Impact of Prior Antibiotic Use in Primary Care on Escherichia coli Resistance to Third Generation Cephalosporins: A Case-Control Study
by
, , and
Chiara Fulgenzio
1
,
Marco Massari
2,
Giuseppe Traversa
2,3,
Roberto Da Cas
2,
Gianluigi Ferrante
4,
Richard Aschbacher
5,
Verena Moser
5,
Elisabetta Pagani
5,
Anna Rita Vestri
1,
Orietta Massidda
6 and
Peter Konstantin Kurotschka
7,* 1
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Postgraduate School of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy
3
Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, 00187 Rome, Italy
4
Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
5
Health Service of Bolzano/Bozen Province, 39100 Bolzano/Bozen, Italy
6
Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, 38123 Povo, Italy
7
Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(4), 451; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040451
Submission received: 16 March 2021
/
Revised: 12 April 2021
/
Accepted: 14 April 2021
/
Published: 16 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Use, Resistance and Stewardship)
Abstract
:Research is lacking on the reversibility of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Thus, we aimed to determine the influence of previous antibiotic use on the development and decay over time of third generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistance of E. coli. Using the database of hospital laboratories of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen (Italy), anonymously linked to the database of outpatient pharmaceutical prescriptions and the hospital discharge record database, this matched case-control study was conducted including as cases all those who have had a positive culture from any site for 3GC resistant E. coli (3GCREC) during a 2016 hospital stay. Data were analyzed by conditional logistic regression. 244 cases were matched to 1553 controls by the date of the first isolate. Male sex (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.10–2.01), older age (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21), the number of different antibiotics taken in the previous five years (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08–1.33), at least one antibiotic prescription in the previous year (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.36–2.71), and the diagnosis of diabetes (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.08–2.30) were independent risk factors for 3GCREC colonization/infection. Patients who last received an antibiotic prescription two years or three to five years before hospitalization showed non-significant differences with controls (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68–1.38 and OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59–1.24), compared to an OR of 1.92 (95% CI 1.36–2.71) in those receiving antibiotics in the year preceding hospitalization. The effect of previous antibiotic use on 3GC-resistance of E. coli is highest after greater cumulative exposure to any antibiotic as well as to 3GCs and in the first 12 months after antibiotics are taken and then decreases progressively.
1. Introduction
The introduction of penicillin in the 1930–1940s initiated the antibiotic era, which contributed significantly to the global decrease of morbidity and mortality due to communicable diseases [1]. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), likely due to natural selection occurring when microorganisms are exposed to antimicrobial drugs, emerged shortly afterwards [2,3]. This prompted the search and development of new effective antibiotics but, since the antibiotic pipeline is now running dry, the world is facing the threat of a post-antibiotic era. In addition to AMR, the excessive use of antibiotics has been recently reported to have consequences beyond the clinical setting, the impact of which is only beginning to be appreciated [3]. Therefore, reducing unnecessary antibiotic use is a pivotal strategy to preserve the efficacy of these drugs and also to reduce unintended effects [4,5].
The health burden of AMR is of global concern, since it causes longer hospital stays and higher healthcare and societal costs. It is estimated that every year in Europe 33,000 people die due to infections caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria with approximately one third of these deaths (namely 10,762) occurring in Italy [6].
Although initially the occurrence of antibiotic resistant infections was deemed to be of concern especially in hospital settings, drug resistance of pathogens causing community acquired infections has emerged as a widespread phenomenon [7].
Consumption of antibiotics is extremely variable between and within countries: according to the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Network (ESAC-net), community antibiotic use in 2018 ranged between 32.4 Defined Daily Doses (DDDs)/1000 inhabitants/day (DIDs) in Greece and 8.9 DIDs in the Netherlands [8]. A similar variability is observed within Italy, where, outpatient antibiotic use in 2018 varied between 23.0 DIDs in the Campania Region and 10.6 DIDs in the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen [9].
The highest burden attributable to infections caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria is determined by only a few species of resistant microorganisms. Among the list of the different species, third generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistant Escherichia coli (3GCREC) are top ranked, both in terms of number of cases and of attributable deaths, followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa [6,10]. Time series analyses show how from 2002 and 2019 3GC E. coli resistance percentages increased significantly in Europe, with a population-weighted mean resistance of 15.1% in 2019 and large intercountry variability, reflecting a comparably high variation of antibiotic use in the hospital and in the community sector across countries [11,12]. This rising trend of 3GC-resistance in E. coli is confirmed as still ongoing globally [13]. As for Italy, the population-weighted mean resistance of 3GC resistant E. coli in 2019 was 30.5%, showing, if compared to the European mean, a high prevalence even if a stable trend since 2015 [14].
The causal relationship between antibiotic consumption and antibiotic resistance is described at both the individual and the community level [15,16]. In particular, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is fostering the community spread of resistant bacteria worldwide [17]. The association between antibiotic consumption and development of resistance is strongest when antibiotic use is recent, and studies show that resistance decreases over time. This is likely due to a functional trade-off between the maximal fitness in the presence or in the absence of an antibiotics within bacteria. What remains unclear is how much time it takes to restore antibiotic susceptibility and how this varies for different antibiotic classes and in different bacterial species [18]. The better understanding of antibiotic resistance decay over time in individual patients is relevant to inform public campaigns and to instruct physicians through targeted interventions aimed to promote a rational use of antibiotics in the community [18,19,20]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the impact of outpatient antibiotic use on the occurrence of infections caused by 3GCREC and the resistance decay over time. The primary objective was to determine the influence of previous antibiotic use on the development and decay of resistance to 3GCs of E. coli in patients treated by Primary Care Physicians. A secondary objective was to determine, in the same population of patients, the influence of previous 3GC use on the development and decay of resistance to 3GC of E. coli.
2. Results
A total of 1794 isolates were included in the analyses. Among them, urine isolates were the most frequent, followed by blood cultures as illustrated in Figure 1.
Within the study period, 241 cases and 1553 controls met the inclusion criteria, with a ratio of 6.44 controls per case. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Comparing cases and controls, the median age in case patients was 79 years while in controls it was 76 years (p = 0.003). The sample was predominantly composed of women (56% in cases and 66% in controls, p = 0.004). Moreover, case patients were more likely to be treated with many different drugs than controls (p < 0.0001), consistently with the finding that among these patients a higher burden of chronic diseases could be observed: case patients were more likely to be affected by diabetes (p < 0.0001), cancer (p = 0.012), COPD (p = 0.031) and end-stage kidney disease (p = 0.005) compared to control patients. In univariate analysis, 3GC-resistance was associated with longer hospital stays, hospitalization with surgical interventions and organ transplant, even if these associations were weak.
Concerning the influence of previous antibiotic use on current resistance of E. coli to 3GCs, an overall higher exposure to antibiotic drugs could be observed in patients who tested positive to 3GCREC compared to those infected with sensitive strains, showing a clear association between prior antibiotic use and the development of 3GC-resistance in E. coli at an individual level. Moreover, in univariate analysis the risk of colonization or infection due to 3GCREC was higher if at least one antibiotic prescription was issued to the patient in the year preceding hospitalization (OR 2.69, p < 0.0001), still elevated but decreasing in those patients in which the antibiotic therapy was undergone two years previous (OR 1.65, p < 0.0001) or three to five years (OR 1.59, p = 0.002) prior to hospitalization.
The final regression model included 10 variables which reached statistical significance (p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis (Table 2): age, gender, DDDs of drugs taken in the five years preceding hospitalization, number of antibiotics (J01) taken in the previous five years, at least one prescription of antibiotics (J01) taken in the previous 5, 4, 3 years, at least one prescription of antibiotics (J01) taken in the second previous year, at least one prescription of antibiotics (J01) taken in the previous year, days of hospital stay, diagnosis of diabetes.
The analysis showed that independent risk factors for being infected or colonized by 3GCREC are the following: male sex (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.10–2.01, p = 0.009), older age (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21, p < 0.0001), the number of different antibiotics taken in the previous five years (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08–1.33, p < 0.013), at least one antibiotic (J01) prescription in the previous year (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.36–2.71, p = 0.001), and the diagnosis of diabetes (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.08–2.30, p = 0.019). Moreover, the analysis showed a significant, albeit weak association between longer hospital stays and 3GC-resistance of E. coli (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.08, p < 0.0001).
Concerning the decay of the risk of resistance of E. coli isolates to 3GCs over time, the results of the univariate analysis are confirmed in the multivariate model, at least as a trend. As shown in Table 2 and in Figure 2, having received at least one antibiotic prescription three to five years before hospitalization was associated with a lower risk for patients of being colonized or infected with 3GC-resistant E. coli (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59–1.24, p = 0.399) than receiving an antibiotic prescription both in the second year before hospitalization (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68–1.38, p = 0.866) or in the year preceding hospitalization (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.36–2.71, p < 0.001).
An analysis focused on the last year prior to hospitalization (Table 3) revealed a dose-response effect of antibiotic use on resistance: the use of 3GC increases the risk of being infected or colonized by 3GCREC more than two-fold if two or more prescriptions of 3GCs were issued in the considered period of time (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.07–4.08, p = 0.030). This association turned to be protective in our sample when considering a lower exposure to 3GC, even if statistically not significant (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.37–1.40, p = 0.345), showing that a cumulative exposure to 3GCs in the prior 12 months had a clear dose-response effect on 3GC-resistance in E. coli. Consistently, the same dose—response effect is observed when considering any antibiotic (J01) the exposure of interest (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.45–2.85, p < 0.0001).
To ascertain the consistency of these findings, four sensitivity analyses were carried out: (1) to rule out an effect of in-hospital antibiotic administration or hospital acquired infections, all patients who were tested 48 h after their hospital admission were excluded (supplementary file, Table S3); (2) to rule out the effect on susceptibility testing of very recent 3GC-use (we were interested in the effect of less recent antibiotic use), all patients who received at least one 3GC prescription 15 days prior to hospitalization were excluded (supplementary file, Table S4); (3) to rule out a potential effect of co-resistance, controls were defined as those subjects who have had a bacterial culture with E. coli sensitive to any antibiotic and not only to 3GCs (supplementary file, Tables S5 and S6). All four sensitivity analyses showed results consistent with those of the main analyses.
3. Discussion
3.1. Summary of Main Findings
The present case-control study is the first one to use routinely collected healthcare data in a multiple-database approach that characterize factors associated with community-acquired antibiotic resistant infections in Italy. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first study that provides evidence about resistance decay in individuals after outpatient antibiotic use using long term data. We found that, over a 5-year period, the risk of developing a community acquired infection due to 3GCREC increases significantly in patients who were exposed to antibiotics previously, with the highest risk observed for antibiotics taken in the last 12 months and for greater cumulative exposures to any antibiotic as well as to 3GCs. Apart from previous antibiotic use, we also found male sex, older age, and the presence of diabetes to be significantly associated with 3GC-resistance of E. coli after adjustment for other factors.
3.2. Comparison to Existing Literature
Our results are consistent with a recent study on 146,452 E. coli isolates from 143 tertiary care hospitals in China. Authors found that 3GC-resistance of E. coli correlated with the prior consumption of all antibiotics, as well as, specifically, of β-lactams, including cephalosporins and 3GCs [21]. However, the study was not designed to adjust these associations with respect to other factors, nor did it take into account the duration of the association with respect to the interval between antibiotic consumption and the diagnosis of resistance. A systematic review of five randomized controlled trials and 19 observational studies from 2010 [16] found that the association between antibiotic consumption and resistance was strongest at 0–1 months from exposure and could last for up to 12 months. None of the included studies analyzed specifically the association between antibiotic use and 3GC-resistance of E. coli, the majority focusing on single antibiotics rather than all antibiotics [22,23] or used interviews rather than actual prescriptions to estimate the exposure variables [24]. A more recent systematic review of five randomized controlled trials and 20 prospective observational studies from 2018 [18] found that AMR was highest soon after antibiotic use and showed a decrease of resistance after 1–3 months, a faster decrease for at least one of the bacteria (penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae) than previously reported.
Our results are consistent with the findings from Costelloe et al. [16] and Bakhit et al. [18] but, in addition, we were able to measure a long term trend in the decay of resistance by examining the 5 year period prior to the diagnosis of the resistant infection. Moreover, we found that cumulative exposure to 3GCs is an independent risk factor for being diagnosed with community acquired 3GCREC.
According to a recent study from Taiwan focusing on factors associated with community acquired 3GCREC infections, 3GC-resistance in E. coli is an independent risk factor for longer hospital stays [25]. A similar finding was reported also in previous studies [26,27]. In our study we could detect a significant, albeit weak, association between longer hospital stays and 3GC-resistance in E. coli (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.08, p < 0.0001). This association could be interpreted as follows: longer hospital stays could be an independent risk factor for 3GCREC colonization/infection, although we cannot exclude that E. coli resistant to 3GCs is, vice versa, an independent risk factor for longer hospital stays. This because resistance to 3GC was diagnosed during the hospital stay.
Resistance to 3GCs in Enterobacteriaceae is frequently caused by Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria [28,29]. ESBL-producing isolates often show resistance to other β-lactams, and can be associated also with aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance [30]. A recent systematic review of 27 observational studies on risk factors of fluoroquinolone-resistance in E. coli found that previous antibiotic use was a strong independent risk factor for resistance (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.92 to 3.92). Fluoroquinolone-resistance in E. coli was reported as independently associated with diabetes mellitus (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.83) and male sex (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.64). Moreover, studies on community acquired ESBL-producing E. coli infections have identified diabetes mellitus (but not male sex) as an independent risk factor for these kind of infections [31,32]. Our study suggests that both diabetes mellitus and male sex are risk factors for community acquired E. coli resistance to 3GCs, although more primary research is needed to better define risk factors of 3GC-resistance in E. coli.
3.3. Strengths and Limitations
A significant strength of this study is the data source: (1) hospital discharge records include data from every single hospital discharge carried out in the given period of time; (2) the database of drug prescription records contains any antibiotic prescription covered by the NHS, filled by every single physician in the examined period of time; (3) databases of the regional reference laboratories contain all susceptibility tests performed in the province where this study was carried out. This allowed us a data linkage among comprehensive datasets covering a catchment area 532,644 inhabitants [33]. Furthermore, the use of data from multiple health information systems made it possible to collect information on exposure from months or even years earlier without the risk of recall bias, as well as data on hospitalizations and comorbidities.
Some limitations have to be mentioned. We were able to establish the exact date of diagnosis of bacterial resistance, but we know nothing about the actual date of the onset of the resistance. Thus, the association between antibiotic consumption and resistance could be interpreted in two ways: (a) the high level of antibiotic use induces resistance in the bacteria; (b) the high level of antibiotic use is a consequence of non-response to antibiotic therapy in individuals already colonized by resistant bacteria.
Another limitation of the study is that the DDD gives a rough estimate of drug consumption and reflects only approximately the dose and the length of treatment. Moreover, we assume that the antibiotics prescribed were actually taken. If this were not the case, there would be an overestimation of exposure. Finally, we have no information on privately purchased antibiotics, which could lead to an underestimation of exposure. However, in Italy the rate of privately purchased antibiotics that cannot be tracked is 17.4% of total outpatient antibiotic consumption, with 3GC representing less than 0.1% [9]. Thus, if anything, it is probable that underestimation occurred for the exposure to other more used antibiotic rather than to 3GCs.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Design, Setting and Data Sources
The present case-control study was conducted in the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen, located in northern Italy, which at the date of 1 January 2020 accounts for 532,644 inhabitants [34], under a scientific agreement with the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS) with the aim of conducting pharmacoepidemiology studies on large databases by linking different sources of routinely collected health data. Data were obtained from the following information systems:
- The database of hospital laboratories of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen that was used to define cases and controls.
- The database of outpatient pharmaceutical prescriptions of the Bolzano/Bozen Local Health Trust, that was used to define the exposure.
- The hospital discharge record database of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen, that was used to identify potential risk factors.
The database of hospital laboratories was queried to extract all patients who were hospitalized in 2016 and for whom a bacterial culture test was carried out. From those, only patients with E. coli isolates were included in the study and patients were classified as cases, if they carried 3GC-resistant isolates, or controls, if they carried 3GC-sensitive isolates. For each case, we matched all available controls on the date of the first isolate (±30 days). We defined the sampling date of the first bacterial isolate as the “index date” and we cleared cases and controls for which the index date was not available. If, during 2016, a patient had more than one laboratory report attesting either bacterial resistance or negative isolates, only the first one was used. Figure 3 represents a flow-diagram of included cases and controls.
Analyses were conducted on the following biological materials: blood, urine, respiratory tract secretions, soft tissue specimens and various others (including vulvar, vaginal and perianal specimens, ascites and other abdominal fluid, pleural liquid and post-surgery drainage fluid). All specimens were processed in the laboratories of the hospitals included in the study. Bacterial species were identified using the VITEK II system (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA) or the Matrix-assisted-laser-desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Maldi-TOF). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the VITEK II system. The interpretation of the antibiograms was based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) interpretation criteria (http://www.eucast.org/, accessed on 27 February 2021). Results of the performed antibiograms were classified as follows: Resistant (R), sensible (S) or intermediate (I). Only patients carrying isolates with a R or S test results were included in the analyses.
The database of outpatient pharmaceutical prescriptions of the Bolzano/Bozen Health Service, which contains all prescriptions covered by the National Health System (NHS) and is regularly updated, was queried to extract all pharmaceutical prescriptions issued from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2016 by primary care physicians of the Province of Bolzano/Bozen (i.e., general practitioners and out of hours primary care physicians). Prescriptions issued by hospital-based physicians were excluded in order to meet the study objectives, namely, to point out the impact on resistance of outpatient antibiotic use. Antibiotics used in the 5 years preceding the index date were categorized according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) (https://www.whocc.no/, accessed on 27 February 2021) classification system: J01 for general antibiotics and J01DD for 3GC (supplementary file, Table S1) [35].
We also used cumulative define daily doses (DDDs) of different drug classes taken in the previous five years, as a comorbidity measure. The correspondence between medications classified according to ATCs and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) is shown in the supplementary file (Table S2) [36].
The hospital discharge records database of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen contains the discharge records of all the hospitals of the Province. The information collected includes patient demographics, hospitalization characteristics (e.g., discharge date, hospitalization regimen, discharge modalities) and clinical characteristics (e.g., primary diagnosis, concomitant diagnosis, diagnostic or therapeutic procedures). It was used to assess potential risk factors for colonization or infection with 3GC-resistant E. coli that could act as confounding factors, namely: age, gender, the hospital ward in which the patient was admitted, total days of hospitalizations, hospitalizations with surgery, hospitalizations with device implantation, hospitalizations with organ transplant, diagnosis of chronic diseases (cancer, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], AIDS, immunosuppression), hemodialysis and previous use of cortisone drugs.
Potential risk factors for 3GC-resistance in E. coli and their data sources are listed Table 4.
4.2. Definition of Exposure
Subjects were considered exposed if they received at least one prescription of antibiotics (ATC J01) issued by a primary care physician in the 5 years preceding the hospitalization in which a bacterial culture test was carried out. In order to meet the secondary objective of the study, exposed subjects were considered only those who were prescribed with a 3GC (see supplementary file) in the previous 12 months.
4.3. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive analyses were conducted to compare the characteristics of enrolled patients, namely of cases and controls. Categorical variables were presented as percentage, while continuous variables were reported as mean (±standard deviation) or, where appropriate, as median (interquartile range). Risk factors for 3GC-resistance were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Matched Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of any association that emerged. Factors with a p-value < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were considered eligible for the multivariate analysis and was included using a backward stepwise selection method.
The following sensitivity analyses were carried out.
Firstly, due to the fact that the aim of the present study was to ascertain the effect on bacterial resistance of community antibiotic use over time, we excluded from the analyses all patients with an index date 48 h away from the hospitalization date. This in order to exclude all potential hospital acquired infections from the outcome measure.
Secondly, in order to eliminate the potential effect of very recent antibiotic use on bacterial resistance, the second sensitivity analysis was performed excluding all patients who received at least one prescription of antibiotics in the 15 days preceding hospitalization.
Lastly, a sensitivity analysis used as controls only subjects with an E. coli isolate fully sensitive to all antibiotics. This in order to in order to exclude a potential confounding effect of co-resistance.
5. Conclusions
Over a 5-year period, we found that the risk of developing a community acquired infection due to 3GCREC increases significantly in patients who were exposed to antibiotics previously, with the highest risk observed for greater cumulative exposures to any antibiotic as well as to 3GC. We found that the effect of antibiotic exposure on 3GC-resistance of E. coli was highest in the first 12 months after antibiotics were taken and then decreased progressively.
These findings can be useful to inform public campaigns and to instruct physicians through targeted interventions aimed to promote a rational use of antibiotics in the community, although more studies are needed on different bacterial species and antibiotic classes from more long-term data.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10040451/s1: supplementary file, Table S1: Codes for exposure, Table S2: Codes for considered comorbidities, Table S3: Sensitivity analysis 1, Table S4: Sensitivity analysis 2, Table S5: Sensitivity analysis 3, Table S6: Sensitivity analysis 4.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization and methodology, M.M., G.F. and G.T.; data curation, C.F., R.D.C., M.M., G.F., R.A., V.M. and E.P.; data analysis, C.F. and M.M.; interpretation of findings, P.K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.K.K.; writing—review and editing, P.K.K., C.F., O.M., G.F., R.D.C. and M.M.; visualization, C.F.; supervision, G.T., M.M., O.M. and A.R.V.; project administration, M.M., R.D.C. and G.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data were generated in routine care and personal identifiers were removed prior to analysis. An individual anonymized code allowed the linkage between all data sources. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the ethics committee of the Italian National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, reference number PRE-555/17—17 July 2017).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study and the analysis used anonymous clinical data.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Michael B. Whalen (Istituto di Biofisica [IBF], Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche [CNR] Trento, Italy) for his suggestions on the revision and proof-reading of the manuscript. This work is part of CF’s final thesis in Medical Statistics and Biometry at the postgraduate specialization school of the University of Rome “La Sapienza”. She would like to thank all the co-authors for the collaboration and support she received.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Aminov, R.I. A brief history of the antibiotic era: Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Front. Microbiol. 2010, 1, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sykes, R. The 2009 Garrod Lecture: The evolution of antimicrobial resistance: A Darwinian perspective. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 1842–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hiltunen, T.; Virta, M.; Laine, A.L. Antibiotic resistance in the wild: An eco-evolutionary perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hollis, A.; Ahmed, Z. Preserving Antibiotics, Rationally. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2474–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Biswas, R.; Halder, U.; Kabiraj, A.; Mondal, A.; Bandopadhyay, R. Overview on the role of heavy metals tolerance on developing antibiotic resistance in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassini, A.; Hogberg, L.D.; Plachouras, D.; Quattrocchi, A.; Hoxha, A.; Simonsen, G.S.; Colomb-Cotinat, M.; Kretzschmar, M.E.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Cecchini, M.; et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: A population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goossens, H.; Ferech, M.; Vander Stichele, R.; Elseviers, M. Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: A cross-national database study. Lancet 2005, 365, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial Consumption Surveillance in Europe 2018; Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Consumption Surveillance Network (ESAC-Net); ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Osservatorio Nazionale Sull’Impiego dei Medicinali. L’uso degli antibiotici in Italia. Rapporto Nazionale 2019; Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA): Roma, Italy, 2020.
- MacKinnon, M.C.; Sargeant, J.M.; Pearl, D.L.; Reid-Smith, R.J.; Carson, C.A.; Parmley, E.J.; McEwen, S.A. Evaluation of the health and healthcare system burden due to antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli infections in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ECDC. Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2019. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/surveillance-antimicrobial-resistance-europe-2019 (accessed on 26 December 2020).
- Peñalva, G.; Högberg, L.D.; Weist, K.; Vlahović-Palčevski, V.; Heuer, O.; Monnet, D.L. Decreasing and stabilising trends of antimicrobial consumption and resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in segmented regression analysis, European Union/European Economic Area, 2001 to 2018. Eurosurveillance 2019, 24, 1900656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez-Uria, G.; Gandra, S.; Mandal, S.; Laxminarayan, R. Global forecast of antimicrobial resistance in invasive isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 68, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bellino, S.; Iacchini, S.; Monaco, M.; Del Grosso, M.; Camilli, R.; Errico, G.; D’Ancona, F.; Pantosti, A.; Pezzotti, P.; Maraglino, F.; et al. AR-ISS: Sorveglianza Nazionale Dell’antibiotico-Resistenza. Dati 2019; Rapporti ISS Sorveglianza RIS-1/2020; Istituto Superiore di Sanità: Roma, Italy, 2020; Available online: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/antibiotico-resistenza/ar-iss (accessed on 26 December 2020).
- Bell, B.G.; Schellevis, F.; Stobberingh, E.; Goossens, H.; Pringle, M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistance. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Costelloe, C.; Metcalfe, C.; Lovering, A.; Mant, D.; Hay, A.D. Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010, 340, c2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Llor, C.; Bjerrum, L. Antimicrobial resistance: Risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Ther. Adv. Drug Saf. 2014, 5, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bakhit, M.; Hoffmann, T.; Scott, A.M.; Beller, E.; Rathbone, J.; Del Mar, C. Resistance decay in individuals after antibiotic exposure in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2018, 16, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurotschka, P.K.; Serafini, A.; Massari, M.; Da Cas, R.; Figueiras, A.; Forte, V.; Moro, M.F.; Massidda, M.; Contu, F.; Minerba, L.; et al. Broad Spectrum project: Factors determining the quality of antibiotic use in primary care: An observational study protocol from Italy. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e038843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Gennaro, F.; Marotta, C.; Amicone, M.; Bavaro, D.F.; Bernaudo, F.; Frisicale, E.M.; Kurotschka, P.K.; Mazzari, A.; Veronese, N.; Murri, R.; et al. Italian Young Doctors’ knowledge, attitude and practices on antibiotic use and resistance: A national cross-sectional survey. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, P.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, S.; Shen, P.; Lu, X.; Xiao, Y. Association between the rate of third generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae and antibiotic consumption based on 143 Chinese tertiary hospitals data in 2014. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 39, 1495–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donnan, P.T.; Wei, L.; Steinke, D.T.; Phillips, G.; Clarke, R.; Noone, A.; Sullivan, F.M.; MacDonald, T.M.; Davey, P.G. Presence of bacteriuria caused by trimethoprim resistant bacteria in patients prescribed antibiotics: Multilevel model with practice and individual patient data. BMJ 2004, 328, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hay, A.D.; Thomas, M.; Montgomery, A.; Wetherell, M.; Lovering, A.; McNulty, C.; Lewis, D.; Carron, B.; Henderson, E.; MacGowan, A. The relationship between primary care antibiotic prescribing and bacterial resistance in adults in the community: A controlled observational study using individual patient data. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hillier, S.; Roberts, Z.; Dunstan, F.; Butler, C.; Howard, A.; Palmer, S. Prior antibiotics and risk of antibiotic-resistant community-acquired urinary tract infection: A case-control study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 60, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W.-P.; Huang, Y.-S.; Wang, J.-T.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chang, S.-C. Prevalence of and risk factor for community-onset third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli bacteremia at a medical center in Taiwan. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliveira, M.C.; Oliveira, C.R.A.; Gonçalves, K.V.; Santos, M.S.; Tardelli, A.C.S.; Nobre, V.A., Jr. Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third generation cephalosporins upon hospital admission: Risk factors and clinical outcomes. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 19, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- de Kraker, M.E.A.; Wolkewitz, M.; Davey, P.G.; Koller, W.; Berger, J.; Nagler, J.; Icket, C.; Kalenic, S.; Horvatic, J.; Seifert, H.; et al. Burden of antimicrobial resistance in European hospitals: Excess mortality and length of hospital stay associated with bloodstream infections due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 66, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chervet, D.; Lortholary, O.; Zahar, J.R.; Dufougeray, A.; Pilmis, B.; Partouche, H. Antimicrobial resistance in community-acquired urinary tract infections in Paris in 2015. Med. Mal. Infect. 2018, 48, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDanel, J.; Schweizer, M.; Crabb, V.; Nelson, R.; Samore, M.; Khader, K.; Blevins, A.E.; Diekema, D.; Chiang, H.Y.; Nair, R.; et al. Incidence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Infections in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2017, 38, 1209–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brolund, A.; Edquist, P.J.; Mäkitalo, B.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; Söderblom, T.; Wisell, K.T.; Giske, C.G. Epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in Sweden 2007-2011. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, O344–O352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Navarro, M.D.; Romero, L.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Muniain, M.A.; Perea, E.J.; Pérez-Cano, R.; Pascual, A. Epidemiology and clinical features of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in nonhospitalized patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Alcalá, J.C.; Cisneros, J.M.; Grill, F.; Oliver, A.; Horcajada, J.P.; Tórtola, T.; Mirelis, B.; Navarro, G.; Cuenca, M.; et al. Community Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase–Producing Escherichia coli. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008, 168, 1897–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Latry, P.; Molimard, M.; Bégaud, B.; Martin-Latry, K. How reimbursement databases can be used to support drug utilisation studies: Example using the main French national health insurance system database. Eur. J. Clin. Pharm. 2010, 66, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- ISTAT—Direzione Centrale Per le Statistiche e le Indagini Sulle Istituzioni Sociali, Popolazione Residente al 1° Gennaio 2019. Available online: http://demo.istat.it (accessed on 10 March 2021).
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System: Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment; Norwegian Institute of Public Health: Oslo, Norway, 2020; Available online: https://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/2020_guidelines_web.pdf (accessed on 6 September 2020).
- Geraci, J.M.; Ashton, C.M.; Kuykendall, D.H.; Johnson, M.L.; Wu, L. International Classification of Diseases. 9th Revision, 5th ed.; Clinical Modification; Medicode: Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13; StataCorp LLC: College Station, TX, USA, 2013; Available online: https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/citing-software-documentation-faqs/ (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. 2016. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 27 February 2021).
Figure 1.
Distribution of included isolates. Others = vulvar, vaginal and perianal specimens, ascites and other abdominal fluid, pleural liquid, post-surgery drainage fluid.
Figure 1.
Distribution of included isolates. Others = vulvar, vaginal and perianal specimens, ascites and other abdominal fluid, pleural liquid, post-surgery drainage fluid.
Figure 2.
Forest plot showing the influence of previous antibiotic use in the past 5 years on the decay of resistance to third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) of E. coli over time (multivariate analysis).
Figure 2.
Forest plot showing the influence of previous antibiotic use in the past 5 years on the decay of resistance to third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) of E. coli over time (multivariate analysis).
Figure 3.
Flow diagram of included cases and controls. Abbreviations: R = 3GC-resistant specimens; S = 3GC-sensible specimens; I = 3GC-intermediate specimens.
Figure 3.
Flow diagram of included cases and controls. Abbreviations: R = 3GC-resistant specimens; S = 3GC-sensible specimens; I = 3GC-intermediate specimens.
Table 1.
Characteristics of 241 case patients infected/colonized with 3GC-resistant E. coli and 1553 matched control patients infected/colonized with 3GC-susceptible E. coli.
Table 1.
Characteristics of 241 case patients infected/colonized with 3GC-resistant E. coli and 1553 matched control patients infected/colonized with 3GC-susceptible E. coli.
| Variable | Cases a | Controls a | Crude OR (95% CI) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Median (IQ) | 79 (68–85) | 76 (61–84) | 1.11 b (1.04–1.20) | 0.003 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male (%) | 106 (43.98) | 530 (34.13) | 1.49 (1.14–1.98) | 0.004 |
| Hospitalization ward | ||||
| Other (%) | 4 (1.66) | 12 (0.77) | - | |
| Surgery (%) | 82 (34.02) | 597 (38.44) | 0.44 (0.14–1.41) | 0.167 |
| Intensive care unit (%) | 12 (4.98) | 78 (5.02) | 0.47 (0.13–1.71) | 0.252 |
| Medicine unit (%) | 143 (59.34) | 866 (55.76) | 0.54 (0.17–1.71) | 0.296 |
| Drug’s DDD taken in previous 5 years, Median (IQ) | 4334.15 (1092.92–7802.62) | 3117.01 (414.83–6392.25) | 1.04 c (1.01–1.06) | 0.016 |
| Number of active ingredients taken in previous 5 years, Median (IQ) | 16 (9–24) | 12 (5–19) | 1.04 (1.03–1.05) | <0.0001 |
| At least one cortisone drug’s DDD taken in previous 5 years (%) | 29 (12.03) | 139 (8.95) | 1.38 (0.90–2.13) | 0.144 |
| Number of antibiotics taken in previous 5 years, Median (IQ) | 3 (1–4) | 2 (0–3) | 1.27 (1.19–1.35) | <0.0001 |
| At least one J01 prescription taken in previous period (%) | ||||
| I year | 161 (66.80) | 681 (43.85) | 2.69 (2.00–3.61) | <0.0001 |
| II year | 127 (52.70) | 626 (40.31) | 1.65 (1.26–2.17) | <0.0001 |
| III–V years | 161 (66.80) | 879 (56.60) | 1.59 (1.19–2.12) | 0.002 |
| At least one 3GC prescription in previous year (%) | ||||
| 0 | 212 (87.97) | 1437 (92.53) | - | - |
| 1 | 12 (4.98) | 78 (5.02) | 1.04 (0.56–1.95) | 0.898 |
| 2+ | 17 (7.05) | 38 (2.45) | 3.23 (1.78–5.87) | <0.0001 |
| Hospitalization days, Median (IQ) | 47 (8–97) | 12 (0–46) | 1.05 d (1.04–1.07) | <0.0001 |
| Hospitalization with surgery (%) | 177 (48.55) | 642 (41.34) | 1.32 (1.01–1.73) | 0.044 |
| Hospitalization with device implantation (%) | 29 (12.03) | 127 (8.18) | 1.52 (0.98–2.34) | 0.059 |
| Hospitalization with organ transplant (%) | 6 (2.49) | 26 (1.67) | 1.59 (0.65–3.88) | 0.305 |
| Diagnosis of chronic diseases | ||||
| Cancer (%) | 59 (24.48) | 270 (17.51) | 1.52 (1.10–2.11) | 0.012 |
| Diabetes (%) | 61 (25.31) | 251 (16.16) | 1.79 (1.29–2.47) | <0.0001 |
| AIDS (%) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (0.13) | NA | NA |
| COPD (%) | 86 (35.68) | 461 (29.68) | 1.39 (1.03–1.87) | 0.031 |
| Immunosuppression (%) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (0.13) | NA | NA |
| Haemodialysis (%) | 7 (2.90) | 29 (1.87) | 1.22 (1.06–1.40) | 0.005 |
a Number (%) of patients or median (IQ); b OR calculated for 10-year increments; c OR calculated for 1000-DDD increments; d OR calculated for 10-day increments. Abbreviations: IQ = interquartile range; DDD = defined daily dose; AIDS = acute immune deficiency syndrome; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; NA = not Applicable.
Table 2.
Summarized results of the main multivariate analysis (backward step-wise approach).
| Variables | Cases a | Controls a | Adj OR (95% CI) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Median (IQ) | 79 (68–85) | 76 (61–84) | 1.11 b (1.02–1.21) | <0.0001 |
| Gender, Male (%) | 106 (43.98) | 530 (34.13) | 1.49 (1.10–2.01) | 0.009 |
| Drug’s DDD taken in previous 5 years, Median (IQ) | 4334.15 (1092.92–7802.62) | 3117.01 (414.83–6392.25) | 0.95 c (0.91–0.99) | 0.013 |
| Number of antibiotics taken in previous 5 years, Median (IQ) | 3 (1–4) | 2 (0–3) | 1.20 (1.08–1.33) | 0.001 |
| At least one J01 prescription taken in previous period (%) | ||||
| I year | 161 (66.80) | 681 (43.85) | 1.92 (1.36–2.71) | <0.0001 |
| II year | 127 (52.70) | 626 (40.31) | 0.97 (0.68–1.38) | 0.866 |
| III—V years | 161 (66.80) | 879 (56.60) | 0.85 (0.59–1.24) | 0.399 |
| Hospitalization days, Median (IQ) | 47 (8–97) | 12 (0–46) | 1.06 d (1.03–1.08) | <0.0001 |
| Hospitalizations with surgery (%) | 177 (48.55) | 642 (41.34) | 0.89 (0.82–0.98) | 0.012 |
| Diabetes (%) | 61 (25.31) | 251 (16.16) | 1.57 (1.08–2.30) | 0.019 |
a Number (%) of patients or median (IQ); b OR calculated for 10-year increments; c OR calculated for 1000-DDD increments; d OR calculated for 10-day increments. Abbreviations: IQ = interquartile range; DDD = defined daily dose.
Table 3.
Summarized results of multivariate analysis (backward step-wise approach) focused on 3GC use in the 12 months preceding hospitalization.
Table 3.
Summarized results of multivariate analysis (backward step-wise approach) focused on 3GC use in the 12 months preceding hospitalization.
| Variables | Cases a | Controls a | Adj OR (95% CI) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Median (IQ) | 79 (68–85) | 76 (61–84) | 1.11 b (1.02–1.21) | 0.012 |
| Gender, Male (%) | 106 (43.98) | 530 (34.13) | 1.49 (1.10–2.02) | 0.010 |
| Drug’s DDD taken in previous 5 years, Median (IQ) | 4334.15 (1092.92–7802.62) | 3117.01 (414.83–6392.25) | 0.95 c (0.91–0.99) | 0.009 |
| Number of antibiotics taken in previous 5 years, Median (IQ) | 3 (1–4) | 2 (0–3) | 1.15 (1.05–1.25) | 0.002 |
| At least one other J01 prescription in previous year (%) | 156 (64.73) | 640 (41.21) | 2.03 (1.45–2.85) | <0.0001 |
| 3GC prescriptions in the previous year (%) | ||||
| 0 | 212 (87.97) | 1437 (92.53) | - | - |
| 1 | 12 (4.98) | 78 (5.02) | 0.73 (0.37–1.40) | 0.345 |
| 2+ | 17 (7.05) | 38 (2.45) | 2.08 (1.07–4.08) | 0.030 |
| Hospitalization days, Median (IQ) | 47 (8–97) | 12 (0–46) | 1.06 (1.03–1.08) | <0.0001 |
| Hospitalization with surgery (%) | 177 (48.55) | 642 (41.34) | 0.89 d (0.82–0.99) | 0.010 |
| Diabetes (%) | 61 (25.31) | 251 (16.16) | 1.6 (1.09–2.34) | 0.016 |
a Number (%) of patients or median (IQ); b OR calculated for 10-year increments; c OR calculated for 1000-DDD increments; d OR calculated for 10-day increments. Abbreviations: IQ = interquartile range; DDD = defined daily dose, 3GC = third generation cephalosporin.
Table 4.
Potential risk factors for 3GC-resistance in E. coli and their data source.
| Potential Confounding Factor | Data Source |
|---|---|
| Age | |
| Gender | hospital discharge records database |
| Hospitalization ward | hospital discharge records database |
| Surgery | hospital discharge records database |
| Intensive care unit | |
| Internal Medicine | |
| Other | |
| Drug’s DDD taken in previous 5 years | |
| Number of active ingredients taken in previous 5 years | database of drug prescription records |
| One or more cortisone drug DDDs taken in previous 5 years | database of drug prescription records |
| Number of antibiotics taken in previous 5 years | database of drug prescription records |
| One or more J01 prescription taken in previous 5,4,3 years | |
| One or more J01 prescription taken in previous 2 years | database of drug prescription records |
| Hospitalization days | database of drug prescription records |
| Hospitalizations with surgery | |
| Hospitalizations with device implantation | database of drug prescription records |
| Hospitalizations with organ transplant | hospital discharge records database |
| Diagnosis of chronic diseases | hospital discharge records database |
| Cancer | hospital discharge records database |
| Diabetes Mellitus | hospital discharge records database |
| AIDS | hospital discharge records database |
| COPD | |
| Immunosuppression | |
| Hemodialysis |
Abbreviations: DDD = defined daily dose; AIDS = acute immune deficiency syndrome; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Fulgenzio, C.; Massari, M.; Traversa, G.; Da Cas, R.; Ferrante, G.; Aschbacher, R.; Moser, V.; Pagani, E.; Vestri, A.R.; Massidda, O.; et al. Impact of Prior Antibiotic Use in Primary Care on Escherichia coli Resistance to Third Generation Cephalosporins: A Case-Control Study. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040451
AMA Style
Fulgenzio C, Massari M, Traversa G, Da Cas R, Ferrante G, Aschbacher R, Moser V, Pagani E, Vestri AR, Massidda O, et al. Impact of Prior Antibiotic Use in Primary Care on Escherichia coli Resistance to Third Generation Cephalosporins: A Case-Control Study. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(4):451. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040451
Chicago/Turabian StyleFulgenzio, Chiara, Marco Massari, Giuseppe Traversa, Roberto Da Cas, Gianluigi Ferrante, Richard Aschbacher, Verena Moser, Elisabetta Pagani, Anna Rita Vestri, Orietta Massidda, and et al. 2021. "Impact of Prior Antibiotic Use in Primary Care on Escherichia coli Resistance to Third Generation Cephalosporins: A Case-Control Study" Antibiotics 10, no. 4: 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040451
APA StyleFulgenzio, C., Massari, M., Traversa, G., Da Cas, R., Ferrante, G., Aschbacher, R., Moser, V., Pagani, E., Vestri, A. R., Massidda, O., & Kurotschka, P. K. (2021). Impact of Prior Antibiotic Use in Primary Care on Escherichia coli Resistance to Third Generation Cephalosporins: A Case-Control Study. Antibiotics, 10(4), 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040451
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
