Next Article in Journal
Catalytic Modification of Porous Two-Dimensional Ni-MOFs on Portable Electrochemical Paper-Based Sensors for Glucose and Hydrogen Peroxide Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Fluorescent Sensing Platforms for Detecting and Imaging the Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
MoS2-Nanoflower and Nanodiamond Co-Engineered Surface Plasmon Resonance for Biosensing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Progress in Functional-Nucleic-Acid-Based Fluorescent Fiber-Optic Evanescent Wave Biosensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biosensors Based on the Binding Events of Nitrilotriacetic Acid–Metal Complexes

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(5), 507; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050507
Submission received: 25 March 2023 / Revised: 21 April 2023 / Accepted: 24 April 2023 / Published: 28 April 2023

Abstract

:
Molecular immobilization and recognition are two key events for the development of biosensors. The general ways for the immobilization and recognition of biomolecules include covalent coupling reactions and non-covalent interactions of antigen–antibody, aptamer–target, glycan–lectin, avidin–biotin and boronic acid–diol. Tetradentate nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) is one of the most common commercial ligands for chelating metal ions. The NTA–metal complexes show high and specific affinity toward hexahistidine tags. Such metal complexes have been widely utilized in protein separation and immobilization for diagnostic applications since most of commercialized proteins have been integrated with hexahistidine tags by synthetic or recombinant techniques. This review focused on the development of biosensors with NTA–metal complexes as the binding units, mainly including surface plasmon resonance, electrochemistry, fluorescence, colorimetry, surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy, chemiluminescence and so on.

1. Introduction

The immobilization of biomolecules onto solid supports (e.g., electrodes, chips, quartz and substrates) or functional units (e.g., dyes, enzymes and nanomaterials) is of great importance for implementing bioassays [1,2]. A desired methodology for bioreceptor immobilization should ensure the following terms: (i) a proper orientation and uniform distribution to promise target accessibility, recognition and detectability; (ii) stability and robustness to allow flow-through assays or sequential measurement cycles; and (iii) antifouling capabilities to lower nonspecific interactions and reduce false positive signals [3]. Currently, versatile immobilization strategies have been reported, including physical adsorption based on electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, direct chemical adsorption based on the gold–thiol binding, chemical cross-linking to functional monolayers and affinity-or linker-mediated immobilization [4,5]. The selection of an appropriate immobilization approach is dependent on the physicochemical and chemical properties of solid interfaces and target proteins as well as the intended usage scenario. For example, surface-accessible active functional groups of exposed amino acid residues, such as an amine group in lysine residue and thiol group in cysteine residue, can be utilized as the anchoring points through covalent coupling onto a pretreated solid surface [6,7,8,9]. Despite the high simplicity and stability, covalent binding may lead to the random orientation of biomolecules and the follow-up conformational change, thus decreasing the activity of bioreceptor and the partial or complete loss of its binding ability toward the target. Thus, site-specific immobilization strategies based on specific recognitions or affinity ligands are peculiarly attractive for the construction of biosensors. Typically, biotinylated antibodies have been well tethered to the avidin-modified layers via the strong avidin–biotin interactions [10,11,12]. However, the chemical modification of proteins may result in the decline inactivity and the presence of multiple siteson proteins may cause their uncontrollable orientation.
The immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) principle is based on the relatively strong interaction between transition metal cations (e.g., Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Co2+) and accessible metal-binding amino acid residues (e.g., cysteine, histidine and tryptophan) [13,14,15]. It is originally applied to the purification of proteins containing histidine residues on the surface with the equal strength of “bio-specific” interactions. A multitude of metal-chelating ligands with different denticities have been fixed on the solid support matrixes changed from agarose gels to rigid silica particles. In this process, the ligands act as Lewis bases to bind divalent transition metal ions, such as tridentate iminodiacetic acid, tetradentate nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) and pentadentatetris(carboxymethyl)ethylene diamine [16,17]. The entrapped metal ions serve as Lewis acids and the remained unoccupied coordination sites can further ligate to the imidazole moieties of hexahistidine (His6) tags. As coordination-bonding-based artificial receptors, the ligands exhibit different IMAC protein separation efficiencies based on the number and conformation of chelation sites [18,19]. Among them, the tetradentate ligand of NTA can be chelated with bivalent transition metal cations (e.g., Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Co2+) to form a hexagonal complex and two unoccupied coordination sites remain for the further ligation to the imidazole moieties of His6 tag. Nowadays, NTA-based IMAC is one of the most promising approaches for reversible and controlled protein immobilization [3,20].
Some characteristic groups of biomolecules can be used as the anchor sites or affinity tags for the coupling of them onto the transducer surfaces with preserving activity [21]. As one of the smallest and most commonly used affinity elements, His6 tag can be readily fused to the N- or C-terminal of a synthetic peptide or recombinant protein without influence on the target-binding activity [22]. Moreover, the immobilized His6-tagged proteins can be easily displaced by competing coordinators (e.g., ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or imidazole) under mild conditions, realizing the elution of targets and the regeneration of solid surfaces and materials [23,24]. Furthermore, histidine-rich proteins with unusually high histidine contents can also interact with NTA–metal complexes [25,26]. The dysregulation of these proteins has been associated with several diseases, including liver cirrhosis, cancer, asthma and pulmonary disease [27,28]. Wright’s group has reported a series of novel works for Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (pfHRP-II) extraction and detection using NTA–metal complexes [29,30,31]. Thus, the broad arrays of chelators modified on various materials, including NTA, polydopamine, 1-acetato-4-benzyl-triazacyclononane and chitosan, have been popularly used to extract and immobilize biomolecules from real samples while retaining bioactivity for further research [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Currently, countless NTA-functionalized molecules and materials are commercially available for protein immobilization and site-specific labeling, including fluorescent dyes, lipids, antibodies, peptides, magnetic beads and gold nanoparticles [40]. Considering their great potential, the applications of NTA–metal complexes in different fields have been summarized in several reviews [41,42,43,44]. For instance, Wieneke et al. reviewed the development of multivalent chelators for in vivo protein labeling [45]. You et al. summarized the progress of multivalent chelators for spatially and temporally controlled protein functionalization [46]. Lόpez-Laguna et al. provided comprehensive insights on the emerging biotechnology of histidine-rich peptides [47]. However, no systematic reviews currently focus on the advancement of biosensors with NTA–metal complexes as the binding units. To maintain the theme of this review, herein, we summarized the current developments of biosensors based on the binding events of NTA–metal complexes. We classified the developments of such biosensors according to the detection techniques, including surface plasmon resonance (SPR), electrochemistry, fluorescence, colorimetry, surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy (SERS), chemiluminescence and so on. Moreover, future challenges and research trends for NTA–metal complexes-based bioassays are briefly discussed.

2. NTA–Metal Complexes−Based Biosensors

There are several important factors for the modulation of the binding affinity and the constant between NTA–metal complexes and biomolecules. The choice of the NTA–metal-based system for a particular application is critical for the efficient immobilization and detection of biomolecules [48]. The reversible character is favorable for protein purification and a higher affinity interaction is desired in the case of protein labeling in vitro and in live cells. The length, number and position of His6 tag may influence the purification and immobilization of recombinant proteins [49,50,51]. In this aspect, Knechtet al. investigated the binding properties between several different series of oligohistidines as well as mixed oligohistidines/oligoalanines and Ni2+–NTA by SPR experiments [52]. The results suggested that His6 tag possessed an equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of 14 ± 1 nM, and the highest affinity of the peptides and two His residues separated by either one or four residues are the preferred binding motifs. Although a longer histidine tag (e.g., His8 or His10) can achieve higher purity efficiency, it may cause the inhibition of protein functions and require a higher concentration of imidazole to elute. In addition, Madoz-Gúrpide et al. suggested that the orientation of enzyme ferredoxin/NADP+ reductase on the surface of NTA–Cu2+ complexes-functionalized electrode could be tuned by adjusting the position of a histidine pair (His–X3–His) in α-helices [53]. Schröper et al. investigated the effect of His6 tag-based affinity-binding strategy on the immobilization of redox protein horse heart cytc on the gold electrode surface [54]. It was found that cytc with C-terminal His tag exhibited the strongest redox signal due to the proximity between the His6 tag and the intramolecular electron transfer pathway. Moreover, Khan et al. found that double-His6 tags separated by an 11-amino acid spacer exhibited at least one order of magnitude stronger binding affinity to Ni–NTA-modified surfaces, compared with the single-His6 tag or two single-His6 tags at both the N- and C-terminals [55].
An individual metal–NTA–His6 complex shows relatively low stability and affinity (KD = 1 × 10−5 M) [56]. The binding stability can be enhanced by increasing the surface density of NTA [57,58]. Multivalent chelators such as di- (2.7 × 10−7 M), tri- (2 × 10−7 M) or tetra-NTA (4 × 10−8 M) derivatives have also been designed to achieve a high density of chelators as binding sites, thus enhancing the NTA-based surface stability [59,60,61,62,63]. For instance, Lata et al. demonstrated that an increasing number of NTA moieties could lead to a substantial increase in binding stability, achieving a subnanomolar affinity [64]. You et al. reported the application of multivalent chelators for high-affinity and spatially and temporally controlled the recognition and functionalization of His6-tagged proteins [46]. Moreover, other irreversible covalent interactions were combined with the reversible coordination interaction, including photochemical reaction, amine coupling reaction and epoxide chemistry [65,66,67,68,69]. However, these approaches typically require complicated synthetic processes and lack high specificity.
The chelators exhibit a different affinity for bivalent metal ions (Cu2+ > Ni2+ > Zn2+ ≥ Co2+) and distinctive specificity (Co2+ > Zn2+ > Ni2+ > Cu2+) toward His6-tagged proteins, which may affect their utilization in practical applications [70,71]. Compared with the carboxyl self-assembled monomer (SAM), that of Ni–NTA can pattern His6-tagged biomolecules in a higher immobilization capacity and binding activity, improving the detection sensitivity [72]. However, the sensing surface may suffer from slow and continuous dissociation of immobilized biomolecules due to the low affinity and stability between the His-tagged biomolecules and NTA mediated by Ni2+ and other metal ions [73]. Moreover, low pH, reductants and chelators, such as EDTA and imidazole in matrices, may quickly disturb the NTA–metal complexes. Cu2+ shows the greatest affinity, which can be used to isolate low abundant proteins from crude lysates, followed by other purification steps. In addition, the conversion of bivalent metal ions to different metal oxidation states is one of the alternative strategies to address those shortcomings and maintain the benefits of His6-tagged protein immobilization [74]. For example, Spatz’s group developed the Co3+-mediated, stable and kinetically inert interaction between His6 tag and NTA for a permanent, oriented and specific protein immobilization [75,76]. In this strategy, the formation constant of exchange-inert Co3+ complexes is higher than that of conventional Co2+ and Ni2+ complexes, which is resistant toward competitive chelators and washing off over time.
In case of the NTA–Ni2+–His6 tag system, the stability constants of four complexes should be considered, including Ni2+/His6-tagged protein, Ni2+/NTA (KD = 1.8 × 10−11 M), Ni2+/imidazole (KD = 9.8 × 10−4 M) and Ni2+/EDTA (KD = 4 × 10−19 M) [52]. Taking advantage of the differences between the adjustable dissociation constants, the captured His6-tagged proteins can be eluted by imidazole under mild conditions, resulting in Ni2+ ions to remain bound to NTA. In the context of protein purification, the addition of imidazole can improve the selectivity of NTA–metal complexes toward His6-tagged proteins. Based on the differences between the dissociation constants of Ni2+/EDTA and Ni2+/NTA, the surface can be regenerated by completely removing Ni2+ ions with EDTA and then followed by repeatedly loading the chelators with Ni2+ ions [52]. The regeneration of sensing surfaces can make the ligand density similar with that for the incubation or injection of each analyte, which is helpful for the conventional analysis [77].
The compatibility of NTA with chemical conjugation protocols can enable versatile and efficient surface chemistries for the robust and reproducible immobilization of His6-tailed biomolecules on different solid surfaces and nanomaterials. SAMs of NTA–metal chelators can endow the interface with desired properties. At present, various strategies have been reported to modify the interface with NTA–metal chelators for the deposition of His6-tagged biomolecules [78,79,80]. For example, NTA moieties can be functionalized with different alkyl thiols to form metal-chelating layers on gold electrodes [81,82,83]. However, the synthesis of the alkane thiol chelators was complicated and the formed monolayer was less well-ordered. To overcome these difficulties, NTA modified with an amino group can be covalently tethered onto the carboxyl-terminated SAM preformed on the electrode through the 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-activated amine coupling reaction [58,84,85]. In addition, Haddour et al. reported that the pyrrole monomer modified with NTA could be electrochemically polymerized into a conductive poly(pyrrole)-NTA film for the reversible oriented immobilization of His6-tagged proteins [86]. NTA conjugated with pyrene can attach onto carbon-based nanomaterials (e.g., carbon nanotubes and graphene) deposited on the interface via π-stacking interactions between pyrene derivatives and the materials, which could be reinforced by electropolymerization [87,88,89,90].

2.1. SPR Biosensors

SPR technique can determine the binding affinity and kinetics between ligands and receptors, which has been widely used in the monitoring of various biological recognition events in real time. The rational fabrication of biorecognition interface is responsible for the reliability and accuracy of SPR assays [91]. Among various immobilization strategies, NTA–metal complex-aided approach can facilitate the immobilization of His6-tagged bioreceptors on SPR platform in a site-specific and oriented manner [92,93,94,95]. For example, thiol-functionalized NTA can be tethered on the gold-based SPR chip [96]. However, the oxygen sensitivity of thiol species may cause the degradation of the chemisorbed SAM during storage. For this consideration, NTA could be coupled to polymer brushes which were pre-immobilized on the chips for the construction of protein-resistant interfaces [97,98].
His6-tagged biomolecules can be immobilized on NTA-functionalized chips for the sensitive and accurate investigation of the interaction between bioreceptor and analyte [99,100]. The integration of single-layer graphene with gold chip can improve the sensitivity of SPR biosensors. Singh et al. developed a SPR immunosensor by growing graphene on the chip surface through chemical vapor deposition, which is different from that of graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide (rGO) or grapheme decorated metal nanoparticle-based platforms (Figure 1A) [101]. In this study, graphene was modified with the film of ploypyrrole-NTA or pyrene-NTA, followed by the immobilization of biotinylated cholera toxin as the bioreceptor unit via the effective NTA–Cu2+/biotin system for antibody detection. The result demonstrated that the ultrathin functional layer formed by the π-stacking interaction of pyrene-NTA and the subsequent electropolymer achieved the best detection performance (Table 1). With the similar immobilization system, Yuan et al. reported SPR-based DNA assays using an NTA–Cu2+-covered graphene-modified chip to immobilize a biotinylated DNA capture probe, in which the enzymatic catalysis was integrated into SPR assay for signal amplification (Figure 1B) [102]. In this study, nickel-chelated pyrene-NTA was tethered onto the rGO-modified chip to immobilize biotin-labeled capture DNA. After the hybridization between capture DNA, target DNA and reporter DNA, HRP-tagged reporters could catalyze the conversion of aniline into polyaniline precipitation, resulting in great signal amplification via the mass-effect. However, the gradual dissociation of His6-tagged proteins may result in an unstable baseline, adversely influencing the accurate analysis.
To increase the binding stability, Wang et al. reported the SPR detection of small molecule binding events by integrating the His6–Ni2+ coordination and the amine coupling reaction to covalently affix His6-tagged proteins [103,104]. Although proteins exhibit amore uniform orientation and a higher density through this immobilization approach, the chip surface would not be regenerated due to the covalent linkage. Double- or triple-His6 residues could be added into the sequence of proteins for enhancing the attachment [55,105,106]. However, the increased cost and complexity in expressing proteins with double- or triple-His6 residues will present a disagreeable problem. To overcome this shortcoming, trisNTA-functionalized polymers, such as poly-L-lysine graftpoly(ethyleneglycol) polymer and dextran, were utilized to stably yet reversibly bind His6-tagged or biotin-labeled proteins for the investigation of different protein bindings and interactions [107,108,109,110,111,112]. With a trisNTA–Ni2+-covered chip, Liu et al. developed a SPR biosensor for the detection of biomarkers in body fluids (Figure 1C) [113]. It was found that the His6-tagged proteins attached on the chip surface could be readily regenerated by changing the pH of EDTA solution. Alternatively, Spatz’s group reported a novel surface functionalization strategy by using Co3+ ion as the mediator between NTA and His6-tagged protein [76,114]. In this approach, Co2+ ion in the complex was oxidized to Co3+ in situ by H2O2. Compared with Co2+ and Ni2+ complexes, Co3+ complexes exhibit exchange-inert property, higher association and lower dissociation rate constant under the similar coordination environments [114]. Thus, Co3+ complexes have been employed to immobilize His6-tagged proteins for bioassays, such as QCM, biolayer interferometry and fluorescent assays [99,115,116,117,118,119]. Notably, Lammertyn’s group used NTA–Co3+-modified surface to design fiber optic (FO)-SPR biosensors (Figure 1D) [70]. The analytical performances, including immobilization efficiency, surface coverage, reproducibility, stability and specificity, were investigated with plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) as the model example. His6-tagged anti-PAI-1 antibody fragment (scFv-33H1F7) was used as the receptor and anti-PAI-1 monoclonal antibody (MA-31C9)-modified AuNPs were used as the recognition elements for signal amplification.
Figure 1. (A) Schematic illustration of the functionalization of the graphene layer via π-stacking of pyrene-NTA followed by electropolymerization for the reinforcement of the layer [101]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the noncovalent functionalization of rGO for sensitizing SPR-based DNA sensing synergistically with biocatalytic polymerization [102]. Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (C) Schematic illustration of trisNTA-based rapid and regenerable SPR determinations of biomarker concentration and biomolecular interaction [113]. Copyright 2021Elsevier. (D) Schematic illustration of (a) the immobilization steps of His6-tagged protein on Au-coated surface by Co3+–NTA strategy and (b) FO-SPR based bioassay of PAI-1 using Co3+–NTA for bioreceptor immobilization [70]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Figure 1. (A) Schematic illustration of the functionalization of the graphene layer via π-stacking of pyrene-NTA followed by electropolymerization for the reinforcement of the layer [101]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the noncovalent functionalization of rGO for sensitizing SPR-based DNA sensing synergistically with biocatalytic polymerization [102]. Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (C) Schematic illustration of trisNTA-based rapid and regenerable SPR determinations of biomarker concentration and biomolecular interaction [113]. Copyright 2021Elsevier. (D) Schematic illustration of (a) the immobilization steps of His6-tagged protein on Au-coated surface by Co3+–NTA strategy and (b) FO-SPR based bioassay of PAI-1 using Co3+–NTA for bioreceptor immobilization [70]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 13 00507 g001

2.2. Electrochemical Biosensors

Electrochemical biosensors can measure the target concentration by monitoring the change of current, potential, conductance or impedance at a solid electrode [120,121]. The electrode modifiers can significantly affect the performances of electrochemical biosensors. The assembly of redox enzymes in a proper alignment is particularly critical for the realization of fast electron transfer between the electrode surface and the redox center of enzyme, retaining the catalytic and regulatory property of protein [122,123,124]. The SAMs of NTA–metal chelators on the electrode surface can allow for the well-controlled and reversible immobilization of a wide range of His6-tagged enzymes via the specific affinity binding, including horseradish peroxidase (HRP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), laccase and glucose oxidase and nitrate reductase [125,126,127,128,129,130]. For instance, Blankespoor et al. fabricated a dense monolayer of NTA–Cu2+ complexes on the surface of a carbon electrode for the immobilization of His6-tagged HRP and realized the electrochemical reduction of H2O2 in the presence of an artificial redox mediator [131]. Wang et al. reported the immobilization of superoxide dismutase (SOD) on the NTA–Ni2+-modified electrode for the in vivo detection of O2•− in a rat brain, demonstrating that the direct electron transfer of SOD was greatly enhanced by the NTA–Ni2+ complexes (Table 1) [132]. Conzuelo et al. reported the competitive detection of β-lactam antibiotics using an NTA–Co2+-modified electrode to immobilize the recombinant bacterial penicillin binding protein (PBP) (Figure 2A) [133]. In this study, HRP-labeled specific tracer (PENG-HRP) was used as the signal label for the competitive binding and hydroquinone (HQ) was used as the redox mediator for the catalytic oxidation of H2O2.
Aptamers including DNA/RNA and peptide possess several intrinsic properties, such as excellent structure flexibility, high specificity and affinity, good target diversity and ease of synthesis. The immobilization of His6-tagged aptamers on an NTA–metal complex-modified electrode can produce a highly oriented aptamer assembly to prevent the nonspecific adsorption [135]. Cosnier’s group utilized poly(pyrrole-NTA) film to immobilize His6-tagged aptamer in the presence of Cu2+ ions for a label-free impedimetric detection of thrombin and bisphenol-A, respectively [136,137]. Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) is a simple and direct electrochemical method to study molecular interactions. Xu et al. reported the QCM-based detection of protein kinase A (PKA) with a His6-tagged peptide inhibitor of IP20 as the aptamer-mimicking biorecognition element, in which the aptameric peptide was immobilized on the NTA–Ni2+-covered quartz electrode (Figure 2B) [134]. The kinase concentration could be sensitively determined based on the frequency response of the QCM crystal. In addition, Zaitouna et al. developed an electrochemical biosensor for Ara h 2 antibody detection using the NTA–Ni2+ SAM to immobilize the His6-tagged and methylene blue (MB)-labeled peptide [138]. The detection performance of NTA–Ni2+SAM-based assay was better than that of the biosensor based on the conventional immobilization with a thiolated peptide.
Aside from His6 tag, biotinylated biomolecules can bind with NTA–metal complexes because three potential binding sites (carboxylate, thioether and ureido groups) of biotin can coordinate with a bivalent metal cation in the NTA chelate [88,139]. For this view, Bauret al. reported the immobilization of biotinylated GOx and polyphenol oxidase on the Cu2+-chelated poly(pyrrole-NTA) film for the amperometric detection of glucose and catechol, respectively [140]. Meanwhile, Palomar et al. developed an impedimetric immunosensor for the determination of an anticholera toxin antibody by the immobilization of biotin-labeled cholera toxin B subunit on the Cu2+-chelated poly(pyrrole-NTA) [141]. The coordinated metal ions in an NTA complex can also bind specifically to phosphorylated biomolecules. Gao et al. reported an electrochemical assay for sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1) detection using NTA–Fe3+ complex to recognize phosphorylated lipids on liposomes [142]. As presented in Figure 3A, liposome was used to embed a substrate of SphK1 in lipid layer through hydrophobic interaction and encapsulate electroactive MB molecules. After the catalytic reaction on the membrane, the reacted liposomes were captured by the NTA–Fe3+ complex-modified sensing electrode, and the abundant MB molecules in liposome could generate a strong electrochemical signal, thus reflecting the kinase activity.
SAM of NTA assembled on the electrode can coordinate with metal ions for electrochemical detection by stripping voltammetry. For instance, Kerekovic et al. investigated the copper(II) binding capacity of an NTA-modified gold electrode via adsorption transfer stripping voltammetry [144]. The results showed that Cu2+ ions in the chelates could be directly determined by adsorption transfer stripping voltammetry without an electrochemical accumulation step. Meanwhile, Sasaki et al. developed an electrical assay for the on-site detection of Cu2+ ions based on the SAMs of NTA-modified organic thin-film transistor [145]. The coordination of Cu2+ ions with NTA could induce the potential shift of the extended-gate, generating an observed change in the drain current. Moreover, Fe3+ in the chelating condition retains the ability to catalyze the electrochemical redox of H2O2. Gu et al. reported a bifunctional NTA–Fe3+ complex-based nanoprobe for the electrochemical detection of SphK1 activity [143]. As displayed in Figure 3B, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were employed to carry NTA–Fe3+ complexes to recognize phosphorylated sites of substrates. Then, multiple NTA–Fe3+ complexes and AuNPs catalyzed the decomposition of H2O2, largely amplifying the catalytic amperometric response.

2.3. Fluorescence Biosensors

Fluorescence assays are the most commonly used optical methods to determine molecular interaction, mobility and conformational change. NTA moieties have been linked to peptide substrates or modified with fluorescent units for fluorescent bioassays and bioimaging [146,147,148,149]. For example, Kim et al. used NTA–Ni2+ complex-modified tetramethylrhodamine (TMR)-doped SiO2nanoparticles to label a bacterial lysate containing estrogen receptor R ligand binding domain [150]. SiO2 NPs could improve the sensitivity and limit the fluorescence quenching of dyes by external nickel ions.
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) or magnetic beads (MBs) can be facilely manipulated with an extra magnetic field. They have been widely used in protein/peptide isolation after modification with NTA–metal complexes. Thus, NTA–metal–coated MBs or MNPs have been employed to separate fluorescently labeled peptides from a homogeneous solution (Table 1), leading to the change of fluorescence intensity. For example, Wang et al. reported a label-free fluorescent method for the detection of thrombin activity based on a His6-tagged recombinant green fluorescence protein (EGFP) and Ni2+–NTA-coated MNPs [151]. As shown in Figure 4A, EGFP with a thrombin cleavage site and a His6 tag at the N-terminal could be enzymatically cleaved by thrombin, thus resulting in the release of His6 tag with the inability to attach NTA–Ni2+-coated MNPs. After magnetic separation, the fluorescence intensity of EGFP in the solution is positively related to the activity of thrombin. However, the high cost, large size and pH sensitivity may limit the application of the method for protease assays. In addition, Tan et al. developed a fluorometric method for the detection of protein kinase activity based on the adsorption between NTA–Zr4+ MNPs and phosphorylated peptides [152]. As shown in Figure 4B, the fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated substrate peptide was phosphorylated by protein kinase. The phosphorylated product could adsorb on the surface of NTA–Zr4+ MNPs via the chelation of Zr4+ and phosphate. After magnetic separation, the fluorescence intensity of the solution evidently decreased, which was indicative of the activity of protein kinase.
Organic fluorophores have been extensively used to label proteins in vivo through different chemically and biologically labeling techniques without changing the structure and disrupting the normal function of proteins. NTA has been used as a chemical recognition unit to modify fluorescent probes for labeling His6-tagged proteins or peptides at a specific site via reversible metallochelate coupling of metal ion and His6 tag. A few organic dyes have been conjugated with NTA complexes to label His6 tags, such as fluorescein, perylene and Atto488 [56,153,154,155,156,157]. Typically, Glymenaki et al. synthesized three different porphyrin−NTA dyads and successfully employed them to label different His6-containing peptides [158]. Lata et al. modified different fluorophores with trisNTA groups for the selective labeling of proteins in cell lysates and on the surface of living cells [159]. Gatterdam et al. prepared several NTA-based multivalent chelators with linear, cyclic and dendritic scaffolds, respectively, and compared their performances on the labeling of cellular His6-tagged proteins [160]. The results demonstrated that the cyclic trisNTA chelator exhibited the highest affinity and kinetic stability. Furthermore, Uchinomiya et al. reported a site-specific covalent labeling of His10-tagged proteins [161]. In this study, the interaction between His-tag and NTA–Ni2+ facilitated the nucleophilic reaction between ahistidine residue in His10 tag and the electrophilic tosyl group in the NTA–Ni2+ probe by the proximity effect. Different from the probes that merely labeled proteins, dye–NTA conjugates designed by Margulies and coworkers could monitor the change on protein surface by altering the intensity or wavelength of emission upon binding [162,163,164]. Peri-Naor et al. used the DNA probe modified with both His tag and boronic acid group to develop targeted, pattern-generating and protein surface sensors (Figure 5A) [165]. The method can be used to discriminate between the distinct glycoform populations and identify the glycosylation states of therapeutic proteins.
The poor ability of NTA-based fluorescent probes to penetrate cell membrane may significantly limit the applications in the study of intracellular proteins and subcellular organelles. To facilitate the identification of proteins in living cells, Wieneke et al. designed a cell-penetrating multivalent trisNTA chelator of carrier complexes to label protein of interest (POI) based on the cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) [166]. As shown in Figure 5B, Ni2+-loaded and fluorophore-modified trisNTA could bind to His6-tagged HIV TAT49−57. After being delivered into the cytosol and nucleus, the trisNTA preferentially interacted with His10–POI, thus resulting in the release of the carrier peptide. In addition, Zhang et al. synthesized a Nap-G/Biotin/ANA-FFpYGK-NTA–Ni2+ probe consisting of an NTA–Ni2+ group, a self-assembling peptide FFpY and a hydrophobic group [167]. After the hydrolysis is catalyzed by ALP, the product could self-assemble into nanofibers and enter the cells with an increased efficiency to label His6-tagged proteins.
In single-molecule fluorescence imaging, it is important to improve the photostability of fluorophores by using solution additives/photostabilizers or directly conjugating the photostabilizer to the fluorophores, leading to the quenching of photodegradation-involved transient intermediates. It has been documented that Ni2+ ion is an efficient photostabilizing agent through a physical route to quench the triplet excited state of some fluorophores [168,169]. For example, Glembockyte et al. designed a trisNTA Alexa647 fluorophore as a self-healing dye for single molecule fluorescence imaging [170]. As illustrated in Figure 5C, four different Alexa647-labeled trisNTA probes were synthesized with various length and rigidity of linkers. After the complexation of three Ni2+ ions, the photostability of Alexa647 was significantly enhanced due to the closer proximity between Ni2+ions and fluorophores. Moreover, trisNTA in the fluorophores also acted as a handle to specifically label His6-tagged POI for single-molecule imaging.
Transition-metal ions with paramagnetic nature can quench the fluorescence of molecules and nanomaterials with a distance-dependence property [171,172]. Ahn et al. reported the label-free, single-protein detection based on a near-infrared fluorescent NTA–Ni2+ complex-modified single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) [173]. As shown in Figure 5D, when the His6-tagged proteins were bound to the complex, the fluorescence intensity was reduced due to the decrease in the intermolecular distance between Ni2+ and SWNT. After the addition of target protein (antiHis6-tag antibody), the fluorescence signal increased based on the analyte–protein interaction. Based on this platform, Ahn et al. investigated glycan–lectin binding for glycan profiling [174].
NTA chelator can also be used to immobilize drugs and biomolecules on the surface of nanomaterials for targeting delivery. For instance, the trisNTA-modified graphene oxide has been used to load His10-tagged EGFP for the delivery of drugs into cells [175]. Morales et al. developed a light-activated genome editing platform by monitoring the release of enzymes from hollow gold nanoshell (HGN) nanocarriers [176]. As shown in Figure 6, Crerecombinase, a protein fusion with a TAT internalization peptide segment, was tested. The protein was immobilized on the HGN modified with NTA-labeled dsDNA in the presence of Cu2+. A red fluorescence was observed after the release of Crerecombinase.
Figure 5. (A) Schematic illustration of glycoform differentiation by a targeted, self-assembled, pattern-generating protein surface sensor [165]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of live-cell labeling of His-tagged proteins in distinct cellular compartments using a cell-penetrating noncovalent trisNTA carrier complex formed by fluorescent trisNTA and His6-tagged TAT49−57 [166]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of: (a) the structure of trisNTA construct, (b) structure of Alexa647, (c) structure of the linkers used for trisNTA–Alexa647; trisNTA–Pro12-Alexa647; trisNTA–Pro4-Alexa647 and trisNTA–OEG4-Alexa647 constructs. (d) Schematic illustration of the single-molecule experiment used to evaluate the photostability of trisNTA constructs [170]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic of a label-free protein array based on fluorescent NTA–Ni2+ complex-modified SWNT [173]. (a) Array fabrication using SWNT/CHI and in situ generation of individually addressed capture proteins using cell-free protein synthesis for label-free optical detection of protein interactions. A SWNT/CHI suspension is spotted on glass and functionalized with Ni-NTA to bind His-tag-containing capture proteins. Cell-free extract and PCR amplified DNA coding for each protein were added to each spot for protein expression and in situ immobilization. (b) Optical and NIR fluorescence image of the SWNT/CHI array. (c) Signal transduction mechanism for label-free detection of protein-protein interactions: a NIR fluorescence change from the SWNT occurs when the distance between the Ni2þ quencher and SWNT is altered upon analyte protein binding. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. (A) Schematic illustration of glycoform differentiation by a targeted, self-assembled, pattern-generating protein surface sensor [165]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of live-cell labeling of His-tagged proteins in distinct cellular compartments using a cell-penetrating noncovalent trisNTA carrier complex formed by fluorescent trisNTA and His6-tagged TAT49−57 [166]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of: (a) the structure of trisNTA construct, (b) structure of Alexa647, (c) structure of the linkers used for trisNTA–Alexa647; trisNTA–Pro12-Alexa647; trisNTA–Pro4-Alexa647 and trisNTA–OEG4-Alexa647 constructs. (d) Schematic illustration of the single-molecule experiment used to evaluate the photostability of trisNTA constructs [170]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic of a label-free protein array based on fluorescent NTA–Ni2+ complex-modified SWNT [173]. (a) Array fabrication using SWNT/CHI and in situ generation of individually addressed capture proteins using cell-free protein synthesis for label-free optical detection of protein interactions. A SWNT/CHI suspension is spotted on glass and functionalized with Ni-NTA to bind His-tag-containing capture proteins. Cell-free extract and PCR amplified DNA coding for each protein were added to each spot for protein expression and in situ immobilization. (b) Optical and NIR fluorescence image of the SWNT/CHI array. (c) Signal transduction mechanism for label-free detection of protein-protein interactions: a NIR fluorescence change from the SWNT occurs when the distance between the Ni2þ quencher and SWNT is altered upon analyte protein binding. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 13 00507 g005

2.4. Colorimetric Assays

Colorimetric assays have attracted intensive attention due to their low cost and high simplicity. Such methods do not require expensive or sophisticated instrumentation because the color change can be read by the naked eye. Enzymes can efficiently catalyze various chromogenic reactions for colorimetric assays [177,178]. For example, a phosphotriesterase (PTE) trimer can hydrolyze the substrate organophosphate paraoxon to produce faint yellow p-nitrophenol. However, the stability and activity of enzymes are not sufficient for usage in the development of portable sensing devices. Medintz’s group demonstrated that the stability and activity of PTE were obviously enhanced when it was adsorbed onto NTA–Ni2+ complex-modified AuNPs [179]. For this view, they developed a colorimetric method for the detection of organophosphates with PTE–NTA–Ni2+-AuNPs [180].
Peptide-based colorimetric assays have been widely developed to evaluate different protease activities. The signal reporter-modified His6-tagged peptide can be immobilized on the solid surface or nanoparticles (Table 1). In the presence of target protease, peptide was enzymatically hydrolyzed and the release of signal reporter would result in the change of solution color. Moss et al. designed an enzyme-based amplification system for the colorimetric detection of proteases [181]. HRP-conjugated His6-tagged substrate peptides were attached onto NTA–Ni2+–modified MBs. In the presence of target enzymes matrix metalloproteinase 2 or disintegrin and metalloproteinase 8, the peptide was cleaved to release HRP into solution. After magnetic separation, HRP in the unreacted peptide on the MBs was quantified by a standard HRP color assay with 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2 as the substrates. However, the high cost and complicated cross-linking procedures of the enzyme-conjugated substances may limit the applications of the colorimetric assays.
To enhance the sensitivity of colorimetric methods, nanomaterials can be used as the carriers to load signal molecules in a high loading efficiency. Under the external stimulus, such as pH, light and surfactants, signal molecules will be rapidly released, generating a significant colorimetric response for signal amplification. For this consideration, Gao et al. reported an integrated magneto-colorimetric method for the assay of lipid kinase (SphK1) activity using NTA-modified MNPs and TMB-loaded liposomes [182]. As shown in Figure 7A, lipid substrates anchored on liposomes were phosphorylated by SphK1. NTA–Fe3+–MNPs could specifically bind to the phosphate sites on liposomes. After magnetic separation, TMB molecules were released from the liposomes and then oxidized by H2O2 under the catalysis of NTA–MNPs, producing a colorimetric signal for the visual detection of SphK1 activity.
The aggregation/disaggregation of AuNPs can result in a detectable color change due to the surface plasmon coupling. Based on this unique property, several colorimetric assays based on AuNPs and NTA–metal complexes have been reported for clinical diagnosis and environmental protection [31,185,186]. For example, Lee et al. reported the AuNPs-based colorimetric assay of protein phosphatase activity through Zn2+–phosphate interaction (Figure 7B) [183]. The His6-tagged peptide substrates could bind to NTA–Ni2+-covered AuNPs by specific coordination. After phosphorylation, the peptide could trigger the aggregation of AuNPs in the presence of Zn2+ ions. In addition, Kim et al. found that the carboxy AuNPs could adsorb metal ions such as Ni2+ through metal-affinity coordination [184]. As illustrated in Figure 7C, peptide labeled with His6 tags at both ends could trigger the aggregation of Ni2+-adsorbed carboxy AuNPs. Cleavage of the peptide into two segments by protease (matrix metalloproteinase) prevented the aggregation of AuNPs. Swartz et al. developed a colorimetric sensor for the detection of histidine-rich proteins based on NTA–Ni2+-functionalized AuNPs and AgNPs [187]. In this work, pfHRP-II with multiple repeats of AHH and AHHAAD exhibited high affinity toward NTA–Ni2+ and could induce the aggregation of NTA–Ni2+-functionalized AuNPs in a concentration-and pH-dependent manner. Additionally, AuNPs can catalyze the silver deposition on the nanoparticle surface. Based on this catalytic ability, Cheng et al. reported a scanometric strategy for the determination of matrix metalloproteinases using His6-tagged peptide-AuNPs [188]. The metalloproteinases could cleave the specific substrate peptide to release AuNPs from the NTA–Ni2+-modified chips. The greyscale signal from the silver enhancement decreased with the reduction of the amount of bound AuNPs.

2.5. Others

2.5.1. SERS

SERS can provide the molecular fingerprint information for sensitive chemical andbiological detection. However, most of biomolecules only produce weak SERS response due to their small Raman cross-section and low polarizability. To enhance the sensitivity, silver and gold nanoparticles could be used as the substrates to amplify the SERS signal. NTA–metal complexes modified on the substrate can act as the recognition elements to capture targets from complex samples. The captured target in proximal to the substrate surface would offer a Raman signal. For example, catechol can bind to Fe3+ ions with exceptional stability via the coordination interaction. Kaya et al. used NTA–Fe3+ complex-modified AgNPs as the substrate for the SERS detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid [189]. The formed NTA–Fe3+–dopamine complexes caused the signal enhancement. In addition, Cao et al. reported the sensitive SERS determination of catecholamine by using NTA–Fe3+ complexes-modified polyvinylpyrrolidone-capped AuNPs as the substrates [190]. Li et al. prepared NTA–Ni2+ complex-modified AuNPs active substrate to capture histamine via the formation of NTA–Ni2+–histamine complex for histamine detection [191].

2.5.2. Chemiluminescence

Chemiluminescence signal can be generated by a redox reaction in which the electronically excited species from a chemical reaction return to the ground state. Based on this principle, Han et al. developed a chemiluminescence immunosensor for the detection of allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) by immobilizing the His6-tagged allergens to the NTA-modified MNPs [192]. As shown in Figure 8, NTA was conjugated to the surface of Fe3O4@SiO2 through the amidation reaction and the recombinant His6-tagged Can f 1 (rCan f1), which was then adsorbed onto the Fe3O4@SiO2-NTA surface in the presence of Ni2+ ions. Next, sIgE in sera from allergic patients specifically captured by Fe3O4@SiO2-NTA@rCan f1 was labeled with HRP-modified anti-IgE. After the magnetic separation, HRP on MNPs surface-catalyzed the chemiluminescence reaction, achieving the quantitative detection of sIgEs.

2.5.3. Immunochromatic Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs)

RDTs show the advantages of easy operation, wide applicability, rapid response and low cost [193]. Wright’s group used NTA–Ni2+-coated MBs to concentrate the malarial biomarker of histidine-rich protein II (pfHRP-II) for enhancing test performances [194]. To realize the detection of low level of infection by multiantigen RDTs, they further developed a magnetically assisted multiplex biomarker enrichment strategy [195]. As shown in Figure 9, the antibodies were first modified with His6 tags by maleimide-thiol interaction and then captured by NTA–Ni2+-coated magnetic beads. The captured antibody–antigen conjugates could be magnetically purified, concentrated, and then released into a RDT-compatible volume for assay.
Particles in an evaporating colloidal drop can migrate onto the drop’s edge to form a ring on the underlying substrate, which has been widely exploited in the analytical science called as the coffee-ring effect [196]. Wright’s group reported an RDT for the detection of poly-L-histidine (PLH) as a pfHRP-II biomimic based on the biomarker-mediated disruption of coffee-ring formation [197]. In this work, pfHRP-II promoted the cross-linking between NTA–Ni2+-functionalized magnetic particles and indictor particles with red fluorescence. The conjugates were then pulled to the center under a magnetic field. Meanwhile, the indictor particles with green fluorescence were transported to the edge. However, in the absence of pfHRP-II, the colocation of both indicator particles at the edge led to a ring with yellow emission with no center signal. However, this method exhibited the shortcomings of low sensitivity, the requirement of an extra magnetic field and a high background signal. To solve those problems, Wright’s group developed a platform for recombinant HRP-II detection using NTA–Ni2+ complex-modified gold-plated polystyrene microspheres (AuPS) and NTA–Ni2+ complex-functionalized glass [198]. During the coffee ring formation, the conjugate of recombinant HRP-II and AuPS particles moved to the drop edge by binding to the NTA–Ni2+ complex-functionalized glass. The non-specific materials could be washed away from the surface.
Table 1. Biosensors based on the binding events of NTA–metal complexes.
Table 1. Biosensors based on the binding events of NTA–metal complexes.
Detection TechniquesSubstrateBiorecognition ElementsMetal IonsTargetLinear RangeLODRef.
SPRNTA-modified gold-coated fiber-optic probeHis6-tagged scFv-33H1F7Co3+PAI-13.125~400 ng/mL0.20 ng/mL[70]
Polypyrrole-NTA-modified graphene-gold chipBiotinylatedCT cholera toxinCu2+Anti-CT4 × 10−3~4 ng/mL4 pg/mL[101]
TrisNTA-modified chipHis6-tagged S1 proteinNi2+Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody0.5~96 μg/mL57 ng/mL[111]
TrisNTA-modified chipHis6-tagged protein GNi2+IgG0.5~20 μg/mL47 ng/mL[113]
NTA-modified gold-coated fiber-optic probeHis6-tagged ADAMTS13Co3+Anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies1.56~100 ng/mL0.24 ng/mL[116]
NTA-modified electrodeHis6-tagged receptorCu2+Amyloid-beta16–231 × 10−3~1 μM1.43 nM[82]
ECNTA-modified gold electrodeNTA–Cu2+Cu2+Lipopolysaccharide1 × 10−4~0.1 ng/mL0.1 pg/mL[84]
NTA-modified carbon electrodeHis6-tagged SODNi2+O2•−0.1~100 μM21 nM[132]
NTA-modified SPCEsHis6-tagged PBPCo2+Ampicillin1.3~9.9 ng/mL0.7 ng/mL[133]
NTA-modified Au-coated quartz electrodeHis6-tagged peptideNi2+PKA0.64~22.33 mU/μL0.061 mU/μL[134]
Polypyrrole-NTA-modified electrodeNH2–His5-DNACu2+HIV DNA1 × 10−6~10 nM1 fM[135]
Polypyrrole-NTA-modified electrodeHis5-modified aptamerCu2+Thrombin4.7 × 10−3~0.5 nM4.4 pM[136]
Polypyrrole-NTA-modified electrodeHis5-modified aptamerCu2+Bisphenol A1 × 10−5~1μM10 pM[137]
NTA-modified gold electrodeHis6-tagged Ara h 2Ni2+Ara h 2 antibody1~10 pM1 pM[138]
Polypyrrole /NTA-modified electrodeBiotinylated CT B SubunitCu2+Anti-CT1 × 10−7~10 μg/mL0.1 pg/mL[141]
NTA-modified gold electrodeNTA Cu2+0.4~100 μM10 nM[144]
NTA-modified thin-film transistor NTA Cu2+0~15 μM0.51 μM[145]
FLZr–NTA-modified MNPsEGFPNi2+thrombin3 × 10−4~5 × 10−2 U/mL0.3 mU/mL[151]
Zr–NTA-modified MNPsFITC-labeled peptideZr4+PKA0~1 U/μL0.5 mU/μL[152]
ColorCarboxy AuNPsDual His6-tagged peptideNi2+MMP-73~52 nM10 nM[184]
NTA-modified chipHis6-tagged peptideNi2+MMP-70.1~100 ng/mL97 pg/mL[188]
SERSNTA-modified AgNPsNTA–Fe3+Fe3+Dopamine0.5~4 nM60 pM[189]
NTA-modified AuNPsNTA–Fe3+Fe3+Dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine0.556~10 μM; 0.125~10 μM; 0.2~9.09 μMNotreported[190]
NTA-modified AgNPsNTA–Ni2+Ni2+Histamine1~100 μM1 μM[191]
CLFe3O4@SiO2-NTAHis6-taggedCan f 1Ni2+SpecifcIgE2.52~10.02 ng/mL0.35 ng/mL[192]
Abbreviation: EC, electrochemistry; FL, fluorescence; CL, chemiluminescence; CT, cholera toxin; PKA, protein kinase A; Ara h2, Arachishypogaea2; SOD, superoxide dismutase; SPCEs, screen-printed carbon electrodes; PBP, penicillin binding protein; MNPs, magnetic nanoparticles; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; recombinant-enhanced green fluorescence protein; MMP-7, matrix metalloproteinase-7; AuNPs, gold nanoparticles; AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.

3. Conclusions

NTA–metal complexes were initially developed as coordination-bonding-based artificial receptors for protein purification. Their pleiotropic merits have facilitated their expanded applications recently as functional and structural agents in multidisciplinary research such as protein engineering, synthetic chemistry and biological analysis. The noncovalent, specific and strong interaction between NTA–metal complexes and His6 tags enabled the site-specific and reversible immobilization or labeling of biomolecules, which is helpful to fabricate versatile optical and electrochemical biosensors, especially for point-of-care tests in low-resource settings. For example, NTA–metal complex-functionalized materials, such as cellulose membranes and MBs, have been successfully used to enrich the biomarker concentration for sample preparation, resulting in the enhanced sensitivity of diagnostics. NTA–metal complexes-based affinity techniques provide site-specific, controllable and reversible approaches to immobilize biorecognition elements on detection platforms or nanomaterials under mild conditions without decreasing their functional activities. Moreover, NTA–metal complexes conjugated with other functional species can be used to label His6-tagged proteins, and their unique optical, catalytic, electrochemical and magnetic properties have endowed them with signal generation ability in diagnostics.
Despite the successful applications in different research fields, there are still some important challenges to be resolved. For example, the cytotoxicity of NTA–metal-His6 tags and their influence on the structure, function and stability of proteins should be carefully investigated even though the site-specific modification of proteins by NTA derivatives have already been widely used for living-cell and single-molecule imaging. In addition, the insufficient fouling resistance ability should be improved when the biosensors are used for the assays of undiluted blood plasma samples. NTA–metal complexes can be coupled with other strategies for signal amplification, such as DNA techniques and enzymes. We believe that the integration of NTA–metal complexes with modern analytical techniques would result in a remarkable boost for the design and implementation of powerful and novel biosensors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z., Y.C., Y.L. and M.Q.; writing—review and editing, L.L.; project administration, L.L.; funding acquisition, L.Z. and L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Research Project of Henan Province (212102210037) and the Program for Innovative Research Team of Science and Technology in the University of Henan Province (21IRTSTHN005).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wong, L.S.; Khan, F.; Micklefield, J. Selective covalent protein immobilization: Strategies and applications. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4025–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Trilling, A.K.; Beekwilder, J.; Zuilhof, H. Antibody orientation on biosensor surfaces: A minireview. Analyst 2013, 138, 1619–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Steen Redeker, E.; Ta, D.T.; Cortens, D.; Billen, B.; Guedens, W.; Adriaensens, P. Protein engineering for directed immobilization. Bioconjug. Chem. 2013, 24, 1761–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Samanta, D.; Sarkar, A. Immobilization of bio-macromolecules on self-assembled monolayers: Methods and sensor applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2567–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.W.; Huang, X.R.; Wang, T.H. Construction and direct electrochemistry of orientation controlled laccase electrode. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 446, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, E.S.; Shim, C.K.; Lee, J.W.; Park, J.W.; Choi, K.Y. Synergistic effect of orientation and lateral spacing of protein g on an on-chip immunoassay. Analyst 2012, 137, 2421–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Karyakin, A.A.; Presnova, G.V.; Rubtsova, M.Y.; Egorov, A.M. Oriented immobilization of antibodies onto the gold surfaces via their native thiol groups. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 3805–3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Della Ventura, B.; Schiavo, L.; Altucci, C.; Esposito, R.; Velotta, R. Light assisted antibody immobilization for bio-sensing. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2011, 2, 3223–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Song, S.; Li, N.; Bai, L.; Gai, P.; Li, F. Photo-assisted robust anti-interference self-powered biosensing of MicroRNA based on Pt-s bonds and the inorganic-organic hybridization strategy. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 1654–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guesdon, J.L.; Ternynck, T.; Avrameas, S. The use of avidin-biotin interaction in immunoenzymatic techniques. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2017, 27, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, C.C.; Kuo, Y.Y.; Liang, C.F.; Chien, W.T.; Wu, H.T.; Chang, T.C.; Jan, F.D.; Lin, C.C. Site-specific immobilization of enzymes on magnetic nanoparticles and their use in organic synthesis. Bioconjug. Chem. 2012, 23, 714–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Holland-Nell, K.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G. Specifically immobilised aldo/keto reductase akr1a1 shows a dramatic increase in activity relative to the randomly immobilised enzyme. Chembiochem 2007, 8, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheung, R.C.; Wong, J.H.; Ng, T.B. Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography: A review on its applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 1411–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arnold, F.H. Metal-affinity separations: A new dimension in protein processing. Nat. Biotechnol. 1991, 9, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Block, H.; Maertens, B.; Spriestersbach, A.; Brinker, N.; Kubicek, J.; Fabis, R.; Labahn, J.; Schāfer, F. Immobilized-metal affinity chromatography (imac): A review. Methods Enzymol. 2009, 463, 439–473. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gaberc-Porekar, V.; Menart, V. Perspectives of immobilized-metal affinity chromatography. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2001, 49, 335–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xu, J.J.; Ambrosini, S.; Tamahkar, E.; Rossi, C.; Haupt, K.; Tse Sum Bui, B. Toward a universal method for preparing molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles with antibody-like affinity for proteins. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hochuli, E.; Dobeli, H.; Schacher, A. New metal chelate adsorbent selective for proteins and peptides containing neighbouring histidine residues. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 411, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ruan, M.; Nicolas, I.; Baudy-Floèh, M. New building blocks or dendritic pseudopeptides for metal chelating. Springerplus 2016, 5, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hsieh, Y.L.; Chen, C.W.; Lin, W.H.; Li, B.R. Construction of the nickel oxide nanocoral structure on microscope slides for total self-assembly-oriented probe immobilization and signal enhancement. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 3304–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hall, E.A.H.; Chen, S.; Chun, J.; Du, Y.; Zhao, Z.Y. A molecular biology approach to protein coupling at a biosensor interface. TrAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2016, 79, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zeng, X.Q.; Shen, Z.H.; Mernaugh, R. Recombinant antibodies and their use in biosensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 402, 3027–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bellare, M.; Kadambar, V.K.; Bollella, P.; Gamella, M.; Katz, E.; Melman, A. Electrochemical signal-triggered release of biomolecules functionalized with His-tag units. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 2274–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, W.; Wang, D.I.; Li, Z. Facile fabrication of recyclable and active nanobiocatalyst: Purification and immobilization of enzyme in one pot with Ni-NTA functionalized magnetic nanoparticle. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8115–8117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bauer, W.S.; Kimmel, D.W.; Adams, N.M.; Gibson, L.E.; Scherr, T.F.; Richardson, K.A.; Conrad, J.A.; Matakala, H.K.; Haselton, F.R.; Wright, D.W. Magnetically-enabled biomarker extraction and delivery system: Towards integrated ASSURED diagnostic tools. Analyst 2017, 142, 1569–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rowinska-Zyrek, M.; Witkowska, D.; Potocki, S.; Remelli, M.; Kozlowski, H. His-rich sequences—Is plagiarism from nature a good idea? New J. Chem. 2013, 37, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jones, A.L.; Hulett, M.D.; Parish, C.R. Histidine-rich glycoprotein: A novel adaptor protein in plasma that modulates the immune, vascular and coagulation systems. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2005, 83, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sahal, D.; Kannan, R.; Sinha, A.; Babbarwal, V.; Gnana Prakash, B.; Singh, G.; Chauhan, V.S. Specific and instantaneous one-step chemodetection of histidine-rich proteins by pauly’s stain. Anal. Biochem. 2002, 308, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Davis, K.M.; Gibson, L.E.; Haselton, F.R.; Wright, D.W. Simple sample processing enhances malaria rapid diagnostic test performance. Analyst 2014, 139, 3026–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ricks, K.M.; Adams, N.M.; Scherr, T.F.; Haselton, F.R.; Wright, D.W. Direct transfer of hrpii-magnetic bead complexes to malaria rapid diagnostic tests significantly improves test sensitivity. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kantor, A.G.; Markwalter, C.F.; Nourani, A.; Wright, D.W. An antibody-free dual-biomarker rapid enrichment workflow (andrew) improves the sensitivity of malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Anal. Biochem. 2021, 612, 114020–114026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, T.H.; Huang, Y.T.; Cheng, H.W.; Chen, Y.W.; Lee, C.H.; Hsu, Y.D.; Pan, R.L.; Tseng, F.G. Single molecule take-and-place technique for positioning a membrane protein on a lipid bilayer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 21184–21190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kitai, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Toyoshima, Y.Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Murayama, T.; Sakaue, H.; Suzuki, H.; Takahagi, T. Simple method of synthesizing nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid gold nanoparticles with a narrow size distribution for protein labeling. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 50, 095002–095006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schmid, E.L.; Keller, T.A.; Dienes, Z.; Vogel, H. Reversible oriented surface immobilization of functional proteins on oxide surfaces. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 1979–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wasserberg, D.; Cabanas-Danes, J.; Prangsma, J.; O’Mahony, S.; Cazade, P.A.; Tromp, E.; Blum, C.; Thompson, D.; Huskens, J.; Subramaniam, V.; et al. Controlling protein surface orientation by strategic placement of oligo-histidine tags. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9068–9083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hainfeld, J.F.; Liu, W.; Halsey, C.M.; Freimuth, P.; Powell, R.D. Ni-NTA-gold clusters target His-tagged proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 1999, 127, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yang, J.B.; Ni, K.F.; Wei, D.Z.; Ren, Y.H. One-step purification and immobilization of his-tagged protein via ni2+-functionalized Fe3O4@polydopamine magnetic nanoparticles. Biotechnol. Bioproc. Eng. 2015, 20, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Johnson, D.L.; Martin, L.L. Controlling protein orientation at interfaces using histidine tags: An alternative to Ni/NTA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2018–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ravikumar, R.; Chen, L.H.; Jayaraman, P.; Poh, C.L.; Chan, C.C. Chitosan-nickel film based interferometric optical fiber sensor for label-free detection of histidine tagged proteins. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 99, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schmitt, L.; Dietrich, C.; Tampé, R. Synthesis and characterization of chelator-lipids for reversible immobilization of engineered proteins at self-assembled lipid interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 116, 8485–8491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. You, C.J.; Bhagawati, M.; Brecht, A.; Piehler, J. Affinity capturing for targeting proteins into micro and nanostructures. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 393, 1563–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Markwalter, C.F.; Kantor, A.G.; Moore, C.P.; Richardson, K.A.; Wright, D.W. Inorganic complexes and metal-based nanomaterials for infectious disease diagnostics. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 1456–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Soler, M.; Lechuga, L.M. Biochemistry strategies for label-free optical sensor biofunctionalization: Advances towards real applicability. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 5071–5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mu, B.; Zhang, J.Q.; McNicholas, T.P.; Reuel, N.F.; Kruss, S.; Strano, M.S. Recent advances in molecular recognition based on nanoengineered platforms. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wieneke, R.; Tampe, R. Multivalent chelators for in vivo protein labeling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 8278–8290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. You, C.J.; Piehler, J. Multivalent chelators for spatially and temporally controlled protein functionalization. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 3345–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. López-Laguna, H.; Voltà-Durán, E.; Parladé, E.; Villaverde, A.; Vázquez, E.; Unzueta, U. Insights on the emerging biotechnology of histidine-rich peptides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 54, 107817–107831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bauer, W.S.; Richardson, K.A.; Adams, N.M.; Ricks, K.M.; Gasperino, D.J.; Ghionea, S.J.; Rosen, M.; Nichols, K.P.; Weigl, B.H.; Haselton, F.R.; et al. Rapid concentration and elution of malarial antigen histidine-rich protein II using solid phase Zn(II) resin in a simple flow-through pipette tip format. Biomicrofluidics 2017, 11, 034115–034130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hochuli, E.; Bannwarth, W.; Döbeli, H.; Gentz, R.; Stüber, D. Genetic approach to facilitate purification of recombinant proteins with a novel metal chelate adsorbent. Nat. Biotechnol. 1988, 6, 1321–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Suh, J.K.; Poulsen, L.L.; Ziegler, D.M.; Robertus, J.D. Molecular cloning and kinetic characterization of a flavin-containing monooxygenase from saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1996, 336, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giusti, F.; Kessler, P.; Hansen, R.W.; Della Pia, E.A.; Le Bon, C.; Mourier, G.; Popot, J.L.; Martinez, K.L.; Zoonens, M. Synthesis of a polyhistidine-bearing amphipol and its use for immobilizing membrane proteins. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 3751–3761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Knecht, S.; Ricklin, D.; Eberle, A.N.; Ernst, B. Oligohis-tags: Mechanisms of binding to Ni2+-NTA surfaces. J. Mol. Recognit. 2009, 22, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Madoz-Gúrpide, J.; Abad, J.M.; Fernández-Recio, J.; Vélez, M.; Vázquez, L.; Gómez-Moreno, C.; Fernández, V.M. Modulation of electroenzymatic nadph oxidation through oriented immobilization of ferredoxin: NANP+ reductase onto modified gold electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9808–9817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Schroper, F.; Baumann, A.; Offenhausser, A.; Mayer, D. Direct electrochemistry of novel affinity-tag immobilized recombinant horse heart cytochrome c. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 34, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Khan, F.; He, M.Y.; Taussig, M.J. Double-hexahistidine tag with high-affinity binding for protein immobilization, purification, and detection on ni-nitrilotriacetic acid surfaces. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 3072–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kapanidis, A.N.; Ebright, Y.W.; Ebright, R.H. Site-specific incorporation of fluorescent probes into protein: Hexahistidine-tag-mediated fluorescent labeling with (Ni2+:nitrilotriacetic acid)n-fluorochrome conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12123–12125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gershon, P.D.; Khilko, S. Stable chelating linkage for reversible immobilization of oligohistidine tagged proteins in the biacore surface plasmon resonance detector. J. Immunol. Methods 1995, 183, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Le, T.T.; Wilde, C.P.; Grossman, N.; Cass, A.E. A simple method for controlled immobilization of proteins on modified SAMs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 5271–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tinazli, A.; Tang, J.; Valiokas, R.; Picuric, S.; Lata, S.; Piehler, J.; Liedberg, B.; Tampe, R. High-affinity chelator thiols for switchable and oriented immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins: A generic platform for protein chip technologies. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5249–5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lata, S.; Piehler, J. Stable and functional immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins via multivalent chelator headgroups on a molecular poly(ethylene glycol) brush. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 1096–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Knezevic, J.; Langer, A.; Hampel, P.A.; Kaiser, W.; Strasser, R.; Rant, U. Quantitation of affinity, avidity, and binding kinetics of protein analytes with a dynamically switchable biosurface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15225–15228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Huang, Z.H.; Hwang, P.; Watson, D.S.; Cao, L.M.; Szoka, F.C., Jr. Tris-nitrilotriacetic acids of subnanomolar affinity toward hexahistidine tagged molecules. Bioconjug. Chem. 2009, 20, 1667–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huang, Z.H.; Park, J.I.; Watson, D.S.; Hwang, P.; Szoka, F.C., Jr. Facile synthesis of multivalent nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) and NTA conjugates for analytical and drug delivery applications. Bioconjug. Chem. 2006, 17, 1592–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lata, S.; Reichel, A.; Brock, R.; Tampe, R.; Piehler, J. High-affinity adaptors for switchable recognition of histidine-tagged proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10205–10215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Meredith, G.D.; Wu, H.Y.; Allbritton, N.L. Targeted protein functionalization using His-tags. Bioconjug. Chem. 2004, 15, 969–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hintersteiner, M.; Weidemann, T.; Kimmerlin, T.; Filiz, N.; Buehler, C.; Auer, M. Covalent fluorescence labeling of His-tagged proteins on the surface of living cells. Chembiochem 2008, 9, 1391–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Willard, F.S.; Siderovski, D.P. Covalent immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins for surface plasmon resonance. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 353, 147–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chevalier, S.; Cuestas-Ayllon, C.; Grazu, V.; Luna, M.; Feracci, H.; de la Fuente, J.M. Creating biomimetic surfaces through covalent and oriented binding of proteins. Langmuir 2010, 26, 14707–14715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mateo, C.; Fernández-Lorente, G.; Cortés, E.; Garcia, J.L.; Fernández-Lafuente, R.; Guisan, J.M. One-step purification, covalent immobilization, and additional stabilization of poly-His-tagged proteins using novel heterofunctional chelate-epoxy supports. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 76, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qu, J.H.; Horta, S.; Delport, F.; Sillen, M.; Geukens, N.; Sun, D.W.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; Declerck, P.; Lammertyn, J.; Spasic, D. Expanding a portfolio of (FO-) SPR surface chemistries with the Co(III)-NTA oriented immobilization of His6-tagged bioreceptors for applications in complex matrices. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 960–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mehlenbacher, M.R.; Bou-Abdallah, F.; Liu, X.X.; Melman, A. Calorimetric studies of ternary complexes of Ni(II) and Cu(II) nitrilotriacetic acid and N-acetyloligohistidines. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2015, 437, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, X.M.; Song, S.Y.; Pei, Y.X.; Dong, H.; Aastrup, T.; Pei, Z.C. Oriented and reversible immobilization of His-tagged proteins on two- and three-dimensional surfaces for study of protein–protein interactions by a qcm biosensor. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2016, 224, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Clow, F.; Fraser, J.D.; Proft, T. Immobilization of proteins to biacore sensor chips using Staphylococcus aureus sortase A. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 30, 1603–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pellis, A.; Vastano, M.; Quartinello, F.; Herrero Acero, E.; Guebitz, G.M. His-tag immobilization of cutinase 1 from thermobifida cellulosilytica for solvent-free synthesis of polyesters. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12, 1700322–1700327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wegner, S.V.; Spatz, J.P. Cobalt(III) as a stable and inert mediator ion between NTA and his6-tagged proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7593–7596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wegner, S.V.; Schenk, F.C.; Spatz, J.P. Cobalt(III)-mediated permanent and stable immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins on NTA-functionalized surfaces. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 3156–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tang, Y.J.; Mernaugh, R.; Zeng, X.Q. Nonregeneration protocol for surface plasmon resonance: Study of high-affinity interaction with high-density biosensors. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 1841–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lori, J.A.; Morrin, A.; Killard, A.J.; Smyth, M.R. Development and characterization of nickel-NTA-polyaniline modified electrodes. Electroanalysis 2006, 18, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kang, E.; Park, J.W.; McClellan, S.J.; Kim, J.M.; Holland, D.P.; Lee, G.U.; Franses, E.I.; Park, K.; Thompson, D.H. Specific adsorption of histidine-tagged proteins on silica surfaces modified with Ni2+/NTA-derivatized poly(ethylene glycol). Langmuir 2007, 23, 6281–6288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ley, C.; Holtmann, D.; Mangold, K.M.; Schrader, J. Immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins on electrodes. Colloids Surf. B 2011, 88, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tinazli, A.; Piehler, J.; Beuttler, M.; Guckenberger, R.; Tampé, R. Native protein nanolithography that can write, read and erase. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zborowska, M.; Sulima, M.; Marszałek, I.; Wysłouch-Cieszyńska, A.; Radecka, H.; Radecki, J. Nitrilotriacetic acid–copper(II) monolayer deposited on a gold electrode for the immobilization of histidine tagged v domain of receptor for advanced glycation end products–the basis of amyloid–beta peptide sensing. Anal. Lett. 2014, 47, 1375–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cheng, F.; Gamble, L.J.; Castner, D.G. XPS, tof-sims, NEXAFS, and SPR characterization of nitrilotriacetic acid-terminated self-assembled monolayers for controllable immobilization of proteins. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 2564–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cho, M.; Chun, L.; Lin, M.; Choe, W.; Nam, J.; Lee, Y. Sensitive electrochemical sensor for detection of lipopolysaccharide on metal complex immobilized gold electrode. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2012, 174, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tran, Q.T.; de Sanoit, J.; Pierre, S.; Arnault, J.-C.; Bergonzo, P. Diamond electrodes for trace alpha pollutant sequestration via covalent grafting of nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) ligand. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 136, 430–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Haddour, N.; Cosnier, S.; Gondran, C. Electrogeneration of a poly(pyrrole)-NTA chelator film for a reversible oriented immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5752–5753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Holzinger, M.; Baur, J.; Haddad, R.; Wang, X.; Cosnier, S. Multiple functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes by dip coating. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2450–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Singh, M.; Holzinger, M.; Biloivan, O.; Cosnier, S. 3D-nanostructured scaffold electrodes based on single-walled carbon nanotubes and nanodiamonds for high performance biosensors. Carbon 2013, 61, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Osella, S.; Kiliszek, M.; Harputlu, E.; Unlu, C.G.; Ocakoglu, K.; Kargul, J.; Trzaskowski, B. Controlling the charge transfer flow at the graphene/pyrene–nitrilotriacetic acid interface. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 5046–5054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jorde, L.; Li, Z.H.; Pöppelwerth, A.; Piehler, J.; You, C.J.; Meyer, C. Biofunctionalization of carbon nanotubes for reversible site-specific protein immobilization. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 129, 094302–094311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mauriz, E.; García-Fernández, M.C.; Lechuga, L.M. Towards the design of universal immunosurfaces for SPR-based assays: A review. TrAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2016, 79, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pfeifer, P.; Aldinger, U.; Schwotzer, G.; Diekmann, S.; Steinrücke, P. Real time sensing of specific molecular binding using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 1999, 54, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Boonen, A.; Singh, A.K.; Hout, A.V.; Das, K.; Loy, T.V.; Noppen, S.; Schols, D. Development of a novel SPR assay to study cxcr4-ligand interactions. Biosensors 2020, 10, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Maalouli, N.; Gouget-Laemmel, A.C.; Pinchemel, B.; Bouazaoui, M.; Chazalviel, J.N.; Ozanam, F.; Yang, Y.K.; Burkhard, P.; Boukherroub, R.; Szunerits, S. Development of a metal-chelated plasmonic interface for the linking of His-peptides with a droplet-based surface plasmon resonance read-off scheme. Langmuir 2011, 27, 5498–5505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wegner, G.J.; Lee, H.J.; Marriott, G.; Corn, R.M. Fabrication of histidine-tagged fusion protein arrays for surface plasmon resonance imaging studies of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4740–4746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sigal, G.B.; Bamdad, C.; Barberis, A.; Strominger, J.; Whitesides, G.M. A self-assembled monolayer for the binding and study of histidine-tagged proteins by surface plasmon resonance. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gautrot, J.E.; Huck, W.T.; Welch, M.; Ramstedt, M. Protein-resistant NTA-functionalized polymer brushes for selective and stable immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Schartner, J.; Hoeck, N.; Guldenhaupt, J.; Mavarani, L.; Nabers, A.; Gerwert, K.; Kotting, C. Chemical functionalization of germanium with dextran brushes for immobilization of proteins revealed by attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 7467–7475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Qu, J.H.; Leirs, K.; Escudero, R.; Strmsek, Z.; Jerala, R.; Spasic, D.; Lammertyn, J. Novel regeneration approach for creating reusable FO-SPR probes with NTA surface chemistry. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Yi, X.Y.; Hao, Y.Q.; Xia, N.; Wang, J.X.; Quintero, M.; Li, D.; Zhou, F.M. Sensitive and continuous screening of inhibitors of beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) at single SPR chips. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 3660–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Singh, M.; Holzinger, M.; Tabrizian, M.; Winters, S.; Berner, N.C.; Cosnier, S.; Duesberg, G.S. Noncovalently functionalized monolayer graphene for sensitivity enhancement of surface plasmon resonance immunosensors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2800–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yuan, P.X.; Deng, S.Y.; Yao, C.G.; Wan, Y.; Cosnier, S.; Shan, D. Polymerization amplified SPR-DNA assay on noncovalently functionalized graphene. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 89, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Wang, X.Y.; Liu, Q.H.; Tan, X.F.; Liu, L.Y.; Zhou, F.M. Covalent affixation of histidine-tagged proteins tethered onto Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid sensors for enhanced surface plasmon resonance detection of small molecule drugs and kinetic studies of antibody/antigen interactions. Analyst 2019, 144, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wang, X.Y.; Zhou, F.M. Dual-valve and counter-flow surface plasmon resonance. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 4972–4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Nieba, L.; Nieba-Axmann, S.E.; Persson, A.; Hamalainen, M.; Edebratt, F.; Hansson, A.; Lidholm, J.; Magnusson, K.; Karlsson, A.F.; Pluckthun, A. Biacore analysis of histidine-tagged proteins using a chelating NTA sensor chip. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 252, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Fischer, M.; Leech, A.P.; Hubbard, R.E. Comparative assessment of different histidine-tags for immobilization of protein onto surface plasmon resonance sensorchips. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 1800–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, J.; Spulber, M.; Wu, D.; Talom, R.M.; Palivan, C.G.; Meier, W. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-tris-nitrilotriacetic acid acrylamide) for a combined study of molecular recognition and spatial constraints in protein binding and interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 12607–12614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tanner, P.; Ezhevskaya, M.; Nehring, R.; Van Doorslaer, S.; Meier, W.; Palivan, C. Specific his6-tag attachment to metal-functionalized polymersomes relies on molecular recognition. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 10113–10124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rakickas, T.; Gavutis, M.; Reichel, A.; Piehler, J.; Liedberg, B.; Valiokas, R. Protein-protein interactions in reversibly assembled nanopatterns. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3369–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bhagawati, M.; You, C.J.; Piehler, J. Quantitative real-time imaging of protein-protein interactions by LSPR detection with micropatterned gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9564–9571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jiang, M.; Dong, T.B.; Han, C.W.; Liu, L.Y.; Zhang, T.T.; Kang, Q.; Wang, P.C.; Zhou, F.M. Regenerable and high-throughput surface plasmon resonance assay for rapid screening of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody in serum samples. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2022, 1208, 339830–339838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Reichel, A.; Schaible, D.; Al Furoukh, N.; Cohen, M.; Schreiber, G.; Piehler, J. Noncovalent, site-specific biotinylation of histidine-tagged proteins. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 8590–8600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Liu, L.Y.; Han, C.W.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, T.T.; Kang, Q.; Wang, X.Y.; Wang, P.C.; Zhou, F.M. Rapid and regenerable surface plasmon resonance determinations of biomarker concentration and biomolecular interaction based on tris-nitrilotriacetic acid chips. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2021, 1170, 338625–338633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Pires, M.M.; Chmielewski, J. Self-assembly of collagen peptides into microflorettes via metal coordination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2706–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Xu, L.; Cao, H.Y.; Huang, C.D.; Jia, L.Y. Oriented immobilization and quantitative analysis simultaneously realized in sandwich immunoassay via His-tagged nanobody. Molecules 2019, 24, 1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Horta, S.; Qu, J.H.; Dekimpe, C.; Bonnez, Q.; Vandenbulcke, A.; Tellier, E.; Kaplanski, G.; Delport, F.; Geukens, N.; Lammertyn, J.; et al. Co(III)-NTA mediated antigen immobilization on a fiber optic-SPR biosensor for detection of autoantibodies in autoimmune diseases: Application in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 13880–13887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Auer, S.; Azizi, L.; Faschinger, F.; Blazevic, V.; Vesikari, T.; Gruber, H.J.; Hytönen, V.P. Stable immobilisation of His-tagged proteins on BLI biosensor surface using cobalt. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2017, 243, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Qu, J.H.; Leirs, K.; Maes, W.; Imbrechts, M.; Callewaert, N.; Lagrou, K.; Geukens, N.; Lammertyn, J.; Spasic, D. Innovative FO-SPR label-free strategy for detecting anti-rbd antibodies in COVID-19 patient serum and whole blood. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Qu, J.H.; Peeters, B.; Delport, F.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; Lammertyn, J.; Spasic, D. Gold nanoparticle enhanced multiplexed biosensing on a fiber optic surface plasmon resonance probe. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 192, 113549–113557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yang, L.; Yin, X.; An, B.; Li, F. Precise capture and direct quantification of tumor exosomes via a highly efficient dual-aptamer recognition-assisted ratiometric immobilization-free electrochemical strategy. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 1709–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lu, L.; Su, H.; Li, F. Ultrasensitive homogeneous electrochemical detection of transcription factor by coupled isothermal cleavage reaction and cycling amplification based on Exonuclease III. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 8328–8334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ataka, K.; Giess, F.; Knoll, W.; Naumann, R.; Haber-Pohlmeier, S.; Richter, B.; Heberle, J. Oriented attachment and membrane reconstitution of His-tagged cytochrome c oxidase to a gold electrode: In situ monitoring by surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16199–16206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Aghamiri, Z.S.; Mohsennia, M.; Rafiee-Pour, H.A. Immobilization of cytochrome c and its application as electrochemical biosensors. Talanta 2018, 176, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Akram, M.S.; Ur Rehman, J.; Hall, E.A. Engineered proteins for bioelectrochemistry. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2014, 7, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Maly, J.; Di Meo, C.; De Francesco, M.; Masci, A.; Masojidek, J.; Sugiura, M.; Volpe, A.; Pilloton, R. Reversible immobilization of engineered molecules by Ni-NTA chelators. Bioelectrochemistry 2004, 63, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Maly, J.; Ilie, M.; Foglietti, V.; Cianci, E.; Minotti, A.; Nardi, L.; Masci, A.; Vastarella, W.; Pilloton, R. Continuous flow micro-cell for electrochemical addressing of engineered bio-molecules. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2005, 111–112, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Balland, V.; Hureau, C.; Cusano, A.M.; Liu, Y.; Tron, T.; Limoges, B. Oriented immobilization of a fully active monolayer of histidine-tagged recombinant laccase on modified gold electrodes. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7186–7192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Demin, S.; Hall, E.A. Breaking the barrier to fast electron transfer. Bioelectrochemistry 2009, 76, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Campbell, W.H.; Henig, J.; Plumeré, N. Affinity binding via zinc(II) for controlled orientation and electrochemistry of histidine-tagged nitrate reductase in self-assembled monolayers. Bioelectrochemistry 2013, 93, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Vallina-Garcia, R.; del Mar Garcia-Suarez, M.; Fernandez-Abedul, M.T.; Mendez, F.J.; Costa-Garcia, A. Oriented immobilisation of anti-pneumolysin fab through a histidine tag for electrochemical immunosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 23, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Blankespoor, R.; Limoges, B.; Schollhorn, B.; Syssa-Magalé, J.L.; Yazidi, D. Dense monolayers of metal-chelating ligands covalently attached to carbon electrodes electrochemically and their useful application in affinity binding of histidine-tagged proteins. Langmuir 2005, 21, 3362–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, Z.; Liu, D.; Gu, H.; Zhu, A.W.; Tian, Y.; Shi, G.Y. NTA-modified carbon electrode as a general relaying substrate to facilitate electron transfer of SOD: Application to in vivo monitoring of O2- in a rat brain. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 43, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Conzuelo, F.; Gamella, M.; Campuzano, S.; Martinez-Ruiz, P.; Esteban-Torres, M.; de las Rivas, B.; Reviejo, A.J.; Munoz, R.; Pingarron, J.M. Integrated amperometric affinity biosensors using Co2+-tetradentate nitrilotriacetic acid modified disposable carbon electrodes: Application to the determination of beta-lactam antibiotics. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 3246–3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Xu, X.H.; Zhou, J.; Liu, X.; Nie, Z.; Qing, M.; Guo, M.L.; Yao, S.Z. Aptameric peptide for one-step detection of protein kinase. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 4746–4753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Baur, J.; Gondran, C.; Holzinger, M.; Defrancq, E.; Perrot, H.; Cosnier, S. Label-free femtomolar detection of target DNA by impedimetric DNA sensor based on poly(pyrrole-nitrilotriacetic acid) film. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 1066–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Xu, H.; Gorgy, K.; Gondran, C.; Le Goff, A.; Spinelli, N.; Lopez, C.; Defrancq, E.; Cosnier, S. Label-free impedimetric thrombin sensor based on poly(pyrrole-nitrilotriacetic acid)-aptamer film. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kazane, I.; Gorgy, K.; Gondran, C.; Spinelli, N.; Zazoua, A.; Defrancq, E.; Cosnier, S. Highly sensitive bisphenol-a electrochemical aptasensor based on poly(pyrrole-nitrilotriacetic acid)-aptamer film. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 7268–7273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zaitouna, A.J.; Lai, R.Y. An electrochemical peptide-based Ara h 2 antibody sensor fabricated on a nickel(II)-nitriloacetic acid self-assembled monolayer using a His-tagged peptide. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2014, 828, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Griesser, R.; Sigel, H.; Wright, L.D.; McCormick, D.B. Interactions of metal ions with biotin and biotin derivatives. Complexing and hydrogen-bond formation of the ureido group. Biochemistry 1973, 12, 1917–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Baur, J.; Holzinger, M.; Gondran, C.; Cosnier, S. Immobilization of biotinylated biomolecules onto electropolymerized poly(pyrrole-nitrilotriacetic acid)–Cu2+ film. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 12, 1287–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Palomar, Q.; Gondran, C.; Holzinger, M.; Marks, R.; Cosnier, S. Controlled carbon nanotube layers for impedimetric immunosensors: High performance label free detection and quantification of anti-cholera toxin antibody. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 97, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Gao, T.; Gu, S.; Mu, C.; Zhang, M.; Yang, J.; Liu, P.; Li, G. Electrochemical assay of lipid kinase activity facilitated by liposomes. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 252, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Gu, S.; Gao, T.; Yang, Y.; Zhi, J.; Li, J.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, K.; Yang, J. A bifunctional Fe(III)-coordinated nanoprobe for electrochemical detection of sphingosine kinase 1 activity. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 72, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kerekovic, I.; Milardovic, S.; Palcic, M.; Grabaric, Z. Characterization of cysteamine self assembled on gold functionalized with nitrilotriacetic acid and evaluation of copper(II) binding capacity with adsorption transfer stripping voltammetry. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2014, 724, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Sasaki, Y.; Minami, T.; Minamiki, T.; Tokito, S. An organic transistor-based electrical assay for copper(ii) in water. Electrochemistry 2017, 85, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Yang, W.C.; Swartz, J.R. A filter microplate assay for quantitative analysis of DNA binding proteins using fluorescent DNA. Anal. Biochem. 2011, 415, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kim, S.H.; Ge, P.; Katzenellenbogen, J.A. A new quinoline sensitizer-centered lanthanide chelate and its use for protein labling on Ni-NTA beads for TR LRET assays. Chem. Commun. 2009, 45, 183–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Li, N.; Yi, L.; He, Z.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Lin, J.M. A DNA-directed covalent conjugation fluorescence probe for in vitro detection of functional matrix metalloproteinases. Analyst 2017, 142, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Chao, A.L.; Jiang, N.; Yang, Y.; Li, H.Y.; Sun, H.Z. A Ni-NTA-based red fluorescence probe for protein labelling in live cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kim, S.H.; Jeyakumar, M.; Katzenellenbogen, J.A. Dual-mode fluorophore-doped nickel nitrilotriacetic acid-modified silica nanoparticles combine histidine-tagged protein purification with site-specific fluorophore labeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13254–13264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, M.; Lei, C.Y.; Nie, Z.; Guo, M.L.; Huang, Y.; Yao, S.Z. Label-free fluorescent detection of thrombin activity based on a recombinant enhanced green fluorescence protein and nickel ions immobilized nitrilotriacetic acid-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Talanta 2013, 116, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Tan, P.L.; Lei, C.Y.; Liu, X.; Qing, M.; Nie, Z.; Guo, M.L.; Huang, Y.; Yao, S.Z. Fluorescent detection of protein kinase based on zirconium ions-immobilized magnetic nanoparticles. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2013, 780, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Goldsmith, C.R.; Jaworski, J.; Sheng, M.; Lippard, S.J. Selective labeling of extracellular proteins containing polyhistidine sequences by a fluorescein-nitrilotriacetic acid conjugate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 418–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Peneva, K.; Mihov, G.; Herrmann, A.; Zarrabi, N.; Borsch, M.; Duncan, T.M.; Mullen, K. Exploiting the nitrilotriacetic acid moiety for biolabeling with ultrastable perylene dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5398–5399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Guignet, E.G.; Hovius, R.; Vogel, H. Reversible site-selective labeling of membrane proteins in live cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Thai, H.B.; Yu, J.K.; Park, Y.J.; Ahn, D.R. A dual-responsive pH-sensor and its potential as a universal probe for assays of pH-changing enzymes. Analyst 2015, 140, 2804–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhao, C.X.; Hellman, L.M.; Zhan, X.; Bowman, W.S.; Whiteheart, S.W.; Fried, M.G. Hexahistidine-tag-specific optical probes for analyses of proteins and their interactions. Anal. Biochem. 2010, 399, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Glymenaki, E.; Kandyli, M.; Apostolidou, C.P.; Kokotidou, C.; Charalambidis, G.; Nikoloudakis, E.; Panagiotakis, S.; Koutserinaki, E.; Klontza, V.; Michail, P.; et al. Design and synthesis of porphyrin-nitrilotriacetic acid dyads with potential applications in peptide labeling through metallochelate coupling. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 1803–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Lata, S.; Gavutis, M.; Tampe, R.; Piehler, J. Specific and stable fluorescence labeling of histidine-tagged proteins for dissecting multi-protein complex formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2365–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Gatterdam, K.; Joest, E.F.; Gatterdam, V.; Tampé, R. The scaffold design of trivalent chelator heads dictates affinity and stability for labeling His-tagged proteins in vitro and in cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12395–12399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Uchinomiya, S.H.; Nonaka, H.; Fujishima, S.H.; Tsukiji, S.; Ojida, A.; Hamachi, I. Site-specific covalent labeling of His-tag fused proteins with a reactive Ni(II)-NTA probe. Chem. Commun. 2009, 59, 5880–5882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hatai, J.; Prasad, P.K.; Lahav-Mankovski, N.; Oppenheimer-Low, N.; Unger, T.; Sirkis, Y.F.; Dadosh, T.; Motiei, L.; Margulies, D. Assessing changes in the expression levels of cell surface proteins with a turn-on fluorescent molecular probe. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 1875–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Selvakumar, K.; Motiei, L.; Margulies, D. Enzyme-artificial enzyme interactions as a means for discriminating among structurally similar isozymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4892–4895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Nissinkorn, Y.; Lahav-Mankovski, N.; Rabinkov, A.; Albeck, S.; Motiei, L.; Margulies, D. Sensing protein surfaces with targeted fluorescent receptors. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 15981–15987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Peri-Naor, R.; Pode, Z.; Lahav-Mankovski, N.; Rabinkov, A.; Motiei, L.; Margulies, D. Glycoform differentiation by a targeted, self-assembled, pattern-generating protein surface sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 15790–15798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Wieneke, R.; Laboria, N.; Rajan, M.; Kollmannsperger, A.; Natale, F.; Cardoso, M.C.; Tampe, R. Live-cell targeting of his-tagged proteins by multivalent N-nitrilotriacetic acid carrier complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13975–13978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhang, L.S.; Yin, Y.L.; Wang, L.; Xia, Y.; Ryu, S.; Xi, Z.; Li, L.Y.; Zhang, Z.S. Self-assembling nitrilotriacetic acid nanofibers for tracking and enriching His-tagged proteins in living cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Glembockyte, V.; Lincoln, R.; Cosa, G. Cy3 photoprotection mediated by Ni2+ for extended single-molecule imaging: Old tricks for new techniques. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1116–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Glembockyte, V.; Lin, J.; Cosa, G. Improving the photostability of red- and green-emissive single-molecule fluorophores via Ni2+ mediated excited triplet-state quenching. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 11923–11929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Glembockyte, V.; Wieneke, R.; Gatterdam, K.; Gidi, Y.; Tampé, R.; Cosa, G. Tris -N-nitrilotriacetic acid fluorophore as a self-healing dye for single-molecule fluorescence imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11006–11012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Brege, J.J.; Gallaway, C.; Barron, A.R. Fluorescence quenching of single-walled carbon nanotubes with transition-metal ions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4270–4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Hendler-Neumark, A.; Bisker, G. Fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotubes for protein detection. Sensors 2019, 19, 5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ahn, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Reuel, N.F.; Barone, P.W.; Boghossian, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Yoon, H.; Chang, A.C.; Hilmer, A.J.; Strano, M.S. Label-free, single protein detection on a near-infrared fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube/protein microarray fabricated by cell-free synthesis. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2743–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Reuel, N.F.; Ahn, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Zhang, J.Q.; Boghossian, A.A.; Mahal, L.K.; Strano, M.S. Transduction of glycan-lectin binding using near-infrared fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotubes for glycan profiling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 17923–17933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Jana, B.; Mondal, G.; Biswas, A.; Chakraborty, I.; Saha, A.; Kurkute, P.; Ghosh, S. Dual functionalized graphene oxide serves as a carrier for delivering oligohistidine- and biotin-tagged biomolecules into cells. Macromol. Biosci. 2013, 13, 1478–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Morales, D.P.; Morgan, E.N.; McAdams, M.; Chron, A.B.; Shin, J.E.; Zasadzinski, J.A.; Reich, N.O. Light-triggered genome editing: Cre recombinase mediated gene editing with near-infrared light. Small 2018, 14, e1800543–e1800550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Lan, W.S.; Chen, G.P.; Cui, F.; Tan, F.; Liu, R.; Yushupujiang, M. Development of a novel optical biosensor for detection of organophosphorus pesticides based on methyl parathion hydrolase immobilized by metal-chelate affinity. Sensors 2012, 12, 8477–8490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Chen, Y.Y.; Lian, H.T.; Liu, B.; Liu, G.M.; Wei, X.F. Ni-NTA resin-based multiplexed origami device for highly efficient sensing of allergen-specific IgE. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2023, 385, 133674–133684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Breger, J.C.; Oh, E.; Susumu, K.; Klein, W.P.; Walper, S.A.; Ancona, M.G.; Medintz, I.L. Nanoparticle size influences localized enzymatic enhancement-a case study with phosphotriesterase. Bioconjug. Chem. 2019, 30, 2060–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hondred, J.A.; Breger, J.C.; Garland, N.T.; Oh, E.; Susumu, K.; Walper, S.A.; Medintz, I.L.; Claussen, J.C. Enhanced enzymatic activity from phosphotriesterase trimer gold nanoparticle bioconjugates for pesticide detection. Analyst 2017, 142, 3261–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Moss, M.L.; Koller, G.; Bartsch, J.W.; Rakow, S.; Schlomann, U.; Rasmussen, F.H. A colorimetric-based amplification system for proteinases including MMP2 and ADAM8. Anal. Biochem. 2015, 484, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Gao, T.; Mu, C.L.; Shi, H.; Shi, L.; Mao, X.X.; Li, G.X. Embedding capture-magneto-catalytic activity into a nanocatalyst for the determination of lipid kinase. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Lee, J.O.; Kim, E.J.; Lim, B.; Kim, T.W.; Kim, Y.P. Rapid detection of protein phosphatase activity using Zn(II)-coordinated gold nanosensors based on His-tagged phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Kim, G.B.; Kim, K.H.; Park, Y.H.; Ko, S.; Kim, Y.P. Colorimetric assay of matrix metalloproteinase activity based on metal-induced self-assembly of carboxy gold nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Lee, S.K.; Maye, M.M.; Zhang, Y.B.; Gang, O.; van der Lelie, D. Controllable g5p-protein-directed aggregation of ssDNA-gold nanoparticles. Langmuir 2009, 25, 657–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Alsadig, A.; Vondracek, H.; Pengo, P.; Pasquato, L.; Posocco, P.; Parisse, P.; Casalis, L. Label-free, rapid and facile gold-nanoparticles-based assay as a potential spectroscopic tool for trastuzumab quantification. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Swartz, J.D.; Gulka, C.P.; Haselton, F.R.; Wright, D.W. Development of a histidine-targeted spectrophotometric sensor using Ni(II)NTA-functionalized Au and Ag nanoparticles. Langmuir 2011, 27, 15330–15339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Cheng, W.; Chen, Y.L.; Yan, F.; Ding, L.; Ding, S.J.; Ju, H.X.; Yin, Y.B. Ultrasensitive scanometric strategy for detection of matrix metalloproteinases using a histidine tagged peptide-Au nanoparticle probe. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2877–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Kaya, M.; Volkan, M. New approach for the surface enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS) detection of dopamine at picomolar (pM) levels in the presence of ascorbic acid. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 7729–7735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Cao, X.M.; Qin, M.; Li, P.; Zhou, B.B.; Tang, X.H.; Ge, M.H.; Yang, L.B.; Liu, J.H. Probing catecholamine neurotransmitters based on iron-coordination surface-enhanced resonance Raman spectroscopy label. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2018, 268, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Li, P.; Zhou, B.; Ge, M.; Jing, X.; Yang, L. Metal coordination induced SERS nanoprobe for sensitive and selective detection of histamine in serum. Talanta 2022, 237, 122913–122920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Han, X.S.; Cao, M.D.; Zhou, B.C.; Yu, C.M.; Liu, Y.X.; Peng, B.; Meng, L.; Wei, J.F.; Li, L.; Huang, W. Specifically immobilizing His-tagged allergens to magnetic nanoparticles for fast and quantitative detection of allergen-specific IgE in serum samples. Talanta 2020, 219, 121301–121308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Filchakova, O.; Dossym, D.; Ilyas, A.; Kuanysheva, T.; Abdizhamil, A.; Bukasov, R. Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods. Talanta 2022, 244, 123409–123440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Davis, K.M.; Swartz, J.D.; Haselton, F.R.; Wright, D.W. Low-resource method for extracting the malarial biomarker histidine-rich protein ii to enhance diagnostic test performance. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 6136–6142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Bauer, W.S.; Gulka, C.P.; Silva-Baucage, L.; Adams, N.M.; Haselton, F.R.; Wright, D.W. Metal affinity-enabled capture and release antibody reagents generate a multiplex biomarker enrichment system that improves detection limits of rapid diagnostic tests. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 10216–10223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Yang, M.W.; Chen, D.J.; Hu, J.; Zheng, X.Y.; Lin, Z.J.; Zhu, H.M. The application of coffee-ring effect in analytical chemistry. TrAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2022, 157, 116752–116771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Trantum, J.R.; Wright, D.W.; Haselton, F.R. Biomarker-mediated disruption of coffee-ring formation as a low resource diagnostic indicator. Langmuir 2012, 28, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Gulka, C.P.; Swartz, J.D.; Trantum, J.R.; Davis, K.M.; Peak, C.M.; Denton, A.J.; Haselton, F.R.; Wright, D.W. Coffee rings as low-resource diagnostics: Detection of the malaria biomarker plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein-ii using a surface-coupled ring of Ni(II)NTA gold-plated polystyrene particles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 6257–6263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. (A) Schematic illustration of the development of the affinity biosensor involved in the immobilization of the recombinant His6-tagged PBP by using Co2+−NTA-modified SPCEs [133]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the aptameric peptide (IP20)−PKA conjugate as a sensing platform to monitor kinase [134]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. (A) Schematic illustration of the development of the affinity biosensor involved in the immobilization of the recombinant His6-tagged PBP by using Co2+−NTA-modified SPCEs [133]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the aptameric peptide (IP20)−PKA conjugate as a sensing platform to monitor kinase [134]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 13 00507 g002
Figure 3. (A) Schematic illustration of the principle and fabrication procedures for lipid kinase activity based on liposome-assisted electrochemical assay [142]. Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (B) Schematic illustration of SphK1 activity assay based on the bifunctional NTA–Fe3+ complex-modified AuNPs [143]. Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
Figure 3. (A) Schematic illustration of the principle and fabrication procedures for lipid kinase activity based on liposome-assisted electrochemical assay [142]. Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (B) Schematic illustration of SphK1 activity assay based on the bifunctional NTA–Fe3+ complex-modified AuNPs [143]. Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
Biosensors 13 00507 g003
Figure 4. (A) Schematic illustration of the strategy using Ni2+–NTA MNPs and the recombinant EGFP to detect the activity of thrombin [151]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier. (B) Schematic illustration of the fluorescence kinase activity assay based on Zr–NTA MNPs enrichment [152]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier.
Figure 4. (A) Schematic illustration of the strategy using Ni2+–NTA MNPs and the recombinant EGFP to detect the activity of thrombin [151]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier. (B) Schematic illustration of the fluorescence kinase activity assay based on Zr–NTA MNPs enrichment [152]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier.
Biosensors 13 00507 g004
Figure 6. Schematic of (a) a light-activated delivery of gene editing enzymes, such as Cre recombinase by HGN-mediated release by NIR laser irradiation and (b) assembly of a TAT peptide fusion of Crerecombinase on HGN surfaces by a modular handle based on the affinity of polyhistidine tags to a NTA–metal complex presented by a double-stranded DNA scaffold [176]. Copyright 2018 WILEY-VCH.
Figure 6. Schematic of (a) a light-activated delivery of gene editing enzymes, such as Cre recombinase by HGN-mediated release by NIR laser irradiation and (b) assembly of a TAT peptide fusion of Crerecombinase on HGN surfaces by a modular handle based on the affinity of polyhistidine tags to a NTA–metal complex presented by a double-stranded DNA scaffold [176]. Copyright 2018 WILEY-VCH.
Biosensors 13 00507 g006
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration of the principle and assay procedures of the magneto-colorimetric assay for SphK1 activity [182]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of colorimetric assay for protein phosphatase activity based on AuNPs and His6-tagged phosphopeptides in the presence of Zn2+ [183]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of the colorimetric assay for protease activity based on metal-induced self-assembly of AuNPs [184]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier.
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration of the principle and assay procedures of the magneto-colorimetric assay for SphK1 activity [182]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of colorimetric assay for protein phosphatase activity based on AuNPs and His6-tagged phosphopeptides in the presence of Zn2+ [183]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of the colorimetric assay for protease activity based on metal-induced self-assembly of AuNPs [184]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier.
Biosensors 13 00507 g007
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of (a) the synthetic route of Fe3O4@SiO2-NTA and immobilization of rCan f1 via Ni–NTA and His-tag interaction, and (b) the immunosensor Fe3O4@SiO2-NTA@rCan f1 for quantitative detection of sIgE in real samples [192]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of (a) the synthetic route of Fe3O4@SiO2-NTA and immobilization of rCan f1 via Ni–NTA and His-tag interaction, and (b) the immunosensor Fe3O4@SiO2-NTA@rCan f1 for quantitative detection of sIgE in real samples [192]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Biosensors 13 00507 g008
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of conjugation strategy and operation principle for the pLDH and HRPII biomarker enrichment strategy [195]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of conjugation strategy and operation principle for the pLDH and HRPII biomarker enrichment strategy [195]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 13 00507 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, L.; Chang, Y.; Li, Y.; Qiao, M.; Liu, L. Biosensors Based on the Binding Events of Nitrilotriacetic Acid–Metal Complexes. Biosensors 2023, 13, 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050507

AMA Style

Zhu L, Chang Y, Li Y, Qiao M, Liu L. Biosensors Based on the Binding Events of Nitrilotriacetic Acid–Metal Complexes. Biosensors. 2023; 13(5):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050507

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Lin, Yong Chang, Yingying Li, Mingyi Qiao, and Lin Liu. 2023. "Biosensors Based on the Binding Events of Nitrilotriacetic Acid–Metal Complexes" Biosensors 13, no. 5: 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050507

APA Style

Zhu, L., Chang, Y., Li, Y., Qiao, M., & Liu, L. (2023). Biosensors Based on the Binding Events of Nitrilotriacetic Acid–Metal Complexes. Biosensors, 13(5), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050507

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop