TYR, as well as the recent advances in biochemical assays for sensing TYR activity and their biomedical applications. The design strategies of various TYR substrates, alongside with several lists of all reported biochemical assays for sensing TYR including analytical conditions and kinetic parameters, are presented for the first time. Additionally, the biomedical applications and future perspectives of these optical assays are also highlighted. The information and knowledge presented in this review offer a group of practical and reliable assays and imaging tools for sensing TYR activities in complex biological systems, which strongly facilitates high-throughput screening TYR inhibitors and further investigations on the relevance of TYR to human diseases.

1. Introduction

Tyrosinase (TYR, E.C. 1.14.18.1), a type-3 binuclear copper-containing oxidoreductase, efficiently catalyzes o-hydroxylation of monophenols to diphenols (monophenolase activity) and the oxidation of diphenols to quinones (diphenolase activity), without any additional cofactors (Figure 1) [1,2]. It is ubiquitously distributed in organisms ranging from bacteria to eukaryotes and plays a pivotal role in the enzymatic browning of fruit or fungi, as well as mammalian melanin synthesis [3,4]. In mammals, melanin is exclusively synthesized in melanosomes via complex biochemical reactions (Figure 2), and this endogenous substance is primarily responsible for the pigmentation of retina and skin [5,6]. TYR catalyzes the first two steps in melanin biosynthesis: the o-hydroxylation of L-tyrosine and the oxidation of L-DOPA. Since the remainder of the reaction sequence can proceed spontaneously at physiological pH, the conversion of L-tyrosine to dopaquinone (DQ) has been implicated as a crucial rate-limiting procedure in melanogenesis [7,8]. DQ could spontaneously convert into dopachrome, which gradually decomposes into 5,6-dihydroxyindole (DHI) and 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (DHICA) through a succession of redox reactions [5,9]. Ultimately, these dihydroxyindoles are oxidized to eumelanin. Alongside, in the presence of cysteine or glutathione, DQ is converted to 5-S-cysteinyl dopa or glutothionyl dopa, finally yielding pheomelanin [10,11]. The types and relative amounts of these melanin constitute color-based ethnic diversification. Three tyrosinase-like enzymes co-regulate melanogenesis, including TYR and TYR-related proteins 1 (TRP-1) and 2 (TRP-2). TRP-1 shows DHICA oxidase and low tyrosine hydroxylase activity when zinc is replaced by copper. TRP-2 contains two zinc ions at the active site and isomerizes dopachrome to DHICA. They are metal-containing glycoproteins and share ~40% amino acid sequence identity and ~70% similarity [1]. Despite TYR and TYR-related proteins 1 (TRP-1) and 2 (TRP-2) being necessary for melanogenesis, TYR is the most critical rate-limiting enzyme [10].
Recent pharmacological investigations have revealed that the abnormal metabolism of melanocytes and imbalance in TYR activity are indirectly or directly responsible for various dermatoses [1,12,13]. For example, functional mutations in the gene encoding TYR (TYR, 11q14-21, MIM 606933) would inactivate TYR and cause a deficiency in melanin, thereby resulting in oculocutaneous albinism type 1 (OCA1, MIM 203100), an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by the absence of pigment in hair, skin, and eyes [14]. On the contrary, excess melanin accumulation or abnormal distribution would give rise to hyperpigmentation disorders, including age spots, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and even malignant melanoma [13,15]. In particular, the overexpression of TYR and TRP 1 is significantly associated with the risk of melanoma, a fatal skin carcinoma [16,17,18]. To this end, it has been viewed as a relatively specific biomarker and therapeutic target for melanoma lesions. Additionally, the abnormal level of TYR induces dopamine neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration, which is related to Parkinson’s disease (PD) [19,20,21]. Monitoring TYR activity in complex biosystems undoubtedly remains critical and challenging for biomedical research and drug high-throughput screening (HTS).
In recent decades, various analytical techniques, including immunochemical analysis, mass spectrometry-based proteomics, and substrate-based biochemical assays, have flourished for the quantification of TYR. However, only the substrate-based biochemical assay could rapidly and sensitively determine the real activity of TYR in complex biological systems, leading to its common use in drug discovery and clinical studies [22]. Herein, we will review the role of biochemical detection based on optical substrates in TYR detection in the past 40 years. This review covers breakthroughs in the development of probe substrates and corresponding analytical methodologies for sensing TYR activity. By listing the substrate information and kinetic parameters of several optical methods for the first time, the advantages and defects of these various approaches are sufficiently compared and analyzed. Ultimately, the challenges and future perspectives in this field are highlighted. Collectively, this review provides a practical reference for developing new TYR substrates and methods, which is of great significance for related diseases studies and medical screening.

2. Biochemical Characteristics of TYR

2.1. Structural Feature and Catalytic Mechanism of TYR

Human TYR is a glycoprotein (13% carbohydrate) predominantly located in the melanosome membrane of melanocytes [23,24]. The presence of the transmembrane domain and glycans renders it difficult to isolate homogeneous TYR from melanocytes, which impedes crystallographic studies. Fortunately, the most characteristic TYR can be acquired from Streptomyces glausescens, the fungi Neurospore crassa, or Agaricus bisporus [7,25,26]. To compare the conservation of catalytic cavity, the crystal structures of TYR from bacteria (Streptomyces castaneoglobisporus [25] and Bacillus megaterium [27]), fungi Agaricus bisporus [28], and walnut leaves [29] were retrieved from Protein Date Bank. A salient feature of TYR from various sources (Figure 3) is the presence of strictly conserved binuclear copper atoms at the active site, each of copper atoms is coordinated with three conserved histidines, respectively [3]. Moreover, the normal redox state of copper atoms is exceedingly significant for enzyme activity. Due to the relatively high similarity and homology with mammalian TYR, mushroom TYR from Agaricus bisporus acts as a model for enzyme kinetics and inhibitor screening [28,30,31]. Although extensive studies are devoted to TYR, its catalytic mechanism remains controversial. According to the presence/absence of oxygen and the oxidation state of copper ions [Cu (Ⅱ)/Cu (Ⅰ)], three enzymatic forms (Eoxy, Emet, and Edeoxy) participate in the catalytic cycle (Figure 4) [3,32]. The resting form of TYR is found to be a mixture of 85% met and 15% oxy forms, while only the latter could act on the monophenol [7,33,34]. During the monophenolase cycle, to form Eoxy-monophenol complex (EoxyM), the oxygen atom on the deprotonated monophenol is coordinated with the coppers of Eoxy. Then, the phenol is o-hydroxylated to generate Emet-diphenol (D) complex (EmetD) [26,35]. Reducing agents could well draw the Emet into the Edeoxy, with concomitant oxidation to the corresponding o-quinone [36]. Since the deoxy form is the only one capable of reacting with oxygen to regenerate Eoxy and continue the catalytic action, monophenolase activity usually manifests as a characteristic lag time until a sufficient amount of catechol helps Emet to become Edeoxy [36]. Remarkably, this period depends on several factors, including enzyme concentration, monophenol concentration and the presence of reducing agents, especially o-diphenol derivatives (such as L-DOPA) that could shorten and even abolish the lag time [30,33,37]. In the diphenolase cycle, Eoxy continues to bind o-diphenol to originate the EoxyD complex, while both Eoxy and Emet are capable of oxidizing the diphenol to the o-quinone. After this, Emet is regenerated to complete the catalytic cycle continuously [30,34].

2.2. Substrate Specificity of TYR

Based on the broad substrate spectrum, in principle, any simple monophenol or corresponding catechol appears to be its substrate [38]. Besides, TYR also oxidizes various aromatic amines, o-aminophenols, and aromatic o-diamines (Figure 5), despite the reaction rates being orders of magnitude smaller than the corresponding phenols or catechol [39,40]. In terms of phenols, mammalian TYR tends to be relatively specific for its physiological substrate (L-tyrosine and L-DOPA) and has a higher affinity for the L-isomers [41]. A prevalent characteristic in monophenol substrates is without substituents in the ortho-position of the phenolic hydroxyl group. Understandably, large side-chain substituents increase the difficulty of substrate interaction with the key catalytic residues; this is unpropitious for the recognition and catalytic process between the enzyme and ligand [36]. A kinetic study [42] quantitatively discussed the effects of substituents in the 1-position of the aromatic ring on the rate of hydroxylation catalyzed by TYR. The results revealed that monophenols with a high electron donor tend to be oxidized faster [42]. In sharp contrast, the oxidation rate of catechol is positively correlated with the electron-withdrawing capacity of the para-substituents [36]. As such, the steric hindrance, stereochemical characteristics, and electronic effects of substituents have a distinct influence on the rate of TYR-mediated catalysis.
According to the chemical stability of the corresponding o-benzoquinone, phenolic substrates (Table 1) can be roughly divided into the following three categories [42,44]. (1) The first sort of substrates catalyzed by TYR could yield stable o-quinones. For example, 4-tert-butylcatechol (TBC) is detectable for the diphenolase activity, whose o-quinone is exceedingly stable. (2) The second substrates produce a highly unstable o-quinone but evolve into a stable product via a first-order reaction. Targeted at diphenolase activity, the common determination is based on the formation of dopachrome using L-DOPA as a substrate. Moreover, there is 3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid (DOMA) [45], dopamine (DA) [46], and isoproterenol (ISO) [47]. (3) The third kind of substrates are oxidized to an unstable o-quinone that is vulnerable to potent nucleophiles (N) and yields chromatic adducts (NQ) with a clear stoichiometry. Commonly used nucleophiles include L-proline (Pro) [48], L-cysteine (Cys) [49], and especially 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone (MBTH) [42]. Related substrates mainly include 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, L-DOPA, DA, etc.

3. Optical Assays for Sensing TYR Activity

The development of analytical techniques mainly focuses on improving and monitoring bioactive species, especially real-time analysis in vivo [50,51,52,53]. The current optical methods, including spectrophotometry and fluorometric detection, exhibit distinct performance. In this paper, we review the research advances of various methods by emphasizing on both their pros and cons, and we also summarize the non-fluorescent substrates and fluorescent substrates.

3.1. Spectrophotometric Assays

Due to its intrinsic sensitivity, low cost, and continuous study of the reaction process, the spectrophotometric technique has become the most widely used method [44,54]. Hitherto, in vitro assays of the oxidase activity of TYR are predominantly comprised of the dopachrome formation methods that use L-tyrosine or L-DOPA as substrate [55,56,57,58]. However, this mainstream approach also has inherent flaws. It relies on the hypothesis that DQ (an oxidation product of L-DOPA) is completely converted to dopachrome, instead of directly measuring DQ [57]. The instability and relatively low absorption coefficient of dopachrome in an aqueous system mean that the test must be performed quickly and at a low sensitivity. Considering the high reactivity and instability of intermediates and the interference of external factors (such as temperature and oxygen), many other assays are subsequently improved. Many nucleophiles start appearing on the stage by capturing highly reactive DQ as stable-colored products [59]. Under acidic conditions, MBTH generate a pink adduct with high molar absorptivity and solubility, whose clear stoichiometry and high stability endow great measurability [42,44,60].
Distinct from the above, the quinonization product of 4-tert-butylcatechol (TBC) is remarkably stable, simple to accumulate in the reaction mixture, and facile to detect. Lamentably, its affinity (Km = 990 μM) toward TYR is exceedingly poor, which restricts its application [37]. More typical substrates and their optical parameters are documented in Table 2.
In recent years, some breakthroughs have been made in substrates identification and detection means. Several sensing platforms utilized the reducibility of catechol to capture some chromogenic reagents for quantitative analysis [62,63]. For instance, Ag+ could oxidize 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) to the oxidized 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (oxTMB), accompanied by remarkable changes in color and absorbance [64,65]. The introduction of reducing substances (such as DA) directly decreases oxTMB, resulting in faded blue and a decrease in absorbance (Figure 6). Accordingly, using TMB as a chromogenic probe, a facile colorimetric assay was proposed to sense TYR activity in human serum samples and to screen inhibitors [66]. In a similar vein, Deng et al. demonstrated that catechol could suppress the activity of oxidase-mimicking chitosan-stabilized platinum nanoparticles (ChPtNPs), thereby significantly decreasing acidified TMB products [67]. With the oxidation of catechol, a linear relationship between the amount of restored color and the TYR activity was evaluated. In terms of detection means, inspired by specific chromogenic and fluorogenic reactions between resorcinol and catecholamines [68], an absorbance–fluorescence dual-readout assay was established. With tyrosine as a substrate, this assay achieved the determination of TYR in serum samples and inhibitor screening [69]. Notably, these innovative assays are consistent with the L-DOPA oxidation-based method.
As a classical analytical method, the spectrophotometry assay still exhibits promising prospects for in situ quantitative analysis. Furthermore, when establishing an experimental methodology, the enzyme activity in the presence of substrates, absorption coefficient or stability of products, anti-interference and sensitivity, incubation time, and even reagent consumption, ought to be taken into account [54,67].

3.2. Fluorometric Assays

Despite spectrophotometry being commonly used for the detection of TYR activities in vitro, this method is insufficient when it comes to high-throughput screening (HTS) or dynamic tracking [70]. Owing to their superior sensitivity, ultrahigh spatiotemporal resolution, and without isolation and derivative, the fluorescent substrate-based techniques have shown unprecedented developments in real-time visualizing and detecting biomolecules in vitro or in vivo [71,72,73]. To date, a great number of TYR-activated fluorescent substrates have flourished, primarily including organic fluorescent molecules and nanometer material-based probes [74].

3.2.1. Small Molecule-Based Fluorescent Substrates

The current probes are mainly designed by the specific phenolic substrates (recognition moiety) in conjugation with fluorophore scaffolds through an appropriate linker [75,76]. Given the metabolic characteristics of TYR, the recognized fragment should contain a phenolic hydroxyl, without substituents in the ortho position; this facilitates the formation of catechol [77]. To the best of our knowledge, 4-hydroxyphenyl and 3-hydroxyphenyl are the two main types of responsive unit (Figure 7a). However, 4-hydroxyphenyl, as a classical responsive moiety for TYR, could react with both reactive oxygen species (ROS) and TYR in most cases [70]. Owing to H2O2, HOCI and some free radicals are usually at a relatively high concentration (about μM levels) especially in tumor cells; this cross-interference may result in false-positive signals and inaccurate results [78,79]. Rejoicingly, the replacement of 4-hydroxyphenyl with 3-hydroxyphenyl not only preserves binding affinity towards TYR but also avoids the influence of cross-interference from ROS. Mainstream designs primarily include the oxidization-cleavage mechanism and the inhibited photo-induced electron transfer (PET) process (Figure 7b) [80]. The former is oxidized to an unstable o-quinone in presence of oxygen and TYR, which undergoes an intramolecular 1,6-rearrangement-elimination, further releasing free fluorophore and triggering a fluorescence response. In the latter, the initial hydroxyphenyl group exerts a PET effect on the parent. Accompanied by the formation of o-quinone and the blocked PET effect, the probe is lit up. By rationally adjusting the TYR-recognition unit and fluorophore structure, a variety of probes could be acquired. The newly developed TYR fluorescent substrates and their biological parameters are presented in Table 3.

4-Hydroxyphenyl Recognition Units

The classic structure of 4-hydroxyphenyl is covalently coupled with fluorophore via a carbamate linkage. A novel probe Mela-TYR with melanosome-targeting ability first imaged the distribution of TYR in organelles (Figure 8) [89]. This probe utilized morpholine as a melanosome-targeting group and 4-aminophenol as a responsive warhead. Since the acidic environment (about pH 4.2–4.6) of melanosomes, the protonated form of morpholine enhanced the hydrophilicity of morpholine and facilitated its accumulation in melanosomes. Subsequently, the colocalization experiments with mCherry-tagged melanosomes and DND-99 (a commercial dye) validated this targeting ability. Through Mela-TYR imaging, it was found that TYR was significantly up-regulated in live B16 cells stimulated by psoralen/ultraviolet light A, which was further verified by standard colorimetric methods. To observe another representative example, the near-infrared (NIR) probe NBR-AP was activated through an oxidization-cleavage reaction and displayed a linear relationship over the range of 1~200 U/L [88]. Moreover, NBR-AP accomplished the sensitive and selective detection of endogenous TYR activity in B16F10 cells and zebrafish (Figure 9). Real-time in vivo imaging of melanoma and metastasis in xenogeneic mouse models suggested that NBR-AP may be a reliable approach for the early diagnosis of metastatic melanoma during cancer surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first investigation to utilize a fluorescent substrate for the diagnosis of early melanoma in a rodent model. Follow-up studies demonstrated that a longer linker between the recognition moiety and the dye skeleton might prominently decrease the steric hindrance of the probe entering the catalytic site. By combining thermodynamic computation with molecular docking simulation, Li et al. analyzed the Gibbs free energy change of different urea bonds during spontaneous hydrolysis, as well as the distance between the phenolic hydroxyl group (metabolic site) and the catalytic site [92]. Thus, a rapidly responsive and ultra-sensitive NIR probe MB1 was rationally designed. As a specific substrate of TYR (Km = 4.6 µM; Vmax = 0.45 µM/min), the fluorescence intensity of MB1 could increase >100-fold within 20 min, providing immense convenience for drug screening. Notably, this sensor could effectively kill melanoma cells by photodynamic therapy (PDT). As such, this sensor held great potential in melanoma-specific imaging and treatment.

3-Hydroxyphenyl Recognition Units

When ROS reacts with the hydroxyl recognition unit, it tends to form quinone derivatives rather than hydroxylated product. On this premise, to eliminate the interference from ROS, 3-hydroxyphenyl is proposed. Wu et al. developed NIR probe 1. This sensor displayed a specific response to TYR, even when the concentration of ROS was much higher than that found at physiological levels. The high specificity of probe 1 facilitated the accurate detection of TYR activity in live cells and zebrafish, which was further verified by ELISA [82]. Inspired by the excellent work of predecessors, Peng et al. constructed a NIR melanosome-targeting probe (HB-NP) for the highly selective detection of TYR at the subcellular level (Figure 10) by incorporating 3-hydroxyphenyl moiety and the morpholine unit (melanosome-targeting group) into the salicyladazine skeleton [80]. Compared to Mela-TYR, the probe exhibited a large Stokes shift (195 nm) after PET effect inhibition. HB-NP successfully visualized and quantified intracellular TYR activity in various living cells. Moreover, HB-NP distinguished two human uveal melanoma cells with different invasive behaviors and evaluated the effects of the inhibitor (kojic acid) and the up-regulating treatment (psoralen/ultraviolet A). Zhang et al. designed a novel, water-soluble probe that detected the endogenous TYR in living cells and zebrafish [83]. The recognition fragment, 3-hydroxybenzyloxy, could specifically identify TYR instead of ROS. In particular, the probe successfully realized the diagnosis of melanoma in a xenogeneic mouse model.
In brief, each of the above probes exhibits unique performance. For high-throughput screening at the target level in vitro, the sensitivity and rapid response of tool molecular demonstrate more importance [96]. On the other hand, the tracing and visualization analysis of TYR activity in vivo requires long emission wavelengths and specificity [97,98]. In the near future, combining computational means such as molecular docking, more superior sensors for various purposes are expected to be rationally designed; these sensors have broad application potential in the field of bioanalysis.

3.2.2. Nanoparticle-Based Fluorescent Probes

Other than small molecular probes, nanometer material-based biosensors have also aroused considerable interest in the detection of biological analytes. Some emerging nanomaterials utilize the characteristics of TYR-mediated metabolism to trigger a linear fluorescence response with intermediates. For example, under aerobic and alkaline conditions, dopamine is converted to polydopamine via oxidation and self-polymerization. Enlightened by the intrinsic fluorescence properties of polydopamine, Liu et al. prepared the fluorescent polymethyldopa nanoparticles (PMNPs) [99]. Metyrosine acted as a substrate of TYR to yield methyldopa (a dopamine analog). The latter further reacted with ethanolamine to produce PMNPs (Figure 11a). Ultimately, the strategy of in situ formation of fluorescent PMNPs performed well in screening inhibitors. Using a similar principle, Ding et al. introduced tyramine as a model substrate, which could be converted into DA by TYR. Based on the specific sensing between silicon nanoparticles (Si NPs) and DA, the solution color and fluorescence emission changed significantly (Figure 11b). Subsequently, a novel ratiometric fluorescence analysis was established for screening TYR activators and inhibitors [100]. Wang et al. developed a fluorescence-sensing platform utilizing rare-earth-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) [101]. Tyramine was oxidized to DA and further yielded melanin-like polymers, leading to the effective quenching of UCNPs (Figure 11c). Collectively, most nanoparticle-based fluorescent probes have fulfilled relevant drug screening protocols. Some potential factors, including complicated synthesis, time-consuming sample pretreatment, homogeneity, and stability of nanoparticles, deserve adequate consideration. Furthermore, compared to traditional colorimetry, both methods seem to be suitable only for TYR activity evaluation in vitro.

4. Biomedical Applications of TYR Activity Assays

4.1. Sensing and Imaging TYR Activities in Biological Systems

Melanoma is the most aggressive malignancy in skin cancer. It is characterized by high metastatic potential, poor prognosis, and the up-regulation of melanocytes [102]. Reintgen et al. determined the order of melanoma nodal metastases and showed that cutaneous melanoma usually first metastasized to the regional nodal basin via the regional lymphatics [103,104]. About one-third of melanoma patients have a local recurrence, while distant metastasis at the initial site of relapse is also relatively common [105]. The most characteristic metastatic sites are lymph nodes, lungs, liver, brain, and bones [106]. The precise detection of subclinical metastases for early diagnosis and treatment of melanoma is a matter of urgency. Human TYR (11q14-21, MIM 606933) is primarily expressed in epidermal, follicular, and ocular melanocytes. It is essential for pigment formation [107]. The overexpression of TYR and TRP 1 is significantly associated with the risk of melanoma [1]. B16F10 cells are often selected as cell models due to the high TYR expression. TYR has acted as a valuable tumor marker and therapeutic target for the early diagnosis and treatment of melanoma lesions. As a critical melanoma-associated antigen, TYR can be recognized by autologous T lymphocytes, thus inducing effective tumor-specific responses.
Currently, a serum assay remains the mainstream approach for biomarker detection [88]. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was developed to detect circulating melanoma cells (CMCs) in the peripheral blood. This method was based on the amplification of the messenger RNA (mRNA) for TYR, while normal melanocytes are not thought to circulate in the peripheral blood [108,109,110]. However, test results are often controversial and can show false positives; the latter may be due to sample processing and the transient presence of metastasizing tumor cells [111]. By adopting in vivo fluorescent imaging strategy, the elevation of the TYR level (or activity) at the melanoma focus can be localized spatially, thereby lessening the risk of false-positive signals. The NIR probe NBR-AP successfully realized the early diagnosis of melanoma and metastasis in a mouse model by imaging TYR activity [88]. The levels of TYR in the tumor and metastatic organs analyzed by Western blot were consistent with the fluorescence results (Figure 9e), in which TYR in the tumor, lung, and spleen was found to be over-expressed. These results demonstrate that small-molecule fluorescent probes have great promise in the early diagnosis of melanoma and the analysis of biological samples.

4.2. Screening and Characterization of TYR Inhibitors

TYR is the initiating and rate-limiting factor in melanin biosynthesis, serving as a prominent target for pigmentation disorders [9,10,112,113]. Accordingly, TYR inhibitors can block the formation of pigment and exhibit broad application prospects in agricultural, medicinal, and cosmetic industries [114]. Most compounds are reported as TYR inhibitors due to their function in copper chelation or competition with substrates, while the former could give rise to the irreversible inactivation of TYR [26,36,115].Popular whitening agents, such as hydroquinone, β-arbutin (a hydroquinone derivative), or kojic acid, have always been regarded as positive controls, but they also have certain drawbacks (Table 4). Efficiently discovering potent TYR inhibitors with superior safety profiles remains a mainstream concern in hyperpigmentation therapy [116].
Over the past few decades, increasing attempts have been devoted to identifying effective TYR inhibitors from natural products and synthetic compounds through in vitro and in silico procedures. Generally speaking, spectrophotometry is the most commonly used in the determination of TYR activity [30,112,123]. Most inhibitors are assessed by dopachrome formation using L-tyrosine or L-DOPA as substrates. Tajima et al. synthesized a series of bibenzyl derivatives and found bibenzyl xyloside 2 to be a potent inhibitor (IC50 = 0.43 μM) that was 17 times more effective than kojic acid [124]. Ishioka et al. developed some novel TYR inhibitors based on the structure of rhododendron, with IC50 values ranging from 0.39 μM to 35.9 μM [125]. Using L-tyrosine and L-DOPA as substrates, Jung et al. designed thirteen (E)-benzylidene-1-indanone derivatives, in which BID3 was the most potent inhibitor of mushroom tyrosinase (IC50 = 0.034 μM, monophenolase activity; IC50 = 1.39 μM, diphenolase activity) [126]. Durai et al. applied evolutionary chemical binding similarity (ECBS) to screen a virtual chemical database for human TYR, which effectively identified seven potential TYR inhibitors [127]. In summary, candidate drugs with high affinity and great druggability can be rapidly identified through virtual screening in combination with the HTS methods presented in this review. All these compounds could be used as lead compounds to design novel potent TYR inhibitors for the treatment of diseases associated with TYR-overexpression [128].

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

Mammalian TYR catalyzes the initial and rate-limiting reactions of the melanin biosynthetic pathway, which is a relatively specific biomarker for malignant cutaneous melanoma [2,129]. Monitoring TYR activity remains significant and challenging for the discovery of novel therapeutics. In recent decades, the specific substrate-based optical method has been used for detecting TYR activity in real samples and high-throughput screening of TYR inhibitors. Herein, we reviewed the research advances of various assays, with an emphasis on their respective pros and cons. More substrate preferences and kinetic parameters were also outlined. Among them, the spectrophotometric technique is the most widely used method. Traditional assays for TYR activity mainly depend on the characteristic absorbance of colored products from the substrate L-tyrosine or L-DOPA. Recently, other means have also become more widely used, such as the introduction of nucleophiles to capture DQ to generate stable-colored adducts.
To achieve better performance in cell imaging applications, several TYR fluorescent substrates with high specificity and excellent optical properties have gradually emerged, including organic small molecules and nanocomposites. Owing to multiple advantages, such as superior selectivity, high sensitivity, and the potential for dynamic tracking, fluorescent probes could serve as versatile tools for analytical sensing and optical imaging analysis [130]. This not only facilitates the realization of high-throughput screening (HTS) of inhibitors but also evaluates the inhibitory potential of enzyme inhibitors in living cells, living tissues, and even in vivo; these findings significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of drug discovery [131,132]. Notably, fluorescent probes-based molecular imaging can spatially localize the elevation of the TYR level (or activity) at the melanoma focus, thereby greatly reducing the risk of false-positive signals [133]. The safety of biosensors is a significant prerequisite for the biological studies of TYR in vivo. NIR probes or two-photo probes are capable of deepening photon penetration, reducing photo damage, and producing low background fluorescence, which hold great promise in biomedical imaging [134]. Furthermore, the conjugation of NIR dyes with anticancer agents assists in the synergistic management of cancer, thus integrating the merits of imaging and therapeutic effects to realize the ultimate objective of simultaneous diagnosis and treatment [135,136].

Author Contributions

P.W. and G.-B.G. conceived and designed the paper. Y.-F.F., S.-X.Z., X.-K.Q. and G.-B.G. wrote the manuscript. F.-B.H., Q.-S.P. and D.-F.Z. collected the information. Y.-W.X., X.-K.Q. and P.W. revised the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFE0200900, 2017YFC1700200, 2017YFC1702000), the NSF of China (81922070, 81973286), the Three-year Action Plan of Shanghai TCM Development [ZY-(2018-2020)-CCCX-5001], Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (18XD1403600), Shuguang Program (18SG40) supported by Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lai, X.; Wichers, H.J.; Soler-Lopez, M.; Dijkstra, B.W. Structure and Function of Human Tyrosinase and Tyrosinase-Related Proteins. Chemistry 2018, 24, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Min, K.; Park, G.W.; Yoo, Y.J.; Lee, J.S. A perspective on the biotechnological applications of the versatile tyrosinase. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 289, 121730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Olivares, C.; Solano, F. New insights into the active site structure and catalytic mechanism of tyrosinase and its related proteins. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res. 2009, 22, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, S.H.; Baek, K.; Lee, J.E.; Kim, B.G. Using tyrosinase as a monophenol monooxygenase: A combined strategy for effective inhibition of melanin formation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pillaiyar, T.; Manickam, M.; Jung, S.H. Downregulation of melanogenesis: Drug discovery and therapeutic options. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 282–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brenner, M.; Hearing, V.J. The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin. Photochem. Photobiol. 2008, 84, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chang, T.S. An updated review of tyrosinase inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 2440–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pillaiyar, T.; Namasivayam, V.; Manickam, M.; Jung, S.H. Inhibitors of Melanogenesis: An Updated Review. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 7395–7418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, S.Y.; Baek, N.; Nam, T.G. Natural, semisynthetic and synthetic tyrosinase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pillaiyar, T.; Manickam, M.; Namasivayam, V. Skin whitening agents: Medicinal chemistry perspective of tyrosinase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32, 403–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hearing, V.J.; Tsukamoto, K. Enzymatic control of pigmentation in mammals. FASEB J. 1991, 5, 2902–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ando, H.; Ichihashi, M.; Hearing, V.J. Role of the ubiquitin proteasome system in regulating skin pigmentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4428–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Costin, G.E.; Hearing, V.J. Human skin pigmentation: Melanocytes modulate skin color in response to stress. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 976–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ray, K.; Chaki, M.; Sengupta, M. Tyrosinase and ocular diseases: Some novel thoughts on the molecular basis of oculocutaneous albinism type 1. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2007, 26, 323–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. dos Santos, V.I.F.; Lima, M.D.F.; Sofia, M. Mechanisms regulating melanogenesis. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2013, 88, 76–83. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghanem, G.; Fabrice, J. Tyrosinase related protein 1 (TYRP1/gp75) in human cutaneous melanoma. Mol. Oncol. 2011, 5, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gradilone, A.; Cigna, E.; Agliano, A.M.; Frati, L. Tyrosinase Expression as a Molecular Marker for Investigating the Presence of Circulating Tumor Cells in Melanoma Patients. Curr. Cancer Drug Tar. 2010, 10, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jawaid, S.; Khan, T.H.; Osborn, H.M.; Williams, N.A. Tyrosinase activated melanoma prodrugs. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Carballo-Carbajal, I.; Laguna, A.; Romero-Gimenez, J.; Cuadros, T.; Bove, J.; Martinez-Vicente, M.; Parent, A.; Gonzalez-Sepulveda, M.; Penuelas, N.; Torra, A.; et al. Brain tyrosinase overexpression implicates age-dependent neuromelanin production in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. da Silva, G.F.; Ming, L.J. Alzheimer’s disease related copper(II)- beta-amyloid peptide exhibits phenol monooxygenase and catechol oxidase activities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2005, 44, 5501–5504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hasegawa, T. Tyrosinase-expressing neuronal cell line as in vitro model of Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1082–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, F.Y.; Wang, P.; Zhao, D.F.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Fan, Y.F.; Xia, Y.L.; Ge, G.B.; Yang, L. Analytical methodologies for sensing catechol-O-methyltransferase activity and their applications. J. Pharm. Anal. 2021, 11, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cordes, P.; Sun, W.; Wolber, R.; Kolbe, L.; Klebe, G.; Rohm, K.H. Expression in non-melanogenic systems and purification of soluble variants of human tyrosinase. Biol. Chem. 2013, 394, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dolinska, M.B.; Wingfield, P.T.; Sergeev, Y.V. Purification of Recombinant Human Tyrosinase from Insect Larvae Infected with the Baculovirus Vector. Curr. Protoc. Protein. Sci. 2017, 89, 6.15.1–6.15.12. [Google Scholar]
  25. Matoba, Y.; Kumagai, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Yoshitsu, H.; Sugiyama, M. Crystallographic evidence that the dinuclear copper center of tyrosinase is flexible during catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 8981–8990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kim, Y.J.; Uyama, H. Tyrosinase inhibitors from natural and synthetic sources: Structure, inhibition mechanism and perspective for the future. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 1707–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zolghadri, S.; Bahrami, A.; Hassan Khan, M.T.; Munoz-Munoz, J.; Garcia-Molina, F.; Garcia-Canovas, F.; Saboury, A.A. A comprehensive review on tyrosinase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019, 34, 279–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Ismaya, W.T.; Rozeboom, H.J.; Weijn, A.; Mes, J.J.; Fusetti, F.; Wichers, H.J.; Dijkstra, B.W. Crystal structure of Agaricus bisporus mushroom tyrosinase: Identity of the tetramer subunits and interaction with tropolone. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 5477–5486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Ionita, E.; Aprodu, I.; Stanciuc, N.; Rapeanu, G.; Bahrim, G. Advances in structure-function relationships of tyrosinase from Agaricus bisporus-investigation on heat-induced conformational changes. Food Chem. 2014, 156, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sendovski, M.; Kanteev, M.; Ben-Yosef, V.S.; Adir, N.; Fishman, A. First structures of an active bacterial tyrosinase reveal copper plasticity. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 405, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bijelic, A.; Pretzler, M.; Molitor, C.; Zekiri, F.; Rompel, A. The Structure of a Plant Tyrosinase from Walnut Leaves Reveals the Importance of “Substrate-Guiding Residues” for Enzymatic Specificity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015, 54, 14677–14680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Fenoll, L.G.; Peñalver, M.J.; Rodríguez-López, J.N.; Varón, R.; García-Cánovas, F.; Tudela, J. Tyrosinase kinetics: Discrimination between two models to explain the oxidation mechanism of monophenol and diphenol substrates. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fenoll, L.G.; Rodriguez-Lopez, J.N.; Garcia-Sevilla, F.; Garcia-Ruiz, P.A.; Varon, R.; Garcia-Canovas, F.; Tudela, J. Analysis and interpretation of the action mechanism of mushroom tyrosinase on monophenols and diphenols generating highly unstable o-quinones. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1548, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sanchez-Ferrer, A.; Rodriguez-Lopez, J.N.; Garcia-Canovas, F.; Garcia-Carmona, F. Tyrosinase: A comprehensive review of its mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1247, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qu, Y.; Zhan, Q.; Du, S.; Ding, Y.; Fang, B.; Du, W.; Wu, Q.; Yu, H.; Li, L.; Huang, W. Catalysis-based specific detection and inhibition of tyrosinase and their application. J. Pharm. Anal. 2020, 10, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rescigno, A.; Sollai, F.; Pisu, B.; Rinaldi, A.; Sanjust, E. Tyrosinase inhibition: General and applied aspects. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2002, 17, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Sanjust, E.; Cecchini, G.; Sollai, F.; Curreli, N.; Rescigno, A. 3-Hydroxykynurenine as a substrate/activator for mushroom tyrosinase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 2003, 412, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McLarin, M.A.; Leung, I.K.H. Substrate specificity of polyphenol oxidase. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 55, 274–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gasowska, B.; Kafarski, P.; Wojtasek, H. Interaction of mushroom tyrosinase with aromatic amines, o-diamines and o-aminophenols. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1673, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rescigno, A.; Bruyneel, F.; Padiglia, A.; Sollai, F.; Salis, A.; Marchand-Brynaert, J.; Sanjust, E. Structure-activity relationships of various amino-hydroxy-benzenesulfonic acids and sulfonamides as tyrosinase substrates. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1810, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Espin, J.C.; Garcia-Ruiz, P.A.; Tudela, J.; Garcia-Canovas, F. Study of stereospecificity in mushroom tyrosinase. Biochem. J. 1998, 331, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Espin, J.C.; Varon, R.; Fenoll, L.G.; Gilabert, M.A.; Garcia-Ruiz, P.A.; Tudela, J.; Garcia-Canovas, F. Kinetic characterization of the substrate specificity and mechanism of mushroom tyrosinase. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 1270–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Toussaint, O.; Lerch, K.J.B. Catalytic oxidation of 2-aminophenols and ortho hydroxylation of aromatic amines by tyrosinase. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 8567–8571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garcia-Molina, F.; Munoz, J.L.; Varon, R.; Rodriguez-Lopez, J.N.; Garcia-Canovas, F.; Tudela, J. A review on spectrophotometric methods for measuring the monophenolase and diphenolase activities of tyrosinase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 9739–9749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rodríguez-López, J.N.; Serna-Rodríguez, P.; Tudela, J.; Varón, R.; Garcia-Cánovas, F. A continuous spectrophotometric method for the determination of diphenolase activity of tyrosinase using 3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid. Anal. Biochem. 1991, 195, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jimenez, M.; Garcia-Carmona, F.; Garcia-Canovas, F.; Iborra, J.L.; Lozano, J.A.; Martinez, F. Chemical intermediates in dopamine oxidation by tyrosinase, and kinetic studies of the process. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1984, 235, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiménez, M.; García-Cánovas, F.; García-Carmona, F.; Iborra, J.L.; Lozano, J.A. Isoproterenol oxidation by tyrosinase: Intermediates characterization and kinetic study. Biochem. Int. 1985, 11, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rzepecki, L.M.; Waite, J.H. A chromogenic assay for catecholoxidases based on the addition of L-proline to quinones. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 179, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gauillard, F.; Richard-Forget, F.; Nicolas, J. New spectrophotometric assay for polyphenol oxidase activity. Anal. Biochem. 1993, 215, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ge, G.B.; Feng, L.; Jin, Q.; Wang, Y.R.; Liu, Z.M.; Zhu, X.Y.; Wang, P.; Hou, J.; Cui, J.N.; Yang, L. A novel substrate-inspired fluorescent probe to monitor native albumin in human plasma and living cells. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 989, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, Y.-R.; Feng, L.; Xu, L.; Hou, J.; Jin, Q.; Zhou, N.; Lin, Y.; Cui, J.-N.; Ge, G.-B. An ultrasensitive and conformation sensitive fluorescent probe for sensing human albumin in complex biological samples. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 245, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kamel, S.; Khattab, T.A.J.B. Recent Advances in Cellulose-Based Biosensors for Medical Diagnosis. Biosensors 2020, 10, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhu, Y.D.; Pang, H.L.; Zhou, Q.H.; Qin, Z.F.; Jin, Q.; Finel, M.; Wang, Y.N.; Qin, W.W.; Lu, Y.; Wang, D.D.; et al. An ultra-sensitive and easy-to-use assay for sensing human UGT1A1 activities in biological systems. J. Pharm. Anal. 2020, 10, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Haghbeen, K.; Tan, E.W. Direct spectrophotometric assay of monooxygenase and oxidase activities of mushroom tyrosinase in the presence of synthetic and natural substrates. Anal. Biochem. 2003, 312, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Munoz, J.L.; Garcia-Molina, F.; Varon, R.; Rodriguez-Lopez, J.N.; Garcia-Canovas, F.; Tudela, J. Calculating molar absorptivities for quinones: Application to the measurement of tyrosinase activity. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 351, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lin, Y.F.; Hu, Y.H.; Lin, H.T.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Q.X. Inhibitory effects of propyl gallate on tyrosinase and its application in controlling pericarp browning of harvested longan fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 2889–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Winder, A.J.; Harris, H. New assays for the tyrosine hydroxylase and dopa oxidase activities of tyrosinase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1991, 198, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moonrungsee, N.; Shimamura, T.; Kashiwagi, T.; Jakmunee, J.; Higuchi, K.; Ukeda, H. Sequential injection spectrophotometric system for evaluation of mushroom tyrosinase-inhibitory activity. Talanta 2012, 101, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nolan, L.C.; O’Connor, K.E. A spectrophotometric method for the quantification of an enzyme activity producing 4-substituted phenols: Determination of toluene-4-monooxygenase activity. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 344, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mann, T.; Scherner, C.; Röhm, K.H.; Kolbe, L. Structure-Activity Relationships of Thiazolyl Resorcinols, Potent and Selective Inhibitors of Human Tyrosinase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Rescigno, A.; Sanjust, E.; Soddu, G.; Rinaldi, A.C.; Sollai, F.; Curreli, N.; Rinaldi, A. Effect of 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid on mushroom tyrosinase activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1384, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Teng, Y.; Jia, X.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Ratiometric fluorescence detection of tyrosinase activity and dopamine using thiolate-protected gold nanoclusters. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 4897–4902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, W.H.; Ma, W.; Long, Y.T. Redox-Mediated Indirect Fluorescence Immunoassay for the Detection of Disease Biomarkers Using Dopamine-Functionalized Quantum Dots. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 5131–5136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, S.; Tian, J.; Wang, L.; Sun, X. Highly sensitive and selective colorimetric detection of Ag(I) ion using 3,3′,5,5′,-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) as an indicator. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 165, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ni, P.; Sun, Y.; Dai, H.; Hu, J.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z. Highly sensitive and selective colorimetric detection of glutathione based on Ag [I] ion-3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB). Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 63, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lei, C.; Zhao, X.E.; Sun, J.; Yan, X.; Gao, Y.; Gao, H.; Zhu, S.; Wang, H. A simple and novel colorimetric assay for tyrosinase and inhibitor screening using 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine as a chromogenic probe. Talanta 2017, 175, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Deng, H.H.; Lin, X.L.; He, S.B.; Wu, G.W.; Wu, W.H.; Yang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Peng, H.P.; Xia, X.H.; Chen, W. Colorimetric tyrosinase assay based on catechol inhibition of the oxidase-mimicking activity of chitosan-stabilized platinum nanoparticles. Mikrochim Acta 2019, 186, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Acuna, A.U.; Alvarez-Perez, M.; Liras, M.; Coto, P.B.; Amat-Guerri, F. Synthesis and photophysics of novel biocompatible fluorescent oxocines and azocines in aqueous solution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 16704–16712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Zhao, J.; Bao, X.; Wang, S.; Lu, S.; Sun, J.; Yang, X. In Situ Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Reactions for the Sensitive Dual-Readout Assay of Tyrosinase Activity. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 10529–10536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sun, W.; Li, M.; Fan, J.; Peng, X.J.A. Activity-Based Sensing and Theranostic Probes Based on Photoinduced Electron Transfer. ACC Chem Res. 2019, 52, 2818–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zou, L.; Wang, P.; Qian, X.; Feng, L.; Yu, Y.; Wang, D.; Jin, Q.; Hou, J.; Liu, Z.; Ge, G.; et al. Bioelectronics, a highly specific ratiometric two-photon fluorescent probe to detect dipeptidyl peptidase IV in plasma and living systems. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 90, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, B.; Zhang, H.; Zhong, M.; Wang, S.; Xu, Q.; Cho, D.-H.; Qiu, H. A novel off-on fluorescent probe for specific detection and imaging of cysteine in live cells and in vivo. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, Q.; Chen, Y.J.C.C.L. A GSH-responsive PET-based fluorescent probe for cancer cells imaging. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 32, 1541–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yang, S.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, A.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, W.; Cao, D.S.; Yang, R. Substrate-Photocaged Enzymatic Fluorogenic Probe Enabling Sequential Activation for Light-Controllable Monitoring of Intracellular Tyrosinase Activity. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 7194–7199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, S.; Li, H.; Yao, Q.; Ghazali, S.; Fan, J.; Wang, J.; Gao, F.; Li, M.; Wang, H.; Dong, C.; et al. A unique two-photon fluorescent probe based on ICT mechanism for imaging palladium in living cells and mice. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 2913–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jin, Q.; Feng, L.; Zhang, S.J.; Wang, D.D.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, J.N.; Guo, W.Z.; Ge, G.B.; Yang, L.J.A.C. Real-Time Tracking the Synthesis and Degradation of Albumin in Complex Biological Systems with a near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 9884–9891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Singh, H.; Tiwari, K.; Tiwari, R.; Pramanik, S.K.; Das, A. Small Molecule as Fluorescent Probes for Monitoring Intracellular Enzymatic Transformations. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 11718–11760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhao, C.; An, J.; Zhou, L.; Fei, Q.; Wang, F.; Tan, J.; Shi, B.; Wang, R.; Guo, Z.; Zhu, W.H. Transforming the recognition site of 4-hydroxyaniline into 4-methoxyaniline grafted onto a BODIPY core switches the selective detection of peroxynitrite to hypochlorous acid. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 2075–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lu, P.; Zhang, X.; Ren, T.; Yuan, L.J.C.C.L. Molecular engineering of ultra-sensitive fluorescent probe with large Stokes shift for imaging of basal HOCl in tumor cells and tissues. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 2980–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Peng, M.; Wang, Y.; Fu, Q.; Sun, F.; Na, N.; Ouyang, J. Melanosome-Targeting Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe with Large Stokes Shift for in Situ Quantification of Tyrosinase Activity and Assessing Drug Effects on Differently Invasive Melanoma Cells. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 6206–6213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sidhu, J.S.; Singh, A.; Garg, N.; Kaur, N.; Singh, N. A highly selective naphthalimide-based ratiometric fluorescent probe for the recognition of tyrosinase and cellular imaging. Analyst 2018, 143, 4476–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wu, X.; Li, L.; Shi, W.; Gong, Q.; Ma, H. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe with New Recognition Moiety for Specific Detection of Tyrosinase Activity: Design, Synthesis, and Application in Living Cells and Zebrafish. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 14728–14732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Tian, X.; Ding, N. A novel hydrosoluble near-infrared fluorescent probe for specifically monitoring tyrosinase and application in a mouse model. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 9463–9466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wu, X.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Shi, W.; Ma, H. A highly sensitive and selective fluorescence off-on probe for the detection of intracellular endogenous tyrosinase activity. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 2443–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, H.; Liu, W.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, X.; Huang, L.; Zhang, H. Highly Selective Fluorescent Probe Based on Hydroxylation of Phenylboronic Acid Pinacol Ester for Detection of Tyrosinase in Cells. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 855–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yan, S.; Huang, R.; Wang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Fu, B.; Weng, X.; Zhou, X. A two-photon fluorescent probe for intracellular detection of tyrosinase activity. Chem. Asian. J. 2012, 7, 2782–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, C.; Yan, S.; Huang, R.; Feng, S.; Fu, B.; Weng, X.; Zhou, X. A turn-on fluorescent probe for detection of tyrosinase activity. Analyst 2013, 138, 2825–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhan, C.; Cheng, J.; Li, B.; Huang, S.; Zeng, F.; Wu, S. A Fluorescent Probe for Early Detection of Melanoma and Its Metastasis by Specifically Imaging Tyrosinase Activity in a Mouse Model. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 8807–8815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhou, J.; Shi, W.; Li, L.; Gong, Q.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Ma, H. Detection of Misdistribution of Tyrosinase from Melanosomes to Lysosomes and Its Upregulation under Psoralen/Ultraviolet A with a Melanosome-Targeting Tyrosinase Fluorescent Probe. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 4557–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, P.; Li, S.; Fu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Ding, C. A colorimetric and near -infrared ratiometric fluorescent probe for the determination of endogenous tyrosinase activity based on cyanine aggregation. Analyst 2019, 144, 5472–5478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, X.; Shi, W.; Chen, S.; Jia, J.; Ma, H.; Wolfbeis, O.S. A near-infrared fluorescent probe for monitoring tyrosinase activity. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2560–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Li, Z.; Wang, Y.F.; Zeng, C.; Hu, L.; Liang, X.J. Ultrasensitive Tyrosinase-Activated Turn-On Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe with a Rationally Designed Urea Bond for Selective Imaging and Photodamage to Melanoma Cells. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 3666–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Naidu Bobba, K.; Won, M.; Shim, I.; Velusamy, N.; Yang, Z.; Qu, J.; Kim, J.S.; Bhuniya, S. A BODIPY-based two-photon fluorescent probe validates tyrosinase activity in live cells. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 11213–11216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kim, T.I.; Park, J.; Park, S.; Choi, Y.; Kim, Y. Visualization of tyrosinase activity in melanoma cells by a BODIPY-based fluorescent probe. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12640–12642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Li, Z.; Xia, X.; You, Y.; Lu, C.; Yang, G.; Ma, C.; Nie, J.; Sun, Q.; Wu, S.; Ren, J.; et al. Fast-response fluorescent probe with favorable water solubility for highly sensitive imaging of endogenous tyrosinase in living cells and zebrafish model. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 1785–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhou, Q.H.; Qin, W.W.; Finel, M.; He, Q.Q.; Ge, G.B. A broad-spectrum substrate for the human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and its use for investigating glucuronidation inhibitors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 180, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Qiang, J.A.; Hm, A.; Lei, F.B.; Ping, W.A.; Rh, A.; Jing, N.B.; Ling, Y.A.; Gg, A.J.C.C.L. Sensing cytochrome P450 1A1 activity by a resorufin-based isoform-specific fluorescent probe. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 2945–2949. [Google Scholar]
  98. Dl, A.; Wc, A.; Sheng, H.; Xc, B.; Jya, B.J.C.C.L. The regulation of biothiol-responsive performance and bioimaging application of benzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole dyes. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 2891–2896. [Google Scholar]
  99. Liu, G.; Zhao, J.; Lu, S.; Wang, S.; Sun, J.; Yang, X. Polymethyldopa Nanoparticles-Based Fluorescent Sensor for Detection of Tyrosinase Activity. ACS Sens. 2018, 3, 1855–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ding, Y.Z.; Wang, W.F.; Chai, T.; Qiang, Y.; Shi, Y.P.; Yang, J.L. Ratiometric target-triggered fluorescent silicon nanoparticles probe for quantitative visualization of tyrosinase activity. Talanta 2019, 197, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, H.; Lu, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, H. Detection of tyramine and tyrosinase activity using red region emission NaGdF4:Yb, Er@NaYF4 upconversion nanoparticles. Talanta 2019, 197, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pinho, J.O.; Matias, M.; Gaspar, M.M. Emergent Nanotechnological Strategies for Systemic Chemotherapy against Melanoma. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Kounalakis, N.; Goydos, J.S. Tumor cell and circulating markers in melanoma: Diagnosis, prognosis, and management. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2005, 7, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Reintgen, D.; Cruse, C.; Wells, K.; Berman, C.; Fenske, N.; Glass, F.; Schroer, K.; Heller, R.; Ross, M.; Lyman, G.; et al. The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases. Ann. Surg. 1994, 220, 759–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Parkin, D.M.; Pisani, P.; Ferlay, J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 80, 827–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Heo, J.R.; Kim, N.H.; Cho, J.; Choi, K.C. Current treatments for advanced melanoma and introduction of a promising novel gene therapy for melanoma (Review). Oncol. Rep. 2016, 36, 1779–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. King, R.A.; Pietsch, J.; Fryer, J.P.; Savage, S.; Brott, M.J.; Russell-Eggitt, I.; Summers, C.G.; Oetting, W.S.J.H.G. Tyrosinase gene mutations in oculocutaneous albinism1 (OCA1): Definition of the phenotype. Hum Genet. 2003, 113, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Smith, B.; Selby, P.; Southgate, J.; Pittman, K.; Bradley, C.; Blair, G.E. Detection of melanoma cells in peripheral blood by means of reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction. Lancet 1991, 338, 1227–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Palmieri, G.; Ascierto, P.A.; Perrone, F.; Satriano, S.M.; Ottaiano, A.; Daponte, A.; Napolitano, M.; Caraco, C.; Mozzillo, N.; Melucci, M.T.; et al. Prognostic value of circulating melanoma cells detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Quaglino, P.; Savoia, P.; Osella-Abate, S.; Bernengo, M.G. RT-PCR tyrosinase expression in the peripheral blood of melanoma patients. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2004, 4, 727–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Visús, C.; Andres, R.; Mayordomo, J.I.; Martinez-Lorenzo, M.J.; Murillo, L.; Sáez-Gutiérrez, B.; Diestre, C.; Marcos, I.; Astier, P.; Godino, J.J.M.R. Prognostic role of circulating melanoma cells detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for tyrosinase mRNA in patients with melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2007, 17, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Mendes, E.; Perry, M.D.J.; Francisco, A.P. Design and discovery of mushroom tyrosinase inhibitors and their therapeutic applications. Expert Opin. Drug Dis. 2014, 9, 533–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ullah, S.; Son, S.; Yun, H.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Chun, P.; Moon, H.R. Tyrosinase inhibitors: A patent review (2011–2015). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2016, 26, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Leyden, J.J.; Shergill, B.; Micali, G.; Downie, J.; Wallo, W. Natural options for the management of hyperpigmentation. J. Eur. Acad Derm. Venereol 2011, 25, 1140–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhu, T.H.; Cao, S.W.; Yu, Y.Y. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of paeonol thiosemicarbazone analogues as mushroom tyrosinase inhibitors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kubo, I.; Kinst-Hori, I.; Chaudhuri, S.K.; Kubo, Y.; Sanchez, Y.; Ogura, T. Flavonols from Heterotheca inuloides: Tyrosinase inhibitory activity and structural criteria. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2000, 8, 1749–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Jow, T.; Hantash, B.M. Hydroquinone-induced depigmentation: Case report and review of the literature. Dermatitis 2014, 25, e1–e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Draelos, Z.D. Skin lightening preparations and the hydroquinone controversy. Dermatol. Ther. 2007, 20, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Searle, T.; Al-Niaimi, F.; Ali, F.R. The top 10 cosmeceuticals for facial hyperpigmentation. Dermatol. Ther. 2020, 33, e14095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhou, H.; Zhao, J.; Li, A.; Reetz, M.T. Chemical and Biocatalytic Routes to Arbutin (dagger). Molecules 2019, 24, 3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Burnett, C.L.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Hill, R.A.; Klaassen, C.D.; Liebler, D.C.; Marks, J.G., Jr.; Shank, R.C.; Slaga, T.J.; Snyder, P.W.; et al. Final report of the safety assessment of Kojic acid as used in cosmetics. Int. J. Toxicol. 2010, 29, 244S–273S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Saeedi, M.; Eslamifar, M.; Khezri, K. Kojic acid applications in cosmetic and pharmaceutical preparations. Biomed. Pharm. 2019, 110, 582–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ashooriha, M.; Khoshneviszadeh, M.; Khoshneviszadeh, M.; Rafiei, A.; Kardan, M.; Yazdian-Robati, R.; Emami, S. Kojic acid-natural product conjugates as mushroom tyrosinase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 201, 112480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tajima, R.; Oozeki, H.; Muraoka, S.; Tanaka, S.; Motegi, Y.; Nihei, H.; Yamada, Y.; Masuoka, N.; Nihei, K. Synthesis and evaluation of bibenzyl glycosides as potent tyrosinase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 1374–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ishioka, W.; Oonuki, S.; Iwadate, T.; Nihei, K.I. Resorcinol alkyl glucosides as potent tyrosinase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Jung, H.J.; Noh, S.G.; Park, Y.; Kang, D.; Chun, P.; Chung, H.Y.; Moon, H.R. In vitro and in silico insights into tyrosinase inhibitors with (E)-benzylidene-1-indanone derivatives. Comput. Struct Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 1255–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Durai, P.; Ko, Y.J.; Kim, J.C.; Pan, C.H.; Park, K. Identification of Tyrosinase Inhibitors and Their Structure-Activity Relationships via Evolutionary Chemical Binding Similarity and Structure-Based Methods. Molecules 2021, 26, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, D.; Zou, L.; Jin, Q.; Hou, J.; Ge, G.; Yang, L. Human carboxylesterases: A comprehensive review. Acta Pharm. Sinica. B 2018, 8, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Ando, H.; Kondoh, H.; Ichihashi, M.; Hearing, V.J. Approaches to identify inhibitors of melanin biosynthesis via the quality control of tyrosinase. J. Investig. Derm. 2007, 127, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Park, S.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Kang, J.S.; Kim, I.Y.; Choi, K.S.; Kim, H.M. Carboxylesterase-2-Selective Two-Photon Ratiometric Probe Reveals Decreased Carboxylesterase-2 Activity in Breast Cancer Cells. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 9465–9471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Wu, X.; Shi, W.; Li, X.; Ma, H. Recognition Moieties of Small Molecular Fluorescent Probes for Bioimaging of Enzymes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 1892–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Li, S.; Hu, R.; Wang, S.; Guo, X.; Zeng, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, G. Specific Imaging of Tyrosinase in Vivo with 3-Hydroxybenzyl Caged D-Luciferins. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 9296–9300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yi, X.; Wang, F.; Qin, W.; Yang, X.; Yuan, J. Near-infrared fluorescent probes in cancer imaging and therapy: An emerging field. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 1347–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Vendrell, M.; Zhai, D.; Er, J.C.; Chang, Y.T. Combinatorial strategies in fluorescent probe development. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4391–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Kobayashi, H.; Ogawa, M.; Alford, R.; Choyke, P.L.; Urano, Y. New strategies for fluorescent probe design in medical diagnostic imaging. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2620–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Pode, Z.; Peri-Naor, R.; Georgeson, J.M.; Ilani, T.; Kiss, V.; Unger, T.; Markus, B.; Barr, H.M.; Motiei, L.; Margulies, D. Protein recognition by a pattern-generating fluorescent molecular probe. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biosensors 11 00290 g001 550
Figure 1. The slow ortho-hydroxylation of monophenol and the fast oxidation of catechol catalyzed by TYR.
Figure 1. The slow ortho-hydroxylation of monophenol and the fast oxidation of catechol catalyzed by TYR.
Biosensors 11 00290 g001
Biosensors 11 00290 g002 550
Figure 2. Biosynthetic pathway of melanin [7,8,10]. DQ: dopaquinone; L-Dopa: L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; DHICA: 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2 carboxylic acid; DHI: 5,6-dihydroxyindole; ICAQ: indole-2-carboxylic acid-5,6-quinone; IQ: indole-5,6-quinone; HBTA: 5-hydroxy-1,4-benzothiazinylalanine.
Figure 2. Biosynthetic pathway of melanin [7,8,10]. DQ: dopaquinone; L-Dopa: L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; DHICA: 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2 carboxylic acid; DHI: 5,6-dihydroxyindole; ICAQ: indole-2-carboxylic acid-5,6-quinone; IQ: indole-5,6-quinone; HBTA: 5-hydroxy-1,4-benzothiazinylalanine.
Biosensors 11 00290 g002
Biosensors 11 00290 g003 550
Figure 3. The conserved cavity of TYR from different sources. (a) The crystal of TYR from Streptomyces castaneoglobisporus (PDB ID: 2ZMX). (b) The crystal of TYR from Bacillus megaterium (PDB ID: 3NQ1). (c) The Crystal of TYR from fungus (PDB ID: 2Y9W, Agaricus bisporus). (d) The Crystal of TYR from plant (PDB ID: 5CE9, Juglans regia). Two copper ions (orange) are coordinated with three histidine residues, respectively.
Figure 3. The conserved cavity of TYR from different sources. (a) The crystal of TYR from Streptomyces castaneoglobisporus (PDB ID: 2ZMX). (b) The crystal of TYR from Bacillus megaterium (PDB ID: 3NQ1). (c) The Crystal of TYR from fungus (PDB ID: 2Y9W, Agaricus bisporus). (d) The Crystal of TYR from plant (PDB ID: 5CE9, Juglans regia). Two copper ions (orange) are coordinated with three histidine residues, respectively.
Biosensors 11 00290 g003
Biosensors 11 00290 g004 550
Figure 4. Catalytic cycle of TYR.
Figure 4. Catalytic cycle of TYR.
Biosensors 11 00290 g004
Biosensors 11 00290 g005 550
Figure 5. The catalytic reaction of TYR-mediated aromatic amine and o-aminophenol. Adapted with permission from ref. [43]. 1987, American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. The catalytic reaction of TYR-mediated aromatic amine and o-aminophenol. Adapted with permission from ref. [43]. 1987, American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 11 00290 g005
Biosensors 11 00290 g006 550
Figure 6. Detection system of Ag+-TMB with dopamine as substrate. (a) Mechanism of the colorimetric assay based on Ag+-TMB system for TYR activity. (b) The metabolic reaction of dopamine catalyzed by TYR.
Figure 6. Detection system of Ag+-TMB with dopamine as substrate. (a) Mechanism of the colorimetric assay based on Ag+-TMB system for TYR activity. (b) The metabolic reaction of dopamine catalyzed by TYR.
Biosensors 11 00290 g006
Biosensors 11 00290 g007 550
Figure 7. Several strategies reported for designing the fluorescent substrates of TYR. (a) Some typical warheads of fluorescent probe for TYR detection. (b) Two sensing mechanisms of OFF-ON probes towards TYR.
Figure 7. Several strategies reported for designing the fluorescent substrates of TYR. (a) Some typical warheads of fluorescent probe for TYR detection. (b) Two sensing mechanisms of OFF-ON probes towards TYR.
Biosensors 11 00290 g007
Biosensors 11 00290 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) The structure of Mela-TYR and its reaction mechanism with TYR. (b) Colocalization of Mela-TYR and lysosome tracker DND-99 in B16 cells. The cells were pretreated with inulavosin (10 μM) for (1) 0, (2) 6, and (3) 12 h, respectively, and then incubated with Mela-TYR and DND-99 [89]. Copyright permission is granted by American Chemical Society.
Figure 8. (a) The structure of Mela-TYR and its reaction mechanism with TYR. (b) Colocalization of Mela-TYR and lysosome tracker DND-99 in B16 cells. The cells were pretreated with inulavosin (10 μM) for (1) 0, (2) 6, and (3) 12 h, respectively, and then incubated with Mela-TYR and DND-99 [89]. Copyright permission is granted by American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 11 00290 g008
Biosensors 11 00290 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) The schematic diagram of NBR-AP for TYR detection. (b) Images for 3-day-old zebrafish incubated with various concentrations of the probe and kojic acid. (c) Fluorescent and bright field images of 4-week-old mice injected with the probe upon injection with B16F10 cells. (d) Images of dissected organs of the mice injected with the probe upon injection with B16F10 cells for 14 days. (e) Relative intensity values (n = 3) obtained from (d) and calculated using Image J2x software, while the relative intensity from tumor is defined as 1.0 [88]. Copyright permission is granted by American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. (a) The schematic diagram of NBR-AP for TYR detection. (b) Images for 3-day-old zebrafish incubated with various concentrations of the probe and kojic acid. (c) Fluorescent and bright field images of 4-week-old mice injected with the probe upon injection with B16F10 cells. (d) Images of dissected organs of the mice injected with the probe upon injection with B16F10 cells for 14 days. (e) Relative intensity values (n = 3) obtained from (d) and calculated using Image J2x software, while the relative intensity from tumor is defined as 1.0 [88]. Copyright permission is granted by American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 11 00290 g009
Biosensors 11 00290 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) The mechanism of TYR activity detected by HB-NP. (b) Colocalization of HB-NP and Alexa Fluor 488 (a commercial dye) in B16 cells [80]. (1) Bright-field image of the B16 cells; (2) fluorescence image of the red channel for HB-NP; (3) fluorescence image of the green channel for Alexa Fluor 488 (λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–555 nm); (4) the merged image of (1)–(3). (4) Intensity correlation plot of HB-NP and Alexa Fluor 488. (6) Intensity profile of the linear ROI across the cell (yellow line in images (2)–(4)). Copyright permission is granted by American Chemical Society.
Figure 10. (a) The mechanism of TYR activity detected by HB-NP. (b) Colocalization of HB-NP and Alexa Fluor 488 (a commercial dye) in B16 cells [80]. (1) Bright-field image of the B16 cells; (2) fluorescence image of the red channel for HB-NP; (3) fluorescence image of the green channel for Alexa Fluor 488 (λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–555 nm); (4) the merged image of (1)–(3). (4) Intensity correlation plot of HB-NP and Alexa Fluor 488. (6) Intensity profile of the linear ROI across the cell (yellow line in images (2)–(4)). Copyright permission is granted by American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 11 00290 g010
Biosensors 11 00290 g011 550
Figure 11. Schematic illustration of the PMNPs (a), Si NPs (b), and UCNPs (c) for the TYR activity detection.
Figure 11. Schematic illustration of the PMNPs (a), Si NPs (b), and UCNPs (c) for the TYR activity detection.
Biosensors 11 00290 g011
Table
Table 1. Properties of the detectable species from several substrates.
Table 1. Properties of the detectable species from several substrates.
SubstratesChemical StructuresMetabolite
Stability		Coupled
Reagent		Detectable
Species		λ
(nm)		ε
(M−1·cm−1)		Ref.
4-Tert-butylcatechol (TBC) Biosensors 11 00290 i001Stable-o-Quinone4001200[44]
L-Tyrosine Biosensors 11 00290 i002Unstable-Dopachrome4753600[45]
L-DOPA Biosensors 11 00290 i003Unstable-Dopachrome4753600[45]
MBTHMBTH-adduct48422,300[42]
Dopamine (DA) Biosensors 11 00290 i004UnstableMBTHMBTH-adduct50342,500[42]
Isoproterenol (ISO) Biosensors 11 00290 i005UnstableMBTHMBTH-adduct49731,500[42]
Table
Table 2. Non-fluorescent substrates of TYR.
Table 2. Non-fluorescent substrates of TYR.
SubstratesChemical StructuresEnzyme SourcesMetabolitesEnzyme
Activity		Km
(μM)		Vmax (nmol/min/mg)Ref.
L-Tyrosine Biosensors 11 00290 i006MushroomL-DOPAMonophenolase activity270-[41]
L-DOPA Biosensors 11 00290 i007MushroomDopachromeDiphenolase
activity		800-[41]
3-Hydroxyanthranilic acid Biosensors 11 00290 i008MushroomCinnabarinic acidDiphenolase
activity		78012[61]
4-Tertbutyl-catechol Biosensors 11 00290 i009Mushroom4-Tert-butyl-1,2-benzoquinoneDiphenolase
activity		990-[37]
Table
Table 3. Fluorescent substrates of TYR.
Table 3. Fluorescent substrates of TYR.
NamesChemical Structuresλex/em
(nm)		FoldsKm
(μM)		Vmax
(μM·min−1)		LOD
(U·mL−1)		Biological
Applications		Ref.
L3 Biosensors 11 00290 i010425/467
425/535		-43.51.870.2A375 cells[81]
Probe 1 Biosensors 11 00290 i011670/708-1564.582.76B16 and HeLa cells, zebrafish[82]
HB-NP Biosensors 11 00290 i012480/6754887.351.070.5B16, HepG2, A549, HeLa, CCC-HPF-1 and CCC-HSF-1 cells; inhibitor screening.[80]
Probe 1 Biosensors 11 00290 i013670/708---0.11Imaging of TYR in B16 cells and zebrafish, melanoma diagnosis in a mouse.[83]
Probe 1 Biosensors 11 00290 i014550/586-300.720.04B16, HepG2 and MCF-7 cells[84]
Probe 1 Biosensors 11 00290 i015550/583-6.50.00090.5B16 and HepG2 cells[85]
NHU Biosensors 11 00290 i016382/50312---B16-F1 and HeLa cells[86]
Probe 1 Biosensors 11 00290 i017460/54012---Screening inhibitors[87]
NBR-AP Biosensors 11 00290 i018580/6607229.55.75-Imaging of TYR in B16F10 and HeLa cells, in vivo imaging of zebrafish and mice[88]
Mela-TYR Biosensors 11 00290 i019425/54750--0.07B16 and HeLa cells, the subcellular localization[89]
Cy-tyr Biosensors 11 00290 i020630/760
516/556		---0.02B16, HeLa, MCF-7 and HUVEC cells[90]
Probe 1 Biosensors 11 00290 i021650/720---0.01Screening inhibitors[91]
MB1 Biosensors 11 00290 i022640/706>1004.60.45-B16F10 and HeLa cells, photodynamic therapy[92]
Tyro-1 Biosensors 11 00290 i023400/45212.5--0.025B16F10 and HeLa cells[93]
Probe 1 Biosensors 11 00290 i024460/515-5.36.36-B16F10 cells[94]
CHMC-DOPA Biosensors 11 00290 i025538/629---0.003HepG2 cells, zebrafish[95]
Table
Table 4. The commonly used positive inhibitors and their adverse effects.
Table 4. The commonly used positive inhibitors and their adverse effects.
InhibitorsChemical StructuresSourcesAdverse EffectsDosageGroupRef.
Hydroquinone
(HQ)		 Biosensors 11 00290 i026Plant
(1)
Irritant contact dermatitis.
(2)
Exogenous ochronosis.
(3)
Transient erythema.
<4%Forbidden[117,118]
β-Arbutin Biosensors 11 00290 i027PlantFacial tingling<3%Approved[119,120]
Kojic acid
(KA)		 Biosensors 11 00290 i028Fungus
(1)
Contact dermatitis (especially in sensitive skins).
(2)
Long-term use may make the skin more prone to sunburn.
(3)
Using KA on damaged or broken skins can lead to cancer.
<1%Approved[121,122]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, Y.-F.; Zhu, S.-X.; Hou, F.-B.; Zhao, D.-F.; Pan, Q.-S.; Xiang, Y.-W.; Qian, X.-K.; Ge, G.-B.; Wang, P. Spectrophotometric Assays for Sensing Tyrosinase Activity and Their Applications. Biosensors 2021, 11, 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11080290

AMA Style

Fan Y-F, Zhu S-X, Hou F-B, Zhao D-F, Pan Q-S, Xiang Y-W, Qian X-K, Ge G-B, Wang P. Spectrophotometric Assays for Sensing Tyrosinase Activity and Their Applications. Biosensors. 2021; 11(8):290. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11080290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Yu-Fan, Si-Xing Zhu, Fan-Bin Hou, Dong-Fang Zhao, Qiu-Sha Pan, Yan-Wei Xiang, Xing-Kai Qian, Guang-Bo Ge, and Ping Wang. 2021. "Spectrophotometric Assays for Sensing Tyrosinase Activity and Their Applications" Biosensors 11, no. 8: 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11080290

APA Style

Fan, Y. -F., Zhu, S. -X., Hou, F. -B., Zhao, D. -F., Pan, Q. -S., Xiang, Y. -W., Qian, X. -K., Ge, G. -B., & Wang, P. (2021). Spectrophotometric Assays for Sensing Tyrosinase Activity and Their Applications. Biosensors, 11(8), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11080290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop