Next Article in Journal
Fluorescent Sensing Platforms for Detecting and Imaging the Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in the DNA-Mediated Multi-Mode Analytical Methods for Biological Samples
Previous Article in Journal
A UiO-66-NH2 MOF/PAMAM Dendrimer Nanocomposite for Electrochemical Detection of Tramadol in the Presence of Acetaminophen in Pharmaceutical Formulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Electrochemical Biosensor Performance for 17β-Estradiol Determination with Short Split—Aptamers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/bios13050513
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impedimetric DNA Sensor Based on Electropolymerized N-Phenylaminophenothiazine and Thiacalix[4]arene Tetraacids for Doxorubicin Determination

by
Tatjana Kulikova
1,
Igor Shiabiev
1,
Pavel Padnya
1,
Alexey Rogov
2,
Gennady Evtugyn
1,3,
Ivan Stoikov
1 and
Anna Porfireva
1,*
1
A.M. Butlerov’ Chemistry Institute of Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlevskaya Street, 420008 Kazan, Russia
2
Interdisciplinary Center of Analytical Microscopy of Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlevskaya Street, 420008 Kazan, Russia
3
Analytical Chemistry Department, Chemical Technology Institute, Ural Federal University, 19 Mira Street, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(5), 513; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050513
Submission received: 3 April 2023 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 26 April 2023 / Published: 30 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in DNA Nanostructure-Based Electrochemical Biosensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Electrochemical DNA sensors are highly demanded for fast and reliable determination of antitumor drugs and chemotherapy monitoring. In this work, an impedimetric DNA sensor has been developed on the base of a phenylamino derivative of phenothiazine (PhTz). A glassy carbon electrode was covered with electrodeposited product of PhTz oxidation obtained through multiple scans of the potential. The addition of thiacalix[4]arene derivatives bearing four terminal carboxylic groups in the substituents of the lower rim improved the conditions of electropolymerization and affected the performance of the electrochemical sensor depending on the configuration of the macrocyclic core and molar ratio with PhTz molecules in the reaction medium. Following that, the deposition of DNA by physical adsorption was confirmed by atomic force microscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The redox properties of the surface layer obtained changed the electron transfer resistance in the presence of doxorubicin due to its intercalating DNA helix and influencing charge distribution on the electrode interface. This made it possible to determine 3 pM–1 nM doxorubicin in 20 min incubation (limit of detection 1.0 pM). The DNA sensor developed was tested on a bovine serum protein solution, Ringer–Locke’s solution mimicking plasma electrolytes and commercial medication (doxorubicin-LANS) and showed a satisfactory recovery rate of 90–105%. The sensor could find applications in pharmacy and medical diagnostics for the assessment of drugs able to specifically bind to DNA.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Electropolymerization is a unique approach to developing modifying layers in biosensor design. There are many different electropolymerized coatings which exert their own redox activity and take part in electron transfer within the layer and on the electrode interface. Pyrrole [1], aniline [2], thiophene [3] and their derivatives [4,5,6] are the most popular precursors that are electrochemically polymerized and show electroconductive properties. The performance of electropolymerized layers depends on the monomer structure, pH, electrodeposition conditions and electrolyte content of the reaction media.
Phenazine, phenoxazine and phenothiazine derivatives are another type of species able to form electrochemically active films via electrolysis [7,8,9]. They became widespread due to their ability to mediate electron transfer and electrostatically accumulate many analytes and biomolecules applied in biosensor assembling. Similarly to polyaniline, which is mostly applied as a support for biocomponents [10,11], electropolymerized phenothiazine and phenazine dyes offer good opportunities for electric wiring of binding sites and have found increasing application in immuno- and DNA sensors [12,13,14]. Their use is also promoted by milder conditions of electropolymerization against those of polyaniline. They can be electrodeposited onto an electrode in neutral media. As opposed to polyaniline, there is no necessity to electrodeposit these monomers from acidic media, which is their essential advantage when working with biorecognition agents, e.g., DNA.
The electrochemical characteristics of methylene blue as a precursor of the supporting layer were studied in [15], where electrochemical deposition of the polymeric form was performed onto an electrode modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes in an aqueous solution. In addition, poly(methylene blue) layers have been obtained on electrodes preliminarily modified with ZnO nanoparticles [16], copper-carbon nanofibers [17] and NiO nanoflowers [18].
Redox mediation activity of poly(methylene green) was shown by Tsuruoka et al. [19]. They grafted poly(methylene green) onto porous carbon electrodes and obtained high currents of glucose oxidation. Electropolymerization of proflavine was performed on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) [20]. The modified electrode was then utilized for immobilization of DNA and detection of the DNA intercalators. Cyclic voltammetry, scanning electron microscopy and impedance spectroscopy were used to characterize the redox properties of proflavine polymer prior to and after DNA deposition. The limits of detection (LOD) were 0.3 and 0.001 nM for doxorubicin and daunorubicin, respectively.
Liu et al. applied electropolymerized polythionine for GCE modification followed by DNA immobilization [21]. Due to negative charge of the phosphate groups in the DNA backbone, positively charged polythionine layer promoted accumulation of the DNA molecules on the electrode interface. After that, Ag nanoparticles bearing a positive charge were deposited on the surface. The construction technique applied was utilized for the immobilization of horseradish peroxidase and hydrogen peroxide determination with good sensitivity and acceptable stability of the signal. Other examples of polythionine being incorporated into DNA sensors involve the detection of Cd in mussels with an aptasensor based on polythionine–Au nanoparticles [22] and electrochemiluminescent detection of hybridization events [23].
The synthesis and characterization of novel polythiophene derivatives containing porphyrin units were reported for future possible application in solar cells [24]. Their electrochemical behavior was studied by cyclic voltammetry in organic media, where they showed lower oxidation potential in comparison with polythiophene.
The electropolymerization of phenazine dyes presents complications related to the pH dependence of redox properties, monomer aggregation and its low solubility in aqueous media. Aggregation can accelerate charge-recombination processes and make worse the reproducibility of the surface layer characteristics and reversibility of the electron transfer. In this regard, it is important to extend the variety of phenothiazine derivatives and characterize their performance in electropolymerization and DNA sensor assembling. Recently, we have described the electrochemical properties of N-phenyl-3-(phenylimino)-3H-phenothiazin-7-amine (PhTz, Figure S1 of Electronic Supporting Information, ESI, Supplementary Materials) [25].
It was shown that PhTz in its monomeric form is involved in the quasi-reversible process of electron transfer, which is affected by DNA deposition due to electrostatic interactions. Meanwhile dense contact between the DNA backbone and polymeric film can sterically hinder the access of small molecules able to biospecific interactions with DNA. Previously we have shown that the incorporation of charged macrocycles able to multiply non-covalent interactions with DNA alters the morphology of the surface layer and enhances the electrochemical response related to the detection of DNA damage and anticancer drug determination [26,27,28].
In this work, the thiacalix[4]arene carboxylic acids in various configurations bearing four carboxylate groups have been for the first time applied in the assembling of DNA-sensing layers and the impedimetric determination of doxorubicin as a model DNA intercalator.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

The phenothiazine derivative PhTz was synthesized as described in [29], and thiacalix[4]arene tetracarboxylic acids (Figure S2) were synthesized as described in [30] at the Organic and Medicinal Chemistry Department of Kazan Federal University.
HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid) and DNA from fish sperm and salmon testes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Dortmund, Germany). Doxorubicin-LANS® (“Verofarm”, Moscow, Russia) was purchased from a local pharmacy. All other reagents were of analytical grade and applied without further purification. Working 0.05 M phosphate buffer and 0.1 M HEPES, used in electropolymerization and electrochemical investigations, respectively, contained 0.1 M NaNO3 as a supporting electrolyte. Millipore® water (Simplicity® Water Purification System, Merck-Millipore, Mosheim, France) was used for the preparation of working solutions for all the measurements. Voltammetric and impedimetric measurements were carried out in presence of a 0.01 M mixture of K3[Fe(CN)6] and K4[Fe(CN)6]. For electrochemical measurements and electropolymerization, PhTz was dissolved in acetone and then mixed with phosphate buffer (pH = 7.1) at a 1:1 (v/v) ratio. The pH of the obtained mixture was additionally adjusted by NaOH/HCl to the requested pH prior to measurements. For assessment of the possible influence of serum electrolytes, Ringer–Locke’s solution (0.45 g NaCl, 0.021 g KCl, 0.016 g CaCl2·2H2O, 0.005 g NaHCO3, 0.015 g of MgSO4 and 0.025 g NaH2PO4·2H2O in 50 mL of deionized water [31]) was used.

2.2. Apparatus

Voltammetric and impedimetric measurements were performed with an Autolab PGSTAT302 N potentiostat/galvanostat equipped with the FRA32M module (Metrohm Autolab b.v., Utrecht, The Netherlands) at room temperature in a three-electrode cell. GCE (2 mm in diameter, OhmLiberScience, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) was applied as the working electrode; Ag/AgCl (3.0 M NaCl) (Metrohm Autolab b.v. Cat No 6.0733.100) as the reference electrode; and Pt wire as the counter electrode.
Electrochemical impedance spectra (the Nyquist diagrams) were recorded at the frequency range from 100 kHz to 0.04 Hz with an amplitude of 5 mV. The impedance parameters were determined by fitting with the Randles equivalent circuit [Rs(Q[RetW])], where Rs is the solution resistance, Q the constant-phase element (CPE), Ret the electron transfer resistance and W the Warburg element. Equivalent circuit fitting was performed with the NOVA software (Metrohm Autolab b.v.).
Atomic force spectroscopy (AFM) images were obtained with a Dimension FastScan probe microscope (Bruker, Germany) in the quantitative nanomechanical mapping mode with “Bruker ScanAsyst Air” silicon probes (curvature radius ~2 nm) and k 0.4 N/m. The scan rate was equal to 1 Hz within a 256 × 256 window. Image processing was performed with the Gwyddion-Free SPM (version 2.57) data analysis software.

2.3. Electrode Modification

GCE was first mechanically polished with 0.05 µm alumina powder and then washed with deionized water. After that, it was immersed in a mixture of 0.2 M sulfuric acid and acetone (1:1 v/v), and its potential was cycled between −0.5 and 1.0 V until stabilization of the voltammogram. After that, it was washed again with buffer and acetone and dried at room temperature. For PhTz electropolymerization, the electrode was moved to 3 mL of solution containing 1.5 mM 50 mM phosphate buffer and 100 mM NaNO3 mixed with 1.33 mL of acetone. After stabilization by running 10 cycles of the potential between −0.1 and 1.0 V (100 mV/s), 170 µL of 0.5 mg/mL pf PhTz in acetone was added to the same solution, and the potential was scanned in the same potential range for 2.5 cycles. The polymerization product was additionally stabilized by moving the electrode to the HEPES buffer with no PhTz monomer and running one additional potential cycle in the same conditions. DNA if mentioned was drop-casted onto the electrode surface with electropolymerized PhTz, left for 20 min for adsorption and then washed with working buffer. Implementation of thiacalix[4]arene carboxylic acids in the surface layer was performed by their addition to the solution containing monomeric PhTz at a molar ratio of 1:1, 1:2 or 1:4.

2.4. Doxoruibcin Determination

The DNA sensor assembled as described above was fixed upside down. An aliquot of doxorubicin solution or spiked serum sample was drop-casted onto the surface, and the sensor was covered with a plastic tube to prevent drying of the solution. After incubation, the electrode was washed with deionized water and working buffer, and the EIS spectra were recorded in 0.01 M [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− solution. In a blank experiment, the DNA sensors were exposed in a similar manner in deionized water and buffer solution with no doxorubicin. In addition, similar experiments were performed with GCE covered with polyPhTz with no DNA.

3. Results

3.1. Polymerization of PhTz and Cyclic Voltammetry of the Surface Layer Obtained

Previously, we have studied electrochemical behavior of monomeric PhTz [25] and showed the reversible redox conversion of the phenothiazine core of the molecule. In this work, we started from the consideration of the conditions of the polyPhTz electrodeposition on bare GCE. The coating expected should be as thin as possible but cover all of the surface of the working electrode. For aniline electropolymerization, it was shown that two to three cycles of potential scanning were sufficient to obtain the polymer film [32]. Figure 1 shows that cyclic voltammograms recorded on GCE in the solution contained 0.072 mM PhTz. Electropolymerization with a higher number of potential scans was considered in [25].
It is obvious that such a limited number of cycles cannot result in the formation of large molecular products of electrolysis. In the following discussion, electropolymerization products are rather assigned to oligomers insoluble in working media and deposited on the electrode interface.
The electropolymerization is initiated by irreversible oxidation of the PhTz molecule at high anodic potential (1.3 V). When the potential scan was reversed at lower potential, no changes in the following scans on voltammograms were found. With multiple cycling, a new pair of redox peaks appeared and grew at 0.30–0.35 V, which testifies the deposition of the polymeric form of PhTz. After the first three to four scans, the above peaks regularly increased, but after the fifth cycle (not shown) the peaks were stabilized and became much broader, indicating a limitation of the monomer access to the electrode surface and a slower electron transfer.
A half-cycle means the final potential was defined as the highest anodic potential to accumulate the most oxidized (and positively charged) form of the polymerized PhTz favorable from the point of view of electrostatic interactions with DNA and thiacalix[4]arene tetracarboxylic acids tested as layer components.
The GCE modified with polyPhTz transferred in the buffer with no monomer did not show remarkable peaks of the monomer but demonstrated better conditions of electron exchange. It was confirmed by recording [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− voltammograms (Figure 2).
The peak potential difference (0.36 V for 2.5 cycles and 0.42 V for 3.5 cycles) and the peak current ratio (Ipa/Ipc = 1.1 for 2.5 cycles and 1.0 for 3.5 cycles of the potential scan) were typical for quasi-reversible electron transfer (Figure 2a). Meanwhile the peak currents increased with the number of potential scans, indicating the contribution of the polymer to the electron transfer. The equilibrium potential calculated as a half-sum of appropriate peak potentials of the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− pair was about 0.27 V for both coatings (2.5 and 3.5 cycles). It is shifted against that recorded on bare GCE (0.23 V) to more positive values. It can be concluded that the deposition of the polyPhTz layer did not interfere with the electron exchange reaction of ferricyanide ions, and this redox probe can be further used in the EIS measurements.
The addition of thiacalix[4]arene carboxylic tetraacids (named hereafter as macrocyclic acids) to the reaction media surprisingly increased the currents related to the accumulation of the polyPhTz form on the GCE (Figure S3) and the ferrocyanide oxidation peak on the voltammogram (Figure 2b). Being electrochemically inactive, macrocyclic acids promoted adsorption of positively charged electropolymerization products on the electrode. The influence is more pronounced on the direct (anodic) branch of the cyclic voltammograms, whereas the cathodic peak currents on the reversed branch are about the same with no respect of the presence of the macrocycle in the solution. The concentration of macrocyclic acids was selected to be 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4 mol/mol against PhTz to control the charge of the complex formed in electrostatic interactions. Assuming the presence of the PhTz units in the polymer as dications and full dissociation of macrocyclic acids into tetraanions, the 1:1 ratio corresponds to a negative charge of the 1:1 complex, 1:2 ratio to a neutral complex and 1:4 ratio to a positively charged complex of PhTz and the macrocycles studied.
The influence of the configuration of the macrocycle (denoted as TC-cone for cone, TC-paco for partial cone and TC-alt for 1,3-alternate, see Figure S2 for chemical structures) on the shape and relative position of the[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− peak pair was found to be insignificant. From this fact, the influence of the macrocycles tested can be attributed rather to the total charge of the reactants at the stage of their transfer to the electrode than to the spatial limitations resulting from the absolute volume of the counterparts.
Adsorption of the DNA molecules on the polyPhTz–thiacalixarene layer decreased the ferri-/ferrocyanide peak currents and increased the peak potential difference due to the incorporation of large non-conductive biomolecules in the surface film. Their charge is opposite to that of the redox probe and affects the access of the redox probe. The comparison of the influence of two anionic species (macrocyclic acids vs. DNA) on the conditions of electron transfer in the polyPhTz layer made it possible to conclude that incorporation of thiacalix[4]arene carboxylic acids is governed by electrostatic forces and does not result in changing the charge of the layer–solution interface. DNA molecules adsorbed on the surface of the electrodeposited product provide negative charge to the interface and hence prevent access by ferri-/ferrocyanide anions.

3.2. AFM Measurements

In accordance with the AFM data, electropolymerization of PhTz results in the formation of irregular roundish particles evenly distributed along the electrode surface. The AFM images and 3D models of the surface morphology are presented in Figure 3 and the particle size distribution in Figure 4. In 2.5 cycles of potential scanning, some particles had a toroid form with a small cavity in the central part. In 3.5 cycles of polymerization, the number of particles increased, and the maximal profile difference became slightly lower. The addition of macrocyclic acids to the PhTz solution resulted in the formation of a more regular coating with a narrower size distribution. The relief difference decreased about twice over. The maximum on the size distribution histogram (Figure 4b) also decreased about twice over compared to the PhTz coating. Probably the PhTz–TC interaction resulted in the disaggregation of the phenothiazine molecules and the acceleration of their coupling in the electrochemical step. As a result, the rate of deposition increased, and the average size of the polymer seeds decreased against similar characteristics obtained in the PhTz polymerization in the absence of the macrocyclic acid (Figure 4a vs. Figure 4b). It should be noted that the concentration chosen for the PhTz monomer was near the maximum available in the aqueous medium. Low solubility of the PhTz was the reason to add 50% acetone to the buffer applied in the electropolymerization step. This explains the variety of the polymer particles formed in conditions of low solubility and random aggregation. Macrocyclic acids promote the disappearance of the lowest particles that either increase faster in size or amalgamate via bridging macrocycle molecules with the formation of supramolecular associates. The ensuing adsorption of the DNA molecules did not alter the overall size variation of the particles but increased the percentage of the median size (compare Figure 4b,c). This means the DNA did not affect the granulation of the PhTz–TC-cone particles, but its adsorption increased the size of appropriate granules. Thus, AFM data confirmed the suggestion about the mechanism of the influence of macrocyclic acids on PhTz polymerization and the electrochemical properties of the product.

3.3. EIS Measurements

EIS parameters were calculated from the fitting data with the R(Q[RW]) equivalent circuit (Randles circuit). EIS measurements were performed in the presence of a 0.01 M [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox probe. Preliminary investigations performed in cyclic voltammetry mode showed no influence of interlayer electron exchange on the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox behavior. The Nyquist diagram contained a semicircle in the area of high frequencies corresponding to the step electron transfer as a limiting step of electrode reaction and a linear part attributed to the diffusion control. The diameter of the semicircle corresponds to the electron transfer resistance (Ret) and is commonly used for assessment of the surface layer permeability and electron exchange conditions on the electrode interface. All the calculations were conducted for three individual electrodes prepared with the same set of reagents; GCE covered with polyPhTz (2.5 cycles) showed an Ret value of 10.9 ± 0.5 kΩ because the polymer deposited showed redox activity but not electroconductivity and hence limited the rate of electron exchange on the electrode interface. In agreement with this statement, the 3.5 scans of the potential increased the Ret value to 18.9 ± 2.3 kΩ. The accumulation of the charged polymer resulted in an increase of the constant phase element Q from 8.9 ± 1.4 μF to 15.2 ± 0.8 μF. Q was interpreted here as capacitance because the roughness coefficient was near 0.9 for all the EIS measurements discussed in this section. The addition of macrocyclic acids to the reaction medium alters the EIS parameters (Figure 5).
As can be seen, the use of charged complexes formed by macrocyclic acids and PhTz (1:1 and 1:4 molar ratio of reagents) resulted in similar decreases of the Ret values (3.3 ± 0.7 and 4.1 ± 0.5 kΩ, respectively), whereas the use of a neutral complex with two PhTz units per one tetracarboxylic acid derivative (1:2 ratio) gave the opposite result (Ret = 14.6 ± 1.4 kΩ against 10.9 ± 0.5 kΩ for the GCE/polyPhTz electrode). Probably, charged species are disaggregated more effectively, and this influences the efficiency of polymerization to a greater extent than the implementation of non-conductive and electrochemically inactive counterparts. The capacitance of the electrode described was found to be insignificant to the macrocyclic acid added. In all the coatings, it was equal to 9–11 μF.
The results of PhTz electropolymerization depended on the configuration of the macrocyclic acid. Thus, for TC-alt, the Ret changed in the range of molar ratios 1:4, 1:2 and 1:1 from 2.8 ± 0.3 to 15.2 ± 0.7 kΩ and 0.56 ± 0.03 kΩ, respectively. Contrary to that, the capacitance changed in the opposite direction (7.8 ± 0.6, 12.3 ± 0.7 and 112 ± 5 μF, respectively). It should be noted that in the 1,3-alternate configuration, the carboxylic groups are located on the opposite sides of the plane of the macrocycle core (see Figure 2) so that interaction with a flat phenothiazine fragment of the polymer does not result in full neutralization of the negative charge and leaves open the possibility of further electrostatic interactions. This offers more possibilities regarding the assembly redox active layer on the electrode surface and creates more favorable conditions for electrodeposition of the 1:1 complex with a total positive charge against those with negative charges of the interface. Thus, the significantly lower Ret value calculated for TC-alt can be attributed to the electrostatic attraction of negatively charged ferri-/ferrocyanide ions used in EIS measurements as redox probes. The partial cone configuration (TC-paco) did not show significant differences from the behavior of TC-cone and demonstrated the same Ret values for the 1:4 and 1:1 complexes.
At the next step, the DNA solution was drop-casted onto the modified electrode and left for a certain period of time for equalization and adsorption. A 10 min incubation led to a 2.5-fold increase of the Ret value due to recharging of the electrode surface and electrostatic repulsion of ferri-/ferrocyanide anions. Oppositely, when a thicker coating (3.5 cycles of potential scanning) was assembled with the same DNA quantity, the electron transfer resistance value decreased twice over against GCE/polyPhTz (not shown). To improve the sensitivity of the response toward DNA loading, the incubation period was extended to 20 min. The following increase of exposition did not shift the EIS parameters confirming equalization of the surface layer content but increased their deviation in a series of individual sensors (sensor-to-sensor repeatability higher than 15%).
Figure 6 shows the Nyquist diagrams corresponding to the equal loading of DNA (1 mg/mL of DNA from fish sperm) and incubation period (20 min) on the GCE/polyPhTz sensor obtained in the presence of various macrocyclic acids.
As can be seen, the DNA deposition discriminated the Ret values related to various macrocyclic acids. The greatest difference was found for 1,3-alternate, confirming the effect of the symmetrical positions of carboxylate groups and non-compensated negative charge of the complex. The cone configuration with the carboxylate groups directed to one side of the macrocycle plane is shown lower. The substitution of the DNA from fish sperm with that from salmon testes did not affect the EIS parameters.

3.4. Doxorubicin Determination

Doxorubicin is a chemotherapy medication that belongs to the anthracycline family widely used in treating lung, thyroid, ovarian, gastric and especially breast cancer [33,34]. Despite high efficiency, doxorubicin exerts severe adverse effects, e.g., cardiotoxicity, therapy related malignancies and gonadotoxicity [35]. For this reason, it is important to monitor both the doxorubicin level in biological fluids and its pharmacokinetics in chemotherapy. At present, doxorubicin levels are determined by UV–vis spectrometry [36], chromatography [37,38], fluorimetry [39], capillary electrophoresis [40] and chemiluminescence [41]. Being rather sensitive, such techniques are rather expensive, require complicated maintenance and are labor- and time-consuming. Electrochemical DNA sensors offer an alternative to conventional instrumentation for preliminary control of doxorubicin concentration compatible with a point-of-care texting format.

3.4.1. Measurement Conditions

Doxorubicin as a DNA intercalator is included between pairs of complementary nucleobases of double-stranded DNA. This can lead to changes in the specific volume and flexibility of DNA strands, often resulting in further DNA damage in reactions with reactive oxygen species. Structural DNA changes can be electrochemically monitored if the DNA molecules are immobilized on a surface with redox properties sensitive to charge variation.
The coating based on electropolymerized PhTz (2.5 cycles) in the presence of thiacalix[4]arene derivative in the 1,3 alternate configuration (TC-alt) was selected for doxorubicin determination. DNA from salmon testes was applied to the polymer surface. In comparison with that from fish sperm, it contains more double-stranded DNA fragments [42] and hence should be more sensitive to intercalators. In the concentration range from 0.003 to 1 nM, the electron transfer resistance regularly decreased with the drug concentration (Figure 7).
At higher doxorubicin concentration, the direction of the changes reversed and became irreproducible, probably due to desorption of intercalated DNA from the polymer layer. This might result from rather weak binding forces in supramolecular aggregates formed on the electrode interface. When an intercalator penetrates the double-stranded DNA helix, the electrostatic interactions acting as film-forming factor become weaker. First, DNA increases the diffusional barrier of the ferri/ferrocyanide indicator access, but then the density of the barrier changes irregularly, and the deviation of the resulting response grows.
The response toward doxorubicin is probably due to partial separation of negative charge centers in the DNA duplex and the decrease of the specific charge on the polymeric layer. Overloading of the DNA molecules can result in neutralization of the charge by a protonated amino group of a doxorubicin molecule.
The signal of the sensor is linearized in semilogarithmic plots in accordance with Equation (1) (n is the number of experimental points within the linear range of the calibration curve).
Ret, kΩ = (4.3 ± 0.5) − (6.84 ± 0.44) × log(cDox, nM), n = 6, R2 = 0.985
The detection limit (LOD) assessed from an S/N = 3 ratio was equal to 1.0 pM. The limit of quantification was calculated from an S/N = 10 ratio and was 3.0 pM. The comparison with the performance of other electrochemical sensors for doxorubicin determination is presented in Table 1. One can see the impedimetric sensor proposed allowed high sensitivity and low concentrations determined against other sensors described. The only exception is the detection of DNA-specific interactions based on the use of ultra-thin polyaniline films [32] and acridine yellow monomer adsorbed on the electrode [43], where the electrostatic influence of doxorubicin binding is amplified by changes in the electroconductive properties of polyaniline and by desorption of the dye molecules from the electrode interface.

3.4.2. Measurement Precision and Lifetime

Sensor-to-sensor repeatability was calculated from the response of 6 individual sensors to 0.1 nM doxorubicin (20 min incubation). For freshly prepared sensors the RSD was equal to 4.5% and increased to 7.2% within a day when placed between the measurements in the working buffer. In dry conditions the sensor retained its sensitivity toward doxorubicin for at least two weeks when stored in dry conditions at 4 °C. The lifetime can be sufficiently extended if the DNA loading is directly performed prior to exposition in doxorubicin solution. In such a format, the RSD. for the sensors stored for six weeks was 5.5%. All the sensors contacted the doxorubicin only once, and attempts to recover sensors after signal measurement resulted in irreproducible changes of the EIS parameters.

3.4.3. Selectivity and Real Sample Assay

Doxorubicin’s influence on the redox properties of the polyPhTz layer assumed intercalation of the DNA molecules so that other medications with similar effects would interfere with doxorubicin for DNA binding. This can be related to antitumor drugs with structures similar to that of doxorubicin (daunorubicin, idarubicin, valrubicin, etc.). Thus, we have shown previously the possibility for determination of daunorubicin ([20], LOD of daunorubicin 1.0 pM, poly(proflavine) as a DNA matrix) and idarubicin ([43], LOD 0.3 fM, poly(Azure A) as a DNA matrix) based on a similar mechanism of signal generation (changes in the polymer redox properties due to intercalation process). Although the concentrations detected vary, all of the anthracycline drugs affected the response measured in direct-current voltammetry or EIS mode. Higher sensitivity of idarubicin determination was reached due to the application of methylene blue as an auxiliary mediator of electron transfer. In addition, all three anthracycline medications mentioned were compared in the same measurement conditions with a polyaniline-DNA biosensor ([56], LODs of 0.01 nM doxorubicin, 0.1 nM daunorubicin and 0.2 nM idarubicin). It should be noted that anthracycline drugs are mostly applied separately, and medications differ in the nature of auxiliary components providing target delivery of the substances to the solid tumor (lipids, stabilizers, etc.). Meanwhile, sulfonamide preparations were shown to be rather inert and did not affect the signal of anthracyclines measured with similar sensors with electropolymerized coatings [56].
Bovine serum albumin was added to the HEPES buffer as a model of serum proteins and Ringer–Locke’s solution (see content in Experimental section) as a model of plasma electrolytes. The recoveries of the detection of 0.1 nM doxorubicin were 110 ± 15% and 95 ± 10%, respectively.
Doxorubicin-LANS® (“Verofarm”) was dissolved in 0.1 M HEPES and used for the incubation of the impedimetric sensor as described above for a standard solution of the drug. The recovery was calculated using a calibration plot for a 0.1 nM nominal concentration, and a recovery of 92 ± 12% was found for three individual sensors.

4. Discussion

The formation of ultrathin layers of a phenylamino derivative of phenothiazine, PhTz, in neutral solution made it possible to obtain on bare GCE a stable film with mediation activity and affinity toward DNA molecules specifically adsorbed on the film by drop-casting protocol. Contrary to previously described investigations of the electrochemical properties of PhTz, the electrodeposition of the redox-active layer was performed with no additional modifiers like carbon black in one step. The addition of carboxylic derivatives of thiacalix[4]arene bearing four carboxylate groups promoted the deposition of electroactive products by electrostatic interactions. The resulting redox activity of the polymer coating and its interaction with DNA depended on the configuration of macrocyclic acids, and contribution was maximal for the symmetrical 1,3-alternate derivative. The molar ratio of macrocyclic acids and PhTz monomer in the reaction medium was found to be most important for the redox properties of the sensor and its applicability for the detection of biospecific interactions of DNA. The influence of both DNA and macrocyclic acids was attributed to electrostatic interactions and the formation of the differently charged complexes affecting the access of the redox probe ([Fe(CN)6]3−/4−) to the electrode. The intercalation of DNA with doxorubicin diminishes the charge of phosphate residues because of the shielding effect and neutralization of the charge with the amino group of the drug molecules. This resulted in changes in the electron transfer resistance. The signal was found to be quite stable and sensitive, including in measurements in the presence of serum albumin and plasma electrolytes.
The simple design of the sensing layer and the high sensitivity of doxorubicin determination make the impedimetric sensor developed attractive for new antitumor drug selection, pharmacokinetics and chemotherapy monitoring of oncology patients [57].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios13050513/s1, Figure S1: Chemical structure of N-Phenyl-3-(phenylimino)-3H-phenothiazin-7-amine studied; Figure S2: Chemical structures of thiacalix[4]arene tetracarboxylic acids studied; Figure S3: Cyclic voltammograms of PhTz polymerization recorded in phosphate buffer–acetone mixture (1:1 v/v) in the presence of 0.072 mM PhTz and TC-cone.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.; methodology, I.S. (Ivan Stoikov); investigation, A.R., I.S. (Igor Shiabiev) and T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.E.; project administration, P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Russian Science Foundation, Russian Federation (grant № 19-73-10134, https://www.rscf.ru/en/project/19-73-10134/ (accessed on 2 April 2023)).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and supplementary material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tavares, A.P.M.; Truta, L.A.A.N.A.; Moreira, F.T.C.; Carneiro, L.P.T.; Sales, M.G.F. Self-powered and self-signalled autonomous electrochemical biosensor applied to cancinoembryonic antigen determination. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 140, 111320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fang, D.; Xu, T.T.; Fang, L.Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, Y.Y.; Zhang, H.Y.; Miao, Z.Y.; Mao, C.; Chi, B.; Xu, H. A blood compatible, high-efficient sensor for detection of Cr(VI) in whole blood. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 329, 129219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Joice, E.K.; Rison, S.; Akshaya, K.B.; Varghese, A. Platinum decorated polythiophene modified stainless steel for electrocatalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2019, 49, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schneider, S.; Fuser, M.; Bolte, M.; Terfort, A. Self-assembled monolayers of aromatic pyrrole derivatives: Electropolymerization and electrocopolymerization with pyrrole. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 246, 853–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, S.P.; Zhou, J.Y.; Noroozifar, M.; Kerman, K. Gold-platinum core-shell nanoparticles with thiolated polyaniline and multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the simultaneous voltammetric determination of six drug molecules. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guven, N.; Sultanova, H.; Ozer, B.; Yucel, B.; Camurlu, P. Tuning of electrochromic properties of electrogenerated polythiophenes through Ru(II) complex tethering and backbone derivatization. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 329, 135134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tkach, V.V.; de Paiva Martins, J.I.M.; Ivanushko, Y.G.; Yagodynets’, P.I. Dye electropolymerization for electrochemical analysis. a brief review. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2022, 12, 4028–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dalkiran, B.; Brett, C.M.A. Polyphenazine and polytriphenylmethane redox polymer/nanomaterial–based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: A review. Microchim. Acta 2021, 188, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Choi, E.J.; Drago, N.P.; Humphrey, N.J.; Van Houten, J.; Ahn, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, I.D.; Ogata, A.F.; Penner, R.M. lectrodeposition-enabled, electrically-transduced sensors and biosensors. Mater. Today 2023, 62, 129–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, D.; Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Tong, X.; Hua, T.; Qin, R.; Shao, Y. Polyaniline-based biological and chemical sensors: Sensing mechanism, configuration design, and perspective. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023, 5, 593–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Majeed, A.H.; Mohammed, L.A.; Hammoodi, O.G.; Sehgal, S.; Alheety, M.A.; Saxena, K.K.; Dadoosh, S.A.; Mohammed, I.K.; Jasim, M.M.; Salmaan, N.U. A Review on polyaniline: Synthesis, properties, nanocomposites, and electrochemical applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2022, 2022, 9047554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cosnier, S. Affinity biosensors based on electropolymerized films. Electroanalysis 2005, 17, 1701–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Evtugyn, G.; Hianik, T. Electrochemical DNA sensors and aptasensors based on electropolymerized materials and polyelectrolyte complexes. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 79, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martínez-Rojas, F.; Castañeda, E.; Armijo, F. Conducting polymer applied in a label-free electrochemical immunosensor for the detection prostate-specific antigen using its redox response as an analytical signal. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 880, 114877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghoorchian, A.; Madrakian, T.; Afkhami, A.; Bagheri, H. Spectroelectrochemical and electrochromic behavior of poly(methylene blue) and poly(thionine)-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2021, 25, 1217–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mokhtari, Z.; Khajehsharifi, H.; Hashemnia, S.; Solati, Z.; Azimpanah, R.; Shahrokhian, S. Evaluation of molecular imprinted polymerized methylene blue/aptamer as a novel hybrid receptor for Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) detection at glassy carbon electrodes modified with new biosynthesized ZnO NPs. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 320, 128316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pandey, I.; Bairagi, P.K.; Verma, N. Electrochemically grown polymethylene blue nanofilm on copper-carbon nanofiber nanocomposite: An electrochemical sensor for creatinine. Sens. Actuators B. 2018, 277, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, L.; Wei, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhong, J. An electrochemical biosensor based on NiO nanoflowers/polymethylene blue composite for non-enzymatic glucose detection. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 146512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tsuruoka, N.; Soto, S.S.; Ben Tahar, A.; Zebda, A.; Tsujimura, S. Mediated electrochemical oxidation of glucose via poly(methylene green) grafted on the carbon surface catalyzed by flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent glucose dehydrogenase. Colloids Surf. B. 2020, 192, 111065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Porfireva, A.V.; Goida, A.I.; Rogov, A.M.; Evtugyn, G.A. Impedimetric DNA sensor based on poly(proflavine) for determination of anthracycline drugs. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Hu, L.M.; Yang, S.Q. Amplification of bioelectrocatalytic signalling based on silver nanoparticles and DNA-derived horseradish peroxidase biosensors. Microchim. Acta 2008, 160, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Z.; Liu, C.; Su, X.; Zhang, W.; Zou, X. Signal on-off ratiometric electrochemical sensor based on semi-complementary aptamer couple for sensitive cadmium detection in mussel. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 346, 130506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Shan, Y.; Jin, Y.; Gong, M.; Wang, X. Nano polythionine-based electrochemiluminescence biosensor for detection of the p16INK4a gene using RuAg@AuNPs core-shell nanocomposites as DNA labels. J. Lumin. 2018, 201, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aguilar-Ortíz, E.; Zaragoza-Galán, G.; Solladié, N.; Rein, R.; Aguilar-Martínez, M.; Macías-Ruvalcaba, N.; Rivera, E. Preparation and characterization of novel polythiophenes bearing oligo (ethylene glycol) spacers and porphyrin units: Optical and electrochemical properties. Synth. Met. 2012, 162, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kuzin, Y.I.; Padnya, P.L.; Stoikov, I.I.; Gorbatchuk, V.V.; Stoikov, D.I.; Khadieva, A.I.; Evtugyn, G.A. Electrochemical behavior of the monomeric and polymeric forms of N-phenyl-3-(phenylimino)-3H-phenothiazin-7-amine. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 345, 136195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kulikova, T.; Padnya, P.; Shiabiev, I.; Rogov, A.; Stoikov, I.; Evtugyn, G. Electrochemical sensing of interactions between DNA and charged macrocycles. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuzin, Y.I.; Gorbatchuk, V.V.; Rogov, A.M.; Stoikov, I.I.; Evtugyn, G.A. Electrochemical properties of multilayered coatings implementing thiacalix[4]arenes with oligolactic fragments and DNA. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gorbatchuk, V.V.; Porfireva, A.V.; Stepanova, V.B.; Kuzin, Y.I.; Evtugyn, V.G.; Shamagsumova, R.V.; Stoikov, I.I.; Evtugyn, G.A. Co-polymers of oligolactic acid and tetrasubstituted thiacalix[4]arenes as a new material for electrochemical sensor development. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 246, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khadieva, A.; Gorbachuk, V.; Shurpik, D.; Stoikov, I. Synthesis of tris-pillar[5]arene and its association with phenothiazine dye: Colorimetric recognition of anions. Molecules 2019, 24, 1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stoikov, I.I.; Smolentsev, V.A.; Antipin, I.S.; Habicher, W.; Gruner, M.; Konovalov, A.I. Array of fluorescent chemosensors for the molecular recognition of halide anions on the basis of the stereoisomers of thiacalix[4]arene tetranaphthylamides. Mendeleev Commun. 2006, 16, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hongpaisan, J.; Roomans, G.M. Retaining ionic concentrations during in vitro storage of tissue for microanalytical studies. J. Microsc. 1999, 193, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kulikova, T.; Porfireva, A.; Evtugyn, G.; Hianik, T. Electrochemical DNA sensors with layered polyaniline-DNA coating for detection of specific DNA interactions. Sensors 2019, 19, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Arcamone, F.; Cassinelli, G.; Fantini, G.; Grein, A.; Orezzi, P.; Pol, C.; Spalla, C. Adriamycin, 14-hydroxydaunomycin, a new antitumor antibiotic from S. peucetius var. caesius. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1969, 11, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Thorn, C.F.; Oshiro, C.; Marsh, S.; Hernandez-Boussard, T.; McLeod, H.; Klein, T.E.; Altman, R.B. Doxorubicin pathways: Pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2011, 21, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Van der Zanden, S.Y.; Qiao, X.; Neefjes, J. New insights into the activities and toxicities of the old anticancer drug doxorubicin. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 6095–6111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liao, L.B.; Zhou, H.Y.; Xiao, X.M. Spectroscopic and viscosity study of doxorubicin interaction with DNA. J. Mol. Struct. 2005, 749, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stratigou, I.-C.; Tsiasioti, A.; Tzanavaras, P.D.; Markopoulou, C.K.; Fytianos, K.; Zacharis, C.K. Homogeneous liquid liquid extraction using salt as mass separating agent for the ultra high pressure liquid chromatographic determination of doxorubicin in human urine. Microchem. J. 2020, 158, 105260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rahmani, F.; Hosseini, M.-R.M.; Es-haghi, A.; Mollahosseini, A. A 96-Monolithic inorganic hollow fiber array as a new geometry for high throughput solid-phase microextraction of doxorubicin in water and human urine samples coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2020, 1627, 461413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Y.; Danielsson, B. Rapid high throughput assay for fluorimetric detection of doxorubicin—Application of nucleic acid–dye bioprobe. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 587, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Anderson, A.B.; Ciriacks, C.M.; Fuller, K.M.; Arriaga, E.A. Distribution of zeptomole-abundant doxorubicin metabolites in subcellular fractions by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El-Maghrabey, M.; Kishikawa, N.; Kamimura, S.; Ohyama, K.; Kuroda, N. Design of a dual functionalized chemiluminescence ultrasensitive probe for quinones based on their redox cycle. Application to the determination of doxorubicin in lyophilized powder and human serum. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 329, 129226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Suprun, E.V.; Kutdusova, G.R.; Khmeleva, S.A.; Radko, S.P. Towards deeper understanding of DNA electrochemical oxidation on carbon electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 124, 106947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Goida, A.; Kuzin, Y.; Evtugyn, V.; Porfireva, A.; Evtugyn, G.; Hianik, T. Electrochemical sensing of idarubicin—DNA interaction using electropolymerized Azure B and Methylene blue mediation. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, J.; Bo, X.; Zhou, M.; Guo, L. A nanocomposite prepared from metal-free mesoporous carbon nanospheres and graphene oxide for voltammetric determination of doxorubicin. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Vacek, J.; Havran, L.; Fojta, M. Ex situ voltammetry and chronopotentiometry of doxorubicin at a pyrolytic graphite electrode: Redox and catalytic properties and analytical applications. Electroanalysis 2009, 21, 21399–22144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Skalová, Š.; Langmaier, J.; Barek, J.; Vyskočil, V.; Navrátils, T. Doxorubicin determination using two novel voltammetric approaches: A comparative study. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 330, 135180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Singh, T.A.; Sharma, V.; Thakur, N.; Tejwan, N.; Sharma, A.; Das, J. Selective and sensitive electrochemical detection of doxrubicin via a novel magnesium oxide/carbon dot nanocomposite based sensor. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 150, 110527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abbasi, M.; Ezazi, M.; Jouyban, A.; Lulek, E.; Asadpour-Zeynali, K.; Ertas, Y.N.; Houshyar, J.; Mokhtarzadeh, A.; Soleymani, J. An ultrasensitive and preprocessing-free electrochemical platform for the detection of doxorubicin based on tryptophan/polyethylene glycol-cobalt ferrite nanoparticles modified electrodes. Microchem. J. 2022, 183, 108055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Porfireva, A.; Vorobev, V.; Babkina, S.; Evtugyn, G. Electrochemical sensor based on poly(Azure B)-DNA composite for doxorubicin determination. Sensors 2019, 19, 2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peng, A.; Xu, H.; Luo, C.; Ding, H. Application of a disposable doxorubicin sensor for direct determination of clinical drug concentration in patient blood. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016, 11, 6266–6278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Karadurmus, L.; Dogan-Topal, B.; Kurbanoglu, S.; Shah, A.; Ozkan, S.A. The interaction between DNA and three intercalating anthracyclines using electrochemical DNA nanobiosensor based on metal nanoparticles modified screen-printed electrode. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Moghadam, F.H.; Taher, M.A.; Karimi-Maleh, H. Doxorubicin anticancer drug monitoring by ds-DNA-based electrochemical biosensor in clinical samples. Micromachines 2021, 12, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Asai, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Nagashima, S.; Ogata, G.; Hibino, H.; Einaga, Y. An electrochemical aptamer-based sensor prepared by utilizing the strong interaction between a DNA aptamer and diamond. Analyst 2020, 145, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Porfireva, A.; Evtugyn, G. Electrochemical DNA sensor based on the copolymer of proflavine and Azure B for doxorubicin determination. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kulikova, T.; Porfireva, A.; Rogov, A.; Evtugyn, G. Electrochemical DNA sensor based on acridine yellow adsorbed on glassy carbon electrode. Sensors 2021, 21, 7763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shamagsumova, R.; Porfireva, A.; Stepanova, V.; Osin, Y.; Evtugyn, G.; Hianik, H. Polyaniline—DNA based sensor for the detection of anthracycline drugs. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 220, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Evtugyn, G.A.; Porfireva, A.V.; Belyakova, S.V. Electrochemical DNA sensors for drug determination. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2022, 221, 115058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biosensors 13 00513 g001 550
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of PhTz polymerization recorded in phosphate buffer–acetone mixture (1:1 v/v) in the presence of 0.072 mM PhTz, scan rate 100 mV/s: (a) 2.5; (b) 3.5 cycles of potential.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of PhTz polymerization recorded in phosphate buffer–acetone mixture (1:1 v/v) in the presence of 0.072 mM PhTz, scan rate 100 mV/s: (a) 2.5; (b) 3.5 cycles of potential.
Biosensors 13 00513 g001
Biosensors 13 00513 g002 550
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms recorded in 0.01 M [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− solution on GCE (a), bare (1) and that covered with the polyPhTz synthesized in 2.5 (2) and 3.5 (3) potential cycles; (b) polyPhTz synthesized in the presence of TC-cone (3) and that after 20 min incubation of DNA (4) (2.5 cycles).
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms recorded in 0.01 M [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− solution on GCE (a), bare (1) and that covered with the polyPhTz synthesized in 2.5 (2) and 3.5 (3) potential cycles; (b) polyPhTz synthesized in the presence of TC-cone (3) and that after 20 min incubation of DNA (4) (2.5 cycles).
Biosensors 13 00513 g002
Biosensors 13 00513 g003 550
Figure 3. Morphology (a,c,e) and 3D models of the GCE surface (b,d,f) after electrodeposition of polyPhTz (a,b); polyPhTz in the presence of TC-cone (c,d); and that after 20 min exposition of 1 mg/mL DNA (e,f).
Figure 3. Morphology (a,c,e) and 3D models of the GCE surface (b,d,f) after electrodeposition of polyPhTz (a,b); polyPhTz in the presence of TC-cone (c,d); and that after 20 min exposition of 1 mg/mL DNA (e,f).
Biosensors 13 00513 g003
Biosensors 13 00513 g004 550
Figure 4. Particle size distribution calculated from AFM data: (a) GCE—polyPhTz (2.5 cycles of electropolymerization); (b) GCE—polyPhTz/TC-cone; (c) GCE—polyPhTz/TC-cone—DNA.
Figure 4. Particle size distribution calculated from AFM data: (a) GCE—polyPhTz (2.5 cycles of electropolymerization); (b) GCE—polyPhTz/TC-cone; (c) GCE—polyPhTz/TC-cone—DNA.
Biosensors 13 00513 g004
Biosensors 13 00513 g005 550
Figure 5. The Nyquist diagrams obtained with GCE covered with polyPhTz (2.5 cycles) in the presence of TC-cone, reagent ratio TC-cone: PhTz (mol/mol) = 0 (1), 1:4 (2), 1:2 (3) and 1:1 (4). Inset: equivalent circuit, Rs—solvent resistance, Ret—electron transfer resistance, W—Warburg impedance, Q—constant phaser element.
Figure 5. The Nyquist diagrams obtained with GCE covered with polyPhTz (2.5 cycles) in the presence of TC-cone, reagent ratio TC-cone: PhTz (mol/mol) = 0 (1), 1:4 (2), 1:2 (3) and 1:1 (4). Inset: equivalent circuit, Rs—solvent resistance, Ret—electron transfer resistance, W—Warburg impedance, Q—constant phaser element.
Biosensors 13 00513 g005
Biosensors 13 00513 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) The Nyquist diagrams obtained with GCE covered with polyPhTz (2.5 cycles) in the presence of TC-cone (1), TC-paco (2) and TC-alt (3) and coated with DNA (20 min incubation, 1 mg/mL of DNA from fish sperm); (b) comparison of the electron transfer resistance for various coatings of the GCE/PolyPhTz/DNA sensors prior to and after DNA loading: polyPhTz (4), poly-PhTz TC-alt (5), polyPhTz—TC-cone (6), polyPhTz—TC-paco (7).
Figure 6. (a) The Nyquist diagrams obtained with GCE covered with polyPhTz (2.5 cycles) in the presence of TC-cone (1), TC-paco (2) and TC-alt (3) and coated with DNA (20 min incubation, 1 mg/mL of DNA from fish sperm); (b) comparison of the electron transfer resistance for various coatings of the GCE/PolyPhTz/DNA sensors prior to and after DNA loading: polyPhTz (4), poly-PhTz TC-alt (5), polyPhTz—TC-cone (6), polyPhTz—TC-paco (7).
Biosensors 13 00513 g006
Biosensors 13 00513 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) The Nyquist diagrams obtained with GCE covered with polyPhTz (2.5 cycles) in the presence of TC-alt and DNA (20 min incubation, 1 mg/mL of DNA from salmon testes) after incubation in increasing concentrations of doxorubicin (20 min. incubation; (b) calibration graph of doxorubicin determination in semilogarithmic plots, average ± S.D. for three individual sensors.
Figure 7. (a) The Nyquist diagrams obtained with GCE covered with polyPhTz (2.5 cycles) in the presence of TC-alt and DNA (20 min incubation, 1 mg/mL of DNA from salmon testes) after incubation in increasing concentrations of doxorubicin (20 min. incubation; (b) calibration graph of doxorubicin determination in semilogarithmic plots, average ± S.D. for three individual sensors.
Biosensors 13 00513 g007
Table
Table 1. Analytical characteristics of the determination of doxorubicin with electrochemical sensors and DNA sensors.
Table 1. Analytical characteristics of the determination of doxorubicin with electrochemical sensors and DNA sensors.
ModifierConcentration RangeLOD, nMRef.
Electrochemical sensors
Mesoporous carbon nanospheres/rGO10 nM–10 μM1.5[44]
Pyrographite10 nM–1.0 μM10[45]
Silver amalgam0.6–10 μM440[46]
/MgO/carbon nanodots/0.1–1.0 μM90[47]
Tryptophan/PEG/CoFe2O4 60 nM–2.0 μM30[48]
Electrochemical DNA sensors
poly(Azure B)0.1 nM–0.1 μM0.07[49]
Polyaniline1.0 pM–1000 μM0.0006[32]
CNTs–polylysine2.5 nM–0.25 μM1.0[50]
Pt/Ag nanoparticles 0.2–2.0 μM-[51]
SWCNTs1. nM–20 μM0.6[52]
BDD/DNA aptamerUp to 2.3 μM49[53]
Copolymer of Azure A and proflavine0.03–10 nM0.01[54]
Acridine Yellow adsorbed on GCE0.1 pM–1.0 nM0.0007[55]
PolyPhTz/macrocyclic acids3.0 pM–1.0 nM0.001This work
Acronyms: rGO—reduced graphene oxide, PEG—poly(ethylene glycol), CNTs—carbon nanotubes, SWCNTs—single-wall carbon nanotubes, BDD—boron-doped diamond.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kulikova, T.; Shiabiev, I.; Padnya, P.; Rogov, A.; Evtugyn, G.; Stoikov, I.; Porfireva, A. Impedimetric DNA Sensor Based on Electropolymerized N-Phenylaminophenothiazine and Thiacalix[4]arene Tetraacids for Doxorubicin Determination. Biosensors 2023, 13, 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050513

AMA Style

Kulikova T, Shiabiev I, Padnya P, Rogov A, Evtugyn G, Stoikov I, Porfireva A. Impedimetric DNA Sensor Based on Electropolymerized N-Phenylaminophenothiazine and Thiacalix[4]arene Tetraacids for Doxorubicin Determination. Biosensors. 2023; 13(5):513. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050513

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulikova, Tatjana, Igor Shiabiev, Pavel Padnya, Alexey Rogov, Gennady Evtugyn, Ivan Stoikov, and Anna Porfireva. 2023. "Impedimetric DNA Sensor Based on Electropolymerized N-Phenylaminophenothiazine and Thiacalix[4]arene Tetraacids for Doxorubicin Determination" Biosensors 13, no. 5: 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050513

APA Style

Kulikova, T., Shiabiev, I., Padnya, P., Rogov, A., Evtugyn, G., Stoikov, I., & Porfireva, A. (2023). Impedimetric DNA Sensor Based on Electropolymerized N-Phenylaminophenothiazine and Thiacalix[4]arene Tetraacids for Doxorubicin Determination. Biosensors, 13(5), 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050513

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop