Next Article in Journal
Zip Nucleic Acid-Based Genomagnetic Assay for Electrochemical Detection of microRNA-34a
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Bacterial Nanocellulose-Based Electrochemical Biosensors: Functionalization, Challenges, and Future Perspectives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/bios13010143
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Dual-Emission Carbon-Dot Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor for Morphine Recognition in Biological Samples

by
Qinhong Yin
1,
Yijie Wang
2,
Xuerong Li
2,
Dezhi Yang
2,
Yaling Yang
2,
Cheng Yang
1 and
Yanqin Zhu
3,*
1
Faculty of Narcotics Control, Yunnan Police College, Kunming 650223, China
2
Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
3
Research Center for Analysis and Measurement, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(1), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010143
Submission received: 13 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 15 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Optical and Photonic Biosensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Herein, a novel nitr[ogen-doped carbon dot (N-CD) fluorescence sensor with a dual emission ratio is developed using the microwave-assisted synthesis of m-phenylenediamine and spermidine. As a result of the fluorescence inner filtration effect (IFE) effect between morphine (MOR) and N-CD, the blue fluorescence of N-CDs at 350 nm was reduced in the presence of MOR, whereas the fluorescence of N-CDs at 456 nm increased substantially. The results demonstrated that the approach has a tremendous potential and that the linear range of MOR detection is 0.25–25 µg/mL, with a 71.8 ng/mL detection limit. Under UV light, the blue fluorescent system is easily visible to the naked eye. More significantly, the sensor proved successful in providing satisfactory results for the speciation measurement of MOR in a variety of biological samples.

1. Introduction

An essential opium alkaloid known as morphine (MOR) is a natural source of a phenanthrene derivative purified from the poppy plant [1]. Clinically, it helps patients with pain relief, particularly chronic cancer symptoms. Regrettably, MOR can, like all opioids, lead to addiction and even death as a result of respiratory failure [2,3,4,5]. Overdose deaths caused by opioids claimed over 100,000 lives in the United States for the 12 months ending in April 2021, a 28.5% increase from the year before [6]. To monitor MOR levels in biological samples and prevent overdose or abuse-induced toxicity, morphine analysis is required in the healthcare and forensic domains [7].
It is generally accepted that MOR diagnosis uses two strategies: initial on-site screening and laboratory validation. The majority of the initial screening process involves qualitative analysis, which can immediately determine whether specimens contain morphine. The commonly used screening techniques include immunoassay, spectroscopy, and molecular imprinting [8,9,10]. These initial screening methods, although simple and fast, cannot be quantitatively analyzed and are also prone to false positive or false negative phenomena. For laboratory confirmation, samples are sent to the laboratory for further quantitative analysis using large instruments such as HPLC-MS (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) [11,12] and GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) [13,14]. However, these instruments are bulky and require professional personnel to operate, so they cannot be used for rapid detection in the field of front-line law enforcement.
The fluorescence analysis method has been used more and more in field rapid detection due to its features of convenient operation, simple equipment, high sensitivity, and strong selectivity [15]. Carbon dots (CDs), generally termed semiconductor nanocrystals, are zero-dimensional nanocrystals, and the size is no more than twice the exciton Bohr radius of the corresponding semiconductor material [16]. When the size reaches a critical value, the energy will be completely quantized, showing quantum characteristics, so it is called quantum dots. As a novel form of fluorescent semiconductor, quantum dots have many unique properties compared with traditional fluorescent dyes, such as good photostability, adjustable fluorescence emission wavelength, high fluorescence intensity, and good biocompatibility [17]. Because of their unique optical properties, they have gradually replaced the traditional organic fluorescent dyes and are a relatively ideal fluorescent nanomaterial. CDs have been used in detection and analysis more frequently due to their excellent fluorescence performance [18,19,20].
As the name implies, CDs are used in chemical sensors because of their molecular recognition function. However, fluorescent chemical sensors are usually interfered with or affected by sensor concentration, stability of detector or light source, and coexistence of components in a complex sample matrix [21]. The double emission ratio fluorescence method can avoid the above problems by using ratio fluorescence to detect the target [22]. It is still relatively uncommon to use carbon dots in the development of ratio fluorescence probes and to use CDs further in the detection of illegal drugs in biological samples.
In this study, novel carbon dots were synthesized from m-phenylenediamine and spermidine as the source of N atoms by microwave. Due to the improved inhibition efficiency attributed to the fluorophore’s inner filter effect of the nanoparticles in the occurrence of MOR, the fluorescence detector was modified for the analysis of MOR. For the highly selective MOR measurement in biological samples, the dual emission ratio fluorescence sensor has been successfully employed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All reagents and chemicals were analytical grade (⩾99.0% purity) and were utilized as received without additional purification. The Ministry of Public Security’s Key Laboratory of Narcotics Assay and Control Technology supplied MOR, heroin and methylamphetamine standards (⩾99.5% purity). Spermidine (99.0% purity) and m-phenylenediamine (99.0% purity) were provided by Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd., and Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., both of Shanghai, China. Siens Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. and Maclean Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) provided the amino acids (⩾98.0% purity) used in the interference test (Tianjin, China). All other chemicals were purchased from Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. and Fengchuan Chemical Reagent Technologies (Tianjin, China). Using the Milli-Q filtration apparatus (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), double-distilled water (18.2 MΩ cm) was utilized as the input to generate deionized water.

2.2. Instruments

A quartz cell (1 cm × 1 cm)-equipped Agilent G9800A Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer (USA) was applied to record the fluorescence spectrum. The emission and excitation monochromatic slit widths were both fixed at 10 nm. A TENSOR-27 FTIR spectrometer was used to record the FT-IR spectrum (Bruker, Bremen, Germany). Utilizing a UV-2550 spectrophotometer, the ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrum was recorded (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). PHI5000 Versa Probeqy-II with monochromatized Al K light was used to characterize X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (ULVAC-PHI, Kanagawa, Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded by a PANalytical X’pert3 powder diffractometer using Ni-filtered Cu Ka radiation. Using a transmission electron microscope, TecnaiG2 F30 S-Twin (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was applied to analyze the size and appearance of carbon dots. Carbon dots were synthesized using the Analytik-Jena TOPwave microwave-assisted digesting system (Jena, Germany). Using a Leici PHS-3 digital pH meter, the pH was controlled (Shanghai, China).

2.3. Preparation of Real Samples and Standard Solutions

In this study, blood samples were collected from healthy individuals. To collect serum at 4 °C for the plasma preparation, blood samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 30 min. In water, a stock standard solution of MOR (100 μg/mL) was prepared. The stock standard solutions were diluted with deionized water to formulate working solutions. All solutions were kept in a freezer at 4 °C.

2.4. Preparation of N-CDs

The fluorescent N-CD schematic diagram for the synthesis process is shown in Figure 1. Spermidine (0.4 g) and m-phenylenediamine (0.4 g) were precisely weighed, dissolved in 40 mL of deionized water, and then heated at 180 °C for one hour in a microwave. Using a 0.22 μm filter membrane, the sample was filtered, and the filtrate was collected for dialyzing. The fractions corresponding to 3 kDa were ultrafiltered from N-CDs and studied in our work.

2.5. Detection of MOR with the Ratiometric Sensor

At room temperature, 100 µL of N-CDs solution and 20 µL of serum with various concentrations of MOR were carefully mixed. Under the optimized conditions, the pH was adjusted to 8 with citrate-disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer. Next, the mixture was diluted to 4 mL with deionized water and heated in a water bath at 44 °C to maximize the sensitivity. The final MOR concentrations were 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 25 µg/mL. Then, with excitation at 310 nm, fluorescence spectra in the wavelength range of 330–470 nm were obtained. This sensing system’s MOR selectivity was evaluated using NO2−, HCO3−, K+, Na+, Mg2+, Cu2+, K+, Fe2+, Mn2+, Zn2+ and other amino acids, such as Tyr, Gly, Try, Leu, Met, Glu, Lys, and Cys.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization Results of N-CDs

TEM was used to analyze the nanostructure of N-CDs. N-CD TEM images at various scales are displayed in Figure 2A,B. As shown in Figure 2A, the transmission TEM images show good monodispersity and good size homogeneity of N-CDs, clearly indicating that these nanoparticles are almost spherical with an average size of 5 nm. However, neither Figure 2A nor Figure 2B showed any obvious lattice fringes, suggesting that the crystallinity of the carbon dots is weak, which is in accordance with previous research [23,24].
The N-CD FT-IR spectra are shown in Figure 2C. The stretching vibrations of O-H and N-H are associated with the low-intensity band at 3472 cm−1. The C-H stretching and bending vibrations were demonstrated by the peaks at 2065 cm−1 and 732 cm−1, respectively [25]. The C=C and C-N bending vibrations are correlated to the peaks at 1605 and 1424 cm−1, respectively [26]. These results confirmed the existence of the -NH2, C-N, and C=C groups, which enhanced the solubility of N-CDs in water.
Figure 2D shows the XRD patterns of the obtained material. As can be seen, it has an amorphous structure with a broad peak at 2θ = 21.22° that is clearly related to the amorphous nature of C-dots.
XPS was applied to investigate the chemical groups on the surface of N-CDs. C1s, N1s, and O1s concentration levels are the origin of the peaks in the spectrum at 283.2, 399.2, and 530.4 eV (Figure 3A). Three peaks in the C1s spectra can be assigned to the C=C, C-N, and C=O groups with energies of 284.8, 286.2, and 288.8 eV, respectively (Figure 3B) [27]. Two peaks in the N1s spectra were observed at 399.2 and 401.3 eV (Figure 3C), and they might belong to N-H and N-O bond types. Two major peaks from the C=O and C-O groups can be observed at 532.0 and 533.7 eV, according to further analysis of the O1s spectra (Figure 3D) [28]. Additionally, quantum yield (QY) of N-CDs was determined based on the relative method by using quinine sulfate as reference (dissolved in 0.1 M H2SO4, QY = 54.6%) [29]. According to the reference calculation formula, the N-CD quantum yield was 12.95%.

3.2. Optical Properties of N-CDs

Figure 4A shows the N-CDs’ UV-vis spectrum. The π-π* transitions are responsible for the shoulder peak at 242 nm [30]. Besides the peak at 242 nm, no sharp absorption peaks were present for N-CDs, except for the display of a long absorption edge, which was extended from 275 to 400 nm. Using the same 310 nm excitation wavelength, N-CDs in this sensor system displayed two emission peaks (350 nm and 456 nm) (Figure 4B).

3.3. Effect of Solution pH

Fluorophore ionization has a significant impact on how much light is emitted. Since the I350/I456 value decreases with increasing concentration of MOR, it is necessary to adjust the solution pH to maximize a method’s sensitivity. To maximize a method’s sensitivity, it is necessary to adjust the pH of a solution. The pH ranged in this study from 6.0 to 9.0. I350/I456’s fluorescence ratio increased from pH 8.0 to 9.0 after declining from pH 6.0 to 8.0. (Figure 5A). Therefore, before testing, the pH value of the test solution must be adjusted to 8.0.

3.4. System Temperature

Temperature has an effect on the return of excited electrons to the ground state to produce changes in fluorescence intensity. Thus, the effects of system temperatures of 14, 24, 34, 44, 54, 64, and 74 °C on the fluorescence intensity were explored (Figure 5B). The results show that the fluorescence ratio of I350/I456 decreased from 14 °C to 44 °C and then increased when the temperature increased from 44 °C to 74 °C. Considering this comprehensively, the temperature of the system was chosen at room 44 °C. The temperature change feature could be attributed to the temperature-enhanced population of non-radiative channels of surface (trap/defect) states. More non-radiative channels would be activated at a higher temperature, and more excited electrons returned to the ground state via a non-radiative process, resulting in decreased fluorescence intensity [31,32].

3.5. Effect of Interfering Ions and Substances

An innovative fluorescence probe must have excellent selectivity. The effects of different ions (NO2−, HCO3−, Na+, Mg2+, Cu2+, K+, Fe2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Fe3+) and interfering substances (tyrosine, glycine, tryptophan, leucine, methionine, glutathione, glucose, lysine, cysteine and vitamin C) added in the same proportion (100 μg/mL) on the fluorescence signal of the morphine+N-CDs system were explored. Experiments were carried out three times in regard to the results displayed in Figure 6A,B. These interfering ions and interfering substances did not affect the system. The systematic execution of N-CDs concerning their selectivity towards MOR was also conducted against some of the very common interfering MOR analogues such as heroin and methylamphetamine. It was found that morphine significantly enhanced the fluorescence of N-CDs at 466 nm, while heroin and methamphetamine had no effect on N-CDs at 466 nm (Figure 6C). The above results confirm the good selectivity of the ratiometric fluorescence sensor toward MOR.

3.6. Method Validation

The concentration of MOR displayed a consistent pattern as a function of I350/I456 in the range of 0.25–25 μg/mL (I350/I456 = 1.6027 − 0.02622C, R2 = 0.9910) under optimal conditions (Figure 7). Error bars in the calibration curve were obtained from three parallel measurements. The method’s LOD was determined to be 71.8 ng/mL using the formula 3 s/K (s is the continuous determination standard deviation of 10 blanks, and K is the slope of the calibration trendline), and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 4.6% (c = 5 μg/mL, n = 8), in accordance with the IUPAC standard [33]. Based on this, the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of MOR determined by this sensor was calculated to be 0.239 μg/mL by 10 s/k. This approach exhibited a comparable detection limit to earlier reported MOR probes based on CDs, but it had a higher selectivity [34,35,36,37,38].

3.7. Analysis of Real Samples

Considering the complexity of blood samples, we added morphine to blood samples in this study to verify the accuracy and anti-interference of the method. Actual blood samples from patients were tested using the standardized calibration curve. The suggested method was used to determine the amounts of MOR in various blood samples (Table 1). The innovative fluorescent approach used had a recovery of between 93.8% and 103.3% with RSDs of under 6%. The analytical data of several strategies for MOR detection are evaluated in Table 2. The outcomes reveal that the proposed approach can be used to swiftly test blood for illegal drugs using the methods outlined. The results confirmed that the proposed method showed good anti-interference and accuracy.

3.8. Sensing Mechanism of Ratiometric Nanosensor towards MOR

We performed a series of tests to examine the effects of various MOR substances in the N-CDs system, and the results are shown in Figure 8A. These tests were carried out to investigate the potential mechanism of the N-CDs/MOR based fluorescence sensing technique for MOR analysis. The fluorescence of N-CDs at 350 nm was reduced when the MOR was introduced, whereas the fluorescence of N-CDs at 456 nm was substantially enhanced. The absorbance peak of MOR aligns with the emission spectrum of N-CDs, as shown in Figure 8A, demonstrating the possible existence of an inner filtration effect (IFE) or Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between N-CDs and MOR [39,40]. As a result, the intensity of the N-CDs fluorescence emission gradually decreased with the addition of morphine. As a result of the comparatively small size distribution of the resulting N-CDs, Figure 4B also exhibits a narrow band at 300–400 nm in the emission spectra. To further confirm the sensing mechanism, a fluorescence lifetime experiment was conducted [41]. Figure 8B shows the fluorescence lifetime graph. The average lifetime of fluorescence is 2.25 ns (χ2 = 0.90), while the lifetime components of N-CDs are τ1 = 0.83 ns (26.15%) and τ2 = 2.42 ns (73.85%). The mean fluorescence lifetime is 2.83 ns (χ2 = 0.94), and the lifetime components after the addition of morphine are τ1 = 0.86 ns (23.76%) and τ2 = 3.01 ns (76.24%). These results show that the fluorescence lifetime is essentially unaffected by the presence or absence of MOR. This indicates that IFE, not FRET, causes fluorescence quenching because the donor’s PL lifetime is constant during IFE but seems to change significantly during FRET. As a result, we can conclude that MOR and N-CDs have an IFE effect [42].
Since FRET is not affected by the polarity of the solvent, changing the polarity of the solution has little effect on the quenching efficiency based on FRET. Therefore, we also studied the interaction of N-CDs in different apolar solvents (Figure 8C). The experimental results show that the fluorescence is dramatically changed in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and chloroform (CHCl3). This further confirms that the interaction mechanism between N-CDs and MOR might be due to IFE.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a simple and accurate ratiometric fluorescence sensor for MOR measurement between N-CDs and MOR was developed. Based on the FRET effect, the addition of MOR further inhibited the fluorescence of N-CDs. High sensitivity, superior selectivity, rapid detection, and an expanded linear response range were all promising characteristics of the dual-emission carbon-dot ratiometric fluorescence sensing device. The detection of MOR in actual blood samples was evidence of the developed method.

Author Contributions

Q.Y.: Characterization, data analysis and writing. Y.W.: Probe synthesis, selectivity sensitivity and data analysis. X.L.: Conceptualization, supervision and data analysis. D.Y.: morphine detection in real samples, preparation of N-CDs composite hydrogels and CQD-based test papers. Y.Y. and C.Y.: Manuscript editing and data analysis. Y.Z.: original draft and editing, manuscript review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82260337), National Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Student of China (No. 202111392006), the Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Ministry of Public Security for Drug Analysis and Anti-Drug Technology (No. YNPC-B2021004) and Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province/General Project (No. 202001AT070002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acharya, H.S.; Sharma, V. Molecular characterization of opium poppy (Papaver somniferum) germplasm. Am. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 5, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pandey, S.S.; Singh, S.; Babu, C.S.V.; Shanker, K.; Srivastava, N.K.; Shukla, A.K.; Kalra, A. Fungal endophytes of catharanthus roseus enhance vindoline content by modulating structural and regulatory genes related to terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Celik, I.; Camci, H.; Kose, A.; Kosar, F.C.; Doganlar, S.; Frary, A. Molecular genetic diversity and association mapping of morphine content and agronomic traits in turkish opium poppy (papaver somniferum) germplasm. Mol. Breed. 2016, 36, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Brezinová, B.; Macák, M.; Eftimová, J. The morphological diversity of selected traits of world collection of poppy genotypes (genus Papaver). J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2009, 10, 183–192. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bandoni, A.L.; Stermitz, F.R.; Rondina, R.; Coussio, J.D. Alkaloidal content of argentine argemone. Phytochemistry 1975, 14, 1785–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pham, Q.; Burrows, M.; Litwin, A. Urgent need to expand syringe services programs in South Carolina and beyond. Subst. Abuse Trea. Pre. Policy 2022, 17, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Alhaddad, M.; Sheta, S.M. Dual naked-eye and optical chemosensor for morphine detection in biological real samples based on Cr (iii) metal-organic framework nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2022, 5, 28296–28304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lü, S.; Chang, W.B.; Li, Y.Z.; Ci, Y.X. The immunoassay of morphine using phase separation and colloid gold marking. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 28, 1324–1325. [Google Scholar]
  9. Feng, S.; Chen, W.; Huang, W.; Cheng, M.; Lin, J.; Li, Y. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of morphine in silver colloid. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2009, 7, 1055–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vergara, A.V.; Pernites, R.B.; Tiu, B.D.B.T.; Leon, A.C.C.; Mangadlao, J.D.; Binag, C.A.; Advincula, R.C. Capacitive detection of morphine via cathodically electropolymerized, molecularly imprinted poly(p-aminostyrene) films. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016, 217, 1810–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heydari, P.; Martins, M.; Rosing, H.; Hillebrand, M.; Gebretensae, A.; Schinkel, A.H.; Beijnen, J.H. Development and validation of a UPLC-MS/MS method with a broad linear dynamic range for the quantification of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in mouse plasma and tissue homogenates. J. Chromatogr. B 2021, 1166, 122403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jin, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of opiate and related metabolites in human urine samples by UPLC-MS/MS. Int. J. Mass Spectrome. 2021, 464, 116575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Robert, M. GC-MS quantitation of codeine, morphine, 6-acetylmorphine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, and oxymorphone in blood. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2005, 29, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
  14. Santos, V.; López, K.J.; Santos, L.M.; Yonamine, M.; Carmona, M.J.; Santos, S.R. Determining plasma morphine levels using GC-MS after solid phase extraction to monitor drug levels in the postoperative period. Clinics 2008, 63, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Tian, Y.; Martinez, M.M.; Pappas, D. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: A review of biochemical and microfluidic applications. Appl. Spectrosc. 2011, 65, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lim, S.Y.; Shen, W.; Gao, Z.Q. Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 362–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, S.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, K.; Wu, A.; Lin, H. Toward high-efficient red emissive carbon dots: Facile preparation, unique properties, and applications as multifunctional theranostic agents. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 8659–8668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, S.; Jiang, C. Fluorescent carbon dots: Rational synthesis, tunable optical properties and analytical applications. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 40973–40989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, D.; Zhang, F.; Liao, Y.; Wang, F.; Liu, H. Carbon quantum dots from pomelo peel as fluorescence probes for “turn-off-on” high-sensitivity detection of Fe3+ and L-cysteine. Molecules 2022, 27, 4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Q.; Du, S.; Tian, F.; Long, X.; Xie, S.; Tang, S.; Bao, L. Silver nanoparticle-functionalised nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots for the highly efficient determination of uric acid. Molecules 2022, 27, 4586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhattacharyya, D.; Sarswat, P.K.; Free, M.L. Quantum dots and carbon dots based fluorescent sensors for TB biomarkers detection. Vacuum 2017, 146, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, K.X.; Nie, C.; Guan, R.F.; Zhang, H. Double emission fluorescence probes based on unconventional fluorescent molecules and fluorescein isothiocyanate for ClO and Cu2+ detection. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2022, 50, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, D.; Fang, L.; Chen, H.; Yin, L.; Ying, S.; Xie, J. One-step hydrothermal synthesis and optical properties of self-quenching-resistant carbon dots towards fluorescent ink and as nanosensors for Fe3+ detection. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 8290–8299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, S.; Yang, H.; Xu, R.; Jiang, Y.; Gong, Y.; Gu, L.; Yu, Y. Selenium embedded in MOFs-derived N-doped microporous carbon polyhedrons as a high performance cathode for sodium-selenium batteries. Mater. Chem. Front. 2018, 2, 1574–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Chang, Q.; Hu, S. Carbon dots with concentration-tunable multicolored photoluminescence for simultaneous detection of Fe3+ and Cu2+ ions. Sensor. Actuat. B 2017, 253, 928–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cheng, Y.; Li, C.M.; Mu, R.Z.; Li, Y.F.; Xing, T.T.; Chen, B.B.; Huang, C.Z. Dynamically long-term imaging of cellular RNA by fluorescent carbon dots with surface isoquinoline moieties and amines. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 11358–11365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gao, Z.; Li, X.; Shi, L.; Yang, Y. Deep eutectic solvents-derived carbon dots for detection of mercury (ii), photocatalytic antifungal activity and fluorescent labeling for C. albicans. Spectrochim. Acta A 2019, 220, 117080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Xie, Y.; Bi, J.; Li, Y.; Song, Y.; Cheng, S.; Li, D.; Tan, M. Facile one-step synthesis of highly luminescent n-doped carbon dots as an efficient fluorescent probe for chromium(vi) detection based on the inner filter effect. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 3729–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miao, C.F.; Guo, X.Z.; Zhang, X.T.; Lin, Y.N.; Han, W.D.; Huang, Z.J.; Wen, S.H. Ratiometric fluorescence assay based on carbon dots and Cu2+-catalyzed oxidation of O-phenylenediamine for the effective detection of deferasirox. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 34525–34532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Luo, H.; Gao, Y. One-step preparation of nitrogen-doped and surface-passivated carbon quantum dots with high quantum yield and excellent optical properties. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 7648–7654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Eda, G.; Lin, Y.Y.; Mattevi, C.H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Chen, H.A.; Chen, I.S.; Chen, C.W.; Chhowalla, M. Blue photoluminescence from chemically derived graphene oxide. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hu, Y.; Yang, J.; Jia, L.; Yu, J.S. Ethanol in aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution: Hydrothermal synthesis of highly photo luminescent carbon dots as multi-functional nanosensors. Carbon 2015, 93, 999–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, L.; Wei, R.; Li, K.; Zhou, Z.; Song, P.; Tong, A. A ratiometric fluorescent probe for hydrophobic proteins in aqueous solution based on aggregation-induced emission. Analyst 2013, 138, 2068–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mokhtari, A.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Ensafi, A.A.; Beitollahi, H. Application of modified multiwall carbon nanotubes paste electrode for simultaneous voltammetric determination of morphine and diclofenac in biological and pharmaceutical samples. Sensor. Actuat. B 2012, 169, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Masteri-Farahani, M.; Mosleh, N. Functionalization of graphene quantum dots with antimorphine: Design of selective nanosensor for detection of morphine. Mater. Lett. 2019, 241, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Masteri-Farahani, M.; Askari, F. Design and photophysical insights on graphene quantum dots for use as nanosensor in differentiating methamphetamine and morphine in solution. Spectrochim. Acta A 2019, 206, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, C.; Yu, X.; Shi, X.M.; Han, Y.F.; Guo, Z.M.; Liu, Y. Development of carbon quantum dot–labeled antibody fluorescence immunoassays for the detection of morphine in hot pot soup base. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yin, Q.; Wang, M.; Fang, D.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, L. Novel N,Cl-doped deep eutectic solvents-based carbon dots as a selective fluorescent probe for determination of morphine in food. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 16805–16813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dai, R.; Hu, Y. Green/red dual emissive carbon dots for ratiometric fluorescence detection of acid red 18 in food. Sensor. Actuat. B 2022, 370, 132420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, M.; Wang, M.; Zhang, F.; Su, X. A ratiometric fluorescent biosensor for the sensitive determination of α-glucosidase activity and acarbose based on N-doped carbon dots. Analyst 2020, 145, 5808–5815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Z.; Huang, J.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, Q.; Dong, B. Ultrathin hexagonal SnS2 nanosheets coupled with g-C3N4 nanosheets as 2D/2D heterojunction photocatalysts toward high photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 163, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. You, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, R.; Pan, Q.; Sun, A.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, X. Development and application of tricolor ratiometric fluorescence sensor based on molecular imprinted nanoparticles for visual detection of dibutyl phthalate in seawater and fish samples. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 848, 157675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biosensors 13 00143 g001 550
Figure 1. A schematic illustrating the synthesis and morphine detection of N-CDs.
Figure 1. A schematic illustrating the synthesis and morphine detection of N-CDs.
Biosensors 13 00143 g001
Biosensors 13 00143 g002 550
Figure 2. The analysis of N-CDs using (A) particle size distribution and (B) TEM images at different scales; (C) FT-IR; (D) XRD.
Figure 2. The analysis of N-CDs using (A) particle size distribution and (B) TEM images at different scales; (C) FT-IR; (D) XRD.
Biosensors 13 00143 g002
Biosensors 13 00143 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) XPS spectra of N-CDs, high resolution (B) C 1s, (C) N 1s, and (D) O 1s peaks of N-CDs.
Figure 3. (A) XPS spectra of N-CDs, high resolution (B) C 1s, (C) N 1s, and (D) O 1s peaks of N-CDs.
Biosensors 13 00143 g003
Biosensors 13 00143 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra of N-CDs; (B) fluorescence spectra of N-CDs.
Figure 4. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra of N-CDs; (B) fluorescence spectra of N-CDs.
Biosensors 13 00143 g004
Biosensors 13 00143 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of (A) pH under the same conditions (system temperature: 44 °C; N-CDs: 100 µL; MOR concentration: 10 μg/mL; Ex: 310 nm; Em: 350 nm and 456 nm) and (B) system temperature under the same conditions (pH: 8.0; N-CDs: 100 µL; MOR concentration: 10 μg/mL; Ex: 310 nm; Em: 350 nm and 456 nm).
Figure 5. Effect of (A) pH under the same conditions (system temperature: 44 °C; N-CDs: 100 µL; MOR concentration: 10 μg/mL; Ex: 310 nm; Em: 350 nm and 456 nm) and (B) system temperature under the same conditions (pH: 8.0; N-CDs: 100 µL; MOR concentration: 10 μg/mL; Ex: 310 nm; Em: 350 nm and 456 nm).
Biosensors 13 00143 g005
Biosensors 13 00143 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of (A) interfering ions and (B) interfering substances under the same conditions (pH: 8.0; system temperature: 44 °C; N-CDs: 100 µL; MOR concentration: 10 μg/mL; Ex: 310 nm; Em: 350 nm and 456 nm) (n = 3); (C) fluorescence spectra of MOR and its analogues (pH: 8.0; system temperature: 44 °C; N-CDs: 100 µL; concentration of MOR and its analogues: 10 μg/mL).
Figure 6. Effect of (A) interfering ions and (B) interfering substances under the same conditions (pH: 8.0; system temperature: 44 °C; N-CDs: 100 µL; MOR concentration: 10 μg/mL; Ex: 310 nm; Em: 350 nm and 456 nm) (n = 3); (C) fluorescence spectra of MOR and its analogues (pH: 8.0; system temperature: 44 °C; N-CDs: 100 µL; concentration of MOR and its analogues: 10 μg/mL).
Biosensors 13 00143 g006
Biosensors 13 00143 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) A linear plot of I350/I456 versus the concentration of morphine in the range of 0.25–25 μg/mL (n = 3); (B) Fitted curves of I350/I456 versus the morphine concentration plotted on a log scale.
Figure 7. (A) A linear plot of I350/I456 versus the concentration of morphine in the range of 0.25–25 μg/mL (n = 3); (B) Fitted curves of I350/I456 versus the morphine concentration plotted on a log scale.
Biosensors 13 00143 g007
Biosensors 13 00143 g008a 550Biosensors 13 00143 g008b 550
Figure 8. (A) Fluorescence spectra of N-CD solution with different concentrations of morphine. (B) The fluorescence lifetime curve of N-CDs and N-CDs + morphine. (C) The fluorescence spectra of N-CDs in different apolar solvents.
Figure 8. (A) Fluorescence spectra of N-CD solution with different concentrations of morphine. (B) The fluorescence lifetime curve of N-CDs and N-CDs + morphine. (C) The fluorescence spectra of N-CDs in different apolar solvents.
Biosensors 13 00143 g008aBiosensors 13 00143 g008b
Table
Table 1. Quantification of MOR in samples (n = 3).
Table 1. Quantification of MOR in samples (n = 3).
SamplesAdded (μg/mL)Found (μg/mL)Recovery (%)RSD (%)
Blood
(female)		-N. D. a--
2.4952.41196.75.6
4.9905.153103.34.3
Blood
(male)		-N. D. a--
2.4952.515100.83.5
4.9904.68393.84.9
a Not detected.
Table
Table 2. The overview of analytical data of the reported methods for the analysis of MOR.
Table 2. The overview of analytical data of the reported methods for the analysis of MOR.
MaterialsDetection MethodLinearity RangeLODReference
graphene quantum dotsvoltammetric electrode0–3.5 μM0.06 μM[34]
chiral colloidal CdSe quantum dotsfluorescence enhancement/0.06 μM[35]
graphene quantum dotsfluorescence enhancement0–33 μM0.5 μg/mL[36]
anti-morphine antibody-labeled C-Dotsfluorescence immunoassay3.2 × 10−4–10 mg/L3.0 × 10−4 mg/L[37]
N,Cl-CDsfluorescence enhancement0.15–280.25 μg/mL46.5 ng/mL[38]
N-CDsfluorescence quenching0.25–25 μg/mL71.8 ng/mLThis work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, D.; Yang, Y.; Yang, C.; Zhu, Y. Dual-Emission Carbon-Dot Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor for Morphine Recognition in Biological Samples. Biosensors 2023, 13, 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010143

AMA Style

Yin Q, Wang Y, Li X, Yang D, Yang Y, Yang C, Zhu Y. Dual-Emission Carbon-Dot Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor for Morphine Recognition in Biological Samples. Biosensors. 2023; 13(1):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Qinhong, Yijie Wang, Xuerong Li, Dezhi Yang, Yaling Yang, Cheng Yang, and Yanqin Zhu. 2023. "Dual-Emission Carbon-Dot Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor for Morphine Recognition in Biological Samples" Biosensors 13, no. 1: 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010143

APA Style

Yin, Q., Wang, Y., Li, X., Yang, D., Yang, Y., Yang, C., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Dual-Emission Carbon-Dot Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor for Morphine Recognition in Biological Samples. Biosensors, 13(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop