Next Article in Journal
Lab-on-a-Chip Platforms for Airborne Particulate Matter Applications: A Review of Current Perspectives
Next Article in Special Issue
Easy-to-Operate Co-Flow Step Emulsification Device for High-Throughput Three-Dimensional Cell Culture
Previous Article in Journal
Proof of Concept in Artificial-Intelligence-Based Wearable Gait Monitoring for Parkinson’s Disease Management Optimization
Previous Article in Special Issue
How to Perform a Microfluidic Cultivation Experiment—A Guideline to Success
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Microsystems for Cell Cultures

by
Iordania Constantinou
1,2
1
Institute for Microtechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
2
Zentrum für Pharmaverfahrenstechnik (PVZ), Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Biosensors 2022, 12(4), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040190
Submission received: 21 March 2022 / Accepted: 22 March 2022 / Published: 23 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Microsystems for Cell Cultures)
Microfabricated systems are increasingly being utilized in biotechnological, biomedical, and pharmaceutical research and development as replacements for traditional in vitro cell cultures, bioreactors, and animal experiments (Figure 1). Such microsystems include microfluidics for cell culture, comprising microphysiological systems (MPS), also known as organ-on-a-chip (OoC) platforms, and microbioreactors.
OoCs are designed to recapitulate the complex biochemical and biophysical conditions of living cells and tissues and replicate their natural microenvironment. The dynamic control over the conditions cells are exposed to is facilitated by active and passive components, such as microvalves, as well as by integrated microsensors. The ability to in situ control and monitor both the cell culture microenvironment and the biological responses of the cultured cells allows for elevated data relevance and sets microfluidic platforms apart from traditionally used cell culture tools. In addition to OoC platforms, microbioreactors have become versatile bioprocess engineering tools used for microbial and mammalian cell cultivation. Such cell culture technologies are often equipped with miniaturized sensors that provide feedback, allow process monitoring and control, and ensure the necessary cell culture conditions are maintained.
This Special Issue aims to assemble a collection of novel methods and microsystems for cell cultivation. Advances in the areas of system design, sensor integration, as well as target applications are welcome. Two original articles have already been published in this Special Issue. Stelzle et al. reported a parallelizable microfluidic platform with a multi-well plate format, where ten independent cell culture chambers support the modelling of cellular barriers co-cultured with 3D tumor spheroids. Real-time barrier function was assessed using integrated electrodes for transepithelial/transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements [1]. Grünberger et al. have contributed a protocol paper on how to successfully perform a microfluidic cultivation experiment with the aim to promote broader applicability of microfluidic cell culture devices in the field of life science and promote their ongoing advancement [2]. The focus of the published protocol lies in the successful and reproducible cultivation of cells (bacteria, algae, fungi, mammalian cells) in microfluidic systems. An overview of the most frequently occurring challenges and pitfalls is provided, along with guidelines on how to overcome them.
Further contributions in the form of original work, reviews or protocols on the broad topic of microsystems for cell cultivation are welcome.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nair, A.L.; Mesch, L.; Schulz, I.; Becker, H.; Raible, J.; Kiessling, H.; Werner, S.; Rothbauer, U.; Schmees, C.; Busche, M.; et al. Parallelizable Microfluidic Platform to Model and Assess In Vitro Cellular Barriers: Technology and Application to Study the Interaction of 3D Tumor Spheroids with Cellular Barriers. Biosensors 2021, 11, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Täuber, S.; Schmitz, J.; Blöbaum, L.; Fante, N.; Steinhoff, H.; Grünberger, A. How to Perform a Microfluidic Cultivation Experiment—A Guideline to Success. Biosensors 2021, 11, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microfabricated platforms, often equipped with integrated sensors, are increasingly utilized as replacements for traditional in vitro cell cultures, bioreactors, and animal experiments. Figure contributed by Christian Sieben, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research. Created with BioRender.com (accessed date 21 March 2022).
Figure 1. Microfabricated platforms, often equipped with integrated sensors, are increasingly utilized as replacements for traditional in vitro cell cultures, bioreactors, and animal experiments. Figure contributed by Christian Sieben, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research. Created with BioRender.com (accessed date 21 March 2022).
Biosensors 12 00190 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Constantinou, I. Microsystems for Cell Cultures. Biosensors 2022, 12, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040190

AMA Style

Constantinou I. Microsystems for Cell Cultures. Biosensors. 2022; 12(4):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Constantinou, Iordania. 2022. "Microsystems for Cell Cultures" Biosensors 12, no. 4: 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040190

APA Style

Constantinou, I. (2022). Microsystems for Cell Cultures. Biosensors, 12(4), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop